Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
truth_n	apostle_n	church_n	great_a	2,465	5	3.0819	3	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A66381	The case of indifferent things used in the worship of God proposed and stated, by considering these questions : Qu. I. Whether things indifferent used in divine worship (or, whether there be any things indifferent in the worship of God?) : Qu. II. Whether a restraint of our liberty in the use of such indifferent things be a violation of it?	Williams, John, 1636?-1709.; Bagshaw, Edward, 1629-1671.	1683 (1683)	Wing W2689; ESTC R260	33,991	53

prevailing Custom and was as a thing decent introduced into the Christian Church Thus it is also as to Edification which doth in like manner often depend upon circumstances and according to those circumstances the Edification of the Church in its Peace Union and Comfort may be promoted or hindered and that may be for Edification in one Age or Church which is not so in another Thus the being covered in Divine Worship was for Edification in the Jewish Church being used in token of Fear and Reverence Distance and Subjection in allusion to which the Seraphims are represented appearng before God after that manner Isai. 6. 2. and in mitation of whom the Apostle pleads that Women should be vailed in Religious Assemblies in token of Subjection and Shamefacedness 1 Cor 11. 10. But on the contrary He doth Judge and Determin that for the Reasons above given it was better and more for Edification that Men should be therein Uncovered So the Love-feasts and Holy-kiss of Charity were at the first thought good for Edification and were accordingly used in Apostolical times being an Excellent and Useful Admirable and Friendly Custom as thereby was signified the Universal Love and Charity that Christians ought to maintain and which they should at all times but especially in Divine Worship be forward to express and renew But when Disorder and Licentiousness arose from them they were generally laid aside and Abolished by Authority So it was thought to be for Edification in the Primitive Church to Administer Baptism by immersion or dipping and the Apostle doth make use of it as an excellent argument to newness of life Rom. 6. 3 4. and yet notwithstanding the signification of it and the practice of the Church for a long time a Charitable reason hath over-ruled it and brought in Sprinkling instead of it Thus sitting at the Lords Supper is accounted decent by some and for Edification as it 's a table posture and is a sign of our being feasted by God and yet in a general Synod of the Reformed Churches in Poland c. it was declared that forasmuch as sitting was introduced first by the Arrians beside the Custom used in all the Evangelical Churches throughout Europe we reject it as peculiar to them that as they do irreverently treat Christ so also his Sacred appointments and as a Ceremony less Comely and Devout and to many very offensive So that Order Decency and Edification being generally mutable things and varying as circumstances vary there could in the nature of the thing be only general rules prescribed and so the particulars must be left to discretion and to be determined by those that are best able and have Authority to judge of the circumstances and to pick out of them those which are Indifferent what may best serve the ends of Religion and the honour of its institutions 2. I shall prove that things Indifferent in themselves though not prescribed may be Lawfully used in Divine Worship from the practice of our Saviour and his Apostles Under the Law the Constitution was very exact the Rites and Orders of it very particular and the Observation of them punctually required But as it was not so precise but that many things respecting the outward order were added so some things were altered upon prudential considerations and by the addition or alteration of which the Authority of that Law was not conceived to be infringed nor violated as it 's evident from the respect which our Saviour shewed to them and his compliance with them An instance of this is the Synagogual Worship It 's a controversy whether there was any provision made under the Law for the places themselves the intimations of that are if any very obscure but there are not so much as any intimations of the manner and order or parts of the Worship therein to be observed and yet we find such there was Acts 15. 21. Moses being read and preached there every Sabbath day and that our Saviour frequently resorted to it and bore a part in it John 18. 20 c. The like temper we find him of when he used the Cup of Charity after the manner of the Jews in the Passover though there was no institution for it and that it was as many other things taken up and used amongst them by way of signification and as a Testimony of entire Friendship and Charity Luke 22. 17. But I conceive alteration of circumstances in the institution is much more exceptionable than the addition of such to it and yet this was both done by them and observed by our Saviour when there was nothing else to oblige him but only a condescension to them in such usages and rites as were inoffensive in themselves and what were then generally used in the Church That the posture first required and used in the Passover was standing the circumstances being to be eat with Staves in their Hands and Shoes on their Feet c. do prove and is affirmed by the Jews and it is as manifest that the Jews in the time of our Saviour and for a long time before did recede from it and did eat it in the posture of discumbency whether it was as they looked upon themselves as settled in the possession of Canaan which they were at the first institution Travelling towards or as it 's said by the later Jews because it was a sign of Liberty and after the manner of Kings and Great men is not so material as it is that our Saviour did follow this Custom and complied with this practice of theirs without hesitation And thus did the Apostles when they observ'd the hours of Prayer Acts 3. 1. which were of humane institution as well as the Pray●rs themselves for without doubt they were publick Prayers which were used in the Temple but though the place was yet that service was of no more Authority than what was used in the Synagogues Now if the Jews did thus institute and alter things relating to external Order and Administration according as the case might require and it was lawful for them so to do as it 's plain from the compliance of our Saviour and the Apostles with them in it then much more may it be supposed lawful for the Christian Church to exercise that liberty when they have no other than such general rules for their direction as they had then without such particulars as they had And that this is no other than a certain Truth will appear from the same liberty taken in Apostolical times in Religious Assemblies when the Christian Church not only complied with the Jews in such Rites as they were under no Obligation but that of Charity to use and which they did use because they were not forbidden and so lawful as when St. Paul took upon him a Vow Acts. 21. 26. but also had some Observances of its own that were of a ritual nature and as they were taken up so might be laid down upon

are call'd things not Commanded and not with respect to the latter 2. Indeed the Phrase not Commanded is only a Meiosis or Softer way of speaking when more is understood than express'd A Figure usual in all Authors and Languages that I know of and what is frequently to be met with in Scripture Thus it s given as a Character of an Hypocritical People they chose that in which I Delighted not which is but another Word for what was said in the verse before their Soul Delighted in their Abominations or Idolatries And when the Apostle would Describe the evil state of the Gentile World by the most Hainous and Flagitious Crimes such as Fornication Covetousness Maliciousness Envy Murder and what not he saith of these that they were things not convenient And it is as evident that the Phrase not Commanded is of the like kind when the things its applied to are alike Notorious and Abominable But it s further Objected that it s said in Scripture ye shall not add unto the Word which I Command you neither shall ye diminish ought from it And that our Saviour condemning the Practices of the Scribes in this kind concludes In Vain do they Worship me Teaching for Doctrines the Commandments of Men. From whence it may be collected 1. That all things not Commanded by God in his Word are additions to it 2. That such additions are altogether unlawful To this I reply 1. If they mean by adding to the Word the doing what that Forbids and by diminishing the neglecting of what that requires as the next Words do intimate and is plainly the sense otherwhere when it s no sooner said What thing soever I Command you Observe to do it but it immediately follows thou shalt not add thereto nor diminish from it it s what we willingly condemn according to that of our Saviour Whosoever shall break one of these least Commandments and shall teach Men so he shall be called least in the Kingdom of Heaven 2. If they mean by adding the appointing somewhat else instead of what God hath appointed as Jeroboam did the Feast of the Eighth Month and by diminishing the taking away what God hath Commanded as Ahaz did the Altar and Laver c. This is what we condemn also and do blame in the Church of Rome whilst they feed the People with Legends instead of Scripture and take away both that and the Cup from the Laity 3. If they mean by adding the adding insolent expositions to the Command by which the end of it is frustrated This our Saviour condemn'd in the Pharisees Why do ye Transgress the Command of God by your tradition For God Commanded saying Honour thy Father c. but ye say whosoever shall say to his Father it is a gift c. Thus ye have made the Commandment of God of none effect by your tradition And this we condemn in the Church of Rome who do defeat the Commands of God by their Doctrines of Attrition and Purgatory c. 4. If they mean by adding the making of that which is not the Word of God to be of equal Authority with it This our Saviour condemn'd in the Pharisees when they Taught for Doctrines the Commandments of Men and esteem'd them as necessary to be obeyed and to be of equal force with what was Authorized by him nay it seems they had more regard to the Tradition of the Elders than the Commandment of God as our Saviour Insinuates verse 2 3. and has been observed from their own Authors This we also condemn in the Church of Rome which decrees that the Apocrypha and Traditions should be received with the like Pious regard as the Sacred Writ 5. If by adding they mean the giving the same Efficacy to humane Institutions as God doth to his by making them to confer Grace upon the rightly disposed and by diminishing that the Service is not complete without it This our Saviour condemn'd in the Pharisees when they maintained that to eat with unwashen Hands defiled a Man verse 20. And this we condemn in the Church of Rome in their use of Holy-Water and Reliques and Ceremonies Thus far we agree but if they proceed and will conclude that the doing any thing not Commanded in the Worship of God is a Sin though it have none of the ingredients in it before spoken of we therein differ from them and upon very good reason For therein they differ from our Saviour and his Apostles and all Churches as I have shewed Therein also they depart from the notion and reason of the thing For adding is adding to the substance and making the thing added of the Nature of the thing it s added to and diminishing is diminishing from the substance and taking away from the Nature of it but when the substance remains intire as much after this humane appointment as it was before it without Loss and Prejudice without Debasement or Corruption it cannot be called an addition to it in the sence that the Scripture takes that Word in Nay so far are we from admitting this charge that we return it upon them and do bring them in Criminals upon it For those that do Forbid what the Gospel Forbids not do as much add to it as those that Command what the Gospel doth not Command And if it be a Crime to Command what that Commands not it must be so to Forbid what it Forbids not And this is what they are Guilty of that do hold that nothing is to be used in the Worship of God but what is prescribed for if that be not a Scripture Proposition and Truth as certain it is not then what an addition is this A greater surely than what they charge upon us for all that is Commanded amongst us is look'd upon not as necessary but expedient but what is Forbid by them is Forbid as absolutely unlawful the latter of which alters the Nature whereas the other only affects the circumstances of things The second Commandment Thou shalt not make unto thee any Graven Image c. is frequently made use of to prove that we must apply nothing to a Religious Use but what is Commanded and we are told that the sence of it is that We must Worship God in no other way and by no other means or Religious Rites than what he hath prescribed The best way to answer this is 1. To consider what is Forbidden in this Commandment and 2. To shew that we are not concern'd in the Prohibition As to the former 1. In this Command it is provided that there be no act of Adoration given to any besides God By this the Heathens are condemned in their Plurality of Gods and the Church of Rome in the Veneration they give to Saints and Angels 2. That the Honour we give to God be sutable to his Nature and agreeable to his Will Sutable to his Nature and so we are not to Worship him