you Which doctrine is to be preached to believers Who may be considered under a two-fold consideration Either as added to the Church walking in visible or Church-fellowship Or as not yet added to the Church To both which sorts I shall endeavour to lay open their duty that so they may be conformable to their great Law-giver the Lord Jesus I shall speake of them in order But first to such as are not in a true visible Church fellowship The commands of Christ to them are these two in an especiall manner First That they should be baptized Secondly That being baptized they should be added or joined to the Church In the first of these I shall handle severall particulars 1. That Baptisme was commanded to be preached and practised 2. That Saints were baptized 3. The severall sorts of Baptisme spoken of in the Scriptures 4. That Baptisme of water was preached by the Disciples and commanded to be practised by the Saints 5. Who was the Author and Institutor of water Baptisme 6. What the true nature use and end of Baptisme with water is 7. Who was and is a true Administrator or Dispenser of it 8. Who be the true and proper subjects of water Baptisme 9. The true manner of the administration of it 10. The principle by which a Saint ought to be moved to subjection unto it 11. The power enabling to performe it or submit to it 12. How long the Ordinance of Baptisme was and is to continue I shall presume to be more large in this point of Baptisme then in others First Because this lyeth most hid and many Christians are enquiring after it Secondly Because this being cleared up the Controversies about Ordinances and Church visible fellowship would soone bee reconciled In this Chapter I shall speake of the first foure particulars 1. That Baptisme was commanded to be preached is evident Math. 28. 19 20. Where Christ saith Goe yee therefore and teach all Nations baptizing them teaching them to observe all things which I have Baptisme was commanded to be preached and practised commanded you Now Christ taught them to baptize and then to observe it as Christs command Againe saith Christ Marke 16. 15 16. Goe preach the Gospell to every Creature he that believeth and is baptized c. This was commanded to be preached Which commission the Apostle Peter executed faithfully Acts 2. 38. Commanding every one of them to repent and be baptized So Acts 10. 48. He declared it as their duty and commanded their subjection to it The truth of this is so unquestionable that I shall passe to the second That as it was commanded so it was practised is manifest Acts The Saints were baptized 2. 41. They that gladly received the word preached by Peter were baptized And many in Samaria which believed both men and women were baptized Acts 8. 12. The Eunuch the Gaoler Lydia Crispus and many Corinthians were baptized Acts 18. 8. I thinke it altogether needlesse to insist longer on this particular well knowing no man will deny this but he that denies the Scriptures likewise 3. The Scriptures speake of severall sorts of Baptisme which There are severall sorts of Baptisme spoen of in the Scriptures I shall unfold to you with their agreement and difference Now Baptisme in the Scriptures admits of a three-fold consideration First As it is a Baptisme of water Secondly As it is a Baptisme of the Spirit Thirdly As it is a Baptisme of afflictions 1. The Baptisme of water we finde mentioned in divers e Baptisme water places as John 1. 21. Acts 8. 38. Now this Baptisme of water was with materiall water 2. The Baptisme of the Scriptures prophesied of by John called e Baptisme the Holy â—â—st and 2. 28 29. The Baptisme of the Holy Ghost and fire Math. 3. 11. promised by God in Joel by Christ Acts 1. 5. Yee shall be baptized saith Christ with the Holy Ghost not many daies hence Which was fulfilled Acts 2. There appeared cloven tongues like as of fire and they sate upon each of them and they were all filled with the Holy Ghost and began to speak with other tongues as the spirit gave them utterance This Baptisme is called the Baptism of the spirit because it was the onely worke of the spirit with which they were filled called the Baptisme of fire because of the operation of the spirit which like fire was a light to them that sate in darknesse like fire because of its refining nature burning up that chaffe and drosse that was in them and making them more pure a Baptisme of fire in respect of its consuming nature destroying the man of sinne t is a fire that goeth out of the mouth of the Lord Jesus that burnes up consumes and destroyes the stubble and chaffe of Antichrist Yea of this Baptisme it is said There sate cloven tongues like fire upon the heads of the Apostles Which visibly demonstrated the power of the spirit in giving them the gift of tongues or languages whereby they could speake to all men in their severall languages wherein they were naturally borne Acts 2. 8. Now this was a visible glorious spirituall Baptisme the proper nature end and use of this was to crowne the doctrine of Jesus with a Crowne of glory to confirme spread abroad to all Nations and exalt the Gospell of Jesus and Christ in his Gospell This was that which amused the world yea to heare the Apostles speake with tongues they were confounded amazed and mervailed Acts 2. 6. 7. greatly 3. There is likewise a Baptisme of afflictions or sufferings A Baptism of affliction Therefore saith Christ I have a Baptisme to be baptized withall and how am I streigthned in my spirit till that be accomplished This was the Baptisme of his death into which death we are baptized Now this Baptisme holds forth to us our descending into misery as if wee were overwhelmed with misery and our ascending from it into glory Wee as Christ did when he was in the world must take up his Crosse and follow him in afflictions for We beare about in our bodies the dyings of the Lord Jesus I might here shew you the sweet unity consent and harmony that is in these Baptismes and wherein they differ but you will see this more fully if you consider what ensues But some may say T is true there is a Baptisme of water of the spirit and Qu. fire and of afflictions but is there not a Baptisme of the spirit besides that Baptisme of the Holy Ghost and fire which you say consists in new tongues and miraculous visible appearances of the spirit which Baptisme of the spirit is the worke of Gods spirit upon the heart in believing and the like according to that in Titus We are saved by the washing of regeneration c. Tit. 3. 4. To this I answer Yielding That we are saved by the washing of regeneration and the renewing of the Holy Ghost which hee Answ shed on
of their Authority If the Scriptures were not to be believed above their words why doe they seeke to prove their matter from them Nay which seemes a wonder to me these very bruits for I can give them no fitter name that deny the Scriptures doe often times bring Scripture to prove their deniall of them Sometimes they object to us the seeming Contradictions that are in them telling us the Word of God cannot contradict it selfe and for this they alleadge the Scriptures that say God cannot lye and the like by which doe they not set to their seales that God is true and the Scriptures his word Yet a little further let them set aside the Scriptures and bid them reason of any thing and what will they then say How will they prove what they say Will they prove their assertions from some undeniable principles From whence I pray you fetch they their principles It is either from nature or from grace If from nature that is corrupted Who can bring a cleane thing out of an uncleane thing Nature teaches not the true Worship of God If from grace Where is this grace made manifest And if it be not manifest who will believe them For the proving of doubtfull things is alwaies by things more known If it be made manifest surely then t is in the Scriptures Well To conclude this Consider that heavenly stile faithfulnesse in reproving as well great and small that sweet unity that is there that majesty and authority that is to be found there and in no writing else that almost all men that have ever seene them stand in admiration of them which are an evident demonstration of the excellency of them But there are many things in the Scripture that seeme incredible as Sampsons staying so many with the Jaw-bone of an Asse and Christs being Object borne of a Virgin and Noahs Arke and many more To whom doe these seeme incredible Dost thou believe there Sol. is a God If thou dost Why shouldest thou thinke it impossible for him to bring to passe these things And if he tels us these things are so why shall we not believe them But it may be though mayst say there are many things that seeme to contradict each other What then Are they not true because thy narrow foolish and shallow heart cannot comprehend it There are many things in nature which thou canst give no reason of Why quarrellest thou not with them also and with that God that made them If thou understandingly didst but reade them I dare say thou wouldst say there is not one thing in the whole Scriptures needlesse nor any Contradictions Some things in them are figures some histories some lawes which all hold forth the majesty soveraignty and excellency of the Lord. I shall for the present say no more of the rule of discovery but this That he that shall deny the Scriptures to be the Word of God is a bruit beast without any bounds yea he is but an Atheist that cannot chuse but deny God himselfe The fourth thing is the manner of discovery The light of God The manner of discovery reveales the mysteries of God And this is 1. Ministerially God discovers himselfe by his Ministers but Ministerially more of this hereafter 2. Plainly The Lord Jesus delights to speake after a familiar Plainly manner to the soule teaching it by wordes easy to be understood Christ spake in Parables how say you then he speakes plainly Object Sol. To that I answer It is true there was a time when Christ spake in Parables but yet it is worth our observing that he used such parables that the very Jewes that heard him knew whom and what he meant by his Parables But further I say likewise that Christ spake afterwards to his Disciples plainly not in parables which the Disciples acknowledged saying So now thou speakest plainly If you looke to the manner of Christs speaking it is most plain making use of the plainest similitudes that could be Thus did the Apostles preach not with entising words of mans wisedome but with plainesse of speech in demonstration of the spirit and power Which when I consider I cannot but wonder at the imposters deceivers and deceived of this generation who come with high swelling words and uncouth language that in truth their words are harder to be understood then their matter who speake as if they desired rather to have their persons wit eloquence and elocution advanced then the Gospell of Jesus He is not now among many wanton Christians thought worthy of hearing that hath not an art of copying some new expressions to paint and indeed adulterate and counterfeit the truth Well I am sure Paul was of another minde that said He had rather speake five words which he understood then ten thousand in an unknowne tongue These men to my understanding doe as if a man minding to shew forth the excellent proportion of a beautifull man should build a faire and beautifull Turret or Scaffold very high and sets the man upon it which indeed Eclipses the beauty of a man and fixes their eyes on the beautifull structure he stands upon They pretend to hold forth Christ but in truth t is their owne words not Christ that is so much doted or admired by these Disciples of whom through their faire words they have made merchandise for Satan Lastly Christ teaches the soule infallibly there is no guile in his mouth his words are not yea and nay but the truth of God the unquestionable truths of God he speakes not at peradventure I thinke this is true I suppose it to be true and the like doubtfull phrases but saith This is the voice of the God of the Lord of him that cannot lye Oh blessed are all that are thus taught of Jesus Christ his words are the sure words of prophecy whereto wee doe well to give heed Lastly A word or two to the subjects to whom this light reveales The subjects to whom this light is discovered the matter I have before showne to be the substance revealed and they are two fold according to the diversity of the matter revealed Now the matter revealed is either the mysteries of the Fathers love to a poore soule which is hidden from the wise men of the world and this the true light discovers onely to the children of the Kingdome Or else 2. The matter revealed is the truth of God barely and nakedly as it is in it selfe without the soules interest in it to whom it is revealed And in this sense Saul was among the Prophets and the Spirit of God was upon Balaam whereby he knew Israel to be blessed though himselfe partook not of that blessing In this sense the spirit gives gifts to the rebellious this is a receiving truth but not in the love of it from which a man may utterly fall away Though a man hath all knowledge yet if he be not a chosen vessell of the Father and have not the
author of it he instituted and appointed it But some may say The Baptisme of water is Johns Baptisme for John Object saith I baptize you with water but he that cometh after me shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and fire So that water Baptisme is onely Johns and not Christs as spirit Baptisme is onely Christs and not Johns In answer to this I will shew you clearly the Baptisme of water Sol. Of the unity of Johns and Christs Baptism being one In the outward element of water was Christs as well as Johns and that by nnfolding to you the true nature of Johnes Baptisme and the true nature of Christs Baptisme wherein their unity and difference will appeare their unity is manifest 1. In that the element of both was the same materiall water it is said John baptized with water and I have already proved to you the Saints were baptized into the name of Jesus with water also Cornelius and the rest were baptized with water 2. The Baptisme of water both of Christs and Johns came from heaven Christ tels us Johns is from heaven Math. 21. 25. The Both from heaven word of God came to John in the wildernesse He is said To be sent from God also So the Baptisme of water administred by Christs Disciples is like wise from heaven Therefore saith Christ All power is given to me in heaven and earth Goe yee therefore teach and baptize It was the power of heaven conferred upon Christ which commanded and enabled the Disciples to preach and practise the Ordinance of Baptisme 3. Both Johns and Christs Baptisme pointed at Christ though Both held forth Christ The difference between Christs and Johns baptisme under a various consideration Thus for their agreement now I will shew wherein they differ As First That the Baptisme of water administred by Christs command after his resurrection was not administred upon the same ground as Johns 1. Johns doctrine upon which his administration depended was They were not administred upon the same grounds not the same with that the Apostles preached for John held forth a Christ to come to dye to suffer to take away sinne but now the doctrine of the Gospell is That Christ is come dead risen ascended up to heaven and sitteth at Gods right hand 2. John baptized persons believing in a Christ to come after him but now he that shall baptize into a Christ as not come denies the faith For this is the Antichrist that denies Christ to be come in the flesh dead and risen againe They preached the Lord crucified and baptized them that believed in him who was then dead and risen from the dead Johns Baptisme pointed at remission of sinnes to be by Jesus Christ but the Baptisme of water administred by the Disciples of Christ held forth remission of sinnes already and they were to be baptized to manifest their sinnes being pardoned 3. The subjects of Johns Baptisme were onely Jewes it is said of him All Judea and Jerusalem came out to be baptized in Jordan But Christs are Go preach the Gospell to every Creature viz. Jewes and Gentiles baptizing them Thus was the Gentiles with Cornelius baptized with water 4. That was a preparation to the Baptisme of the Holy Ghost for he prepared the way of the Lord but this followes after as in Cornelius and if by Baptisme of the spirit you meane regeneration the Baptisme of water alwaies followed that at-least the profession of it which is the true ground of visible administrations 5. The Commissions by which the Baptisme of water was dispensed were divers the one by God to John in the wildernesse the other from Christ to the Saints being risen from the dead 6. And Lastly The Baptisme of Iohn is alwaies called the Baptisme of Iohn and no where the Baptisme of Christ and therefore we shall finde a distinction betweene them and the Disciples are said to baptize in the name of Jesus Christ A second difference is this That the Baptisme of water administred by Iohn ceased for he saith of himselfe I must decrease that is They have not the like continuance to say my person my office my ministry must all stoope to Christ who must encrease Iohns doctrine ceased in Christ so his Baptism for Christ being come dead and risen Iohn was not any longer by his ministry to prepare his way and truly if you take away the doctrine upon which any thing is administred you likewise take away the administration but now Christs Baptisme endures being established upon a more strong foundation Christ humbled and exalted dead and risen therefore are the believers who were filled by the Holy Ghost baptized with the Baptisme of water in the name of the Lord Jesus The continuation whereof I shall prove afterwards Thus is it manifest that the Baptisme of water was as well commanded by Christ as by Iohn and was not onely Iohns baptisme as many suppose And whereas Iohn saith I baptize you with water but Christ shall baptize you with the spirit and fire It proves not that Christ did not command his Disciples to continue baptizing with water but this it proves that Christs baptisme was greater then Iohns Iohns was onely water but Christs water and the spirit too I say this expression of Iohns proves no more that Christ hath not a baptisme of water then Pauls words saying that Paul planteth and Apollo watereth but it is God that gives the blessing proves that God plants not nor waters which would be strange to affirme To conclude this likewise I shall onely desire you to minde this if the baptisme of water was onely Iohns and to endure only till soules were baptized with the Holy Ghost as those that say water baptisme is onely Iohns affirme then demand I how comes it to passe that being baptized with the Holy Ghost is used by Peter as an undeniable argument that Cornelius should be baptized with water Sure this is an undoubted truth that that dispensation which is the onely ground of putting an end to Baptisme of water as they say the baptisme of the spirit is cannot be a true ground to continue it but Peter uses it as an argument for its continuance from whence without wresting the Scriptures perverting the truth dazling mens eyes with the bare notions of mystery spirit life or substance we may safely conclude that baptisme of water is Christs baptisme as well as Iohns and was preached and practised by the Disciples of the Lord Jesus But lest we should be cheated or beguiled through the false representations of the carnality of this Baptisme I will in the next particular discover its great glory 6. The way being now something more cleare I desire to proceed The true nature use and end of water Baptisme and shew you the true nature use and end of this ordinance or baptisme wherein the true glory of it will appeare notwithstanding the endeavours of men or Devils to staine it it
to Antioch being a good man and full of the spirit Thus was Paul and Barnabas separated by the Church for the worke of the Lord. Now I desire you to minde this that the power calling and enabling any to preach the Gospell and baptize is no other but the same power for the nature of it that carried out and enabled the Apostles and Evangelists of old to preach and baptize I say the Church hath power to appoint or separate any whom God hath made willing able to do this as a part of the work of the Lord for Baptisme of water is an ordinance in relation to Church fellowship which is visible And surely the Church is not destitute of power for the accomplishment of that which is so necessary in visible fellowship namely the administration of that Ordinance It is true say some many may preach the Gospell but are there any who Object so preach it as the Apostles did for the word in the Greeke speaking of the Apostles preached is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So saith Christ in his Commission 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Preach the Gospell which holds forth a preaching with authority having a message to deliver which word comes from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies a Gryer So that the Apostles preached even by way of Preclamation as it were But speaking of the scattered brethren Acts 2. It is said They went 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Preaching after such a manner as any other might doe declaring the Gospell of peace but so that the administration of Baptisme is tyed to such who preach in the first sense and not to them that preach in the latter sense In answer to this objection I say That the Greeke words Sol. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are promiscuously used in the Scripture So that from them there is no good ground of such a scruple for in the 8th of Acts verse 15. the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used as it is said there 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but verse 8. we shall see the same preaching of Philip to be held forth by the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for there it is said They believed Philip 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Evangelizing or preaching the things that concerne the Kingdome of God The same word is likewise used in the last verse And so Paul expresseth the true nature of his preaching by the same word saying 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sometimes we finde the preaching of the Gospell to be expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Acts 8. 25. so Acts 11. 19. There it is written They went 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 preaching the word to none but the Jewes By which it is evident that the preaching the Gospell is not so restrained to one particular word as no other word is sufficient for the holding of it forth But further the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies a preaching a joyfull message like a good messenger from which I shall conclude that the Preacher of the Gospell He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved is the true administrator of this Ordinance But may some say Many that have professed to be the true administrators Object of this Ordinance and have administred it upon severall persons doe now deny it so that except there be some visible miraculous demonstration between them that doe truly preach the truth who are really sent of God and them that onely seeme to be so and in truth are not we are like to be deceived in the Administrator and so the Ordinance will be without effect In answer to this Grant that many may fall from what they Sol. professe and professe what they doe not really enjoy and seeme to be what they are not Yet notwithstanding we need not expect miracles of distinction nor question our Baptisme for mens denying what they professe it is neither a new nor a strange thing many in the Apostles dayes did so and Judas one of the twelve fell from his profession and ministry too yet the doctrine that Judas was commanded to preach did not fall in his fall Suppose a wicked man may speake the truth to thee who wast ignorant of it and God should make that truth to be powerfull in thee and that many should afterward deny it shall their unbeliefe and back-sliding make the faith of God of none effect God forbid So if a man preach thou oughtest to be baptized and thou dost submit to the will of God if he denies it thy Baptisme is true for indeed it is not essentially necessary to the administration of Ordinance of Baptisme that the administrator should be such a one that shall never deny the truth for if so it must be revealed from heaven who shall continue before we may be assured of a true Minister which we have no ground in all the Scripture to expect neither is that any ground at all for us to submit to that or any ministry Visible appearances are the ground of visible administrations and our faith and practise is not tyed to the persons of any but to the doctrine of Jesus Christ So that if any one comes in the name of a Disciple preaching the doctrine of Christ and God makes us to see it our duty to conforme to his doctrine wee should not question so much his calling as manifest our ready conformity to the will God I shall onely add this to this particular that I cannot finde that Gods people were ever made uncapable of doing their duty for want of an administrator But the same God that enjoynes the observation of a command likewise provides a sutable way for the execution thereof 8. The next thing to be spoken to are the subjects of Baptisme Of the true subjects of Baptisme of water which without guesses suppositions or strained consequences we shall finde plainly discovered to be Saints visible professors believers Therefore saith the Scriptures He that believeth and is baptized Baptisme followes faith as Peter evidently demonstrated when the Eunuch asked What hindred that he might not be baptized saying If thou believest with all thy heart thou mayst So it is said that Crispus and many Corinthians believed and were baptized they are such that repent and gladly receive the word these and these onely are the true subjects of Baptisme But may some say It is true visible believers are subjects of Baptisme so Object also are the Infants of believing parents therefore you doe amisse to restrain it to them that make an outward profession of the Gospell These late yeares have so abounded in this controversy that Sol. I might well spare my labour of answering any other wayes to it then by advising thee to consider what hath beene written by others but seeing it remaines still an objection I shall endeavour briefly to remove it out of thy way and therefore will shew thee that infants are not the subjects of Baptisme which I shall onely demonstrate by two
Arguments First Those persons are onely to be baptized whom Christ gave Arg. 1 Against infant Baptisme a Commission to his Disciples to baptize But Christ gave a Commission to his Disciples to baptize none but visible professors of the Gospell of Christ Ergo Onely professors of faith are to be baptized and so not children because they cannot professe faith The major or the former proposition is evident for if they baptized others then Christ commanded them they set up an Ordinance of their owne and were guilty of will-worship and taught for the Doctrines of God their owne traditions If any one shall deny this I desire he would shew me in the Scripture where the Lord Jesus hath declared his approbation of any mans setting up an Ordiance in his owne house which he himselfe enjoyned not with the reasons for such an assertion and we will fully consider of the matter The second proposition is likewise cleare if we consider the Commission given to his Disciples to baptize we shall see the persons expresly denominated to be believers as first that in Mathew where Christ saith Goe teach all Nations baptizing them From whence many though exceeding ignorantly lay a foundation for infant sprinkling concluding all nations are to be baptized and infants are a part of nations therefore to be baptized not knowing they may as well conclude all Heathens Infidels Barbarians Idolaters and the worst of men or any part of the Nations may be baptized by the same argument but the truth is these words are a cleare deniall of infant Baptisme for they are first commanded to teach the Nations and then baptize them that is to say them that are taught as it is in the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to be referred to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 included in the verb and that this may appeare to be the cleare minde of the spirit we will shew you it cannot be meant otherwise for if he meanes not them that are taught then they have a command to baptize unbelieuers which surely no man that pretends to know Christ dares to affirme But say some they are to baptize those that they teach which teaching is Object their outward declaration of the Word so that to whom they outwardly preach the word they may administer baptism To this I answer first This is not the true meaning of the word taught for the word signifies so to teach as to make Disciples they Sol. were to make Disciples as instruments in the hand of God as co-workers with the Lord and them they were to baptize and if it should bemeant to al to whom the Word was to be preached whethey believe or no this excludes Infants except we affirme we are to preach the Gospel to Infants of daies that are not capable of understanding our words which I think will never be-proved and as it excludes them it includes all unbelievers who hear the word and obey it not which is contrary to truth Again in that Scripture in Marke Goe preach the Gospel to every creature and he that believeth and is baptized shall be saved Faith is still put before Baptisme if any shall yet say Christ gives a Commission to Baptize any other then Believers let them set down where it was given and when and we will seriously weigh that Commission The second and last argument I shall at present propound though the first alone is sufficient against Infants Baptisme is this That which confounds the Church and the world making them both one is altogether unlawfull But Baptisme of Infants doth confound the Church and the world together therefore unlawfull The first is evident and so is the second if we consider that all men by naturall generation are but of this world naturall a naturall man begets a sonne in his own likenesse no man is born a Saint by virtue of his naturall birth the children of Believers and unbelievers are all in one state in respect of visible appearance But may some say that children of Believers are in the Covenant and so Object are not of the world therefore they may be Baptized If they are in the Covenant they are either in the Covenant of grace or some outward Covenant of Church Ordinances if any Sol. say they are in the covenant of grace I say they are all of them so or some of them so that all are not so consider what is said of Esau Ro. 9. and indeed election is no ground of Baptisme to be administred but profession but if you say they are in an outward Covenant I demand the proofe of such a Covenant in the Gospel but if any say there was an outward Covenant of Churchfellowship with Abrahams natural seed so now with the natural seed of all believers be not too hasty in your conclusions consider the Scripture there is now no Seed of Abraham according to the flesh who are the onely people of God but if we believe we are Abrahams children so that as Abrahams naturall seed enjoyed many jewish priviledges so now Abrahams spirituall seed enjoy spirituall priviledges Abraham was in a double capacity as a Father of many Nations in the flesh to whom pertained Circumcision the giving thelaw c. as a Father of the faithfull and so believers are only his seed But the promise is said to be unto them Acts 2. 38. The promise is to you Object and to your children therefore if the promise be unto them why may not they have the Seale of the promise Consider in answer to this two things 1. Those to whom the promise is made are commanded first Sol. to repent and be baptized so that if the bare being in the promise without reference to faith was a sufficient ground for the Apostle to baptize them I see not to what purpose he exhorts them first to repent Secondly consider the restriction of the promise 't is even to as many as the Lord our God shall call which must be restrained only to them whether you take the promise to be meant of remission of sins for this is given to no man but upon believing or if you mean outward ordinances they are onely for the called baptisme Church fellowship breaking bread prayer all are for the called who are onely able to act faith in them But children were circumcised and Baptisme comes in the roome of Circumcision Object therefore may children be baptized This reasoning from Circumcision to Baptisme of Infants will not hold for if you say the ground of both is the same and say they were circumcised because in the Covenant and so children Sol. Baptized if by Covenant you mean the promise of eternall life that was not the ground of circumcising any for many were in that covenant that were never circumcised for in truth 't was not the Covenant but the command of God that was is the ground of submitting to any Ordinance but if you say the Covenant was an outward promise of
takes her off from Jerusalem that Mountaine wherein they worshipped confining themselves to places therefore saith he Neither at Jerusalem nor at this Mountaine Now Christ doth not simply deny the worshipping of God at Jerusalem for we know the Churches worshipped God in their spirits at Jerusalem after Christs death but prophecyes of the abolishing of that legall and ceremoniall worship of the Jewes which was tyed to one place above another and indeed the worship of God under the Old Testament was in comparison of the worship of the Gospell fleshly or carnall not sinfull whereby they were tyed to many sacrifices and weary journies in going up to Jerusalem to worship But now there is great liberty and freedome wherein they professe God in ipirit So that to worship God in spirit and truth is to worship him after a spirituall manner from a spirituall principle in opposition to that legall state wherefore Paul cals himselfe a minister of the spirit and not of the letter Neither doth that place at all deny outward Baptisme for Christ saith The houre is already come when those that worship God worship him in spirit and truth When you will not deny Baptisme of water to be in use neither can a man truly worship God in any ordinance without he worship God in the spirit But Baptisme of water is a fleshly thing an outward thing which cannot be Object 3 admitted into the Kingdome of heaven for the Apostle saith the Kingdome of God is not meat and drinke but righteousnesse and peace and joy in the Holy Ghost Rom. 14. 17. Consider I pray thee the Apostle there meddles not with Baptisme Sol. but disswading them from offending one another in meate and drinke for some would eate flesh and some could not He tels them The Kingdome of God is not meate and drinke For those things were not commanded to be eaten or forbidded so that we should sinne if we doe or doe not eate But righteousnesse c. Now righteousnesse is the performance of all the commands of God to which Baptisme of water is a part as Christ saith Suffer me for thus it becometh me to fulfill all righteousnesse Christ did all things commanded and that as one of the commands of God So that this is no Argument at all except you can prove Baptisme of water to be the meate and drinke he there speakes of which can never be made manifest so that for thee to call Baptisme of water a fleshly thing it argues a carnall understanding of the commands of God But Paul cals it a fleshly thing for he saith We are the Circumcision Object which worship God in the spirit and rejoice in Christ Jesus and have no confidence in the flesh So that Paul relinquishes all outward things as Baptism and the like as fleshly worshipping God in the spirit Philip. 3. 3. This Objection is like the first where Paul points not at all at Sol. Baptisme but at his Jewish priviledges which he enumerates verse 5 and 6. Which very things he tels us be they which he meanes by flesh and hath not confidence in them Surely were we able to see how that we are commanded to glorifie God in soule body and spirit we should leave such carnall reasoning and not take Paulâ— arguing against Jewish outward Ceremonies abolished by Christs death as a ground against Baptisme of water which is grounded upon his death But water Baptisme ceased when spirit Baptisme came in and was not to Object continue after that for fire Baptisme devoures water Baptisme Behold into how great mistakes men run when they endeavour Sol. to vanquish the truth it selfe The Scripture expresly tels us Acts 10. That the Apostle Peter seeing Cornelius and those that were with him baptized with the Holy Ghost for the Holy Ghost fell on them as on the Apostles Acts 11. makes use of this as a ground to prove nothing could hinder him from being baptized with water Oh the subtilty of Antichrist who makes wise men even as it were mad to forge their owne reasons endeavouring to make that a ground of destroying water Baptisme which the Apostle used as an argument for the establishment of it But some say The Baptisme of water was onely used in the minority or infancy of the Church therefore when the Church grew higher in the knowledge of God they laid aside these things Therefore is it said in the Hebrewes We must leave the principles of the doctrines of Christ and go on unto perfection of which principles Baptisme is one which we ought now to leave Hebr. 6. 1. c. Whoever thou art that thus arguest against Baptisme by the same Sol. argument thou mayst leave faith toward Christ and the resurrection of the dead That I may clearly shew thee thy mistake of the Scripture consider the Apostle speaks to those who did owne those principles and reproved them not for owning them for Ch. 5. he tels them They had need to have them taught againe But for not encreasing in the knowledge of God Therefore he tels them For their time they had need to have beene teachers of others And so from these principles he drawes their thoughts higher into the mysteries of Christ So that the Apostle saith Leaving them we presse forward that is to say leaving now or at present to speake of them which yee know and owne already we will goe forward to speake of higher things which higher things destroy not the other which is evident if you consider the other to be the principles or beginnings of the doctrine of Christ Now the building destroyes not the foundation these beginnings and the other more perfect things are at perfect unity I but say some The Apostle saith He forgets those things that are behind Object and reached forth to those things that are before So that we must not onely leave them but forget them Phil. 3. 13. To which I answer The word forgetting is not to be taken Sol. for an absolute forgetfulnesse of all things he had before done for this Paul did not but in reference to the glory of perfection hee had in his eye he did as a man in a race running towards the prize he doth as it were forget all things behind him in respect of his continuall motion So in the things of God we ought day by day to presse forward till we come to the marke to the enjoyment of perfection So that there is no good ground for such an Objection for the Apostle James Commends them that are not forgetfull hearers but doers of the word But notwithstanding surely to be baptized is to know Christ after the Object flesh therefore saith Paul Though we have knowne Christ himselfe after the flesh yet henceforth know we no man after the flesh no not Christ himselfe 2 Cor. 5. 16. That we know not Christ after the flesh is true and yet it is as Sol. true that to be baptized is not to know Christ after the flesh this
Scripture is most strangely perverted from whence many soules take advantage to propagate their owne delusions That we may a little manifest the truth of this Scripture wee are to consider what it is to know Christ after the flesh if you say to know Christ after the flesh is to know him as dying at Jerusalem I say thus we are alwaies to know him neither doe we know him at all truly except we so know him and if you meane the knowledge of him in any Ordinance of the New Testament that is to know him according to the spirit But to know Christ after the flesh is to know him after a carnall manner in a way of distinction or outward priviledge by a fleshly relation for thus Paul once knew himselfe According to the flesh to be an Israelite circumcised the eight day and not a sinner of the Gentiles Thus did they know Christ to be of the natural seed of Abraham that went forth preaching peculiarly to the Jewes Who said Salvation is of the Jewes but now they knew him not after those fleshly distinctions for now there is neither Jew nor Gentile bond nor free Barbarian nor Scythian Male nor female but all are one in Christ Iesus therefore saith Paul verse 17. If any man be in Christ he is a new Creature old things are past away that is to say the priviledges the Iewes have by birth and that old administration therefore saith Paul We serve God not in the oldnesse of the letter but in the newnesse of the spirit not in a fleshly manner but spiritually so that this Scripture doth not in the least speak against baptisme or breaking of bread but against the fleshly priviledges that many Iewes boasted of which were done away in Christ But the Scripture saith If yee be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world why as though living in the world are yee subject to ordinances Object Touch not tast not handle not which all are to perish with the using after the commandements and doctrines of men which directly speakes against Ordinances how then can you plead for the ordinance of water Baptisme or any other outward Ordinance Col. 2. 21. If thou didst but consider what Ordinances he speakes against Sol. thou wouldest have spared this objection he forbids the rudiments of the world the doctrines and commands of men in the things of God these are not by Saints to be tasted touched nor handled for they perish in the using that is to say we reape no benefit by them but we suffer losse in the use of them but I hope no man will say we are not to touch the doctrines ordinances and commandements of Christ if they shall not onely Baptisme but faith and spirituall worship must not be touched for these are the doctrines of Christ and the same Apostle that forbids these earthly sinfull commands himselfe praises the Corinths For keeping the Ordinances he delivered to them 1 Cor. 11. 2. which he received of Christ It is true the Apostles did practise Baptisme of water but they did it Object only as an outward Ceremony of Johns baptisme which was not easily layd down and so they practised Circumcision That the Apostles and Disciples did practise baptisme I have already Sol. proved and not upon Johns but Christs accompt And I say again they did it as a command from Christ for if they had done it only as a Ceremony how comes it to passe Peter commands the Gentiles to be baptized who were ignorant of Iohns baptisme and how comes it in the Disciples Commission as I have more largely before proved it to be Again if it was only practised as a Ceremony I desire thou wouldest shew me where how or when this Ceremony ended surely 't was not by fire baptisme as is most evident from Acts. 10. Yea this is evident all Ceremonies that pointed at a Christ to come ceased in Christ but baptisme as I have before proved hath its institution from Christ as risen from the dead but for a more clear and distinct answer I say it is true that the Apostle did circumcise Timothy in the Gospel yet notwithstanding the ground or accompt whereupon he circumcised is farre different from the ground of the administration of baptisme for if you consider it you will finde that Paul did not circumcise Timothy but upon the desire of the Elders of Jerusalem for the satisfaction of the Jewes Paul being to goe to them that he might have the more advantage to gaine upon them did this for if you observe it Timothy's mother was a Jew and so of right he ought to be circumcised Paul had the greater care to doe it least they should have refused to admit him into their company But oh how far different was the administration of baptisme performed by virtue of Christs command as I have plainly proved before not to please any but in obedience to Christ Again this was only once and only to one that we read of practised For afterward when they would have Titus to be circumcised Paul would not give way to it no not at all when the Galathians pleaded for it he expresly told them if they were circumcised Christ should Profit them nothing Now doe I demand of thee to shew me where the Scripture saith that baptism was administred to please man or where you finde the Lord by the Scripture forbidding the use of it or disannulling the practise of it So that for any one to conclude baptism was used because it was a ceremony that ought but could not easily be laid down is but a bare affirmation which hath no colour of truth or proofe and if any one shall affirme it is so I pray him in love to give me the grounds and reasons from the Scriptures for such an assertion to which I here promise in the strength of the Lord to returne a further answer But some other object from Matth. 28. That the disciples are there commanded Object to baptize into the name not in the Name of the Father c. that is into the virtue of the Father or into the Father himself which is only true in the baptism of the spirit so that that baptism cannot be meant a baptism of water I have already proved that the Apostles did not by any act of Sol. theirs give the Spirit for they did only publish to the eare it was the Lord spake to the heart they baptized with water but Christ with the holy Ghost and fire it was the work of Paul to plant and Apollo to water but only of the Lord to give the blessing So that the true understanding of these words are that the disciples were commanded to preach the Lord Jesus and his name and to baptize them into that name that is to say to dip them into his profession to seperate them unto the Lord and therefore Paul saith were you baptized into the name of Paul that you so much boast your selves to be of