But yet since it 's no casie thing to obliterate and wholly to eradicate the matter of that Law which commands us to set apart a whole day within the compass of a week and refer it for Spiritual Labour therefore that sly Adversaries by his Emissaries whose wit is ready and that have a mercenary tongue for colouring Impostures changing their opinion at pleasure with the inconstant Ecebolius at the first only desputes after his crafty manner whether such a time be ordained of God These men more boldly than truly acknowledge the authority of time to be received not from Gods but Mens constitution as though the Lords-Day were like the Holy-dayes which were commanded the Romans namely such as the Praetors according to their arbitrary power did proclaim And so its observation should depend upon the civil Magistrate and Churches authority These things thus being handled after these mens will and others not strenuously applying their minds to retard the speedy course of their enterprises reasons are found out with a little ado for errour is a fruitful thing by which men not very religious and observant of piety may at last rush upon the constant sanctification of this time with unwashen hands and feet as the Proverb is and tread it under feet as if it were only instituted of God not for the sake of any Spiritual work but carnal idleness These things courteous Reader have given me occasion more narrowly to search out both the Institution and Sanctification of this time namely whether first it could be shown from the Fountain of holy Writ from whence wise men know we must always judge what is to be defined of every Divine Truth and the ancient practise of the following Church which learned it from the Apostles any part of time weekly be destined to performe the holy exercises of Religion Secondly by what Authority that time is imposed upon the Church Divine or Humane Thirdly in what things the solemn sanctifying thereof consisteth Touching all which what may be shown from the foresaid Fountains the following pages will briefly without prejudice of others judging according to truth by the grace of God inform us These are I say the things of which I have purposed to treat God assisting which before I enter on some things remain of which the Reader studihus of truth is timely to be admonished First of all though there be none of any authority and name amongst the Professors of more pure Christianity who beareth not most clear testimony to the Lords Festival yet in no case must we expect that all things which chiefly make for the illustrating it can be demonstrated out of the papers of the most approved Fathers in one age Nor can any one of right be offended or wonder at this since the reverend authority of the Fathers especially in the controversies that unhappily sprang up in their age is to be attended in weighing whereof they have professedly and openly declared what their mind was but in other things which they have touched upon only by the bye they have not so roundly shewed their judgements Besides we know there is no point of Christian Religion the illustration whereof hath not more and more increased in the Church by progress of time to effect which the succeeding Church was enforced through a certain necessity for sometimes the foolish frowardness of adversaries and sometimes the lewdly-imployed manners of their own men have required this that diverse Canons about some heads of Religion the knowledge whereof formerly increased in the Church should be appointed I believe none will deny that the most profound mystery of the Holy Trinity was known to the Christian Church from its infancy yet in several Councils of the succeeding Church diverse Canons were ordained about it The Reverend Fathers in the Council of Nice ordain that our Lord Jesus Christ is not a Creature and this they did according to Pauls word In the Council of Constantinople all profess they did believe that the Holy Ghost is true God as co-essential to God both Father and the Son In the Council of Ephesus under the Emperor Theodosius the younger the Divinity of the Son is again concluded These mysteries were illustrated by these new constitutions and yet who will be so mad as for that cause to contend they were first then known to the Church when these new Canons were set forth about them which only the Holy Fathers ordained to obviate the frowardness of Hereticks that either denyed er adulterated the received Truth that the Divine verity which the former Church embraced being obscured and held down by the wicked artifices of adversaries might be restored to its ancient vigour But not onely the madness of Hereticks but sometimes also the inordinate manners of Christians have occasioned new Canons ordaining about things formerly known for it was an usual thing for the Fathers to inquire into the manners of those Churches that were commended to their care and when they observed that their Christian people were ensnared in errour or wandring from the path of truth or at least walking not uprightly according to the received rule of piety they straightway used new Canons as medicines congruous to both these evils and so in the Church as in the Commonwealth good Laws grew out of evil manners And although the things that were before ordained were abundantly sufficient to quench those errours newly sprung up or reform their lewd manners yet either the new breaking out of errour or dilating of manners not at all consonant to the holy light of the Gospel and creeping every way like leaven were stopped by the bar of new Canons But thereupon we must not think that the former Church was not bound to the truth which was by a Postliminium established with new sanctions or to manners reformed by their authority Which is easie to be observed in this business of the Lords Day The succeeding Church through the care of the best Emperours having obtained peace established divers things about the Lords Festival which are not now extant in the Doctors of the Primitive Church But who will say that the piety established by new Canons for observing that solemnity was not known to the former Christians whenas even in the Apostles age as it shall afterwards appear from the Scriptures the Lords Day was solemnly used for all the exercises of Religion in which the true manner of keeping it holy doth consist And the Fathers of the succeeding Church ordaining new Canons about its solemnity have not concealed this as is to be seen in the second Council at Matiscon Can. 1. in which they gravely study to set forth the Lords solemnity but to this they were moved by the rash custome of some as they say who exposed the Lords day to contempt In Concil Cabilon held about the year 664. caution is taken for prohibiting Country labours on that day which thing when the Fathers did ordain they confess they did
prophesie some things are revealed according to the Apostle whilst other sit by Yea men of every age studiously following after the known truth even while they diligently apply their ages to the study of the Scripture are blessed with a New-light of knowledge not observed by their Predecessors It sometimes also falleth out that some things may be revealed to men of inferiour condition which are hid to others of greater name and authority as may be seen in St. Paphnatius who being armed with the Divine authority of the Epistle to the Hebrews wherein it 's asserted that Marriage is honourable in all opposed in that famous Council of Nice the Bishops that ordained an excess of rigour or studiously endeavoured to prejudice the Church with an intolerable inconveniency of too severe a prescription yet all that famous convention of Holy Bishops Presbyters and Deacons yielded to Paphnatius his opinion Chrysostom gives leave to the weaker although the least to speak any thing that 's profitable even in the Church-assembly Moreover one and the same understanding at the same moment receiveth not all the sacred mysteries of Faith but the Holy Ghost the onely teacher of truth openeth to men their understanding at divers times And most commonly it happens that he that cannot have the first place for wisdome may have the second for modesty by retracting what he hath inconsiderately spoken Now as in the Expositions of other Scriptures there are more Masters when they judge diversly and contradictorily amongst themselves so it falleth out in the gloss of the foresaid Texts For some of them whereof the first and second do note that the offices of Religion are to be performed by the Christian Church on that day the third its name being supported by testimonies do piously and modestly defend the authority of the Lords day which others of them contend cannot be defended by those authorities The former of these opinions is more common and received of more both ancient and modern Divines Neither doth the latter want asserters of great authority in the Church Mr. Calvin of blessed memory in his Learned Commentaries so interprets that place Act. 20. 7. that it seems to bring little help to prove the Lords day solemnity Whose opinion I see divers do embrace whose temper I cannot enough wonder at in this because in this point they stifly-adhere to Learned Calvins opinion from which in other matters of Christian Faith they are altogether aliens and cry out that the vilest Comments of the Papists are far to be preferred to his elaborate Expositions which breath forth Piety and excellent Learning and whatever is approved by the judgment of that well exercised Divine Mr. Calvin they little esteem it and that because the most famous Calvin sometimes thought so Yet in this business they judge nothing ought to be approved but what forsooth seems good to Calvin When I consider these mens temper it comes into my mind what Theophilus sometime did to the Monks sirnamed Longi at whom he was displeased He conspired with the common sort of Monks who affirmed with Origen that God had an humane shape although he thought otherwise against those Friars Whence arose a great contention amongst the Monks who turned themselves to rail and not dispute So divers who matter not Mr. Calvins judgment do yet under a pretence of his authority studiously defend their own opinions to the end they might set by the ears those whom they observe to admire and love famous Calvin's judgment as reason requires in other things while some of them adhere to and others dissent from his opinion when yet in the mean time they value not Mr. Calvin a straw Whoever knows the Learned Calvin cannot but acknowledge him for a most stout maintainer of Gods truth by whose auspicious labours in this age through Gods mercy an admirable course hath been made to all excellency of Doctrine and Religion which might have perished had not he being stirred up by Gods grace as another Atlas upholden the ruinous affairs of the Church He was also a most earnest restorer of Christian liberty which with might and main pursued about the use of meats and dayes against the Papists and other adversaries of the truth And let none think it strange if upon the matter he find the same happen to him which does to the diligent Husbandman after that his good seed sprouts out in his field who perceiving Darnel and Tares while he goes about to root them out contrary to his purpose he plucks up some of the Wheat with the Tares Whilst that famous Divine observes the observation of the Jewish Sabbath to cease and that upon Apostolical authority he thought it congruous to truth to pronounce the Christian Church free from observing the Weekly Sabbath This opinion he manifested especially when he set himself against the unnecessary Festivals of the Papists from whose most grievous yoke he had an earnest desire to free the Church of Christ It will not be well taken for me to dissent from Calvin together with the Learned Beza Gallacius on Ex. 31. and Fajus Mr. Calvins most intimate Colleagues and other Divines of great name though it be done with never so great modesty and craving his pardon however I judge him worthy to be reckoned amongst our greatest Writers But I will come now to weigh the foresaid Texts whereof the first is in Act. 20. 7. where St. Luke sayes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Upon the first day of the week when the Disciples came together to break bread Paul preached unto them ready to depart on the morrow and continued his speech until midnight Where the Church-assembly is as they say painted to the life by all its circumstances and first from the time then from the duties performed of the Church in that assembly concerning all which a double question is moved of some that seek a knot in a bulrush In the one whereof what Luke means by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. the first day of the week in the other they discuss what must be understood by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. breaking of bread In describing the Church of Troas first the time is noted namely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where some interpret it not for the first but one day of the week as if Luke had signified nothing else by that phrase than that they met on a certain day of the week when St. Paul was there They eat according to the Proverb with very tender jaws to whom these dainties relish But with their leave what they say cannot agree with the genuine sense of that place For in that place Sabbatum must needs be taken either for the whole week as the Hebrews usually speak or for the last day in the week We must not understand it here in the latter sense because the Apostle abode at Troas only seven dayes Act. 20. 6 and in that space only one Sabbath properly so
They of Asia contend it must be celebrated on the fourteenth day they of the West on the Lords day only and which is more those acknowledge their opinion received by tradition from John these from Peter and Paul This controversie Eusebius Hist l. 5. explains more at large Who therefore can be brought to believe if the festivity of the Passover was ordained by the Apostles authority that so soon divers Churches that were governed of the very Apostles Scholars would make a departure from so holy a precept and that in celebrating the Lords day all the Churches of Christ through the whole world should follow one and the same rule Why had they not also done the like in the Feast of the Passover if it had been instituted by Apostolical authority It is not likely therefore it was ordained of the Apostles And yet I cannot but wonder at the wit of some men who hold the Passovers festivity which the Scriptures are silent in for divine and yet they repute the Lords day whose observation we meet with in Scripture for Ecclesiastical and humane If therefore the Passovers festivity was instituted of the Apostles no man can justly prefer it to the Lords day ordained of Christ by his Apostles Nor must we judge otherwise of the Feast of the happy Nativity of Christ whose solemnity was anniversary but on what day of the year to be celebrated it 's uncertain Chrysostom although he conjectures Christ was born on the eighth before the Calends of January in December recites divers opinions about this matter but follows his own opinion without condemning of others and permits every one to abound in his own sense till such time as the Lord shall reveal to every one of us what must be holden for certain St. Hierom if so be that Sermon de Nativitate Domini which goes commonly under his name be Hieroms saith Whether the Lord Jesus was born to day or baptized to day a different opinion is carried about in the world and according to the variety of traditions is the sentence diverse In this authors judgement whoever he was it was uncertain what day the blessed Nativity of Christ fell out on The Learned Casaubon Exercit. ad apparat Bar. annal num 68. tells us there were of old divers opinions in the Church about Christs Nativity Some writing that he was born on the sixth of January others on the nineteenth of April others on the nineteenth of May some in the month of September most on the twenty fifth of December Now these divers opinions about these feasts which are taken for chief ones do teach us that they were ordained by no law of the Apostles otherwise in their writings without doubt we should have met with a direct assigning of the time to be set aside for keeping them in Memory as it is observed of the Lords day which yet it 's plain no where can be found Moreover if their ordination had been derived from the Apostles they had either all been equal among themselves or it had been known some way to the Church which amongst them had been of greater authority and right But the contrary appeareth from the most grave Fathers which differ from one another about this thing and therefore one is sometimes preferred before another of them Chrysostom calls the Feast of Christs Nativity the Mother of all Feasts Orat. de Philognio Gregory Nyssen calls it the holy of holies and feast of feasts Gregory Nazianzen judgeth it to be preferred far before all others that are Christs and are celebrated in honour of him Since therefore it is not agreed on amongst the Fathers of the Church of the first institution of these Festivals and their prerogatives none will doubt that their institution was not received from the Apostles Which things being supposed it can be inferred by no necessary consequence that these are to be compared much less to be preferred to the Lords day From all which it appeareth that the observation of the Lords day was far different from that of the Sabbath and other dayes because the Sabbath day amongst Christians had on it no cessation from worldly labours neither was it observed with such solemnity of the whole Church as was the Lords day yea the Sabbath is not read to be observed of the whole Church whenas yet the premises do evince that the Lords day was ever solemnized from the very Apostles age in the Church dispersed through all Nations and we have observed that other Festivals of Christs are not to be compared with much less to be equallized or preferred to the Lords Day CHAP. IV. The chief of the Fathers make mention of the Lords Day its authority depends not on the Constitutions of Emperours when it was at first ordained that Judges should cease from hearing Law-suits on that day the Christians were punished for observing it What it is Dominicum agere BEtter to manifest the celebrity of the Lords Festival I will moreover bend my mind to two things by which in the first place I will demonstrate that the Lords Day all along in the Church from the very Apostles age was consecrated to perform religious exercises on Secondly that on all that day the Church was wont to be vacant from all worldly matters which two things will clearly enough shew its solemnity above all other dayes to which these things agree not amongst men that relish the truth In demonstrating the fiâ—st of these we will prove that the Lords day was alwayes celebrated and will briefly open both the reasons of its solemnity and its names which we meet with amongst the ancients Let it be sufficient to illustrate the first that there is none of any note in the ancient Church who doth not give an ample testimony to this its solemnity Amongst the renowned witnesses of this truth let St. Ignatius come forth who thus charges us Let every lover of Christ celebrate the Lords day which was consecrated to the Lords Resurrection as the Qneen and Prince i. the chief day as Constantine the Great in Euseb de vit ejus lib. 4. cap. 18. of all other dayes Justin Martyr in the end of his second Apology confesseth that on that day which they call Sunday were holden solemn assemblies of all that lived both in villages and cities and he tells us more at large what was done in those assemblies of which afterwards we shall hear more Dionysius Bishop of Corinth when he mentions Clements Epistle to the Corinthians in Eusebius saith he kept holy the Lords day Tertullian reckoneth the Lords day which he calls the eighth namely from the Creation amongst the Christians solemnities The same doth Origen although otherwise he was not at one with himself about the times for performing Religious exercises lib. 8. contra Celsum Eusebius when he speaks of the Ebionites whom he reports did observe the Lords dayes after the same
them out furnished with special authority to gather the Church to lay whose foundations belong to the Apostolical dignity out of the promiscuous multitude of all nations and so they were sent out by Christ to all Nations without any exception for which cause when a Church was planted in any part of the world whither they came they fixed not but removed some other way Thirdly They were endued with that abundance of Grace of the Holy Ghost for the Ministry committed to them by the Lord that they preached the truth of the Gospel infallibly I know sayes Hierom how to esteem of the Apostles in one manner of other Doctors after another that those alwayes taught the truth these in some things did erre as men Whence the Doctrine commended to the Church by the Apostles was alwayes accounted for the rule and Canon of all Christian Religion Fourthly The Apostles at the beginning of the Church by the visible sign of imposition of hands conferred the gifts of the Holy Ghost upon others that were instructed of them in the Doctrine of the Gospel and they were endued with divers other gifts of Miracles by which their call was rendred clear both to themselves and others Matth. 10. 8. And these are the signs by which the blessed Apostle teaches us that he had executed the office of a true Apostle in the Church of Corinth 1 Cor. 12. 2. Deservedly for these causes were they that were elected to the honourable state of Apostolical dignity preferred to other Ministers of the Church not only in the chief eminency of Order but of Power and hence it was that all questions respecting the affairs of the whole Church were propounded to be discussed by the Apostles whom all the Churches consulted in doubtful cases as may be seen Acts 15. 2. 1 Cor. 7. 1. and whatever they determined the whole Church every where embraced which made a conscience of departing a fingers breadth from those things that were committed to them by the Apostles If therefore the solemnity of the Lords Day was celebrated while the Apostles were living which the Scriptures testifie was done as we have seen chap. 2. it must of right chiefly be imputed to their ordination otherwise without doubt the Universal Church had not followed it Baronius thinks that all who are well in their wiâ—â— will say that since it is found that it was done in the Apostles times it could not be ordained and commanded to be kept of any other but of themselves Neither is any thing worthy consideration brought to the contrary except it be because the Blessed Apostles have left no singular command with the Church for the observation of this day although he that shall attend their practise may lawfully deny this since their example and practise hath the force of a precept But who will deny that some things were instituted of the Apostles in the Church whose use while they were alive I pass not for Traditions introduced into the Church when the Apostles were dead was grown out with the primitive Christians of whose first institution or necessary continuation afterwards no precept is extant in the Scriptures yet who will be bold to extenuate the authority of these commands or will affirm that the Church at this day is not obliged to observe them because their observation being mentioned in Scripture is as it were a command by vertue whereof the Church is bound to continue them The thing will be more plain by examples The Apostles ordained Deacons Act. 6. and Elders in every Church Act. 14. 23. In the Ordinations of all Ministers imposition of hands was used but where is there extant an express commanâ— from Christ for perpetuating the ordination of those the institution of these or for the use of this ceremony yet none doubts but that the Apostles in performing of these were acted by a Divine instinct of the Spirit and that the Church at this day is bound to them by vertue of Apostolical institution But that I may briefly shew that the blessed Apostles and no others were the authors of this solemnity that which follows may suffice If it were observed while they were yet living which the Scriptures do evidently enough manifest it is deservedly to be ascribed to their ordaining it for it was either instituted by them and their authority or by some other Doctors of the Church without their consent a third way is not given the latter whereof is absurd and never to be admitted of any exercised in the Christian Faith because the Apostolical authority as formerly we have abundantly enough shewn was supreme in the Church it belonged to them to declare to the Christian flock what was best to be done in all things and not to the Church to prescribe them Statutes and Laws Why therefore did it not appertain to the Apostles the faithful founders of the Church amongst other things to commend this also to the Church and not to the Church to prescribe it the blessed Apostles Moreover the general consent of all Churches in celebrating this festival evinceth the same otherwise they had dissented from one another as in other observations not received from the Apostles but observed for a time by the succeeding Church as in the Feast of the Passover in observing Fasts c. so doubtless it would have happened in celebrating the Lords Day if by Divine authority received from the Apostles its observation had not been used amongst the Christians Thirdly if the Christian Church had ordained that day to be celebrated without the advice of the Apostles either those that turned Christians from Jews or Gentiles had done this but not those to whom the cessation of their old Sabbath was not known but by the Apostles much less would they attempt to do this by themselves or on their own authority Neither will any wise man think that those whom the Apostles invited from Heathenism to embrace the Christian faith were the authors of this Festival because it is not usual with them to Sabbatize after the manner of the Church unless so far as they were instructed to it by the Apostles Fourthly if the Holy Apostles by authority committed to them from Christ had not instituted the Lords Day but had left its observation free to the judgment of the Church then we might on good reason have called the Church the Queen of the Sabbath which yet is a very clear argument of Christs Divinity as the Learned Dr. Paraeus piously for none is Lord of the Sabbath but he that hath instituted the Sabbath c. The Sabbath is of the Lord they God Lastly if its authority did depend upon the Churches institution then it may by it be again abolished when it shall think good but this was never hitherto since Christs ascension attempted because the Lords day being taken away the publick worship of God must of necessity fall Since therefore the observation of the Lords day was used while the Apostles were
no be bound by the Fourth Command in the Decalogue to sanctifie one day weekly Amongst equal estimates of things saith the foresaid Learned Divine it cannot but be without controversie that it is as well for Christians as Jews having finished their labours on the six dayes to sanctifie the seventh that with the Jews they acknowledge that they worship the most blessed and Almighty God the Maker of Heaven and Earth But although in this both Jew and Christian do agree that when they have spent six dayes in their labours on the seventh they should rest yet they differ amongst themselves in the determination or designation of the day destined to this holy rest For the Christians keep holy that day which to the Jews was the first in the week and call it the Lords day that they might prove themselves the servants of God who in the dawning of that day subdued the Devil that spiritual Pharaoh and redeemed his people from a spiritual servitude by raising up Jesus Christ our Lord from the dead who hath regenerated the Christian Church not unto a sublunary Canaan but unto a lively hope of an immortal inheritance preserved for us in the Heavens And that I may dispatch in a word The Christian by sanctifying the Lords day doth prosess that he is a Christian that is as St. Peter interprets it believes in hinâ— that raised up Christ from the dead Hence it easily appears that both Jews and Christians though the same day be not solemnized amongst them both were led by the same reason to sanctifie the seventh day which to the Jews might call to mind their liberty restored from Egypt and servitude of a worldly Pharaoh and to Christians from a spiritual Egypt and Pharaoh But lest any one should object unto me Christians might profess this by sanctifying the last day in the week I add moreover they could not do so by right for if the Christians should keep holy day after the manner of the Jews then they would declare that their spiritual Redemption was not yet perfected but yet did look for it especially whenas the Redemption of Israel out of Egypt by the Ministry of Moses was a type and pledge of our future and spiritual liberty by Christ and the inheritance of the earthly Canaan which those that were freed from Egyptian bondage did seek after prefigured a celestial inheritance which the redeemed by the holy Blood of Christ did look for Since therefore the shadow vanished when the body was present we must not believe in God foretelling future things by types and shadows but in him that hath most faithfully accomplished the truth according to the prophecies foretold by him So Austin against Faustus the Manichee It is not saith he a diverse doctrine but a different time it was one thing for these things that they must be foretold by figurative prophecies and another thing that they must now be fulfilled by the truth made manifest and accomplished As by an apt similitude Mr. D. G. illustrateth it There is saith he in all Nations the same law of all the Stars and the same motion although a great variety may arise from the difference of the Horizon whereupon it may be our day when it 's night with our Antipodes so the law of Nature is the same with us and the Jews yet in some things it admitteth of some mutation from the difference of the Horizon as I may say whilst they inhabited the old world and we the new that is the Sun of Righteousness on the seventh day came to their Meridian by Creation to ours on the eighth day by Christs Resurrection whence that which was a festival to them to us is none Although the Sabbath be translated to the Lords day yet for that reason its being a sign between God and his people is not taken away but translated to another day Neither is the thing changed that was signified by that sign but only the manner and circumstance of time and clearness of signification I will hasten therefore to demonstrate the cessation of celebrating the Sabbath after the Jewish manner and substitution of the Lords Day into its place both out of Scriptures and Fathers The holy writings of the Apostles do testifie that the observation of the Jewish Sabbath as well as other festivals in use amongst them is removed from off the Christians shoulders So St. Paul Col. 2. 16. Let no man therefore judge you in meat or in drink or in respect of an holy day or of the new moon or of the Sabbath dayes In that Chapter while the Apostle mentions various corruptions of the Sacred Religion which he teacheth will be profitable for the Church diligently to shun he reckons up three sorts of them the first whereof by false teachers was drawn from Philosophy the second from humane traditions the third from the rudiments of the world Now by the rudiments of the world he means the pedagogy of Moses out of which ver 16. he brings forth two corruptions to wit of the choice of meats prohibited by the Law and sanctifying of Festivals observed under the same Amongst the Jews there were divers Feasts some of great name and authorty celebrated yearly namely of the Passover Pentecost and Tabernacles and then besides these they celebrated their New Moons every Month and their Sabbath every week the Apostle affirms that all these Festivals which after a manner were the shadow of Christ to come and Christ their truth and body that is they did portend what afterwards were truly exhibited of Christ had their end when Christ was once come for when the body is come the shadow vanisheth Even as in the Emperours absence his image hath authority but when he is present hath not so these things also before the coming of the Lord in their time were to be observed but when he is come do want authority And therefore they that contend for observing the Sabbath after the Jewish manner do deny that Christ is come witness the blessed Apostle for gaping at the shadow they embrace not the body There was a time when they were to be trained up by the shadow but he that follows the shadow when the body is present is deceived Therefore from that place of the Apostle we must believe that the Jewish Sabbath of which he speaks under the number of a Multitude Sabbaths because it was celebrated every week and seldome do we meet with it in the singular number as before was observed is ceased by the coming of Christ or that Christ is not yet come The same Apostle sharply taxeth the Galatians for observing of days that having rejected the wholsom Doctrine of the Gospel they returned to the same beggarly Elements that is legal observations Gal. 4. 10. Ye observe saith he dayes and months and times and yeares Where according to Tertullian contra Marcion lib. 1. c. 20. Chrysostom Theodoret Primasius c. in Gal. 4. by dayes the Apostle understandeth
the Sabbaths of the Jews and by the names of Months New moons by years the computing of years according to the Jews The false Apostles did urge the Sabbath New moons and the other Feast dayes of the Jews because they were legal observations but the Apostle having pious bowels rolling within him doth seasonably admonish the Galatians that they should not yield to them in this business and so his labour in promulging the Gospel be in vain And to any that considers the circumstances of the Text it is a thing without controversie that the Apostle properly doth reprehend the Galatians because that after they had acknowledged and received the Doctrine of the Gospel in a Jewish manner to whom not only the day for the worship but also the celebration in its rest was of it self religious they had observed Feast dayes as if such a kind of observation were so necessary to the worship of God that by its neglect their salvation was in hazard Neither are the words of the Apostle so to be taken as if he only reprehended the Galatians for observing dayes on this ground that they might make a guess of the success of their actions as the Heathens did as St. Austin would have it Epist ad Januarium although in another place he interprets this place doubtfully Austin in Epist ad Cal. expounds it first of the Heathens custom and then of the Jews Also the Commentaries in Gal. attributed to Ambrose do interpret the place of the Apostle in the same manner but because the observation of dayes which was rejected of the Apostle was done according to those weak and beggarly elements Gal. 4. 9. i. e. as we said legal observations which the Galatians did seriously sue for being so taught of the false Apostles The sense of the Apostles words cannot be expounded according to the foresaid Fathers These sacred testimonies of the blessed Apostle do shew that the Jewish Sabbath was abrogated by Christs coming Nor do I dissent from the gravest Lights in the Churh in teaching the cessation thereof for with an-unanimous consent they do teach that the observation of the Jewish Sabbath is not to be imposed on Christians So Athanas Hom. de semente Homil. de Sab. Circumcis Cyprian would have the eighth day to be to the Christians what the Sabbath was which as he saith is as it were the Image of the Lords day August Ep. 118. c. 12. Ambros in Eph. 2. Chrysost in Cal. 1. Tertullian calls the Sabbath temporal which in time should cease Chrysostom confesses the same Hom. 12. ad Pop. Aug. l. 6. c. 4. contr Faust Manich. de Gen. ad literam lib. 4. c. 13. Hither also are to be referred other fore-cited testimonies of the Fathers which yield a testimony evident enough for the cessation of the Jewish Sabbath Now since these holy Fathers do assert that the precept of the Sabbath is not to be observed of Christians whether do they simply contend for abrogating the observation of the weekly Sabbath or only that it must not be kept on that manner and on the seventh day as the Sabbath was commanded the Jews Which is very worthy our consideration and the later seems to be intimated by the following examples Whereas the name is put upon the seventh day and the observation thereof ordained yet we saith Hilary do rejoyce on the eighth which is also the first the festival of the Sabbath being finished Therefore Hilary affirmeth not a simple abrogation but change of the Sabbath whose name we often meet with and the observation prescribed because he confesseth that Christians did observe the festival of the Sabbath though on the Sabbath day i. e. the seventh day from the Creation it was not done Tertullian while he disputeth that the Patriarchs did not acknowledge the use of the Jewish Sabbath yet he granteth the Sabbath which he calls eternal that is it was before the Law and must last when it ceaseth for no where doth Tertullian deny the sanctification of the seventh day from the Creation which the Jewes do assert St. Austin contr Faust Manich. whilst he teacheth that the Sabbath and Circumcision were figures saith it is no diverse doctrine namely ours from that of the Jews about the observation of the Sabbath but a different time it was one thing for these things that they must be foretold by figurative prophecies and another thing that they now must be fulfilled by the truth made manifest and accomplished Where Augustine confesseth that both the Jews and Christians observation of the Sabbath is grounded upon the same foundations of Doctrine though the same consideration of time be had amongst both Yea in another place he acknowledgeth that the command of the Sabbaths observation was more enjoyned to us than the Jews The 251 Sermon in August de tempore saith also that the glory of the Sabbath is transferred upon the Lords day that is the positive determination of the seventh day is changed which yet he affirmeth not is abolished For where there is only a mutation of a thing there is not an utter destruction of it Therefore according to the author of that Sermon the Law of the Sabbath is not vanished and made void so that by it we are not obliged to observe any Sabbath Origen grants that every holy and just man ought to observe the Sabbath's festival and he shews how this must be done neither doth he yet speak of that spiritual Sabbath of which we meet with frequent mention in the Fathers but of the Christian Sabbath which now is succeeded into place of the former Sabbath which he shews by the works that are to be done on that day Leaving therefore saith he the Judaical observations of the Sabbath let us see how the Christian ought to observe the Sabbath On the Sabbath day he speaks of the Lords day under that name he ought not to work any of all the worlds actions If therefore thou ceasest from all thy secular works and doest no worldly thing but attendest on spiritual works goest to the Church hearest godly Lectures and Treatises lookest not after present and visible things but at invisible and things future this is the observation of the Christian Sabbath This shews that Origen speaks of the Sabbath as it is to be observed of Christians and not of the spiritual Sabbath or else Christians all their dayes ought not to be troubled with their secular labours which Origen never thought on Athanasius saith that he observed the Sabbath day not as they in the first age Now what else meaneth the observation of the Sabbath in Athanasius but keeping it holy day by vertue of the command in the Decalogue about the Sabbath The image of the Lords day according to Cyprian went before in the Sabbath Whereby he infinuateth that the Lords day is to us what the Sabbath was to the Jews whose place it now supplieth in the