registred by themselves which we must believe they did or enacted For doctrine necessary for salvation we are for him but surely for evidence of fact or rituall observation this is no better than absurd rigour than unchristian incredulity Where is there expresse charge for the Lords Day Where for Paedobaptisme Where for publike Churches Where for Texts to be handled in Sermons Where for publike Prayers of the Church before and after them and many such like which yet we think deducible from those sacred authorities That is true of Hierome Hieron Tom. 6. in Agge 1. Quae absque authoritate c. Those things which men either finde or feigne as delivered by Apostolike tradition without the authority and testimonies of Scripture are smitten by the sword of Gods Spirit But what is this to us who finde this which we challenge for Apostolicall recorded in the written Word of God Or with what conscience is this alledged against us which is directly bent against the hereticall doctrines and traditions of the Marcionites either utterly without or expresly against the Scripture §. 11. The two famous Rules of Tertullian and S. Augustine to this purpose asserted I May not baulke two pregnant testimonies of the Fathers wherewith this great Anthierarchist and his Northerne 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much and justly troubled as our cause is advantaged not so much because they are the sentences of ancient Fathers which they have learned to turne off at pleasure with scorne enough as for that they carry in them such clearenesse and strength of reason as will not admit of any probable contradiction The former is Tertull. conâ—r Marcion c. 4. that of Tertullian Constabit id esse ab Apostolis traditum quod apud Ecclesias Apostolorum fuerit sacrosanctum That shall clearely appeare to be delivered by the Apostles which shall have been religiously observed in the Churches of the Apostles What evasion is there of so evident a truth Vbi supra Me seemes saith Parker that Tertullian understands onely those Churches which were in the very time of the Apostles not the subsequent for he saith not Quod est but Quod fuerit and thus it may be held true But this is to mocke himselfe and those that trust him and not to answer all the Fathers testimony The question must be what in Tertullian's time should be held to have beene Apostolike and therefore he saith Constabit not Constitit now if he shall speak to Parkers sense he shall say That which was religiously kept in the Church planted by the Apostles and in their own time is to be held Apostolike what is the reader ever the wiser since it were equally hard to know what their Churches then did and what they themselves ordained to be done were it not for the continued tradition and practice descending from them to the succeeding ages so as either they must trust the Churches then present for the deduction of such truth or els nothing would be proved Apostolike Neither is there any thing more familiar with the Fathers than to terme those the Churches of the Apostles even for some hundreds of yeares after their decease wherein they after some residence had established a government for future succession which had 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Synesius speaketh as it were too easie to instance in a thousand particularities yea that it may appeare how Parker shuffles here against his owne knowledge there is a flat mention of the Churches after the time of Saint Iohn the longest liver of all that holy traine which he cals Ioannis alumnas Ecclesias Tert. l. 4. contra Marc. c. 5. So as this of Parkers is a miserable shift and not an answer The other is that famous place of Saint Augustine against the Donatists agiâ—ated by every pen Quod universa c. That which is held by the universall Church and not ordained by any Councell but hath beene alwayes retained in the Church is most truly believed to be delivered by no other than Apostolicall authority which Parker sticks not to professe the Achillaean argument of the Hierarchists Neither have they any cause to disclaime it the authority of the man is great but the power of his reason more For that which obtaineth universally must either have some force in it selfe to command acceptation or els must be imposed by some over-ruling Authority and what can that be but either of the great Princes as they are anciently called of the Church the holy Apostles or of some generall Councels as may authoritatively diffuse it through all the world If then no Councels have decreed the observation of an ordinance whence should an universall not reception onely but retention proceed saye from Apostolike hands No cause can work beyond his owne Sphere Private power cannot exceed its owne compasse Let not any adversary think to elude this testimony with the upbraiding to it the Patronage of the Popish Opinion concerning Traditions we have learned to hate their vanities and yet to maintaine our owne Truths without all feare of the patrocination of Popery We deny not some Traditions however the word for want of distinguishing is from their abuse growne into an ill name must have their place and use and in vaine should learned Chamier Fulk Whitakers Perkins Willet and other Controversers labour in the rules of discerning true Apostolicall Traditions from false and counterfeit if all were such and if those which are certainly true were not worthy of high honour and respect And what and how farre our entertainment of Traditions is and should be I referre my Reader to that sound and judicious discourse of our now most Reverend Metropolitan against his Iesuite A.C. Onwards therefore I must observe That whereas Chamier doth justly defend Cham. Panstrat de Traditionibus that the Evidence of these kind of Traditions from the universall receipt of the Church doth not breed a plerophory of assent he doth not herein touch upon us since his Opposition is only concerning points of faith Our defence is concerning matter of fact neither do we hold it needfull there should be so full a sway of assent to the testimony of the Churches practice herein as there ever ought to be to the direct sentence of the sacred Scripture Will none but a divine faith serve the turn in these Cases which Parker himselfe professes to bee farre from importing salvation Is it not enough that I doe as verily believe upon these humane proofes what was done by the Apostles for the plantation and settlement of the Church as I doe believe there was a Rome before Christ's Incarnation or that a Iulius Caesar was Emperour or Dictator there or Tully an Oratour and Consul or Cato a wise Senator or Catiline a Traytor Certainly thus much beliefe will serve for our purpose who so requires more besides the grounds of the Apostolike Ordinances recorded in Scripture thus seconded may take that counsell which boyes construe the Lapwing
the Church Paracles l. 1. c. 4 and her Governours in the second their practice prescribes her government although as he adds without booke not without the Churches owne consultation and consent which if it be granted makes the more for us who ever since we were a Church have consented to the Apostles practice and constantly used the same What do I stand upon this They are the words of Cartwright himselfe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the example of the Apostles and generall practice of the Churches under their government draweth a necessitie §. 9. The third ground That the formes ordained by the Apostles were for universall and perpetuall use THirdly it is no lesse evident that the form which the Apostles set and ordained for the governing of the Church was not intended by them for that present time or place onely but for continuance and succession for ever For no man I suppose can be so weak Praecepta ipsa disciplinae omnibus in futurum Ecclesiis dictante Sp. Sancto tradiderunt Sco. Wy Paracles l. 1. c. 4 as to thinke that the rules of the Apostles were personall locall temporary as some Dials or Almanacks that are made for some speciall Meridians but as their office and charge so their rules were universall to the whole world as farre and as long as the world lasteth For what reason is there that Crete or Ephesus should be otherwise provided for than all the world besides Or what possibility to think that those first planters of the Gospell should leave all the rest of Christs Church as the Ostrich doth her eggs in the dust without any farther care The extent and duration of any rule will best be measured as by the intention of the Authour so by the nature and use of it S. Paul's intention is clearely expressed for a continuance untill the appearing of our Lord Iesus Christ 1 Tim. 6.14 As for the nature of the severall directions they carry perpetuity and universality of use in the face of them there being the same reason of their observation by all persons concerned and in all times and places why should not every Bishop be as unreproveable as a Cretian or an Ephesian Why should an accusation be received against an Elder upon more slender evidence in one place than another Why should there not bee the same courses taken for Ordination and Censure in all ages and Churches since the same things must of necessity bee done every where in all ages and Churches But why should I strive for a granted Truth For it is plaine that the Isle of Crete and Ephesus were but the patternes of other Churches and Timothie and Titus of other faithfull Overseers If therefore it shall appeare that Episcopacie so stated as we have expressed was in these persons and Churches ordered and setled by Apostolicall direction it must necessarily be yeelded to be of Apostolike and therefore Divine Institution §. 10. The fourth ground That the universall practice of the Church immediately succeeding the Apostolike times is a sure Commentary upon the practice of the Apostles and our best direction FOurthly I must challenge it for a no lesse undoubted Truth That the universall practice of the Church immediately succeeding the Apostles is the best Commentary upon the practice of the Apostles and withall that the universall practice of Gods Church in all ages and places is next unto Gods Word the best guide and direction for our carriages and formes of Administration The Copartners and immediate Successors of those blessed men could best tell what they next before them did for who can better tell a mans way or pace than he that followes him close at the heeles And if particular men or Churches may mistake yet that the whole Church of Christian men should at once mistake that which was in their eye it is farre more than utterly improbable A truth which it is a wonder any sober Christian should bogle at yet such there are to our griefe and to the shame of this late giddy age even the great guides of their faction Polit. Eccles l. 2. cap. 7. Falsum est c. Our mis-learned countriman Parker the second Ignis fatuus of our poore mis-led brethren and some Seconds of his stand peremptorily and highly upon the Deniall It is false saith he that the universall practice of the Church is sufficient to prove any thing to be of Apostolike Originall And jeeringly soone after Vniversa Ecclesiae praxis consensus patrum unica Hierarchicorum Helena est The universall practice of the Church and consent of Fathers saith he is the onely dearling of the abettors of the Hierarchy But the practice of the Church immediatly after the Apostles is no evidence Heare now I beseech you my deare brethren all ye who would pretend to any Christian ingenuity and consider whether you have not reason to distrust such a leader as would perswade you to slight and reject the testimony and practice of the whole Church of God upon earth from the first plantation of it to this present age and to cast your selves upon the private opinions of himselfe and some few other men of yesterday surely in very matter of doctrine this could be no other than deeply suspicious than foulely odious If no man before Luther and Calvin had excepted against those points wherein we differ from Rome I should have hated to follow them how much more must this needs hold in matter of fact Iudge what a shame it is to heare a Christian Divine carelesly shaking off all arguments drawne from Antiquity Continuance Perpetuall Succession in and from Apostolike Churches unanimous consent universall practice of the Church immediate practice of all the Churches succeeding the Apostles as either Popish or nothing And all these are acknowledged for our Grounds and are not Popish For me I professe I could not without blushing and astonishment read such stuffe as confounded in my selfe to see that any sonne of the Church should be not onely so rebelliously unnaturall to his holy mother as to broach so putrid a Doctrine to her utter disparagement but so contumelious also to the Spirit of God in his providence for the deare Spouse of his Saviour here upon earth Holy Jrenaeus Iren. l. 4. contr haeres I am sure was of another minde Agnitio vera saith he The true acknowledgement is the doctrine of the Apostles antiquus Ecclesiae status and the ancient state of the Church in the whole world by the Succession of Bishops to whom the Apostles delivered the Church which is in every place And then whiles we have both these the doctrine of the Apostles seconded by the ancient state of the Church who can out-face us What meanes then this wilfull and peevish stupidity Nihil pro Apostolico habendum Ibid. l. 2. c. 7. Nothing saith Parker is to be held for Apostolike but that which is found recorded in the writings of the Apostles Nothing Was all
were the immediate Successours of the Apostles would or durst set up a forme of government different from that which was fore-designed to them and that either faulty or selfe-devised Certainly it must needs follow either those succeeding governours practised maintained and propagated that forme which they immediately before received from the hands of the Apostles or els they quite altered it and established a new If the first we have what we desire if the later those holy men were guilty of a presumptuous Innovation which were a crime to thinke Charity thinks not evill And what evill can be worse than to violate or transgresse Apostolicall Ordinances How highly doth the Apostle of the Gentiles praise the Corinthians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Cor. 11.2 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That they kept all his orders and observed his Traditions and would he have lesse deeply blamed those that should have wilfully broken them Vultis veniam in virga Will ye that I shall come to you with a rod saith the same Apostle All the Christian world knew how sacred the Authority of those great Delegates of our Saviour was how infallible their Determinations how undoubted their inspirations Withall it must be granted that the first Ages were the purest as the water that first rises from the spring is clearer than that which by a long decursion hath mixed it selfe with the soyle of the Channell Can it therefore enter into any wise and honest heart that those prime Saints even in the greatest purity of the Church would wilfully varie from the holy Institutions of the blessed Apostles And as the fickle Israelites did so soone as Moses his back was turned worship Idols of their owne invention Surely he must be strongly uncharitable that shall thinke so strangely impudent that dares maintaine it and wickedly credulous that can believe it Quae defectio in Ecclesia quidem ipsa Apostolorum aetati proximâ adeò coepit ut argumento certo illius universa praxis esse nequeat Paâ—k Polit. Eccles l. 2. c. 8. But the defection began in the Church presently after the Apostles yea in their time A point eagerly urged by the faction It is no trusting therefore to the universall practice of the Successors Our owne Authours are frequently alledged for the earlinesse of this Apostasie Whitakers Reynolds Field Mornay what need it when the Apostle himselfe tels us the mystery of iniquity began then to worke yea and as it is said your Moderator lately told you Saint Paul himselfe by appointing Bishops was himself a worker in it The mystery of iniquity What is that but the plots of that Antichrist Yea but you ordinarily speak of him as I thought but as one The Romane vice-god Now I perceive it is a mistake there was the Antichrist at Hierusalem the Antichrist of Antioch of Alexandria shortly in every Church one But let them say now Doe they repute the Bishop of Rome to bee the Antichrist or not If they doe let them shew us what it is that makes him so which all good Bishops do not as mainly oppose What hand hath the Patriâ— rch of Constantinople or Alexandria or the Abassine Bishops in his transcendent supremacy and usurpation These disclaime him these resist him Did the Episcopacie of these and all other Christian Churches give any aid to the advancement of that usurpers infallibility or universall supremacie Did or do the Christian Bishops of all other Churches give him their shoulder to hoyse him up above all that is called God If they helpe him up who offers to pull him down Shortly then if the mystery of iniquity did then work for Rome yet not for the Grecian Syrian Asian Churches No no it was not any point of the defection this but rather of the perfection of the Church But here we are choaked with the examples of some Churches which soone after their plantation swerved from their former purity Of Israel it is said Rehoboam left the Law of the Lord 2 Chron. 12.1 and all Israel with him Of the Galathians I marvell that you are so soon turned away from Christ Galat. 1.6 and severall errours are reckoned up of succeeding Churches and men It is no such strange matter therefore that the Christian Church should in some sort faile after the decease of the Apostles How little reason and great uncharitablenesse is there in this Argument If there were some errours shall we suspect all truths And if some particular Churches failed in some opinions shall we therefore mis-doubt the practice of the universall Parker grants that in the times of the Apostles the Church was in her 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the height of her health even then were there not quarrels were there not foule mis-opinions in the Churches of Corinth Galatia Thessalonica Colossae If these particular failings did not hinder the soundnesse in doctrine and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in government of the universall Christian Church what reason have we to cast this aspersion upon the subsequent It is true as Physitians observe that in seven yeares the body changes and in thirty there is as Keckerman observes not ill a remarkable alteration in every state Neither is the Church priviledged from mutability but as a man changes his complexion but still holds his visage and as the State changes its Officers but still retaines the lawes and formes of Administration so the Church may perhaps alter some Customes and either mend or impaire in manners and yet still continue the rules and formes of her government neither have we reason to thinke otherwise of those which succeeded the Apostolike And if some men therein declined towards errour or heresie God forbid the Church should suffer as guilty of their lapses But as for the maine lawes of Church-Discipline if the succeding Governours should have so foulely forgotten themselves after the decease of the two great Apostles of the Gentiles and the Circumcision yet Saint Iohn lived a faire age after no lesse than sixty eight yeares after our Saviour and had leisure enough to controll their exorbitances had they been such neither would he have indured any such palpable and prejudiciall innovation in the Church of God Briefly then if it shall appeare that these holy men who were immediate Successours in the Apostolike chaires continued and maintained an imparity and superiority of the Episcopall function we have evicted what we plead for § 13. The sixth ground That if the next successors would have innovated the forme of government yet they could not in so short space have diffused it through the whole Christian world BVt sixtly if the succeeding Church-Governours would or durst have owned so much presumption as to alter or innovate the forme of government left by the Apostles yet they could not possibly in so short a space have diffused their new uniforme platforme of Administration through the whole Christian world For who knowes not that universality of power and jurisdiction died with the Apostles they
onely could claime the whole world for their Dioecesse neither could they leave any heires behinde them of their Apostleship the succeeding Administrators of the severall Churches were fixed to their owne Charges having neither power to command in another mans division nor such eminence of authority as that their example should be a rule to their neighbours How then can any living man conceive it possible if there had not been an uniforme order setled by the Apostles that all the world should so suddenly meet in one forme of policie not differing so much as in the circumstances of government That which Parker thinks to speak for his advantage neque uno impetu disciplina statim mutata est Polit. Eccles l. 2. c. 8. sed gradatim paulatim that the discipline was not changed at once but by little and little as by insensible degrees makes strongly against him and irrefragably for us for here were no lingring declinations towards that government which we plead for but a present and full establishment of it in the very next succeeding hands which could not have been but by a supereminent and universall command If we doe but cast our eyes upon those Churches which now dividing themselves from the common rule of Administration affect to stand upon their own bottome do we not see our Countrimen of Amsterdam varying from those of Leiden concerning their government and in the New-English Colonie those of the Boston-leaders from the Westerne Plantation When we see drops of water spilt upon dry sand running constantly into one and the same streame we may then hope to see men and Churches not overswayed otherwise with one universall command running every where into a perfect uniformity of government especially in a matter of such nature and consequence as subordination and subjection is It was the singular and miraculous blessing of the Gospell in the hands of the first Propagators of it Psal 19.3 4. that There was no speech nor language where their voice was not heard Their line of a sudden went out through all the earth and their words to the end of the world The Sun which rejoyceth as a strong man to run a race could scarce out-goe them but as for their followers the very next to them they must be content to hold their own a much slower pace and by leisure to reach their journeyes end If therefore it shall be made to appeare that presently after the decease of the Apostles one uniforme order of Episcopall government so qualified as we have spoken was without variation or contradiction received in all the Churches of the whole Christian world it must necessarily be granted that Episcopacie is of no other than Apostolicall Constitution §. 14. The seventh ground That the ancientest histories of the Church and Writings of the first Fathers are rather to be believed in the report of the Primitive state than the latest Authours SEventhly I must challenge it for a Truth not capable of just denyall that the ancientest histories of the Church and Writings of the first Fathers are rather to be believed in the report of the Primitive State of Church-government than those of this present age A truth so cleare that a reasonable man would think it a shame to prove yet such as some bold leaders of the faction that would be thought learned too have had the face to deny Parker the late oracle of the schisme hath dared to do it in termes who speaking of the testimony of the Primitive times Park Polit. Eccles l. 2. c. â— Haecne Ecclesia illa est quae certum testimonium in causa disciplinaria praestitura nobis est Is this saith he in the high scorne and pride of his heart the Church that shall give us so sure a testimony in the cause of Discipline and every where disparaging the validity of the ancient histories preferres the present Is Eusebius mentioned who records the succession of Primitive Bishops from their first head Ibid. l. 2. c. 5. At Eusebio defuit c. But saith he Eusebius being carried away with the sway of that age wanted that golden reed which is given to the Historians of our times Apoc. 11.2 to measure the distance of times the difference of manners the inclinations of Churches and the â—rogresse and increases of the Antichristian Hierarchy c. Are any of the holy Fathers allâ—â—â—ed Alas poore men saith he they were much mistaken yet howsoever they are much beholden to him Ibid. c. 8. for saith he Non volentâ—s sed nescientes non per apostasiam aut contemptum sed per infirmitatem ignorantiam lapsi sunt Patres qui in disciplina aberrârunt The Fathers who erred in this matter of discipline did not offend out of will but out of want of knowledge not through apostasie or contempt but through infirmity and ignorance But can I now forbeare to ask who can indure to heare the braying of this proud Schismatick For the love of God deare brethren mark the spirit of these men and if you can think it a reasonable suggestion to believe that all ancient histories are false all the holy and learned Fathers of the Church ignorant and erroneous and that none ever saw or spake the truth not of doctrine onely but not of fact untill now that these men sprung up follow them and relie upon their absolute and unerring authority but if you have a minde to make use of your senses and reason and not to suffer your selves to be wilfully besotted with a blinde and absurd prejudice hate this intolerable insolence and resolve to believe that many witnesses are rather to be believed than none at all that credible judicious holy witnesses are rather to be trusted for the report of their own times than some giddy corner-creeping upstarts which come dropping in some sixteen hundred yeares after But what then will ye say to this challenge Quid autem Patres qui adversus nos c. Polit. Ecclesâ—l 2. c. 19. The Fathers saith Parker which by the favourers of Episcopacie are produced against us were for the most part Bishops so as while they speake for Episcopacie they plead for themselves Ecquis igitur eos credendos dicet Will any man therefore say they are to be believed Or will any man forbid us to appeale from them Blessed God! that any who beares the title of a Christian should have the forehead thus to argue Appeale To whom I pray To the succeeding Doctors and Fathers No they were in the same predicament to the rest of the whole Church They were governed by these leaders whither therefore can they imagine to appeale but to themselves and what proves this then but their owne case And if the Fathers may not be suffered to be our witnesses will it not become the house well that these men should now be the Fathers Iudges But the Fathers were Bishops the case was their owne true they were Bishops and it is our glory
the Apostles themselves If it were constituted in their time and proceeded from them and were in this name received of all Churches then certainly it must be yielded to be of Apostolicall that is divine Institution More if it needed might be added and that out of Chamier's owne allegations Thus much truth is not grudged us by these ingenuous Divines All the question is of the nature and extent of this Superiority This difference there was but as that great Pancratiast others with him contend though many prerogatives were yielded to the Bishop in his place especially in the nobler Cities yet this place Cham. ubi supra was but Primatus ordinis a Primacy of order onely nulla erat hic dominatio aut jurisdictio sed sancta charitas Here was no rule no jurisdiction but all was swayed by an holy Charity Here 's the knot wher 's the wedge Why 't is here If charity did it then it doth it still for I hope Jurisdiction and charity may well stand together and Chamier had no reason to oppose things which agree so well as well in a Bishop as in a civill Magistrate for as for rule if we affect any but fatherly and moderate and such as must necessarily be required for the Conservation of peace and good order in the Church of God we doe not deprecate a Censure We know how to bear humble minds in eminence of places how to command without imperiousnesse and to comply wth out exposing our places to contempt so as those are but spightfull Frumps and malicious suggestions which are cast upon us of a tyrannicall pride and Lordly domineering over our brethren We are their Superiours in place but we hate to think they should be lowlier in mind But hereof we shall have fitter occasion in the sequel §. 10. The superiority and Iurisdiction of Bishops proved by the testimony of the first Fathers and Apostolicall men and first of Clemens AS for that Jurisdiction which we claime and those reverend and obedient respects which we expect from our Clergy if they be other than those which were both required and given in the very first times of the Gospell under the Apostles themselves and of those whom they immediatly intrusted with the government of the Church let us be hissed out from among Christians For proof of this right then whom should I rather begin with after the Apostles than an Apostolicall man a copartner and a deare familiar of the two prime Apostles St. Peter and St. Paul I mean Clemens whom St. Paul mentions honourably in his Epistle to the Philippians Philip. 4.3 by the title of one of his fellow-labourers whose names are in the booke of life One who laid St. Peter in his grave as Theodoret tells us and followed that blessed Apostle both in his See and in his Martyrdome yea one whom Clemens Alexandrinus enstyles no lesse than an Apostle of so great reputation in the Church that as Ierome tells us he was by some reputed the pen-man of the holy Epistle to the Hebrews and that learned Father findes the face of his style alike if not the same you looke now that I should produce some blowne ware out of the pack of his Recognitions or Apostolicall Constitutions but I shall deceive you And urge a Testimony from that worthy and Apostolike Author which was never yet soyled so much as with any pen either in Citation or much lesse in Contradiction of venerable and unquestionable authority It is of that noble and holy Epistle of his which he wrote to the Corinthians upon the occasion of those quarrels which were it seemes on foot in St. Paul's time and still continued Emulation and side-takings amongst and against their teachers which belike proceeded so farre as to the ejecting of their Bishop and Presbyters out of their places He gravely taxes them with this kinde of Spirituall conspiracy and advises them to keepe their own stations For which purpose having laid before them the history of Aarons rod budding and thereby the miraculous confirmation of his election he addes And our Apostles knowing by our Lord Jesus Christ the contention that would arise 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 about the name of Episcopacy and they Clem. Epist ad Corinthios 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. for this very same cause having received perfect knowledge appointed the foresaid degrees and gave thereupon a designed order or list of Offices that when they should sleepe in their graves others that were well approved men might succeed in their charge or service Those therefore which were constituted by them or of other renowned men after them with the consent and good liking of the whole Church and have accordingly served unblameably in the Sheepfold of Christ with all meeknesse quietly and without all taynt of corruption and those who of a long time have carryed a good testimony from all men these we hold cannot justly or without much injury be put from their Office and service For it were no small sinne in us if we shall refuse and reject them who have holily and without reproofe undergone these Offices of Episcopacy And withall blessed are those Presbyters who having dispatched their journey by death have obtained a perfect and fruitfull dissolution For now they need not fear least any man shall out them from the place wherein they now are For we see that some ye have removed and displaced from their unblameably-managed office ye are contentious my brethren and are quarrelsome about those things which do not concerne salvation search diligently the Scriptures c. Thus Clement Did he write this trow we to the Church of Corinth or of Scotland Judge you how well it agrees but in the mean time you see these distinctions of degrees you see the quarrels arising about the very title You see that the Bishops ordained by the Apostles succeeded in their service you see they continued or ought to continue in their places during their life you see it a sin to out them except there be just cause in their misdemeanour The testimony is so clear that I well foresee you will be not a little pinched with it and desirous to give your selfe ease And which way can you doe it perhaps you will be quarrelling with the authority and antiquity of the Epistle But this yron is too hot for you to take up It hath too much warrant in the innate simplicity of it and too much testimony from the ancient Fathers of the Church for any adversary to contradict Though it could come but lately to our hands yet we know long since that it had the attestation of Iustin Martyr of Irenaeus who calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Clemens Alexandrinus of Origen of Cyrill of Ierusalem of Photius who tearms it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a very worthy Epistle of Ierome who tearms it valde utilem a very profitable Epistle and tells us that it was of old publikely read as authenticall in Churches
in the town of Kirkwall The Superintendent of Rosse his Dioecesse shall comprehend Rosse Sutherland Murray and the North Isles called the Skye and Lewes with their adjacents his residence shal be the Canonry of Rosse The Superintendent of Argile his Dioecesse shall be Argile Kintire Lorne the South Isles Argile and Boot with their adjacents his residence is at Argile The like of the Superintendent of Aberdene the Superintendent of Breckin the Superintendent of Fiffe the Superintendent of Edinburgh the Superintendent of Iedburgh the Superintendent of Glasgow the Superintendent of Dumfreys all of them bounded with their severall jurisdictions which who desires to know particularly may have recourse to the learned Discourse of D Lindsey then Bishop of Brechen concerning the proceedings of the Synod of Perth Where he shall also finde the particularities of the function and power of these Superintendents Amongst the rest these That they have power to plant and erect Churches to set order and appoint Ministers in their Countreys That after they have remained in their chiefe townes three or foure moneths they shall enter into their Visitation in which they shall not onely preach but examine the life diligence and behaviour of the Ministers as also they shall trie the estate of their Churches and manners of the people They must consider how the poore are provided and the youth instructed they must admonish where admonitions need and redresse such things as they are able to appease They must note such crimes as are hainous that by the censures of the Church the same may be corrected And now what main difference I beseech you can you finde betwixt the office of these Superintendents and the present Bishops How comes it then about that the wind is thus changed That those Church-governours which your owne reformers with full consent allowed and set downe an Order for their Election in your Constitutions before the Book of Psalms in Meeter should now be cashiered There and then M. Knox himselfe whose name you professe to honour by the publike authority of the Church conceives publike prayer for M. Iohn Spotteswood then admitted Superintendent of Lothian in these words O Lord send upon this our Brother unto whom we doe in thy name commit the chiefe charge of the Churches of the division of Lothian such a portion of thy holy Spirit as that c. And in the name of the Church blesseth his new Superintendent thus God that hath called thee to the office of a watchman over his people multiply the gifts of his grace in thee c. Now I beseech you how is this Superintendency lost That which was then both lawfull and usefull and confessed for no other then a calling from God is it now become sinfull and odious Are we become so much wiser and more zealous than our first reformers as there is distance betwixt a Superintendent and no Bishop But what is it the stroake the Bishops have in government and their seat in Parliament which is so great an eye-sore Let me put you in mind that your greatest patrons of your desired Discipline have strongly motioned an Ecclesiasticall Commission for the over-looking and over-ruling your Consistories and even when they would have Bishops excluded both out of those Comitiall Sessions Moved also to the Lords of the Counsell in Q Eliz. time by the humble Mot. and out of the Church yet have moved such was Beza's device long since for Scotland That in the place of Bishops there might be present in the Parliament-house some wise and grave Ministers of speciall gifts and learning sorted out of all the land to yeeld their Counsell according to Gods heavenly Law even as the Civill Iudges are ready to give their advice according to the temporall Law and for matters of greater difficulty What a world is this Grave and wise Ministers and yet no Bishops Doth our Episcopacie either abolish our Ministery or detract ought from wisdome and gravity Away with this absurd partiality But these must be to advise not to vote in any case beware of that where then is the third estate Beza's Counsell we see is yet alive but it comes not home to the purpose Welfare that bold Supplicator to Q. Elizabeth which moved that foure and twenty Doctors of Divinity to be called by such names as should please her Highnesse might be admitted into the Parliament House and have their voices there instead of the Bishops O impotent envie of poore humorists Doctors but no Bishops Any men any names but theirs the old word is Love creepes where it cannot goe How much are we beholden to these kinde friends who are so desirous to ease us of these unproper secularities Even ours at home can nibble at these as they think ill-placed honours and services yours goe alas too roundly to worke striking at the root of their Episcopacie not pruning off some superfluous twigs of priviledge rather than not strike home not caring whom they hit in the way would God I might not say even the Lords Anointed whom they verbally professe to honour at whose sacred Crowne and Scepter if any of the sons of Belial amongst you do secretly aime whiles they stalke under the pretence of opposition to Episcopacie the God of heaven find them out and powre upon them deserved confusion But for you alas Brethren what hopes can I conceive that these pre-judged papers can have any accesse to your eyes much lesse to your hearts my very Title is barre too much But if any of you will have so much patience as to admit these lines to your perusall I shall beseech him for Gods sake and for his own to be so farre indifferent also as not upon groundlesse suggestion to abandon Gods Truth and Ordinance and out of meere opinion of the worth of some late Authour to adore an Idoll made of the earings of the people and fashioned out with the graving toole of a supposed skilfull Aaron Shortly after these poore well-meant howsoever I doubt ineffectuall endeavours my prayers shall not be wanting for your comfortable peace loyall obedience perfect happinesse Oh that the God of heaven would open your eyes that you may see the truth and compare what you have done with what you should doe how soone would you finde cause to retract your own decrees and to re-establish that true Ordinance of the living God which you have beene mis-induced to abandon §. 9. An exhortary conclusion to our brethren at home ANd for you my dearely beloved Brethren at home For Christs sake for the Churches sake for your soules sake be exhorted to hold fast to this holy Institution of your blessed Saviour and his unerring Apostles and blesse God for Episcopacie Doe but cast your eyes a little back and see what noble instruments of Gods glory he hath beene pleased to raise up in this very Church of ours out of this sacred vocation What famous servants of God what strong Champions of Truth and renowned Antagonists of Rome and her superstitions what admirable Preachers what incomparable Writers yea what constant and undaunted Martyrs and Confessours men that gave their blood for the Gospell and imbraced their fagots flaming which many gregarie Professours held enough to carry cold and painlesse To the wonder and gratulation of all forraigne Churches and to the unparallelable glory of this Church and Nation I could fill this page with such a Catalogue of them who are now in their heaven that come for the present to my thoughts besides those Worthies yet living both here and in Ireland who would be unwilling from my pen tO blush at their owne just praises as might justly shame and silence any gaine-sayer After that a malicious Libeller hath spit out all his poyson against Episcopacie and raked together out of all histories all the insolencies and ill offices which have in former ages been done by professedly Popish Prelates which do almost as much concerne us as all the Treasons and Murders of formerly male-contented persons can concerne him faine would I have him shew me what Christian Church under heaven hath in so short a time yeelded so many glorious Lights of the Gospell so many able and prevalent adversaries of Schisme and Antichristianisme so many eminent Authours of learned workes which shall out-bid time it selfe let envie grinde her teeth and eat her heart the memory of these worthy Prelates shall be ever sweet and blessed Neither doubt I but that it will please God out of the same rod of Aaron still to raise such blossomes and fruit as shall win him glory to all eternity Go you on to honour these your reverend Pastors to hate all factious withdrawings from that government which comes the nearest of any Church upon earth to the Apostolicall And that I may draw to Conclusion for the farther Confirmation of your good Opinion of the Bishops of your Great Britaine heare what Iacobus Lectius Iacob Lectius Prascriptionum Theologicarum l. 2. Nota. 2. the learned Civilian of Geneva in his Theologicall Prescriptions dedicated to the Consuls and Senate of Geneva saith of them De Episcoporum autem vestorum vocatione c. As for the calling of your Bishops saith he speaking to his Popish adversaries others have accurately written thereof and we shortly say that they have a show of an Ordinary Ministery but not the thing it selfe and that those onely are to be held for true and legitimate which Paul describes to us in his Epistles to Timothy and Titus Cujusmodi olim in magno illo Britanniarum regno extitisse atque etiamnum superesse subindeque eligi Episcopos non diffitemur Such kind of Bishops as we doe not deny but yeeld to have been of old and to be still at this day successively elected in the great Kingdome of Britaine Thus he when Geneva it selfe pleades for us why should we be our owne adversaries Let me therefore confidently shut up all with that resolute word of that blessed Martyr and Saint Ignatius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let all things be done to the honour of God Give respect to your Bishop as you would God should respect you My soule for theirs which obey their Bishop Presbyters Deacons God grant that my portion may be the same with theirs And let my soule have the same share with that blessed Martyr that said so Amen FINIS
Tertullian Quod ab Apostolis non damnatur imo defenditur hoc erit judicium proprietatis That which is not condemned by the Apostles yea defended rather may well be judged for their own and then he would have found how strong this plea of Tertullian is against himselfe For where ever can he show Episcopacy condemned by the Apostle yea how clearly do we show it not allowed only but enjoyned finding therefore Episcopall imparity so countenanced by the written word we have good reason to call in all antiquity and the universall Church succeeding the Apostles as the voice of the Spouse to second her glorious husband Had there been any sensible gapp of time betwixt the dayes of the Apostles and the Ordination of Bishops in the Christian Church we might have had some reason to suspect this Institution to have been meerly humane but now since it shall appeare that this worke of erecting Episcopacy passed both under the eies and hands of those sacred Ambassadors of Christ who lived to see their Episcopall successors planted in the severall regions of the world what reason can any man pretend that this institution should be any other then Apostolicall had it been otherwise they lived to have Countermanded it How plain is that of St. Ambrose Paul saw Iames at Ierusalem because he was made Bishop of that place by the Apostles and to the same effect St. Austin contra Cresiâ—n 1. 2. St. Ierome the only Author amongst the ancients who is wont with any colour to be alleadged against the right of Episcopacy yet himself confesseth that Bishops began in Alexandria from Mark the Evangelist who died sixe yeers before St. Peter or St. Paul Thirty five yeers before St. James the Apostle Forty five yeers before Simon Cleophas who succeeded St. Iames in the Bishoprick of Ierusalem being the kinsman of our Saviour 〈◊〉 l. 3. c. 11. as Eusebius Brother to Joseph as Egesippus The same author can tell us that in the very times of the Apostles Ignatius was Bishop of Antioch indeed of Syria Sicut Smyrnaeorum ecclesia habens Policarpum ab Joanne conlocatum Tert. de praesc Policarpus of Smyrna Timothy of Ephesus Titus of Crete or Candia That Papias St. Iohns Auditor soon after was made Bishop of Hierapolis Quadratus a disciple of the Apostles Bishop of Athens after Publius his martyred predecessor And can we think these men were made Bishops without the knowledge and consent of the Apostles then living or with it without it we cannot say except we will disparage both the Apostles care and power And withall the holinesse of these their successors who were knowne to be Apostolicall men disciples of Christ Companions of the Apostles and lastly blessed Martyrs if with it we have our desire what shall I need to instance Our learned Bilson hath cleared this point beyond all contradiction In whom you may please to see out of Eusebius Egesippus Socrates Ierom Perpet goverm of the Ch. ch 13. Epiphanius others as exact a pedegree of all the holy Bishops of the Primitive Church succeeding each other in the foure Apostolicall Sees untill the time of the Nicene Councell as our Godwin or Mason can give us of our Bishops of England or a Speed or Stow of our English Kings There you shall finde from Iames the Lords brother who as Ierom himselfe expresly sate as Bishop in the Church of Ierusalem to Macarius who sate in the Nicene Councell 40. Bishops punctually named From St. Peter who governed the Church of Antioch and was succeeded by Evodius and he by Ignatius twenty seven In the See of Rome thirty seven In the See of Alexandria from Marke the Evangelist twenty three A Catalogue which cannot be questioned without too much injurious incredulity nor denied without an unreasonable boldnesse The same course was held in all other Churches neither may wee thinke these varied from the rest but rather as Prime Sees were patternes to the more obscure For the other saith Eusebius Euseb l. 3. c. 37. it is not possible by name to rehearse them all that were Pastours imployed in the first successions of the Church-government after the Apostles Neither indeed needeth it the wariest buyers by one handful judge of the whole sack and this truth is so cleer that the most judicious late Divines have not stuck to acknowledge so much as we have desired §. 9 The testimony and assent of Bucer and some famous French Divines BY the perpetuall observation of the Church even from the Apostles themselves saith Bucer we see it seemed good to the holy Ghost that among the Presbyters to whom the charge of the Church is specially committed one should have the singular Charge of the Churches and in that Charge and Care governed others for which cause the name of Bishops was attributed to these chiefe Governours of the Church Thus he in full accord with us And Chamier when he had first granted that statim post Apostolorum excessum immediately after the decease of the Apostles began the difference between a Bishop and Presbyter Cham. de membris Eccles milâ— t. l. 4. c. 1. straight as correcting himselfe addes Quid Res ipsa caepit tempore Apostolorum vel potius ab ipsis profecta est The thing it selfe began in the very time of the Apostles yea proceeded from them Thus hee although withall hee affirmes this difference not to have been Essentiall but Accidentall A distinction in this respect unproperly perhaps applied by him but otherwise Nulla est EsseÌ„tialis distinctio inter Episcopos Presbyteros respectu ministeriâ— idem enim utrisque est Apostoli tamen erant primarii a Christo ministri instituti qu bus non aliis Ecclesiae suae fundationem regimen commisit Spalat de Rep. Eccl. 1. 2. c. 3. Spalatensis justly both yelds and makes in a right and sure sense For certainly in the proper works of their ministeriall function in preaching and administring the Word and Sacraments they differ not or only differ in some accident but yet in those points which concerne Ordination and the administration of government then the difference is reall and palpable and that as we shall soon see not without a fixed Iurisdiction To the same purpose my reverend and ancient friend Moulin in one of his Epistles to the renowned Bishop of Winchester Molin Epi. ad Winton Ep. 3. Statim post c. Soon after the Apostles time saith he or rather in their owne time as the Ecclesiasticall story witnesseth It was constituted That in one Citie one Presbyter should have preeminence over his Colleagues who was called a Bishop Et hanc regiminis formam omnes ubique Ecclesiae receperunt and this form of government all Churches every where receive I do willingly take the word of these two famous professors of the French Church The one sayes Constitutum est It was constituted in the time of the Apostles the other that it proceeded from