find also the wise Salomon to affirme that Gods words will make a man vnderstand righteousnes and iudgement and equitie and euery good path I find likewise in Saint Luke and other Euangelists Luke 1. vers 4. These things are written that we might haue the certaintie of that whereof we are instructed and that we might beleeue in Iesus and in beleeuing haue life eternall through his name I find further that Christ saith Search the Scriptures Ioh. 20. vers 31. for in them yee thinke to haue eternall life and they are they which testifie of mee as also in another place When one asked Christ what he might do to be saued Luk. 10. vers 26. he referreth him to the Scriptures for his direction saying What is written in the Law So did Abraham answere the rich Glutton They haue Moses and the Prophets Luke 16.29 I find also Saint Paul free from all exception herein saying The Scriptures are able to make vs wise to saluation 2. Tim. 3. vers 15. Vers 16. Vers 17. through the faith that is in Christ Iesus and are profitable to teach to improue to conuert to instruct in righteousnesse that the man of God may be absolute and perfect to euery good worke And in another place we may not presume aboue that which is written I find likewise Saint Peter to accord with Saint Paul 2. Pet. 1.19 when hee saith Wee haue a more sure word of the Prophets whererunto wee cannot take heed as vnto a light that shineth in a darke place till the day dawne and till the day-starre arise in our hearts Many more proofes would the canonicall Scriptures afford to the same effect therefore since by the premised places of Scripture I see that he that speaketh not according to the word of God hath no light in him since the Scriptures can make vs know righteousnesse iudgement equitie and euery good path since they were written that we might haue certainty in that we are instructed in and beleeuing haue life eternall since we are sent to the Scriptures by Christ since they are able to make vs wise to saluation since they are profitable to make vs perfect to euery good worke since it is presumption to go aboue that which is written since the Prophets be our light in darknesse what better rule can we haue of our faith what can excuse any mans ignorance that knoweth this or what an obstinate wilfulnesse were it for me that knowing these testimonies of Scripture shall not beleeue them or why should I not thinke that the Church of England hath not the best reed or mete-wand to measure the truth of her doctrine by when she teacheth Juel Apol. part 2. cap. 9. diuis 1. That the Scripture comprehended in the canonicall bookes of the old and new Testament is the rule of faith so farre that whatsoeuer is not read therein or cannot be proued thereby is not to be accepted as any point of faith or needfull to be followed 4 Which doctrine cannot be shaken or ouerthrowne By proofes of Fathers if we esteeme the authoritie of the learned who do most plentifully giue witnesse and vnanswerable proofes for the same S. Basil who liued in the fourth centurie after Christ saith Let the holy Scriptures be arbitrators betweene vs Basil opist 80. ad Eustac medicum pag. 334. and whosoeuer hold opinions consonant to those heauenly oracles let the truth be adiudged on their side And Optatus disputing against a Donatist presseth him thus Contra Parmem lib. 5. pag 393. We are saith he to equire out some to be iudges betweene vs in these controuersies The Christians cannot because both sides cannot yeeld them and by parts taking the truth shall be hindered The Iudge must be had from without our selues If a Pagan he knowes not the mysteries of Christianitie if a Iew he is an enemie to Baptisme therefore vpon the earth no iudgement concerning this matter can bee found the Iudge must be had from heauen but to what end should we kocke at heauen when heere we haue one in the Gospell Heere we see Saint Basil appeales for iudgement to the Scriptures and so Optatus likewise to the Gospell no acknowledgement here of other arbitrement vpon earth What shall I speake of Tertullion who is most plaine for me Tertul. contra Hermog calling the Scriptures the rule of faith The golden-mouthed Chrysostome will not heere forsake me who termeth the Scriptures Chrysost hom 13. in 2. Cor. Hom. 3. de Laz. A most exquisite rule and exact squier and ballance to trie all things by And also in another place saith God hath left vs the Scriptures more firme then any miracle And vpon the Acts of the Apostles discourseth very fitly to this purpose Chrysost hom 33. in Act. A Gentile saith hee commeth and saith I would bee a Christian but I know not which side to cleaue vnto many dissensions are among you and I cannot tell which opinion to hold euery one saith I speake the truth and the Scriptures on both sides are pretended so that I know not whom to beleeue to this Chrysostome replieth Truly saith he this maketh much for vs for well might you be troubled if we should say we relie vpon reason but seeing we take the Scriptures which are so true and plaine it will be an easie matter for you to iudge And tel me now hast thou any wit or iudgement Note this for it is not the part of a man barely to receiue whatsoeuer he heareth but if thou marke the meaning thou mayest throughly know that which is good when thou buyest a garment though thou hast no skill in wearing yet thou sayest not I cannot buy it they deceiue me but thou doest all things that thou mayest learne to know it say not then I am no scholler and will be no iudge I can condemne no opinion for this is but a shift and a cauill and let vs not vse it for all these things are easie There is nothing can bee more cleere for this most sufficient rule of faith then that which is written by this ancient Author of the imperfect worke falsely fathered as some thinke vpon Saint Chrysostome whom because he is often alleaged by the learned of the Romane Church I will also alleage against them this Author expounding those of Saint Matthew Chrysost opus imperfect hom 49. Then those that are in Iurie let them flie vnto the mountaines explicateth them thus that is they that are Christians let them repaire vnto the Scriptures The mountaines are the writings of the Apostles and Prophets and wherefore doth he at that time command all Christians to repaire to the Scriptures because in that time heresie hath obtained the Curches there can be no proofe of true Christianity neither can there be other refuge for Christians which shall desire to know the truth of faith but the sacred Scriptures Before it was many wayes shewed which was
learned Doctor whom they call the Angelicall Doctor sayth Tho. Aqu. lec in 1. Tim. 6. The doctrine of the Apostles and Prophets is called Canonicall because it is as it were the rule of our vnderstanding 1. q. 1. ar 4. And againe our faith resteth and stayeth it selfe vpon the reuelation giuen to the Apostles and Prophets which writ the Canonicall bookes 1. q. 1. ar 8. and not vpon reuelation if any such haue beene made to other Doctors And also in another place hee sheweth how all iudgement of truth is to be referred to the Scriptures saying In arguing it properly vseth viz. the said reuealed knowledge Tho. 1 q. part 1. q. 1. ar 8. ad 2. whereof he speaketh of necessitie the authorities of Canonicall Scripture but the authorities of other Doctors of the Church as it were arguing out of her owne but probably For our faith doth relie vpon the reuelation made to the Apostles and Prophets who wrote the Canonicall bookes nd not vpon any reuelation made to other Doctors Therefore Augustine sayth in his Epistle to Hierome Epi. 19. Paulo post princip to 2. I haue learned to giue this honor to the onely bookes of Scriptures which are called Canonicall as to beleeue most firmely that not one author of them hath erred in writing but others I reade so that with what soeuer holinesse and learning they are endued as not therefore to thinke any thing a truth because they haue held or written so And in another place Faith doth cleaue vnto all the articles of faith for one medium to wit for the first truth proposed vnto vs in Scriptures according to the doctrine of the Church vnderstanding rightly and therefore hee that swarueth from this meane doth totally want faith Antoninus the Archbishop of Florence writeth expressely Sum. part 3. tit 18. c. 3. ff 3. That God hath spoken but once and that in the holy Scripture and so plentifully to meete with all temptations and all cases that may fall out and all good workes that as Gregorie in the two and twentieth booke of his Morals expounds it he needes no more speake vnto vs concerning any necessarie matter seeing all things are found in the Scripture Gerson a great man in the Councell of Constance sayth De com sub vtraque specie The Scripture is the rule of our faith which being well vnderstood no authoritie of men is to be admitted against it Durandus sayth That generally in the things that touch our faith wee must speake to that which the Scripture deliuereth Praef. in sent least any man fall into that which the Apostle noteth 1. Cor. 8. If he thinke he knoweth something yet the knoweth nothing as he ought to know for the manner of our knowledge must be not to exceede the measure of faith and the holy Scripture expresseth the measure of faith Alliaco the Cardinall sayth 1. Sent. q. 1. ar 3. The verities themselues of the sacted Canon be the principles of Diuinitie because the finall resolution of Theologicall discourse is made into them and originally from them is drawne euery conclusion of Diuinitie Conradus Clingius sayth Locor l. 3. c. 29. pag. 290. The Scripture is the infallible rule of truth yea the measure and iudge of the truth Peresius the Diuinitie Reader at Barcelona in Spaine sayth The authoritie of no Saint is of infallible truth Iac. Per. de ratio con li. 2. c. 19. for Saint Augustine giues that honor onely to the sacred Scriptures Whereupon I frame this reason That onely is the infallible rule which is of infallible truth but the Scripture onely is of infallible truth therefore the Scripture onely is the infallible rule 8 Bellarmine also writeth thus Other late Writers De verbo Dei li. 1. cap. 2. The rule of faith must be certaine and knowne for if it be not certaine it is no rule at all if it be not knowne it is no rule to vs but nothing more certaine nothing better knowne than the sacred Scripture contained in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles wherefore the sacred Scripture is the rule of faith most certaine and most safe and God hath taught vs by corporall letters which wee might see and reade what he would haue vs beleeue concerning him Whence I gather that if the Swenckfeldians are to bee drawne to the written Text then ought those of the Church of Rome also be recalled to the same rule from their vncertaine traditions from the Popes sole definitiue sentence and from their Councels not teaching by Scriptures If nothing be more knowne nothing more certaine as the Cardinall confesseth than the Scriptures why doe they reiect them from being the rule as not sufficient to preserue from error not knowne ynough The same Cardinall sayth in another place De not eccles c. 2. ff respond Simpliciter The Scripture is better knowne than the Church in some case as namely where it is receiued and speaketh plainly and the question is of the Church Willauincentius confesseth The Scriptures and they alone are able to teach vs to saluation De ratio stud Theol. li. 1. c. 31. pag. 21. as the Apostle in the third chapter of his second Epistle to Timothie affirmeth saying All Scripture is inspired of God in which words the Apostle comprehendeth all things that are needfull to the saluation of man Comment in 2. Tim c 3 in vers 15 16. Espenceus writeth That if any thing be needfull either to be knowne or done the Scriptures teach the truth reproue the false reclaime from euill persuade to good neither yet doe they make a man good in some sort but perfect yea they can teach a man to saluation and make him learned sufficiently Panormitane writeth thus One faithfull man Part 1. de elect polest ca. significa though priuate is more to be beleeued than the Pope or a whole Councell if he haue better reason on his side and authoritie of the Old and New Testament And Gerson more sully De exemp doct part 1. considera 5. The examination and triall of doctrine concerning faith belongeth not onely to the Pope and Councell but to euery one also that is sufficiently seene in the holy Scripture because euery one is a fit iudge of that he knoweth And againe some lay-man not authorised may be so excellently learned in the Scripture that his assertion shall be more to be credited than the Popes definitiue sentence for the Gospell is more to be credited than the Pope Therefore if such a lay man though he be priuate teach a truth contained in the Gospell and the Pope either know it not or will not know it yet it is euident that his iudgement is to be preferred Costerus Cesterus sayth That such verities concerning our faith as are absolutely necessarie to be knowne and beleeued of all men are plainely taught in the Scriptures themselues Doctor Saunders sayth Rock pag. 193. Wee
shew in those wordes I answere it is to be said that one thing may be said to be before another two waies Tho. Aq. 22. q. 4. ar 7. one way of it selfe another way by accident and of it selfe faith is the first of all other vertues for as in things agible and to be done the end is the beginning as is abouesaid it is behoofefull that the Theologicall vertues which haue the last end for their obiect be the first and take place of other vertues and for the last end it selfe it is behoofefull that first it be in the vnderstanding then in the will because the will is not carried vpon any thing but as it is apprehended in the vnderstanding therefore for that the last end is in the will by hope and charitie and in the vnderstanding by faith Tho. Aqu. 12. q. 34. art 4. ad princip art q. 13. art 3. it is behoofefull that faith be the first of all vertues because naturall vnderstanding cannot reach vnto God as he is the obiect of blisse in which sort hope and charitie aymeth vnto him yet accidentally another vertue may be before faith for the cause which is accidentally is accidentally the first Now to remoue the impediment appertaineth to that cause which is accidentally as it is manifest by the Philosopher accordingly Aristoteles in 8. Phisuli 8. text 32. to 2. whereunto some vertues may bee said accidentally to be before faith in how much they remoue the impediments of beleeuing as fortitude remoueth inordinate feare hindering faith humilitie pride by which the vnderstanding refuseth to submit it selfe to the truth of faith and the same may be said of some other vertues although they be not truly vertues vnlesse faith be presupposed Augustin contra Iouinianum l. 4. cap. 3 tom 7. as it appeareth by Saint Augustine in his booke against Iouinian Hence it appeareth by this Doctor that if faith be wanting no Christian can haue that reuealed knowledge which necessarily for his saluation hee is bound to haue and therefore I incessantly laboured to finde out the assurednesse of this faith and the more that I thought how I might finde out this faith so necessarie to saluation it pleased God to suffer me to proceede in my search for some infallible rule by which I might measure without danger of mistaking the true faith of Christ and thereby be most comfortably led as with the fierie pillar like the Israelites by night through the wildernesse of this world Exo. 13. vers 22. vnto the most desired land of euerlasting happinesse and securitie where that promise of God made by the mouth of his Prophet may be verified of vs Esay 32. vers 18 My people shall dwell in a peaceable habitation and in sure dwellings and in quiet resting places CHAP. VI. Containing the fourth fundamentall obseruation about the rule and straight mete-wand of the true Christian faith BEing thus arriued by Gods grace to discouer and rightly to obserue how important a thing it is to build vpon this foundation of true faith The true Canonicall Scriptures the chief rule of faith without which all the building of our soules would be but weake and soone fall to ruine I felt my selfe most forcibly moued by Gods Spirit with all humilitie and diligence to search out the most straight rule where no crookednesse should appeare with the which I might so truly measure out the right faith and true Church of God which Saint Paul calleth the Piller and firmament of truth In the desire whereof occurred vnto my memorie the Angell that talked with Saint Iohn Apocal. 21. vers 15. hauing a golden reed in his hand to measure the spirituall Hierusalem with all the gates the walles the foundations and all the parts of that great citie wishing that it would please God to bestow vpon me such a golden reed wherewith I might measure out the true faith and Church of God that all that are crooked in faith and misproportioned in their liues might find out the truth and be in the number of those of whom the Psalmist saith Psalme 32.11 Laetamini in domino exultate insti gloriamini omnes recti corde Be glad ye righteous and reioyce in the Lord and bee ioyfull all yee that are vpright in heart Whereupon I began to reflect vpon the chiefest rules spoken of either by the Church of Rome or other Churches pretending reformation and examining with a great desire of truth whether visibilitie and continuance of personall succession of Bishops in any Church or whether the Popes sole iudgement and definitiue sentence either with a Councell or tanquam ex Cathedra without a Councell or whether vnwritten traditions or whether the written word and facred Scriptures could be vnto me a straight rule of true faith and of the true Church of Christ me thought I found by all probable euidences and allowed testimonies that only and principally the written word of God I meane the true canonicall Scriptures could be the golden rod and straight mete-wand wherewith the true proportion and frame of Christian faith could bee measured in so much that me thought I might well say to my inexplicable comfort and to the honor of God as that high soaring Eagle Saint Iohn said Apoc. 11. vers 1. There was giuen me a reed like vnto a rod and it was said vnto mee rise and mete the Temple of God and the Altar and them that worship therein 2 But heere thou wilt say gentle Reader that this is but an imagined golden reed Obiections against Scripture as the chiefe or certaine rule and that this is but as crooked a measure as any other in respect of the many difficult places of Scripture which tire out the braines of the most learned as also in regard of the diuersitie of iudgements that is found about the sence of Scriptures for that the translations hauing been diuers it is hard for any man to iudge which is the truest but all these mists of but apparent reasons will easily be disperst if thou wilt please but heedily to peruse the proofes and authorities I bring for this my sure and strongest fundamentall obseruation I know onely but three kinds of strong arguments that may be produced for any veritie as namely the sacred Scriptures the authoritie of the learned and the force of natural reasons all which three do proclaime with a loud voice vnto vs that the written word is the most certain sufficient and infallible rule of faith that we can haue in this world and consequently the true golden mete-wand of Gods eternall truth and all Christian reuealed verities 3 This haue I gathered first out of the Scriptures By proofe of Scripture Esay 8.20 for I find in Esay the Prophet that we must repaire to the Law and to the testimonie if any speake not according to that word Prou. 2. vers 1. Prou. 2. vers 9. there is no light in them I
held that all men besides Christ alone deriued from Adam doe contract originall sinne from Adam Now if this be a matter of faith that all haue contracted sinne from Adam shall it not be against faith to hold that the virgine Marie did not contract sinne from Adam What did she not deseend from Adam by the line of corporall generation Or is there any Scripture or reuciation to the contrarie Is there any exemption of this Virgine No curtainely Nay I dare confidently affirme that it would haue been a great discomfort to this holy Virgine not to haue been partaker of that seet redemption by Christ which others were partakers of If shee were not partaker of the benefit of redemption why did shee say 1. Luc. 47. Magnificat anima mea Dom et exultauit spiritus mâ—us in Deo salutarimeo My soule doth magnisie the Lord and my spirit doth reioyce in God my Sanior How could it be true that God was her Sauior vnlesse it were by Christ of whom wee read in S. Mathew Ipse saiuuÌ„ faciet populuÌ„ suuÌ„ à peccatis eoruÌ„ 1. Matth. 21. He shall sane his people from their sinnes If she had onely been preserued from originall sinne by extraordinarie priuiledge she would haue said that she did reioyce in God her preseruer therefore in that she said she reioiced in God her Sauior according to the phrase of Scripture it is right well inferred that shee acknowledged her selfe saued from originall sinne by Christ whom shee had thus conceiued by the helpe of the holy Ghost without the seede of man to saue people from their sinnes so consequently her selfe calling â—im her Sauior If it be true that S. Paul sayth Ephes 2. Eramus omnes silij irae we were all the children of wrath and sivnus pro omnibus mortuus est if one died for all ergo omnes mortui sunt 1. Cor. 2. v. 14. 15. therefore all died Et pro omnibus mortuus est Christus and Christ died for all it necessarily followeth that the virgine Marie was also a child of wrath by originall sinne through Adam and that Christ who did for all died also for her or else how can it be verified that he died for all If my illation is not to be credited herein Thomas of Aquin may be demaunded his opinion and he will be found to agree with me herein Tho. 3. p.q. 27. art 2. in corp his wordes are these The sanctification of the virgine Marie cannot be vnderstood before giuing of soule or life for a two-fold respect First because sanctification of which we speake is no other than a cleansing from originall sinne Cap. 12. de diui Nomi parum à principio for holinesse is perfect cleanenesse as Dionysius sayty but sinne cannot be clensed but by grace whereunto the reasonable creature is onely subiect Therefore before the infusion of the reasonable soule the blessed Virgine was not sanctified Secondly for that since onely the reasonable creature can haue sinne before the infusion of the reasonable soule the fruit conceiued is not obnoxious to sinne And therefore by what meanes soeuer the blessed Virgine was sanctified before giuing soule or life shee should neuer haue incurred the blot of originall sinne and so shee should not haue stood in neede of redemption or saluation which is by Chris of whom it is said Matth. 1. He shall saue the people from their sinnes But this is inconuenient that Christ should not be the Sauior of all men as wee reale in the first to Timothie the fourth Therefore it resteth that the sanctification of the blessed virgine was after shee receiued soule or life Here then it is apparant that this their Angelicall Doctor held the virgine Marie to be obnoxious to originall sinne because the sanctification he speakes of as himselfe sayth is a cleansing from originall sinne as also for that he sheweth that it would haue beene inconuenient for her not to haue incurred the blot of originall sinne because then shee should not haue stood in neede of redemption So that I thinke it is hereby plaine by the Scriptures according to Thomas Aquinas vnderstanding that the virgine Marie was conceiued in originall sinne and therefore this doctrine is a point of faith 3. Hence I obserue farther The disagreement in the Church of Rome about the virgine Maries conception Ban. part 1. pag. 75. De consecratione d. 4. firmissime nu 12. pag. 101. vpon more serious consideration of the doctrine holding the contrarie how much the late Diuines of the Romish Church especially the Iesuites doe swarue from former Diuines who taught the virgine Marie to be conceiued in originall sinne Bannes acknowledgeth that all the Fathers with one consent held the virgine Marie to be conceiued in originall sinne And Turrecremata sayes That almost all the Schoolemen held the virgine Marie had originall sinne yea that is the common opinion among the famousest of them and he hath colleced an hundred of that minde I obserue a notable contradiction amongst some Romane Writers in this point Cardinal Bellarmine indeede commeth neere the truth when he sayth To affirme that the blessed virgine was conceiued in originall sinne Bellar. de stat peccat l. 4. c. 15. is not against faith He had said well if he had said it is de side it is a matter of faith for is not that a matter of faith which is plaine by the expresse word of God as I haue shewed Yet others say shee had no originall sinne Almain potest eccles c. 16. Clicto super Damas l. 3. c. 2. Frac. Titl Io. 2. and that it is a point of our faith so to beleeue and that it is impietie to thinke otherwise Now if they say true then doe they make the Cardinall an Heretike when in the second conclusion hee affirmeth That the blessed Virgine is piously thought to haue beene conceiued without originall sinne by the singular priuiledge of God Is that thing to be but piously beleeued which is a point of our faith as the former said Or is not that thing against faith which is contrarie to that proposition which they say is a point of faith and that it is impietie to thinke otherwise But in verie truth omitting the contradictions of their writings about this doctrine if we looke but into the institution of the Feast of the Virines conception which they keepe euerie yeare we shall finde it verie nouell in respect of antiquitie and such occasions thereof as are vnfit to ground their doctrine vpon contrarie to all antiquitie 4. To. 1. c. 4. tit 1. p. 6. Anthonie d'Aneroult in his Historicall Catechisme sheweth how the Feast of the Conception of the Virgine Marie was instituted which he recounteth in this manner William the Duke of Normandie An apparition whereupon this doctrine was grounded and the Feast of her Conception first instituted a man fearing God after he had conquered England and reformed the
CHAP. IIII. Containing the second fundamentall obseruation of the supernaturall and reuealed knowledge which is necessarie to saluation AS the first worke whereby Almightie God manifested the greatnesse of his power when hee layed the foundation of the world was the light Genes 1. vers 3. which being dispersdd and confused hee afterwards placed in the globe of the Sunne by which the whole world receiueth comfort and life Euen so in the creation of man who is a liuely mirror and glasse of that greater world A supernatural knowledge necessarie he hath placed in light of vnderstanding in the firmament of his soule to direct him in the way of Gods true seruice and to bring him vnto the promised land of eternall happinesse yet not so that without dependance on him the light of our naturall vnderstanding hath sufficient knowledge thereof or can attaine thereunto of it owne naturall power without Gods especiall illumination for that as all Diuines hold to procure the saluation of our soules it is most behoofefull and necessarie that besides all naturall knowledge and Philosophicall disciplines got by the onely bare discourse of naturall reason our reasonable soules haue a supernaturall knowledge reuealed from God transcending the reach and capacitie of reason which indeed is called the Science of Saints Sap. 10. vers 10. 2 This is excellently well taught and proued by the great Schooleman of the Romane Church The proposition proued who sayth thus It is said in the second to Timothie the third chapter Euerie Scripture inspired from God Tho. Aqu. part 1. q. 1. art 1. sed contra is profitable to teach to dispute to reprehend to instruct to righteousnesse but the Scripture inspired from God belongeth not vnto Philosophicall disciplines which are inuented by the reason of man therefore it is profitable besides Philosophicall disciplines that there be another knowledge inspired from God In which wordes it is here to bee noted that this Doctor taketh the word profitable for necessarie which acception of his is repugnant to those Romanists that abuse the meaning of Saint Paule who onely will haue it serue to shew the profit of the Scriptures but not the necessitie of them and so exclude the Scriptures from being the most infallible certaine and sufficient rule of saluation therefore this Schoolemans sence and meaning here is verie remarkable by the word profitable signifying the necessitie of a reuealed knowledge 3 This he declareth much more plainely in the bodie of the same question answering the maine proposition An absolute necessitie of reuealed knowledge and saying That it was necessarie for mans saluation that there should be a certaine knowledge according to Gods reuelation besides Philosophicall disciplines which are found out by reason of man first because man is ordained by God as to a certaine end which surpasseth the comprehension of reason according to that of Esay the 64. The eye hath not seene O God Esay 64. without thee the things which thou hast prepared for those that loue thee and it is behoofefull that men haue foreknowledge of this end who must order their intentions and actions to an end Hence it was necessarie for mans saluation that certaine things which exceede humane reason should be made knowne vnto him by Gods reuelation Behold here most cleerely an absolute necessitie of a supernaturall reuealed knowledge for the vnderstanding of such things as surmount the capacitie of our naturall vnderstanding 4 His words following doe also import a conuenient necessitie also of such knowledge euen for those things belonging to saluation which wee know by naturall reason A conuenient necessitie of reuealed knowledge His words are these For those things also belonging to God which may be searched into by humane reason it was necessarie man should be instructed by Gods reuelation because the truth of God searched into by reason can be deriued vnto man but by a few and of a long time and with the admixtion of many errors vpon the knowledge notwithstanding of which truth the whole saluation of man dependeth which is in God Therefore that saluation might come vnto men the more conueniently and the more certainely it was necessarie that they should be instructed of diuine things by diuine reuelation it was necessarie therefore that besides Philosophicall disciplines which are found out by reason a sacred knowledge should be had by reuelation Whence it appeareth that a reuealed knowledge is required for a twofold necessitie the one absolute the other ad bene esse for the greater conueniencie and for the better auoidance of error and all to attaine happily the end for which we are created 5 Whereby wee may gather the great excellencie and dignitie of this knowledge aboue all others The excellencie of this knowledge the same Doctor in the next question saying That Augustine sayth in the foureteenth of the Trinitie Tho. Aqu. art 2. sed contra Li. 14. ca. 1. in med to 3. Vnto this Science is that alone attributed wherewith the most holesome faith is engendred nourished defended and strengthened But this belongeth vnto no Science but to the sacred knowlege therefore this holy doctrine is a science Ibid. in corpor And further he sheweth the author of it saying That as the Musitian beleeueth the principles deliuered him by the Arithmetician so the student of sacred doctrine beleeueth the principles delinered vnto him from God Hence the same Doctor saythi in the question following That the holy Scripture speaketh thereof as of one Science for it is said in the tenth of Wisedome he gaue him the knowledge of Saints whereby it is euidently cleere that all the sacred and reuealed doctrine and all the knowledge of faith must come from God Genes 28. vers 12. and be reuealed vnto vs mortall wights liuing in this worldly Pilgrimage for our true comforts and not to bee obtained by our selues euen as to Iacob in his fleepe the mysticall ladder reaching from heauen to earth with God leaning vpon the toppe and the Angels ascending and descending was from God reuealed vnto him when his waking eies could not behold it of whom those words of Wisedome He gaue him the wisedome of Saints Bonauent comment in Sap. cap. 10. are litterally spoken as the Franciscans seraphicall Doctor commenteth vpon that place and therefore may well be called the science and learning of Saints and not of men 6 From the due obseruation of which doctrine I considered the great vanitie and vnhappinesse of those Collections vpon the precedent doctrine that puffed vp with the pride of humane sciences neglect the studie of this principall science of God and his Saints vnto which all the rest are but as handmaids to beare vp her traine Humane sciences vaine Hence I resolued with the assistance of Gods grace to employ all the labours of my studies chiefely in attaining to the perfect knowledge of this science Secondly Knowledge necessarie in Priests I
haue most plaine Scriptures in all points for the Catholike faith he meaneth the faith of the present Church of Rome Doctor Hill in his quart of reasons the eight reason And Doctor Hill seemes willing to haue it thought that they build vpon the Scriptures in all points of doctrine when he sayth Neither may here the Protestants reply and say that the Papists build vpon miracles visions prophecies and vpon such like but not vpon the Word for all that they alledge are most agreeable to the word of God neither doe they teach any doctrine but such as is deriued out of the holy Bible This affertion sheweth much weaknesse of iudgement and little skill euen in the grounds of Diuinitie for who is so ignorant that knoweth not the Papists doe build vpon miracles visions prophecies And who so simple amongst them that know not that they build least vpon the word when they generaly teach that the written word is not sufficient for faith without traditions And what a foule misbeseeming vntruth is it for a Doctor to say That all that they alleadge are most agreeable to the word of God when they ordinarily obiect that the perpetuall virginitie of the virgine Marie the assumption of her bodie into heauen the baptizing of reasonlesse children the keeping of the Sunday and others the like are not to be proued by the word of God but are built onely vpon traditions Is not this then a very grosse forgetfulnesse to affirme That they teach not any Doctrine but such as is deriued out of the holie Bible And yet he forgetteth himselfe so much that againe in the same reasons hee saith euen for the time past That the Catholikes meaning Papists euer squared their Doctrine by the Line and the Leuell of the word of hir Spouse and therfore neuer had cause to reiect the least iote of the holie Bible and at one word the Catholikes follow the Bible By all which it seemeth most apparent that the learned doe approue the word of God that is the Canonicall Scriptures to be the most certain sufficient and most infallible rule that can be assigned What reason then haue I to forsake the iugement of so many learned men both ancient and moderne Writers who heerein are most conformable to Scripture it selfe 9 For if we consider rightly of the nature of faith Natural reason sheweth this rule obseruing that the knowledge whereto it consenteth and the end to which it leadeth are supernaturall nothing can seeme more agreeable to naturall discourse than to gather also that only that book which containes Gods reuealed verities can be the sufficientesi means to know them which is the holy writings of the old and new Testament If a man should aske me why I beleeue the creation of the world all the miracles wrought by Moses Elias and Elisaeus that there is a God that Christ is is the sonne of God that he was borne of a virgine I cannot answere with assurednesse because this Priest or that Priest teacheth me so for reason will obiect that hee may erre or that all Priests agree not therein or that first I must be assured he teacheth me doctrine of such a Church as cannot misinstruct me which I must know by some other meanes Therefore my only answere must be that I beleeue because those Scriptures reuealed from God doe teach me which are the most sufficient rule whereby I can haue assured knowledge of truth reuealed from God by all which it seemed most cleare vnto m that onely the Scriptures can be the most assured sufficient and infallible rule by which I am to measure my faith and all vertues belonging thereunto and therefore all other rules are verie subiect to the crookednesse of many errors Siluest vers 60. fides Nu. 2. Hence I began to see my former error in holding with Siluester that the Pope as the vice gerent of Christ vpon earth was to be my rule according to his assertion taken out of Saint Thomas The Pope hath the primacie of the vniuersall Church to whom it appertaineth to determine those things which belong to faith 22. 1. 11. ar 3. that they may bee held of all with a constant faith and in him resideth the authority of the vniuersall Church Therefore it belongeth to faith to adhere vnto the sentence of the chiefe Bishop in those things which belong to faith yea also in those things which belong vnto good manners because in such the Church cannot erre nor consequently her head as head or as Bishop which I vnderstand alwaies to be true when in doubts he is required not as a learned man or such a person but as the head of Christianity or according to Archidiaconus Note this when he determineth with the Councell of Cardinals but the first is better because the Pope may be without Cardinals But when I remembred that two Popes namely Sixtus and Clemens set out two Bibles within two yeares space for Sixtus Bible came forth in the yeare 1590. and Clements in the yeare 1592. with commaundement to be read and followed vpon penalties mentioned in their seuerall breues wherein many disagreements contradictions and contrarieties appeared in so important a matter of faith as the appointment of what is Scripture and what is not that herein Pope Sixtus grieuously erred I concluded that the Popes sentence definitiue could not bee a sufficient rule for me to measure my faith by vnlesse I would be like vnto a principall Romane Clarke of this land affirming that heere in England he thought the opinion of Cardinall Bellarmine the best to be held concerning deposition of kings namely that the Pope hath his dominion in temporalties onely indirectly yet if he were in Rome he would follow the opinion of Bosius that he hath it directly as the most plausible there And much wondering that such an assertion should passe from the mouth of so graue a man I began to inferre that if but place or persons were the rule of such mens faith in matters of such waight it was time for me who regarded but the saluation of my soule to seeke after some better rule more sure and infallible 10 Now then courteous Reader hauing found out this most sufficient rule of faith namely the holy Scriptures I referre my selfe vnto your impartiall censure to iudge whether I could doe lesse then to measure all the doctrinall points of my faith by this golden meet-wand and therewith measure out the spirituall and true Church of Christ which if thou shalt iudge fit for me I hope such shall be the care of thine owne saluation as to vse it alwaies in like manner for thy selfe that thy faith may be free from all crookednesse of heresies and thereby be made partakers of Gods promises for the manifold diuisions about the Church the diuers errours taught by those that pretend to bee other mens Teachers and euen the loue of thy selfe may well make thee say with holy Dauid following the
as the Church of Rome teacheth who being deuoted much to the virgine Marie prayed often vnto her to bee deliuered from this doubt Who being one day at Masse the Hoast before the saying of the Pater noster was gone out of his sight whereof as hee was in a great amazement the virgine Marie appeared vnto him holding her sonne Iesus betwixt her armes and said vnto him This is he whom I brought into this world this is he whom you haue consecrated this is he whom you haue held and touched with your hands and shewed to the people to be adored which you eate and drinke in the Sacrament behold here I giue you my Sonne with reuerence and deuotion to be receiued of you and so as shee presented him vnto him he changed at that instant againe into the forme of bread whom he receiued and so his doubt ceased Here you see courteous Reader strange miracles alledged by the Papists in confirmation of their doctrine one while the bread is vnseene then Christ and our Ladie and then againe the forme of bread another while a Mule forsaking his prouender to adore God in the Sacrament whether these be not such signes wonders and great prodigies as may seduce the elect if it were possible I leaue to the holy Ghost to informe you the truth saying Nolite eis credere beleeue them not And one more yet I will relate vnto your memorie which hath beene wrought of late yeares and may be esteemed for a notable lie Till Bred. 7. Col. sac c. 7. There was a certaine Caluinist that married a Catholike woman that is Papist that long endeuoured to induce her to heare a Caluinist Minister preach The wife after she had a long time contradicted him was at last constrained to goe by the rigorous speeches and threatnings of her husband yet did she first acquaint her ghostly father there with who aduised her to obey the commaundement of her husband and to goe onely once to the said Sermon yet with condition to goe first to Confession and to the Communion The woman hauing performed the aduise of her ghostly father strengthned with the Sacraments went to the Sermon and she was no sooner entred but the Preacher became as silent and mute as a fish yet said at last after a little pause Here is some bodie present that hath eaten of the bread of Papists which is the cause that I will now giue ouer preaching hoping to make recompence another time The husband who was present seeing the Preacher A pretie fiction to disgrace Caluinists by Gods permission to become silent and disabled to prosecute his matter for the presence of one that had receiued the holy Communion who being returned home enquired of his wife whether shee had not receiued the Communion that morning or not she without dissimulation answering yes her husband suddainly knew that this doctrine of the Caluinists was false and accursed in that being placed with the light of the Sacraments of the Catholike Church it withered so and came to nought whereupon presently he made a good fire burned all his bookes to pouder and ashes and became himselfe a child of the Catholike Church In which miracle first I obserue that the ghostly father of this woman gaue her leaue for obedience to her husband to go to the Church of Caluinists which how it can hang with the doctrine of Paule the fifths Breue who sheweth it vnlawfull for English Catholikes to goe to the Churches of Heretikes viz. of all Caluinists and Protestants that are so in his iudgement vnlesse it be said that the Church of Rome holds one doctrine of faith lawfull at one time that is not lawfull at another time I should be glad to be resolued But this I obserue to proceede from Gods prouidence that the inuentors of these and the like miracles for the confirmation of their doctrine in one point doth often in some circumstance or other shew such ignorance or falsehood that discouereth them either not to approue the matter they intend or else runneth into some other error lesse tolerable shewing them most plainely to be such signes and wonders as Christ giueth a Caueat of them Not to be beleeued Many other miracles I might here insert but that I will not be too tedious in such idle tales fitter to be told amongst children as fables than to any men of more ripe iudgement yet are they amongst the Clergie of Rome of such account that their Sermonists are stuffed with them as may be obserued in Iacobus de Voragine Iohannes Meff Bernard de Bust Philippus Dies and many the like and are held more profitable for the people than any other manner of doctrine Yet I obserue one thing by reading of their liues of Saints that many miracles which were authenticall for many hundred yeares past are now growne to be Apocryphall as may be seene by comparing the auncient liues of S. George S. Katherine the Queene and others with them as they are of late yeares corrected and written by Lipeloo following Baronius and other writers of the same kind 12 Now therefore to draw neere my conclusion My conclusion about miracles what fruit could I better gather vpon the due obseruation of Christs warning vnto the world Not to beleeue such miracles than that the Church of Rome cannot bee the true Church of God that either winketh or authoriseth infinite numbers in the same nature as these are of which I haue alreadie recorded out of her owne Writers for which cause I could not but abandon her Communion and flye to that Church which like a faithfull Spouse resteth contented with the former miracles where with Christs Church was begun and chiefely relying vpon the holy Scriptures and the auncient doctrine of the Primitiue Church Yet is not my opinion in this point of miracles so to bee vnderstood as that I doe thinke no true miracles at all shall euer be done in the declining age of Gods Church but I would haue it knowne that my iudgement is that none are to be beleeued which are pretended to be done in confirmation of new doctrines not taught in the Scriptures not knowne to the auncient Church because it is most euident that Christ hath forbidden all beleefe of them and therefore not to be esteemed of otherwise than as of illusions of Sathan wherewith to enchant soules and to make them beleeue lyes in stead of truth and verities Oh what a miserie is it to see how many simple sincere and ouer-credulous Christians are cousened with these deceits and illusions of the Diuell and the true markes of Antichrist Let me therfore entreat thee courteous reader to remember the predictions of these signes and wonders aboue mentioned forespoken of by Christ S. Paule and S. Iohn and not so fondly to be lead blind-folded to the eternall destruction of thy soule by too much credulitie Be not like the Scribes and Pharisies seeking after signes from heauen for the faith least you
I find that men of farther reach obseruing the successe of the intended powder-treason following soone after haue obserued that that letter which master Blackwell should haue spread amongst Catholikes was but a cloake of the secret designement of the powder-day to take away all apprehension of danger in the state whereof it is probably thought that both the Pope and father Aquauiua were either expressely or circumstantially made acquainted with that businesse nay moreouer my selfe strongly vrging against one the vnlawfulnes of the powder-designement he wished me to be silent for it was more then probable that the Pope knew well thereof and in speaking against it I should but cause the Iesuites to disaffect me and doe my selfe no good Hereupon I grew silent and thought the more then of such horrible hypocrisie for that some reported that both the Pope and Cardinals had spoken publikely against it which me thought could not hang well together without some intollerable hypocrisie especially considering that Greenway by the Pope was not only suffered to liue in Rome but also exalted euen before the Popes face to the dignitie of being one of his Penitentiaries appointed publikly to heare cōfessions in S. Peters Church in Rome and Gerard likewise suffered to liue quietly in Flanders without checke or controule by any man who made such deep protestations to one master Buckland Priest vpon his saluation that he had no wayes notice of the powder-designement that as I heard the said master Buckland say either he must needs beleeue him to affirme a truth or else that he was as great an hypocrite and dissembler as euer liued in the world So like are the followers of the Romane Church to the first kind of the Pharisies hypocrisie in pretending outward holinesse whilest in their hearts they harbour most detestable vnrighteousnesse Therefore well did Saint Bernard describe Hypocrites saying that they were Mordaces vt canes dolosi vt vulpes superbi vt leones they are biting like dogges they are guilefull like foxes they are proud like lions for such will suffer no mans reputation to be vntoucht but will teare it with their spitefull teeth they are craftie as foxes which teare in peeces the sheepe of the best wooll and as proud as lions for that they contemne all disgrace all without regard to any mans person or dignitie 5 Secondly The second kind of Romish hypocrisie I haue also obserued the second kind of the Pharisies hypocrisie to be very abundant in the Church of Rome which consisteth in a preposterous and defectiue outward holines breeding scrupulosity in trifles and largenes of conscience in matters of more moment As for example I find that for violating their custome obseruation vpon fasting-dayes many will bee exceedingly scandalized but giue no shew of scandale-taking at the most wicked example of the powder-treason or the traytors thereof but rather by their silence seeme willing to approue it to lament only the misfortune of their desired successe Others there are that will controule and checke any rash iudgement euen in trifles in others who themselues without scruple or knowledge or iudgment wil not stick to lay the imputation of the powder-treason vpon Protestants themselues who should by Machiuillian complotments be the first contriuers of it to draw Papists vnto it thereby to make them the more odious to the world Againe the Church of Rome forbiddeth Priests to be married which is lawfull by the law of God and whereas mariages betwixt kindred in the degrees of affinity are prohibited by the law of God they suffer and permit dispencing with mens consciences therein as for example that one brother may marry his brothers wife which was allowed in this kingdom by the Pope that the neece may marry her vncle which hath bin granted but to mean persons euen of late yeeres in Hamp-shire by authoritie granted from the Pope What cā be more preposterous thē to make a law which God neuer made in liew therof to disanull an institution which God hath made Besides the Popes thēselues suffer some of the Clergie to professe external pouertie as the poore Capuchins whilest themselues and others liue in all pompe iollity and pleasure vsing all coulors of holines to enrich thēselues and to draw treasures out of al coūtries to fill the Exchequer of S. Peter withall Who sees not most plainly that many deluded soules whilest for the grant of indulgences yearely to this Church and that Church they pay round summes of money into the Romane offices they grow negligent in seeking pardon from God and so neuer obtain truly pardon for their sins what shall I say of their preposterous zeale in keeping holidaies I often noted that the daies appointed in memory of Saints are much more solemnely kept then Sonday which is the feast of their Lord and Master in stead of one prayer to the Father or to the holy Ghost or the blessed Trinity the childrē of that Church do say many either to the virgin Mary or to S. Francis S. Benet Beatus Ignatius or some other Saint to whom they are most peculiarly addicted By all which examples I obserue the Church of Rome much also to exceed in this preposterous hypocrisie and externall holinesse without any order or rule 6 Thirdly The third kind of Romane hypocrisie I haue further entred into a deepe consideration of the third kind of Pharisaicall hypocrisie which consisteth more in words than in deedes more in shaddow than in truth Which I find without measure to abound likewise in the church of Rome For the Pope himself in words caries the stile of Seruus seruorum Dei the seruant of the seruants of God which is but meerely verball for in effect his actions are all noted with pride carrying the shew of Lord or Emperour rather than of a Seruant Auent Annal. lib. 7. who as one writeth Dominus dominantium perde ac si Deus foret esse contendit he striueth to be the lord of rulers in as if he were God and who seeth not this to be true that considereth his challenge of soueraignetie euen in temporalls ouer all Emperors and Kings of the world that beholdeth him carried vpon mens shoulpers that know how hee maketh all Princes but his vassals to be depriued of their kingdomes and all dignities whensoeuer he thinketh it expedient propter finem spiritualem for a spirituall end that is for the good of the Church that hath seene him attended vpon by the whole Colledge of Cardinalles whose intollerable prie was such that a King of Fraunce finding him inexorable in the cause of Fredericke Math. Paris in Henr. 3. His Maiesties speech in the Parliament Recessit iratus indignans quod humilitatem quam sperauerat in seruo seruorum minimè reperisset hee went away angrie and scorning not to finde the humilitie he hoped for in the seruant of seruants wel therfore may his Maiestie term him for such his pride as he doth That
three-crowned monarch or rather monster who is so humble in the phrase of his Title and so glorious in statelinesse of his Crowne In words likewise his Holinesse is Vicarius Christi but in his actions he seemes opposite to Christ as when hee taketh away Christs bloud from the lay people in the sacrament And that holy Pope shewed himselfe but a bad Vicar Balaeus in vit Pontific in Leo. 10. that with a blasphemous and sacrilegious tongue called al the beliefe we haue of Christ Fabulam a fable or tale It is a verball matter in the Pope to be called Petri successor the successour of Peter Platin. in Io. 10. but it is a reall true thing that à Petrivestigijs discessit potestate seculari hee swarued from Peters steppes by secular power becomming more like to Constantine than to Saint Peter Bern. de consid lib. 4. nay rather like to Simon Magus in thr sale of holie things than vnto Simon Peter in the free gift of them who had neither siluer nor gold yet gaue them freely in the name of Iesus Christ Acts 3. v. 6. It is also a verball matter for his Holinesse to be called clauiger regni coelorum the porter or key-keeper of heauen gates but it is a reall thing that hee leadeth many into hell in the mean while a caue at is giuen that etsi innumerabiles sectum animas due at ad infernum nemo tamen illum iudicet Dift 40. si Papa although hee leade innumerable soules with him to hell yet none iudges him No man may presume to say vnto him Curita facis Why dost thou so It is but a verball thing which Casuists teach when they say Em. Sa. verbo litterae 1. Literas alienas aperire legere mortale est nisi sit scribentis superior It is a mortall sinne to reade and open other mens letters vnlesse he be superior to him that writeth them But it was more than verball when a deuoted follower of the Iesuites went to the master of the Postes in Bruxells and there paied for a Packet of Letters sent to a Benedictin Monke out of Spaine pretending that he was his friend and affirming that he would see them safly deliuerd to the party to whom they were directed yet first he was so friendly vnto him that he opened the packet of Letters went and shewed them to the Iesuite Legier in Bruxells and when all was done caused them by the helpe and light hand of a trustie Iesuited Ladie cunning both in opening and sealing enclosed them vp againe so artificially excepting one which was of greatest importance that miscaried yet by gulling a fourth person sent them at length to the honest Moncke to whom they were directed Is not this verie curteous charitie in the religious Iesuite towardes his religious brother of an other Order professing with him the like euangelicall Councels of perfection this is no hypocrisie but curtesie This is but kind charitie to pay for an other mans letters and to send them to the owner without suffering him to pay postage to take away one letter of most weight whereupon the whole busines of the Benedictins affaires written from their Prouinciall in Spaine belike with them is but a part of friendship nam amicorum omnia sunt communia all things are common amongst friends Fie vpon this holinesse of such a religions professor of Euangelicall perfection thus peremptorily to intrude himselfe into his brothers secrets thus vncharitably to abuse the loue of his friendes good natures as to make them instruments of so vnchristian inciuilitie and so wickedly against all iustice and right reason to put the poore Monke to write againe into Spaine to his Generall before he could proceede in the affaires of his Order a good Machiauillian tricke to take aduantage of time but certes no man can hold it an honest part in a religious man Many presidents of this kinde of Pharisaicall hypocrisie might be alleaged but that I delight not to make long stay in the relation or thinking of such impieties 7 Lastly The fourth kind of Romish hypocrisie the fourth kind of Pharisaicall hypocrisie which I obserue to abound in the church of Rome consisteth in seeking the praise and glory of man for from what source can it proceed that the Pope should so ambitiously hunt after the supreame loueraignetie ouer all Clergie-men and Kings but the vaine desire of his owne glory and greatnes in this world which all men should admire and praise what should cause the Iesuites more than other religious to seeke the gouernement of the secular Priests in the Colledges but the glorie of themselues or the vnsatiable desire of praise as men that would be thought the chiefe and strongest pillars of the Catholike Romaine faith in England what sense or reason can moue them if they had any care of their owne body and corporation to meddle in such a corporation as is distinct from theirs and in no points of Euangelicall perfection agreeing with them But such is the prouidence of God permitting their busie heads to be troubled so much with other mens affaires that they loose all spirit of their pretended religious perfections and setting still other men together at variance for their owne vaineglorious designements they neglect the care of their owne profession hinder others and breede a confusion in their whole Church of diuided affections which at last may bee hoped will cause the vtter ruine and desolation of the Papacie that so the trueth may preuaile and the tyrannie of Antichrist come to an end notwithstanding all their goodly pretences of doing all things Ad maiorem Dei gloriam which euery good Christian aymeth at aswell as they Now therefore of such hypocrites wee may say with good reason It were behouefull that these dregges of men were cut off and burnt that with their filth they should no longer defile Gods seruice Polidor Virgil. inuent l. 7. c. 5. as Polidore Virgil saide of others pretending the same Euangelicall perfection and much greater than these doe 8 Now the due obseruation of this Pharisaicall hypocrisie The Romane hypocrisie a good inducement to make any man abandon that Church not to abound any where so much as in the Church of Rome seemed vnto me as a most probable argument to induce me to relinquish all societie with her and her teachers whereof my selfe was one for if Christ bad beware of them I should haue beene too disobedient to his commaund if I should any longer haue staied my-selfe in the communion of their Church when I considered many Vas and woes pronounced by the Sonne of God to fall vpon all kinde of hypocriticall Pharisies I could not but conceiue a great daunger in staying longer with them in the participation of their Sacraments and in the doctrine of their Beliefe which I found to bee so much replenished both with doctrine and workes of hypocrisie that I may truely say of the most
amongst many which I haue read and noted out of diuers authors of good credit and well approued in the Church of Rome The first is taken out of Pope Gregorie the Great S. Greg. Mag. hom 37. in Euang lib. 4. dialog cap. 57. who writeth That a certaine man being taken prisoner by his enemies was carried into a farre Countrey where hee was kept prisoner a long time whose wife not hearing any thing of him thought him to bee dead and therefore caused a Masse to be said for him euery weeke Whereupon it happened that so often as the Masse was offered for the deliuerance of his soule so often were his irons and shackles loosened in the prison where he was which afterward when being released he returned againe to his wife he told her as much with great admiration whereupon the wife enquiring the time and the houre when hee found him so freed from his fetters she found it happened at he same houre that Masse was said for him Whereupon Pope Gregorie saith Hence my best beloued brethren and good friends learne ye how much the sacred hoast being offred by our selues is of force to vntie the bands of our hearts since being offered by one it had such power as to breake the bands of anothers bodie Certainly if this sacrifice be of such force I maruaile why the Priests in prison offering it with the deuotion of worthie Confessors heere in England should not be able often to loosen their chaines yea and to open the verie prison gates for their deliuerance but this cannot be because such fictions neuer prooue true and these are but fables inuented to delude poore simple soules that Priests by saying of Masses for them may emptie their purses and bee partakers of their coine Againe as it is written that heere in England A certaine Prince which had beene sicke of the Palsie a long time and carried into Saint Stephens Church Edinerus Angelus in vit S. Anselm to heare Masse sung by Anselme Bishop of Canterburie and to receiue his blessing whereupon he recouered present health Either this storie is inuented to honour Anselme with or else to approue the Masse by it or if the Masse be of such power how hapneth it in all this time of persecution as the Papists terme their small suffrings here in England that they haue no sicke persons cured by so many Masses as are offered by Priests and Iesuites But all is but mans inuention and as babes are deceiued with shewes so are simple Papists with false lies and such like fabulous wonders inuented either by ambitious and foolish Priests or hypocriticall and pharisaicall Monkes and Friers It is an vsuall thing in the Church of Rome by such inuentions to confirme one false doctrine by another so confirmed so I haue noted the doctrine of Purgatorie by the doctrine of the Masse for diuers Romish Authours haue left it recorded that Benedictus Octauus Pope was deliuered out of Purgatorie by the sacrifice of the Masse Petr. Dam. Card. Al. lâ—y in fest S. Odâ—li 〈◊〉 Ian. Laur. Sur. to 1. lib. 2. cap. 2. An. Ebor. cap. de orat Cath hist cap 5. tit 19. part 2. Tho. Cant. lib. 2. Aâ—un cap. 53. part 14. Cath. hist cap. 5. tit 19. part 5. and the prayers of Saint Odilus Abbot and his Monkes Heere is a miracle framed not onely for the Masse but also for Purgatorie and praying for the dead So likewise I haue read of a Priest in France who being verie poore yet verie deuoutly affected to the soules in Purgatorie in so much that euerie day without failing he â—ffered the sacrifice of the Masse for them for the which he was cited and accused before his Prelate and being brought before his Bishoppe hee simplie confessed the truth wherefore hee was taxed to payment of a certaine summe and forced to giue suretie for the same which hauing sworne to performe the poore man was in great trouble finding out none to answer for him but instantly the eyes of the Bishoppe were opened and hee beheld more than a thousand hands stretched foorth readie to giue suretie for the Priest Whereupon the Bishopped said vnto the Priest thou hast sureties enough goe and according to thine owne pleasure and mine say Masse as thou hast done heretofore Many other straunge wonders could I alleage in this kind not to bee beleeued but rather to bee wondered at that any man dares haue so much presumption as by such wicked deuises to wrong Gods truth and to maintaine false-hood for if it bee a true marke of false teachers which Christ prescribed when he spake of those that should do such wonders that the elect might be seduced by them then it followeth that the Romish teachers are those euen in this verie doctrine of the Masse who onely pretend to haue miracles and wonders to approue it 10 For in truth they haue no one place of Scripture for this sacrifice which they so highly esteeme of The storie of Mâ—lchâ—sedech wrested to prooue the Masse they pretend many figures and types of the old Law many predictions out of the Prophets and also other testimonies out of the Gospell but they are all insufficient weake and impertinent nothing seruing their purpose So most impertinently doth Cardinall Bellarmine alleage the example of Melchisedech Desacrif mis lib 5. cap. 5. 6. Genes 14. Psal 109. vers 5. who brought foorth bread and wine for hee was the Priest of the Highest but Christ is a Priest after the order of Melchisedech and not according to Aaron as Paul teacheth Hebrewes the seuenth therefore hee was to institute an vnbloodie sacrifice vnder the forme of bread and wine This reason of Bellarmines is of no force for were it true that Melchisedech offered bread and wine which is not yet nothing else would follow but that Christ offered bread and wine which our Aduersaries will neuer graunt for they teach that bread and wine doth not continue after consecration but that they are annihilated and so transubstantiated that nothing remaineth of the substance besides the bodie and blood of Christ Besides Melchisedech did not offer but onely brought foorth as the Hebrew word signifieth bread and wine for the refreshing of Abrahams souldiers as the Text it selfe clearely teacheth Neither is Melchisedâ—ch a Type of Christ either in offering or bringing foorth bread and wine but first in respect of the name Melchisedech the King of righteousnesse secondly because hee was King of Salem Jsai 9.6 and Christ is King or Prince of peace Thirdly because Melchisedech was together both a King and a Priest and so is Châ—â—st Fourthly because the Progenie of Melchisedech is not related so is Christ a Priest for euer after the order of Melchisedech Psal 110.4 Therefore this figure of Melchisedech hath no refâ—reâ—â—ce to the saâ—rifice of the Mâ—sse at all Controuers 5. Confess Petricomensi cap. 41. And howsoeuer Pighius and Hosius say that this is the
hold of the Popes Indulgences grounded vppon the couetousnesse of Popes and drew them to employ their studies more in gathering together temporall wealth than the riches of Gods graces and true knowledge of the Scriptures For hence and from this source only hath flowed diuers points of doctrine now currant in Rome more tending to the amplification and enlarging of his temporall Kingdome than the Kingdome of Christs Church amongst which the doctrine of Pardons and Indulgences is not the least profitable for the filling vp of the Popes cofers and giuing contentment to his auaricious desires arguing the great spirituall blindnesse God hath permitted him to fall into in punishment of the detestable sinne 2. Indulgences disproued by their definitions Now this obseruation hauing auerted my minde from the Church of Rome with diuers others and laied open vnto my soule the most foule abhominations of that Church for the better explication of her erroneous doctrine concerning Indulgences and Pardons I must shew thee curteous Reader how this auersion grew in mee by the examination and studie of truth First I beganne to examine the true nature of these Romish Indulgences and Pardons by the definition of them which I found in Cardinall Bellarmine to be thus expressed Lib. 5. de poenit cap. 2. Indulgences saith he are the remissions of paines which are to be endured after the remission of faults granted vnto the faithfull for a reasonable cause by the high Bishops out of a Fatherly lenitie and condescention Ioannes Viguerius the great Scholler of Spaine calleth Indulgence Ioan. Viguer Instit Christi cap. 16. vers 29. A distribution of the treasure or an application of the penalties of the supererogation of Christ or of his Saints for the remission of paines due for passed sinnes made by him that ruleth the Vniuersall Church with iudgement of discretion Siluester their best Summist for cases of conscience defineth it thus The Ecclesiasticall Indulgence Siluest verb. Jndulgentia num 3. is a donation of some thing taken out of the spirituall treasure of the Church made vnto a sinner that hee may satisfie God the creditour of his paines Thus these learned men of Rome write of the nature of Indulgences Whereupon first I note out of Bellarmine that these pardons are not to bee granted without a reasonable cause and according to Viguerius with iudgement of discretion yet notwithstanding this is contradicted by Emanuel Sa the Iesuite who saith That some say an Indulgence giuen without cause is of value Verbo Indulgen num 1. Bonauent 4. d. 20.2 part q. vlt. Solu 4. d. 21. q. 2. art 2. others doe not onely require a iust cause but such a cause as is proportionable to the Indulgence I but Sa himselfe peremptorily affirmeth I thinke no doubt to be made of an Indulgence giuen from the Pope Where I note this man to be more the Popes Friend than the rest who whether the Pope with iust cause or without iust cause graunt an Indulgence hee approues it and further I obserue a great difference amongst the Romish Writers in this point and therefore no credit to bee giuen to those that so much disagree in the cause why Indulgences should bee graunted Secondly I note out of Siluester that the subiect of Indulgences is a sinner I meane as hee saith it is graunted to a sinner and yet this seemeth to bee contradicted by him and others who saith Hee that is not in Gods grace obtaineth not Indulgence Sil. Lerb Indulg 5. Tho. 3. p. q. 27. art 1. Solu 4. d. 21. q. 2. a. 3. Adrian 4. de Indulgent col 13. Concl. 3. Thirdly I obserue moreouer that whereas the Pope graunteth Indulgences oftentimes both from sinne and paine which now is growne ordinarie hee crosseth the Doctrine of these Authours who in the definition of an Indulgence make mention onely of remission of paine and not of the sinne for according to their owne Doctrine else where both mortall and veniall sinnes are taken away by the Sacrament of Penance as the proper subiect and matter of their Sacramentall absolution 3. Now for the establishment of this doctrine of Indulgences The Scripture abused about Indulgences they haue no Scripture as farre as I can perceiue of any force which hath made the Reformed Churches to tearme these Papall Indulgences pious frauds of the faithfull inuentions and impostures and his Maiestie discouering as much iustly to reckon them amongst the trash depending vpon Purgatorie To Christ. Mon. f. 43. not worth the talking of yet doe they not sticke to bee so presumptuous as to alleage Scriptures most indiscreetly for their doctrine as namely Ioannes Viguerius doeth as if hee had got a great victorie against the Reformed Churches in this point prouing the name of Indulgence to bee found in the Prophet Esay his wordes which he citeth are these Notwithstanding to conuince their ignorance Instit Christ c 6. § 6. vers 19. and vnbridled boldnesse wee must shewe the name Indulgence expresly to bee found in the sacred Letters in the same sense the Church vseth And this chiefly in Esay the Prophet where in the Person of Christ hee saith The Spirit of the Lord vpon mee in that hee hath annointed mee Hee sent mee to announce vnto the meeke to heale the contrite of heart to Preach Indulgence vnto Captiues releasement to those that are shut vp and so it can not bee denyed that the name of Indulgence in the sacred Letters is not to bee found And that Esay wrote according to the intention which the Church vseth Christ the Lord hath declared in S. Luke where it is said Luc. 4. that when vpon the Sabaoth hee entred the Synagogue of Nazareth hee rose vp to reade and the Booke of the Prophet Esay was deliucred vnto him and turning the Booke he found the place where it was written the Spirit of the Lord vpon me for that he hath annointed me hee hath sent mee to Euangelize to the poore to heale the contrite of heart to Preach remission to Captiues behold how the name Indulgence Christ interpreteth remission But of what Indulgence spake Esay truly of sinnes for the pardoning and remitting of which Christ was sent by God the Father and because in sinne there are two thinges to wit the fault and the paine the remission of the fault and also the remission of the paine is rightly called Indulgence But the Church as is said taketh Indulgence for the application of penalties of supererogations of Christ and his Saints by which paines are remitted therefore nothing is more manifest than that the name of Indulgence is found in the sacred Letters according to the intention which the Church vseth Here I see a braue proofe of a vaunting Spaniard who with his Spanish Brauadoes thinks to haue conquered but I beleeue when hee shall haue found the strength and truth of his encounterers whom hee termeth Heretiques if he were now aliue he would say as I
confession to the elder of the two and chiefly in respect of his authoritie The next morning shee went to him desiring him to heare her confession who being willing bad his companion to withdraw himselfe a little a side which he did yet sometimes casting his eies towardes them he perceiued that at euery sinne the Lady confessed a Toade went out of her mouth but being at last neare the point of confessing her most odious and detestable sinne where with her soule was charged for feare and shame shee durst not expresse it whereupon the yong religious Frier who stood at the end of the Chappell saw all the mentioned Toades returne againe into her mouth Soone after these two religious men departed and being vpon the way the yongest beganne to tell the elder that which hee had scene when the Lady was at confession with him wherby the elder vnderstood that the same Lady A strange tale about a Ladie not confessing all her sinnes willingly and to her knowledge had concealed some sinne which shee had not confessed who forthwith returned backe againe vnto her to admonish her to looke well to her conscience but alas hee found her dead And as hee praied to God for her three daies together at length shee appeared vnto him with a chaine of redde hot yron about her necke with two Serpents embracing her and sucking her breasts with two Toades in her cies from her mouth and nostrills issued forth fire and brimstone and about the haire of her head there were a great number of Lizardes who said vnto him O Father I am that accursed and miserable woman that two daies since made a confession vnto you but because I did willingly conceale the sinne of Adulterie and Incest behold I am damned for euer With that the Confessarius adiured her by the liuing God to declare two thinges vnto him first the signification and meaning of these diuers paines Vnto whom shee answered that the Lizards crawling about her head were for the punishment of the dressings shee wore about her head the two Toades which couered hereies were the punishment of her wanton and lasciuious lookes the flaming darts were for punishment of her detractions defamations foule and dishonest songs and speeches The two Serpents which sucke my breasts signifie the foule touchings which haue beene committed vpon mee The crueltie of the Dogges that deuoure my handes are punishments for mine owne vnchast touchings of my selfe and for that I haue giuen presents vnto my Louers out of the goodes wherewith I might haue relecued the poore Seruants of CHRIST IESVS I am seated vpon this Dragon that putteth mee to vnspeakable paine and torment burning my legges and thighes in punishment of all my wicked deedes Then the Penitentiarius willed her to expound his other doubt namely for what sinnes men of these times were principally damned Shee answered that men went downe to Hell for all manner of sinnes but women chiefly for foure sorts of sinnes for the sinne of luxurie for their sinnes of vaine apparell and painting for witch-craft and for their shame to confesse their sinnes And so when shee had said thus much the Dragon with a wonderfull great noise raised vp himselfe and carried her to hell where shee remaineth in endlesse torments If this were a true storie no doubt it would make much for auricular confession but the cause of suspition is that there is no place named where this should happen or where this Ladie dwelt besides it standeth onely vpon the bare relation of a Frier which kinde of people are by many much suspected of forgerie in such deuises and lying miracles which often the very circumstances of them doe discouer to be false Is it likely that she who had long concealed her sinnes would haue gone at all to confession vnlesse shee had purposed to open them he being a stranger and vnknowne But the storie may serue in Friers iudgements to terrifie poore women withall as the Popes Anathemaes doe terrifie many men who stand more in feare of them than of Gods threatnings But sweet Iesus keepe men from beleeuing such lying wonders and giue them grace not to giue eare to any thing not warranted in Scriptures or iustified by antiquitie and as thou hast mercifully led me from beleeuing such lyes so of the same goodnesse impart also the shining beames of truth vnto others and graunt that thy onely two Sacraments Baptisme and the holy Eucharist iustituted by thy selfe may haue their due esteeme and other institutions to be esteemed not as Sacraments but as matters profitable for vse and fit to be practised in the Church CHAP. XVII Containing an obseruation about the doctrine of the Virgine Maries conception in originall sinne ALbeit I finde that God is to be glorified for the great vertues and priuiledges he bestoweth vpon his Saints and chiefest seruants The doctrine of the Virgine Maries immunitie from originall sinne doth derogate from the honor of God yet it is to be done with such moderation and carefull discretion that whilest wee glorifie him in them we be warie not to attribute more vnto the Saints than will stand with the condition of seruants in giuing that glorie which is due to the master vnto his inferiors for although God himselfe haue said Whosoeuer shall honor me 1. Reg. I will glorifie him so hath he also left it recorded from his owne mouth I will not giue my glorie vnto any other Whence it followeth that although God haue bestowed such rare and singular priuiledges and prerogatiues vpon the virgine Marie the mother of Christ as he hath not done the like to any creature whatsoeuer insomuch that she her selfe knowing and feeling the happinesse of them said All generations shall call me blessed 1. Luc. 47. because he hath done me great fauors who is powerfull and holy be his name which is to be fulfilled amongst all good Christians regarding the word of God because she was blessed indeed aboue all women for the blessed fruit of her womb as S. Elizabeth said who being the Redeemer of the world brought benediction and ouercame the diuell the anthor of all malediction Yet ought not any be so much transported with an ouer-deeming affection and iudgement to this virgin as to giue her such glory as surpasseth the nature of a creature descended from Adam and onely may be giuen to Christ Iesus greater in glorie than his mother who being God and man was her Sauior because he came to saue all which benefit she acknowledged her selfe most thankfully in her Canticle saying My spirit hath exulted in God my Sauior 2 And I doe most plainely obserue by the Scriptures And it is most repuguant to Gods word Rom. 8. Tho. 12. q. 81. that she was to be conceiued as well as others in originall sinne for all mankind sinned in Adam S. Paule saying Death passed to all in whom all sinned And Thomas Aquinas sayth According to the Catholike faith it is firmely to be