Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
truth_n apostle_n church_n succession_n 1,709 5 10.1649 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A63629 A letter to the misrepresenter of papists being a vindication of that part of the Protestant preface to the Wholesome advices from the Blessed Virgin, &c. which concerns the Protestants charity to papists, and a layman's writing it : in answer to what is objected against it in the 4th chapter of the second part of the Papist misrepresented, &c. / by the same layman who translated the Wholesome advices, &c. and made the preface to them. Taylor, James, fl. 1687-1689. 1687 (1687) Wing T285; ESTC R39707 11,353 19

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

A LETTER TO THE Misrepresenter of Papists BEING A Vindication of that part of the Protestant Preface to the Wholesome Advices from the Blessed Virgin c. which concerns the Protestants Charity to Papists and a Layman's writing it IN Answer to what is Objected against it in the 4th Chapter of the Second Part of the Papist Misrepresented c. By the same LAYMAN who translated the Wholesome Advices c. and made the Preface to them IMPRIMATUR Guil. Needham Jan. 14. 1686. London Printed by J. D. for J. Robinson at the Golden Lion and Thomas Newborough at the Star in St. Paul's Church-yard 1687. A LETTER to the Misrepresenter of PAPISTS SIR I Find that the Translation of the Wholsom Advices from the Blessed Virgin c. which may have help'd to settle the Minds of others has something discompos'd yours For tho you are not I dare say pleas'd with the Protestant Preface to it yet however you dissemble your pain Wise-men say that you bite that Preface for grief of the Translation I cannot but admire the Art of you Gentlemen of the Church of Rome in running down Books with bold Contempt which you know not otherwise how to deal with This Translation and Preface for some Reasons is an Eye-sore to you and chiefly for helping to spoil the new Fashion of maintaining Popery by Representing it Something therefore must be done with it and so a little part of the Preface which did not belong neither to the main design of the Book must be singled out and be made an Example As for all the rest 't is sufficiently answer'd by saying Must I set up for Reader of Anatomy upon all the Pamphlets that come into the World I am highly obliged to you for the Kindness but I think the Scavenger has much the better Office who his nothing but Dirt and Sinks to deal with much less offensive than to be always raking into filthy Calumnies fulsome Incongruities and noysom Impertinencies Which kind of Language one would hardly use but out of a great desire to be unanswerable one way or other After this touch upon the whole you come to touch at some particulars which seem to fall within your Province of Representing or rather to touch at something which you were the better provided to touch because you had in the very same manner touch it before in your fourth Vindication of the First Part. The particular is That Papists allow no less a possibility of Salvation to Protestants than Protestants do to Papists Now altho this is all that I am concern'd to oppose yet I shall offer a few words to your Preparatory Discourse in which you pretend to shew what good reason you have to pronounce against the Possibility of Salvation amongst us or rather in the new fashion'd Phrase that we as Protestants are guilty of Sins inconsistent with Salvation inasmuch as we are separated from your Communion The short of what you say is That after most serious considerations and the weighing of all reasons the Papist believes the Roman Church in which he is to be that one only holy Catholick Church and therefore he does not question but what is truly affirm'd of the Church of the Apostles and succeeding Ages and those that fell from it is most true of the same Church now in being of which he is a Member and of all those who separate from it upon what pretext soever Now it had been much more to the purpose to have produced those serious Considerations than to have spent so much time as you did to prove what none of us make the least question of viz. That Christ Establish'd a Catholick Church that he committed the Care of it to the Apostles that they were inspir'd with the knowledg of Truth that they left Pastors to govern and feed the Flock after their decease and that the Promise of Salvation is made to Believers exclusively to Unbelievers This I say is all very true but not to your purpose unless you had prov'd also what you do but insinuate That we have separated our selves from the Doctrine and Government of the Church of Christ Which words I wonder that you were not afraid to use when they lay so fair to be turn'd upon your selves For we are no less sure that many of your Doctrines are no parts of the Doctrine of that Church and that Rome's being the Mother and Mistress of all Churches was not the Government of that Church over which the Apostles were c. Overseers for their time than we are that such a Church was established in the World. And therefore if they who separate themselves from the Doctrine and Government of the Church of Christ as it was first establish'd cannot hope for Salvation Pray look to your selves as to that Point instead of contending that you are the only Catholick Church out of which there is no hope of Salvation As to what you would insinuate that there must be in the Church a Succession of Pastors to the Worlds end who should no more err in teaching than the Apostles themselves did and that your Church has that Succession I must tell you as to the first that it is by no means prov'd from John 14. v. 16. since what is there promis'd to the Apostles is not promis'd to the Church of all Ages so as it was to the Apostles The Spirit of God abode with the Apostles for ever that is so long as they liv'd to guide them into the knowledg of Truth and by them to guide the Church in all after-Ages There are many things in this Discourse of our Saviour to his Apostles which cannot be apply'd to any Age of the Church after theirs And therefore what is and what is not limited to them must be argued out from the Nature of the things themselves which are said And lastly tho you will not have this Promise limited to the Persons of the Apostles but annext to their Function as in some sense I grant it may be yet you ought to have taken notice that the Promise is however limited by a Condition even in the words foregoing and following the Promise If ye love me keep my Commandments and there the Condition is once exprest For it follows And I will pray the Father and he shall give you another Comforter that he may abide with you for ever even the Spirit of Truth And now mark once again what follows Whom the World cannot receive because it seeth him not neither knoweth him Where if by the World be meant worldly and wicked Men as I believe you will grant you see here is no absolute promise of such a Guidance to a Succession of Pastors as shall make it at any time of the Church Heresy to contradict whatsoever they teach or Schism to withdraw from their Obedience As to the last If you had prov'd such a Succession of Infallible Teachers as you speak of yet I tell you once more that the hardest part of