Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
truth_n apostle_n doctrine_n teach_v 3,406 5 6.1737 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A15726 The ground of a Christians life Deliuered in a sermon at Harwood in Lancashire, the first day of December 1618. By Robert Worthington minister of Gods word at Acceington. Worthington, Robert, minister of Gods word at Acceington. 1620 (1620) STC 25999; ESTC S103650 35,929 86

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

of people and Churches so was their doctrine diuiding the word of truth aright Amongst them of the circumcision the Apostle presseth the doctrine of faith but where the Gospell was established he vnfoldeth further 2. Cor. 6. 34. Tit. 2. 1. 2. 1. Tim. 6. 17. 18. the mysterie of godlinesse teaching other graces and gracious duties necessary and appertaining to Christian life Here we see the wisedome of God in scattering the Scriptures not onely for the making his people more diligent in searching them but also that they may The Brownist a wrester of holie Scripture in many things remaine in his iust iudgement a stone to stumble at euen to such as are disobedient and vnbeleeuing Furthermore would the Familist and Separatist take any paines in comparing Scripture with Scripture they should finde but weake grounds for their indiscreet and vngodly proceedings For although they are bold and peremptory in alledging Scripture yet if they were able to see their pride and ignorance they should finde but a slippery ground-worke to vphold and maintaine their wilfull separation The alledging of Scripture literally and solely without comparison will no more helpe in some cases then bare sufferings without the cause will helpe a man to be The diuell cunning in quoting Scripture Psal 91. 11. Matth. 4. 6. a Christian The diuell for his owne defence hath alledged Scripture he can tell Christ it is written That the Lord had giuen his Angels charge ouer him and with their hands they should lift him vp that at any time he dash not his foote against a stone therefore what if he cast himselfe downe from the pinacle of the Temple But the Lord Iesus knew that although this Scripture was truth yet it was no warrant for him to subiect himselfe to Christians must not consent to euerie quoter of Scripture Satans wil or enterprise such a needlesse action And can we perswade our selues that he laboureth not to traine vp as many as he can in such cunning sophistry will he leaue any arrow in his quiuer vnshot before he will be conquered When humane learning cannot serue he Satan a cunning sophister will not be afraid to vrge diuine Scripture Wofull experience witnesseth his working vpon the corruptions of corrupt professours causing their pride ignorance and hypocrisie to end in Anabaptisme Brownisme and Apostacie But let vs search some of their mainest grounds The first place which I purpose The ground of Separatists to shew is in the 1. Corinthians 5. 6. 7. 11. A little leauen doth leauen the 1. Cor. 5. 6. 7. 11 whole lumpe purge out therefore the old leauen If any which is called a brother be a fornicatour or an idolater or couetous or a rayler or drunkard or extortioner with such an one eate not But the Apostle saith not Particulars will not alwayes hold to maintaine generals Eate not with any that is disobedient but with a brother There were many that denyed the resurrection he commanded not these to be cast forth neither doth he say that when he shall come to them he will cast all such foorth as haue not repented of their fornication 2. Cor. 12. 21. and wantonnesse but bewaile them The person therefore that may not be eaten with is a brother a Christian by name one excommunicated the end whereof Our sharpe dealing with others must be sugred with loue vnto them 2. Thess 3. 14. 15. was not to root him out but to plant him in For this must be done that he might be ashamed neither was he to be accounted as an enemy but admonished as a brother The holy Fathers presently after the primitiue times were troubled themselues The Church euer troubled with schismatickes with such schismaticall Donatists as namely Parmenian and Cresconius with others who grounded themselues vpon this Scripture with such like Vnto whom Augustine writeth in this manner Cum quisque fratrum i. Christianorum intus in Eccles●● societate constitutorum in aliquo tali peccalo fueri● deprehēsus vt Anathemate dign us habeatur fiat hoc vbi periculum schismatis nullum est c. August cont August cont Parm. lib. 3. cap. 3. When any of the brethren that is of the Christians which haue place within in the vnity of the Church be taken in some such sin that he may be counted worthy to be excommunicate let it be done where there is no danger of a schisme This man saith he Corripite non ad eradicandum sed ad corrigendum Cast out that he being stricken through feare may be healed through shame When seeing himselfe excommunicated of the whole Church he cannot finde a multitude to be of his fellowship with whom he may reioyce in his fin and insult ouer the good We see here by the testimony of the Father as also by the prastise of the Apostle that multitudes may not be reiected much lesse whole Churches as these Separatists dreame Lest while we go about to plucke vp Matth. 13. 24. the tares we plucke vp the wheat likewise Other Scriptures they ground vpon as these out of the Prophets Ieremiah 23. 28. What hath the chaffe to do with the Ierem. 25. 28. wheate Also vpon that in Esaiah 52. 11. Depart depart come out from thence touch Esay 52. 11. no vncleane things come out from the middest thereof and separate your selues you that beare the vessels of the Lord. But when was this separation was it not when Babel was incurable neare vnto destruction Otherwise the Prophets themselues yea Christ and his Apostles sinned when they were in the Temple with vngodly multitudes Hath not the chaffe bene euer The Church was neuer without hypocrites with the wheate Is there no chaffe at Amsterdam or hath God no people but there Hath there not bene hypocrites in the Church and who are worse or how shall they be winnowed before the separating Angell come with his The chaffe and the wheat must be together ●ntill the last day winnowing fan The cause now of their separation is because we are Babilonish the Church of England say they is idolatrous and antichristian Admit we were so which is a shamelesse slander yet this is no ground for present and sudden corporall separation If these who were extraordinarily gifted hauing withal the spirit of discerning separated not what ground hath the Brounist The Iewes and false teachers were superstitious enough yet Paul remained among them vntill the Lord called him from thence to go preach vnto them of the vncircumcision And so did Christ For what doth the Lord require more then a disioyning in affection fellowship Besides if all humane constitutions be simply sinnes then were all primitiue reformed Churches idolatrous and vncleane and the Apostles themselues guilty of sinne for communicating with such Nay further who may communicate with the Church of England although he digresse from the same order himselfe For we may not sit at
as necessary to saluation or equalized with the law of God neither may they by their multitude obscure the glory of Christ in his ordinances but such lawes as are made vniustly or command vnlawfull things do binde neither in generall nor particular neither in themselues nor accidentally and therefore cannot be of faith Now the Church of Rome maketh Great difference betwixt the Church of Rome and the Church of England lawes and ordaineth constitutions not onely Extrafidem without faith but also contrafidem against faith and to bind the conscience in paine of mortall sinne laying grieuous burthens vpon mens shoulders heauie to be borne And thus farre in the third vse proceed we in order to the fourth Vse 4 In the fourth place it teacheth Gods Ministers to preach the Scriptures as in Gods ministers must preach Gods word 2. Tim. 4. 1. 2. respect of the necessity thereof all our actions being to be done of faith so also from the direction of the Apostle who saith to Timothy Preach the word Nay we haue the example of Christ who preached Moses and the Prophets himselfe The Scribe demanding the way to life Christ answereth by interrogation What Luke ●● ●6 is written in the law how readest thou Againe he entring into a Synagogue at Nazareth vpō the Sabboth it being his Luke 4. 17. ordinary custome by the testimony of the Euangelist and a booke of the Prophet Esaiah being deliuered him he openeth the booke and findeth it written thus The Spirit of the Lord is vpon me because he hath anointed me that I shold preach the Gospell to the poore c. The which he expoundeth and applyeth as plainly appeareth in the verses following yea he vrgeth it as a duty vpon the people for to heare Moses and the Prophets They haue Moses and the Prophets saith he Luke 16. 29. let them heare them Now what made way for Antichrist but leauing of the Scriptures From whence ariseth schisme heresie together with grosse idolatry The casting aside of the word is the high way to schisme heresie and grosse Idolatry but from ignorance in the Scriptures For opinion and sense may faile and erre when faith rightly grounded vpon the word cannot What hath caused so many sects to spring vp in the bosome of the Church as Donatists Familists Brownists Anabaptists but want of comparing Scripture with Scripture When men want indifferent ●ares and hearts their affections rather inclining to courses of security and liberty and their iudgements blinded through pride and selfe-loue how soone I say are such seduced drawne away and corrupted Therefore as it is a duty to search the Scriptures they being the ground of faith and pillar of truth so it behoueth the Lords embassadors to come to the people with not Thus say I but Thus saith the Lord. For what wise man will The word of God vpholdeth a ministers office and authority credit euery heare-say or what subiect wi●l yeeld respect to such an one as coūterfeiteth the kings Embassador hauing neither his Maiesties Armes nor Seale I will not deny but it is a blessed thing to teach Gods truth from a sanctified spirit for who is able to direct in that mysticall doctrine of regeneration so well as he that is regenerate himselfe or what art is able to describe and teach like experience It was an infallible truth and grounded certenty sufficiently perswading the wise men that in Bethleem Mich. 5. 2. Matth 2. 9. was borne Christ the king of the Iewes when the prophecy of the Prophets and the conducting starre paralleled both directing vnto one and the same place As sure and credible will it be when Gods sacred Spirit in vs shall sympathise with Gods word and his Spirit make a sweet harmony in his Ministers his reuealed truth But if sense preposterously faile without the guide of faith then beware of ship wracke for Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne We see then as in a glasse the duty of all Gods embassadors for as we may not preach our selues but Christ Iesus the Lord so may we not deliuer a parcell of the Scriptures or diuulge them partially The true treasure and diuine Oracles of the Almighty require faithfulnesse for so ought stewards to be found faithfull Cor. 4. 2. Gods truth as it is so it must be taught The word of truth deserueth true diuision The whole word of God must be taught as also right application whereby the whole counsel of God may be reuealed to the Saints For oftentimes the want of comparing Scripture with Scripture and distinguishing of times produceth an Ataxie or confusion in the Churches of God To instance in some particulars and lamentable presidents The cauils and innouations of that Anabaptisticall Sect who say that the New Testament is sufficient to saluation therfore the Old vnnecessary and vnprofitable and they ground themselues vpon these Scriptures 2. Cor. 3. 6. and 14. Who 2. Cor. 3. 6. 14 16. hath made vs able Ministers of the New Testament not of the letter but of the Spirit for the letter killeth but the Spirit giueth life Moses say they had a couering Anabaptists very proud and grosly ignorant which in Christ is taken away But the Apostle saith not that Moses is taken away but the veile is taken away For the Apostle speaketh of the illumination and conuersion of the Iewes to Christ as appeareth in the sixteenth verse Neuerthelesse when their hearts shall be turned to the Lord the veile shall be taken away Indeed the shadows and ceremonies must needes be taken away when the substance is come but Christ was not shadowed or typified in the moral law therfore that cannot vtterly be taken away Matt. 5. 17. 18. for his comming was not to abolish it but to fulfill it therefore the Old Testament is both necessary and profitable Furthermore what although the Apostle teach that the letter killeth but the There remaines good vse of the morall law both for repentāce and life spirit giueth life doth he thereby any thing else but shew the difference betwixt the Law and the Gospel namely that the one is able to do nothing without the other For the orgā of the quickning Spirit cannot be properly said to be the Law but the Gospell since the Law hath no power to regenerate but the Gospell yet in regeneration and conuersation the Law hath it worke and vse and therefore cannot be abolished Another ground they haue in Matth. 17. 5. Christ say they by the command Matth. 17. 5. of the Father is onely to be heard but to heare Moses the Prophets of Christ is to heare Christ Besides it is the command of the Sonne himselfe who was equall with the Father They haue Moses Luke 16. 39. and the Prophets let them heare them Yea he telleth the Iewes that If they had beleeued Iohn 5. 47. Moses they would haue beleeued him for he wrote of him Againe
1. Cor. 8. 10. chap. 10. 21. the Idols table Therefore vntill they proue vs Babilonish and besides all that to be incurable their pretended grounds shall end in meeare conceits for Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne The last sort or sect that I purpose to meddle with who would faine seeke a staffe from Scripture to hold themselues by is the Papist One of their mainest grounds is in the Epstile of Iames 2. 24. Ye see then how that of workes a man is iustified Iam. 2. 24. and not of faith onely Here they ground their second iustification for Second iustification a mere inuention they would haue him that is iust to be more iustified although comparisons of greater and lesser do not make a seuerall kind but declare an increase in the same kind of iustification and not a new kind of iustification Now wheras the Apostles Paul and Iames may seeme to contradict and oppose themselues the one prouing so often in his Epistles that we are iustified by faith without the workes Rom. 4. 3. Galat. 3. 6. of the Law alledging the example of Abraham for iustification by faith whom the Apostle Iames here vseth for iustification by works We must therefore examine and scanne sundry necessarie questions for the reconciling of them as also for the remouing the aduersary from off his blind ground in this weighty point The first question to be scanned is what faith the Apostle Iames meaneth or speaketh of in this place the which he maketh so insufficient whether historicall miraculous hypocriticall or liuely and operatiue It is true that the Apostle Paul speaketh of the last as appeareth Gal. 5. 5. 6. Galathians 5. 5. 6. Circumcision auaileth nothing nor vncircumcision but faith which worketh by loue But the Apostle Iames No opposition betweene the Apostles I am 2. 19. Great difference betwixt a liuing faith and a dead faith speaketh of the first namely historicall as appeareth in the 19. verse of this second chapter which he calleth the faith of diuels So then they both speake the truth the one that we are iustified by faith onely without workes speaking of a liuely faith the other that we are not iustified by faith onely speaking of a dead barren and counterfet faith The second question to be scanned is what iustification the Apostle Iames meaneth for there is a twofold iustification as there are sundry sorts of faith First therefore we are iustified before God of which iustification the Prophet Dauid speaketh Psa 32. 1. 2. Blessed is that Rom. 43. Psal 32. 1. 2. man vnto whom the Lord imputeth not his sinne Of which righteousnesse and iustification the Apostle Paul speaketh who saith That Abraham beleeued and it was Gods promise a sufficient ground for iustifying faith counted vnto him for righteousnesse The other iustification is before men which we haue by workes they being as euidences that we are righteous before God Of this iustification doth the Apost Iames speake for Abrahams offering vp of his sonne could not be the cause of his righteousnesse before God for his Rom. 4. 18. faith in the promise was reckoned vnto him for righteousnesse thirty yeares before he offered vp his sonne Therefore before God was his faith not made perfect through workes but before men Besides we reade of but few workes that the theefe on the crosse wrought Yet Luke 23. 42. 43. through faith was he iustified and the heauenly paradise promised vnto him The third question to be scanned is what works the Apostle Iames meaneth whether workes going before or after faith It is certaine that the Apostle Paul speaketh of workes going before faith which he denieth to be able to iustifie vs as appeareth Galath 5. 2. 3. 4. Behold I Paul say vnto you that if ye be circumcised Gal. 5. 23. 4. Christ shall profit you nothing for I testifie againe to euery man which is circumcised that he is bound to keepe the whole Law Ye are abolished from Christ whosoeuer are iustified by the Law ye are fallen from grace But Saint Iames speaketh of workes which follow faith as appeareth in the 18. verse Iames 2. 18. In nature causes of things go before their effects where he saith thus Shew me thy faith out of thy workes and I will shew thee my faith by my workes Besides the author to the Hebrewes declareth that Abrahams obedience and sacrifice was a worke following faith for he saith That by faith Hebr. 11. 17. Abraham offered vp his sonne Isaacke Workes then that follow Iustification cannot be the causes thereof wherefore the Apostle Iames must needs speake of Iustification before men and not before God The fourth question to be scanned is touching the persons with whom they haue to deale a distinction is very apparent Rom. 103. The Apostle Paul was to deale with pharisaicall hypocrites and Iewish teachers who held and taught that vnlesse they obserued the law of Moses they could not be saued But the Apostle Iames was to deale with carnall libertines and Epicure-like professours who boasted of a barren faith and neglected to bring forth the fruits of righteousnesse Many there were that vpon the preaching of faith gaue libertie to the flesh and thereby became the seruants of corruption as the Apostle Peter witnesseth 2. Pet. 2. 18. 19 therefore there must needs be necessitie of their seuerall doctrine and no opposition in it the one being to deale with such as too much preferred workes the other being to deale with such as too much neglected them From whose examples People of different qualities must haue different doctrine preached vnto them the Ministers of the Gospell may learne that one kind of doctrine cannot be necessarie at all times in all places and to all persons therefore must they take heede to their flockes wisely and perfectly to guide by the rule of faith in the life of life for Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Vse 5 The fift vse is an admonition against ignorance Our doctrine will not giue vs libertie nor licence to pleade for simplicity Knowledge very necessarie to the life of faith Christians may make some vse of Satan for he knowes much and laboureth much Pro. 8. 10. 11. for where there is blindnesse in the iudgement there cannot be but sin in the practise Therefore search we for knowledge as for hid treasures let vs make choise of wisedome before gold and preferre it before pearles But for our better proceeding consider we of some motiues and speciall inducements The first is the necessitie of knowledge Our grand enemy the Diuell is subtill and well practised in our manifold corruptions yea he vnderstandeth historically the Scriptures he rageth in these last and worst dayes insomuch that although he cannot hinder many from profession yet he keepeth many from sauing knowledge driuing men into extreames conceits and base absurdities Pray we therefore earnestly for a sanctified vnderstanding Secondly knowledge
was there any opposition in the Spirit of Christ which was both in Moses and the Prophets 1. Pet. 1. 10. 11 The doctrine of Moses and the Prophets rightly applied very profitable and Christ Of this saluation saith the Apostle the Prophets haue enquired and searched which prophesied of the grace that should come vnto you Searching when or what time the Spirit which testified before of Christ which was in them should declare the sufferings that should come vnto Christ and the glorie that should follow Yea the same Apostle affirmeth that We haue a 2. Pet. 1. 19. most sure word of the Prophets What letteth then but we may attend vnto the sound doctrine of Moses and the Prophets Furthermore the testimonie of the Apostle Paul is pregnant to this purpose who auoucheth That the whole 2. Tim. 3. 16. Corruption needeth correction as well as instruction Reproofes sometimes very needfull Scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach improue correct and to instruct in righteousnesse therefore the whole Scripture is necessarie the Christian standing in neede of it either for ground of faith or rule of obedience both in his generall particular calling Like vnto these dreames is the errour of many Libertines who ground vpon that saying in Ieremiah After those dayes Ierem. 31. 33. saith the Lord I will put my Lawes in the● inward parts and write them in their hearts as also vpon that saying of the Apostle Yee are our Epistle written not with inke 2. Cor. 3. 2. 3. but with the Spirit of the liuing God Although it be true that the knowledge of the Law may be written naturally in mens hearts yet he commanded the same to be writtē in two tables of stone For how doth the Lord write this Law in our hearts How doth he seale vp vnto vs the couenant of our reconciliation and regeneration by the finger of his The preaching of the word the conduit pipe to conuey grace into our harts Spirit but by the doctrine of the Law and Gospell preached heard written read meditated Or how could the Apostles call themselues the Preachers of the New Testament if the Gospel could not be preached And in vaine should Christ bid vs Search the Scriptures Iohn 5. 39. Furthermore the Euangelists and Apostles call their doctrine which was the New Testament a Scripture or Writing as appeareth by that testimony of Luke who thought it meete to write Those Luke 1. 3. things which he had diligently searched out Luke 1. 3. as also Iohn witnesseth who saith That these things are written that ye may beleeue Iohn 20. 31. And the Apostle Paul thought it necessary to write as is plaine in his Epistles Phil. 3. 1. Thus we see that the men of God and The Spirit of God in the hearts of his people and his word agree together Ministers of the Gospell wrote by the Spirit the Gospell with inke the hearts of true beleeuers sanctified by the Spirit through the preaching of the Gospel answering correspondently that word which was both written and preached as was euident among those Conuerts at Corinth in whom was manifest the power of the Gospell the preaching of faith being the power of God to saluation to Rom. 1. 16. euery one that doth beleeue We see then by wofull experience that Satan transforming himselfe into an It is the work of Satan to draw men frō Gods word which is the ground of faith Angell of light seeketh to ground many a poore soule vpon seeming shadowes drawing them from the rocke of refuge and certenty namely Moses and the Prophets Euangelists and Apostles of Iesus Christ who haue written and spoken as the Spirit directed and gaue them vtterance Were not therefore the proud Anabaptist fuller of conceit then iudgement he would neuer paraphrase the sacred Scriptures in that manner as he doth as I haue already shewed and will further shew in one instance Christ saith Mathew 5. 34. Sweare not at all therefore Matth. 5. 34. saith he it is not lawfull in any case to sweare Whereas the Lord vpon necessitie hath commended and commanded a lawfull oath warranting the same both by example and precept as appeareth in Deut. 6. 13. Thou shalt feare the Lord thy Deut. 6. 13. God and serue him and shalt sweare by his Name Yea the Apostle testifieth vppon necessity an oath to be a very good thing An oath saith he for confirmation Hebr. 6. 16. is the end of all strife Thus by conceited exposition would this sect of people bring Christ to abrogate his Fathers law and derogate from his Fathers glorie A proud spirit vnfit to expound the Scripture whereas our Sauiour meaneth nothing lesse for his purpose is nothing else but to expound the Law and deliuer it from the grosse corruptions and deprauations He that willingly wresteth the Scripture neither respecteth God nor Christ of the Scribes and Pharises For they taught that the third commandement was to be vnderstood of periurie onely or false swearing therefore our Sauiour sheweth that in this commandement is forbidden not onely periury and false swearing by the Name of God but also all rash and ordinary swearing in our common talke whether by the Name of God or any of his creatures because swearing amisse by them redoundeth to his dishonour He therefore here forbiddeth all needelesse and superfluous All needlesse swearing is much forbidden in the Scripture oathes in our ordinary communication And as these do erre not knowing nor vnderstanding the Scriptures so do many others as namely the Carnall cauiller that ioyneth himselfe with the publike assemblies partaking of the same word and Sacraments with the Saints of God But this man would haue one line to be sufficient vnto saluation for he findeth it written in the Scriptures That Iohn 3. 36. Naturall men would haue all but they would do nothing he which beleeueth in the Sonne hath euerlasting life But if this man reade forward he shall see and finde That he which obeyeth not the Sonne shall not see life Such will like the doctrine of faith but they cannot well brooke the doctrine of repentance But if they attend or list to heare they shall heare Christ to be as rigorous as his Father both in summoning all men Marke 1. 15. Luke 13. 5. to repent as also in threatning woes against impenitents The Apostles as they preach faith so they preach sanctification Acts 2. 38. and amendment of life for it is the absolute will of God that we should 1. Thessal 43 1. Pet. 1. 15. be holy as the Lord our God is holy The whole word of the Lord therefore must be deliuered by the Ministers of the Gospell that the whole courses of mens liues may be guided by the rule of faith Christ and his Apostles did not alwayes Rom. 9. 10. 11 preach faith but according to the dispositions