the Elect and declared in the Gospel and God doth not fix on these terms for any Worth in them or profit to him 3. The Gospel is the Instrument or Sign by which this Will of God is expressed This is not the Language of God in Adam's Law if this were not superadded to that we had been utterly miserable 4. This fixeth that Rule of the Promise which Mr. C. p. 33. is at a loss to know God promiseth he will justifie him that truly believes and save the upright in Heart Hereby he that in Truth believes and is upright answers that Rule which the Unbelievers and Hypocrites do not and so God doth not hereby promise to save them yea he declares they shall not have an Interest in these Mercies because they continue such and condemns them as such at last It 's Faith not Infidelity it 's Faith in Truth not Faith in Perfection nor Hypocrisie I shall offer thee some few Reasons why I say this is some part of the Essence of the Gospel and that God hath fixed this Rule therein R. 1. The Gospel is oft called a Law by the Spirit of God Isa. 42. 4. He shall not fall nor be discouraged till he have set Judgment in the Earth and the Isles shall wait for my Law Mic. 4. 2. Many Nations shall come c. for the Law shall go forth of Zion c. Rom. 3. 27. The Law of Faith Rom. 10. 31. The Law of Righteousness the Law of Liberty Iam. 1. 25. 2. 12. A converting Law Psal. 19. 7. The Law of Christ Gal. 6. 2. The best Commentators expound these to be the Gospel yea many say this is that Law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Rom. 8 2. Many more places might be added R. 2. Mens Behaviour towards the Gospel is expressed by words that denote it to be a Law Rom. 10. 16. They have not obeyed the Gospel 2 Cor. 9. 13. Your professed Subjection to the Gospel 2 Thess. 1. 8. To take vengeance on them that obey not the Gospel 1 Pet. 4. 17. What will the end of them be that obey not the Gospel R. 3. Justification is a judicial Act and therefore it must be by a Law if we allow God to be a Ruler when He doth it We dispute this against the Papists who deny it to be a forensick Term. It 's true the Righteousness for which we are justified is Christ's which answer'd the Law of Innocency but the application of it to one man rather than another and to the same man at one time and not before is by the Gospel It 's not the voice of the Law of Works that the believing Sinner shall be justified for Christ's Righteousness Rom. 3. 26. So Gal. 3. 22. And I might shew that in Justification is a Right to Impunity And can any thing but a Law give this for Condemnation by Law cannot be reversed without a Law R. 4. The Gospel gives a Right to its Benefits upon believing Ioh. 1. 12. to as many as received him to them gave he power to become the Sons of God even to them that believe in his Name What did God by his Gospel give to these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Right a Title to be the Sons of God Very many places of this kind might be urged And little do men see what follows from denying this Gospel-Rule when we read such Places as they were worthy Rev. 3. 4. the Reward a Right to the Tree of Life Are these Terms proper from the meer nature of Mens Actions That 's Popish Merit Or from the Law of Works That 's false and anti-Evangelical But it 's safe to say it 's a Gospel Worthiness Reward Right c. God having for Christ's sake promised to give Blessings in such a way The Gospel-Law is so entirely founded on Christ and refers to him so fully that there is no more than an inviolable Connexion between Terms and Benefits there 's no boasting when the Claim is strongest yea not boasting but ascribing all to Christ is one of the great Terms R. 5. If God hath no Gospel-Rule beside Election and Distinguishing Mercy to confer Glory by then God will not nay cannot forgive or save the Non-Elect though they should believe in Christ. Say not they will not believe that makes no alteration as to the Point in hand Hath not God declared he will save them if they believe That is his Law and their rejecting his Salvation God arraigneth them for He is condemned because he hath not believed c. What an allay to their Misery would it be to think Tho' I had believed I had not escaped this Woe I have lost neither Christ nor Heaven by my Unbelief Read God's Pleas with all Sinners remember Christ's Tears over lost Ierusalem What do Men speak of a Day of Grace that Men may sin away Nay what are the serious Pleas of Ministers with every Soul to believe and repent All are delusive Mockery whilst God is as free to pardon the Elect whether he believes or no He is at liberty to damn others though they should believe nay He is sure to do it should they believe because they are not Elect. If this leads not to Hobbism I see nothing I own that Forgiveness is an Act of Soveraignty that is he is free to give Faith and Forgiveness upon it to whom he will But they that think God hath left himself absolutely free to forgive the Adult whether they believe or no and to condemn the Believer seem to forget their Bible Would men of this Principle but preach according to their Scheme I think their Influence would abate with all that seriously mind Heaven not withstanding Mr. C. says that Pardon will not leave them impenitent R. 6. The Apostles with all the Saints may be arraigned as fallen from Grace and turned from the Gospel if it be no Rule according to which God applies Christ's Righteousness for Justification How could Peter say Repent and be baptized for the remission of Sin c. when the People cried What shall we do How could Paul answer the Goaler's Question What shall I do to be saved Believe on the Lord Iesus Christ and thou shalâ—… be saved This is not an Advice to Signs but to appointed Terms q. d. God hath commanded you to repent and believe and hath enacted that if you do so the Blood of Christ shall wash and save you So Gal. 2. 16. We have believed that we might be justified by the Faith of Christ. They believed for this very end If any say it was Christ justified it 's true but it was upon believing Faith is not the justifying Righteousness but it is the Condition of our being justified by this Righteousness and the Saints did ill to believe to this end if God had not enacted it to this end Nor could they do it in this assurance that they should be justified when they believed if God
Mr. Mead who did object nothing against it but a prudential Consideration and the same answer he made to Dr. Bates when he first asked him and before the second Edition came out I telling him what use his Hand might have been of he made the like answer and made then to me no Objection against the Book but that he wished I had left out that of the third to the Phil. All which I mention'd to some with real respect to him and those Brethren But since Mr. C's Book was published Mr. M. tells me and others he is not of my judgment but I know not wherein except in my sence of that Text. Yet there are others that forbare subscribing who declare no disagreement and he must quite alter his useful way of Preaching if he much differ from me Others ask why I raked into Dr. Crisp's Ashes A. It was needful I should instance some Author for they said nobody affirmed those things I mentioned in my Sermon I chose Dr. C. before another not from Prejudice but because he was reprinted with an unhappy Front his Works seemed the Standard of the propagators of these Errors This Book was taking with many recommended to People by Mr. Trayl and others as I can prove and he must never be answer'd if not after his Death and tho' I treat him with all respect yet I wonder his Works should be so applauded now when most of our great Divines opposed them heretofore Yea as Mr. Nesbit from creâ—…lible Hands informs me the Assembly of Divines desir'd to have them burnt Obj. You are said to misquote him A. I cannot find I mistook one word except that once I set Justifie instead of Pardon which is alter'd in the second Edition Obj. You misrepresent his Sence A. Not that I know â—…nd what Mr. C. instanceth I have fully proved it must be his sence tho' I inform you in my Book he oft speaks Contradictions but the most I mention he labours to prove and his Scheme enforceth it Obj. You take Bits of Sentences A. I still give one full period and it 's only to avoid swelling my Book that I mention'd no more in other Clauses yea in what is material I oft set his words at large and if it be needful I shall put him in a fuller light Many Obj. My Book was written against Mr. Cole A. I had no Eye to him at all except in the Digression about Repentance which was much the same as I deliver'd at a third meeting to compose the Debate between Dr. Bates and him tho' since then he broke out against us twice this I preface in my Book with these words Herein I have to do with men of more orthodox Principles than Dr. Crisp. And Mr. Cole must know these words did refer to him yea notwithstanding many strange Passages I hope he doth not hold most of those Opinions nor can he agree with Mr. Chancy unless he disagree with what he hath oft said yea and printed Obj. It 's more than hinted that I intend in that Book to reflect on all them called Congregational A. I am sure I abhor such an Intention nay did not I pitch on Testimonies from among them to oppose these Errors I know many of their Ministers whom I think free from the least disposition towards them the New England Synod effectually oppos'd them Mr. Flavel and Mr. Lob have written well against them I cite Bulkley Dr. Owens c. who are fully for the opposite Truths and tho' I sent Mr. M. word that in the mind I was in I would forbear Testimonies from his Writings but that I would not bind my self for any time yet I have since met with great reason to cite him as one fully for the Truth Yea Mr. N. tho' I never requested it in my House declared That if Mr. M. and three more such had subscribed he would not have been unwilling to do it and he desired me to add Congregational to the Divines in and about this City who forbear to subscribe only from prudential Considerations which I refused He remembreth the latter part and owneth it and he told Mr. Hume that if one Passage or two were rectified he would subscribe my Book It 's true some clamorous People that cry up these Opinions happen to be of that Perswasion but I hope far the greater part are better principl'd and many seem on the wrong side only from Misrepresentations Obj. Why do you use the word Rector A. It 's a proper word used by Dr. Owens Mr. Charnock and most This Book hath met with various entertainment with many it hath pleas'd God to grant it acceptance and many Ministers out of the Country offered their Subscriptions but of the four seeming Answers to it I 'll give these hints To Mr. B. I am obliged for his Christian usage and while he allows that I speak the Language of Time and of the Dispensation I am under I will comply with his Proposal not to enter the Lists unless I have occasion to prove my Sence of Phil. 3. which I find patroniz'd by Augustin Of Mr. Keach I would but ask 1. Doth not he believe that persons are bound to agree to the Covenant of Grace and thereby engaged to love God and sincerely obey him and is not refusing to agree to this Covenant the damning Sin yea is not this Refusal the Heart of Unbelief And that 's all I there affirm 2. Is his Spirit in a right frame when he shall bring these words in my Catechism to prove that we are not justified upon believing till we do Good Works when in that short Catechism there is this Q. Is not a Believer pardoned before he can put forth any other Act of Obedience A. Thô true Faith is a certain Principle of Obedience yet so soon as we believe we are pardoned even before there can be time to put forth any other Acts of Obedience Yea how oft do I say in my Book that no Act of ours is a jot of the Righteousness for or by which we are justified but that is Christ's alone and yet this person fixeth the quite contrary on me and so batters in the dark and warneth all from hearing me The Lord humble and forgive such The Letter from the City c. seems rather to design a Turn than argue a Truth for as it weakly saith some things true and others erroneous so throughout he belies their Principles whom he exposeth if it be wilfully let his own serious Reviews give him his Character if ignorantly why should he intermeddle There are few Books written that pretend so much which may be so easily and much exposed Mr. C. is the Author I here deal with I have long read Books and from five years old have had no Employment besides my Studies yea before nineteen I was regularly admitted a Preacher yet I never met with a Tract parallel to his for abusive Language violent Rage and uncharitable Censures Many great Divines
disswade me from a Reply assuring me it was at best needless with their Advice I had complied but that I find the Ignorant believe his Misrepresentation of my Principle It 's amazing what Eye they read with if they read at all What 's become of Truth or Ingenuity that Professors dare affix these Doctrines to me which I a thousand times disown and never can ascribe any Passages to ground them on but are still forced to cry This is your meaning against my plain words and entire Scheme as thou wilt see in this Reply Mr. C. saith I juggle and equivocate when I declare I still speak my mind and must be the most inconsistent Fool if it were not so But what should induce me to juggle or equivocate I value not the Purses of any and in God's Cause I fear not the Abilities of the whole Party yea by more of God's presence I shall be reconciled to their fiery and clamorous Tongues which is their only formidable strength tho' the liberty they take doth not evidence a good Cause or a Christian Spirit They give out that I oft meet with Noblemen about a great Affair when I never spake with one of these Noblemen nor ever was once in any Meeting about that matter They assert Mr. How said he had not put his Hand to my Book but that I assured him Mr. M. would do the same when Mr. H affirms he never said any such thing but that after he had signed he desired me to ask Mr. M's Hand Others say that Hands were affixt without their leave which is too gross to reply to Nay they turn the effects of my sinking Distempers to my reproach the worst I wish them is Forgiveness and more Charity and Wisdom Obj. They say some of the first Subscribers did not read the whole Book A. The whole substance of the Book is in the Truths and Errors which they did peruse Obj. Do not some of the Subscribers recant A. Tho' they have been abused yet the only one that to me seem'd willing that his Name had been left out and that only because of the noise I offer'd to publish that he desir'd it but he hath forborn any such desire Two of these Authors pretend to great Piety in their Party above others the Lord encrease it in all but I am perswaded they call many Serious ones of their Party who live under the power of the contrary Truth and understand not the Errors of those for whose persons they may have regard There be a far greater number of humble meek heavenly Christians that abhor these Errors which they observe to alter much the Christian Calm and tender Frame of such that I hope are upright in the Substance And I heartily desire all of us would lay these Texts to Heart 1 Cor. 13. Though I have all Faith and have not Charity I am nothing Iam. 1. 26. If any man among you seem to be religious and bridleth not his Tongue but deceiveth his own Heart that man's Religion is vain Iam. 3. 13 to 18. But the Wisdom that is from above is first pure then peaceable gentle and easie to be entreated And it 's evident notwithstanding what Mr. C. saith of Passions p. 12. that a holy Fear with a siducial Consent to Christ tâ—…ds more to make a man's state safe and his walk exact than sudden Confidence or easie Perswasions It 's true Assurance should be endeavoured in our working out our Salvation with trembling and with fear yet Mr. Sedgwick was a man I 'll believe before Mr. C. or the Letter and he saith In my Conscience this is the general Opinion of ungodly men they hear Christ died to take away Sin and to make Peace for Sinners and therefore they will take no thought after Christ but will live basely and boldly in their sinful ways c. but Christ never yet made such a Reconciliation that all Sinners whatsoever though they live in Unbelief and Impenitency shall share in it but only penitent Sinners and believing Sinners S. of Cov. p. 258. I shall represent the true state of the points in debate that if any men will engage me to Edification and with Truth they may be directed The Controversie with Dr. C. my Book doth it so plainly that I hope all may see it there but the present Specimen more especially shall refer to Mr. C. who differs from many that help the noise though they will not see it 1. It is not whether a certain number of Sinners are of Free Grace elected to Faith and Iustification which I affirm but whether the Elect are required by the Gospel to believe that they may be justified which Mr. C. denies and I affirm 2. It is not whether the Gospel be such a Law as that Acts of Obedience to it stand in the place of legal Works so as that for them we are saved which I deny but whether the Gospel doth assure Salvation for Christ's Merits to such as obey it and threaten an exclusion from this Salvation against all such as disobey it This Mr. C. denies and I affirm 3. It is not whether we are justified by our Faith or any Act of ours as if they as Works or Qualifications were a jot of that Righteousness for which or by which we are justified this I deny but whether God hath fixed this as the Revealed Gospel-Rule that a man must be a penitent Believer whom God will justifie for Christ's Righteousness This Mr. C. denies and I affirm 4. It is not whether the Faith and Forgiveness of the Elect be the Fruits of Election and Distinguishing Mercy which I affirm but whether God hath a revealed Rule by which as Paternal Ruler he gives Pardon and Glory to Believers for Christ's sake and judicially withholds them from others whom he condemns not for their being unelected but for their final Impenitency and Unbelief This Mr. C. denies and I affirm To other of his Citations under his Third Principle add this p. 32. If you understand Judicial in respect of any Duty Grace or Qualification found in us tho' wrought by the Spirit I abhor it 5. It is not whether we are immediately justified upon believing before any Works which follow the first Act of Saving Faith this I affirm but whether if Faith should be ineffectual to Acts of sincere Holiness and to prevent Apostacy and utter Ungodliness would we be subject to Condemnation by the Gospel-Rule This Mr. C. denies and I affirm 6. It is not whether Holiness or Good Works are necessary to Salvation this they and I affirm but whether God doth require them as indispensible means of obtaining the possession of Salvation through Christ and declares that the total want of them and much more their Contraries shall expose to Misery This Mr. C. must deny and the Necessity they speak of is only a Physical Necessity not a moral Note 〈◊〉 two last Questions refer to the Adult that have time 7. It is not
which Faith is the great Term of the Covenant and includes so much of Repentance as I insist on Q. Shall the Elect fall from a state of Forgiveness A. No the Decree the Intercession of Christ the Promise of Perseverance yea and Forgiveness it self do all assure a perseverance in Grace and so a continuance in a pardoned estate Q. What do you trust in as that for which God will accept of you and save you A. Only in the Righteousness of the Lord Jesus Q. Do not you trust in your own inherent Righteousness as that for which God will save you A. I abhor such a Thought Q What stress do you lay on Good Works A. Not as necessary to my justified state into which I am admitted upon my first believing 2. Nor as any Righteousness for which God will save me Q. What stress then do you lay A. No more than as they evidence my Faith to be true execute my first believing Consent prevent their Contraries which the Gospel threatens with Misery and answer the Rule of any Gospel-promise that God hath made and will execute for Christ's sake to the upright person Q. Do you think that we are justified by our Good Works at the last day as if they were the Righteousness by which we shall be saved at the last day A. No I would tremble at such a Thought and declare it 's Christ's Righteousness alone and unmixed that I hope to be saved for and by Q. What are your Thoughts then as to our inherent Righteousness and Good Works as they fall under Christ's Judgment at the last day A. My whole Heart is 1. That if a man truly believe and dye before he hath opportunity to do more he shall be sentenc'd Happy as a Believer notwithstanding he was prevented by Death from professing the Truth and proceeding in Holiness performing Acts of Worship c. 2. God hath declared that none shall at last be saved by Christ's Righteousness that are Infidels Ungodly utterly unprofitable or Apostates And therefore all that God will then save for Christ's Merits must truly be and will be declared to be no Infidels Ungodly utterly unprofitable nor total Apostates but the contrary and they shall be judged free from the guilt of final Infidelity 3. The most eminent in Faith Holiness Sufferings and Labours shall be adjudged to greater degrees of Glory which added degrees will be as truly the effects of Christ's sole Merits as the lesser degrees All this is exactly consonant to my Book and my full Perswasion Because I see that well-meaning People are imposed on by a noise of Popery and Arminianism I shall let thee see how our Protestant and Orthodox Divines do represent and oppose the Popish and Arminian Points in this matter and so thou maist judge how the Antinomians secure their destructive Errors by this clamour The sum of the Popish Principles our Divines oppose may be thus reduc'd They think that 1. by Attrition or a 〈◊〉 legal feaâ—… of Punishments Men do ex congruo or meetness merit Charity and Faith which be the beginning of Sanctification and that this begun Sanctification is all our first Justification 2. That whatever be the efficiency of the Spirit in working Faith it is determinable by Man's free Will whether any believe or no. 3. That upon our improvement and exercise of this first Charity and Faith we truly and properly merit the encrease of Holiness and Eternal Glory and that ex condigno This they call the second Justification 4. That by the Absolution of the Priest on Confession in the Sacrament of Pennance our Sins of Age are forgiven as original Sin was by Baptism and venial Sins and temporal Punishments of mortal Sins by Satisfaction and Indulgences and all in a way of merit The Points that can be at all pretended as my Concern I 'll give you as stated by Dr. Ames in his Bellarminus Enervatus with râ—…y own Answers to his Questions Tom. 3. lib. 5. Q Whether Prayer Fasting or Alms are satisfactory Works A. I plainly deny it oft p. 240. Q. Do our Works truly and properly make satisfaction to God for that Obligation to Punishment which remaineth to be expiated A. I say No for we make no satisfaction by any thing Tom. 4. p. 109. Q Whether Faith alone justifieth A. I say Yes that is we are justified by Faith alone as that which alone receives Christ and before Works of Obedience But yet I think Ames well explains this p. 112. Something may be before Pardon as a pre-requisite Disposition so that it be not the cause of Pardon And this is all I say of Repentance and agree with him in p. 112. Repentance taken for legal Humiliation goes before Iustification as a Disposition in Order pre-requisite but not as a Cause 2. Evangelical Repentance is taken for Conversion of which Faith is a principal part Yea add That a great part of Repentance is the effect of Justification 3. I agree with him in the next words Quocunque modo c. Which-ever way Repentance is taken neither Grief nor detestation of Sin is the cause of Iustification Nay more I agree with Ames in his Account of Faith cap. 2. p. 101. Fides specialis misericordiae duplici ratione vocatur c. Faith of special Mercy which is Trust or Relyance is taken in two respects 1. whereby it apprehends Christ or cleaves to him for apprehending special Mercy by him 2. As it apprehends special Mercy as already bestowed In the first sence it goes before Iustification in the latter sence it follows Iustification Lib. 6. Cap. 1. He treats of imputed Righteousness and p. 139. saith that this is the Protestant Judgment Christi justitiam catenus imputari c. Christ's Righteousness is so far imputed to us that by the vertue thereof we are as much esteemed just before God as if we had somewhat in our selves wherewith we might be esteemed just before him P. 205. Q. An opera bona c. Are the Good Works of Men truly and properly the Merits of Eternal Life A. I positively and oft deny it and dare not assert that Condecency which Ames and others do Reader if thou art a man of any Skill in these things thou wilt find that they oppose the Papists concerning our Graces and Works only as merirorious and causal of Saving Benefits and I deny them to be either See even Chemnit Exam. par 1. p. 172. Davenant de Iustit actuali cap. 30. q. 1. arg 1. Ames Bellarm. Enerv. tom 4. lib. 6. Downam of Iustif. p. 15. I shall now shew thee what our Calvinists and Orthodox Divines oppose the Arminians in as to this Doctrine of Justification The Synod of Dort in their Canons Part 1. p. 289. of the Errors under the Head De Morte Christi thus condemn the Arminians Qui docent foedus illud novum gratiae c. That teach that the Covenant of Grace which the Father upon the intervention of Christ's