yeild your selves to be wholly and absolutely ruled by the will of any nor inthrall your judgements submit your consciences to the sentences lawes definitions doctrines of any man or Angell but onely to your Lord and Master Christ But if so be we were to receive all that is prescribed and submit to impositions of men without search and scrutiny whether they be of God or no we should make men Masters of our faith This were to set man in Gods stead to put man in Christs throne this were to yeeld an implicite faith and blinde obedience which to doe is to make men Gods and your selves beastes Thus you see I have laid downe the position I have cleared it to you by Scripture I have confirmed it by argument 3. I am now in the third place to shew you that this hath been the constant doctrine of our learned and orthodox Divines in opposition to the Papists ancient and moderne I thinke it not necessary to name many a few therefore for all Clem. Alex. hath this passage * Non absolutè enuntiantibus fidem habemus quibus licet contrarium enuâ—tiare c. Clem. Alex. Si contraria invicem senserint concilia debemus quasi judices probare meliora Hilar. de Synod advers Arianos We are not absolutely to assent to the doctrines and determinations of men who themselves may dissent from their owne opinions nor to expect the testimony which is given of men but to search and prove what is the voice of God Another this * If Synods should determine contrary we as judges should prove and approve of the better It is the speech of another viz. a Ego solis eis Scripturarum libris qui jam canonici aâ—pellantur didici hanc honorem timo remâ— differre ut nullum eorum authorem sâ—ibendo aliquid errasse firmissi nè credam c. Aug. Dâ—v 169. I have learned to give this honour and reverence to the Canonicall Scriptures only to believe what ever is therein is truth it self but for other writings though men excellent in learning and holines yet I reade them so as that I do not therefore think theÌ„ to be true because they have thus spoken thought but because they do thus appear to me to be consonant agreable to the minde of God the word of truth Another thus b Iâ— qui praeest si praeter voluntatem Dei vel praeter quod in Sacris Scripturis evidenter praecipitur vel dicit aliquid vel imperat tanquam falsus test is Dei aut sacrilegas habeatur Isidor If any that are in authority shall declare or command any thing which is not agreeable to the will of God or not evidently commanded in Scripture let him be held as a false witnes of God or one sacrilegious Another c Omnis homo dimittens rationem propter authoritatem humanam incidit in inspientiam bestialem Daven He that puts off reason or subjects reason to meet humane authority fals into beastly folly and the same Author d Nos plus rationi damus quà m cutcunque authoritati humanae c. We doe not preferre the authority of any meer man before reason and therefore seeing the fathers whether taken singly or joyntly in Councels are but meer men and their authority but meer humane authority The faith of Christians is not to be so subjugated to the determinations of them that there shall be left no use of reason much more of Scripture in proving and examining doctrines whether of God or no. e Sicut debitor est voluntas suae operationis in bonis volenâ—iâ— sic intellectus suae operationis debitor est in veris credendis seu cognoscendis quare nec error nec ignorantia excuset unquam a perditione Paris de leg cap 21. Pariensis hath this passage As the will is a debtor unto God in its operations for the choice of good so is every mans understanding a debtour to God in its operations for the beleeving of truth Therefore neither errour nor ignorance can excuse any before God if they perish Another saith this f Ad ipsum verbum Dei oportet nos omnes scientiarum disciplinaâ— opiniones tanquam ad lydeum lapidem examinare c quodcunque ab eo authâ—râ—tatem non habet eadem facilitate contemnitur quâ affertur Cornel. Agrip de vanit scient cap 100 de verbo Dei It is our duty to bring all opinions to the Word as the touch-stone of them and if any hath not its authority thence It may be as easily contemned as it is offered and held forth Luther also speaks the same thing he hath this passage g Over debent ferre judicium utrum Praeâ—ati vocem Christi vel alienorum proponant Luther Tom 2. pag. 375. Consul Dav. de Jud. nor fidei ubi plures recitantur pag. 167 186. c. etiam 168 c. It is the duty of the flock of Christ to examine whether their Pastors doe speak the voice of Christ or visions of their own heart The same man saith further Where the Word of God is preached the people have not only power and command to judge of doctrines but every godly man ought to performe this under danger of salvation And if we should consult with all they all speak the same language and say though there is not given to all the faithfull a spirit of interpreting Scripture in an authoritative and publike way yet every Christian hath a spirit to examine and judge of doctrine in his own conscience Learned Whitaker hath this expression h Non datur omnibuâ— fidelibus spiritus interpraetandi Scripturas ad authoritatem publicam in ecclesia sed tamen â—â—nâ—us cujuscunque Christiani est spiritâ—◠〈◊〉 ad privatam doctrinae probationem dijudicationem in conscientia ipsius Polan Syntag. l. 1. cap 45. Omnibus piis incumbit ut sibi caveant quam vis doctrinaÌ„ diligenter examinent ne falsa forsan pro veris suscipiaÌ„t quisquis debet niâ—i sua fide sueque judicio diviniâ—us in spâ—rato non ex alterius nutu arbitrio pendere Whitak cont 1. quaest 5. de interpret Script It lies all Christians much upon to examine all doctrine lest they doe otherwise take false doctrine for true and every one ought to lean to the perswasion of his own judgement enlightned and not to depend upon the will and judgement of others Another of our learned Divines saith i In doctrinis quorumvis mortalium admiâ—tenâ—is adhibendum est examen judicium discretionis ut possimus tanquam probi argentarij adulterinam à legâ—tiâ—â—a doctrina discernere Dâ—v In the receiving of the doctrines of any mortall man we are to examine and like unto tryers of silver are to discern between false doctrine and true Again k In doctrina investiganda non alienis tantum modo oculis sed suis utendum c. Daven In the finding out of doctrine we are
consult but they also judged and determined those opinions which had been taught to be disturbing destructive and subverting errours v. 24. 3. They have not only power to enquire and judge but they have power to censure and condemn errours All which is but yet a dâ—gmatiâ—all or doctâ—inall power of declaring and determining of truth or of errour which I conceive will be granted on all hands even by those who are most shie and tender in weighing forth â—ny power unto them And indeed Act. 15. doth make all this evident there they examined they judged they censured the errour which was broached among them And after ages they followed the same patern The first great Councel of Nice as I shewed you did censure and condemn the heresie of Arius The Councel of Ephesus did condemn the heresie of Nestorius the Councel of Constantinople did censure and condemn the heresie of Macedonius Euseb eccl hist l. 6. c. 42. The errour of Montanus was judged and condemned by many Synods in Asia So that this is cleer a Synod hath power to examine to judge to censure and condemn errours Obj. But it will be said Councels may erre That famous Councel of Nice it self had yet it's errours one of which was That heretikes should be rebaptized c. And if Councâ—ls may erre Concilium Nic enum primuâ—â— quod suit omnium nobilissi â—um â—eleber â—â—mum tamen erravit Whit. â—oâ—t 2 c 2. q 6 p 6 8 620. then may they censure and condemn truth as well as errour and that is fearfull Answ This is one of the Scepticall Objections of this age we have too many who themsâ—lves being sure in nothing seek to weaken all determinations what ever as if they because they are subject to errour might not be certain in truth but for answer 1. It 's granted Councels may erre and the best of Councels may erre That famous Councâ—l of Nice had it's errours which Whitaker in respect it was so famous is tender of uncovering But though they may erre doth it follow that they do alwaies erre This is a non sequitur 2. Again though they may erre doth this take away their right of judgement of errour and truth weaknesse and subjection to errour in judgement doth not take away right of judgement God hath allowed this way of judgement to determine of doubtfull doctrines and decide controversies and he hath said Let the spirit of the Prophets be subject to the Prophets 1 Cor. 14.32 A place which Junius applies to this and the errour of some must not nullifie the ordinance of God 3. Though they may erre yet they are not so likely to erre as others an Assembly of godly and learned men met together in Gods way they are under a promise to be led into the way of all truth 4. Though they may erre in some particulars of lesser moment yet points of greater moment are clear and evident 5. In what they erre we are not to follow them Ministeriall judgement is theirs private and practicall judgement is yours and you are not to receive and embrace their determinations further then they shall appear to you to be consonant and agreeable to the Word of truth you are not to obey because they say it but because they say it authoritatively from Gods word Officiall authority they have as a Church of Christ but objective authority they have not so that what they say because they say it is therefore to be closed with Thus the Papists say not we We say that Synods have no peremptoâ—y absolute illimited authority to determine as they please but their power is Ministeriall and limited to the Word of God and we may say for our own practice Tantum valet â—ecretum Conâ—tlâ—j quantum vaâ—et ejus ratio Amâ—s The decrees of Councels are no farther binding then the reasons of them are evident to be of God And so much shall serve for the first generall branch of the power of Synods We come to the second 2. As they have power relating to erroneous doctrines so they hâ—ve power as relating to erroneous persons And this we will lay forth in these branches 1. They have power to conveâ—n them and call them before them if by their writings or otherwise their persons are known Indeed in Act. 15. we doe not reade of any summons of those false teachers nor was there any need for they may be conceived to be personally present and rebuked in the face of the Synod as subverters of souls And if they were not present to whom doth Peter speak vers 10. Now therefore why tempt ye God to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples Certainly it was not to the Apostles and Elders they were not guilty of that fact but those who sought to obtrude the observation of the Mosaick Law upon the Brethren Again who were they that made much disputing in the Synod ver 7. sure it was not the Apostles nor any others besides themselves but had they not been there I thinke there is no question among rationall men but the Apostles and Elders conveened had a power to call them and that it was their duty to come Certainly if we be bound to be ever ready to give to any that asketh us a reason of the hope which is in us much more to such an Assembly as this authorized of God for such ends as these were So that I take the first for granted they have power to call erroneous persons 2. They have power to admonish and rebuke them this is evident also from Act. 15. those disturbers were rebuked in the face of the whole Assembly There is a three-fold rebuke Fraternall Concionall Judiciall the one is done by a brother the second may be done by one single Pastour as is commanded 1 Tim. 4.2 3 4 5. Preach the Word reprove rebuke exhort with all long suffering the last is done by a consociation of Pastours and Elders If one single Pastour hath power to rebuke authoritatively an erring brother how much more a consociation a Synod of Pastours and Elders 3. They have power doctrinally to censure such persons and to condemn them Thus you see in Act. 15. They censured those for lyars troublers subverters of souls And thus may a Synod censure and condemn an erroneous person Thus did the Councel of Nice censure and condemn Arius not only his errour but the person also * Tom. 1. epiâ—t ad ubâ—â—j orthodoxos Act. 1. ult Athanasius desired and vehemently supplicated his fellow-pastours of other Churches to meet together in a Synod to vindicate and redeem the Church from errour and that they would 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by thâ—ir suffrages condemn and reject the authours of such mischiefs There are usually laid down three wayes of censuring and condemning erroneous persons 1. The first is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 politically when an erroneous person is censured by civil censures viz. to be imprisoned or to suffer in his
revealed Indeed Satan hath many other ends as I have shew'd you and besides them divers other might be named Satan is busie when God is sowing wheate to sowe his tares when God is discovering of truth to be communicating of errours he hopes in the heate of the market to vent his own wares he hopes in the throng to put off one with another and that men will not so carefully observe it at least if men be shie to entertaine the one he hopes by this to lessen the authority and to prejudice the entertainment of the other And indeed the multitude of errours abroad they are great disadvantages to the entertainment of the truth they are a great prejudice to the receiving of it Men that heare of false reports abroad though they have not been abused with them will be shie to entertaine truth so men that heare of a multitude of erronious opinions abroad in the world though they have not been seduced or led aside with them yet will be shie and afraid to own the truths which God in that generation doth hold forth to them And by this meanes Satan hath a great advantage he perswades and prevailes with men to adhere to their former principles without any inquiry after more And this is dangerous As it is dangerous to stint and bound our selves in practise thus much we will doe and no more as it is the spirit of many men So it is dangerous to stint and bound our selves in principles or things to be knowne thus much I know and I will search into the revelation of no more 2 Pet. 1.9 1 Pet. 3.18 Heb. 6.1 As we are not perfect in grace and therfore we are to adde to faith virtue to our virtue patience c. to grow in grace to be led forward to perfection and he that sits down with any measure is yet to begin So we are not perfect in knowledge the Apostle tells you we know but in part and therefore we are still to study and search not only after clearer revelation of things known but fuller revelation of Gods mind to us and he that contents himselfe with the measure of revelation he hath is yet to begin in the knowledge of Christ And therefore this is a dangerous errour when Satan shall perswade and prevaile with us to adhere in those things we doe know and sleight any further revelation to be content with those measures of revelations we have and to seeke to know no more of Gods mind and will to us And this is another wile which Satan hath in the multitude of errours that thereby he might prejudice the further search and inquiry into the mind of God disadvantage the entertainment of truth and perswade with us to stick and adhere only in those which are already revealed to us It is good to adhere to those that are revealed but bad to adhere in them and seeke no further revelation because we are not perfect in knowledge therefore must grow As we say of grace so of truth It is good to have a heart stablished in grace but stinted in grace is nought stablishing doth keepe the heart from going backward and that is good but stinting doth keepe a man from going forward and that is nought You are to aspire to grow in knowledge as well as in grace But you will say what needs any more Object our Fathers held out these truths and sought no further and we hope they are saved and so shall we too if we doe but adhere in the truths of our fore-fathers and seeke no further 1. The reasoning is corrupt I say this is corrupt reasoning Answ that our Fathers held out these and these things for truth it is not enough to evidence they are truth that they went in this way is not sufficient to declare it was a good way and a way for us to walk in this is to take up our Religion by tradition not from Scripture the Papists have the same Arguments our Fathers were of this Religion and therefore it is good which you will all say is corrupt reasoning You have a place in Jer. 9.14 they walked after Balaam which their fathers taught them 2. But secondly admit our fathers held forth these things for truths yet they held not forth all truth they knew some but yet they knew not all truths It is said we know but in part And God is therefore said to appoint a Ministery in the Church for the further building us up in knowledge Ephes 4.12 13. for the edifying of the body of Christ till we all come in the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the sonnes of God to a perfect man 3. Againe though our fathers held out these truths yet we wrong our fathers to say that they sought no further though they knew these and these truths yet they labour'd not only after a clearer revelation of truths known but after further revelation of truths not yet known and discovered to them and this appeares both in their writings and also upon experience every generation growes up in further knowledge of the mysteries of Christ and the Gospel as might be instanced in many points which have been debated between us and Papists and us and Arminians Pelagians all which truths have been the proper revelations to those particular generations And therefore you wrong them to say they knew these and sought no further And the experience of much more revealed in every generation is sufficient confutation of that Did our fathers in King Henry the eights dayes who first rejected the papall tyranny or our fathers in King Edward the sixths dayes who set up that infant reformation that wanting nursing fathers and mothers hath been kept back and held down so long where otherwise it might have come to manhood and perfection the thriving of the child lies much in the goodnesse of the nurse Kings and Queenes are called nursing fathers and nursing mothers to Religion this child this infant Reformation hath not had that nursing whereby it should thrive the breast of nourishment hath been kept from it and drawne out towards children of errour they have thriven the true child hath pin'd away Kings and Queenes are called shadowes as Josiah Lam. 4.20 32. Isa 2. And we speake it with griefe as things have been carried they have indeavoured to make them like trees which the papall faction have clasped about and adhered to as the Ivie to the tree not because they love it but because they have sucked sweet from it but they have been such shades as have hindered the growth of better things But to passe this If you come down to Queene Elizabeths dayes did our fathers in her time know so much had they that full revelation of that which is in our dayes he that reades may easily see And therefore this is a plaine confutation though our fathers did hold out some truths yet they sought after more they did not rest in that they had but
a step-mother to sound doctrine Indeed some errours had their frownes few their blowes them that had it was not as they were errours but as the persons which held them were enemies to them This I speake the rather because men say it was better in the Bishops time then now for then there were not so many errours I say there were yea and such as were more dangerous being foundation errours such as opposed the power of godlinesse such as were flatly opposite to the offices of Christ such as were destructive to the true religion and such I know none on foot now if there were yet they had their being then and their corruption in doctrine and discipline hath been a great occasion to the breeding and begetting of them if you say though they were in that time yet they durst not appeare I may say againe in answer to that 1. There were other errours farre more dangerous that durst appeare both in Presse and Pulpit 2. Againe as those errours durst not appeare so neither was the truth suffered to appeare for one errour which they suppressed they held down many a truth if they suppressed errour they murthered truth and stifled it 3. If they suppressed any yet they reformed none It is the proper work of the discipline of Christ rather to reforme then to restraine rather to amend then to suppresse at least to reforme with restraining and to restrain together with reforming Indeed to suppresse by reforming and amending and not by silencing and smothering them which was their way and the great occasion of the swelling and not the abating of them As it is with Rivers the stopping of them doth but swell them and increase them the more it doth not any way lessen and abate them Certainly the way of Christ to deale with errours is to endeavour to reforme them to amend them to preach the word boldly to convince gainsayers to admonish to exhort to reprove to mourne over them and when nothing will doe to ejâ—ct them and cast them out Tit. 3.10 and when that is done not to leave them but to labour still to convince them to mourne over them Government as Christs doth not reach to crumenall or corporall punishment either to the punishment of the body or the state as I shall shew at large hereafter when I come to set down the wayes which are left us in the word to restraine to reduce men from errour Now then the way which they went silencing suspending imprisoning fining of men whipping undoing men Certainly was not the way of Christ for the reforming of errours * Suadenda fides non imponenda saith Bern. men are rather to be perswaded then commanded rather to be dealt withall by the authority of God then of man which is as nothing in heavenly things when God concurres not but this I shall speake unto at large in the last question and therfore will proceed no farther now This is the fourth ground of abounding errours in our dayes even the want of the discipline of Christ the want of regular proceedings in severall Congregations and Synods for the reforming of them 5. A fift ground is the too much connivance nay incâ—uragement that they find among the people of God this is a great ground of broaching opinions We say a receiver makes a thiefe your readinesse to comply with opinions and to receive all doth give great incouragement to broach them It was that which the Prophet complained of in his time Jer. 5.31 The Prophets prophesie falsely and the Priests bear rule by their meanes and my people love to have it so and what will be the end thereof ô quam consentaneum cries one in the reigne of the Bishops how did the Prophets or those Emissaries Preachers they had sent forth prophesie falsely and how did the Priests bear rule by that meanes they held up the standing and dignity of the Bishops and how did the people love to have it so they were well enough pleased and contented with their doctrine and way We were like Issachar who thought rest was good although it was with burthen and you see now what is the end thereof Some of this may be appliable to us the Prophets Prophecie falsely and my people love to have it so there is too much connivance too much content too much pleasing among the godly themselves in variety of opinions though none under the notion of errour Indeed there is thus much good in it that things come to be debated and scanned by this we come to search upon what grounds we stand we come to sift out the truth of God which certainly never was more clearely revealed then when some errours have been the occasion to cleare it and bring it forth as I shewed before In the point of Free-grace in opposition to mans free-will in the work of conversion which had not been so fully discovered if Pelagius had not broached that errour that a man might be saved if he would So the freenesse of Gods grace in justification had not been so clearely discovered if the Papists had not broached and maintained that errour of justification by works Indeed were they undoing errours that are preached and held forth by any St Johns rule comes in Epist 2. ver 10 11. If there come any unto you and bring not this doctrine that is that Jesus is the Christ as he shews you before ver 7 8. Receive him not into your houses neither bid him God speed for he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evill deeds So then did you know any to hold forth fundamentall errours such as are the overthrow of faith or destructive to the power of godlinesse there is no countenance to be given to such you make your selves sharers with him in his fin and bring upon your selves the same guilt And therefore saith Paul Tit. 3.10 A man that is an heretique after the first and second admonition reject knowing that he that is such is subverted and sinneth being condemned of himselfe These are the rules for undoing errours Nay and were they defiling though not daâ—ning errours were they but sinfull though not destroying errours yet if they were evidenced to us and manifest to us to be errours we ought not to connive at them to countenance them in their way but to admonish to reprove them to exhort them and use all possible wayes left by Christ to reclaime them But now when the things held forth are but meerely opinion or if more yet they are not any way injurious to faith or hurtfull to the power and practise of godlinesse then there may be more agreement the difference of judgement should not in this case alienate affections though you are not all of one mind yet you are all of one heart and here you differ only about the way to advance Gods glory You have both cordiall affections to God and Christ you desire to bring him glory only you differ in the way one thinks
thee on selfe purging but at last he that shall come will come 4. A fourth ground of instability may be the violence and heate of their affections to find out truth which puts them on to an inquisitivâ—nesse a triall a search of all things In which search it may be this appeares a truth and may be another time there seemes a truth in another men are not setled while they are searching they are not fixed while they are inquiring their good affections prompt them on to inquire after truth and during inquiry they are unfixed and unsetled in the truth And so much for the second generall ground why many are carried away viz. want of stability 3. A third ground too much credulity Some men are too slow to beleeve and some are too facile and easie of beliefe to be too slow to beleeve when God speakes is our wickednesse and to be too facile and easie of beliefe what man speakes is weaknesse It is not good to be slow to beleeve a truth and it is evill to be facile to beleeve an errour and yet both these may arise from the same grounds in the spirit A man is slow to beleeve a truth because he doth suspect it an errour and he is facile to beleeve an errour because he doth apprehend it for a truth so that both these may arise from the honesty of a mans spirit in the one he is fearfull to entertaine an errour and therfore slow to beleeve a truth in the other he is fearfull to reject a truth and therfore gives entertainment to an errour Feare is oftentimes made a shooing-horne to draw on an errour and to hold out a truth But this I am not now to deale withall That which I am now upon seemes the contrary to feare viz. too much credulity and easinesse of spirit to beleeve which though it be contrary yet two contrary causes may produce one and the same effect Errour may be the effect of an excessisive feare as well as of an easie faith though indeed it be more properly the effect of too easie faith then of an excessive feare Men that take all upon trust are like to be deceived And it is a maine ground why many are carried away with errour their overmuch credulity their easinesse of beliefe There is too much of this temper even in the godly themselves and I have thought of divers grounds of it 1. This easinesse to beleeve doth arise from the great esteeme of the wisdome and holinesse of those who hold forth an opinion if indeed he were learned and not godly or if he were godly and weake in knowledge it would give some place to jealousie but where these two meete together they have great authority upon the spirits of men and all that proceeds from such men is received as infallible truth men take things upon trust from an honest man but they will examine what a cheater brings if an honest man bring you gold you will scarce try it especially if he say it is weight he hath tried it and he knowes it to be weight but if a dishonest man bring it though he say it is good yet you will try it Men will suspect a truth if a liar tell it and therfore Christ would not own the Devils acknowledgement of him when he said thou art the Sonne of God But they will be ready to beleeve an untruth if an honest faithfull man affirme it When you heare any news of great concernment the first thing you enquire is of what credit is the authour and if he be thus qualified 1. That he be a man of great intelligence one who knowes much of affaires 2. If he be a wise man and an honest man one who is not over credulous that will beleeve all and disperse for truth what ever he heares if he be one who hath seldome failed in his intelligence one that hath often spoken truth you conclude that what ever he brings is truth and yet it is possible for this man to publish a falshood too So if you know one who is a wise learned man a man hath much commerce with Heaven and intelligence thence one who is godly and holy and a man not apt to receive all opinions not overcredulous to take in all nor forward to vent all which he hath heard nay and perhaps hath been one who hath delivered many glorious truths of Christ why such a man you are ready to receive all from him even as Gospell you beleeve all he saith every thing comes with a great deale of authority into your spirits And yet its possible for this man to be mistaken it is possible to erre we know but in part saith the Apostle and who can say he is infallible in his knowledge Indeed there is much to be given to a man thus qualified in points that are of lesse concernment and controverted on all sides and this may be done I conceive without any prejudice to faith I say it may be done and yet not to resolve our faith into the authority of men But when this carries all when opinions are drunke in because they are the judgement of such men or because such men so godly so learned so faithfull doe hold them forth this is to pin our faith upon anothers sleeve this is to resolve our faith into the authority of others and is a shread of that garment whereby Babylon is distinguished it hath much of the Roman doctrine in it I beleeve as the Church beleeves so I beleeve it because such hold it forth And that is the first ground of overmuch credulousnesse in men which we had need to beware of and the more because we are too apt to slide into it and put man in Gods steed to us 2. A second ground of this overmuch credulousnesse is the benigne and faire aspects which an opinion carries It may be you heare of an opinion and it is comely drest it carries such faire and benigne aspects it lookes so lovely that we are ready to receive it and give entertainment to it without any more examination Thus the Devil beguiled Eve at the first the Apostle tells us she was deceived and what deceived her it was the benigne aspects which the fruit carried you reade it Gen. 3.6 And when she saw that the tree was good for food and that it was pleasant to the eyes and a tree to be desired to make one wise here were the benigne aspects the lovely lookes of it and what followes she tooke of the fruit thereof and did eate and did eate her death in it too so here when we looke upon the benigne and faire aspects which an opinion may seeme to carry we are ready to receive it and give entertainment to it without further triall This is to worke upon the understanding by the affections which is a preposterous and a dangerous way because the affections are blinde coecae potentiae and those gain'd they win the understanding to them by
this passage Then doe we sufficiently know that the doctrine is of God when we perceive it to be propounded to us by our lawfull Pastor especiall a Councell assenting to it And if any will not rest here in the doctrine propounded but will try further and arrogate judgement over their judges and call to question whether those things are truths which are propounded by the Church by whom the spirit of God would teach us let such an one know he doth transgresse Gods bounds and the way and manner of trying of spirits commanded of God The same man saith further It is not fit that any private man should arrogate to himselfe to judge of the doctrines or opinions of his Priest Quic simpliciter omnes jubebantur sacerdoti de rebus controversis aâ—â—quid statuentâ— acquiescere Greg. Ecclesiae ministerio credimus simpliciter absolutè si ministri ecclesiae in aliquo dubio definiendo errarent populus Christianus errare posset imo deberet Stapl. because every one are simply and absolutely commanded to rest in the determinations of the Priest I will but name another who yet riseth higher We doe simply and absolutely believe the ministry of the Church And the people are so subjected to the sentences of their Pastors that if the Priest doe erre in any thing the people may and ought to erre in obedience of them So that you see if you aske the judgement of the Papists in this point you are in a poore case you are to stand to the determinations and definitions of Synods Councells without any doubt or examination whether they be true or no and that they might the better bring in this implicite faith and blinde obedience They tell you that they are infallible that you might the rather put out your owne eyes and be led by their light they tell you that they are unerring guides and in indeed if this were true the people might better shut their eyes and goe by theirs they might rather tye their boate to their ship follow the dictates definitions of them without either doubt or examination but they must believe the one that they cannot erre and then they must doe the other that is stand to all their sentences and determinations But we will passe this onely we shew you that they take away all power in any Christian man of judging or examining and prooving the doctrines which are propounded by their Councells and Bishops and doe require a blinde faith and obedience to them all saying that every particular person ought to stand to the determinations of the Church and to beleeve them to be truth because the Church hath an unerring spirit And this belief suits well with the people say they to believe as the Church believes for he that doth believe him that doth believe is not improperly said to believe though he know not what he doth believe An opinion which doth a Papistae in religione recipienda ethnicorum imo pecuduÌ„ more ducuÌ„tur beast men and denude them of all reason and what is of man in them Against which Luther speaks in these words b Hoc uno scelere meritos esse Praelatos Romanenses ut ex ecclesiae coetu tanquam lupi tyranni pellereÌ„tur Tom. 2. p. 375. Qu. Who are to examine opinions For this one wicked opinion viz. that absolute dominion which they claim over the faith and consciences of men the Roman Prelates deserve to be driven out of the number of the faithfull as Wolves and tyrants And under this censure we will leave them and come to the answer of the Question Qu. Who are those who are to examine opinions You have heard what the Papists say viz. that none ought to doubt of or examine the opinions definitions and determinations of the Church Before we come to give you our answer we will premise some distinctions as touching examination 1. First then there is an examination in foro publico or externo And 2. There is an examination in foro privato or interno that is 1. There is a publike and authoritative examination 2. There is a private and Christian examination Or 1. There is an examination in reference to publike censure 2. There is an examination in reference to private settlement The first is authoritative and is that which comes up to that which Divines call judicium ministeriale or ministeriall judgement which is when many Ministers are authoritatively called convened and met together there they are not onely inquisitors and examiners of opinions but Judges that is ministeriall and subordinate Judges or determinators of doctrines and opinions and may passe censure upon such opinions as are found erroneous And of this kinde is conceived to be that great solemn convention of the Disciples and Elders Act. 15. Where there was an examination and debate of things and thereupon a passing of censure and judgement And of this kinde were those ancient and famous Councels and Synods in the Primitive times of the Church famous against those errours and heresies in those daies And this is the first kinde authoritative examination 2. The second is a private and conscientious examination of opinions in a mans own Court the Court of conscience whereby a man doth try and debate whether those things which are prescribed or those things which are preached written c. be truths and agreeable to the Word of God And this doth amount to that which Divines call judicium discretionis or the judgement of discretion in which men have power to examine debate and to passe judgement in reference to their own practice and walking Every man is not only to be an inquisitor or examiner of all opinions nay of the definitions and determinations of Councels but he is to judge of them and this he ought to doe in respect of his own practice though his judgement is not binding to others or concerns not others no further then others shall finde that there appeares truth in it Now having premised this I shall come to the answer and passing by the first leaving it to another place viz. authoritative examination We shall only deal with the second and say That every Christian who hath care of his salvation ought to examine not only private opinions but even the sentences definitions determinations of Synods of Councels and to bring all to the rule of faith the Word of God the true touchstone of doctrines and to receive them and reject them as they are conceived to be agreeable or disagreeable thereto This position that we have here laid down in answer to the question I shall 1. Cleare it by Scripture 2. Confirme it by argument And 3. Strengthen it by the testimonie of Divines against the Papists And 4. Answer objections and so goe to the second 1. I shall clear it by Scripture and you have one here in the text Mat. 24.4 Take heed that no man deceive you c. 1 Thess 5.21 Prove all things and hold fast
Divines against the Papists It would be too vast and intricate The result of all would be but this one Position that the Word of God and God in his Word the Scripture and God in Scripture is the only infallible supreme authoritative Rule and judge of matters of doctrines and worship of things to be believed and things to be done And this I shall make good to you in brief by Scripture-arguments and by the suffrage of learned and holy men and answer some Objections and come to the third Question That alone to which all the properties of a Rule doe belong is surely the rule and touch-stone whereby we should try opinions But to the Scripture alone doe all the properties of a Arg. 1 Rule belong And therefore surely the Scriptures are alone the Rule and touch-stone of opinions I suppose the first Proposition is clear all the difficulty lies in the second That to the Scriptures alone doe all the Properties of a Rule belong And this I will evince to you by the enumeration of some of the chief properties of that which is to be a Rule which I shall shew you are incommunicable to any thing but Scripture I will number six of them Prop. 1 The Rule of divine and heavenly things ought to have the authority of God who you know is alone acknowledged the Law-giver to his Church As in Common-wealths it is not in every Lawyer to make Laws these are established by the supreme authority so in divine things it is not for any man to constitute rules of faith and worship but it is proper to God alone Vide Dav. de jud norm fidei p. 46. who hath the supreme authority in his Church The Rule of divine things ought to have Gods authority and that alone the Scripture hath as it is confessed by all And therefore the Word only can be the Rule Prop. 2 The Rule of divine and heavenly things ought to be known and evident and clear to all who are to live by it You know in Common-wealths * Ignorantia juris neminem excuset the ignorance of the Law doth not excuse any man that breaks it because all are bound to know it And so ignorance of the minde of God in Scripture doth not excuse any because all are bound to search and enquire all are bound to know it and if so then must it be supposed to be evident and clear in things pertaining unto life .. And that is implied in those words of Christ Luk. 16.29 They have Moses and the Prophets let them hear them As if he had said they need no miracles they need not one to rise up from the dead the Word is nigh unto them they have Moses and the Prophets let them hear them and like to that is Rom. 10.6 7 8. Say not in thy heart who shall ascend up to heaven that is to bring Christ down from above or who shall descend into the deep that is to bring up Christ again from the dead But what saith it the word is nigh thee even in thy mouth and in thy heart that is the word of faith which we preach Prop. 3 The Rule of divine things ought to be constant stable immutable and unmoveable Consul Whitak cont 1. q. 5 c. 12. Misner de eccl Sect. 4 c. 7. Thes 3. Morton Apol Cath. p. 2. l. 5. c 9 10. c. But this only belongs to the Word men are fickle unstable like water Councels may alter be one to day another to morrow to day determine this and afterwards upon better grounds recede from their former thoughts and determine the contrary But now the Scripture that is ever the same it is an unalterable Rule it is unmoveable and unchangeable like God himself ever the same yesterday and to day and the same for ever The grasse withereth the flower fadeth but the Word of the Lord continues for ever Prop. 4. That which is to be the Rule to try opinions by Consul Whit. con 1. q. 6 pâ—â— totam Morton Apol. Cath. p. 2. l. 1. c. 53 54. Necesse est Scriptur dâ— sanct as in testimoniuÌ„ vocate naÌ„ sine his testibus enarratione c. Orig. Non afferamus stateras dolosâ—â— ubi appendamuâ— quod voâ—â—mus quo modo volumus pro arbitrio nostro sed stateram divinam de Scripturis sanctis c. Aug. Peccurro ad illam stateram dominicam ubi non ex bâ—mano sensu sed ex authoritate divina rerum monâ—eÌ„ta pensantur Aug. de cap. l. 2. c. 6 14. or the touch-stone to prove and examine opinions by it must be able and sufficient to doe it it must be adequate and proportionable to the things which are to be â—ryed it must be able to discover all truths and to evidence all errours Otherwise it is not a compleat Rule But that alone is the Scripture neither Men nor Councels are able to doe this some things may appear to them to be errours which are truths and to be truths which are errours and therefore men cannot be the touch-stone or the rule of tryall but now the Scripture is able this is a compleat rule this is proportionable and adequate to the things to be tried and doth reveal errour by discovering it to be dissonant to it and truth by declaring it agreeable to it self Prop 5. That which is the rule of tryall must be infallible it be such a Rule as cannot deceive if we come to aâ—ke for bread and it should give us a stone for truth and it should deceive us with errour it cannot be said to be a just Rule of tryall The rule must be unerring it must be infallible But this can no man be none can plead an unerring priviledge none can say that their determinations are infallible we know but in part and the best the most learned may not only come short in things they ought to know but may fail may mistake in the things they thinke to know As might be evidenced at large in many famous Councels therefore men cannot be the rule they are not infallible But now the Scriptures are they are the Word of the living God they are the standard of truth and truth it self We may deceive our selves in the search but the Scriptures are infallible they cannot deceive if a man have never so juct a measure yet he may deceive himselfe in the measuring but yet this deceit is not to be charged upon the measure but upon our selves So the Scriptures are a just infallible unerring rule yet may a man be deceived in the measuring of things by it but this deceit is not to be charged upon the rule but upon our selves Either we err not knowing the Scriptures or we err in the partiall search enquiry into theÌ„ we are not faithfull in the scrutiny All fayling ariseth either from ignorance from neglect or from corrupt affections and not from the Scriptures themselves All errours doe pretend to have then
Scripture but declares the necessity of the illumination of the spirit So much for the first objection 2 Obj. Another objection against the Scriptures being judge of opinions is this It is the worke of a judge so to declare his sentence that the one party may see he was in an errour and the other that he is in the right but the Scripture nor the Spirit of God in Scripture doth thus evince truth and convince of errour as to make the parties to know they are in truth or were in errour therefore the Scripture cannot be the judge of opinions Answ It is the worke of a Judge to declare the law to give his sentence declare his judgement and not to convince partyes It will be a hard thing to convince the loser that he is in the wrong Men who are given up to errour blinded with folly and bewitched with selfe-love in love with their owne opinions it is a hard thing to convince such that they aâ—e in an errour And shall we say the Word of God shall lose its judiciary authority because men in errour will not discerne of its judgement 2. Though they will not see now and be convinced yet the time will come that they shall see if not before yet at the greâ—â— day of account all things shall be made evident many that breake the lawes and are guilty of felony or of murther yet will not confesse to a petty Justice that he is guilty but at the Assize he is made evident and then he is convinced of it so however men sew fig-leaves and cover their nakednesse now will not confesse their error yet at the great day of Assize all shall be made evident and their mouthes stopped 3. I say that the Scriptures do sometimes so clearly evince truth and convince of errour that the parties themselves even in this life are convinced of it and cannot gaine-say or stand out against the evidence 4. I say againe if that the light and judgement and authority of the Word will not convince men of errour neither will any authority upon earth doe it * Quae controversiae siniri non possunt ex determinatione verbi divini neque finâ—entur unquamex determinatione cujuscunque authoritatis humane Daâ—en Qui ex scripturarâ—m lata sententia se victum non agnoscit nunquam agnoscet se victum ex sententia alterius judicis cujuscunque Daven Those controversies that cannot be concluded and determined by the judgement of the Word neither can they be determined and ended by any authority upon earth He that doth not acknowledg himselfe conquered by the evidence of Scripture will never acknowledge himselfe overcome by the sentence of any judge upon earth Give me leave to shut up what I have spoken in a word of application and I shall enter upon that enquiry Vse You see I have shewed you two things Who are to examine and by what rule to examine I have charged one upon you as your duty at all times It is the duty of every one to examine c. And I have given you here the rule by which you are to try viz. the Word of God This is the touch-stone It is not men not Councels not Synods much lesse the Pope whose unerring authority the Papists set above Councells But it is the Word of God which is the rule and judg a Theodor. histor Eccles l. 1. c. 7. In epist ad Innocent Epis 90. Inrer Epist Aug. and therefore by this the Councell of Nice both tryed and condemned the Arian Heresy by this the Councell of Carthage of Melevis of Orange tryed and condemned the Pelagian Heresy It is the speech of a heathen Philosopher b Qui ponit legem judicem ponit Deum qui addit hominem addit Bestiam he that makes the law judge makes God judge but he that makes man substitutes a beast instead And he gives this reason c Quia homines optimi distorquentur affectibus lex autem vacua est hujusmodi preturbationibus Arist because the best men are wrested with affections but the law is free of these perturbations If so much is to be given to humane lawes above the judgements of the best of men how much more to the divine the Law of God It hath been my work to clear this to you the Scripture is the rule Oh that now you had wisdome in the tryall you had need of wisdome to search to examine and need of wisdom to determine It is a shame to see how men sit as if these things did not belong to them Some are slothfull and will not enquire like Gallio they care for none of these things I have read of a Story of Henry the fourth of France who asking the Duke of Alva whether he had not observed the eclipses he answered no he had so much he said to doe upon the earth that he had no leisure to look up to heaven and there are many of this spirit who are so taken up and have so much to doe with the businesse of the world that they have no leisure to look up to heaven Some who enquire but sleightly and overtly they aske with Pilate what is truth but doe not take paines to finde it Others again who enquire but with corrupt affections which either bribe the understanding into errour or blinde the understanding that it cannot discern of truth Others that perhaps finde but either fear to own it or turn their backs on it as the young man in the Gospel Pelago se non ita coÌ„missurâ— esset quin quando liberet pedeÌ„ referre posset and you know what the King of Navar is said to speak to Beza that he would lanch no further into the deep then he might come safe to shore Men look upon truth as an ignis fatuus that leads them into boggs most men would entertain truth as a servant but few as a King they would own so much as might be serviceable to them but they will not own any more not so much as may master them so long as they may live on truth they like it but cannot away with it when it comes to live on them nay and live on the best of their comforts to live on their estates wives children possessions nay liberty and life c. this is hard And he that sees not truth his honour truth his riches truth his friends truth his liberty life that man will never own truth alone In the disquisition of truth in the enquiring after truth in these daies beware of a double spirit beware there be not treachery in thee beware of a double spirit beware of being byassed with corrupt affections c. Aske the way to Sion with your faces thitherward that is with resolution to goe it when it is revealed be not only willing to know but stand resolved to doe and when God sees you willing to doe he will make you able to know And so much shall serve by way
what ever comes from them On the contrary if they see mens practices are irregular they presently conclude their judgement is irregular too and that is a false light which carries a man into by-paths certainly say they true light would direct and steer men into paths of holinesse This is still concluded on That men of a bad life are certainly men of as ill a belief and sin in practice is a sure note of errour in judgement And there is great reason for such thoughts because if the things received were truth they would have a great influence into mens lives they would have a great command over mens practices and waies And if the light within them were not directive certainly it would be afflictive if it did not guide them it would scourge them and they could not be able to live in sinfull practices against such eminent convictions of light to the contrary and therefore they conclude such as is the practice such is the principle and that sinfull life is accompanied with as bad doctrine where men doe walk in darknesse and doe works of darknesse surely they are in darknesse there is no light in them It was the Fathers argument of Nero who was a wicked man a monster of men Certainly that is the truth which Nero persecutes And so doe we conclude certainly that is errour which these men countenance and truth which they oppose those are errours in judgement which are accompanied with such sins in life and that judgement cannot but be erroneous where the life is so enormious Thus it is with most men they take up the judgement of things by mans practices not by Gods precepts by mens walking not by Gods rules and indeed the lives and practices of men are great obstacles and stumbling blocks to the entertainment of truth if bad and as great advantages to errour if unblameable And to speak truth these are probable grounds of truth and errour but they are not infallible evidences I say they are probable grounds The end of all truth is to reform our lives to transform our hearts And the power of truth doth enable men to live holily It doth not only teach us to doe so Tit. 2.11 12. The grace of God hath appeared teaching us to deny ungodlinesse and worldly lusts But it doth inable us to doe so it is called a sanctifying truth Joh. 17.17 Sanctifie them with thy truth So that certainly it is a probable signe where men are sinfull in their lives they are erroneous in their judgements too But yet it is not an infallible evidence It 's possible to be erroneous in judgement and yet unblameable in conversation The Pharisees they were unblameable in their conversation who could charge them you may reade how he vaunts himself over the poor Publican Luk. 18.11 But yet you know he was erroneous in his judgement The like I may say of Arius of Arminius they were said to be men unblameable in their lives but yet fearfull erroneous in their judgements one denying the deity of Christ and the other denying the grace of Christ under the pretence of extending it to all they overthrow the nature of it and give it to none And are not many of the Papists also strict and unblameable in their lives as who more strict then they who look for justification and salvation by what they doe you shall have more charitable works from those who look to purchase heaven by them or those who thinke by them to perswade with God and to procure Gods favour to them I speak it not without sorrow then from those who yet have the affection of charity and only look for and are assured of their salvation by Christ alone Men doe not work so freely from ingagement as to ingage not from sense of mercy and thankefulnesse for it as to procure mercy and ingage God to them but this by the way Now to return I say some of the most devout of the Papists are strict and unblameable in their lives yet are they erroneous in their judgements so that you see it is possible to be erroneous in judgement and yet unblameable in life and conversation with men And again I say it is possible to be right in judgement and yet naught in life all convinced men are not converted men all that are sound in judgement in the main things are not holy of life their passions and corrupt and sinfull affections blinde their judgements in this or that particular act or may over-power their judgements and sway and carry them in those waies which their own light and conscience condemns them in And these are those which we call sinners against conscience against light of which sort are most of they who live in the Church of God They are men self-condemned their consciences and light within them tels them they doe wickedly and sinfully but yet their passions and corrupt affections carry them on violently in those waies of sin But now such men are right in judgement only by the power of argument the evidence of reason not by the demonstration of the spirit that light they have of truth it is but a common not a saving not a sanctifying light it is but a generall not a spirituall powerfull transforming and changing light The Toad though the whole body be poyson yet they say it hath a pearl in its head it serves thus farre for our turn it is one of the best pearls ever was found in it though men may have poysonous hearts and are of corrupt lives yet may they be for a time right in judgement in main things I say 1. For a time And 2. In main things with those two restrictions it may hold 1. For a time for it will not be long either the light will overcome sin in life or the sinfull life will darken and obscure the light God saith so 2 Thess 2.10 11. They who receive the truth and not with love of it they shall be given up to strong delusions to believe lies c. And because we know not when God may leave such men and give them up to blindenesse of minde to strong delusions and to their hearts lusts therefore is it not safe to receive knowledge or rather doctrine from their lips 2. The second restriction is in main things for a time they may be right in their judgements in main things that is in generall and common things which are of universall reception and have universall consent of which things either by education or by industry and art and diligence they have gotten and acquired the light and knowledge of God reveals no secrets to them those he reserves to impart to his friends he tels us The secrets of the Lord are with them that fear him Psal 25.14 And Christ tels his Disciples Henceforth I call you not servants but friends And upon this ground Because what ever I have heard of the Father I have made known to you Joh. 15.15 Joh. 15.15 Others have
this time with Commission to preach and instruct men in waies of worship to reveal to men the truth and prepare mens hearts that so when things come to be setled we might not if possible have any to yeeld to things with implicit faith and blinde obedience It was the practice of good Hezekiah when he restored the worship of God 2 Chron. 29. beg he sent out Posts like to Evangelists to prepare the people and to humble them for their revoltings and to reduce them to the worship of God And if this be not done 2 Chro 29. beg compared with the 2 Chro. 30.6 7. we may fear either great opposition in men or else blinde submission and implicit obedience 2. Or the multitude adheres to doctrines out of corrupt ends As the Ivy adheres to the tree not because it loves the tree but because the tree feeds it with berries and leaves it adheres to it for its own advantage because out of it it may suck berries So doe most men adhere to Religion and doctrine Or as the winde follows the abundance of exhalations So they go where there is the most advantage to be got indeed innumerable are the corrupt ends that corrupt minded men propound to themselves in the entertaining doctrine some out of fear others out of faction a third for repute the most for profit and advantage all speak this language Who will shew us any good It was the great Argument of the Craftsmen of Diana why they adhered to that Idolatry By this craft we have all our gain And it is a great motive to a carnall heart he that hath no principle of motion and life within he either stands still or is moved with the crowd or if he have any motion of his own something without him is the spring of it The multitude is a great body and a dull body and indeed hath no motions of it 's own it is carried about meerly with weights and the great weights are outward things which taken off there is no motion at all they are like the dead sea and cannot stirre So that you see if we goe about to take up our judgement of truth or errour from the multitude of them who adhere to it how dangerous it is to be mistaken 3. If by multitude be meant the greater number of holy and learned men in the Church of God I say then this is a probable signe though no infallible evidence that the opinion held forth is a truth 1. I say it is a probable signe I have told you God doth never desert his people in necessary essentiall truths He hath promised they shall be taught of God and they have an unction of the holy One whereby they know all things that is all things necessary to salvation And for accessory and circumstantiall truths It is a probable signe that the things which upon impartiall search and debate they hold forth are truths though it be not sufficient for us to conclude them so because they have determined so but we are to examine and search whether they be so or no. I say it is a probable signe but we are not to submit to it as their judgement but are to see the judgement of God in them Cons Park l. 2 c. 11. de authoritate PatruÌ„ not to conclude our selves upon the authority of men unlesse we see the authority of God in them 2. Though it be a probable signe yet it is not an infallible evidence We all know that godly and learned men have yet much darknesse in their understanding they doe but know in part none can plead an unerring spirit none are infallible I have shewed you that Synods and Councels may erre What David confessed he spake in haste we may speak upon best deliberation so farre as men All men are liars As the learnedst men have darknesse in their understanding so they have corruption in their hearts there is self and pride and corrupt aims and ends which may creep into the hearts of the best And how farre God may suffer men to be byassed by these things it is not for man to determine how farre corrupt aims and ends may winde themselves into the heart and bribe a mans understanding or blinde his sight it is not for man to judge they who are most acquainted with their hearts doe finde cause enough to be jealous and suspect them yea and upon known experience And therefore though the multitude of godly and learned men concurring in an opinion to be a truth though it may be a probablâ— signe yet can be no infallible evidence that what they hold forth is a truth I say it is no concluding evidence There may be cases wherein one man may be in the truth and yet many godly and learned men may be in an errour * Vnâ—â— Puphnutius toâ—um Concilium Nicaâ—â—um direxit Niceph. l. 8 c. 19. Eliâ—s nuâ—s erat sed totus mundus non erat dignus qui rependeretur ipsi Chr. One Paphnutius was in the truth when the whole Councel of Nice were in an errour they were learned men and it appears they were godly by their humble submitting of themselves to better reason though but one man brought it they were not so partiall as to adhere to their own votes nor were they so proud as not to recede from their opinions and be concquered by truth nor did they stand upon their number when they saw truth against them One naked truth should conquer them and make them throw down their weapons and one man having truth with him should be too big for that great Assembly they did not plead their number their votes and the multitude which adhered to them but as men that came to search out truth not victory they yeelded up themselves to the power and conquest of it A mighty argument of their humility and sincerity Indeed we are not to measure truth by the number of votes but by the authorities of Scripture a Nos numero sen â—enitam noÌ„ metimur Verâ—tas numero non astimatur vel unuâ— qui veritatem habet sufficienter munitur adversus totum mundum Mat. D. White de eccl l. 30 p. 127. Whit. cont 2. q. 5. c. 5. We doe not judge of truth by the number of men though a man be alone yet if he have the truth with him he is sufficiently armed against the whole world One Micheas having the truth with him was too hard for the 400. Prophets who were in an errour 1 King 22.15 Indeed it is not impossible that one man should be in the truth and many in an errour nor is it absurd to prefer the judgment of one man in the truth before many in an errour It was well spoken of Augustine a Si justus es noli numerare sed appende stateram afferaequaÌ„ non dolesaÌ„ Aug. in Ps 39. If thou would passe right judgment of an opinioÌ„ do not number but weigh weigh not in the false
balance of the multitude but in the balance of truth the Word of God This is certain b Veritas neque à nultis neque à paucis pendet Park l. 2. p. 253. Truth doth neither depend on many nor few And therefore we are not to goe by number of votes and voices in finding out of truth but by the authorities of Scripture we are not here to goe by the pol but by the line the Word of God To the Law and to the testimonies if they speak not according to this the light is not in them most voices are not here to carry it but enquire What saith the answer of God You know if the diall be not set by the Sunne you care not what it saith So if men be not guided by the Word it 's no matter what they say though they be myriads of men that speak it Indeed we may give too little and too much to multitude 1. We give too little when the concurrent opinions and deliberate thoughts of a number of godly learned and holy men is of no weight with us when we will reject their results ignorantly wilfully without an impartiall debate and examination of them an honour that you give to the opinions I may say the errours of men of no name Certainly as you are not to submit to the judgement of any Assembly or company of the learnedst and holiest men with a blinde obedience So neither are you to reject their results and determinations with a perverse will you are to try them and be so farre from unprejudiced thoughts that you are charitably to judge that probably so many holy and learned men are not in an errour probably they are in the truth and if you thinke otherwise before triall and debate you give too little to them and it is your sin 2. We give too much to multitude and number 1. Either when we judge of an opinion to be truth because the promiscuous multitude doth adhere to it 2. Or when we blindly subscribe to an opinion for truth because many learned and holy men are the Patrons and maintainers of it 1. When we judge of an opinion to be truth because the promiscuous multitude abundance in the Church adhere to it And this is indeed the great errour men are carried away with the crowd they are not able to stand against the stream they are carried down with the multitude and the number of them in the way is the great argument that concludes them in it also Christ tells us here in the text That many shall come in his Name and say they are Christ and shall deceive many Here you are told there may be a multitude of seducers and a multitude of seduced they shall deceive many And it is the worst of arguments to prove truth by multitude It is a passage of Chrysostom * In theatris multitudo quaeratur Multitudo nota ecclesiae ac proindè veritatis noÌ„ est quia ecclesia saepe in paucis confistit deinde quia multitudo malorum impiorum major est post reâ—â—ò faâ—sa Religio majora occupavit spatia quaÌ„ vera Chry. ad pop Antioch â—om 26. The multitude can be no true Character of the truth and he gives three reasons 1. Because the Church of God doth consist in a few 2. Because the number of wicked men are the greatest 3. Because errour hath gotten more ground then truth the possessions and territories of errour doe farre exceed the bounds of truth you know there are more tares then wheat in Gods field more Goats then sheep in his fold more chaff then corn in his floor more bad fishes then good in his net if Atheisticall prophane men unbelievers proud ambitious men coverous and worldly persons hypocrites and formall professours were singled out the residue would be but few you would see ground why Christ calls his flock a little flock a small remnant and to take up the complaint of the Prophet that the number was but as the gleanings of grapes after the vintage is over but as the shaking of an Olive-tree after the fruit is gathered even one of a City two of a Tribe and to say with Christ Broad is the gate that leads to death and many there be that enter thereat but narrow and strait is the gate which leads to life and few there be which enter therein So that you see if we take up judgement of truth by the number of men in the Church that adhere to it we may be mistaken we are commanded not to follow a multitude to evil * Quae nam precor utilitas est multuÌ„ esse foenum quaÌ„ paucos lapides praeciosos non in numeri multitudine sed in virtutis probitate multitude consistit There is much drosse little gold much hay and stubble and little precious stones If there be any validity in this argument of number it is not in the weight but in the worth a Non in quantitate molis sed in qualitate virtutis Non salvat Christianum quod pontifex dicit praeceptum suum esse justum sed oâ—o tet illud examinare atque se iuxta regulaÌ„ superius dataÌ„ dirigere Ger. Laicus temerè doctoribus ecclesia credere non debeat sed coriaÌ„ doctrinas examinare praesertiuâ— cum populi aures sacerdotum cordibus sape sanctiores sim Hieronâ— Epist. not in the bulk or quantity but in the worth and quality of the persons that are the maintainers of it And yet therein we may erre also which is the second way whereby we give too much to multitude When we blindely subscribe to an opinion for truth because many learned and holy men are the Patrons and maintainers of it I have clear'd this to you at large that it is the duty of every Christian to examine not only the private opinions of private men but the sentences definitions debates of Synods and Councels and to embrace or reject them as they shall appear consonant and dissonant to the rule of truth the Word of God And the Scriptures are plain for it we are commanded to try all things 1 Thess 5.21 And not to believe every spirit 1 Joh. 4.1 and to search the Scriptures Joh. 5.39 Isa 8.20 And the Bereans were commended for the same notwithstanding the doctrine they examined was the doctrine of the Apostles Act. 17.11 And it will not be sufficient for you to say you followed the doctrines of your leaders Christ tells you If the blinde lead the blinde both shall fall into the ditch And therefore we shall give too much to a number of holy and learned men to drinke in and receive what ever they doe propound to subscribe our judgement to their positions without further debate and examination of them though the things be truths yet we erre in our way of closing with them we give blinde obedience and implicit faith to them we make men the masters of our faith which wrongs God and injureth
loved him not wisely he blamed their ignorance And thus farre it holds men may doe things with honest affections and yet doe them ignorantly And if you grant not this what flesh can be saved There were many of our Fathers that have opposed many things as errours Cons Park de polit eccles l. 2. c. 20. p. 256. which are the received truths of God certainly they opposed them with honesty of heart though not with an understanding heart the fault was not so much in their heart as in their head they did not oppose them out of sinister and corrupt affections but with honesty of heart they walked according to their notion of things and that will serve to demonstrate a man an honest man though not an upright man a good Christian that demonstration must be taken in upon better grounds It was said of Asa That notwithstanding the high places were not removed yet his heart was perfect with the Lord all his daies 1 King 15.14 perfect that is sincere A man may have a perfect heart in this sense that is a sincere heart and yet have many failings in life nay and not only many imperfections in his judgement but some errours too such as are not damnable fundamentall errours but only circumstantiall and lesser but then these errours must a rise from the imperfections of his knowledge not from the corruption of his heart The Apostle seems to imply this Phil. 3.15 16. As many as be perfect let them be thus minded and if any be otherwise minded God shall reveal even that unto them Neverthelesse whereunto you have already at mined let us walk by the same rule let us minde the same things So much for the third 4. Here is another efficacy of errour it will ingage a man to doe much for it a man may doe much service for an errour as well as for a truth a man may preach may write may dispute may be at much pains spare for no cost to advance and promote to an errour I could give you as you all thinke innumerable testimonies and experiences of this It was said of the Pharisees that they would compasse sea and land take much pains to make a Profelyte which when they had done A man was much more the childe of the devil then he was before as Christ saith And what pains will not the Papists take how doe they compasse sea and land What unwearâ—able pains doe they take and all this to Proselyte men to bring them to their Religion Doth it not often fare that a servant of errour will doe much more for it then they who are the children of truth will doe for the truth What drudges are they often to Satan when we are too slack in the service of God and at two times especially the authours and maintainers of errour are active and sedulous viz. either in the rise of it or in the fall of it either when it first appears or when it doth decline then they set themselves with all their strength in the one to advance it in the other to hold it up When the beast was wounded there was great pains to lick him whole again It teacheth us what we are to doe for truth Indeed errour is more beholding to it's servants then truth is to hers Oh that men should doe so much for the devil and so little for God that they should think no pains too much for errour and that we should be at no greater layings out for the truth It is a consideration may humble us all that men should doe more for their sins then others for their graces Micah 6.8 That men should take more pains and be at more cost for errour then we will be at for the truth As men will spend themselves to nothing for a sin to maintain their lusts so will they doe for an errour nay and much more because when men spend themselves for a sin a lust they doe it not without some check of conscience for the doing of it they have inward troubles and stings of conscience in the doing of it they are self-condemned in it and therefore cannot do it without much regreeting but when a man doth any thing for an errour when a deluded man spends himself for his opinion he doth it chearfully he glories in it he looks upon all as set upon Gods score he looks upon what he doth as the evidence of his sincerity and love to God and therefore glories in it triumphs in it and doth it chearfully he is glad he hath been so serviceable to his opinion and looks upon it as being serviceable to God in it as no question many have done and many deluded Papists do and this is a great work of errour 5. As it will engage a man to doe so it will check a mans conscience if he doe not As when a man deals not faithfully with truth if for fear or hope or worldly respects he will either be shie to own it as Nicodemus Christ or if he will suppresse it baulk and decline it if he will detain the truths of God in unrighteousnesse or if he will deny a truth conscience is up in arms against him and flees in his face for it checks him reproves torments him So it may be with an errour if a man have received and entertained an errour and he is perswaded it is a truth though it be an errour if now he have not been faithfull to it if he have for fear favour carnall and worldly respects been either shie to own it in some company if he have baulked it and declined it if he have betrayed it receded from it and denied it conscience is presently up to check to reprove him and torment him for it Indeed a man may close with an errour for base ends and respects and for the same respects may recede from it and yet never be touched for it no checks within him but if a man have closed with an errour with an honest simple heart then if he doe not walk answerable to it if he baulk and decline it he shall hear of conscience If a Papist should be forced from his Religion for fear though his way be an errour yet not forsaking it out of light and conviction that it was an errour but out of fear of punishment his conscience will torment him for it and so in any other opinion if the heart embrace it with honest respects which hath caused some to say that men are neither to be bribed nor threatned out of their opinions but to be convinced and perswaded they are not to be compelled by force nor yet to be seduced allured or bribed by rewards this is to make men sinne against conscience It was Augustines but he retracted it * Fides non est imponenda sed suadenda contra haereticos nihil vi agendum No force is to be used against Heretikes which we shall speak to in the next great Querie Thus you see as errour will
entertainers of an opinion it is a probable signe that the opinion is truth Indeed God doth not honour wicked men or men of corrupt hearts with the first discoveries of truth what they have they have from others A man may well suspect that opinion which a corrupt heart is the revealer of God reveals his hidden things to his hidden ones The secrets of the Lord are with them that fear him and the humble he will teach and guide in all truth as he tels us Psal 25.14 Psa 25.14 Other men have no promise of Gods making known his minde unto them nor are they under any condition for God to doe it But now the godly they are under a promise he hath said He will lead us into the way of all truth he hath told us we shall be taught of God and we are under the condition of such revelation for we are in Covenant with him and that 's one condition Jer. 31.33 Jer. 31.33 34. Isa 54.13 Joh. 15.15 Hos 6.3 34. We are his children that 's another Isa 54.13 We are his friends Joh. 15.15 We are such as seek him Hos 6.3 Then shall we know if we follow on to know he will reveal his minde to them that seek him And being under these gracious conditions we may expect that God should reveal his minde and truth to us So that is the third Answer Reall holinesse in the publishers and receivers of an opinion is a probable signe that the opinion is a truth I would not give too much to holinesse in this kinde for I am not to be led by any mans practice but Gods precepts but this I would say in doubtfull cases where there is not a clear rule in the Word though I would not submit my judgement nor give up my understanding to the opinion of any yet holinesse should prevail much with my affections and I should conclude it is either a truth or certainly it is no dangerous errour that these hold And if I should see two contrary opinions held by godly and holy men I would not goe about to dispute and debate which of them are most holy nor can I conclude that both are truths But this I would conclude that certainly neither of them are dangerous errours both of them are but circumstantiall truths This is a maxime God is never wanting to his Church and people in necessary truths nor doth he leave them to undoing errours And that 's the third Answer That reall holinesse is a probable signe the opinion such hold forth is a truth Conclus 4. Though a reall holinesse be a probable signe Concl. 4 that the opinion is a truth yet it is not an infallible evidence 1. The best men are but men and therefore not infallible not unerring what Whitaker said of the ancient Bishops a Etiam illi Episcopi qui martyres fuerunt 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 passi sunt Whit. cont 4. so I may say of all even the best of men they have their failings they have need of some grains of allowance Another speaking of the Fathers saith b Sancti quidem fuerunt sed tamen homi nei affectus suos habuerunt They were holy men but yet were but men and had humane affections and humane frailties Origen Tertullian Cyprian they were holy men c At qui isti in errores multos inciderunt but they fell into many errours d Qui verò pertinaciter eorum sententias desenderiit haeretici habiti sunt Tertullianistae Origenistae appellati Reynold cens Apoc. praelect 4. Jude v 16. And those who took them up and maintained them were called heretikes Tertullianists and Origenists The best men are but men and imperfect in knowledge the Apostle tels us we know but in part we have many corruptions which are too apt to byas us and lead us aside The best men the most godly may be led aside 1. Either from weaknesse of judgement for we know but in part 2. Or from partiality of affections 3. Or from over-weening the maintainers of an opinion It is a dangerous thing for us to have mens persons in admiration men are apt to take things upon trust from honest men 4. Or from the benigne and fair aspects which an opinion may carry thus the affections sometime work upon the understanding and gain the understanding not by demonstration but by allurement this is to bribe us and inveagle our judgements into an opinion not to reason and perswade us Certainly the lesse the understanding hath to deal with the affections and the affections with the understanding in the finding out truth and errour as I said before the safer and clearer is your way 5. Or from over-credulousnesse Or 6. From fear of denying a truth all which I spake to at large in the fore-going Discourse Certainly the best men may be led aside as men they are incident to errour as corruption in them inclinable Nay the Apostle tels us Rom. 16.18 By good words and fair speeches they deceive the hearts of the simple Ro. 16 1◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the hearts of them not evil as the word is As many followed Absolom in the simplicity of their hearts So there are many who may follow an errour not out of corrupt affections for by-ends or for advantage but even out of the simplicity of their hearts Men may have corrupt hearts in a truth and honest hearts in an errour that is honest ends and honest aims And so much for the fourth answer Though reall holinesse in the maintainers be a probable signe yet it is not an infallible evidence of the truth of an opinion And so much for the fourth Question we now come to the fift Qu. 5. Whether this be not sufficient to evidence an opinion to be true that it is held up and maintained by learned men and on the contrary to discover it an errour that it is maintained by illiterate and unlearned men It hath been the great argument the Papists have had all must needs be truth which such learned Doctours have held and again that must needs be an errour which is upheld and maintained by a sort of unlearn'd and illiterate men and we have had the same note sung to us Cons Park Polit. Eccl. l. 2. c. 20. c. And there are some places of Scripture which seem to favour it that the want of learning is a great cause that men run into many errours as you see 2 Pet. 3 16. where the Apostle speaking of Pauls Epistles he tels us That there are some things hard to be understood which they that are unlearned and unstable doe wrest as they doe also other Scriptures unto their own destruction By which the Apostle seems to inferre that the want of learning is the cause that many doe run into errour And yet if this place be conferr'd with other places it will appear not to make so much for that purpose but on the contrary
those who have been judged to be unlearn'd have been in the truth and those who were the learned men of that age were in the errour In the times of Christ and his Apostles the Scribes and Pharisees and the learned Doctours of the Law they were in the errour as you know the Apostle asketh us in the 1 Cor. 1.20 1 Cor. 1.20 Where is the wise where is the Scribe where is the disputer of this world hath not God made foolish the wisdome of the world So in the 1 Cor. 6.7 8. 1 Cor 6.7 8. We speak the wisdome of God in a mystery which none of the Princes of this world knew speaking of the great Doctours of the Jews for had they known it they would not have crucified the Lord of glory So that if you look into those times the learned men were in an errour and on the contrary those who were judged unlearned though they were truly learned in the wisdom of God they were in the truth as you know And indeed in all ages of the Church as it hath been a great advantage unto errour the learning of those who have maintained it so it hath been a great obstacle and prejudice to the truth the unlearnednesse of the maintainers You see in the times of the Gospel it was that which they opposed against Christ Which of the Doctours believe in him And it was that which they had against the Apostles it 's said Act. 4.13 when they saw the boldnesse of Peter and John and perceived that they were unlearned they marvelled Nay they objected this against Christ himself who was the wisdom of the Father and whose humane nature was filled with all the wisdom of God For in him dwelt all the fulnesse of knowledge nay Col. 1.19 all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge as the Apostle Col. 2.3 Col. 2.3 Yet they said of him when they heard him to teach Joh. 7.15 Joh. 7.15 How knoweth this man letters having never learned They saw he was not brought up as others were in the Schools of the Prophets it might be he worked at his fathers trade till the time that he began his Ministery which was not till he was baptized about the 30th year of his age and they thought seeing he was never taught by man therefore he knew no letters they were ignorant that he had an invisible Tutour the Spirit of God as the Prophet tels us Isa 61.1 Isa 61.1 Isa 42.1 2 3. Isa 42.1 2 3. Isa 50.4 Isa 50.4 The Lord God hath given me the tongue of the learned that I should know how to speak But ignorant they were that he was the wisdom of God and all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge were hid in him they were in him God hath filled the humane nature with all these treasures but they were hid in him as the Apostle saith they were vailed and their eyes could not behold them as you see by them in this place So that you see as it hath been a great advantage to errour so hath it been a great prejudice to truth the learning or want of learning in the maintainers of it And I conceive the ground is this because most men of the world they are led by an implicit faith and believe as others doe and they are great admirers of learning and therefore give up their faith to those whom they apprehend to be learned men and walk by their light submit to their knowledge believe as they believe and there they rest without troubling of themselves any further Tutum est peccare authoribus istis Sic And one would think this a great deal of wisdom As one said of great persons so they say and in naturall wisdom it seems safe * Errare cum doctoribus istis to erre with such learned men why will men say if they know not what is the truth who should How can such poor men as we be able to judge of things so well as those who are the Doctors and Rabbies of the Church And so I finde most men ready to resolve their faith into the opinion of others and give up their judgements to those whom they doe apprehend to be learned they thinke that such must needs be in the truth but for others they apprehend them weak and illiterate and therefore doubtles they are in an errour Now to answer this Question which is of some weight that we may more distinctly proceed and more clearly come to the resolution of it I will in the first place give you the divers acceptations of learning in Scripture and tell you how it may be taken 1. Sometimes I finde it taken in a good sense sometimes in a bad It is taken for truth The knowledge of him who is truth it self Ephes 5.20 Eph. 5.20 And once we read it is taken for errour or erroneous doctrine Rev. 2.24 Rev. 2.24 where St John speaks of the doctrine of Jezabel who had taught that men might eat things sacrificed to Idols and commit fornication without sin as many as have not this doctrine or this learning 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the words may be read As many as have not this learning that is this errour or as many as are not carried away with this erroneous doctrine they are all the same But 2. Sometimes we read that learning is taken Divinely Humanely We begin with the first 1. Sometime learning is taken humanely and so sometimes Strictly Largely 1. Strictly and that 1. Either for the knowledge of tongues and so I conceive it is taken 1 Cor. 14.16 1 Cor. 14.16 where the Apostle speaking of the knowledge of tongues which was a miraculous gift and accompanied the first times of the Gospel first given to the Apostles that the Apostles might be able to speak to all men in their own languages as you see in Act. 2. beg Act. 2. beg yet continued for certain time in the Church as you see it there 1 Cor. 14. this the Apostle cals learning and saith when the Church is met together and all speak with tongues and there come in those that are unlearned or unbelievers will they not say that you are madd Where by unlearned in that place he means such as have not the knowledge of tongues and therefore understood not what they spake which I call humane knowledge though at this time divinely given 2. Sometimes learning is taken for the knowledge of Arts and Sciences Act. 7.22 Act. 7 22. And Moses was learned in all the learning of the Egyptians and was mighty in words and deeds And in this sense it is probable they spake when they said the Disciples were unlearned Act. 4.13 Act. 7.13 that is they are not skild in the knowledge of the Arts and Sciences nor were they brought up in the Schools of the Prophets and so instructed as they were 2. Learning is taken largely for the improvement in all kindes