he praised God Joseph was no King aud therefore had no Scepter to fall down before In the Hebrew Gen. 47. for top we read head which by a Metaphor signifies the top because the head is the end and highest part of man and consequently of any thing else And for staffe we now read in the Hebrew bed which fell out because the word mittah there extant pricked with other Vowels signifies a staffe for in the Hebrew matteh is a staffe and mitteh a bed The Septuagint whom the Apostle followes read it matteh and so translated it staffe otherwise thâ—n wâ— now read it in the Hebrew Text. If we follow the Hebrew Text as it is now extant the sence will be That Jacob because he could not raise his body out of his bed therefore he bowed his head forward upon his beds head and so worshipped God Bezâ— speaking of the divers Latine translations of the New Testament onely he saith of the vâ—lgar Latine that he followeth it for the most part and preferreth it before all the rest Maximâ— ex parte amplector claeeris omnibus antepono He speakes of the new Testament onely and of that Latine translation of the new Testament in comparison of all other Latine translations which were before him as Erasmus Castalion and such like These placâ—s may serve to shew that the vulgar Latine is corrupt no Book being entire or free fron errour Isidore Clarius Brixianus praefâ—â—t in Biblia a great learned man of their own affirmeth that it hath 8000 places in which the sense of the Holy Ghost is changed Since the Councell of Trent 2 Popes have set forth this vulgar Edition diversly which of these shall be received as authenticall How often doe the Papists leave the vulgar in all their controversies when it is for their advantage so to doe it is a matter ordinary with them and needlesse to be proved There is no Edition Ancienter then the Hebrew if the Latine have been used a 1000 yeares in the Church the Hebrew hath been used almost 3000 yeares the Chaldee Arbicke Syriacke and Greeke Editions also have beene used above a 1000 yeares and so should be authentique by the Papists argument Having spoken of the authority of the Scriptures the Canonicall Books and the Authenticall Editions I now goe on to treate of the end of the Scripture its adjuncts or properties fitted to that end and the Interpretation of Scripture The end of the Scripture comes next to be considered of this I have spoken somewhat afore but shall now inlarge my selfe The end of the Scripture is considered 1. In respect of God 2. In respect of us In respect of God the end of the Scripture is a glorifying of him by it we may learne to know love and feare him and so be blessed The glory of God is the chiefe end of all things Prov. 16. 4. In respect of us The end of the Scripture is 1. Intermediate temporall edification which is fitly referred to 5 principall uses the two first respect the mind the other three the heart will and affection It is profitable for Doctrine it serves to direct to all saving truth nothing is to be received as a truth necessary to salvation but what is proved out of Scripture Where that hath not a tongue to speake I must not have an eare to heare Hoc quia de scripâ—uris non habet autoritatem eadem facilitate contemuitur qua probatur Hieron 2. Reproofe or Confutation to refute all errours and heterodoxe opinions in Divinity By this sword of the Spirit Christ vanquished Satan Matth. 4. 4. 7. 10. by the Scripture he opposed the Jewes John 5. 45. 46. 47. and 10. 34. by this he refuted the Scribes and Pharisees Matth. 9. 13. and 12. 1. Luke 10. 25. 26. 27. Matth. 19. 34. and 21. 12. 13. the Sadducees Matth. 22 29. By this Austin refuted the Pelagians Irenaeus the Valentinians Tertullian the Mâ—rcionites Athanasius the Arrians In comitijs Vindelicorum cum episcopus Albertus aliquando legeret Biblia referente Luthero in Sermon Convival interrogasset quidam è consiliarijs quid libri hic â—sset nescio equidem respondet qualis sit liber sed omnia quae in eo lego nostrae religioni planè sunt contraria 3. Correction of iniquity setting streight that which is amisse in manners and life 4. Instruction to righteousnesse Instruunt Patriarchae etiam errantes Basil saith the Psalmes are a common Store house and Treasury of good Instruction The Title of the 32 and some other Psalmes is Maschil that is a Psalme of instruction 5. Comfort in all troubles Psal. 19. 8 and 119. 50. and 92. the Greek word for Gospell signifieth glad-tidings The Promises are the Christians best Cordials as Gods Promises are the rule of what we must pray for in faith so they are the ground of what we must expect in comfort 2. Ultimate and chiefest our Salvation and life Eternall John 5. 39. and 20. 31. 2 Tim. 3. 15. It will shew us the right way of escaping hell and attaining Heaven It will shew us what to beleeve and practise for our present and eternall happinesse This was Gods aime in causing the Scripture to be written and we shall find it fully availeable and effectuall for the ends for which it was ordained by God CHAP. VIII THe properties of the Scripture fitted to that end The properties which the Scripture must have for the former end are these It is 1. Of Divine Authority 2. True and Certaine 3. The rule of faith and manners 4. Necessary 5. Pure and Holy 6. Sufficient and Perfect 7. Perspicuous and Plaine 1. It is of Divine Authority and so greater then all exception It is Divine 1. In its efficient cause and Originall which is God the Father dictating in his Sonne declaring and publishing by his holy Spirit confirming and sealing it in the hearts of the faithfull He wrote the Decalogue immediately with his own finger and Commanded the whole Systeme and all the parts of Scripture to be written by his servants the Prophets and Apostles as the publike Actuaries and Pen-men thereof therefore the authority of the Scripture is as great as that of the holy Ghost who did dictate both the matter and words those speeches are frequent the Lord said and the mouth of the Lord hath spoken 2. In the subject matter which is truth according to godlinesse certaine powerfull of venerable antiquity joyned with a sensible demonstration of the Spirit and Divine presence and with many other things atteâ—â—ing its divine authority Whence it follows that the authority of the Holy Scriptures is 1. Infallible which expresseth the minde and will of God to whom truth is essentiall and necessary 2. Supreame and Independent into which at last all faith is resolved from whiâ—h it is not lawfull to appeale By which singular authority the Scripture is distinguished
both from all prophane and Sacred writings and Paul honours it with this Elogie a faithfull saying and worthy of all acceptation 1 Tim. 1. 15. a more sure word 2 Pet. 1. 19. the Comparative for the Superlative in which there is no doubting and uncertainty but all things firme As God is Iâ—hovah of himself so is his word autoritative of it selfe and is true and to be obeyed whether thou think it Scripture or no. There is no higher authority for thee to appeale to it is above opinions of men conscience and therefore it must determine all controversies 2. It is true and certaine verity is affirmed of the Scriptures primarily internally and by reason of it selfe which is called the truth of the object which is an abâ—olute and most perfect agreement of all things delivered in the Scripture with the first truth or divine will of which the Scripture is a symbole and lively Image so that all things are delivered in it as the Holy Ghost hath dictated whence those honourable titles are given to it the Scripture is called a sure word 2 Pet. 1. 19. Psal. 19. 7. the Scripture of truth Dan. 10. ult words of truth Eccles. 12. 10. Yea truth it self John 17. 17. having the God of truth for the Authour Christ Jesus the truth for the witnesse the Spirit of truth for the Composer of it and it worketh truth in the hearts of those which heare it 2 Pet. 2. 2. The Apostle preferres the Scripture before the Revelation made by Angâ—ls Gal. 1. 8. Christ commends the certainty of it above all other sorts of Revelation 1 Pet. 1. 19. above information from the dead Luke 16. 31. The word of God is not onely true but eminently true truth it selfe prima veritas and pura veritas The Scripture hath a twofold truth 1. Of assertion it containeth no errour 2. Of promise there is no unfaithfulnesse in it The first truth referres to the matter which is signified properly called truth or verity The second referres to the intention of the Speaker which is properly called veracite or fidelity the latter is implyed Psal. 19. thy Testimonies are sure and so the sure mercies of David the former is implyed in that the word is purer then Gold 7 times refined There are two signes of truth in the Scripture 1. The particularity of it it names particulars in genealogies dolosus versatur in generalibus 2. Impartiality toward friends and their adversaries the most holy men have their faults described they give due commendation to their adversaries The truth of Scripture is 1. More then any humane truth of sense or reason 2. Above all naturall reason as the doctrine of the Trinity the incarnation of Christ justification by faith in Christ. 3. A truth which evidenceth it self 4. The standard of all truth nothing is true in doctrin or worship which is not agreeable to this 3. The Scripture is the rule of faith and manners It is termed Canonicall generally by the Fathers of the word Canon which signifieth a rule because it containes a worthy rule of religion faith and godlinessâ— according whereunto the building of the house of God must be sitted These properties saith Suarez are required in a rule 1. That it be known and easie the Scripture is a light 2. That it be first in its kind and so the measure of all the rest 3. It must be inflexible 4. Universall 1. It is a perfect rule of faith and obedience and able to instruct us sufficiently in all points of faith or doctrinals which we are bound to beleeve and all good duties or practicals which we are bound to practise Whatsoever is needfull to beleeve or to doe to please God and save our soules is to be found here whatsoever is not here found is not needfull to beleeve and practise for felicity Christ proveth the resurrection of the dead being an article of our faith against the Sadduces Matth. 22. 32. and the use of the Sabbath being a rule of life against the Pharisees by an inference made from the Scripture Matth. 12. 7. The Heads of the Creed and Decalogue are plainely laid downe in Scripture therefore there we have a perfect rule of faith and manners It is a rule 1. For faith Jerome in his controversie with Helvidius saith Credimus quia legimus non credimus quia non legimus We beleeve because we read we doe not beleeve because we doe not read Christ often saith have ye not read is it not written what is written in the Law Luke 10. 26. faith and the word of God must run parallel This we first beleeve when we doe beleve saith Tertullian that we ought to beleeve nothing beyond Scripture When we say all matters of doctrine and faith are contained in the Scripture we understand as the Ancient Fathers did not that all things are literally and verbally contained in the Scripture but that all are either expressed therein or by necessary consequence may be drawne from thence All controversies about religion are to be decided by the Scripture Deut. 12. 32. and 4. 2. Josh. 1. 7. Franciscus de Sâ—lis a Popish Bishop saith the Gospell was honoured so much that it was brought into the Councell and set in the midst of them and to determine matters of faith as if Christ had been there 2. It is a perfect rule for our lives and practise Psal. 19. 11. and Psal. 119. 9. In the Scriptures there are delivered remedies against all vices and meanes are there laid down for the attaining of all vertues We must follow the Scriptures exactly and not swerve to the right hand or left a metaphore taken from a way or rule saith Chamier when Linacer a learned English man heard the beginning of the 5. of Matthew read Blessed are the poore in spirit c. he broke forth into these words either these sayings are not Christs or we are not Christians It is a perfect not a partiall and insufficient rule as the Papiâ—â—s make it as God is a perfect God so his word is a perfect word if it be but a partiall rule then it doth not perfectly direct and he that should perfectly doe the will of God revealed in Scripture should not yet be perfect Secondly if the Scripture be a partiall rule then men are bound to be wise above that which is written that is above the Law and Gospell Regula fidei debet esse adaequata fidei aut regula non erit Whitakerus 1. All addition and detraction are forbidden to be made by any man to the word Deut. 4. 2. and 12. 32. Deut. 5. 32. Gal. 1. 8. 2. The Scripture is said to be perfect to beget heavenly and saving wisdome Psal. 19. 8. 2 Tim. 3 15 16 17. 3. Men in the matter of faith and Religion are sent to the Scripture onely 2. The Scripture is an Infallible rule Luke 1. 4. of which thou hast had a full assent Regularectè definitur
Church 2. We grant that the Apostâ—es living and preaching and the Canon of the New Testament being not yet sealed their Gospell delivered viva voce was no lesse a rule of faith and worship then the writings of Moses and the Prophets 3. We doe not reject all the traditions of the Church for we embrace certaine Historicall and Ceremoniall ones but we deny that opinions of faith or precepts of worship can be confirmed by unwritten traditions 4. We call that an opinion of faith to speake properly and strictly when a Proposition is revealed by God which exceeds the capacity of nature and is propounded to be beleeved as necessary to be knowne to salvation Fundamentall opinions are those which by a usuall and proper name are called Articles of faith 5. What is not in respect of the matter an Article of saith may be a Proposition to be beleeved with a Theologicall faith if you looke to the manner of revealing as that the Sunne is a great light the Moone a lesse Gen. 1. 16. that Rachel was beautifull Leah bleare-eyed The Papists doe not cease to accuse the Scripture of imperfection and insufficiency as not containing all things necessary to salvation The Councell of Trent sess 4. decret 1. Saith that the truth and discipline is contained in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus The Papists generally divide the word of God into the word written and traditions They affirme that there are many things belonging to Christian faith which are neither contained in the Scriptures openly nor secretly This opinion is maintained by the Papists but it was not first invented by them The Jewish Fathers did use the traditions of the Elders and it hath been said of old Marke 7. 5. Matth. 5. 21. for their errours and superstitions yea at length they affirmed firmed that God gave to Moses in mount Sinai the Scripture and the Cabala or a double Law the one written the other unwritten The Tridentine Fathers session 4th doe command Traditions to be received with the same reverend affection and piety with which we embrace the Scripture and because one Bishop in the Councell of Trent refused this he was excluded In the meane space they explaine not what those traditions are which must be so regarded none of them would ever give us a list and Catalogue of those Ordinances which are to be defended by the authority of unwritten traditions not of the word committed to writing onely they affirme in generall whatsoever they teach or doe which is not in the Scripture that it is to be put into the number of Traditions unwritten The cause of it selfe is manifest that at their pleasure they might thrust what they would upon the Church under the name of Traditions Vide Whitak de Script controviae quaest Sexta c. 5. See also Moulins Buckler of Faith p. 51. Lindan the Papist was not ashamed to say that it had been better for the Church if there had been no Scripture at all but onely Traditions For saith he we may doe well enough with Traditions though we had no Scripture but could not doe well enough with Scripture though we had no Traditions Baldwin saith a Testament may be either scriptum or nuncupativum set downe in writing or uttered by word of mouth But a nuncupative Testament or Will made by word of mouth without writing must be proved by solemne witnesses The solemne witnesses of Christs Testament are the Prophets and Apostles Let Papists if they can prove by them that part of the Testament of Christ is unwritten Because our Adversaries doe contend for Traditions not written hotly and zealously against the totall perfection of the Scripture that they might thrust upon us many points by their owne confession not contained in Scripture and usurpe to themselves irrefragable authority in the Church it shall not be amisse largely to consider of this matter And 1. to enquire of the signification of the words Greek and Latine which are translated Tradition and then to come to the matter which is controverted between us and the Papists The Greeke word signifying Tradition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in the new Testament is used only in these places Matth. 15. 2. 3. 6. Marke 7. 3. 5. 8. 9. 13. 1 Cor. 11. 2. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 8. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and in the vulgar Latine is rendred Traditio Matth. 15. 2. 3. 6. Marke 7. 3. 5. 8. 9. 13. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 6. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and praecepta 1 Cor. 11. 2. Whereto the Rhemists translation which seemeth to be but a bare translation of the vulgar Latine doth wholly agree using the word Tradition every where excepting 1 Cor. 11. 2. where they use the word precepts but set in the margent the word Tradition Arias Montanus in his Interlineall translation doth render it traditio Beza doth commonly expresse it by the word traditio In the English Geneva Bible we translate it by the word instruction tradition calling mens precepts traditions the Apostles doctrine Ordinances or instructions not that we feared the word tradition but because we would not have the simple deceived as though the unwritten verities of the papists were thereby commended or as though we had some honourable conceite of them and what we did herein the signification of the word doth give us free liberty to doe in our last English Translation we use the word tradition as often as the vulgar Latine or the Rhemists have done not that we were driven by feare or shame to alter what was done before but because we would cut off all occasion of carping at our translation though never so unjust First we contend not about the name tradition the word may lawfully be used if the sense affixed thereto be lawfull 2. All traditions unwritten are not simply condemned by us 3. The Apostles delivered by lively voyce many observations dispensable and alterable according to the circumstances of time and persons appertaining to order and comelinesse onely we say that they were not of the substance of Religion that they were not generall concerning all Churches 4. We receive the number and names of the authors of Books Divine and Canonicall as delivered by tradition but the Divine truth of those Books is in it self clear and evident unto us not depending on the Churches authority The Books of Scripture have not their authority quoad nos from the approbation of the Church but winne credit of themselves and yeeld sufficient satisfaction to all men of their divine truth whence we judge the Church that receiveth them to be led by the Spirit of God yet the number authors and integrity of the parts of those Books we receive as delivered by tradition 5. The continued practise of such things as are neither expressely contained in Scripture nor the example of such practise expressely there delivered though the grounds reasons and cause of the necessity of such practise be
7. For there are â—hree that beare record in Heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost The Arrians wiped this place out of many bookes 2 Cor. 13. 14. The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the communion of the holy Ghost be with you all The Arrians Samosatenians Sabellians Photinians and others deny the Trinity of persons in one essence of God Servetus a Spaniard was burnt at Geneva in Calvins time he denied that Christ was Gods Sonne till Mary bore him Servetus Trinitatem idolum item Cerberum Tricipitem vocabat See Mr Cbeynels rise of Socinianisme ch 1. p. 6. Socinus cals him Deum tripersonatum ridiculum humanae curiositatis inventum Infaustus Socinus omnium haereticorum audacissimus saith Rivet See Cheynels rise of Socinianisme Chap. 3. That the Father is God is confessed by all and it is manifest from Scripture we are directed to pray to him The Apostle saith Grace to you and peace from God our Father Philem. v. 3. That Christ is God is proved 1 By cleare Texts of Scripture affirming this truth in so many words The Prophet foretelling of him saith this in his name by which you shall call him Jehovah or the Lord our righteousnesse Jerem. 23. 6. and the mighty God Esay 9. 6. Paul saith Rom 9. 5. who is God over all blessed for ever and St John saith 1 John 5. 20. This is very God and St Paul saith 1 Tim. 3. 16. Great is the mystery of Godlinesse God manifested in the flesh and accordingly Thomas made his confession John 20. 28. My Lord and my God which title he accepteth and praiseth Thomas for believing and that he could not have done without extreame impiety had he not been God 2 By evident reasons drawn from the Scripture He hath the Name Titles Workes essentiall Attributes and worship of God ascribed unto him in Scripture 1 Divine Names and Titles are given to Christ He is the onely blessed Potentate 1 Tim. 6. 15. The King of Kings Revel 1. 5. and Lord of Lords Apoc. 17. 14. 19. 16. He is called the Image of the invisible God Col. 1. 25. the brightnesse of his glory Heb. 1. 3. the word and wisdome of the Father Prov. 8. 12. 9. 1. He is called the Word because he is so often spoken of and promised in the Scripture and is in a manner the whole subject of the Scripture he is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cum articulo John 1. 1. Acts 20. 28. 1 Tim. 3. 16. the great God Titus 2. 13. the true God 1 John 5. 20. God over all or blessed above all Rom. 9. 5. the most high Luke 1. 76. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by which name the Septuagint have expressed Jehovah the proper name of God alone John 20. 28. My Lord Jude 4. the onely Lord Acts 10. 36. the Lord of all 1 Cor. 15. 48. the Lord from Heaven 1 Cor. 2. 8. the Lord of glory 1 Cor. 2. 8. the Lord of Heaven and Earth Matth. 28. 18. These Titles are too high and excellent to be given unto any meere man whatsoever God therefore who wil not have his glory given to another would never have given these Titles to another if he were not God 2 The workes of God even the principall and most eminent of all which are proper to the Lord onely are ascribed to Christ. 1. The worke of Creation even of creating all things John 1. 3. and Col 1. 16. He for whom and by whom all things were created is very God for Christ and by him all things were created therefore he is very God 2 The worke of preservation and government is attributed to him also he is before all things and by him all things consist Heb. 1. 2. He who upholds all things by his powerfull word is God so doth Christ therefore he is God 3 The working of Divine miracles raising up the dead by his own power is given to him John 6. 54. and John 5. 21. He that can quicken and raise the dead is God so doth Christ therefore he is God 4 Redeeming of mankind Luke 1. 68. Matth. 20 28. Eph. 1. 7. Rev. 1. 5. 5 Sending of the Holy Ghost John 21. 22. 14. 16. and of Angels is ascribed to him Matth. 13. 41. Revel 1. 1. He forgives sinnes Marke 9. 2 5. He gives eternall life 3 The principall and incommunicable attributes of God are given to him 1 Omniscience John 2. 24 25. He knew all men and he knew what was in them John 21. 17. Lord thou knowest all things 2 Omnipotency Rev. 1. 8. Phil. 3. 21. 3 Eternity John 17. 5. Revel 1. 18. John 1. 1. Esay 9. 6. He is called the everlasting Father 4 Omnipresence Matth. 18. 20. 5 Unchangeablenesse Heb. 1. 11 13. 13. 8. He that is Omniscient Omnipotent Eternall Omnipresent Unchangeable equall to the Father in Majesty and glory Phil. 2. 16. is God so is Christ therefore he is God Laâ—â—ly worship due to God is ascribed to him Heb. 1. 6. Let all the Angels of God worship him Revel 5. 13. the Lambe that is Christ hath the same worship tendred to him that the Father hath We are commanded to call upon his name to believe and trust in him John 14. 1. 3. 16. 6. 39. to hope in him Esay 11. 10. we are baptized in his name Matth. 28. 19. Acts 8. 16. and sweare by him Rom. 9. 1. Ob. Christ is called God of God and light of light Sol. Christ as God is from himself but if the Deity of Christ be considered as in the person of the Sonne so it is from the Father The Sonne in respect of his essence is from none in respect of the manner of subsistence he is from the Father Ob. Matth. 19. 17. Christ denieth that he was good because he was not God Sol. Christ applieth himselfe to him to whom he spake now he called Christ good in no other sence then he would have done any other Prophet and in this sense Christ rebuked him for calling him good Ob. John 17. 3. God the Father is called the onely true God Sol. Some referre both these to God himselfe and Christ but others give a generall rule that the word alone is not opposed to the other persons but to the creatures and feigned Gods and so John 8. 9 the woman is not excluded but her accusers the added expressions shew him to be God because it is life eternall to know him as well as the Father Ob. Ephes. 4. 6. Sol. The word Father is not there used relatively or personally for the first person in the Trinity but essentially as Mal. 2. is there not one Father of us all and so he is God called Father in regard of his workes ad extrâ—i Ob. John 14. 28. My Father is greater then I. Sol. As he was man onely or mediator the Father was greater then
Ghost is the maker preserver and governour of all things by his wisdome power justice providence Concerning man 1 That he was made by God of a visible body and an immortall and spirituall soule both so perfect and good in their kindsâ— that he was perfectly able to have attained eternall life for himselfe which was provided as a reward of his obedience 2 That being thus made he yeelded to the temptations of the Devill and did voluntarily sinne against God in eating of the Tree forbidden and so became a child of wrath and heire of cursing an enemy to God and slave to the devill utterly unable to escape eternall death which was provided as a recompence of his disobedience 3 That he doth propagate this his sinfulnesse and misery to all his posterity Concerning Christ. 1 That he is perfect God and perfect man the second Person in the Trinity who tooke the nature of man from the Virgin Mary and united it to himselfe in one personall subsistence by an incomprehensible union 2 That in mans nature he did die and suffer in his life and death sufficient to satisfie Gods justice which man had offended and to deserve for mankind remission of sinnes and life everlasting and that in the same nature he rose againe from the dead and shall also raise up all men to receive judgement from him at the last day according to their deeds 3 That he is the onely sufficient and perfect Redeemer and no other merit must be added unto this either in whole or part Lastly concerning the meanes of applying the Redeemer they are three 1 That all men shall not be saved by Christ but onely those that are brought to such a sight and feeling of their owne sinfulnesse and misery that with sorrow of heart they doe bewaile their sinnes and renouncing all merits of their owne or any creature cast themselves upon the mercy of God and the onely merits of Jesus Christ which to doe is to repent and believe and in this hope live holily all the remainder of their life 2 That no man is able thus to see his sinnes by his owne power renounce himselfe and rest upon Christ but God must worke it in whom he pleaseth by the cooperation of his Spirit regenerating and renewing them 3 That for the working of this faith and repentance and direction of them in a holy life he hath left in writing by the Prophets and Apostles infallibly guided to all truth by his Spirit all things necessary to be done or believed to salvation and hath continued these writings to his people in all ages Observe those places Acts 15. 11. 1 Tim. 1. 15. Let a man hold this that there was nothing but death in the world till Christ came and that he is come to save horrible sinners John 17. 3. Secondly there is a practicall place Titus 3. 8. Let us 1. See our selves dead without Christ and wholy trust in him 2. Let us be exemplary in our lives and conversations There are other Fundamentals which are onely comparatively necessary that is expected from one man which is not expected from another and more from those that live in the Church Have these six principles of the Apostle not onely in your heads but hearts 1. That a man is dead in himselfe 2. That his remedy lies out of himselfe 3. Know the doctrine of the Sacraments 4. The Word of God 5. Have some apprehension of the life to come 1. That there is a passage from death to life 2. That there is a fixed and irrevokable estate after this life Hold the doctrine of faith so that Christ may live in you and you be delivered up into that forme of doctrine lay hold on life eternall Secondly there are some particular principles There is a naturall light and supernaturall The light of nature teacheth some principles That you must doe as you would be done by that no man hates his owne flesh that one must provide for his family that there is a God and one God that he is to be honoured and reverenced above all 2. Supernaturall Let all our actions be done 1. in love 2. in humility 3. in faith 4. in God this the Gospell teacheth Shew your selves Christians in power go beyond the Heathen in practising the good rules of nature 1. Be carefull to make a wise choice of principles one false principle admitted will let in many errors and erroneous principles will lead men into erroneous practises 2. Labour to act your principles if you captivate the light God wil put it out 3. Be sure you worke according to your principles we pitty another in an errour when he follows his principles Here is an apology for those teachers which tread in Pauls steps are carefull to lay the foundation well It was the observation of our most judicious King JAMES That the cause why so many fell to Popery and other errours was their ungroundednesse in points of Catechisme How many wanton opinions are broached in these daies I wish I might not justly call them Fundamentall errours Some deny the Scriptures some the Divinity of Christ some the immortality of the soule Errours are either contra against the foundation which subvert the Foundation as that of the Papists who deny the al-sufficiency of Christs once suffering 2. Circa about the foundation which pervert the Foundation as the Lutherans opinion of the ubiquity of Christs body 3. Citra meerly without these divert the foundation as in the controversies of Church-government whether it be Sociall or Solitary this strikes not at the Foundation Laurentius saith the Apostle 1 Cor. 3. 11 12 13 14 15. speakes not of Hereticall Teachers and those which erre in fundamentals but of those which erre in lighter matters because he saith of both that they build upon one and the same Foundation Christ. We should contend for a known Fundamentall necessary truth Jude 3. the common faith not every opinion entertained on probable grounds It is a great question in Divinity An Magistratui Christiano liceat capitales poenas de haereticis sumere Whether Heretickes are to be punished by the Christian Magistrate with death The Papists say Haeretici qua Haeretici comburendi That Hereticks for Heresie sake though they doe not trouble the State ought to be put to death Luther doth not approve of the capitall punishment of Heretickes especially for the pernicious sequell of it among the Papists against the Protestants He thinkes it better that they be banished The present Lutherans hold the same almost concerning that question Meisner doth distinguish between haereticus simplex and haereticus seditiosus ac blasphemus these last he saith may be punished with capitall punishments The Socinians being themselves the worst of Hereticks would have no outward forcible restraining of any errour though never so grosse and pernicious For the Protestants heare what Zanchy saith Omnes fere ex nostratibus hujus sunt sentenâ—iae quod haâ—retici sint
Arts and Sciences but they could not learne of them the knowledge of the true God they themselves being ignorant and grosse Idolaters Neither could they erre in that which they delivered for by them the Spirit of Christ and Christ himselfe did speake 1 Pet. 1. 11. 2 Pet. 1. 21. Acts 28. 25. 2 Cor. 13 3. In thâ—ir owne judgement the most holy did erre as 1 San 16. 1 and Nathan 2 Sam. 6. which errour is truly related in the Scripture but when they spake according to the guidance of the Spirit which did ever assist them in the penning of the Scripture they could not erre I have learned saith Austin to Jerome to give this honour onely to the Canonicall bookes firmely to believe that no authour of them erred in writing from all others he expected proofe from Scripture or reason 12. The wonderfull consent singular harmony and agreement of the Scriptures shewes that they came not from men but from God John 5. 46. each part sweetly agreeth with it selfe and with another and with the whole Acts 26. 22. 11. 17. Luke 24 27. John 5. 46. Matth. 4. 4. what was foretold in the old is fulfilled in the new Testament If there seem any contrariety either in numbring of yeeres circumstance of time and place or point of doctrine the fault is in our apprehension and ignorance not in the thing it selfe and by a right interpretation may easily be cleared See Dr. Willet on Gen. 24. 38. These considerations strengthen this argument 1. The length of time in which this writing continued from Moses untill John to whom was shewed the last authenticall revelation which prevents all conceits of forgery since they were not written in one nor yet in many ages 2. The multitude of books that were written and of writers that were imployed in the service 3. That difference of place in which they were written which hinders the writers conferring together Two other arguments may evince this truth that the Scriptures were from God 1. Miracles both of 1. Confirmation which the Lord shewed by Moses Exod. 19. 16. 24. 18. 34. 29. the Prophets 1 Kings 7. 24. Christ himselfe and the Apostles for the confirmation of their doctrine such as the devill was not able to resemble in shew The raising of the dead the standing still or going backe of the Sunne the dividing of the Sea and the Rivers the making of the barren fruitfull My works testifie of me saith Christ and believe the workes which I doe if you will not believe me 2. Preservation of the bookes of the Scripture 〈◊〉 the fury of many wicked Tyrants which sought to suppresse and extinguish them but could not As God caused it to be written for the good of his people so by divine providence he hath preserved the same whole and entire Here we have three arguments in one 1. The hatred of the Devill and his wicked instruments against the Scripture more then any other booke Antiochus burnt it and made a Law that whosoever had this booke should die the death yet secondly it was preserved maugre his fury and the rage of Dioclesian Julian and other evill Tyrants Thirdly the miserable end of Julian Antiochus Epiphanes Herod Nero Domitian and Dioclesian and other persecutors of this doctrine The bookes of Salomon which he wrote of naturall philosophy and other knowledge the profitablest bookes that ever were the Canon excepted are perished but those alone which pertaine to godlinesse have been safely kept to posterity which is the rather to be observed since many more in the world affect the knowledge of naturall things then godlinesse and yet though carefull of keeping them they have not been able to preserve them from perpetuall forgetfulnesse whereas on the other side these holy writings hated of the most part and carelesly regarded of a number have notwithstanding as full a remembrance as they had the first day the Lord gave them unto the Church The Roman Empire for 300 yeeres set it selfe to persecute and extirpate this new doctrine and in all these troubles the Church grew and increased mighily Acts 12. 1. Herod killed JAmes with the sword yet v. 24. the word grew and multiplied The miracles wrought in the confirmation of Scripture differ much from the wonders wrought by the false Prophets Antichrist and Satan himselfe Matth. 24. 24. 2 Thes. 2. 11. Apoc. 13. 13 14. they are neither in number nor greatnesse comparable to these 1. They differ in substance Divine miracles are above and against the force of nature as dividing of the red Sea the standing still of the Sunne the others seem wonderfull to those which are ignorant of the cause of them but are not true miracles simply above the ordinary course of nature but effected by the art and power of Satan or his instruments by naturall causes though unknown to men and many times they are but vaine delusions 2. They differ in the end those true miracles were wrought by the finger of God for the promoting of his glory and mans salvations these to seale up falshood and destroy men confirmed in idolatry and heathenisme 2 Thess. 2. 9. Those were not done in a corner or secretly but openly in the presence of great multitudes nay in the sight of the whole world by the evidence of which an unknown doctrine before contrary to the nature and affections of men was believed Bainham said in the midst of the fire Ye Papists behold ye looke for miracles and here now ye may see a miracle for in this fire I feele no more paine then if I were in a bed of down but it is to me as sweet as a bed of Roses The miracles done by our Saviour Christ and his Apostles receved testimony of their most venemous and bitterest enemies they had 2. The Testimony 1. Of the Church and Saints of God in all ages 2. Of those which were out of the Church 1. Of the Church Both ancient and Judaicall and the present Christian Church 2. Of the members of the Church 1. The Church of the Jewes professed the doctrine and received the bookes of the old Testament and testified of them that they were Divine which invincible constancy remaineth still in the Jewes of these daies who though they be bitter enemies to the Christian Religion doe stiffely maintaine and preserve the Canon of the old Testament pure and uncorrupt even in those places which do evidently confirme the truth of Christian Religion 2. The Christian Church hath also most faithfully preserved the old Canon received from the Jewes and now delivered by the Apostles as a depositum and holy pledge of the Divine will 2. Of the members of the Church the constant testimony which so many worthy Martyrs by their blood have given to the truth Rev. 6.
been an introduction unto him not that his faith rested upon it as a finall stay but that it caused him so farre to respect the word of the Gospell to listen unto it and with a kind of acquisite and humane faith to believe it that he was thereby fitted to a better illumination by force whereof he might more certainly believe it to be of God But that the testimony of one Father in one place in a matter of such consequence should be of that force it is strange We deny not the ministery of the Church as an externall meanes to move us to imbrace the word of God but we deny the authority of the Church to be the principall meanes When we call the Scriptures Canonicall we call them not so passively because they are received into the Canon by men and accepted of but actively because they prescribe a Canon and rule to us The office of the Church in respect of the Scripture stands in foure things 1. To distinguish Canonicall Scripture from that which is not Canonicall although the determination of the Church be not the onely or chiefest cause why the Apocrypha are rejected 2. To be a faithfull keeper of those books which are inspired by God like a notary which keepeth publique writings 3. To publish declare and teach the truth as a cryer with a loud voyce ought to pronounce the Kings edicts but to pretermit adde or alter nothing Matth. 28. 19 20. Acts 8. 35. 1 Tim. 3. 15. This Church here is not that Church which the Papists make to be the Judge of controversies neither the Church representative which is a generall Councell nor the Church virtuall which they imagine to be the Pope but the Church Essentiall the congregation of all faithfull believers the House of God as he calleth it The Apostle here speaks of a pillar not more Architectonico understanding by it some essentiall piece of the building but more forensi such a post or pillar on which Tables and Proclamations use to hang. In old time the Gentiles used to write their Lawes in Tables and so hang them upon pillars of stone that the people might read them as Proclamations are nailed to posts in market Towns The Apostle describing the Church likeneth it to one of these pillars whose use was to shew what hung thereon It is pillar not because it holds up but holds forth the truth 4. To interpret the Scripture by the Scripture Since many things in Scripture are doubtfull and hard to be understood without an Interpreter Acts 8. 31. it doth belong to the Church to expound the same to interpret and give the sence Nehem. 8. 8 9. Luke 24. 27. provided that this exposition be by the Scriptures Some of the Papists say that the Church may condere artioulos fidei facere canonicum quo ad nos and though they talke of Councels and Fathers yet all is as the Pope concludes The testimony and tradition of the Church especially the Primitive Church is necessary to know that the Gospell of Matthew is divine Scripture by an historicall and acquired faith to know this by a divine and infured faith besides the authority of the Church the matter character and contents of every booke and comparing of it with other Scriptures doe serve as an inward cause to produce the said infused faith Ob. We are sent to the Church to determine all controversies 1 Cor. 11. 16. Sol. Controversies are either dogmaticall concerning faith or rituall concerning true order the proposition is about these not the first Secondly from this fundamentall truth that the Scripture is immediately from God the basis indeed of all religion 1 Cor. 15. the wickednesse of the Church of Rome is farther to be condemned which will not suffer the Scriptures to be read in their Churches but in an unknowne tongue nor in private by the common people without speciall leave and certaine cautions from their superiours Of old they would not suffer them to be read at all of late they are forced to give licences to some and they teach them that they should not make the Scripture judge of the doctrine and practice of the Church but the doctrine and practise of the Church must be the interpreter and judge of the meaning of the Scripture that is they must take the Scripture to meane none otherwise whatsoever it seem to say then what is agreeable to that which the Pope doth teach and practice There cannot be a surer signe of a bad cause then that it feares to be tried by the writings which it selfe cannot deny to be written by God for correction for reproofe for instruction in righteousnesse Some Papists are more modest herein as Bellarmine l. 2. de verbo Dei c. 15. Catholica Ecclesia statuit ne passim omnibus concedatur Scripturae lectio some more rigid as Huntly and Hosiua The Papists object the obscursity of Scriptures as an argument to hinder lay-men from reading them and account it a matter of profanation to allow men women and children and all promiscuously the use of the vulgar translation and thinke they will rather be hurt then benefited by them taking occasion of erring from them Hosius urgeth that give not holy things to dogs cast not Pearles before Swine to prove the people must be barred from reading of the Scriptures It is Pope Innocents glosse a beast might not touch the mount a lay-man might not meddle with Scripture Lindan saith nihil noxae inferretur in Ecclesiam salvâ— traditionis fundamento if there were no Bible and another Scriptura citius faciet Haereticum Lutherarum quam Catholicum Because we will have all proved by Scripture and make that the compleat rule for what we believe or doe in all Theologicall matters they call us Scripturarios Scripturemen and atram entarios Theologos and so to carry or read a Bible is matter of scoffe we may stile them in Tertullians phrase Scripturarum Lucifugae Traditionaries Saint Gregory who is blessed in their Church exhorteth a lay-man to the serious study of the Scriptures that thereby he might learne the will of God alledging that the Scripture is the Epistle of God unto his creature Quid est autem Scriptura sacra nisi Epistola omnipotentis Dei ad Creaturam Greg. lib. 4. epist. 40. ad Theodorum medicum Proving further that obscurity of Scripture is so frothy an argument for perswading any devout Christian not to read them that it should rather incite them to greater diligence therein and therefore he elegantly compares the Scripture to a River wherein saith he there are as well shallow fords for Lambs to wade in as depths and gulphs wherein the Elephant may swim Chrysostome held it a thing necessary for all men daily to read the Scriptures Audite quaeso saeculares comparate vobis Biblia animae pharmaca Saint Jerome did exhort divers women thereto and commended
Chapters Obadiah He was almost contemporary to Jeremy It is but one Chapter Doctor Rainolds hath well expounded this prophesie The destruction of the Enemies of the Church is handled in the 16. first verses the Salvation thereof by the Ministery of Pastors in the five last Jonah He prophesied in the time of Jeroboam 2 King 14. 25. Jerome proves by the authority of the Hebrewes that he was contemporary with Hosea and Amos. It consists of foure Chapters Abbots and King have both commented well in English on this prophesie Micah Humiliatus sic dictus Propheta ab insigni miranda humilitate He prophesied in the times of Iotham Achaz and Hezechiah Kings of Judah as appeares by the inscription Ch. 1. v. 1. and was almost contemporary with Isay with whom he agreeth in many things He exceeds all the Prophets in this one thing that he determines the place of Christs Birth 5. Chap. 2. v. It consists of 7. Chapters Daneus and Chythraeâ—s have done well on it Nahum It is probable that he lived before the Babylonish captivity and was contemporary to Micha but 90 yeares after Jonah It consists of three Chapters which containe both a prediction of the destruction of the Assyrians Ch. 1. and also an Explication of the causes of it Chap. 2. and 3. Daneus is the best Expositor of this Book The Hebrews think that both Nahum and Hibacuc wrote in the times of Manasseth Both the order in which these bookes were Anciently placed and the things themselves which are contained in their writings doe intimate as much Grotius Habacue Luctator It is probable that he lived about Jeremies time or a little before It consists of three Chapters Grineus and Daneus have done well on him Zephanie He prophesied in the times of Josiah King of Judah and was contemporary to Jeremy He prophesieth especially of the overthrow of the Kingdome of Judah It consists of three Chapters Daneus hath done well on this prophesie Haggai Chag signifieth a Feast in Hebrew his name signifieth Festivus laetus aut festum celebrans vel diligens quòd templi Hierosolymitani aedificationem post Captivitatem maximè urserit He began to prophesie after the Babylonish captivity in the second yeare of Darius King of Persia Esd. 5. 1. Hag. 1. 1. Grineus and Daneus have done well on this Zacharie He prophesied after the Babylonish captivity and followed Haggai within two moneths he handleth the same subject it consists of 14. Chapters His Booke is more large and obscure then any of the 12. Prophets Daneus hath done well on the whole and Master Pemble on 9. Chapters Malachie Nuncius seu Angelus meus Mal. 4. 4. 5. He was the last Prophet of the old Testament See Grotius of him Tertull. cals him the limit land-marke of both Testaments limes inter vetus novum Testamentum It consists of foure Chapters Daneus and Polanus and Stocke have commented well on this Book So much concerning the severall Books of the old Testament CHAP. IV. THe new Canon is that which the Christian Church hath had written in Greek from the time of Christ and his Apostles and it summarily containes the word published by Christ and his righteous acts The History of which is in the foure Bookes of the Evangelists the examples in the Acts of the Apostles the exposition in the 21. Epistles and lastly the prophesie in the Revelation All the Bookes of the new Testament were written in Greeke for divers reasons First because that tongue in the time of Chist and his Apostles was the most excellent of all among the Languages of the Gentiles Secondly because it was then most Common as Latine is now Tullie shewes orat pro Archia poeta how farre the Greeke Tongue spread Thirdly because in this tongue all the Philosophie and Sciences of the Gentiles were written The Greeke tongue by the writing of Philosophers Orators Historians and Poets was fraught with the best learning which Heathenisme afforded It came to passe by the singular providence of God that this Testament was written in one tongue onely for what Nation else would have yeelded to another that the Scriptures in their tongue were authentique and so the seeds of debate might have beene sowne amonst them All almost agree in this that all the Bookes of the new Testament were written in the Greeke tongue it is onely doubted concerning three of them the Gospell of Matthew Marke and the Epistle to the Hebrewes many affirm that the Gospell of Matthew was written by Matthew in Hebrew or rather in Syriacke the Language used by Hebrewes in the time of Christ and his Apostles that the Epiâ—â—le to the Hebrews was written in Hebrew Mark in Latin It is certaine that the Primitive Church from the first times used the Gospell of Matthew written in Greeke and counted it authenticall If any one say that the Latine Edition of Marke in the vulgar is not a version but the first Copie he may easily be refuted from the uniforme stile in it with other Latine Gospels and it will appeare to any Reader that the Gospell of Marke which the Roman Church useth is later then the Greeke and that the Latine was made from it For the Epistle to the Hebrewes though many among the Antient thought it was written in Hebrew yet all agree that the Greek Edition was in use thence from the first times of the Church Glassias saith Matthew wrote his Gospell first in Greek for his stile agrees with Marke Writers acknowledge that there is an Ancient Hebrew Copie of Matthew but upon good ground deny that it is the originall truth for besides that by received Tradition it is held otherwise Matth. 1. 23. and other such like places doe evince it for why should he writing in Hebrew interpret Hebrew words to them which understand that Language Hieron in quatuor Evangelia and Salmasius hold that Matthew was written in Hebrew Evangelium Matthaei Hebraicè ab auctore scriptum esse nemo non veterum tradidit Hebraeum illud Syriacum esse quod in usu tunc temporis in Judaea fuit Hieronymus docet qui Evangelium Matthaei scriptum fuisse testatur Chaldaicâ— Syroque Sermone Salmas de Hellenistica Erasmus Cajetane Calvin Junius Whitaker Gomarus Causabone Gerhard deny that Matthew was written in Hebrew Chamier de Canone l. 12. c. 1. saith we have the new Testament in Greek for although some contend that the Gospell of Matthew and the Epistle to the Hebrewes was written in Hebrew yet saith he it is very uncertaine and so propius falso I thinke saith Rivet that the Epistle to the Hebrewes was written in Greeke a tongue then most common and which was used by many Hebrewes which were called Hellenists That Marke should be written in Latine originally is improbable many of the reasons alleaged to prove that Matthew was not written in Hebrew are of force here also the Jewes at
name at least thrice saying I John Chap. 1. 9. 21. 1 2. 22. 8. whereas in the Gospell he never maketh mention of his name there he writes the history of Christ here he writes of himself and the Revelations declared to him Thirdly in the last Chapter are five testimonies heaped together v. 5 6 7 8. 1. Of the Angels 2. Of God himselfe the Lord of the holy Prophets 3. Of Jesus Christ behold I come shortly 4. Of John I John heard and saw all these things 5. The protestation of Jesus Christ vers 18. Fourthly the matter of the Booke doth convince the authority thereof seeing everywhere the Divinity of a Propheticall spirit doth appeare the words and sentences of other Prophets are there set downe part of the Prophesies there delivered are in the sight of the world accomplished by which the truth and authority of the whole is undoubtedly proved there are extant many excellent testimonies of Christ and his Divinity and our redemption by Christ. Fifthly The most ancient Fathers Greeke and Latine ascribe this Booke to John the Apostle Theophylact Origen Chysâ—stome Tertullian Hilary Austin Ambrose Irenaeus To deny then the truth of this booke is contra solem obloqui to gainsay the shining of the Sunne it selfe The Chyliasts abuse many testimonies out of this Booke but those places have been cleared long agoe by the learned as bearing another sence See Dr Raynolds conf with Hart Chap. 8. p. 406. Calvin being demanded his opinion what he thought of the Revelation answered ingenuously he knew not at all what so obscure a writer meant Se penitus ignorare quid velit tam obscurus scriptor Cajetan at the end of his Exposition of Jude confesseth that he understands not the literall sence of the Revelation and therefore exponat saith he cui Deus concesserit It consists of 22 Chapters the best Expositors on it are Ribera Brightman Pareus Cartwright Dent Forbes Mode Simonds 1. The Scriptures written by Moses and the Propheâ—s sufficiently prove that Christ is the Messiah that was to come the old Testament may convince the Jewes which deny the new Testament of this truth John 5. 39. They that is those parts of Scripture written by Moses and the Prophets there were no other Scriptures then written The 53 Chapter of Esay is a large history of his sufferings We have also another Booke or Testament more clearely witnessing of Christ the Gospel is the unsearchable riches of Christ Ephes. 3. 8. So much may suffice to have spoken concerning the Divine Canon the Ecclesiasticall and false Canon follow CHAP. V. SOme Hereticks utterly abolisht the Divine Canon as the Swingfeldians and Libertines who contemned all Scriptures the Manichees and Marcionites refused all the Bookes of the old Testament as the Jewes doe those of the new as if they had proceeded from the Divell Some diminish this Canon as the Sadduces who as Whitaker and others hold rejected all the other Prophets but Moses some inlarge it as the Papists who hold that divers other Bookes called by us Aprcrypha i. hidden doe belong to the old Testament and are of the same authority with the other before named and they adde also their traditions and unwritten word equalling it with the Scripture both these are accursed Rev. 22. 18. But against the first we thus argue whatsoever Scripture 1. is divinely inspired 2. Christ commandeth to search 3. To which Christ and his Apostles appeale and confirme their doctrine by it that is Canonicall and of equall authority with the new Testament But the holy Scripture of the old Testament is divinely inspired 2 Tim. 3. 16. where he speakes even of the Bookes of the old Testament as is gathered both from the universall all writing viz. holy in the 15 verse and from the circumstance of time because in the time of Timothies infancy little or nothing of the new Testament was published 2. Christ speakes not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the people in generall to search it John 5. 39. this famous elogium being added that it gives testimony of him and that we may finde eternall life in it 3. Christ and his Apostles appeale to it and confirme their doctrine by it Luke 24. 27. Rom. 3. 21. Acts 10. 43. 17. 11. 20 43 26. 20. the new Testament gives testimony of the old and Peter 2 Pet. 1. 19. of Pauls Epistles The Ecclesiasticall Canon which is also called the second Canon followeth to which these Bookes belong Tobit Judith first and second of the Machabees Wisdome Ecclesiasticus Baruch Additions to Daniel and Hester for these neither containe truth perfectly in themselves nor are sanctified by God in the Church that they may be a Canon of faith and although abusively from custome they were called Canonicall yet properly in the Church they are distinguished from the Canonicall by the name of Apocryphall The false Canon is that which after the authority of the Apocrypha increased was constituted by humane opinion for the Papists as well as we reject for Apocryphall the third and fourth Booke of Esdras the prayer of Manasses the third and fourth of Machabees as Thomas Aquinas Sixtus Senensis Bellarmine and so the Councell of Trent confesse when they omit these and reckon up the whole Canon The state therefore of the controversie betwixt us and the Papists is whether those seven whole bookes with the Appendices be Sacred Divine Canonicall We doe not deny but many of these especially Wisdome and Ecclesiasticus are very good and profitable and to be preferred before all humane Tractates but that they are properly and by an excellency Canonicall and of infallible truth out of which firme arguments may be drawne that we deny Those Bookes which the Jewes of old and the reformed Churches now reckon for truely Canonicall in the old Testament are received all even by our adversaries for Canonicall without any exception 2. for the Canonicall Bookes of the new Testament there is no controversie between us and so far we agree but in the old Testament whole Bookes are reckoned by them for Canonicall which we hold Apocryphall The reason why these Bookes at first were added to holy writ was this the Jewes in their later times before and at the comming of Christ were of two sorts some properly and for distinction sake named Hebrews inhabiting Jerusalem and the holy Land others were Hellenists that is the Jewes of the dispersion mingled with the Graecians These had written sundry bookes in Greeke which they made use of together with other parts of the old Testament which they had in Greeke of the translation of the 70 when they now understood not the Hebrew but the Hebrewes received onely the 22 Bookes before mentioned Hence it came that the Jewes delivered a double Canon of Scripture to the Christian Church the one pure unquestioned and Divine which is the Hebrew Canon the other in Greeke
time of Austin fasting on the Sabbath day which was kept only at Rome Necessary Traditions which are delivered in the forme of a Precept that Easter is to bee celebrated on the Lords Day Free which are delivered in the forme of counsell as sprinkling of holy water Objection The Scripture it not perfect with a perfection of parts because many parts are either defective or excessive 1. Some labour wiâ—h a defect as Genesis 11. 12. a person is omitted in the Genealogy of Cainaan which was the Sonne of Aphâ—xad but it is reckoned in Luke in Christs Genealogy not in the old Testament therefore there is a defect Sol. Luke reckons it according to the vulgar opinion of the Jewes Junius in his paralels would have the fault to be in the Septuagint whom Luke followed not approving of their errour but yeelding to the time least the Gospell otherwise should have beene prejudicâ—d but Bezas opinion is rather to be approved of that this word is inserted from the Ignorance of those who undertooke to correct this Text according to the translation of the Seventy Interpreters For in an Ancient manuscript which Beza followed this word Cainaan was not to be found therefore he omitted it in his translation and so hath our great English Bible Ob. There is something found in the Scripture against the Commandement of God Deut. 4. 2. therefore there is excesse as well as defect for many Bookes which we beleeve to be Canonicall are added Sol. He doth not forbid adding by Gods Command but from the will of man for God himselfe added afterward The Papists arguments for Traditions answered Ob. Bellarmine saith Religion was preserved for 2000 yeares from Adam to Moses onely by Tradition therefore the Scripture is not simply necessary Sol. By the like reason I might argue that Religion was long preserved not onely without the Pope of Rome but also without Baptisme and the Lords Supper with the like institutions therefore they are not simply necessary yet none of ours hold the Scriptures simply necessary Secondly it is false that Religion was preserved all that while by ordinary Tradition onely for the living voyce of God sounded most perpetually in the Church and the doctrine of Religion was conveighed successivly from the Father to the Sonne which living voyce of God by little and little ceasing writing afterward succeeded and hath the same necessity now which Gods living voyce had before Ob. Whatsoever things are commended from Scripture are necessary but so are Traditions ergo they are necessary Joh 16. 12. I have yet many things to say unto you but ye cannot beare them now therefore say they the Lord spake many things which are not written Sol. 1. He saith not that he had many things to tell them which he had not taught them before but which they were not now so well capable of for it appeareth that he taught them that which they understood not and therefore they needed to be further taught of them by the holy Ghost which should not teach them any new thing that Christ had not taught but onely make them understand that which they had beene taught of our Saviour Christ. 2. If the holy Ghost did teach them any thing which our Saviour Christ had not before spoke unto them of yet that makes nothing for Traditions seeing that which the holy spirit taught them he taught them out of the Scriptures 3. If the holy Ghost should have taught the Apostles some things which neither Christ had told them of nor the Scriptures had taught them yet this is rather against the Papists For that which the holy Ghost taught them they undoubtedly left in record unto the Church as being faithfull Stewards and revealing the whole Counsell of God unto the people 4. It hath been the practise of Hereticks as Austine affirmeth at all times to cover their dreames and phantasies with this sentence of our Saviour Christ. Lastly if it be asked what were those grave and great mysteries which the Apostles could not for their rudenesse beare they are forsooth Oyle and Spittle in Baptisme Candles light at noone dayes which was not in the darker time of the Law Baptizing of Bels and such like gue-gaws as the grossest and carnallest men are fittest to receive Ob. 2 Thess. 2. 15. Therefore Brethren stand fast and hold the Traditions which ye have been taught whether by word or our Epistle From these words say our Adversaries it appeares that all things were not written nullum Papistae in Scripturis locum probabiliorem inveniunt saith Whitaker The Hereticks say the Rhemists on this place purposely guilefully and of ill conscience refraine in their translations from the Ecclesiasticall and most usuall word Tradition evermore when it is taken in good part though it expresse most exactly the signification of the Greeke word but when it â—oundeth in their fond fantasie againâ—â— the Traditions of the Church as indeed in true sense it never doth there they use it most gladly Here therefore and in the like plâ—ces that the reader may not so easily like of Traditions unwritten here commended by the Apostle they translate 〈◊〉 â—onstitutions Ordinances and what they can invent else to hide the truth from the Rimple or unwarry Reader whose translations have none other end but to be guile such by art and conveighance Thus farre the Rhemists Paul taught the Thessalonians some things by word of mouth which he taught them not in his two Epistles which he wrote unto them therefore he taught some doctrines which he wrote not as if that Paul wrote no more Epistles then these two whereby that which he taught not them in writing unto them he taught them by writing unto others Secondly how followeth this argument Paul wrote not all the doctrines of God unto the Thessalonians therefore they are not all written in the Propheticall and Evangelicall writings whereas it is plainly testified that the Old Testament containeth a perfect rule of the doctrine of salvation the new being written for a Declaration of the fulfilling and further clearing of that in the Old Testament Thirdly it appeareth manifestly in the Acts what was the summe of that which Paul taught the Thessalonians by word of mouth For there it is witnessed that Paul taught out of the Scriptures that it behoved Christ to suffer and rise againe from the dead and that Jesus was Christ this teaching then by word is there limited to the Scriptures of the Law and Prophets Neither ought it to seeme strange that this was the summe of all which the Apostle taught at Thessalonica where he tarried so small a while when amongst the Corinthians where he remained longest of any place and consequently taught most he sheweth that he taught nothing but Christ and him crucified Fourthly the Apostle himself in this very place calling verse 14. whatsoever he taught by word or wrote by the name of