THE PERPETVITIE OF A REGENERATE MANS ESTATE Wherein it is manifestly proued by sundry arguments reasons and authorities That such as are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ by a liuely faith can neither finally nor totally fall from grace It is also proued that this hath beene the receiued and resolued Doctrine of all the ancient Fathers of all the Protestant Churches and writers beyond the seas and of the Church of England All the principall arguments that are or may be obiected against it either from Scripture or from reason are here likewise cleared and answered By WILLIAM PRYNNE Gent Lincolniensis PSAL. 125. Verse 1. They that trust in the Lord shall be as Mount Sion which cannot be remoued but standeth fast for euer Fulgentius de Praedestinatione ad Monimum Gratia praeuenis impium vt fiat iustus subsequitur iustum ne fiat impius Praueniselisum vt surgat subsequitur eleuatum necadat LONDON Printed by WILLIAM IONES dwelling in Redcrossestreete 1626. TO THE MOST REVEREND FATHER IN GOD GEORGE BY THE Diuine Prouidence Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Primate of England and one of his Maiesties most Honourable Priuy Councell MOST Reuerend Father in God it hath pleased the dispenser and giuer of all honour and preferment out of his especiall prouidence to aduance your Grace next to our gratious and Dread Soueraigne to the highest place of rule and dignitie in this our Church whereby you are farre ingaged to patronize the truth of God and the established and resolued Doctrines of our English Church Which when I had well considered it moued me to consecrate these first fruites of my studies to your Grace which are nothing else but a iust though weake and meane defence of a principell and ground of that religion which hath beene long established and setled in our Church till some factious and nouellizing spirits if not worse were so bold and impudent of late for to disturbe it The men and meanes by which this truth hath beene disturbed and drawne into question are not vnknowne I suppose vnto your Grace and therefore I neede not to informe against them All that I shall say of them is only this that they are now so potent and so politique that if they are not speedily and carefully preuented by your Grace they are like to quell at least to cloud that glorious truth and Gospell which hath shined so bright so plentifully and comfortablie among vs for so long a season with the dismall the dangerous and pernitious mists of Poperie and Arminianisme Their bookes you know which are fraught with dangerous and hurtfull errors and so much the more dangerous because they are sweetned cloathed and guilded ouer with the name and countenance of the Doctrine of the Church of England are printed and reprinted sold openly and dispersed publikely without controll and the pious wholsome and Christian labours of all such as would confute them by reason of those meanes which they haue made can either finde no license for the presse or if they chance to come vnto the presse by stealth or otherwise they are either quelled and smothered in it before they come vnto their birth or else they are called in and quelled before they can bee published and dispersed for to cleare and vindicate the truth so that by the supportation and propagating of the one and the discountenancing and suppressing of the other that truth of God which wee haue hitherto professed is like to be betrayed Shall these factious scismaticall and hereticall spirits bee so industrous to establish and to vent their Errors and to quell the truth and shall not wee be as diligent and couragious to defend it shall they with all their might and maine plant Poperie and Arminianisme nay Pelagianisme Atheismie in our Church and shall wee sit still with foulded hands with silent tongues and stupified hearts and not labour to withstand them Alas where is our loue where is our zeale to God and to his cause where is our ancient courage for the truth that wee are now so cold and frozen that we are now so much ashamed of that glorious Gospell of Iesus Christ which hath flourished so long among vs and hath made vs a mirror and a spectacle of Gods mercies vnto all the world that now wee dare not or at least wee will not defend and take its part that we dare not to contend and struggle for it but that we suffer it so willingly to bee surprised and betrayed as if wee were more willing to be rid of it then any longer to inioy it Certainly this want of courage for and loue vnto the truth as it is a sure syntome that iniquitie doth abound among vs so it may iustly cause the Lord to bring a famine and scarcitie among vs not of bread only which now is very likely to befall vs but euen of the word of God which is farre worse yea it may prouoke him and that deseruedly to giue vs vp to strong delusions to beleeue lies that we all may be damned because wee would not receiue the loue of the truth that so wee might be saued O therefore let mee now beseech your Grace that as in former times you haue so now you would take heart and courage for the truth You haue many incouragements many inforcements and ingagements for to doe it For your incouragement you haue the Lord of hosts and the almightie King of heauen for to take your part you haue the votes and prayers of all true hearted Christians you haue all the aide and assistance that heauen and earth can yeeld vnto you O feare not then the face or frowne of man whose breath is in his nostrells feare not the power or the malice of any that oppose the truth for wherin are they to be accounted of the Lord of hosts is with you the God of Iacob is your refuge man therefore cannot stand before you For inforcements and incouragements to be zealous and couragious for the truth you haue very many You are called to defend and to support the truth the very nature and qualitie of your function and the very dignitie of that place and person which now you doe sustaine doe euen ingage and binde your Grace to be couragious and zealous for it God hath committed his truth Gospell to your trust and hath giuen it you in charge to propagate and defend it God and our Gratious Soueraigne haue committed the care and custodie of this our Church to your charge and they haue giuen you more ability and power and so more cause for to defend the truth and doctrine that is established and setled in it then to other men and therefore they will require and expect from your Grace to whom so much is committed much more then they can or will from any other O therefore as you tender the glory and honour of the God of heauen the defence of Christ and of his cause and Gospell the
the Scriptures and if thou wilt but weigh them with a iudicious and impartiall eye thou shalt finde them so disioynted so incongruous so indigestlie so idle and absurd so full of inconsequies and grosse Nonsequiturs so palpably miscollected and incongruously wrested and extorted from the places which are cited for to warrant them that thou canst not choose but wonder at the injudiciousnesse and weaknesse of such as doe produce them For mine owne part I wonder how any that make a vaunt or shew of judgement wit or learning can be so strangely besotted and so much ouer-seene as to build a point of faith and doctrine vpon such slender and injuditious collections and grounds as these and to oppose a manifest and vndeniable truth with these weake childish absurd incongruous injudicious and ridiculous arguments and collections which children and schoole-boyes would blush to vrge Certainly if it were not that some of this sect haue a name of learning wit and judgement in the world I should thinke them very illiterate and simple very childish sottish and injudicious to produce such strange collections arguments and conceits as these against so euident and cleere a truth But what shall I say God himselfe hath besoâ—…ted them with these vaine delusions hee hath giuen them ouer to a reprobate and iniuditious sence to beleeue those lies and fancies of their owne because they would not receiue the loue of the truth and submit their wills and judgements to his word and hence it is that they are not ashamed to broach these vaine conceites these false collections and injuditious if not absurd and ridiculous arguments which they themselues would scoffe at deride and vtterly disclaime if they were in their right sences and had not their faces steeled with impudencie and boldnesse I mention this but as an Item on the by I now proceed to the insuing arguments The twentyfourth argument which may be produced against mee is that which is the very ground the very head roote and fountaine of this damnable and pernitious Error of the finall and totall Apostacie of the Saints and it is onely this A true regenerate Saint of God may commit a grosse and vnknowne sinne and dye before hee hath particularly repented of it Therefore he may fall away both finally and totally from the state of grace For answer to this grand and vnanswerable objection as our Antagonists repute it I shall deny the argument for the inconsequencie of it Now that this argument followes not it is euident by these insuing reasons First because it requires a particular and actuall repentance after euery knowen and grosse sinne that a true member of Christ commits as absolutely necessary to saluation which if I should admit it would necessarily follow that no man could bee saued First because that there is no man whatsoeuer that can particularly repent of all those particular and mortall sins which he hath committed from time to time Secondly because the most righteous men in the world doe no doubt commit some actuall and deadly sin or other in thought word and deed betweene the last minute instant of their death and their last actuall repentance of which sins they haue no time and space particularly to repent if therefore an actuall repentance were absolutely required after euery particular act of sinne that a child of God commitâ—… it would bee then impossible for any to bee saued a desperate and dismall consequent which would make the very stoutest of our Antagonists to quake and tremble if it were admitted to bee true as they pretend it for to bee Secondly this argument followes not because it would either bring in that Popish distinction of veniall and mortall sinnes when à s the least sinnes that any man can commit as idle words and thoughts are mortall and deadly in their owne proper nature as appeares by Deut. 27. 26. Ier. 17 9. Ezech. 18. 20. Math. 5. 28. cap. 12. 37 38. Acts 8. 22. Gal. 3. 10. and Ephes. 5. 3 7. Or else it would make euery sinne yea the very least sinne that a regenerate man commits to seuer and cut him off from Christ and to cast him downe from the state of grace For if any mortall sinne whatsoeuer may cut a man off from Christ and cast him downe from the state of grace as you affirme it may why then should not euery sinne doe it as well as any sinne Euery sin is alike mortall in it felfe and in its owne nature and therefore euery sinne as well ac any sinne should cut a man off from Christ and cast him downe from the state of grace That which makes any sinne to cut a man off from Christ is onely this that it is a mortall sinne now euery sinne is a like mortall in its owne essence and nature therefore euery sinne should cut a man off from Christ as well as any sinne where there is the same cause there must needes be the same effect Now you your selues doe grant that euery sinne which a Saint of God commits doth not seuer and cut him off from Christ and if it were not so in were impossible for any to be ingrafted into Christ or to be saued for before he could repent him of one sinne he would still commit another which would hinder his inscition into Christ and his inuesting into the state of grace his sinnes would come so fast and thicke vpon him that hee could neuer be ingrafted into Christ againe and so he could not be saued If therefore any deadly sinne that a Saint commits doth not seuer him from Christ and cast him downe from the state of grace then no sinne at all can doe it because all sinnes are alike mortall in their owne nature and so your argument doth not follow Thirdly this argument followes not because it would make the sinnes of regenerate men vtterly to abolish and roote out that immortall seede of grace which is planted in their hearts make them liable to eternall condemnation which cannot be For Saint Iohn doth certifie vs in expresse words in the 1 Iohn 3. 9. that whosoeuer is borne of God doth not commit sinne for his feede remaineth in him neither can bee sinne bâ—…cause bee is borne of God that is hee cannot sin vnto death or to extirpate that seede of grace which is within him The seed of grace is an incorruptible and immortall seed 1 Pet. 1. 23. therefore no sinnes which the Saints of God commit can suffocate or quite extinguish it True it is that the sinnes of Gods children may crosse hinder and in part suppresse the acts and fruites the increase and growth of grace for a time but yet they cannot quell nor quite extirpate that habit and seed of grace which is within them they cannot make them not to bee the sons of God the members of Christ or the elect of God and therefore the argument followes not Fourthly the argument followes not because it would make repentance to be
can haue any benefit or aduantage by them but when once the condition on our parts is in truth performed by God who workes it for vs then the promises and the things promised are our owne for euer without any further condition This we may see in these three seuerall promises of God Hee that repenteth hee that beleeueth hee that receiueth Iesus Christ shall be saued and shall not come into condemnation Marke 16 16. Iohn 1 12. cap. 3 17 18. cap. 5 24. Acts 2 37 38 39. cap. 3 19. and cap. 16. 30 31. Here it is true that these promises being conditionall and requiring something on our parts before wee shall inioy them wee by the assistance and helpe of God must first truly repent beleiue and receiue Iesus Christ before we shall be saued and freed from condemnation but when we haue once truly repented belieued and receiued Iesus Christ then we are saued and freed from condemnation for euer Now in these three generall promises I would haue you to obserue these two things which make much for my present purpose First that these three promises are the originall charters and assurances that giue vs interest right and title vnto heauen and eternall life and that all these other promises which belong vnto vs after we haue truly belieued repented and receiued Iesus Christ giue vs no new interest right and title to heauen and eternall life but onely serue for to confirme and strengthen that interest right and title to which wee had in them before by these three generall promises that so wee may inioy them with greater comfort and assurance I cannot better expresse it then by this similitude A man hath lands demised to him by a fine or by a deed indented and inrolled or some such originall conuaiance these very originall deedes without any other assurance doe giue him a full perfect and absolute right and interest in those lands Suppose now that after this deuise the party that sold those lands should make a generall release or confirmation of those lands vnto the party to whom they were deuised this release or confirmation giues him no new right or interest in these lands but onely serues to strengthen and confirme the old which was sure and safe enough before So it is heare these three originall promises when once wee doe truly beleiue repent and receiue Christ Iesus they are the originall charters that giue vs a full sure and perfect interest right and title to heauen and eternall life and all these other promises which God makes vnto vs either for himselfe or vs when once we are within the couenant and state of grace serue onely to strengthen and confirme our ancient interest right and title vnto heauen which was sure and safe before they giue vs no new interest right and title to it So that if a man doe but once truly beleiue repent and receiue Christ Iesus this makes him sure of heauen and eternall life though hee had no other promises to assure him but these Secondly obserue that saluation heauen and eternall life in these three radicall and originall promises are suspended onely and depend meerely vpon the performance of the conditions themselues and not vpon the perpetuall and continuall performance of them God doth not say if ye beleiue and beleiue for euer if yee repent and repent for euer if yee receiue Iesus Christ and receiue him for euer yee shall bee saued and haue euerlasting life no there is no such matter in the promises but if wee truly beleiue if we doe truly repent and receiue Christ Jesus in the sinceritie of our hearts though it be but once wee shall be saued and haue euerlasting life because that hee that doth truly beleiue truly repent and receiue Christ Iesus but once doth belieue repent and receiue Christ Iesus for euer he is passed from death to life for euer and shall not come into condemnation Iohn 5 24. Rom 8 1 2. and Marke 16. 16. Suppose a man should promise another an hundred pounds vpon condition that hee should marry his daughter or publikely recant those iniuries which he had done vnto him if there he doth marry his daughter but once or recant those iniuries in publike but once though hee doe not reitterate them hee shail haue the hundred pound because hee hath performed the condition So when as God doth promise vs saluation heauen and eternall life if we belieue râ—…pent and receiue Christ Iesus in sinceritie and in truth if once wee doe but truly beleiue repent and receiue Christ Iesus wee shall certainly be saued and haue heauen and euerlasting life because the condition on which these are suspended is performed I would aske but this question of any of our Antagonists whether any man may not safely make this argument with himselfe Euery one that doth truly belieue repent and receiue Christ Iesus shall be saued and haue euerlasting life But I my selfe do truly belieue repent and receiue Christ Iesus therefore I shall bee saued and haue euerlasting life If this be not a good argument then what benefit comfort or assurance can any Christian take from these or any other promises of the Gospell what claime interest or title can he lay to saluation heauen or eternall life or to what end doe these promises serue If it be a good argument as I thinke none can deny it then certainly heauen saluation and eternall life depend onely vpon the faith and repentance of men and their receiuing of Iesus Christ without any necessary relation to any inclusiue condition if they perseuere withall for he that doth but once truly beleiue repent and receiue Christ Iesus doth beleiue repent and receiue Christ for euer Certainly as Christ himselfe by dying vnto sinne but once is become the authour of eternall saluation to all truly penitent and beleiuing sinners and being raised from the dead dieth no more death hath no more dominion ouer him Rom 6 9 10. Hebr 5 9. cap. 7 27. and cap 9 25 28. So he that is but once truly regenerated and aliue to God through Iesus Christ our Lord dieth no more death hath no more dominion ouer him but he shall liue for euer vnto God and shall not come into condemnation Rom 6 7 to 12 Iohn 5 24. Rom 8 2. 1 Iohn 3 9 14. and Hebr 10 2. how then can he euer finally or â—…otally fall from grace Let all the deuils in hell or men in earth lay their heades together they shall neuer with all their wit and sophistrie delude or ouerthrow this plaine and pregnant truth Againe there are a second sort of promises which are proper peculiar only to those which are in truth regenerated and within the couenant and state of grace of which sort the greater part of all the promises which I haue formerly cited are which promises I haue proued giue them no new interest right or title vnto heauen and eternall life but onely serue to ratifie and confirme that
comfortable delectable and glorious This is the ordinarie and constant method and manner of the working of Gods spirit in the hearts and soules of all such as are once truly regenerated the very Spirit of God assures their soules and consciences that God will alwayes loue them and preserue them vnâ—…o the end that hee will never suffer them wholly to depart or stray from him that hee will giue them perseuerance and cause them to hold out constantly vnto the end The spirit of God himselfe doth secretly powerfully and fully resolue and satisfie their soules and consciences that they shall neuer returne vnto their sinâ—… againe or fall finally or totally from him Therefore those who are sound growne and experienced Christians can neuer be perswaded to beleeue that they shall ever appostatize and fall quite away from God or grace because the spirit of God doth so powerfully perswade them and resolue them to the contrary Wherefore I dare bee bold for to avouch this for truth that those who hold thee fiuall and totall Apostacie of the Saints did neuer so much as feele the powerfull sweete and comfortable working of Gods spirit in their hearts which would haue fully resolved them to the contrary Carnall men who haue never felt the sweet and comfortable working of Gods spirit in their hearts and soules may chance to call this holy truth into question because the spirit of God did neuer seale it to their soules or fixe and stampe it on their hearts But regenerate and â—…oly men can neuer doe that because the Spirit of God doth witnesse to their spirits that they are the sons of God and that they shall continue such vnto the end so that all the divells in hell cannot perswade them to the contrary From hence therefore I doe collect this experimentall sensible and vnanswerable argument which though it be a meere Mysterie and Riddle vnto naturall and carnall men who cannot perceiue these holy operations of Gods spirit because they are spiritually discâ—…rned and are knowne and discovered to be true onely by an inward experience sensâ—… and feeling and not by any outward knowledge learning Science or Discourse whatsoever Yet the hearts and consciences of all experienced and grounded Christians must willingly subscribe and yeeld vnto it That which the inward working and secret operation of Gods holy Spirit doth powerfully evidently and vndeniablie seale and ratifie vnto the hearts soules and consciences of all experienced growne and syncere Christians that must needs bee a sure firme and infallible truth But the spirit of God by the inward and secret operation of it doth powerfully evidently and vndeniably seale and ratifie vnto the hearts soules and consciences of all experienced growne and syncere Christians that they shall neither finally nor totally fall from grace And therefore it must needs be true For proofe of the minor proposition I onely appeale vnto the soules and consciences of growne strong and aged Christians who haue had long and sweet experience of the sweet working of Gods spirit in their hearts And for the Maior no man can deny it vnlesse hee will make the working of Gods spirit in the hearts of his Saints to bee but a meere imposture and delusion which is blasphemous for to thinke Wherefore I doubt not but that these foâ—…r last arguments here produced will bee so prevalent and irresistable in the hearts of all experienced and growne Christians who are onely able to discerne and iudge of them that they cannot but subscribe to this assertion and imbrace it as the truth The sixt thing in the spirit of God which may establish vs in this present truth is the perpetâ—…all guidance and direction of Gods spirit from which I frame this sixt argument Those that are alwayes led guided and directed by the spirit of God those that walke not after the flesh but after the spirit and are so ouer-ruled and mastered by the spirit that they cannot fulfill the lusts of the flesh and doe the euill that they would it is impossible for them either â—…inally or totally to fall from grace But all those who are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ are alwayes led guided and directed by the Spirit of God Exek 36. 27. I will put my spirit within you and cause you to walke in my statutes and yee shall keepe my iudgements and doe them Rom. 8. 14. As many as are led by the spirit of God they are the sonnes of God Psal. 48. 14. For this is our God for euer and euer hee will be our guide euen vnto death Io. 16. 13. When the Spirit of truth is come it guides you into aâ—… truth They walke not after the flesh but after the spirit Rom. 8. 1. And they are so ouer-ruled and mastered by the Spirit that they cannot doe the euill that they would Gal. 5. 16. 17. This I say then walke in the spirit and yee shall not fulfill the lusts of the flesh for the flesh lusteth against the spirit and the â—…pirit against the flesh and these are contrary the one to the other so that yee cannot doe the things yee would the Spirit of God doth cause them to walke in his 〈◊〉 and to keepe his iudgements and doe them they cannot chuse but doe them Ezek. 36. 27. and Act. 4. 20. Therefore it is impossible for them either finally or totally to fall from grace Lastly the intercession and assistance of Gods spirit may ground and settle vs in this present truth For the spirit of God when wee are vnable of our selues to pray in that manner as wee ought doth alwayes helpe our informities and makes intercession vnto God for vs with gronings which cannot bee vttered and hee who searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mindâ—… of the spirit because hee maketh intercession for the Saints according to the will of God Rom. 8. 26 27. When wee are weake dull and dead and quite indisposed vnto holy duties then doth the holy Ghost helpe and quicken vs and enable vs to performe them in a gratious comfortable and holy manner whence I conclude with this argument Those whom the spirit of God doâ—…h alwayes make intercession for and those â—…hom the holy Ghost doth alwayes assist in the performance of euery holy dutie it is impossible for them to fall from grace But the spirit of God doth alwayes make intercession to God for those that are truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ and doth alwayes assist them in the pâ—…rformance of euery holy dutie Therefore it is altogether impossible for them to fall from grace And thus you see how true this Doctrine and position must needs bee true in respect of the holy Ghost himselfe Fourthly it is altogether impossible for the Saints of God that are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ either totally or finally to fall from grace in respect of the Angels who doe alwayes gard them and attend them from which I forme this argument Those about
for to hinder it Wherefore since true and sauing Grace is of a permanent perpetuall immortall incorruptible perseuering growing and increasing nature it is impossible for those that haue this Grace as all those who are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ must needs haue it or else they were neuer truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ either finally or totally to fall from it againe euen in respect of the very nature of Grace it sâ—…lfe Lastly it is altogether impossible for such as are once truly regenerated and ingrafted into Christ either finally or totally to fall from grace in respect of the many dangerous consequents which else would ineuitablie follow vpon the contrary and that both in respect of the Trinity in respect of the true Saints of God in respect of grace and in respect of the Church of God in generall but specially of our Church of England First these dangerous consequents would follow euen in respect of the Trinitie and Dietie it selfe For first it would deâ—…ogate from the honour of the Trinitie What greater dishonour could there be vnto the whole Trinitie What greater dishonour to Father Sonne and holy Ghost then this that they should suffer any of those Saints whom they haue chosen for themselues and vndertaken to preserue and keepe to â—…all from grace â—…hat they should begin to build the fabricke of grace in men and yet be vnwilling or vnable for to make an end that they should make so many absolute couenants and promises to preserue and keepe the Saints from falling and not performe their words that they should giue true grace to men and yet repent them of these gifts and take them quite away that they should owne such for their followers their seruants and attendants their children and their friends as should disgrace them by their falls and bring a scandall vpon the profession of their names What would Atheists what would Heathens say if they should heare of this position that the true Saints of God may apostacie and fall away from grace would they not say that it were farre better to haue no God at all that it were farre better to haue an Idoll God then such a God as this as either will not or cannot keepe his Saints from falling from him Certainely this very Doctrine of the Apostacy of the Saints dishonours all the Trinitie in all their sacred and most glorious attributes yea it depriues God of his Dietie it puls him from his throane and sets vp man aboue him it makes God to be no God at all or at least to be no better then an Idoll or an idle God Wherefore in respect of this dishonor which elâ—…e would light vpon the whole Trinitie this Doctrine of the perseuerance of the Saints must needes be true Secondly if the true regenerate Saints of God might Apostatize and fall away from grace it would derogate much from the word and promise of God and Christ. For they haue promised to preserue all such as are once truly regenerated and to keepe them from falling they haue promised that their graces shall not faile that they will giue them perseuerance to the end that they will finish the worke of grace begun within them that they will preserue them blamelesse to the day of Christ and keepe them so that they shall neuer perish but haue euerlasting life as I haue pâ—…oued at large before If then the Saints of God might either finally or totally â—…ll from grace where then were the truth of God and Christ where were the performance of their word and promises wee might then say that all these promises of God were but false and counterfeite and so we should make God and Christ no better then the Diuell himselfe who is a lyar and the father of lyes Iohn 8. 44. Yea I may boldly say that this assertion of the Apostacie of the Saints would quite ouerthrow the whole frame and fabricke of the word of God For take the whole Scripture from the beginning to the very end of it the whole frame and fabricke of it serues to no other end and purpose but to take away all from man in matters of grace and to attribute all to God that so he only and not man might haue the praise and glory of all Now this assertion of the Apostacie of the Saints it takes all away from God and attributes all to man that so man might glory in himselfe onely and not in the Lord. It giues a man free will to reiect or receiue grace at the first and it giues him full power and ability to reiect or to retaine grace after hee hath receiued it it takes away Gods prouidence kingdome soueraigntie and power ouer man it exempts man wholly from his jurisdiction it makes man an absolute creature it makes him a God and Lord ouer himselfe whereas the Scripture dorh take man of from his owne legges and subiects him wholly vnto God in whose hands his life his thoughts his will his waies and all his actions are and so it dissolues and ouerturnes the whole frame and fabricke of the Scriptures and strikes at the very foundation and roote of all religion Wherefore this Doctrine of the Apostacy of the Saints can neuer be admitted to bee tâ—…ue euen in this respect and so my present assertion must be sound and orthodox Thirdly if the true regenerate Saints of God might fall quite away from the state of grace it would derogate much from the great goodnesse and the infinite mercy and loue of God vnto his children For if those Saints of God might fall quite away from grace where then were the exceeding riches of Gods mercy where were the gratiousnesse and infinite goodnesse of his nature where were the freenesse the constancy and vnchangablenesse of his loue If you obiect that the fault is not in the loue of God to them but in their want of loue to him I answere first that Gods loue to them is free and voluntary Hosea 14. 5. I will loue them freely therefore if God should quite withdraw his loue from them for their disobedience vnto him this freenesse of Gods loue would be much tainted and blemished and the breach would light on God Secondly Gods loue to them is the cause of their loue to him 〈◊〉 Iohn 4. 10. 19. and it is the loue mercy of God which should preserue and keepe the saints in obedience loyalty and subiection vnto him yea God himselfe hath promised to preserue their whole spirit soule and body blamelesse vnto the comming of our Lord Jesus Christ. 1 Thâ—…s 5. 23 24. If therefore God should suffer them to sin against him and so to incurre his displeasure whereas hee hath vndertaken to preserue them blamelesse vnto the comming of Iesus Christ the breach must bee first on Gods part in suffering them to sinne and not on theirs who hath no power of their owne without the power and ayde of God to keepe themselues from sinne
time for to suruey them or hauing an higher conceite of other mens learning then his owne he trusted vnto their quotations and thence he was deceiued And this is not vnlikly For I finde all M. Mountagues quotations one only excepted to wit that of Clement in his constitutions recorded verbatim by that famous Arminian Bertius in his booke de Apostatia sanctorum neither are they to be found in any mans works but his Indeed Mr. Mountague in his Gagge cap. 20 would make the world beleeue that he did quote his Fathers not out of their owne workes but out of Bucer and other Protestant Diuines but to tell you the truth these quotations are not to be found in Bucer or in any other Protestant Diuine but only in that infamous and arch Arminian Peter Bertius out of whom Mr. Mountague hath transcribed them verbatim Only herein is the difference Bertius hath recorded these quotations in Latine Mr. Mountague hath translated some of them verbatim into English Bertius he cites many sentences and more Fathers then Mr. Mountague doth who hath culled out the eminentest and choycest of them And because all the world shall know that I wrong not Mr. Mountague I will compare his quotations and Bertius his quotations together Mr. Mountague in his Gagge pag. 165. 166. quotes Ignatius the ancientest Father this day extant the selfe-same quotation you shall finde in Bertius in his Apostatia Sanctorum pag. 90. Mr. Mountague quotes Tertullian de Prescript cap. 3. Gagge pag. 166. 167. So doth Bertius in the selfe-same words pa 96. So he quotes Cyprian Epist. 7. Gagge 167. So doth Bertius pag. 98. So hee quotes Nazianzen Gagge 168. So doth Bertius in the same words pag. 99. 100. So hee quotes Hierome lib. 2. advers Pelagianos Gagge 168 the selfe-same quotation you shall finde in Bertius pag. 100. So he quotes St. Gregory lib. 6. in 1 Regum you shall finde the same in Bertius pag. 103. So hee quotes St. Augustine de corrept Gratia cap. 13. Gagge 168. Apeale 27. for the booke de bono Persue and lib. 11. de Ciu. Dei cap. 12. Appeale 27. the selfe-same quotations are in Bertius pag. 102. and in Bellarmine lib. 3. de Iustif. cap 14. So hee quotes Prosper resp 7. ad cap. Gallorum Appeale 2â—… you shall finde the selfe-same words and quotation in Bertius pag. 102. so he quotes Cyprian de vnitate Ecclesiae Athanasius lib. 4. cont Arrian Basil epist ad Chilonem in the margent Appeale 36. The selfe-same quotations are in Bertius pag. 97. 98. 99. Thus hath our lëarned Mr. Mountague who vaunts so much of his skill and knowledge in the Fathers transcribed them verbatim out of Bertius Nay I will say more he hath transcribed all he hath touching this point of falling from grace either in his Gagge or in his Appeale yea his very argument from our 16. Article out of Bertius let him disproue it if he can and therefore it is no meruaile that Mr. Mountague avoucheth the totall and finall Apostacy of the Saints to bee the Tenet of Antiquitie of the Protestants in Germany and of the Church of England because that Bertius saith so to out of whom he did transcribe it But whether Mr. Mountague bee an honest innocent and harmelesse man and one that seekes only the peace of the Church in dealing thus I leaue it vnto others for to judge I come now to giue a short answer to these Fathers which Mr. Mountague hath cited out of Bertius As for Clement and Ignatius there is a great question whether they are spurious and abortiue yea or no and most Protestant Diuines not without good cause thinke them to be meere forgeries and so their authorities are but little worth But admit them to bee true yet they proue nothing against vs. For that of Ignatius that one and the same man is sometimes the childe of God and againe the childe of the diuell is no more but this in substanee that the childe of God doth sometimes fall into sinne and so in the judgement and repute of men is sometimes the childe of God and at other times the childe of the diuell but not in Gods esteeme if you reade the place you shall finde this to bee the meaning as for the other places they are impertinent and need no answer As for that of Clement it is nothing to the purpose for hee saith not that the holy Spirit is wholly deuided from any man that euer had it but if hee bee diuided hee leaueth them destitute c. That of Tertullian if you reade all the chapter is expresse for vs for it is no more in briefe then this that hypocrites fall away from God but such as are truly regenerated doe still continue with him That of Cyprian is no more then this that men must vse the meanes to preserue their graces That of Nazianzen is no more then this the ordinary and common gifts of Gods Spirit as prophecie and a royall minde may bee lost That of Hierome and Gregorie is only this in substance that wee cannot know whether other men shall perseuere because we know not their estates and therefore wee cannot call them happy before their death The Epistle of Basil ad Chilonem is but a meere exhortation to perseuerance there is not one word in it that a regenerate man may fall from grace That of Prosper is spoken only of such as were regenerated in shew and not in truth and so is that of Augustine de bono Perseu cap. 13. That of Augustine de Ciui dei Is nothing to purpose for he saith not that all the Saints of God doe not perseuere but that all of them know not certainly whether they shall perseuere that is they are not certaine of their perseuerance with the certainty of knowledge but yet they are sure of it with the certainty of faith as the Protestants in the Disputation of Ratishon pag. 511. haue expounded it So that all which these Fathers say proues nothing at all against mee if it be well examined and if Bertius or Mr. Mountague had dealt ingeniously and not cited the Fathers by peece-meale the very places which they alledge would either not make for them or else make against them Well then to end this controuersie I dare defend it against any man that either all or at least most of the Fathers are expresse and strongly for vs let these their testimonies which I haue cited out of their owne records and not at the second hand determine it and this I will say withall that there is neuer a Father which being rightly vnderstood doth make any jot against vs. Wherefore seeing that this totall and finall Apostacie of the Saints is but an vpstart doctrine among vs quite contrary to the whole streame and current of the Fathers I will conclude with that golden rule and saying of an ancient Father Vincentius Lerinensis by name who flourished about the yeare of our Lord
comfort from them that feele the wrath of God and that this Error is euidently confuted by these words Being justified by faith wee haue peace with God Also therefore is righteousnesse of faith that it might be sure Therefore it aduiseth vs to lay hold on this sweet comfort that the Sonne of God is the keeper of his Church as he saith Iohn 10. No man shall take my sheepe out of my hands Hee doth protect vs and also by his holy Spirit doth confirme our mindes to true opinions as hee doth begin eternall life so doth hee kindle in our hearts good motions faith the loue of God true inuocation hope chastitie and other vertues Through the Sonne of God wee are deliuered from eternall death and translated into eternall life as hee saith I giue vnto them eternall life and hee that hath the Sonne hath life And let hope be firme and sure as Peter saith hope perfectly that is looke for eternall life not with doubtfull opinion The famous Augustane confession confirmed and ratified by all the Protestant Princes States and Churches of Germany Anno Dom. 1530. in the 3. Article concurreth with vs for saith the Article Christ doth sanctifie all those that beleeue on him by sending the holy Ghost into their hearts who doth gouerne comfort and quicken them and defend them against the diuell and the force of sinne If against the Diuell and the force of sinne then nothing can cast them downe from the state of grace If you object that the 12. Article of this famous Confession doth condemne the Anabaptists who deny that such who are once iustified can loose the holy Ghost and therefore by the voyce of this confession those who are once justified may fall from grace I answer that the Protestant Diuines in Germany who were at the making of this Article and those who haue liued since did neuer expound or intend it in this sense that a man once iustified might fall away from grace either totally or finally but they condemned this Tenet of the Anabaptists in that sense as they defended it For this was the opinion of the Anabaptists That when once a man was regenerated and had obtained the holy Ghost and was made a true beleeuer that sin could not hurt him and therefore they would tell men that if they did beleeue let them doe what they would or commit what sinne they would it could not hurt them for faith would blot out all those sinnes which was the Error of the Valentinians as Irenaeus hath recorded it Now in this sense only doth this confession condemne the Anabaptists and in no other and so did the Lutherans before them as you may reade in Articulis Smalcandicis Article 3. composed by Luther himselfe which you shall finde in Lutherana Concordia pag. 310. Now the reason yeelded by the Lutherans why they condemne this Error of the Anabaptists in their third Article will fully proue that the true regenerate Saints of God can neuer fall from grace Forsay they the Saints of God doe alwayes grieue and repent for their sinnes groaning vnder the burthen of them and they alwayes striue against them Theresore those that voluntary rush into sinne whether it be adultery murther or blasphemie must needes shake off faith and the holy Ghost and faith and the holy Ghost must needes depart from them For the holy Ghost doth nener suffer sinne to reigne to get strength or to obtaine the victory and to be perfected but hee doth represse and curbe it that so it might not doe the thing it would But if it doth what it would certainly the holy Ghost and faith are lost neither are they present For so saith Iohn hee that is borne of God doth not sinne neither can hee sinne So that both the Augustane Confession and the Article of Smalcard are both for me and not against me being rightly vnderstood The Augustane Confession composed by the Argentine Church and confirmed by their Senate Anno dom 1539. concurreth with vs For these are the words of their 7. Article This sole and only mediator hath taken away our sins and reconciled vs to his Father hee hath impetrated the holy Ghost for all those whom his Father hath giuen him and which heare his voyce This regeneration together with all Christs merits the holy Ghost doth inspire into the hearts of all the faithfull and preserue them in them to the end All these Confessions of the Protestants in Germanie and else-where are expresse for me let Mr. Mountague now shew mee any to the contrarie But you will tell mee now that Mr. Mountague records it That all the Protestants of Germanie haue concluded against mee and consented to the Church of Rome in the Diot of Ratisbon Vpon those grounds and reasons which he there mentions True it is that Mr. Mountague hath so recorded it but his records are so false in euery thing that he must haue a strong faith that will beleeue them without examination of the truth of them For my owne part I haue read the disputation of Ralisbon set out by Bucer himselfe Anno dom 1548. and I can finde no such thing as Mr. Mountague relates in it For first this question of a totall finall fall from grace was not so much as controuerted there neither are there any of those Scriptures grounds and Fathers which Mr. Mountague hath recorded in his Gagge or in his Appeale only that place of Phil. 2. 12. and of St. Augustine de Ciuit Dei lib. 11. cap. 12. excepted so much as mentioned in all that disputation and these two quotations are cited by Steuen Bishop of Winchester who did oppose the Protestants in that Disputation and not by Bucer and the other Protestants there present How then could the Protestants of Germanie yeeld to that position in this Diot which was not drawne into question there Indeed the question of the certainty of saluation was there controuerted and discussed and by the vnanimous consent of all the Protestants resolued and determined against Maluenda Billickius and the Bishop of Winchester who did oppose it and in the resolution and determination of this Controuersie if you will beleeue learned Zanchius in his Confession to the Senate of Argentine in this our point De perseuerantia sanctorum or the Disputation of Ratisbone it selfe our very assertion though it were not there particularly controuerted was yet de claro resolued for vs in this famous Diot in the name of all the Protestants in Germanie For in the Disputation of Ratisbon or Ralisbon pag. 41. Respons ad Replic 14. This is the expresse Resolution of all the Protestants in that Diot That true faith and a sinne that wastes the conscience are incompatible and that hee which liues by a true iustifying faith can neuer sticke in such a sinne So pag. 243. to 251. they proceed to proue this assertion and conclusion For say they those who haue this iustifying
Rom. 14. 13. verse 20. is no more in substance and sense but this That stronger Christians must so much respect the weaker as that they must not giue them any just occasion of scandall or offence to wound and vexe their consciences to breed any sâ—…rupels or doubts in them to weaken their loue to God to discourage them in the practise of religion or to prouoke them vnto any sinne and not that scandals can make weake Christians in whom there is any truth of grace begun to Apostatize or to renounce the faith or to fall finally or totally from grace for this these scandals cannot do they cannot cause any of the true sheepe of Christ any that truly feare the Lord or belong vnto the â—…old of Christ to fall from grace or to depart from God and perish Iohn 10. 28. Ier. 32. 40. and 1 Iohn 2. 19. To answer this obiection in a word I answer that there is a double perishing the one in respect of such as giue the scandall and offence the other in respect of such as doe receiue it A weake brother may vtterly perish in respect of those that giue the scandall and offence that is they may doe as much as in them lies to cause him for to perish and to renounce the faith and therefore God will take it as ill at their hands as if hee had actually perished for it is onely Gods mercie which supports him and not their scandall that offends him that keepes him from Apostacie therefore God is as much offended with them as if they had perished in good earnest But yet such a brother doth neuer actually perish in respect of himselfe he doth neuer actually Apostatize and fall from grace This place proues on ely that hee may perish in respect of him that giues the offence but yet not actually in respect of himselfe and therefore it makes not against me The fifteenth obiection is that of the 1 Tim. 5. 11 12. The yonger widowes refuse for when they haue begun to waxe wanton they will marry hauing damnation because they haue cast off their first faith From whence this argument may be framed Regenerate men may cast off their first faith and so bee damned for it therfore they may fall away from the state of grace To this I answer first that the Antecedent is false and is not warranted by this text For Paul speakes not here of true regenerate men and of such as were really ingrafted into Christ but of young petulant and wanton widowes whose light and vnchast behauiour doth euidently proue that they had no grace or faith at all within them So that your argument hence can be no more but this Young petulant and wanton widowes may fall from grace therefore such as are once truly regenerated may doe so to which is no good consequent Secondly I answer that faith in this place doth not signifie the grace of true justifying and sauing faith but that vow of chastitie and perpetuall widdowhood which widdowes vsed for to make in former times when as they had their vse and place in thâ—… Church of God as appeares by the very sense and scope of the place Againe damnation in his place signifies only blame or reproofe or an Ecclesiasticall censure or punishment as excommunication or the like which was vsed to be inflicted vpon delinquents in this kinde and not eternall condemnation of soule and body in hell or the state of damnation So that the true and proper sense of the place is no more but this Widdowes that breake the vow of chastity either by marrying againe or by incontinency are to bee blamed and censured by the Church for breach of this their vow because they are an occasion of scandall and reproach vnto the Church What maket this to a totall or finall fall from grace Surely nothing at all and therefore I passe it ouer without any further answer The sixteenth objection is this A man man receiue the grace of God in vaine and beleeue in vaine as appeares by the 2 Cor. 6. 1. and 1 Cor. 15. 2. Therefore hee may fall from the state of grace I answer first that if you take the grace of God for the habituall graces of Gods Spirit and beleife for true and sauing faith then the Antecedent is false and is not warranted by these places of Scripture which are quoted but if you take grace for the word of grace and the offer of Christ to men in the Gospell and beliefe for an historicall and common faith as they are taken here by the Apostle then the argument is false and followes not Now that this place of Paul is meant onely of the word of grace and of the offer of grace to men in the Gospell and not of the habituall graces of Gods Spirit it appeares by the coherence and dependancie of the 2 Cor. 6. 1. vpon the 2 Cor. 5. 19 20. God hath committed vnto vs the word of reconciliation Now then wee are ambassadors for Christ as though God did bee seech you by vs wee pray you in Christs steed bee yee reconciled to God wee then as workers together with him befeech you also that yee receiue not the grace of God in vaine which proues that this is onely meant of the offer of grace and Christ to men and not of the habit and seed of grace it selfe So that your argument from hence can bee no more but this Men may heare the word of God in vaine therefore the true regenerate Saints of God may fall from the state of grace a strange in consequent For that of the 1 Cor. 15. 2. vnlesse yee haue beleeued in vaine it is not meant of a true liuing sauing and justifying faith but of an historicoll fruitlesse dead and in-effectuall faith or beliefe which did neuer truly regenerate transforme the heart and soule of those who did injoy it This doth fully appeareby the opposition Antithesis in the samâ—… verse By which yee are saued vnlesse yee haue beleeued in vaine so that sauing faith is here put in opposition to this vaine beliefe which proues that this vaine beliefe was no true and ustifying faith So that your argument from hence must be this Men may loose a vaine and ineffectuall faith therefore the true regenerate Saints of God may fall from the seeds and habit of true justifying faith Secondly I answer that these two places proue nothing for your conclusion admitting that they were meant of true habituall grace and faith for the one of them is but a meere exhortation the other a bare exception and condition neither of them is absolute and positiue So that your argument from them can bee but this The Saints of God are exhorted not to receiue the grace of God in vaine and they shall bee saued vnlesse they beleeue in vaine therefore they may fall away from grace which is but an idle consequence and rather deserues to be derided then answered So that this objection doth
nothing impeach the truth of this our assertion The seuenteenth obiection against this present assertion is drawne and collected from Psal. 27. 9. 11. Psal. 51. 11. Psal. 71. 9. and from other places and prayers of this nature and it is but this in substance The regenerate Saints of God doe alwaies pray to God not to hide his face from them not to put them away in his anger not to leaue them nor forsake them not to cast them off at last nor to take away his holy Spirit from them Therefore they may fall from grace or else these prayers would bee but vaine and idle I answer that the argument followes not and the reason which you alledge for to confirme it is but friuilous First because that prayer is a chiefe meanes to preserue the Saints of God from Apostacie and backsliding and to confirme and settle them in the state of grace therefore the vse of prayer cannot imply a falling from grace This is no good argument The Saints of God do vse the meanes to peâ—…seuere therefore they may fall from grace because the Saints cannot perseuere in grace but by vsing of the meanes and the vse of the meanes is the cause of perseuerance not of Apostacie this is your argument in effect The Saints of God doe vse prayer to God which is a meanes of perseuerance therefore they may fall from grace What a ridiculous and absurd argument this is let all men judge The perpetuall care of God ouer his Saints his euerlasting loue towards them his continuall presence with them together with the guidance and direction of his Spirit are the chiefest causes why the Saints of God do thus perseuere in grace which though God hath promised vnto them freely and will be sure to make them good vnto them yet hee will haue them for to pray vnto him for the accomplishment and performance of them that so they may bee thankfull to him for them that so they may prise them at an higher rate and ascribe the glory of them vnto him Therefore their prayers vnto God to haue these promises accomplished and made good vnto them cannot imply a finall or a totall fall from grace Secondly The argument followes not nor yet the reason which is alledged because it makes the promises of God vncertaine euen in respect of God himselfe God hath promised not to leaue nor yet forsake his children Deut. 31 5. Iosh. 1. 5. 1 Sam. 12. 22. and Heb. 13. 6. hee hath promised them not to cast them off Iob. 8. 20. Isay. 41. 9. 1 Sam. 12. 22. and Iohn 6. 37. and that his spirit shall abide with them for euer Iohn 14. 16 17. doe their prayers therefore vnto God make these promises of God vncertaine in themselues and doubtfull whether they shall bee performed by that God of truth and faithfulnesse that made them to them God forbid for this would bee nothing else but to make God a lyar and to make him subiect vnto change and ficklenesse in whom there is no variablenesse nor shadow of turning I am 1. 17. I would demand but this question of you who presse this argument whether your praying vnto God for his presence and spirit doe imply that God will not giue them to you If it doth how then can you pray in faith without doubt and waâ—…ering beleeuing that you shall receiue the thing you pray for It is impossible for any man to pray in faith if his prayer vnto God did imply an incertaintie in Gods persormance of the thing hee prayes for and so it should bee impossible for any man to haue any fruite or benefit by his prayers because they are not made in faith So that if this were true your prayers must needes be faithlesse and fruitlesse and all these gratious and comfortable promises of God concerning the hearing and answering of your prayers would bee of no effect or truth If it doth not implie thus much that God will not grant the things you pray for how then will this your Argument follow or stand good If the prayers of the Saints to God not to cast them off not to forsake them or depriue them of his presence or his Spirit doe not implie that God will caâ—…t them off forsake them and withdraw his Spirit from them then you can collect nothing at all against me from these prayers no not so much as a possibilitie of falling from the state of grace Wherefore if you will but recollect your senses and weigh but this your Argument in an vpright ballance you cannot but acknowledge and confesse it to be ridiculous false and idle and nothing to the present purpose The eighteenth objection that may bee made against me is collected from these words of Paul Gal. 5. 4. Christ is become of none effect vnto you who euer of you are iustified by the law ye are fallen from grace The Saints of God may fall from grace in seeking to be justified by the law therefore they may fall away from grace I answer that the Antecedent is not warranted by this place which you alledge for the scope of this place and of this whole Epistle is nothing else but to disswade the Galathians from seeking iustification and righteousnesse by the Law and to seeke justification only by faith in Christ. So that this place alleaged is nothing else but a dehortation and no more in sense then this Those that seeke to be justified by the law shall haue no benefit by the death of Christ and therefore beware how you seeke to be justified by the law What is this to our purpose Surely nothing at all Yea but you will say that the Galathians fell from grace Well I grant it But from what grace was this surely the grace of God offered vnto them in the Gospell or the grace of the Gospell which is not here in question but not the true and sauing graces of Gods Spirit they fell from the doctrine of grace in cleauing to the law not from the Spirit and habit of grace by cleauing vnto sinne The greater part not all the Galathians fell from the Gospell to the law but that the true regenerate Saints of God which were among them did so to that they fell away from the state of Grace this place is not sufficient for to proue it though you racke and wrest it to the vtmost The nineteenth obiection may be drawn from that prayer of Agur. Pro. 30. 8. 9. Giue me neither pouerty nor riches feed me with food conuenient for mee left I be full and denie thee and say who is the Lord or lest I be poore and steale and take the name of God in vaine Plentie or pouertie may make a regenerate man to fall from grace as appeares by this prayer of Agur. therefore regenerate men may fall from grace I answer first that plenty or pouertie may cause regenerate men to fall from grace if God should leaue them to themselues