beleevâ— shall be saved is certainly knowen by the light of Scripture when the Spirit is pleased to open the eyes to cause us to see and beleeve savingly this trueth But this assumption But I beleeve Is proven not by the shining light of Scripture but in the kind of reflect knowledge that is cleare by the light of the spirit reflect knowledge I take is the immediate birth of the Spirit in so farre as it is reflect for when it is to bee proven by discourse and another syllogisme thus He that loveth the bretheâ—â— beleeveth But I love the brethren ergo I beleeve The assumption which is not ever cleare but often needeth an higher proofe must either bee made good by another Scripture and so in infinite or ye must come to some immediate light comming only from the spirit ye cannot go in infinite for ye leave the soul in that case in perpetuall doubting and therfore some immediate light there must be to discerne such a thing as this which is not knowen by the light of nature for the object is supernaturall and the light of Scripture doth not serve the turne if we speake of a reflect knowledge on which the conscience doeth rest without any further proofe because the scripture prooveth not to you that either you such a man by name beleeveth or that the characters of beleiving to wit that you John Anna by name love the brethren that you know him because you keepe his commandments more than it doeth evidence the same to any other by name and so except your name were in Scripture nothing can be proven by light of Scripture as touching the truth and evident and cleare reflect knowledge of the assumption But I beleeve except you say a major proposition can prove an assumption and make this a good consequence all that beleeve are saved ergo John and Anna are saved which is no good consequence can not settle the conscience or that this is a strong consequence these that keepe his commandements those that love the Brtheren know Christ savingly and are translated from life to death ergo I John Anna we are by name such as know Christ savingly and are translated from death to life either must the assumption I John Anna we are such as keepe his commandements and love the Brethren be proven by Scripture which is unpossible except your name were there or then by sense and the immediate light of the Spirit But the truth is from the book of nature yee may prove all that have life and perfect eyes see and discerne colours but except it be in the booke of nature that John Anna have life and perfect eyes or except by your owne immediate light of sense and life yea prove that John Anna have life and eyes ye cannot make good that John Anna doe see and discerne colours if they shall thereof doubt 2. Our Divines upon warrantable grounds of Scripture say as I know he that beleeveth shall be saved by light of Scripture and I know that I beleeve by the testimony of an inlightned conscience so I know that I see colours both from the shining of the Sun and from my owne sense convincing me even so I know by Scripture and Cain knoweth he that hates and maliciously killeth his brother Abel is condemned But that Cain may know he hateth and malitiously killeth his brother Abel he needeth not to have it proved to him by Scripture his owne conscience can prove it 7. If then the question be whether or no the Saints doe so grow in knowledge that they must ever leave place for new light from the Spirit I answer in the sense the Sectaries intend it is most false for John Paul and the Saints know and are perswaded that Christ God man dyed for sinners rose for our righteousnesse justifieth the ungodly that beleeve c. other manifest Scripturall truths not fundamentall as that there were eight persons saved from drowning in the arke so as it is blasphemous to say they leave place to a new light of the Spirit to beleeve the contrary of these to wit that Christ God-man dyed not for sinners as Familists teach and that he rose not for our righteousnesse that he justifieth not the ungodly that beleeve in him and that there were not eight persons but only two saved in the arke For this were 1. To lose the old true light to get a new false light 2. This were to subvert all certainty of faith and to doubt of all we beleeve 3. This were to make the Spirit of truth the doctor and teacher of lyes and untruth for of two contradictory truths the one must be false but God is light and truth and there is no darknesse in him and so the Spirit cannot teach two contradictorie wayes If we make the question whether are we to know and learne so by the Spirit that we must grow in knowledge and light of old truths to know them more distinctly and with a higher measure of farther knowledge which is new not in nature but in degrees we acknowledge in this sense new light because there are new consequences and deductions of the Spirit from the old truths implicitely and more darkly known which were not so distinctly knowne before and so after ages hath more light then former ages and that because 1. The least of the Kingdome of God is greater in regard of saving light then John Baptist the greatest of Prophets 2. Under the N. Testament it s said they shall not teach one another but they shall be all taught of God Jer. 31.34 Esa. 54.11 which was fulfilled in part in Johns time and when the Apostle wrote to the Hebrews 1 Ioh. 2.27 Heb. 8.10 and the Spirit is to be powred on all flesh as was prophesied Ioel 2.28 29. and fulfilled Acts 2. when the Holy Ghost was sent downe as Peter saith but I judge though the day began then yet it was but the morning dawning of the Christian Summer season that is to endure to the end of the world and therefore I crave leave to doubt if these Prophesies bee fully and compleatly accomplished Esay 2.1.2 as touching the peace that shall be under the Messiahs Kingdome or that which is Esay 11.6 7 8. especially that v. 9. For the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea and that of Isaiah ch 30.18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25. and that v. 26. Moreover the light of the Moone shall be as the light of the Sunne and the light of the Sunne shall be seven-fold as the light of seven dayes in the day that the Lord hindeth up the breach of his people and healeth the stroake of their wound and that of Isaiaâ— ch 54. and ch 60. c. 61. c. 62. and of divers other glorious Prophesies which I humbly conceive God shall fulfill at the incomming of the Jews to their Messiah at that resurrection from the dead
not ergo the invisible Church at all times and finally may simply fall from the sound faith of fundamentalls necessary for salvation more then this is a good consequence this particular beleever may in one particular fundamentall point erre fouly and grossely for a time ergo he is not infallibille simpliciter but may finally and totally fall away And that of our Saviours I have prayed for thee that thy faith faile not Luke 22.32 though it free not Beleevers from particular failings both in doctrine of faith and conversation of life and that grossely and fouly yet it secures them by Christs intercession in a state of infallibility in fundamentalls and in a condition of indeclinability in conversion so as beleevers are infallible in point of faith touching fundamentalls necessary to salvation except Familists hold the Apostacie of the Saints or that all may goe to heaven finally doubting Pag. 174.175 Sparkles Saltmars tells what are the tradions of man and for Mark 7.9 he citeth Matth. 9. or heresies Now a heresie saith he is something against the doctrine of faith in the word or Scriptures not against any interpretations doctrins conclusions glosses comments or preaching of men who speak not Scripture originally nor infallibly as the Apostles did but so far as that is the very Scripture they speak so far as they speak the truth in Jesus and in the Spirit of God else they teach for doctrines the traditions of men Answ. Traditions of men are not necessarily errors in fundamentalls except only by a remote consequence as all errors are against the fundamentalls 2. There are heresies that are by good consequence against fundamentalls else the Saduces their denying of the resurrection Mat. 22. was no heresie for Christ proveth by a good consequence that they denyed the Scripture I am the God of Abraham when Abraham was then dead when God spake out of the bush to Moses Exod. 3. yet they denyed but conclusions deduced from Scripture 3. There is another strange ingredient in heresie according to Familists and that is because God speakes not now immediatly his word to us as he did to the Apostles no man is an hereticke that denyeth the whole faith except he that denyes the Scripture as the Scripture and except he deny it in so farre as teachers speake the truth in Jesus and in the Spirit of God else that is if they be not Familiâ—ts that teach and speake not in the Famisticall spirit they teach for doctrines the traditions of men that is heresies for Gods truth then to speake heresie is to speake only against fundamentall truths when a Familist in the Spirit of God speaketh them 2. But then when a hereticke readeth in the word this fundamentall Christ came in the world to save sinners 1 Tim. 1.15 though he deny it and spit at it that is no heresie because the paper and printed booke speaketh not in the Spirit of Jesus 3. The written word of God is not the word of God but only the word is spoken by a Familist in the Spirit of Christ. 4. When Preachers void of the Spirit speake that which is the very word of God and fundamentalls of faith these truths are not the word of God but the traditions of men and heresies so his Master H.N. taught the Scripture preaching to be but figurative service the word of God was never published to the world till H.N. the least among the holy ones of God was made alive through Christ anointed with his godly being manned himselfe with H N. and godded H.N. with himself published the light of glory H. Nicholas Evangelic c. 34. sent 9. Pag. 175. Schisme is a dividing from Christians who are in an outward profession of truth Now there may bee schisme iâ— visible Churches or fellowships of Saints upon this account but there can bee none in the true body of Christ or the spirituall Church for they that are joyned to the Lord are one spirit and they are made perfect in one Answ. There is no outward Schisme or renting but it begins at the heart Schisme is a dividing of the hearts as well as a visible parting with the Church or a part thereof else schisme were no sinne which yet Paul reproveth as a sinne 1 Cor. 1. 1 Cor. 3.1 2. The Church of Corinth and these that made a rent were both the visible and the invisible Church that they were the visible Saltm cannot deny they were the invisible Church also 1 Cor. 1.13 Christ was crucified for them and they were babes in Christ fed with milke 1 Cor. 3.1.2 and built upon one only foundation v. 10. Saltmarsh must say they were all unconverted that made the schisme 3. Familists will have none the true body and spirituall Church of Christ but the invisible Church so that upon this account they that beleeve and visibly professe neither Christ nor his truth before men yea who all their dayes deny Christ and so shall be denyed of Christ before the Father and his holy Angells Matth. 10.32 33. may be and are the true body of Christ and the Spirituall Church so H. Nicholas Epistle to the two daughters of Warwicke 4. May not a schisme and seperation fall in these that are both the true body and spirituall Church when of a Church of beleevers effectually called consisting of foure hundred two hundred seperate from two hundred I think they may as well as Barnabas a good man and full of the Holy Ghost seperated from Paul But in so farre as they are saith he in that one Spirit they cannot be divided Ans. True but Saltm speakes lyes in hypocrisie when he saith the spirituall Church are made perfect in one Lord in this life upon the same reason as they are one and as united to the Lord they cannot lye whore steale murther but out of some remnants of corruption they can sinne But Familists put them in a condition they can in this life sinne no more or if they sinne their transgression is not sinne it is not they but their Asse the flesh that sinnes as Libertines said but that is no violation of the Law of God CHAP. XXXIII Saltmarsh Sparkles pag. 22â— Familists minde touching Prayer ALL constant speakings to God in this as they call a conceived way or impremeditate or extemporary way is taken commonly amongst Christians for prayer in the Spirit and for that Spirituall way which the Disciples of Christ used in the Gospel who were growne up from the infancy and childishnesse of formes or words taught them which is but a meer natural or outward thing as they say which any may perform by strength of naturall parts as wit and memory and affections Saltmarsh here first condemneth prayer morning and evening under the words of constant speakings to God because he will have no praying but when the Spirit acts immediatly 2. All extemporary prayers goe not for praying in the Spirit among Christians commonly he belyeth Protestants and the truly
and the blowing of the last Trumpet 52. and the swallowing up of death in victory 55 56 57. as if all these should come to passe in this life agreeable to this saith H. N. Evangel ch 35. se 9. In which resurrection of the dead God sheweth unto us that the time is now fulfilled that his dead or the dead which are fallen asleepe in the Lord rise up in this day of his judgement and appeare unto us in godly glory which shall also henceforth live in us everlastingly with Christ and reigne upon the earth wherein the Scripture commeth to be fulfilled in this present day And Saltm willeth these that are as spirituall as himself and his Familists to beleeve this and receive it that is except we make shipwracke of faith and say the resurrection is past in this life as did Hymeneus and Philetus wee are all legall literall men and void of the Spirit 2. Saltmarsh is unwilling to contradict the truth of God 1 Cor. 15.24 too openly to wit that in the end the Kingdome shall be delivered up Now whether this be meant of Christs reigning no more in his Church in this life by Ordidinances or as Chrysostome doth expound the place it be the rendering up to the Father his conquâ—isâ—d and purchased people as it is most agreeable to Eph. 5.27 I dispute not now but Saltmarsh saith faintly This is not only done on the whole body of Christ at the last but also here He dares not say this rendering up is not onely at the last day but also in this life yet the Apostle is cleare he thought of no rendering up of the Kingdome in this life as Saltmarsh by this new spirit supposeth for the text is cleare v. 22.23 every man shall rise againe from the dead Christ first and then his members 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Then is the end when he shall deliver up the Kingdome to the Father Then there is no rendring up till the dead in Christ be raised v. 23.24 but the dead in Christ in their bodies of which undoubtedly the Apostle speaketh 1 Cor. 15.1 2 3 4 c. doe not rise in this life 2. This rendering up is not till the end then shall the end be 3. It is when all rule and authority shall be put downe v. 27. This is not in this life 4. It is when the last enemy shall be subdued 26. 5. When God shall be all in all 28. These are not in this life therefore Saltm dreames Saltmarsh Sparkles p. 165. Jer. 38 2. He that goeth forth to the Chaldeans shall live but if yee stay in the City yee shall be consumed this is a figure of abiding no longer under any dispensation Law Christ in the flesh Gospel Spirit then God and his presence appeares upon it Ans. We know not this Spirit that dreames of phansied types and allegories without shadow of reason in the holy Scripture wee have no ground to beleeve that the Holy Ghost intends any thing of this kinde only Saltmarsh his Popish Spirit saith so the Scripture is silent Saltmarsh pag. 145.147 148. he saith Mal. 3. ver 18. Ye shall discorne betweene the righteous and the wicked proveth the Spirit of discerning by which we shall know false teachers Antichrists as in the Apostolicke Church and who feares God truely who not as the sense knows its object Answ. By this Familists deny the spirits and hereticks are to be judged by the word but that man is the Hereticke the Legalist though never so heavenly if he be a Puritan the spirit of Familists discerns him to be a Cain or a Judas 2 The place of Malachie is this ver 14 15. Ye say it is in vaine to serve the Lord and there is no reward for it But serve ye God and ye shall finde in your owne experience a reward and comfortable fruit in differencing betweene him that serveth God and serveth him not for ch 4.1 Christs trying day cometh Saltmarsh also sparkles p. 70 71. abuseth these Scriptures Gal. 41. and 1 Cor. 3.1.2 He applyeth the former to the Disciples of Christ under Johns ministery and Christs in the flesh but these words The Heire so long as he is a child differeth not from a servant though he be Lord of all Touch not the times of John Baptist or of Christ in the dayes of his flesh though in these times the Ceremonies were still in vigor but the Heir under nonage and Tutors Gal. 4. is the Church of the Jews under the bondage of the Law and the Ceremonies thereof and the Rudiments of the World it was not the Holy Ghosts mind to speake of Christ in the flesh as a Mosaicall Lawgiver or that his heavenly Sermons he preached Matth. 5. Matth. 23. John 10. Joh chapters 13 14 15 16. his heavenly Prayer John 16. hâ—s death and sufferings and resurrection was a dispensation to be layd aside as the tutory of the law and beggerly Ceremonies Sabbath and shadows he speaketh of Gal. 4. for then the Apostles in vaine call us to mind of the words and commandements of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ as hee commanded them to doe Matth. 28.19 20 21. 1 John 1.1 2 3 4. 2 Pet. 1.15 16 17 18 19. and though Christ promised at his ascending to send the Spirit this was not to abolished the doctrine of John and that which Christ had taught them in the dayes of his flesh for of that Spirit he promiseth to send he saith Joh. 14.16 Yee know that Spirit for he dwelleth in you for the present and shall be in you in a larger measure when I shall send him Act. 2. But Familists and Antinomians must have no ministration of the Spirit till Christ ascended to heaven And for the other place Paul 1 Cor. 3.1.2 calleth the Corinthians carnall and could not write to them as spirituall not because they were under the doctrine of Iohn Baptist and Christ as Saltmarsh dreameth for that doctrine taught no carnall divisions but he calleth them carnall on this ground v. 3.4 Whereas there is among you envying strife and divisions are ye not carnall and walke as men For while one saith I am of Paul another I am of Apollo are ye not carnall if the Apostle call the Corinthians carnall as Saltmarsh saith because they were under the doctrine of John Baptist and Christ in the flesh of which there is not a syllable in that text or in all the Scripture then must Christ and John Baptist have taught their hearers striving envying schismes and one to say I am of Paul and another I am of Apollo which is blasphemous Now it is against sense and reason that ever God ordained any ministration so carnall as that these under it were carnall because of their striving and envying Saltmarsh tells us as I observe every man should stay under the ministration he is in till the Spirit say come up hither then Paul calleth the Corinthians to abide in this carnality of
or the Spirit which is not the doctrine that Paul and Iohn received from the Lord Gal. 1.8 2 Ioh. v. 10. 1 Cor. 11.23 But Familists will have the Scriptures to beare witnesse to us of and to reveale the Father and the Son but for the holy Spirit he must be revealed without the testimony of Prophets and Apostles though Christ our dying friend hath left us his will in his last testament confirmed by the death of the Testator and forbids us to expect any farther revelation Heb. 1.1.9.16.17.27.28 Rev. 22.12.18.19 Is it not safer to beleeve the Prophets and Apostles upon whose word and doctrine we are builded as living stones and a habitation to God Eph. 2.20 21 22. then to relye upon the word of such seducers as H. Nicholas Del Saltmarsh and the like who come in their owne name and bring neither word nor workes to witnesse their doctrine not so much as Simon Magus and the Antichrist who bring wonders and living miracles to evidence that they are sent from God Familists have no escape but to say that their new discoveries are revealed to them by the Spirit to be contained in the spirituall and allegoricke sense of the Scripture Now undeniably the Scripture hath a literall sense and here it hath a mysticall and spirituall sense and so many senses as the Papists teach So Bellermine de verb. dei l 3. c. 3. Thomas p. 1. art 10. So Cajetanus ibid. Alpâ—onsus a Castro l. 1. adver her Lyra in 2. Reg. 7 Bucanus in Theolog. Scolastic part 2. c. 3. q. 5. 11. The same Gospell-truths in the manner of preaching and delivering of them may be spiritually by some and literally and dryly published by others and nothing is thereby either added or taken away from the substance of truth But duties commanded in the Law are then pressed upon the consciences of the hearers in a legal way when they are forced upon the consciences of the people upon legal motives Law-obligations threatnings of curses sad judgements but they are then spiritually preached when they are pressed upon the hearers in a terrible Law-way but for that end discovered to them that they may be chased into Jesus as to the Gospel-sanctuary and City of refuge to such as runne themselves out of breath to be in the bosome of our Saviour 2. They would be pressed so spiritually as there may bee still a pointing at a pardoning ransome and a healing and curing spirit so that all obedience must be new from new principles of the Mediators grace and upon Gospell motives only not from Hagar and the covenant tending to bondage Nor 3. upon the same necessity and account they were to be performed by vertue of a Covenant of workes What I before said toucheth the question whether the formall and last object of our faith be the word of God or the anointing strength saving grace and eye-salve of the Spirit as some Schoolmen Granado and others affirme the latter but the word is the formall object of faith the saving grace or anointing the efficient by which we are anointed inabled and quickned to beleeve the word now the eye-salve or anointing is not that which we see and beleeve that which we see is the saving gospel-Gospel-truths we beleeve Saltmarsh with Familists denying the Scripture to bee the word of God will have the inward supernaturall grace and anointing to be the only obliging rule of faith otherwise saith he it s in vaine to write bookes one against another for we then but set letter to letter argument to argument reason to reason but all in vaine without the Spirit as if Christ in proving the resurrection against Saduces Paul in proving justification by faith without works against such as turn the grace of God into wantonnes had not set letter to letter argument to argument and all in vaine for they remained still blinde yet Christ and Paul convinced and silenced these obstinate wranglers by the word of God without powring the Spirit on them without whose power they remained unconverted and hardened against the truth the formall object is that into which our faith is resolved when we give a reason of our faith as thus for what cause or formall motive doe you see with the eye of faith and believe that Maries son is the Messiah only Saviour ye do answer because so saith the Lord in the Old and N. Testament and that is the true object but yee doe not give an account of your faith when yee answer I beleeve it because I have eyes within inlightned because that is not to answer what is the true object of your faith if any aske you upon what morall grounds goe you to Rome yea give no reason if yee answer I goe to Rome because I have a will and a locomotive power in the nerves and muscicles of my body to move for now you answer by the efficient cause when the question is made of the formall objective cause If any aske why doe you see colours in day-light yee doe not answer because I have eyes and a seeing faculty but to the former you say I goe to Rome for such businesse to the lâ—tter I see colours in day-light because they are seeable and colours cloathed with light before my eyes so 1 Ioh. 5.10 He that beleeveth on the Sonne of God hath the witnessâ— within him that is the beleever hath objectively the the truth stamped in his heart but the anointing by which he was inabled to receive the testimony and truth is not for that the object or the thing beleeved or received but the saving helpe by which wee are strengthened to beleeve and receive the testimony the inward speaking of God to the heart as Augustine saith lib. 11. confess c. 3. sine strepitu syllabarum without noise of words is the saving apprehending of Christ and gospell-Gospell-truths but it is not the thing or object savingly apprehended the day-starre in the heart is not the Gospell-truth that wee see and receive but the light of Christ inabling and the Spirit strengthning the soule to beleeve and receive these gospell-Gospell-truths for without the day-starre and Spirit no man can see these truths 12. Upon the principles of Antinomians and Familists these and the like Gospell-promises I will give you a new heart and a new spirit Behold I make all things new a bruised reed shall hee not breake Come to me all yee that are weary and heavy laden and I will ease you Him that commeth I will in no wise cast away but will raise him up at the last day Yee that have no mony come buy and eat c. are as literall and legall being written and preached and as carnall for they value them to be but outward ordinances as this Cursed be every one that abides not in all that is written in the Law of God to do it or as the very Law and Covenant of workes which promiseth not any new heart but presseth the Law in its
without the more forced and unnaturall is all such obedience and the lesse from a spirituall power within The beleever is saith Towne washed from all sinne made perfectly just and holy the friend and Sonne of God the Spouse of Christ the heire of all things the conquerour of all his enemies advanced to sit and remaine in the glory of heaven with Christ for ever and ever he is out of the power kingdome and limits of the Law he is one Spirit with Christ hence is peace securitie consolation joy contentment and happines of a Christian. Hee is a compleat man if wee beleeve Antinomians 1. The word preached though it dwell within him yet that it bee applyed by a Preacher from without is necessary and that Peter writ Stirre up and put in remembrance the Saints that Paul be comforted by Titus and that Christ from without blow on and act the soule to will and to doe and that Paul beseech Christ thrise and have a new answer my grace is sufficient for thee is most needfull 2. There shall be no ground of new emergent complaints to God And 3. of praises to Christ for particular victories over our lusts and the world 4. Nor any ground of spirituall submission and patience while the Lord be pleased to deliver And 5. of trusting in God and exercising faith in him who delivereth us from so great a paâ—ticular death as came on Paul in Asia and from heavinesse through manifold temptations if need be for the triall of our faith Now if all were within us and the obedience more violent and Legall lesse free and connaturall because we must goe to helps without faith needed not goe without doores or without it selfe to Christ and the in-dwelling Spirit should be one for all meanes and ordinances and new showres and bedewings and fresh drops from Christ the honey-combe of heaven should be uselesse our stock within should doe all nor should we know what it is to walke or stand on our owne clay-legs It s true if externalls and the Crosse or the Letter of Law or Gospel onely move us to obedience and there be no internall principle of grace within us then the obedience is but finer hypocrisie and lesse free and more violent and as it were forced But Antinomians imagine a beleever to bee so perfect because pardoned that the Spirit within him doth all and needeth neither Ministers nor ordinances because helps without are Legall not Gospel-like CHAP. LIV. What peace we may fetch from gracious performances THe Spirit acteth Legally say Antinomians when men measure forgivenesse by their sinne and sanctification and can beleeve no more then they have peace for and that peace dependeth on some of their owne performances in so doing saith Towne Legalists had rather gather peace and securitie from repentance and reformation of life then from justification which is onely effectuall to make and cause true peace But our minde is this Asser. 1. We are not to measure forgivenesse so by sinne and sanctification as the measure of pounds and talent-weights of pardon should arise from the like weight of pounds and talents of sinne and sanctification because great sinfulnesse and drames and halfe ounces of sanctification and love to Christ may argue to the beleever the pardon of tenne thousand talents Christ argued the woman loveth much ergo many sins are forgiven her we read not that this was the womans owne Logicke 2. We draw peace and pardon not from so many yards or ells of obedience as merchants measure cloth the Spirits consequence is not from the quantity but from the quallity of sanctification sparkles of gold may prove there is a gold mine in that ground and that in abundance nor draw we the consequence from sinnes simply but from sinnes hated subdued resisted Asser. 2. Peace with God or the peace of faith is not every way the same with peace with our selves and of our owne spirituall sense and apprehension Peace fundamentall and with God is solidly grounded on pardon Being justified by faith we have peace with God it s often so with the Saints that they have faith for pardon and yet no feeling for peace Asser. 3. We may have peace with God when wee have not peace with our selves as the covenant stands sure between God and us when we have great disquietnesse of minde either through some hainous transgression or present unbeliefe and it is not fit wee should have peace with our selves under some great sinne it is but carnall security if Peter after the deniall of Christ be quiet in Spirit and have deepe peace the disquietnesse of unbeliefe apprehending eternall wrath is sinfull but in regard of anxiety of godly sorrow its kindly there be stormes in winter when there are causes of them and faire Sommer-like weather is not so good for the season in Winter because not so kindly and sutable to a right frame of nature Asser. 4. Peace with our selves may arise from the works of saving grace but neither assurance nor peace can flow from naked acts of love and sanctification not quallified and goldned with Christ and his grace as Towne falsely slandereth us because such bastard works as are but white and comely sinnes and being in men out of Christ can but produce sandy and rotten peace but such acts of holynesse as essentially flow from heightned principles of soule-saving grace and are floured and crowned with Christs merits may bee grounds of solid peace though not causes and though some of our drosse still accompany our best performances yet may we difference in them Christs gold from our oare his wine from our dregs this peace is a heart not smiting but smiling and saying Our rejoycing is this the testimony of our conscience c. and where there is joy there is peace both are fruits growing in the same soile so speaketh the Church with my soule I have desired thee in the night whence followeth Lord thou wilt ordaine peace for us Why For thou hast wrought all our workes in us But wee had not rather draw our peace from walking with nor from beleeving in God thorow Christ nor did wee ever meane that faith farre lesse holy walking should bee the cause of that fundamentall peace of peace betweene God and the sinner as Towne supposeth works are not fellow-mediators with Christ works had no bloud to interpose as Christ the peace-maker had for he is our peace works faith nor any thing in us were not actors nor commissioners in the treaty of pacification and the truth is the peace we have in our conscience and apprehension even from faith is the result the bloome that groweth on the stalke the floure or rose of Jesse rather then peace and it hath the right hew and resplendencie of peace because there is so much of Christ in either our faith or holy performances the rosie pleasant and
was not in onely beleeving that GOD walked with God or the Sonne Christ with the Father for him as Antinomians say making imputative sanctification all in all that is required in us but also in Enochs personall holy and sincere conversing with men Hence that goeth as a description of the good Kings of Israel and Judah He did right in the sight of the Lord. Which includeth their conversation on earth with men as well as their faith in God So to walke as the children of the day As wise men not as fooles in Christ as we have received him and to live no longer the rest of our time in the flesh to the lusts of men but to the will of God to have our conversation in the world by the grace of God in simplicity and godly sincerity All these and many the like hold forth necessarily a sincere walking before God as in his sight in our dayly conversation with men and the Antinomian doctrine in this is that though beleevers walke as carnall men serve their lusts whore lye cousen deceive yet they are strongly to beleeve that God seeth them not nor any fleshly and sinnefull walking in them God seeeth not their whoring lying cheating cousening to bee sinne and their beleeving that God seeth not their wickednesse is their living by faith and walking in the Spirit with God up in heaven as Enoch did 2. Nothing of beleeving Antinomians sinneth but their flesh as the Libertine said in Calvines time I sinne not but mine Asse the flesh the conscience the justified person that is in Christ sinneth not because the flesh is under the Law as Towne saith nor is this sinning of the flesh sinne because sinne essentially is against a commanding Law and cannot but in the sight of God be accounted sinne for God cannot seeing all his judgements and wayes are according to righteousnesse but account Adultery to be Adultery Murther to bee Murther but Antinomians say nothing that a beleever doth no Adulteries nor Murthers are sinnes nor can God see them as sinnes For how can the Lord see sinne saith Eaton where there is none There is no more sinne in a beleever then in Christ himselfe 3. It is no matter saith Eaton that we feele sinne and death still in us as if Christ had not taken them away because God thus establisheth the Faith of his power and therefore that there may be place for Faith we feele the contrary for it is the nature of Faith to feele nothing but letting goe reason shutteth her eyes and openeth her eares to that which iâ— spoken by God and cleaveth to the word spoken both living and dead It s true Faith beleeveth pardon and freedome from the guilt and obligation to eternall wrath which is a gospel-Gospel-truth farre from sense but faith closeth not its eyes to beleeve a lye that Adultery is no sinne before God because a justified man committed it The glory of God needeth not to begge helpe of a lye that it may be manifested 4. By this the justified man liveth and abideth as Towne saith for ever by faith in the sight of God But what haste The Resurrection is not past yet except Antinomians with Familists follow Hymeneus and Phyletus nor are the justified yet glorified they abide not ever under Gods eye sinnelesse and as cleane as Christ as Eaton blasphemeth to his everlasting shame for the Jebusite saith Towne remaineth in the Land the Law of the members and sinnefull corruption of the flesh dwelleth in them 2. They must say dayly Forgive us our sinnes if God be their Father else they neede not pray dayly Hallowed bee thy name thy Kingdome come c. 3. The flesh of sinne dwelleth with the Spirit Rom. 7. while they live 4. Death is not an imaginary lye and fancie so as Faith must beleeve the contradicent that is that beleevers breath goeth not out they returne not to their dust they are to beleeve sure beleevers see corruption Acts 13.36 Act. 2.27 28 29. 1 Cor. 15.42 43 44. Then Antinomians cannot say true that there is no more sinne in beleevers nor any thing having the nature and being of sinne then is in Christ. 5. They are not yet enjoying God in a vision of glory as Christ did even in the dayes of his flesh for he was both viator and comprehensor a traveller to the Crowne and an enjoyer of the crowne and therefore though justified they must walke here below and cannot chuse but sinne though they be not forced to sinne as Towne saith CHAP. LIX How Justification is one indivisible act not successive as Sanctification and yet God dayly pardoneth sinnes WEe make no question but we are at once justified and not by degrees and succession as wee are sanctified because justification is a foreinsecall and Law-change or judiciall sentence of God absolving the person of the sinner from all punishment or obligation to punishment due to him for sinnes past present and to come according to the rule of revenging and Law-persuing justice and that for the alone righteousnesse of the surety Christ freely imputed and by faith received of him and the bloud of Jesus Christ shall purge you from all your sinnes in whom wee have redemption the remission of our sinnes in his bloud Now the Scripture no where intimateth a favour of free grace in purging us from sinnes by halves or quarters as if some were halfe washen halfe delivered from the wrath to come and halfe unwashen and half under wrath 2. There is no condemnation to a soule once in Christ and justified Rom. 8.1 then there can be no re-acceptation or second receiving of a soule into the state of a justified person from the state of an ungodly man as if he had fallen from the former state and there can bee no second deliverance from eternall wrath to be inflicted for a new committed sinne Yet doe I not see that one and the same justification negagatively because it is never retracted is therefore a successive and graduall worke that groweth more and more as sanctification doth for so predestination to glory which is negatively one and the same should bee a graduall growing worke for as no shaddow of change can fall on God so neither can Predestination be retracted Yet is there no cause to deny that sinnes are dayly pardoned and remitted as they are committed for God is said to remit sinnes dayly when he reneweth the sense of the once passed act of attonement and applyeth what he once did to the feeling and comfort of the beleever for we never taught that Faith is a cause or so much as an instrument or condition without which Christ doth not on the Crosse by the power of his bloud take away sinnes now he that denyeth that God by his Spirit reneweth the lively apprehension of this act of attonement must deny that a beleever can oftner then once lay the weight
strict conversation and a care by doing to please God any personall walking with God is but a legall bargaining with God to out-buy Christ and evacuate free grace and a mixing of Law and Gospel and confounding of the two Covenants and of heaven and hell and presently upon this the party is as free of doubting till his dying day as if he were in heaven still in a merry pinne as if he were above the starres before the throne under no Law above all duties reades heares prayes none but when some immediate rapts of a living active God comes on him a dead passive block in Christ the Scripture either Law or Gospel is but a dead Letter hee is neither tyed nor awed with Law or Gospel Precept or Command nor preaching nor seales but is acted by a free Spirit an immediate light and speech of a Spirit above and beyond all outward word or Letter of old or new Testament except when the Spirit shall speake or apply them to the heart and then these Commandements tye the outer man and the flesh and then they bind not for any authority of the Law-giver but for the onely Gospel love of Christ as if Christ had put his Father out of office whereas Gospel-love commands obedience upon and for both the authority of the Lawgiver and the love of Christ and when this convert falleth in Adultery murther swearing lying robbing 1. It is not he but the flesh and sense and the outward man that doth these 2. They were remitted and made no sinnes and hee as cleane as Christ from them before they bee committed 3. The Law hath no more to doe with him then the persuer saith Saltmarsh hath to doe with the murtherer who hath fled to the citie of refuge But Saltmarsh's Legall convert he meaneth all not converted the Antinomian way is not our convert as he dreameth 1. Because we look not at conversion meerly as a change in affection and conversation without Christ Faith and saving grace 2. Antinomians make all the change in conversion to be meerely imputative to beleeve that Christ was converted and repents for us and to regard no inward change 3. It is false that Saltmarsh saith That pressing of meere commands from the word may worke a Legall change of affection and conversation For if by meere commands from the Word he meane 1. commands without the Spirit that is such as are written and preached Gospel or Law that of themselves want all grace and joyning of the Spirit Then sure Cicero and Seneca their meere words without God cannot change a Zeno a Xenephon from debauched slagitious men into white civeâ—l Moralists without some Spirit if he meane that the Gospel-letter as a Letter can doe more then the Law-letter without the Spirit he is much deceived for words as words whether of Law or Gospel without God can work no change But Saltmarsh if I mistake not hath a third meaning that meere commands from the authority of God the Law-giver can worke but a Legall and counterfeit conversion this is most false We have a grave controversie with Papists touching the formall object of Divine Faith Whether it bee the testimony of the Church as Papists say or the authority of God speaking in his Word as we teach Now we hold that the testimony of the Church is but the testimony of men and can produce but an humane faith not a Divine but the testimonie of God himselfe speaking in the Scriptures can onely beget a supernaturall and divine faith when the Holy Ghost followeth the Word and rendereth it lively If then we beleeve divine truths and Scripturall commands because so saith the Lord in his Word either Law or Gospel this is a divine and supernaturall faith so to beleeve upon Gods meere commands as Law-giver not because naturall reason so dictateth nor because the Church or man so saith nor because the times favour the Gospel as the seed is received with a sort of beliefe that falleth on stony ground is divine Faith and is not contrary but sweetly complyeth with faith grounded upon the love of Christ and wrought by the grace of God in the Gospel Antinomians dreame that these two are contrary when they are not so 4. It s most false that the Law is in the heart before hand by nature so as wee beleeve it naturally for the authority of the Law-giver for so naturall faith of the Law should fight with naturall unbeliefe and deepe security to laugh and sleepe sound under the curse of God Wee naturally know much of the Law but we have not a Legall faith to beleeve because so saith the Law-giver by nature 5. It s false also that Nature can propound to it selfe life eternall as its end as Saltmarsh saith Balaam could not desire it farre lesse intend it hee onely wished the end of the just 2. The end must bee the last end subordinate to Gods glory Antinomians are Pelagians and poore friends to free grace as I noted before for when salvation is the end all meanes are gone about when the end is intended that may conduce to that end all meanes that may crosse the obtaining thereof eschewed Now naturall Legall converts cannot goe about all for salvation and in reference to it its cleare when gold is a mans end as in the covetous pleasure the end in the voluptuous honour the end in the ambitious if all acts about the meanes or that may thwart the attaining of the end bow not to this end it s not so in Legall converts 3. When the end is attained but in hope and assurance the minde is satisfied and quieted Legall converts are not so satisfied 4. Legall converts order salvation to and for themselves and the happinesse of it not the holinesse to please themselves not to honour God because heaven is a Honey-combe that very Nature beleeving an eternity desires to sucke 5. Severe and strict walking in our sense is walking in all duties by the light and conduct of saving grace and the faith of the elect of God which wee contend for against most Antinomians who are but loose livers and cannot fall on a Legall convert CHAP. LXVIII How the Spirit worketh freely in the Antinomian way SAltmarsh boldly goeth on to hold forth When the Spirit of adoption works not freely but servilly and legally Object 1. When men put something of satisfaction on any performance as if God were prevailed with by any thing of their owne Answ. Satisfaction to revenging justice or of merit or of perfect obedience to the Law in our performances we disclaim or that we prevaile with God by any thing of our owne as if our performances were causes of turning God were any thing without the grace of Christ and his merits but for prevailing with God to obtaine a blessing by prayer and teares we say it with the Scripture Hos. 12.3 Jaakob by his strength had power with God yea hee had power over
that in the Gospell the word and the Spirit are alwayes joyned and therefore saith Christ the words that I speake are spirit and life that is they come from the spirit and carry spirit with them Then 1 the Gospell pâ—eached externally to Del and to Antinomians is not that word by which Christ converts soules faith is not from outward hearing as an instrument of our conversion the contrary of which we have proved It s from the inward word in the heart now the word in the heart is very faith it selfe the argument of both Swenckefel and Del is nothing for it is this the word outwardly preached except it come to the heart can never convert the soule because it is but a meere sound saith Swenckefeld it s but a very letter say Antinomians therefore the externall word is no instrument of our conversion but onely the internall word I utterly deny the consequence lay a pen well inked to paper a thousand times it shall never write except the hand of the writer draw the characters ergo the pen is no instrument of writing it followes not So bread except by the blessing of God it be turned into blood and flesh can never nourish ergo the bread that the Baker bakes is no instrument by which we are nourished It s an unjust consequence and distroyes all ordinances naturall and Spirituall It onely followes ergo the word without us is no efficacious cause of conversion and no principall cause and can do nothing except the Spirit inact and animate and concurre with the word which we with both hands yeeld and beleeve as a gospel-Gospel-truth The word is but a sound a letter I answer it is not a common sound such as the odes of Horatiâ—s and Epistles of Seneca render but it is in it selfe a sound filled with Majesty power heaven so as every word seemes to be with-child of grace and life yea and separate the word from the Spirit and in the stile conveyance method there is so much divinity majesty holinesse life gravity as the child bewrayes heaven in its forehead and lookes like the Father and Author God and therefore it s more then a sound to a deafe soule actu secundo it hath but a sound and whereas Antinomians say it s but a dead letter they speake of the paper inke and printed characters of the word but vvee take it not so but as the vvords do connotate and involve the things signified the precious promises and as the Lord saith Hose 8. The great things of my law and so they are not dead letters but the instrument chariot meanes of conveyance of Christ and the Spirit to the heart and though vvithout the Spirit the vvord vvorkes not as no instrument no toole nor hammer no axe can build a house except the Mason and Carpenter act and move them shall it follow they are not for that instruments at all 2 Del and Antinomians with Swenckefeld will have the Gospel preached to none but to those that have the internall word and Spirit in their hearts then when Christ and the Apostles Mat. 13. Act. 28. Act. 13. preach Christ and the Gospel in the letter as some other thing then the Law it is not the word of God nor the Gospell why it wants the Spirit to goe along with it and can never change nor reforme saith Del pag. 18. and begetteth but a literall and feighned faith saith Swenckefeld and the word and the Spirit are alwayes joyned saith Del pag. 19. now this is not the written read nor externally preached Gospel nor the Scripture so they must but coâ—sen us for they meane the internall word not verbum vocale And the preaching of faith that Saltmarsh speaketh of free grace pag. 146 is not the Scripture nor preached word which I demonstrate Del speaketh of such a word as hath the Spirit alwayes ioyned with it pag. 19. But the scripture and the externall vocall word hath not alwayes the Spirit joyned with it for when it is preached to Reprobates and to malicious obdured soules that stumble at Christ and the word being thereunto appointed 1 Pet. 2.7 Mat. 13 14 15. Ioh. 12.37 38 39. Ioh. 9.39 It hath not the Spirit joyned with it 2 They speake of such a word as hath the Spirit actually converting and which is therein differenced from the Law that is but a dead letter and cannot minister the Spirit so Del ser. pag. 18 19. So Saltmarsh free grace pag. 146 147 so Swenckfeld ibid. therefore all that Antinomians and Swenckfeldians say that they take not away Word ministery ordinances preaching are meere delusions for by the word of God that begets faith they meane the internall word not scripture nor the written and preached word and so they say nothing to take off this error justly layd upon them to wit that under the Gospell there is no need of Scripture Preaching Sacraments hearing nor doing of any duties to men nor abstinence from murthering killing whoring stealing c. all exterâ—alls are indifferent 3 You see how false it is that the Gospell is not to be preached to any but to those that are converted because it cannot be received by faith by any but by such contrary to Christs expresse commands to his Apostles Mat. 28.19 20. Goe teach all nations so Paul preached to the obstinate Jewes Act. 13 to the scoffing Athenians Act. 17. Is it not therefore the Gospel that they preachâ— 4 It is an undue arguing of Swenckefeldians and Antinomians The word is a literall carnall sensible thing ergo God workes not faith which is a spirituall grace thereby for it followes onely God workes not faith by the vocall word alone except he put to the pul of omnipotency of grace 2 The assumption is false the preached word though in its sound it be carnall literall bodily yet in its power Majesty and the thing signified which is the birth in the wombe of the word it is spirituall lively heavenly 5 Nor doth it follow that Iustification begins at man if the vocall word be the instrument thereof except they say that hearing and preaching did necessarily and effectually produce justification and conversion they are no parts no members no efficacious causes of conversion or Iustification 6 Iustifying faith and salvation both are in their nature things spirituall and yet have their originall from the word preached as an instrument yea from the foolishnesse of preaching 1 Cor. 1.21 Nor is the word altogether bodily because it incurres in the sense of hearing but taking the word preached as it includes the great things of God not as it is letters and sounds it is not carnall but spirituall 2 Cor. 10.5 Sharper then a two edged sword to save or kill on either edges Heb. 4.12 yea even when it is rejected the savour of death unto death 2 Cor. 2.16 17. And the Everlasting Gospell Rev. 14.6 7 Nor can it follow that justifying faith is a work of man
this sanctification of life is not a jot the way of that justified person to heaven I perswade my selfe Luther had an eye to Antinomians when he said 〈◊〉 feared after his death that the doctrine of the true office of the law should be obscured Luther to 3. fol. 102 admoneo pietatiâ— amatores praecipue qui aliquando sunt futuri doctores ut diligentèr ex Paulo disâ—â—â—t intelligere verum et proprium usum legis qui ut timeo post tâ—mpora nostra interim obscurabitur et prorsus obruetuâ— to 4.106 timeo quod ista doctrina de vero legis usu nobis extinctiâ—â—bscurabitur 3 Conclusion Luther saith the New man needeth no law it s the flesh the old man the body of sin that is under the Law The law in a Christian ought not to exceed his bounds and ought onely to have dominion over the flesh which is subject to it and remaineth under it but oh law wilt thou invade the conscience and exercise dominion there and accuse the conscience of a justified beleever none terrified of sin and take away the joy of heart thou dost this beyond thy office When I behold Christ I am all holy and pure knowing nothing of the Law as it curseth and condemneth the beleever but if I behold my flesh I finde avarice lust wrath pride feare of death sadnes horror hatred murmuring and impatience against God in so farre as these are present Christ is absent or if he be present he is weakely present here there is need yet of a paedagogoe who should exercise and vex this strong asse the flesh that by this paedagogue sinnes may bee diminished and a way prepared for Christ. Luther Lex in Christiano non debet excedere limites suos sed tantum dominum habere in carnem quae et ei subiecta sit et sub ea maneat hoc ubi fit lex consistit intra suos limites lex si tu vis ascendere in regnum conscientiae et ibi dominari loquitur de conscientia hominis justificati sub tentationibus terrefacta et eam arguere peccati et gaudiâ—m cordis tollere hoc praeter officium tuum facis Si Christum inspicio totus sanctuâ— et purus sum nihil plane sciens de lege Si vero meam carnem inspicio sentio avaritiam libidinem iram superbiam timorem mortis tristitiam pavorem odium murmurationem et impatientiam contra Deum quatenus ista adsunt catenus abest Christus aut si adest infirme adest hic opus est adhuc paedagogo qui fortem asinum carnem exerceat et vexet ut hac paedagogia minuantur peccatâ— et Christo via paretur I grant the Antinomians now as Town Saltmarsh Den and the old Antinomians in Luthers time spoke after the same Grammer and stile and so did the Libertines in Calvins time say non ego pecco sed Aâ—inus meus It s not I that transgresse the law and am under the law but my asse But they have a farre other minde then Luther for the Antinomians as Schlusfelburgius saith cato heriti l 3. p. 53 54. taught that the flesh only and the unrenewed man was under the law but the renewed and justified man was under no law more then if it had beene never given to him and the law was no rule of life and obedience to a beleever Luther cryeth against this as most false and Luther saith those that beleeve in Christ must be daily mortified by daily Law-rebukes and arguenda sunt peccata et proponenda ira dei propter incredulos qui in ecclâ—sia sunt imo etiam propter credentes ne adhaerescenti peccato et innatae imbicillitati indulgeant lex manet inquit ante evangelium et justificationem in justificatione et post justificationem Luther verum tunc amplius non sunt opera legis sed Christi in nobis per fidem operantiâ— et viventis per omnia ideo non possunt sunt Mogis omitti quam ipsa fides nâ—c sunt minus necessaria quam ipsa fides Caeterum opera legalitâ—r perfecta quae verè sunt legis ficta et falsa sunt Good workes saith Luther are not any more the workes of the law compelling under the paine of damnation for he saith in the same place libere et gratis facienda sunt but workes of Christ working in us by faith and every way living in us therefore they can no more be omittted then faith it selfe and are no lesse necessary then faith it selfe Observe this in reading Luthers works that he taketh the law as opposed to justifieing grace and as it may condemne or justifie and so as an instrument of the Covenant of works exacting perfect obedience in a legall sence otherwise neither Luther nor any of our Divines will say good works absolutely perfect and in all things conforme to the Law are necessary to salvation for it is false all beleevers are saved by faith in Christ without any such good workes or perfect legall obedience Then we must hold this to be Luthers minde that if good workes be commanded to the renewed man in the law as well as faith and be as necessary as faith then the renewed part is under the law commanding good workes as well as it is under the command of faith but Luther saith the former Antinomi say nothing sins but the flesh nothing is under the law but the flesh so nothing is under a command and an obleiging rule of law or Gospell to doe good workes and beleeve but the flesh a senselesse untruth For it is the new man by the Spirit of Christ saith Luther from the word of truth that doth good workes and beleeveth So Luther to 4. fol. 499 in Psal. 130. 2 and excellently saith Luther to 1 fol. 436 Christiana lâ—bertas est quando non â—utata legâ— mâ—taâ—tur homines ut lâ—x eadem quae prius libero arbitrio odiosaâ—uit iam defusa per spiritus saâ—ctâ— charitatem cordibus nostris iucunda fiat Hence Luther saith two things that contradicts the Antinomians 1. The Law is not changed when the sinner is changed but that which was hatefull to free will before is the same law but now sweet and pleasant to the heart then if the law be not so much as changed it is not abolished to the beleever it s made of hatefull pleasant 2. That Law that is pleasant to the heart and sweet it is not given to the flesh and unrenewed part but especially to the renewed part 3 The renewed part in the beleever doth either do good workes by the grace of Christ and so keepe the law though unperfectly or not doe good workes at all If the latter be said the renewed part is not renewed but dead and is the very old man which is a contradiction but if thâ— former be said that it is the new man or renewed part that
qualifications and signes fell to the other extremity of no signes of sanctification at all by H. Denne an High Altar man a bower at the sillables of the name Jesus and conforme to all the abominable late Novations introduced by Canterbury who also opposed the Remonstrance and Petition of the well affected pleading for a riddance from Episcopacy Ceremonies and other corruptions and is now a rigid Arminian and an enemy to free Grace an Anabaptist an Antinomian to these joyne Paul Hobson who speakes more warily then the rest and R. Beacon in his late Catechism who holds sundry grosse points and M. Del in his Sermon before the House of Commons whose noble Ancestors could not have indured Familisme Sâ—einianisme or the like to be preached in their ears CHAP. XVIII Saltmarsh cleareth his minde touching personall mortification faintly and holdeth many other points of Familisme as of Christ crucified risen ascended to heaven in a figure or in the spirit not really in his true Man-head SAltmarsh is now the cheife Familist in England hath written of late a Treatise called Sparkles of glory which containes the spirits and extractions of the doctirne of Swenckfeld David Georgius Henry Nicholas and all the Familists Antinomians and older Libertines in which he professeth himselfe A Seeker and disclameth Presbytery Independency Anabaptisme and that there is neither Ministery Church or Ordinances nor any promise of continuance of them till Christs second comming contrary to Mat. 28.19 20 21. Ephe. 4.11 12 13. Mat. 26.13 Mat. 24.14 And pleads for liberty of conscience and yeeldeth that he will write no more against that learned and Godly man M. Tho. Gittaker Hee further labours to cleare himselfe Sparkles of glory pag. 323 324 325 326 That he said that Christ hath beleeved perfectly repented perfectly mortified sin perfectly for us which hee thus explaineth to wash it from Antinomianisme and so calleth it a pretended Heresie 1 saith hee that Christ hath done all for us is truth hee hath fullfilled all righteousnesse for us bâ—â— that which is of the Law and that which is in the Gospel in graces c. And upon this accompt is made unto us righteousnesse c. 2 Faith Repentance Mortification were all in Christ origiginally primarily as in their nature their fountain their root or seed and therefore hee is said to give repentance to Israel and he is the Authour and finisher of our faith and it is caled the faith of the son of God and of his fulnesse all wee have received and grace for grace for every grace in him a grace in us A. 1 If Saltmarsh have no other sense but that our faith repentance mortification are in and from Christ as the meritous cause because Christ by the merit of his death procured grace to us to beleeve repent mortifie sinne 2 That these are from Christ efficienter as the efficient cause or from the spirit of Christ infusing the life of God in us and actuating the supernaturall habit of grace in us and working in us to wil and to do this is that which Protestant Divines say that Christ is our Savior merito and efficaciâ by the merit of his death against Papists and the effectuall yea and the irresistable applying of his death to save us as we teach against Papists Pelagians Socinians then surely I hope neither that learned man M. Gattaker nor any of ours censured M. Saltmarsh for Antinomianisme or any heresie in his point we agree and then we say that M. Saltmarsh in these words gives us a faire and ingenious Recantation I am glad of this But Saltmarsh will be found to wash Antinomianisme off himselfe with Ink-water and he hath no face at least it is much ignorance to call Protestants Legallists because they teach that our faith repentance and mortification are from Christ by way of merit and the effectuall working of grace nor did ever Protestant deny this 1 Saltmarsh free grace p. 61 62. excludeth personal not acting such and such a sinne and our personall sanctification from being part of Gospel pure and spirituall mortification p. 62 63. And saith our pure and Gospel mortification is to beleeve that Christ mortified sinne perfectly for us and the like hee saith of sanctification and repentance p 84 85. So Saltmarsh willeth us not to repenâ— nor beleeve nor mortifie sinne in our owne person but to beleeve Christ hath done these for us perfectly and then we beleeve repent and mortifie sin perfectly 2 He citeth Scripture But yee are sanctified but yee are justified c. This is out of all doubt personall sanctification flowing from Christs merits and his spirit And I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth mee This is personall doing in Paules person by the grace of Christ and wee are his workemanship created in Christ Jesus unto good workes Those be good workes that wee in our owne person doe by the spirit of sanctification But Saltmarsh exponeth all these to be not ours but the very personall actings of Christ for his words are these pag. 84. free grace All these scriptures set forth Christ the sanctification and the fulnesse of his the all in all Christ hath beleeved perfectly for us hee hath repented perfectly he hath sorrowed for sinne perfectly he hath obeyed perfectly for us and all is ours and we are Christs and Christ is Gods Now Saltmarsh can have no such sense as here hee would force on himselfe For never man doubted but personall acts of grace or don by the strength of grace are ours but how are they ours as we are Christs onely as Christ acteth them for us without us No are they not ours the Spirit of Jesus worketh them in us and causeth us personally to doe and act them Ezek. 36.27 John 7.39 If Christs perfect beleeving perfect repenting and his perfect mortifying of sinne be ours because Christ did these acts for us in the dayes of his humiliation while he was in the flesh then are they ours before we be born and the holy Ghost must exhort us to doe all in the strength of Christ and to be sanctified and to beleeve perfectly to justification and that we be his workmanship to walk in good workes that we put on the new man that we mortifie sin 1640 yeares before we be born for so many yeares agoe Christ performed all these things for us but we are this day exhorted to put on the new man and to walk in good works Now the holyghost in scripture must either speak non-sense or wheÌ„ he saith walk in love eveÌ„ this day repent while it is to day stand up from the dead to day beleeve to day he must mean you need not stirre foot or hand or any power of your soul to these acts for Christ performed all these acts for you 1640 yeares agoe For then he must mean Christ hath repented perfectly in me a beleever and wrought perfect repentance free of sinne in me a sinner and Christ hath obeyed perfectly
love have no heads nor Kings which are borne of the flesh and bloud of sin And c. 37. s. 7. It is well-pleasing of God that one man of God lordeth not over the other neither that the one be the others bond-servant c. 38. s. 4. A King is the scum of ignorance Then the Saints cannot returne to that carnall dispensations to bee under Magistrates but Familists by their principles have leave to say one thing and beleeve the contrary So doth H.N. teach Epist. to the two daughters of Warwick M. Bowls for ungratitude a monster of men if he be the Author of that lying Pamphlet called Manifest truths could have witnessed more against the sense of this letter but he defending it betrayeth the truth the Covenant of God as too many like him doe now for he casts a covering over this letter and passeth it in a word and boldly asserteth for truths many grosse lyes and spake never one word in Print of the heresies and foule tenets which he heard as an eare-witnesse in the Army though his charge was to be a preacher To conclude I know none that would wring the sword out of the Parliaments hand but these that force the Parliament by the terror of twenty thousand armed men either to grant their unjust demands by Thursday at night next or they will take some extraordinary course with them So Beacon in his Familisticall Catechisme p. 189. would prove the truth of this that all externalls are indifferent by Gal. 6.15 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing nor uncircumcision but a new creature and 1 Cor. 10.29 Now by outward things Familists must meane all outward worship or Idolatry and why not acts of saving or destroying our brother the taking or not taking of your neighbours wife to please her in love for the Law of love of Spirit and life is more Royall and excellent then committing Idolatry or not committing Idolatry then murther adultery perjury c. or not doing of these outward things because the Law of love is the cause and generall Commandement of the whole Law and above externalls but if these be indifferent so as we must for love and the unity of the Spirit do them or not doe them then Peter was not to be blamed by Paul Gal. 2. for he pleased the Jews in that he did but Paul saith in Judaizing in a lesse matter he was to be blamed and looked awry to the Gospel Nor can Familists say in externals in the first table we are to do or not do as the Law of love in pleasing one another shall permit but in matters of the second Table before men we are not to murther or not murther whore or not whore because the Law of love cannot stand with murthering whoring stealing Ans. I see not but the indifferency upon the Familists ground is the same as touching both Tables of the Law 1. Because if Christ free us from the Law as a rule of life he freeth us from the Commandements of the second Table as a rule of life as from these of the first Table because the Gospel-liberty is alike from all and every part of the Law except we say Christ leaves us under condemnation as touching sinnes against the second Table but freeth us from condemnation as touching Idolatry perjury blasphemy Atheisme unbeleefe which is absurd 2. We are to please one another in love Rom. 15. especially in acts of charity between man and man in eating or not eating Rom. 14. and why not in acts of adultery and murther he that said Thou shalt not worship false Gods said Thou shalt doe no murther 3. The Law of loving God which is more worthy then the Law of loving our neighbour makes the keeping of the first Table as strong a band to please God in loving him and in keeping all his Commandements as the Law of loving of our neighbour if it be true that we must obey God rather then man 4. But here is the mystery there is no sinne in relation to God can be committed by a pardoned man because pardon makes him he cannot sin but for scandals sake he must not displease his brother 2. If we must in outward things please all in love and the unity of the Spirit then doth the Law of love oblige us to contradictory observances at one and the same time which is unpossible for to be circumcised offended Paul and beleevers of the Gentiles and not to be circumcised offended the Jewes then doe what yee can yee must fail against the Law of love and the vnity of the Spirit And then Saltmarsh and Beacon among Jewes must bee circumcised and Paul saith that is to fall from Christ then may wee whore or not whore murther or not murther to please one another in love and professe or deny Christ before men to please one another 3. The law of God and command of Christ that must flow from the law of love for love is a fullfilling of the law doth command the Apostles to teach and baptize and command the people to heare and be baptized and to eate and drinke till the Lords second comming in remembrance of Christ crucified then except we sinne against the love of God we cannot wholly omit these outward things 4 Upon this ground Saltmarsh and Beacon doe preach writ Books pray which are outward things yet they cannot but displease their brethren the Seekers and the most spirituall or rather most carnall of the Family of love in so doing for they breake the unity of the Spirit in these outward things when they ought in love to please one another and not writ any thing which they thinke and professe to bee a ly The place Gal 6. hath this sense neither circumcision of the Jews nor want of circumcision in the Gentiles of themselves and separated from a divine commanding Authority and inward renovation can save a man but a new Creature by faith only Or rather neither the Jew called circumcision nor the Gentiles called uncircumcision as in Gal. 2.7 is any thing nor are men saved because Jews or because Gentiles but as new Creatures in Christ as Gal. 6.28 29. There is neither Jew nor Greeke in Christ c. as the ver 16. cleareth as many as walke according to this rule c. Then it maketh nothing for the indifferency of circumcision which to use at that time was to runne in vaine and to fall from Christ Gal. 5. and for Rom. 15. Paul speaketh of meats at that time indifferent in the which we are to please one another in love but not but according to the rules of love and charity yea we are to displease one another rather ere we displease God and murther our brothers soule Paul would not please Peter in Judaizing Yea if an Antinomian or a Familist a Socinian an Arrian or any false teacher come to us he not bringing this doctrine of the Gospel we are not to please him in love though
Life to come which yet the Apostle Heb. 6.1 2. maketh fundamentals of salvation though the Chapter tells us in the Title of the last discovery and highest concerning the whole mystery of God to men But in that Chapter 1. He denieth the Trinity and maketh the three persons as Mr. Beacon doth in his Catechisme also p. 47 48 49 50 51. but manifestations of God Thus God being infinitly one yet in a three-fold manifestation saith he to us of Father Son and Spirit c. a person is not a manifestation but hath need to be manifested to us and denying the personall union of the second person with the Man Christ he makes it but God present with men and Angels in the manifestation of grace and salvation and with Devills and wicked men in the manifestation of Law and Justice So God is no more united to our nature in the man Christ then he is united to Angels and Devills and to elect men and the wicked and the reprobate and Christ is no more God-man in one person then he is God-Angel or God-Devill I tremble to speake it in one person and Christ is just God-man the Sonne of Mary born of a woman and of the seed of David as he is God-Peter God-Paul God Cain God-Judas Iscariot for saith he p. 199. God makes out himself in an image in this creation or nature therefore he takes to himself one part of it into union to himselfe according to one way of manifestation called in the Scripture light love grace salvation Father Bridegroome glory and that part which injoyes God in this manifestation is called the Angels the Saints the elect the Sonne the Tabernacle of God the new Jerusalem the Temple the Spouse he taketh to himselfe the other part of the creation and there he is present but not in this way of grace and light but of another manifestation called Law justice wrath everlasting burning and these are called devills wicked men flesh which live in God and subsist in him as creatures in their being Now the Scripture cals this the great mystery of godlinesse God manifested in the flesh Saltmarsh maketh this as great a mystery God manifested in the Devill to cast him into hell And as the new Jerusalem the Spouse is Christ or God in the flesh of the Saints and Angels by grace and salvation and Christ liveth in Paul and Paul is by grace Godded and Christed and the Angel Gabriel Godded and Christed so Christ lives in Cain Judas Beelzebub by justice and condemnation and the union of God is neither personall in the son of Mary nor in Sathan but only in the effects of grace and salvation in all the elect and by Law and justice in all the damned Angels and men and here is the mystery God is all that part of the creation that commeth under the name of reasonable creatures men and Angels and all the Angels and men created of God were crucified with Christ and all are the Lord of glory by union so that as Libertines made God the soule forme and life of all things men and devills and said that God wrought all good all ill in the creatures and no creature was to be praised for doing well nor to be blamed or punished for ill doing because God is the Author of righteousnesse and sinne so the Familists say that Christ is the form and soul of men elect and reprobate of Angels elect reprobate and that God works in them is united to them and they are meer passive organs in all good or ill So I beleeve Saltm and the Familists do subvert the whole faith and hold nothing with us but doubt of all But I returne to that I said there is a twofold infallibility now though beleevers have not that infallibility proper to Prophets and Apostles in prophesying and writing Scripture yet must we not runne to the other extremity and say as these that fight for Liberty of conscience that there is not since the Prophets and Apostles fell asleep any infallible perswasion and certainty of faith but all our knowledge is conjecturall and a meere fluctuation and fleeting opinion and a faith for a yeare a month or an houre which wee may lay aside the next month and that anointing even the Spirit of God infuseth in us opinions of God contrary among themselves and false and true which is the present judgement of our minde which we are to stand to and to suffer for or to deny as we see the times goe For 1. The Scripture tells us of a sure perswasion of things beleeved Luke 1.1 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and Luke holdeth forth to Theophilus a certainty of knowledge 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that thou mayest know the certainty of these things whereof thou hast been instructed So the word imports a certainty Act. 5.23 Act. 21.34 Act. 22.30 Act. 25.26 Act. 2.36 Let all the house of Israel know 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 assuredly A full and certaine perswasion excludeth all doubting and deception or mistake and this the Saints have and may have Col. 2.2 That their hearts might bee comforted unto all riches of the full assurance of understanding 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Thess. 1.5 The Gospel came not to you in word only but in much assurance Rom. 4.21 being fully perswaded This was the perswasion of a faith and such a faith as by which wee are justified without workes Rom. 14.5 Let every one be fully perswaded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in his owne minde 2 Tim. 4.17 That by me the preaching might bee fully knowne Nor is that perswasion of Pauls Apostolicke or by revelation extraordinarily but common to all Christians Rom. 8.38 For I am perswaded that neither death nor life nor Angels c. shall be able to seperate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord 2 Tim. 1.12 I know in whom I have beleeved and I am perswaded that hee is able to keepe that which I have committed to him against that day This certaine perswasion must bee certaine and infallible both to themselves and grounded upon the promise and truth of God who cannot lye Tit. 1.2 Yea and our Divines with good warrant say the Catholicke in visible Church is thus farre infallible that in 1 fundamentalls 2 necessary for salvation they cannot 3 finally and totally erre and fall from the faith But all our Divines and your owne confession of the Assembly at Westminster saith ch 31. Art 4. All Councells generall or particular since the Apostles times may erre and many have erred To which I answer No Councells nay nor the whole invisible Church is infallible in the sense that the Apostles are infallible both in beleeving and teaching by immediate inspiration and so their word is not a rule of faith 2. A Generall Councell conveened in Councell may erre in particular Synodicall acts that is for a time and in some points as the Synod meaneth but it followeth
dreameth or that wee labour to draw assurance of a good spirituall estate from outward reformation which saith Towne Protestant Legalists labour for when the heart is naught Antinomians say that all our evidences are dung True they are not evidences of Legall perfect righteousnesse more they prove not Asser. 1. Love to the brethren sincerity and the like that have not grace for their stocke a right fountaine and principle the Spirit for their Father Christ for their Crowne and garland are no evidences at all that wee are in Christ for they rather darken then render justification evident Could wee looke over our selfe and abstract our thoughts from our selfe as if we were nothing and dead and behold the actings of grace and Christs love-raptures and the glancing of love on his members as on bits pieces and little images of a super-excellent transcendently glorious Christ and see these in the Spirit the worker then were surer inference to be made thus then when we eye our selves As beholding the excellencie of a Godhead in Sunne and Moone when we looke above the shaddow-creature and with senses abstracted and the elevation of the Spirit wee see these created excellencies in the deep and boundlesse Sea which hath no shoares nor coasts nor bottome in a vast and great God we are farther from Idolatry then when wee pore on and pine away in the minds restings in this side of an infinit Majestie and so is it here If it be naturall Logick and the light of our owne sparks that make the inference I love the brethren therefore I know I am translated from death to life it s but Moone-light of one halfe sleeping that is suspected to bee day-light but if naturall light by the day-light of saving grace make the inference it is sure arguing As And hereby doe we know that we know him if we keepe his Commandements and we know that we have passed from death to life because we love the brethren 2. All these are equivalent to the same But if we walke in the light as hee is light wee have fellowship one with another and the bloud of Jesus Christ his Sonne clenseth us from all sinnes And He that loveth his brother abideth in the light and there is none occasion of stumbling in him And if yee know that he is righteous yee know that every one that doth righteousnesse is borne of him This is written for our own personall security and knowledge of our owne state as all the Epistle aymeth at this and not so much as we may know one another as is cleare when John sheweth us the scope of his Epistle is to give marks and I nothing doubt but the Holy Ghost aymeth at the discovery of a dead faith and to refute the Antinomians as is cleare These things have I written unto you that beleeve on the name of the Sonne of God that yee may know that yee have eternall life and that yee may beleeve on the name of the Sonne of God So saith he 3. Putting a difference betweene the children of the world and the children of the devill in this the children of God are manifest and the children of the devill whosoever doth not righteousnesse is not of God neither hee that loveth not his brother Then certainely some hath said in Johns daies It is enough to salvation if a man beleeve in Christ he is obliged by no Law nor Commandement that is outward and written to doe righteousnesse John saith such a one is not borne of God And My little children let us not love in word neither in tongue but in deed and in truth and hereby by reall loving of the brethren we know that we are of the truth and shall assure our hearts before him And Whatsoever we aske we receive of him because we keepe his Commandements and doe the things that are pleasing in his sight Now sure this cannot make the keeping of his Commandements and our good works fellow-Mediators with Christ. Then John must argue from the effect to the cause and intimate that its false that some may bee borne of God who keepe not his Commandements as Antinomians say When one that walloweth in fleshly lusts is to beleeve without more adoe in Christ and he is a saved man So saith John Little children let no man deceive you he that doth righteousnesse is righteous as he is righteous he that committeth sinne is of the Devill Then some have deceived themselves and others in saying That doing of righteousnesse was neither condition nor way nor meane to salvation nor any infallible signe of a mans being in the state of grace Now who saith all these this day but the Antinomian Now if Antinomians as they doe say that a discourse by way of a practicall Syllogisme or naturall Logick can produce no Divine but onely a humane Faith And that all Logick is to be abeted the carnall and corrupt discoursings by Logick that exalt themselves against the knowledge of God are to be abeted but that the use of naturall reason not corrupt should be disclaimed is against the tenour of the Old and New Testament in which there bee Lawes Ordinances reasonings practicall Syllogismes to beget faith to cause us slee sinne follow holynesse which no man can say is a humane thing except Antinomians following their old Masters the Libertines who said to lay aside naturall reason discoursing to know neither good nor ill was true mortification and naturall reasoning and knowledge of sinne or righteousnesse sense of ill doing or feare of sinne or judgement are but the tastings of the old Adams forbidden fruit as wee shall heare afterward Asser. 2. Yea we may know our selves to bee in the state of grace by holy walking and acts of beleeving and we may know our holy walking to be true by other acts of holy walking and beleeving so John saith by the loving of the brethren we may know we are in Christ and so that wee beleeve and love God and againe reciprocally By this wee know that we love the children of God when we love God and keep his Commandements for this is the love of God that we keep his Commandements Then the loving of God that may argue that wee beleeve may also evidence our Justification and all dependeth on this as the Spirit joyneth the light and evidence of grace to cause us know our loving of God and translation into Christ by our loving of the children of God and againe our loving of the Children of God by our loving of God 1 Joh. 3.14 1 Joh. 5.2 Asser. 3. One and the same cloud that is the cause of our doubting whether we beleeve or no is not the cause of our doubting whether wee love the brethren or no and so they must furnish different evidences from a misty twylight or evening of desertion from some apprehension of the sinnes of youth often our faith is clowded
nor doe Antinomians know these poynts of the dephs of eternall free grace though they talke of them to abuse them to licentiousnesse But let us for the clearing of the Doctrine of Faith wipe off Saltmarshs poore reasons for immediate beleeving without all preparations his 3. Argument to the other two which yet are but one is Object It exalteth grace more to receive a sinner who hath no money no price no righteousnesse Answ. Adde an assumption But he that cometh dry empty sinfull and prepared with some sense of sinne of the Physitian Christ is the onely man that hath no money the Pharisie as a Pharisie is the man that hath money and righteousness in himselfe and is whole and needeth the Physitian in no sort and in that he is thus undisposed for Christ it should debase grace if the Lord should sell his wine and milke for the sinners money and sure that And hee that hath no money is a restriction of those who are invited to come unto the waters for all are not such as have no money for though really all want money and price to buy the waters wine and milk really because all are sinners Pharises or no Pharises yet there bee none here invited but onely some certaine persons who in their owne sense and their selfe-humbled condition make objections against themselves Oh! I am unworthy and unprepared for these waters I have no money nor prayer and Christ meanes them not to me but to some worthyer then I. Now Pharisies and all sinners even these that are selfe-righteous never move such doubts but take the Antinomian short cut and thinke they have money and presumptuously and being whole and unbroken come and buy that is they beleeve but in truth they presume This poore argument confoundeth preparations of sense and feeling which are preparations not of causation or action but of meere order which we assert according to the Scripture with preparations of merit or with the market-preparations of Pharisees Papists and Arminians which we detest and abhorre and hee cannot frame an argument from Esay 55. against us Object 4. It s right lifting up of Jesus on the Crosse as Moses lift up the Serpent in the wildernesse not for the healed to looke upon but the wounded the sixt Objection saith no other but that its most agreeable to the Gospel-way of dispensation the whole need not a Physitian but the sicke I came not to call the righteous but sinners to repentance Answ. These places are much for us for the stung and wounded Israelites did not typifie sinners as sinners not all sinners without exception 1. All the heathen in the Wildernesse that were stinged with Serpents and all the Israelites ignorant of the vertue of the Serpent were not cured by looking on the brazen Serpent Numb 21.9 10 11. but onely such as were sensible of their paine and looked to the Serpent then that the type may not halt in this 1. Saltmarsh must presume that all who were stinged Heathen or Israelites who looked up were cured as sinners as sinners have Christ offered to them as sinners and so all sinners now the Text saith the contrary only the people of Israel had the benefit of the cure 2. Onely such as knew the vertue of the Serpent of brasse 3. I confesse Antinomians with Pelagians and Arminians take ever the easiest way and the shortest cut to heaven that as many as are sinners are sinners spiritually stung and sinne-sick and sinners in their owne sense and feeling as sinners in the Texts alledged are opposed to these that neede not the Physitian and to the righteous who sure are not the sinners and the sicke that the Physitian Christ came to cure and to call to repentance Saltmarsh cannot cull out a Text in all the Scripture so contrarie to his tenent as these for the Title of his Chapter or Article which is L I. is this Jesus Christ offered to sinners as sinners that is to all sinners and to men because they are sinners under the reduplication of sinners then the Text must beare Christ came not to call the righteous but sinners to repentance that is in the Antinomian glosse Christ came not to call sinners but sinners to Repentance for sure the Righteous that is the selfe-righteous and proud Pharisees who thought themselves no sinners but righteous and whole were sinners and obstinate and proud and malicious sinners and truely needed the Physitian no lesse then Publicans but in their owne apprehension and swelling conceit they were neither sinners nor sicke nor unrighteous Then whether Saltmarsh will or no by the sick and sinners and the stung and wounded Christ must meane some inherent qualification and preparation for the Physitian Christ which was onely in such and such sinners to wit who were lost in their owne eyes and sinners in their owne feeling for really and truely Pharisees were sinners sick and dead in sinnes and trespasses and yet the Lord Jesus denyeth that hee came to call the Pharisees and selfe-righteous sinners he came to call his owne sinners onely not all sinners This then is no Gospel-way nor way of grace but the Antinomian licentious way That Christ is offered to sinners as sinners and Christ came to call sinners as sinners to repentance for Christ is offered to sinners as such and so qualified sinners and Christ came to call to repentance not sinners as sinners no not Pharisees not the righteous not the whole but sinners as such sinners as sick as self-lost as self-sinners and self-condemned and qualified with the sense of their owne wretched and sinnefull condition otherwise how will they answer Christs Apologie giving a reason why hee conversed with Publicanes and sinners with Mathew cap. 9. and Zacheus Luke 19. and other sinners Luk. 15. Math. 11. and not with Scribes and Pharisees for Christ expressely saith that he did it because the fittest place the Physitian can be in is to sit at the sicke mans bed-side Object 5. It leaves men saith he under greater condemnation when Christ is brought home to the soule for then there can be no objecting Lord had I beene thus and thus fit and prepared then I should have received thee but I was a foule sinner at that same very time and so guilty O will the Lord answer I come therefore to pardon thee and to wash thee in my bloud because thou art foule and that is no excuse Answ. 1. Nothing can be concluded against the truth from a lye ex veris non nisi verum there is no greater lye then this excuse had I been thus and thus fit and prepared I should have received thee but I was a foule sinner at that very time guilty For 1. wee teach not that preparations doe infallibly yea or necessarily produce faith and the receiving of Christ. Many are sick and pained with storme of conscience whom Christ never cureth It is like the rich gluttons challenge of
for sinnes that Christ hath so blotted out that they have neither name being nor nature of sinnes is unlawfull and we are obliged by no Commandement of God say they to duties the Spirit maketh us willing but the word and Spirit are not contrary as we conceive the Spirit doth oblige as it goes along with the obliging word for if ye commit murther or lie say they being justified yee sinne not but the flesh in you 2. Wee are not guilty therein because the Spirit acted us not to forbeare 3. It was pardoned and remitted before it was committed and so hath neither name nor nature of sinne for the right end of duties we know no other but to glorifie God to be land-marks or a way to our countrey and to testifie we love our Redeemer we make them not one penny of payment for heaven â— I am not against the settlement of Church-government prudently as now Ans. If Prudential-government be from Christ and his Testament it is not enough not to be against Christ but ye must be with him if it be not of Christ the more shame to you and all your way not to be against that which hath not Christ for its Father and Authour 2 The King of the Church in all substantials hath set out a plat-forme in his word Humane prudence is too bold to prescribe to Christ how he should rule his House But this way Saltmarsh is not against the Church-government of Rome by Popes Cardinals Patryarchs Metropolitans Arch-Bishopes and the Government abjurd in his Covenant for these be prudential Church-governments 3 It is a wide Familisticall conscience to teach there is no Church no ministry no preaching no censures now on earth as you and all Seekers doe and yet not to bee against a Church-government in a prudential way in which the Magistrate sits as a Church-Officer to judge But this is the detestable Neutrality of Antinomians in all Religions to be neither hot nor cold this nor that 6 Nor is this any cause or reason why Saltmarsh should not be against the Prudentiall Government of mans devising because God hath his people under severall attaintments and measures as in Queen Maries Martyrdome for then because God hath saved some under Prelacie some under Poperie yea before Christs comming some under Gentilisme as Saltmarsh thinketh of Job for then Saltmarsh and Familists should not be against the settlement of Prelaticall Government and of their Romish Ceremonies not against Popish and Heathenish Prudentiall and Idolatrous Church-Government I thinke then Saltmarsh will be any thing in externals Paganish Popish or Prelatical no wonder then that Familists in their Petition raile against Puritans for none-conformity and professe in their Petition to King James their obedience to all the Prelaticall will-worship CHAP. XXXI Saltmarsh and Familists teach that there is salvation in all Religions I Am onely against a forme as it becomes an Engine of persecution c. Ans. So Saltmarsh here opens a great mystery of Familisme which is Liberty of conscience and salvation under all Religions for if any forme of Religion never so sound be commanded even by a Law of God and ratified politically by a Law of man and none left free to mens owne Spirit as to the only binding rule though it be a Spirit of Sathan it is no lawfull Religion to Saltmarsh Now that this is his minde is cleare from that he saith Spark 171 172. In books of controversie we can but set letter to letter and Scripture to Scripture and argument to argument and nothing can be judged till the day or time of more revelation of truth till the Holy Ghost and fire sit upon each of us trying every mans worke and burning up that in us which is hay and stubble in which words beside that Saltm judgeth and condemneth himselfe in writing this same booke of Controversie in favour of the Familists condemning in expresse words the Protestants in all the articles of their faith he will have no man to see truth or to judge any otherwise or know what he beleeves but by conjectures till the day of revelation come that he turne Familist and become all Spirit and all glory so all the Protestants that are not Familists set but letter to letter and are literall legalists and have no certainty what they beleeve and when this Spirit commeth he teacheth not by the word setting letter to letter and Scipture to Scripture but by immediate inspiration above and beyond the word 2. This Spirit even having come upon Saltmarsh as hee plainly saith p. 68. And in his Epistle to the Parliament p. 2.3 does but dictate to him errors hay and stabble that must be consumed for if he so do when he hath taught these toyes hee teacheth the contrary the next day what a spirit is this 3. If the Scripture be not the judge of controversies by setting letter to letter Scripture to Scripture understood according to the naturall and genuine grammaticall sense which the words yeeld without constraint then is the Scripture as Scripture and in its native sense a nose of wax and hath no native sense but wee are to expect a higher spirituall allegorick sense then the letter can beare that from the Spirit We have by this way then no certain rule of faith the unâ—â—able then may lawfully wrest the scripture to their own desâ—ruction Paul proveth Jesus to be the true Messiah and that convincingly he confounded the Jewes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 confuting them that they were confounded in their mind and strongly proved with violence and strength of Scripture light that this is the Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 9.22 and Christ remitteth the Jews to the Scriptures as the judging rule Act. 5.39 If the Scriptures be so dark uncertain doubt some to naturall men void of the Spirit ye shall not convince Cain by the 6. Commandement that he is a murtherer nor Achan by the 8 Command that he is a theef nor Ananias that he is a lyar All may say the Spirit hath the coÌ„trary sense that truly by this way And in the following words he would not be against an Assembly or Synod at Westminster though he deny there is any such Ordinance of God now as Synod or Ministers or Church if they would minister as they have received that is propound to all the Kingdome he saith not all the Churches what they are perswaded of in their conscience and leave it without compulsion to the Spirit of God to perswade for this were true liberty where we see to minister as we receive 1 Pet. 4.10 to Saltmarsh is to teach and propound to others and walke themselves and accordingly beleeve as they have received that is according as they are perswaded in their conscience then if the Assembly of Divines were perswaded in their consciences that to one man to have fifteen wives at once as John of Leyden and his beleeved and that the Alcaron were the
truth of God he should thinke they minister as they received all the Familists and Antinomians in England if they should sit down in a Synod and all the Papists in another Synod all the Socinians in third Synod all the Arrians in a fourth all the Prelatic all Reconcilers in a fifth all the Anabaptists in a sixt and propound such things only as they have received or they are in conscience perswaded of to all the Kingdome they should then all minister as they had received and should be good stewards of the manifold grace of God for so Peter speaketh 1 Pet. 4.11 for sure Saltmarsh cannot say the commandement of the Parliament must be required to make a Synod if men speake their owne drunken perswasions to M. Saltmarsh they fulfill the Apostle Peters rule Let every one minister as he hath received Now by this to minister as we receive is not to minister as we receive from the Lord 1 Cor. 11.23 nor according as Ministers Heare the word at the mouth of Gâ—d Ezeck 2.8 ch 2.10 or as the anointing teacheth us 1 Joh. 2. â—â— Joh 6.45 46. because the Lord or his Spirit or the anointing cannot teach men lyes contrary to the word of truth but the perswasions of men often are lyes errors mistakes then shall every mans erroneous conscience and his owne dreaming spirit be the rule of his owne faith and his teaching of others And 2. This is cleare from his words in the former Epistle to the Parliament if such as conforme not to doctrine and discipline of the Church and preach without ordination shall be proceeded against by fines imprisonment then all the glorious discoveries of God above or beyond that systeme or forme of doctrine shall be judged and sentenced as heresie and schisme and so God himselfe shall be judged by man Now this consequence is nothing that God must be judged by man except the perswasions of the consciences of Familists Antinomians Socinians Arminians Arrians and all the sects that say they are the godly party be very God beleeving professing teaching in them then if such can no more be judged then God what ever their spirit perswadeth them must be truth for God cannot but perswade truth then I confesse the Sects must be infallible because the Scriptures say no more of the Prophets and Apostles then God spake in them and the mouth of Prophets is called the very mouth of God Luke 1. 3. Why These judges the Saints now called Sectaries are not infallible but when Sectaries come twenty thousand armed men against the Presbyterians who in conscience beleeve and have proved that the Sectaries speake lyes in hypocrisie must not they be infallible in both judging them to speak against their conscience and in opposing Liberty of conscience and also in killing them or then they kill men upon fallible conjectures Then if Presbyterians be perswaded in their conscience that liberty of conscience is Atheisme not true liberty then must Sectaries who are but men judge God and punish us because we minister to others what wee have received for we are perswaded of the truth we teach 4. This way promiseth salvation in all Religions so men in these be perswaded in their conscience of the truth thereof against which the Assembly hath determined according to the word of God ch 20. Sect. 3. and. c. 10. Sect. 4. CHAP. XXXII What certainty of faith the Saints may attaine to beyond the Familists fluctuation of faith of Heresie and Schisme 5. FAmilists and Antinomians goe one with the Belgicke Arminians and all our late English Independents who are for Liberty of conscience and a Catholicke toleration and punishing in a coercive way no kinde of men never so blasphemous for their conscience teach print what they will there being no infallibility now in any since the Apostles expired But this is a most false ground for there is a twofold infallibility one in teaching flowing from immediate inspiration proper to the Prophets and Apostles and another infallibility and certainty of perswasion common to all beleevers Now Libertines turne all our faith in a topicke and conjecturall opinion so most of them are turned Scepticks and affirme that we know nothing with any certainty yea the more supernaturall and sublime that fundamentalls of salvation are the more indulgence and latitude of liberty is to bee yeelded to the consciences of all men because the higher the subject is the ranker is our propension to erre God having given a thinner and more scarce measure of knowledge in supernaturall things that doe so farre transcend the sphere and orbe of naturall reason then of knowledge in naturall things our mindes being in their owne element and in a capacity to reach their connaturall and proper object wheÌ„ they are among natural things knowable by the light of nature hence that opinion now so prevailing that all and every Religion is to be Tollerated and an indulgence yeelding to all in superstructurs in foundamentals though a man should deny that Christ is the Saviour of the world therfore Saltmarsh takes on him Sparkles of glory as p. 185 186 187 188 to reckoÌ„ out the articles of our faith especially concerning the first Adams sin sin originall of Christ borne of the Virgin Mary made under the law bearing our sins dead buried ascended into Heaven siting at the right hand c. speaketh of the highest attaintments of the Protestants generally in the mystery of salvation but speaketh not one word of the generall resurrection of our bodies of Christ comming to judge all men of a Heaven and Hell after this life as if these were none of the highest attaintments of the Protestants generally in the mystery of salvation And Saltmarsh as I conceive with Hymeneus and Philetus and other Libertines in the Armie doubt of or deny these therefore not owning these points of faith nor the doctrine of faith repentance love new obedience praying preaching sacraments as if hee professed himselfe no Protestant in these points saith these are beleeved by Protestants but doth not owne them as a part of his owne beleefe but he goeth on p. 190. and teacheth us of a further discovery as to free grace as if Protestants had never attained to a further discovery as to free grace and here he falles in on his owne secrets of Antinomianisme and contradicteth the Protestants and debaseth the confession of the late Anabaptists the seaven Churches of the assembly of Divins at Westminster speaks not one word in this new discovery of Christ God-man born of a womaÌ„ under the law c. or of the Articles of the faith of Protestants yea pa. 198 199 c. he tels us of the last and as some say of the highest and most glorious discovery concerning the whole mystery of God to men and his creation in which hee againe saith nothing of the Protestant faith not one word of Christ God and Man of the Resurrection of the last Judgement of the