way of handling sacred things But the Spiritual Amplitude of Divine Truths is restrained hereby whilst low mean Philosophical senses are imposed on them And not only so but endless Divisions and Contentions are occasioned and perpetuated Hence when any Difference in Religion is in the pursuit of Controversies about it brought into the field of Metaphysical Respects and Philosophical terms whereof there is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sufficient provision for the supply of the Combatants on both sides the truth for the most part as unto any concernment of the souls of men therein is utterly lost and buried in the rubbish of senseless and unprofitable words And thus in particular those who seem to be well enough agreed in the whole Doctrine of Justification so far as the Scripture goeth before them and the Experience of Believers keeps them company when once they ingage into their Philosophical Definitions and Distinctions are at such an irreconcilable variance among themselves as if they were agreed on no one thing that doth concern it For as men have various apprehensions in coining such Definitions as may be defensible against Objections which most men aim at therein So no Proposition can be so plain at least in materia probabili but that a man ordinarily versed in Paedagogical Terms and Metaphysical Notions may multiply Distinctions on every word of it 8. Hence there hath been a pretence and appearance of twenty several Opinions among Protestants about Justification as Bellarmine and Vasquez and others of the Papists charge it against them out of Osiander when the Faith of them all was one and the same Bellar. lib. 5. cap. 1. Vasq. in 1.2 Quaest. 113. disp 202. whereof we shall speak elsewhere When men are once advanced into that field of Disputation which is all overgrown with thorns of subtilties perplexed notions and futilous terms of Art they consider principally how they may entangle others in it scarce at all how they may get out of it themselves And in this posture they oftentimes utterly forget the business which they are about especially in this matter of Justification namely how a guilty Sinner may come to obtain Favour and Acceptance with God And not only so but I doubt they oftentimes dispute themselves beyond what they can well abide by when they return home unto a sedate meditation of the state of things between God and their own souls And I cannot much value their notions and sentiments of this matter who object and answer themselves out of a sense of their own Appearance before God much less of theirs who evidence an open inconformity unto the Grace and truth of this Doctrine in their hearts and lives 9. Wherefore we do but trouble the faith of Christians and the peace of the true Church of God whilst we dispute about Expressions Terms and Notions when the substance of the Doctrine intended may be declared and believed without the knowledge understanding or use of any of them Such are all those in whose subtile management the captious Art of wrangling doth principally consist A diligent Attendance unto the Revelation made hereof in the Scripture and an examination of our own experience thereby is the Sum of what is required of us for the right understanding of the truth herein And every true Believer who is taught of God knows how to put his whole trust in Christ alone and the Grace of God by him for Mercy Righteousness and Glory and not at all concern himself with those loads of thorns and briars which under the names of Definitions Distinctions accurate Notions in a number of Exotick Paedagogical and Philosophical terms some pretend to accommodate them withall 10. The Holy Ghost in expressing the most eminent Acts in our Justification especially as unto our Believing or the acting of that faith whereby we are justified is pleased to make use of many Metaphorical Expressions For any to use them now in the same way and to the same purpose is esteemed rude undisciplinary and even ridiculous but on what Grounds He that shall deny that there is more spiritual sense and experience conveyed by them into the hearts and minds of Believers which is the life and soul of teaching things practical than in the most accurate Philosophical expressions is himself really ignorant of the whole Truth in this matter The Propriety of such Expressions belongs and is confined unto natural science but spiritual Truths are to be taught not in the words which mans wisdom teacheth but which the Holy Ghost teacheth comparing spiritual things with spiritual God is wiser then man and the Holy Ghost knows better what are the most expedient ways for the Illumination of our minds with that knowledge of Evangelical Truths which it is our Duty to have and attain then the wisest of us all And other knowledge of or skill in these things then what is required of us in a way of Duty is not to be valued It is therefore to no purpose to handle the mysteries of the Gospel as if Holcot and Bricot Thomas and Gabriel with all the Sententiarists Summists and Quodlibetarians of the old Roman Peripatetical School were to be raked out of their Graves to be our guides Especially will they be of no use unto us in this Doctrine of Justification For whereas they pertinaciously adhered unto the Philosophy of Aristotle who knew nothing of any Righteousness but what is an habit inherent in our selves and the Acts of it they wrested the whole Doctrine of Justification unto a compliance therewithall So Pighius himself complained of them Controv. 2. Dissimulare non possumus hanc vel primam doctrinae Christianae partem de Justificatione obscuratam magis quam illustratam a scholasticis spinosis plerisque quaestionibus definitionibus secundum quas nonnulli magno supercilio primam in omnibus autoritatem arrogantes c. Secondly A due consideration of him with whom in this matter we have to do and that immediately is necessary unto a right stating of our thoughts about it The Scripture expresseth it emphatically that it is God that justifieth Rom. 8. 33. And he assumes it unto himself as his Prerogative to do what belongs thereunto I even I am he that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine own sake and will not remember thy sins Isa. 43.25 And it is hard in my Apprehension to suggest unto him any other reason or consideration of the pardon of our sins seeing he hath taken it on him to do it for his own sake that is for the Lords sake Dan. 9.17 in whom all the seed of Israel are justified Isa. 45.25 In his sight before his Tribunal it is that men are justified or condemned Psal. 143.2 Enter not into Judgement with thy servant for in THY SIGHT shall no man living be justified And the whole work of Justification with all that belongeth thereunto is represented after the manner of a Juridical proceeding before Gods Tribunal as we shall see afterwards Therefore saith the Apostle
alone others Faith and Works also and that in the same kind of necessity and use That whose consideration we at present undertake is the second thing proposed And indeed herein lies the substance of the whole controversie about our Justification before God upon the determination and stating whereof the determination of all other incident Questions doth depend This therefore is that which herein I affirm The Righteousness of Christ in his Obedience and Suffering for us imputed unto Believers as they are united unto him by his spirit is that Righteousness whereon they are justified before God on the Account whereof their sins are pardoned and a Right is granted them into the Heavenly Inheritance This Position is such as wherein the substance of that Doctrine in this important Article of Evangelical Truth which we plead for is plainly and fully expressed And I have chosen the rather thus to express it because it is that Thesis wherein the Learned Davenant laid down that common Doctrine of the Reformed Churches whose defence he undertook This is the shield of Truth in the whole cause of Justification which whilst it is preserved safe we need not trouble our selves about the Differences that are among Learned men about the most proper stating and declaration of some lesser concernments of it This is the Refuge the only Refuge of distressed Consciences wherein they may find Rest and Peace For the confirmation of this Assertion I shall do these three things 1 Reflect on what is needful unto the Explanation of it 2 Answer the most important general Objections against it 3 Prove the Truth of it by Arguments and Testimonies of the holy Scripture As to the first of these or what is necessary unto the Explanation of this Assertion it hath been sufficiently spoken unto in our foregoing Discourses The Heads of some things only shall at present be called over 1. The Foundation of the Imputation asserted is Union Hereof there are many Grounds and Causes as hath been declared But that which we have immediate respect unto as the Foundation of this Imputation is that whereby the Lord Christ and Believers do actually coalesce into one mystical Person This is by the Holy Spirit inhabiting in him as the Head of the Church in all fulness and in all Believers according to their measure whereby they became members of his mystical Body That there is such an Union between Christ and Believers is the Faith of the Catholick Church and hath been so in all Ages Those who seem in our days to deny it or question it either know not what they say or their minds are influenced by their Doctrine who deny the Divine Persons of the Son and of the Spirit Upon supposition of this Vnion Reason will grant the Imputation pleaded for to be reasonable at least that there is such a peculiar Ground for it as is not to be exemplified in any things natural or political among men 2. The Nature of Imputation hath been fully spoken unto before and thereunto I refer the Reader for the understanding of what is intended thereby 3. That which is imputed is the Righteousness of Christ and briefly I understand hereby his whole Obedience unto God in all that he did and suffered for the Church This I say is imputed unto Believers so as to become their only Righteousness before God unto the Justification of Life If beyond these things any Expressions have been made use of in the Explanation of this Truth which have given occasion unto any Differences or Contests although they may be true and defensible against Objections yet shall not I concern my self in them The substance of the Truth as laid down is that whose Defence I have undertaken and where that is granted or consented unto I will not contend with any about their way and methods of its Declaration nor defend the Terms and Expressions that have by any been made use of therein For instance Some have said that what Christ did and suffered is so imputed unto us as that we are judged and esteemed in the sight of God to have done or suffered our selves in him This I shall not concern my self in For although it may have a sound sense given unto it and is used by some of the Antients yet because offence is taken at it and the substance of the Truth we plead for is better otherwise expressed it ought not to be contended about For we do not say that God judgeth or esteemeth that we did and suffered in our own persons what Christ did and suffered but only that he did it and suffered it in our stead Hereon God makes a Grant and Donation of it unto Believers upon their Believing unto their Justification before him And the like may be said of many other Expressions of the like nature These things being premised I proceed unto the consideration of the general objections that are urged against the Imputation we plead for And I shall insist only on some of the principal of them and whereinto all others may be resolved for it were endless to go over all that any mans Invention can suggest unto him of this kind And some general considerations we must take along with us herein As 1. The Doctrine of Justification is a part yea an eminent part of the mystery of the Gospel It is no marvel therefore if it be not so exposed unto the common notions of Reason as some would have it to be There is more required unto the true spiritual understanding of such mysteries yea unless we intend to renounce the Gospel it must be asserted that Reason as it is corrupted and the mind of man destitute of Divine supernatural Revelation do dislike every such Truth and rise up in Enmity against it So the Scripture directly affirms Rom. 8.7 1 Cor. 2.14 2. Hence are the Minds and Inventions of men wonderful fertile in coyning Objections against Evangelical Truths and raising cavils against them Seldom to this purpose do they want an endless number of sophistical Objections which because they know no better they themselves judge insoluble For carnal Reason being once set at liberty under the false notion of Truth to act it self freely and boldly against spiritual mysteries is subtile in its arguings and pregnant in its Invention of them How endless for instance are the Sophisms of the Socinians against the Doctrine of the Trinity and how do they triumph in them as unanswerable Under the shelter of them they despise the force of the most evident Testimonies of the Scripture and those multiplied on all occasions In like manner they deal with the Doctrine of the satisfaction of Christ as the Pelagians of old did with that of his Grace Wherefore he that will be startled at the Appearance of subtile or plausible Objections against any Gospel mysteries that are plainly revealed and sufficiently attested in the Scripture is not likely to come unto much stability in his Profession of them 3. The most of the
Doctrine and that which would so easily solve this difficulty and answer this objection as both of them are by some pretended certainly neither his wisdom nor his care of the Church under the conduct of the infallible Spirit would have suffered him to omit this reply were it consistent with the truth which he had delivered But he is so far from any such Plea that when the most unavoidable occasion was administred unto it he not only waves any mention of it but in its stead affirms that which plainly evidenceth that he allowed not of it See Eph. 2.9 10. Having positively excluded Works from our Justification not of Works least any man should boast it being natural thereon to enquire to what end do Works serve or is there any necessity of them instead of a distinction of Works legal and Evangelical in order unto our Justification he asserts the necessity of the later on other Grounds Reasons and Motives manifesting that they were those in particular which he excluded as we have seen in the consideration of the place Wherefore that we may not forsake his pattern and example in the same cause seeing he was Wiser and Holier knew more of the mind of God and had more zeal for personal Righteousness and Holiness in the Church than we all if we are pressed a Thousand times with this objection we shall never seek to deliver our selves from it by answering that we allow these things to be the condition or causes of our Justification or the matter of our Righteousness before God seeing he would not so do Secondly we may observe that in his answer unto this objection whether expresly mentioned or tacitly obviated he insisteth not any where upon the common principle of moral Duties but on those motives and reasons of Holiness Obedience good works alone which are peculiar unto Believers For the question was not whether all mankind were obliged unto Obedience unto God and the Duties thereof of by the moral Law But whether there were an Obligation from the Gospel upon Believers unto Righteousness Holiness and good Works such as was suited to affect and constrain their minds unto them Nor will we admit of any other state of the question but this only whether upon the supposition of our gratuitous justification through the imputation of the Righteousness of Christ there are in the Gospel grounds reasons and motives making necessary and efficaciously influencing the minds of Believers unto Obedience and good Works for those who are not Believers we have nothing to do with them in this matter nor do plead that Evangelical grounds and motives are suited or effectual to work them unto Obedience yea we know the contrary and that they are apt both to despise them and abuse them See I Cor. 1.23 24. 2 Cor. 4.4 such persons are under the Law and there we leave them unto the Authority of God in the moral Law But that the Apostle doth confine his enquiry unto Believers is evident in every place wherein he maketh mention of it Rom. 6.2 3. How shall we that are dead unto sin live any longer therein Know ye not that so many of us as were Baptized into Jesus Christ c. Eph. 2.10 For we are the workmanship of God created in Christ Jesus unto good Works Wherefore we shall not at all contend what cogency unto duties of Holiness there is in Gospel motives and reasons unto the minds of Vnbelievers whatever may be the truth in that case But what is their power force and efficacy towards them that truly believe Thirdly The answers which the Apostle returns positively unto this objection wherein he declares the necessity nature ends and use of Evangelical Righteousness and good Works are large and many comprehensive of a great part of the Doctrine of the Gospel I shall only mention the heads of some of them which are the same that we plead in the vindication of the same truth 1. He pleads the Ordination of God God hath before ordained that we should walk in them Eph. 2.10 God hath designed in the disposal of the order of the causes of Salvation that those who believe in Christ should live in walk in abound in good Works and all Duties of Obedience unto God To this end are Precepts Directions Motives and Encouragements every where multiplied in the Scripture Wherefore we say that good Works and that as they include the gradual progressive Renovation of our natures our growth and increase in grace with fruitfulness in our lives are necessary from the Ordination of God from his will and command And what need there any further dispute about the necessity of good Works among them that know what it is to believe or what respect there is in the Souls and Consciences of Believers unto the commands of God But what force say some is in this Command or Ordination of God when notwithstanding it and if we do not apply our selves unto Obedience we shall be justified by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ and so may be saved without them I say 1 As was before observed that it is Believers alone concerning whom this enquiry is made and there is none of them but will judge this a most unreasonable and senseless objection as that which ariseth from an utter ignorance of their state and relation unto God To suppose that the minds of Believers are not as much and as effectually influenced with the Authority and Commands of God unto Duty and Obedience as if they were all given in order unto their Justification is to consider neither what Faith is nor what it is to be a Believer nor what is the Relation that we stand in unto God by Faith in Christ Jesus nor what are the Arguments or motives wherewith the minds of such persons are principally affected and constrained This is the Answer which the Apostle gives at large unto this Exception Rom. 6.2 3. 2 The whole fallacy of this Exception is 1 In separating the things that God hath made inseparable These are our Justification and our Sanctification To suppose that the one of these may be without the other is to overthrow the whole Gospel 2 In compounding those things that are distinct namely Justification and eternal actual Salvation the respect of Works and Obedience being not the same unto them both as hath been declared Wherefore this Imagination that the commands of God unto Duty However given and unto what ends soever are not equally obligatory unto the Consciences of Believers as if they were all given in order unto their Justification before God is an absurd figment and which all of them who are truly so defie Yea they have a greater power upon them than they could have if the Duties required in them were in order unto their Justification and so were antecedent thereunto For thereby they must be supposed to have their efficacy upon them before they truly believe For to say that a man may be a true Believer or truly
that Judgment being according unto Works answered and the Impertinency of it declared Pag. 211. CHAP. VII Imputation and the nature of it The first express Record of Justification determineth it to be by Imputation Gen. 15.6 Reasons of it The Doctrine of Imputation cleared by Paul the occasion of it Maligned and opposed by many Weight of the Doctrine concerning Imputation of Righteousness on all hands acknowledged Judgment of the Reformed Churches herein particularly of the Church of England By whom opposed and on what Grounds Signification of the Word Difference between reputare and imputare Imputation of two kinds 1. Of what was ours antecedently unto that Imputation whether good or evil Instances in both kinds Nature of this Imputation The thing imputed by it imputed for what it is and nothing else 2. Of what is not ours antecedently unto that Imputation but is made so by it General nature of this Imputation Not judging of others to have done what they have not done Several distinct Grounds and Reasons of this Imputation 1. Ex Justitia 1. Propter Relationem foederalem 2. Propter Relationem Naturalem 2. Ex voluntaria sponsione Instances Philem. 17. Gen. 43.9 Voluntary sponsion the Ground of the Imputation of Sin to Christ. 3. Ex injuria 1 King 1.21 4. Ex mera Gratia Rom. 4. Difference between the Imputation of any Works of ours and of the Righteousness of God Imputation of Inherent Righteousness is Ex Justitia Inconsistency of it with that which is Ex mera Gratia Rom. 11.6 Agreement of both kinds of Imputation The true nature of the Imputation of Righteousness unto Justification explained Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. The thing it self imputed not the effect of it proved against the Socinians Pag. 226. CHAP. VIII Imputation of Sin unto Christ. Testimonies of the Antients unto that purpose Christ and the Church one Mystical Person Mistakes about that State and Relation Grounds and Reasons of the Vnion that is the foundation of this Imputation Christ the Surety of the New Covenant in what sense unto what ends Heb. 7.22 opened Mistakes about the Causes and Ends of the Death of Christ. The New Covenant in what sense alone procured and purchased thereby Inquiry whether the Guilt of our sins was imputed unto Christ. The meaning of the words Guilt and Guilty The Distinction of Reatus culpae and Reatus paenae examined Act of God in the Imputation of the Guilt of our Sins unto Christ. Objections against it answered The Truth confirmed Pag. 246. CHAP. IX Principal Controversies about Justification 1. Concerning the nature of Justification stated 2. Of the Formal Cause of it 3. Of the Way whereby we are made partakers of the Benefits of the Mediation of Christ. What intended by the Formal Cause of Justification declared The Righteousness on the account whereof Believers are justified before God alone inquired after under those Terms This the Righteousness of Christ imputed unto them Occasions of Exceptions and Objections against this Doctrine General Objections examined Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ consistent with the Free Pardon of Sin with the necessity of Evangelical Repentance Method of Gods Grace in our Justification Necessity of Faith unto Justification on supposition of the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. Grounds of that Necessity Other Objections arising mostly from mistakes of the Truth asserted discussed and answered Pag. 289. CHAP. X. Arguments for Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. Our own Personal Righteousness not that on the account whereof we are justified in the sight of God Disclaimed in the Scripture as to any such end The truth and reality of it granted Manifold Imperfections accompanying it rendering it unmeet to be a Righteousness unto the Justification of Life Pag. 315. CHAP. XI Nature of the Obedience or Righteousness required unto Justification Original and Causes of the Law of Creation The Substance and End of that Law The Immutability or unchangeableness of it considered absolutely and as it was the Instrument of the Covenant between God and Man Arguments to prove it unchangeable and its Obligation unto the Righteousness first required perpetually in force Therefore not abrogated not dispensed withal not derogated from but accomplished This alone by Christ and the Imputation of his Righteousness unto us Pag. 340. CHAP. XII Imputation of the Obedience of Christ no less necessary then that of his suffering on the same Ground Objections against it 1. That it is impossible Management hereof by Socinus Ground of this Objection That the Lord Christ was for himself obliged unto all the Obedience he yielded unto God and performed it for himself answered The Obedience inquired after the Obedience of the Person of Christ the Son of God In his whole Person Christ was not under the Law He designed the Obedience he performed for us not for himself This Actual Obedience not necessary as a qualification of his Person unto the discharge of his Office The Foundation of this Obedience in his being made Man and of the Posterity of Abraham not for himself but for us Right of the Humane Nature unto Glory by virtue of Vnion Obedience necessary unto the Humane Nature as Christ in it was made under the Law This Obediencs properly for us Instances of that nature among Men. Christ obeyed as a publick Person and so not for himself Humane Nature of Christ subject unto the Law as an Eternal Rule of dependance on God and subjection to him not as prescribed unto us whilest we are in this World in order unto our future Blessedness or Reward Second Objection that it is useless answered He that is pardoned all his sins is not thereon esteemed to have done all that is required of him Not to be unrighteous Negatively not the same with being righteous Positively The Law obligeth both unto punishment and obedience how and in what sense Pardon of Sin gives no title to Eternal Life The Righteousness of Christ who is one imputed unto many Arguments proving the Imputation of the Obedience of Christ unto the Justification of Life Pag. 361. CHAP. XIII The Difference between the two Covenants stated Arguments from thence Pag. 396. CHAP. XIV All Works whatever expresly excluded from any interst in our Justification before God What intended by the Works of the Law Not those of the Ceremonial Law only Not perfect Works only as required by the Law of our Creation Not the outward Works of the Law performed without a principle of Faith Not Works of the Jewish Law Not Works with a conceit of Merit Not Works only wrought before believing in the strength of our own wills Works excluded absolutely from our Justification without respect unto a Distinction of a First and Second Justification The true sense of the Law in the Apostolical Assertion that none are justified by the Works thereof What the Jews understood by the Law Distribution of the Law under the Old Testament The whole Law a perfect
Rule of all Inherent Moral or Spiritual Obedience What are the Works of the Law declared from the Scripture and the Argument thereby confirmed The nature of Justifying Faith further declared Pag. 400. CHAP. XV. Of Faith alone CHAP. XVI Testimonies of Scripture confirming the Doctrine of Justification by the Imputation of the Rightesness of Christ. Jere. 23.6 Explained and vindicated Pag. 419. CHAP. XVII Testimonies out of the Evangelists considered Design of our Saviours Sermon on the Mount The purity and penalty of the Law vindicated by him Arguments from thence Luk. 18.9 10 11 12 13. The Parable of the Pharisee and Publican explained and applied to the present Argument Testimonies out of the Gospel by John Chap. 3.14 15 16 17 18 c. Pag. 425. CHAP. XVIII Testimonies out of the Epistles of Paul the Apostle His design in the Fifth Chapter to the Romans That Design explained at large and applied to the present Argument Chap. 3.24 25 26. explained and the true sense of the words vindicated The Causes of Justification enumerated Apostolical Inferences from the consideration of them Chap. 4. Design of the Disputation of the Apostle therein Analysis of his Discourse Ver. 4 5. particularly insisted on their true sense vindicated What Works excluded from the Justification of Abraham Who it is that worketh not In what sense the ungodly are justified All Men ungodly antecedently unto their Justification Faith alone the means of Justification on our part Faith it self absolutely considered not the Righteousness that is imputed unto us Proved by sundry Arguments Pag. 431. Chap. 5. Ver. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18. Boasting excluded in our selves asserted in God The design and sum of the Apostles Argument Objection of Socinus removed Comparison between the two Adams and those that derive from them Sin entered into the World What Sin intended Death what it compriseth What intended by it The sense of those words in as much or in whom all have sinned cleared and vindicated The various oppositions used by the Apostle in this Discourse Principally between Sin or the Fall and the Free Gift Between the disobedience of the one and the obedience of another Judgment on the one hand and Justification unto Life on the other The whole Context at large explained and the Argument for Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ fully confirmed P. 464. Chap. 10. V. 3 4. explained and insisted on to the same purpose Pag. 489. 1 Cor. 1.30 Christ how of God made Righteousness unto us Answer of Bellarmine unto this Testimony removed That of Socinus disproved True sense of the words evinced P. 497. 2 Cor. 5.21 In what sense Christ knew no sin Emphasis in that expression How he was made Sin for us By the Imputation of Sin unto him Mistakes of some about this expression Sense of the Antients Exception of Bellarmine unto this Testimony answered with other Reasonings of his to the same purpose P. 502. The Exceptions of others also removed Gal. 2.16 Pag. 513. Ephes. 2.8 9 10. Ephes. 2.8 9 10. Evidence of this Testemony Design of the Apostle from the beginning of the Chapter Method of the Apostle in the Declaration of the Grace of God Grace alone the cause of Deliverance from a State of Sin Things to be observed in the Assignation of the Causes of Spiritual Deliverance Grace how magnified by him Force of the Argument and evidence from thence State of the Case here proposed by the Apostle General determination of it By Grace ye are saved What it is to be saved inquired into The same as to be justified but not exclusively The causes of our Justification declared Positively and Negatively The whole secured unto the Grace of God by Christ and our Interest therein through Faith alone Works excluded What Works Not Works of the Law of Moses Not Works antecedent unto believing Works of true Believers Not only in opposition to the Grace of God but to Faith in us Argument from those words Reason whereon this exclusion of Works is founded To exclude Boasting on our part Boasting wherein it consists Inseparable from the Interest of Works in Justification Danger of it Confirmation of this Reason obviating an Objection The Objection stated If we be not justified by Works of what use are they answered Pag. 516. Phil. 3.8 9. Heads of Argument from this Testimony Design of the Context Righteousness the Foundation of Acceptance with God A twofold Righteousness considered by the Apostle Oppossite unto one another as unto the especial end inquired after Which of these he adhered unto his own Righteousness or the Righteousness of God declared by the Apostle with vehemency of speech Reasons of his earnestness herein The turning point whereon he left Judaism The opposition made unto this Doctrine by the Jews The weight of the Doctrine and unwillingness of Men to receive it His own sense of Sin and Grace Peculiar expressions used in this place for the Reasons mentioned concerning Christ. Concerning all things that are our own The choice to be made on the Case stated whether we will adhere unto our own Righteousness or that of Christs which are inconsistent as to the end of Justification Argument from this place Exceptions unto this Testimony and Argument from thence removed Our Personal Righteousness Inherent the same with respect unto the Law and Gospel External Righteousness only required by the Law an impious Imagination Works wrought before Faith only rejected The Exception removed Righteousness before Conversion not intended by the Apostle Pag. 256. CHAP. XIX Objections against the Doctrine of Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. Nature of these Objections Difficulty in discerning aright the sense of some Men in this Argument Justification by Works the end of all declension from the Righteousness of Christ. Objections against this Doctrine derived from a supposition thereof alone First principal Objection Imputed Righteousness overthrows the necessity of an holy Life This Objection as managed by them of the Church of Rome an open calumny How insisted on by some among our selves Socinus fierceness in this charge His foul dishonesty therein False charges on Mens opinions making way for the rash condemnation of their persons Iniquity of such censures The Objection rightly stated Sufficiently answered in the previous Discourses about the nature of Faith and force of Moral Law The nature and necessity of Evangelical Holiness elswhere pleaded Particular answers unto this Objection All who profess this Doctrine do not exemplifie it in their lives The most holy Truths have been abused None by whom this Doctrine is now denied exceed them in holiness by whom it was formerly professed and the power of it attested The contrary Doctrine not successful in the Reformation of the lives of Men. The best way to determine this difference The same Objection managed against the Doctrine of the Apostle in his own days Efficacious prejudices against this Doctrine in the minds of Men. The whole Doctrine of
Apprehensions who cryed Sirs What must I do to be saved 2. With respect unto this state and condition of men or men in this state and condition the enquiry is What that is upon the account whereof God pardoneth all their sins receiveth them into his favour declareth or pronounceth them Righteous and acquitted from all Guilt removes the Curse and turneth away all his wrath from them giving them Right and Title unto a blessed Immortality or life Eternal This is that alone wherein the Consciences of sinners in this estate are concerned Nor do they enquire after any thing but what they may have to oppose unto or answer the Justice of God in the commands and curse of the Law and what they may betake themselves unto for the obtaining of Acceptance with him unto life and salvation That the Apostle doth thus and no otherwise state this whole matter and in an Answer unto this Enquiry declare the nature of Justification and all the causes of it in the third and fourth Chapters of the Epistle to the Romans and elswhere shall be afterwards declared and proved And we shall also manifest that the Apostle James in the second Chapter of his Epistle doth not speak unto this Enquiry nor give an Answer unto it but it is of Justification in another sense and to another purpose whereof he treateth And whereas we cannot either safely or usefully treat of this Doctrine but with respect unto the same Ends for which it is declared and whereunto it is applied in the Scripture we should not by any pretences be turned aside from attending unto this Case and its Resolution in all our Discourses on this subject For it is the Direction Satisfaction and peace of the Consciences of men and not the curiosity of Notions or subtilty of Disputations which it is our Duty to design And therefore I shall as much as possibly I may avoid all those Philosophical Terms and Distinctions wherewith this Evangelical Doctrine hath been perplexed rather than illustrated For more weight is to be put on the steady Guidance of the Mind and Conscience of one Believer really exercised about the Foundation of his peace and acceptance with God then on the confutation of ten wrangling Disputers 3. Now the Enquiry on what account or for what Cause and Reason a man may be so acquitted or discharged of sin and accepted with God as before declared doth necessarily issue in this Whether it be any thing in our selves as our Faith and Repentance the Renovation of our Natures inherent habits of Grace and actual works of Righteousness which we have done or may do or whether it be the Obedience Righteousness Satisfaction and Merit of the Son of God our Mediator and Surety of the Covenant imputed unto us One of these it must be namely something that is our own which whatever may be the Influence of the Grace of God into it or causality of it because wrought in and by us is inherently our own in a proper sense or something which being not our own not inherent in us not wrought by us is yet imputed unto us for the pardon of our sins and the Acceptation of our Persons as righteous or the making of us Righteous in the sight of God Neither are these things capable of mixture or composition Rom. 11.6 Which of these it is the Duty Wisdome and safety of a convinced sinner to rely upon and trust unto in his Appearance before God is the sum of our present Enquiry 4. The way whereby sinners do or ought to betake themselves unto this Relief on supposition that it is the Righteousness of Christ and how they come to be partakers of or interested in that which is not inherently their own unto as good Benefit and as much Advantage as if it were their own is of a distinct consideration And as this also is clearly determined in the Scripture so it is acknowledged in the Experience of all them that do truly believe Neither are we in this matter much to regard the senses or arguings of men who were never throughly convinced of sin nor have ever in their own persons fled for Refuge unto the Hope set before them 5. These things I say are always to be attended unto in our whole Disquisition into the nature of Evangelical Justification For without a constant respect unto them we shall quickly wander into curious and perplexed Questions wherein the Consciences of guilty Sinners are not concerned and which therefore really belong not unto the substance or truth of this Doctrine nor are to be immixed therewith It is alone the Relief of those who are in themselves 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 guilty before or obnoxious and liable to the Judgment of God that we enquire after That this is not any thing in or of themselves nor can so be that it is a Provision without them made in infinite Wisdom and Grace by the mediation of Christ his Obedience and Death therein is secured in the Scripture against all contradiction And it is the fundamental Principle of the Gospel Math. 11.28 6. It is confessed that many things for the Declaration of the Truth and the order of the Dispensation of Gods Grace herein are necessarily to be insisted on such are the nature of Justifying Faith the place and use of it in Justification the Causes of the new Covenant the true notion of the Mediation and Suretiship of Christ and the like which shall all of them be enquired into But beyond what tends directly unto the Guidance of the Minds and satisfaction of the Souls of Men who seek after a stable and abiding foundation of Acceptance with God we are not easily to be drawn unless we are free to lose the Benefit and Comfort of this most important Evangelical Truth in needless and unprofitable contentions And amongst many other miscarriages which men are subject unto whilst they are conversant about these things this in an especial manner is to be avoided 1. For the Doctrine of Justification is directive of Christian Practice and in no other Evangelical Truth is the whole of our Obedience more concerned For the Foundation Reasons and Motives of all our Duty towards God are contained therein Wherefore in order unto the due improvement of them ought it to be taught and not otherwise That which alone we aim or ought so to do to learn in it and by it is how we may get and maintain peace with God and so to live unto him as to be accepted with him in what we do To satisfie the Minds and Consciences of men in these things is this Doctrine to be taught Wherefore to carry it out of the understandings of ordinary Christians by speculative notions and distinctions is disserviceable unto the Faith of the Church Yea the mixing of Evangelical Revelations with Philosophical Notions hath been in sundry Ages the Poison of Religion Pretence of accuracy and artificial skill in Teaching is that which giveth countenance unto such a
they would quickly discern such an imperfection in the best of their Duties such a frequency of sinful irregularities in their Minds and disorders in their Affections such an unsuitableness in all that they are and do from the inward frames of their Hearts unto all their outward actions unto the Greatness and Holiness of God as would abate their confidence in placing any Trust in their own Righteousness for their Justification By means of these and the like presumptuous conceptions of unenlightened minds the Consciences of men are kept off from being affected with a due sense of sin and a serious consideration how they may obtain acceptance before God Neither the consideration of the Holiness or Terrour of the Lord nor the severity of the Law as it indispensibly requireth a Righteousness in compliance with its commands nor the promise of the Gospel declaring and tendring a Righteousness the Righteousness of God in answer thereunto nor the uncertainty of their own minds upon Trials and Surprizals as having no stable ground of Peace to Anchor on nor the constant secret disquietment of their Consciences if not seared or hardened through the deceitfulness of sin can prevail with them whose thoughts are prepossessed with such slight conceptions of the state and guilt of sin to fly for Refuge unto the only hope that is set before them or really and distinctly to comport with the only way of Deliverance and Salvation Wherefore if we would either teach or learn the Doctrine of Justification in a due manner a clear apprehension of the Greatness of our Apostasie from God a due sense of the Guilt of sin a deep Experience of its power all with respect unto the Holiness and Law of God are necessary unto us We have nothing to do in this matter with men who through the Feavor of Pride have lost the Understanding of their own miserable condition For Natura sic apparet vitiata ut hoc majoris vitij sit non videre Austin The whole need not the Physician but the sick Those who are pricked unto the Heart for sin and cry out what shall we do to be saved will understand what we have to say Against others we must defend the Truth as God shall enable And it may be made good by all sorts of Instances That as men rise in their notions about the extenuation of sin so they fall in their regard unto the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ. And it is no less true also on the other hand as Unbelief worketh in men a disesteem of the Person and Righteousness of Christ they are cast inevitably to seek for countenance unto their own Consciences in the extenuation of sin So insensibly are the minds of men diverted from Christ and seduced to place their confidence in themselves Some confused respect they have unto him as a Relief they know not how nor wherein but they live in that pretended height of humane Wisdom to trust to themselves So they are instructed to do by the best of the Philosophers Vnum bonum est quod beatae vitae causa firmamentum est tibi fidere Senec. Epist. 31. Hence also is the internal sanctifying Grace of God among many equally despised with the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. The sum of their Faith and of their Arguments in the confirmation of it is given by the Learned Roman Oratour and Philosopher Virtutem saith he nemo unquam Deo acceptam retulit nimirum recte Propter virtutem enim jure laudamur in virtute recte gloriamur quod non contingeret si donum a Deo non a nobis haberemus Tull. de nat Deor. 4. The opposition that the Scripture makes between Grace and Works in general with the Exclusion of the one and the Assertion of the other in our Justification deserves a previous consideration The opposition intended is not made between Grace and Works or our own Obedience as unto their Essence Nature and Consistency in the order and method of our Salvation but only with respect unto our Justification I do not design herein to plead any particular Testimonies of Scripture as unto their especial sense or declaration of the mind of the Holy Ghost in them which will afterwards be with some Diligence enquired into but only to take a view which way the Eye of the Scripture guides our Apprehensions and what compliance there is in our own Experience with that Guidance The Principal seat of this Doctrine as will be confessed by all is in the Epistles of Paul unto the Romans and Galatians whereunto that also of the Hebrews may be added But in that unto the Romans it is most eminently declared For therein is it handled by the Apostle ex professo at large and that both Doctrinally and in the way of controversie with them by whom the Truth was opposed And it is worth our consideration what process he makes towards the Declaration of it and what principles he proceeds upon therein 1. He lays it down as the fundamental maxime which he would proceed upon or as a general Thesis including the substance of what he designed to explain and prove that in the Gospel the Righteousness of God is revealed from Faith to Faith as it is written the Just shall live by Faith chap. 1.17 All sorts of men who had any knowledge of God and themselves were then as they must be always enquiring and in one Degree or other labouring after Righteousness For this they looked on and that justly as the only means of an Advantagious Relation between God and themselves Neither had the Generality of men any other thoughts but that this Righteousness must be their own inherent in them and performed by them as Rom. 10.3 For as this is the Language of a natural Conscience and of the Law and suited unto all Philosophical notions concerning the nature of Righteousness so whatever Testimony was given of another kind in the Law and the Prophets as such a Testimony is given unto a Righteousness of God without the Law chap. 3.21 there was a Veil upon it as to the understanding of all sorts of men As therefore Righteousness is that which all men seek after and cannot but seek after who design or desire Acceptance with God so it is in vain to enquire of the Law of a natural Conscience of Philosophical Reason after any Righteousness but what consists in inherent Habits and Acts of our own Neither Law nor natural Conscience nor Reason do know any other But in opposition unto this Righteousness of our own and the necesssity thereof testified unto by the Law in its Primitive constitution by the natural Light of Conscience and the apprehension of the nature of things by Reason the Apostle declares that in the Gospel there is revealed another Righteousness which is also the Righteousness of another the Righteousness of God and that from Faith to Faith For not only is the Righteousness it self revealed aliene from those other Principles
that herein their Spiritual and Eternal Interest was concerned they made their Enquiries after the Truth in this matter which they knew must be the only means of their Deliverance All men in those days were either kept in Bondage under endless Fears and Anxieties of mind upon the convictions of sin or sent for Relief unto Indulgences Priestly Pardons Pennances Pilgrimages works satisfactory of their own and supererogatory of others or kept under Chains of Darkness for Purgatory unto the last day Now he is no way able to compare things past and present who fees not how great an Alteration is made in these things even in the Papal Church For before the Reformation whereby the Light of the Gospel especially in this Doctrine of Justification was diffused among men and shone even into their minds who never comprehended nor received it the whole almost of Religion among them was taken up with and confined unto these things And to instigate men unto an abounding sedulity in the observation of them their minds were stuffed with Traditions and Stories of Visions Apparitions frightful Spirits and other Imaginations that poor mortals are apt to be amazed withall and which their restless disquietments gave countenance unto Somnia terrores Magici miracula sagae Nocturni Lemures portentaque Thessala Were the principal objects of their Creed and matter of their Religious Conversation That very Church it self is comparatively at ease from these things unto what it was before the Reformation though so much of them is still retained as to blind the Eyes of men from discerning the Necessity as well as the Truth of the Evangelical Doctrine of Justification It is fallen out herein not much otherwise then it did at the first Entrance of Christianity into the world For there was an Emanation of Light and Truth from the Gospel which affected the minds of men by whom yet the whole of it in its general Design was opposed and persecuted For from thence the very vulgar sort of men became to have better apprehensions and notions of God and his properties or the Original and Rule of the Universe then they had arrived unto in the midnight of their Paganism And a sort of learned speculative men there were who by virtue of that Light of Truth which sprung from the Gospel and was now diffused into the minds of men reformed and improved the old Philosophy discarding many of those falshoods and impertinencies wherewith it had been encumbred But when this was done they still maintained their cause on the old principles of the Philosophers and indeed their opposition unto the Gospel was far more plausible and pleadable than it was before For after they had discarded the gross conceptions of the common sort about the divine Nature and Rule and had blended the Light of Truth which brake forth in Christian Religion with their own Philosophical notions they made a vigorous Attempt for the reinforcement of Heathenism against the main Design of the Gospel And things have not as I said fallen out much otherwise in the Reformation For as by the Light of Truth which therein brake forth the Consciences of even the vulgar sort are in some measure freed from those Childish Affrightments which they were before in Bondage unto so those who are Learned have been enabled to reduce the Opinions and Practices of their Church into a more defensible posture and make their Opposition unto the Truths of the Gospel more plausible than they formerly were Yea that Doctrine which in the way of its Teaching and Practice among them as also in its effects on the Consciences of men was so horrid as to drive innumerable persons from their Communion in that and other things also is now in the new Representation of it with the artificial covering provided for its former effects in practice thought an Argument meet to be pleaded for a return unto its entire Communion But to root out the Superstitions mentioned out of the minds of men to communicate unto them the knowledge of the Righteousness of God which is revealed from Faith to Faith and thereby to deliver them from their bondage fears and distress directing convinced sinners unto the only way of solid peace with God did the first Reformers labour so diligently in the Declaration and Vindication of the Evangelical Doctrine of Justification and God was with them And it is worth our consideration whether we should on every cavil and sophism of men not so taught not so employed not so tryed not so owned of God as they were and in whose Writings there are not appearing such Characters of Wisdom sound Judgment and deep Experience as in theirs easily part with that Doctrine of Truth wherein alone they found peace unto their own Souls and whereby they were instrumental to give liberty and peace with God unto the Souls and Consciences of others innumerable accompanied with the visible effects of Holiness of Life and fruitfulness in the works of Righteousness unto the praise of God by Jesus Christ. In my judgment Luther spake the truth when he said amisso Articulo Justificationis simul amissa est tota Doctrina Christiana And I wish he had not been a true Prophet when he foretold that in the following Ages the Doctrine hereof would be again obscured the Causes whereof I have elsewhere enquired into Some late Writers indeed among the Protestants have endeavoured to reduce the controversie about Justification with the Papists unto an Appearance of a far less real Difference then is usually judged to be in it And a good work it is no doubt to pare off all unnecessary occasions of Debate and Differences in Religion provided we go not so near the Quick as to let out any of its vital Spirits The way taken herein is to proceed upon some Concessions of the most sober among the Papists in their Ascriptions unto Grace and the Merit of Christ on the one side and the express judgment of the Protestants variously delivered of the necessity of good works to them that are justified Besides it appears that in different expressions which either party adhere unto as it were by Tradition the same things are indeed intended Among them who have laboured in this kind Ludovicus le Blanc for his perspicuity and plainness his moderation and freedom from a contentious frame of Spirit is pene solus legi dignus He is like the Ghost of Tiresias in this matter But I must needs say that I have not seen the effect that might be desired of any such undertaking For when each party comes unto the Interpretation of their own Concessions which is ex communi jure to be allowed unto them and which they will be sure to do in compliance with their Judgment in the substance of the Doctrine wherein the main stress of the Difference lies the distance and breach continue as Wide as ever they were Nor is there the least ground towards peace obtained by any of our condescensions or
they found in many who yet do so assent unto the Truth But as we have shewed this is necessary unto Evangelical Justifying Faith and to suppose the contrary is to overthrow the order and use of the Law and Gospel with their mutual Relation unto one another in subserviency unto the design of God in the Salvation of Sinners 4. It is not a way of seeking Relief unto a convinced sinner whose mouth is stopped in that he is become guilty before God Such alone are capable Subjects of Justification and do or can seek after it in a due manner A meer Assent unto Divine Revelation is not peculiarly suited to give such persons Relief For it is that which brings them into that condition from whence they are to be relieved For the knowledge of sin is by the Law But Faith is a peculiar acting of the Soul for Deliverance 5. It is no more then what the Devils themselves may have and have as the Apostle James affirms For that Instance of their Believing one God proves that they believe also whatever this one God who is the first Essential Truth doth reveal to be true And it may consist with all manner of wickedness and without any Obedience and so make God a liar 1 Joh. 2.4 And it is no wonder if men deny us to be justified by Faith who know no other Faith but this 6. It no way answers the Descriptions that are given of justifying Faith in the Scripture Particularly it is by Faith as it is justifying that we are said to receive Christ Joh. 1.12 Col. 2.6 To receive the Promise the Word the Grace of God the Attonement Jam. 1.21 Joh. 3.33 Act. 2.41 chap. 11.1 Rom. 5.11 Heb. 11.17 To cleave unto God Deut. 4.4 Act. 11.23 And so in the Old Testament it is generally expressed by Trust and Hope Now none of these things are contained in a meer Assent unto the Truth but they require other actings of the Soul than what are peculiar unto the understanding only 7. It answers not the Experience of them that truly believe This all our Enquiries and Arguments in this matter must have respect unto For the sum of what we aim at is only to discover what they do who really believe unto the Justification of Life It is not what notions men may have hereof nor how they express their Conceptions how defensible they are against Objections by accuracy of Expressions and subtile Distinctions but only what we our selves do if we truly believe that we enquire after And although our Differences about it do argue the great imperfection of that state wherein we are so as that those who truly believe cannot agree what they do in their so doing which should give us a mutual tenderness and forbearance towards each other yet if men would attend unto their own Experience in the Application of their Souls unto God for the pardon of Sin and Righteousness to Life more than unto the notions which on various occasions their minds are influenced by or prepossessed withall many differences and unnecessary disputations about the nature of Justifying Faith would be prevented or prescinded I deny therefore that this general Assent unto the Truth how firm soever it be or what effects in the way of Duty or Obedience soever it may produce doth answer the Experience of any one true Believer as containing the entire Actings of his Soul towards God for pardon of sin and Justification 8. That Faith alone is Justifying which hath Justification actually accompanying of it For thence alone it hath that denomination To suppose a man to have Justifying Faith and not to be justified is to suppose a Contradiction Nor do we enquire after the nature of any other Faith but that whereby a Believer is actually justified But it is not so with all them in whom this Assent is found nor will those that plead for it allow that upon it alone any are immediately justified Wherefore it is sufficiently evident that there is somewhat more required unto Justifying Faith than a real Assent unto all Divine Revelations although we do give that Assent by the Faith whereby we are justified But on the other side it is supposed that by some the Object of Justifying Faith is so much restrained and the nature of it thereby determined unto such a peculiar Acting of the mind as compriseth not the whole of what is in the Scripture ascribed unto it So some have said that it is the pardon of our sins in particular that is the Object of Justifying Faith Faith therefore they make to be a full perswasion of the forgiveness of our sins through the Mediation of Christ or that what Christ did and suffered as our Mediator he did it for us in particular And a particular Application of especial mercy unto our own Souls and Consciences is hereby made the Essence of Faith Or to believe that our own sins are forgiven seems hereby to be the first and most proper Act of Justifying Faith Hence it would follow that whosoever doth not believe or hath not a firm perswasion of the forgiveness of his own sins in particular hath no saving Faith is no true Believer which is by no means to be admitted And if any have been or are of this Opinion I fear that they were in the asserting of it neglective of their own Experience Or it may be rather that they knew not how in their Experience all the other Actings of Faith wherein its Essence doth consist were included in this perswasion which in an especial manner they aimed at whereof we shall speak afterwards And there is no doubt unto me but that this which they propose Faith is suited unto aimeth at and doth ordinarily effect in true Believers who improve it and grow in its exercise in a due manner Many great Divines at the first Reformation did as the Lutherans generally yet do thus make the mercy of God in Christ and thereby the forgiveness of our own sins to be the proper Object of Justifying Faith as such whose Essence therefore they placed in a fiducial Trust in the Grace of God by Christ declared in the Promises with a certain unwavering Application of them unto our selves And I say with some confidence that those who endeavour not to attain hereunto either understand not the nature of Believing or are very neglective both of the Grace of God and of their own Peace That which enclined those great and holy Persons so to express themselves in this matter and to place the Essence of Faith in the highest Acting of it wherein yet they always included and supposed its other Acts was the state of the Consciences of men with whom they had to do Their Contest in this Article with the Roman Church was about the way and means whereby the Consciences of convinced troubled sinners might come to rest and peace with God For at that time they were no otherwise instructed but that these things were to be obtained not
23 24. 2. We suppose herein a sincere Assent unto all Divine Revelations whereof the Promises of Grace and Mercy by Christ are an especial part This Paul supposed in Agrippa when he would have won him over unto Faith in Christ Jesus King Agrippa believest thou the Prophets I know that thou believest Act. 26.27 And this Assent which respects the Promises of the Gospel not as they contain propose and exhibit the Lord Christ and the Benefits of his Mediation unto us but as Divine Revelations of infallible Truth is true and sincere in its kind as we described it before under the notion of Temporary Faith But as it proceeds no farther as it includes no Act of the Will or Heart it is not that Faiâ—h whereby we are Justified However it is required thereunto and is included therein 3. The proposal of the Gospel according unto the Mind of God is hereunto supposed That is that it be preached according unto Gods Appointment For not only the Gospel it self but the Dispensation or Preaching of it in the Ministry of the Church is ordinarily required unto Believing This the Apostle asserts and proves the necessity of it at large Rom. 10.11 12 13 14 15 16 17. Herein the Lord Christ and his Mediation with God the only way and means for the Justification and Salvation of lost convinced sinners as the product and effect of Divine Wisdom Love Grace and Righteousness is revealed declared proposed and offered unto such sinners For therein is the Righteousness of God revealed from Faith unto Faith Rom. 1.17 The Glory of God is represented as in a Glass 2 Cor. 3.18 and Life and Immortality are brought to Light through the Gospel 2 Tim. 1.10 Heb. 2.3 Wherefore 4. The Persons who are required to believe and whose immediate Duty it is so to do are such who really in their own Consciences are brought unto and do make the Enquiries mentioned in the Scripture What shall we do What shall we do to be saved How shall we fly from the wrath to come Wherewithall shall we appear before God How shall we answer what is laid unto our Charge Or such as being sensible of the Guilt of sin do seek for a Righteousness in the sight of God Act. 2.38 Act. 16.30 31. Micah 6.6 7. Isa. 35.4 Heb. 6.18 On these suppositions the Command and Direction given unto men being Believe and you shall be saved the Enquiry is what is that Act or Work of Faith whereby the may obtain a real interest or propriety in the Promises of the Gospel and the things declared in them unto their Justification before God And 1. It is evident from what hath been discoursed that it doth not consist in that it is not to be fully expressed by any one single habit or Act of the Mind or Will distinctly whatever For there are such Descriptions given of it in the Scripture such things are proposed as the Object of it and such is the Experience of all that sincerely believe as no one single Act either of the Mind or Will can answer unto Nor can an exact method of those Acts of the Soul which are concurrent therein be prescribed Only what is Essential unto it is manifest 2. That which in order of Nature seems to have the precedency is the Assent of the Mind unto that which the Psalmist betakes himself unto in the first place for relief under a sense of sin and trouble Psal. 130.3 4. If thou Lord shouldst mark Iniquity O Lord who shall stand The Sentence of the Law and Judgment of Conscience lye against him as unto any Acceptation with God Therefore he despairs in himself of standing in Judgment or being acquitted before him In this state that which the Soul first fixeth on as unto its relief is that there is forgiveness with God This as declared in the Gospel is that God in his Love and Grace will pardon and justifie guilty sinners through the blood and Mediation of Christ So it is proposed Rom. 3.23 24. The Assent of the Mind hereunto as proposed in the Promise of the Gospel is the root of Faith the foundation of all that the Soul doth in believing Nor is there any Evangelical Faith without it But yet consider it abstractedly as a meer Act of the Mind the Essence and Nature of Justifying Faith doth not consist solely therein though it cannot be without it But 2. This is accompanied in sincere Believing with an Approbation of the way of Deliverance and Salvation proposed as an effect of Divine Grace Wisdom and Love whereon the Heart doth rest in it and apply it self unto it according to the Mind of God This is that Faith whereby we are justified which I shall farther evince by shewing what is included in it and inseparable from it 1. It includeth in it a sincere Renunciation of all other ways and means for the attaining of Righteousness Life and Salvation This is Essential unto Faith Act. 4.12 Hos. 14.2 3. Jerem. 3.23 Psal. 71.16 I will make mention of thy Righteousness of thine only When a person is in the condition before described and such alone are called immediately to believe Math. 9.13 chap. 11.28 1 Tim. 1.15 many things will present themselves unto him for his relief particularly his own Righteousness Rom. 10.3 A Renunciation of them all as unto any hope or expectation of Relief from them belongs unto sincere Believing Isa. 50.10 11. 2. There is in it the Wills consent whereby the Soul betakes it self cordially and sincerely as unto all its expectation of pardon of sin and Righteousness before God unto the way of Salvation proposed in the Gospel This is that which is called coming unto Christ and receiving of him whereby true Justifying Faith is so often expressed in the Scripture or as it is peculiarly called believing in him or believing on his name The whole is expressed Joh. 14.6 Jesus saith unto him I am the Way the Truth and the Life no Man cometh unto the Father but by me 3. An Acquiescency of the Heart in God as the Author and principal Cause of the way of Salvation prepared as acting in a way of Soveraign Grace and Mercy towards sinners Who by him do believe in God who raised him up from the dead and gave him Glory that your faith and hope might be in God 1 Pet. 1.21 The Heart of a sinner doth herein give unto God the Glory of all those holy properties of his Nature which he designed to manifest in and by Jesus Christ. See Isa. 42.1 chap. 49.3 And this Acquiescency of the Heart in God is that which is the immediate root of that waiting patience long-suffering and hope which are the proper Acts and Effects of Justifying Faith Heb. 6.12 15 18 19. 4. Trust in God or the Grace and Mercy of God in and through the Lord Christ as set forth to be a propitiation through Faith in his Blood doth belong hereunto or necessarily ensue hereon For the person called
necessary Condition of Justification for it is that which they call the first Justification alone which we treat about And that the Continuation of our Justification depends solely on the same causes with our Justification it self shall be afterwards declared But it is not yet proved nor ever will be that whatever is required in them that are to be justified is a Condition whereon their Justification is immediately suspended We allow that alone to be a Condition of Justification which hath an influence of causality thereunto though it be but the causality of an Instrument This we ascribe unto Faith alone And because we do so it is pleaded that we ascribe more in our Justification unto our selves than they do by whom we are opposed For we ascribe the efficiency of an Instrument herein unto our own Faith when they say only that it is a Condition or Causa sine qua non of our Justification But I judge that grave and wise men ought not to give so much to the defence of the Cause they have undertaken seeing they cannot but know indeed the contrary For after they have given the specious name of a Condition and a Causa sine qua non unto Faith they immediately take all other Graces and Works of Obedience into the same state with it and the same use in Justification and after this seeming Gold hath been cast for a while into the fire of Disputation there comes out the Calf of a personal inherent Righteousness whereby Men are justified before God virtute foederis Evangelici for as for the Righteousness of Christ to be imputed unto us it is gone into Heaven and they know not what is become of it Having given this brief Declaration of the Nature of Justifying Faith and the Acts of it as I suppose sufficient unto my present Design I shall not trouble my self to give an accurate Definition of it What are my Thoughts concerning it will be better understood by what hath been spoken than by any precise definition I can give And the Truth is definitions of Justifying Faith have been so multiplied by Learned Men and in so great variety and such a manifest inconsistency among some of them that they have been of no advantage unto the Truth but occasions of new Controversies and Divisions whilst every one hath laboured to defend the Accuracy of his own Definition when yet it may be difficult for a true Believer to find any thing compliant with his own Experience in them which kind of Definitions in these things I have no esteem for I know no man that hath laboured in this Argument about the Nature of Faith more than Doctor Jackson yet when he hath done all he gives us a definition of Justifying Faith which I know few that will subscribe unto yet is it in the main scope of it both pious and sound For he tells us Here at length we may define the Faith by which the just do live to be a firm and constant Adherence unto the mercies and loving kindness of the Lord or generally unto the spiritual food exhibited in his Sacred Word as much better than this Life it self and all the Contentments it is capable of grounded on a taste or relish of their sweetness wrought in the Soul or Heart of a Man by the spirit of Christ. Whereunto he adds The terms for the most part are the Prophet Davids not metaphorical as some may fancy much less equivocal but proper and homogeneal to the subject defined Tom. 1. Book 4. chap. 9. For the lively Scriptural Expressions of Faith by receiving of Christ leaning on him rolling our selves or our burden on him tasting how gracious the Lord is and the like which of late have been reproached yea blasphemed by many I may have occasion to speak of them afterwards as also to manifest that they convey a better understanding of the Nature Work and Object of Justifying Faith unto the minds of men spiritually enlightened than the most accurate Definitions that many pretend unto some whereof are destructive and exclusive of them all CHAP. III. The Vse of Faith in Justification It s especial Object farther cleared THe Description before given of Justifying Faith doth sufficiently manifest of what Vse it is in Justification Nor shall I in general add much unto what may be thence observed unto that purpose But whereas this Vse of it hath been expressed with some variety and several ways of it asserted inconsistent with one another they must be considered in our passage And I shall do it with all brevity possible for these things lead not in any part of the Controversie about the Nature of Justification but are meerly subservient unto other Conceptions concerning it When Men have fixed their Apprehensions about the principal matters in Controversie they express what concerneth the Vse of Faith in an Accommodation thereunto Supposing such to be the Nature of Justification as they assert it must be granted that the Vse of Faith therein must be what they plead for And if what is peculiar unto any in the substance of the Doctrine be disproved they cannot deny but that their Notions about the Vse of Faith do fall unto the Ground Thus is it with all who affirm Faith to be either the Instrument or the Condition or the Causa sine qua non or the preparation and disposition of the Subject or a meritorious cause by way of condecency or congruity in and of our Justification For all these notions of the Vse of Faith are suited and accommodated unto the Opinions of Men concerning the nature and principal causes of Justification Neither can any Trial or Determination be made as unto their Truth and Propriety but upon a previous Judgment concerning those causes and the whole Nature of Justification it self Whereas therefore it were vain and endless to plead the principal matter in Controversie upon every thing that occasionally belongs unto it and so by the Title unto the whole Inheritance on every Cottage that is built on the premises I shall briefly speak unto these various Conceptions about the Vse of Faith in our Justification rather to find out and give an understanding of what is intended by them than to argue about their Truth and Propriety which depends on that wherein the substance of the Controversie doth consist Protestant Divines until of late have unanimously affirmed Faith to be the instrumental cause of our Justification So it is expressed to be in many of the publick Confessions of their Churches This Notion of theirs concerning the Nature and Vse of Faith was from the first opposed by those of the Roman Church Afterwards it was denied also by the Socinians as either false or improper Socin Miscellnn Smalcius adv Frantz disput 4 Schlicting adver Meisner de Justificat And of late this expression is disliked by some among our selves wherein they follow Episcopius Curcellius and others of that way Those who are sober and moderate do rather decline
produce the effect of Justification by a physical operation nor can do so it being a pure Soveraign Act of God nor is morally any way meritorious thereof nor doth dispose the subject wherein it is unto the Introduction of an inherent formal cause of Justification there being no such thing in rerum natura nor hath any other Physical or moral respect unto the effect of Justification but what ariseth meerly from the constitution and appointment of God there is no Colour of Reason from the Instrumentality of Faith asserted to ascribe the Effect of Justification unto any but unto the principal efficient cause which is God alone and from whom it proceedeth in a way of free and soveraign Grace disposing the Order of things and the Relation of them one unto another as seemeth good unto him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 3.24 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ver 25. It is therefore the Ordinance of God prescribing our duty that we may be justified freely by his Grace having its use and operation towards that End after the manner of an Instrument as we shall see farther immediately Wherefore so far as I can discern they contribute nothing unto the real understanding of this Truth who deny Faith to be the instrumental cause of our Justification and on other Grounds assert it to be the Condition thereof unless they can prove that this is a more natural exposition of those expressions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is the first thing to be enquired after For all that we do in this matter is but to endeavour a right understanding of Scripture propositions and expressions unless we intend to wander extra oleas and lose our selves in a maze of uncertain conjectures Secondly They designed to declare the use of Faith in Justification expressed in the Scripture by apprehending and receiving of Christ or his Righteousness and Remission of sins thereby The words whereby this use of Faith in our Justification is expressed are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the constant use of them in the Scripture is to take or receive what is offered tendered given or granted unto us or to apprehend and lay hold of any thing thereby to make it our own as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is also used in the same sense Heb. 2.16 So are we said by Faith to receive Christ Joh. 1.12 Col. 2.6 The Abundance of Grace and the Gift of Righteousness Rom. 5.17 The word of Promise Act. 2.41 The word of God Act. 8.14 1 Thes. 1.6 chap. 2.13 The Atonement made by the blood of Christ Rom. 5.11 The forgiveness of sins Act. 10.43 chap. 26.18 The Promise of the spirit Gal. 3.14 The Promises Heb. 9.15 There is therefore nothing that concurreth unto our Justification but we receive it by Faith And unbelief is expressed by not receiving Joh. 1.11 chap. 3.11 chap. 12.48 chap. 14.17 Wherefore the Object of Faith in our Justification that whereby we are justified is tendered granted and given unto us of God the use of Faith being to lay hold upon it to receive it so as that it may be our own What we receive of outward things that are so given unto us we do it by our hand which therefore is the instrument of that reception that whereby we apprehend or lay hold of any thing to appropriate it unto our selves and that because this is the peculiar Office which by nature it is assigned unto among all the members of the body Other Vses it hath and other members on other Accounts may be as useful unto the body as it but it alone is the instrument of receiving and apprehending that which being given is to be made our own and to abide with us Whereas therefore the Righteousness wherewith we are justified is the Gift of God which is tendred unto us in the Promise of the Gospel the Use and Office of Faith being to receive apprehend or lay hold of and appropriate this Righteousness I know not how it can be better expressed than by an Instrument nor by what notion of it more light of understanding may be conveyed unto our minds Some may suppose other Notions are meet to express it by on other Accounts and it may be so with respect unto other uses of it But the sole present Enquiry is how it shall be declared as that which receiveth Christ the Atonement the Gift of Righteousness which will prove its only use in our Justification He that can better express this than by an Instrument ordained of God unto this End all whose use depends on that Ordination of God will deserve well of the Truth It is true that all those who place the formal Cause or Reason of our Justification in our selves or our inherent Righteousness and so either directly or by just consequence deny all Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ unto our Justification are not capable of admitting Faith to be an Instrument in this work nor are pressed with this consideration For they acknowledge not that we receive a Righteousness which is not our own by way of Gift whereby we are justified and so cannot allow of any Instrument whereby it should be received The Righteousness it self being as they phrase it putative imaginary a chimaera a fiction it can have no real accidents nothing that can be really predicated concerning it Wherefore as was said at the Entrance of this Discourse the Truth and Propriety of this declaration of the Vse of Faith in our Justification by an Instrumental cause depends on the substance of the Doctrine it self concerning the nature and principal causes of it with which they must stand or fall If we are justified through the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ which Faith alone apprehends and receives it will not be denied but that it is rightly enough placed as the Instrumental cause of our Justification And if we are justified by an inherent Evangelical Righteousness of our own Faith may be the Condition of its Imputation or a disposition for its Introduction or a congruous merit of it but an Instrument it cannot be But yet for the present it hath this double advantage 1 That it best and most appositely answers what is affirmed of the Vse of Faith in our Justification in the Scripture as the Instances given do manifest 2. That no other notion of it can be so stated but that it must be apprehended in order of time to be previous unto Justification which Justifying Faith cannot be unless a man may be a true Believer with Justifying Faith and yet not be justified Some do plead that Faith is the Condition of our Justification and that otherwise it is not to be conceived of As I said before so I say again I shall not contend with any man about Words Terms or Expressions so long as what is intended by them is agreed upon And there is an obvious sense wherein Faith may be called the Condition of our Justification For no more may be
places of the Scripture Wherefore there is no Reason why we should limit the Object of it unto the Person of Christ as acting in the discharge of his Sacerdotal Office with the Effects and Fruits thereof Answ. 1. Saving Faith and Justifying Faith in any Believer are one and the same and the Adjuncts of Saving and Justifying are but external Denominations from its distinct Operations and Effects But yet Saving Faith doth act in a peculiar manner and is of peculiar use in Justification such as it is not of under any other Consideration whatever Wherefore 2 Although Saving Faith as it is described in General do ever include Obedience not as its Form or Essence but as the necessary Effect is included in the cause and the Fruit in the Fruit-bearing juyce and is often mentioned as to its Being and Exercise where there is no express mention of Christ his Blood and his Righteousness but is applied unto all the Acts Duties and Ends of the Gospel yet this proves not at all but that as unto its Duty Place and acting in our Justification it hath a peculiar Object If it could be proved that where Justification is ascribed unto Faith that there it hath any other Object assigned unto it as that which it rested in for the pardon of Sin and Acceptance with God this Objection were of some force But this cannot be done 3 This is not to say that we are justified by a part of Faith and not by it as considered essentially for we are justified by the entire Grace of Faith acting in such a peculiar way and manner as others have observed But the Truth is we need not insist on the Discussion of this Enquiry For the true meaning of it is not whether any thing of Christ is to be excluded from being the Object of Justifying Faith or of Faith in our Justification but what in and of our selves under the name of receiving Christ as our Lord and King is to be admitted unto an Efficiency or Conditionality in that work As it is granted that justifying Faith is the receiving of Christ so whatever belongs unto the Person of Christ or any Office of his or any Acts in the discharge of any Office that may be reduced unto any cause of our Justification the meritorious procuring material formal or manifesting cause of it is so far as it doth so freely admitted to belong unto the Object of Justifying Faith Neither will I contend with any upon this disadvantageous stating of the Question What of Christ is to be esteemed the Object of Justifying Faith and what is not so For the thing intended is only this whether our own Obedience distinct from Faith or included in it and in like manner as Faith be the condition of our Justification before God This being that which is intended which the other question is but invented to lead unto a compliance with by a more specious pretence then in it self it is capable of under those terms it shall be examined and no otherwise CHAP. IV. Of Justification the notion and signification of the Word in the Scripture UNto the right understanding of the nature of Justification the proper sense and signification of these words themselves Justification and to justifie is to be enquired into For until that is agreed upon it is impossible that our Discourses concerning the thing it self should be freed from equivocation Take words in various senses and all may be true that is contradictorily affirmed or denied concerning what they are supposed to signifie And so it hath actually fallen out in this case as we shall see more fully afterwards Some taking these words in one sense some in another have appeared to deliver contrary Doctrines concerning the thing it self or our Justification before God who yet have fully agreed in what the proper determinate sense or sigfication of the words doth import And therefore the true meaning of them hath been declared and vindicated already by many But whereas the right stating hereof is of more moment unto the Determination of what is principally controverted about the Doctrine it self or the thing signified than most do apprehend and something at least remains to be added for the Declaration and Vindication of the import and only signification of these words in the Scripture I shall give an account of my observations concerning it with what diligence I can The Latine Derivation and Composition of the word Justificatio would seem to denote an internal change from inherent Unrighteousness unto Righteousness likewise inherent by a Physical motion and Transmutation as the Schoolmen speak For such is the signification of words of the same Composition So Sanctification Mortification Vivification and the like do all denote a real internal Work on the Subject spoken of Hereon in the whole Roman School Justification is taken for Justifaction or the making of a man to be inherently Righteous by the infusion of a principle or habit of Grace who was before inherently and habitually unjust and unrighteous Whilst this is taken to be the proper signification of the word we neither do nor can speak ad idem in our Disputations with them about the cause and nature of that Justification which the Scripture teacheth And this appearing sense of the Word possibly deceived some of the Antients as Austin in particular to declare the Doctrine of free gratuitous sanctification without respect unto any Works of our own under the name of Justification For neither he nor any of them ever thought of a Justification before God consisting in the pardon of our sins and the Acceptation of our Persons as Righteous by vertue of any inherent habit of Grace infused into us or acted by us Wherefore the subject matter must be determined by the Scriptural use and signification of these words before we can speak properly or intelligibly concerning it For if to Justifie men in the Scripture signifie to make them subjectively and inherently Righteous we must acknowledge a mistake in what we Teach concerning the nature and causes of Justification And if it signifie no such thing all their Disputations about Justification by the infusion of Grace and inherent Righteousness thereon fall to the Ground Wherefore all Protestants and the Socinians all of them comply therein do affirm that the use and signification of these words is Forensick denoting an Act of Jurisdiction Only the Socinians and some others would have it to consist in the pardon of sin only which indeed the word doth not at all signifie But the sense of the word is to Assoil to Acquit to Declare and pronounce Righteous upon a Trial which in this case the pardon of Sin doth necessarily accompany Justificatio and Justifico belong not indeed unto the Latine Tongue nor can any good Authour be produced who ever used them for the making of him inherently Righteous by any means who was not so before But whereas these words were coyned and framed to signifie such things as are
of this Covenant are established in the Covenant it self whereon God will bestow all the Benefits and Effects of it upon us which are Faith and Obedience Wherefore what the Lord Christ hath done for us is thus far accepted as our legal Righteousness as that God upon our Faith and Obedience with respect thereunto doth release and pardon all our sins of Omission and Commission Upon this pardon there is no need of any positive perfect Righteousness unto our Justification or Salvation but our own personal Righteousness is accepted with God in the room of it by virtue of the New Covenant which Christ hath procured So is the Doctrine hereof stated by Cursellaeus and those that join with him or follow him Sundry things there are in these Opinions that deserve an Examination and they will most if not all of them occur unto us in our progress That which alone we have occasion to enquire into with respect unto what we have discoursed concerning the Lord Christ as surety of the Covenant and which is the Foundation of all that is asserted in them is That Christ by his death procured the New Covenant for us which as one says is all that we have thereby which if it should prove otherwise we are not beholding unto it for any thing at all But these things must be examined And 1. The Terms of procuring the New Covenant are ambiguous It is not as yet that I know of by any declared how the Lord Christ did procure it whether he did so by his Satisfaction and Obedience as the meritorious cause of it or by what other kind of causality Unless this be stated we are altogether uncertain what Relation of the New Covenant unto the Death of Christ is intended And to say that thereunto we owe the New Covenant doth not mend the matter but rather render the Terms more ambiguous Neither is it declared whether the Constitution of the Covenant or the Communication of the Benefits of it are intended It is yet no less general That God was so well pleased with what Christ did as that hereon he made and entered into a New Covenant with mankind This they may grant who yet deny the whole satisfaction and merit of Christ. If they mean that the Lord Christ by his Obedience and Suffering did meritoriously procure the making and establishing of the New Covenant which was all that he so procured and the entire effect of his death what they say may be understood but the whole Nature of the Mediation of Christ is overthrown thereby 2. This Opinion is liable unto a great Prejudice in that whereas it is in such a Fundamental Article of our Religion and about that wherein the Eternal Welfare of the Church is so nearly concerned there is no mention made of it in the Scripture For is it not strange that if this be as some speak the sole effect of the Death of Christ whereas sundry other things are frequently in the Scripture ascribed unto it as the effects and fruits thereof that this which is only so should be no where mentioned neither in express words nor such as will allow of this sense by any just or lawful consequence Our Redemption Pardon of sins the Renovation of our Natures our Sanctification Justification Peace with God Eternal Life are all joyntly and severally assigned thereunto in places almost without number But it is no where said in the Scripture that Christ by his death merited procured obtained the New Covenant or that God should enter into a New Covenant with mankind yea as we shall see that which is contrary unto it and inconsistent with it is frequently asserted 3. To clear the Truth herein we must consider the several notions and causes of the New Covenant with the true and real respect of the Death of Christ thereunto And it is variously represented unto us 1. In the Designation and Preparation of its Terms and Benefits in the Counsel of God And this although it have the nature of an Eternal Decree yet is it not the same with the Decree of Election as some suppose For that properly respects the subjects or persons for whom Grace and Glory are prepared This is the Preparation of that Grace and Glory as to the way and manner of their communication Some learned men do judge that this counsel and purpose of the Will of God to give Grace and Glory in and by Jesus Christ unto the Elect in the way and by the means by him prepared is formally the Covenant of Grace or at least that the substance of the Covenant is comprized therein But it is certain that more is required to compleat the whole nature of a Covenant Nor is this purpose or counsel of God called the Covenant in the Scripture but is only proposed as the spring and fountain of it Eph. 1. â—â— 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11. Unto the full Exemplification of the Covenant of Grace there is required the Declaration of this Counsel of Gods Will accompanied with the means and powers of its Accomplishment and the Prescription of the ways whereby we are so to be interessed in it and made partakers of the Benefits of it But in the enquiry after the procuring cause of the New Covenant it is the first thing that ought to come under consideration For nothing can be the procuring cause of the Covenant which is not so of this spring and fountain of it of this Idea of it in the mind of God of the preparation of its Terms and Benefits But this is no where in the Scripture affirmed to be the effect of the Death or Mediation of Christ and to ascribe it thereunto is to overthrow the whole freedom of eternal Grace and Love Neither can any thing that is absolutely Eternal as is this Decree and Counsel of God be the effect of or procured by any thing that is external and temporal 2. It may be considered with respect unto the foederal Transactions between the Father and the Son concerning the Accomplishment of this Counsel of his Will What these were wherein they did consist I have declared at large Exercitat Vol. 2. Neither do I call this the Covenant of Grace absolutely nor is it so called in the Scripture But yet some will not distinguish between the Covenant of the Mediator and the Covenant of Grace because the promises of the Covenant absolutely are said to be made to Christ Gal. 3.16 and he is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or first subject of all the Grace of it But in the Covenant of the Mediator Christ stands alone for himself and undertakes for himself alone and not as the Repretsentive of the Church But this he is in the Covenant of Grace But this is that wherein it had its designed establishment as unto all the ways means and ends of its Accomplishment and all things so disposed as that it might be effectual unto the eternal Glory of the Wisdom Grace Righteousness and Power of
However I know not of any that say we are accounted of God in Judgment personally to have done what Christ did and it may have a sense that is false namely that God should judge us in our own persons to have done those Acts which we never did But what Christ did for us and in our stead is imputed and communicated unto us as we coalesce into one mystical person with him by Faith and thereon are we justified And this absolutely overthrows all Justification by the Law or the Works of it though the Law be established fulfilled and accomplished that we may be justified Neither can any on the supposition of the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ truly stated be said to merit their own Salvation Satisfaction and Merit are Adjuncts of the Righteousness of Christ as formally inherent in his own person and as such it cannot be transfused into another Wherefore as it is imputed unto individual Believers it hath not those properties accompanying of it which belong only unto its existence in the person of the Son of God But this was spoken unto before as much also of what was necessary to be here repeated These Objections I have in this place taken notice of because the answers given unto them do tend to the farther explanation of that Truth whose confirmation by Arguments and Testimonies of Scripture I shall now proceed unto CHAP. X. Arguments for Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. The first Argument from the Nature and Vse of our own Personal Righteousness THere is a Justification of convinced sinners on their Believing Hereon are their sins pardoned their persons accepted with God and a Right is given unto them unto the Heavenly Inheritance This state they are immediately taken into upon their Faith or Believing in Jesus Christ. And a state it is of actual peace with God These things at present I take for granted and they are the Foundation of all that I shall plead in the present Argument And I do take notice of them because some seem to the best of my understanding to deny any real actual Justification of sinners on their Believing in this life For they make Justification to be only a general conditional sentence declared in the Gospel which as unto its Execution is delayed unto the day of Judgment For whilst men are in this world the whole Condition of it being not fulfilled they cannot be partakers of it or be actually and absolutely justified Hereon it follows that indeed there is no real state of assured Rest and Peace with God by Jesus Christ for any persons in this life This at present I shall not dispute about because it seems to me to overthrow the whole Gospel the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ and all the comfort of Believers about which I hope we are not as yet called to contend Our Enquiry is how convinced sinners do on their Believing obtain the Remission of sins Acceptance with God and a Right unto Eternal Life And if this can no other way be done but by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ unto them then thereby alone are they justified in the sight of God And this Assertion proceedeth on a supposition that there is a Righteousness required unto the Justification of any person whatever For whereas God in the Justification of any person doth declare him to be acquitted from all crimes laid unto his charge and to stand as Righteous in his sight it must be on the consideration of a Righteousness whereon any man is so acquitted and declared for the Judgment of God is according unto Truth This we have sufficiently evidenced before in that juridical procedure wherein the Scripture represents unto us the Justification of a Believing sinner And if there be no other Righteousness whereby we may be thus justified but only that of Christ imputed unto us then thereby must we be justified or not at all And if there be any such other Righteousness it must be our own inherent in us and wrought out by us For these two kinds inherent and imputed Righteousness our own and Christs divide the whole nature of Righteousness as to the End enquired after And that there is no such inherent Righteousness no such Righteousness of our own whereby we may be justified before God I shall prove in the first place And I shall do it first from express Testimonies of Scripture and then from the consideration of the thing it self And two things I shall premise hereunto 1. That I shall not consider this Righteousness of our own absolutely in it self but as it may be conceived to be improved and advanced by its Relation unto the satisfaction and merit of Christ For many will grant that our inherent Righteousness is not of it self sufficient to justifie us in the sight of God But take it as it hath value and worth communicated unto it from the merit of Christ and so it is accepted unto that End and judged worthy of Eternal Life We could not merit Life and Salvation had not Christ merited that Grace for us whereby we may do so and merited also that our Works should be of such a Dignity with respect unto Reward We shall therefore allow what worth can be reasonably thought to be communicated unto this Righteousness from its respect unto the Merit of Christ. 2. Whereas persons of all sorts and parties do take various ways in the assignation of an interest in our Justification unto our own Righteousness so as that no parties are agreed about it nor many of the same mind among themselves as might easily be manifested in the Papists Socinians and others I shall so far as it is possible in the ensuing Arguments have respect unto them all For my design is to prove that it hath no such Interest in our Justification before God as that the Righteousness of Christ should not be esteemed the only Righteousness whereon we are justified And first we shall produce some of those many Testimonies which may be pleaded unto this purpose Psal. 130.3 4. If thou Lord shouldst mark Iniquities O Lord who should stand But there is Forgiveness with thee that thou maist be feared There is an Enquiry included in these words how a man how any man may be justified before God how he may stand that is in the presence of God and be accepted with him How he shall stand in Judgment as it is explained Psal. 1.5 The wicked shall not stand in the Judgment shall not be acquitted on their Trial. That which first offereth it self unto this End is his own Obedience For this the Law requires of him in the first place and this his own Conscience calls upon him for But the Psalmist plainly declares that no man can thence manage a plea for his Justification with any success And the Reason is because notwithstanding the best of the Obedience of the best of men there are Iniquities found with them against the Lord
essence of it whereunto alone respect is had in this Law by any thing that can fall out And although God might superadd unto the original Obligations of this Law what Arbitrary commands he pleased such as did not necessarily proceed or arise from the Relation between him and us which might be and be continued without them yet would they be resolved into that Principle of this Law that God in all things was absolutely to be trusted and obeyed 7. Known unto God are all his Works from the foundation of the World In the constitution of this order of things he made it possible and foresaw it would be future that man would rebell against the preceptive power of this Law and disturb that order of things wherein he was placed under his moral Rule This gave occasion unto that effect of infinite Divine Righteousness in constituting the punishment that man should fall under upon his Transgression of this Law Neither was this an effect of Arbitrary will and pleasure any more than the Law it self was Upon the supposition of the Creation of man the Law mentioned was necessary from all the Divine Properties of the nature of God And upon a supposition that man would Transgress that Law God being now considered as his Ruler and Governour the Constitution of the punishment due unto his Sin and Transgression of it was a necessary effect of Divine Righteousness This it would not have been had the Law it self been Arbitrary But that being necessary so was the penalty of this Transgression Wherefore the constitution of this penalty is liable to no more change alteration or abrogation then the Law it self without an alteration in the state and relation between God and man 8. This is that Law which our Lord Jesus Christ came not to destroy but to fulfil that he might be the end of it for Righteousness unto them that do believe This Law he abrogated not nor could do so without a Destruction of the Relation that is between God and man arising from or ensuing necessarily on their distinct Beings and Properties But as this cannot be destroyed so the Lord Christ came unto a contrary end namely to repair and restore it where it was weakned Wherefore 9. This Law the Law of Sinless perfect Obedience with its sentence of the punishment of Death on all Transgressors doth and must abide in force for ever in this World For there is no more required hereunto but that God be God and Man be Man Yet shall this be farther proved 1. There is nothing not one word in the Scripture intimating any alteration in or Abrogation of this Law so as that any thing should not be duty which it makes to be duty or any thing not be sin which it makes to be sin either as unto matter or degrees or that the thing which it makes to be sin or which is sin by the Rule of it should not merit and deserve that punishment which is declared in the sanction of it or threatned by it The wages of sin is Death If any Testimony of Scripture can be produced unto either of these purposes namely that either any thing is not sin in the way of Omission or Commission in the matter or manner of its performance which is made to be so by this Law or that any such sin or any thing that would have been sin by this Law is exempted from the punishment threatned by it as unto merit or desert it shall be attended unto It is therefore in universal force towards all mankind There is no Relief in this case But behold the Lamb of God In exception hereunto it is pleaded that when it was first given unto Adam it was the Rule and Instrument of a Covenant between God and man a Covenant of Works and perfect Obedience But upon the entrance of sin it ceased to have the nature of a Covenant unto any And it is so ceased that on an impossible supposition that any man should fulfil the perfect Righteousness of it yet should he not be justified or obtain the benefit of the Covenant thereby It is not therefore only become ineffectual unto us as a Covenant by reason of our weakness and disability to perform it but it is ceased in its own nature so to be But these things as they are not unto our present purpose so are they wholly unproved For 1. Our Discourse is not about the Foederal adjunct of the Law but about its moral nature only It is enough that as a Law it continueth to oblige all mankind unto perfect Obedience under its Original penalty For hence it will unavoidably follow that unless the commands of it be complied withal and fulfilled the penalty will fall on all that Transgress it And those who grant that this Law is still in force as unto its being a Rule of Obedience or as unto its requiring Duties of us do grant all that we desire For it requires no Obedience but what it did in its Original constitution that is sinless and perfect and it requires no Duty nor prohibits any sin but under the Penalty of Death upon disobedience 2. It is true that he who is once a sinner if he should afterwards yield all that perfect Obedience unto God that the Law requires he could not thereby obtain the Benefit of the Promise of the Covenant But the sole Reason of it is because he is antecedently a sinner and so obnoxious unto the Curse of the Law And no man can be obnoxious unto its Curse and have a right unto its Promise at the same time But so to lay the supposition that the same person is by any means free from the Curse due unto sin and then to deny that upon the performance of that perfect sinless Obedience which the Law requires that he should not have right unto the Promise of Life thereby is to deny the Truth of God and to reflect the highest dishonour upon his Justice Jesus Christ himself was justified by this Law And it is immutably true that he who doth the things of it shall live therein 3. It is granted that man continued not in the Observation of this Law as it was the Rule of the Covenant between God and him The Covenant it was not but the Rule of it which that it should be was superadded unto its Being as a Law For the Covenant comprized things that were not any part of a Result from the necessary Relation of God and Man Wherefore man by his sin as unto Demerit may be said to break this Covenant and as unto any Benefit unto themselves to disannul it It is also true that God did never formally and absolutely renew or give again this Law as a Covenant a second time Nor was there any need that so he should do unless it were declaratively only for so it was renewed at Sinai For the whole of it being an Emanation of Eternal Right and Truth it abides and must abide in full force for
of God Wherefore by an Act of Derogation from its Original power it is provided that it shall oblige us still unto Obedience but not that which is absolutely sinless and perfect but although it be performed with less intension of Love unto God or in a lower Degree then it did at first require so it be sincere and universal as unto all the parts of it it is all that the Law now requireth of us This is all that it now requires as it is adapted unto the service of the new Covenant and made the Rule of Obedience according to the Law of Christ. Hereby is its preceptive part so far as we are concerned in it answered and complied withall Whether these things are so or no we shall see immediately in a few words 18. Hence it follows that the act of God with respect unto our Obedience is not an act of Judgment according unto any Rule or Law of his own but an Acceptilation or an esteeming accounting accepting that as perfect or in the Room of that which is perfect which really and in truth is not so 19. It is added that both these depend on and are the procurements of the Obedience suffering and merits of Christ. For on their account it is that our weak and imperfect Obedience is accepted as if it were perfect and the power of the Law to require Obedience absolutely perfect is taken away And these being the effects of the Righteousness of Christ that Righteousness may on their account and so far be said to be imputed unto us 20. But notwithstanding the great endeavours that have been used to give a colour of Truth unto these things they are both of them but fictions and imaginations of men that have no ground in the Scripture nor do comply with the experience of them that believe For to touch a little on the latter in the first place There is no true Believer but hath these two things fixed in his mind and conscience 1. That there is nothing in principles habits qualities oractions wherein he comes short of a perfect compliance with the Holy Law of God even as it required perfect Obedience but that it hath in it the nature of sin and that in it self deserving the Curse annexed Originally unto the breach of that Law They do no therefore apprehend that its Obligation is taken off weakned or derogated from in any thing 2 That there is no Relief for him with respect unto what the Law requires or unto what it threatens but by the Mediation of Jesus Christ alone who of God is made Righteousness unto him Wherefore they do not rest in or on the acceptation of their own Obedience such as it is to answer the Law but trust unto Christ alone for their acceptation with God 21. They are both of them doctrinally untrue For as unto the former 1 It is unwritten There is no Intimation in the Scripture of any such Dispensation of God with reference unto the Original Law of Obedience Much is spoken of our Deliverance from the Curse of the Law by Christ but of the Abatement of its preceptive power nothing at all 2 It is contrary to the Scripture For it is plainly affirmed that the Law is not to be abolished but fulfilled not to be made void but to be established that the Righteousness of it must be fulfilled in us 3 It is a supposition both unreasonable and impossible For 1 the Law was a Representation unto us of the Holiness of God and his Righteousness in the Government of his Creatures There can be no Alteration made herein seeing with God himself there is no variableness nor shadow of changing 2 It would leave no standard of Righteousness but only a Lesbian Rule which turns and apply's it self unto the light and abilities of men and leaves at least as many various measures of Righteousness as there are Believers in the World 3 It includes a variation in the center of all Religion which is the natural and moral Relation of men unto God For so there must be if all that was once necessary thereunto do not still continue so to be 4 It is dishonourable unto the mediation of Christ. For it makes the principal end of it to be that God should accept of a Righteousness unto our Justification inexpressibly beneath that which he required in the Law of our Creation And this in a sense makes him the Minister of sin or that he hath procured an Indulgence unto it not by the way of satisfaction and pardon whereby he takes away the guilt of it from the Church but by taking from it its nature and demerit so as that what was so originally should not continue so to be or at least not to deserve the punishment it was first threatned withal 5 It reflects on the goodness of God himself For on this supposition that he hath reduced his Law into that state and order as to be satisfied by an observation of it so weak so imperfect accompanied with so many failures and sins as it is with the Obedience of the best men in this World whatever thoughts unto the contrary the Phrensie of Pride may suggest unto the minds of any what reason can be given consistent with his goodness why he should give a Law at first of perfect Obedience which one sin laid all mankind under the penalty of unto their Ruine 22. All these things and sundry others of the same kind do follow also on the second supposition of an Acceptilation or an Imaginary estimation of that as perfect which is imperfect as sinless which is attended with sins innumerable But the Judgment of God is according unto Truth neither will he reckon that unto us for a perfect Righteousness in his sight which is so imperfect as to be like tattered Rags especially having promised unto us Robes of Righteousness and Garments of Salvation That which necessarily followeth on these Discourses is That there is no other way whereby the original immutable Law of God may be established and fulfilled with respect unto us but by the Imputation of the perfect Obedience and Righteousness of Christ who is the end of the Law for Righteousness unto all that do believe CHAP. XII The Imputation of the Obedience of Christ unto the Law Declared and Vindicated FRom the foregoing General Argument another doth issue in Particular with respect unto the Imputation of the Active Obedience or Righteousness of Christ unto us as an Essential part of that Righteousness whereon we are justified before God And it is as followeth If it were necessary that the Lord Christ as our Surety should undergo the penalty of the Law for us or in our stead because we have all sinned then it was necessary also that as our Surety he should yield obedience unto the preceptive part of the Law for us also And if the Imputation of the former be needful for us unto our Justification before God then is the Imputation of the latter
had by this time infected the minds of many with their abominations and amongst them this was one and not the least pernicious that by Faith was intended a liberty from the Law and unto Sin or unto them that had it the taking away of all difference between good and evil which was afterwards improved by Basilides Valentinus and the rest of the Gnosticks Or it may be it was only the corruption of mens hearts and lives that prompted them to seek after such a countenance unto Sin And this latter I judg it was There were then among professed Christians such as the world now swarms withal who suppose that their Faith or the Religion which they profess be it what it will shall save them although they live in flagitious wickedness and are utterly barren as unto any good Works or Duties of Obedience Nor is there any other occasion of what he writes intimated in the Epistle For he makes no mention of Seducers as John doth expresly and frequently some while after Against this sort of persons or for their conviction he designs two things 1. In general to prove the necessity of Works unto all that profess the Gospel or Faith in Christ thereby 2. To evidence the vanity and folly of their pretence unto Justification or that they were justified and should be saved by that Faith that was indeed so far from being fruitful in good Works as that it was pretended by them only to countenance themselves in Sin Unto these ends are all his arguings designed and no other He proves effectually that the Faith which is wholly barren and fruitless as unto Obedience and which men pretended to countenance themselves in their sins is not that Faith whereby we are justified and whereby we may be saved but a dead carcass of no use nor benefit as he declares by the Conclusion of his whole Dispute in the last Verse of the Chapter He doth not direct any how they may be justified before God but convinceth some that they are not justified by trusting unto such a dead Faith and declares the only way whereby any man may really evidence and manifest that he is so justified indeed This design of his is so plain as nothing can be more evident and they miss the whole scope of the Apostle who observe it not in their Expositions of the Context Wherefore the principal design of the Apostles being so distant there is no repugnancy in their Assertions though their words make an appearance thereof For they do not speak ad idem nor of things eodem respectu James doth not once enquire how a guilty convinced Sinner cast and condemned by the Law may come to be justified before God and Paul speaks to nothing else Wherefore apply the Expressions of each of them unto their proper design and scope as we must do or we depart from all sober Rules of Interpretation and render it impossible to understand either of them aright and there is no disagreement or appearance of it between them Secondly they speak not of the same Faith Wherefore there can be no discrepancy in what one ascribes unto Faith and the other denies concerning it seeing they understand not the same thing thereby for they speak not of the same Faith As if one affirms that fire will burn and another denyeth it there is no contradiction between them whilst one intends real fire and the other only that which is painted and both declare themselves accordingly For we have proved before that there are two sorts of Faith wherewith men are said to believe the Gospel and make profession thereof as also that which belongs unto the one doth not belong unto the other None I suppose will deny but that by Faith in the matter of our Justification St. Paul intends that which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or properly so called The Faith of Gods Elect precious Faith more precious then Gold the Faith that purifieth the heart and works by love the Faith whereby Christ dwelleth in us and we abide in him whereby we live to God a living Faith is that alone which he intendeth For all these things and other Spiritual effects without number doth he ascribe unto that Faith which he insisteth on to be on our part the only means of our Justification before God But as unto the Faith intended by the Apostle James he assigns nothing of all this unto it yea the only Argument whereby he proves that men cannot be saved by that Faith which he treats of is that nothing of all this is found in it That which he intends is what he calls it a dead Faith a Carcass without breath the Faith of Devils a wordy Faith that is no more truly what it is called than it is true Charity to send away naked and hungry persons without relief but no without derision Well may he deny Justification in any sense unto to this Faith however boasted of when yet it may be justly ascribed unto that Faith which Paul speaks of Bellarmine useth several Arguments to prove that the Faith here intended by James is justifying Faith considered in its self but they are all weak to contempt as being built on this supposition that true justifying Faith is nothing but a real assent unto the Catholick Doctrine or Divine Revelation De Justificat lib. 1. cap. 15. His first is that James calleth it Faith absolutely whereby always in the Scripture true Faith is intended Ans. 1. James calls it a Dead Faith the Faith of Devils and casteth all manner of reproach upon it which he would not have done on any Duty or Grace truely Evangelical 2. Every Faith that is true as unto the reality of assent which is given by it unto the Truth is neither living justifying nor saving as hath been proved 3. They are said to have Faith absolutely or absolutely to believe who never had that Faith which is true and saving Joh. 2.23 Act. 8.13 He urgeth that in the same place and Chapter he treats of the Faith of Abraham and affirms that it wrought with his works Vers. 22 23. But this a vain shadow of Faith doth not do It was therefore true Faith and that which is most properly called so that the Apostle intendeth Ans. This pretence is indeed ridiculous For the Apostle doth not give the Faith of Abraham as an instance of that Faith which he had treated with so much severity but of that which is directly contrary unto it and whereby he designed to prove that the other Faith which he had reflected on was of no use nor advantage unto them that had it For this Faith of Abraham produced good Works which the other was wholly without Thirdly He urgeth v. 24 You see then how that by Works a man is justified and not by Faith only For the Faith that James speaks of justifieth with works but a false Faith the shadow of a Faith doth not so it is therefore true saving Faith whereof the Apostle speaks Ans.