Churches concerning Fundamentalls and that the whole Bickering is either about certaine manners of speech which are not founded in the Scriptures themselves or about consequences which some affirme others denie that they can be rightly inferred out of the Scriptures meane time the Fundamentalls being safe on both sides although all errour be not excluded about things not Fundamentall The truth of this Assertion will appeare First if with a sincere and prudent Judgement we ponder all those things in which those who wrangle about other matters yet acknowledge there is one Consent and Harmony of all Protestant Churches Pag. 18. James Andrews reckons up seven Propositions of all which he confesseth there is no Controversie betwixt the Churches Pag. 20. Also Beza recites certaine heads of doctrine of the Person of Christ and Communication of his Properties in all which it is evident That all Protestant Divines doe Consent Not many yeeres since the Conference at Lipsigh Pag. 5.6 certaine famous Divines summ'd all these Points up to twelve Articles in which there is unanimous consent of the Communication of the Person of Christ and his Properties In these things wherein we have the opinions of all Protestant Churches so well agreeing I dare not say that nothing is wanting which belongs to knowledge in divinity yet I confidently affirme That there is nothing deficient which pertaines to the Catholike Faith nothing which is necessary to be knowne and beleeved to the Salvation of a Christian man Lastly nothing which argues either these or those to have started asunder from the Foundation or that they ought to start from mutuall Communion If therefore in this Controversie of the Person of Christ and Properties of his Natures there remaine some knotty things which are more smoothly to be explained Let Divines afford their helping hand to this matter and not for this thing rend their Churches in pieces Let them kindly bring back their wandring Brethren into the way let them not furiously break asunder the bands of Brotherly Unity Let them build upon the fundamentall Doctrines their owne Gold Silver or Pretious stones and let them throw downe the hay and stubble built up by others Let them not thrust downe others from the Foundation nor disjoynt themselves from those whom they themselves see stick fast to the Foundation and Fundamentall Articles Secondly what hath been said of the joynt Consent in Fundamentalls may be plainly seene if we weigh all those Heresies that ever opposed the Fundamentall Articles of the Person of Christ and overturned the Foundation of mans salvation For they who damne and curse all these cannot be accused of violating the Foundation except by Slander cannot be condemned but by high injustice But now it is well knowne that no Heresie can be reckoned up whether ancient or moderne against which all the Protestant Churches are not most ready to bring their voice to condemne them In the Conference at Lipsigh whereof we have often made mention for the hope it gave to us of renewing of unity all the speakers with joynt consent Pag. 10. and from their whole heart did damne and reject all errours of ancient and later Arians Nestorians Eutichians Monothelites Marcionites Photinians and by what other names soever they be called On the other side with mouth and heart they gave their consent to the Apostolicall Nicene and Athanasian Creed He that in this manner approves all Points received and allowed of the Ancient Church concerning the Person of Christ and properties of both his Natures rejects all things condemned of the same may perchance in manner of speech retaine a forme of words not very sound or in some consequences may make a small swerving from the Truth but cannot make a departure from the foundation or fundamental Doctrine of the Catholike Church seeing Melanct. said rightly Apud Lutherum Tom. 1o. in disp p. 441. B. That opinions unknown to the ancient church although at this time they be generaly received yet are no Doctrines of the Catholik Church much lesse such Fundamentall doctrines as are of force before God to break the Peace Unity of Churches Thirdly in this matter of the Person of Christ and communication of his Properties that those things are not fundamentall which as yet hang undecided may appear from the very terms and words which Divines are constrained to use to expresse their opinion For in fundamentalls we heare Plaine cleer propositions such as these are In Christ God and Man the humane and divine nature are most neerly coupled together each nature in Christ hath and retaines its owne proprieties The proprieties of one nature can never be made the proprieties of another nature In the person of Christ there is a Communication of Properties by which that is attributed and ascribed to the whole Person which is proper to one of his natures As when we say God was crucified for us or the Man Christ is Omnipotent In this Communication the divine nature neither powreth forth the properties of its Divinity nor infuseth them into the humane nature These and all other things which are cleerly spoken of the Person of Christ and Communication of his Properties are contradicted by none But those things which are conceived and infolded in strange forreign and doubtfull termes beget strifes upon strifes and questions upon questions Such are those Problems Whether the proprieties of the Natures in the Person of Christ be communicated only verbally or really Whether they bee communicated in the abstract or the concrete and others of the same stampe which by the very sound of the words doe appeare to have sprung out of the Schoole of Grammarians and Logicians not of the Apostles and ancient Fathers and therefore not to bee recounted in the number of fundamentalls But let us adde some few things of the questions themselves That some affirme that this question is propounded Whethere there be such an Union of natures in the person of Christ in which neither nature communicates any thing to the other besides the bare name they seem to me to feigne a question which never was betwixt the protestant Churches For with one voice they confesse That such is the Union of the natures in the Person of Christ in which many things are communicated to the humane Nature yea all things although excellent gifts whereof a created nature can be a subject capable to receive them And even as no Protestant corrupteth this Proposition The Man Christ is God with this wicked Interpretation The Man Christ hath the bare and empty title of God So neither doe any deprave this proposition The Man Christ is omnipotent with this perverse exposition The Man Christ is in word only or title Omnipotent but acknowledgeth the matter it selfe which is signified in this Praedicate truly and really to agree to the Man Christ because it truly agrees to his person which the terme Man doth designe and denote They which on the other side defend that it is
Catholique Church under Christ the head The Illustrious Princes themselves Osiander Antist p. 75 in their Preface to the forme of concord cleerely professe That it is in no wise their purpose or intent to damnt those men who erre out of a kinde of simplicity of heart nor are they blasphemous against the truth of heavenly doctrine much lesse to condemne whole Churches which are under the Roman Empire nor that they did doubt that even in those Churches many godly were found which hitherto consented not with them in all things And also Lucas Osiander when it was objected against him that he called the Calvinists the Devils Martyrs diligently purged himselfe in this manner They that have heard my Sermons will say that they never heard any raylings against the Martyrs of Christ In Antist pag. 91. and my publike writings doe witnesse that I called them holy Martyrs that on Bartholomew day were murdered in France It is therefore seriously to be weighed whether it be safe whether it be pious whether it agree with the duty of Christian Churches for every errour of lighter moment not to reach forth the riâ—ht hand of fellowship to those Churches which notwithstanding this errour may remaine Christ's Martyrs yea his holy brethren Will they â—ill they whosoever acknowledge Christ their elder Brother they must of necessity have all the Brethren of the same Christ joyned unto them in a most neere and Brotherly Communion Moreover I doubt not at all but that the Saxon and Helvetian Churches and others which either consent with these or those acknowledge themselves to have and to desire to retaine Brotherly Communion with the English Scotish Irish and other forreign Reformed Churches Surely as concerning us although we consent not with them in all points and titles of controversall Divinity yet we acknowledge them Brethren in Christ and protest our selves to have a Brotherly and holy Communion with them But if they themselves be like minded towards us with what equiâ—â— dâ—e the German Churches amongst themâ—elves deprive each other of that Brotherly Communion which with forreign Churches they feare not to retaine What therefore Mâ—ses said of old â—o the Israelites that fought together that may truly be said to the Dutch Churches striving amongst themselves Acts 7.26 but cannot truly be confuted by them Yee are brethren why doe yee wrong one to another Lastly what all the godly are bound to begge of the most great and good God and request it in their fervent Prayers that this may come to passe out of doubt they are bound to employ all their study and endeavours But who doth not daily solicite God for the peaceable and flourishing State of the Church Who prayes not that those things may be taken away which trouble vex disturbe or any way hinder the Spirituall edification of the Church This was the wish of the Royall Psalmist and the same ought also to be of Princes Psal 122. v. 9. Doctors and all Christians Neither did he only wish all good things to the church of God but sought for them and procured them as much as lay in his power This was his duty 't is surely ours also And here I should not be so well employed if in a long set Oration I should lay open to the German Churches either the commodities of Peace and Union or the discommodities of long lasting dissention That of Prudentius is instead of an Oracle Scissura domestica turbat Rem populi titubátque foris quod dissidet intus Home-bred rents trouble the State and that shakes abroad which is divided at home Let them therefore looke to that which is for the benâ—fit of their owne Churches and let them resolve with themselves that all that is not only to be requested of God in daily Prayers but also it must be laboured after with the greatest and unwearied endeavours of all men that it may be effected and obtained Neither let men unexperienced in matters hope that they shall ingratiate themselves the more with the Papists and suffer lesse dammage from them if they refuse to joyn with those whom they call Calvinists What is to be hoped of them Osiander long since hath told The Papists saith he burne the Lutherans no lesse than the Zwinglians in those places In Antist pag. 74. where the Pope of Rome that fierce and cruell beast hath and doth exercise full dominion They therefore who are highest in their favour can hope for no more kindnesse from them than Polyphemas in Homer bestowed on Vlysses 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will eate Vlysses last after his Companions They will devoure the Câ—lvinists sooner the Lutherans later and at last if they can they will devoure all Hitherto wee have employed our paines to this purpose that this communion betwixt the Dutch Churches may bee understood not onely to be possible but by vertue of Gods commandement altogâ—ther due and necessary It remaines now that we shew in what manner and by what meanes these Churches miserably rent and torne a sunder may with best conveniency and speed be reduced and made up together into one Body which I will endeavour to doe rather that I may manifest the willingnesse of my minde to so worthy a worke than that I conceive those noble Churches and evermore stored with plenty of learned pious and peaceable Divines to stand in need of the counsell of forreginers in this matter Forasmuch therefore as the foreâ—â—â—d controversies may be agitated either betwixt Churches belonging to divers dominions whereof one is not subject to another or betwixt Christians of the same Church who acknowledge one or the selfe same Prince or supreme Magistrate wee will speake first of divers Churches standing on terms of equall right â—hen of the members of â—ne and the selfe same Church how they re all to be joyned together amongst themselves For the reducing of divers Churche into one communion I conceive no more fit and convenient way can be thought upon than that familiar one of appointing a faire and peaceable Conference betwixt Divines chosen by the authority of their Princes For if any man think that by calling a Councel out of all the Reformed Churches these questions which have employed the wits of most learned men these many years may within a few moneths or years or within one century of years be so defined that the consent of all men may be obtained in all these heads of controversall Divinity be it spoken with the good leave of all good men to me it seems scarce likely Seeing the weake eye of Mens mindes hardly pierceth into the nicity of subtile controversies even when it surveys them being in quietnesse But if it be as if it were full of black dust raysed with the motion of Disputants for most part it cannot so much as see them or with a fixed and steddy looke behold them And to speak the truth Councels especially those that are Generall ought rather to be used for the defending
Epist 150 161. and Epist 162 163 164. Tom. 7. de unitate Ec. cap. 13. 16. and he saith it is an unwise part to goe about to condemne the Communion of the whole world He sheweth moreover That for the good of Vnitie we must beare with some things wee approve not at all and that the knowne bad prejudice not the Good in the Church if either they want power to forbid and drive them from the Communion or if some reason hinder for the preserving of Peace In a word he avoucheth That the Donatists who would acknowledge no Brethren besides those on their owne part did erect an altar of sacrilegious dissension against the whole world Thus farre Augustine Also Optatus fights fiercely against this manner of restraining Brotherly Communion He saith a Lib. 1. in mitio That the Donatists were owned of the Orthodox for Brethren He saith that b Lib. 2. prope ab initio They by this their restrained Brotherhood suffer not the Son of God to possesse the Inheritance promised unto him by his Father but doe place the Church where they please and where they please not there again do banish it out He saith c Lib. 3. init That the very name of Brotherhood however odious to the Donatists is notwithstanding necessary for the Orthodox to use towards the Donatists themselves He saith d Lib. 6. That those follow Gods Will and Commandements who loving Peace hold Communion with the Church in the whole world Lastly he saith e Lib. 7. That this Separation of some Brethren from others which the Donatists defend was displeasing to God To finish our fourth Reason although I perswade my selfe that there is none of the Protestant Churches which abhor from Brotherly Communion with others with as high a straine of Pride and malignitie of minde wherewith the Donatists detested communion with others yet I ingenuously professe that I understand not how they can cleere and winde themselves off who retaine not Brotherly Communion with other Churches but endeavor to confine the Priviledges of Christian Brotherhood onely within the bounds of their owne Churches No particular Church Reas 5 holds it self bound to break off and renounce brotherhood with another Church for the vices of men living therein though known dispersed and reigning Seeing we all know Gluttony reignes in one place Drunkennesse in another Lust in a third and these nationall vices are no lesse known to us than their Opinions If therefore for these haynous offences in life which reigne in many we take not occasion to dissolve our tye of brotherhood with whole Churches neither ought we to doe it for the errors of the Understanding which are of lesse guilt in the sight of God and often stretch not to the whole Body of Christian people 1 Cor. 5.11 2 Thes 3.6 If wee will make use of the Apostle for our Counsellour wee should depart from the company of other Christians rather for their wickednesse than for their ignorance yet for neither injoyneth he Churches to separate from Churches but only private persons to withdraw from the company of private persons Yea it is unlawfull for the Heresie of few or many Doctors ruling in particular Churches to cast off any whole Christian Church and separate it from Brotherly Communion with us A man that is an Heretick after the first and second admonition reject Titus 3.10 knowing that he that is such is subverted and sinneth being condemned of himself saith the Apostle It is lawfull to exclude a single man from the communion of other Christians for a damnable Heresie See Aug. Epist 162 tom 6. de util cred cap. 1. wherein he is condemned by his owne judgement or convicted of obstinacie but it is not lawfull for an errour into which he is trained in by the deceit and subtiltie of others and which he defendeth not with any wilfull stomack but only being deceived with an imagination and conceit of Truth and Pietie But no Protestant Church can seperate or banish any other whole Protestant Church for example the English or French from Brotherly Communion with it either for faults in life or errrors in Doctrine The reason is at hand Because it cannot be proved that that whole Church hath fallen into a damnable heresie because the obstinacy of a whole Church in an error whatsoever can neither be demonstrated to forraign churches nor ought to be presumed of them Lastly because wee have no command from God nor Admonition from the Apostles to breake the bond of Brotherhood betwixt whole Churches If any here should aske why the Doctors of the Churches who never perswaded their People to disjoynt themselves from the Brotherly Communion with other Churches for the grosse and enormous vices every where reigning amongst Christians should so vehemently perswade that this must be done because of the Errors they conceive them to be fallen into Let him receive this answere That this commeth thence to passe because we more affect the praise of knowledge than of holinesse and take it in worse part from them who oppose our Dictates which are doubtfull than from them that break and violate the plaine and open Commandements of God If the matter were otherwise we might easily perceive that it was no more lawfull to breake off Brotherhood which is betwixt particular Churches for their errours in Doctrine than for the sinnes of Life which we behold generally and openly to reigne amongst them Chap. 10 Therefore wee must beware of the errours of others but in no case must separate from those Christian Churches wherein they are predominant whether they belong to life or to doctrine because for the doing of such an Act there is no lawfull power in the Ministers of any particular Church CHAP. X. That Brotherly Communion is not to he broken betwixt the Protestants is showne by the nature and quality of those points whereunto they contend THis as it seems to me must be premised in the first place That the Bands of Brotherly Cōmunion ought not to bee dissolved betwixt Christian Churches for all discords of Opinions but only for the opposing or denying of Fundamentall doctrines For it seems to be confessed amongst all Protestants that this separation is not to be made for every straw of Erroneous opinions For hence it is that when they desire to maintain that this Joynting of Churches was concluded on good ground together herewith they alwayes commenc'd this suite That they have made a discession or departed from some Foundation of the Catholique Faith For unlesse this appeare to be done not of this or that Doctor in the Church but of the Church it self as it is considered under the respect of a Body compacted or conjoyned together it ought not to availe to the parting of one Protestant Church from another But in this place it will not be unseasonable to advise in a few words that the actuall exercise of outward Communion with some particular
Church when it is compared to a Building when it is likened to a Man is termed the Head when resembled to a Tree stiled the Root It is called an Head because it maintaineth the members united unto it ceasing not to convey spirituall strength and life into them In the same sense it is named a Root because it spouteth a vitall Sap into all the Boughs and Sprigs ingrafted in it As therefore those are counted Fundamental Doctrines which are sufficiently effectuall and absolutely necessary to joyne Christians to their Foundation so may they also be called Capitâ—â—â— or Radicall Articles which being known and beleeved by any Members of the Mysticall Body they may be united to their Quickning Head and any of the Branches may rely upon that Roote of theirs which conveyeth Life unto them and stick fast to the same Moreover as every thing is not sitly called the Foundation which is usefully imployed about the building but only that which is so underlaid beneath the building that without it it cannot be supported but may stand strongly if coupled and conjoyned with it So all Doctrines profitable for the furthering of edification are not properly termed Fundamentall but only those which are so necessary to be known that without them there is no coupling of the building to the Foundation with them a saving conjunction may be had though somethings be wanting which are requisite to the perfecting of the Knowledge of a Christian Lastly 2 Tim. 3.16 let us acknowledge with the Apostle all Scripture to be profitable for Doctrine for Reproofe for Correction for Instruction of all Christians in Righteousnesse Godlinesse and Truth but we do not call all propositions founded in Scripture Fundamentall Doctrins because the nature of the thing and the propriety of the Metaphor doth forbid it The folly of Tanner in a like case was laughed at by all when in Conference at Ratisbone he feircely maintainedt hat whatsoever is affirmed in the Scripture is an Article of the Christian Faith as for example that Tobiah had a Dog But least we should stay longer than it is meet in handling the bare signification of words be this setled and resolved on that the names of Foundation and Fundamentall agree only to those things which in reference to what is founded on them are of absolute necessity and power to bring unto Salvation I find amongst Divines in this Sense a threefold acception of Foundation 1. Personall Foundation of the Church and this only one properly so called 2. Ministeriall Foundations of Churches so termed but not in the same Propriety of Language 3. Doctrinall Foundations justly so called as deserving that honorable stile not by the Opinion of a few Divines but the constant Judgment of the Catholique Church All the difference betwixt the Reformed Churches is about the two later yet can it not easily be composed Chap. 3 except we discourse of all three So much of thenotion and use of the words we come now to handle them severally in order CHAP. III. Of the only Personall Foundation of the Church Christ Jesus God and Man Mediator betwixt God and Men and of the true conjunction with him THE most wise God and most loving towards mankind was pleased to found a Church which should endure for ever and prevaile against the Gates of Hell Now such a Church could not be except it stood on a solid and eternall Foundation which might not be forced by any strength or foundred by Engines God therefore thought fit to lay no other Foundation than Jesus Christ the eternall Son of an eternal Father whom he sent into the World that every one which beleeveth on him might not dye but have everlasting life The prophets and Apostles witnesse with a joynt consent Him alone to be the Personall Foundation of the Church Psal 118.22 Esay 28.16 Act. 4.11 12. 1 Cor. 3.11 Hence David calleth Him the corner Stone Esaiah termeth Him a tryed Stone Precious and placed in the foundation of Zion This is the Stone set at nought by the Builders which is become the Head of the Corner neither is there Salvation in any other Other foundation can no man lay than that is laid which is Jesus Christ. Now what hath been said of this one only Foundation ought also to be understood of the one only Head Husband Root of the Church and also of all other Metaphorical Titles which import the same dignity of Christ the Churches same dependancy on him For Christ God and man is the only quickning and saving Head of the Church from whom the whole Body is fitly joyned together and compacted Eph. 4.15 16. Ioh. 3.29 Hos 2.20 Fph. 5.26 He is the only Bridegrom of the Church who hath the Bride and hath espoused her to himself that he might Eternally preserve that is that he may sanctifie her in this World and present her glorious in that which is to come Lastly he is the heavenly root of the Church Col. 2.7 in whom whosoever are rooted spring up towards Heaven and shall continually flourish in Heaven This Personall prerogative is so properly invested in Christ God and man that it can agree to no other Heb. 2.11 Not to Angels because they want that conformity of Nature which ought to be betwixt the Foundation and things founded in it the Head and the Members joyned unto it the Husband and Wife coupled to him in lawfull marriage Not to a bare man because no mortall by reason of the corruption and weaknesse of humane Nature can possibly performe the office of a Foundation Head Spouse in upholding quickening and preserving of the Church Not to God himselfe considered alone in the dreadfull nature of his Divine Majestie For though we acknowledge God the founder of the Church we still want a Foundation to which we need not feare to approach draw neare to come and as it were to glue our selves But the Majesty of God considered in it selfe is not only a light not to be approached unto but also is a consuming fire and what mortall man can dwell with a devouring fire Heb. 12.29 Isa 33.14 We cannot therefore have in or under Heaven any other personall Foundation by the Mediation whereof we may be reconciled and united to God save only the Word Ioh. 1.14 Made Man full of Grace and Truth But to what purpose is this dispute about a matter so plaine and granted of all Protestants Namely that it may hence appeare that other Churches neither may nor ought to renounce brotherly Communion with those particular Churches which retaine a saving conjunction with this Foundation We wonder not that the Papists who besides Christ himself make another personall Foundation another Head another Husband of the Church cut and cast off all Churches though firmely and fastly sticking to Christ which cleave not to the Pope of Rome as to their Foundation Head Husband Nor care we for their false clamours whereby they think to affright the
Churches that wee keep and preserve our own people safe and sound from their Errours and not that wee may render the others odious branding them for obstinate Heretiques Seeing it is easie to call any man an Heretique but not so easie to comprise in a certaine regular Definition what makes an Heretique Yea if we beleeve Augustine it is a matter of very great difficulty CHAP. VI. Chap. 6 Of the notes and markes whereby we may know that any Point is not Fundamentall WEE have showne already that Fundamentall points have this character plainly printed upon them that without the knowledge of them neither Salvation of Christians nor the Worship of God can consist Now let us adde some other signes and tokens out of which we may safely set down that any point is not Fundamentall although some urge and enforce it for Fundamentall and they especially who have long laboured and sweat soundly in the maintaining of it First therefore that is not Fundamentall which was never clearely revealed from the beginning by the Prophets and Apostles inspired from Heaven to Christian people and to Christian Churches founded by them through the whole World For they had not been pure from the bloud of them all if they had shunned to declare all the Counsell of God to all so far forth as it was necessary to the procuring the Salvation of all by Faith in Christ Jesus And the saving Truth in such necessary and fundamentall things was so revealed by the Apostles that all might behold it Mark 16.15 Go ye into all the world and preach the Gospell to every creature Rom. 1.16 For it is the power of God unto Salvation to every one that beleeveth We preach Christ Col. 1.28 warning every man and teaching every man in all wisdome that we may present every man perfect in Christ Jesus What therefore in the time of the Apostles was not declared to all that cannot in our Age begin to bee Fundamentall Yea neither the Papists themselves dare deny this although they arrogate to the Pope of Rome and Romish Church more power than is meet over the Articles of the Christian Faith For Canus set all those things apart from the Doctrines of the Catholique Faith Lib. 4. cap. ult pag. 145.146 which were not univorsally preached by the Apostles How much more then ought they to be severed from the Fundamentals Lib. 12.6.10 p. 391. The same Author alloweth that some propositions may bee called Truths of the Christian Doctrine which he thinks not worthy to be called Truths of the Catholique Faith For this name he counts peculiarly to belong to those Doctrines which so nearly concerne the Faith that by removing them Faith it selfe is taken away Lib. i. quest 17. p. 148. And Corduba to the same purpose saith It is no Catholique Truth nor is the contrary opinion Heresie unlesse such a Truth be revealed and generally propounded to all to be necessarily beleeved Last of all Bellarmine himselfe grants us Lib 4. de Verbo Dei cap. 11. That those things which are absolutely necessary for all to Salvation were preached unto all by the Apostles themselves Let this therefore bee the first signe of a Doctrine not Fundamentall that it hath not beene delivered by the Apostles to all publiquely generally and plainely Secondly that is no Fundamentall Point which was never admitted and held for such in the Primitive Church succeeding the Apostles and never recommended to all by generall consent of the Catholique Church For if any will maintaine that the Catholique Church did ever refuse or was ignorant of any Fundamentall Doctrine he must by the same reason maintaine that the whole Church was severed from her Foundation which no man well in his wits will ever suffer to enter into his Thoughts It was well observed by the right Reverend Arch-bishop of Armach a man of singular Piety and stored with the commendation for Learning in all kinds That if at this day wee should put by the points wherein Christians differ one from another and gather into one body the rest of the Articles wherein they generally agree Vsher Sermon before the King pag. 43. which worship Christ God and Man and acknowledge him for their Saviour We should find that in those propositions which without all Controversie are Vniversally received in the Christian World so much truth is contained as being joyned with holy Obedience may be sufficient to bring a man unto everlasting Salvation Which plainely evinceth that these things alone of the common Faith are those which rightly are called Fundamentall but as for those points which we so dearely prise and for love of them clash the Protestant Churches together because of the right of neare alliance which they have with the Fundamentals they may sometimes be ranked amongst true and profitable Doctrines but may not be accounted absolutely necessary or Fundamentall Thirdly it is not a Fundamentall maxime of the Christian Religion which is so handled or propounded that to conceive the truth thereof and to apprehend it with Faith we stand in need of the Wit and cunning of Logicians and of the abstracted and abstruse speculation of Metaphysitians Nazian Orat. 21. For nothing were more unjust than the Christian Faith if it should only sit and belong to those who are Learned and Skilfull in these Arts. Nothing is more usuall amongst Learned Men than in their minds and conceits to abstract the manner of things from the things themselves nothing more common than to propound the same single numericall thing to be considered under severall formall differences and to reare and raise these touring speculations on the plaine Doctrines of the Christian Faith If any such matter were Fundamentall or necessary to be knowne to Salvation there were no hope of the Salvation of all unlearned People But we defend with Augustine Epist 3.22 that the Faith of the holy Church is apprehended not by the Reason of Disputation but the Piety of beleeving otherwise none but the Philosophers should obtaine blessed happinesse Yea we say with the Apostle 1 Cor. 1.20 27. Where is the Wise where is the Scribe where is the Disputer of this World c. But God hath chosen the foolish things of the World to confound the Wise As if he had said Where art thou O Learned man and skilfull in lofty speculations Art thou alone meet to receive the Doctrine of Life Yea every one of the plaine countrey People is more fit than thy selfe and thou altogether unfit if thou thinkest that in these things thou mayst rely on thy own Art and witty apprehension for the way of Salvation is not only a holy way but also so plaine and direct that the foolish cannot wander in it Isa 35.8 So be it they stick to the Word in the simplicity of their hearts On the place As Luther well affirmeth Therefore saving and Fundamentall Doctrines are not to be sought for in the dark
clouds of speculation but in the plaine propositions of the holy Scriptures to the conceiving whereof there is more need and use of Faith than Art of an obedient Heart than of a subtile and piercing Wit Fourthly as all points justly challenging to themselves the Title of Fundamentall are plaine and naked for the manner of their Expression so ought they to be few and so framed that they do not swell to an infinite number yea that they grow not into so great a bulk burthensome to bee portable in the memory of Gods little ones Hence Aquinas cals them the First things to be beleeved 2a 2ae Qu. 2. de Fide cap. 2. and speciall Articles of the Faith William Paris termes them the Fundatories of Religion Others stile them Radicall Truths But although these first Fundatory and Radicall Doctrines of the Christian Religion may beget and bring forth a great uncertaine and numerous of-spring of Consequenceâ— arising from and following after â—â—â—m yet it beares no proportion with reason that they in themselves should 〈◊〉 many or uncertaine When therefore wee behold that to these First credibles of the Divine Essence and Attributes of the Incomprehensible Trinity of the Hypostatical Union of two Natures in Christ of the Cómunication of his Properties and almost of every Object of Knowledge in Divinity there is annexed so great a traine of severall points as thick Volumes are not able to containe them it is most certainely sure that the greatest part of them is not Fundamentall All Christians ought to heare the Counsell of Learned Nazianzen Orat. de Modest observ in D sp Contemplate saith he on Divine things but stay stil in the Termes Speake the Phrases and Language of the Spirit and if it be possible nothing else Do not thou curiously pry thorow those narrow rifts into the Nature of the Father the Essence of the only begotten Sonne the Glory of the Holy Ghost and one God in three Persons Vse the words accustomed the reason of them belongs to those that are Wiser to inquire Let it satisfie thee that thou hast the Foundation and let alone to Artificers to build thereupon Would to God only Artificers would build upon them would to God they would not mingle their many and almost infinite superstructures with the few and plaine Fundamentals to bee embraced with equall affections and to bee received with honour alike If they endeavour thus to do yet it becomes all pious and prudent Christians to discerne and make a difference betwixt those first and few things to bee beleeved immediately revealed by Christ and his Apostles and those numberlesse deductions of Divines which they according to their severall minds and opinions seeke to thrust and crowd into the same roome with Fundamentals Fiftly it is no Fundamentall point which though furbished and attired in new termes is not the same in effect with the Doctrine expressed in the words of the Holy Scripture For if the addition of our new coyned words importeth any thing more than what is in the Scripture this new accession may bee allowed for a consequent of the Fundamentall Doctrine but it cannot with this new peece bee urged for a direct downeright Fundamentall Doctrine But if the new word or the addition therein for matter of the Sense of the Proposition brings no new thing at all but so that understanding the Termes the effect of both appeares to be the same then wee acknowledge both to bee Fundamentall For the disserence of the expression alters not the nature of a Fundamentall Doctrine where the essence and meaning of the Proposition remaines the same What wee have said somewhat obscurely we will make plaine by an example Christ is God and the Sonne of God This is a Fundamentall Point and so also is this Christ is coessentiall with God his eternall Father For although in the latter there is a new Terme yet it addes no new thing nor affirmes any thing which will cause the cumberance of a toilesome deduction to extract it out of the former but whosoever understandeth the termes of both presently understands that they agree so well as in sense they are the same For no man of sound sense can have a conceit of diverse Gods in the same Essence or substance But if the Doctrine or Proposition deck't in forraign Termes and new language cannot bee annexed to a plaine and cleare Fundamentall Article without a busie and artificiall deducing of it it ought not to bee inserted into the Catalogue of Fundamentals Indeed those which perceive the force of the Consequence or Deduction are bound to afford beliefe to such Consectaries But they to whom it doth not sufficiently appeare that such a Proposition followeth from any Fundamentall point they are not bound to embrace it for a tried Truth much lesse for such a Doctrine without which no hope is left to obtaine Salvation To conclude in a word As often as it is inquired whether any Doctrine bee Fundamentall or no let us not give heed to the clamours of Disputants But have recourse to those Notes which now wee have reckoned up If the Doctrines they presse on us bee not clearely recommended by the Apostles themselves to the Catholique Church in the first preaching of the Gospell if in succeeding Ages they were not Universally received if they bee not suited to the capacity of simple Christians but only fitted to the braines of Philosophers and Logicians if they bee too many and not comprised within certaine bounds Lastly if expressed in such formes of Speech that they cannot bee reduced to an equivalent sense with a cleare and of all confessed Fundamentall Article sometimes they may bee Truthes but they can never beâ— counted Fundamentals CHAP. Chap. 7 VII Of the Summe of Fundamentall points contained in the Creed and Commandements so farre as wee ought to Beleeve or Practise MANY of the Papists and somme of ours when we maintaine that the difference betwixt the Reformed Churches is not about Fundamentals presently require of us to bring in a Bill and set forth an acurate Catalogue of Fundamentals so that we may say so many Fundamentals there be of the Christian Faith neither more nor lesse We easily answer the Papists that it were presumption in Protestants who confesse themselves subject to errour to undertake so hard a Taske let Papists rather addresse themselves to the Pope of Rome who alone can speake Oracles and is said to have all Laws Humane and Divine lockt up in the Closet of his Brest But if any of our men shall earnestly maintaine that unlesse this first be done no Brotherly love can be renewed betwixt the Protestant Churches let him try which is somewhat more easie if he can but only reduce the Propositions in Controversie which he desires should be Fundamentall to a certain and stinted number If he shrinkes to do this let him not blame the backwardnesse of others in the same matter Although it be not hard to show the reasons why