as an Embleme of a judgement so Gen. 19. 26. 4. For Strengthning and supporting great buildings so Judg. 16. 29. 5. Wee reade I. king 7. 21. that Solomon erected two pillars in the Temple porch called Jachin and Boaz interpreted by the seventy Interp. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Direction and Protection or as others Light and Integrity They were as the Vrim and the Thummim purity of Doctrine and sanctity of life a sound faith and pure living a sound head and charitable hands sound precepts good 6. practise by the which God directeth establisheth his Church 6. Amongst the Romans were Pillars erected to Conquerours after warres for Triumph so in Foro there were new Obelisks and in Campo Martio such pillars and high statues But the pillar 7. here mentioned is not a Materiall but a Metaphoricall not a reall but a figurative not an Architectonicall but Politicall not simply but comparatively so that is in respect of men locking leaning to it As to the question first to bee answered to wit What is the 2ly What Church is this pillar Church that is this Pillar I Ans first in generall 1. Each true Church is this Pillar yea each individuall Believer is a pillar in a sound sense as Revel 3. 12. But secondly If the Quaere bee to which this attribution chiefly and primarly belongs that is whether firstly to the Catholick or to the particular Churches Then I answere thus That since the Catholick Church is first in Divine Intention and in Institution and in Priviledges and in Authority and so in Dignity and Perfection yea and since the Federall Promises are first made to the Church Catholick as is well proven by J. Hudson Hence it is that I affirme that the Notion the denomination the qualifications of a pillar do all belong primarly to the Church Catholick It is well said of Jerome even to this very point Orbis major est urbe This is a cleare trueth every affection applicable or rightly applyed to the Catholick is not straight and still to be applyed to each particular as to be infallible or to be The Mother of us all it were incompetent to apply this to each particular though both these in act not erring are this Pillar yet with more and lesse yet with subordination yet as of the higher and of the lower degree Which I the rather insist upon to refute that new conceit of Independents who hold no kirk to be a Pillar of truth but their particular Congregations This is just as the Papists say No true kirk but that of Rome and as the Donatists before them said No true kirk but in Africa but both are mistaken not knowing the true affections of II. Why to be a pillar is attributed to the church the true Catholick Visible Church Now to cleare the second That is Why this Title is given to the Church I shall first negativè shew in what sense the Church is not a Pillar then positive shew in what sense it is a Pillar As to the first that is well cleared by D. Feeld lib. 4. cap. 4 of the Church 1. IT is not the Pillar of trueth as if divine trueths for their entitie and beeing did depend on the Church nay sayes 1. In what sense it is not the pillar of truth CHRYSOST well The Church depends on these trueths 2. Nor is it a Pillar as if our faith depended on Church-Authority To which purpose Irenaeus sayes well lib. 3. cap. 1. Inst. The Apostolick writes are the Pillars of our faith and cap. 2. the Gospell is the Pillar of trueth and not mens Authority The Church is not the authour or procreant cause of our faith 3. Nor is the Church a Pillar as if God could no other wayes reveale supernaturall trueths but by its Ministry as by necessity invincible No These have been revealed both by Himselfe immediatly to this or that private man and by Angels 4. Nor is it as if the Kirk were in no sense subject to ignorance or the least errour in its decisions and so to appeale to it as the supreame infallible Judge to whose discretion appertaineth the differencing between 2. In what sense it is the pillar of trueth trueth and falsehood Yet I affirme the Church to be a Pillar of trueth with Calvin Beza Davenant Chamier c. 1. As Custos it is a keeper to which divine saving needfull revealed trueths are concredited To which purpose heare what these three Fathers say to this point Irenaeus lib. 3. cap. 4. The Apostles laid up in the Church as in a rich treasure all trueth and she keeps the Apostles faith preaching Tertullian The Kirk keeps the scriptures which are Christs heirship Lactant. lib. 6 Instiâ— The Catholick Church onely keeps the true worship of God it onely is the fountaine of trueth if any enter not into it or go out of it he is a stranger to salvation without are errours fancies and lies 2. As Tutana as a defendresse that is supporting and maintaining it as CHRYSOST Hom. 11. on Tim. explicats this well when he sayes The Kirk by its Ministry and preaching supports and upholds the trueth as it were on its shoulders 3. As PRâ—CO as an Herauld proclaiming promulgating professing it and bearing witnesse to it which no society on earth doth or can do but the Church 4. As REGISTRATRIX a Recorder transmitting it to posterity successively so it is a Thesaurer a Tutrix an Herauld a Notar keeping defending proclaiming recording divine trueths which moved Ravanella rightly to say That In Ecclesia prostant Veritates Catholicae And as Aug. said before him lib 3. cap. 6. contra DONAT Every Kirk should leade men to the faith But yet to make the justnesse of this predication more cleare I say That as of old the Egyptians and the Romanes and in ordinary Magistrats now erect Pillars posts to the which they affixe their Edicts Lawes Wills or to which of old were joined their Tabulae pensiles in the which Proclaimations carrying their minds are expressed notified and insinuated so the Kirk to Written Trueths it is not they but it demonstrats them even as the Pillars or broads affixed to them are not the LAW' 's in recto so it is with the Kirk according to that saying of the same CHRYSOST Trueth establisheth the Kirk and not the Kirk the Trueth HAMMOND in his Notes to this well explains this The vsefulnesse of a pillar is from the basis on which it stands else it will down If the basis be so set that it sinke not the pillar being firmely fastened on it and standing upright it is able to beare a vast weight of building upon it and so these two though severall in themselves as contiguous not continuat yet joining together and so as it were consolidated together in one they do as one not severally support what is laid on it so that as said is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
IT is not misapplyed that of Prov. 9. 1. Wisdome hath built her house she hath hewen out her seven pillars c. But of this enough Now I come to the greatest and last title of the Church The ground of the Trueth Now I am to treate of the Church IV Title The ground of the truth under this notion and because this is most materiall I must insist a little on it And the rather in that the Moderne Jesuits affirme that wee Protestants abhorre to reade this and that this TEXT is so pungent that wee flee from the literall sense of it Therefore this shall be my Method First I am to cleare the words of this Title II. To propose that grand question that falls pertinently 1. The Title is explained here to bee discussed which is Whether this ground can make a ground or grounds III. I must cleare some other doubts proposed here that by way of vindication Then IV. Some vses to be made of this assertion That Gods Kirk is the ground of the trueth As to the first The greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by some is rendered Fundamentum by others better Firmamentum in latine As Whitak Contr. 4. q. 5. Criticks distinguish between 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thus That the first is properly rendered a ground the second properly a seat applying the word ground to the trueths existing and revealed and applying the word seat to the Church according to what wee reade Matth. 22. 2. of Moses Chayre or seat Of the which Criticisme P. Bayne gives this reason in Comment on Ephes 2. 19. 20. That which so supports all as that it is not supported in a right and strict notion is a ground so Maimonides call his booke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but that which so The ground of grounds supports as that it is supported is properly a seat and receptacle or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but improperly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or a ground Yet wee shall vse it as it is here in the English rendered Theophylact. Beda P. de Aliaco Chaloner explicate this TITLE thus The Church is the ground of trueth because supernaturall divine trueths are in it we lean to the Church as to the seat of trueth but not to it as to the lowest and chiefest ground why these trueths are trueths D. F. Whyte 3. Conf. p. 4. clears this well thus The pure Apostolick Church was the pillar and ground of trueth simply intierly fully in all things but the subsequent and the Moderne Churches is onely so with limitation that is conditionally that is in so farre as they deliver Apostolick doctrines the Apostles were exempted in all their decisions from all errours but the Fathers and Councels are onely so in so farre as they adhere to the trueths written by Prophets and Apostles And indeed what hee sayes is all granted by the more moderate PAPISTS as by Occam Cusanus Picus Gerson IT was the old doctrine Ground 1. Personall 2. Doctrinall 3. Ministeriall of CHRYSOST Homil. 49. on Matth. Let no man beleeve Churches but in so farre as they lean to the Scriptures if thou wouldst know where is the true Church then flee and run to the Scriptures But yet further to cleare this NOTE as Davenant well observes That there is a threefold ground of trueth 1. Is Personall and that is Christ I. Cor. 3. 11. Isai 28. 16. 2. Is doctrinall and that is the Scriptures see Ephes 2. 20. 3. Is Ministeriall and that is Pastors Fathers Councel-determinations and all their right Superstructures that is so farre as they are conforme to the scriptures I. Cor. 3. 10. Let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon As for the second I answere this question negatively Whether II. Can the church mak or creat grounds 1 Reason the Church can make Fundamentals that is if it can produce and procreat that to be a fundamentall now which before was never received as such Now the Reasons of my deniall are these 1. I ground on the judgement of these WRITTERS wherof the first is Vincentius Lyrin who in his book anent profane Novelties chap. 3. hath these words The Church addes nothing diminishes nothing changeth nothing cuts not off necessars proposes not superfluous things losses not her own usurpes not that which belongs to others but every way cares to polish what was informed of old to cōfirme what is expressed and revealed and to keep what is defined and confirmed yea this the Church still intends that whatever was simply beleeved before should afterwards be more carefully beleeved And after him G. Occam in his Dialogues Neither sayes he the whole Church nor a Generall Councell nor the Pope can make an Article of faith Bellar. also lib. 2. de Concil cap. 12. The Councells when they define do not make any point defined to be of infallible trueth but they onely declare it to be so To all which three worthy sentences we subscribe If the Church could make fundamentalls then it could unmak 2 Reason them but the more moderate of the Papists deny this upon this ground that it belongs to the same power both to creat and annihilate And so they reject that non obstante of the Councel of Constance grounding on that of Scotus 1. dist 11. q. 1. Trueth was of faith before heresie had a beeing so that the determination of the 3 Reason Kirk doth not make a trueth though it define against an heresie 3. That which the Kirk declares is either extra or intus If it be without the nature of the thing declared then its declaration of the thing is false and so it cannot be fundamentall if it be within the compasse and nature of the thing declared then it is yet onely in that kinde fundamentall seing the declaration whatever it be is posterior to the nature of the thing That is but a sillie Evasion of some to wit that the declaration of the Church maketh a point fundamentall quoad nos nay it doth not that as the same F. White well proves ibid. p. 9. For no respect to us can varie the foundation if the thing be not fundamentall in the nature of it the Kirks declaration doth not make it so to us Since then the Kirk hath no reall detracting power no more as said is can it have any reall 4 Reason adding power since both are alike forbidden Deut. 4. 2. 4. All credible points are at last resolved into Scripture therfore it is it that makes fundamentalls CYPRIAN speaks appositly to this purpose lib. de Bapt. All Ecclesiasticall discipline hath its rule frō the Scripture here it is bred and borne and hither it must returne Camerarius lib. 1. Sent. d. 11. q. 1. Theologicall principles are the very trueths of the sacred Canons because the last resolution of Theologicall discourse is made unto them and out of these trueths firstly each Theologicall Proposition is deduced
the Word of GOD thus they unavoydably slide into the Circle most filthily dauncing in a ring The faith c. But as for our beleefe to close this point it is thus resolved Wee beleeve the Christian doctrine to be true because the true God is the Authour of it We discerne that God is the Authour of it both by his intrinsicke and extrinsicke seals or attestations of it in that it bearech his Image and Superscription and is confirmed by his undoubted uncontroled Miracles and other effects which leade us to the Cause O but say the Rhemists and Bellarm. and others The Presence Ob. 4. the Promise the Prayers of Christ to and for the Church the assistance of the Holy Spirit to and with the Spouse and Body of Christ and former experiences towards his inheritance may make us conclude that in a proper and strict sense the Church is the ground of trueth so infallible that it cannot erre in the decisions of trueth else to what end are all these its Priviledges Ans Answer Let us yeeld all these priviledges to and of the Church but what is that to the present Roman Church which is their aime what a slight including argument were this O Timothy know how thou oughtest to behave thy selfe in Gods house the kirk of Ephesus because the Kirk of ROME is the ground of trueth because to it ar the promises because to it is given infallibilitie Is not this a meer begging of the question The point here is never proven One particular Church hath no more particular priviledges then another Ephesus is now an Apostate so hath Rome also apostatised To cleare my Answere yet further I propose these two queries 1. How can the present Roman Kirk be a ground of trueth since Quer 1 it disagreeth so much with it self anent both the nature number of fundamentalls neither dare its Doctours define either of these My second querie is Where is the seat of infallibilitie Quer 2 Who it is that is the infallible Judge The papists of France hold that a Generall Councell is above the Pope that it is it that is infallible so do these WRITERS Cusanus Cameracensis Garson Almain Florent Panormitan c. The Italians maintaine the flate contrare and most of the Jesuits O but sayes BELLARM Christs prayer for Peter was for faiths infallibilitie both to him and all his successours in that Chayre but that is flately denied no more is in Luk. 19. but a prayer and promise to Peter against heart-unbeleefe but not a word anent the words of his mouth nothing anent his pretended successours But here yet they object this against vs Can that be a true Church or a safe Religion or way to walk in which is fallible but the Protestant Church is such according to our confessed tenet I Ans 1. by these distinctions 1. I distinguish between a man that may be deceived and a man that is deceived 2. between infallibilitie in the Object in the Subject 3. between infallibilitie in the absolutely necessar points and in some inferiour smaller matters as is well marked by Baxter p. 43. 44. Therefore wee say 1. Suppose wee should deviat yet wee have an infallible Rule the Word though there be much weaknes in the Recipient yet there is still infallibilitie in the Object the Scriptures 2. I affirme all Churches to be infallible that they cannot erre in fundamentalls in sensis composito that is while they remaine true Churches and deny no essentiall of Faith but the same in sensis diviso are fallible that is when they leave the Objects infallibilitie that is the holy Scriptures as the Rule of trueth 3. Wee make a difference between that Cui subesse potest falsum and that Cui actu subest falsum A man may be deceived who yet is not deceived None is falsus or actually deceived when he beleeves the doctrine of the Protestant Religion that is the holy Scriptures A man may be actually not mistaken when he is not absolutely infallible But lastly here they object a passage of August who in his Epist 162. sayes that in Romana Ecclesia semper viguit Apostolicae Cathedrae principatus To which I answere 1. Distinguish between what Rome now is when it was sound Then was no Supremacy then no visible Monarchie then no power of both the swords then the Principalitie was in the profession of a sound faith in the practise of piety in in prayers in charity in tears c. So that this makes nothing for the establishment of the tyranny of the present Roman Church Now of what I have said I give these generall Observes and 1 Observe vses And the first shall be this 1. Wherever this divine trueth really is and is sincerly professed there is a true Kirk Boyd in his Comment on Ephes pag. 335. hath a note apposite to this Trueth is the forme informing of the Church and the Church is the matter informed even as the Candlestick holds out the Candle so its light so doth the true Church hold out the light of trueth And no lesse hath Hensius a pertinent note on the place to this Where God is there is trueth where trueth is there is the ground of trueth Our God is a God of trueth psal 31. 5. and Christ is trueth Ioh. 17. 14. 6. and trueth comes by him Ioh. 1. 17. and the gospell is the gospell of trueth Gal. 3. 1. and all Worshippers should worship Him in spirit and in trueth Ioh. 4. 23. and where men are begotten by the Word of trueth I am 1. 18. there I say we may warrantably conclude is a true Kirk Then let this be the first use wee make of this point IT is incumbent to all the true Members of this true Kirk to be for 2 Vse the Trueths holden out and professed in it II. Cor. 13. 8. For this end follow these precepts and practises of holy men here mentioned As 1. Choose the trueth with DAVID psal 119. 30. 2. Love the trueth with ZECHARY chap. 8. 19. 3. Buy the trueth with SOLOMON prov 23. 23. 4. Pray for its propagation with CHRIST himself Ioh. 17. and 17. psal 43. 3. 5. Speak the truth with PAUL Eph. 4. 25. 6. Walk in the trueth as GAIUS Ioh. 3. 3. and psal 86. 11. 7. Pray with David to be lead in the trueth psal 25. 5. 8. Execute the judgement of trueth ZECHAR 8. 16. 9. Beare witnesse unto the trueth as John Baptist did Ioh. 5. 33. 10. Have your loines girt about with the girdle of trueth Eph. 6. 14. 11. And be yee established in the present trueth II. Pet. 1. 12. 12. Teach the way of God in trueth Matth. 22. 16. II. Cor. 4. 2. Therefore my third vse is Let Ministers learne to divide the word of trueth aright in this do as Paul bids II. Tim. 2. 15. and in this do as Paul did see 3 Vse II. Cor. 4. 2. and II. Cor. 6. 4.
Lynd and L. Sharpus 2. Let any impartiall Reader consider the five Propositiones called the determination of Innoc. X. anno 1653. for the Molinists against the Jansenists and he shall finde in them a new faith unknown to the better and purertimes of the Church Certaine it is a heterodox Representative can no more lay challenge to a Pillar then a Where to chastity or as a Theefe to honesty Whence it is acutly said by one of One thrasonickly boasting but misapplying the words of Psal 75. 3. I beare up the Pillars of it nay rather as it is II. King 25. 13. They have broken the Pillars of brasse and carried the brasse to Babylon If the Church of the Living God be a Pillar of trueth holding 2 Obs them out then men may reade and heare and see these trueths then it a Visible Church and Pillar Here I do lay aside and justly condemne both extreams 1. Is of these that mantain no Kirk to bee a true PILLAR but that of the predestinate which is Invisible 2. Is of these who hold no Kirk to be the Pillar of trueth on earth but a glorious conspicuous visible pompatick a Kirk dressed to the eye full of worldly splendor and outward magnificence as Bellarm. defines it If the Kirk of God be the Pillar of trueth then that is a false assertion of the Socinian or Racovian Catechisme That from the 3 Obs Apostles dayes for the space of 1400 years the Kirk of Christ hath perished and that in that whole long intervall there was nothing amongst men called Christians but the Antichristian Whore no saints then no Pillars of trueth then O this is most false and comfortlesse opposing the Promises made to the Church against which the gates of hell shall not prevaile Against which no weapon formed shall prosper Isai 54. 17. see Isai 59. 21. Matth. 28. 20. A Pillar by strong opposition may be made to shake and tremble yea to be at a losse in its former strength standing and yet it is not either cut off or removed from its base Concuti potest at non perire the firmnesse of it continues when the outward splendor is not so apparent but obscured Then it becomes all honest Ministers to be as Pillars and posts in Gods house to hold out all revealed trueths in Gods house 4 Obs an vse plainly pertinently powerfully Malach. 2. 7. The Priests lips should keep knowledge that is as one noteth Even as his heart and braine is for himself so should his lips and tongue be for the good of the Kirk Marke to that end these two words of PAUL Tit. 1. 9. Holding fast the forme of sound words Phil. 2. 16. holding forth the word of life The Lord sayes to Jerem. chap. 1. 18. I have made thee this day an iron pillar that is firme strong and straight so should Ministers be and not broken Reeds like Egypt Isai 36. 6. on which if a man lean it will pierce his hand It is a good remarke of Ravanella This speech of PAUL to Timothy is set down not so much assertivè as preceptivè what ought to bee quomodo oporteat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 These that seeme to be pillars ought so to carry as that they may be real pillars Let us do our duty in doing in suffering within the compasse of our Callings remembring that sweet word of Christ Revel 3. 12. Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the Temple of my God and hee shall no more go out Here we may see the great dignity of the Ministry Wee are 5 Obs intrusted with this depositum this pearle of pryce wee are the pillars to which are affixed the Oracles of God See II. Cor. 4. 7. Wee have this treasure c. and this to purpose to propagate and preach to the World It is well answered by Mares to Tirin Our asservation of divine trueths is not as that of a Chist locall and materiall but as said is it is morall and formall for to act as said is is not thecae sed columnae Let us then constantly attend at the posts of Wisdome which thus honours us as to be pillars Since PAUL urges his good Behaviour in his particular Charge 6 Obs at Ephesus hence I collect that a particular Church joined to consolidated as it were with the base may well be called the Pillar of trueth but if any such particular adhere not to the base it is no longer a Pillar What are the seven Churches of the lesser Asia now even turned to rubbish What ar the famoê° Churchs of Africa now Stables to impure Mahumetisme What is become of the renowned Churches of Asia the greater Dennes of Infidelity What is become of many the celebrious Churches of Greece Infected with pernitious heresies God is not tyed to particular times and places As there was a famous orthodox Nicen Councell so was there as infamous and unsound a Nicen. As there was an orthodox Ephesine Councell so after there was a wicked and a praedatorie Ephesin O then it were good for all and every particular Church to remember to practise what the Spirit speaketh to the Churches of Asia As to that of Thyatira Rev. 2. 25. But that which ye have already hold fast till I come As to that of Sardis Revel 3. 3. Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard and hold fast As to that of Ephesus Rev. 2. 5. Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen and repent and do thy first works As to that of Philadelphia Revel 3. 11. Hold that fast which thou hast that no man take thy Crown As that of Laodicea Revel 3. 18. I counsell thee to buy of me gold tried in the sire that thou mayest be rich c. If this Pillar hold out this Light and Law and Rule Then all that are within the verge and reach of it should looke to it 7 Obs walk by it as it is said of the brasen Serpent Numb 21. 9. Ioh. 3. 14. so of this Pillar looke to it beleeve it obey it so farre as it followes Christ I. cor 11. 1. IT is marked of that Pillar that lead the Israelits that it was one and the same pillar that was light to Israel but darknesse to Egypt Exod. 14. 19. so the same Word preached by faithfull Pastors becomes to some The savour of life to life to others of death unto death II. Cor. 2. 16. as an Edict on the post to some is matter of comfort to others not so Here wee see clearly That one and the same thing may bee both supporting and supported both active and passive as to its being and vse and as to trueths the Church supports the trueth in the wayes before specified quoad declarari ac manifestari Trueth againe supports the Kirk in genere entis et moris that it hath the beeing of the Church of the Living GOD and that it in its Latitude and Complexe should be invincible and infallible