Covenant of Grace less beneficial and extensive than the Covenant of Works and so consequently doth not allow as great Benefits Priviledges and Immunities to the Covenant of Grace which he doth to the Covenant of Works all which are the dangerous Consequences of Antipedobaptism as I hope I have sufficiently proved and convincingly made out and in the evincing or proving this Argument I have plainly shewed that we have the proper meaning of three Texts of Holy Scripture which I think to any Man of sense is as clear a Proof and as powerful an Evidence to engage our belief to the truth of any Doctrin propounded to us as if we had brought the positive and express Words of Holy Scripture which is as strong a conviction as any Man can with the least shew of reason desire So that if the true sense of the Holy Jesus's Commission to his Blessed Disciples be duly considered and that no other meaning can tolerably be put upon them being backt with the Authority of two other places of Holy Scripture and a threefold Cord is not easily broken no Antipedobaptist that is a Man of sense will hereafter press for a positive and direct place of Holy Writ because he hath no reason to expect a Tautology in Sacred Scripture to please an Humour or serve an Interest and because he will thereby weaken his Cause and then have great reason to be ashamed of if not repent for the Injury he doth his Principles and he will see the vanity of demanding express words for a confutation when he hath plain sense against him for the Holy Scriptures are to be expounded and interpreted by their Sense and not by their Sound by their Spiritual Meaning and not by the bare Words Syllables and Letters for they are best understood by their proper Design and Purport or a true Relation to their Coherence and Connexion with what preceeds and follows after And now give me leave to offer one thing that will confirm the sense of the Texts I have delivered and will also further shew how unreasonable and absurd weak and trifling the Antipedobaptists are for being so peremptory and positive in demanding an express place of Holy Scripture for the baptizing of Infants and this I will endeavour to evince from Customs among the Jews well known to all learned Men. Three things were required by the Jews to make a Male Proselyte of Righteousness Circumcision a kind of Purfication by Water which was an Allusion to Baptism and Oblation which was commonly two Turtles or Pidgeons To a Female Purification by Water and Oblation Now because the Jews since their Dispersion have neither Altar nor Sacrifice they say For the Male Circumcision and Purification by Water are sufficient For the Female Only Purification by Water In David's time they tell us many Thousands were added to the Church without Circumcision by Purification only Hence we may observe that a kind of Admission by Water into the Church was long in use among the Jews tho' it were not Sacramental till the Blessed Jesus's Institution therefore it may seem to be used by them because they looked for it as a Sacrament at the coming of the Messiah as is evident by their coming to St. John the Baptist not so much scrupling his Baptism as his Authority by what Power he baptized St. John i. 25. And they asked him and said unto him Why baptizest thou then if thou be not that Christ nor Elias nor that Prophet By which three different words they meant the Messiah because he was well known to the Jews by those Terms or Phrases to be foresignified so that had he owned himself for such they would not have doubted his Commission but Christ being plainly proved the Messiah he was Lord of the Sacrament as well as of the Sabbath and so had a sufficient Power to institute a New Sacrament and so substituted Baptism in the room of Circumcision which whosoever believes not to be as extensive as the other is so irrational as to make the holy Jesus not so merciful a Legislator as Moses which shews the unreasonableness and absurdity of demanding an express Text of holy Scripture for Infant Baptism which was the Truth to be cleared and I hope is sufficiently made apparent and manifest CHAP. XI Some general Observations upon the Sense and Expositions delivered LET me now offer some general Observations upon the Sense and Expositions of those Texts I have brought for the Proof hereof and I will begin with the Observation of Chemnitius in his Plea he makes against the Antipedobaptists of Germany * Ego sane qui simplicitatem amo etiamsi nec intelligam nec explicare possim quomodo Infantes qui Baptizantur credant judico tamen suffitire firmissima illa testimonia explicata Infantes esse Abaptizandos neque enim ab illis propterea discedendum etsi non possim vel intelligere velexplicare quomedo credant Infames Chemnit Exam. Conc. Trid. part 2. Tit. de Baptismo ad Canon 13. I do so truly love Simplicity and Truth that altho' I cannot tell how Children who are baptized believe yet I judge the Testimonies from Holy Scripture above-named most strong Evidences and a sufficient Proof for this Christian Practice neither ought Christians to depart from this Truth tho' I cannot understand or explain how Children believe In some things we should take St. Paul's Advice And become Fools that we may be wise 1 Cor. iij. 18. Obedience being more acceptable than burnt Offerings 1 Sam. xv 22. And we should offer up our Understandings to divine Revelation where there is clear Reason to submit to it Faith is the wisest and most well-pleasing Service we can offer to God Nescire ea quae docere non vult Magister maximus erudita est inscitia not to know those things our great Master would have us ignorant of is if I may so speak without a Solecism a learned Ignorance But prais'd be Heaven I have yet met with no Arguments of the Adversaries so strong as to need such an Apology or Plea We find not any Accusation laid to the Charge of Christianity by the Jewish or Pagan World upon this Account which certainly would have been done by some of the Enemies of our holy Religion if the Jewish Believer had not enjoyed the same Immunities when Christian that he did before Or if the first Planters of Christianity had preached the same Doctrin the Antipedobaptists do now how would the Enemies of our holy Religion have declamed against us and declared the Doctrin they preached was not the same Covenant God offered to the Father of the Faithful and the People of Israel because that included Father and Son as to the Covenant and the Sign that conveyed the Benefits of the Covenant An Obj. Now because the Antipedobaptists call upon us for an Example of any baptized in a gathered Church without Faith and that herein the holy Scripture is silent Answ To which I
will give a full Answer and for which I shall in great part Vid. Mr. Ellis's Treat called Pastor and Clerk Or a Debate real concerning Inant Baptism p. 182 195. be obliged to the Judicious Mr. Ellis 1. I am not obliged to make any return 2. This is a perillous Method of arguing to Religion 3. That it doth not further their Cause 1. I am not obliged to make any return For we may well continue the Custom seeing we have so strong Reasons from holy Writ for it and seeing we have so long enjoyed and used it by so many Instances from the Primitive times as may be proved so that we have Prescription to plead and that Lawyers tells us in some Cases is a good Bar against all other Titles It is upon these Accounts your duty that contradict it to declare any one Instance or Proof that these Reasons and this continued Custom of all times since the holy Apostolick Age should not be continued which I am satisfied they will not be able to perform if they should be so couragious as to undertake it and therefore it will be in vain to make any attempt that way 2. This method of demanding positive Words from Holy Writ for all that Men are to believe or do is extream hazardous to Religion where there is sufficient reason without such an Authority to engage our Faith 1. As to Doctrin it would censure the Method of arguing used by our Blessed Saviour and his Holy Disciples and so make way for a falling from the Truth and giving entrance to the most pernicious Heresies and therefore he that believes such a Doctrin can be no good Christian and possibly for this Reason several have gone from one Sect to another till they came to be of no Religion at all and looking for what is not to be had in Holy Writ nor should be expected from any sort of arguing they have thereupon cast off all 2. As to customary Practices what a door of entrance would there be for strange Doctrins and stranger Practices there is no Command for or Instance of a Woman partaking in the Holy Communion we read not of the baptizing of the Holy Disciples no Command or Instance of one that is not a Clergyman may not have more Wives than one whereupon I have read of one in Essex that married more than one at a time and as it was supposed for that Reason 3. It doth not further their Cause because where there is a good Reason for us to believe or do we are not to stop or stay our belief or defer acting till we have an Instance from Holy Scripture What Command or foreknown Instance had the Holy Apostle of the Circumcision to admit the Centurion of the Italian Band and his Family to Baptism seeing they were not circumcised only that he collected it that because he had a Title to the Covenant by the miraculous Gift of the Holy Ghost he had right to the Sign that conveyed the Priviledge of the Covenant The Commission the Holy Jesus gave to his Blessed Disciples at his leaving the World in relation to the persons is in the Masculine Gender and the Account of St. Peter's baptizing his first Converts was in the same Gender Why then did St. Philip admit to baptism Women as well as Men Acts viij 12 And why do the Antipedobaptists as well as we admit Women to the Communion when there is neither Command nor Rule to enjoyn it To conclude all I shall need to say by way of Exposition upon these three Texts As the Obligatory Power of the Ceremonies and Rites among the Jews was abolished because they did not agree with the ingenuous temper of the Christian Institution so more principally was it taken away as being disagreeable to the Notion of its being an Universal Society for it would have impeded the Propagation of the Religion of the B. Jesus had it been burdened with the Ceremonies and Rites of the Jews which were grown hateful as well as nauseous to the Heathenish part of Mankind and to name no other Instance he was upon this account engaged to alter the Sacrament for Admission into his Church or the Sign of the Old Covenant Circumcision I mean whereby the People of Israel excepting some few Nations as the ancient Egyptians Ethiopians Ishmaclites and Colchians were differenced from the rest of Mankind They were I say Vid. Case of Infant-Baptism pag. 20. grown nauseous and hateful to the World for the use thereof as it is insinuated by several of the Poets as Martial Horace Petronius and Juvenal Is any man called being circumcised let him not become uncircumcised i. e. 1 Cor. vij 18. Let him not use means to attract the Praeputium or Foreskin which the Jewish People were frequently wont to do to shun reproach and to deliver themselves from Persecution in Paganish Kingdoms And upn this account it would have been a great hindrance to the propagation of the New Dispensation should the Heathen World have been admitted to the New Covenant by that way no Sacred Ceremony could be more unacceptable to Mankind in general and hereupon the Wisdom of our Merciful Redeemer as well as New Legislator is to be commended in altering the old antiquated Sign into a more gentle pleasant way of admission by Water which was as of a more universal use so of a more general signification because the Heathen World as well as the People of Israel used it For Heathenism was little else but the Jewish Religion abused by the Prince of Darkness and Father of Lies as Christianity was little more than pure Natural Reason exalted and improved by the King of Light and Purity CHAP. XII A Defence of the Expositions delivered from Jewish Customs AND now that I may engage you to the belief of the sense I have given of these three Texts of Holy Scripture I declare the Account I have offered is according to Jewish Custom and the sense of things well known among them which is the only true and proper way of coming to their right meaning and without such an Exposition or Allusion it is impossible to understand several Phrases and Places in the New Testament Dr. Hammond's Case of Infant-Baptism in his Resolution of six Queries And this may appear from an excellent Account given by the Reverend Dr. Hammond in eight Particulars which I will only mention but not enlarge upon referring you to the Account he gives and then add one memorable Instance to confirm this way of expounding H. Scripture 1. In the calling and receiving Disciples 2. In the Donation of the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven 3. In the Blessed Sacrament of the Lord's H. Supper 4. In Imposition of Hands 5. In the Title of Apostles 6. In the Name and Office of Bishops 7. In the Title of Deacons 8. In the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Church in both Notions of it for the People and the Rulers thereof or Church-Representative
Sin and Faith whereby they stedfastly believe the Promises of God made unto them in that Sacrament answ That is for answer hereunto Those that are baptized when adult are indispensably obliged thereunto and Infants when they come to years of discretion and thus our Church Catechism expounds her sense which Promise or Graces Children when they come unto Age are bound to perform It is a good Rule in the Civil Law Nemo tenetur ad Impossibile No Man is obliged unto the performance of that which is impossible to be done by any human power And then we cannot believe that he who is the God of Reason as well as Truth will oblige his Creature to a Duty which he is not able to perform by any Powers he hath created him with and suppose God should infuse into a Child an extraordinary and miraculous measure of Grace as well as Reason as he did into our blessed Saviour and St. John the Baptist who were sanctified from or in the Womb yet we read not tho' they had so great a proportion of the Gifts of the Holy Spirit that during the state of their infancy they magnified God and spake with Tongues antecedent to the use of Speech the manifestation of which Miraculous Power and the discovery of which Divine Gift the Jews at the Feast of Pentecost Acts 2.4 8 11. 10.46 and the first Gentile Converts shewed But to return Tho' these Graces are not needful to all in all circumstances for where there is not a capacity to act them there can be no obligation to their exercise yet that the Children of Believers have a right to the Covenant as soon as born and so have a right to the Seal that conveys the Title and are obliged to its Use if they will enjoy the Priviledges of the Covenant I hope hath been made appear beyond contradiction yet they are needful for some that are admitted unto that Holy Ordinance and this Distinction ought to be well understood and weighed If Baptism be allowed to those who have not the proper Qualifications then those Qualifications are not absolutely needful unto the Undertakers of that Holy Ordinance Faith is sometimes needful when Repentance is not so sometimes Faith and Repentance conjoyned and otherwise sometimes Acts 8.37 When St. Philip admitted the Ethiopian Eunuch to Baptism he only enjoyned Faith 2.41 38. not Repentance St. Peter when he made three thousand Converts at his first Sermon enjoyned Repentance only In short It is as the condition is or the needs of the Party require In Infants the matter is plain as to Repentance the non-performance whereof cannot hinder their being baptized because they having committed no sin are not obliged unto the Duty and yet this is as needful for being baptized as Faith So that this evidences they are not absolutely needful not to all not to Children but only accidentally so and if they may be baptized if they want one why not if they want the other is a Mystery that will not nay I am inclined to believe cannot be discovered by those that because they think the contrary are engaged to make the Revelation Besides I add Actual Faith is needful not to the undertaking but to the subsequent Products of that Holy Ordinance because the first Planters of Christianity admitted some tho' adult to Baptism who had no Faith but were only formal Professors and of this sort were Simon Magus Alexander the Coppersmith Demas and Diotrephes and Judas if baptized and also the Gnostic Hereticks For the Effect is from the Searcher of Hearts who knows our secret thoughts but the External Ordinance may be performed and undertaken by those who know not such Secrets And this is a clear Proof that that Faith which is needful to the product of the Holy Ordinance is not needful to its undertaking and if formal Professors may be partakers of it much more Children if to such as actually impede or hinder the product much rather to them that do not so If it be objected by the Antipedobaptists An Obj. The Church cannot tell but that those that say they have Faith may have it but she certainly knows Children have not I answer answ The Church cannot tell but Hypocrites stop the Product and oppose the Grace of Baptism but she can tell Children do not nor can make hindrance or opposition there is a possibility one may partake of the Grace but the second cannot stop its effects Moreover Children have Faith because they believe in the Holy Jesus St. Matth. 18.6 St. Mark 9.42 as we are told in Sacred Scripture in express words recorded by two Evangelists if one be not enough And that this is a satisfactory and sufficient Proof the Holy Scriptures do assure us when they tell us St. Joh. 8.17 that the Testimony of two Men is true and this witness and evidence it appears we have for the truth of this Doctrin that Children have Faith and that this their Faith was true sound and such as God will accept we may with good reason believe because he that is truth and will not therefore deceive us doth seem so to assure us Vid. pag. 89. as we have already made appear in this Chapter Whosoever shall offend one of these little ones that believe in me and therefore fit for his Blessing which is Divine The exercise of our understanding is no more necessary to make us fit for Grace than for Reason but we have seeds of Reason congenite and innate antecedent to the exercise of our understandings otherwise there would be no distinction between a Rational Creature and a Brute when first produced into being and brought to light Sparks and Seeds then of Reason there may be to use the words of the great African Father Per Infantis animan non ubi ratio nulla erat sed ubi adhuc sopita erat St. Aug. Ep 23. ad Bonifac. The Soul of an Infant hath Reason but as yet not capable of use like Fire raked together in the Embers So likewise there is a possibility of Grace being infused by the Divine Spirit as is clear in the fore-quoted Instance of the blessed Jesus and his Praecursor or Fore-runner St. John the Baptist who were sanctified in or from the Womb. Or else they may be said to believe by the Faith of those that present them unto the Holy Ordinance in the Sacred Place Fide gestantium Idem ibidem For to this I may add the Child hath the Faith of the Parent imputed to it and that the Faith of the Parent is imputable to the Child and available for great purposes is apparent because we read in the Holy Gospel That the Blessed Jesus makes the Faith of the Parent necessary unto the Healing of the Child From whence I argue thus That if the Faith of the Parent may be imputed for the recovering of the Bodily Diseases why may not the same be imputed for the curing the Distempers
you light on a Matter that displeases but ponder why you are displeased If your Sentiments in Religion are charged to be against Evidence of Reason and Testimony of Holy Writ you ought to be offended because you entertained such high Thoughts of your Abilities but if you will not assume or take so much Confidence proceed and consider if the Author hath or hath not good cause to oppose you whatever the Result be on a due Trial you will have no Cause to be troubled at your labour in the Inquisition or Search For if there be no cause to oppose your Sentiments you may think you have ground to continue them If the Author hath ground for what he writes you may with Satisfaction alter them It is probable a word may be too jocose or too sharp but let not such Expressions cause the Argument to be cursorily or hastily read but weighed without the lett of Passion or byass of Interest to hinder that Conviction the Author aims at I declare with sincerity I bear not any Bitterness towards any nor was I under an emotion or heat of Mind when I studied or preached on this Subject The Author knows how hard it is to remove a prejudice and withal believes it no easie thing to change Sentiments how impertinent soever born and bred with us For such Reasons as these I cannot express Indignation against my Adversaries but truly pity them because they subdue not that intemperate Zeal by which they appear for Novel Opinions against Primitive Canons and Ecclesiastic Establishments I have endeavoured to express my self as moderately as I could not designing to provoke a Passion but work a Conviction I have treated my Adversaries with respect designing only to reduce them from Error to Truth not to boast of Victory or proclaim a Triumph If you have other thoughts of him than he declares he importunately entreats you if you meet with any thing may seemingly raise a Passion esteem it a slip of his Pen and consider rather the reason is offered than the Dress it appears in I will now acquaint you with the Reason engaged me in this Controversie You may believe me who know my own Mind best it was a charitable Design on such deluded Persons as have sincere Intentions for what is true but through the smallness of their Understanding have such narrow Capacities as not to attain the knowledge of Truth and a Zeal to promote Christian Doctrine His Adversaries may entertain what thoughts they think fit his natural Temper is not waspish nor contentious neither is he displeased with any because he doth not think as he doth He knows not of any Quarrel he hath with any on the Account of Religion He neither affecteth Differences nor is maintained thereby He hath possibly more Esteem than he deserves but if not what he is satisfied with as much as may preserve him from being tempted to envy others and the unworthy Arts of purchasing Credit by lessening his Neighbour And as he publishes not this for popular Applause so is he at no loss for what he opposes but it is the Interest of Religion and a Love for Truth have engaged him in this business for he apprehends them greatly endanger'd by Error Many Persons have not time to enquire into the Causes of Matters of Moment nor are they without great Importunity engaged therein But believe as such act for whom they have an Admiration and though they know not the Reason of things they oft outvy those they follow That the Truth of Religion be discovered tends much to the quiet of the World and the welfare of Mankind Men cannot but believe it necessary Religion should be clearly understood and certainly such Men's Travels deserv Praise who endeavour to make persons know its Principles that their practice may be directed I can with sincerity own I have used my Endeavours to set this Controversie in as clear a Light as the Revelation of Holy Scripture and the Dictates of Reason could discover which are the best Instructors of our Mind in the knowledge of Truth and the best Directors how to lead our Lives accordingly But I may wish for Success on this charitable Design rather than expect it if there be Truth in the excellent * Vide Lord Bacon 's Letter to Mr. Matthews p. 69. cited by the Author of the Friendly Debate p. 176. Part 4th Lord Bacon's Observation That there is little dry Light in the World but it is all moist being infused and steeped in Affection Blood and Humours The Reason of Men is made to stoop to Interest and they judge according to the Current of their Inclinations I can make the same Declaration the Excellent †Vide Dr. Sherlock 's Preface to his Case of Allegiance due to Sovereign Powers stated and resolved according to Scripture and Reason and the Principles of the Church of England Dean of St. Paul's doth and with the same sincerity I doubt not he doth That one occasion of publishing his Book is That it is extorted from me by the rude Clamors and unchristian Censures of some and the earnest Importunity of others For an Antipaedobaptist told me I dare not publish my Conference with Mr. M. C. for if I did he would so expose me I should not dare to look him in the Face I have for once accepted his bold Challenge to evidence the fierceness he delivered himself with did not put me in a fright and that their Coryphaeus in that Country where I am concerned may have an Opportunity of shewing his Art And as for Importunity though it be a trite Apology for the Publication of a Book yet I had more than was usual so much that I was tired therewith Whereupon from a distrust of my self I shewed my Argument to several Persons eminent for their Learning among the Clergy even some of the highest Station Some said I was bound in Conscience out of Obligation to the Catholick Church in general and to the Church of England in particular to print it which I would not be so conceited as to believe said on Account of the Argument but from this Consideration The Defence of a Fundamental Truth is a Publick Service Infant-Baptism being not only an Article of the Church of England's Faith as she declares in these words * Vide Articles agreed upon by the Arch-Bishops and Bishops and the whole Clergy of both Provinces Printed 1562. Art 27. The Baptism of young Children is in any wise to be retained in the Church as most agreeable with the Institution of Christ but likewise is and hath been a Doctrin of the Catholic Church in all Ages as the excellent Mr. †Vide Mr. Walker 's modest Plea for Infant-Baptism Printed at Cambridge 1677. Walker hath made appear Others would persuade me to it from a likely prospect of Success it might have on the advers Party because they said tho others had done it in a rational way and in particular
Mr. Walker in his modest Plea for Infant-Baptism yet none had handled it in such a Scriptural Way by Testimonies from Holy Writ which manner of treating this Christian and comfortable Doctrine might be most effectual on the Minds of such as opposed this Truth because the Antipaedobaptists will not admit any Proof but from the direct Words of Holy Scripture or an Exposition so plain that may be equal to a literal sense And this way I have endeavoured to prove this momentous Subject and for this Reason some thought it might be successful on those of that Party that have teachable Minds and this Consideration the Conscience and real desire of doing good was the strongest Motive to expose it to the Public And truly if it may be instrumental to the convincing any that are not too far gone by Interest or Humour it will be a greater satisfaction than the Eulogies of the wisest Men and I shall think my Labour sufficiently compensated If any admire this Subject is methodized and worded so like the way of Preaching it is because I believed it would have the stronger Impression on the people it was preached to if it were printed as they heard it and I had rather be subservient to my People's Good than comply with the capricious Humour of the nicest Critick An Account of the Conference with Mr. M. C. upon the Subject of Infant-Baptism and the Occasion of it AFter this I hope useful Introduction I come to perform the Obligation of my Promise which was to give a Relation of a Conference publicly held with an Antipaedobaptist of no small Fame on the Subject and of the Occasion and this I will endeavour to do with all imaginable Sincerity and take all possible Care not to commit any voluntary Error or wilful Mistake In the Month of October 1686. I was collated to a Living by my reverend Diocesan After a Year I received Information that an Antipaedobaptist had perverted one of my Parish But I hope without a reproachful Reflection I may say of some that pervert tru Doctrin what the Holy Jesus said of the glozing Pharisees Wo unto you Scribes and Pharisees Hypocrites St. Matth. XXIII 15. for you compass Sea and Land to make one Proselyte and when he is made you make him two-fold more the Child of Hell than before The first Intelligence I had as I remember was from my Parishioner's Neighbour of whom he held a considerable Farm the Gentleman was firm to the Church of England and though he is no Loquacious Talkativ Person yet I have heard him give good Reason for his Principles From the Account he gave I found him in Christian Charity concerned for his Tenant whereupon he desired me to discourse his Tenant and because he thought he would be unwilling to give me a Meeting he told me the next time he came he would send for me to discours him to make a Tryal if I could reduce him to the Church Accordingly he did and I readily went where I treated him with all the Civility he could look for and discoursed what I thought proper and I spoke with all the kindness and plainness was possible that what 〈◊〉 said might have an Influence on him But I was disappointed in my hopes for I found â—im weak and which is usually the unhappy â—ate of such obstinate so that though I â—poke plainly yet he either did not understand me or would not be convinced by what I offered So true is the Observation of the wise Lord Bacon â—ertinaciae Hominum nullum Remedium posuit Deus The Lord Bacon That God hath appointed no Remedy for the Obstinacy of Men And if he have appointed none it will be in vain to endeavour to find any All I could get was an importunate Request I would permit him to bring one to dispute with me I was much against it at first because usually such Designs come to no good nor seldom have their desired end but are attended with noise and clamour and generally there is a greater Contestation for Victory than Truth and a Man's Reputation is more consulted than their Satisfaction on whose Account the Meeting is appointed The Answer he gave was He was no Scholar and so not able to discourse with a Man of Learning as he supposed me to be I replied whatever my Stock of Learning was I would make no use of it with him because I charitably intended his Good but this instead of satisfying engaged him to renew his Importunity there might be a public Disputation which he pretended would be much to his Satisfaction but I believe it was but a pretence For on the Account of some after-Circumstances I have reason to conjecture that his Importunity for such a Meeting was not so much to be convinced as from a Confidence that the Advocate he pitch'd on for he was in Vogue with his Party for his Disputatious Faculty and as I have heard hath often travelled many Miles to dispute with a Clergy man would so far baffle me it would give a Reputation to his Cause and confirm him in his Principles But because he could not prevail for a Consent his Neighbour joined desiring I would comply Upon which out of respect to him I condescended but on this Condition there might be but a few at the hearing of our Discours and if he would name how many he would bring I would endeavour to equal his Number or be content with fewer For I told him I believed three or four judicious Persons of a side might better understand the Reason and Truth of an Argument than a Multitude For I had for many Years been of the same Mind with the ingenious Mr. Matthew Clifford who hated Crowd and Noise A little after I had notice my Parishioner would bring his Man on December the thirteenth 1687. And because I would be just to my Word I acquainted to the best of my Knowledge only two Persons viz. my Parishioner's Neighbour and his Father But he on the other side dealt unfairly with me for contrary to his Promise he sent his Man to Church the Sunday before the Day to acquaint my People when Sermon was done there was to be a Dispute between Mr. M. C. and My self Some time before which I addressed my self to a Consideration of the Doctrine of Baptism and the Holy Gospel Covenant and what Persons are to be admitted thereto and to enjoy the Privileges by receiving the Sign thereof I had only by me one Book on the Subject that treated of the Nature of the Covenant and whether Persons that were not capable of understanding the Articles thereof could by the external sign be admitted to the Privileges But I had a belief he would not or cared not to manage the Controversy from that Principle and thereupon I laid the Book aside and for some time consulted the Holy Scriptures and addressed my self by importunate and sincere Prayers to the Throne of Grace for the Divine Assistance not
the gaining the Gentile World to his New Dispensation and to be professors of his Sacred Institutions and obedient Subjects to his excellent Laws And this did more suitably answer his Advent or Coming into the World who came to be an Universal Saviour for all Mankind For Moses was but a Legislator to the Israelites and Joshua a Saviour to the Jews only and yet on that account called Jesus because he delivered that People from their Enemies and entred them into Canaan But he that was to be an Universal Redeemer and so the true Jesus in the most extensive signification of the word thought fit to appoint such a Sacrament of Admission into his Kingdom as might work upon and prevail with the whole World even all Mankind Now from what hath been said and from a custom among the Jews concerning Proselytes of Justice which all learned Men know to be so and Men of Sense among the Antipaedobaptists acknowledge that after such a Proselyte was Baptiz'd and Circumcis'd and had thereby a Right to eat of the Passover his Child born after such an Admission into the Covenant had a Right to Circumcision at Eight days old as well as a natural-born Jew it may appear that denying Baptism to Infants now is an Hindrance to the Propagation of the Holy Gospel both as to Jews and Pagans As to the Jew because he might say to an Antipaedobaptist offering Arguments to perswade him to become a Christian He would not be of his Religion because after he was in Covenant and had received the Sign of the Covenant his Child was not in Covenant and so had no Right to the Sign which he had in his Way by virtue of his Faith and so consequently the Benefit and Privilege less in ours than in his Way And so the Pagan might say to an Antipaedobaptist perswading him to embrace Christianity I will rather be a Jew than a Christian because as soon as I own and profess their Faith my Child after such a Declaration is in Covenant as well as my self and hath a Right to the Sign So that by this account it plainly appears that the denying Infants Baptism is an Hindrance to the Progress of the Holy Gospel from Evidence of Reason From whence it may seem rationally to follow That he who holds any Principle that derogates from and diminishes the Honour of Christianity and impedes the Propagation of the Religion of our dear Redeemer hath no true and proper Right to the Honourable Name and Title of a Christian which is the natural and pernicious consequence of Antipaedobaptistic Tenets So that how General soever the Commission the Holy Jesus gave to his Blessed Disciples for converting the Heathen Nations was the sence must be plainly this which if I can secure by two other Texts of Holy Scripture confirm by Allusion to Jewish Customs and by the Coherence establish by the Authority of the Ancient Primitive Fathers and answer the strongest Objections of our Adversaries I shall say all that can be thought necessary by Men of Reason in defence of Infant-Baptism Go teach all Nations Baptizing them i.e. When you have sufficiently instructed the Pagan World in and convinced them of the Excellency of my Holy Gospel and thereby perswaded them to embrace my Divine Religion my Spiritual Worship and then after a publick Profession they have declared themselves my Disciples and Followers ascertain them that they are admitted into my Covenant of Grace and receive them into and give them a possession of my Covenant by the Sign and Seal of Baptism and then assure them that their Children shall have the same Right to my Covenant that the natural-born Children of Jews have and the Children of the Proselytes of Righteousness or Justice had after their Parents were converted to the Jewish Religion The Naturalists have learn'd by diligent enquiry That if a Pearl have a foulness and happen to fall into the Womb of a Dove 1 Pet. ij 2. Albertus lib. de Gemmis Vid. Mr. Carpenter's Anabaptist washt and washt and shrunk in the washing p. 15 16. and continue some time there the Dove will return it fair and clear So Doctrines should be proved in the Womb of the Holy Spirit the true Holy Scripture-Dove which Womb is the sincere Word of Truth the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and if the Doctrine be true Pearl the Holy Spirit will speedily deliver it for such and cleanse it from any Foulness or Impurity it hath contracted in this naughty World This Interpretation is suitable to the Nature of Baptism because it was appointed for all that need it and all should have Baptism that stand in need of Baptismal-Grace and all stand in need of Baptismal-Grace that would be cleansed from Original Pollution and all stand in need of being cleansed from Original Defilement that are Polluted therewith Aequè certa sunt ac evidentia quae ex sacris literis evidenter ac certe deducuntur atque ea quae in illis expressè 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i.e. ad verbum in terminis habentur Ex veronil nisi verum Principia fides vel quae ex iis deducuntur sunt in Scriptura Omnis divina Revelatio est in Scriptura vel directe vel per necessariam inevitabilem consequentiam It is a true Maxim That Matters are alike sure and clear which are assuredly and evidently drawn from Holy Writ as the Matters which are read there in their own proper terms and phrases Or the same Observation may be thus worded Consequences are as true as the Principles they are drawn from if truly and properly deduced The ground of this is as certain as Truth it self From Truth proceeds nothing but what is so if drawn by a right Consequence And another Ground may be because the Consequence so drawn is in a manner as true as the Principle and Truth so drawn is the same with that from whence the Deduction springs and rises Upon this account we observe That the Doctrines of Faith and what is deducible therefrom is contained in Holy Writ And again Every Doctrine that is the Discovery and Birth of Heaven is either expresly or by a needfull and unavoidable Conclusion in Holy Writ And on this account we declare That he who believes a Truth believes all the Deductions that can properly be drawn therefrom CHAP. IV. An Exposition of St. Matth. xxviij 19. Whereby the Sence delivered is further cleared IF Christian Children from the Sence I have delivered of this Text be not as capable of Baptism as the Jewish Children of Circumcision Upon what account arises the Distinction Not from the Nature of Abraham's Covenant for that as to the material part was the same with ours made over to us by the Holy Jesus Nor from the manner of Conveyance for Circumcision did signifie the same thing under the former Dispensation as Baptism under the latter And hereupon seeing the two Covenants were for the Nature of them alike and
words that our Adversaries may see I deal fairly with them He argues from the Coherence and Sense of the 15 16 17 and 33. Verses of Acts 2. and recites Vers 38. And that by you and your Children are meant the same which are mentioned Vers 17. under the term of Sons and Daughters answ To all which I answer This cannot be the Sense so as to exclude Infants from Baptism if they have a Right unto the Covenant which the Holy Scripture seems plainly to assert and hath been sufficiently convincingly and undeniably proved by Learned Men which may supersede any Attempt of mine to evince it or make it plain and evident because it was Repentance and Baptism gave a Title to the Promise and till they did Repent and Believe i. e. Embrace the Holy Gospel they had no Right to the Promise for it is said Repent and be Baptized and you shall receive the Gift of the Holy Ghost But they were to be in Covenant by Repentance or Faith before they enjoyed the Priviledges of the Holy Gospel and until then were in the same Case with them afar off who were not in Covenant and so had no right unto the Promise until they did Repent or Believe But here it may be further objected by the Antipedobaptists An Obj. that the gentile Converts of Cornelius's Family had this Gift of the Holy Ghost antecedent unto Baptism so that that was not necessary unto the Gift Act. 10.44 For it is said While Peter spake these words the Holy Ghost fell upon all them which heard the word i. e. that believed and upon their hearing St. Peter was convinced of the Truth of his Blessed Doctrin and thereupon embraced the Faith of the Holy Jesus and became Christians So that the same Qualification that fitted them for the reception of the Holy Ghost capacitated them for Baptism as appears three Verses after Act. 10.47 Can any forbid Water that these should not be Baptized that have received the Holy Ghost as well as we answ To which I answer Supposing the Promise to relate to the Gift of the Holy Ghost it neither excludes the necessity of Baptism nor Children from coming or being brought to receive the benefit of that Holy Ordinance Vid. ch 8 9. pag. 43. 51. according to the rational and true Exposition we have already given of that Text in this Book to which I refer my Readers But here An Obj. like the monstrous Hydra another Objection springs up and arises It 's true saith the Antipedobaptist tho' we own by the Promise the Gift of the Holy Ghost yet we do not believe that Gift excludes from Baptism but we deny Baptism unto those that are not qualified as those first Converts were i. e. endued with the Gifts and Graces of Repentance and Faith answ This I acknowledge true in those Subjects that are capable of acting those Graces but not necessary in those that have a natural as well as moral incapacity to act those Graces as the Case with Children is because they are in Covenant as hath been already declared and proved And being Baptism is not the Covenant but the Seal of the Covenant he that is in Covenant hath a right to the Seal that ensures the Benefits and Priviledges of the Covenant by the same Rule and Reason as he that is the true Heir unto an Estate hath a Right and Title unto the Instruments that convey that Estate Moreover add to this Children have one of these Graces tho' not the other and if one be sufficient the other is not necessary I mean Faith which in some and a true Sense they may be said to have otherwise the Blessed Jesus would not have cautioned Persons against offending little Ones that believe in him Mat. 18. by whom he meant small Children as I hope we have made sufficiently to appear Vid. ch 7. p. 42 43. And that this was a true Faith we may be assured not only because it was spoke by Truth it self who would not therefore impose upon Mankind but also because Christ is the proper Object of Faith and him the Text expresly tells us they believed in and for Repentance it is not indispensably necessary which I shall thus endeavour to prove I may say of Hatred as is usually said of Love Ignoti nulla Cupido for that which is unknown we have no Desire or Affection So of Hatred the odiousness and deformity of that I am wholly ignorant of I cannot properly be said to hate Now before Hatred there usually preceeds Grief and Sorrow and I cannot be said truly to lament or mourn for a Thing if I understand not any loss or damage I thereby sustain Now to apply this to our present Case there may be a Sin pardoned in some Cases and in some Persons without Repentance as that word imports Grief and Sorrow Detestation and Hatred Dereliction and Forsaking by all this I mean Original Sin of which Infants are guilty as well as the Adult Person by the imputation and transmission of the Protoplast's or first Adam's Guilt Now Children by reason of their Infantile capacity are not allowed the ability of exercising these Passions and cannot be said to be afflicted and grieved to detest and hate to abandon and forsake that which was not their own proper and voluntary Act. So that upon this Account Repentance is not necessary for their state and condition because of their Incapacity to act the proper parts of Repentance and because they lye not under such a Personal Guilt as may be said in a more especial manner to be proper and peculiar to the exercise of some parts of Repentance But for Faith so far as it is necessary that Children in some sense may be said to have it as they have the Benefits of their Parents Faith derived to them But that Faith and Repentance are not always and in all Cases indispensably necessary unto Baptism may appear plainly from the Instance of the Holy Jesus who was Nullius Poenitentiae Debitor in him was no Guilt and so consequently no necessity of Repenting there was was no necessity of Faith in him For of Faith he was the Author and Finisher as the Author of the Epistle to the Hebrews acquaints us Heb. 12.2 and yet he submitted to St. John's Baptism which was in order to Repentance and therefore called the Baptism of Repentance and hereupon it is that Faith and Repentance are not always absolutely and indispensably needful to the being baptized And this may sufficiently solve an Objection lately made to me against Infant Baptism An Obj. by an Antipedobaptist from our excellent Church Catechism who promised me upon conviction to return to our Church which Promise he is obliged in Conscience to perform if he give not a Rational Answer to what I have said and shall offer for the solution of this seeming Difficulty What is required of Persons to be baptized Repentance whereby they forsake
in the least trusting to my self but earnestly begging the Aid of Heaven that the God of Truth would enable me to maintain what was true And this I the rather did because I believed this one of the Doctrins of Faith once delivered to the Saints St. Jude vers 2. St. Jude exhorts Christians earnestly to contend for When the Day was come I waited till about ten or eleven of the Clock before my Antagonist appeared about which hour he came and knock'd at door which when I opened I saw him and a great Crowd I let in as many as my room I intended for our Dispute would hold for so many crowded in There were some scores After I let him in he walked somewhat briskly and with a sort of Smile as if I were to be led in Triumph as the Roman Victors dealt with their conquered Slaves at the end of my Hall attacks me with a Challenge to dispute in the Church I told him there seemed some Vanity in the Request as if he designed Noise more than Argument Whereupon I desired him to look into my Parlor which I told him was large enough for as many as were fit to hear us Beside I told him to dispute in the Church might be accounted a Riot and I asked him if he would secure me from the damage I might sustain by undergoing the Penalty assigned for the Transgression of the Laws Whereto he answered he thought the Act for Liberty of Conscience was my Security To which I replyed though I had the use of my Church for Preaching as he his Meeting-place to Hold-forth in yet I did not believe the Law allowed the Church to be a place for Disputation nor was it fit it should because it was improper where the Holy Gospel of Peace was Preached there Contention or Controversie should be managed However if he would go to my Reverend Diocesan and request his leave upon License from him I would comply After which he walked into my Parlour to enter into Discourse I told him being so many were gathered together we should act with good Intentions designing the People's satisfaction that they might be convinced which of us had Truth on his side being our Principles were diametrically opposite and directly contrary not consulting our Credit as if we contended for Victory more than Truth and being we of the Church of England had the Laws on our side for what we professed and as we thought Truth in Possession he ought by strong Reasons to shew our Title was not Good before he attempted to dis-seize us of the Truth we hoped we justly possessed But before we begun I desired one thing which I thought was reasonable because for the Good of the Auditors and that was I had a License from my Lord Bishop to teach School and on that Account I had an Usher that did write a fair and swift hand and desired he might write the Argumentative part of our Discourse and such Collateral Proofs we urged to strengthen our Arguments and after our Conference was done the Writing might be viewed by such as heard us and they have Liberty to judge which had spoken most Truth and that he might be sure he should not be imposed on I told him the Man that wrote what he spoke should read it and ask him if it were his Words and his Sens or if he could read Written-hand he should read it himself which I had not said but he moved me by asking an impertinent Question before but he answered he would have nothing writ on either side That Proposal being denied I had another to make which was as reasonable viz. That I might propose two or three Cases that should include the greatest part of what was necessary for solving the Doubts and answering the Objections against Infant-Baptism and if he would allow any of his Party to understand the Principles of Antipaedobaptism better than himself I would appeal to him whether they did not or if he thought I imposed too much by such a Proposal for I had resolved before his coming to treat him with civility I would allow him the Liberty I desired to take provided the Questions he should ask were as proper as mine for I am of the Poet's Mind Damus petimusque vicissim The Answer I had was He should not ask me a Question nor should I ask him one upon which I replyed That his coming was to wrangle â—ot dispute and I was sorry the People were so disappointed however I was willing they should hear what he had to say on which I desired him to begin but I perceived which he ought not to have done for a Reason I have hinted he expected I should begin whereupon I did But before I give an Account of what was said I will give you the three Cases propounded for a resolution of The Antipaedobaptists Object An Obj. Baptism is only to be administred to the Adult and those of years of Discretion For the making out of which in Answer to what is objected it is desired these things appear If Children are to be Baptized answ 1 then it seems necessary there should be an express place of Holy Scripture to enjoyn it though the former part of the Proposition be allowed yet the Consequence follows not and therefore is desired to be proved If a Party be admitted into Covenant answ 2 then it seemeth needful the Party should understand the Articles of the Covenant he is admitted to but in some Cases this is as inconsequent as the former and therefore it is desired that the Consequence of this Hypothetic or Conditional Proposition be evinced or made out to be universally true in all Cases and in all Times answ 3 If there was an express place of Holy Scripture for the Circumcising of Children under the Law then it seems reasonable there should be an express place of Holy Scripture for Baptizing Children under the Blessed Gospel and this likewise is desired to be made evident and because according to the Logicians Rule Affirmanti incumbit probatio The Proof lies on his side that Asserts and the Antipaedobaptists do affirm these things it is desired they make proof or else they have no Reason to expect we should entertain a Belief of them And now being I was engaged to begin I will give as true an Account as I can of what I offered and he answered I told him I thought it as reasonable Children should be admitted into Covenant under the Holy Gospel as under the Law there being nothing more in the Holy Gospel-Covenant to debar them an admission thereto than there was in that under the Law besides it adds strength to the Argument if we consider that the Covenant made with Abraham and the Holy Gospel Covenant are for substance one and the same as St. Paul tells us expressly Gal. iii. 8. and as we have made appear in the Book Vid. p. 97 98. of this Book and certainly the Holy Apostle
understood the Nature and Difference of Covenants better I believe than any Antipaedobaptist in England To all which he made no return but after some Pause and an Harangue to the People he told me he would not be satisfied unless I brought him an Example out of the Holy Scriptures of the New Testament for any Child being Baptized or a Command for his admission into Covenant that way To which I urged the probability of Children being Baptized Acts xvi 15.33 when it is said That Lydia was Baptized and her Houshold and of the Jaylor That he was Baptized and all his straitway 1 Cor. 1.16 and when St. Paul saith I Baptized also the Houshold of Stephanas and to speak ingenuously the only thing considerable he said was the proving the probability there were no Children in those Families I am very sorry I have forgot what he said but if I could remember it I would do him that Justice as to relate it for I would pay my Adversary that respect as to declare all the Truth and Reason of him that his Cause will bear or that he can with good ground desire but that which is but probably true may notwithstanding be false However that I may allow my Adversary all he can reasonably ask supposing there were no Children in those Houses mentioned Dato sed non concesso disputandi gratia Allowing but not granting it as we say sometimes in the Schools for disputation-sake yet the Argument is not weakned because the Holy Apostle spoke those Words not with the consideration of there being Children in those Families but in allusion to known Customs among the Jews in their receiving Proselytes of Righteousness as we have made appear in the Book Afterwards he urged the necessity of a direct Command in the Holy Scriptures of the New Testament In totidem verbis for the Baptizing Children in so many Words whereupon I asked him If he believed such a Command necessary to which he replyed He did I returned upon him I thought it was undecent if not absurd so positively to assert a thing necessary and offer no Reason beside I said if he would give a Reason why he believed it necessary I would do that which by Rules of Disputation he could not oblige me to for no Man is bound to prove a Negative viz. prove it not necessary Hereupon he made a longer Pause than before and after he recovered himself made so long an Harange to those present I was forced to pull him by the Sleeve and desire him not to make my House a Meeting-place and assume or take so much Considence as to instruct my People unless he thought me not able for such an Employment which if he did I desired him to make proof and when he had done to make his complaint to my Reverend Diocesan Upon which with a sort of flattering smile he complemented me and told me he thought me able for my Office and said he and I might agree well in all points but one viz. Infant Baptism for he heard I was an Arminian and so was he Whereupon I told him I somewhat doubted whether he understood the Quinquarticular Controversie managed at the Synod of Dort and knew what an Arminian was but whether he did or no was not material now but I acquainted him I desired not to pass under any Character but that of a Christian nay that Honourable Name for the best things may be abused in some Cases and Circumstances if I understand St. Paul right where it is used for a Faction in opposition to Christian Peace is blame worthy Now this I say that every one of you saith I am of Paul and I of Apollos and I of Cephas 1 Cor. 1.12 13. and I of Christ Is Christ divided was Paul Crucified for you or were you Baptized in the Name of Paul So that there were four Parties in the Church of Corinth And therefore did I affect to be called by a Name that should preserve Universal Charity I would espouse that of a Reformed Catholique without renouncing the Name Christian And then I offered a Reason why there was no necessity for an express Text of Holy Scripture in the New Testament for the Baptizing Infants because it was so long known in the Jewish Church before our Blessed Saviour's days and as he took the other Sacrament from the Jews Post-coenium or After-Supper so he took this from their way of admitting Proselytes of Righteousness before they Circumcised them And why should we not for the same Reason debar Women from the Lord's Supper as Children from being admitted by Baptism into the Covenant seeing there is no more Command for one than for the other So that Christ's not saying whether Children were admitted to Baptism is so far from being a cogent Proof that weighing the former Jewish Customs it is the strongest Motive to believe it But still notwithstanding all I said to shew the absurdity of his Request and the Arguments I offered to signifie the unreasonableness of such a Demand without answering one of my Reasons my Adversary importuned me for an express place of Holy Scripture in the New Testament for the Baptizing Children whereupon I asked him if I brought a place of Holy Scripture whose Sence could have no other tolerable meaning but the allowance of Infants to be Baptized it were not the same as if I brought express Words for Baptizing Children which he yielded Upon which it pleased God as if he would assist the defence of his Divine Truth for I thought not on it before this I own because I am not willing to ascribe any thing to my self to suggest to my Mind that place of St. Paul For the unbelieving Husband is sanctified by the Wife 1 Cor. VII 14. and the unbelieving Wife is sanctified by the Husband else were your Children unclean but now are they Holy Where Interpreters understand by the unbelieving Husband or Wife an Infidel and by the Wife or Husband that sanctifies a Christian from whence I drew this Argument That if Children as soon as born had a right to the Covenant by the Parents Faith where but one of the Parents is a Christian then Baptism being the Sign of the Covenant and not the Covenant as the Antipaedobaptists own It follows by the Argument à Majori ad Minus from the greater to the less if the Child when born hath a right to the Covenant he hath a right to the Sign Omne majus includit in se minus for according to the Logical Maxim The greater includes the less and he that should deny this would be as absurd as he that should say he that receiveth Ten Pounds receives not Five And then I told him there were but two sorts of Holiness with reference to Men though there may be a Relative Holiness with respect to things a Personal and a Foederal Holiness at which he stared on me as if he understood me not on which I
lay out such a Temptation there being none but he and I and therefore I desired he would allow me to propose something calmly to him which since resulted to my thoughts for I was willing to be his Proselyte if he could convince me to be in an Error and as willing he should be my Proselyte if I could prove him in a Mistake For though I loved the Church of England well yet I loved Truth better and if he could evince or prove she had not Truth on her side I would forsake her but I could have no Answer for he diverted to other discourse and said we had spoke enough on the Argument He hath since been with me and desired a Dispute in the Church I told him I would meet him in any Church if he would submit to two Conditions which I thought reasonable the one was That he would get my Reverend Diocesan's leave or secure me from any Penalty the Bishop or the Law might lay on me The other was That he would be at the Charge to hire an Amanuensis to write down the Argumentativ part of his Discours and I would be at as great a Charge to hire one that should write down what I offered and then at the end of our Conference the Papers should be exposed to the consideration of the most Judicious Auditors to examine which spoke most according to the true Sens of Holy Scripture or the dictates of right Reason but this offer he refused and said he would have nothing writ on either side And the cause why I would engage him thereto was because it would be a kindness in that it would be a great Caution we should speak properly and would oblige us to circumspection and care from the consideration and fear of that shame and reproach we should be exposed to by delivering our selves inconsistently and incoherently and it would be a satisfaction to the People because then we should use our endeavours to speak Truth and to confirm it by Reason which if we did it might have a good effect on the People that heard it to understand who spoke most properly according to the sense of Holy Scripture and so consequently who had the clearest Truth on his side but no Argument would prevail with him to submit to such reasonable terms and then I told him I would allow him to tell I refused to accept his Challenge But then I desired him to tell on what terms I denied to comply or if not I should take care to do it and then he would have cause not to be satisfied with but ashamed of the Report When he was with me on New-years-day 1688. I told him I understood that was the first day he Held-forth in his Meeting-place and I supposed he spoke against our Principles and truly the Festival engaged me to say something in defence of our declared Doctrines I said I doubted he trusted to such an Extemporary Effusion and such an extraordinary Measure of the Holy Spirit that I thought he could give little Account of what he said after he concluded but I told him I hoped I trusted as much to the Holy Spirit as he in a rational way for I studied for what I delivered and then I implored the Divine Blessing on what I studied which I thought as much as I ought to trust to for I believe since the Miraculous Aids of the Holy Ghost are ceased the Divine Spirit doth afford his Blessing in the use of means and not in an extraordinary manner and then I read what I spoke in reference to Infant-Baptism which I desired him to censure as severely as he pleased provided he would give me a Reason The Account whereof is as followeth Preaching that day on the Institution of Circumcision from Gen. XVII 9.15 I made this Observation That Heathen Proselytes and their Infants were made Partakers of God's Covenant whence I thus argued in the General for Infant-Baptism If this be understood it will afford a strong though not usually brought-Argument for Baptizing of Infants For if this be true as may be made appear by Jewish Customs it is plain not being of the Seed of Abraham but being of the Faith of Abraham gave a Person a right to the Covenant and to the Sign of it Circumcision or else no Proselytes could be made from Heathenism and so admitted into Covenant by that Sign and then by Parity of Reason the Faith of the Christian Parent shall be imputed to the Child And if the Faith of the Parent gives a Title to the Covenant or being a Christian Baptism like Circumcision being only the Sign of the Covenant by Parity of Reason the Faith of the Parent as I have hinted gives a right to the Sign because the Sign is less than the Privilege Besides there is no being a Disciple of Christ without being Baptized into his Blessed Name that being the Sign of the Holy Gospel Covenant and made as necessary as Circumcision which was the Sign of the Covenant under the Law not that I would be so uncharitable as to Damn all that die unbaptized because it is here as in Circumcision the Infant can be in no fault as not being capable of Obedience to the Command or transgressing the Law by contempt and so cannot be said to break the Covenant that doth nothing belonging to the keeping it and though the Child did not Ezod IV. 24. yet Moses the Father of the Child went in danger of his Life whom the Lord met by the way in the Inn and sought to kill which if duly considered might make all Christian Parents that neglect the bringing their Children timely to Baptism tremble for fear of some severe punishment falling on themselves which may be one reason why our excellent Church declares in the Rubrick of Private Baptism and enjoyns the Pastors and Curates of every Parish oft to admonish the People that they deferr not the Baptism of their Children longer than the first or second Sunday or other Holyday next after the Child be born Vnless on a great and reasonable Cause declared to the Curate and to be by him approved Moreover if there be no enjoying the Benefits of the Covenant without the Sign this makes the Sign necessary and the wilful neglect of necessary means endangers any Person 's Salvation without the Interposition of an extraordinary Mercy and that which is above or beyond means is ever miraculous And if such a miraculous proportion of Mercy were indulged as oft as such a wilful neglect gave occasion it would cease to be miraculous because a Miracle is not only an extraordinary act of Power but a rare contingency and therefore cannot oft happen otherwise the Sun 's daily motion about the Earth would be as great if not a greater Miracle than it s once * Josh X. 12 13. 2 Kin. XX. 9 10 11. standing still or once Retrograde Motion Lastly let it be considered that our Adversaries think Christian Instruction necessary before the
admission of the Party to Baptism and we think it necessary afterward supposing the Party liveth to years of discretion and if not we have more reason to rely on an extraordinary act of Mercy that have given the Sign and all the Party is at present capable of and being also what the Party was commanded to submit to under a previous dispensation and which was never prohibited and also such an one as was Typical of the Dispensation we are under than they have to depend on a miraculous proportion of Mercy who will not use what the Child is capable of nor give it that Sign to which the Benefits of the Covenant are annexed An Apostrophe to unbaptized Children and without which they are not to be enjoyed Alas poor helpless Children that their Parents should be so unmerciful as not to allow them as much Pity as God vouchsafeth Mercy and refuse that Sign of the Covenant God hath appointed as the only conveyance of the Advantages thereof and deny them those means God hath instituted as the Title to make over the Blessings of Heaven and convey that Happiness that is only to be enjoyed in the Mansions of Glory above A great part if not most of this hath been urged in a Conference for the establishing this considerable because comfortable Truth the necessity of Baptizing Infants which if it had been weighed and the force of its Reason examined as the importance of the matter required there had been no cause for that which I have been more than once told of I mean unreasonable because undecent singing Io Paans and making boasting Triumphs before the Victory by Men that had rather serve a Faction and an Interest than promote that Religion that is tru because rational and love their Reputation more than their Conscience and value their Credit and Honour more than the Truth in Sincerity or to use an Holy Scripture Phrase and an Expression by them much delighted in and as much abused and wrested to the deceiving the unthinking many The Truth as it is in Jesus This I read and asked what he had to say He gave me no other Answer than this that he thought I was a Man understood my Principles I thanked him for his Candor and told him I was not fit to be a Public Instructor if I did not And then I added I would make some Enlargements to the Paper I shewed him and would print it if he would give me a Civil and Rational Answer To which he returned I might do as I pleased but he would have nothing to do with me in Print because as he said I understood my Principles which was an Intimation he would have nothing to do with any in Print but such as he thought he could confute But to do Justice When I read the Paper I told him of the Boastings I heard he made of the Victory he had obtained He assured me he had not said any such thing but pretended a respect for me Yet I have reason to suspect he might under-hand encourage such Reports for I am inclined to believe he is not a Man of that Perfection but he may be tempted to and without breach of Charity I may suppose him sometimes to entertain with a sort of Pleasure some little Titillations of the Animal Life to use the Platonic Phrase which the best Men may be too propens to if what I have heard be true for I was told by a Neighbour-Minister that one in his Parish who was an Antipaedobaptist told him he had an excellent Gift of Praying And he hoped to have an excellent Gift of Preaching Whereupon he asked if he had heard of me and the Conference I had with their great Man and reputed Bishop He answered yes and said I was a Man of great Noise but little Sens I am content for once that pert Fellow should make a Trial of Skill on me and employ his little Learning and Art about me and if he can prove his Charge I will be satisfied patiently to bear the reproachful Accusation He added Their Goliah their great Champion had so baffled me that I had not the Courage to appear before him But I will entertain such candid Thoughts of Mr. M. C. as to believe he will not give so mean a Character of me as this Thrasonic Fellow hath However I was a little after at a Market-Town where I heard he was and when I found him I told him I would give him any thing the House afforded for I had a Mind to acquaint him what his wise Admirer said of him and me if he would be so kind as to allow me a little Discours with him but he answered he could not then spare time Thus I have given as tru and fair an Account as possibly I could of the Conference as my Memory would serve to relate of what was done some Years ago If any ask why I did not publish it sooner the Reason is because I was willing to preach it to my People before I published it And that I did not nor could do it till this Summer there were some Reasons I think not necessary to publish I find a Poet tells of an Author who was so exact in the composing a piece of Work that he was nine Years before he published it Nonumque prematur in Annum Horat. I must confess I was not so exact as to spend half the time in the composure of this Treatise tho' it hath not appeared till now I have endeavoured to treat my Adversary with Respect for I had much rather persuade and convince the Judgment by Arguments of Reason than exasperate an angry Humour or raise a Passion by a petulant Expression If any of the Advers Party shall judge themselves obliged in vindication of a weak and almost baffled Cause to make a Return If they will do it candidly and ingenuously like Scholars or Gentlemen they shall be entertained with the same Civility in my Reply But if they shall answer with Noise and Nonsense impertinently or in a Burlesque way I acquaint them I affect not Domitian's Employment and time doth not so hang on my Hands that I have any to expend in catching Flies and I had rather bear with their buzzing than be so diverted from Business And truly I was willing to treat my Adversaries kindly and manage this Controversie with Plainness for the Reasons the learned Mr. Walker gives Vide Mr. Walker 's excellent Preface to his modest Plea for Infant-Baptism to whom I refer my Readers And as I have not committed any voluntary Error in this Relation so I have taken Care in the Book it self to write with so much Plainness that if perchance I have used a difficult Term I have adjoined a Synonymous Word to explain my meaning And because some of my People have desired I would print all I preached on the Subject of Infant Baptism I will here transcribe one or two Papers which I used before I came to
circumcised becometh a Debtor to keep the whole Law which the Jewish Children were as uncapable of keeping as Christian Children are of the Holy Gospel and so the Objection lieth as strong against Circumcising as Baptizing Children And it is reasonable according to the Laws of Men too For it is well known to all Lawyers that it is a common thing to admit a Child to an Estate by Guardians and Tutors under several Conditions which the Child cannot undertake the Performance of till he come to that Age wherein he can exercise his Reason And is it not full as reasonable to admit Children on certain Terms to an Holy Gospel Estate as to a secular one on Conditions they are uncapable of executing And thus we have the Laws of Heaven and Men too against our Adversaries Nay we have three strong Weapons to defend the Truth if we know but how to wield and manage them 1. The Holy Scripture which is the Sword of the Spirit 2. Reason which I may call the Sword of Nature 3. The Law which I may name the Military Sword And being thus secured with spiritual natural and material Armour we may be so courageous as not to fear the most violent Attempts that shall be made against us and may believ according to an Holy Scripture Phrase very proper to our Case that against Truth and us too while we hold the Truth and stick to sound Principles no Weapon formed shall prosper or have its intended effect and when I had delivered these three Accounts from the Pulpit in defence of Infant-Baptism I was thinking that if I could make the Sense of this last Text viz. St. Matth. XXVIII 19. Go teach all Nations baptizing them I say if I could prove those Words to be not only not for the Antipaedobaptists but against them and for us I did believe I should say all was sufficient to prove its Lawfulness from Holy Scripture And meditating one Morning I employed my Thoughts to give the Words such a Sens and to justifie it when I had done And in order thereto I did humbly and fervently implore the Divine Assistance and God who is never wanting to help them who with Humility and Faith address themselves to him suggested this Account of the Text to my Mind that I have offered in the following Papers which when I had composed I penn'd down because I was not willing to forget what my Thoughts had delivered as the proper meaning of the Text according to my Judgment and I made use of no Book but the Greek Testament to satisfie my self in the Account the Original giveth of Acts II. 39. which with 1 Cor. VII 14. I made use of as collateral Proofs to confirm the Sens given For I did believ the comparing of one Place of Holy Scripture with another one of the best ways of coming to its tru Meaning which when I had drawn out it made about two Sheets of Paper which was all at first I did design to print But the Occasion of enlarging it was this A Neighbour-Clergy-man with whom I discoursed about the Sens given of St. Mat. XXVIII 19. and the Confirmation I brought from those two other Places of Holy Scripture beforementioned acquainted me he had a Book of an ingenious Antipaedobaptist that did seem to invalidate any Proof for Infant-Baptism from those two Texts which I desired to read and he lent me When I came home I did without prejudice peruse what he had wrote and at the first sight I was somewhat surprized but on consideration and retiring into my self I did find his Arguments against the Sens I offered were but weak as I hope will appear to any impartial Reader by the Answer I have given After I had done this I resolved to use all Means I could think of or remember to establish the Sens I had given of the Text and accordingly read over some useful Treatises upon the Subject and because as Pliny somewhere saith Ingenuum est profiteri per quos profeceris Plinius An ingenious thing it is to own by whom we have profited I will give an Account to whom I am obliged and more particularly I stand engaged to the reverend Dr. Hammond in his Resolution of Six Queries one whereof is about Infant-Baptism the other is the Excellent Author of the Case of Infant-Baptism Which was one of those cases the Reverend Lord Bishop of London did out of a pious and excellent Design engage his City Clergy to state and resolve for the satisfaction of Dissenters and to reduce them to the Church of England As for Dr. Hammond I have used his words in a manner and for the other I have in most if not in all places altered his words and taken his sens that I might adapt it to my own style that the Work might look the more alike and seemingly appear all of a piece Something I have borrowed from Mr. Ellis in his Book called Pastor and Clerk or a Debate real concerning Infant Baptism As to the Authorities I have used to confirm the sens delivered I have not taken things on Trust but perused and examined good Editions of the Original Authors and have been careful neither to mis-report their words nor misrepresent their sens and having made this Ingenuous Acknowledgment I cannot be accused of Plagiarism because I give my Authors all the Reputation they can desire by owning what I have taken And now I hope I may without any conceitedness say I have used all the proper Methods for reducing Gainsayers into the Paths of Truth and Peace For besides three Rational Arguments for Infant-Baptism I have endeavoured to prove it from that place of Holy Scripture the Adversaries think against it and to engage the belief of the most avers and pre-possessed I have offered all the proper methods of Conviction 1. I have given a clear Exposition to confirm the meaning 2. I have much enlarged that Exposition 3. I have proved the Sens by the Coherence 4. I have confirmed the meaning by the Original for in some places of Holy Scripture no Translation cometh up exactly to the Original for in every Language there are some peculiar Idioms that cannot well be translated into another Tongue 5. I have strengthened the Sens by two other places of Holy Scripture for the Holy Spirit by comparing one place with another doth best interpret his meaning 6. I have given some general Observations to establish the Sens of the three Texts delivered 7. I have defended the Exposition given by an Allusion to Jewish Customs without which Account it is impossible to come to an understanding of some places of Holy Scripture in the New Testament 8. I have confirmed what I have offered as the sens of the three places of Holy Scripture from the Authority of some of the Ancient Fathers who living nearest the times of the Holy Apostles may reasonably be presumed best to know the sens of their Writings and I could have produced more in
defence of Infant-Baptism but I was not willing to stuff my Book with Quotations from the Ancients but only thought good to use those that might establish the meaning of these Texts I quoted 9. I have endeavoured to Answer three strong Objections of the Antipaedobaptists against the sens delivered After I had done I shew'd it to some of the Clergy in the Country and I was told by one it had been done in part this way by others I said possibly it might so but I had never seen it in any Book or Author I speak not this to put any value on or assume or take any thing to my self but only to own a Gracious Return to my importunate Prayers while I was employed in the Investigation and Search after Divine Truth and to implore his Blessing that it might have that good effect I sincerely designed in the composure of it Non nobis Domine non nobis sed Nomini tuo sit Gloria And if it shall work a Conviction on any that have erred from the way of Truth I will say in the Words of the Royal Prophet Not unto us O Lord not unto us but unto thy Holy Name be the sole Praise Honour and Glory given and ascribed And indeed it is almost morally impossible for a Wise Man to be Proud if he duly consider what St. Paul saith Who maketh thee to differ from another And what hast thou 2 Cor. IV. 7. that thou didst not receive Now if thou didst receive it Why dost thou Glory as if thou hadst not received it I have so far consulted the satisfaction of the Vulgar Readers that I have placed almost all my Quotations in the Margin except where I had occasion to give an Account of the Original as to St. Matth. XXVIII 19. and Act. II. 39. which I could not well do and if the candid Reader shall skip those two Chapters and what I could not well put into the Margin I hope the unprejudiced Person may receive satisfaction from the rest of the Book And that the meanest Capacity may understand the strength of my Argument and the sens of what I have wrote where I have used any Greek or Latin I have set in the Book and could not place in the Margin I have put it between these two Marks and made the Sens entire without the understanding or reading what is so written Nay some of the Antipaedobaptists are desirous to adorn their Books with the Authorities of Learned Men and to make use of Tradition if it be of their side In truth it is usually seen that hardly any oppose Tradition but those that suppose it is not of their side or cast off Authority but such as believ it against them And I suppose for this Reason Colonel Danvers a great Patron of and Advocate for their Cause and a Principal Head of their Party hath flourished his Book with many Quotations of the Authorities of the Ancients But I doubt not if his Book be examined it will appear he hath either mis-quoted his Authors or mis-represented their Sens and this the Learned Mr. Mr. Walker 's Modest Plea for Infant Baptism Prope finem Walker hath in part already evidenced in the Postscript to his excellent Book and in particular tells us that St. Cyprian's Epistle to Fidus hath not yet been demonstrated to be illegitimate and saith that this Author even Mr. Danvers owns not it is yet made out no not so much as by Monsieur Daillé who hath given the World the greatest discovery of that kind and we have good reason to believ it to be genuine and good ground we have for such a Belief seeing it is allowed by Two Learned Doctors of the Church St. Augustine and St. Hierome as Mr. Walker hath evidenced towards the end of his Book by two Quotations from them to which I referr my Readers And truly I have been told by some of the Learned that some worthy Persons of our excellent Church have challenged the Antipaedobaptists to stand to the Tryal of Antiquity and to appear for their Principles no farther than such Authority will allow but I have heard they have refused to submit to such a Test and pretend they will not be convinced by any other Arguments how strong soever they may not only appear but really be than the plain Words or literal Expressions of Holy Scripture or its direct Sens and the making out the Truth by this way is the hearty Endeavour and sincere Design of this Book and how far it is done according to such a Rule is submitted to the Judgment of the candid and judicious Readers And now on the whole matter I hope I may venture to say if I have given the true sens of Christ's Commission to this Blessed Disciples for the Administration of this Holy Sacrament of Baptism and confirmed it by proper Proofs and answered the strongest Objections brought by the Adversaries against the sens delivered in defence of the Orthodox and Christian Doctrin of Infant-Baptism than he who resists such Evidence renounceth his Belief of the Sacred Scriptures the Revelation of the Holy Will of Heaven and forfeits his Title to the honourable Profession of Christianity And truly the Learned and Judicious Mr. Walker hath given the World such a rational Discours in defence of this Principle in his Modest Plea for Infant Baptism and hath proved by such strong Arguments the Infants Need for it Idem Ibidem In the Title Page Benefits by it Capableness of it and Right to it that whosoever will not believ the comfortable and Christian Doctrin of Infant-Baptism upon the Testimony he bringeth for its proof renounceth his Title to Reason and forfeits his right to the Noble Estate of Humanity and with Nebuchadnezar degenerateth into the Nature of a Beast Dan. IV. 32 33. Nay I think I may without too much boldness say Mr. Walker hath so undeniably proved their Claim and Title to it that in a Spiritual and Evangelic Sens he makes it Sacriledg and in a Temporal and Legal one Robbery to debar them of admission to it all or a great part of which hath been made manifest and apparent consequentially and implicitly from the method we have pitched on and the Arguments we have made use of so that there is no need of borrowing any thing from him he having done it in his way so plainly and fully But they that would have a more particular Account than I have thought fit to give may have plenary and full satisfaction from his excellent Book before-mentioned to which I referr them I have endeavoured to answer all the Objections that I ever heard of or read in any of their Books that were started by the Antipaeaobaptists that were material and I know not any I have passed by unanswered for their difficulty but may have omitted some that were so triffling they either needed not or deserved not any Answer As for that Objection of the Antipadobaptists
of its being administred to Infants never once questioned the Unlawfulness of it never urged it is a plain Case that those Times had no such Thoughts of Infant-Baptism as the Antipaedobaptists in our Days entertain For had they thought Baptizing Infants unlawful for want of an Holy Scripture Command or Example when any Persons had been exhorted to an early Baptizing their Children how easie an Answer had been at hand The Holy Jesus never commanded such a thing as Infant-Baptism the Blessed Apostles never practised such a thing as the Baptizing Infants There is neither Precept nor Example in Holy Scripture and therefore it is unlawful and we dare not do it But in regard there is in all those times not the least appearance of any such Objection or of any such Plea pretended for the delay it is evident they thought there was either Precept or Example in Holy Scripture or both or else that the want of either or both did not make it unlawful and so did not delay it on the Account of the Unlawfulness thereof And so all our Antipaedobaptists boasting of Antiquity for the Baptizing only Adult Believing Persons and against the Baptizing Believers Infant-Children affords them little Boast there is not the least strength added to their Cause nor weakness brought on ours I heartily wish those ignorant People that are deluded and cozened with the great Noise and gay Shew of Antiquity to take notice hereof that they be no longer deceived and imposed And now this grand prejudice is as I hope fully removed and all Objections I can imagine any way considerable have been endeavoured to be rationally and clearly answered in the following Book I shall now heartily desire my Readers to join with me in the pious and devout Suffrage of our excellent Liturgy in the Office of the Litany That iâ— may please thee to bring into the way of Truth all such as have erred and are deceived We beseech thee to hear us Good Lord. And now as I begun this large Preface with some of the Sens of a Learned Bishop of our Church in some of his Prefaces to his Books so I will conclude this large Account not only with some of the Sens but in the Words of the same Reverend Bishop I mean the Lord-Bishop of Ely In short then to shut up all if it had not been to fill up some vacant Pages and to be just to the performance of the Promise I made in the Title-Page of giving a Relation so far as my Memory would serve of a Conference publicly held with an Antipaedobaptist of no small Fame I had made almost as short a Preface as those Words of the Son of Syrach according to which I expect the Success of my Labour Ecclus XXI 15. If a skilful Mad hear a wise Word he will commend it and add to it But as soon as one of no Vnderstanding heareth it it displeaseth him and he casteth it behind his Back Examine all things and judge righteous Judgment July 26. 1692. A TABLE OF THE CONTENTS CHAP. I. AN Introduction unto the Subject discoursed upon Pag. 1 CHAP. II. Some Rational Arguments offered for Infant-Baptism Pag. 2 CHAP. III. The tru Sens of the Holy Jesus 's Commission unto his Blessed Disciples for the Administration of Baptism recorded St. Matth XXVIII 19. maketh for the Baptizing of Infants Pag. 4 CHAP. IV. An Exposition whereby the Sens delivered of St. Matth. XXVIII 19. is farther cleared Pag. 12 CHAP. V. The Exposition for clearing the Sens of St. Matth. XXVIII 19. farther enlarged Pag. 26 CHAP. VI. The Sens of St. Matth. XXVIII 19. proved by the Coherance and Connexion of the Words Pag. 38 CHAP. VII The Sens of St. Matth. XXVIII 19. farther evidenced from the Original Pag. 40 CHAP. VIII The Sens of St. Matth. XXVIII 19. confirmed by an Exposition of Acts II. 39. in general Pag. 48 CHAP. IX A farther Confirmation by a particular Exposition of Acts II. 39. Pag. 53 CHAP. X. The Sens of St. Matth. XXVIII 19. strengthened by an Exposition of 1 Cor. VII 14. Pag. 57 CHAP. XI Some General Observations upon the Sens and Expositions given Pag. 62 CHAP. XII A defence of the Expositions delivered from Jewish Customs Pag. 68 CHAP. XIII Authorities of the Ancient Fathers to establish the Sens of the Three Texts of Holy Scripture Pag. 72 CHAP. XIV The just Complaint of the Jews if this Doctrin be not tru Pag. 76 CHAP. XV. An Answer unto an Objection that would overthrow the Sens given of St. Matthew XXVIII 19. Pag. 79 CHAP. XVI An Answer unto an Objection that would undermine the Sens offered for Acts II. 39. Pag. 91 CHAP. XVII An Answer unto an Objection that would overturn the Sens delivered of 1 Cor. VII 14. Pag. 125 CHAP. XVIII An Account whence Infant-Baptism results Pag. 137 CHAP. XIX An Appeal unto the Reason of Mankind Pag. 140 CHAP. XX. The Conclusion Pag. 142 A Prayer used at the end of these Dicourses by way of Humble and Importunate Address unto the God of Truth sitting upon his Throne of Grace his Mercy-Seat the true Scheinah or Symbol of his Divine Presence to implore the Descent of the Heavenly Blessing upon this charitable and well-intended Design Pag. 145 CHAP. I. An Introduction to the Subject discoursed upon SEeing some Men of ill Principles and Separatists from our excellent Church have with an evil design set up a Meeting in this Parish as we may reasonably conjecture without breach of Charity I think it my most indispensible Duty to confirm and settle you in those necessary and fundamental Truths our Church holds by the clear Testimony of Holy Scripture and the evident Dictates of Reason that you may not be seduced into dangerous Errors by weak or cunning Men that lie in wait to deceive I have formerly made appear I hope to the satisfaction of unprejudiced because dis-interested Persons that the Place of Holy Scripture the Enemies of Infant-Baptism so much insist upon and boast of viz. St. Matth. xxviij 19. Go teach all Nations baptizing them is no more against the Comfortable and Christian Doctrine of Infant-Baptism than Gen. 1.1 In the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth And now I will endeavour to prove That that Place of Holy Scripture if rightly understood is not only not against us but for us and against them And this I will attempt to evince and make appear by the Evidence of Reason and the Testimony of Divine Revelation CHAP. II. Some Rational Arguments for Infant-Baptism THE Argument I offer in short is plainly this which I will reduce into the form of a plain and proper Syllogism That Principle which hinders the Propagation of Christian Religion can be no Christian Doctrine But the denying Baptism to Infants hinders the Progress of the Christian Religion Therefore such a Principle can be no Christian Doctrine The Major all Christians even our Adversaries allow but the making out the Minor is the Difficulty for which