Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
truth_n believe_v church_n pillar_n 1,678 5 10.0870 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A05364 A consultation what faith and religion is best to be imbraced. Written in Latin by the R. Father Leonard Lessius, Professour in Diuinity, of the Society of Iesus. And translated into English by W.I. Lessius, Leonardus, 1554-1623.; Wright, William, 1563-1639. 1618 (1618) STC 15517; ESTC S105037 99,482 276

There are 6 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

no small matter but euen such as all other things be they good or bad are nothing in comparison therof And this damnation or saluation dependeth of good or bad Religion If thy Religion be good it shall be easy for thee to obtaine saluation but if it be euill it is impossible for thee to be saued By euill or false Religion thou canst not please God Hebr. 11. consequently not obtayne pardon of thy sinnes not true Iustice nor yet by any meanes be made partaker of Christs redemption but remaynest in death and the wrath of God remayneth vpon thee For that all men without the redemption of Christ Rom. 3.4 and liuing againe in him do remayne in death of sinne are the sonnes of wrath but whosoeuer imbraceth not true Religion is made voyd of the Redemption and quickening of Christ wherefore of necessity he must remaine in death and be the sonne of wrath and fewell for eternall fire Furthermore true Religion is only one and not manifold for that there is but one verity one faith Ephes 4. one baptisme one God Lord of all wherof it followeth by consequence First that all Religion all Faith all Confessions of faith besides this only one are false hurtefull pestilent and brought in by the Diuell as author therof and the Father of lyes Secondly no man that hath not this onely Faith can possibly obtaine euerlasting faluation and all that shall be destitute therof although otherwise they liue neuer so well shall infallibly perish eternally 1. Cor. 13. For that which the Appostle saith of charity to wit If I should speake which the tongues of men Angells if I should know all mysteries if I should distr●bute all my goods to be meate for the poore if I should deliuer my body so that I burne and haue not ch●●rity it doth profit me nothing may with better reasō be spoken of true faith religion which is the vary foundatiō of charity and of all other christian vertues Thirdly it is a very grosse errour of certaine simple people that thinke it to be inough to their saluatiō if they belieue in Christ and that he dyed for their sinnes although they belieue not many other things for examples sake those which belong to Sacraments sacrifice of the Church and other such like pointes of faith for so should almost all Sects of beretikes be saued for that all except some few do imbrace Christ or els they should not be heretikes but Apostataes and belieue that he dyed for their sinnes And so by this meanes shal be saued the Montanistes Nonutiam the Donatistes and Sabellians the Arrians Macedonians Aerians Eutichians Monethelites and such like pestes of the Church Tit. 3. Wherefore then hath the Church in all ages vehemently opposed therselfe against heresies wherfore doth the Apostle command vs to aouyd an hereticall man after one or two reprehensions 2. Tim 2. Wherfore should we beware of their very speaches as a certaine infectious canker In vayne then are all these thinges spokē and done if saluation may be obtayned togeather with heresy Then truly is that a meere forged tale against the consent of all Ages which S. Augustine reciteth in these wordes Constituamus aliquem c. Let vs imagine saith he a man to be chast continent not couetous not a seruer of Idols liberal to the poore no mans enemy not contentious Aug. l. 4. cont Donat cap. 8. patient quiet emulating or enuying no mā sober frugall c. but yet an hereticke let there be no doubt at all to any but that such a one for this only thing in that he is an heretike shal not possesse the kingdome of God For as that man as witnesseth S. Iac. 2. Iames who offendeth in one commandement is made guilty of all looseth his whole iustice although he keep the rest of the commandement● because he contemneth the lawmaker himselfe who made the whole law euē so he that denieth obstanately but one article of faith though he retayne the rest i● made guilty of his whole Religion looseth all his Faith and Religion because he contemneth the Author therof For that the chiefe supreme Verity being one and the same hath reuealed all the articles of faith and doth propose the same to be beleeued of vs by the Church her spouse 1. Tim. 3. which is the pillar and firmament of truth He therfore that doth obstinately reiect but any one the least article of Faith not relying vpon the iudgment of the Church by that very act is he iudged to contemne the Author of the first principal Verity whose preacher interpreter instrument is the Church and by this meanes he looseth al his liuely faith which is necessary to saluation Neyther helpeth it any thing at al that he yet beleeueth some principall heads or articles of faith because he beleeueth them not with a liuely faith which cōsisteth vpon only diuine authority proposed vnto vs by infallible means els he should belieue the rest also that are propounded to him by the same meanes but he belieueth them with a certaine humane faith that is to say because by his owne priuate iudgment or opiniō he so thinketh them to be belieued taking vnto himselfe authority to iudg and discerne what things are to be belieued and what are to be reiected so as the chief reason of his beliefe is his priuate iudgment and therfore all that faith and beliefe is humane and of no value For most certaine it is that as true Iustice doth extend it selfe to all the commandements so doth true faith in like māner which is required to saluation extend it selfe to all those things that are reuealed vnto vs from God in such sort that we eyther expressoly belieue or be ready to belieue them all if they be accordingly proposed vnto vs. Wherby it is manifest how carefully we ought to endeauour to obtaine true faith and Religion seing that the same is the very foundation of all our saluation and without which most certaine damnation is to be expected Wherfore I haue thought good in this place to set downe certaine Considerations or Reasons manifest and perspicuous to euery one of ordinary capacity wherupon may be framed a certaine and infallible Deliberation concerning this busines of Religion I. CONSIDERATION Of the desyre of perfection wherunto Christian Religion leadeth THAT Religion is alwayes to be preferred that sauoureth of purity and holines of life That Christiā Religion leadeth to desyre of Perfectiō which draweth our myndes from earthly affections and styrreth vs vp to the loue of heauenly For that the chiefe end and scope of Religion is to sequester mens affections from these base and temporall things and to lift them vp to meditate loue and pursue celestiall and euerlasting Such is the only Catholike Religion and no other For she persuadeth to abstaine from pleasures of the flesh and alluiements of this life She teacheth to
law but offendeth in one he is made guilty of all for he who said thou shall not commit adultery said also thou shall not kill as if he should say he is made guilty of all and shal be punished as a breaker of the whole law because he hath despised the law maker who is the author of the whole law In like manner therfore he which shall deny one article although he belieue all the rest is made guilty of violating his whole faith and Religion because he contemneth God who is the first Truth who no lesse reuealed this then the other he contēneth the Catholike Church the spouse of Christ who is the pillar strength of Truth wherby he hath no lesse determined we should belieue this then the other And this is the reason why he is no lesse an heretike who with pertinacy denieth one point of faith thē he which denieth a hundred because in that he denieth one he contemneth God who is the first truth and did reueale it he contemneth the authority of the Church the which did propose it vnto vs he maketh the Church subiect to error and a liar wherby he is made also vncertaine of all the rest and looseth all his diuine faith for the ground of his diuine faith being takē away his whole faith must needs perish and consequently there remaineth only an opinion or humane fayth subiect to error wherby he belieueth all the rest The 10. Reason Tenthly and lastly this opinion is very dangerous in the practise therof for it maketh a man that he careth not what religion he hold what he belieueth or not belieueth he doth not therfore seeke after the truth and he doth as easily and with as great security lay hold on false as true things yet all men not only Catholike but euen the more principal sects those which are learned wise men do absolut'y affirme that none can be saued without the true faith and religion and whosoeuer are depriued therof shall perish for euer The followers therfore of this opinion are condemned of all and they only promise vnto themselues saluation without any author testimony or reason for it relying and trusting only in their owne vain imagination of their foolish braine let then therefore heare out of S. Fulgentius what antiquity hath alwaies holden and what the Catholike Church hath taught in all ages Thus therfore he writeth setting downe the rules of our common saith in his booke de fide ad Petruin Diaconum Cap. 38. Belieue assuredly saith he and doubt nothing at all that not only all Pagans but also all Iewes Heretikes and Schismatikes who shall dy out of the Catholike Church shall go into euerlasting fire which is prepared for the diuell and his Angells And in the 39. Cap. Belieue assuredly and doubt nothing that euery heretik or Schismatik christned in the name of the Father of the Son and of the holy Ghost if he be not within the number of those which are of the Catholik Church what almes soeuer he hath made albeit he shall shed his bloud for the name of Christ can by no meanes be saued for neither baptisme nor large and charitable almes nor death it selfe suffered for Christes sake will auaile that mā who 〈…〉 vnity of the Catholik Church as long as this hereticall or schismaticall wickednes wh●th leadeth to perdition shall continue in him This hath always byn the faith of the Catholike Church and the most certayne and vndoubted doctrine of the holy Fathers the which I would to God al those who remaine out of the Church of God would attentiuely and diligently consider they would truly and easily preceiue in how dangerous a state they continue Thou O Christ the light of the world shyne vnto their mindes and lighten their hartes Amen FINIS
Apostles or their sucessours to gouerne the people And therfore it is cleere that the Church of Christ is not with them The III. Reason From the defect of their Mission THE third reason is because these Religions were brought in by them that were sent by no lawfull authority but came of themselues and for this cause are they and their Authors worthily to be suspected of errour least perhaps they proue to be wolues and seducers For that no man may preach in the Church vnlesse he be sent by lawfull authority according to that of the Apostle How shall they preach Rom. 10. vnlesse they be sent otherwise there should soone arise a great confusion in the Church for that euery one might take vpon him the office of preaching and gouerning the Church and sow abroad what errors he listed And if in a temporall Common wealth humane Policy no man may intrude himselfe and take vpō him the office of a magistrate to gouerne the people in temporall things only pertaining to this life but that he must first be appointed therunto by the Prince How much lesse then in the Church and spirituall kingdone of Christ may any man assume vnto himselfe the office of Pastour to gouerne the people in those things which belong to eternall saluation but he that is ordained and appointed therunto by the supreme rector of the Church and Prince of Holyes For that confusion in gouerment of the Church is much more to be auoided thē in Policy when as the one threatens destruction to the soule the other only losse of goods and fortune Againe Ioan 10. he that entreth not by the dore into the theepfold but climbeth vp some other way is a theefe and robber saith our Lord. But he that taketh to himselfe the office of a Pastour in the Church without lawfull Mission and Auchority he entreth not in at the dore but climbeth vp some other way as the holy Fathers do commonly expound the place and is manifest of it selfe For what is it to enter in at the dore but to enter by the lawfull way and by lawfull authority The dore is the ordinary way and made of purpose wherby to enter into the sheepfold and wherby is designed that authority by which the Ministers of the Church are to be admitted into the sheepfold of Christ to gouerne and feed his sheepe Furthermore our Lord saith in S. Iohns Ghospell Ioan. 7. he that speaketh of himselfe seeketh his owne glory but he that seketh the glory of him that sent him he is faithfull and in him there is no iniustice By which words we are warned not to belieue them who are not lawfully sent but come of themselues because they seeke their owne glory and therfore they do not speake for truth but for their owne praise and comodity and thither do they direct all their doctrine And finally the Apostle in the Epistle to the Hebrews doth account this mission so necessary that he doth require the same in our Sauiour Christ saying Neyther doth any man take the honour to himselfe but he that is called of God as Aaron Hebr. 5. So Christ also did not glorify himselfe that he might be made a High Priest but he that spake to him My Sonne art thou this day haue I begotten thee Wherby our Sauiour did so often inculcate to the Iewes his mission to wit that he came not of himselfe but was sent of his Father and confirmeth the same many wayes From whence it is cleerly deduced that Luther Caluin and the rest of these new Doctours are not to be heard but their doctrine altogeather to be shunned because it is manifest that they were not sent by any lawfull authority but came of themselues It is also manifest that they vsurped vnto themselues the offices of magistrates and Pastors the Authority of reforming the Church It is manifest I say that they came not in at the dore and by the lawfull way but cl●mbed ouer some other way into the sheepfold and therfore according to our Sauiours iudgment and sentence they are to be accompted for theeues and robbers Perhaps they will say that they were sent of Christ immediatly as in old tyme the Prophets were sent by God in an extraordinary manner to reforme the people and as the Apostles were sent by Christ our Sauiour to cōuert the world and as S. Paul after the Ascension of our Lord who was not sent of men nor yet receiued the Ghospell from men but immediatly frō God himselfe To this I answere first it is not inough to say and stoutly to affirme but it must be proued and conuinced to be true least it may seeme to the people ordinary pastors to reiect them as deceauers for a lawfull cause as the Prophets and Apostles did not only say that they were sent of God but shewed the same also abundantly by heauenly signes Secondly all Archeretikes and false Prophets throughout euery age haue affirmed the same to wit that they were sent of God from him receaued their Authority And therfore eyther we must receaue them all or none For why should I for example sake rather belieue that Caluin was sent of God then Luther or Menno or Munzer Arius or any other Archeretike when as he can produce no greater signes or testimonies for his mission then they Thirdly if Caluin were sent of God then Luther was not sent of God and so likewise to the contray Because if two men do prophesy cōtrary things and that the one doth condemne the others prophesy and doctrine of errour and heresy the one doth so destroy the others religion and therfore if they were both sent of God it seemes that the spirit of God doth oppugne deny and ouerthrow it selfe destroying by one what he had built by another But amongst the Prophets truly sent by God there hath alwaies bin a principal vnity and consent in doctrine Fourthly if Luther or Caluin were set of God to reforme the Church I demaund then what tyme and in what place God gaue them this Office what words did he vse vnto them cyther internall or externall In what manner did he declare vnto them the chiefe heads and points of this Reformation what order and manner did he prescribe them How or in what forme did he appeare vnto them Externally in a visible shape as he did to S. Paul or internally by imaginary vision in some extasis as he did to the Prophets to S. Iohn Euangelist in the Apocalyps For that he is wont to obserue al these things with those whome he sendeth And the Prophets themselues presently in the beginning of their preaching did explicate and declare all these things to the people that they might vnderstand of whome they were sent or what comman̄dement was giuen vnto them to performe as out of the Prophesyes of Isay Ieremy Ezechiel Daniel and others is manifest that they were all wont to premit these things first of all And
and Anabaptists are at bitter wars one with another about many points of fayth and do impeach one the other of heresy The Lutherans do dissent both among themselues in many things and from Luther himselfe ●heir Father and Apostle in so much as at this tyme there be reckoned thirty one principal Sects of Lutherans different in name and disagreing in many points of doctrine The Caluinists be at variance among themselues especially in the Article touching the head of the Church For a great part of them giueth that power to the secular Prince though she be a woman and these be called Protestants Others of them hold the same for impiety and blasphemy and those they call Puritaus The Anabaptists differ among themselues in very many things so as of them there be numbred 14. diuers Sects distinct both in names and in points of doctrine Finally it is now come to this that where euery one followeth this rule of Scripture alone and relyeth vpon it there be almost as many heresyes as there be heretiks For the greater part of them especially the more simple affirme that they little regard or care what Luther or Caluin taught sith they cleaue fast to the holy Scriptures and recur to the word of God in which there cannot be any errour and so they thinke themselues very secure And euery one vnderstandeth the Scripture according to his own capacity and sense Wherhence it followeth that where they thinke they haue the Scripture for an infallible rule of their beliefe insteed of Scripture they haue and follow their owne imagination For whatsoeuer they imagine to be signified meant by the words of scrip ture they take for the true fense of Scripture and so lookehow many diuers imaginations of men there be so many rules there be of beliefe But whence is it that to euery one his owne imagination should seeme the most true verity and the very fense of Scripture It procedeth partly of a certaine exceeding selfe-pleasing lone and estimation For he who maketh any great reckoning of himselfe easily perswadeth himselfe that all his owne innentions and conceipts of mind be great and extraordinary partly by working of the Diuell who doth in wardly pernert mensphanfyes so as what they apprehend they forth with for euery most light and idle poore reason thinke to be most cuident truth For whiles men wearied with the auncient Religion loathing it do auerse the truth longe to heare nou●lt yes they are by Gods iust iudgment suffered to be begnyled by the Diuell Whereupon whiles he worke the inwardly in their senses they thinke themselues to haue recevued the light of Gods spirit and vnto it they referre all iudgment touching matters of fayth Hence it is that to euery sect almost to euery priuate man their owne apprehension seemeth to be the pure word of God neyther care they for all the reasons that are brought to the contrary The Apostle insinuateth no lesse when he sayth 2. Thes 2. For that they haue not receyued the Charity of truth that they might be saued therefore God will send them the operation of errour that they may belieue lying He shall send not by way of commaund but by giuing more power to the Diuell for the deceyuing of them who haue contemned the truth or ancient Religion and the thrusting of them into a thousand errors But the most of them especially the simple say God will not permit them to be deluded who search the truth with an humble hart for the hath promised that he will giue a good spirit to them who aske him And this do I for I make my petition to God that he would please to illuminate me open vnto me the true sense of the Scriptures and I cease not continually to search them This is a great deceipt of the Diuell For how do they with an humble hart search out the truth who contemne makeno esteeme of the iudgment of the Doctors of the Church of the interpretation and exposition of the holy Fathers and of the definitions of Generall Councells who refuse to vse the way appointed and shewed by God and require vnnecessary reuelations For from them they might vnderstand the truth and exempt themselues from all errour but they haue not a will to submit themselues vnto them thinking that they may by their owne industry their owne wit and priuate spirit with a more facility and certainity find the truth out of the bare naked Scriptures As though the holy Fathers Doctors and Prelats of the Church did eyther not search the Scritures or wanted the spirit of God and sound iudgment so as it passed their skil to ariue to the true vnderstanding therof What greater pride can there be thought then that a priuare person and comonly an Idiot ignorant of all antiquity and good literature should prefer himselfe before so great authority and holynes and so great a number of Doctors And therfore they must not thinke thatso longe as they be of that mind they shall obta●ne any thing at our Lords hands because they aske both yll and prowdly but that they shall rather be deceyued by the spirit of pryde and of lying whereunto they are by Gods iust iudgment for so great a cryme delyuered This is that spirit whereof all heretiks though they be neuer so different in Doctrine haue their part and vaunt themselues and of which euery one thinketh the truth to be reuealed vnto him which certes he that is not blinde may casily obserue and see because Gods spirit reucaleth not contraryes Moreouer the holy Scrip●ure no where remitteth priuate men in doubts of fayth to the fearch of the Scriptures but to the Church and to them who be the Prelats of the Church So in Deu●eronomy c. 17. in matters of doubt they are remitted to the Priests who haue charge and rule for the tyme whome he that shal refuse to obay is sentenced to dy Therfore hath God appointed pastors doctors in his Church therfore would he haue it conspicuous to the whole world to be the pillar and firmament of truth that all might with case make their recourse vnto it and most securely repose vpon the determination of it There is not giuen to all the spirit of vnderstanding the Scriptures as is plaine by testimony of the Apostle 1. Cor. 12. 1. Ioan. 4. 2. Cor. 11. We are not to giue credit to euery spirit but the spirits are to be tryed if they be of God Wherfore though your spirit suggest vnto you something you are not therefore secure for you are not sure that it is of God For it is certaine that infinite numbers haue been and are deceyued cuery heretike vaunteth himselfe of this spirit The Angell of Sathan oftentymes transfigureth himselfe into an Angell of light Wherefore by what hath been said it is most euident that a priuate spirit cannot possibly carry it selfe for the rule of beliefe The XII Reason Drawne from Absurdity
acknowledging of one God I add further Then in vayne was Christ made man in vayne did he worke so many Miracles that so he might be acknowledged and belieued to be the Mossias Sauiour of the world in vaine was he crucified and dyed For none of all these thinges was necessary to mans saluation it being sufficient to send preachers about the world to perswade men the beliefe of one God After this manner reasoneth the Apostle Gal. 2. If iustice be by the Law then in vayne saith he is Christ dead which is as much to say if Iustice can be obtayned by the knowledg of one God and obseruation of the Law in vayne was Christ crucifyed because then the death of Christ had not byn necessary for our saluation The 2. Reason Besides Rom. 3. Apoc. ● 7. Act. 4. hence it must necessarily follow that the whole Scripture is false since that it telleth vs how Christ is our Sauiour Mediatour and Redeemer and propoundeth him vnto vs as a Propitiatour by ●aith in his bloud by whose Sacrifice ●e are reconciled vnto God by his bloud our sinnes are washed away and with whose faith we are iustified N●●ther is there any other name vnder h●●●en giuen vnto men in which they ●●ght to be saued Thus speaketh the 〈◊〉 Scripture and all this must needes be friuolous and false if euery man may be saued in his owne Religion But some may perhaps obiect that Christ is indeed our Redeemer and that all our good commeth from him yet his faith notwithstanding is not absolutely necessary For it is sufficient that we belieue that all our good commeth and proceedeth from the bountifull goodnesse of God vnto vs neyther is it needful for vs to know by what meanes it is bestowed vpon vs. But this not only repugneth to the holy Scripture but also it is against the reason of the holy Scripture because the sayd holy Scripture doth euidently teach vs that Christs redemption is not applied vnto vs but by fayth and therfore all such as are destitute of the fayth of Christ are voyd of their iustification and remayning still guiltie of sinne are the children of wrath and in danger of eternall damnation It repugneth to reason Why Christian saith is necessary to saluation because to the end that we may become partakers of any great and vnaccustomed benefit all reason requireth that we acknowledge the benefit and our be ●●●●ctor and that we honour him as it be cometh vs with all thankes-giuing for ●oth the condition of the benefit and of our benefactor doth require of vs this gratefulnesse of mind Seing therfore that the benefit of our redemption is so great and vnaccustomed and he who bestowed it vpon vs so great and famous as also the meanes wherby he bestowed it vpon vs so strange and meruaylous it is requisit we should acknowledge all these things least we should liue and dye vngratefull toward so great a benefactor and least insteed of blessing thanking him after the manner of the Iewes we curse and blaspheme him It is therfore an absurd thing to esteme those who do not beleeue in Christ to be partakers of eternall saluation prepared for vs by Christ The which also by this may be confirmed because none can be saued who doth not know God and the benefit of his creation for otherwise all Idolators might be saued neither therfore can he be saued who doth not know the benefit of his redemption because the benefit of our redemption is farre greater and more admirable and doth more appertayne to the Glory of God and of Christ our Redeemer and requireth also of vs greater honour seruice and thankes giuing Neyther is it sufficient for vs to know in generall that all good thinges come vnto vs from God for this is not sufficient for the honor and gratitude which is dew vnto him but we must also know what and how great the benefit is as also by what manner way and meanes he bestowed it vpon vs that is to say that he hath deliuered vs from sinne and euerlasting death and that he hath opened vnto vs the way to eternall life that after a most admirable manner to wit by ioyning our nature vnto his by suffering therein death for vs. For this especially commendeth his charity mercy and iustice this also exacteth at our hands all duery prayse and thankes-giuing these therefore are most necessarily to be knowne to saluation The 3. Reason If euery one may be saued in his owne fayth then therfore that fayth is sufficient to saluation which is not a gift of God but an humane perswasion The ground of faith among ●e Iewes Turkes is false conceyued by our private iudgement relying vpon humane authority built vpon a deceitfull foundation For the Turkes although they belieue one Go● to be the Creatour of heauen and earth and to be the rewarder of both good and euill workes their faith notwithstanding is not of the holy Ghost but of their owne priuate iudgment or rather of the Diuel for they do not belieue so because God hath reuealed it vnto men by any true Prophet but because Mahomet whome they thinke to be the Prophet of God his instrument to teach mortall men hath so set it down in his Alcoran Albeit therfore that which they belieue be true yet because the ground of their beliefe and the whole reason therof is f●lse and pestilent to wit that Mahomet is a Prophet of God the faith it selfe whereby they belieue is deceytfull and the foundation therof whereupon it is grounded is hurtfull to saluation necessarily inclining and forcing the mind to cast it selfe into all the p●stiferous errours of that sect How therfore cā that faith be called sufficient for them vnto saluation or that they can be saued by that faith How can that which is vncertayne deceitfull pestiferous be made the foundatiō of our instice before God or of eternall saluation In like manner albeit the Iewes do belieue the same or rather more thinges agreable vnto truth yet the faith wherby they do belieue them is deceytfull and voyde of the spirit of God For the whole reason or cause of their beliefe is because the Rabbyns and Doctors of their Synagogue do so interpret the holy Scriptures vnto them For they are the rule of their beliefe or which is all one the holy Scripture as it is subiect to their interpretation But this whole reason of their beliefe is deceytfull and no lesse hurtful and dangerous then that of the Turkes for it is no lesse hurtefull to belieue that their Rabbyns interpreting the holy Scriptures are indued with the spirit of God then to belieue that Mahomet is the Prophet of God neither are they drawne into lesser absurdityes by the force of that principle How therfore can that faith be the foundation or ground of saluation The 4. Reason Finally this opinion maketh no difference betwixt Turcisme Iudaisme and Christianisme
things truly had byn done in vayne foolishly and wrongfully if in these sects eternall saluation might haue byn obteined the which seing no wise man can say we must of necessity confesse that those heresies are the plagues of soules that saluation can by no meanes consist with them The 2. Reason Secondly because it condemneth all antiquity of error who hath alwayes iudged that an heretike cannot be saued and therfore it hath opposed 〈◊〉 selfe so vehemently against them and hath alwayes very diligently confuted them The 3. Reason Thirdly because it condemneth the Apostle himselfe who in his third to Titus commandeth vs in this sort Tit. 3. Eschew an heretike after one or two admonitions knowing certaynly that he which is such a one is ouerthrown and sinneth being condemned by his owne proper iudgment Why doth he command him to be esehewed if his error be not a hindrance to saluation why doth he say that he is ouerthrowne condemned 2 Tim. 2. In like manner in his 2. Tim 2. Their speach sayth he creepeth as a canker Euen as therefore the canker is a disease which killeth a mans body vnlesse it be cut away so is an Heretike vnto a company of Christians and Catholikes But some peraduenture will obiect and say that none is to be accounted an heretike but he which reiecteth Christ or denyeth some thing belonging vnto the Creed But this is absurdly vnwisely spoken for so he should not be an heretike who should take away both the old and new Testament and should say that those things are eyther feygn●d or written by the spirit only of a man and as the writings of prophane authors subiect to many errors he were not an heretike who should deny hell or the eternity of the paynes therof or should affirme that all the diuells should once besaued seing that there is no mention made of these things in the Apostles Creed he should not be an heretike who should forbid marriage and who should fay that marriages were ordeyned by the Diuell who also should affirme that som kind of flesh is of it owne nature vncleane all whome notwithstanding the Apostle iudgeth to be heretikes 1. Tim. 4. He were not an heretike who should say that there are two persons in Christ whom notwithstanding S. Iohn calleth an heretike and Antichrist Epist. 1. c. 4. He were not an heretike who should deny Baptisme and all other Sacraments And finally none of those of whome we haue spoken before were to be accounted Heretikes the which is contrary to all antiquity and all the Doctors who haue liued in these ten or twelue ages The 4. Reason Fourthly this opinion doth make all the foresayd heresyes and sects equall with the Catholike faith and Religion affirming that we may aswell be saued in them as in it The Catholike Religion therfore shall be no better then Arianisme Pelagianisme Nestorianisme Eurichianisme and other false Religions the whith both in it selfe is most absurd and nothing els but to induce a new Atheisme For to affirme all Religions to be good and that it little importeth the worke of our Saluation what Religion we professe is to make no account of any Religion for if there be any Religion it cannot be but one as there is but one Truth one Iustice one Faith one happines one Lord and God and one Man Iesus Christ mediator of God and man The 5. Reason Fifthly it is a skornefull thing to say that it is sufficient for euery one to belieue the Creed according to their owne sense and vnderstanding therof seing there is but one only truth the which if we do not attayne we belieue that which is false but a false faith auayleth nothing to saluation It is therfore all one whether thou belieuest the Creed after such a manner or after no manner at all one therfore may be saued albeit he doth not absolutely belieue many articles The same also may be said of the holy Scriptures For if it be sufficient to belieue the holy Scriptures vnderstood in their owne sense seing that this sense may often tymes be erroneous it will also suffice albeit thou doest not belieue them at all for a false faith can be no more needfull to saluation then no faith at all that is to say whereby one doth absolutely belieue nothing at all Yf thou doest say that the Creed must be belieued in a true sense then thou condemnest all the Sects of this tyme whereof there is none which belieueth all the articles of the Creed in the same sense with Catholikes or which doth not differ one from another in the explication of the Creed Wherfore seing that there is but ōly one Truth it necessarily followeth that all Religions sauing one doe erre from the truth therefore are not sufficient to saluation But it is euident The disagrement of fectaries in the sense of the Creed that they differ much in the vnderstanding of the Creed for that Article And in Iesus Christ his only Sonne the Arians Tritheitans and many Caluinistes affirming the Sonne lesser then the Father doe other wise explicate then the Lutherans and Catholikes do who hold God the Sonne to be equall and consubstantiall with his Father The article of Christs descending into hell the Caluinists do otherwise vnderstand who do thinke that Christ suffered there the torments of the damned soules and that he doubted of his saluation and that he was affrayd least he should be wholy consumed by euerlasting death otherwise Catholikes and Lutherans hold who say that such ā exposition is not the sense of that Article but a blasphemy of Caluin The article of Christs ascending into heauen is otherwise vnderstood by the Lutherans and Vbiquitarists who hold Christes body to be present euery where and in all places as his diuinity is presēt euery where otherwise the Caluinists and Catholiks hold who do not doubt to affirme but that by this exposition the whole Creed is ouerthrowne and that Christes Incarnation Natiuity Passion death ascending to heauen and his comming to Iudgmente is therby quite taken away The article of iudging the quicke and the dead the Catholikes do otherwise expound who hold that God shall so iudge vs that he will reward our good workes with heauen and punish our euill deeds with hell otherwise the Caluinists and Lutherans who deny all reward to good workes and that God only in his diuine iudgement will principally esteeme reward a speciall fayth only The aricle of the Holy Ghost the Catholikes and Lutherans do otherwise vnderstand then the Arians and many Caluinists The article of the Church the Lutherans and Caluinists do vnderstand of the inuisible congregation of those which are predestinate the Catholikes do vnderstand it of the visible company of Catholiks wherein many are predestinate many are reprobate The article of Communion of Saynts the Lutherans and Caluinists do so extenuate that they take away almost all the communion holden by Catholiks The article of