three yeeres after the persecution by him begun Howeuer the Councell of Millain of Sirmium c. was the then visible Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But I hope they wil not say that it was the true Church of God For though almost all the Bishops and most Christians throughout the Romane Empire did subscribe vnto these Councels yet was not the true Church of God during these three yeeres inuisible but more remarkably visible in some few which did contradict the then visible Church content to suffer exile or other martyrdome in maintenance of the Holy Catholike faith which is the life and soule of the Church of God In few ages after wherein worse beasts then Valens was were chiefe Gouernours of the visible Church that is after the succession of Romish Bishops was growne vp vnto a perfect beast according to the measure of Antichrist the true Church of God was remarkeably visible in such as that visible Church did condemne for heretikes Instances to this purpose are plentifull in vnpartiall Writers And when the doctrine of Antichrist was come to his full growth as in the Councell of Trent although the whole bodie of Germany besides Chemnitius and some few others although the whole visible Church of France besides Caluin and some such had subscribed vnto that Councell yet the true Church of God had beene visible in France and Germanie in these worthies Enough there was in their writings against that Councell to condemne all such as followed it that is the visible or representatiue Church of Rome of palpable Antichristian heresie Yet when we say that the true Church of God was visible in these men in their writings or in Iohn Hus c. wee doe not tye our selues to embrace what soeuer they wrote for truth Wee may say of the true visible Church or of the truth by which we become visible members of the true Catholike Church as one said of Truth philosophicall That it could not be sound intire in the writings of any one Sect of Philosophers in the writings of all of them it might This aduantage we haue of all the Philosophers that we haue a surer and more perfect rule for examining the writings or doctrines of seuerall visible Churches than they had any for examining truths philosophicall Absolutely to assent in each particular to any writers or teachers since the first constitution of the Apostolike Church or accomplishment of the written rule of faith were to dissent from them in the maine and fundamentall point of Catholicke Faith For vnlesse there bee an vnfayned and hearty desire a spirit of watchfulnesse and of willingnesse to limit our adherence vnto whatsoeeuer other writings according to the greater or lesse evidence of their consonancy with the written rule neither Scholar nor Master nor Church visible or representatiue can be any other then equiuocall or dead members of the true Church The Catholike faith it selfe could it possibly be planted in any mans heart without the spirit or Genius to direct or informe it would quickly either putrifie or grow crooked 3 Amongst other glorious titles wherwith the same Author seekes to adorne the Church of Rome this which is the title of his fift chapter is one that the true Church cannot erre A proposition I must confesse as hard for vs to disproue if hee take it in sensu composito as it is for him to proue in sensu diuiso That no Church as it is true and whilest it is true or in respect of those points with reference to which it is denominated true can possibly erre is a truth that cannot be denied But if by the true Church he mean a visible or the visible Romish Church there neither is nor hath been any visible Church though planted by the Apostles themselues which since their times hath not either ceased to bee a visible Church or else continued for a long time as palpably erroneous and false as truely visible Whatsoeuer this Author deeme or write his Fellowes and Masters with one mouth confesse that every priuate man in their Church may erre that the Bishops assembled in Councell without the Popes direction or confirmation of their sentence may erre that the Pope himselfe vnlesse he speake ex cathedra may erre And by this confession either the Romish church is no true Church saue onely whilest the Pope speakes è Cathedra or else the whole bodie of the true Church if the Romish church be the true Church may sometimes erre For at all times else both head and members of this Church may erre In this inference I take it as granted that the Pope doth not alwaies speake ex cathedra Now if in these interims of his cathedrall silence any Bishop Priest or Iesuit shal take vpon them to instruct their Auditors out of the Pulpit or otherwise in points of faith or controuersie their poore flocke by this mans collections against vs cannot be made partakers of that true and infallible faith without which no man can be saued because their Preachers or ministers are not infallible nor to vse his words vndoubtedly fenced from all danger of errour His collections against vs are these Finally to what end doe Protestants striue so much for the Churches erring but onely to depriue themselues thereby of Church Faith and Religion For wheras neither religiō nor Church can stād without supernaturall faith nor supernaturall faith be attained without infallible certainty of the things beleeued if their Preachers their Ministers their Church be not vndoubtedly fenced frō all danger of error the Articles they beleeue haue not that inerrable warrant which is necessarie to faith Did this man may wee thinke beleeue that hee himselfe was vndoubtedly fenced from all danger of errour If he did so beleeue the Cardinalls of Rome shall doe him much wrong if they chuse him not Pope the next Election or appoint him not as coadiutor to the present Pope If it be replyed that the Romish instructers bee they Bishops or Priests cannot erre because they neither beleeue nor teach others to beleeue any points of faith but with absolute submission of their instructions to what the Pope already hath spoken or shall hereafter speake ex cathedra concerning the same points the medicine will be a great deale worse then the disease For this perswasion or resolution is altother incompatible with the first grounds of faith and is flat Apostacie from Christ as hath beene discussed at large in the second booke vpon the Creed and shall be further manifested if occasion require in the second booke of this Treatise To the former obiection the answer on our part is easie For true faith receiues its infallibilitie not from any infallibilitie in our immediate and ordinary teachers but from the infallibility of the truths themselues which they propose vnto vs out of the rule of truth and from the infallibilitie of that internall and secret Teacher without whose impressions of truths infallible in mens hearts no true faith
of this case they would not conclude the cause specially before a Iudge not acquainted with the mystery of the Creation For he that hath a wife and a wife hath a wife and shee that hath a husband and a husband hath a husband But if that precept of our Sauiour Whosoeuer putteth away his wife vnlesse it bee for adulterie and marieth another committeth adultery and hee that marieth her being so put away committeth adultery were once produced any Heathen Ciuilian might giue this absolute and infallible sentence If yee Christians will admit this Law for true and iust or for a rule of conscience then Polygamy certainly is a naturall part of Adultery and hee that hath a wife and marieth another is to bee punished as an Adulterer For what is the reason why he that putteth away his wife though by legall diuorce and marieth another commits adultery with the second or why he that marieth the first being so put away is likewise an Adulterer Is not the reason because the bond of matrimonie betwixt the husband and the first wife according to this your Christian law is not dissolued by a legall sentence of diuorce extra casum adulterij vnlesse in case of adultery Yet as a sentence of diuorce gotten vpon suspicion of adultery or subornation or vpon other causes which humane Lawes and Gods Law vnto the Iew did permit cannot by the Evangelicall Law altogether dissolue the bond of matrimony so out of all question it doth rather loosen or weaken it than corroborate or knit it faster Wherefore if hee that hauing gotten a sentence of diuorce by formall course of Law against his wife become guilty of Adultery in the Court of conscience and by the Euangelicall Law if hee marry another then much more shall he be an Adulterer who hauing a wife whose chastity was neuer called in question against whom no sentence of Law hath beene obtained if he shall presume to marry another Thus farre an Heathen by light of naturall reason without the assistance of Gods Spirit may goe in this and many other controuersies amongst Christians 3 Were not most Recusants throughout this Kingdome worse affected I will not say towards vs and our Religion but towards truth it selfe euen towards the light of the Gospell than any ciuill Heathen either are or can be they might as clearly discerne the vsurped authority of the Romish Church ouer their faith and ouer Scriptures the rule of faith to be as true a branch of Apostasie from Christ as Polygamy is of Adultery and that it doth more euidently dissolue the bonds of matrimony betwixt Christ and his Spouse the Church than Polygamy or adulterie doth the bond of matrimonie betwixt man and wife First they make the Scriptures as was said before not onely an imperfect rule in respect of its quantity but this defect being in their opinion supplyed by associating vnwritten Traditions vnto it in the second place they make both Scriptures and vnwritten Traditions to bee an vnsufficient rule in respect of their quality For it is their doctrine that we cannot know which be Canonicall Scriptures which are not which be authenticke traditions which not but by relying vpon the authority of the visible Church Againe admitting the Church could determine which were Authenticke Traditions which were not and that no Traditions should hereafter be receiued besides those which shee had determined yet if any controuersie should arise concerning the meaning of those Scriptures which she hath determined to be Canonicall or concerning the meaning limitation or vse of these Traditions which shee hath acknowledged to be authentike no priuate man may take vpon him absolutely to beleeue this or that to be the meaning of either but with submission of his iudgment to the Churches sentence And this as I haue elswhere shewed at large is not onely to make the authority of the Church to bee aboue the authority of the Scriptures but vtterly to nullifie the authority of the Scriptures saue onely so farre as they may serue as a stale or footstoole to support or hold vp the authority of the Church or Pope So that the last resolution of the Romanists beliefe as out of their owne comparisons of the Scriptures to colours and the authority of the Church vnto the light by which colours become visible to vs as is elsewhere demonstrated must be this That he absolutely beleeues onely the infallible authority of the Church concerning the truth of Scriptures and their true meaning their truth or meaning he neither absolutely nor infallibly beleeues So that if he beleeue any diuine truth it is onely ex accidenti that is in as much as the Church doth not erre in that point of faith which she proposeth vnto him howbeit to beleeue that which is true vpon no better motiue or condition then this is much worse then the ignorance of truth or meer vnbeliefe of the same truth How many seuerall diuine truths or articles of faith soeuer he thus beleeueth hee can be no true Catholike because he beleeues no diuine truth but as it is mixt with hellish antichristian falshood If wee shall proue that this supposed infallibilitie of the Romish Church doth in diuers points induce not onely heresie but infidelity and that infidelity of a worse sort then can be incident to any Heathen I hope our intended conclusion will bee sufficiently euicted that whosoeuer holds this absolute infallibility of the present visible Romish Church whatsoeuer he holds besides can bee no Catholike To giue you an instance for proofe of this 4 If one being a Christian shall steale hee doth commit a grieuous sinne yet a sinne of one kinde or species that is theft he doth not thereby cease to be a Christian he doth not thereby become an Infidell or Antichristian The like wee may say of fornication adultery murder incest or the like all which are grieuous sinnes and without repentance exclude men from the Kingdome of Heauen Yet can wee not say that they make a man an Infidell though worthy to be cast out of the Church vntill hee giue full proofe of his humble submission and hearty repentance for his fact But if any man that hath beene baptized and made a partaker of the word which in many points hee beleeues shall by couetousnesse malice intemperancie or the like haue so farre corrupted the feeds of Christianity or Law of God written in his heart as he shall thinke that which indeed and truth is theft fornication adultery murder or incest to be no sinne he is by the generall verdict of the Schooles not onely an hereticke but an Infidell Now Infidelitie is of two sorts either infidelitas purae negationis priuatiue infidelity such as is in the Heathen which haue not knowne God or his Lawes as hauing no commerce with his people or infidelitas prauae dispositionis depraued infidelity of which there bee more degrees as first it may bee in the Heathen to whom the truth of the
sprinkling of the ashes of an Heifer The third terme typified by the Ceremoniall sinne is mans naturall corruption sinnes originall or actuall or sinne of what kind soeuer committed against the morall Law of God The fourth terme is the sacrifice by God appointed to purifie and clense vs from such sinnes and that was the bloody sacrifice of our Lord and Sauiour Christ whereof the legall sacrifices were types or shadowes So that the legall sacrifices had two vses or references the one expiatory for their offring did expiate sins meerly ceremoniall the other sacramentall or prefiguratiue for they did picture out or represent the eternall sacrifice whereby our redemption was fully wrought as the Apostle proues at large in the 10. chapter to the Hebrewes His argument in this place is in effect thus The same efficacie which sacrifices meerly legall offred by the Priest had in cleansing men from sinnes meerly ceremoniall as from touching of the dead or some creeping thing c. the same but much greater efficacy hath the blood of Christ being offred by the eternall Spirit that is by the Godhead personally dwelling in him to cleanse vs from all sinnes against the morall Law of God and to purifie vs from such dead workes as not expiated by his blood would bring forth euerlasting death Now the Apostle takes it as granted that the legall sacrifices did not onely sufficiently cleanse men from such sinnes but withall did legally sanctifie them and so in like manner Christs blood was not onely the full price of our redemption but is withall the fountaine of our sanctification by which we are qualified for admission into the heauenly Sanctuary 4 The first originall of the Iewes hypocrifie and malice was their ignorance in the law of Moses for they thought these legall sacrifices were sufficient to clense them from all sins whatsoeuer And if such sacrifices could haue freed from sinne the Iew had beene most free from sin of any people liuing Most of those that presecured our Sauiour Christ might be as S. Paul was whilest he was a persecutor 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without staine or blot in respect of the righteousnesse which is of the Law Phil. 3.6 In presumption of this their integrity with reference to the Law of Ceremonies of their being Abrahams sons not by Agar but by Sarah the better sort of the worser Iewes scorned to heare of being set free by the truth it selfe which they in part beleeued If ye continue in my word then are you my disciples indeed And ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free They answered him We be Abrahams seed and were neuer in bondage to any man how saiest thou Ye shall be made free But our Sauiour tells them In as much as they committed sinne they were the seruants of sin being servants they were in the same case with Agar and her son for the seruant abideth not in the house for euer If the son therefore shall make you free yee shall be free indeed Iohn 8. vers 31 32 33 34 35 36. Thus you see that the Apostle Gal. 4. v. 18. c. did teach no other thing thā our Sauiour here doth These Iewes by relying vpon the prerogatiues of the Law became as sons of the bondwoman remaining still slaues to sin Others by adhering to the new Testament which the Son of God ratified by his blood became sons of the freewomā or as this Euangelist elsewhere speaks the sons of God How exactly the present visible Romish Church doth parallel Agar and the Ierusalem which thē was when our Sauiour and S. Paul thus wrote and spake shall by Gods assistance be declared hereafter Let vs now see how ill that Church doth parallel Noahs Arke CHAP. XII The Allegorie or Argument of proportion drawne from Noahs Arke explicated according to the former rules and retorted vpon the Romanist 1 FRom these and the like Arguments drawne from the types to their antitypes we are for conclusion to frame the Argument drawn from Noahs Arke after another fashion and to a better end then the Romanist doth The termes of proportion in this argument are conspicuous First Noah secondly his Arke thirdly the meanes of safety from the flood by his Arke Termes to these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are first Christ 2. his Church and 3. the saluation of such as enter into his Church First to parallel Noah and Christ in some few points The Lord said vnto Noah Gen. 7. ver 1. Thee haue I found righteous before mee in this generation that is as the Apostle saith of Abraham hee had whereof to boast with men but not with God He was righteous not only coram hominibus but prae hominibus coram Deo more righteous than any other man liuing euen in the sight iudgmēt of God yet not perfectly righteous in the sight of God This was Christs peculiar in whō that which was in some measure or cōparatiuely verified in Noah was exactly fulfilled for he onely amongst all the Generations of men was altogether pure and righteous before God Againe Noah was a Preacher of righteousnesse and extraordinarily qualified for this function by the spirit of Christ So much that place of S. Peter proueth in his 1. Epistle 3. chapter verse 18 19 20. For Christ also hath once suffered for sinnes the iust for the vniust that hee might bring vs to God being put to death in the flesh but quickened by the Spirit By which also he went and preached vnto the spirits in prison which sometime were disobedient when once the long-suffring of God waited in the dayes of Noah while the Arke was a preparing Yet Noah had but his portion though a large one of the Spirit sed Christo Deus non admetitur spiritum God giueth not the Spirit by measure to Christ Ioh. 3. verse 34. He spake but the word and great was the number of Preachers and from his inexhaustible fulnesse wee all receiued grace for grace 2 Againe Noah built an Arke by Gods appointment for the safetie of all such as were obedient to his preaching into which whosoeuer would not enter was destroyed by the Floud for disobedience to his preaching All this was fulfilled of the Church which Christ builded for whosoeuer doth not enter into it shall be deuoured by the euerlasting flames for disobedience to this authentique Preacher of righteousnesse The issue then betweene vs and the Romanists is vnto what Church Noahs Arke answers as a figure to the visible Romish Church or onely to the Church before defined which is one Holy and Catholike Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Wee say of this later onely not of any visible Church saue onely so farre as it is an introduction to this Church Our reason is this Although it be true that none of the sonnes of men besides such as entred into Noahs Arke were saued from the deluge yet is not this negatiue more vnquestionably true then the affirmatiue That
in Vincentius his iudgement a Rule of faith neither vncompleate for its quantitie nor vnsufficient for its qualitie a Rule euery way competent for ending controuersies in religion without the assumption either of Tradition or decrees of Councell as any associates or homogeneall parts of the same rule 7 Vnto what vse then did Ecclesiastical tradition or generall Councels serue for quelling heresies Ecclesiastical traditions or vnanimous consent of particular Churches throughout seuerall Kingdomes or Prouinces in points of faith was in ancient times yet may be an excellent meanes by which the Spirit of God leads generall Councels into the truth And the Councels whose care and office it was to compare and examine Traditions exhibited were the soueraigne and principall meanes vnder the guidance of Gods Spirit by which as many as imbraced the loue of truth were led into all those truths which are at all times necessary to saluation but were much questioned and obscured by the iuglings and falsifications of former Heretikes Into the same truths which these Councels were then wee now are led not by relying vpon the sole authority of the Councels which the Spirit did lead but by tracing their footsteps and viewing the way by which the Spirit did lead them And this was by necessary deductions or consequences which reason inlightened by the Spirit and directed by the sweet disposion of diuine prouidence did teach them to make and doth inable vs to iudge that they were truely made by them CHAP. XXIII Of the agreement betweene the Enthusiast or some non-conformitants to the Church of England and the Romish Church concerning the manner how the Spirit of truth as they suppose doth lead men into all truth That the true sense of scriptures is as determinable by light of reason and rules of art as the conclusions of any other sciences or faculties are A generall suruey of the depraued or more then hereticall or heathenish infidelity of the moderne Romish Church 1 IGnorance or vnaduertence of the manner how the Spirit leads vs into the truth or true sense of the rule of faith hath beene the mother of two monstrous twinnes in latter ages of Enthusiasme and of Romish implicite or magicall faith The Enthusiast presumes hee hath the Spirit for his guide and knowes he hath it meerely by his breathing or afflâ—tion The Romanist obseruing the Enthusiâ—st to runne into grosse errours by relying vpon the immediate voyce the breathing or suggestion of his priuate Spirit thinkâ—s it safest to beleeue none but publike Spirits and that the publike spirit speakes nothing or iudgeth nothing for authentike saue onely in publike Assemblies as in generall Councels or in such publike place as is the Consistorie of the Pope and his Cardinals Neither of them consider as the truth is that either the connexion betweene principles of faith and the conclusions or inferences which follow vpon the admission of such principles as true or the non-coherence of inferences pretended from sacred principles expresly contained in the Scriptures may be as clearely demonstrated to reason though vnsanctified as the connexion or non-coherence betweene the principles and conclusions of any art or science whatsoeuer Betweene sciences properly so called and the facultie of diuinitie this is the onely difference The principles or Maximes of sciences properly so called may bee rightly conceiued and fully assented vnto by meere light of nature without such assistance or illumination of the Spirit as Christ hath promised to his Church and without which no principles of faith though expresly contained in Scripture can be rightly conceiued much lesse firmely beleeued So that the conclusions of arts and sciences may by light of nature be absolutely knowne whereas euen those conclusions of faith whose connexion with the principles of faith expresly contained in Scripture is as cleere and demonstratiuely euident to reason not inlightened by the Spirit as any connexion is betweene scientificall conclusions and their principles cannot bee absolutely knowne or firmely beleeued without the assistance of the Spirit because the principles whence they are deduced cannot by reason vnsanctified or not inlightened bee absolutely knowne or assented vnto And vnlesse the princples be absolutely known or beleeued the best knowledge or beliefe of the Conclusions can be but conditionall Euery Artist knowes that the connexion or non-coherence betweene a postulatum or hypothesis that is a proposition not fully knowne but taken as granted and the conclusion thence rightly deduced or pretended may bee as cleare and euident as the connexion betweene an vndoubted principle and the conclusion demonstratiuely deduced from it or pretended to bee so deduced Hee that is no competent Iudge of a probleme absolutey considered may giue absolute and infallible iudgement of the same probleme vpon the mutuall acknowledgement or agreement of the controuersors As if two Nouices in Arithmetike should moue this question Whether fifty were a square number whether sixty foure were a cubicke and referre the decision of both ore tenus to an exquisite Mathematician that did not well vnderstand English it were impossible for him to resolue the probleme before he perfectly vnderstood the termes But vpon their mutuall acknowledgement that fifty in English was as much as Quinquaginta in Latine and a square the same that Quadratum in Latine hee could absolutely resolue them that fifty could be no square that the next number below it was a square although hee knew not how to expresse it in English Vpon the acknowledgement of both parties likewise that sixty foure in English was as much as sexaginta quatuor in Latine he could absolutely resolue them that it was both a square and a cubicke number 2 To propose the like case in Diuinity which shall be this Whether Polygamie bee lawfull or rather a true branch of adultery suppose this controuersie were to bee handled before some Heathen Ciuilian betweene two Christians the one of which had maried the others daughter and intended to marry a second wife in a forraigne Country where the party grieued had no Christian Magistrate to doe him right An heathen Iudge that could vnderstand the literall meaning of the Scripture though he did not in any sort beleeue them and made no conscience of Polygamie himselfe might in this case giue as vpright iudgement as the Pope and his Cardinals could and that according to the rule of faith so the parties would both submit themselues to haue the controuersie decided by that rule that is by the Scriptures of the old and new Testament The party peccant might plead custome and tradition The practice of the Patriarckes and holy men of God for his warrant and that with greater probability than the Romanist can plead for worshipping Images or then they excuse themselues from spirituall Adultery If the party grieued should against custome and tradition plead or oppose that law Let every man haue his wife and euery wife her husband or other like Texts which some great Diuines haue alleaged for decision