them out furnished with special authority to gather the Church to lay whose foundations belong to the Apostolical dignity out of the promiscuous multitude of all nations and so they were sent out by Christ to all Nations without any exception for which cause when a Church was planted in any part of the world whither they came they fixed not but removed some other way Thirdly They were endued with that abundance of Grace of the Holy Ghost for the Ministry committed to them by the Lord that they preached the truth of the Gospel infallibly I know sayes Hierom how to esteem of the Apostles in one manner of other Doctors after another that those alwayes taught the truth these in some things did erre as men Whence the Doctrine commended to the Church by the Apostles was alwayes accounted for the rule and Canon of all Christian Religion Fourthly The Apostles at the beginning of the Church by the visible sign of imposition of hands conferred the gifts of the Holy Ghost upon others that were instructed of them in the Doctrine of the Gospel and they were endued with divers other gifts of Miracles by which their call was rendred clear both to themselves and others Matth. 10. 8. And these are the signs by which the blessed Apostle teaches us that he had executed the office of a true Apostle in the Church of Corinth 1 Cor. 12. 2. Deservedly for these causes were they that were elected to the honourable state of Apostolical dignity preferred to other Ministers of the Church not only in the chief eminency of Order but of Power and hence it was that all questions respecting the affairs of the whole Church were propounded to be discussed by the Apostles whom all the Churches consulted in doubtful cases as may be seen Acts 15. 2. 1 Cor. 7. 1. and whatever they determined the whole Church every where embraced which made a conscience of departing a fingers breadth from those things that were committed to them by the Apostles If therefore the solemnity of the Lords Day was celebrated while the Apostles were living which the Scriptures testifie was done as we have seen chap. 2. it must of right chiefly be imputed to their ordination otherwise without doubt the Universal Church had not followed it Baronius thinks that all who are well in their wiâ—â— will say that since it is found that it was done in the Apostles times it could not be ordained and commanded to be kept of any other but of themselves Neither is any thing worthy consideration brought to the contrary except it be because the Blessed Apostles have left no singular command with the Church for the observation of this day although he that shall attend their practise may lawfully deny this since their example and practise hath the force of a precept But who will deny that some things were instituted of the Apostles in the Church whose use while they were alive I pass not for Traditions introduced into the Church when the Apostles were dead was grown out with the primitive Christians of whose first institution or necessary continuation afterwards no precept is extant in the Scriptures yet who will be bold to extenuate the authority of these commands or will affirm that the Church at this day is not obliged to observe them because their observation being mentioned in Scripture is as it were a command by vertue whereof the Church is bound to continue them The thing will be more plain by examples The Apostles ordained Deacons Act. 6. and Elders in every Church Act. 14. 23. In the Ordinations of all Ministers imposition of hands was used but where is there extant an express commanâ— from Christ for perpetuating the ordination of those the institution of these or for the use of this ceremony yet none doubts but that the Apostles in performing of these were acted by a Divine instinct of the Spirit and that the Church at this day is bound to them by vertue of Apostolical institution But that I may briefly shew that the blessed Apostles and no others were the authors of this solemnity that which follows may suffice If it were observed while they were yet living which the Scriptures do evidently enough manifest it is deservedly to be ascribed to their ordaining it for it was either instituted by them and their authority or by some other Doctors of the Church without their consent a third way is not given the latter whereof is absurd and never to be admitted of any exercised in the Christian Faith because the Apostolical authority as formerly we have abundantly enough shewn was supreme in the Church it belonged to them to declare to the Christian flock what was best to be done in all things and not to the Church to prescribe them Statutes and Laws Why therefore did it not appertain to the Apostles the faithful founders of the Church amongst other things to commend this also to the Church and not to the Church to prescribe it the blessed Apostles Moreover the general consent of all Churches in celebrating this festival evinceth the same otherwise they had dissented from one another as in other observations not received from the Apostles but observed for a time by the succeeding Church as in the Feast of the Passover in observing Fasts c. so doubtless it would have happened in celebrating the Lords Day if by Divine authority received from the Apostles its observation had not been used amongst the Christians Thirdly if the Christian Church had ordained that day to be celebrated without the advice of the Apostles either those that turned Christians from Jews or Gentiles had done this but not those to whom the cessation of their old Sabbath was not known but by the Apostles much less would they attempt to do this by themselves or on their own authority Neither will any wise man think that those whom the Apostles invited from Heathenism to embrace the Christian faith were the authors of this Festival because it is not usual with them to Sabbatize after the manner of the Church unless so far as they were instructed to it by the Apostles Fourthly if the Holy Apostles by authority committed to them from Christ had not instituted the Lords Day but had left its observation free to the judgment of the Church then we might on good reason have called the Church the Queen of the Sabbath which yet is a very clear argument of Christs Divinity as the Learned Dr. Paraeus piously for none is Lord of the Sabbath but he that hath instituted the Sabbath c. The Sabbath is of the Lord they God Lastly if its authority did depend upon the Churches institution then it may by it be again abolished when it shall think good but this was never hitherto since Christs ascension attempted because the Lords day being taken away the publick worship of God must of necessity fall Since therefore the observation of the Lords day was used while the Apostles were
meetings in those dayes when they could But the Church being wonderfully increased and daily corroborated in the Faith by the frequent preaching of the Apostles it appeareth by the History of the Apostles travels recorded by St. Luke that the Christians where-ever they lived were wont to meet upon set dayes to handle Religion to prove its truth divers examples are ready in the Acts of the Apostles and their Epistles in which the celebrating of their meetings is usually denoted by these phrases meeting together to hear the word of God Acts 13. 44. coming together to break bread Acts 20. 7. to come together 1 Cor. 11. 20. ministring to the Lord. Acts 13. 2 c. they are said sometimes to meet in the Temple Act. 2. 46. Sometimes other Christians than the Apostles were at the Jews Synagogues because there the Apostles preached Christ to the Jews and therefore other Christians also resorted thither that they might hear the Apostles teaching Act. 5. 12. That the first Christians were sometimes present at the Jews Synagogues on the Sabbath day is granted the Holy Writ being witness hereof Acts 13. 14. also Acts 17. 2. it 's said the Apostle as his manner was went in unto them and three Sabbath dayes reasoned with them out of the Scriptures c. but not to solemnize the Sabbaths after the Jewish manner from whose observation the Christians and that by authority committed to the Apostles from the Lord were far enough off especially when Paul himself could most severely reprove the Colossians and Galatians because some amongst them stood for the Sabbath and other feasts of the Jews but because they then had obtained a good occasion of communing with the Jews being met together that their readings of the Law and Prophets being finished in the Synagogues they might preach the Gospel with more fruit in such a concourse of men which upon other dayes they could not so easily obtain and for no other end as from the alledged testimonies is evident Which things let the Reader seriously weigh with himself For at what time or in what place soever they could speak with the Jews they set upon them and preached the Gospel to them Therefore both on the Sabbaths and other dayes as well in the Synagogues as when they were met other where the Apostles were not wanting amongst the Iews in the office of preaching When they had tarried certain dayes amongst the Macedonians because no fit occasion for preaching the Gospel was offered as the circumstances of that place teach which the Apostles every where greedily sought after they preached Christ on the Sabbath dayes out of the City by a River side to the women which resorted to publick Prayers according to their custome St. Paul hastened to keep the Feast of Pentecost at Ierusalem only because he might have many of the Iews living dispersedly in divers places of the world there gathered together with whom he might treat about Christ and so the preaching of the Gospel by them returning home might be made famous through the world So thinketh Chrysost who sayes What means that haste of his he speaks of Pauls hasting to the Feast it was not for the Feast but for the Multitude Afterwards he sayes He made haste to preach the word It 's granted therefore that the Apostles and other Christians in those first times were present at the Synagogues of the Iews yet although they met with them on the Sabbaths they are not read in the Scripture to meet on the Sabbath dayes apart from the Iews and by themselves Neither do we read that this was done of them with an intention to solemnize the Sabbath or have a worship common to the Iews which was not lawful to be done St. Paul sometimes disputed in Areopagus Act. 17. 19. and the Schools of the Heathen Act. 19. 9. In which the Schoolmasters were wont to explain the names genealogies fables and histories of their gods to observe their Feasts and instruct their Catechetae in their rites Yet no man will thence conclude as Mr. Eaton well observes that because he was present in their Schools he did observe the Heathens feasts and worship their gods In like manner the Apostles must not be said to have observed the Jewish Sabbath although they had divers disputations thereon as the concourse of the Iews gave them occasion Moreover if the Christians had observed the Sabbath then Justin Martyr had satisfied with little ado Trypho the Jew that counselled him to observe the Sabbath For it had been enough for Martyr to have answered the Iew that the Christian Church did observe the Sabbath Yet this he grants not but that blessed Martyr plainly denies that the Jewish Sabbath ought to be observed by the Christians The same do other Fathers against the Iews as we shall see afterwards Lastly we read not that the Apostles were alwayes at their Synagogues For it 's said Act. 19. 9. when the Iews hearts were hardned at Pauls Doctrine first Paul himself departed from them neither is he ever after read to enter into their Synagogues Besides he segregated from them the Disciples that embraced the sounder Doctrine lest as it 's in the Proverb the sick cattel should infect the sound Therefore as long as they conceived any hope of converting the Iews they neither declined their company nor Synagogues But when they observed that they rose up against the sound Doctrine of the Gospel with an obdurate heart they forthwith forsook them neither are they read in Scripture ever after to enter into their Synagogues any more CHAP. II. The ordinary time observed for celebrating the publick worship of God after Christs death was the Lords day solemnly used by the Christian Church in the very Apostles age Three Texts of the New Testament namely Act. 20. 7. 1 Cor. 16. 1 2. and Apoc. 1. 10. are briefly considered AFterwards when the Christians had no dealing with the Iews we read that they met by themselves in the Apostles age and that on the Lords day to exercise the offices of Piety and Divine Worship But for the period of time in which at first they held these conventions by themselves apart from the Iews there 's nothing occurrs in Scripture and divers dispute about it Passing by whose dispute it plainly appears in the Holy Scripture that the Lords day while yet the Apostles were alive was destined for the publick meeting of the Church There are three Texts of the New Testament namely Act. 20. 7. 1 Cor. 16. 1 2. and Apoc. 1. 10. in which there is plain mention of that dayes celebrity on whose most grave authorites the religious observation of the Lords day by the common suffrage almost of all Divines doth chiefly rest Yet all Interpreters agree not amongst themselves in their Expositions of them and no wonder since to all it is not given presently to hit upon the sense of what is delivered in the Scriptures but to some that
some do daily partake of the Lords blood and body on the Lords day which all the ancients do witness was done in the Church-assembly and others only on the Sabbath and Lords day and in other places only on the Lords day Hierom acknowledges the Christians did observe Quartam Sabbati Parasceven and the Lords day although he shews they differed from the Jews in the observation of those dayes The testimonies of the Fathers hitherto mentioned do shew that although the use of the Lords day grew every where yet the Church had in some places oftener in others more rarely their weekly meetings whereupon it seemed equal and just to some to ordain other dayes which the succeeding Church proclaimed for publick meetings to be equallized with the Lords day and that chiefly for three causes first the publick meetings of the Church were held on other dayes besides the Lords Secondly the Christians were bound to the same duties of Religion on other dayes appointed by the Church for meetings which were required by the Church on the Lords day Lastly some Feasts the Anniversary namely were more esteemed in the Church than the Lords and these things are confidently enough affirmed that they might shew if by any means they could that the original and obligation of the Lords day and other Festivals is the same both which they set forth to the world for humane but let them look to it to whom they affirm it lest they be twit with that of Ezek. 43. 8. But that the prerogatives of the Lords Day above others may more clearly appear let us by Gods help weigh of what value the reasons are with which they contend for other feasts to be equallized with the Lords day which that it may be done with plainness we will first clearly distinguish the Church-assemblies held on the Sabbath dayes from others which were held on the Lords day relying upon the gravest testimonies of the ancients then by Gods assistance we will shew the peculiar excellency of the Lords Day for the dignity whereof it is superiour to other dayes while others contend against it in vain First we affirm that excepting the Lords there was no other weekly we speak of stated and ordinary holy day with the whole Church next the Apostles We have heard in the first Chapter that the Christians met on the first day of the week and for the allegations in this chapter out of the Fathers and Historians for the observation of the Sabbath they cannot demonstrate that the Sabbath was observed by the Christian Church as an holy day which unless it be first explicated they that peruse the records of the Ancients will haply fall into a troublous matter After the Apostles death Socrates Sozomen Epiphanius Hieronymus Augustine and if there be any more say that the Church in the publick assembly did perform the duties of piety as the Sabbaths came about yet whoever shall say that the Sabbath was neither accounted holy nor equalled to the Lords day will do no wrong to the truth Who will say the Sabbath is holy when in the holy Records a tittle cannot be read of its institution or observation in the Christian Church as is of the Lords day but that the Lords day was instituted of the Apostles indued with extraordinary power and moved by the Holy Ghosts inspiration we will afterwards by the Grace of God inform you Yea let him tell who can that the Christians in the Apostles age met by themselves on Sabbath dayes which thing yet they did on the Lords dayes is apparent enough from the Scriptures but after the Apostles death I deny not that the Christians met together on Sabbath dayes although they accounted not the Sabbath holy and those assemblies were chiefly in use with the Oriental people according to some because the Jews dispersed in the Orient and accustomed to the Sabbatical solemnity could not easily be contented to be plucked from it although they observed the Lords Day which what is it else to do but brand them with Ebionism or as Baronius thinks because certain Hereticks reproached the Sabbath that the God of the Hebrews whom they called Evil rested on that day therefore they fasted on the Sabbath Contrariwise the Catholicks not Judaizing but that they might worship him as God the Father Creator of heaven and earth with a solemn celebrity said that in honour of him the Sabbath as well as the Lords day to the glory of Christ ought to be celebrated Thus they To whom Vedelius in his notes on Ignatius's tenth Epistle numb 6. doth answer Learnedly and Orthodoxly enough Or because the Sabbath hath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. a regard of creation as is defined in the Constitutions which they call the Apostles But how much these kind of conjectures are to be valued that are supported with no reasons of any authority or genuine testimonies of the Fathers let others judge It 's without controversie that the Oriental Christians and others did at that time hold assemblies on the Sabbath day although upon what reasons they were chiefly moved to this it is not well enough known by the Writers of that age Yet did they not hold the Sabbath day holy The difference of the Eastern from the Western Church in observing the Sabbath teacheth this while the Oriental people kept holy day on the Sabbath most in the West fasted I say the most of them because they of Millain though in the West and divers others of the West were not attentive to fast on Sabbath dayes but dined soberly Ambrose had a custome to dine on the Sabbath Witness Paulinus Ambrose confesseth this of himself in Augustine Augustine acknowledgeth he dined on the Sabbath without superstitious vacation Ep. 86. Yet the Roman Church and some others and at length every where even they of the East fasted on the Sabbath These things about those who fasted on the Sabbath do not declare that they acknowledged it for a Feast or holy day on which fasting was altogether to be forborn according to the custome of the Church Aug. Ep. 86. and other Authors being witnesses yet that the Lords day was accounted holy at that time is granted of all Moreover the Sabbath was not every where amongst the Christians observed with that solemnity of the Church as the Lords day For the meetings were not held in the same manner on Sabbaths as on the Lords dayes Some things touching both observed out of the Fathers will shew this 1. What things are reported of Historians and others about observing the Sabbath touching gathering assemblies were not used in every Church every where For in the Churches of Rome and Alexandria the manner of meeting on the Sabbath held not Witness Sozom. Hist l. 7. c. 19. and afterwards in other Churches it grew out of use Athanasius Hom. de semente glorieth that he never medled with the Sabbath after the Jews manner namely Tertul.
They of Asia contend it must be celebrated on the fourteenth day they of the West on the Lords day only and which is more those acknowledge their opinion received by tradition from John these from Peter and Paul This controversie Eusebius Hist l. 5. explains more at large Who therefore can be brought to believe if the festivity of the Passover was ordained by the Apostles authority that so soon divers Churches that were governed of the very Apostles Scholars would make a departure from so holy a precept and that in celebrating the Lords day all the Churches of Christ through the whole world should follow one and the same rule Why had they not also done the like in the Feast of the Passover if it had been instituted by Apostolical authority It is not likely therefore it was ordained of the Apostles And yet I cannot but wonder at the wit of some men who hold the Passovers festivity which the Scriptures are silent in for divine and yet they repute the Lords day whose observation we meet with in Scripture for Ecclesiastical and humane If therefore the Passovers festivity was instituted of the Apostles no man can justly prefer it to the Lords day ordained of Christ by his Apostles Nor must we judge otherwise of the Feast of the happy Nativity of Christ whose solemnity was anniversary but on what day of the year to be celebrated it 's uncertain Chrysostom although he conjectures Christ was born on the eighth before the Calends of January in December recites divers opinions about this matter but follows his own opinion without condemning of others and permits every one to abound in his own sense till such time as the Lord shall reveal to every one of us what must be holden for certain St. Hierom if so be that Sermon de Nativitate Domini which goes commonly under his name be Hieroms saith Whether the Lord Jesus was born to day or baptized to day a different opinion is carried about in the world and according to the variety of traditions is the sentence diverse In this authors judgement whoever he was it was uncertain what day the blessed Nativity of Christ fell out on The Learned Casaubon Exercit. ad apparat Bar. annal num 68. tells us there were of old divers opinions in the Church about Christs Nativity Some writing that he was born on the sixth of January others on the nineteenth of April others on the nineteenth of May some in the month of September most on the twenty fifth of December Now these divers opinions about these feasts which are taken for chief ones do teach us that they were ordained by no law of the Apostles otherwise in their writings without doubt we should have met with a direct assigning of the time to be set aside for keeping them in Memory as it is observed of the Lords day which yet it 's plain no where can be found Moreover if their ordination had been derived from the Apostles they had either all been equal among themselves or it had been known some way to the Church which amongst them had been of greater authority and right But the contrary appeareth from the most grave Fathers which differ from one another about this thing and therefore one is sometimes preferred before another of them Chrysostom calls the Feast of Christs Nativity the Mother of all Feasts Orat. de Philognio Gregory Nyssen calls it the holy of holies and feast of feasts Gregory Nazianzen judgeth it to be preferred far before all others that are Christs and are celebrated in honour of him Since therefore it is not agreed on amongst the Fathers of the Church of the first institution of these Festivals and their prerogatives none will doubt that their institution was not received from the Apostles Which things being supposed it can be inferred by no necessary consequence that these are to be compared much less to be preferred to the Lords day From all which it appeareth that the observation of the Lords day was far different from that of the Sabbath and other dayes because the Sabbath day amongst Christians had on it no cessation from worldly labours neither was it observed with such solemnity of the whole Church as was the Lords day yea the Sabbath is not read to be observed of the whole Church whenas yet the premises do evince that the Lords day was ever solemnized from the very Apostles age in the Church dispersed through all Nations and we have observed that other Festivals of Christs are not to be compared with much less to be equallized or preferred to the Lords Day CHAP. IV. The chief of the Fathers make mention of the Lords Day its authority depends not on the Constitutions of Emperours when it was at first ordained that Judges should cease from hearing Law-suits on that day the Christians were punished for observing it What it is Dominicum agere BEtter to manifest the celebrity of the Lords Festival I will moreover bend my mind to two things by which in the first place I will demonstrate that the Lords Day all along in the Church from the very Apostles age was consecrated to perform religious exercises on Secondly that on all that day the Church was wont to be vacant from all worldly matters which two things will clearly enough shew its solemnity above all other dayes to which these things agree not amongst men that relish the truth In demonstrating the fiâ—st of these we will prove that the Lords day was alwayes celebrated and will briefly open both the reasons of its solemnity and its names which we meet with amongst the ancients Let it be sufficient to illustrate the first that there is none of any note in the ancient Church who doth not give an ample testimony to this its solemnity Amongst the renowned witnesses of this truth let St. Ignatius come forth who thus charges us Let every lover of Christ celebrate the Lords day which was consecrated to the Lords Resurrection as the Qneen and Prince i. the chief day as Constantine the Great in Euseb de vit ejus lib. 4. cap. 18. of all other dayes Justin Martyr in the end of his second Apology confesseth that on that day which they call Sunday were holden solemn assemblies of all that lived both in villages and cities and he tells us more at large what was done in those assemblies of which afterwards we shall hear more Dionysius Bishop of Corinth when he mentions Clements Epistle to the Corinthians in Eusebius saith he kept holy the Lords day Tertullian reckoneth the Lords day which he calls the eighth namely from the Creation amongst the Christians solemnities The same doth Origen although otherwise he was not at one with himself about the times for performing Religious exercises lib. 8. contra Celsum Eusebius when he speaks of the Ebionites whom he reports did observe the Lords dayes after the same
manifest which it will be worth the while to know that for convocating the Church ordinarily more days were set apart after the Apostles death than the former Church observed Concerning the Assemblies of the Church while the Apostles were yet alive some things observable do occurr in the Evangelists the Holy Ghosts amanuenses and the faithful describers of the Acts of the Apostles in declaring whereof we will first consider what is recorded of the Apostles in this thing and then of the other members of the Church And first of all we will shortly touch upon the assemblies of the Apostles although they cannot truly be reputed amongst the ordinary conventions of the Church because which way soever the Apostles turned they took every occasion to preach the Gospel because they open us a way to understand others After the saving Passion of Jesus Christ our most merciful Redeemer the mention of the first of these at which were present the rest excepting Thomas occurrs Joh. 20. 19. in which Christ vouchsafed his presence The occasion of which meeting is not mentioned but doubtless as all Interpreters conjecture this was done that by their mutual presence they might comfort one another For as many as are Christs do perpetually incline to communicate all things whether their sorrows or joyes among themselves and then their Lord being gone their greatest fear was of the Jews for which cause we read that the place wherein they held their meeting was shut and barred when the Apostles were assembled they conferred among themselves of what divers related of Christs Resurrection the time of this meeting is noted in John it was the first day of the week and about evening of that day or after Sun-set at which time Christ having conquered the grave and death presented himself to them alive Secondly after eight dayes or the eighth day current from his appearing the same Evangelist tells us John 20. 26. that they were all met together where Jesus came again and stood in the midst of them Here some make a question whether the day of their second meeting was the eighth from the first or after the eighth day Cyril affirms it was the eighth or Lords day the first and last being reckoned neither doth it hinder that it 's said after eight dayes Christ taught that the Son of man must suffer many things c. and after three dayes rise again Mar. 8. 31. yet Christ rose from the dead on the third day from his burial not after the third day So also 't is said Luke 2. 21. When eight dayes were accomplished for the circumcising of the Child i. e. on the eighth very day for the H. Ghost speaks of the eighth day current and not finished so here after eight dayes or on the eighth day are all one It must be added also that Christ appeared in the evening of that day Afterwards some of the Apostles were together when they went to fish to whom also Jesus appeared Thirdly the General convention of all the Apostles is declared Act. 1. 4. in which they were commanded not to depart from Jerusalem but there wait for the promise of the Father and thither they came after the glorious Ascension of Christ where being gathered together they tarried for the Spirit promised of God the Father and Christ Luke reports that women also were present at this Congregation of the Apostles where they continued their meeting till the Feast of Pentecost abiding with one accord in Prayer and Supplication which fell out also on the first day of the week So thinks Isychius who sayes the day of Pentecost fell out on that day which our Saviour rose on and indeed whoever shall compare his reckoning with the Law of God about keeping Pentecost will find that Isychius in this misses not the truth at all For the day of Pentecost which the Scripture elsewhere calls the Feast of Weeks or of New-fruits because on that day the Shew-bread was offered out of the new fruits was the fiftieth inclusively from the day of offering the First-fruits Lev. 23. which was the day immediately next after the Passover on which the Lord Jesus who was the first-fruits of the dead lay in the Grave and the fiftieth day from that inclusively was the first in the week upon which the H. Ghost descended on the Apostles as they were that day assembled Act. 2. These are the meetings which the Holy Scripture testifies the blessed Apostles held upon the fiftieth day from Christs resurrection which being held upon the first day of the Week Christ oftentimes honoured with his presence But why they met on that and not another day it is not easie to declare although one may guess at the cause of the first and last meeting yet hath the Holy Ghost shewn us nothing of the second occasion And it 's uncertain whether Christ before his death or for those forty dayes wherein he reasoned with them after his resurrection of things pertaining to the Kingdome of God gave his Apostles any command for setting apart some new time for their meetings Epiphanius sayes they knew very well that the Sabbath was at an end from his converse with them and Doctrine before his Passion This at least is an indubitable truth that they met on the first day of the week and that Christ made renowned their meeting held on that day by his own gracious presence and mission of the Holy Ghost And St. Cyril must be credited Holy Congregations are held at this day of right in Churches because on that day Jesus appeared to his Apostles as they were met together Nor doth Isychius think otherwise in the place afore quoted Therefore according to those most grave Fathers because the eighth day was made famous with the presence of Christ and the gifts of the Holy Ghost sent down from Heaven it is at this day also by the Church solemnized with a more honourable worship Afterwards the Apostles together with the faithful are said daily to meet to hear the word of God and receive bread Act. 2. 46. Yea the Apostles ceased not to teach from house to house and in the Temple Act. 5. 42. And these are the things which the Holy Ghost hath afterwards left us written in the Holy Scriptures concerning the Apostles meetings to the solemnizing whereof we read not that they observed a certain or set time because they had to do with the Jews to whom before others according to the ancient prophecies the Gospel was to be declared Therefore the Apostles were often present at the Jews assemblies â—nd that upon their Sabbaths And whether the Apostles when first they went forâ—â—â—o preach the Gospel met apart from the Jews amongst themselves on other daâ—â—s the Holy Ghost is silent in the Scriptâ—re But at that time the Candidates of Christianity being hindred with fear of the Jews could not without great difficulty meet together We must then think they held their
prophesie some things are revealed according to the Apostle whilst other sit by Yea men of every age studiously following after the known truth even while they diligently apply their ages to the study of the Scripture are blessed with a New-light of knowledge not observed by their Predecessors It sometimes also falleth out that some things may be revealed to men of inferiour condition which are hid to others of greater name and authority as may be seen in St. Paphnatius who being armed with the Divine authority of the Epistle to the Hebrews wherein it 's asserted that Marriage is honourable in all opposed in that famous Council of Nice the Bishops that ordained an excess of rigour or studiously endeavoured to prejudice the Church with an intolerable inconveniency of too severe a prescription yet all that famous convention of Holy Bishops Presbyters and Deacons yielded to Paphnatius his opinion Chrysostom gives leave to the weaker although the least to speak any thing that 's profitable even in the Church-assembly Moreover one and the same understanding at the same moment receiveth not all the sacred mysteries of Faith but the Holy Ghost the onely teacher of truth openeth to men their understanding at divers times And most commonly it happens that he that cannot have the first place for wisdome may have the second for modesty by retracting what he hath inconsiderately spoken Now as in the Expositions of other Scriptures there are more Masters when they judge diversly and contradictorily amongst themselves so it falleth out in the gloss of the foresaid Texts For some of them whereof the first and second do note that the offices of Religion are to be performed by the Christian Church on that day the third its name being supported by testimonies do piously and modestly defend the authority of the Lords day which others of them contend cannot be defended by those authorities The former of these opinions is more common and received of more both ancient and modern Divines Neither doth the latter want asserters of great authority in the Church Mr. Calvin of blessed memory in his Learned Commentaries so interprets that place Act. 20. 7. that it seems to bring little help to prove the Lords day solemnity Whose opinion I see divers do embrace whose temper I cannot enough wonder at in this because in this point they stifly-adhere to Learned Calvins opinion from which in other matters of Christian Faith they are altogether aliens and cry out that the vilest Comments of the Papists are far to be preferred to his elaborate Expositions which breath forth Piety and excellent Learning and whatever is approved by the judgment of that well exercised Divine Mr. Calvin they little esteem it and that because the most famous Calvin sometimes thought so Yet in this business they judge nothing ought to be approved but what forsooth seems good to Calvin When I consider these mens temper it comes into my mind what Theophilus sometime did to the Monks sirnamed Longi at whom he was displeased He conspired with the common sort of Monks who affirmed with Origen that God had an humane shape although he thought otherwise against those Friars Whence arose a great contention amongst the Monks who turned themselves to rail and not dispute So divers who matter not Mr. Calvins judgment do yet under a pretence of his authority studiously defend their own opinions to the end they might set by the ears those whom they observe to admire and love famous Calvin's judgment as reason requires in other things while some of them adhere to and others dissent from his opinion when yet in the mean time they value not Mr. Calvin a straw Whoever knows the Learned Calvin cannot but acknowledge him for a most stout maintainer of Gods truth by whose auspicious labours in this age through Gods mercy an admirable course hath been made to all excellency of Doctrine and Religion which might have perished had not he being stirred up by Gods grace as another Atlas upholden the ruinous affairs of the Church He was also a most earnest restorer of Christian liberty which with might and main pursued about the use of meats and dayes against the Papists and other adversaries of the truth And let none think it strange if upon the matter he find the same happen to him which does to the diligent Husbandman after that his good seed sprouts out in his field who perceiving Darnel and Tares while he goes about to root them out contrary to his purpose he plucks up some of the Wheat with the Tares Whilst that famous Divine observes the observation of the Jewish Sabbath to cease and that upon Apostolical authority he thought it congruous to truth to pronounce the Christian Church free from observing the Weekly Sabbath This opinion he manifested especially when he set himself against the unnecessary Festivals of the Papists from whose most grievous yoke he had an earnest desire to free the Church of Christ It will not be well taken for me to dissent from Calvin together with the Learned Beza Gallacius on Ex. 31. and Fajus Mr. Calvins most intimate Colleagues and other Divines of great name though it be done with never so great modesty and craving his pardon however I judge him worthy to be reckoned amongst our greatest Writers But I will come now to weigh the foresaid Texts whereof the first is in Act. 20. 7. where St. Luke sayes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Upon the first day of the week when the Disciples came together to break bread Paul preached unto them ready to depart on the morrow and continued his speech until midnight Where the Church-assembly is as they say painted to the life by all its circumstances and first from the time then from the duties performed of the Church in that assembly concerning all which a double question is moved of some that seek a knot in a bulrush In the one whereof what Luke means by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. the first day of the week in the other they discuss what must be understood by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. breaking of bread In describing the Church of Troas first the time is noted namely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where some interpret it not for the first but one day of the week as if Luke had signified nothing else by that phrase than that they met on a certain day of the week when St. Paul was there They eat according to the Proverb with very tender jaws to whom these dainties relish But with their leave what they say cannot agree with the genuine sense of that place For in that place Sabbatum must needs be taken either for the whole week as the Hebrews usually speak or for the last day in the week We must not understand it here in the latter sense because the Apostle abode at Troas only seven dayes Act. 20. 6 and in that space only one Sabbath properly so
no be bound by the Fourth Command in the Decalogue to sanctifie one day weekly Amongst equal estimates of things saith the foresaid Learned Divine it cannot but be without controversie that it is as well for Christians as Jews having finished their labours on the six dayes to sanctifie the seventh that with the Jews they acknowledge that they worship the most blessed and Almighty God the Maker of Heaven and Earth But although in this both Jew and Christian do agree that when they have spent six dayes in their labours on the seventh they should rest yet they differ amongst themselves in the determination or designation of the day destined to this holy rest For the Christians keep holy that day which to the Jews was the first in the week and call it the Lords day that they might prove themselves the servants of God who in the dawning of that day subdued the Devil that spiritual Pharaoh and redeemed his people from a spiritual servitude by raising up Jesus Christ our Lord from the dead who hath regenerated the Christian Church not unto a sublunary Canaan but unto a lively hope of an immortal inheritance preserved for us in the Heavens And that I may dispatch in a word The Christian by sanctifying the Lords day doth prosess that he is a Christian that is as St. Peter interprets it believes in hinâ— that raised up Christ from the dead Hence it easily appears that both Jews and Christians though the same day be not solemnized amongst them both were led by the same reason to sanctifie the seventh day which to the Jews might call to mind their liberty restored from Egypt and servitude of a worldly Pharaoh and to Christians from a spiritual Egypt and Pharaoh But lest any one should object unto me Christians might profess this by sanctifying the last day in the week I add moreover they could not do so by right for if the Christians should keep holy day after the manner of the Jews then they would declare that their spiritual Redemption was not yet perfected but yet did look for it especially whenas the Redemption of Israel out of Egypt by the Ministry of Moses was a type and pledge of our future and spiritual liberty by Christ and the inheritance of the earthly Canaan which those that were freed from Egyptian bondage did seek after prefigured a celestial inheritance which the redeemed by the holy Blood of Christ did look for Since therefore the shadow vanished when the body was present we must not believe in God foretelling future things by types and shadows but in him that hath most faithfully accomplished the truth according to the prophecies foretold by him So Austin against Faustus the Manichee It is not saith he a diverse doctrine but a different time it was one thing for these things that they must be foretold by figurative prophecies and another thing that they must now be fulfilled by the truth made manifest and accomplished As by an apt similitude Mr. D. G. illustrateth it There is saith he in all Nations the same law of all the Stars and the same motion although a great variety may arise from the difference of the Horizon whereupon it may be our day when it 's night with our Antipodes so the law of Nature is the same with us and the Jews yet in some things it admitteth of some mutation from the difference of the Horizon as I may say whilst they inhabited the old world and we the new that is the Sun of Righteousness on the seventh day came to their Meridian by Creation to ours on the eighth day by Christs Resurrection whence that which was a festival to them to us is none Although the Sabbath be translated to the Lords day yet for that reason its being a sign between God and his people is not taken away but translated to another day Neither is the thing changed that was signified by that sign but only the manner and circumstance of time and clearness of signification I will hasten therefore to demonstrate the cessation of celebrating the Sabbath after the Jewish manner and substitution of the Lords Day into its place both out of Scriptures and Fathers The holy writings of the Apostles do testifie that the observation of the Jewish Sabbath as well as other festivals in use amongst them is removed from off the Christians shoulders So St. Paul Col. 2. 16. Let no man therefore judge you in meat or in drink or in respect of an holy day or of the new moon or of the Sabbath dayes In that Chapter while the Apostle mentions various corruptions of the Sacred Religion which he teacheth will be profitable for the Church diligently to shun he reckons up three sorts of them the first whereof by false teachers was drawn from Philosophy the second from humane traditions the third from the rudiments of the world Now by the rudiments of the world he means the pedagogy of Moses out of which ver 16. he brings forth two corruptions to wit of the choice of meats prohibited by the Law and sanctifying of Festivals observed under the same Amongst the Jews there were divers Feasts some of great name and authorty celebrated yearly namely of the Passover Pentecost and Tabernacles and then besides these they celebrated their New Moons every Month and their Sabbath every week the Apostle affirms that all these Festivals which after a manner were the shadow of Christ to come and Christ their truth and body that is they did portend what afterwards were truly exhibited of Christ had their end when Christ was once come for when the body is come the shadow vanisheth Even as in the Emperours absence his image hath authority but when he is present hath not so these things also before the coming of the Lord in their time were to be observed but when he is come do want authority And therefore they that contend for observing the Sabbath after the Jewish manner do deny that Christ is come witness the blessed Apostle for gaping at the shadow they embrace not the body There was a time when they were to be trained up by the shadow but he that follows the shadow when the body is present is deceived Therefore from that place of the Apostle we must believe that the Jewish Sabbath of which he speaks under the number of a Multitude Sabbaths because it was celebrated every week and seldome do we meet with it in the singular number as before was observed is ceased by the coming of Christ or that Christ is not yet come The same Apostle sharply taxeth the Galatians for observing of days that having rejected the wholsom Doctrine of the Gospel they returned to the same beggarly Elements that is legal observations Gal. 4. 10. Ye observe saith he dayes and months and times and yeares Where according to Tertullian contra Marcion lib. 1. c. 20. Chrysostom Theodoret Primasius c. in Gal. 4. by dayes the Apostle understandeth
rather than the later because the cited words of the Canons do ordain what forms of prayer they should use whose office it was to perform acts of Religion when they stood at the altar So Conc. Carthag where they that were to Treat stood not the Bishops seat who did interpret the Scripture was in the midst of the Church as we have formerly shown This therefore was ordained by the Fathers lest as Hereticks increased and spread their Heterodox opinions the Christian people who did not well enough attend their practise should be imposed upon by Hereticks Canons were established because in that age especially every faction did spread abroad certain forms of Prayers and Psalms by which when they were met together they might allure unto them men that were not well enough exercised in the faith but unwarily embraced their dreams as Historians report it fell out in Chrysostoms age not long after the aforesaid Councils were held That I say these mens endeavours should be prevented lest Hereticks should spread abroad Forms of Liturgies not agreeing with the Doctrine received from the Apostles it was ordained that in publick Liturgies which were not to be prescribed by any one man none should have liberty to use any forms of Prayers but what were either formerly in use namely before the mists of Heterodoxisme had obscured the shining face of truth or had been approved by the most judicious brethren or lastly confirmed by the authority of some Synod The very words of the cited Canon do declare that the Mileritan Fathers do speak of such Prayers Let the place be seen it is extant in the first Tome of the Councils pag. 600. Moreover it appears that this was the cause of those Canons by the condition of the times in which they were ordained For at that time the Church was grievously sick of the wounds both of Arrianism and Pelagianism And reason it self perswades not to restrain the cited Canons to the Prayers which were conceived by him that Treated to the people For those were to be conceived alwayes as the necessity of the Church did require as formerly Tertullian taught us for which cause they could not alwayes be the same but were to be varied pro re nata and as the necessity of the people for whom the Treater was to offer the sacrifice of the lips to God required On the contrary if the Canons speak of the Treaters prayers then this is worthy observing that the Grave Fathers in those sanctions did not intend to prescribe lawes for all and every Treater in the Prayers he was to conceive but onely for those who were not well instructed in Religion for they speak of some who name the Father for the son or the son for the Father and who had written out Prayers to themselves from some other So Conc. Carth. where above they ordain lest the less exercised in Religion should be imposed upon through the fraud and deceit of others that they conferr with their wiser brethren about the Prayers they had written out before they uttered them to the people The same is also to be said to the Mileritan Canon wherein it is provided that nothing be composed against the Faith either through ignorance or less care And yet by those sanctions the more instructed of the brethren are not restrained to Forms of Prayer unless they be approved by others We read that certain prayers were prescribed by Constantine the Great to his Guard which they used on the Lords day yet none will thence conclude that other Christians were to put up no Prayers to God but what were commanded The cited Canons are therefore to be understood either of Liturgy Prayers or of the Prayers of the Treater unfit through ignorance to conceive Prayers and of no others Fifthly in their Prayers conceived after this manner they prayed to God for things just honest and meet to be heard Arnob. cont Gent. lib. 1. And these they asked for all mens sakes not only for familiars but enemies for Emperours and Subjects and in their prayers they seriously pleaded with God for all others so Arnobius lib. 4. For themselves and all every where as Justin Martyr Ap. sec For the Emperours health as Tertull. apol cap. 30. For their offices for their worldly state and peace Tertull. ibid. And especially for the Church because the whole people of Christ are one Cypr. de Orat. Dom. Sixthly these Prayers were conceived in a known tongue Origen instead of all will teach us this who writeth against Celsus a froward adversary of the Christian name Contr. Celsum l. 8. where he lets all know that the right Christians did not in their prayers make use of the usual names of God in Holy Writ but the Greeks prayed in the Greek and the Romans in the Roman and every one in his own Language and praised God according to their might and the Lord of all Languages heard them pray in all Languages understanding them as well when they spake in divers as if they all agreed in one Language that I may say so and as men of one voice Where he teaches us that Christians in what place soever they lived did in their Prayers use no other than their vulgar idiom Seventhly it will not be far from our purpose to add something of the posture of the body in conceiving of prayer Where in the first place it will be worth our noting what Austin excellently observed there is no prescript posture how the body should be ordered in Prayer only that the Soul being present before God that it perform its devotion And he addeth that some prayed standing some kneeling and some lying prostrate Justin Martyr relates that they prayed standing Apol. 2. When we stand saith Cyprian we ought with watchfulness and with all our hearts to apply our selves to prayer But we read that Prayer was used to be made to God upon the knees more frequently and it appears that this posture or rite in Prayer was most ancient and common in all ages Clem. Alexand. Strom. 7. saith that they fell down upon the earth when they paryed The Christian souldiers are said kneeling on the ground as it is usual with Christians when they pray to compose themselves to offer up Prayers to God in Euseb Hist. 5. c. 5. Arnobius also affirms that Christians when with joynt Prayers they worshipped God they were prostrate or as afterwards when they prayed they fell upon their bended knee The Church saith Epiphanius in fine Panarii commandeth Prayers to be made with all diligence and with kneeling on set dayes But on the Lords day in memorial of the Lords Resurrection they worshipped not on their knees and anciently they rejoyced in that immunity from the Passover till Pentecost So Tertullian Just Mart. q. 115. Which custome being in some places decayed the 20th Canon of the first Council of Nice hath ordained to be kept every where although St. Paul prayed kneeling