upon every occasion 6. This darknesse did shew the spirituall darknesse of their soules and was a forerunner of the everlasting darknesse of hell which waited for them Ferus For the mysticall application of this Egyptian darknesse 1. Origen doth expound it of the unsearchable and impenetrable depth of the divine providence Augustine doth accommodate and applie it to the tenth Commandement Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours wife for such he saith are palpably blinded even as the Egyptians were 2. But more fitly doth the same Origen applie it to signifie the blindnesse of the Egyptians and the darknesse of their superstitious minde that were ignorant of the true knowledge and worship of God giving themselves to most filthie Idolatrie and it betokeneth also the grosse darknesse wherein the Gentiles were buried before they were called to the knowledge of the Messiah all the world was then in darknesse onely in Israel was light and the knowledge of God But contrariwise in the passion of Christ it was darke among the Jewes and light elsewhere which signified that light was sprung up to the Gentiles and blindnesse fallen upon the Jewes 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. The law is to be preached to the obstinate Vers. 4. IF thou refuse to let them goe behold to morrow I will bring Locusts Moses to Pharaoh being an obstinate and impenitent man preacheth nothing but the law and judgement the Gospell is not to bee preached to such but onely to the broken hearted as Christ saith That the spirit of God was upon him to preach the Gospell to the poore Luk. 4.18 This was a signe betweene the true Prophets and false that these alwayes cried to the people peace peace but the other told the people of their sinnes Ferus 2. Doct. The difference betweene the children of God and the children of the world Vers. 23. ALl the children of Israel had light where they dwelt In this difference betweene the children of Israel and the Egyptians is shadowed forth the divers estate betweene the children of God and the children of this world the one are lightned with the knowledge of grace the other sit downe in the region of darknesse and shadow of death as the Apostle saith Yee are all the children of the light and the children of the day we are not of the night nor of darknesse 1 Thess. 5.5 Borrh. 5. Places of confutation 1. Conf. That children are the members of the Church against the Anabaptists Vers. 9. WE will goe with our young and with our old with our sonnes and with our daughters Both young and old belonged unto Israel and to the Church of God which maketh against the Anabaptists that count infants no members of the Church and therefore denie them to be baptised But the Psalmist exhorteth not onely the ancient to praise God but the young also Young men and maidens old men and children Psalm 48.12 Ferus 2. Conf. Ignorance and darknesse not to be found in the Church of Christ but among the Egyptians Vers. 23. BVt all the children of Israel had light where they dwelt This externall light betokeneth the spirituall light of knowledge that the true Israel hath the light and knowledge of God It hath beene held as a principle among the Romanists and their practice sheweth them to bee of the same mind still that ignorance is the mother of devotion And great hath beene the ignorance and darknesse which reigned many yeeres under the Kingdome of Antichrist Borrh. And out of the darke smoke of the bottomlesse pit this mistie darknesse have come forth all those swarmes of Locusts Monkes Friers Masse Priests Seminaries whose endevour is to sow â—rror among the people and to settle them in ignorance of the truth to which purpose they forbid the Scriptures to be read or prayers to be said but in the Latin tongue they permit them not to read any books which may instruct them in the truth to sing Psalmes to conferre or reason of their faith All this sheweth that they would still keepe theirs in the Egyptian darknesse But thanks be unto God that hath caused the light of the Gospell of his Sonne to shine upon his Israel in this land that now that prophesie may be verified againe of this land which is also by the way of the Sea The people that sate in darknesse have seene great light and to them that sate in the region and shadow of death light is raised up Matth. 4.15 16. 6. Places of morall use 1. Mor. Of the necessity of good education Vers. 3. THat thou mayst declare in the eares of thy sonne Hence appeareth the necessitie of the good education of children that they should be instructed in the feare of the Lord in their youth and so will they not forget it when they are old Ferus This is the Apostles counsell that the fathers should bring up their children in the instruction and information of the Lord Ephes. 6.3 The want of good instruction in the youth is the cause of the licentiousnesse and unthriftinesse of the young men of this age 2. Mor. The departure of the Ministers of God dangerous Vers. 6. SO he turned him and went out from Pharaoh This sudden departure of Moses from Pharaoh and with indignation did foreshew the fearefull condition of Pharaoh whom the Ministers and Prophets of God forsake It was an evident argument of destruction at hand So their case is hard that are left destitute of the Ministers of Gods word Worldly men consider not this nay they many times wish in their hearts that there were not a Minister to speake unto them But like as the Jewes state was desperate when the Apostles left them and shooke off the dust of their feet against them Act. 13.51 so it fareth with those that are deprived of the presence of Gods Ministers Ferus 3. Mor. The office and part of good counsellers Vers. 7. THen Pharaohs servants said unto him It is the part of good counsellers to perswade Kings and Princes to deale well with the servants of God and to move them to the good of the Church and common-wealth Piscator Not to flatter the Prince to make themselves great or to deale unfaithfully and onely to seeke themselves as Shebna did Isai. 22. but to be like the faithfull Eliakâ—â— and as Ebedmelech that obtained favour for Ieremie 4. Mor. Not one jot of Gods word to be omitted Vers. 26. THere shall not be an hoofe left In those things which God hath prescribed and commanded noâ— the least thing is to be omitted Moses was charged to make all things belonging to the Tabernacle even to the snuffers and ashpans according to the paterne which the Lord shewed him in the mount Exod. 25.9 Simler So not one jot of the word of God must be left undone but it must be kepâ— exactly to an haires breadth as wee say CHAP. XI 1. The method and Argument IN this Chapter there is a continuation of the narration of Moses
offend against this precept Qui Christi cognitione carent quae cognitio non alia re quà m fide in Christum constet Which want the knowledge of Christ which knowledge consisteth in nothing else than in faith in Christ. Marbach Commentar in hunc locum Against this opinion that faith in Christ is not commanded in the Morall law the reasons follow afterward but first the question must further be explaned 1. First then we are to distinguish of faith which is of foure kindes or sorts 1. There is fides initialis or fundamentalis the faith of beginnings or the fundamentall faith whereof the Apostle speaketh Hebr. 11.6 That he which commeth unto God must beleeve that God is c. And this kinde of faith toward God the Apostle referreth to the doctrine of beginnings Heb. 6. 1. This faith apprehendeth onely the being and essence of God to know him to be the only Lord. 2. There is another faith called fides miraculorum the faith of miracles touched by the Apostle 1. Cor 13.2 If I had all faith so that I could remove mountaines 3. There is fides historica an historicall faith which beleeveth all things to bee true that are written in the Scriptures in which sense S Iames saith The Devils beleeve and tremble they beleeve there is a God and that all is true which the Scripture speaketh of God of his justice power punishing of sinners rewarding of the righteous 4. There is beside these a justifying faith whereof S. Paul maketh mention In that I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Sonne of God who hath loved me and given himselfe for me Galath 2.20 This faith is the life of the soule whereby hee which beleeveth is able in particular to apply unto himselfe the merits of Christs death Now this is the difference betweene these foure kindes of faith the first apprehendeth the essence and being of God the second the faith of miracles his power the third which is the historicall faith his truth the fourth namely the justifying faith his mercie The three first to beleeve God to be to beleeve him to bee omnipotent to beleeve him to be just and true are included in the first precept Thou shalt have no other Gods c. but not the last wherein is the errour of the Romanists that make all these kindes of faith the same in substance differing only in property which if it were true then it were possible for them that have the one faith to have the other and so Devils also which in some sort doe beleeve should also be capable of justifying faith But this matter that all these kindes of faith are not the same in substance nor of like nature with the justifying faith is shewed elsewhere whither I referre the Reader 2. Further we are to distinguish of the law for it is taken sometime more largely either for all the Scriptures of the old Testament as Luk 16.17 It is more easie that heaven and earth should passe away than that one title of the law should fall So Ioh. 15.25 It is written in their law they have hated mee without a cause which testimony is found in the Psalmes Psal. 35.19 or else the law is taken for all the bookes of Moses and so the Law and Prophets are named together Matth. 7.12 This is the Law and the Prophets But the law is sometime taken more strictly for the Morall law whereof the Apostle speaketh Rom. 7. I knew not sinne but by the law and so S. Paul opposeth the law of workes to the law of faith Rom. 3.27 Now as the law is taken generally either for all the old Scriptures written by the Prophets or for the writings of Moses it cannot be denied but that faith in Jesus Christ is in this sense both contained and commanded in the law for of Christ the Lord spake by the mouth of his Prophets Luk. 1.70 And Moses wrote of Christ as our Saviour saith Had yee beleeved Moses yee would have beleeved me for Moses wrote of mee Ioh. 5.45 But as the law is taken strictly for the Morall law the law of workes which containeth only the ten words or Commandements so we deny this justifying faith to bee commanded in the law 3. Indirectly or by way of consequent it will not bee denied but that this faith also is implied in the law because we are bound by the law to beleeve the Scriptures and the whole word of God for this is a part of Gods worship to beleeve his word to be true and so some define faith Est certa persuafio qua assentimur omni verbo Dei nobis tradita It is a certaine perswasion whereby wee give assent to all the word of God Vrsin And so by this precept wee are bound to receive all the promises and doctrines concerning Christ delivered in the old and new Testament But directly as a part and branch and so a worke of the law wee deny justifying faith to be in this precept or any other prescribed or commanded The reasons are these 1. The Morall law and the Gospell differ in the very nature and substance for the one is naturally imprinted in the heart of man the other is revealed and wrought by grace The first the Apostle testifieth where he saith The Gentiles which have not the law do by nature the things contained in the law Rom. 2.14 The other also is witnessed by the same Apostle Rom. 2.24 We are justified freely by his grace The argument then may be framed thus The morall law is graft in the heart of man by nature but faith in Christ is not by nature but by grace above nature for if it were naturall all men should have faith which the Apostle denieth 2. Thessal 3.2 Faith then in Christ belongeth not to the law Therefore it is strange that Bellarmine confessing in another place that pracepta decalogi sunt explicationes juris natura that the precepts of the decalogue are the explications of the law of nature Lib. 2. de Imaginib Sanctor cap. 7. could not inferre hereupon that the precepts of faith and of the Gospell are no explications of the law of nature and therefore have no dependance of the morall law Ambrose useth this very argument Nemo sub lâ—ge fidem constituat lex enim intra mensuram ultra mensuram gratia Let no man place faith in the law for the law is within the measure and compasse of nature but grace is beyond measure Ambros. in 12. Luc. 2. The effects of the law of works and the law of faith are divers for the one worketh feare the other love and peace as the Apostle saith Ye have not received the spirit of bondage to feare againe but yee have received the spirit of adoption whereby we crie Abba Father Rom. 8.17 Againe the Apostle saith The letter killeth the Spirit giveth life 2 Cor. 2.6 Thus then the argument standeth the same thing cannot bee the instrument of
contrary things of life and death peace and terror love and feare for a Fountaine cannot make both salt water and sweet Iam. 3.12 But the law is the minister of death of feare and terror Ergo not of life and peace and so consequently not of the faith of the Gospell which bringeth all these 3. The same thing doth not both make the wound and give a plaister to heale it The law doth shew us our sinne faith by grace in Christ healeth it the law reviveth sinne Without the law sinne is dead Rom. 7.8 but we are dead to sinne and alive to God in Iesus Christ our Lord Rom. 6.11 The same cannot make us both to die unto sinne and revive sinne the law doth the one therefore not the other So Augustine saith Ad hoc data est lex ut vulnera ostenderet peccatorum qua gratiae benedictione sanaret Therefore was the law given that it should shew the wounds of our sinnes which it should heale by the benediction of grace August de poenitent medic 4. The Preachers publishers and givers of the law and Gospell are divers The law was given by Moses but grace and truth came by Iesus Christ Ioh. 1.17 But if justifying faith were commanded in the law then grace also should come by the ministrie of Moses that gave the law This is Bernards reason who further inferreth thus Venit prâ—inde gratia plenus veritate Dominus noster c. Therefore Christ our Lord came full of grace and truth that what could not bee done by the law might bee fulfilled by grace Serm. parâ— 28. 5. The qualities and conditions of the law and the Gospell are divers the law promiseth life to him that worketh Moses thus describeth the righteousnesse of the law That the man which doth these things shall live thereby Rom. 10.5 But the Gospell requireth not the condition of working but beleeving to him that worketh not but beleeveth in him that justifieth the ungodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse Rom. 4.5 If then faith were commanded in the law to beleeve should also be a worke of the law then the Apostles conclusion were in vaine I conclude that a man is justified by faith without the works of the law But if faith be excluded out of the works of the law then it is not commanded or contained in the law for then it should be a worke of the law 2. Further the invocation of Angels and Saints which is commonly practised and stifly maintained in the Church of Rome is another apparent transgression of this first commandement because they give a speciall part of the divine worship which consisteth in prayer and invocation unto the creature First we will see and examine the arguments produced by the Romanists in defence of this superstition and then by other reasons out of the Scriptures convince and confute them The Romanists Arguments answered brought in defence of the invocation of Saints 1. THe Saints doe pray for us therefore we may and ought to pray them The antecedent or first part that the Saints doe pray for us they would prove by these places of Scripture Exod. 32.13 Moses thus saith in his prayer Remember Abraham Izhak and Iakob thy servants c. Ierem. 15.1 Though Moses and Samuel stood before me yet could not my affection be toward this people Baruch 3.4 O Lord God almightie heare now the prayer of the dead Israelites 2 Macchab. 14.15 And Onias spake and said This is a lover of the brethren who prayeth much for the peoplâ— to wit Ieremias the Prophet of the Lord. Answ. 1. As for the testimonies cited out of Baruch and the booke of Macchabees they prove nothing because they are no books of Canonicall Scripture 2. The other testimonies are impertinently alleaged for in the first Moses maketh no mention of the prayers which Abraham Izhak and Iakob should make for the people but of the covenant which the Lord made with them In the other of an hypotheticall and conditionall proposition they make a categoricall and absolute affirmation The text is If Moses and Samuel stood they inferre that Moses and Samuel did stand Simler But it may better be answered that if these were alive among the people to stand before the Lord for them in prayer c. as see the like Ezech. 14.14 Though these three men Noah Daniel and Iob were among them they should deliver but their owne soules by their righteousnesse 3. The Saints doe pray unto God by their generall wishes and desires as wishing that the Kingdome of God were accomplished as Revel 6.10 The soules under the Altar crie with a loud voyce saying How long Lord c. doest thou not judge and avenge our bloud But our particular necessities they are ignorant of and so doe noâ— make particular requests for us therefore the argument followeth not they pray by their generall desires for the Church Ergo they pray for us in particular 4. Seeing that the Romanists doe hold that the Patriarks and Fathers of the old Testament were in Limbo which they make a member or part of hell they doe contradict themselves in making them mediatours and intercessours in heaven 2. Argum. The Angels they say know our affaires and pray for us As Zachar. 1.12 The Angell of Iehovah answered and said O Lord of hosts how long wilt thou bee unmercifull to Ierusalem c. Therefore it is lawfull to pray to the Angels Answ. 1. That the Angels doe report our affaires unto God and so may make relation of our prayers and words also as of our other gests and acts unto God as the Lords messengers and ministers we will not denie but that they make any particular requests for men the Scripture no where speaketh and we are not bound to beleeve the relation of our prayers unto God is one thing and mediation and intercession is another 2. That Angell of Iehovah which prayed for Jerusalem was the Lord Christ who maketh intercession for his Church unto whom the rest of the Angels returne their message vers 11. who is also called Iehovah vers 20. 3. Neither doth it follow if it could bee proved out of Scripture that the Angels prayed foâ— us that we are to pray to them because they are not alwayes present to heare us and we are forbidden in Scripture to worship them Revel 22.9 and therefore to pray unto them which is a part of divine worship 3. Argum. The Saints that are living doe one pray for another much more the Saints being dead because their charitie is more perfect and seeing there is a communion of Saints as of the living so also of the dead which communion being not in faith and hope whereof there is no more use with them that are at rest it remaineth it is in charitie As therefore we may request the living to pray for us so we may pray the dead also to entreate for us Answer 1. The argument followeth not for the Saints alive doe one
them that gave them their several tongues hom 11. in Numb But the text it selfe overthroweth this opinion v. 9. The Lord Iehovah did confound their languages 3. Confut. Against Celsus that saith Moses borrowed of other writers THirdly Celsus objected that Moses borrowed this story of the towre of Babel of those that write of the Gyants called Aloides how they cast downe a great towre But Origen answereth that the writers of that history were after Homer who was after Moses so that he could not take any thing from them lib. 4. cont Cels. It is more like that they corrupted the true story of Moses with the Poeticall fictions 4. Confut. Against the Pagans that fable of the beasts that they had sometimes one language 4. CErtaine Pagans not beleeving that the world was not any time of one language compare this narration of Moses to that fable of the beasts that sometime they had all one language and one understood another till such time as they sent an embassage to the Gods that they might bee alwayes in their flourishing youth and never be old and for this their proud request their speech was confounded that now one understandeth not another The like truth say they is in this narration of Moses For how is it like that they could in that instant every man forget his former speech ex Philone But this is a doltish comparison betweene reasonable men and unreasonable beasts those being no more capable of speech than they are of reason And seeing all the world tooke beginning from one man before the floud from Adam after the floud from Noah why should it seeme incredible that the world used one language And why should it seeme unpossible that God to whom all things are possible in that instant could make them forget their language seeing that some diseases as the Lethargy doe bring such forgetfulnesse as that the patient knoweth not how to call things by their names and Pliny writeth of Corvinus Messala that he forgot his owne name 5. Confut. Against Philastrius that all the world was of one language not divers before 5. PHilastrius counteth it an hereticall opinion that all the world was of one language before the tower of Babel they are said so to be saith he that although they spake divers languages yet they one understood another and so in effect it was but as one But the text is contrary that the whole earth was of one language and one speech not of one understanding but of one lip as it is in the hebrew that is they framed their words and language after the same manner And how could every man understand so many languages which are held of most to have beene not so few as seventy without a miraculous gift such as the Apostles had and whereas Moses maketh mention of divers languages in the 10. chap. v. 5.20.31 there that is spoken by way of anticipation And here Moses setteth forth the beginning and occasion of the diversity of languages by a certaine figure called hysterosis which declareth that last that was done first setting the effect before the cause 6. Confut. Against Philo that this division of tongues is to bee understood historically not in allegory 6. FOurthly Philo draweth this story of the confusion of tongues to an allegory to signifie the confusion of vices Hoc est nunc propositum sub figura confusionis linguarum dijicere constipatuâ— vitiorum cuneum This is Moses purpose under this figure of confusion of tongues to cast downe the conjoyned muster of vices for to speake properly this parting of one language into many is a separation rather than a confusion Contra. 1. After this manner the whole story of Genesis may bee allegorized so that we should have neither creation of the world nor inundation of the same in true history but in devised allegory 2. This division of tongues is called a confusion not in respect of the divers speech which was indeed divided not united or confounded but of the speakers who were confounded in their affection in being astonished at so suddaine an alteration in their memory in forgetting their accustomed speech in their understanding because they one understood not another in their worke which was confused the server bringing one thing when the builder called for another 7. Confut. Against Plato and Aristotle 7. PLato his opinion is that words have their force and meaning from nature Aristotle that they were first framed as it pleased man But here wee learne that God gave unto man speech and he infused into men at once diversity of languages 8. Confut. Against the Lutherans that make an omnipresence of Christs body 8 Vers. 5. THe Lord came downe the Lutheranes Vbiquitaries that maintaine an omnipresence and ubiquity that is an every-where presence of Christs flesh being pressed by this argument that Christs body doth move from place to place therefore it is not every where doe answer out of this place that God is said to move and descend and yet he is every where But the reason is not alike for to ascend and descend is spoken of Christs body truly and properly but of the God-head only metaphorically and figuratively 9. Confut. Against the latine service in popery 9. Vers. 9. THerefore the name was called Babel because their language was so confounded that they one understood not another so what is the Church of Rome to bee counted but another Babel and synagogue of confusion where the people understand not the Priest noâ— one another in their latine service and prayers Muscul. 10. Confut. Against Pererius the marrying of the uncle and neece unlawfull 10. Vers. 29. THe name of Abrahams wife was Sarai who is held to be the daughter of Haran Abrahams brother which marriages were not then forbidden by any law but afterwards they were where the errour of the papists and namely of Bellarmine and Pererius may be noted who affirme that it was not forbidden by Moses law for the uncle to marry his neece for Othoniel the younger brother of Caleb married Achsa Calebs daughter Iud. 1.13 Contra. 1. To marry in this degree is forbidden in Leviticus by necessary collection Levit. 18.12 Thou shalt not uncover the shame of thy fathers sister for she is thy fathers kinswoman doth not the same reason hold for the other sex thou shalt not uncover the shame of thy fathers brother for hee is thy fathers kinsman Where the degree is prohibited in the male it holdeth also in the female sex unlesse they will say because the law saith thou shalt not cover thy neighbours wife and expresseth not thy neighbours husband that therefore the one should bee lawfull and not the other 2. Othoniel was not the brother of Caleb but either his nephew as the Septuagint read Othoniel the sonne of Kenez adelphon the brother of Caleb namely Kenez for so is the construction in the greek or else as Iunius collecteth Othoniel and Caleb were brothers children Caleb
laughed 2. Neither did this laughter of Abraham shew any infidelitie and unbeliefe in him as Chrysostome thinketh and some others who make Abrahams and Sarahs laughter all one infidelitate peccavit sanctus Abraham c. Holy Abraham saith he sinned by infidelity and therefore his seed was punished 400. yeares with servitude 6. homil de poenitent The same also is the opinion of Hierome that Abrahams laughing his speech shall Sarah that is ninetie yeare old beare his wish and prayer for Ismael did declare his incredulity lib. 3. cont Pelag. But the Apostle cleareth Abraham of all such imputation of unbeleefe where he saith Rom. 4.19 alluding to this place He was not weake in faith v. 21. being fully assured that he which had promised was also able to doe it And if Abrahams laughter had proceeded from doubtfulnesse God would not have named Isaack of such laughter in the which name Rasi noteth many mysteries in the letters jod signifieth the ten tentations of Abraham â—sadds the age of Sarah of ninetie yeare cheth the eighth day for circumcision coph an hundred yeares which was Abrahams age 3. Neither did Abraham at the first doubt but afterward was confirmed in the faith which is the opinion of Ioannes Arboreus reported by Pererius for the Apostle doth free Abraham also from all doubting either first or last Rom. 4.20 Neither did hee doubt of the promise of God through unbeleefe 4. Neither is Cajetans conceit to be admitted whereunto Pererius seemeth to subscribe that Abraham doubted not of the truth of Gods promise or of his power but onely he doubted whether the promise were to be taken literally or mystically in chap. 17. Gen. for what reason had Abraham to thinke of any mysticall sense if he beleeved that God would and could literally and properly make good his word And Saint Paul sheweth that Abraham understood the promise properly and literally when he saith that he considered not his owne body which was now dead being almost an hundred yeare old nor the deadnesse of Sarahs wombe Rom. 4.19 5. Neither yet can I fully consent to Ambrose and Rupertus that doe discharge Abraham of all manner of doubtfulnesse as Ambrose saith that whereas Abraham prayeth for Ismael he did not doubt of Gods promise to receive a sonne by Sarah but desireth that Ismael also may live sic superabundet gratia and so Gods grace might abound the more Rupertus saith that whereas Abraham said shall a sonne be borne to him that is an hundred yeare old Non dubitando dixit sed suam faelicitatem admirando He doubted not in so saying but admiring his owne happinesse for there appeareth some difficulty and hesitation in Abrahams speech seeing hee objecteth with himselfe the same thing which Sarah did shall a childe bee borne to him that is an hundred yeare old as Sarah said shall I certainly beare a childe that am old Gen. 19.13 though Abraham yeelded not to this objection as Sarah did neither shewed so great weaknesse in doubting and therefore was not reproved as Sarah was 6. Wherefore the best solution is that these objections and doubts in Abraham proceeded not from want of faith but Abraham feeling in himselfe a sight betweene faith and carnall sense striveth against humane reason and overcommeth these motions at the first and so was strengthened as the Apostle saith in the faith and his faith was thereby made more glorious Calvin There was then in Abraham a strife betweene his naturall reason which wondred that he at an hundred yeare should have a sonne of Sarah and his faith which beleeved that God was able to doe it yet in this cogitation he remained not long his faith prevailed QVEST. XIII Whether Abraham were circumcised first or last Vers. 23. THen Abraham tooke Ismael c. 1. It is questioned whether Abraham were circumcised first to give good example or last which I thinke rather with the Hebrewes because Abraham had beene unfit by reason of his cutting to circumcise others but it is certaine he beganne first with his owne sonne Ismael to make the other more willing 2. Abraham alone could not circumcise all his family therefore it is like that thereto be used the helpe of others as the Jewes to this day use Chirurgians which are skilfull in cutting to circumcise their children 3. Abraham the same day doth circumcise his family to testifie to the world that he was not ashamed of the badge of his profession and to shew his prompt obedience in not deferring the commandement whereupon to this day the Jewes circumcise in the day not in the night Mercer 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Our faith must rest onely upon Gods words Vers. 4. BEhold I make my covenant c. Wee learne that our faith must depend onely upon Gods word as here the Lord would have Abraham to consider who it was that made this covenant with him behold I c. We must not then greatly regard what man saith but the word of God must be our warrant As our Saviour maketh this opposition You have heard that it was said to you of old time c. but I say unto you Mat. 5.27 sic Calvin 2. Doct. the Sacraments called by the name of the things Vers. 10. THis is my covenant That is the signe of my covenant so the Sacraments are called by the name of the things which they represent because they are not naked and bare signes but doe verily seale unto us the promise of God In the same sense and by the like figure called metonymiâ— doth our Saviour call the bread his body saying This is my body whereof it was a figure onely and representation Mercer 3. Doct. Difference betweene externall and internall calling in the Church Vers. 7. I Will establish my covenant betweene me and thee and thy feed after thee in their generations c. All then that were of Abrahams seed by Isaack did belong to the externall covenant and Church of God and therefore are called in generall by our Saviour the children of the Kingdome yet the covenant of grace appertained onely to those that received it by faith and so were the children of faithfull Abraham as Saint Paul saith They which are the children of the flesh are not the children of God but the children of the promise are counted for the seed Rom. 9.8 Calvin 4. Doct. Baptisme the Sacrament of regeneration belongeth to Infants Vers. 12. EVery man-childe of eight dayes old shall be circumcised c. From hence the baptisme of Infants which commeth in the place of circumcision is most pertinently proved against the grosse errour of the Anabaptists for as then Infants were circumcised to shew the contagion of the nature from the which they were cleansed by the circumcision of the spirit so even Infants now being guiltie of originall corruption have need of the Sacraments of regeneration 5. Doct. Gods purpose and promise towards vs should not stay our prayers Vers. 20. COncerning Ismael I
land mounting c. Abraham saw not the raine of fire and brimstone but the smoake onely thereof and yet he rose very early so that it seemeth the burning of Sodome was done in a moment for the raine fell not till Lot was entred into Zoar which was about the Sunne rising vers 23. By this we may see how suddenly the world at Christs comming shall be consumed with fire and we changed in a moment in the twinkling of an eye 1 Cor. 15.52 Muscul. 6. Doct. Wherefore unlawfull copulations are often more fruitfull than lawfull Vers. 36. THus were both the daughters of Lot with childe c. We finde in Scripture that many lawfully companying with their husbands as Sara Rebecca Rachel Anna yet hardly conceived and yet divers with one unlawfull copulation were with childe as Thamar with Iuda Bersebe with David Lots daughters with their father which the Lord doth not as more favouring such unlawfull conjunctions but to this end that such secret uncleane works should come to light for their conversion as in Iuda David or confusion Marlor 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Vniversality no sure marke of the Church Vers. 4. ALL the people from all quarters All rhe whole City of Sodome consented in evill onely Lot and his family were free Universality then is but a slender or uncertaine argument of the truth or Church that professeth it It is oftner seene that the greater part is the worse than otherwise The Romanists therefore reason but simply that their religion is the best because the greater part of the world received it for by the same reason the uncleane conversation of Sodome might bee justified against Lot 2. Confut. Against Atheists that beleeve not the transmutation of Lots wiâ—â— Vers. 26. SHe became a pillar of salt Let not prophane persons scoffe at this as though it were one of Ovids Metamorphosis fables There is a great difference betweene Gods actions and Poets fictions he that beleeveth that God made all things of nothing which dayly seeth birds to come forth of egges and living creatures to be ingendred by dead seed and hopeth for the resurrection of the body cannot doubt but that God could turne a womans body into a salty pillar 3. Confut. Monkish and solitary life maketh not more holy Vers. 38. HE dwelt in a cave Even Lot in a solitary cave committed sinne it is not then the place that amendeth mens manners Gregory well saith sic desit spiritus non adjuvat locus If an heart be wanting the place helpeth not Lot sinned in the mountaine Adam fell in Paradise the Angels in heaven It is then but a Popish fantasie that a Monks coule a cloister life an Hermites weed can make a man more holy But it is to be feared that as dtunkennesse and incest were committed even in the cave so the Gloisters and Cells of Popish votaries are not free from the like uncleannesse 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. Vnruly people to be gently handled Vers. 7. I Pray you my brethren doe not so wickedly c. Lot sheweth that a furious multitude is to be gently dealt withall and not to be exasperated with sharpe words as here Lot calleth the Sodomites his brethren not in the same profession but in respect of his cohabitation and common condition of life This is S. Pauls rule Instructing them with meeknesse that are contrary minded 2 Tim. 2.25 2. Observ. God delivereth in extremity Vers. 10. THe men put forth their hands and pulled Lot c. The Lord though he deferre his helpe yet will not faile us in the greatest danger when we are brought to a straight As here Lot was delivered from the Sodomites as from raging Lions when he was as under their pawes Calvin In the like pinch the Lord delivered David when Saul had compassed him in 1 Sam. 23.26 3. Observ. Prophane persons make a mocke of Gods judgements Vers. 14. HE seemed to his sons in law as though he had mocked c. Such are the prophane Atheists and worldlings that make but a mocke and scorne of Gods judgements and are no better perswaded of the end of the world by fire than these wretches were of the destruction of Sodome of such S. Peter speaketh That there shall be in the last dayes mockers c. which shall say where is the promise of his comming c. 2 Pet. 3.3 Calvin 4. Observ. We must not deferre our turning to God Vers. 16. AS he prolonged the time By Lots example who delaying the time if God had not beene more mercifull to draw him forth might have perished in the overthrow of Sodome wee are taught how dangerous a thing it is to deferre our calling and to trifle or dally with Gods judgements Therefore the Prophet Amos saith Prepare to meet thy God O Israel Amos 4.12 better to meet and prevent the Lord by repentance than to stay till his judgements overtake us 5. Observ. We must not forsake our calling Vers. 26. HIs wife looked backe This teacheth us that a man should not fall away from his profession and calling whereinto he is once entred as our Saviour saith He that setteth his hand to the plowe and looketh back is not fit for the kingdome of God Luk 9.26 Muscul. 6. Obser. He that wavereth in faith is never setled Vers. 28. NOt so my Lord Lot not following the Lords direction to goe first to the mountaine entreateth for Zoar yet being in Zoar he is not contented to stay there So they which doe not submit themselves to Gods ordinance but are doubtfull in faith are unconstant and wavering and never setled as Saint Iames saith A wavering minded man is unstable in all his wayes 7. Observ. Custome and continuance in sinne dangerous Vers. 35. THey made their father drunke that night also c. We see then what a dangerous thing it is once to give way to the tentation of Satan Lot having beene once drunken already is more apt to fall into it againe so fearefull is a custome and continuance in sinne Our instruction is therefore that we should resist the temptation at the first and not by yeelding to give way for a second assault 〈◊〉 the Apostle saith Be not overcome of evill but overcome evill with goodnesse Rom. 12.21 8. Observ. The sinne of drunkennesse how dangerous FUrther we see how much drunkennesse is to be taken heed of which did prostitute Lot so excellent a man to such beastly uncleannesse Origen well noteth Decepit Lot ebrietas quem Sodoma non decepit uritur ebrius flammis mulierum quem sobriam sulphurea flamma non attigerat drunkennesse deceived Lot whom Sodome could not deceive he burneth with the lust of women being drunken whom while he was sober the flames of brimstone touched not Wherefore let us alwayes remember that saying of the Apostle Be not drunke with wine wherein is excesse but be ye fulfilled with the spirit Eph. 5.15 CHAP. XX. 1. The Method THis Chapter hath
are not to be stood upon 2. Some think that these children began to be borne in the beginning of the first seven yeares as R. Levi but the text overthroweth that conceit for Iacob went not into Lea till he had ended his terme of seven yeares vers 21. Some thinke that these and the rest of the children were borne to Iacob in the last seven yeares and the six yeares beside of Iacobs service but the story is otherwise that all Iacobs children were borne before he entred into a new covenant to stay still with Laban his two seven yeares being expired Genes â—0 25 But it is more probable that all Iacobs children only Benjamin excepted that was borne in the land of Canaan that is eleven sonnes and one daughter were brought forth in the compasse of the last seven yeares for it is not necessary to assigne their birth successively one to be borne after another but that their mothers might be with childe at once and so it is not improbable that foure women in seven yeares might bring forth 11. or 12. children Mercer 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. God directeth even the least actions of his servants Vers. 1. IAcob lift up his feet that is he went cheerefully and willingly and in that mention is made of so small an action as the lifting up of his feet we learne that even the least and ordinary actions of the faithfull are directed by the spirit of God and guided by his providence Mercer as our Saviour taketh knowledge of Nathaniels sitting under the figge tree Ioh. 1.48 so the Apostle saith that all things worke together for the best to them that love God Rom. 8.28 2. Doct. Men may hold the truth in generall and yet faile in particular Vers. 15. SHouldest thou serve me for nought Laban here speaketh reason and seemeth to know what is just and right but afterward he failed and recompenced Iacob but meanely for his faithfull service as Iacob complaineth Thou hast changed my wages ten times Gen. 31.41 Thus we see that carnal men may hold generall principles a right but when it commeth to their owne particular then they are blinded with selfe-love Calvin So dealt Herod with Iohn Baptist he did acknowledge him to be a just and holy man yet to please his wives daughter commanded him to be beheaded 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Custome not to be pretended where greater enormities are admitted Vers. 26. IT is not the manner of this place to give the younger before the elder He pretendeth a custome in the lesse matter in the meane time he transgresseth the custome and all good order in a thing of greater importance in thrusting upon a man in the night one sister for another thus after the like manner the Romanists object the custome of the Church against the marriage of Ministers whom they call Priests and in the meane time they breake all good order while for want of the due remedie fornication and uncleane lust is suffered to be practised amongst them Muscul. 2. Confut. Iacobs polygamie and marriage of two sisters not justifiable Vers. 30. SO entred he into Rachel also This multiplicity of wives which is called polygamie is diversly excused 1. Augustine saith Nulla lege prohibebatur it was forbidden by no law quandâ—mos erat crimen non erat It was no fault when the custome was so as in times past it was a shame for the Romans to have talares tunicas side garments but now every one of honest sort doth weare them Aug. lib. 22. cont Faust c. 47. Contra. 1. Though there were no written law in those times yet their owne conscience grounded upon the light of nature and the faithfull tradition of the fathers might have discerned it to be a fault seeing that God in the beginning for one Adam made but one Eve and Lamech of the wicked race is the first found in Scripture to have had two wives 2. And though custome may be pretended for many wives yet to marry two sisters there was no such custome Mercer 3. The example of long garments is nothing like for it is a thing indifferent which may be thought comely or uncomely as time and place doth vary but that which is simply unlawfull and against the first institution as polygamie is cannot be borne out by any custome 2. Some say that polygamie is after a sort against nature yet so as it may be dispensed with as it is like after the flood to Noah this indulgence was given Perer. in 29. Gen. numer 31. Contra. 1. If Noah had beene dispensed with for many wives then had there beene greatest cause to have used that liberty and if polygamie for propagation were tolerable God might have preserved in the arke more than for every man one woman 2. Against a written law and institution as this is of having one wife Gen. 2.24 A man shall leave father and mother and cleave to his wife not wives a dispensation unwritten cannot be admitted 3. Divers allegories are made of Iacobs two wives Augustine by Leah figureth the people of the Iewes by Rachel the Gentiles Rupertus saith contrary that Rachel was a type of the Iewes Leah of the Gentiles August ser. 80. de tempor Rup in Gen. 29. Gregorie by Leah interpreteth the active life by Rachel the contemplative Homil. 14. in Ezech. ex Perer. Contra. 1. By the diversitie of these allegories it appeareth they are mens collections and humane devices and therefore cannot excuse the transgression of a divine ordinance 2. And though these allegories might be warranted by the Scripture yet thereby is not the fact justified Christs comming for the suddennesse thereof in Scripture is compared to the comming of a theefe yet I trust thereby is not a theeves sudden approching approved 3. This then is the resolution of this question 1. that Iacob shewed his infirmity in this not double but quadriple marriage yea and the same incestuous in the marriage of two sisters 2. yet Labans fault was greater than Iacobs who by his craft induced him unto it 3. God in his deepe providence used this oversight of Iacob as a meanes greatly to increase and multiply his seed 4. Iacob and the rest of the Patriarkes in their manners and generall example of life but not in some particular acts such as this is are to be imitated Mercer 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. Education of children in labour Vers. 9. RAchel came with her fathers sheepe for she kept them Thus in that simple age did they bring up their children not idly and wantonly but in labour and houshold workes Laban had many servants beside in his house yet he setteth this faire damzell to keepe his sheepe though this be not an example now to men of good sort and place thus to imploy their daughters for the particular yet they should follow it so far to provide that their children bee industriously brought up and not to give them the reines of licentious
the selling of Ioseph and of Christ to agree in the summe who was sold for 30. pence but it is not necessary that the type should be answerable in every particular circumstance 5. The Hebrewes thinke that the ordinary price of servants was 30. sicles but that they abated ten because they sold Ioseph in secret but it appeareth otherwise in the law where the price of redemption of the male from five yeares to twenty is twenty shekels Levit. 27.5 But in this place they had no respect to any custome or law but according to their number they set the price of 20. shekels for every one of them which were ten in all two shekels for Benjamin was very young not above foure or five yeare old and could not give consent and Ruben afterward gave consent unto them Mercer QUEST XXIV Of the counsell of Iudah to sell Ioseph into captivity Vers. 26. IVdah said what availeth it if we slay though we keepe his bloud secret c. 1. They were resolved already not to lay violent hands themselves upon Ioseph but to suffer him to perish in the pit and yet Iudah so accounteth of it as if they should slay him themselves 2. Iudah was moved by the spirit of God to deliver Ioseph from this second death yet he sheweth his hatred in that he giveth counsell to make a bond-slave of him which was a bad as death 3. Iudah by this meanes thinketh to avoid three inconveniences first the shedding of his bloud secondly to take him from his father who was so affected toward him thirdly to prevent the honour which Ioseph dreamed of 4. The Hebrewes thinke that for this compassion in Iudah afterward Daniel of that tribe was delivered from the Lyons but it is certain that upon this occasion of selling Ioseph into captivitie the Israelites afterwards went downe into Egypt and were afflicted with a long and hard bondage 5. In the meane time while they were making their bargaine Ioseph did intreat his brethren with many prayers and teares Gen. 42.22 but they would not heare him Mercerus QUEST Where Ruben was when Ioseph was sold. Vers. 29. RVben returned to the pit 1. Ruben was absent when Ioseph was sold some thinke to minister to his father according to his course some to mourne alone by himselfe for the sinne committed with his fathers concubine But it is most like that he went about some other way to the pit to have taken Ioseph thence secretly and therefore Iosephus thinketh that Ruben came thither in the night Mercer 2. Philo thinketh that after Ruben understood that his brethren had sold Ioseph he utterly misliked it making them worse than theeves for they prey upon strangers but these upon their owne brother lib. de Iosâ—ph but it is more like that Ruben did rest satisfied after he understood that they had not killed him and consented unto them Mercer 3. Before he knew what was done he cryed out Whither shall I goe both because he was the first-borne and therefore should bee most blamed for the losse of Ioseph Muscul. as also for that he had so lately offended his father before for his incestuous act Iun. QUEST XXVI Of the sprinkling of Iosephs coat with bloud and the deceiving of Iacob Vers. 31. THey tooke Iosephs coat and killed a kid c. 1. Iosephus thinketh that they brought Iosephs coat themselves but the text is otherwise vers 32. they sent it but Iosephus ghesseth right that they sent the coat rent and torne as though indeed some wilde beast had devoured Ioseph and they dipped it in a kids bloud which they say is most like unto mans bloud 2. Iosephus also is deceived in that he thinketh that Iacob had some knowledge before of Iosephs captivity but now changeth his minde thinking surely that Ioseph was devoured for from whence could Iacob have any knowledge what was befallen Ioseph but by his brethren who were sure to keepe it secret from their father ex Perer. 3. Rupertus hath also a strange opinion that Iacob was not so simple when he saw the bloudy coat to thinke that a beast had devoured every part of Ioseph nothing to remaine but his coat but that he did surmise that his brethren had killed him but durst not tell his sonnes of it because he saw them so maliciously bent for Iacob sheweth the contrary by his owne words that he gave credit to their report that an evill beast indeed had spoiled Ioseph vers 33. and if Iacob had so thought hee would not have spared by his fatherly authority to rebuke his sonnes to bring them to repentance 4. It is like that afterward when it was knowne to Iacob that Ioseph lived that his brethren confessed the truth to their father and acknowledged their fault but that Iacob seeing how God had turned Iosephs captivity to the good of them all therein considering Gods providence spared to rebuke them as Ioseph upon the same reason did forbeare his brethren Gen. 45.7 5. Simeon and Levi as they were most cruelly given as it appeareth by the destruction of the Sichâ—mites are thought to have bin the principall actors against Ioseph which may be the cause that afterward Simeon was bound by Iosephs commandement so the Hebrews thinke that Iudas that betrayed Christ was of the tribe of Simeon as the Priests and Scribes were of Levi that put him to death And as Iudah here might have counsell to deceive Iacob with the bloud of a kid so hee himselfe was deceived of Thamar about a kid Mercer QUEST XXVII The greatnesse of Iacobs sorrow for Ioseph Vers. 34. HE sorrowed for his sonne a long season c. Many things increased the sorrow of Iacob for his sonne Ioseph 1. Because he imagined that Ioseph was devoured of some beast Ne frustum quidem superest quod sepulchro infâ—ratur There was no part of him left to be committed to buriall 2. The very sight of the torne and bloudy garment did augment his griefe as the very sight of Caesars garment wherein he was killed moved the people to be revenged upon those that murdered him and Iulia the wife of Pompey when she saw his garment sprinkled with bloud at the sight thereof swouned away and died Perer. ex Dion 3. Iacob continued twenty two or twenty three years mourning and lamenting for Ioseph for now he was seventeene yeare old but when Iacob heard tell that he was living in Egypt he was 39. yeare old for he was 30. yeares of age when he stood before Pharaoh and after that seven yeares of plenty were past and two yeares of famine 4. This extremity of griefe caused Iacob outwardly to testifie the same first by the renting of his cloaths which afterward did grow into use and custome to shew the great sorrow and indignation of minde as Caleb and Iosua rent their clothes Numb 14.6 when they heard the murmuring of the people and Paul and Barnabas when the people would have offered sacrifice unto them Perer.
and handle them roughly to bring them to knowledge and confession of their treachery against him so Christian governors should not put the Iewes to death but use them hardly by laying taxes and impositions upon them that at the length they may be brought to repentance for their blasphemies against Christ as it is in the Psalme Slay them not lest my people forget it but scatter them abroad by thy power Psal. 59.12 Rupert lib. 9. comment in Gen. cap. 4. 2. Doct. Where the feare of God is not there can be no true vertue Vers. 18. THis doe and live for I feare God c. Ioseph biddeth them bee secure of his sincere and true dealing with him because he feared God so that true religion is the fountaine of vertue and honest dealing they therefore that feare not God may for a while make a semblance and shew of honestie but it cannot be in truth where the ground of true religion is wanting where therfore the feare of God is not we cannot expect any vertuous action as Abraham reasoned with himselfe when he sojourned in Gerar The feare of God is not in this place and they will slay me for my wives sake Gen. 20.12 3. Doct. The guilt of sinne remaineth when the act is past Vers. 21. THey said one to another we have verily sinned against our brother By this wee learne that although the act of sinne be done and past yet the guilt and conscience of sinne may continue as here the sinne which they had committed against Ioseph 23. yeares before is revived Muscul. As the Lord said to Cain If thou doest not well sinne lieth at the doore Gen. 4.7 It lieth lurking in the doore of the conscience ready upon every occasion to assault us 4. Doct. The author of affliction it commeth not by chance Vers. 28. WHat is this that God hath done unto us These men having a guilty conscience thinke that God meeteth with them in every corner yet this good perswasion they have that nothing hapned to them by chance as this the finding of their mony in their sacks mouth but they ascribe all to Gods providence they make him the authour of their crosses and affliction Calvin As David in like manner saith that the Lord bid Shemei curse him 2 Sam. 16.11 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Saint Pauls prophecie of some that should give eare to the doctrine of devils fulfilled in the Synagogue of Rome Vers. 6. THey bowed their face to the ground before him Here Iosephs brethren unwittingly doe fulfill Iosephs prophecie that they should fall downe unto him and doe him reverence like as the Jewes did ignorantly accomplish many things in the passion of Christ which were foretold by the Prophets So also they which in these dayes give eare to the doctrines of devils in the Romish and Antichristian Synagogue doe fulfill the prophecie of the Apostle 1 Tim. 4.1 some of them of ignorance and simplicity but their blinde guides of malice and obstinacie against the truth Muscul. 2. Confut. Against Purgatory Vers. 8. IOseph knew his brethren but they knew not him Augustine propounding this question how it came to passe that all this time of Iosephs prosperity he sent no word to Iacob but he continued still mourning for his sonne giveth this reason Quoniam sine istis minutis peccatis Iacob esse non potuit volens Deus illa parva peccata in hoc seculo igne tribulationis consumere c. Because Iacob could not be without some small sinnes God would by this meanes purge them with the fire of tribulation in this world serm 82. de tempor If small sinnes then which they call veniall bee purged in this world then there is nothing remaining to be cleansed in purgatory fire afterward which they say serveth to the purging not of mortall but veniall sinnes and indeed Iob well sheweth that our purgatory fire is in the affliction and sorrow of this life where he saith Exibo ut aurum I shall come forth like gold Iob 23.10 And the Prophet saith That the Lords fire is in Sion and his furnace at Ierusalem Isa. 31.9 it is not then in hell or Purgatory I much muse that Pererius alleaging this sentence of Augustine could not perceive how strongly it maketh against Purgatory 3. Confut. Against the swearing by Saints Vers. 15. BY the life of Pharaoh ye shall not goe hence c. Thomas Aquinas justifieth this fact of Ioseph in swearing by the life of Pharaoh and would warrant thereby the swearing by creatures as namely by Saints for an oath saith he is made two wayes by execration when some creature is produced that God should shew his judgement upon if one sweare falsly as when one sweareth by his head or such like the other way is by contestation either directly when the name of God is mentioned or indirectly when some creature is named in whom the truth should be manifested so we sweare by the Gospell wherein Gods truth is expressed by Saints that beleeved in the truth so Ioseph sware by Pharaoh a minister of Gods truth and justice Thom. 2.2 qu. 89. ar 6. Conâ—ra 1. This subtill disputer doth justifie that kinde of oath which is directly forbidden by our Saviour himselfe as to sweare by the head Matth. 5.36 Neither shalt thou sweare by thine head wee may justly suspect him in the rest when at the first he dare controll the holy doctrine of the Gospell 2. Men use not to sweare by the Gospell but upon it when they lay their hands upon the book for so we reade that the Saints have used some visible ceremonie and rite in taking an oath as Abrahams servant layed his hand upon his masters thigh Gen. 24.3 Iacob did sweare unto Laban upon an heape of stones but neither did the one sweare by his masters thigh nor the other by the stones but by the name of God Gen. 24.3 Gen. 31.53 Iacob sware by the feare of his father Isaack after the same manner is a booke used as a visible object for further evidence in the ministring of an oath but Saints are neither visible nor present and therefore the case is not alike 3. It is also directly forbidden to sweare by any but by the Lord Deut. 6.13 Thou shalt feare the Lord thy God and serve him and sweare by his name and though onely be not here found yet our Saviour so interpreteth Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him onely shalt thou serve Matth. 4.10 and so consequently by him onely shalt thou sweare 4. Concerning Iosephs act I have shewed before quest 9. that although it may be somewhat qualified and extenuated yet it cannot be justified but it savoureth somewhat of the Egyptian manners and seemeth to be against that place Zephan 1.5 where the Prophet reproveth those that sweare by the Lord and sweare by Malcham that is their King whether they made the idoll or a mortall man their King both abuses are here reproved 6. Places
that God had shewed before by the mouth of the Prophets that Christ should suffer he hath thus fulfilled Act. 3.15 18. 4. Mor. To seeke to maintaine peace Vers. 24. FAll not out by the way Ioseph as he was ready to make peace with his brethren and to be at one with them so he laboureth to maintaine peace among themselves thus teaching us by his example not only to be lovers of peace our selves but to procure it in others according to the doctrine of Christ Blessed are the peace-makers for they shall be called the children of God Matth. 5.9 5. Mor. Lyers shall not be beleeved when they speake the truth Vers. 26. FOr he beleeved them not This is a just reward of lyers that when they speake the truth they shall not be beleeved Iacobs sonnes had told him a tale before when they shewed him Iosephs coat as though some wilde beast had devoured him Genes 37. and now when they tell the truth that Ioseph was alive no credit is given unto them Muscul. Thus S. Paul would not endure that the maid which had the spirit of divination and deceived the people with lies should testifie the truth of the Apostles that they were the servants of God and taught the way to salvation Act. 16.18 CHAP. XLVI 1. The Method and Argument of the Chapter FIrst we have here set downe Iacobs preparation to his journey 1. He offereth sacrifice to God 2. The Lord answereth him by vision appearing unto him and encouraging him to goe downe to Egypt promising him both a prosperous journey a peaceable end and the returne of his posterity vers 2. to 5. Secondly the journey itselfe is described vers 5. to vers 8. with an enumeration of the persons that went downe with Iacob 1. In particular the of-spring of Leah and her maid Zilpah the of-spring likewise of Rachel and her maid Bilhah of every one by themselves from v. 8. to 26. they are all summed in grosse v. 26.27 Thirdly Iacobs arrivall in Egypt is declared 1. How he sent for Ioseph and of their meeting greeting and salutation in Goshen vers 27. to 31. 2. The counsell and advice given by Ioseph to his brethren how they should answer Pharaoh that they might obtaine the land of Goshen vers 31. to the end 2. The divers readings where the translations differ v. 1. he came to the well of the oath H. S. to Bersheba caeter v. 2. he heard God calling him by a vision of the night H. God said to Israel in a vision of the night cat v. 3. I am the God of thy fathers S. I am God the God of thy father B. G. I am the mighty God of thy father caet he haâ—el celohe the strong God v. 4. I wil bring thee up againe in thy returne H. I will bring that back againe in the end S. I will surely make thee come up againe C. B. I will bring thee up againe G. I will cause thee to come up by comming up with thee T.P. he v. 5. they tooke their substance S. their father children and wives caeter v. 6. they tooke all that they possessed in Canaan H. S. they tooke their cattell and goods which they had gotten in the land of Canaan caeter he racash to get goods v. 7. their daughters and daughters daughters S. their daughters H. their daughters and sons daughters caet v. 10. Iachin Saher H. B. Achin Saar Iachin Sacher C. Iachin Zohar G. Iachin Tzochar T. he Sochar P. v. 12. Ezron Amul H. C. Esron Iemuel S. Hezron Hamul B. G. chezron chamul T. P. heb v. 13. Thola Phua Semron H. Thola Phua Asum Sambram S. Thola Phuah Iob Simron caet v. 16. Arâ—lis S. Haeri caet v. 17. Ieul S. Iesui caet v. 20. priest of On. T.P.C.G. cohen signifieth both a prince and priest v. 21. the sonnes of Manasses which Syra his concubine bare unto him were Machir Machir begat Galaad the sonnes of Ephraim Manasses brother Sutalaam and Taam the sonnes of Sutalaam Edem S. the rest have none of these words v. 21. Mophim Ophim and Ared H. Mamphim Ophim and Gerah begat Arad S. Muppim Huppim and Arde. caet v. 22. eighteene soules in all S. fourteene soules all caet v. 27. all the soules are seventy five S. seventy caeter the sonnes of Ioseph nine soules S. two soules cater v. 28. he sent Iudah c. that he should meet him at the citie of the nobles in the land of Ramesse S. that he should tell him that he might meet hm in Goshen H. to prepare before him C. to direct his face to Goshen B. to direct his way to Goshen H. to premonish him to meet him in Goshen T. to appeare before his face in Goshen P. he iarah to appeare to signifie v. 37. said to his brethren S. said to his brethren and all his fathers house caet v. 34. in Gâ—sem of Arabia S. in the land of Goshen caet 3. The theologicall explication QUEST I. Why Iacob offered sacrifice in Bersheba Vers. 1. ISrael came to Bersheba c. 1. This place is interpreted the well of the oath or of seven for shabang signifieth both so called first by Abraham where he made a covenant with Abimelech and gave him seven lambs Gen. 21. and afterward the name was revived by Isaack Gen. 26. 2. To this place came Iacob being both in his way as he went to Egypt for it is in the utmost bounds of Canaan toward the South as also because there Abraham and Isaack had long dwelled built altars there and consecrated it as a peculiar place for Gods worship 3. He offereth sacrifice both to give thanks to God for the life of Ioseph and to desire the Lord to make his journey prosperous Iun. QUEST II. Of the Lords calling of Iacob Vers. 2. IAcob Iacob who answered I am here c. 1. He is called Iacob not Israel not because as the Hebrewes imagine he should not prevaile against men in Egypt for he is also called Israel in Egypt Gen. 48.29 but when as the Lord vouchsafeth to speake familiarly unto him he calleth him by his name Iacob Mercer 2. The name is doubled to stirre him up to greater attention Calvin and to shew the certainty of that which God spake Perer. â— Iacob answereth readily here am I and therefore Iosephus misreporteth this story that Iacob should say quisnam esset who it was that spake unto him as though he had not beene acquainted with Gods voice lib. 1. antiquit QUEST III. Who it was that spake to Iacob Vers. 3. I Am God the God of thy father 1. This then was not an Angel that spake in the person of God but it was the Lord himselfe to whom Iacob offered sacrifice vers 1. 2. who is called the God of his father rather than of Abraham because Iacob so used to call the Lord the feare of his father Isaack Genes â—1 53 and for that he had
of cattell Calvin 2. That they might dwell apart from the Egyptians and so not be corrupted with their idolatry and supestition Mercer Muscul. 3. Lest that being dispersed among the Egyptians they might have beene distracted and so one divided from another Iosephus 4. Because the Egyptians abhorred keepers of sheep it would have beene an occasion of envy and hatred if they had lived among the Egyptians 5. lastly the land of Goshen stood more commodious for the Israelites returne and passage out of Egypt being situate in the utmost bounds toward Canaan whereas if the Israelites had beene seated in the inward or remote parts of the Countrey they could not afterward so conveniently have escaped Pererius QUEST XVII Why keepers of sheepe were an abomination to the Egyptians Vers. 34. FOr every sheepe-keeper is an abomination to the Egyptians c. These are the words of Moses rather than of Ioseph as the like reason is inserted by Moses Gen. 43.34 why the Hebrewes and Egyptians might not eat together the Egyptians then abhorred shepherds and keepers of sheepe 1. Not onely because they were a proud people and despised shepherds as base and servile men as Rupertus for they were an abomination unto them which is more than to contemne and despise them 2. Neither did they abhorre shepherds as though there were none of that condition among the Egyptians for they had their flocks of sheepe Genes 47.17 3. Neither yet is it like that the Egyptians did altogether abstaine from all eating of flesh Aben Ezra reporteth of the Indians that they kill no flesh neither doe so much as eat of the milke that commeth of cattell and that for this cause the Egyptians abhorred the Hebrewes 4. Therefore I thinke rather that the Egyptians especially detested keepers of sheepe rather than of other cattell because they superstitiously adored that kinde and so abstained altogether from slaying of sheepe and eating the flesh thereof keeping them for their milke and wooll whereas the Hebrew shepherds did without any scruple eat of their flocks other kinds of cattell it is like they did eat of as Mercerus reporteth the opinion of some writers that it was lawfull for the Egyptians to kill and eat foure kinds of creatures Oxen Calves Swine and Geese 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Not to depend upon meanes or put any confidence in Princes Vers. 4. I Will goe downe with thee into Egypt Although Ioseph were Lord of Egypt and a man of great power able to provide for Iacob and protect him from danger yet the Lord would not have Iacob to depend upon the meanes but to trust to his providence Muscul. Whereby also wee are taught not to put our confidence in men but to wait upon God as it is in the Psalme It is better to trust in the Lord than to put any confidence in man it is betteâ— to trust in the Lord than to put any confidence in Princes Psal. 118.9 2. Doct. The Lord will never forsake his elect Vers. 4. I Will also bring thee up againe c. The Lord promiseth his presence and gracious assistance to Iacob both going downe into Egypt and returning the Lord then will never forsake his elect Whom he once loveth he loveth to the end Ioh. 13.1 and as he said to Iosua I will not leave thee nor forsake thee Iosu. 15. so the same promise belongeth unto all the faithfull servants of God as the Apostle â—pplieth it Heb. 13.5 3. Doct. A man is not bound to reveale all his counsell so he speake the truth and lie not Vers. 34. THen ye shall say thy servants are men occupied about cattell This also was true which Ioseph taught his brethren to answer that they might dwell in the land of Goshen but there was another reason which Ioseph would have them to conceale because it was the most fruitfull and fertile soyle of all Egypt We see then that a man is not bound to utter all his minde but speaking the truth in the rest he may conceale that which he thinketh will bee prejudiciall to his suit and businesse Calvin and in such affaires that precept of our Saviour taketh place To be wise as serpents but innocent as doves Matth. 10.16 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. No Sacraments without the spirit and life of the word Vers. 2. GOd spake unto Iacob in a vision The Lord doth not onely appeare and shew a vision to Iacob but hee also speaketh unto him to the vision he adjoyneth a voyce of this nature and kinde are all Gods signes and ceremonies they are not dead or dumbe but the word of God putteth life unto them Wherefore it is presumption in the Church of Rome to impose signes and Sacraments upon the Church which receive not their life from the Word Calvin as our Saviour saith It is the spirit that quickneth the flesh profiteth nothing Ioh. 6.63 so the fleshie and terrene part in signes and sacraments profiteth not without the spirit and life which they receive from the Word 2. Confut. Antiquity no good argument of the truth Vers. 3. I Am the God of thy father He saith not of thy fathers as of thy great Grandfather for Terah was an idolater Iosu. 24.4 Iacob could not goe beyond Abraham for divers hundred yeares to fetch his faith though the most ancient Patriarks Noe Seâ— Heber were of the same faith and religion Wee see then that antiquity is no good argument to prove true religion by unlesse wee run unto the first beginning for so truth is more ancient than errour In like manner wee deny not but that of late yeares wee cannot derive the profession of the Gospell from our fathers and ancestors past the third degree because all the world was blinded with superstition and ignorance for divers hundred yeares but leaving the meane generations which were corrupted we are able to fetch and derive our faith from the Apostles of Christ this the Romanists doe call in derision a probation of our faith persalium by leaping But Iacob could prove his faith no otherwise he must leape from Abraham to Heber and Sem So Steven would not prove his faith from the immediate descent of his father for of them he saith ye have alwayes resisted the holy Ghost as your fathers did so doe you Act. 7. he ascendeth up to Abraham and Moses and the prophets times and in such manner doe we prove and justifie our faith and profession 3. Confut. Against Perer that holdeth the Septuagint in their number of 75. not to 〈◊〉 error Vers. 27. ALL the soules of the house of Iacob c. are 70. yet the Septuagint reade 75. notwithstanding Pererius justifieth the Septuagint and freeth them from errour although they set downe five more of Iosephs race than Moses hath which were born in Egypt afterward If this saith he be an error in them then was it in Moses for he also numbreth among the rest the sonnes of Phares and Benjamin which were borne afterward in Egypt
might bring forth serpents of a sudden Contra. The excellency of the agent doth adde to the manner of the worke as to doe it sooner or better it addeth noâ— to the matter Angels working by naturall meanes doe it more admirably than nature can worke it of it selfe but beyond the strength of nature or against the course of nature they can doe nothing 3. Pererius misliking both these answers of Cajetane yet consenting to his opinion for the truth of this miracle addeth a third that Satan fetched those serpents and suddenly transported them into this place and suborned them in stead of the rods Cont. But the text saith the rods were turned into serpents the serpents then were not brought from any other place but there changed or seemed so to be Againe as here they turne their rods into serpents so afterward did they change water into bloud but that was not by transportation for from whence could Satan convey such abundance of true lively bloud which is not ingendred but in the body neither have they power to alter substances it was therefore done by collusion and so was this 3. Wherefore the founder opinion is that those serpents which the Egyptian Sorcerers brought forth were only such in shew not indeed or in truth so Iosephus writeth that the Magicians serpents In speciem ac similitudinem verorum serpentium reptasse did creepe in shew and likenesse of true serpents lib. 2. antiquit cap. 15. And Iustinus Martyr Those things which the Magicians did by the helpe of the Devill spectantium oculis praestigias offundebant did dazle and deceive and as it were cast â— mist before the eyes of the beholders quaest Orthodox 16. Tertullian Mosis veritas mendacium Magorum devoravit Moses trueth devoured their lie lib. de anima Gregor Nyssenus saith they were visus deceptione serpentes serpentes onely in the mistaking of the fight Ambrose calleth it commentitiam emulationem a fained emulation in cap. 3.2 Epist. ad Timoth. Hierome saith imitabantur signa quae faciebat Moses sed non erant in veritate They did imitate the signes which Moses did but they were not in truth lib. 2. advers Iovin The reasons of this opinion before alleaged are these 1. because solius divinae potestatis est It belongeth onely to the power of God to convert a dead substance into a living creature Rupert 2. Moses true serpents devoureth the other which Iosephus and Ferus urge as an argument that they were imaginary 3. Other signes which they did were only imaginary as the turning of water into bloud as is before shewed and so this also QUEST XXII By what meanes Satan deluded Pharaoh with a shew of serpents THis being then thus resolved upon that those were but serpents in shew and to the outward sense this counterfeit signe might be wrought two wayes by the operation of Satan 1. Either by the confounding the inward sense and phantasie of the beholders that they imagined to see that which was not as sicke men of phrensie doe conceive they see strange sights and there is no question but that the Devill can effect whatsoever by diseases or other naturall meanes may be wrought 2. Or else which is more like Satan did forme such a shape and shew of spirits as before is shewed that the Devill hath such power by illusions apparations and phantasies to deceive as the Apostles seeing Christ walking upon the seas supposed it had beene a spirit Phantasma that is a phantasticall apparition Mark 6.49 Ex Perer which sheweth that such illusions were usuall QUEST XXIII Why the Lord suffered the Sorcerers of Egypt to shew such contrary signes NOw the Lord suffered the Magitians thus by their lying signes to contend with Moses for divers weighty causes 1. That by this meanes Moses the faithfull servant of God and true Prophet might be the better knowne as darkenesse maketh the light more glorious and sicknesse health Chrysostome So Saint Paul saith There must bee Heresies that they which are approved among you might bee knowne 1. Cor. 11.29 2. That Moses might be freed from the imputation of being a Sorcerer which thing some have not beene affraid to object and a difference might appeare betweene his working by the power and in the name of God and of the Sorcerers working by the power of Satan Rupert 3. That thereby it might be made manifest how the truth hath alwayes gainesayers and is never without contradictions and oppositions as Lucifer opposed himselfe to God in heaven Cain to Abel in earth Ismael was against Isaack the true Prophets were molested by the false Thus Saint Paul collecteth that as Iannes and Iambres withstood Moses so these also resist the truth 2. Tim. 3.8 Perer. 4. Hereby also it is manifest how according to the common saying the Devill is Gods ape that he taketh upon him to imitate and counterfeit Gods workes that therefore wee should examine such workes and signes whether they be of God that wee be not deceived and as the Apostle saith cry every spirit 1. Ioh. 4.1 5. Another reason is that seeing the Devill by his ministers can doe such strange things that the servants of God bee not offended when thy see wonders and signes to be done in the false Church by Heretikes or Idolaters the instruments of Satan 6. This was permitted for the triall of the faith and constancie of Moses and Aaron and the rest of the Hebrewes whether because of the contrary signes they would doubt of the truth of Gods promises Perer. 7. And for the further hardning of Pharaohs heart as hee had deserved by his former sinnes that God might take occasion thereby to worke all his wonders in Egypt Simler Ferus Borrh. QUEST XXIV Whether Pharaoh being deceived by the Magicians false signes be thereby excusable BUt seeing these Magicians by their Satanicall craft doe so strongly deceive whether is Pharaoh to be excused that he doth not acknowledge Moses to be the Minister and Prophet of God To this the answer is that this notwithstanding Pharaoh is not to be held excusable because there are evident signes to have discerned betweene the working of the one and of the other so that Pharaoh could not plead ignorance To omit the differences before noted Quest. 20. how that true miracles differ from false in the power of working in the quality of persons that worke the worke it selfe the manner and the end which differences are not so easie to be discerned of all there were besides most notorious workes that discovered the hypocrisie and weaknesse of those Sorcerers 1. Moses serpent devoured theirs which required a greater power 2. They could counterfeit the like plagues but they could not remove the true plagues as Moses did 3. They faile in their working they could not bring forth lice nor counterfeit any of the plagues following 4. The plagues doe fall upon the Sorcerers themselves chap. 9.11 5. Lastly they themselves doe give way and confesse it was the finger of God
said to harden mans heart divers profitable questions come now in order to be handled for seeing the Lord is here divers times said to harden Pharaohs heart as chap. 4.21 chap. 7.3 chap. 9.12 chap. 10. vers 10. and 20. and 27. chap. 11.10 chap. 14. vers 14. and 8. even nine times in all it seemeth that Moses of purpose useth this significant phrase and doth inculcate it often that we should well weigh and consider it QUEST XIII What the hardnesse of heart is FIrst then it is requisite to be knowne what this hardnesse of heart is 1. It may first be described negatively by the unaptnesse of an hard heart to any thing that is good it is neiâ—her passive active or apprehensive of any good thing not the first nec movetur precibus nec cedit minis It is neither moved by prayers nor giveth way to threats as Bernard saith For the next he saith it is ingratum ad beneficia ad câ—â—silia infidum it is unthankfull for benefits unfaithfull in counsell unshamefast in evill things c. There is no activitie in it to any goodnesse And for the third praeter solas injurias nihil non praeterit it remembreth nothing that is past but wrongs nor hath any forecast for the time to come unlesse it be to seeke revenge 2. It may be described also by the perpetuall companion thereof the blindnesse of the mind for as ignorance blindeth the understanding so hardnesse of heart blindeth the will and affection As the Apostle saith speaking of the Gentiles having their cogitation darkned through the ignorance that is in them because of the hardnesse of their heart Ephes. 4.18 Both these concurred in Pharaoh he shewed his blindnesse in saying I know not Iehovah his hardnesse of heart in adding Neither will I let Israel goe Exod. 5.2 3. The propertie of hardnesse of heart is this that it is not onely a great and grievous sinne but also the punishment of sinne that it is a sinne the Apostle sheweth Heb. 3.12 Take heed brethren lest then be at any time in any of you an evil heart to depart from the living God And that it is a punishment of sinne S. Paul also testifieth Rom. 1.21 Because when they knew God they did not glorifie him as God c. Then it followeth vers 24. God gave them up to their owne hearts lusts c. 4. Now the qualities and inseparable adjuncts of hardnesse of heart are these 1. Blindnesse of the judgement and understanding as Isai. 6.10 Make the heart of this people fat make their eares heavie and shut their eyes lest they see with their eyes heare with their eares and understand with their hearts 2. They are obstinate and wilfull and refuse to be admonished and instructed Who say unto God depart from 〈◊〉 we desire not the knowledge of thy wayes Iob 21.14 3. Such are rejected and cast out of the presence of God and left unto themselves such an onâ— was Saul of whom it is said That the spirit of the Lord departed from Saul and an evill spirit sent of the Lord vexed him 1. Sam. 16.14 4. They delight in doing of evill and make a sport of sinne Prov. 2.14 Which rejoyce in doing of evill and delight in the frowardnesse of the wicked 5. They regard not to doe things honest in the sight of men but contemne and despise all others Prov. 18.3 When the wicked commeth then commeth contempt 6. They are incorrigible and past all hope of amendment Prov. 1.30 They would none of my councell but despised all my correction 7. They are not ashamed of most vile sinnes Ierem. 3.3 Thou hadst a whores forehead thou wouldest not be ashamed 8. When the Lord smiteth them they feele it not neither have they any sense of Gods judgements whom the wise man compareth to those that sleepe in the mast of a ship and as drunken men that are stricken but know it not Prov. 23.24.25 9. They are growne to such an evill custome of sinning that they can doe none other as the Prophet saith can the blackamore change his skinne or the Leopard his spots then may yee also doe good that are accustomed to doe evill Ierem. 13.23 10. So that the sinnes of such seeme to be inexpiable and indeleble as the same Prophet saith that the sinnes of Iudah were written with a penne of iron and with the poâ—nt of a Diamond chap. 17.1 11. They wax daily worse and worse of whom it is said Revel 22.11 Hee that is filthy let him be filthy still 12. And as they increase in sinne so they doe treasure up Gods judgements against themselves and heape unto themselves wrath against the day of wrath Rom. 2.5 QUEST XIV Whether God be the efficient and working cause of hardnesse of heart NOw in the next place concerning the efficient cause of the hardnesse of heart 1. That it cannot be imputed to God as the worker and Author thereof it may appeare by these reasons First the hardnesse of the heart is a great sinne as is proved in the former question but God is no wayes the Author of sinne seeing he neither tempteth or perswadeth unto it for God tempteth no man Iam. 1.13 neither hath commanded it but hath forbidden it by his Law nor yet worketh with them that doe evill for all that God doth is good and so there is none good but God Mark 10.19 Neither doth the Lord approve sinne being done Psal. 8.4 Thou art not a God that lovest wickednesse If then God neither move to sinne nor commends it nor yet assisteth the committers of it or approveth it he is no way the Author of sinne Secondly if God causeth sinne then every man should sinne of necessity and so his punishment should bee unjust being forced to sinne But as Augustine saith Deus nemini per hoc quod falli non potest aut necessitatem aut voluntatem intulit delinquendi God by this that he cannot be deceived hath not brought upon any either a necessity or willingnesse of sinning Thirdly Augustine useth another excellent reason Fieri non potest ut per quem à peccatis surgitur per eum in peccata decidatur It cannot be that by whom men rise from sinne by him they should fall into sinne Fourthly Plato thus reasoneth Deus qui bonus est malorum causa dici non potest c. God that is good cannot be said to be the cause of evill for then hee should be contrary to himselfe Lastly if God any way should be the Author of sinne then it should be no sinne for whatsoever God doth is good Nay not to doe that which the Lord willeth should be sinne Perer. 2. Yet seeing God is said in Scripture to harden the heart which betokeneth an action aâ—d likewise in other termes God is said to give some over to vile affections Rom. 1.26 and to send upon some strange delusions that they should not beleeve the truth 2. Thess. 2.11 and to make
lifting up of the hand as Abraham did Genes 14 First when they use the name of God pro re futilâ— for a vaine or trifling thing Secondly in rem quam non intendis impleri upon a matter which thou doest not purpose to fulfill as they which sweare falsly Thirdly in vaine that is without cause ne jures nisi ob necessitatem thou must not sweare but upon necessity 4. Thomas more distinctly sheweth first what a vaine thing is and then how the name of God is taken in vaine First a vaine thing is taken for that which is false as he that sweareth falsly then for that which is inutile unprofitable and here they offend which doe sweare de re levi for a small and trifling matter sometime vaine or vanity is taken for sinne and iniquity and in this respect they take the name of God in vaine which take an oath to doe any wicked thing as to commit theft or any such thing of this kinde was Herods oath Secondly the name of God is assumed or taken up upon these reasons 1. Primò ad dicti confirmationem First to confirme our saying and here they offend which sweare by any other than by the name of God 2. Sumitur ad sanctificationem The name of God is used for sanctification as Baptisme is sanctified in the name of God Here they transgresse which abuse the Sacraments or holy things 3. Tertiò sumitur ad confessionem invocationem Thirdly it is taken up for confession and invocation Here they which abuse prayers and the invocation of God to superstitious ends as to enchantments or such like doe profane the name of God 4. Quarto sumitur ad operis completionem Fourthly it is taken for the perfiting and finishing of a worke as the Apostle Coloss. 3. Whatsoever you doe in word or in deed dâ—e all in the name of our Lord Iesus Christ. They therefore which have begun a good profession and afterward fall away doe take the name of God in vaine So Thomas 2.2 quaest 122. art 3. 5. The Hebrewes then doe take this Commadement too strictly that here is forbidden only prolatio nominis Dei tetragrammaton indebita the undue pronouncing of that foure lettered name of God which is Iehovah which it was lawfull they say only for the high Priest to use and that only in the Temple and only then when he blessed the people Ex Lyrano QUEST IV. What is required in taking of a right oath Seeing perjury and taking of a false oath is a breach of this Commandement as it is a dishonour unto God for as our brother is hurt thereby it belongeth unto the ninth Commandement it shall not bee amisse here to shew what conditions are required in an oath that perjury may bee the better prevented this the Prophet Ieremy declareth in these words Thou shalt sweare in truth in judgement and righteousnesse Ierem. 4.2 Which three shall now be declared in their order 1. The first thing required is truth in every oath whether it be assertorium or promissorium whether it be an affirming oath or promising oath the first must have conformity with the truth unto the thing already done in present which is affirmed to bee true otherwise it is a false oath the other respecteth the minde and intent of him that sweareth for he promiseth not certainly that it shall be done because he is uncertaine of the future events but si intendat facere ut promittit verum est if he intend to do as he promiseth it is a true oath otherwise not Tostat. qu. 8. 2. And not only falsity is contrary to truth in taking of oathes but deceit and fraud also as he sware fraudulently that having made a truce with his enemies for certaine dayes set upon them in the night and the woman that sware she was with childe by Eustochius of Antioch which was not the Bishop but another common person of the City of the same name Simler And not he only which sweareth falsum cognitum a false thing knowne but falsum dubium a false thing that is doubtfull taketh a false oath but he that having exactly sifted his memory and yet is deceived non formaliter jurat falsò formallie doth not sweare falsly Cajetan He that thus sweareth falsly injuriam facit Deo sibi omnibus hominibus doth offer wrong to God to himselfe and to men To God because an oath being nothing else but the calling of God to witnesse he that sweareth falsly beleeveth Deum aut nescire verum aut diligere mendacium that God either knoweth not the truth or that he loveth a lye To himselfe he doth wrong for he bindeth himselfe to the judgement of God wishing that the Lord may punish him if he speake not the truth To men hee offereth wrong because there can bee no society or dealing among men if one may not trust another Thomas in opusculo 2. He that sweareth must doe it in judgement that is deliberatly and advisedly not rashly and hastily The Romanes had an use that hee which would sweare by Hercules should goe forth of the doores that he might be well advised and take some pause before hee sware for they held that Hercules did sweare but once in all his life and that was to the sonne of King Augeas This deliberation in their idolatrous oathes should admonish Christians to be well advised in swearing by the name of God Simler 3. They must sweare in righteousnesse that it be a just and lawfull thing which hee sweareth Herein David offended which sware in his rage to put Nabal and his whole house to the sword Simler And he must not only sweare that which is just and lawfull but justly as he which hath seene his brother commit any offence secretly if he take a voluntary oath to discover it being not urged to depose so before a Magistrate sweareth not justly Tostat. quaest 8. QUEST V. Whether men be bound to sweare often SOme of the Jewes held that it was a part of Gods worship to sweare by his name and therefore they thought they did well in often swearing and this their custome they would warrant by that place Deut. 6.13 Thou shalt feare the Lord thy God and serve him and sweare by his name Contra. 1. The three former conditions to sweare in truth judgement and righteousnesse must be observed and kept in every oath which cannot be if men were bound or commanded often to sweare 2. An oath was brought in among men for necessity for this is laid upon man as a punishment that one is not beleeved of another upon his bare word and our Saviour saith Whatsoever is more than yea and nay commeth of evill therefore where no necessity urgeth for one to sweare it is no acceptable service unto God 3. As to sweare is not altogether unlawfull as shall be shewed afterward in the places of controversie against the Anabaptistes for then it should in no case be permitted as adultery and murder
superlativum fâ—cere solent Use to expresse that by the negative which wee use to doe by the superlative The Lord shall not hold him innocent or guiltlesse that is pro impio scelerato habebit c. shall hold him for a wicked man Lippom. 2. And it is as much to say as he will punish him for whom the Lord holdeth innocent he punisheth not Tostat. 3. This commination here added sheweth a treble office of the law Quorum unvm in docenda voluntare Dei c. The one is in teaching the will of God what should be done what not done the other in manifesting the sinne the third in shewing the punishment for the duety omitted Borrh. 4. And by this commination is signified that although the Lord be full of long suffering Compensare tamen soleat tarditatem gravitate supplicii c. Yet he doth recompence the slacknesse of the punishment with the greatnesse thereof Lippom. This sheweth that although blasphemers escape the censure of men yet the Lord will most certainely punish them 5. Paulus Burgensus here taketh up Lyranus because he maketh this commination causa prohibitionis the cause of the former prohibition which he correcteth thus he saith it is comminatio paenae a threatning of punishment not the cause of the prohibition But if Lyranus be interpreted with favour as the Replier to Burgensis thus expoundeth that comminatio est causa motiva observantiae praeceptorum The commination is a motive cause of the observation of the precepts Burgens had no great reason to take this exception to Lyranus 3. Doctrines observed out of the third Commandement 1. Doct. Of the generall and particular contents of this Commandement THe contents then of this Commandement in generall are that as in the negative is forbidden the abuse and profanation of the name of God so in the affirmative included wee are commanded with all reverence and feare to use the name of God The particular vertues here required with their opposite vices are these 1. The propagation of the true doctrine of the will and workes of God and setting forth the same unto others as the Lord chargeth his people Deut. 4.9 Take heed to thy selfe c. that thou forget not the things which thine eyes have seene but teach them thy sonnes and thy sonnes sonnes c. Contrary hereunto are 1. The neglect of this duty in not declaring the will and workes of God to others for it sheweth that they are forgetfull of Gods benefits and so have and know them in vaine as that unprofitable servant saith in the Parable I was therefore afraide and went and hid thy talent in the earth Matth. 25.25 2. The corrupting of the true doctrine concerning the will and workes of God as Ieremy saith of the false Prophets that they prophesied lies in the name of God Ierem. 14.14 Vrsin This is a speciall transgression of this Commandement when any abuseth the name of God Ad confirmandam erroneam religionis doctrinam To confirme any erroneus doctrine of religion Osiander As they doe which alleage Scripture in defense of their errours And to this purpose Gloss. Interlinear Nomen Dei legne lapidi vel hujusmodi non attribues c. Thou shalt not give the name of God to stockes or stones or such like c. 2. The setting forth of Gods praise blessing of his name in all his workes seeking of his glory reverencing of his Majesty is here commanded as the Apostle saith Coloss. 3.17 Whatsoever yee shall doe in word or deed doe all in the name of the Lord Iesus giving thanks to God even the Father by him Contrary hereunto are 1. The contempt or neglect of the glory of God as Rom. 1.21 When they knew God they did not glorifie him as God which transgression is committed when men doe not acknowledge God the giver and author of all good things which they injoy 2. Blasphemy which is to speake evill of the name of God as to murmure and repine against him to make him the author of evill and such like against this sinne it was decreed by Moses law that he that blasphemed the name of God should bee put to death Levit. 24.17 3. Cursing and execration is contrary hereunto when men doe curse others as from God as wishing the plague of God to light on them or such like for so they make God but as the executioner to take revenge according to their lust and wicked desire of such curses speaketh David Psal. 109.17 As he loved cursing so shall it come unto him as he loved not blessing so shall it bee farre from him 3. Confession of the truth is another vertue here prescribed Rom. 10.10 With the heart man beleeveth unto righteousnesse and with the mouth man confesseth to salvation So Saint Peter Sanctifie the Lord God in your hearts and be ready alwayes to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of that hope which is in you 1. Pet. 3.15 Contrary hereunto are 1. The deniall of the truth through feare and infirmity as Peter with cursing denied Christ. 2. A generall apostasie and falling away from the truth of such the Apostle speaketh They went out from us for they were not of us 1. Ioh. 3.19 3. Dissembling of the truth as they which confessed not Christ lest they should have beene cast out of the Synagogue Iohn 11.42 4. Offence and scandall in manners or life whereby God is dishonoured Such were the Jewes of whom the Apostle saith The name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you Rom. 2.24 4. Invocation of the name of God which is a devout petition and asking at the hands of God of such things as we need grounded upon the confidence of the promises of God in Christ. So the Prophet David saith Praise the Lord and call upon his name Psalm 105.1 Invocation as it is a part of Gods worship and so belongeth unto him is a branch of the first Commandement wherein I rather follow Simlerus judgement who maketh invocation of Saints a breach of the first Commandement than Vrsinus who referreth it to the third But in respect of the manner required in prayer that it should be done with a true heart and unfained devotion it appertaineth to the third precept Contrary unto true and faithfull invocation are first the neglect of prayer Psalm 14.4 They call not upon the Lord. Secondly the abusing of prayer and invocation of the name of God to unlawfull ends as to sorcery and enchantment Borrh. Thirdly the asking of such things as are not agreeable to the will of God as the Apostle saith Ye aske and receive not because ye aske amisse Iam. 4.22 Fourthly lip labour in prayer when many words are used but without any true devotion As the Prophet saith This people honoureth mee with their lips but their heart is farre from me Isai. 29.13 as it is cited Mark 7.6 5. Here is commanded a due and reverent taking of the name of God
was Nathaniel a true Israelite in whom there was no guile Ioh. 1.47 hee was a just harmelesse and innocent man Contrarie hereunto are all kinde of hurting or harming others by violence oppression of purpose or negligence of such speaketh the Wise-man They cannot sleepe unlesse they doe evill Prov. 4. 2. Another vertue is gentlenesse mildnesse not to bee apt to quarrell upon every occasion but to bee patient in bearing of wrongs and readie even to forgive our enemies as David spared the life of Saul and endured with patience the reviling of Shemei Contrarie hereunto are 1. Stupiditie not to be angrie or moved at all no not for manifest and notorious wrongs and injuries as Saul saved Agag alive whom Samuel through a just indignation for the great wrongs which that nation had done to the people of God hewed in peeces 2. Anger rage desire of revenge wherein David offended in purposing to put Nabal and his house to the sword in his furie and rage 1 Sam. 25. 3. A third vertue is Peaceablenesse to bee carefull to avoid all offences and occasions of contention and to end and compound strifes and contentions being once risen as Moses did betweene the two Hebrewes Exod. 2. and as Abraham moved to have a separation betweene him and Lot their servants and their cattell for avoiding of further contention Genes 13. Contrarie hereunto it is to be turbulent and unquiet to move sedition discord enmitie such were the seditious in Israel Core Dathan and Abiram Numb 16. Vertues furthering and helping our neighbour are 1. Just severitie in punishing of offenders which is the office of Magistrates who are the Ministers of God in that behalfe as David worthily put to death those two Captaines that had murthered Ishbosheth 2 Sam. 4. Contrarie hereunto are 1. Injustice rigour and crueltie as Herod beheaded Iames and laid hand on Peter also Act. 12. 2. Connivence and remisnesse as God was angrie with Ahab because hee had let Benhadad escape 1 King 20.41 2. Zeale and indignation for the wrongs and injuries offered to men as Abraham armed his houshold to goe and rescue Lot Gen. 14. Contrarie hereunto is carelesnesse of others miserable and afflicted estate as in Pharaohs Butler that remembred not Iosephs afflictions 3. Mercie and commiseration to bee grieved for the miseries of others as David and his companie wept when the Amalekites had smitten Ziklag 1 Sam. 30.4 Contrarie hereunto is hardnesse of heart to have no feeling compassion as the rich Glutton had not of Lazarus Luk. 16. Ex Vrsin 3. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Against the Stoikes that denied any passion at all to be in a wise man WHereas it is shewed before that even rash and unadvised anger is forbidden in this precept according to the doctrine of our blessed Saviour Matth. 5.22 The Stoikes are confuted whose opinion was that the passions of anger and of other such like affections were not incident unto wise men but the opinion of the Peripatetikes was that Ira cadit in sapientem sed moderata that anger is incident to a wise man but moderate and temperate which opinion commeth neerer the truth Et primò patet authoritate And this first is evident by the authoritie of the Gospell which sheweth anger to have beene in our blessed Saviour Secundò ratione Againe it is manifest by reason for if all the passions of the minde were contrarie to vertue there should be some powers of the soule in vaine Imo essent homini in nocumentum they should be to a mans hurt as the facultie of anger and desire but God made nothing in vaine Further anger is taken three wayes Primó prout est in solo judicio rationis absque commotione animi first as it is in the judgement onely without any commotion of the minde and so the Lord in Scripture is said to bee angrie Secondly it is taken for the passion of the minde which sometime is ordered and ruled by reason as when one is angrie Quando debet quantum debet pro quo debet When he ought as much as he ought and for what he ought to be angrie and then it is a note of zeale Thirdly there is a kinde of anger Qua refugit judicium rationis which refuseth and rejecteth the judgement and direction of reason and this is alwayes sinne Thomas in opuscul 2. Confut. Against those that thinke no anger to be forbidden THere are some further that doe hold that anger is not at all forbidden in this precept 1. Because it is naturall 2. We read that God himselfe in Scripture is said to be angrie 3. Christ himselfe was and the holy Saints and Prophets as Moses and Paul 4. The Apostle forbiddeth not to be angrie but onely to persevere and continue in it Ephes. 4.26 Answ. 1. Naturall and moderate affections are the worke of God in the nature of man and so they are not forbidden but those affections which were perfect and good in the nature of man before sinne entred are now through the sinne of man perverted and corrupted and refuse to be subject to reason and so had need to bee reformed by grace these violent and intemperate affections are forbidden and so anger not simplie for to be angrie with that which is evill is commendable So our Saviour condemneth not all anger but when a man is angrie with his brother unadvisedly Matth. 19.22 2. God is not said to be angrie as man is it is no passion or perturbation in God but the Scripture so speaketh of God according to our capacitie for Ira est appetitus ultionis anger is a desire of revenge and therefore because man cannot punish without anger God is said to be angrie quando punit scelera when he punisheth sinne ultio ejus ira dicitur his revenge is called anger 3. These naturall affections and passions of the minde were otherwise in Christ than in us in him they were temperate and moderate without sinne as they were first created in man and such kinde of anger we grant is not forbidden 4. The last reason sheweth that all anger is not forbidden but that onely which exceedeth measure as to be too much inflamed with anger and to continue long therein which we also grant ex Simler 3. Conf. Against the Anabaptists that it is lawfull for Christians to beare armour and to make warre WHereas out of this prohibition Thou shalt not kill is excepted the lawfull Magistrate which either putteth to death or maketh just warre we are here to deale against the Anabaptists who hold it unlawfull for Christians to beare armour or weapons or to wage battell Their reasons and arguments are these 1. Our Saviour in the Gospell biddeth that we should not resist evill but whosoever will smite thee on the left cheeke turne to him the right also Matth. 5.39 Answ. 1. It is evident that our blessed Saviour doth not here bring in a new law but onely freeth the law from the corrupt gloses of
the blessing of the Midwives excuse Exod. 1. and Rahabs made for the spies received into her house Augustines answer is this 1. Aut siguratè prolata sunt atque ita non mendacia c. Either they are figuratively spoken and so no lies for we must consider Non quid in facto dicitur sed quid in sensu significatur Not what is expressed in fact but what is signified in sense for as it is no lye in speech when one word is put for another as in metaphors and other tropes so neither is it in matter when one thing is signified by another 2. Another answer is they are not lies which are mentioned in Scripture Si figurate sunt dicta If they be spoken figuratively Si mendacia non sunt imitanda Or if they were lies they are not to be imitated August lib. de mendac cap. 21. 3. Commendantur comparatione c. They are commended by way of comparison not absolutely 4. Concerning the excuse of the Midwives and of Rahab he saith Non est remunerata fallacia sed benevolentis beniguitas mentis non iniquitas mentientis Their fallacie was not rewarded in them but their mercy the benignity of their mind not the iniquity of their lying Thus August lib. cont mendac cap. 17. 4. Confut. Against the Iesuits new trick of equivocating FOurthly that late taken up trick of the Judasites in equivocating with their mentall reservations is evidently contrary to this Commandement they thinke it lawfull to dissemble with the Magistrate and to delude him with their ambiguous and equivocating answers As if they be asked whether they were in such a place as beyond the seas in France or Spaine at such a time when and where it is certaine they were they will answer they were not understanding to themselves secretly to such an end or purpose The folly and falshood of which their deceitfull equivocations doth diversly appeare 1. This was the very evasion of the old Priscillianists before confuted that if they held the truth inwardly in their heart it was no matter if the truth were not alway in their mouth but a right Christian is knowne by this He speaketh the truth in his heart Psal. 15.3 he hath the truth both in his heart and mouth 2. By this device of theirs they invert the order and nature of things they make falshood truth and truth falshood they turne affirmatives into negatives and contrariwise as it is all one to say I was not in such a place with a mentall reservation as to say I was and so as Augustine saith Veritatem faciunt patronam mendacu They make the truth the patron of a lye 3. If every one should take this licentious liberty there should be no truth among men no certainty of any thing all testimonies given in evidence all promises and contracts might justly be suspected lest some secret condition or reservation might be understood for who can trust him at any time that thinketh it is lawfull to lye and dissemble sometime for as Augustine saith Volens cum mentitur esse aptior fit cum verum dicit intertus For while he applieth himselfe when he lieth aptly to the time he is held uncertaine when he speaketh the truth 4. And whereof commeth this doubling and dissembling but of feare and a bad conscience what needed the Martyrs by their plaine confession of the truth to have adventured and lost their lives if they had held such dissimulation and equivocating lawfull So Augustine saith Si simulare liceret quare id non faciunt Martyres If it were lawfull to dissemble why did not the Martyrs so lib. cont mendac cap. 5. 5. But if they shall reply againe that they doe thus equivocate for the maintenance of their Pope Catholike faith and for the discovering of heresie as they call the profession of the Gospell wee say againe with Augustine in a case not much unlike Melius occultaretur haeresis quà m praetipitaretur veritas It were better that heresie lay hid still than that the verity should be endangered de mendac cap. 7. 6. But the example of our blessed Saviour is pretended who used such kinde of dissimulation and equivocation as Mark. 5.30 Christ made himselfe as ignorant who had touched his cloathes whereas he knew it well enough as well who touched them as that they were touched So Luk. 24.28 Christ made as though he would have gone further and yet did not Likewise Ioh. 7.8 he saith to his brethren Goe ye up unto this 〈◊〉 I will not yet goe up c. but immediatly after he went up vers 10. Here Christ did equivocate with his brethren he said he would not goe up whereas he did indeed goe up meaning not with them Answ. 1. To the two first instances Augustine answereth that they are figures of other things â—as in that Christ maketh himselfe ignorant who touched him therein the Gentiles were prefigured who were a people whom the Lord saith he knew not In the next he saith Christus non menteâ—us est c. 〈◊〉 in câ—â—los profectus est Christ said no untruth for indeed he went further namely to heaven August ibid. c. 19. But wee are not driven here to such a strait with Augustine to finde out a mystery Our Saviour in neither of these places dissembleth for dissimulation is an hiding and cloaking oâ— the truth but in both these places Christ 〈◊〉 by this meanes to bring the truth to light in the first to trie onâ— the faith of the woman that touched him in the other to make 〈◊〉 of the humanity and charity of his Disciples as he did the like to Philip. Ioh. 6.6 to prove him 4. Morall observations 1. Observ. Against the evill custome of lying THou shalt not beare false witnesse By this strait charge and commandement of God all men are warned to take heed of lying and speaking untruth under what pretence soever and that for these foure causes 1. Propter diaboli assimilationem Because lying maketh men like unto the Devill For as God is truth and all that love the truth are the children of God so they that use lying are the children of the Devill for he is a lyer and the father thereof Ioh. 8.44 He told the first lye that was ever made in the world when he said to Eve Yee shall not dye Gen. 3. 2. Propter societatis dissolutionem Humane society and entercourse is by this meanes dissolved for how can one man trust another if lying and dissembling should be used This reason the Apostle urgeth Ephes. 4.25 Cast off lying and speake every one truth unto his neighbour for we are members one of another 3. Propter fama amissionem The lier loseth his credit that he cannot be beleeved no not when he telleth the truth as Ecclesiastic 34.4 Who can be cleansed by the uncleane or what truth can bee spoken of a lier 4. Propter anima perditionem Wee must take heed of lying for it destroyeth the soule
they are distinctly to be prohibited Lyranus also saith that there is Aliaratio boni utilis alia delectabilis One reason of coveting a profitable good another of a delectable good the coveting of the wife belongeth to one and the coveting of the substance to the other Answ. 1. All this onely proveth a difference and distinction in the severall kindes of concupiscence not a distinction of the severall precepts 2. And thus much may bee inferred that because they are distinct concupiscences therefore they are distinctly to be expressed and so they are but it followeth not that they are to bee distinguished in two precepts 3. And yet these concupiscences are not so distinguished but that they may concurre at one and the same time in the inward desire and motion as one may have a carnall desire to his neighbours wife and have a covetous eye also unto her substance Wherefore this last precept which forbiddeth all manner of coveting is not to bee divided into two precepts but is one whole and entire Commandement consisting of divers particulars The reasons are these 1. Origen thus reasoneth Quod si ita putetur non complebitur decem numerus praeceptorum c. If the two first precepts should be made all one there would not bee ten Commandements ubi jam erit decalogi veritas where then is the truth of the decalogue Homil. 8. in Exod. The reason is this that seeing there must bee ten precepts and there are foure in the first table there can bee but six in the second but if the last be divided into two there will bee more than six in the second and so more than ten in all but if wee make but three in the first there will be but nine in all for Origen taketh this as granted that it is all one precept that maketh mention of coveting 2. Another reason is because that which is here put in the first place Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours house thou shalt not covet thy neighbours wife is put in the second place Deut. 5.21 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours wife neither shalt thou desire thy neighbours house which inversion of the order sheweth that they are all one precept for otherwise Moses should have confounded the ninth and tenth precept together Vrsin So also Cajetane Varia â—â—â—ctura uxoris domus ex industria facta à Mose c. This mixture of the wife and house Moses maketh of purpose in these two places because they belong to one precept This reason also is urged by Iunius upon this place 3. This precept Moses periodis non distinxit sed uno versiculo comprehendit did not distinguish by periods as the other precepts but comprehendeth it in one verse which sheweth it to be one precept not two Vrsin 4. Another argument is taken from the reason of this Commandement which is added Nor any thing which is his we are forbidden therefore to covet the neighbours wife house or oxe or asse Quia alterius sunt because they belong to another Cajetan Oleaster There being then one common reason serving the whole it sheweth that it is one Commandement not divers 5. Omnes hae species sub uno genere comprehenduntur All these severall kindes of coveting are comprehended under one generall head Thou shalt not covet therefore they are under one precept Galas 6. Pari ratione in sex vel septem praecepta deduci posse videatur c. With as good reason may it be divided into six or seven precepts as into two because so many particular branches of coveting are rehearsed Simler 7. But one of the best reasons that the precept of not coveting is one and not two is taken from that place of Saint Paul Cum de concupiscentia tanquam de uno pracepto dicit When he speaketh of concupiscence as of one precept Rom. 7.7 I had not knowne lust except the Law had said Thou shalt not lust Vrsin Basting QUEST II. What manner of concupiscence is here forbidden and how this precept differeth from the former COncerning the difference betweene this precept and the other Thou shalt not commit adultery thou shalt not steale there are divers opinions 1. Augustine seemeth sometime to bee of opinion that in those Commandements Ipsum opus notatum videtur in extremo autem ipsa concupiscentia The worke only seemeth to be noted but in the last the concupiscence only quaest 71. in Exod. But this is against our blessed Saviours exposition Matth. 5.28 that a man may commit adultery in his heart if hee hath but looked upon a woman to lust after her therefore in the other Commandements not the externall act only is forbidden but the inward purpose also and desire 2. Thomas Aquin thus distinguisheth concupiscence that it may be taken one way as it is actus voluntaetis an act of the will another ut est actus sensualitatis a sensuall or carnall act but here it is onely forbidden in the first sense as it is Consensus voluntatis in opus vel delectationem As it is a consent of the will either to the worke it selfe or in taking delight But when the will hath once assented sinne is brought forth and so it is a breach of the other Commandements as our blessed Saviour sheweth that if a man have but lusted after a woman with a will and desire unto her in his heart he hath committed adultery 3. Some of the Hebrewes thinke that no concupiscence resting inwardly though it have the consent of the will is here forbidden but such as commeth into some externall act beside the perfect act of any sinne as when one soliciteth another mans wife by gifts speeches gesture kissing and dallying though adultery be not committed But the very consent and purpose of the heart though there follow no outward act is sinne as shall afterward be more fully declared as Levit. 19.17 the very hatred of the heart is prohibited though no mischiefe outwardly be committed 4. Some thinke that there is no more forbidden in this Commandement than before but that the Lord thought good to rehearse and declare in plaine words his will for restraining of the inward concupiscence for he knew Aerius stimulandos urgendos homines ne sub umbra obscurioris doctrina latebraâ— quaererent Lest men should seeke some evasion in the obscurity of doctrine that they were specially to be pricked forward and urged Calvin But it is not like that in so compendious an abridgement of the Law that the same things should be twice repeated and Calvin himselfe onely propoundeth this reason hee doth not much insist upon it 5. Therefore that we may apprehend the true difference betweene this precept and the other wee must distinguish betweene these three Pravaâ— cogitationes assensum simplicem certam deliberationem Evill thoughts a simple assent and a setled and certaine deliberation The first evill thoughts if as soone as they rise a man reject them he seemeth not to be guilty though
justa ratio id postaâ—â—bit but where need it and necessary or just cause doe so require c. otherwise the Law doth forbid all unlawfull swearing as well as the Gospell 3. And the reason why they ought not to sweare by strange gods is ne frequenti juramento iâ—â—â—cantur ad cultâ—â—◠〈◊〉 c. lest that by often swearing they be induced to worship them Glos. interliâ—â—â—â— 4. And as an Hebrew then and so a Christian now was not himselfe so neither were they to compell a Gentile to sweare by them yet as Augustine determineth it is lawfull for a Christian recipere ab eo juramentum in Deo suo c. to receive an oath of a Gentile by his god to confirme some covenant or contract se Gentilis obtularis se facturum if the Gentile doe of himselfe offer it Lyran Tostat. QUEST XXV Whether a Christian may compell a Iew to sweare by his Thorah which containeth the five bookes of Moses VPon this occasion how farre a Christian may compell another of a contrary religion to sweare as a Jew or Turke Tostatus bringeth in divers questions which it shall not be amisse here briefly to touch as first whereas it is an usuall thing with the Jewes at this day to sweare upon their Thorah which is nothing else but a volume containing the five bookes of Moses yet bound up in silke and laid up very curiously in their Synagogue whereout they use to read the lectures of the Law the question is whether it be lawfull for a Christian Judge to urge a Jew to take his oath upon his Thorah for upon the Gospels he will rather dye than take an oath For the resolution of this doubt divers things are to be weighed and considered 1. That there is great difference betweene the Idols and 〈◊〉 gods of the Heathen and the Jewes Thorah for this 〈◊〉 a part of Gods word and containeth nothing but the truth and it is all one as if the Jew did lay his hand upon the Pentateuch or five bookes of Moses as any Christian may take his oath upon the Gospels or any other part of Gods word 2. And like as a Christian laying his hand upon the Gospels doth not 〈◊〉 by the bookâ— for 〈◊〉 were unlawfull in giving the honour due to the Creator unto a creature but hath relation unto God whose verity and truth is contained in that booke So a Jew swearing upon his Thorah yet sweareth by God the Author of the Law and in so doing sinneth not 3. Yet it may so fall out that a Jew may sinne in swearing upon his Thorah as having an opinion that all the contents of that booke as namely the ceremonials are yet in force which are abolished in Christ and yet the Judge may not sinne in requiring the Jew to sweare upon his Thorah for he doth not consider of those things quae sunt in voluntate agentis sed de ipso actis which are in the minde and intent of the doer but of the act it selfe therefore the act of it selfe being lawfull a Jew may be required to doe it Sic Tostat. qu. 14. QUEST XXVI Whether a Iew may be urged to sweare in the name of Christ. BUt as the Jew may be urged to sweare upon his Thorah which they hold to be a booke of truth as Christians doe yet the case is not alike if a Christian should compell a Jew to sweare in the name of Christ for although Christ be in deed and in truth very God yet the Jewes hold him to be worse than any Idoll and therefore the Jew in taking such an oath should doe against his conscience and consequently commit a great sinne or if a Jew should require a Christian to sweare by the name of Christ whom he holdeth to be no God nor yet a good man therein the Jew should also sinne against his conscience for it skilleth not a thing to be so or so indeed dum aliter concipiatur as long as a man otherwise conceiveth and is perswaded in his minde Tostat. qu. 15. QUEST XXVII Whether a Saracene may be urged to sweare upon the Gospels or in the name of Christ. NOw although a Jew cannot be compelled without sinne to sweare in the name of Christ whom he holdeth worse than an Idoll or upon the Gospels which they thinke containe nothing but fables yet the reason standeth otherwise for a Saracene or Turke he may be required to sweare in the name of Christ or upon the Gospels And the reason is because the Saracens have a good opinion of Christ and beleeve that he was sent of God and that he was a great Prophet and a good man and for the most part they doe assent unto the Gospels and beleeve that Christ spake the truth And therefore they in taking such an oath doe not against their conscience and therein sinne not Now if it be objected that the Saracens differ more from the Christians than the Jewes and therefore can no more lawfully take an oath in the name of Christ than the Jewes the answer is that although the Jewes consent with the Christians touching the canonicall bookes of the old Testament as the Saracens doe not yet as touching Christ they doe totally dissent from the Christians and so doe not the Saracens Tostat. qu. 17. QUEST XXVIII Whether a Christian may sweare upon the Iewes Thora BUt it hath beene before shewed that a Jew may be without sinne urged to sweare upon his Thora which is nothing but the Pentateuch containing the five bookes of Moses another question is moved whether a Christian may safely take his oath upon the Jewes Thora And that it is not lawfull so to doe it may be thus objected 1. It is a sinne Iudaizare to Iudaize to doe as the Jewes doe as to be circumcised to observe the Jewish Sabbath and such like But to sweare upon the Thora is to Iudaize that is to doe as the Jewes doe Ergo c. Answ. 1. To Iudaize is not simply to doe that which the Jewes doe but that which they alone doe and none other as to beleeve that which they only beleeve as that the ceremonies of the Law are still in force or to doe that which they only doe as to be circumcised and to abstaine from certaine kinde of meats as Saint Paul chargeth Saint Peter that he compelled the Gentiles Iudaizare to Iudaize concerning their meats for he did eat with the Gentiles before the Jewes came and afterward he withdrew himselfe from them otherwise to beleeve as the Jewes and others also beleeve and to doe likewise as to hold the world to have beene created the Israelites to have beene delivered and all other things in the Scriptures to be true as they are there set downe this is not to Iudaize 2. So because the Thora which is the Pentateuch is not only received of the Jewes but of the beleeving Gentiles and the truth of the Law we subscribe unto as well as the
he did not bring them in by Moses it followeth that Moses could not be that Angell 2. Tostatus therefore thinketh that this Angell must be understood to be Ioshua for he brought them into the land of Canaan neither did he spare their iniquities for he punished Achan Iosh. 7. And Gods name was in him both because he was an Israelite which is interpreted one prevailing with God Rabanus and he is called Ioshua which is the same with Iesus a Saviour and his name being before Oshea God tooke one of the letters of his owne name Iehovah the first letter jod and put it to his name and so made it Ioshuah which signifieth a Saviour Tostat. So also Lyranus Contra. 1. But by name is here understood not any title or appellation consisting of syllables but power and authority and the essence of God which was not in Ioshua Genevens 2. And the peculiar and proper name of God is Iehovah which was never given unto any mortall man Gallas 3. Neither did Ioshuah punish all their transgressions though he met with some publike and notorious offences Simler 4. And if Ioshuah should have beene this Angell carâ—isset populus ductore Angelo c. the people should have wanted this Angell their guide as long as they sojourned in the wildernesse Calvin 5. And further the Lord saith to Moses Mine Angell shall goe before thee Exod. 32.34 But Ioshua went not before Moses he came after and succeeded him Calvin Borrhaius here understandeth both Ioshuah as the type and Christ the great Angell of God secundum veritatem in truth But this cannot agree unto Ioshua at all no not as the type of Christ for the reasons before alleaged 4. Lyranus and Lippomanus doe interpret this place of a created Angell the same which went before them in a pillar of fire and in that he saith My name is in him the meaning is Quicquid loquitur 〈◊〉 nomine loquetur c. Whatsoever he speaketh he shall speake in my name Lippoman Contra. 1. That Angell which went before the people in a cloudy and fiery pillar was no created Angell but God himselfe for he is called Iehovah chap. 13.21 Gallas 2. Whereas the Lord said to Moses that he would not goe himselfe with them but send his Angell chap. 33. 2. and yet afterward being intreated by Moses granted that his presence should goe with them chap. 33.14 hence it is evident that thâ—â— was not such an Angell as he said he would send and not goe himselfe but such an Angell wherein his presence should be Simler 5. Wherefore this Angell is none other but Christ that great Angell of Gods counsell whom God sent into the world as appeareth evidently by these reasons 1. The text saith My name is in him Pro naturali divinitate eodem quo ego censetur nomine In respect of his Deity which he hath by nature he is called by the same name that I am Rupertus Ferus 2. Augustine taketh him to be the same Angell which wrestled with Iacob and changed his name Gen. 32. which was God himselfe Christ in humane shape wrestling with Iacob for Iacob is called Israel because he had prevailed with God 3. This is the same Angell which is called the Angell of Gods covenant Malach. 3.1 Ferus But herein he is deceived he thinketh this to be majorem Angelum a greater Angell than that Angell which went before them in a cloud whereas he is the very same Angell 4. This Angell is called Iehovah chap. 13.21 Iun. Piscator 5. They are bidden not to provoke this Angell But it was Christ whom they tempted and provoked in the wildernesse 1 Cor. 10.9 and Heb. 3.9 Simler 6. Angelus iste judex statuitur c. This Angell is appointed their Judge if they did offend He will not spare your misdeeds Calvin 7. Againe he saith If thou hearken unto him and doe all that I speake c. signifying parem ab illis secum obedientiam flagitare that he requireth of them the same obedience with God himselfe as being of the same power majesty authority as our blessed Saviour saith in the Gospell Ioh. 10. I and my father are one Marbach 8. Iudicium occultorum eidem tribuitur c. Unto this Angell is given the judgement of secret things hee will not spare c. Simler Pelarg. Etsi enim Magistratus non omnia delicta vidit novit c. For although the Magistrate doe not see and punish all offences yet God seeth and in time will be avenged Osiander 9. This was the same Angell which here performeth that which was promised to Abraham long before I will curse them that curse thee Gen. 12.3 as here he saith I will be an enemy to thine enemies and that was Iehovah Gen. 12.1 Pellican QUEST XLV Why in this place the prohibition of idolatry is inserted Vers. 24. THou shalt not bow downe to their gods c. 1. This Law is annexed to the former exhortation of obedience because idolatry is the very root and foundation of all iniquity and the whole Law and Commandements of God were neglected by Idolaters so that nothing was more contrary to their obedience to the Law than idolatry Simlerus 2. And seeing they were to cast out the inhabitants of Canaan which worshipped Idols they are charged also together with them to cast out their superstition and idolatry Tostat. quaest 81. 3. Quia proclives sunt animi hominum ad superstitionem c. Because the mindes of men are prone unto superstition therefore this precept is often here repeated that they should not serve other gods nor doe after their workes but abolish and destroy all monuments of superstition Gallas Ferus 4. And three things are forbidden touching idolatry First they must not bow unto them give them any externall signe of reverence then they must not serve them by sacrificing unto them erecting temples altars and such like Oleaster Thirdly nor doe after their workes that is follow other their superstitious rites and ceremonies and generally tota eorum conversatio prohibita est their whole conversation was naught and therefore is forbidden Tostat. quaest 81. 5. And because it was not sufficient to decline from superstition si religione carâ—as if thou want religion therefore as they are forbidden the worship of false gods so they are commanded to serve the Lord vers 25. Gallas QUEST XLVI What manner of promises are here made and why Vers. 25. ANd he shall blesse thy bread c. 1. This must be here observed that these promises here made are only temporall because the people then were carnall and only sought such things In the new Testament Christ doth not promise these terrene and temporall blessings to his Apostles non quia illis haec invidebat c. not because he did envy them these things but because he had greater blessings for them like as the father when his sonne is come to age doth no more entise him with apples but bestoweth
sint lapides vel capienda sit quaedam duorum nominum quasi intabella inscriptio It is uncertaine whether other stones are here to be understood or wee may take it for a certaine inscription of these two names in a table c. These two latter opinions I put together that it is like these Vrim and Thummim were written in some precious matter not made by art but prepared of God and given to Moses who put them within the breast-plate So Gallasius resolveth Diversum aliquid fuisse à lapidibus catonis minimè dubium est It is without doubt that they were a divers thing from the stones and chaines and what if wee say that these names Vrim and Thummim inscripta fuisse intra pectorale were written within the pectorall QUEST XXVIII How judgement was given by the Vrim and Thummim NOw it will be further inquired how the Lord made answer and the Priest consulted with God by Vrim and Thummim 1. Iosephus thinketh that when the Lord promised good successe to his people the stones shined extraordinarily but he saith Desiit tam essen quam Sardonix fulgorem emittere c. As well the Pectorall which he calleth the essen or rather choshen which is the Hebrew name for the Pectorall and the Sardonix stone upon the right shoulder which used to shine extraordinarily as often as the high Priest sacrificed did cease to send forth such brightnesse and that two hundred yeeres before his time which Tostatus thinketh was in the time of the Macchabees as he doth gather out of that place 1 Macchab. 4.46 where it is said that they laid up the stones of the Altar upon the mountaine of the Temple till there should come a Prophet to shew what should bee done with them It is like then they wanted that direction to know the Lords will by the shining of the stones Tostat. qu. 15. But I thinke it more probable with Montanus that the Vrim and Thummim was lost in the captivity as also the Arke tables of stone Aarons Rod and the pot of Manna as also thinketh Burgens addit 2. And as may appeare Ezra 2.63 that after the captivity they had no Priest with the Vrim and Thummim The Priest which met Alexander in his glorious apparell might have precious stones in his breast without the Vrim and Thummim 2. Ab. Ezra thinketh that they used to write the thing inquired upon in a peece of paper and so put it within the breast-plate upon the Vrim and Thummim and there they should finde written an answer of their question and demand But it is evident that the Lord when he was consulted with answered by voice 1 Sam. 23.11 3. Suidas thinketh that when the Lord granted their petition the Adamant shined extraordinarily if not nihil accedebat ad solitum lapidis fulgâ—rem nothing was added to the usuall brightnesse of the stone and when the Lord threatned warre pestilence or famine the stone had the colour of bloud But it is shewed before that the Vrim and Thummim was no such stone 4. Hugo de S. Victor thinketh there were certaine characters of letters quibus projectis ex literarum junctura desâ—per apparenâ—ium c. by the casting whereof and the joyning together of certaine letters it appeared what was to be done But the Vrim and Thummim was no such uncertaine conjunction of letters but some certaine glorious thing put into the Pectorall as is before shewed 5. Montanus thinketh that the Vrim and Thummim inde proferebantur were taken out of the Pectorall when any answer was to be given and that the Priest by the inspection thereof had his direction But it is not like after Moses there put them that they were taken out as Tostatus well thinketh Oportebateas educere è plicatura rationalis quòd non conveniebat c. That it was not convenient to draw them out from the folding of the Pectorall 6. Nehemonides is of opinion that the answer given by Vrim and Thummim was madregeh a certaine degree and instinct of the Spirit inferiour to prophecie yet of an higher nature than nathkol the voice which came from heaven Ex Pelarg. Ribera also thinketh beside the brightnesse of the stones that the Priest ad prasentiam rationalis spiritum prophetiae accipiebat at the presence of the Pectorall received the spirit of prophecie But for the Lord to answer by Vrim and by Prophets were two distinct things 1 Sam. 28.6 the Lord would not answer Saul neither by dreames by Vrim nor by Prophets 7. Wherefore it is most like though this be not certainly determined in Scripture that the Lord when the Priest asked counsell of God by Vrim made answer by voice As when David asked of God by the Priest that had the Ephod whether Saul would come downe and whether the Lords of Keilah would deliver him into his hands the Lord answered to both his questions that Saul would come downe and that the other would deliver him So 1 Sam. 30.8 David asked counsell of the Lord saying Shall I follow after this companie shall I overtake them and the Lord answered Follow for thou shalt surely overtake them and recover all Hence Tostatus well inferreth Non fiebat inquisitio in aliqua lamina sed à Deo inquirebatur veritas There was no inquisition made in any such place but the truth was inquired of God quaest 12. Ribera also useth this reason that seeing God answered to every point it was necessary there should be some voice heard Nam fulgor gemmarum tot tantaque minuta declarare non potuit c. For the brightnesse of the precious stones could not declare such and so many small particulars God used then to answer the high Priest by voice as Numb 7.89 When Moses went into the Tabernacle of the congregation to speake with God hee heard the voice of one speaking unto him from the mercie seat But it will then be asked if the Priest discerned not the Lords will by the Vrim why is it called the Vrim of judgement and what use was there of it I answer that it was so called not of the effect as though by the inspection of the Vrim hee gave judgement but ex consequenti by a consequent because the Lord onely vouchsafed to give judgement in the cause enquired of by the Priest when he applied the Pectorall with the Vrim and Thummim which was ordained to be a type of Christ the true and perfect light to signifie that in him all wisdome dwelleth and that by him only the will of God is revealed to us Calvin And this further may serve as a proofe thereof that it is like if there had beene any reall demonstration in the stones of Gods will that meanes had beene certaine and perpetuall and never failed But it was otherwise for God answered not Saul by Vrim and in Iosias time who was a vertuous King the high Priest Hilkiah enquired Gods will of the Prophetesse Huldah which he needed
hurtfull unto him for he could not have seene Gods glorie and live Calvin It was therefore commendable in Moses that hee desired in cognitione Dei magis magis aâ—geri to increase more and more in the knowledge of God Marbach As Bernard speaketh of some Qui pro fidei magnitudine inveniuntur qui inducantur in omnem plenitudinem Which are found worthy for their great faith to be brought to a fulnesse of knowledge talis erat Moses qui andebat dicere c. such an one was Moses that was bold to say shew thy selfe unto mee Such was Philip that desired the Father to be shewed them and David that said Thy face will I seeke Magna fides magna meretur c. magnuâ—â—iritibus magnus accurrit sponsus A great faith is worthy of great things to great spirits the Spouse offereth himselfe in stately manner To this purpose Bernard Herein Moses desire then was to be commended but he goeth somewhat beyond his bounds Hereof Ambrose thus writeth excellently Norat sanctus vates Domini quod invisibilem Deum facie ad faciem videre non posset sed devotio sancta mensuram super greditur putavit Deo etiam hoc esse possibile ut corporeis oculis faceret id quod est incorporeum comprehendi non reprehensibilis hic error sed etiam grata cupiditas inexplebilis c. The holy Prophet of God knew well enough that he could not see the invisible God face to face but his holy devotion exceedeth measure and he thought this not to be impossible unto God to make that to be comprehended with corporall eyes which was incorporeall this errour is not much to be reprehended but his insatiable desire was gratefull and accepted c. Cyrill more fully toucheth this point comparing together Moses desire here and Philips Ioh. 14. that Christ should shew them the Father Studiosus quidem Philippus fuit sed non adeo acutus ut commode apte quae sit visio Dei posset intelligere Philip was studious and desirous but not sharp enough to understand what the vision of God is c. And in the same place hee sheweth that Philip failed in these two things first in his understanding for it was impossible for a man oculiâ— corporis Dei substantiam aspicere with the eyes of his body to see the substance of God and in his discretion Non valde prudenter cum imago character patris verus adesset Neither did he aske this wisely seeing the true image and character of God Christ Jesus was present seeing then that the vision and knowledge of the Son sufficed to understand the nature of the father supervacaneus iste Philippi sermo videtur this speech of Philip seemed to be superfluous Non tamen lande sua privandus Philippus yet Philip is not to be deprived of his due praise c. And in these two things Cyrillus setteth forth his commendation first in respect of that which he desired Visionem Patris caeteris omnibus rebus anteposuit He preferred the vision of the Father before all other things Secondly in regard of the end that whereas the Jewes boasted of Moses that God spake with him in the mount and shewed him his glorie hee thought that the Jewes mouths might be stopped Si Christus quoque credentibus in cum Patrem ostenderet c. If Christ also would shew the Father to those which beleeved in him c. In like manner Moses here is to be commended in these two things first ut plurimum spiritualia petit Moses desireth all spirituall things he desired nothing more than to see Gods glorie which is all one with that petition Hallowed bee thy name Ferus And Moses propounded unto him a good end that hee might see Gods glorie ut de eo populo tuo concionari queam that I may preach thereof to thy people Osiander So also in two other things Moses faileth because hac carne circundatus being compassed about with this flesh hee desired to see the greatnesse of Gods glorie and that hee desired to see the brightnesse of Gods glorie qui ministerium non lucis sed umbrae teneret who had the ministerie not of the light it selfe but of the shadow Borrh. QUEST XXXVII What the Lord meaneth by All my good Vers. 19. I Will make all my good goe before thee 1. Some by all my good understand all Gods creatures which he saw in the creating of them to be good and those hee caused to come before Moses that in them hee might behold the glorie of God ex Simlero But Moses which had writ the storie of the creation therein had seene and considered Gods power before and this is a common and ordinarie knowledge of God by his creatures but here Moses craveth an extraordinarie demonstration of his glorie 2. Tostatus by all the Lords good understandeth the divers kindes of good things bonum spirituale both the spirituall good which was the divine essence of God bonum corporale a corporall good which was a most glorious lightsome body both which the Lord shewed unto Moses quest 18. But although it bee true that Moses both inwardly in his minde and outwardly with the eyes of his body did see Gods glorie yet the Divine Essence hee saw not for no man can see God and live as the Lord himselfe saith 3. Ferus giveth this sense thou needest not looke so high as unto my essence inspice opera mea inspice bonâ— quae tibi feci faciam looke unto my workes looke unto those good things which I have done for thee and meane yet to doe c. But this sight and experience Moses had of the Lord before he desireth to see him now in an extraordinarie manner and measure 4. Lippoman followeth the same sense Omne bonum meum quote donabo istum populum oculis tuiâ— videbis All my good which I will bestow upon thee and this people thou shalt see with thine eyes But the demonstration here made of Gods glorie was presently done it cannot therefore bee referred to the benefits which the Lord intended afterward to bestow 5. Some doe understand it of the life to come Requiem aternam dabo tibi in qua est omne bonum in visione Dei c. I will give thee everlasting rest wherein there is all good in the sight of God Gloss. interlin Hugo de S. Victor So also Thomas Aquinas sheweth at large how in illa foelicitate quae provenit ex divina visione c. in that felicitie and happinesse which commeth of the vision of God all humane desire shall bee satisfied and so God will shew them all his good 1. Est quoddam hamanum desiderium intellectuale There is a certaine intellectuall desire of man in the knowledge of the truth which shall then be satisfied 2. Est quoddam desiderium rationale A certaine desire grounded on reason as in attaining unto morall vertues this shall also then
cum caeter B.G.V. G.I.V. B.A.P. 2 King 3. Iudith 7.23 Ioseph lib. 3. bell Iudaic. cap. 12. Laert. lib. 1. c. 1. Ioan. Leo in descriptione Africa lib. 1. cap. 27. Plutarch in Lycurg Psal â—â— 34 Deut. â— 5 Aristot. lib. 8. cap. 14. Ierem. 26.14.15 Prâ—cop in cap. â—7 Exod. Lib. de cura mortuorum c. 5. â—â—pert lib. 3. 〈…〉 Rupert lib. 3. cap. 20. Ioseph lib. 3. antiq Iudâ—â— cap. 3. Lib. 3. in Exod. cap. 19. I.C. I. V. cum caeter I.B.G. cum caeter I. I.G.B. Lâ—ran in 2. Exod. August quast 67. in Exod. Quast 68. in Exod. Lib. 3. in Exod. cap. 22. Ecclesiastic cap. 7.6 Deut. 26.19 Other properties requisite in Magistrates Chrysost. serm de Evang. nuptia facta sunt 1. Cor. 7.5 Super Math. cap. 7. A defence of Queene Elizabeths government 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Plutarâ—◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Matth. 6 Luke 14.14 Menideâ—uâ— Ex histor Nicolaâ— de mâ—rib Gentiaâ— A 9. â— Cor. 11. â— Ex Aâ—lii Donati praefâ—t in Terâ—ntium Oenopides so distinguisheth the bookes of the learned and unlearned Lima nunquam pulchriâ—r appareâ— quà m cum plena est Heb. 5.4 a Exod. 2.12 b Exod. 18.14 c Deut. 16.19 d Ibid. Exod. 1â— Hieron epitaph Paule 2. Cor. 12.14 Bernard de considerat lib. 3. Deut. 34.5 Ambr. de Cain Abel lib. 1. cap. 2. I. B.G.A. B. cum cat I. â— B.G. cum cater V.I.A.P. August quest 70. in Exod. 5. Sam. 8.7 Rupert lib. 3. in Exod. cap. 24. Whether our Saviour with his Disciples and the Iewes kept the Passeover together Synops. controv 13. qu. 4. Rupert lib. 3. in â—â—od cap. 28. Tostatus his reasons answered Rupert lib. 3. in Exod. cap. 28. Gregor 6. moral cap. 27. Thom. in Epist. ad Hebraeos cap. 12. lâ— 4. Lyranus deserded against Buâ—gens and Tostat. Chrysost. in Epist. ad Hebraos hom 32. Thom. in Epist. ad Hebraeos cap. 12. lâ— 4. Gregories opinion concerning the apparition and minystrie of Angels examined How Christ was the mediatour of the old Testament That place expounded Heb. 2.2 how the word and the law was spoken by Angels I.G.B. I.A.P.L. B.G.L. I.V.A. The difference of filiall and servile feare â—yrâ—l conera Iulian. l b. 8. Heresies concerning the Trinity 〈◊〉 the fiâ—st mandenâ— Of diversâ— kindes of faith James 2.19 Synops. pap pag. 879. Divers reasons shewing that justifying faith iâ— not commanded or contained in the Morall law Of the starres Of the Beasts Of Fishes Whether the waters be under or above the earth See more of this question Synops. pap pag. 400. Of oathes made to enemies Of oathes made to theeves Of unlawfull oathes Objections answered made in defences of swearing by Saints Lib. de artâ— amandi The difference betweene the Sabbath of the Jewes and Christians Chrysost. in serm ad popul Antioch pro gratiarum actione Thom. 1.2 q. 100. art 7. ad 2. distinct 37. art 2. q. 1. ad 3. Reconcil Upon what occasion some works are allowed to be done upon the Lords day Divers kinds of rests in the soule Gregor 〈◊〉 registrâ— lib. 11. Epist. â— Chrysost. concion de Lazaro Reconcil Thom. in opuscul Whether Naboth did well in not yeelding his vineyard to the Kings desire What it is to call the brother Racha It is proved lawfull by the Word of God for Christians to wage battell The conditions required in lawfull warre August in lib. de 10. chord cap. 9. Of slandering Of railing Of whispering and tale bearing Of flattery Of lying Confession of the truth To interpret things in the best part The difference of good and bad suspition A lye in the case is to be admitted Reasons shewing the last precept of coveting to be one and not two Of the degrees to be considered in sinne Difference betweene the full assent of the will and an inclination only The divers kindes of concupiscence Of the ceremoniall law Of the judiciall law How the Morall law bindeth How the law is possible to bee kept in the regenerate How it is impossible to be kept in the regenerate Difference betweene the sinnes of the regenerate and unregenerate Of the true end and use of the law a Juel defens Apolog. pag. 59. a Juel defens Apolog. pag. 59. a Juel defens Apolog. pag. 59. a Juel defens Apolog. pag. 59. How God himselfe neither can not will dispense with his owne law It is not in mans power to dispense with the Morall law though God may dispense A strange example of Gods judgement shewed upon three excessive drinkers in little Eason in Essex the 27. of December last Reconcil Of two kindes of high places Three kindes of wayes is the soule joyned to the body R. Parkes his strong positions of comprehending the Godhead Apolog. pag. 204.20 I. A. P. I.B.G. cum caeter I.V.A. I. I.A. I.A. I.B.V.G. Oblation of incense a meere ceremony of the old Law and therefore cannot be retained under the Gospell Moses Judicials rather to be imitated than any other humane constitutions What was to â—e done if a â—an should fall into the pit The oriâ—â—nall and beginning of Sanctuaries How Sanctuaries should be moderated I. I.L.C. I.C.S. I.V. A. V.I.A.P.B. Thom. 1.2 q. 105. art 2. ad Cod lib. 4. tit 34. leg 1. Cod. lib. 4. tit 34. c. 10. Diocletian Cod. lib. 4. tit 34. c. 11. Ibid. leg 7. Cod. lib. 4. tit 34 c. 3. Thom. 1.2 qu. 105. art 2. ad 3. The keeper in trust is not to answer for casualties Cod. lib. 4. tit 23. leg 1. Diocletiâ—â— Cod. lib. 4. tit 23. leg 1. 1.2 q. 105. art 2. ad 4. Cod. lib. 4. tit 23. d. 4. Institut de public judit § secundo Extra de adulter in capit perveâ—iâ—â— * qu. 8. in 7. â— p. 7â— Objections made in the excuse of witches answered Cod. lib. 9. tit 1â— leg 4. 2 King 1. Caus. 26. q. 5. c. 18. Caus. 26. q. 7. c. 15. Caus. 26. q. 2. c. 6. Ibid. c. 7. Ibid. q. 5. c. 4. Caus. 26. q. 5. c. 3. Reasons shewing the equity of this law against witches 4 D. 34. ad 3. in Ser. Cod. 〈◊〉 9. 〈◊〉 18. leg 2. Ibid. leg 3. Ibid. leg â— 2.2 q. 154. 〈◊〉 12. ad 4. Lib. 3. 〈◊〉 c. ◠〈◊〉 lib. de exhortat Martyr c. 5. cited in the Decrees Caus. 23. q. 5. c. 32. Epistol 40. ad Vincentâ—um cited C. 23. q. 4. c. 41. Plat. lib. â—5 de legib August in Psal. 36. cited C. 14. qu. 3. c. 1 sess 10. sub Leon. 10. a Cod. lib. 3. tit 32. log 12. super verb. centesimae b Lib. 7. tit 5â— leg 2. c Lib. 4. tit 32. leg 26. super verb. tertium d Ibid. e Lib. 6. tit 34. leg 1. super haeredes f Cod. lib. 3. tit 32. leg 12. in verb. centesimae g Concil Laodicen c. 5. Cod. lib. 7. tit 47. leg 1. super verb. cum prâ— eo c. Hom. 38. super Matth. Chrysost. ibid cited Decret 88. c. 11. Lib. de Tobiae C.