to banish all considerable doubting And now I conclude First Whatever is True is objectively certain and Infallibly true so far as that no man in Believing it true is therein deceived or mistaken All Truth is Certain Infallible Truth in it self Secondly Few Truths in the world are so Evident as that a blinded prejudiced indisposed person may not be ignorant of them or erre about them Thirdly All Truths in the Scripture have not equal evidence that they are the word of God though all that is known to be the word of God if equally so known have equal evidence in the formal reason of saith that they are true Fourthly All known Truth is infallibly known that is He that knoweth it is not deceived nor can possibly be deceived by taking it to be true so that as Infallibility signifieth not being deceived all true knowledge is subjectively infallible and certain that is its true Fifthly No man can know that Infallibly which is not objectively certain that which is not True cannot be known to be true The strongest and most confident belief of a falshood is a false belief and more than fallible or uncertain Sixthly All Gods word being equally true and infallible the belief of it is also equally true and infallible But being not All equally intelligible evident to be his word and necessary the understanding and belief of every part is not equally easie strong past doubting or necessary Seventhly There is a superficial belief of Divine Revelations even the Gospel which a natural man may have by extrinsick means And there is a more clear apprehension which a Commoner sort of Grace may produce But that Belief which is so clear and powerful as truly to sanctifie and save the soul must be the effect of the special operation of the Holy Ghost who yet hath a course of appointed means in which we must receive it Eighthly The reason of this necessity of the Spirits operation of faith and then by saith is not because the Gospel wanteth due Ascertaining Evidence or an aptitude to convince and sanctifie a soul For it s highly Rational though mysterious and Good But because by corruption and pravity the mind of man is so undisposed to know believe and love truths of such a nature as that there is need of a special Internal higher Operator to set home the work as the hand of a man setteth the seal upon the wax and to do that by it which the bare word alone with the excellentest preacher cannot do Ninethly Yet is no wicked Infidel excuseable that saith If I cannot believe it I will not believe it Because First It is his pravity which is his disability Secondly He is more able for a common superficial belief than for a special effectual belief Thirdly And if he did by the help of that common belief do what he might and God appointeth him in the use of means to obtain a special Faith through grace he should find that God hath commanded no man to labour and seek after grace in vain and if any man have not that grace and power which is of necessity to his faith and salvation it is long of himself who useth not his commoner power and grace as he might use them And so much to prevent misunderstanding Now my Reasons why I take every History Chronology Genealogy in Scripture as certainly true and every other word which is spoken by a true Prophet and Apostle as by the Spirit and not disowned by the Scripture it self but especially such as you accuse in the Gospel are these First A Priore Because it seemeth to me that the writing of the whole Books of the New Testament by them was done in the discharge of the Commission given them by Christ And he promised his Apostles his Spirit for the performance of all their Commissioned office work This writing is part of the preaching which Christ sent them for And no doubt but the Spirit did cause them to write all the substantial part And therefore we have reason to think that the smallest parts are from the same Author and that he assisted them in the least as well as in the greatest Yea the very accidents may have a perfection in their place though less perfect in themselves Though all the Evangelists use not the same Method or Order nor repeat Christs sayings in the same terms yet in respect to the whole frame it may be best that there should be that diversity of words and order to preserve and declare the same sense and things And even their plain and less accurate stile and method may be best as fittest to its use and end Secondly A Posteriore There is no Caviller that yet hath proved any falshood or contradiction in any passages of the Scripture Though the clearing of some of them require more than vulgar knowledge Thirdly Saving the controversies about the few questioned Books and some few sentences and words the Church which received the Scriptures as Gods word did receive the whole as his word and as certainly true in every part Fourthly Because that Spirit of Miracles in the Apostles and that Spirit of Holiness in us which attesteth the Christian Religion doth receive it and attest it as found in the sacred Scripture though not as there alone And it putteth no exception against any part of the sacred record Therefore while it particularly attesteth the chief parts it inferreth an attestation to the smallest for that word or line which is not strictly a part but an accident of the Christian Religion is yet a part of the Bible which containeth it Fifthly And though all the reasons which I have given prove that the Truth of the Christian Religion may be certainly proved though we could not prove every by expression in the Scripture to be true and though we deny not but the Pen-men manifested their humane imperfections in stile and method yet if each passage were not True it would be so great a temptation to the weak and make it so difficult to know in some points what is true in comparison of what it would be if all be true that we have no reason to imagine this difficulty to our selves while its unproved And having said this I am here in order to answer your objections which yet you should not have expected from me whilst so great a number of books are already written which have done it And why should you bid me write that again which is written already unless you had confuted what is written If you understand Latine you may find a multitude of such seeming contradictions reconciled in Sharpius Magrius Althamer Cumeranus but most fully in abundance of Commentators If you understood not Latine you may read enough in Dr. Hammond and many other Annotaters and Commentaries Mr. Cradock's Harmony c. And you may have enough that understand Latine to translate you the solutions as out of Spanhemii Dub Evangel Grotius Jansenius Chemnitius and such others And
was not existent till 4000 years after having any proper casuality to change Gods mind or will The sum of the Christian Doctrine about the Interposition and Redemption by the Son for man upon his fall is but this As if God should say I will not destroy or damn sinful man remedilesly according to the strict termes of the Law of Innocency which he hath broken but will give him a remedying Covenant of Grace because I will in the fulness of Time provide better for the glorifying of my Truth and Holiness wisdome and goodness justice and mercy than the remediless destruction of mankind would do even by the Incarnation doctrine sacrifice merits c. of the eternal word So that this grand work of God is the cause of his subordinate works but not the cause of any real but only relative or denominative mutation in himself This all sound Christians are agreed in And can this offend you Secondly And for the termes of communication of Grace to man it is either First The New Covenant as a Gift of pardon and life Secondly Or the conditions which it requireth of man First The former you neither do find fault with nor can do That God should give the world a Recovering and pardoning Law Secondly The second is all that is here liable to your exception And what do you think amiss in that First Not that Repentance is one of the Conditions of further Grace for that you plead for Secondly Not that Fides in Deum misericordem Faith in Gods revealed meâ—cy as pardoning sin is required of man for that also you plead for But you would have his goodness and mercy to be a sufficient satisfaction to his Justice Answ First I hope you will not exclude his wisdome because you abhorre Atheism as folly Secondly And I hope you will distinguish between the prime satisfying Cause and the satisfying means These plainly differ The prime satisfying Cause is Gods wisdome contriving and determining of the fittest way to communicate his love and spirit But the prime satisfying means is Jesus Christ who was to do that which was fittest to attain the foresaid ends But that which you will accept against is that the Belief in Christs future incarnation was made then necessary to salvation Answ First See that you feign not the Christian Doctrine to say more of this than indeed it doth which I have opened to you before I told you how narrow the Apostles own faith was before Christs Resurrection We know that â—â— the believing Jews knew not so much as they nor so much as the Prophets and more illuminated men And we know that the rest of the world had not so full a revelation as the Jews But we know that all that had the notice of his promise were to believe the truth thereof And those that had not the word of promise made known to them had the possession of many such mercies as that promise gave and as intimated much of the same grace which the promise did Thefore none could be bound to lessthan to believe that God of his mercy would pardon sin and save penitent Believers by such a means of securing the honour of his holiness truth and justice as his infinite wisdome should provide This much you cannot deny And that the promise of the Victorious seed though it seem too obscure to bind men to so distinct a faith as ours is was by Tradition told to Adams posterity and that they had a General belief of such an expiation for some time seemeth intimated in the early and almost universal use of sacrificing of which I shall speak more anon Hitherto then I have vindicated the Christian Doctrine of mans salvation for the first 4000 years Secondly And is there any thing since which should make it more offensive to you First As to the Person of Christ I have said enough in my Treatise the Reason of Christian Religion Verily I think it far harder to confute those that feign all the world to be animated by God as the universal Soul and to conceive how God who is most intimate to all things in whom we live and move and are should not be as neerly united to all things as Christians believe him to be to the humane nature of Christ though undoubtedly it is not so than that he should have that neer union with his humane nature Secondly And as to Christs work I have so largely shewed you the necessity the reasonableness and the harmonical congruities that I will not repeat them In a word The New Testament is the Doctrine of the eternal 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 wisdome or word of God Incarnate to communicate the Divine Spirit and love to man to be a sacrifice for sin the Conqueror of Satan Death and Sin the Head over All things to the Church the Author of Redemption the grand Administrator of the new Covenant the Reconciler and Restorer of man to God the Teacher Ruler and High Preist of the Church in order to this our Restoration and Salvation Thirdly But if it be the Time of his coming that doth offend you I have answered that and further adde First What is there in foolish man that should encourage him to dream that he better knoweth the fittest season for Gods works than God himself Secondly Man was not all the while before without the Benefits of this dedesigned and undertaken Redemption He was still under a Covenant of Grace Thirdly Consider well that God did not intend to give mankind that had so heinously sinned by preferferring the Devils word before his a present and a perfect pardon but onely to give a new Law and Covenant which should be a conditional gift of pardon to be obteined in full perfection in time and by degrees we had made our selves voluntarily the Slaves of Satan And God would not deliver us all at once We had forfeited the heavenly assistance of the holy spirit and God would not give it us all at once Mans time of healing the wounds of his own sin is the time of this life and the perfect cure will not be done till our entrance into the perfect world And as it is with Individual men so it is with the world of all mankind Grace mitateth nature and doth all by degrees darker Revelations were meeter for the Infancy of the world and clearer at noon day and riper knowledge fitter for its maturity And when Satan by Divine permission had plai'd his part and seemed to triumph over the sinful world it was time for Christ to come by Power Wisdom and Goodness meanly cloathed to cast down his Temples and Altars to subsidue his Kingdoms and to triumph over the Triumpher Fourthly But if it be the present conditions of the new Covenant since Christs Resurrection that offendeth you viz that the world is required to believe in him I have answered that and now adde First Remember what I said before that no mans condition is made worse by Christ than
are otherwise disposed whereas the Power and so the Nature of mans soul is certainly gathered from what the wisest do attain Because nothing can act beyond its Power And if the attainments and acts of some mens souls do prove such a Power in them all souls of men are of the same species and therefore the rest might attain it if they had the same objects evidences excitations and improvements I think all this is plain truth Ninethly And if by believing you will heartily give up your souls to Christ and his Spirit you will find that there is yet a more excellent addition of knowledg and certainty to be obtained than by all other means could be procured At least as to the Intension and clearness of the Act if not as to the extension of it to more objects IV. Quest Whether the aforesaid Common notices do make up all the Religion of the Catholick Church And whether the Catholick Church be all the world believing these common truths Answ The question is either de nomine ecclesiae or de re As to the name the word is not used in Gods word for any but the Society of Believers as separated from the unbelieving and ungodly world As for men themselves every one may use this and other words in what sence he please But how aptly you may judge Quoad rem I have told you before how far all the world are capable of salvation if that be the question And I adde The Kingdome of God is a word of a larger sense but the Church of God properly so called is Narrower being Caetus evocatus The Kingdom of God signifieth First All that de jure are obliged to subjection and obedience And so all mankind on earth are of his Kingdome even Rebels Secondly Or it signifieth all that consent to subjection and obedience and profess it And these are First Such as profess subjection to God under some lame defective false conception as one that alloweth them to worship Idols under him or to live in wickedness or one that Governeth not the world by a Law or will not make a Retribution hereafter or as one that will pardon and save men onely for their superstition or without a Saviour And thus allmost all Heathens and Infidels are of Gods Consenting Kingdome Secundum quid Eatenus so far as this cometh to and no more Secondly Or such as profess subjection and love to God as truly described And as reconciled to man and saving them by Christ our Mediator And these are quoad actum First But oral or unsound not Cordial Professors And such are Hypocritical Christians who are simpliciter of the visible Church Secondly Or sincere Consenters who are simpliciter of the essential mystical Church of the Regenerate Now when we thus open the Case as to the Thing there remaineth besides the controversie de nomine no more than how far Heathens are under a Covenant of Grace and how far they are capable of salvation of which I have said enough before V. Quest Whether all Revelation for Religion must be but Notitiarum Communium Symbolum A Creed containing these common notices or truths as is asserted p. 221. Answ I have said enough against this before First What need God send a Prophet or an Angel to tell the world that which they all knew certainly before Secondly Full existence assureth us as I have proved in the Treat that mankind hath need of more Thirdly More tendeth to perfect mans understanding and consequently his will and life This is undeniable And mans perfection is his felicity and end And therefore more than those common notices is needful to his end Fourthly Else as is said you will reduce all the world to the measure of that part which is the lowest the unwisest and the worst You would not in wealth or health be equalled with the basest poorest or the sickest nor yet in wit and knowledg of other matters with the most foolish And why then in the knowledg love and practice of Holiness VI. Quest Whether as some others say all supernatural Revelations be to be tryed by the common notions known by nature Answ First It is supposed that all that pretend to Prophesie and Revelation are not to be believed And therefore that we must try the Spirits whether they be of God and that all tryal of things unknown must be made by some foreacknowledged principles if it be a conclusion that must be known Secondly It must therefore next be understood whether the Truth of the Gospel be to be known as a simple term or a self evident proposition or as a true conclusion First The first kind of knowledge onely apprehendeth the words and sense but not the Verity It is the Truth of the Doctrine that we enquire of Secondly Many Divines assert the second way and say it is Principium indemonstrabile Like est vel non est Doubtless this is not true as to the Natural Evidence of the proposition principle or doctrine But I think that in the very hearing or reading Gods spirit often so concurreth as that the will it self shall be touched with an internal gust or savour of the goodness contained in the doctrine and at the same time the understanding with an internal irradiation which breedeth such a sudden apprehension of the Verity of it as nature giveth men of natural principles And I am perswaded that this increased by more experience and Love and inward gusts doth hold most Christians faster to Christ than naked reasoning could do And were it not for this unlearned ignorant persons were still in danger of Apostasie by every subtile Caviller that assaulteth them And I believe that all true Christians have this kind of internal knowledge from a suitableness of the Truth and Goodness of the Gospel to their now quickned illuminated sanctified souls Thirdly But yet I believe that this is not All the knowledge of the truth of the Gospel which we have There is a common Belief of its truth by other means which most usually goeth before this Generative spiritual reception and belief usually they that are converted to holiness by the Gospel are such as had some Belief of it before and not such as took it to be false to that moment And after Conversion it is to be known as a certain demonstrable Conclusion And so the faith of wise and settled Christians is most rational And they are thus made capable to defend it against Temptations and adversaries and to preach it rightly to unbelievers Thirdly The premises from which this conclusion is proved The Gospel is true are both of them truths of infallible evidence viz. Whatsoever doctrine is attested by so many and such miracles extrinsecally by the self-evidencing impress of Divine Power Wisdome and goodness intrinsecally and by the effecting the like Impression in holy Life Light and Love on the souls of all sincere receivers is certainly true being attested by the spirit of God But such is the
ye for I know that ye seek Jesus which was Crucified he is not here for he is risen as he said Come see the place where the Lord lay and go quickly and tell his Disciples that he is risen from the dead and behold he goeth before you into Galilee there shall you see him so I have told you And they departed quickly from the Sepulcher with fear and great joy and did run to bring his Disciples word and as they went to tell his Disciples behold Jesus met them see Mat. 28. 1 5 6 7 8 9. v. Whether I say was this which is written in St. Matthews Gospel that I have here Transcribed said to the Women and that the Women returned from the Sepulcher to tell the Disciples before that Mary Mâ—gdalen said to him that she supposed to be the Gardiner If thou hast born him hence tell me where thou hast laid him and I will take him away John 20. 15. or whether there be any error of Transcribers Translators or Printers in those Texts if not how may I understand them to be true reports Sir I shall trouble you with no more but these few places which I have proposed in three Questions or Particulars although there are several other Texts that I do not understand how they may be reconciled but if you shall by strength of Argument Grounded upon sound Reason make appear that it was nothing but Ignorance hath made me to think that those Testimonies agree not but are contrary one to the other and that they may be so understood as that no such thing will appear in them then I shall be ready and will with you conclude and say so too and for the future suppose that other places of those books which are received for Scripture as seem to be contrary to one another may be Reconciled though I do not understand how But on the contrary if you do not endeavour by such sound and plain Arguments to make it appear that these Texts here Transcribed by me may be understood so as that no contradiction is in them I must think that it was nothing but Ignorance that made you say that which you have said in answer to that and some other objections Therefore I humbly and earnestly pray and beseech you both in defence of your own writings as also in defence of those Books in which you say you think that no one error or contradiction in any matter can be proved to make it appear in truth and plainness If you judge I have erred from the truth I hope you will endeavour to to convert me from the error of my way if any such be which if you shall do no doubt but it will be a good work see James 5. ult Sir It is your advice that in such kind of Scruples the doubtful should apply himself for satisfaction to some Minister therefore do I write to you and if you shall not give me a gentle and plain Answer I shall be discouraged to make my Scruples known to any other therefore in expectation of your plain Answer I Remain Your Loving Friend in the Bond of Peace SIR TWo sorts of persons use to trouble me and others with their Objections against the Christian Religion First Some Papists who profess to believe it but in designe do act the part of Infidels that they may loose men from all Religion in hope to bring them over to theirs when they have taken them off all other For he that can make another man believe that he was hitherto totally misled is likest to become the Master of his Faith For men are apt to think that none can so easily and certainly shew them the truth as he that hath shewed them their error And when men once think that according to the Grounds of the Reformed Churches they can have no certainty of Faith they will the easilier be brought to the way of those men who promise them that certainty which they make them believe that others want Secondly The other sort are Infidels who of late are grown numerous and audacious and look so big and speak so lowd as to acquaint us that it is not they that are silenced in their speaking place nor driven five miles from every City and Corporation Which sort you are of I know not I read your name and that you are a Sojourner but finding that you write not as a tender Doubter who desireth to be concealed but as a Confident gain-sayer of the Christian Verity and not knowing how safely to send a Letter to the place where you say you sojourn I have thought that it will be most pleasing to you to come to you by the same way as the book did which you except against which was written upon the provocation of a paper Scattered among the Schollars of Oxford when the Oxford Oath and Act were made in the time of the great Plague as by one that was unsatisfied in the Grounds of Christianity but I strongly suspected was written by a Papist it was made so suitable to their designs In two things you have not dealt righteously and ingeniously with me 1. In that you have not answered the Grounded Proofs of the Christian Verity which I have laid down but nibble at the Answer to some Objections which is not the way of a Lover of the truth 2. In that you take no notice of or make no answer to the second part of my answer to that same objection about supposed Contradictions in the Scriptures where I shewed you at large that if that which you object were granted it would not overthrow the certainty of the Christian Faith Both those should have been done by an impartial man The method which the nature of the Cause requireth me now to use in my answer to you shall be in the manifesting these following Propositions Prop. 1. That if it could not by us be proved that every word of the Scripture is true nor the pen men infallible or indefectible in every particle yet might we have a certainty of the Christian Religion Prop. 2. That yet all that is in the Scriptures as the word of God is certainly true and no error or contradiction can be proved in it but what is in some Copies by the fault of Printers Transcribers or Translators Prop. 3. That he that first proveth the Truth of the Christian Faith by solid evidence may and ought to be certain of that truth though he be not able to solve all soeming contradictions in the Scripture or answer all objections which occurre Prop. 4. The true method of one that would arrive at certainty and not deceive himself and others is to lay first the fundamental proofs and examine them till he is thereby confirmed and afterwards to try the by-objections as he is able And not to begin first at the answering of such by-objected difficulties and judging of all the cause thereby Of these I shall now speak in order And whereas you bespeak Plainess and
hath Gods Seal and Witness and can be from none but God These and many more which I have recited in my Treat are naturally known Verities As you very well confess all the ten Commandements to be going a little further than I see my self while you make one day in seven as separated to Gods worship to be such of which ellewhere I have delivered my mind how far it is a natural or supernatural notice III Quest Whether the Notitiae Communes are the only certainties in Religion Answ No Can you possibly deny all certainty of Discourse and Conclusions Ex vero nil nisi verum sequitur will you condemn the Judge as condemning a Malefactor upon uncertainty when he thus argueth All wilful Murderers must be put to death This is certain in the Law This man is a wilful Murderer proved certainly by confession evidence and witness Therefore this man must be put to death so I argue what ever doctrine is attested by a multitude of certain uncontrouled Miracles and by the divine Impress on it self and the divine Image wrought by it on all that truly receive it is attested by God himself and is certainly true But the Doctrine of Christianity was so attested Ergo it is attested by God himself and true The major is a Notitia Communis or naturally known truth The minor was known by sense it self to the first Witnesses and that was as natural a notice as any man is capable of and as sure whatever the Papists say against it for transubstantiation nothing can be sure if all sound Mens senses with their just objects and conditions are not sure in their Perceptions And how sure the distant Believers are I have largely opened in the Treatise Therefore the Conclusion must be sure Object But say the misinformed unbelievers that which all mankind believeth or knoweth hath its evidence in nature it self but beliefs of pretended Revelations Oracles and Visions are as various as Countries almost and therefore uncertain Answ First To the last part first I answer in your converse with men you will think him unnatural unsociable mad that will either believe all things or believe nothing There is credible truth and there is incredible falshood And will you beleive that either God saith all that every Lyar Fathereth on him or else that he never revealeth his will to mankind any otherwise than by his common works When God hath made a Revelation of his Will to the World the Devils usual way of hindring the beleif of it is by imitation and by putting such names and colours on falshood by false Prophets as God doth on the truth Shall we therefore conclude that either all or none is the word of God Or that God saith not true unless the Devil say true also Secondly And will you mark the gross error of such Reasoners about the Notitiae Communes First It is certain that no actual Knowledge conceptive or intellectual Verity is born in man Infants know not these Common Notions at all As the Eye is not born with the actual Species of all things afterward seen but only with a seeing power and disposition so these are called common Notions because mans intellect is so able and disposed to know them as that they will be known easily upon the first due evidence or notification of the Object and therefore almost all men know them Secondly It is certain that this knowing faculty in man as this noble Lord saith requireth its proper conditions for its true apprehension of the Object Now some mens understandings have the help of these conditions far more than others have he nameth to you the conditions himself Thirdly It is certain that the understanding performs not all its apprehensions at once or at first but by degrees and in time as the Objects are duly presented As an Infant seeth not the first day all that ever he must see nor a Schollar learneth not the first day all that he must learn Fourthly It is certain that the latter apprehensions are as sure if not more clear then the first As he that lived twenty years at home and afterward travelleth to London doth as certainly then see London as before he did his Fathers house so a Schollar doth afterward as certainly understand Horace Virgil or Homer as at first he understood his Primmer Fifthly It is certain that as particular notices are multiplied quod actus in time by use and information so the knowing disposition of the faculty is increased And the notice of a thousand truths doth so advance the understanding and befreind other truths not yet received that such a man can know more afterward in a day than an ignorant man can learn in a year Sixthly By all which it is a most evident thing that to make common Notions to be the only certainties is a weakness below a rational man And it is to make the intellect of an Infant to be the standard or measure of all certain intellectual verities and to make the Schollar even before he goeth to School as wise as to certainties as his Master and to make a new born Child to have seen as many Objects as Drake or de Noort or Sandys or Ludovics Romanus in all his travels In a word the Notitiae Communes being the very lowest degree of knowledge are thus equalled with the wisdom of the greatest Philosopher or Divine or Judge Was this learned Lord when he wrote this Book sure of nothing but these common Notions iâ— Religion Seventhly To which I might add that even in mens natural capacities there is a wonderful difference As Ideots know little so Dullards not much And must the wisest go no higher than these Eighthly And will Lawyers Statesmen Physicians Philosophers make this consent of all mankind the test of all their certainties If not why should we do so in our search after the greatest Verities which are most worthy of all the study of our Lives Nothing visible is so analogous to mans soul as fire The nature of which is to be ever of an active illuminative and calefactive faculty but doth exetcise it in such various degrees as the fuel doth occasion There is fire in a flint or steel yea in all things But is it the best way to know what fire is and can do by judging of it onely as it is in a stone No but take your steel and strike the flint and adde the combustible fuel and that which is in a stone can set a City on fire And nil agit quod agere non potest whatever act is produced proveth an antecedent power So if you would judge what mans soul is and can do and what truth is in the Intellect it is not in fools but in the wise that you must discern it And by this those may see their errour who are tempted to think that mans soul is but highly sensitive and imaginative or not made for heavenly and holy employments because so many ignorant and wicked people
therefore where Revelation was not few were wise or virtuous And the Philosophers themselves were all to pieces among themselves and their disagreements and doubtfulness tended to the gulfe of utter Scepticisme Now as nothing is more necessary than Religion as you well profess so Religion consisteth very little in the sensible apprehension of of present existences but in the knowledge of things absent or insensible things past and especially things to come the Happiness to be attained and the misery to be escaped Now if all the Poor unlearned Men and Women in the World must have known all these things only by natural discourse how little Religion would have been in the World when the Philosophers knew so little themselves And though your learning and understanding made the immortality of the Soul so clear to you and the rewards and punishments of another life as that you number it with the common notices yet were not the old Philosophers themselves so commonly agreed on it as they should have been much less all the common People And if you say that now almost all the world believeth it I answer it is Gods great mercy that it is so But consider whether it be not more by the way of believing than of naturall instinct or knowledge For all the Christians and all the Mahometans who believe the words of Moses and Christ also take it by the way of believing And so do most of the Heathens The Japonians have their Amida and Zaca The Chinenses the Indians the Siamenses the Peguans c. have all their Prophets And the very Savages of all the West-Indies or America have their Idols Oracles or Wizards whom they far more depend on than their natural discourse about things Invisible Past or Future So that really if Commonuess go with you for a proof that any point is of natural instinct and certainty as a Notitia Communis this will be one of the chiefest of them that Religion consisting in the notice of and due respect to things absent invisible past and future is to be maintained in the world by divine Revelation and Faith and not by the immediate evidence of things nor by meer discursive Collections from things so evident So that Mans weakness with the quality of the Objects maketh Revelation so necessary that without it the vulgar who are the main body of the World would have next to no Religion And on the contrary how easie and pleasant and satisfactory is it for all these poor People yea to the most learned to have these mysterious truths brought by Revelation to their hands Now through Gods mercy all our common People Women and Children Servants and day-Labourers may know more with ease than ever Democritus Epicurus Antisthenes Zeno yea Socrates Plato or Aristotle could reach by all their studies to the last More I say of Religious necessary knowledge Tenthly And this being so necessary and so great a mercy to mankind I wonder that you put it not among your common notices that God being perfect in love and wisdom and having made man purposely to be Religious here and happy hereafter will certainly provide for his Religion and Happiness so necessary and so excellent a means as Revelation is God being the Father and Lover of light and of Souls and the Devil being the Prince and Friend of darkness Consider whether you may not strongly infer from the very nature of God and the nature and necessity of man and the other communications of Gods mercies to the world that he will certainly give them this great mercy also Eleventhly It is certain that God hath ways of communicating light to mans understanding immediately and not only by extrinsick sensible objects The Father of Spirits who communicateth so much to the corporeal world is not further from Souls nor more out of love with them But if there be any difference may rather be thought to hold a neerer more immediate communion with them than with Bodies and to be himself to the mind what the Sun is to the Eye and more Twelfthly It is certain that God can give the standers by that have no Revelation immediately themselves a fully satisfactory attestation or proof of the truth of another mans Revelations He that denyeth this maketh God to be impotent Thirteenthly It is certain that the Attestation which I described in the Reasons of Christian Religion was such supposing that such were given viz. In the Antecedent Testimony of fulfilled Prophesie the Constitutive Testimony of Gods Spirit apparent in the effects on Christ person and on his Gospel And the Concomitant Testimony of all his Miracles and Resurrection and Ascension And the subsequent Testimony of the Spirit on the Apostles their Miracles and doctrine and on the souls of all serious Christians to the worlds end These are things set all together First Which none but God could do Secondly And which God would not do to deceive the world Thirdly Yea which God would not permit to be done to deceive them in so high a matter Because he is the Omnipotent Omniscient Gracious Governour of the world And if these Testimonies were not of God it were impossible to know any Testimony to be of God And seeing wâ—â—â— have no surer it would be mans Duty to Believe and Obey and be Ruled by a Lie And if it be our Duty to Believe God to be so defective either in Power Wisdome or Goodnesse Holinesse Truth Justice or Mercy as to rule the World and the best of the World in the greatest matters by lying and deceit as if he wanted better means What Wit can devise any remedy against such deceit as shall be so attested as aforesaid Or if deceit can be perceived how can it be mans Duty to Believe it seeing mans Intellect is naturally made for Truth and abhorreth falshood And how can it be Good to Obey Deceit and Lyes And when the Devil is the Father of Lies what blasphemy is it to charge them on God By this it will be apparent that the Question must be in the upshot whether there be a God or no God and so whether there be any thing or nothing Fourteenthly There is some Moral Historical Evidence of the truth of things past which is as certain and much more satisfactory than the Natural Evidence of Conclusions raised by a long series of argumentation Yea some which is truly a Natural Evidence though it depend on the credit of free Agents The proof and reasons I have given in the Treat First The Will though free is Quaedam Natura and hath its Natural propensity to known good as the understanding also is and hath its Natural propensity to Truth And the understanding is not free of it self but acteth per modum Naturae Secondly There are some of the acts of the Will it self which are so free as yet to be necessary As to will Good sub ratione boni to will our own Felicity and nill our own misery to will Life and
knew whether all were true or not But also they did all in the power of the same Spirit which Christ did work by doing such Miracles as Christ had done And this not a few nor in a Corner but in many Countries of the world and that by many thousand Christians in one kind or other tongues healing prophecie or the like as well as the Apostles The certainty of which fact is attested by the very existence of all the Churches converted by it with all their Baptismes Professions and the rest of the Tradition before named No Christian of all this multitude by any terrours death time was brought to the last to repent and say that he had deceived the world by a lie Many Apostates falling off for fear of sufferings but none with any such recantation No adversary confuting the History but commonly confessing most of it with more such evidence which I have open'd in the Treat and must not oft repeat lest I be tedious And that which is still the Natural Evidence is that There is still existent First On the sacred Gospel Secondly On the souls and lives of all serious Christians by its impress the unimitable Image of the Divine Power Wisdome and goodness Life Light and Love as the Divine attestation Only as this noble Author requireth to all true Conceptions and Intellections so do we to this that there be but the necessary conditions in the mind of the receiver And whereas he saith that commonly Miracles are reported a hundred years after Here it was otherwise The Jews were enraged by them for fear of the Romans The Apostles and others wrought them openly Matthew and John that wrote Christs History lived with him and saw what they wrote so did Peter and James Paul wrote what he saw and heard from heaven Luke wrote the Acts of Paul which he saw being his Companion in travels The thousands were converted and Churches in many Countries planted not by bare words but by the Conviction of the Miracles of the Apostles themselves so that every Church and Christian was a History of them And all this they were moved to with the hopes of heaven where truth is known to deny the world and mortifie the flesh and suffer whatever the Gospel would inflict to preserve their hopes and comforts founded in this word of faith XI Quest Whether the common custome of sacrificing throughout the world in all generations were not their actual Confession that the sinner deserved death and that Gods justice required punishment of satisfaction and proceeded not from Divine Revelation in the beginning when God had new made the Covenant of Grace and so was delivered down by Tradition For my part it cannot come into my understanding why else men should think that God is pleased or appeased by the Creatures death or how this should become so common throughout the world And the two exceptions confirm this to be truth First Some Savages in America use no sacrifices But they are such as know not God or so Savage as to have lost all antient Tradition Secondly All the Mahometans and Christians use no bloody sacrifice But that is because First Christians believe that Sacrifices were but types of Christ and that he put an end to them by his perfect Sacrifice 2dly And Mahometans received it from Christ being but Christians degenerate first into Arrians and then into Mahometans and still professing to take Christ for the word and son of God and his word as true onely hating the Christians for saying that he is very God But of this instead of writing after so many I only refer you to their writings And specially to Dr. Owens Latine Tractate on this subject XII Whether Interest make the Judgment of Divines in the Cause of faith more suspicious or contemptible than other mens I put this Question with respect to those words in the Preface Sed neque auspicaciores ubique posterioris istius seculi Scriptores dicendi sunt Fit ita ut pro Regionum fidei diversitate in id potissimum incumbant ne illos domi male multet inopia adeoque non tam quid in se verum quam quid sibi ipsis utile exquirant Non est igitur a larvato aliquo vel stipendioso Scriptore ut verum Consummatum opperiaris Illorum apprime interest ne personam deponant vel aliter quidem sentiant Ingenuus sui arbitrii ista solummodo praestabit Author Answ First It is not to be denyed that there are multitudes of such Carnal Pastors in the Churches that are Christians for the case honour and wealth Secondly But that this should be so with all I shall disprove and prove that none on earth are so credible in this case as Divines First Because they have made it the business of their lives to search out the truth and therefore some of them must be supposed to have the greatest advantages to know it So that for Ability they have no sort of men that are Competitors For diligence and helps are the improvers of understanding And all men are found best at their own profession Lawyers in the Law Physicians in Medicine Philosophers in Philosophy c. And for your self your next words are Nobis tamen ad alia omnia fere quam literarum studia uti oportuit exequenda otium fuit Partim armis in diversis regionibus partim quinquennali Legatione partim negotiis tum publicis tum privatis vacavimus And is not this your disadvantage Who is a good Linguist Lawyer Physician c. that hath had but little leisure for his studies Secondly And as for Will and Interest it is notorious that thousands of the Ministry have so little set by worldly Interest as that it is upon the terms of greatest self-denyal to the flesh that they take up and exercise their office being moved onely by the great Interest of their own and others souls Their voluntary diligent labours their holy lives their contempt of the world may convince any of this that are not blinded by prejudice or malice There are few Learned men in the Reformed Churches but might far better use their studies and labours if they took that for best which is most profitable advancing or pleasing to the flesh Thirdly You had a Brother of your own so holy a man as his sincerity was past exception and so zealous in his Sacred Ministry as shewed he did not dissemble And I suppose had it been necessary you would have so maintained him that he should not have fled from truth for fear of poverty Fourthly What can you think of all those that gave up their lives for the Christian saith and hopes Did they go upon such carnal grounds as you mention Fifthly The revolutions of States and the diversity of Sentiments and especially the Interests of the Carnal part do bring it to pass by Gods over-ruling of all that usually the most serious Christians and Pastors are the sufferers of the age they live in
Gentleness in the Answer I shall grant you the first as far as in such hast and brevity I am able And the second as far as the nature of the cause will bear But if you account all Christians deceived fools you must not expect to be called wise nor that I should flatter you and tell you that Apostasie is a state of safety For I that believe Heb. 6. and 10. must think that this were not Gentleness but Cruelty and worse than to kill you for fear of displeasing you Prop. 1. If it could not by us be proved that every word of the Scriptures is true nor the Pen men infallible or indefectible in every particle yet might we have a certainty of the Christian Religion The reason is Because every particle in the Scripture is not an essential part of the Christian Religion no nor any Integral part if you take the Christian Religion strictly for the Doctrine of necessary Belief Desire and Practice And that part which is indeed the essence yea or Integrity of Christianity may be certainly proved and believed without our being able to prove the certainty or truth of all the rest which is in the Scriptures The Holy Scriptures contain all our Religion and somewhat more that is the Accidents and appurtenances of it As the body of a man besides the parts Essential and Integral hath its Accidents such as are the Hair and the Colour and some Humours which are for Beauty and other uses though not Parts So far are the Papists from being in the right who think that the Christian Religion is not all but part contained in the Scriptures that there is more than all that is necessary to salvation even the appurtenances which have an aptitude to the adorning and promoting of the rest To know who was the Father of every person mentioned in the Bibles Genealogies to know what age each person was of whose age is there mentioned to know the name of every person and every Town to know how far each City was from another whose distances are there expressed with a multitude of such like Historical Genealogical Chronological Topographical Physical incidental passages is but an appurtenance and not strictly a part Essential or Integral of the Christian Faith of Holiness or Religion Yet remember that we maintain as certain that they are all Lyars who accuse God of Lying And that whatever some ignorantly talk to the contrary God cannot lie See the excellent Amesius his Disputation of this Question An falsum subesse potest fidei divinae after his Medulla Theologiae which book with his Cases of Conscience and Alstedius his Encyclopaediae may after the Scriptures and Concordance make a good Divine and be a better Library than the Fathers of the fourth Council Carth. were acquainted with He that thinketh God can lie destroyeth the Objectum Formale fidei divinae and therefore can have no Faith If God could lie in one thing we should never be sure that he revealeth the truth unless by sense it self and after-experience All Faith goeth upon such a Syllogism as this Whatsoever God saith is true But this God saith Ergo it is true So that whosoever believeth every word in the Scripture to be Gods word must believe it all to be true or he can believe none of it at all But yet it is possible for a man to believe one part of the Bible to be Gods Word and not another part which needeth no proof Because that many of the ancient Churches for a certain time doubted of yea received not the Epistle of James Peter 2d the Heb. Apocal. c. and yet were truly of the Christian Religion First We deny not but that there are many false and wicked sayings historically recited in the Scripture as the saying of Cain Pharaoh Gehezi the false Prophets the Devil of Job to Christ c. but the Scripture is nevertheless true For it is true that all these untruths were spoken Secondly The Disciples of Christ were not absolutely and in all things infallible as all Christians do Confess They were not as perfect in Knowledge as now they are in Heaven Either Paul or Barnab as was mistaken about the fitness of Mark to go with them Thirdly There was a greater assistance of the Spirit promised them when two or three of them were assembled in Christs name than when they proceeded singly Mat. 18. 18. But there can be nothing above perfect infallibiâ—ity and impeccability to them all Fourthly We confess that Christs Disciples were not indefectible or sinless As their understandings so their wills and lives had still some imperfections Marke Paul and Silas did not all perfectly do their duties in the case they differed about Peter did amiss in avoiding the Gentile Christians when Paul blamed him openly Gal. 2. And Barnabas and others did not do well in being drawn away to the same â—issâ—â—â—lation When Paul saith of Timothy I have no man like minded â—nd of others They all seek their own He took not all Christians that had the Spirit to be perfect If any man had not the Spirit of Christ he was none of his Rom. 8. 9. And the very wrangling deâ—â—â—â—â—ng Galathians had received the spirit Gal. 3. 1 2 3. And so had the wrangling Corinthians Christ in them 2 Cor 8. 5. Fifthly We confess that he who is either infallible or defectible lyable to error or sia is of himself capable of being deceived and of deceiving others If he were Infallible in respect of the Knowledg of all the Truth yet while he can sin of himself considered he can be heedless careless rash partial and for by respects speak too little or too much It is the Devils last method to undo by overdoing and so to destroy the authority of the Apostles by over magnifying them therefore we will not use his methods nor deny any of this Sixthly Moreover we confess that it is possible for a good Christian to doubt whether those that were but Evangelists as Marke and Luke had the same promise of the Spirits infallible assistance with the Apostles seeing we find not that promise so expresly any where made to them And thereupon he may possibly think that some errors may consist with their measure of the Spirit as it did with many Christians who had the same Spirit Seventhly And we do not believe that the extraordinary operations of the Spirit were alwaies equally in the Apostles themselves we suppose the Prophets could not alwaies Prophesie nor those that spake with tongues use that gift at their own pleasure nor yet those that did miracles healed the sick or raised the dead But that the Spirit wrought as in various sorts and measures in several persons 1 Cor. 12. so also at various times and in various measures in the same person Whereupon it is possible for a good Christian to doubt whether every word in Scripture was written then when the writer had the gift of infallibility and indefectibility
enter Sixthly In that constant Communion of all the Churches in their solemn Assemblies and setting apart the Lords day to that use where in their worshiping of God they expressed and excercised their Religion Seventhly In the constant preaching of the Gospel by the Pastors Eightly In the constant Celebration of the Sacrament of Christs Body and Blood wherein the summe of the Gospel was recited and expressed And the custome was also to repeat the profession of their Belief Ninethly The frequent disputations of the Christian Pastors for their Religion against all Heathens Infidels and Heroticks Tenthly The writings of the said Pastors Apologies Doctrinal Historical Commentaries Devotional Eleventhly The Confession and Sufferings of the Martyrs Twelfthly The Decrees Canons and Epistles of Councils or Assemblies of the Christian Pastors Thirteenthly And after these the Decrees and Laws of Christian Princes in all which we have no need of any peculiar Tradition of the Church of Rome Fourteenthly Yea we may adde the Confessions of Adversaries who tell us part of the Christians Religion as Pliny Celsus Julian c. All these waies set together told men what Christianity was Fifteenthly But the fullest and surest discovery of it was by the holy Scripture of it self which was constantly read in the Assemblies of the Christians In all this I have but told you by how many waies and means materially the Gospel Doctrine was made known Now the great Question is Whether by all these means we might come to a certainty of the truth of the Christian Faith in case we could not prove every word or particle of Scripture to be Gods word and so to be true They that deny it say That he that can mistake or be deceived in one thing may be so in another and we cannot take his word as certain who sometimes speaketh falsly for we can never be sure that he speaketh the truth But I affirm the thing questioned and shall shew the mistake of this reason of the Adversaries First It must be remembred that we ascribe Infallibility Primitive and Absolute to God and no other Therefore we are certain that so much is true as is Gods word Secondly We are Certain that all that is the word of God which he hath set his seal or attestation to which I have largely opened in the Book which you oppose All that which hath the Antecedent and Constitutive and Concomitant and subsequent Attestation of God there opened we are certain is of God Thirdly We are Certain that the Person of Christ and his own Doctrine had all this fourfold Divine Testimony And therefore that Christ and his Doctrine are of God and true And consequently that Christ was the Son of God the Redeemer of the world the Head of the Church and whatever he affirmeth himself to be Fourthly We are certain that the Apostles as Preachers of this Gospel and performers of the Commission Delivered them by Christ had the same attestation in kind as Christ himself had They had the same SPIRIT Though the antecedent testimony by Prophesie was not so full of them as it was of Christ yet the Gospel which they preached and left in writing First Hath in it still visibly to the eye of every truly discerning person the Image of Gods Power Wisdome and Goodness Secondly The same Gospel as preached and delivered by them had the Concomitant Testimony of abundant certain Miracles Prophesies and holy works Thirdly The same Gospel maketh that impression on the souls of true receivers which is the Image of Gods power wisdome and goodness and so proveth it to be of God The concurrence of these three is a full and certain proof Now if there be any doubtfulness in any of this it must be First Either what it is that these Attestations prove Secondly Or whether they are really Divine Attestations Thirdly Or whether Divine Attestations are a certain proof of Truth To begin at the last First If Divine Testimony be not a certain proof of Truth then there is no possible proof in the world For there is no Veracity in any Creature but derivative from God And then it must be either because a Lie is as perfect and Good as Truth which humanity reason and all the world contradicteth and humane society abhorreth there being no savages so barbarous as to think so or because God is imperfect either in wisdome to know what is True and sit or in Goodness to choose it or in Power to use it That is that God is not God or that there is no God and consequently no Being for an Imperfect God an unwise an ill an impotent Being is no God And verily all our Controversies with the Infidel and the Impious and the Persecuter must finally come to this Whethen there be a God II. And that these were really Divine Attestations I have fully proved in the Treatise First They are Divine Effects and the Divine Vestigia or Image Secondly And such as none can do but God None else can give that full Antecedent Testimony of Prophesie None else could have done what Christ did in his Life Death Resurrection and Ascension None could heal all Diseases work all Miracles raise the Dead with a word None else could do what the Apostles did in Tongues and Miracles and wonderous gifts and these wrought by so many before so many for so long a time No other Doctrine could it self bear Gods Image of Power Wisdome and Goodness so exactly nor make such an Impresse of the same Image on the souls of men Nay though this same Doctrine by the Spirit of God be adopted to such an effect yet would it not do it for want of Powerfull application if God by the same Spirit did not set it home so that the sanctification and renovation of souls is a Divine Attestation of this sacred Gospel And besides all the past Testimonies of Christs and his Apostles Miracles here is a double Testimony from God still vouchsafed to all true Believers to the end of the world The one is Gods Image on the holy Scriptures The other is The same Image by this Scripture and the Spirit that indited it printed on all true Christians souls Divine Power Wisdome and Goodness hath imprinted it self first upon the sacred word or doctrine and by that produceth unimitably holy Life Light and Love in holy souls True Christians know this They feel it They profess it They have this Spirit in them illuminating their minds sanctifying their wills and quickening them to vital operation and execution And this is Christs Advocate and Witness still dwelling in all his members I speak not of an immediate verbal or impulsive revelation in us but of a Holy indwelling nature principle operation conforming the soul to God and proving us to bear his Image This is Christs Witness in us that He is Christ indeed and True And this is Our Witness that we are the Children of God And it is our Inherent earnest and pledge first fruits
Christ had commanded them and made part of his Laws To teach them all truth which was Evangelical or part of their Ministerial Office To enable them to be most certain and full in their Testimony of what they had heard from Christ and seen him do which was part of the Gospel In a word to to perform all their proper Office I do not at the present suppose you to take these Texts for the word of God For I must suppose you to be an Infidel But I onely offer them as part of the certain historical evidence concurring with all the forementioned history and evidence of the fact to prove what it was which the Apostles miracles were used to confirm This same Gospel they preached every where when they wrought these miracles And if they confirmed not the Gospel or Christian Religion they confirmed nothing So that it being certain that this Spirit and Miracles were real and certain that they were the Testimony of God and certain that it was the Truth of Christs person actions doctrine sufferings resurrection ascension and Covenant and Commandments which they attested and all that is properly the Gospel or Christian Religion what hindereth our certainty of all this If it were a doubt whether the Spirit attested more it is never the more doubtful whether he attested this much The Apostles constantly preached this Gospel They Baptized persons into the New Covenant They opened the Articles of the Faith to them and caused them to profess that Faith They engaged them into the promise and directed them in the practice of a godly righteous and sober life And they confirmed all this by miracles And is not all this then made sure Yea before they wrote any of the Scriptures And now to the Objection He that speaketh falsly in one thing is to be believed certainly or as infallible in nothing I again answer it is a blind Objection God onely is absolutely infallible All men are fallible in some things We are not to believe that the Apostles could erre in nothing at all Peter knew not what he said when he talkt of dwelling on the Mount They could erre and they could sin And he that sinneth erreth They were not absolutely perfect But it is in certain particulars even in the Declaration of the Gospel that God would not suffer them to erre or to deceive Those words which the Holy Ghost did by inspiration dictate to them it is certain that all those words the same Holy Ghost attested That is To all the word of God And thus much being past doubt what if we were now at a loss about some Appurtenances of the Gospel whether they were any of the Spirits dictates or any part of the word of God or any proper part of that which the Apostles were Commissioned for and Spiritually Enabled to teach What if in some points which they could know by common sense infallibly as well as other men any one should think that they were left meerly to that certainty of sense What if one be uncertain which are the Parts and which but the Appurtetenances of the Gospel in some things which salvation is not laid on Or were uncertain whether the Spirit did determine the Speakers tongue or pen about every such Appurtenance What 's this to the invalidating of any of the rest If indeed when they speak by the Spirits Revelation they spake falsly at any one time we could never be sure that they spake true But when we are sure that all is true which they speak by the Spirit and sure that they spake the Gospel or delivered the Christian Religion by the Spirit and are onely not sure whether every word in Genealogy or by circumstances were spoken by the Spirit nothing will follow hence but that every word of God is true and every word of the Apostles which was a word of God And it is perversness to argue They may erre when they speak their own words as men Therefore they may erre when they speak Gods words by the Spirit First The Testimony of the Internal sanctifying Spirit is infallible And so much as this Spirit attesteth to me is true And I am sure that this Spirit attesteth the truth of the Gospel in me for the substance of the Gospel is imprinted on my heart and by the impression I know the seal But what if I find on me no part of Gods Image which was made by the name of Jorams Father or Son what if I feel no Testimony of the Spirit in me which tells the age of such or such a man there named Nor can prove by the Spirit in me how far Bethany was from Jerusalem What if the mention of Pauls Cloak and Parchments did not sanctifie me Must I be uncertain of that which did Secondly What if I read a promise in the Scripture that God will never fail me nor forsake me but will preserve me in safety to his Kingdome If I were uncertain whether this promise extended to every hair of my head so that none of them should perish or to the preservation of my Colour and such like accidents Will it follow that I cannot be sure that I my self my soul my person shall not be forsaken What if I have a promise that all things shall work together for my good And I am uncertain whether sins or my own follies or rashness or the creeping of every worm in the world or the shaking of every leaf be numbered with those All things Must I be uncertain therefore whether any thing shall work for my good or whether sufferings for Christ shall do it Thirdly What if I be uncertain whether the vegetative faculties or soul in man be material or immateterial Must I be as uncertain whether man have an immaterial or incorporeal soul and whether the intellectual powers be such or not Fourthly What if I be in doubt when the Law doth summon a man to any place or command him any office whether it meant that he shall not change his cloaths or leave them off nor cut his hair or nails but bring all with him Doth it follow that I must be as uncertain whether the person himself must come or not Fifthly What if I be disputing whether a Tree be wood and I cannot tell whether the leaves their ribs or stalkes be truly wood or not must I therefore be uncertain of all the rest Sixthly What if we dispute whether all the Kings officers are to be obeyed and it be a doubt to me whether a Prelate or an Apparator be the Kings Officers can I therefore be assured of no others Seventhly When a witness sweareth to any writing that it is true or to any interrogatories If I be uncertain whether it be the true spelling or Syntax of the words or the propriety of every phrase or every circumstance of the matter which he attesteth must I therefore be uncertain whether he attest any thing at al This one consideration may shew the unreasonableness of
most necessary clear and certain must be held accordly with a more clear assured confidence than those that are unnecessary dark And that uncertainties must be reduced to certainties and not certainties to uncertainties And that all arguing should be a notiore and not a minus not is And as I said before as the Trunks of the Tree the Veins the Arteries the Nerves are few and visible and easily and surely known when the thousands of little branches are hardly visible or numerable so is it with the schemes of truths He therefore that will begin at these numerous small branches will dote rather than know or learn As in the former instances First When I see with my eyes the effects of Power Wisdome and Goodness in all the visible works of God I am sure that it is perfect Power Wisdome and Goodness which is the cause of this I am certain that nothing can give that which formaliter or eminenter it hath not to give nor can the effect exceed the totall cause I am certain that he from whom all Creatures Power Wisdome and Goodness doth proceed must needs himself be more Great and Wise and Good than all the world of Creatures set together which he hath made To this fundamental certainty therefore I must hold if I will not dote whatever little Objections or pratlings may be used against it Secondly Eternity is a thing incomprehensible which quite swalloweth up my understanding and many little things be said against it But I am certain that nothing can make nothing And if ever there had been nothing there never would have been any thing And to this certainty I will hold Thirdly A holy life hath a great many of cavilling Objections raised against it by corrupted nature And shall I there begin to make my trial of it No I am first sure that a Rational free Agent and Subject of God is bound to obey him and that the Greatest Good should be Greatliest loved and that we are totally our Creators own and should be totally devoted to him I am sure I cannot love the infinite Good too much nor be too Good nor do too much Good to others in the world nor make too sure of my own felicity nor too much seek my ultimate end And shall not this assurance hold me fast against all the snarlings and pratlings of the doating drunken world So here I have in the Treatise opened those grounds on which we may be certain of the necessity of this holiness of the life to come and of the truth of the Christian Faith and hopes And because God in mercy hath not put off the world with the skeleton of a bare Creed but also given them the compleat body of sacred Scriptures to be a full perpetual Record of this truth shall I turn his mercy to a snare and sin and question all even the Articles of the Faith because in the Scriptures there are some things accidental to Religion and some things hard to be understood which the ignorant and unskilfull wrest to their destruction This is but to be Devils to our selves and foolish enemies of our own peace and comfort As Cicero speaks against them that pleaded for the souls mortality as if it were a desireable thing You have nothing else that suiteth the Nature and Interest of a man and agreeth with the Nature and Interest of God to set against the Christian Religion in Competition If you would have no Religion you would have no Hopes no Safety no Business or Comfort but Beaâ—â—ial in this world and you would be no Men. If you would have nothing but Nature and the Holiness which Nature clearly calleth for you would have Health in an unhealed Body and Health without the Physician and his Means The Mediator is the way to the Father and if you would Love God and be happy in his Love and have the Pardon of your Sins you have little reason to reject him that cometh to Procure Reveal and Communicate that Love and Pardon which must win your hearts to the Love of God And if you would not die in desperation but have the hopes and foresight of a better life you have little Reason to quarrel with a Messenger from Heaven which bringeth Life and Immortality to light As bad as Christians are if personal quarrels and malignity blind you not and if you will not take the enemies and persecutors of Christianity for Christians meerly because they assume the name you may easily see that serious Christians who live according to their profession are persons of another kind of excellency than all the unbelieving world I know that from some self-conceited ignorant well meaning persons I must look to be reviled and called a betrayer of Christianity because I plead not for it in their way and give you any other answer to your objections than That when God giveth you the spirit you shall know that the Scripture hath no contradictions and that Christianity is the true Religion Till then you cannot know it nor must I give you Reasons for it But I do my work and let who will wrangle and revile How far the sayings of some are true or false that the Scripture is the onely means of faith or saving knowledge of God that it is Principium indemonstrabile as first principles of knowledg are in nature that as others say It hath evidence of credibility but not evidence of certainty as if evidence of Divine credibility or or faith were not evidence of certainty that faith hath not evidence but evidence evacuateth faith or the merits of it with such like a man of understanding may gather from what is said And I must not be so tedious as particularly here to resolve them having done it in Preface to the Second part of the Saints Rest Edit 2. c. long ago And though I have written nothing here which some men cannot make an ill use of and some men will not turn to matter of cavil and reproach I will not therefore leave it out whilst I expect that the Cood which Truth is fitted to is greater than the evil which by accident and abuse will follow it And because you seem Confident and think me bound to answer you and consequently all others not knowing how many hundreds may trouble me in the like kind I send you this in print that other mens mistakes and infidelity also may have the same remedies But I shall conceal your name and dwelling lest the shame of your sin should hinder your patient application of the remedy save onely by telling you that it is long ago since I read a noble Learned Lord who in a Latine Book De Veritate Contra Veritatem said much against the certainty of faith But it was all but learned froth and vanity I Rest A Servant of Christ and desirer of your faith and salvation R. Baxter Dec. 28. 16â—1 THE SECOND PART OF THIS APPENDIX BEING Some ANIMADVERSIONS On the foresaid Treatise
doctrine of the Gospel Ergo it is true as attested by the spirit of God I said before the first is a natural Verity The second proposition is partly of sense and partly of internal and partly external experience as is largely manifested Now as to the Question First No doubt but our Natural faculties must be used in trying supernatural Truth Secondly No doubt he that disputeth with or preacheth to an unbeliever so as to prove what he delivereth to be true must deal with him upon some common principles which both parties are agreed in or else there is no room for proof or for dispute Thirdly But some persons are so ignorant of those certain principles which infer the truth of Gospel revelation that they have need first to be convinced of them which must be done by inferring them from the first truths or some principles which they do confess Fourthly And as a man would convince others by the same method and arguing he must convince himself and try the truth which he is in doubt of Fifthly But if any should mean First That nothing is true in the Gospel but these common principles of nature Secondly Or that nothing else can be proved true Thirdly Or that it would prove any pretended prophesie vision or revelation true so be it they do not contradict the common truths All these are palpable untruths VII Quest Whether these common Verities inferre not the truth of Christianity Answ This is sufficiently answered in the last Perhaps the few Verities mentioned by the Author are not enough to prove Christianity by But that it hath true evidence in sense and reason is manifested heretofore And I believe that he that will by just argumentation follow on the Christian cause with an unbeliever if he can hold him to the point from rambling and suppose him capable of Historical evidence may drive him to yield or to deny common principles yea to deny that God is God and that man is man and consequently that there is any being But the evasion will be by denying notorious matter of fact which therefore must be proved by its proper evidence IX Quest Whether they are necessary conditions of the certain knowledge of a divine Revelation First That it be made immediately to my self Secondly And that I feel a divine afflatus in the Reception as is said Page Answ No A Revelation made to others may be certainly notified to me else if an Angel from Heaven should appear to all men in the Town and Country save one or if all save one saw a thousand miracles to confirm a Revelation yet that one could not be sure of it But I have by abundance of arguments in a peculiar disputation in a Treatise called the unreasonableness of unbelief long ago fully proved the negative And again in my Reas of the Christian Relig. therefore I will not weary the Reader with repetions X. Quest Whether any concurrence of moral evidence at least such as Gospel Revelation hath do truly amount to natural or certain evidence De Rev. Verisim Answ. This Question too I have plainly decided in the Reas of Christian Relig. I now add First The name of moral evidence is here taken by those that use it for that which dependeth on the credit of a voluntary Agent as such And the name of natural evidence signifieth that which dependeth on the nature of the Object in it self considered But I somewhat doubt whether all that use the distinction do commonly understand the difference or what they say Secondly Note that the All or effect of a voluntary Agent hath nevertheless a natural Evidence when it is done or existent If I voluntarily speak or write or go my Action is naturally evident to those that see and hear it as present sensitive Witnesses of it If I freely build a House it is nevertheless naturally Evident when it is built Al things existent in the universe were made by God as a free Agent and yet are nevertheless naturally evident Thirdly Every thing that is when it is if corporeal is naturally Evident to those that have their faculties in those conditions that are necessary and have the object in its necessary magnitude cognation detection site distance medium and abode Fourthly The judgement that is made upon sense it self faileth as this noble Author hath well opened when either the Object the Evidence the Sense or the Intellect want their necessary conditions or qualifications else not Fifthly The Fountain of all Freedome and Morality is the Will of God And yet the moral Evidence of truth which is in Gods word when known to be his word is as sure as any natural Evidence of the thing There being the surest natural evidence ab effect is at least that there is a God most perfect that cannot lie Sixthly The Essences of all things are but imperfectly evident to us The existences of corporeal things that are present and duly qualified are fully evident The existence of things absent beyond the reach of sense is evident only to the discursive intellect not by the immediate natural evidence of the things themselves but by a borrowed evidence from Causes or Signes Discourse improving the Fundamental common truths for the knowing of the rest by proving a certain connexion between them The Praterition of things and the Futurition are both like the distant existence unknown to sense and the immediate apprehension of the intellect And therefore must both be known also by collection as conclusions in discourse or not at all Seventhly Man was not born to know only things present in their existence by sense but also to know things absent things as past and things as future And herein he chiesly differeth from a Bruit Eighthly Though the understanding is most confident of things sensible present yet about things absent past and future it oft doubteth more and is less satisfied in its own conclusions from natural principles than from moral Because sometimes the natural Principles themselves though not the first yet the second or third may be so obscure as to leave the mind unsatisfied Secondly And the connexion among many particulars may be obscure and doubtful Thirdly And in the long Series of collection or arguing the understanding suspecteth its own fallibility so that when Conclusions are far fetcht though from natural Principles the mind may be still in doubt about them And on the contrary when in the way of Revelation the grounds are clear and the understanding hath fewer Collections to make and a shorter journey to go it may be far better satisfied of the truth Ninthly Man 's own necessity is the reason why God doth give us supernatural Revelation and call us to know by the way of Believing For First Most men are naturally dull Secondly Few have leisure by Learning to improve their intellects Thirdly And fewer have leisure disposition to exercise them by long searches argumentation upon every thing that they should know Fourthly And
Pleasure with a simple complacency though not alwaies by election To will all that is fully discerned to have omnimodam rationem boni and nill all that is discerned to have omnimodam rationem mali Now it oft falls out that Historical Narratives shall proceed from some of these necessary acts Salvation Life and Goodness and the necessary means of all may be the Motives Thirdly There are other acts of the will which though they are not absolutely necessary are yet so neer to necessary that they alwaies go one way except in some very rare extraordinary case As for example It is not of absolute necessity that a man feed or cloath himself or that he murder not himself But yet he will ordinarily do the first and forbear the latter because he is necessarily a lover of himself and life and therefore will not cast himself away nor destroy himself without some conceived cause Fourthly There are no causes extant in rerum Natura for the commonness of some such actions Therefore it is certain they will not be done because there can be no effect without its cause And the turning of the will to a mans known corporeal destruction is an effect which hath no common cause Therefore it is a point of more Natural Evidence and Certainty than many Conclusions from Natural premises are that all the people of Europe or England will not to morrow kill themselves nor go naked nor famish or wound themselves c. And consequently that formerly all never did so since it was notoriously so much their interest to do otherwise For there was no cause to produce such an effect If it must be a Miracle rebus sic stantibus which should make all the Europeans or the English to go naked to morrow or to kill themselves than it is Natural to them to do the contrary or not to do this for a Miracle is the over-powering of Nature But the Antecedent is evident to reason from experience Ergo c. There may be Causes for one mans actions which can never fall out to All or to very many All the Physicians in England never did perswade all men against Physick nor all the Lawyers against Law nor all the Covetous men in England the Labourers or Beggars were never against recieving Meat Drink and Money Because there never was a cause of such effects And as it must be a great powerful common Cause that must do this so also if the question be whether ever there were a Parliament in England Whether ever they made Laws with the Kings Whether our statutes were made by such Kings and Parliaments as they are ascribed to c. There is such a concurrent consent of competent Witnesses as could not be to it were it false because it would be an effect without a sufficient Cause Yea against the tendency or disposition of mans nature which would have caused the wills of some to contradict it except a miracle had hindred them For among so many there are cross interest notorious Some Mens interest is against the thing while other Mens are for it And to make multitudes go against their apparent Interest and Friends and Enemies of the event to agree must be done by the power of truth or by a miracle suposing the case such as they could not be all deceived in Fifteenthly But there is yet a fuller natural evidence of the truth of some reports Even when besides the report there remain some visible unimitable effects of the reported actions which could be caused by nothing else As if their Fathers told the Grand-Children of Noah of the deluge they might see such effects of it as might assure them that it was true If the Parents of the man born blind Joh. 9. were told by him that his eyes were cured when they saw it in the effects they must believe it If uncontroulled History tell our Children that London was burnt and new built that Pauls Church was burnt c. that multitudes died of the Plague the year before c. When they see the City the Church the Graves the change of Inhabitants the proved Testaments of the deceased besides uncontradicted testimony here is a natural evidence to assure it Sixteenthly Though some half witted Philosophers boast much of the certainty of their Physicks in comparison of Morality the truth is the most of Physicks are meer untainties and the wisest see it and busily pull down others doctrines but confess they are yet but searching and groping by extrinsick effects and experiments to know what to set up in the stead And so did others before them And long may they so search before they find Whereas there is a more satisfying Evidence in much of Morality as being Natural to Mankind and such as will no sooner cease to be believed than man will cease to be man whereon all the affairs of the world are turned and converse Societies and all the private Comforts of Nature are maintained God hath made known to us what pleased him according to his own wisdome and not at our direction or choice And he hath chosen that for us which is most usefull It is more usefull to us to know how to live well and how to be happy and how to please and glorifie God and do good to one another than to know Gods skil or mysteries in his workes to know what is in the center of the earth or how the active Nature doth operate on the passive whether cold be a privation or positive what is the cause of the continued motus projectorum Whether Light and Heat be bodies or Substances whether they penetrate other bodies c. As it is more useful for me to know how to keep my Clock in order than how to make one to know how to plow sow eat drink to my health than to know by what mysterious operations the Corn or other things do grow and my food is digested c. Therefore this Learned Lord doth truly and wisely enumerate his Notitiae Communes in Morality and Religion as certainties the denial whereof doth unman us God hath left such instincts powers inclinations and conscience in humane nature as shall naturally though with some degree of freedome in the exercise be an insuperable witness in the world to himself and to our common principles and duties Seventeenthly The Historical Evidence of the Gospel of Christ is such as hath all the advantages before described in its kind He lived and preached and wrought his miracles frequently before thousands friends and foes His miracles were never controlled as Moses did the Magicians by greater nor by any certain Truth which they contradicted The eye witnesses themselves were unbelieving till forced by Cogent Evidence They delivered his Doctrine Miracles Resurrection to the world not onely by credible report and to the ruine of their worldly pleasures and interests with the loss of their lives and all this meerly for the hopes of a reward in heaven from God that well