Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
truth_n authority_n church_n scripture_n 9,317 5 6.6427 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A35862 A Dialogue between a new Catholic convert and a Protestant shewing the doctrin of transubstantiation to be as réasonable to be believ'd as the great mystery of the trinity by all good Catholicks. 1686 (1686) Wing D1297; ESTC R29715 4,548 10

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

A DIALOGUE Between a New Catholic Convert AND A PROTESTANT Shewing the DOCTRIN of TRANSUBSTANTIATION To be as Reasonable to be Believ'd as the GREAT MYSTERY OF THE TRINITY By all Good Catholicks Publish'd with Allowance LONDON Printed by Henry Hills Printer to the King 's Most Excellent Majesty for His Houshold and Chappel 1686. A DIALOGUE BETWEEN A New Catholic Convert AND A PROTESTANT Concerning the Doctrins of the Trinity and Transubstantiation A. YOU cannot imagin how much I am overjoy'd to see you I have been big with Discourse these three days for want of utterance You may remember when we talk'd together last we parted in a Dispute concerning Transubstantiation and the Holy Trinity of their equal Reasonableness and Authority I must confess I was not at that time so thorowly arm'd with Reasons to shew you the Parallel but since I have given my self a little leisure to consider of it and I am persuaded I shall be able to give you satisfaction B. Sir you know I am always glad of any Opportunity to gain your good Company but especially upon so good an Occasion I 'le assure you I am not nor ever was an Enemy to Catholic Communion and if I had not too just a Cause I should never suffer my self in that which without reasonable Grounds might be call'd a wilful Schism A. I have no reason to doubt your Integrity and therefore shall not question that I shall only desire the liberty to press my old Argument That you would relie on the Authority of the Church I must confess you have often question'd the doing of it but I am sure when you shall consider there are Mysteries as well as Doctrins in the Christian Religion and when you know that Mysteries are not to be fathom'd by Natural Reason you must needs conclude that in some Cases your safest way is to trust Tradition Now certainly no one can give us so good an Account of That us the Church B. But Sir to be short What relation has this to the present Parallel of the Trinity and Transubstantiation The Authority of the Church is another Point as disputable as That A. Very much For as these two Doctrins have equal ground from Scripture Reason and Tradition so is there the same Obligation of your receiving one as well as the other And indeed I have since wonder'd at my own Profession while a Protestant to think how blind and partial I was But I must confess because we are in a Dispute it is better laying by such aggravating Circumstances and indeed I cannot but be sensible what Prejudices such Discourses always make and therefore I shall speak nothing more of that nature B. But to return to the main Point I must tell you I do not think them equally grounded on Scripture Reason or Tradition and indeed you may remember that was the old Point in dispute with us A. Well Sir to shew you your Error I shall begin with the several Particulars in their Order and so first as to the Tradition of Transubstantiation Now 't is evident That has been deliver'd with less interruption than that of the Holy Trinity That Mystery was question'd in the very Infancy of the Church nay not only so but the Arians prevail'd much against it about the beginning of the Fourth Age. On the other side Transubstantiation lay unquestion'd and quiet a long time and when it came to debate there was no such opposition as that of Arius to call in question the Authority of its Tradition the Church receiv'd it unanimously and in that sense continu'd till rash Reason attempted to fathom the unlimited Miracles and Mysteries of God B. But the Fathers are not half so express in the Doctrin of Transubstantiation as they are in the Mystery of the Holy Trinity A. That 's true and there 's very good Reason for it Transubstantiation has not been a Doctrin so long in dispute and 't is not customary for Men to argue unquestionable Truths And whereas you may think that Transubstantiation has of late receiv'd such shrewd Repulses by your Books I 'le assure you you forget how much the true Catholic Zeal destroys the Seeds of Heresies Do you think that so many Bishops not only of the Eastern but of the Western Church also could be Arians and yet suppose that that Opinion wanted as plausible a Pretence of Tradition Certainly if you consider that you cannot think to establish the Doctrin of the Trinity by Tradition more than Transubstantiation especially considering the strong Footsteps of that Sect even in the Fathers now extant I would cite you some of them but that they are not so much to my main Design and indeed my aim is Brevity B. Well Sir 't is true we cannot so well plead Tradition to what you have urg'd and especially when I call to mind that Arianism was confirm'd by a General Council But we alledge an higher ground we stand upon the Authority of the Scriptures and indeed that is the true Touchstone of all Doctrins A. 'T is true if you will follow the Catholic Church and take the Scriptures literally you may discover the Mystery of the Holy Trinity in them but if you once yield to Figurative Allusions and Interpretations the Arians will be as much too hard for you as you imagin your selves to be for the Catholic Church In short both Doctrins will be at a loss and both equally require the Authority of the Church to support them B. O no surely the Doctrin of the Holy Trinity is more express in Scriptures than so A. To satisfie you that what I say is Truth because I may represent the Parallel the clearer I will personate an Arian that Sect so often condemn'd by the Ancient Church and you shall see his Plea against the Trinity is as fair as yours against Transubstantiation And because this is the main Parallel I shall be somewhat the longer that I may give you the greater satisfaction B. I shall be very glad to hear what you can speak to the matter A. First then I say 'T is highly unreasonable to interpret that Text 1 John 5.7 That there be Three in Heaven that bear record and those Three are One as likewise John 10.30 I and my Father are One literally for if we do we not only oppose Sense and Reason but we make Construction directly against the very Scripture John 10.31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38. and John 17.21 22 23. 1 Cor. 3.8 And what can be urg'd more against us in respect of Transubstantiation B. Very right Sir that Interpretation carries a forcible Reasonableness but the Doctrin of the Trinity do's not wholly depend upon those two Proofs A. Right it do's not but I can give you further Demonstration in this Parallel A principal Ground of the Trinity is because the Son is so often call'd God in Scripture as John 1.1 2. Rom. 9.5 c. Now if we did not comply with the Catholic Church and make a