ancient then the Scripture 1 Ans The Minor is false As for that which some men say that the Church is ancienter then the Scriptures and therefore of greater authority it is too trifling For the Word of God is the everlasting wisdome in God himselfe Neither was the knowledge of it then first manifested unto the Church when it was committed to writing but the manifesting of it began together with the creation of mankind and the first beginnings of the Church in Paradise yea the Word is that immortall seed of which the Church was borne The Church therefore could not be except the word were first delivered Now when we name the holy Scripture The Scripture is first in nature as the cause we mean not so much the characters of the letters and the volumes but rather the sentences which are contained in them which they shall never be able to prove to be of lesse antiquity then the Church For albeit they were repeated and declared often after the beginning of the gathering of the Church 2 Ans The Minor is false yet the summe of the Law and Gospel was the same for ever To conclude neither is that which they assume alwayes true That the authority of the ancienter witnesse is greater then of the younger A younger workman may be more skilfull then an elder for such may be the condition and quality of the younger witnesse that he may deserve greater credit then the ancienter Christ being man bare witnesse of himselfe Moses also and the Prophets had long time before borne witnesse of him yet neither his nor all other witnesses authority is therefore greater then Christs alone In like sort the Church witnesseth that the holy Scripture which wee have is the Word of God The Scripture it selfe also doth witnesse of it self the same but with that kind of witnesse that is more certaine and sure then all the others of Angels and men There is alledged also to this purpose a place 4 Object The pillar of truth 1 Tim 3. where the Church is called the pillar and ground of the truth But sith the Scripture doth teach other-where and that not once that the foundation of the Church is Christ and his word it is manifest enough that the Church is the pillar of the truth not a fundamentall or upholding pillar but a ministeriall that is a keeper and spreader of it abroad and as it were a mansion place or sure seat which might carry the truth left with her and committed unto her in the open face of all mankind Acts 9. Galat. 2. 1 Thes 2. 2 Thes 1. Titus 1. Galat. 2. even as the holy Apostle Paul was called an elect vessell to beare the Name of God before the Gentiles and Kings neither yet did Paul get credit unto the Gospel but the Gospel unto Paul So likewise are the Apostles termed pillars not that the Church rested on their persons but that they were the chiefe teachers of the Gospel and as it were the Chieftaines and Masters of doctrine for a man is not bound to beleeve those that teach on their bare word but for the proofes which they bring of their doctrine Furthermore they alledge a sentence of Austine out of his book entituled 5 Object Chap. 5. A place of Augustine 1 Ans An Example maketh no rule Against the Epistle of the foundation I saith Austine would not beleeve the Gospel except the authority of the Catholike Church did move mee thereunto But first if it were true that either Austine or some others did give credence unto the Gospel onely for the Churches authority yet might there not be fashioned a rule hence of that which all men either did or ought to doe But that this is not the meaning of Austine which these men would have they doe easily perceive who weigh both the whole course of this place and the phrase of speech which is usuall unto Austine For Austine going about to shew that the Manichees were destitute of all proofe of their doctrine first hee opposeth one who as yet beleeveth not the Gospel 2 Ans He speaketh of himselfe as yet not converted or not sufficiently confirmed and denieth that such a one is able any way to be convicted by the Manicheans for he were to be convicted either by arguments drawne out of the doctrine it selfe of which themselves were departed for example sake he proposeth himselfe who should not have beleeved the Gospel except the authority of the Catholike Church had moved him thereunto Austine therefore speaketh this not of himselfe as he was then when he writ these things against the Manicheans but of himselfe before he was yet converted or not sufficiently confirmed And that he speaketh not of the present but of the time past the words that follow doe manifestly declare Whom then I beleeved when they said Believe the Gospel why should I not beleeve them when they say Beleeve not a Manichean For hence it appeareth that when he saith he was moved especially by the authority of the Church hee meanes it of that time at which he obeyed the Churches voice that is departed from the Manicheans unto the true Church But after that once he was converted and had perceived the truth of doctrine that his faith was not now any more builded on the authority of the Church but on a farre other foundation himselfe is a most sufficient witnesse for us whereas in the selfe same booke hee saith on this wise Chap. 14. Therefore he did beleeve the Church especially before he was able to perceive it Thou hast proposed nothing else but to commend that thy selfe beleevest and to laugh at that which I beleeve And when as I of the other side shall commend that which my selfe beleeve and laugh at that which thou beleevest what dost thou thinke we must determine or doe but even to shake hands with them who bid us to know certaine things afterward will us to beleeve things that are uncertaine and Let us follow them who bid us first to beleeve that which as yet we are not able to perceive that being more enabled by faith it selfe we may discerne to understand that which wee beleeve not men now but God himselfe inwardly strengthening and enlightening our mind Wherefore they doe manifest injury unto Austine who draw that which himselfe confesseth of himselfe when he was not yet converted or was but weake unto that time when he affirmeth farre otherwise both of himselfe and all the godly For so reverent a regard ought wee to have of the word of God The application of the answer and such also is the force and efficacie of the holy Spirit in confirming the hearts of beleevers that we beleeve God yea without any creatures testimonie even as Elias forsooke not God no not when hee thought 1 Kings 19. That followeth not which they would 1 Because there is more in the consequent than in the antecedent 2 Because there is
every day more and more deviate from that primitive simplicity But why do I wonder 2 Thes 2.1 Hom. 3. in Rom. Hom. 3. in Tit. 3. seeing God punisheth the world by sending upon it strong delusions in that it loves not the truth But because as Chrysostome saith Errour is various and intricate and hath a restlesse and unstable quality it is no strange thing that of one errour many do arise and that out of one Controversie ten doe proceed At the first the onely Controversie was about the tenth Article concerning Christs body lurking under the bread as also of the orall manducation in the Lords Supper which Controversie was long in agitation amongst the Lutherans but in all the other Articles here set downe by us there was a full consent as the Acts of the Conference at Marpurge Anno 1529. do witnesse yea Divines began to agree in the doctrine of the Lords Supper Anno 1536. but this agreement was quickly broke because after Luthers death some could not handsomely maintainer their opinion of Christs corporall presence in the Bread seeing none of the Evangelists did utter these words of Christ This is my body after this manner This bread is my body or under the bread or under the species of bread lurks my body Besides Christ whom they include in the Wafer or Host according to our Catholick beliefe is not now upon the earth but in heaven sitting at the right hand of God from whence he will come to judge the quick and the dead they were in good hope to shelter their opinion under some other Articles of faith and chiefly under that of the personall union of the two natures in Christ Hence they went about to establish his Ubiquity and Omnipotency hitherto unheard of in the world using this shift If Christs body be every-where it will be also in every Host if it be in every Host then it will be every-where Then they fondly imagined the Article of Christs sitting at the right hand of the Father to be the same with that of the personall union of the two natures as if you would say Christs humanity with the Sonne of God which is that very right hand of God every-where present is personally united and filleth heaven and earth Thirdly because they saw that the Article of Christs Ascension did overthrow the Ubiquity and corporall presence in the Bread by an unheard of and Allegoricall way they expounded Christs Ascension to be meant of nothing else but of his vanishing into the aire of his advancing unto the Divinity and of his Ubiquity To these new monsters of opinions as well the Pontifician Doctors as those of our profession besides divers of the Lutherans did stoutly oppose themselves defending the ancient simplicity and truth of these Articles of our faith which the new Artists of Ubiquity perceiving and finding that they failed here of their purpose they found out new engines and began to accuse those whom they stile Calvinists of other errours to provoke them to Conference and Disputation not onely about the Person of Christ but also about the other Articles of Christianity bragging they could convince them of many fundamentall errours taught in the Reformed Churches Concerning Predestination That all men were not elected but that many were called and few elected Concerning the merit of Christs death That the wicked and incredulous so long as they remained such were not partakers thereof but onely the Elect that beleeved That the promises of the Gospel were universall in respect of the faithful but not of unbeleevers and Epicures Concerning faith That it is the singular gift of God That it is given onely to the Elect in whom onely it is rooted and permanent That the same can never be finally lost because it proceeds of the incorruptible seed of Gods word Concerning the Ministery That Ministers were onely outward dispensers of the word but God wrought inwardly by his Spirit Concerning Sacraments That Christ was yesterday to day and the same for ever and that therefore he was the matter or subject of all Sacraments both of the Old and New Testament Besides that no man either by the word or Sacraments could be partaker of Christ without faith Concerning Baptisme That there was a two-fold washing one outward of water by which the filth of the body is washed away the other inward of the bloud and Spirit of Christ which is the Covenant of a good conscience with God That the Minister baptised onely with water but Christ in the true administration of Baptisme did baptise with the holy Spirit Also that Infidels were not regenerated by Baptisme Also that the children of Christians were children of the promise and of the Covenant even before Baptisme and that for this cause they were to be baptised This doctrine since the yeare 1586. hath beene not onely condemned as Calvinisticall and Hereticall but also reproached and accursed by them who glory in the name of Lutherans And when among the ignorant Vulgar they traduce these Articles as errours of Calvinisme they thinke they have bravely maintained their Cause in defending their fictions of Ubiquity and of a carnall presence in the Lords Supper which now we leave for a while committing our whole cause of God But it is certaine that they have so farre relapsed into the sinke of Pelagianisme and Popery that it is to be feared they will overwhelme the Lutheran Churches with greater darkenesse then ever heretofore and yet alas they stick not to call this the true Evangelicall doctrine and that of the Augustan Confession teaching concerning predestination that in God is no election but that he did promiscuously choose all men Concerning Christs death that he by his death redeemed all men and reconciled them to God that he hath sanctified them and hath received them into favour whether they beleeve or not Concerning remission of sins that a generall pardon is given to all men both faithfull and Infidels Concerning the promises of the Gospell that they belong to all both faithfull and Infidell Concerning Faith that it is the cause of Election that God did first foresee who were to beleeve and persevere that faith is not in our power that notwithstanding it is a worke which God promotes in us and that it may be lost and may be in hypocrites Concerning the Ministery that Ministers may by their preaching conferre divine efficacy and that they are dispensators both outwardly and inwardly Concerning Sacraments that the Sacraments of the Old Testament were onely shadows without Christ the body Concerning Baptisme that there is a mysticall efficacy in the water to wash away sinne and to regenerate that the holy Ghost and his efficacy are annexed to the water that the water and Spirit have the same effect that hypocrites and Infidels in Baptisme are regenerated by the holy Ghost that the Minister doth not onely baptise with water but conferres also the holy Ghost that Christian Infants before Baptisme belong no more to
time after it and are Novices in respect thereof Whereas then undoubtedly the ancientest Religion is most true for men received the first Religion that ever was immediately from God it followeth that the doctrine of the Church alone is true and divine Miracles The miracles whereby God from the beginning of the world confirmed the truth of this doctrine such as the Divell is not able to imitate in deed nay not to resemble in shew I meane The raising of the dead the standing still or going backe of the Sun Luke 7. Josh 10.13 2 Kin. 20. Exod. 14. 2 Kin. 2. Gen. 18. the dividing of the sea and rivers the making of the barren fruitfull and such like which miracles whereas they are the workes of God alone wrought for the confirmation of the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles and God cannot give testimony unto a lye do powerfully evince that this doctrine is most true and proceedeth from God For albeit mention is made also of some miracles of the Heathen 1 Object Others also have miracles Ans It is not true and it is said of Antichrist and false prophets that they shall worke signes and great wonders so that the very elect themselves if it were possible should be seduced yet these neither in number not in greatnesse are equall unto the miracles of the Church and by the end for which they are done it may easily be discerned that they are not wrought by any divine power Wherefore there is a double difference especially by which true miracles are severed from false For first Those miracles which are vaunted of by the enemies of the Church are such as without changing course and order of nature They differ 1 In the substance may be done by the sleights and jugglings of men or Divels and seem therefore to others to be miracles because they perceive not the causes of them and the means wherby they are wrought Furthermore they have this as their chiefe end that they confirme Idols superstitions 2 In the ends manifest errours and mischiefes But the miracles with which God hath set forth his Church are workes either besides or contrary unto the course of nature and second causes and therefore not wrought but by the power of God The which that it might be the more manifest God hath wrought many miracles for the confirming of his truth whose very shew the divel is never able to imitate or resemble as the aforesaid miracles raising of the dead to stay or call backe the course of the Sunne to make fruitlesse and barren women fruit full But specially the miracles of God are distinguished by their ends from the divellish and feigned For they confirme nothing but that which is agreeing with those things which aforetime were revealed by God and that in respect of the glory of the true God of godlinesse and holinesse and the salvation of men And therefore it is said of the miracles of Antichrist 2 Thesâ—â— That his coming shall be by the working of Sathan with all power and signes and lying wonders and in all deceivablenesse of unrighteousnesse among them that perish c. Now 2 Object They are doubtfull if any be so bold as to call in question whether or no the miracles which are reported in the Scriptures were done so indeed he is out of all question of very great impudency Ans The Antecedent is false For hee may after the same manner give the lye to all both sacred and profane histories But let us first understand that as other parts of the holy story so especially the miracles are recited as things not wrought in a corner but done in the publike face of the Church and mankind In vaine should the Prophets and Apostles have endevoured to get credit unto their doctrine by miracles which men had never seen Furthermore the doctrine which they brought was strange unto the judgement of reason and contrary to the affections of men and therefore their miracles except they had been most manifest would never have found credit Also it cleerly appeareth both in the miracles themselves and in the doctrine which is confirmed by them that they who writ them sought not their own glory or other commodities of this life but only the glory of God and mens salvation To these arguments agreeth not only the testimony of the Church but the confession also of the very enemies of Christ who surely if by any meanes they could would have denied and suppressed even those things that were true and knowne much lesse would they have confirmed by their testimony ought that had been forged or obscure Oracles The Oracles and Prophecies of things to come verified by their events of which sort many are found in the books of either Testament whose heavenly fountaine and head-spring is evidently demonstrated in that it is the property of God alone to utter true Oracles Consent in the parts of doctrine The consent of each part of the doctrine of the Church For that doctrine which is contrary unto it selfe is neither true nor of God sith that truth consorteth with truth and God contradicteth not himselfe But the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles alone except all other Religions manifoldly jarre discord and mutinize within themselves even in their very foundation and chiefe points Wherefore the doctrine of the Church alone is true and divine Enemies confession Luke 4.41 The confession of very enemies Because the Divell himselfe is enforced to cry out Thou art the Christ the Sonne of God and other enemies are constrained to confesse that this our doctrine is true for whatsoever goodnesse and truth they have in their Religions the selfe-same hath our Religion and that more cleerly and soundly disciphered and they may easily be convicted to have stollen it from our Religion and intermingled it with their owne forgeries as indeed it is the custome of the Divell through Apish imitation of God to mingle some truth with his manifold falshoods that thereby he may the more cunningly and easily deceive men Whence it ariseth that these things which other Sects have agreeable with our doctrine cannot therefore be refelled because they have borrowed them of us but those things which are contrary to our doctrine are at the first on set overthrown because they are the inventions of men Sathan and wicked mens hatred thereof The hatred of Satan and his instruments exercised against this doctrine For certainly that doctrine is true and divine which all the wicked yea and Satan himselfe with joynt conspiracy despite and endevour to abolish For Truth hatcheth hatred and John 8.44 The Divell is a lyar from the beginning and abode not in the truth But Satan and the world oppugne not nor hate more eagerly any doctrine then the doctrine of the Church because forsooth it accuseth them more sharply and handleth them more rigorously it oftner calleth their cavils into tryall sifreth and discovereth their
by faith to this end principally that God may be honoured it is manifest that to beleeve and doe those things which cannot be denied or omitted without offending of God is the worship of God and contrariwise that God cannot be worshipped but by the prescript of his will both the consciences of all men and God himselfe in his holy word doth testifie as In vain doe they worship me who teach the doctrines and commandements of men It is as wicked therefore to number those things which are not expressed in the word of God Isa 29. Matth. 15. amongst those which are necessary to be beleeved and done in matters of Religion as it is unlawfull for any creature to thrust upon God that worship which himselfe never required 4. The Scripture is sufficient Fourthly there cannot be any thing added of men unto this doctrine without great injury and contumely done unto the holy Scripture For if other things besides these that are written are necessary to the perfection of true Religion then doth not the Scripture shew the perfect manner of worshipping God and of attaining to salvation which fighteth with the plain words of Scripture which affirme that God hath opened unto us in his Word as much as he would have us know in this life concerning his will towards us John 15. as Christ saith All things which I have heard of my Father I have made knowne unto you And Paul I have kept nothing backe but have shewed you all the counsell of God Acts 20. And Knowing that thou hast knowne the holy Scriptures from a child 2 Tim. 3. which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through the faith which is in Christ Jesus For the whole Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to improve to correct and to instruct in righteousnesse 5. Other Doctors may erre the Prophets and Apostles cannot therefore they are tied to these Fifthly we are to consider the degrees of them who teach in the Church For therefore is the authority of the Prophets and Apostles far higher then of other Ministers of the Church because God called them immediatly to declare his will unto other men and adorned them with testimonies of miracles and other things by which he witnessed that he did so lighten and guide their minds with his Spirit that hee suffered them to erre in no one point of doctrine our Ministers are called by men and may erre and doe erre when they depart from the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles Wherefore the Apostle Paul saith Ephes 2. 1 Cor. 3. That the Church is builded upon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles And That hee had laid the foundation and other then that could no man lay others build upon it gold silver precious stones wood hay stubble Now it is manifest that they who may erre ought to be tied unto their doctrine who are warranted by the testimonies of God that they cannot erre Wherefore all other teachers in the Church must not bring any new point of doctrine but onely propound and expound those things unto the Church which are delivered by the Prophets and Apostles The consent of Fathers in this point For these causes therefore doth the whole ancient Church with great consent submit it selfe unto the rule of the sacred Scriptures whose authority yet ought of right to be greater then these mens who both in words and deeds fight against this opinion Basil serm de confess fidei Basil saith That it is a falling from the faith and a fault of pride either not to admit those things which are written in the holy Scriptures or to adde any thing unto them Agust Epist 3. And Augustine For neither ought wee to account of every ones discourses though they be catholike and worthy men as of the Canonicall Scriptures that it may not be lawfull for us without impairing the reverence which we owe to those men to dislike and refuse any thing in their writings if peradventure wee shall find that they have thought otherwise then the Scripture hath as it is by Gods assistance understood either of others Epist 112. or of our selves And If ought be confirmed by the plain authority of the divine Scriptures of those which are called in the Church Canonicall wee must without any doubting beleeve it as for other testimonies by which any thing is moved to be beleeved thou mayest chuse whether thou wilt beleeve them or no. But against these testimonies of the Scriptures and the ancient Church the adversaries of the truth contend that besides the doctrine which is comprised in the holy Bible other decrees also made by the authority of the Church are no lesse unchangeable and necessary to salvation then the Oracles Propheticall and Apostolike And that they may not without some shew and pretence take upon them this authority of decreeing what they list Objections of the Papists 1 Object The Scripture doth not remaine perfect Numb 21. Joshua 10. 1 Kin. 14.19 Jude 9. 14. 1 Cor. 5. Ephes 3. John 21.25 besides and contrary unto the Scripture they alledge places of Scripture in which some writings of the Prophets and Apostles are mentioned which are not come to our hands as The booke of the wars of the Lord The book of the just The booke of the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah The prophecie of Enoch and the story of the body of Moses And lastly the Apostle Paul maketh mention of his Epistles which now the Church hath not Hence therefore these men will conclude That the doctrine of the sacred Scripture is maimed and that therefore the defect hereof must be supplied by the Church But first of all concerning the holy Scripture we are to know that so much thereof hath been preserved of God for us as was necessary and profitable for the doctrine and consolation of the Church Furthermore concerning points of Religion though some holy books are wanting as those Epistles of Paul yet it is manifest that all necessary doctrine is contained in those which are extant They alledge That many things were delivered by word of mouth 2 Object Some things delivered by word of mouth Answer both before there were any Scriptures and afterward also by Christ and the Apostles as John 16.12 1 Corinth 11.34 2 Thessal 2.15 and elsewhere But those things which they delivered by word of mouth are the selfe same which they put in writing except some matters of ceremonies as Act. 15.20 1 Cor. 11.34 which maketh not for the adversaries whose traditions most of them repugne the Scriptures They alledge farther the practice and examples of the Apostles 3 Object That the Apostles have decreed against and besides the Scripture Titus 1. 1 Timothy 1 Cor. 11. 1 Cor. 14. 1 Cor. 7. 1 Cor. 6. Answer as if they did make any ordinances or lawes either besides or against the Scripture as when Paul ordaineth many
day Likewise Galat. 5. â— Stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free Now if againe they reply that the office of Bishops is above the civill power 2 Instance The higher power doth more binde 1 Answer and therefore hath greater force than that to binde men to obey first wee grant that more obedience is due unto the superiour power then to the inferiour as long as it commandeth nothing contrary to Gods word As long therefore as the Ministers propound the word of God unto the Church and for avoiding of offence command such things to be observed as appertain to decency and order they do not now offend against them but against God whosoever obey them not But if they require their lawes concerning things different to be observed with putting an opinion of necessity in them and of the worship of God and doe make them necessary when there is no danger of offence to ensue because this charge is contrary to the word of God no obedience is due unto it Further we confesse that greater obedience is due unto the superiour power in those things in which it is superiour that is in which God would have other powers to obey it But the Ministeriall power is superiour unto the Civill in those things in which it is superiour that is which are of God delivered commanded and committed unto the Ministers that by them they may be declared unto the Church But In matters indifferent concerning which nothing is either commanded or forbidden of God the civill power is superiour by reason of the authority which God in these matters hath given unto the civill Magistrate and not to the Ministers of the Church 8 Object Fathers and Councels are cited But against this they returne againe That wee also doe alledge the testimonies of Councels and Fathers in confirming the doctrine of the Church which were but in vaine for us to doe if their sentences had not the force and authority of Ecclesiasticall doctrine But we never bring nor receive the testimonies of the ancient Church with that mind Answer as if without the authority of the holy Scripture they were sufficient for confirmation of any points of doctrine Neither yet is there regard had of them in vaine 2. Uses of the testimonies of Fathers in points of doctrine For 1. They which are rightly minded after they are instructed by the voice of the Scriptures concerning the truth are yet more confirmed by the Church as by a testimony of lower degree 2. They which attribute more authority unto them then they should or abuse their sayings against the truth are very well refuted by the testimony of them whom they have made their Judges Also they say 9 Object Traditions are order 1 Cor. 14. That order and decency in the Church is necessary by the commandement of God according as it is said Let all things be done comely and in order For God is not the authour of confusion Now the order and discipline of the Church doth a great part consist in traditions Ecclesiasticall wherefore they conclude that by the violating of these mens consciences are wounded Answ Of meere particulars there is no concluding A double liberty of the Church in matters of order and God offended But as God commandeth some order to be appointed and kept in the Church so hath he given a double liberty in it unto his Church To appoint it That it be arbitrary for the Church to appoint as may be most commodious for it what order shall be in every place and at every time observed To keep or not to keep it being appointed so it be without offence That also after any thing is certainly ordained it may be kept or not kept without hurt of conscience both of the whole Church and of every one of the godly if there be no danger of offence For it is necessary that ever a difference be put betwixt the commandements of God by the observing whereof God is worshipped and offended by the breaking of them and those things which God hath left to men to appoint neither is worshipped or offended as himselfe pronounceth either by the altering or omitting of them so long as there is no cause or danger of offence 1 Cor. 14.40 Galat. 5.1 Col. 2.16 And the same Apostle who commandeth all things to be done comely and in order willeth us to stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free and that we should be condemned of no man in meat or drinke or in respect of a holy-day Wherefore not they who without contempt of divine things or wantonnesse or danger of offence doe something otherwise in these things then is appointed but they rather offend against the commandement of God concerning keeping order who either would have no order in the Church or trouble that which is well appointed These men find fault also with the obscurity of the holy Scripture 10 Object Obscure things do not suffice without interpretation 1 Pet. 3.16 which they prove both by examples of hard places of Scripture and also out of Peter where it is said That there are some things hard to be understood in the Epistles of Paul And therefore sith that things darkly spoken without they be expounded cannot suffice to perfect and wholesome doctrine they urge that the interpretation of the Church also is necessary to be received with the Scripture But here above all things they injure the holy Ghost ascribing darknesse and obscurity unto him Answer The Minor is false if they respect the ground who of purpose endeavoured to apply himself in simplicity of speech to the capacity of the common people and the rudest For those things which appertaine to the ground of doctrine which is necessary to be known of all as are the articles of our Beliefe and the ten Commandements they are so plainly recited so often repeated so plentifully expounded in the Scriptures that they are open and easie to any but to him who will not learne even as the 119. Psalme teacheth where the word of the Lord is called a lanterne to our feet and a light to our pathes Againe the entrance into thy word sheweth light and giveth understanding to the simple The word of the Prophet is called a light shining in a darke place To which ye doe well that yee take heed as unto a light that shineth in a darke place untill the day dawne and the day-starre arise in your heart 2 Pet. 1.19 And Solomon affirmeth that hee writeth to give the simple sharpnesse of wit and to the child Prov. 1.4 20. knowledge and discretion Againe that wisedome cryeth without and uttereth her voice in the streets Paul also saith that Christ sent him to preach the Gospel 1 Corinth 1.17 1 Instance The ground of doctrine is unknowne to many Answ Yea to the reprobate 2 Cor. 4.3 Isa 65.2 Rom. 10.21 Psal 36.3 Mat. 11.25 not
same chapter By the works of the law shall no flesh be justified in his sight Vers 20 21 22 23. for by the law cometh the knowledge of sinne But now is the righteousnesse of God made manifest without the law having witnesse of the law and of the Prophets The righteousnesse of God by the faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all that beleeve for there is no difference For all have sinned and are deprived of the glory of God and are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus Conferring like places together To conferre places of Scripture where though the same words be not spoken of the same thing yet the words and formes of speaking are used of the like things For if the interpretation of the like place be certaine and there be the same causes for the like interpretation to be given in the place in controversie which are in the other then of the like places we must give one and the same judgement Mat. 5.29 30. The Lord willeth to put out our eye to cut off our hand if they be a cause of offence unto us Now whereas the Law forbiddeth us to maime our body Thou shalt not kill that therefore by this figure of speech the Lord would have us that wee should rather forsake things most deare unto us than by the rust and motion of them wee should suffer our selves to be withdrawne from God the like forme of speech other-where used Jeremy 22.24 Deut. 32.10 to signifie things most deare and precious doth shew as If Jechoniah were the signet of my right hand yet would I plucke thee thence and Hee kept him as the apple of his eye Consent of the catholike Church with 3 rules of direction therein John 8.37 When once according to that rule the controversies concerning the text and meaning thereof are judged we may lawfully also descend to the consent of the Church yet putting great space betwixt and not without great advisement For lest by the name of the Church we be beguiled 1. No sentence or meaning is to be received which these rules of examining and judging which have been now declared do not suffer 2. Wee must consider what times and what writings are purest what points of doctrine have beene and in what ages either rightly expounded or depraved with errours 3. Whose interpretation either is of the authour or may be of 〈◊〉 confirmed by the testimonies of the Scripture And to this deciding of all controversies about the meaning of the Scripture drawne out of the Scripture it selfe doe all the godly and lovers of truth agree even as it is said Hee that is of God heareth the words of God Now the testimony of the ancient and catholike Church so farre as they see it to accord with the Scripture they doe with glad and thankful mindes embrace and are so much more assured of the knowne truth But if any quarrelling men doe not yeeld unto the testimonies of the Scriptures we must not seeke because of them a Judge higher then the word of God but must leave them unto the judgement of God as the Apostle counselleth us Reject him that is an hereticke after once or twice admonition Titus 3.20 knowing that he that is such is perverted and sinneth being damned of his owne selfe 1 Cor. 14.38 Rev. 22.11 And If any man be ignorant let him be ignorant Hee that is filthy let him be more filthy Neither verily doth he whom the word of God doth not satisfie rest on the authority of men as the truth it selfe doth shew but as these things are sufficient to shut the mouthes of them who gainesay the truth or at leastwise to manifest their impudency so is there further required for the fencing of the consciences of all the godly in debate of Religion besides a care of learning the doctrine of the word of God Prayers An ardent and daily invocating of God by which wee may desire that wee may be taught and guided by his holy Spirit This if wee shall doe hee will not suffer us to make stay in errour which may pull us from him but will open unto us the true and certaine meaning of his word concerning all things necessary to our salvation that our faith may depend not on humane but divine authority even as it is promised Mat. 7.7 Aske and it shall be given you seeke and ye shall finde knock and it shall be opened unto you Luke 11.13 James 1.5 For whosoever asketh receiveth and hee that seeketh findeth and to him that knocketh it shall be opened How much more shall your heavenly Father give the holy Ghost to them that desire him If any of you do lack wisedome let him ask it of God which giveth to all men liberally and reproacheth no man and it shall be given him but let him ask in faith and waver not Object 11. It is unmeet that the holy Ghost should be subject unto another Answ We make him not subject to any other but compare him with himselfe To their former arguments our adversaries adde That it is a shame that the holy Ghost speaking in the Church should be subject to the examination and judgment of another and therefore we must not examine him by the rule of the Scripture But seeing that the same Spirit speaketh in the Church and in the Scripture when wee doe examine the voice of the Church by Scripture we do not subject the holy Ghost to another but we compare him with himself And by this means 1. We give unto him the praise of truth and constancy while we do acknowledge and restifie that he is alwaies like himself and doth never square from himself 2. We confesse that the supreme authority of pronouncing the will of God belongeth unto him while we doe not seek whether those things be true and certaine which he hath spoken but whether those be his words which men ascribe unto him and this doe we even after the selfe same manner which he hath prescribed us and after we find out by the rule of the written word that any thing hath proceeded from him to that without making any controversie we submit our minds and wils Contrariwise it is easie to see 2 Contumelies against the holy Ghost issuing out of the Papists opinion of the Judge of the Scripture that our adversaries themselves are guilty of that contumely against the holy Ghost of which they accuse us For while they will have the authority of giving judgement concerning the meaning of the Scripture and deciding of controversies not to belong unto the Scripture but unto themselves by this very thing 1. They imagine that the holy Ghost may dissent from himselfe 2. They make themselves Judges higher then the holy Ghost and Word of God Lastly whereas Paul saith That he is the Minister of the New Testament Object 12. The Letter killeth the Spirit quickneth 2
Gen. 41.15 But Joseph sware by the life of Pharaoh Therefore it is lawfull to sweare also by man or creatures Ans Some grant that he sinned in so doing namely that he erred following the custome of the Gentiles who were wont to sweare by Kings that thereby he might keep close from his brethren who he was but we may make answer othewise also namely that it was not properly an Oath but only an asseveration made for to shew the evidence of the thing comparing it with a thing which was certaine and evident so that the tenure and meaning of such asseveration is that those things which are avouched are as certaine as that man certainely liveth whom he assevereth to live namely as being knowne and yet living or so certaine as he who assevereth certainely wisheth that man to live whom he nameth So also shall the meaning of Joseph's asseveration be As Pharaoh liveth that is as truely as Pharaoh liveth or is in safety or as truely as I wish him to live and to be in safety so truly say I these things The same sense and meaning is to be rendred of the like asseverations as the asseveration of Hannah 1 Sam. 1.26 17.55 20.3.25.26 As thy soule liveth my Lord namely Ely and of Abner As thy soule liveth O King meaning Saul and of David As the Lord liveth and as thy soule liveth speaking to Jonathan And of Abigail As the Lord liveth and as thy soule liveth speaking to David 3. Whether a Christian may sweare or take a right and lawfull oath Foure causes why we may take a lawfull oath THat a Christian may without breach of piety swear by the name of God namely if the Magistrate exact an oath at his hands or otherwise if necessity so require is here proved by foure arguments Gods glory That Gods glory may thereby be advanced For truth and the manifestation thereof is a thing glorious unto God Mans safety That the safety of others may thereby be procured For our safety consisteth in the truth especially in that heavenly truth Authority of Gods word Because a lawfull oath is authorised by Gods word Example of the ancient Church Exception of Anabaptists and the refutation thereof Because it hath been heretofore rightly taken by the Saints of God Here the Anabaptists except against us saying that of ancient it was lawfull for the Fathers in the Old Testament under the Law to sweare but it is prohibited us in the New Testament Therefore to the former reasons we are to adde these for proofe of the contrary unto their opinion Christs ratification of it in the New Testament Mat. 5.17 Christ saith I am not come to destroy the Law but to fulfill it Now he speaketh this of the Morall Law whereunto an oath belongeth Therefore the taking of an oath was not repealed by Christ It is a part of Gods Morall worship The Morall worship of God is perpetuall But a lawfull oath is a part of the Morall worship of God for it is an invocating of God Therefore it is perpetuall The Prophets call it so Esay 65.16 The Prophets describing the worship of the new Church terme it a swearing by the name of God He that sweareth in the earth shall sweare by the true God Therefore the new Church may sweare by the name of the true God It is a seale of faith and truth and a deciding of debates Heb. 6.16 The confirming of faith and truth and the deciding of debates is profitable lawfull and necessary for Church and Common-wealth and glorious unto God But an oath is a confirmation of faith and truth and a deciding of debates An oath for confirmation is an end of all strife Therefore an oath is not onely lawfull for Christians but also necessary Example of Christ and the Saints in the New Testament Mat. 5.18 Rom. 1.9 Rom. 9.1 2 Cor. 1.23 Phil. 1.8 1 Thes 2.10 We have herein the example of Christ and the Saints in the New Testament For Christ himselfe not once but often used a forme of swearing for confirmation of his doctrine Verily Verily I say unto you And Paul in the same case often interposeth an oath God is my witnesse whom I serve in my spirit in the Gospell of his Son that c. I say the truth in Christ I lye not my conscience bearing me witnesse in the holy Ghost I call God for a record upon my soule c. God is my record how I long after you all Ye are witnesses and God also how holily and justly and unblameably we behaved our selves among you These and the like arguments and examples do sufficiently shew that doubtlesse To sweare lawfully is granted unto Christians even now also in the new Covenant The Anabaptists object against us that saying of Christ Object But I say unto you Mat. 5.34 35 36 37. Sweare not at all neither by heaven for it is the throne of God nor yet by the earth for it is his foot-stoole neither by Jerusalem for it is the city of the great King neither shalt thou sweare by thine head for thou canst not make one haire white or black But let your communication be Yea Yea Nay Nay For whatsoever is more then these cometh of evill James 5.12 And that of James Before all things my brethren sweare not neither by heaven nor by earth nor by any other oath but let your Yea be Yea and your Nay Nay lest ye fall into condemnation Answ That by those places alledged not all oathes but rash and unnecessary oathes are forbidden is manifest both by conference of other places and examples of the Old and new Testement and especially by the purpose and scope of Christ who freeing the true meaning and sentence of the law from the corruptions of the Pharisees Two sorts of oathes 1. Direct 2. Indirect Both these oathes are here forbidden and taxing their hypocrisie sheweth that by the third Commandment is condemned not onely all perjury but also all rash oathes superfluous and unnecessary and in them not only those that are direct oathes in which the name it selfe of God is expressed but also indirect or oblique oathes in which the name of God is understood being dissembled and cloaked by uttering in place thereof the names of creatures For such kind of oathes were then commonly used in ordinary and dayly speech and hypocrites A twofold profanenesse issuing out of the Pharisees accustomed swearing by creatures who did exercise those indirect or oblique formes of swearing By the Temple By the Altar By Heaven c. excused them 1. As if swearing on this wise they profaned not the name of God inasmuch as they expressed not the name of God in their oath 2. As if they were not perjured and forsworne if when they expressed not the name of God in their oath they afterwards brake their faith and oath given in that indirect forme of swearing But
nothing though one should cut or wring it therefore 't is like a scabberd which admits of any sword not of steele only but of wood also or lead or brasse Doth then Parrie lye in this or hath the Jesuite lost his shame But yet they teare and defile the Scripture more miserably for thus Lindanus compares those that dispute out of Scripture to men drawing a woodden saw to whom being wearie there is no end of deluding Hosius in his book De expresso Dei verbo throughout it all handles these Positions That it is the propertie of Hereticks to dispute out of the Scriptures That they must not encounter with Hereticks out of the Scriptures That the Scriptures make Hereticks That the expresse word of God being alledged by Hereticks Protestants he meanes against the sense of all other that is of the Popish Church is the expresse word of the Divell We will not speak of other abominable passages which neither Jewes could attribute to Moses his Law nor Mahumetans to their Alchoran without punishment If heretofore such words had been spoken of Sibylla's leaves the Romans had punished them with death Yet for these or the like meritorious words by which they think they have cut off the Protestant sinews one receives a Bishops robe another a Cardinals Hat as a reward from the Pope O say they scoffingly what conferres your Scripture on you But boast not in thy wickednesse Psal 52.3 Pag. 24. the goodnesse of the Lord is powerfull every day But saith the Jesuite this is devised by Parrie Whitaker and such like deformed Reformers That in Popery the Scriptures are as much accounted as Aesops Fables without the Churches testimony That the Pope preferres the Church to the Scripture That in Popery they deny the word of God to be the rule of living and beleeving aright I answer that nothing of this is objected to us in the secular Theme why then doe you passe by things truly objected and accuse Poperie of these things Cover if you be wise the ulcers of your Babylon The first concerning Aesops Fables Brentius objected to Peter Asoto a black Friar anno 1556. Hee doth not obscurely saith hee intimate that hee hath plainly the same opinion of the Scriptures that any other Asoticus hath or hath written of to wit that the Scripture availeth as much as Aesops Fables without the Churches authority To whom Hosius answering anno 1557. saith thus This might be spoken in a pious meaning which any godly man endued with charity and that thinkes no evill might draw out of these words For truly if the Churches authority did not teach us that this Scripture is Canonicall it should have but little weight with us I pray you then how can you denie Poperie to be of this opinion which Hosius so great a pillar of the Romish Church confesseth may be spoken in a pious sense Tell me then what odds is there between these words To have a very little weight and between these To availe as much as Aesops Fables I wonder you touch the other sore Lib. de Concil col 12.13 which the chiefest of your side doe avoid willingly as a rock in the sea Bellarmine hath so touched it that hee equalls the Decrees of Councels in truth infallibilitie and Canonicall authoritie to the Gospels and holy Scriptures and extolls the Pope far above Decrees of Councels How then is the Pope according to Bellarmine not preferred to Scripture As for the third though we know not who objecteth it to you as you utter it yet it is doubtlesse true For according to the same Cardinall of yours the word of God written is but a partiall rule of right living and beleeving But a partiall rule is no rule if you will urge the nature of a rule for a rule in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is an infallible rule requiring or admitting of no addition or diminution to this that it may be a rule as the Jesuite knowes a rule to be defined by Basil and Varinus If then in Poperie the written word of God be but a partiall law of good life and faith not onely admitting but requiring also the addition of traditions it followes that this is plainly denied in Poperie which this fellow lies was devised by Parrie to wit that the written word of God is the rule of right living and beleeving 22. Lastly what Irenaeus wrote of ancient Hereticks when Roman Poperie is argued out of Scriptures it is turned to the accusation of the very Scriptures as if they were not right or had any authoritie and because they are diversly taken and because truth cannot be found out of them that want tradition 23. Roman Poperie then so many waies the originall of faith which is beleeved by tearing in pieces and blaspheming is deficient from the faith it overthrows faith both to it selfe and to its friends The Assertion If at this day Irenaeus that most ancient defender of the holy Scriptures against Hereticks did see our present controversies what else would he say think you against Poperie then what he wrote against the traditionarie Hereticks of his time that they cannot abide an encounter when they are convicted out of Scripture but fall upon accusing of the very words of God and that three waies First that they are not of authoritie Secondly that they are diversly spoken obscure doubtfull That finally they are imperfect not containing all truth At last they fix upon traditions which they think to be more perfect then the Scriptures they received from the Apostles All the Popish Masters now these hundred yeers past have after no other way handled this argument then what was the proper way of Hereticks of old For as often as they are convicted by our men out of Scripture do not they disswade any meeting or encounter That it is a vaine thing to draw a woodden saw with us Doe they not fall upon accusing the Scriptures themselves that they have no authoritie but what they have from the Church That they are most obscure and diversly spoken That by reason of their imperfection all truth cannot be found in them Doth not at length all their disputation end in tradition See the disputes and discourses of the Scriptures in Bellarmine Stapleton Lindanus Hosius Valentian and others Poperie then I hope understands whose successors the Scholastick Synagogues and Canonisticall in this part are and what principle of faith which is beleeved hath by unworthy tearing and blaspheming fallen from the faith and hath made the way of salvation unpassable both to it selfe and friends 24. Secondly to shake saving Faith by which we beleeve unto righteousnesse and to pull it out of mens hearts is to fail from the Faith and to overthrow faith both to themselves and others 25. Saving faith by which we beleeve unto righteousnesse is not onely an assent or knowledge of these things which concerning God and Christ are written in Gods Word but especially a confidence in the promises of the
they know and beleeve what a one Christ is and what he hath done for each of them as it is said Iohn 17.3 This is life eternall that they know thee the only true God and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent And Iohn 3.36 He that beleeveth in the Son hath eternall life By these and the like sayings we perceive that to be a truth which Dionysius which is falsly named the Areopagite but is thought rather to be a Corinthian ascribes to Bartholomew the Apostle That the Gospel is brief and large The Gospel it a briefe largenesse Briefe It s brevity is apparently more curt than the Law of Moses ought to be and is fixed in the minds and hearts of men and therfore is the summe of the Gospel so oft delivered and repeated in the Scriptures of the Prophets and Apostles and comprised in the Creed But much lesse can ever the wisdome of the Gospel be exhausted than that of the Law But forasmuch as its certain Large that in this mortall life that which is eternall is but begun 2 Cor. 5 2 3 4. For we shall be cloathed upon with that if so be we are not found naked This is the nature of true conversion A true godly man growes in godlinesse that it suffers not those that are converted unto God to stay in their race but kindles in them a perpetuall study and desire of further profiting Therefore is it commanded 2 Pet. 3.18 Grow in grace and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ And Eph. 2.19 20 21. it is said Yo are no more strangers and forrainers but fellow-Citizens with the Saints and of the houshold of God And are built upon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner-stone In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord. And Marke 9.24 The man prayed Lord I beleeve help mine unbeliefe And Luke 17.5 The Disciples cried Lord increase our faith Saints then are commanded and commended and are petitioners to be such as goe forward Therefore they are not of the number of them that have no minde of proceeding onward Comforts and promises for a tender heart and wounded conscience Yet let none be out of heart because they finding in themselves lesse life and vigour and acknowledging their weaknesse and corruptions doe with a true sorrow of minde bewail the same For thus saith the everlasting Father concerning his Son Esay 42.3 A bruised reed shall he not breake and the smoaking flax shall he not quench Againe the Son saith of the Father Mat. 18.14 It is not the will of your Father which is in heaven that one of these little ones should perish And the Son saith of himself Iohn 6.37 All that the Father giveth me shall come unto me And him that cometh unto me I will in no wise cast out Wheresoever piety is not dissembled it is and is cherished of God and together with it Beneficia 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all the everlasting and unchangeable benefits of the Gospel are tyed with the indissoluble bond of divine truth For unlesse the certainty of our faith and salvation did depend upon the alone free mercy of God whereby he receiveth all that beleeve and not upon the degrees of our renovation there would be no stability at all in our comfort Hence therefore may be drawn three things which may be as grounds to judge of a Christian 1. The laying hold of the foundation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i.e. the criticall markes to discerne a true godly man 2. An earnest endeavour of increasing which two include each godly man within the general promise of eternal salvation and 3. Acomfort that notwithstanding our inequality of gifts and degrees to some others we shall not perish which consolation is to be opposed against the cogitation of our owne unworthinesse These three as inseparables hath Saint Paul comprised in those words 1 Cor. 3.11 Other foundation can no man lay than that is laid which is Jesus Christ Now if any one build upon this foundation gold silver precious stones wood hay stuble every ones worke shall be made manifest for the day shall declare c. but hee himselfe shall be saved so as by fire By that therefore which hitherto hath been said it 's apparent that both the Lords injunction and our own salvation doe exhort and bind all men and among these the youth being to wit a great part and also the Nursery of the Church to learne as soone as by age they are capable the grounds of Christian Religion Therefore doth this most earnestly and seriously admonish them to whom the charge of nurturing the younger in yeares doth belong to be carefull of this their dutie 3. Motive the preservation and propagation of the Gospel For we that are teachers and learners ought to have a diligent and earnest care of godlines not only for our own sakes but for their sakes also that are ours and our succeeding posterity For we finde by experience how easily in processe of time an oblivion and manifold depravation of that doctrine creeps in the summe whereof is not concisely and perspicuously couched together and known repeated inculcated and divulged abroad Besides we know Horat. Quo semel est imbuta recens servabit odorem Testa di◠that of what liquor a new vessell is first seasoned with be it good or bad it longest savours There is none in his right minde but will confesse seeing the evill that we learn doth so constantly stick by us that when the youth is not instructed in and inured to religion it doth threaten the leaving to the ensuing times an age of monsters contemning God and all religion and that being we are hardly by the greatest endeavours and longest care made pliable to that which is good the ground-work of the most difficult businesse should be laid in the first age 4. Motive the weake capacity of youth the more ignorant Catecheticall instruction therefore is necessary not only for the preservation of the purity and soundness of religion to us and our posterity but also for the capacities of younger age to whom we have shewed this doctrine must be taught For if it be said of the teaching youth the other arts Quicquid praecipies esto brevis ut cito dicta Percipiant animi dociles teneantque fideles Short precepts shalt thou give which being briefly told Apt wits may soon conceive and faithfull long may hold how much more in this heavenly wisdome which is a stranger to humane wit should we seek out for and apply our selves to breifness and plainness especially seeing divine testimony approves our experience in this as Heb. 5.13 Every one that useth milk is unskilfull in the word of righteousnesse for he is a babe but strong meat is of those that are of full age And therefore when Saint Paul speaketh of his manner of
that had not the Sonne of God revealed it unto us out of his Fathers bosome no wit of men or Angels could have attained unto it In their subjects They vary in their subjects and matter which they handle For the doctrine of the Church comprehendeth the full perfect and entire sense both of the Law and Gospel but Philosophy is quite ignorant of the Gospel and omitteth the principall parts of the Law and rawly and obscurely propoundeth that small portion it retaineth concerning discipline and externall duties drawn but out of some few precepts of the Decalogue It teacherh us also other arts and sciences meete and serviceable for mans life as Logick Physick and the Mathematickes all which are not delivered in Church doctrine but have their proper necessary use in handling and learning the same In their effects They concurre not in their severall effects For the doctrine of the Church alone sheweth us the originall of all evils and mans misery to wit the fall disobedience or sin of our first parents Moreover it ministreth true and lively comfort unto our consciences pointing out the meanes by which wee may wade out of the danger of sin and death and assuring us of life eternall through Christ As for Philosophy it knoweth not the cause of our evils neither yeeldeth it us any sound comfort or consolation Philosophy hath certain comforts common unto her with Divinity Comforts common both to Philosophy and Divinity such are 1. The providence of God 2. The necessity of obeying of God 3. A good conscience 4. The worthinesse of vertue 5. The finall causes or the ends which vertue proposeth 6. The examples of others 7. Hope of reward 8. A comparing of events because a lesse evil compared unto a greater carrieth a shew and shadow of good but true comforts against sinne and death are proper to the Church Comforts proper to Gods Church such as are 1. Free remission of sins by and for Christ 2. The grace and presence of God in our very miseries 3. Our finall delivery and life everlasting Wherefore Philosophy though in respect of Divinity it be unperfect and faile in these premisses yet it never impugneth Divinity Whatsoever erroneous opinions contrary to the true doctrine of the Church occurre in the writings of Philosophers or are cited out of Philosophy to overthrow Scripture all these are either no way Philosophicall but the vaine sleights of mans wit and very biles and sores of true Philosophy such as was the opinion of Aristotle concerning the eternity of the world and of Epicurus touching the mortality of the soule and such like or else they are indeed Philosophicall opinions but unfitly applyed to Divinity The use of these differences in doctrine These maine differences between Christian doctrine and other Religions and Philosophy also are very worthy observation for these ends 1. That Gods glory be no way impaired of us but reserved wholly unto himselfe which cannot be unlesse wee acknowledge and confesse in the face and eye of the world whatsoever he hath precisely commanded us to beleeve either concerning himselfe or his will and that wee adde nothing of our owne braine unto that which hee hath revealed For God cannot be mingled with Idols nor his truth confounded with Satans forgeries without high dishonour to his name 2. That we hazzard not nor endanger our salvation which might happen if erroneously we should imbrace for true Religion any Schismaticall doctrine or heathenish Philosophy 3. That our faith and comfort in Christ Jesus might be strengthened and confirmed which falleth out when wee discerne the perfection of the doctrine of the Church before all other Religions how many important and weighty matters are found in our Religion which are wanting in others What are the causes why they alone are saved who professe this doctrine and other Religions with their Sectaries and adherents are damned and of God rejected Finally that we separate our selves from Epicures and Academicks who either make a mockery of pietie and godlinesse or so rack Religion that they thinke every man in every Religion shall be saved wresting in this sense that saying of the Apostle The just man shall live by HIS faith Now these Epicures are not worthy the answering Rom. 1.17 Hab. 2.4 as for those Academicks they manifestly falsifie the sentence and meaning of the Apostle and are easily refuted For the pronoune HIS in no sort signifieth whatsoever faith every man frameth unto himselfe but the true Catholike faith particularly appropriated unto every man and this word HIS standeth in opposition against any other mans faith though it be a true and good faith and thwarteth and crosseth also the opinion of Justification by works So that the naturall sense of that Text is The just man is justified not by the works of the Law but by faith alone in Christ and that by his owne private faith not by the faith of another man 4 Whence it may appeare that the doctrine of the Church alone was delivered of God 5 By what testimonies the certainty of Christian Religion or Church-doctrine is confirmed GOD in the very creation of the world put this bridle in the mouth of all reasonable creatures that no man without extreame and manifest impudeney such as was the Divell in Paradise durst say that any thing if it were once apparently known to have been spoken or commanded by God might be called into question or that any man might refuse to obey it Here-hence are those things so often inculcated in the Prophets Hearken O heavens and hearken O earth for the Lord hath spoken Thus saith the Lord. The word of the Lord came to Esaias Jeremias c. Sith therefore it appeareth that the bookes of the Old and New Testament are the words of God there is no place left of doubting whether that be the true Religion and Doctrine which is contained in them but whether these books were written by divine instinct and by what proofes and testimonies we are certaine of so great a matter this is a question not to be let passe of us Wherefore this question is necessary For except this above all other things remaine stedfast and immoveable that whatsoever we read in the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles doth as truly declare the will of God unto us as if we did heare God openly speaking tous from heaven it cannot chuse but that the very foundation and whole certainty of Christian Religion must be weakned Wherefore it is a consideration worthy those who are desirous of the glory of God and doe seek for sure comfort to enquire whence it may appeare unto us The first part The authority of the Scripture doth depend on the Church that the holy Scripture is the Word of God To this question now long since answer hath been made by the Papists that forsooth it is not otherwise certaine then because the Church doth confirme it by her testimony But we
beleeve and is not imputed to them unto condemnation according as it is said Rom. 8. â— There is no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus c. And in this sense the distinction of Mortall and Veniall sin may be retained but by no meanes in that sense in which it is used of the Popes Favourites as What the Papists take Mortall and Veniall sin to be if that were Mortall sinne which for the grievousnesse thereof deserveth eternall death that Veniall which for the lightnesse thereof deserveth not eternall death at Gods hands but some temporall punishment onely I had rather in stead of Mortall and Veniall sin use the names of Reigning and Not reigning sin Why the names of Mortall and Veniall sin are impertinent and to be rejected 1. Because the names of Mortall and Veniall sin are obscure and doubtfull For all sins are Mortall and John also calleth Mortall sin or sin to death the sin against the holy Ghost 2. Because the Scripture useth not these termes especially the name of Veniall sin 3. Because of the errours of the Papists who terme Veniall sins those which are light and deserve not eternall paines whereas the Scripture saith Cursed is every one that bideth not in all c. Deut. 27.26 James 2.10 Rom. 6.23 He which faileth in one point is guilty of all The wages of sin is death Whosoever shall break one of these least commandements and teach men so he shall be called the least in the Kingdome of Heaven In a word every sin is in his owne nature Mortall to wit it deserveth everlasting death but it is made Veniall that is it accomplisheth not death eternall in the regenerate by grace through Christ Object 1. But the Elect fall not from grace Answ Finally they doe not But they who sin mortally and doe not repent perish This falleth not to the Elect that they should fall finally but before the end they fall easily and often Object 2. The will of God is unchangeable but hee will the salvation of the Elect Therefore it is unchangeable Answ I grant that it is true concerning the purpose and counsell of God but not concerning our affiance which we have of the remission of sins for our comfort standeth not together with errours which are contrary to the foundation and with sinne committed against our consciences For then are wee said to have remission of our sinnes when wee apply these benefits to our selves Now in Christ Jesus ye which once were farre off are made neere by the the bloud of Christ Ephes 2.13 Hosea 2.23 I will say to them which were not my people Thou art my people And they shall say Thou art my God The Elect may sin against their consciences yet not to death Object 3. Hee that is borne of God sinneth not Therefore the regenerate sinne not Answ 1. He sinneth not to death For the Elect do not wholly forsake God albeit they sinne against their consciences but they retaine still some beginning of true godlinesse by which as by sparkles they are stirred again to repentance as David Peter and others 2. He sinneth not as he is regenerated but he sinneth as long as he abideth in this life sinne not reigning in him and yet sometimes reigning too as he is not regenerated by the Spirit of God but is as yet carnall Regeneration but begun in this Iâ—fe For regeneration or the renuing of us to the image of God is not perfected in an instant but is begun onely in this life and in the life to come is at length finished For so doth John himselfe pronounce of himselfe and all the Saints in this life 1 Epist cap. 1. If we say that we have no sin we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us If we acknowledge our sins he is faithfull and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousnesse This is therefore the meaning of John that the regenerate indeed doe sinne but yet not so that they make much of their sinne or doe so at any time yeeld and assent to evill desires that they cast away all love of godlinesse and repent not For alwaies in the regenerate there remaineth some remnant of a regenerate nature which causeth either a strife against sin or else true repentance that is it suffereth them not to sin to death or everlasting destruction or wholly to forsake God And this consolation so long they enjoy as they know themselves to be regenerated that is as they keep faith and a good conscience Object 4. 1 John 3.9 1 Pet. 1.23 It is said His seed remaineth in him neither can he sin because hee is borne of God And being borne anew not of mortall seed but of immortall by the word of God who liveth and endureth for ever If therefore the seed of Gods word never dieth in them that are borne anew they ever remaine regenerate and ever retaine grace neither ever fall into reigning sin The regenerate in this life may and doe oftentimes lose the grace of God in part but not in whole Answ 1. The regenerate may lose and doe often lose grace and the holy Spirit as concerning some gifts sometimes mo sometimes fewer although they lose it not if we respect all the gifts For there abideth in them some beginning or print of true faith and conversion which although when they yeeld to evill inclinations or desires it is so oppressed and darkened that it neither can be knowne of others neither confirme them of the grace of God and their own salvation for the present yet it suffereth them not wholly to forsake God and the knowne truth and to cast away their purpose of embracing by faith the merit of the Son of God Psal 51.10 12. So David prayeth Create in mee a cleane heart O God and renew a right spirit within mee Againe Restore me to the joy of thy salvation He had lost therefore cleannesse of heart rightnesse and newnesse of spirit and the joy of salvation which he beggeth of God to be restored unto him and yet did he not wholly want them for otherwise he would not have asked neither would he have looked for from God this renewing and restoring 2. The seed of God that is the word of God working true faith and conversion in the Elect abideth and dyeth not in the regenerate as concerning their conversion and finall perseverance how ever they fall often grievously before their end 1 John 2.19 If they had been of us they would have continued with us Object 5. Mat. 7.17 Man in this life is not simply good and therefore his works are not alwaies good A good tree cannot bring forth evill fruit Answ It cannot as it is good For if it be simply good all the fruit thereof is good which shall come so to pass in the life to come But if it be partly good and partly evill such is the
or make breach of some commandement by reason of weaknesse terrour of present torment or feare of danger and yet not oppugne of purpose and malice the truth knowne unto him or make an utter Apostasie from Religion and Piety and persevere in a sensuall senslesse contempt but retire unto repentance in this life Wherefore Reigning sin or the sin against the holy Ghost differ as a generall from a particular the latter of them intimating a precedency of the former but not the former a consequence of the latter It is not incident to the Elect. John 10.28 2 Tim. 2.19 1 Pet. 1.5 1 John 5.15 1 John 2.19 The sin against the holy Ghost is not incident unto the Elect and those who are truly converted because the Elect can never perish but are certainly saved by God My sheep shall no man plucke out of my hands with the like places They then who thus offend were never truly converted and chosen They went out from us because they were not of us That many of the Reprobate are said to be lightened and to be made partakers of the holy Ghost to have tasted the heavenly gift the good Word of God and of the powers of the world to come How many of the reprobates are said in Scripture to be lightned and sanctified 1 Pet. 2. Heb. 6.7 and last of all to have been sanctified with the bloud of the Testament Likewise in Peter to have escaped from the filthinesse of the world the Apostles themselves shew that this is to be understood of the knowledge of the truth and the fore-going and detesiation of errours and vices for a season and lastly of the sufficiency of Christs merits even for the wiping away of their sins also and the offer thereof made to them by his Word and Sacraments which they shew when they interpret that lightning and taste to be the knowledge of the truth and righteousnesse and call them dogs and swine not made so again but returning to their vomit and wallowing in the mire and compare them to the earth drinking in the raine but bringing forth in stead of good herbs thornes and bryars For these things agree not to true faith and conversion We are not lastly to pronounce any man a sinner against the holy Ghost untill we see him give up the ghost in apostasie blasphemy We are not rashly to pronounce who they be that sinne against the holy Ghost and we may not judge of this sinne untill the end that is untill wee know them who once had the truth and confesse themselves to be convicted and perswaded of it with hatred thereof to persecute and reproach it or to end their life in hatred and despite against it The reason hereof is manifest because we are not the beholders of mens hearts If it be objected that there is a sinne unto death I say not that thou shouldest pray for it if he will not that we shall pray for those who sinne to death it must needs be that we may discerne them from others Wee answer that John doth not universally forbid that we pray for any so sinning but at such time as that is manifest unto us either by some divine testimony or by manifest arguments and the sinners owne profession But before this is certaine and manifest unto us we ought to desire of God the conversion of all men and as much as in us lieth to endevour it as it is said I exhort that first of all supplications prayers intercessions 1 Tim. 2.1 2 Tim. 2.24 25 26. Mat. 5.44 Act. 7.60 Our prayer for the adversaries of the truth must be conditionall with submission to Gods will and giving of thankes be made for all men And The servant of the Lord must not strive but must be gentle toward all men apt to teach suffering the evill men patiently instructing them with meeknesse that are contrary minded proving if God at any time will give them repentance that they may know the truth and that being delivered out of the snare of the Divell of whom they are taken they may come to amendment and performe his will And Pray for them which hurt you and persecute you And Lord lay not this sinne to their charge If it be replied That so it will come to passe that our prayer shall be contrary to the will of God if not knowing of it we pray for them who sinne against the holy Ghost The answer is ready That prayer is made for them with a condition Our prayer for them being but conditionall it argueth not but that their sin may be notwithstanding unpardonable by which we submit our will and desires to the counsell of God that he will convert and save the adversaries of the truth if they may be recovered but that hee will represse them and punish them if hee have not appointed to recover them By the same answer is this argument dissolved Their sin is not unpardonable for whom we must pray but we must pray for all men Therefore no mans sinne is unpardonable 1. We deny the Minor because if it appeareth by any divine testimony or by manifest arguments and their owne profession that they are cast away whether they sinne against the holy Ghost or otherwise do not repent we must not pray for them 2. Neither is the Major true For if we know not whether they sin against the holy Ghost or are rejected of God or no we must pray for them but with that condition if they may be recovered Our of these things also which have been spoken answer is made to this Object He that must feare lest he hath any unpardonable sin The feare of unpardonable sin belongeth to the wicked not to the faithfull can never be assured of remission of his sins and life everlasting but if there be any sin unpardonable which is committed before the end of a mans life no man can be assured that he hath not or shall not have such sin Therefore there is either no such sin or no man can be assured of the grace of God and his owne salvation For the Minor of this reason is false concerning those who beleeve for they must certainly thinke that they neither had nor have the sinne against the holy Ghost because there is no condemnation to them who are in Christ neither that they shall have this sin because that no man can pluck the sheep of Christ out of his hand Obj. 1. Adam and Peter obtained remission of sins Adam and Peter sinned against the holy Ghost because they denied the manifest and knowne truth of God Therefore some men sinning against the holy Ghost obtaine remission of sins Answ The proofe of the Minor is a false definition For not every deniall or rejection of the truth is sin against the holy Ghost but that onely which hath accompanying it an inward hatred of the truth and which of a purposed intent and with horrible fury endevoureth to oppresse
it which hatred of truth was not in Adam or Peter Augustine therefore saith Faith failed not Peter in his heart when confession failed him in his mouth God sparing Cains life doth not thereby shew his pardoning of his sin but a further revenging of it Object 2. The sinne of Cain was not unpardonable because God would not have him killed therefore he pardoned him his sinne but Cains sinne was committed against the holy Ghost Therefore some sinne against the holy Ghost is not unpardonable Answ In the proofe of the Major is a fallacy putting that which is no cause as if it were a cause For the cause why God would not have him killed was not for that hee had pardoned Cain his sinne not repenting him of it but that the murderer might be the longer tormented with the furies of his conscience that in so long time not repenting he might be made inexcusable and further also that murders might not wax rife among men Every sin of the unregenerate unpardonable because not repented of which to others through repentance are pardoned Object 3. They who are altogether ignorant of Christ sin not against the holy Ghost but all that know not Christ have unpardonable sinne because it is never pardoned them Therefore some unpardonable sinne is not against the holy Ghost Answ We grant the whole reason if in the Minor and Conclusion thereof be understood by unpardonable sinne those sinnes of the unregenerate which are not indeed remitted unto them for that they persist in those sinnes to the end without repentance yet to others they are remitted who persist not in them but repent of them in this life For not all who commit them persist in them But if that kind of sinne be understood it is never remitted to any man because all they who commit it persist in it to the end of their life without repentance then is the Minor false And so is there no consequence in this reason What pardonable sin is Pardonable sinne or sinne not against the holy Ghost is any sinne whereof some repent and obtaine pardon The fifth division of sinne THere is some sinne which is of it selfe sinne and some which cometh to be sinne by an accident Sinnes of themselves and in their owne nature are all those things which are forbidden in the Law of God What is sin of it selfe as are inclinations motions and actions disagreeing from the Law of God yet they are not sinnes as they are motions nor in respect of God moving all things For motions as they are meere motions are good in themselves and proceed from God in whom we live move and have our being but they are sins in regard of us as they are committed by us against the Law of God For in this sense of themselves and in their owne nature they are sins Sins by an accident are the actions of the unregenerate and hypocrites which are indeed prescribed and commanded by God What is sin by an accident but yet are displeasing unto him because they are done without Faith and Repentance Of this kind are all actions also of indifferency which are effected with scandall Whatsoever is not of faith is sinne To them that are deâ—iled and unbeleeving is nothing pure Rom. 14.23 Tit. 1.15 Heb. 11.6 The vertues of the unregenerate are sins by accident Without faith it is impossible to please God Wherefore all the vertues of the unregenerate as the chastity of Scipio the valour of Julius Cesar the fidelity of Regulus the justice of Aristides c. howsoever in themselves they are good actions and enjoyned by God yet by occasion and accident they are sin and displease God both because the person from whom those actions proceed pleaseth not God neither is reconciled unto God and also because the actions themselves are not done after the same manner neither to the same end which God would have them to be done that is they are not grounded on faith nor wrought to the glory of God which conditions and circumstances are so necessarily required to a good work that without them our best actions are defects and sins as it is sin when a wicked man or an hypocrite prayeth giveth almes offereth sacrifice c. because hee doth it not of faith nor referreth it unto Gods glory Hypocrites give Mat. 6.2 Isa 60.3 c. He that killeth a bullocke c. There is then a main difference betweene the vertues of the regenerate and the unregenerate For 1. The good workes of the regenerate are wrought The differences between the vertues of the regenerate and the unregenerate having Faith for their harbenger and are accepted of God But it fareth not so with the unregenerate 2. The regenerate do all things to the glory of God the unregenerate and hypocrites to their owne praise and glory 3. The workes of the regenerate are linked with inward obedience and a true desire of pleasing God the unregenerate and hypocrites onely performe an outward discipline and homage without the inward obedience therefore their vertues are meer maskes of hypocrisie and no true vertues 4. The imperfection of the workes of the regenerate is covered by the satisfaction and intercession of Christ and the spots of sinne wherewith they are stained are not imputed unto them neither is it objected unto them that they defile the gifts of God with their sinnes The vertues of the unregenerate being in themselves good notwithstanding become and continue sinnes by accident and are polluted with many other sinnes 5. The good workes of the unregenerate are adorned by God with temporall rewards onely and that not as if they pleased God but that by this meanes hee might invite both them and others to honesty and outward discipline of civility necessary for mankind But the good works of the godly God accepteth for Christs sake and crowneth them with temporall and eternall rewards as it is said 1 Tit. 4.8 Godlinesse hath the promise of the life present and that that is to come 6. The unregenerate by practising good workes enacted by God obtaine indeed mitigation of their punishment lest they should with other wicked Impes suffer more exquisite tortures in this life but the good workes of the godly serve not onely for this that they may suffer lighter and easier punishments but also that they may be quite freed from all evill Object We may not do that which is sinne The morall actions of the unregenerate are not therefore to be omitted of us because in themselves they are sin but we must avoid the sin and performe the action Why civill discipline is necessary amongst the unregenerate The workes of the unregenetate though civilly good are sinnes therefore we may not do them Answ Here is a fallacy of accident The Major is true of sinnes which are in themselves sinnes The Minor of sins which are sins by accident Now those things which are in themselves sinne ought simply to be
are contrary to the law and they are contrary to the law of God and make sin as they are committed by man and are in him but as they are guided by God and inflicted they are not sin but a tryal of him that would sin or a punishment of him that had sinned Wherefore that is not of God but of man and the Devil which maketh sin Whether God would the fal of Adam and how Last of all they urge Seeing that God would the fall of Adam either as it was sin or as a punishment and could not will it as a punishment because no sin had gone before which should be therewith punished it seemeth to follow that God would that worke as it was sin But this consequence also is deceitfull because there is not a sufficient ennumeration in the Major For although the first sin was no punishment yet God would that action not as a sin and contrary to his will and nature but as in punishing and receiving againe mankinde into favour by his Son it was a way and occasion of exercising and manifesting his justice and mercy and an example of the weakenesse of al creatures yea of the most excellent if they be not by the singular goodnesse of the Creator preserved as it is declared God hath shut up all in unbeleefe that he might have mercy on all Rom. 11.32 And in the same place it is shewed concerning the blindnesse of the Jews That partly this obstinacy was come to Israel untill the fulnesse of the Gentiles were come in and that the Jewes are enemies of the Gospel for our sakes and that wee have obtained mercy through their unbeleefe That is that God would this their obstinacy not as it was a sin of the Jewes neither only as a punishment of other sinnes but also an occasion of translating the Gospel unto the Gentiles And it is said that God in the preaching of the Law respecteth this That al the world be culpable before him Rom. 3.19 Wherefore this also he respected and would in permitting of sin which if it had not come betweene The Law had not made the world culpable before God Object 1. Sathan was made of God And therefore the malice also of Sathan Answ God made indeed all the Angels God made Sathan good and Sathan made himselfe evill yea those who became Apostates and Devils but yet he created al the Angels at the beginning good But Sathan is said not to have stood stedfast in the truth Then before his fall he stood in the truth but after hee treacherously fell from his allegeance and sinned against God and therefore the crime of that evill sticketh in that run-away the Devill For since that time after he fell there is no truth in him no faith no integrity no feare of God no light no goodnesse 1 John 3.8 He that committeth sin is of the Devill c. for he is the first sinner and the fountaine of sinne Object 2. God made Adam Therefore he made sin Answ Sin is the corruption of nature created good of God but not any creature made of God in man Sin not made of God because it is no creature but the corruption of a creature God made man good who by Sathans perswasion corrupted willingly that goodnesse which he received of God so that now sin is mans and not a creature of God created in man Neither is the nature of man the cause of sin for God who created all things and the very nature of man created them all good Sin a natural property of man corrupted but not of man simply as hee was first created wherefore the very nature of man also was created good but sinne is an accidentall quality which befell unto man in his fall and after his fall being even from the beginning such as now it is but no substantiall property nor of the nature of man Now indeed whereas we are borne in sin sin is a naturall property of men Cont. Manich. c. 9. according to the judgement of Augustine But and if we say any man to be naturally evill we say so because of the originall of the old sin in which all our mortality now is borne Object 3. But the will and power which was in Adam was from God Therefore sin also is from God Ans God gave not man a will and power to work evill God gave not man a will and power to work evill but to do good For hee made a Law to forbid evill Wherefore Adam himself did ill bestow that will and power which he received of God in ill using of them The prodigall son received money of his father not that he should lash it out wastfully but that he might have so much as sufficed need Wherefore when himself did ill bestow his money and perished he perished through his owne default and not by his father though hee received the money of his father Therefore the fault is in the abuse He that giveth thee them leaveth the use of them unto thee If he be just he giveth them thee for to use and not to abuse When thou abusest them the fault is laid on thee who abusest them and not on him who gave them So God gave a will and power to Adam to do good not to work evill Object 4. God made man so as he might fall It was necessary that man should have free power either to stand or fall Rom. 9.20 Isa 45.9 neither did confirm and establish in him the goodnesse of his nature Wherefore he would have him to fall or sin Answ The Scripture beateth back this forwardnesse of men wickedly curious Who art thou which pleadest against God Woe be unto him that striveth with his Maker Except God had made man so as hee might fall there had been no praise of his work or vertue And what if it were necessary that man should be so made as he might fall For so did the very nature of God require God doth not grant his glory to any creature Adam was a man no God And as God is good so is he also just He doth good unto men but hee will have them to be obedient and thankfull unto him He bestoweth infinite goodnesse upon man therefore he should have been thankfull and obedient and subject unto him For he declareth by his law what hee would and what he would not Of the tree of knowledge of good and evill saith hee thou shalt not eat When thou eatest thou shalt die As if he should say Thou shalt regard me thou shalt cleave unto me obey me serve me neither shalt thou else-where seek for the rules of good and evill but of mee and so shalt thou shew thy selfe obedient unto me Repl. God fore-knew the fall of man which if he would he might have hindred but hee did not hinder it Therefore God was in the fault that Adam sinned Ans Unto this objection answer hath been made before neither
in heaven is perfect Answ First these and the like speeches speake of that perfection which is not of degrees but of parts or of the integritie and sincerity of the obedience begun in them Perfection of degrees or obedience perfect in degrees is that which hath not only all the parts of obedience but that degree also which the law requireth in us Such a perfection have not the regenerate in this life They have indeed all the parts of obedience begun in them but yet weakely so that they are here daily more and more perfected but attaine not to the chiefe and due degree thereof untill they enjoy the life to come The perfection of parts is the integrity of obedience or whole obedience begun according to the whole law or it is a desire and endeavour to obey God and withstand corrupt lusts according not to some onely but to all the commandements of his law The perfection of sincerity is a desire or study of obedience and godlinesse not feigned but true and earnest albeit somewhat be wanting to the parts as touching the degree This perfection to wit both the integrity and sincerity of obedience is in all the regenerate For unto them it is proper to submit themselves to the commandements of God even to all without exception and to begin in this life all the parts of true godlinesse or obedience This is called also the justice of a good conscience because it is a necessary effect of faith and pleaseth God through Christ And albeit in all men even in the most holy much hypocrisie remaineth as it is said Rom. 3 4. Every man is a lyar yet there is a great difference betweene them who are wholly hypocrites and please themselves in their hypocrisy having no beginning or feeling of true godlinesse in their hearts and those who acknowledgeing and bewailing the remnants of hypocrisy which are in them have withall the beginning of true faith and conversion unto God Those hypocrites are condemned of God these are received into favour not for this beginning of obedience in them but for the perfect obedience of Christ which is imputed unto them And therefore to this declaration or exposition another is also to be added That they who are converted are perfect in the sight of God not only in respect of the parts of true godlinesse which are all begun in them but also in respect of the degrees of true and perfect righteousnesse of Christ imputed unto them as it is said Colos 2.10 Heb. 10.14 1 Cor. 2.6 14.20 Ephes 4.19 Ye are all complete in him With one offering hath he consecrated for ever them that are sanctified But they reply That the perfection also of degrees is attributed unto the Saints in the Scripture 〈◊〉 Wee speake wisdome among them that are perfect Be perfect in understanding Till wee all meet together in the unity of faith and knowledge of the Sonne of God unto a perfect man and unto the measure of the age of the fullnesse of Christ But these places also doe not call them perfect in respect of the law of God that is in respect of the degree of knowledge and obedience which the law requireth in us but in respect of the weaker who have lesse light and certainty and readinesse confirmed by use and exercise to obey God to resist carnall lusts and to beare the crosse For so is this perfection expounded That we be no more children Ephes 4.14 Heb. 5.14 Philip. 3.12 wandring and carried about with every winde of doctrine Not as though I had already attained to it or were already perfect They oppose against these answers a place out of John 1 John 4.17 18. Herein is the love perfect in us that we should have boldnes in the day of judgement for as he is even so are we in this world There is no feare in love but perfect love casteth out feare for feare hath painfulnesse and he that feareth is not perfect in love But S. John meaneth not that our love towards God Our regeneration and newnesse of life doth assure us of justification as being an effect thereof Rom. 5.5 but Gods love towards us is perfect that is declared and fully known unto us by the effects or benefits of God bestowed upon us in Christ Or as Saint Paul speaketh Rom. 5. where hee saith That the love of God shed abroad in our hearts by the holy Ghost is the cause why wee doe without feare and with boldnesse expect the day of Judgement and of this mercy and free love of God towards us he signifieth that by this token or testimony we are assured because in this life we are reformed by the holy Spirit to his Image For by our regeneration we are assured of our justification not as by the cause of the effect but as by the effect of the cause Now though regeneration be not perfect in this life yet if it be indeed begun it sufficeth for the confirmation and proving of the truth of our faith unto our consciences And these very words which S. John addeth Love casteth out feare shew that love is not yet perfect in us because wee are not perfectly delivered in this life from feare of the wrath and judgement of God and eternall punishment John 3.21 1 John 3.23 Psal 119. For these two contrary motions are now together in the godly even the feare and love of God in remisse and low degrees their feare decreasing and their love and comfort or joy in God increasing untill joy get the conquest and perfectly cast out all trembling in the life to come when God shall wipe away every teare These places of Scripture are to be understood of the uprightnesse of a good conscience not of any perfect fulfilling of the Law in the godly Object 5. Hee that doth truth cometh to the light that his deeds might be made manifest that they are wrought according to God If our heart condemne us not then have we boldnesse towards God I have not declined from thy Law Therefore the good workes of the regenerate may be alledged and stand in Gods judgement as perfectly answerable unto his Law Answ These and the like sayings doe not challenge to the godly in this life perfect fulfilling of the Law but the uprightnesse of a good conscience without which faith cannot consist or stand as neither can a good conscience without faith As it is said Fight a good fight having faith and a good conscience 1 Tim. 1.18 19. And Then being justified by faith Rom. 5.1 wee have peace towards God through our Lord Jesus Christ For a good conscience is a certaine knowledge that we have faith and a purpose to obey God according to all his commandements and that wee and our obedience though maimed and scarce begun please God not for that it satisfieth his Law but because those sins and defects which remaine in us are forgiven us for the satisfaction of Christ
reconciled witnesse Peter who saith He was put to death concerning the flesh Repl. But Christ is the Intercessor and God the Testator Therefore the reconciliation is not of force Ans They differ in person and offices the person of Christ differeth from the person of the Father and the holy Ghost in office not in efficacy and power and in respect of him it is an intercession in respect of us a reconciliation or receiving into favour 2. How a Covenant may be made between God and men THat Covenant could not be made without a Mediatour for we could neither satisfie nor come again in favour with God no nor receive the benefit of reconciliation procured by another Furthermore God in his justice would not admit of us without sufficient satisfaction we were the enemies of God therefore the entrance and accesse to God lay not open to us before he was pacified by the merit of our Mediatour as it hath been shewed more at large before in that question Why a Mediatour is necessary for us The reconciliation could not be plenarily accomplished without the satisfaction and death of the Mediatour Again without the Mediatour regenerating us we should not have been able to stand to the conditions and so had the Covenant been made of no force 3. Whether there be one or moe Covenants There is but one Covenant in substance two in circumstance THe Covenant of God is but one in substance and matter but two in circumstances that is it is one in respect of the more generall conditions by which God combineth or compoundeth with us and we with God but it is two in respect of lesse principall conditions or as some speak it is two as touching the manner of the administration thereof There is but one in substance How one in substance 1. Because there is but one God one Mediatour between God and men Christ Jesus one mean of reconcilement one faith one way of the salvation of all who are saved and have been saved from the beginning It is a great question Whether the ancient Fathers were saved by any other means then we are which except it be well and circumspectly construed obscureth with palpable darknesse the light of the Gospel But these testimonies of Scripture doe lesson and schoole us the truth herein Hebr. 13.8 Eph. 1.22 4.1 Jesus Christ yesterday and to day and the same also for ever God hath appointed him over all things to be the head of the Church By whom all the body is coupled and knit together c. No man hath seen God at any time the only begotten Son which is in the bosome of the Father John 1.18 he hath declared him There is given no other name under heaven whereby we must be saved No man knoweth the Father but the Son and he to whom the Son will reveale him Acts 4.12 Matth. 11.27 John 14.6 I am the way the truth and the life no man cometh to the Father but by me Hee meaneth I alone am the way by which even Adam attained salvation Luke 20.24 John 8.56 Many kings have desired to see these things which ye see and have not seen them Abraham rejoyced to see my day and he saw it and was glad All therefore as well under the Law as under the Gospel who were to be saved had respect to the onely Mediatour Christ by whom alone they were reconciled unto God and saved Therefore there is but one Covenant 2. The Covenant is only one because the principall conditions which are termed the substance of the Covenant are the same both before and since Christs incarnation for in both Testaments before and after the exhibiting of Christ God promiseth remission of sins to beleevers and repentant sinners and men bind themselves to beliefe and repentance There are said to be two Covenants How two in circumstance the old and the new as concerning the circumstances and those conditions which are lesse principall which are the forme of administration serving for the principall conditions that the faithfull may attain unto them by the help of these Now what these principall conditions are shall appear out of that which followeth A rule here may be observed The diversity of Covenants is known by the diversity of their conditions In all Covenants their conditions are ever to be considered which if they be the same then are the Covenants also the same if diverse then the Covenants also diverse if partly the same and partly diverse then the Covenants are also in part the same and in part diverse as in this Covenant 4. In what the old and new Covenant agree and in what they differ The old and new Covenant agree in three things WHereas the Covenant is one and yet the Scripture speaketh thereof as of two we are to consider wherein the old and new Testament concurre and agree and wherein they differ They agree In their Author and Mediatour In their Authour which is God and in their Mediatour which is Christ Object But some man will say Moses was the Mediatour of the old Covenant Ans True as in a type adjoyned to the Mediatour which was signified who then also was Mediatour but now is sole Mediatour without that typicall Mediatour For he is manifested in the flesh and is no more covered with types In the promise of grace In the promise of grace touching remission of sins and life everlasting to be given freely by and for Christ the Mediatour to those only who beleeve which promise was common to the old Church as well as to us For God promised the same grace and mercy unto all who beleeve in the Mediatour In thy seed shall the nations of the earth be blessed Gen. 22.18 Gen. 3.15 Gen. 17.7 John 3.36 The seed of the woman shall break the head of the serpent I will be thy God and the God of thy seed He that beleeveth in the Son hath life everlasting We beleeve through the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ to be saved even as they doe Now here wee speak not in particular of the circumstances of grace but in generall of the promise of grace But Covenants have the same corporall promises also but that only in generall In their condition in respect of us Gen. 17.1 Mark 1.15 In their tenour and condition in respect of us for in both God requireth of men faith and obedience Walk before me and be thou upright And Repent and beleeve the Gospel The new and oâ—d Covenant therefore agree as concerning the principall conditions of the Covenant both in respect of God and in respect of man But the two Covenants differ The old and new Covenant differ In promises of corporall benefits In the promises of corporall benefits for the old Covenant had speciall promises of some certain definite corporall blessings as the promise of the land to be given to the Church of the form of ceremoniall
agnise the mercy and grace of God and yeeld thanks unto him for the same The summe therefore of all is that though the satisfaction of Christ our Mediator for our sins is most perfect yet all are not delivered by it but they only who beleeve the Gospel and do apply the merit of Christ by a true faith unto themselves Object 1. Grace exceedeth the sinne of Adam If therefore for the sin of Adam all men are cast away much more by the grace of Christ all and not beleevers onely shall be saved Answer to the antecedent Grace exceedeth and is above sin in respect of the sufficiency of the satisfaction not in respect of the application thereof Wherefore that all are not saved through the satisfaction or obedience of Christ the fault thereof sticketh in men themselves and is to be ascribed unto the unbeleevers who imbrace not the grace of Christ offered but like ungratefull men reject it Object 2. Whomsoever Christ hath fully satisfied for they are to be received of God into favour for so doth the justice of God require But Christ hath fully satisfied for all the sins of all men Therefore all men are to be received of God into favour or if this be not done God shall be unjust or somewhat is derogated from Christs merit Answ The Major proposition being understood simply and without any limitation is false All are received into favour for whom Christ hath satisfied with this condition if they apply the satisfation of Christ unto themselves by faith This condition is expresly added John 3.10 So God loved the world that hee gave his Sonne that whosoever beleeveth in him should not perish but might have everlasting life Object 3. Adam by one sinne made all subject to condemnation but Christ doth justifie onely some The force therefore of Adams sin is greater to condemne then of Christs satisfaction to save Answ The force of Christs satisfaction is seen not in the multitude of them who are saved but in the greatnesse of the benefit We deny the consequence of this argument because the force excellency and efficacy of Christs satisfaction is not to be esteemed by the multitude or number of those men who are thereby saved but by the greatnesse of the benefit it selfe For it is a greater work to deliver and save even one from everlasting death then to make all men by one sin guilty of everlasting death for be it that Christ should save even but one man yet it was necessary 1. That he should pay in a finite time a punishment in greatnesse and value infinite not onely for that one sin of Adam but for other infinite sins which follow it of which every one also deserves infinite punishment It was required also 2. That he should purge and take away not only that originall and birth-sin but also infinite others 3. And should restore in him a perfect conformity with God Wherefore the grace of Christ in saving even one man doth in infinite manner exceed the sin of Adam Ans 2. Again that the force of that efficacy which is in Christs merit and benefit passeth not through all men as the strength of Adams sin passed through all his posterity the fault hereof is in men who do not as much apply unto themselves by a true faith Christs merit as they do apply unto themselves the sin of Adam both by being born in it and consenting unto it and fostering it Now the reason why all men do not beleeve nor apply this Christs benefit unto themselves is a question of higher and deeper speculation impertinent to this place This may suffice for answer herein Rom 9.28 God hath mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardeneth And he will so shew his mercy that hee will also exercise his justice Quest 21. What is true faith Answ It is not only a certain knowledge whereby I surely assent to all things which God hath revealed unto us in his word a James 2.19 but also an assured trust b Heb. 11.1 7. Rom. 4.18 19 20 21. 10.10 Ephes 3.12 Hebr. 4.6 James 1.6 kindled in my heart by the holy Ghost c Gal. 5.22 Matth. 16.17 2 Cor. 4.13 Joh. 6.29 Eph. 2.8 Act. 16.14 Phil. 1.19 through the Gospel d Rom. 1.16 10.17 1 Cor. 1.21 Act. 10.44 16.14 whereby I make my repose in God being assuredly resolved that remission of sins everlasting righteousnesse and life is given not to others only but to me also e Rom. 1.17 5.1 Gal. 3.11 2.16 and that freely through the mercy of God for the merit of Christ alone f Eph. 2.8 Rom. 3.24 5.19 Luke 1.77 78. The Explication THe doctrine of Faith followeth 1. Because faith is the means whereby we are made partakers of the Mediatour 2. Because without faith the preaching of the Gospel profiteth and availeth nothing The Questions touching Faith are 1. What faith is in generall 2. How many kindes of faith there are in Scripture 3. How faith differeth from hope 4. What are the efficient causes of justifying faith 5. What are the effects of it 6. To whom it is given 1. What faith is in generall THe word fides or faith according to Cicero's derivation Whence faith hath his name Cic. Offic. 1. receiveth his appellation and name from the Gerund fiendo which signifieth doing because that which is covenanted is performed and is defined by him to be The assurance and truth of contracts and whatsoever kind of composition yea the very foundation of justice The generall nature of faith as it is extended unto all things It is commonly defined to be A certain or grounded knowledge of propositions or conclusions to which we assent on authority of the assertion of true witnesses whom wee may not except against or doubt of whether it be God or Angels or man or experience The generall nature of faith as it concerneth onely divine things and is taught in Scripture But whereas in the most generall distinction of faith there is one kind of faith in divine matters another in humane the question here is what Theologicall faith or faith in divine things is Wherefore we must give a more strict difinition of faith taken in generall which notwithstanding must be such as that it comprise all the specials of faith delivered in Scripture In generall therefore The divers acceptations and uses of the name of faith whatsoever faith is mentioned in Scripture it is A certain knowledge firmly yeelding assent to all things which are delivered in the sacred Scriptures of God his will works and grace whereunto we condescend even because God himselfe doth affirme it Or it is to yeeld assent to every word of God delivered to the Church either in the law or in the Gospel for that it is the asseveration or avouching of God himselfe Oftentimes faith is taken for the very doctrine of the Church or those things
wit as touching their accomplishment and consummation Some reconcile the difference of these two in this manner Faith apprehendeth the promises proposed in the Creed concerning things to come Hope the things themselves promised which are to come But this reconcilement is not so popular and easie to be conceived by the vulgar fort as is the other Object 2. Faith is the evidence of things which are not seen Therefore not of things present Answ It is the evidence of things which are not seen to wit by the outward sense but they are seen by the eyes of the mind even as if they did lie open to the eyes of the body Again they are not seen as is afore-shewed in respect of their accomplishment and consummation 5. What are the causes of faith How the H. Ghost is the principall efficient cause of faith Ephes 2.8 THe first and principall efficient cause of faith both historicall temporary and of working miracles is the holy Ghost howbeit hee is cause of these by his divine generall working only but he is cause of justifying faith by a speciall kinde of working By the grace of God ye are saved through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God who enlightneth the minde that it may understand the word and moveth the will that it may assent unto the word once understood Object The divell hath historicall faith It is therefore wrought in him by the holy Ghost Ans Yea even whatsoever faith is in the divell is wrought by the Spirit of God but that by a generall and universall working only as hath been said whereby he worketh in all not by a speciall and proper action because by such a kind of working the holy Ghost fashioneth and frameth a justifying faith in the elect alone For verily whatsoever knowledge and understanding is in divels and hypocrites God effecteth it by his Spirit but not so as to regenerate or justifie them that they might rightly acknowledge him to be the authour of this gift and magnifie him therefore for after this manner hee worketh faith in the elect alone The divels therefore and hypocrites have faith from the Spirit of God but the elect from the Spirit of God sanctifying them The word of God preached the instrumentall cause of faith Rom. 1.16 Rom 10 17. 1 Cor 4.15 The instrumentall cause of faith in generall is the whole word of God comprehended in the books of the old and new Testament in which writings also are contained many works and miracles of God besides the word But the chief and proper instrument of justifying faith is the preaching of the Gospel The Gosel is the power of God unto salvation to every one that beleeveth Faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God This instrument doth the holy Ghost use yet not as necessary in regard of his working but arbitrary and at his own good pleasure both to stir up faith in us and to nourish strengthen and increase the same Wherefore ordinarily justifying faith is never engendered in those who are of yeers to receive it without the preaching of the Gospel Speciall revelation the cause of faith of miracles The formall cause of faith The object of faith The subject of faith The ends of faith The cause of that faith which worketh miracles is not simply the word of God but there must necessarily come thereto an especiall or immediate revelation from God The formall cause of justifying faith is a certain knowledge and confidence in Christ The object of it is whole Christ and his benefits promised in the word The subject or part of man wherein it remaineth is the understanding will and heart of man The end or finall cause 1. The glory of God to wit the celebration of his truth justice bounty mercy which hee hath shewed in the sending of his Son and in the giving of faith in him 2. Our salvation that wee may receive the blessings which are promised in the word 6. What are the effects of faith The effects of faith THe effects of justifying faith are 1. The justifying of us before God 2. Joy resting on God and peace of conscience Being justified by faith we have peace with God 3. Our whole conversion regeneration and all our obedience which followeth faith and beginneth at the same time with faith For by faith God purifieth our hearts Rom. 5.1 To the effects of faith appertaine also the consequents thereof that is increase of spirituall and corporall gifts and the receiving of the things themselves which faith aimeth at Acts 15.9 The first then and immediate effect of justifying faith is justification from this afterwards flow all other benefits purchased by the bloud of Christ which all we beleeve to be given us by faith faith it selfe being the cause of them for That which is the cause unto any cause of any effect is likewise a cause of that effect If thererefore faith be the next cause of our justification in respect of us it is also a cause of those things which necessarily follow justification Thy faith hath saved thee Luke 8.48 In a word The effects of faith are justification and regeneration which is begun here and is to be perfected in the life to come Rom. 3.28 10.10 Acts 13.39 7. Unto whom faith is given Justifying faith is given to all the elect and to them only Joh. 6.44 10.26 Matth. 13.11 Acts 13.48 Rom. 8.30 Ephes 2.8 Rom. 10.16 2 Thes 3.2 Mat. 7.22 JUstifying faith is only proper to the elect and that to all of them for it is given to the elect alone and to all the elect even to infants as concerning some inclination No man can come to mee except the Father which hath sent mee draw him Ye beleeve not for ye are not of my sheep It is given to you to know the secrets of heaven but unto them it is not given And they beleeved as many as were ordained to everlasting life Whom he predestinated them also he called and whom hee called them also hee justified Faith is the gift of God All have not hearkened to the Gospel For all men have not faith Temporary faith and the faith of miracles is given to those who are members of the visible Church only that is hypocrites Have wee not by thy Name done many great works Cast out divels But now neverthelesse this faith of miracles ceaseth which flourished in the primitive Church for that now the doctrine is sufficiently confirmed Historicall faith all they have who are by profession of the Church whether they be of the godly or reprobates yea and they also who are not members of the Church but enemies as divels and tyrants Historicall is a part of justifying faith because there can be no assent or perswasion of a thing which is not first known Object Historicall faith is a good work The divels have historicall faith Therefore they have good works Answ Historicall
hee be worthy of love or hatred Therefore wee cannot be assured of the election of God neither resolve any thing of Gods present favour and so by consequent neither of that which is to come Answer to the Antecedent 1. Man knoweth not true as concerning second causes or by events of things be they good or evill for externall and outward fortune is no certain token whereby to judge of Gods favour 2. Again man knoweth not of himselfe but hee knoweth it God revealing it and certifying us abundantly of his love towards us by his word and Spirit Repl. 5. Who hath known the minde of the Lord Answ Rom. 11.34 No man hath known it before God hath revealed it neither after hee hath revealed it doth any man perfectly know it but so much we know as may suffice to our salvation We all behold as in a mirrour the glory of the Lord with open face 2 Cor. 3.18 Rom. 8.16 and are changed into the same image from glory to glory It is the Spirit which revealeth and witnesseth unto us 1 Cor. 1.22 that wee are the sons of God Object 2. But if the righteous turn away from his righteousnesse and commit iniquity Ezek. 18.24 he shall die in his sins Therefore beleevers also may defect from godlinesse and fall from everlasting salvation Ans 1. That which is spoken but conditionally is no positive assertion Ans 2. He in that place is called just not only who is truly just but also who seemeth just in the eyes of men of which kind oftentimes time-serving hypocrites are which beleeve for a while and afterwards fall away for a true just man is like a tree planted by the waters side whose leafe shall not wither Psal 1.3 4. And the sons and heires only are endued with true conversion and godlinesse Rom. 8.14 As many as are led by the spirit of God they are the sons of God And if sons then also heirs Gal. 4.7 1 Cor. 2.12 16. Wee have received the Spirit of God that we might know the things which are given unto us of God We have the mind of Christ When the Spirit of God which worketh in the sons and heirs of the kingdome their conversion and sanctification is called 2 Cor. 1.22 5.5 Ephes 1.14 The earnest of our inheritance untill the redemption of the possession purchased Object 3. Paul exhorteth the Corinthians 2 Cor. 6.1 Matt. 26.41 that they receive not the grace of God in vain so Christ likewise biddeth us Watch and pray Ans Thereby carnall security is forbidden and certainty of salvation as also faith tranquillity watchfulnesse and praier is commanded for these are the necessary and proper effects of our election and an infallible argument of salvation For all beleevers are elected and Paul teacheth Ephes 1. That by faith we are made partakers of Gods adoption Object 4. Saul failed and fell away finally Saul was one of the godly Therefore the godly also fall away Ans We deny the Minor that Saul was one of the godly for he was an hypocrite Repl. But he had the gifts of the holy Ghost Ans He had such gifts of the holy Ghost as are common to the godly with the reprobate he had not the gifts of regeneration and adoption and therefore neither had hee the holy Ghost sanctifying him which is proper unto the elect Object 5. The doctrine of the certainty of our salvation breedeth security Ans It breedeth indeed a spirituall security by it self in the elect alone and a carnall by accident and that only in the wicked and reprobate but not at all in the godly Quest 22. What are those things which are necessary for a Christian man to beleeve Ans All things which are promised us in the Gospel a John 20.31 Matth. 28.20 Mark 1.15 the summe whereof is briefly comprised in the Creed of the Apostles or in the Articles of the catholick and undoubted faith of all Christians The Explication AFter wee have treated of Faith it directly followeth now that wee speak of the Object of faith that is the summe of those things which are to be beleeved Faith therefore in generall apprehendeth the whole word of God and is strongly perswaded of the truth thereof as appeareth out of the definition thereof But justifying faith properly eyeth the promises of the Gospel or the preaching of grace through Christ Wherefore the Gospel is properly the object of justifying faith and it is properly termed The doctrine of things to be beleeved as contrariwise the law properly is The doctrine of things to be done Mens traditions therefore the Popes ordinances and decrees of Councels are sequestred and excluded from being the object of faith for faith can relie on nothing but the word of God as on an immoveable foundation Now the decrees of men are variable and uncertain sith every man is a lyar only God is true and his word truth Rom. 3 4. Wherefore Christians as they may not frame unto themselves any object of faith so neither may they receive any formed and delivered by others but must beleeve the Gospel only Mark 1.15 as the Scripture teacheth Repent and beleeve the Gospel 1 Cor. 2.5 That your faith should not be in the wisdome of men but in the power of God Now the summe of the Gospel or of things to be beleeved is the Apostles Creed whereof it followeth that wee treat Quest 23. Which is the Creed Answ 1. I beleeve in God the Father Almighty maker of heaven and earth 2. And in Jesus Christ his only Son our Lord 3. Which was conceived by the holy Ghost born of the Virgin Mary 4. Suffered under Pontius Pilate was crucified dead and buried he descended into hell 5. The third day he rose again from the dead 6. He ascended into heaven and sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty 7. From thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead 8. I beleeve in the holy Ghost 9. I beleeve the holy catholick Church the communion of Saints 10. The forgivenesse of sins 11. The resurrection of the body 12. And the life everlasting Amen The Explication THis word Symbole is derived from a Greek word which signifieth either a common collation of divers men to the making of a banquet or a signe token and mark whereby a man is discerned from other Such as is the military signe whereby fellowes are decyphered from enemies The Symbole so termed in the Church is a briefe and summary forme of Christian doctrine or a briefe summe or confession of the points of Christian religion or Evangelicall doctrine Now it is called by the name of Symbole because it is as a token or profession whereby the Church with her members is discerned from all her enemies and from all other Sects Some say that this briefe summe of Evangelicall doctrine was called a Symbole for that this doctrine was collated as it were and
my Spirit upon all flesh and your sonnes and your daughters shall prophecy Whosoever shall confesse mee before men him will I confesse also before my Father which is in heaven Our propheticall office therefore is 1. Rightly to understand and imbrace the doctrine perfect and necessary to salvation concerning God and his will 2. That every one in his place and degree professe the same being understood faithfully boldly constantly in word and life thereby both to celebrate God and to bring many schollars and disciples unto Christ. The difference between Christs Propheticall function and ours is 2 Differences of Christs Prophetical function with ours 1. That Christ hath the spirit without measure wee by measure For it is the proper spirit of Christ which floweth from him and is poured into the hearts of men we have him by gift He being but one hath all the gifts of the holy Ghost and those in the most excellent degree all we have but only some and those farre inferiour 2. That Christ effectually teacheth by moving the hearts of men to accord and assent The sound and voice of others without the inward sound and voice of the holy Ghost doth onely strike the cares neither pierceth it unto the heart 3. What is the Priest-hood of Christians What our Priest-hood is and the parts of it THe office of a Priest is to teach to pray and to sacrifice Wherefore our Priest-hood is 1. To teach and instruct others that is to declare and shew unto others the true knowledge of God And thou when thou art converted strengthen thy brethren Luke 22.32 2. To invocate on God being known aright of us 3. To performe unto God the duties of thankfulnesse to render him his due worship even all outward and inward obedience or to offer up unto God all our life time sacrifices of thanksgiving acceptable unto him What our sacrifices of thanksgiving are and sanctified by the sacrifice of Christ namely to offer up unto him 1. Our selves by mortifying the old man in us and by giving our members as weapons of righteousnesse unto God Rom. 6.13 2. Our prayers Let us therefore by him offer the sacrifice of praise alwaies to God that is the fruit of the lips which confesse his name Heb. 13.15 3. Our almes-deeds Thy prayer is heard and thine almes are had in remembrance in the sight of God 4. Our confession of the Gospel Grace is given mee of God that I should be the Minister of Jesus Christ towards the Gentiles Acts 13.31 ministring the Gospel of God that the offering up of the Gentiles might be acceptable 5. Our cheerefull under going and suffering of the crosse Rom. 15.15 16. that is all calamities persecution contempt banishments and even death it selfe for the confession of the truth and the glory of God Phil. 2.17 2 Tim. 4.6 Col. 1.24 Though I be offered up upon the sacrifice and service of your faith I am glad I am now ready to be offered Now rejoyce I in my sufferings for you and fulfill the rest of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh for his bodies sake which is the Church This Priest-hood Christ communicateth unto us 1. When by the efficacy of his spirit he works in us these forenamed sacrifices of thanksgiving How Christ maketh us Priests which we offer unto God 2. When by his merit and intercession unto his Father he causeth our sacrifices albeit unperfect and stained with our sins to be notwithstanding pleasing and acceptable unto God Our sacrifices different from Christs sacrifice three wates Now our sacrifices differ as well as the sacrifices of the old Priests from Christs sacrifice 1. Christ offered up together a sacrifice both of thankesgiving and propitiatory We offer up only sacrifices of thankesgiving The old Priests also offered up sacrifices of thanksgiving because these belong to the whole Church even from the beginning to the end of the world But those sacrifices which they offered besides were only typicall But no sacrifices of the New Testament are typicall but either eucharisticall and of thankfulnesse as are ours or propitiatory as is the obedience of Christ otâ—â— performed for us in suffering our punishment For he offered not a typicall or figurative but the reall or figured and signified sacrifice as being not a typicall but the signified Priest 2. The sacrifices of Christ are both perfect ours unperfect and defiled with many sins 3. The sacrifice of Christ pleaseth God for it selfe and for the worthinesse that is perfect in it selfe and meriteth remission of sins and eternall life of God for us because it is the death of the very Son of God Our sacrifices merit nothing of God and please him not for themselves but for Christs sacrifice wherewith they are sanctified 4. What is the kingdome of Christians Christians are Kings 1. By partaking of his victory and royalty 2. By having in themselves through him a power to overcome over rule both their enemies and all creatures John 16.33 Rev. 3.21 Luke 22.30 Our royall office 1 John 5.4 1 Tim. 1.18 2 Tim. 2.12 Mat. 25.34 WEe are partakers of Christs kingdome Because he is our King and doth communicate his victory and glory against his enemies and ours with us and maketh us by faith citizens of his kingdome the sons of God his brethren and co heires Because by the vertue and operation of his Spirit he also maketh us Kings that is the Lords over all creatures conquerors of our enemies and partakers of everlasting blisse and glory Be of good comfort I have overcome the world To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with mee in my throne That yee may sit on seates and judge the twelve tribes of Israel Our royall office therefore is 1. That by the vertue of Christs spirit who hath restored unto us our lost royall and heavenly dignity over all our enemies we fight continually against sin the world the divel and the flesh and overcome Which wee do when as by a true faith we are resolved that we have remission of all our sins and when by the same faith we receive the holy Ghost to represse sin even in this life as touching the beginning of our conquest 2. That at length all our enemies being by the grace of Christ fully brought under wee injoy eternall blisse and glory that is the heavenly kingdome which by the working of the holy Ghost is begun in us in this life and which we now possesse in hope but then shall in full possession inherit Our kingdome 1 Cor. 3.21 Fight a good fight having faith and a good conscience If we suffer we shall also reigne with him Inherit yee the kingdome prepared for you from the foundations of the world Briefly our kingdome is 1. That in Christ we are Lords over all creatures All things are yours 1 John 5.4 2. That we overcome our enemies by faith in Christ Who hath given us victory This
Father is consubstantiall with him as likewise with the Son of and from whom he also is 3. What is the office of the holy Ghost THe office of the holy Ghost is sanctification Sanctification the office of the holy Ghost The parts of his office are five Spirit 〈…〉 copulatquâ— â—â—guquâ— Et cen olâ—turâ—â—â—â—â—a salutisâ—â—â— which is wrought immediately by him from the Father and the Son and therefore he is called The Spirit of sanctification The chiefe parts of his office are To teach To regenerate To unite with Christ and God To governe To comfort To confirme or strengthen us The holy Ghost therefore To teach us John 14.26 and 10.13 Teacheth and illuminateth us that wee may know those things which wee ought and may conceive them aright according to Christs promise The holy Ghost whom the Father will send in my name hee shall teach you all things and bring all things to your remembrance which I have told you The Spirit of truth will lead you into all truth So he taught the Apostles at Whitsontide when they were raw before of Christs death and his kingdom he kindled in their hearts a new light he powred into them the miraculous knowledge of tongues and fulfilled the testimony and record of Joel Hereof he is called in Scripture The Teacher of truth the Spirit of wisdom revelation understanding counsell and knowledge c. To regenerate us He regenerateth us when he endoweth us with new qualities and putteth new inclinations in our hearts that is hee worketh faith and conversion in the hearts of the chosen John 3.5 Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit he cannot enter into the kingdome of God I baptise you with water to amendment of life but hee that cometh after me Mat. 3.11 hee will baptise you with the holy Ghost and with fire This baptisme which is wrought of Christ by the holy Ghost is the very regeneration or renewing it selfe the same which was signified by the outward baptisme of John and of other ministers To unite us with Christ Hee conjoyneth us with Christ that we may be his members and may be quickned by him and so maketh us partakers of all Christs benefits I will powr out my Spirit upon all flesh Joel 2.28 1 Cor. 6.11 19. But yee are washed but ye are sanctified but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God Know ye not that your body is the temple of the holy Ghost which is in you 2 Cor. 12.3 4 13. whom ye have of God No man can say that Jesus is the Lord but by the holy Ghost There are diversities of gifts but the same Spirit By one Spirit we are all baptised into the same Spirit Hereby we know that he abideth in us 1 John 3.24 even by the same Spirit which he hath given us To rule and govern us Hee ruleth and governeth us Now to be ruled and guided by the holy Ghost is to be instructed with wisdome and counsell in the actions of our life and vocation and inclined to follow those things which are right and good and to perform the duties of love and charity towards God and our neighbour Rom. 8.14 As many as are led by the Spirit of God they are the sons of God And they began to speak with tongues Acts 2.4 as the Spirit of God gave them utterance To comfort us Acts 5.41 He comforteth us amidst our afflictions and dangers The Apostles who were first flying away for fear of the Jews now being erected by the comfort and solace of the holy Ghost come forth into open place and rejoice when they are to suffer for the confession of the Gospel John 14.16 He will give you another Comforter that he may abide with you for ever To confirm us in faith He confirmeth us which stagger and waver in faith and assureth us of salvation that is he continueth and cherisheth in us Christs benefits unto the end So he made the Apostles couragious and bold who were before timorous and wrapped and intangled with many doubts These things we may plainly see if we compare that Sermon which Peter made at Whitsontide with their speech who went to Emmaus who say Luke 24.21 John 16.22 and 14.16 Wee trusted that it had been he which should have delivered Israel Hereof Christ saith Your hearts shall rejoice and your joy shall no man take from you He shall abide with you for even Hence is he called the Spirit of boldnesse and the seale of our inheritance Divers titles of the holy Ghost These are the chiefe and principall parts of the holy Ghosts office who in respect of this his office hath divers titles of commendation in the Scripture for hereof he is called The Spirit of adoption Rom. 8.15 16. The Spirit of adoption because he assureth us of the fatherly good will of God towards us and is a witnesse unto us of that free goodnesse and mercy wherewith the Father imbraceth us in his only begotten Son Therefore by his Spirit we cry Abba Father The seal of our inheritance 2 Cor. 1.22 Ephes 1.13 14. He is called the earnest and seal of our inheritance because he assureth us of our salvation It is God which stablisheth us with you in Christ and hath annointed us who hath also sealed us and hath given the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts In which Gospel also after that yee beleeved yee were sealed with the holy Spirit of promise which is the earnest of our inheritance Life or Spirit of life Rom. 8.2 Hee is called life because he quickneth us or as the Apostle saith The Spirit of life who mortifieth the old man and quickeneth the new The law of the Spirit of life which is in Christ Jesus hath freed me from the law of sin and of death Water Ezek. 36.5 and 47.1 Hee is called water whereby hee refresheth us being almost dead in sin purgeth out sin and maketh us fruitfull that wee may bring forth the fruit of righteousnesse unto God Fire Matth. 3.9 Hee is called fire because he doth daily burn up and consume concupiscences and vices in us and kindleth our hearts with the love of God and our neighbour The fountain of living water Rev. 21.6 7.17 Hee is called the fountaine because celestiall riches do flow unto us from him and by him The Spirit of prayer Zech. 12.10 Rom. 8 2â— He is called the Spirit of prayer because he stirreth us up unto prayer and instructeth us to pray I will powr upon the house of David and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem the Spirit of grace and of prayer and they shall look upon me The Spirit also helpeth our infirmities for we know not what to pray as we ought The oyle of gladnesse Hebr. 9. The oyl of gladnesse because he maketh us joyfull forward and lively
this which ye now see and hear Wherefore the Son also giveth him but in this order that the Son sendeth him from the Father whence is gathered a strong argument for proof of Christs God-head for who giveth the Spirit of God and who hath any right or title unto him but God for the humane nature of Christ so far off is it that it should have this right and power to send the holy Ghost that contrarily it self was hallowed and sanctified by the holy Ghost What is meant by the giving of the holy Ghost Now we are to understand this giving of the holy Ghost by the Father and the Son as that both of them is effectuall and forcible by him and that the holy Ghost worketh on a precedency of the will of the Father and the Son For wee are to mark and observe the order of operation or working in the persons of the Divinity which is such in working as it is in subsisting the Fathers will goeth before the will of the Son followeth and the will of the holy Ghost followeth them both yet not in time but in order Why the holy Ghost is given The cause wherefore he giveth us the holy Ghost is none other but only of his free election through the merit and intercession of his Son Ephes 1.3 Which hath blessed us with all spirituall blessings in heavenly things in Christ as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world John 14.16 I will pray the Father and he shall give you another Comforter The Son giveth us him or he is given by the Son because hee hath obtained for us by his merit that hee should be given unto us and he by his own intercession bestoweth him on us 6. Unto whom the holy Ghost is given To all who partake of any of his gâ—fts To all the Church How to the elect THe holy Ghost is said to be given unto them to whom he communicateth his gifts and who acknowledge him Wherefore the holy Ghost is given to divers parties according to diverse gifts He is given to the whole Church or assembly of those that are called that is both to the elect and to hypocrites but in a diverse manner to the one and the other To the elect he is given not only as concerning his common gifts but also as concerning his proper and saving graces that is not only as concerning the knowledge of Gods doctrine but also as concerning regeneration faith and conversion because besides that he kindleth in them the knowledge of Gods truth and will hee doth further also regenerate them and endow them with true faith and conversion Hee is therefore so given unto them that he worketh and effectuateth in them his gifts of their salvation and that themselves also may know and feel by those gifts imparted unto them the holy Ghost dwelling in them And further he is no otherwise given unto them then as themselves also be willing and desirous of him and then is augmented and increased in them if they persevere How to hypocrites John 14.17 But to hypocrites the holy Ghost is given only as touching the knowledge of doctrine and other his common and generall gifts The world cannot receive him because it seeth him not neither knoweth him Hence it is apparent how the knowledge of tongues sciences and the like gifts bestowed on the heathen differ from those which are bestowed on the Church for they who amongst the heathen excelled in the knowledge of tongues and good arts and things profitable had indeed the gifts of God but not the holy Ghost whom none are said to have but they whom he hath sanctified and who acknowledge him to be the author of the gifts received 7. When and how the holy Ghost is given and received The holy Ghost is given 1. Visibâ—y THe holy Ghost is then given when he imparteth or communicateth his gifts as hath been already proved And he is given either visibly when he bestoweth his gifts adjoyning outward signes and tokens or invisibly when he bestoweth his gifts without signes or tokens Hee was not alwayes given visibly but at certain times and for certain causes yet was he more plentifully powred on men in the time of the new Testament then before in the time of the old for so had Joel prophecied Joel 2.28 In the last dayes I will powr out of my Spirit So hee was given visibly unto the Apostles and others in the primitive Church Act. 2.3 10.44 There appeared unto them cloven tongues like fire and it sate upon each of them The holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word I saw the holy Ghost come down from heaven c. And these and other like speeches are so to be expounded as that the signe taketh the name of the thing it selfe and therefore that is affirmed of the thing which agreeth unto the signe by which signe the holy Ghost witnesseth his presence and efficacy So also John saw the holy Ghost descending on Christ in bodily shape like a dove Luke 3.22 Hee saw then the shape of a dove under which God shewed the presence of his Spirit Wherefore we must not think that there is any locall motion in God The sending of the holy Ghost is no locall motion but his presence and operation which hee sheweth and exerciseth in the Church For the holy Ghost is spread abroad every-where and filleth both heaven and earth in which respect hee is said to be given sent powred out when by his effectuall and forcible presence he doth create stir up and by little and little perfect his gifts in the members of the Church 2. Invisibly He alwayes was and is given unto the Church invisibly from the beginning unto the end of the world for hee spake by the prophets and hee which hath not the Spirit of Christ is none of his Rom. 8.9 yea without the holy Ghost there never had been 3. By means of hearing the word and receiving the sacraments never should be any Church Hee is given after an ordinary way by the ministery of the word and by the use of the Sacraments and 1. In manifesting himselfe unto us through the studying and meditation of the doctrine of the Gospel for when he is known of us he will communicate himself unto us and when hee sheweth himself to be known of us hee doth also renew and reform our hearts So did hee work in the elect by Peters sermon in the day of Pentecost Acts 2.37 10.44 Likewise he wrought in Cornelius and the rest there present by the same Peter speaking But yet notwithstanding hee doth so work by the word and sacraments as that hee is not tied to those means 4. Freely to that hee is not tâ—ed to â—hem for hee converted Paul in his journey and hee furnished John Baptist with his gifts in his wombe Now when wee say hee is given by
the ministery of the word and sacraments we mean this of persons of a competent age and repute this way for ordinary and speak of that visible sending of the holy Ghost whereby severall men in the Church partake of his accustomed or ordinary gifts â—al 4.6 Rom. 8.9 and whereof it is said Hee hath sent the Spirit of his Son into your hearts c. He which hath not the Spirit of Christ is none of his 2. He is given by working a desire of him in the elect Luke 21.13 for hee is given to them that desire him Hence is drawn a forcible argument to prove the God-head of the holy Ghost for to work effectually by the ministery is proper to God only 1 Coâ— 3.7 Neither is he that planteth any thing neither he that watereth but God that giveth the increase Mat. 3.11 I baptise you with water to amendment of life but he that cometh after me will baptise you with the holy Ghost and with fire The Gospel is the power of God Rom. 1.16 because the holy Ghost is forcible in working by it whereupon also the Gospel is called the ministration of the spirit 2 Cor. 3.8 Now the holy Ghost is received by faith Wherin also after that ye beleeved Ephes 1.13 ye were sealed with the holy Spirit of promise The world cannot receive the Spirit of truth because it neither seeth him nor knoweth him Object But faith is the gift and fruit of the holy Ghost Ephes 2.8 By grace are ye saved through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God No man can say that Jesus is the Lord but by the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 12.3 Therefore the holy Ghost goeth before faith How then is he said to be received by faith Answ 1. The working of the spirit is in order of nature before faith but in time both are together because the first beginning of faith is the receiving of the holy Ghost 2. Faith being once begun the holy Ghost is more and more received Galat. 5.6 Acts 15.9 who worketh aftewards other things in us by faith As it is said Faith worketh by love By faith mens hearts are purified 8. How the holy Ghost is retained THe holy Ghost is retained and kept for the most part by the same meanes by which it is given and received 1. By diligent use of the Ecclesiasticall Ministery He gave some to be Apostles Ephes 4.11 12 13 some to be Prophets for the edification of the body of Christ till we all meet together in the unity of faith 2. By meditation in the doctrine of the Gospel and by studying to profit therein Psal 1.2 He that doth meditate in the Law of the Lord day and night shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of waters that will bring forth her fruit in due season Let the word of Christ dwell in you plenteously in all wisdome Colos 3.16 teaching and admonishing your selves 3. He is kept by increase and continuance and amendment of life that is by a desire of bewaring to offend against our conscience Unto him that hath shall be given He that is righteous let him be righteous still Mat. 13.12 Revel 22.11 Ephes 4.30 Grieve not the holy Spirit of God by whom yee are sealed unto the day of redemption Hither may be referred a desire of avoiding evill company and sin For he that will avoid sin must avoid all occasion of sinning 4. He is retained by daily and earnest prayer and invocation Luke 11.13 Mat. 17.21 How much more shall your heavenly Father give the holy Ghost to them that desire him This kind is not cast out but by prayer and fasting The same may we see in that panoply or complete harnesse which the Apostle describeth Likewise Ephes 6.14 it is confirmed by the example of David who prayeth Psal 51.11 That God will not take his holy Spirit from him 5. He is retained by applying Gods gifts to their right use that is to his glory and to the safety of our neighbour And when thou art converted Luke 22.32 Mat. 25.29 confirm thy brethren Vnto every man that hath it shall be given and from him that hath not even that he hath shall be taken away 9. Whether and how the holy Ghost may be lost How he is lost of Reprobates and how of the Elect. HE may be lost of Hypocrites and Reprobates finally that is so as they shall never recover him and totally that is so that they shall retaine none of his graces Of the Elect he is never wholly lost but onely as touching many gifts because they alwayes retaine some gifts as Davids example testifieth unto us who said Restore to me the joy of thy salvation Take not thine holy spirit from me Psal 51.11 12. Neither is he finally lost of the Elect because at length they return to repentance But of the Reprobate he is altogether or wholly lost and finally so that they never receive him Object But the holy Ghost departed from Saul Therefore he may also depart from the Elect Ans He departed from Saul but not the spirit of regeneration for he never had him only the spirit of prophecy prudence courage and other gifts wherewith he was richly indowed left and forsooke him For he was elect and chosen not unto life but unto the Kingdome as Judas was unto an Apostleship Repl. Yea but the regenerating spirit also departeth because David prayeth Psal 51.12 Restore to me the joy of thy salvation Ans He is lost oftentimes as concerning some gifts of regeneration but not wholly For it cannot possibly be that the godly should retaine no remnants seeing they doe not sinne to death but only of the infirmity of their flesh inasmuch as they are not yet borne againe This Saint John teacheth expresly saying Whosoever is borne of God sinneth not for his seed remaineth in him neither can be sinne because he is borne of God David in his fall lost the joy of his heart the purity of conscience and many other gifts which he coveteth to have restored unto him But the holy Ghost he had not utterly lost for if so how then could he have said Take not thine holy spirit from me wherefore he had not utterly lost him A man saith Bernard never abideth in the same state either he goeth backward or forward For this difference is to be observed and held for the assoiling of that question How namely the perseverance of the Elect may be notwithstanding certaine albeit they lose the holy Ghost which is because they are never wholly and finally destitute of the holy Ghost Five meanes whereby he is lost Now the holy Ghost may be lost five wayes and those contrary to those other meanes whereby he is retained 1. By contempt of the Ecclesiasticall Ministery 2. By neglecting the Word and Doctrine For Paul willedth Timothy To stirre up the gift of
after this life but onely desireth to be rid of his present misery and therefore through humane infirmity and impatiencie doth compare the sense and feeling of his present miseries with the death and state of the dead whatsoever it be as they who are grievously tormented with present distresses and calamities preferre any thing whatsoever before that which they suffer So also Chap. 7. he speaketh as one despairing of delivery in this life Chap. 7 7.10 Remember that my life is but a wind and that my eye shall not returne to see pleasure For so he expoundeth himselfe when he addeth He shall returne no more to his house neither shall his place know him any more So likewise Chap. 17. My breath is corrupt Verse 1. and the grave is ready for me They are words of one despairing of life and salvation God being wroth and angry But when it is said If he set his heart upon man and gather unto himselfe his spirit and his breath All flesh shall perish together Chap. 34.14 15. it is not said that the soule doth sleep or perish but that by the departure thereof the body dieth and is dissolved Further they adde If presently after death the godly were blessed then injury was done unto them who were called againe into this mortall life But to this we answer That neither God can be injurious to any man whereas he is in no mans debt neither can any thing happen better or more acceptable unto the godly then to serve for the manifesting of Gods glory either by life or by death as it is said As alwayes Phil. 1.20 so now Christ shall be magnified in my body whether it be by life or by death c. Last of all if they say That the soule hath neither sense nor action but by bodily instruments and therefore being naked and destitute of these is destitute also of sense motion and operation To grant unto them this Antecedent of the soule being in the body yet notwithstanding of the soule freed from the body both learned Philosophers confesse the contrary and the Word of God testifieth the contrary as We know in part 1 Cor. 13.9 and we prophecie in part but when that which is perfect is come then that which is in part shall be abolished 2. Where and in what estate it abideth being separate from the body THe Papists dreame that the soules of men passe out of their bodies into the fire of Purgatory there to be purged from their sinnes some sooner some later Not in Purgatory as the Papists teach Li. 4. di 21. cap. â— according as they in their life time more or lesse loved the transitory pelfe of this world as Lombard speaketh Contrariwise the Scripture teacheth us that not any fire after death but onely the bloud of Christ in this life cleanseth our soules from all sinne It farther instructeth us how that the soules of the faithfull deceased are not plunged into the place of torment there to be refined from the drosse of their sins but are gathered unto Christ and into Abrahams bosome and on the other side that the soules of the wicked are forth-with cast into hell whence there is no retire and are now tormented with infernall flames but yet reserved to more grievous tortures of that everlasting fire which at the time of Christs coming to judgement The estate of the soules of the godly Luke 23.46 Acts 7.59 Luke 16.22 Phil. 1.3 2 Cor. 5.8 The estate of the soules of the wicked Mat. 10.28 the wrath of Jehovah shall kindle Of the estate of the soules of the godly these places yeeld testimony Into thy hands I commend my spirit Lord Jesus receive my soule And so it was that the beggar died and was carried by the Angels into Abrahams bosome Therefore he feared not Purgatory The faithfull covet to remove out of the body and to dwell with the Lord therefore they passe not through Purgatory first before they approach unto the sight of the Lord. Of the state of the soules of the ungodly these places make sufficient evidence Feare him who is able to cast both body and soule into hell fire The glutton straight after his buriall was in hell torments and cried I am tormented in this flame Luke 16.23 whence he shall never escape Wherefore the soules of the wicked leaving their bodies are not forth-with transported into Purgatory whence there may be a gappe or way to escape but are violently thrust down into the unspeakable fire of hell 3. What the Resurrection is and the errours concerning it THe word Resurrection signifieth sometimes mans spirituall conversion unto God The signification of the word Rev. 20.5 As This is the first Resurrection But in this Article the resurrection of the flesh is A restoring of the substance of our bodies after death even of the same matter whereof they now consist and a reviving and quickning of the same bodies with life immortall and incorruptible by the same immortall soul whereby they now live which God will work by Christ in the end of the world by his divine vertue and power which restoring also shall be of the Elect unto eternall glory The parts of it but of the reprobate unto eternall paines That is there shall be 1. A restoring of the same body which is a re-collecting and gathering together of the same matter whereof our body was first composed and which after our death was scattered and severed into all the elements 2. An uniting of it with the same soule and a reviving of it by the same soule which it had before with a putting off of all infirmities and a putting on of immortality 3. A glorifying of the Elect and an eternall rejection of the Reprobare Three errours concerning the Resurrection The errours held of the Resurrection are of three sorts 1. Some have utterly denied it and have avouched the soules to die together with the bodies as the Sadducees of whom mention is made in the Acts The Sadducees say that there is no Resurrection Acts 23.8 neither Angel nor Spirit 2. Some have granted the immortality of the soule but have construed the resurrection to be a resurrection in this life meaning by this resurrection nothing else but regeneration but the bodies they denied to rise at all although the soules of the godly have fruition after death of everlasting happines Hymeneus and Philetus seeme to have been authors of this heresie of whom the Apostle saith 2 Tim. 2.18 Which as concerning the truth have erred saying that the resurrection is past already and doe destroy the faith of some 3. Some as Anabaptists deny that the very selfe-same bodies which we now have shall rise againe but they say that God at Christs second coming will make new bodies Against all these errours we are to beleeve the Scripture affirming that the dead shall certainly rise againe 4. Whence it may appeare that the Resurrection shall
Supper therefore is often to be iterated and celebrated 1. Because of the words of the institution 2. In respect of the end and purpose of the institution because it must be done in remembrance of Christ Shew the Lords death That is beleeve that Christ dyed and that for you and then professe it also publickly before all Till he come Therefore it must be observed unto the worlds end neither is any other externall form to be looked for untill the day of judgement The words of the institution which have been hitherto expounded 1 Cor. 10.16 may be made more plain and cleer by these words of the Apostle The cup of blessing which wee blesse is it not the communion of the bloud of Christ The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the body of Christ The cup of blessing That is the cup of thanksgiving which is received namely to this end that we may yeeld thanks to Christ for his death and passion The communion of the body likewise the communion of the bloud is to be made through faith partakers of Christ and all his benefits the same spirit being in us which is in Christ John 15.2 â—phes 5. 1 John 1.6 and working the same in us which he worketh in Christ Or it is a spirituall fellowship of the faithfull with Christ as of members with the head and branches with the vine Bread and wine is the communion that is it is the signe and testimony of our communion with Christ But this our communion as the Apostle briefly declareth consisteth in this that wee who are many are but one body Whence it is most easie to collect That this communion of Christ is not a corporalleating For it is wrought only by faith and the holy Ghost Christ is the head and we the members and all wee who are members have also a communion of all Christs benefits Therefore the head is common the benefits common and so the members also common among themselves wherefore their love and dilection is common and mutuall Quest 78. Are then the bread and wine made the very body and bloud of Christ ON THE 19. SABBATH Ans No verily a Matt. 26.29 Mark 14.24 But as the water of baptism is not turned into the bloud of Christ but is only a signe and pledge of those things that are sealed unto us in baptism b Ephes 5.26 so neither is the bread of the Lords Supper the very body of Christ c 1 Cor. 10.16 11.26 although according to the manner of Sacraments and that forme of speaking of them which is usuall to the holy Ghost d Gen. 17.10 11. Exod. 12.11 13. 13.9 Titus 3.5 1 Pet. 3.21 1 Corinth 10.4 the bread is called the body of Christ The Explication THe Papists Transubstantiation under which also Consubstantiation maintained by the Ubiquitaries and others is comprehended is in this Question of the Catechisme consuted and rejected and the sacramentall kind of speech which we use with the true sense of those words of Christ This is my body examined and unfolded We will first intreat of that forme of speech which we use and of the true meaning of Christs words then will wee handle the controversie of Transubstantiation and Consubstantiation That therefore which hath been heretofore spoken in generall of sacramentall phrases and termes must be restrained to this Sacrament For thus Austine himself descendeth from the generall rule of sacramentall termes unto a particular instance of eating Christs flesh Eâ—ist 23. ad Bonifâ—â— This saith he is the only way to find whether a phrase be proper or figurative That whatsoever in Gods word cannot properly be referred to some point of morall duty or to the truth of faith you may be assured that it is figuratively spoken And a little after hee produceth this example Except yee eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drink his bloud yee have no life in you Hee seemeth saith Augustine by these words to injoyne us some hainous crime It is therefore a figurative speech instructing us that wee are to partake of Christs passion and joyfully and fruitfully to recall to mind how his flesh was crucified and wounded for us Wherefore as of Baptisme as hath been already declared so of the Lords Supper also the Scripture speaketh sometimes properly and sometimes figuratively The speech is figurative when Christ saith of the bread This is my body and of the cup This is my bloud Likewise when Paul saith This cup is the new Testament in my bloud For in these the name of the thing signified is attributed to the signe Paul also then speaketh figuratively when he saith This is my body which is broken for you because he attributeth the property of the signe which is to be broken to the thing signified Thus Cyprian must be understood When we drink of the cup we cleave to the crosse Serm. de Coena Hom 24. in 1 Cor. 10. Hom. 27. wee suck Christs bloud and lay our tongues in our Redeemers wounds Thus Chrysostome is to be interpreted when he saith Christs bloud is in the chalice Christs body which is in heaven is presented on earth to our view and is not only seen but touched of us nor touched only but eaten also he is held bitten and eaten of us in token of love as sometimes wee bite at him whom we love and touch his flesh with our tongue These sentences are not truly spoken or understood of the body of Christ but by a trope and figure usuall in sacraments Now the speech is proper when Christ saith Doe this in remembrance of me and when the Fathers every where say The breaking of bread is a memoriall a lively shadow of Christs sacrifice The bread signifieth the body of Christ It is a figure a signe a sacrament of the body of Christ Of the controversie concerning the words used in the Supper NOw whereas our adversaries the Papists and others deny that Christs words are sacramentally spoken and say we are to keep the letter wee must here adde something touching the controversie of the letter and meaning of the letter The Papists bear us in hand that by the vertue and force of consecration there is made a transubstantiation or changing of the bread into the body of Christ the accidents only remaining Others tell us of a consubstantiation or co-existence of Christs body in or with the bread The Transubstantiaries The Transubstantiaries and Consubstantiaries relie not on the simple meaning of Christs words together with the Consubstantiaries doe boast and glory that they understand the words of Christ simply and aright But neither perform that which they brag and boast of for that is the true simplicity and property of the word whereunto for the just understanding and interpretation thereof nothing is to be added neither ought to be taken from it neither any thing altered But as many as hold that the body of Christ
is with in or under the bread they adde unto the words of Christ and depart from true simplicity For if that which Christ said is simply to be retained and that not to be admitted which he said not then may we not say The bread is both bread and the body of Christ but simply this only The bread is the body of Christ For he said not My body is with or in or under the bread or The bread is both bread and my body together neither addeth he as these adde of their own really substantially corporally but he uttereth these bare words of the bread This is my body Neither have the Transubstantiaries their opinion drawn from the words of Christ simply understood namely that of the bread is made the body of Christ or the bread is changed into the body of Christ for this is their own forgery and invention For Christ said not that the bread was now made or was a making or should be made but simply said The bread is my body where no change could come between so that the words of Christ be simply understood Therefore falsly do they perswade the people that they simply rest on the propriety of Gods word when as manifoldly and most farre they swerve and depart from it The true interpretation of Christ words We Protestants retain the words of Christ without adding or altering to wit that the bread is the body of Christ and indeed the true and visible body which was given for us But because these words literally taken would admit a sense repugnant to the truth of Christian faith for if bread were properly Christs body it would follow that bread was crucified for us therefore we affirm that in Christs words a convenient meaning must be inquired after that is Christs words must be understood sacramentally namely that the bread is called Christs body because it is a signe of Christs body the cup or wine in the cup is called Christs bloud because it is a sign of Christs bloud the cup is also called the new Testament because it is a signe of the new Testament even as baptism is termed a washing away of sins and a laver of new birth because it is a signe of both these which are wrought properly by the bloud and spirit of Christ The true sense therefore and naturall interpretation of Christs words is This is my body which is given for you that is This bread broken by me and given to you is a signe of my body delivered to death for you and an authentick seal of your conjunction with me so that he which shall beleeve and eat this bread he truly and really after a sort eateth my body Here therefore to the signe is attributed the name of the thing signified both for the conjunction which the thing signified hath in the right use of the Supper with the signe and also for the proportion which the signe hath with the thing signified In this exposition we are not led and over-ruled by Philosophy and humane reason as our adversaries traduce us and bear the world in hand we are but we observe those rules by which in the joint consent of all sound wise men wee are to censure the interpretation of any Scripture whatsoever namely by the analogie and rule of faith by the nature of the thing or subject by the testimonies of Scripture which teach the same thing Three rules wâ—ereby we may judge of the interpretation of Scripture For by help of these three rules the naturall sense of Scripture is wont to be examined as often as necessity driveth us from the letter to the sense and meaning 1. That no interpretation be received dissonant from the rule of faith or repugnant to any article thereof or any commandement of the Decalogue or any expresse testimony of Scripture for the spirit of truth is not contrary to it self 2. That the sense derived out of words signifying any thing have a congruity with the nature of the thing signified by the words as in this present subject of the Supper whereon wee insist when any question or doubt is moved therein we are to enquire seeing it is a Sacrament how the Scripture else-where speaketh of Sacraments and of the Supper it selfe 3. That other like places be weighed and considered by which it is either manifest and granted or may be demonstrated by some circumstance that they contain the same doctrine concerning the same thing which is contained in the place in controversie For if we be fully resolved of the meaning of any cleerer and uncontroversed place we shall also be resolved of the sense of the place in controversie if the same thing be delivered in both So then it is out of doubt that that meaning of the words of the Supper which is agreeable with these rules is true and those untrue which disagree from them But this our construing and interpretation which indeed is not ours but the doctrine of Christ himself his Apostles and all orthodox or right-beleeving antiquity doth every way sute with these rules wherefore undoubtedly it is most true and best beseeming the truth of the Gospel Now let us come to the arguments by which wee prove our interpretation to be true they are of four sorts 1. Some are taken out of the text it self and circumstances of the institution of the Lords Supper 2. Some are taken from the nature of the thing or subject that is by understanding the speech as the thing it self doth bear and suffer namely according to the nature of all Sacraments 3. Some are drawn from an analogie of the articles of our faith or from a conference of places or parts of Christian doctrine 4. Some are taken from other like places of Scripture where the same thing is delivered in such words as are manifest and whereof there is no controversie 1. The first sort of arguments taken out of the text and circumstances of the institution of the Lords Supper He sate down 1. CHrists humane nature at the first celebrating of the Supper by a corporall kind of placing sate in his proper place at the table and now is in heaven wherefore then it was not neither is it now corporally in the bread or in the place of the bread He took bread 2. Christ at the first Supper took not into his hands nor brake his body but bread wherefore bread is not properly and really the very body of Christ This is my body 3. Christs body was born of a virgin But bread is made of meal therefore it is not really Christs body 4. Christ said of the visible bread being broken This is my body and of the visible cup being distributed unto his disciples This cup is the new Testament in my bloud Therefore the Papists retain not the letter when they say My body is contained under the forms of bread and wine nor the Ubiquitaries when they thus speak My body is in with under this
is The washing by the bloud of Christ in the Supper The body and bloud of Christ Ans The thing is not diverse because it is the same To be washed by the bloud of Christ and To drink the bloud of Christ as we have heretofore proved But the manner of the signifying one and the same thing is diverse that is there is a diverse similitude of one and the same thing signified by the signes or one and the same thing hath a diverse similitude or proportion Therefore as in Baptisme so in Circumcision likewise and the Passeover is promised a spirituall thing not a corporall and so also here in the Lors Supper 3. The third sort of Arguments which are deduced from the analogie of faith 1. FIrme and strong reasons are drawne from the Article which is concerning the truth of Christs humane nature Christ took a humane nature like unto us in all things sinne only excepted and retaineth the same through all eternity for our comfort and safety but humane nature is neither infinite neither can it be in moe places at once nor visible and invisible both together For it is proper unto the Deity only which is unmeasurable to be essentially in many or in all places at once according to that saying of Scripture Jerem. 23.24 Am not I he which fill heaven and earth and by this very attribute or property God is distinguished from all creatures Now the God-head it selfe cannot at the same time be both visible and invisible finite and infinite but in its own substance remaineth alwayes invisible incomprehensible and infinite else could it not be unchangeable We may not therefore imagine that when Christ said This is my body his body then sate both visible to them at the Table and yet was invisible also in the bread or that now it is both visibly conversant in heaven and invisibly contained in the bread 2. From the Article of Ascension Christ ascended truly that is was in his body visibly and locally taken up into heaven so that his body remained not nrr now remaineth on earth but in heaven whence he shall visibly returne to judgement He is not therefore in the bread Or thus we may urge the reason Christs body is finite as being a true body But it is now in heaven Therefore Christs body is not in While they beheld him he was taken up Acts 1.9 Colos 3.1 Seek the things which are above where Christ is The Major also is evident For if the true and very body of Christ be infinite it is on earth was no true body of Christ but apparent and phantasticall because it cannot agree no not to the God-head it selfe to be at one time finite and infinite sensible and insensible and so all those things which are spoken of Christ in the Articles of our Beliefe should not have been done indeed but only should have seemed and appeared to be done and so we should as yet remain in death Now here are two things to be noted 1. That by the argument drawn from the ascension Christs body is not cleane taken out of the Supper as some cavill but only out of the bread For the distance of heaven and earth only hindereth the existence of Christs body both in heaven and in the bread together but not his presence in the Supper to be spirituall eaten by faith For our faith in the word of the promise annexed to the bread and wine beholdeth and imbraceth the body and bloud of Christ and all his benefits there present 2. That the Argument of the Ascension not done but together with the former Argument of the truth of his humane nature overthroweth the opinion of a corporall presence of Christ in the bread For if Christs humane nature might be every-where or present in many places his Ascension could not hinder but that he might at once be both in heaven and in the bread But whereas the humane nature is finite not present in many places nor every-where hence it is that the Argument borrowed from the Article of his Ascension presseth most powerfully and as in the first Supper the consequence derived from the property of his humane nature thus Christs body sits at the Table Therefore it is not in the bread or in the mouth of his Disciples is sound and good so now we necessarily conclude out of the truth of his Ascension thus Christs body is in heaven Therefore it is not in the bread or elsewhere on earth Object It is humane reason alone that judgeth Christs corporall presence in the bread contrary to these Articles of faith Therefore they are not indeed contrary Answ We deny the Antecedent For not reason onely but the Christian faith and Gods Word reacheth us that Christs body is a true humane and finite body and not conversant at once in all or many places and that now since it ascended into heaven it is not in the earth but remaineth and abideth in heaven untill he returne thence to judge the quick and the dead That Christs body then should be present at once in heaven and in the bread is repugnant not to humane reason only but also to Gods Word This indeed is a principle uncontroversed How farre forth we are not to listen to mans reason in divine matters That mans reason in divine matters oppugning Gods Word is not to be regarded but ought to be subject thereunto Notwithstanding it is not simply to be cashiered or discharged no not in controversies of Divinity as if we were to bring a meer brutish and blockish sense to the sifting of the truth of Gods Word but we are to use reason aright to discern therby truth from falshood For to this end was reason given to us men that we should discern by the light of understanding contradictory opinions and fully conceiving what is consonant with Gods Word and what jarreth therewith should applaud and imbrace the one and reject the other If this be not grounded and settled in us there will be no opinion so absurd and impious there will be nothing in the polluted sinks of all Hereticks so filthy and monstrous which may be confuted by holy Scripture For Hereticks and Deceivers will alwayes except against us that their opinions impugne not the truth of Gods Word but that they seeme onely in mans reason so to doe Repl. The Scripture attributeth to Christs body many properties and prerogatives supernaturall or above and beyond nature which are not incident to our bodies as to walke on the waters to be transfigured to be carried up into heaven to pierce and passe through a stone and closed doores to be united to the God-head personally to be made a sacrifice for our sinnes c. Therefore it is no absurdity to attribute unto it presence in heaven and in the bread both at once or even ubiquity it selfe Ans In the Antecedent are many untruths mingled with some truths For the penetration of Christs body through the stone
faith whilst we distinguish and separate that which is divine from that which is humane and joyning them againe after their separation confesse one God and man yea we our selves are made his body by this Sacrament and knit and united to our head by the thing signified by the Sacrament De divina mensa Et quod The Canon of the Nicene Councell Againe here also is the Lords Table Let us not childishly cleave to the bread and wine set before us but lifting up our minds on high by faith let us consider that on that Table is set the Lamb of God taking away the sinnes of the world which is offered of the Priests without killing and let us truely receiving his precious body and bloud beleeve that they are SIGNES of our resurrection For therefore we receive not much but little thereby to acknowledge that it is not received to satisfie In Litur de Trin. l. 8. Orat. de pas but to sanctifie us Basil We have set on the Table the figures of the sacred body and blood Hillarie The bread and wine received and drunke effect and worke that both we are in Christ In 1 Cor. 11. and Christ in us Gregory Nazianzene The figures of the precious body and bloud of Christ Ambrose Because we are delivered by our LORDS death being mindfull thereof in eating and drinking wee Signifie or Represent the flesh and bloud that were offered up for us De Sacr. l. 4. c. 5. Cont. Adim cap. 12. In Psa 3 Epist 23. ad Bonisac Againe This oblation is the FIGVRE OF THE BODY AND BLOVD of our LORD Jesus CHRIST Augustine Our Lord doubted not to say This is my body when he gave a TOKEN of his body Againe The Lord admitted Judas to that banquet wherein he ministred and gave to his disciples the FIGVRE of his body and bloud The same Father saith Vnlesse Sacraments had a certaine likenesse of the things whereof they bee Sacraments without question they were no Sacraments And in consideration of this likenesse oftentimes they beare the names of the things themselves As therefore the Sacrament of the body of CHRIST is AFTER A CERTAINE MANER the body of Christ and the Sacrament of Christs bloud is his bloud so the Sacrament of faith is faith In senten Prosper de ause dist 2. c. Hoc est Againe As then the celestiall bread Christs flesh is IN SOME SORT called Christs body whereas indeed it is a Sacrament of Christs body namely that visible palpable and mortall body which was nailed on the Crosse and the sacrificing of his flesh done by the hands of the Minister is called Christs Passion death and crucifying NOT IN THE TRVTH OF THE THING but in a mysterie SIGNIFYING it So the Sacrament of faith by which is meant Baptisme is faith Serm. ad infant Also These my brethren are therefore called Sacraments because in them one thing is seene another understood That which is seene hath a bodily forme that which is understood hath a spirituall fruit or benefit In Mat. Hom. 83. Chrysostome This is my bloud which is shed for the remission of sinnes which Christ said to shew that his Passion and Crosse was a mysterie and to comfort his disciples Dialog 1. Theodoret Our Saviour verily changed the names of the signes and the things signified and gave the same name to the body which is proper to the signe and that to the signe which is proper to the body The cause of this change is manifest to them that are entred into the first principles of divine mysteries For he would that they who use the Sacraments should not bend and set their minds on the nature of the things which are seene but for the alteration of the names should beleeve that alteration which is made through grace For he who tearmed that by name of corne and bread which is by nature a body and called himselfe a vine he honoured the signes which are seene with the title and name of his body and bloud not by changing the nature but by adding grace to the nature Macarius the Monke hath a famous saying to this purpose Hom. 27. Bread and wine are a correspondent type of his flesh and they who receive the bread which is shewed eate the flesh of Christ spiritually Other testimonies for briefenesse sake we omit Of Transubstantiation NOw it is easie to see what we are to think of Transubstantiation even that it is an impious invention and device of the Papists which also we will shew and prove briefly by divers reasons But first we must declare in a word what the Papists properly meane by their Transubstantiation They suppose that by force of Consecration that is of uttering these words upon the creatures of bread and wine This is my body This is the cup of the new Testament in my bloud the bread and wine is substantially converted or turned into the body and bloud of Christ the formes onely or accidents of bread and wine remaining namely the shape or figure the heat the taste the weight c. They therefore call these words of Consecration operatorie and effective able to work and effect the conversion and change and they say that the change is fully accomplished in the very last instant of uttering the syllable * The Latine particle was UM hoc est corpua me VM which I chose rather to resemble by the English forme of Consecration DY This is my boDY and then there is no longer bread and wine but the body and bloud of Christ is present and is contained under the forms of bread and wine and is eaten and drunk in the Eucharist or Supper by the mouth of the Communicants Concerning the manner of the change it is not agreed on by all Some say that the substance of bread and wine is by Transsubstantiation changed into the substance of Christs body and bloud so that the bread and wine is essentially made the very body and bloud of Christ the externall formes only remaining and this they terme a substantiall change or change of the substance What the Papists call a substantiall change Others are of opinion that the substance of bread and wine is not changed but vanisheth by annihilation or by being brought to nothing and that then the substance of Christs body and bloud succeedeth in place thereof so that the substance of Christs body and bloud after the consecration cometh under these formes and accidents under which before was the substance of the bread and wine And this they call a formal change or a change of formes Lombard in his Sentences expoundeth both these opinions What they call a formall change Li. 4. di 11. Tho. Aqui. p. 3. q. 78. a. 5. and seemeth to approve the former alone Howbeit they call both these changes by the name of Transsubstantiation They affirm also that the particle This in the words of consecration doth note some indeterminate
life after Gods will and exercising all good works It comprehendeth three things which are contrary unto mortification Three parts of this quickning 1. The knowledge of Gods mercy and the applying thereof in Christ. 2. A joyfulnesse thence arising which is for that God is pleased through Christ and for that new obedience is begun and shall be perfected 3. An ardent or earnest endeavour and purpose to sin no more arising from thankefulnesse and because we rejoice that wee have God appeased and pacified towards us a desire also of righteousnes and of retaining Gods love and favour The ardent desire of not sinning and also of righteousnesse and of retaining Gods love and favour is new obedience it self according to those sayings Being justified by faith Rom. 5.1 14.15 wee have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. The Kingdome of God is righteousnesse and peace and joy in the holy Ghost Esay 57.15 I dwell with him that is of a contrite and humble spirit to revive the spirit of the humble and to give life to them that are of a contrite heart Rom. 6.11 Gal. 2.20 Likewise thinke yee also that yee are dead to sin but are alive to God in Jesus Christ our Lord. Thus I live yet not I now but Christ liveth in me and in that that I now live in the flesh I live by the faith in the Son of God who hath loved me and given himselfe for mee Why this latter part of Conversion is called quickning The latter part of Conversion is called Quickning 1. Because as a living man doth the actions of one that liveth so quickning is a kindling of a new light in the understanding and a be getting of new qualities and motions in the will and heart of man whence issueth a new life and new operations 2. Because of that joy which the converted have in God through Christ which is a most pleasant thing The cause through Christ is added because we cannot rejoyce in God except he be appeased and pacified with us but he is not at peace with us but through Christ therefore we cannot joy in God but through Christ Either part of Conversion springeth from faith The reason is because no man can hate sin and draw nigh unto God except he love God and no man loveth God except he be endowed with faith Whereas then in neither part there is expresse mention made of faith the cause hereof is not in that faith is excluded from Conversion but because it is presupposed in the whole doctrine of Conversion and Thankfulnesse as a cause is presupposed where his effect is defined Object Faith bringeth forth joy Therefore not grief and mortification Ans It were no absurdity to averre that the same cause produceth diverse effects in a diverse kinde of causing and in diverse respects So then faith causeth griefe not of it selfe but by some occasion of accident which is sin whereby we offend God so bountifull a Father It effecteth joy by its owne intent because it assureth us of Gods fatherly will towards us through Christ Repl. The preaching of the law goeth before faith seeing that the preaching of repentance hath his beginning from the law But the preaching of the law worketh griefe and wrath Therefore there is some griefe before saith Answ I grant there is some griefe before faith but no such as may be part of Conversion For the griefe of the wicked which is before and without faith is rather an averting from God than a converting unto him See Cal. Instituâ— lib. 3. cap. 3. Paragraph 2. which being quite contrary neither partly nor wholly agree But contrition and grief in the Elect is a certain preparation to repentance and conversion as hath been already said 4. What are the causes of Conversion THe principall efficient cause of our conversion is God himselfe even the holy Ghost The holy Ghost the principall efficient Jerem. 31.18 Lament 5.21 Acts 5.31 Hence is it that the Saints beg of God to convert them and repentance is in divers places of Scripture called the gift of God Convert thou me and I shall be converted for thou art the Lord my God Turne thou us unto thee O Lord and wee shall be turned Him hath God lift up with his right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour to give repentance to Israel and forgivenesse of sins Whence is collected a notable argument for proof of Christs Divinity seeing it is the property of God only to give repentance and remission of sins Acts 11.18 2 Tim. 2.25 Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life If God at any time will give them repentance that they may know the truth and that they may come to amendment out of the snare of the Divell The instrumentall causes or means are The instrumentall causes The Law The Law The Gospell Rom. 3.20 The Gospell Faith After the doctrine of the Gospell hath been preached again the doctrine of the Law For the preaching of the Law goeth before preparing us to the preaching of the Gospell because Without the law there is no knowledge of sinne and therefore no griefe or sorrow for sinne Afterwards followeth the preaching of the Gospel raising up contrite hearts with a confidence of Gods mercy through Christ For without this preaching there is no faith and without faith there is no love of God and consequently no conversion unto God After the preaching of the Gospel againe followeth in the Church the preaching of the Law that it may be the squire of our thankfulnesse and course of life The Law then goeth before conversion and followeth after the same It goeth before it to stir up a knowledge of sin and griefe for the same It followeth that unto the converted it may be a rule of their life Hereof it is that the Prophets do first accuse sin threaten punishments and exhort to repentance and then afterwards comfort and promise and lastly exhort againe and lay down unto them the duties of piety and godlinesse Such was John Baptists preaching So then the preaching of repentance comprehendeth the law and the Gospel though in effecting conversion the offices of both be distinct The next instrumentall and internall cause of conversion is faith because without faith there is no love of God and except we know what the will of God towards us is as namely that hee will remit unto us our sins by and for Christ conversion will never be begun in us neither in respect of the first part thereof Acts 15. â— which is Mortification neither in respect of the second part which is Quickning for by faith are the hearts of men purified Without faith there is no true joy in God neither can wee without faith love God and Whatsoever is not of faith is sinne Rom. 14.23 All good workes flow from faith as from their fountain Wee being justified by faith have peace with God
doe the Saints judge and account of their owne righteousnesse and merit Because they are none of ours but are wrought by God in us Phil. 2.13 1 Cor. 4.7 If wee doe any good works they are not ours but are belonging to God only who worketh them in us by his Spirit It is God which worketh in you both the will and the deed even of his good pleasure What hast thou which thou hast not received We are evill trees if then we doe any good that must needs come from God only It is God which freely maketh us good trees and which worketh good fruits in us as it is said Wee are his workmanship Ephes 2.10 created in Christ Jesus unto good workes which hee hath prepared that wee should walke in them If then we performe any good it is the gift of God and not our merit Mat. 20.16 Is it not lawfull for mee to doe as I will with mine owne Hee must needs be very impudent who having received of gift an hundred florens of a rich man thinketh that he deserveth a thousand moe by receiving of those hundred whereas rather he is by this gift received bound to the rich man and not the rich man to him Because God is not bound to reward any No creature which doth even the most perfect works can thereby merit ought at Gods hand or binde God unto him to give any thing of debt and according to order of justice The reason hereof doth the Apostle yield Who hath given him first We deserve no more our preservation than wee deserved our creation He did owe nothing unto us when he created us so neither now doth hee owe us our preservation neither is he bound to give us any thing but hee did and doth both of his owne free will and meere loving kindnesse Hee receiveth no benefits at our hands Wee can bestow no benefits upon our Creatour Now where there is no benefit there is no merit For a merit presupposeth a benefit received Because there is no proportion between our works and Gods rewards There is no proportion between our works which are utterly imperfect and the excellency of those great blessings and benefits which the Father giveth us freely in his Sonne Lest we should glory in our selves Hee that rejoyceth let him rejoyce in the Lord. But if wee merit by our workes remission of our sins man should have in himself whereof to rejoyce neither should the glory be given to God If Abraham were justified by his workes 1 Cor. 1.13 Rom. 4 2. hee hath wherein to rejoyce but not with God Because we are justified ere we doe them Rom. 9.11 2 13. We are just before we doe good works For ere Esau and Jacob were borne and when they had neither done good nor evill that the purpose of God might remain according to election not by workes but by him that calleth it was said unto her The Elder shall serve the younger As it is written I have loved Jacob and have hated Esau Wherefore we are not then justified before God when we doe good works but we then doe good works when we are justified Because all our good works are due Our good works are all due for all creatures owe unto their Creator worship and thanks-giving so that although we should never sin yet can we not sufficiently declare and shew forth our thankfulnesse whereof we are indebted Luke 17.10 When yee have done all those things which are commanded you say We are unprofitable servants we have done that which was our duty to doe The opinion of merit weakneth consolation Gaâ— 3 40. Rom. â— 16 8. The opinion of merit and justification by works impaireth Christian consolation disquieteth the conscience and causeth men to doubt and despaire of their salvation For when they heare the voice of the Law sounding in their eares Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things and withall consider their owne imperfection they are forthwith convicted in conscience that they never performed all things therein exacted Wherefore they are constrained to waver alwaies uncertain and to dread the curse But faith giveth sure consolation and comfort because it relieth on the promise which is certaine The inheritance is by faith that it might come by grace and the promise might be sure to all the seed Because then Christ had died in vaine Gal. 2.21 If wee should obtaine righteousnesse by our own works the promises should be made void For in Abraham shall all the Nations be blessed And Christ also should have died in vain Because then we should be otherwise justified thâ—n the Fathers of the old Church John 14.6 1 Tim. 2.5 Ephes 4.5 Heb. 13.8 Acts 4.12 There should not be one and the same reason and cause of our salvation if this doctrine of the merit of works should be admitted Abraham and the Thiefe on the Crosse should have been otherwise justified then we are justified But there is but one way leading to salvation I am the way the truth and the life There is one Mediatour between God and men There is one Lord one Faith one Baptisme Jesus Christ yesterday and to day the same is also for ever There is given no other name under heaven whereby we must be saved Therefore we shall not be saved by good works or for our good works Because then Christ were not a perfect Saviour Christ should not give us full and perfect salvation and so neither should he be a perfect Saviour if some thing were as yet required of us whereby we should be made just For look how much of our merit were added unto his so much should be detracted and subducted from his merit But Christ is our perfect Saviour For as Paul witnesseth God with his glorious grace hath made us accepted in his beloved Ephel 1.6 7. and 2.8 1 John 1.7 Acts 2.12 By whom we have redemption through his bloud even the forgivenesse of sins according to his rich grace By grace ye are saved through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God The bloud of Jesus Christ purgeth us from all sin There is no salvation in any other Object God calleth those blessings which hee promiseth to them that doe good works rewards and meed Now meed presupposeth merit Therefore good works doe merit before God Ans Amongst creatures sometimes it doth but never with God because no creature can merit at Gods hands seeing God oweth nought unto any creature But they are called the rewards or meed of our works in respect of God forasmuch as he recompenceth most fully those things which we doe neither yet is that recompence due For there can come no commodity unto God by us and therefore God is not bound no not to make the least recompence For he standeth no waies in need of our works and unto whom they can adde or bring nothing at all of him doubtlesse we
Christ sheweth that even then also the name of God is sworne by when heaven and earth is named because there is no part of the world no creature wherein God hath not engraven some worke of his glory And when men sweare by heaven and earth Why we are said to sweare by God when we sweare by creatures in the sight and hearing of the framer of them both the religion of the oath is not in the creatures by whom they sweare but God himselfe onely is called to record and for a witnesse by the citing of these symboles and badges of his glory Neither doth God stick in the words but respecteth the mind of him that sweareth neither doth the honour or dishonour of Gods name consist so much in the naked and bare letters and syllables as in the sentence and meaning of those signes and symboles like as Christ also teacheth the same in expresse words Matthew 23. Mat 23.16 17. c. which words are to be conferred with this place which now we have expounded The meaning of S. James in the place alledged out of his Epistle is also all one with the meaning of Christ already expressed Repl. But Christ saith Sweare not at all And James saith Nor by any other oath Therefore all oathes are forbidden amongst Christians Answ Here is a fallacy of Composition namely a mis-joyning of words in this clause or sentence which are not to be joyned together For that particle at all is referred to the diverse formes of rash swearing which the Pharisees averred to be lawfull not to the very word of swearing it selfe as if he should say Sweare not falsly or rashly at all to wit neither directly nor indirectly So saith S. James nor by any other oath to wit rash or false by naming of certaine kinds whereof he sheweth that all such like are forbidden Else should Christ himselfe offend against his owne commandement Mat. 5.37 whereas he here saith Let your communication be Yea Yea and Nay Nay and yet else-where oftentimes in his most grave and reverend speech and doctrine useth this asseveration Verily Verily I say unto you Likewise else should James condemne Paul who by an oath tooke God to witnesse unto his soule and the holy Ghost should contradict himselfe in condemning all manner of oathes by James and commending an oath by another Apostle as a ready remedy profitable and necessary for the preservation of humane society to determine and end all strifes and controversies from which in this frailty mans life cannot be free Repl. 2. The permission of oathes in Scripture and the examples of such as have taken them concerne publique oathes onely that is such as are given and taken in some publique behalfe Therefore at least private oathes such as passe betweene private men are wholly forbidden Esay 65.16 Jer. 4.2 Ans 1. We deny the Antecedent because this restraint is not only not found specified in these grants and examples in Scripture but farther also can have no places in either of them as the view and scanning of the places doth prove 2. There are manifest examples of a private oath as of Jacob and Laban Boos Abdias Abigail and David 3. The same is proved also by the end of an oath for the end thereof which is the confirming of faith and truth and the deciding of debates belongeth privately also to all Christians and therefore so doth an oath it self also whereby we confirme and establish faith and truth 4. Of what things we are to sweare or what oathes are lawfull and what oathes are unlawfull Lawfull oathes THose oathes onely are lawfull which disagree not with Gods word and which are taken of things true certainely knowne lawfull possible weighty necessary profitable and worthy of such and so great a confirmation that is such as require a confirmation by oath for the glory of God and safety of our neighbour Of these only must we sweare Unlawful oathes Vnlawfull oathes are such as are contrary to Gods word and are taken of things either false or uncertaine or unlawfull or impossible or light and frivolous Of such things we may not sweare For he that sweareth of things that are false maketh God witnesse of a lie He that sweareth of uncertaine things sweareth with an evill conscience and with a contempt of God when as he dareth to make God a witnesse of that thing which he knoweth not whether it be a truth or a lie and he that so sweareth it is all one to him whether he make God witnesse of a lie or of a truth and withall he desireth that either God will beare witnesse to a lie or if he will not be accounted the witnesse of a lie that then he will punish him that sweareth He that sweareth of unlawfull things maketh God both a favourer and an approver of that which he hath forbidden in his law and so he maketh God contrary to himselfe because he desireth God to punish him if he doe that which God commandeth or if he doe not that which God hath forbidden and furthermore either he hath a purpose to doe against Gods commandement or if he swear in earnest he alledgeth God for a witnesse of a lie He that sweareth of impossible things either is mad or mocketh and derideth God and Men seeing he cannot have an earnest purpose of performing that which he sweareth or sweareth hypocritically and so sweareth of a lie namely he sweareth that he will doe that which neither he will doe neither shall at all be done He that sweareth lightly sheweth no reverence that he hath of God and he that doth easily sweare doth easily also forsweare But the principall and chiefe cause of an oath ought to be 1. The glory of God Two principall causes to be respected in swearing 2. The safety and welfare as well private as publike of our neighbours Object Of uncertaine things we may not sweare Things to come such as those are which men promise to performe are uncertaine Therefore we must not sweare of things to come Ans We must not indeed sweare of the event as which is not at all in our power but of our owne present will of doing either now or hereafter that which is just and lawfull and of the present and future binding of our selves to it whereof every man may and ought to be certaine And so sware Abraham Isaac Abimelech David Jonathan Booz and others binding themselves to a future performance of certaine duties 5. Whether all oathes are to be kept OAthes conceived or made rightly of things lawfull true certaine weighty and possible are necessarily to be kept For if once thou hast acknowledged and testified thy selfe to be justly bound to keep thy promise and hast called God to record hereof when as afterwards thou wittingly and willingly breakest thine oath thou doest violate and breake a just bond and doest either accuse God the witnesse and maintainer of this bond of vanity and lightnesse or
them working what is proper to it but not without the communion of the other Even so saith Hierome it is knowne that one and the same Christ is God and man and that he did work according to both formes Ad Paulam Eustoch to wit of the humanity and divinity and that by this he exercised two operations For both formes or natures did operate the one communicating with the other in that which was proper to it The Word operating what is proper to the Word and the flesh putting in execution what belongs to the flesh c. But in many things the Similie will not hold For in man there is an union of two finite natures but in Christ of a finite nature and an infinite In man both natures are shut up within the same bounds but in Christ the divinitie is not confined to the narrow limits of the flesh In man the union is the composition of matter and forme but in Christ the flesh is not the matter of the divinitie nor this the forme of the flesh In man there results a third thing out of the composition which is neither of the other two but in Christ the Word or person is the same before the union but naked and simple after the union clothed with flesh and in a manner compounded In man the union is dissolved by death but Christ will never lay aside the nature which he once assumed Lastly to this purpose serves that which Thomas observes Part. ult quaest 2. In man saith he there is a two fold unitie made up to wit of the nature and of the person of the nature when as the soule is formally united to the body perfecting it that of two there may be made up one nature as of the act and potentiality of the matter and forme and in this regard the similitude consisteth not because the divine nature cannot be the forme of the body 2. Of the person as when of these is made up one man consisting of a body and a soule and in this is the similitude for one Christ subsisteth in the divine and humane nature XXI Therefore as the soule in respect of its substance is not without the body for it is all united to its body so the whole Word incarnate can neither be nor be found nor ought to be enquired for out of its owne flesh The Animadversion By a manifest fallacie from that which is said respectively or secundum quid to that which is spoken simply of a similitude hee concludes a falshood For this is Hunnius his collection The Similie drawne from man is more fit then from other things Ergo it agrees in every thing and consequently the reason is alike of the soule and of the deity that as the soule is confined to the bounds of the body so the deity doth no where subsist without the flesh Who may not here sensibly perceive the imposture He makes a comparison between the soule and the Word as if there were a parity between them whereas there is an extreme imparity for the soule being a finite spirit cannot be without the bodie in which it is so long as it is tied to the bodie though it be all in all and all in every part But the Deitie of the Word is not a finite spirit but immense and most pure by its most simple immensity all in the finite flesh and all and the same together without the finite flesh and subsisting without all things For who will say that the Deitie of the Word was onely there suppose in the mothers womb in the Temple in the Justice-Hall on the Crosse in the Sepulchre c. where his flesh was said to be circumscribed and to be absent in other places where his flesh was not Who will say that he did not fill heaven and earth that he was not at Rome at Athens and every-where without Judea at the same time when his bodie that was most united then to him did remaine within the limits of Judea alone Surely he who affirmes the contrary either feignes a Deity enclosed and circumscribed in the narrow bounds of the bodie or else a bodie diffused every-where with the Deity that is to use few words hee makes either a finite Deity or an infinite bodie This then is one of these false hypotheses by which this Sophister under-props the ubiquity of the flesh He addes also sophistically that the Word neither is nor can be sought or found without its flesh which words neither have the same meaning nor the same truth For Orthodoxe men confesse that the Word is not to be sought out of the flesh because in the flesh onely as in his temple he will be sought and worshipped by faith and prayers And from hence they gather against the Ubiquitaries that the flesh of the Word doth not lurk within a sacramentall crust because they neither worship it nor ought they to worship it yet they deny not therefore that the Word is not elsewhere by that essentiall immensitie which hee hath in common with the Father and the holy Ghost For so the Word being enclosed within finite flesh should be terminated or bounded or else the flesh should have an immensity every-where with the immensity of the Word both which is false Nor doe the Orthodox Fathers otherwise speake or thinke Athanasius De Incarnat Verbi The Word is in the flesh and over and above all things Ibid. He subsisteth over and above all things Ibid. At the same moment when he was in an humane body hee was over and above all things So Hieron ad Marcel He who was infinite was also in the Son of man totall August Lib. 2. de Incarn The Son of God was totall in the body and totall every-where XXII They are deceived then and they reduce this admirable union to the narrownesse of one onely place who dreame that the Word in the flesh is in one and onely in that place where the humane nature of Christ visibly dwells but besides this place that it subsisteth over and above it in other places innumerable The Animadversion He condemneth for an errour not ours but the doctrine both of holy Writ and of godly Antiquity for the Scriptures unanimously witnesse that the humane nature of Christ was visibly confined still to one place and not to two or more at once invisibly the incomprehensible Word in the meane time shewing its presence both in its flesh and else-where where the flesh is not and the union still remaining entire The Fathers also write cleerely that the Word was so in the flesh that it was not shut up within those narrow confines but that it subsisted out of it and over and above all things else It is a fallacy if not a falshood when he saith that now this admirable union is not to be confined to the narrow inclosure of one onely place for though the flesh be shut up in one place it will not follow that therefore the union
question in their Conference they plainly take it away yet nor without buskin-phrases but such as bring in the same inconveniencies which before they did so that either they betray themselves to be equivocating disturbers or entangle themselves with contradictions which thus appeare In the appendix or addition they say But whether they who by true faith are inserted into Jesus Christ and therefore partakers of his quickning Spirit may not forsake the beginning of their being in Christ fall away from faith lose grace is to be more exactly considered out of Scripture before they can teach it with confidence that is they doubt whether it be true But if before they speak the truth they cannot doubt of this For if they who by true faith are inserted into Christ have sufficient strength to obtaine the victory over sin Satan c. and Christ in all tentations is present with them and reacheth out his hand that they cannot be seduced or taken out of Christs hand by any cunning or strength of Satan how I pray can it be doubted but that such by reason of the helps given to them by Christ and by reason of his assistance and of his confirming and aiding of them in all tentations but chiefly of defection can never forsake the beginning of their being in Christ can never fall away from faith and can never be robbed of their grace In questioning then that which before they asserted and that indeed most truly doe not they fight against themselves They except that their assertion is not categoricall but conditionall that Christ by his Spirit is present with them that hee stretcheth out his hand to them and confirmes them that are inserted into him by true faith if so be they are ready for the fight and beg his help nor be wanting in performance of their duty c. But that this condition is not placed or performed by many and that therefore no conflict followes But I pray what kind of God doe they feigne here whom secretly they exclude What kind of Christ What kind of Spirit To wit such an one who indeed furnisheth those who by true faith are engraffed into Christ with the meanes of resistible grace but doth not fit them for the combate in their tentations suffers them so to snort that they seek not for his help that they are wanting in the performance of their dutie but Gods promises and asseverations doe teach far otherwise for albeit the condition of the combate of prayers and vigilancie which they require be altogether necessary for perseverance yet that this is not so much proposed by the faithfull which is all these men would have as effected by the Spirit of God in the faithfull is cleere by these and such like testimonies Deut. 30.6 Jer. 32.40 De bono persev c. 2. Ezech. 36.27 Isa 59.21 The Lord thy God shall circumcise thine heart and the heart of thy seed that thou maist love the Lord thy God with all thine heart I will put my feare in their hearts that they shall not depart from mee Which words Austin citing for the good of perseverance thus explaines So great shall my feare be which I will put in their hearts that they shall adhere to me continually I will put my Spirit in the midst of you and I will make that you shall walke in my precepts and keep my judgements and doe them This shall be my covenant with them saith the Lord My Spirit which is in thee and my words which I have put in thee shall not depart from thy mouth I will poure upon the house of David and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem Zach. 13.10 1 Cor. 1.8 Phil. 1.6 1 Pet. 1.5 the spirit of grace and supplication and they shall look on mee whom they have pierced c. God will strengthen you even to the end He that hath begun in you a good worke will perfect it untill the day of the Lord Jesus who by the power of God are kept by faith to salvation c. Either these are vaine promises which God forbid or the assumption is false that the condition is not proposed or performed by many who are not engraffed into Christ by true faith Cavilling to the contrary will not availe That these promises are not absolute but to be understood with a condition to be performed by the faithfull that being strictly understood they exclude the least offences of the Saints that a condition is commanded not promised c. which are vaine shifts For the promises speak plainly concerning the very condition of faith prayers perseverance in the faithfull to be wrought by the holy Ghost Nor will it follow that the working of perseverance is not promised because it is commanded and required of the faithfull For it is commanded also that they feare God that they walke in the commandements of God c. and yet God promiseth I will put my feare c. I will make them to walk in my precepts Now this is commanded not because they can but because they should do what is required and De grat lib. arb c. 16. For this cause saith Austin God commands some things which we cannot doe that we may know what to beg of him Hearing then the command they aske for that which is commanded saying with Austin Give me what thou commandest and command what thou wilt De dâ—no persev c. 20. Which words of mine saith he Pelagius at Rome could not endure when they were rehearsed by a certaine brother a fellow Bishop of mine in his presence and in an angry way contradicting him he had almost fallen foule with him that did repeat them The orthodox men at this day are in the like condition with them and yet these promises do not exclude the faillings of the Saints whether their sinnes be great or small but they lift up those that are fallen from their fall for these promises are sometimes also directed to just men that fall Psal 37.24 Psal 89.34 If the righteous fall he shall not be bruised because the Lord supporteth him If his sons shall forsake my Law c. I will visit with the rod their transgressions but my mercy I will not take from him If then this Article in the three former members is true and certaine as it is most true and certaine it cannot by the condition inserted be excused from this manifest conflict and contradiction of the adversative addition thus All ingraffed into Christ by true faith and therefore partakers of his quickning Spirit are so confirmed by Christ that by no deceit of Satan or by any force can they be seduced or taken out of Christs hand this is true and certaine and All ingraffed into Christ by true faith are so confirmed that they cannot be seduced nor taken from Christ this is not true and certaine but doubtfull and uncertaine and more exactly to be weighed according to Scripture This conflict againe is a manifest argument of an
bulwarke Now the cavill about the condition annexed to the promises doth nothing hinder our Arguments as was shewed Neither is the perseverance of the Saints prejudiced by that calumny of scandalous preaching and licentious beliefe of perseverance For otherwise the Apostles preaching of this doctrine had beene scandalous and the Churches beleeving thereof at that time had beene licentious De bono persev c. 18. I saith Austine will not exaggerate this matter with my words but will rather leave it to them to consider that they may see what this is which they have perswaded themselves to wit that the preaching of perseverance doth rather wrong the hearers by desperation then helpe them by exhortation for this were as much as if you would say that then man despaires of his owne salvation when he hath learned to put his trust not in himselfe but in God Neither doth the Paralogisme non causae concerning the neglect or nullifying of the meanes and fore-warnings c. hinder us for by these same meanes the holy Ghost doth worke and support the certainty of perseverance in the hearts of the Saints nor are we moved with the examples of hypocrites and Apostates in their fourth Engine of whom also the five marginals of the Article speake For these men had nothing common with the true faithfull but the bare name onely of faith of all which it is therefore said 1 Joh. 2.1 They went out from us because they were not of us for if they had beene of us they had remained with us but that is might be knowne they were not of us therefore they went out See Austine De bono perseverantiae c. 8. The great and grievous falls of Moses Aaron David Salomon Peter Judas and of others trouble not us for if they did any thing prejudice perseverance it was in the totality not in the finality thereof for it may be easily proved that all those whom the enemies of perseverance do object either were not true beleevers but hypocrites or repented in the end But neither can their totall perseverance be overthrowne from hence except withall Gods promises be overthrowne too which is impossible should be overthrowne by the exception of a pretended condition But the failings of the Saints that I may speake this by the way must not too peevishly be canvased by those who will be accounted among the number of Saints but prudently according to the rule of Charity are to be deplored 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rather then censured considering God is a Father who is to judge his owne sons when they offend and the Saints are his children who are to give an account of their actions to their Father Oftentimes in a family the son and the servant commit the same offence and the son offends more hainously then the servant yet an earthly father thrusts the servant out of doores whereas he will not dis-inherit the son but chastise him onely for his good therefore the offence of a Son committed in the folly of his youth as it doth not induce him to hate his father so it doth not extinguish the fathers affection to his son David trecherously killed Vriah Joab Amasa Peter three times perfidiously denied his Master Judas once betrayed him put aside the event and Peters sin will seeme greater then that of Judas yet Christ looked with pity upon him not upon this Now let our Censors come and prove that Peter utterly lost that faith for which Christ prayed that it might not faile Now for their faults As in sharpe diseases mans life is endangered till the Physicians helpe come yet it is not presently extinguished even so in great sinnes the Saints faith is shaken and weakened but it is not therefore presently lost or dead because the heavenly Physician by his unspeakeable grace sustaines in their hearts that immortall seed of God from which their faith proceeds and supports them with his hand that when they fall they may not be bruised 1 John 3.9 Psal 37.24 This doctrine humane equity not to speake of Christian charity cannot upon any pretence subvert Lastly the two last foolish Paralogismes do not hurt the Saints perseverance if they be even scholastically examined for though both of them should directly conclude as they ought to do the contradictory to perseverance to wit That some truly and actually beleeving and regenerate do lose their faith and spirit of regeneration they must necessarily conclude lest either of the Premisses be false out of pure particulars and the first of them thus Some baptised children of faithfull parents do utterly lose faith and the Spirit of regeneration the reason is because otherwise all without exception should be saved which to them seemes an absurdity but by us is to be wished in charity But some baptised children of faithfull parents do truly and actually beleeve and are regenerated Therefore some truly and actually beleeving and regenerate do utterly lose faith and the Spirit of regeneration but the latter concludes thus Some excommunicate for their wickednesse doe utterly lose their faith Some excommunicate for their wickednesse are truly faithfull and regenerate Ergo Some truly faithfull and regenerate do utterly lose their faith or else of necessity seeing these are childish foolish that the consequences may be mended the former Paralogisme most assume the Minor universally false and the latter must suppose the Major universally false also so that the former must be thus made in Disamis otherwise they cannot conclude except they had rather have a Major universally false Some baptised children of faithfull parents utterly lose their faith and regeneration All the baptised children of faithfull parents truly and actually beleeve and are regenerate Therefore same truly and actually beleeving and regenerate utterly lose their faith and regeneration Here the Remonstrants themselves cannot deny but that the universall Assumption is false except they understand it sacramentally and so againe the consequence should be faulty For Austines doctrine which the orthodox Churches follow is this As in Isaac who was circumcised the eighth day the signe of the righteousnesse of faith went before and because he imitated his fathers faith there followed in him as he grew in yeares the righteousnesse it selfe the seale whereof went before in the Infant even so in baptised Infants the Sacrament of regeneration goeth before and if they have Christian piety conversion followes after the mystery whereof goeth before in the body Neither doe the words of the Catechisme page 74. any thing availe to the proofe of the Assumption universally false The latter from an universall Major in Datisi or a Minor converted in Darii otherwise they cannot conclude will be thus All excommunicated for wickednesse do utterly lose true faith and the holy Ghost Some excommunicate for their wickednesse are truly faithfull and regenerate Ergo Some truly faithfull and regenerate do utterly lose faith and the holy Ghost That here the Major is universally false was rightly answered by the Orthodox in the Conference and not refuted by the others For they may be excluded out of the Church and kingdome of Christ who never were truly in the state of grace but were alwayes hypocrites being destitute of true faith and Gods Spirit And so we have demonstrated that the orthodox truth concerning the perseverance of the Saints in faith doth subsist altogether unhurt by their Engines and let these suffice concerning the fifth Article FINIS