inestimable benefits which wee haue and shall receiue from your selfe and your late Predecessors D. Whitgift Grindall Parker Cranmer of famous and honourable remeÌ„brance Bishops of our Church Archbishops of the See of Canterbury for this vniforme doctrine by some of your Lordships drawen and penned by all of you allowed defended as agreeable to the Faith of the very Apostles of Christ and of the auncient Fathers correspondent to the Confessions of all reformed Churches in Christendome and contrariant in no point vnto Gods holy and written word commended vnto vs both by your authoritie and Subscriptions Now the all mercifull God and heauenly Father which so inspired them and your Lordship with wisedome from aboue and inabled you all to discerne truth from falsehood sound religion from Atheisme idolatry and errors vouchsafe of his infinite goodnes to encrease his graces more and more vpon your Grace to his owne glorie the Churches benefit and your owne euerlasting comfort And the same God which both mercifully hath brought and miraculously against all hellish and diuelish practises of his and our enemies continued the light of his truth among vs giue vs all grace with one heart and consent not onely to embrace the same but also to walke and carrie our selues as it beseemeth the Children of light in all peaceablenesse and holinesse of life for his Sonne our Lord and Sauiour Christ his sake At Horninger neere S. Ed. Bury in Suff. the 11. of March â—n 1607. Your Graces poore Chaplaine alwaies at commaund Thomas Rogers Constitutions and Canons ecclesiasticall an 1604. WHosoeuer shall heereafter affirme that the Church of England by Lawe established vnder the Kings Maiestie is not a true and an Apostolicall Church teaching and maintaining the Doctrine of the Apostles let him bee excommunicated ipso facto and not restored but onely by the Archbishop after his repentance and publike reuocation of this his wicked error Can. 3. Whosoeuer shall heereafter affirme that any of the 39. Articles agreed vpon by the Archbishops and Bishops of both Prouinces and the whole Cleargie in the Conuocation holden at London in the yeare of our Lord God 1562. for the auoyding of diuersities of opinions and for the establishing of consent touching true Religion are in any part superstitious or erroneous or such as he may not with a good conscience subscribe vnto let him be excommunicated ipso facto not restored but only by the Archbishop after his repentance and publike reuocation of such his wicked errors Can. 5. Whosoeuer shall heereafter seperate themselues from the Communion of Saints as it is approoued by the Apostles rules in the Church of England and combine themselues in a newe Brotherhood accounting the Christians who are conformable to the Doctrine Gouernment Rites and Ceremonies of the Church of England to be prophane and vnmeete for them to ioyne with in Christian profession let them be excommunicated ipso facto and not restored but by the Archbishop after their repentance publike reuocation of such their wicked errors Can. 9. The Titles of the 39. Articles with the Pages where to find euerie of them in this booke Art 1. OF faith in the holy Trinitie Page 1. Art 2. Of the Word of God which was made verie man Page 7. Art 3. Of the going downe of Christ into Hell Page 15. Art 4. Of the Resurrection of Christ. Page 17. Art 5. Of the holy Ghost Page 21. Art 6. Of the sufficiencie of the Scripture for saluation Page 26. Art 7. Of the old Testament Page 33. Art 8. Of the three Creedes Page 39. Art 9. Of Originall or birth sinne Page 41. Art 10. Of Free will Page 47. Art 11. Of the Iustification of man Page 50. Art 12. Of good workes Page 56. Art 13. Of workes before Iustification Page 56. Art 14. Of workes of Supererogation Page 59. Art 15. Of Christ alone without sinne Page 62. Art 16. Of sinne after Baptisme Page 65. Art 17. Of predestination and Election Page 69. Art 18. Of obtaining saluation onely by the Name of Christ. Page 82. Art 19. Of the Church Page 86. Art 20. Of the authoritie of the Church Page 98. Art 21. Of the authoritie of generall Councells Page 112. Art 22. Of Purgatorie Page 118. Art 23. Of Ministring in the Congregation Page 131. Art 24. Of speaking in the Congregation in such a tongue as the people vnderstand not Page 141. Art 25. Of the Sacraments Page 142. Art 26. Of the vnworthines of the Ministers which hinder not the effect of the Sacraments Page 160. Art 27. Of Baptisme Page 165. Art 28. Of the Lords Supper Page 170. Art 29. Of the wicked which doe not eate the body and blood of Christ in the vse of the Lords Supper Page 178. Art 30. Of both kindes Page 179. Art 31. Of the oblation of Christ finished vpon the Crosse. Page 181. Art 32. Of the marriage of Priests Page 185. Art 33. Of Excommunicate persons how they are to be auoided Page 189. Art 34. Of the Traditions of the Church Page 193. Art 35. Of Homilies Page 192. Art 36. Of Consecration of Bishops and Ministers Page 196. Art 37. Of the ciuill magistrate Page 201. Art 38. Of Christian mens goods which are not common Page 215 Art 39. Of a Christian mans Oath Page 217. FINIS ¶ THE CATHOLIKE Doctrine beleeued and professed in the Church of England 1. Article Of faith in the holy Trinitie There is but 1 one liuing and true God euerlasting without bodie parts or passions of infinite power wisdome and goodnes 2 the maker and preseruer of all things both visible and inuisible 3 And in vnitie of this Godhead there be three persons of one substance power and eternitie the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost The propositions 1. There is but one God who is liuing true euerlasting c. 2. God is the maker and preseruer of all things 3. In the vnitie of the Godhead there is a Trinitie of persons 1. Proposition There is but one God who is liuing true euerlasting without bodie parts or passions of infinite power wisedome and goodnes The proofe from the word of God THat there is but one God who is c. is a truth which may be gathered from the al-holy and sacred Scripture is agreeable to the doctrine of the reformed Churches For both Gods word giueth vs to knowe that God is one and no moe liuing and true God euerlasting without bodie parts or passions of infinite power wisedome and goodnes and Gods people in their publike confessions from Ausburgh Heâ—uetia Bohemia France Flanders and Wittemberge testifie the same Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Then impious execrable are the opinions of Dragoras Theodorus who fasly denied there was any God Of Protagoras and the Machiuilian Athiests which are doubtfull whether there be a God Of such as fained vnto themselues diuers and sundrie gods as did
were not Gods ordinance for the good but an humane institution for the hurt of men Many haue a fancie that before the generall Resurrection there shall be no magistrates at all because as they dreame all the wicked shall be rooted out Of this minde are the Anabaptists and Familie of Loue 5. Proposition The Bishop of Rome hath no iurisdiction in this realme of England nor other of the kings dominions The proofe from Gods word The Bishope of Rome did hee according to the will of God preach the Gospell labour in the Lords haruest diuide the word of God aright minister the Sacraments instituted by Christ that sincerely shew by his life conuersation the good fruites of a godly Bishop doubtlesse he were worthy of double yea of triple honor Yet will not the word of God were hee neuer so holy and religious warrant him any Iurisdiction out of his Diocesse especially not within this Reamle much lesse when he doth perform no part of a christian but euery part of an antichristian Bishop in corrupting the doctrine of the truth with errors and cursed opinions in polluting the Sacraments of Christ by superstitious ceremonies in persecuting the Church and Saints with fire and sword in making marchandise of the soules of men through couetousnes in playing the Lord ouer Gods haeritage in sitting in the Temple of God as God shewing himselfe that he is God and in exalting himselfe against all that is called God or that is worshipped In respect of which fruites of impieties the said Bishop of Rome in the holy Scripture is described to be very Antichrist that wicked man the man of sinne the sonne of perdition and the aduersarie of God He was openly proclaimed Antichrist by a Counsell in France in the raigne of Hugh He is tearmed by the truly and godly learned The Basiliske of the Church neither the Head nor the Taile of the Church His iurisdiction hath bin and is iustly renounced and bannished out of England by manie Kings and Parliaments as by K. Edward the 1.3 and 6 by K Richard the second by K. Henrie the 4.6 and 8 by Q. Elizabeth and by our most Noble K. Iames. His pride and intolerable supremacie ouer all Christian people is renounced and condemned aswell by the mouthes as wrightings of all the purer Churches and that deseruedlie The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth But with the Papists the Bishop of Rome hee is forsooth for supremacie Abell for gouering the Arke Noah for patriarchship Abraham for order Melchisedecke for dignity Aaron for authoritie Moses for iustice Samuell for zeale Helias for humilitie Dauid for power Peter for his vnction Christ the generall Pastor the common Father of all Christians the high Pastor of Gods vniuersall Church the Prince of Gods people for title God euen the Lord God the Pope for power God For By him Kings raigne hee may iudge all men but must of none be iudged hee can doe what him list aswell as God except sinne His iurisdiction is vniuersall euen ouer the whole worlde Him vppon paine of eternall damnation all Christians are to obey And by his soueraigne authoritie both all Papistes in England were discharged from their obedience and subiection vnto Q. Elizabeth and the same Queene disabled to gouerne her owne people and dominions 6. Proposition By the lawes of this Realme Christian men for hainous and greeuous offences may be put to death The proofe from Gods word As the natures of men be diuers and some sinnes in some countries more abound then in others so are the punnishments to bee imposed vppon malefactors according to the quantitie and qualitie of their offences and any countrie and Kingdome may punnish offendors euen with death if the Lawes thereof and their offence doe require it For All that take the sword shall perish with the sword Gouernors bee sent of the King for the punnishment of euill doers A wise King scattereth the wicked and causeth the wheele to turne ouer them The magistrate beareth not the sword for nought and is the minister of God to take vengeance on them that doe euill Which punishments testifie to the world that God is iust which will haue some sinnes more seuerely punnished then others and the magistrates to cut off dangerous and vngodly members God is mercifull and â—â—th care both of his seruanâ—s and of humane societie God is all wise and holy in that he will haue it knowne who are iust who wicked who holy and who prophane by cherishing and preseruing of the one and by punishing and rooting out of the other Our Godly and Christian brethren in other countries approoue this doctrine The aduersaries vnto this truth The aduersaries of this doctrine be diuers For Some are of opinion that no man for any offence should be put to death Such in old time were the Manichies and the Donatistes and such in our daies be the Anabaptistes And some doe thinke that howsoeuer for other offences against the second Table malefactors may bee put to death yet for haereticall and erroneous opinions in points of religion none are so to suffer Of this minde are the Familistes For They hold that no man should bee put to death for his opinions They blame M. Cramner and Ridley for burning Ioane of Kent for an haereticke It is not christianlike that one man should persecute another for any cause touching conscience Is not that punnishmenâ— sufficient say they which God hath ordained but that one Christian must vexe torment belie and persecute another 7. Proposition It is lawfull for Christian men at the commandement of the Magistrate to weare weapons and serue in warres The proofe from Gods word There is saith K. Salomon a time of warre and a time of peace and Princes are by warre and weapons to represse the power of enemies whether forraigne or intestine For they are in authoritie placed for the defence of quiet and harmlesse subiects as also to remoue the violence of oppressors and enemies whatsoeuer they bee For these causes haue they Horses prepared for the battell Tributes paide them aswell of Christians as others and Subiects to serue them in their warres of what nature soeuer Cornelius being a Christian was not forbidden to play the Centurion or bidden to forsake his profession nor the Souldiers that came vnto Iohns baptisme willed to leaue the warres but to offer no violence vnto any man This truth is graunted by the Churches The adversaries vnto this truth Many are against this assertion whereof some doubt of the truth thereof as Ludouicus Viues Others denie it altogether as vntrue So did in ancient time the Manichies whose doctrine was that no man might goe to warre Lactantius thought it altogether vnlawfull for a good man or a Christian either
cloake their inueterate and rooted pertinacie howe the purpose if not doctrine of our Church is of late altered from that it was And therefore though they can be wel content to allowe of the old doctrine and auncient intention yet vnto the old doctrine and newe Intention of our Church they cannot subscribe might they either gaine much or loose whatsoeuer they haue thereby Besides this newe Intendement contrarie to the old purpose if not doctrine of our Church is become nowe the maine principall obstacle why they cannot subscribe vnto the booke of Cōmon prayer booke of Ordination as earst they some of them foure times haue done when aswell the Intention as Doctrine of our Church was pure and holy Lastly they seeme not obscurely to intimate vnto the State that were they sure or might bee assured that the purpose of our Church were the same which it was neither varied from the doctrine they would be prest and as readie euen foure if not fortie times moe to subscribe vnto the fore mentioned bookes of Common prayer and of Ordination as afore times they did when they were out of doubt the Intention of our Church was correspondent to her Doctrine that it was sound good I haue foure times subscribed saith a Brother to the booke of Common prayer with limitation reference of all things therein contained not vnto the purpose only or doctrine only but vnto the purpose doctrine of the church of England Yet cannot the same man with a good conscience so much as once more subscribe which formerly and that with a good consciēce had subscribed foure times His reasō is Because the purpose if not doctrine of our Church to which hee referred his subscriptiō appeareth to him by the late Canons booke of cōference some speeches of men in great place others to be varied somewhat from that which he before not without reason tooke it to be 35. The purpose of our Church is best knowne by the Doctrine which shee doth professe the Doctrine by the 39. Articles established by Act of Parliament the Articles by the words whereby they are expressed and other purpose then the publique Doctrine doth minister and other Doctrine then in the sayd Articles is contained our Church neither hath nor holdeth and other sense they cannot yeeld then their words doe impart The words be the same and none other then earst and first they were And therefore the sense the same the Articles the same the Doctrine the same and the purpose Intention of our Church still one the same If then her purpose be knowne by her Doctrine and Articles and their true sense by their very words needes must the purpose of our Church be the same because her Doctrine and Articles for number words sillables and letters euery way be the very same And so our Churches intention in her publique Doctrine and Articles reuealed being good at the first it is to still For her purpose continuing one the same cannot be ill at the last which was good and so beleeued and acknowledged euen by the Brothers subscription at the first or good in good Queene Elizabeths and ill in illustrious King Iames his daies 36. If the premisses sufficiently explane not the constancy of our Churches purpose in professing religion sincerely then cast we our eies vpon the Propositions which she publiquely maintaineth and if wee find them the same which euer they haue beene then neede wee not doubt the Brethren themselues being Iudges but the Articles againe their sense the Doctrine purpose and Intention of the Church of England the Propositions interpreting as it were the said Articles is the very same it euer was Now that the Propositions pregnantly and rightly gathered and arising from the articles be the same for substance vnaltered though vpon good considerations some fewe be added to the former and all of them approoued for true and Christian by the lawfull and publike allowance of our Church the booke here ensuing plainly wil declare and so demonstrate withall not the Doctrine onely but intention also of our Church to be the same and not changed and being vnchanged the bookes then of common prayer and of ordination too cōsidered in the purpose and intention of the Church of England and reduced to the Propositions as the Brethren would haue them be well allowed and authentically approoued and the said brethren with as good conscience nowe againe and afresh may subscribe vnto all the Articles euen concerning the Booke of common praier and of ordination aswell as of the Kings supremacie and of Religion as afore often and alwaies they did 37. Fot my selfe most reuerend Father in God what my thoughts be of the religion in this realme at this instant professed and of all these Articles if the premisses doe not that which here followeth will sufficiently demonstrate Twentie yea 22 yeares agoe voluntarily of mine owne accord and altogether vnconstrained I published my subscription vnto them my Faith is not either shaken or altered but what it then was it still is yeares haue made those haires of mine gray which weare not and time much reading and experience in theologicall conflicts and combates haue bettered a great deale but not altered one whit my iudgement I thanke God Nothing haue I denied nothing gainesaid which afore I deliuered Thē Propositiōs are and yet not many moe the method altered quotations added both for the satisfaction of some learned and iudicious freinds of mine requesting it at mine hands and for the benefit both of the common and vnlearned of the studious and learned Reader The whole worke expresseth aswell my detestation and renunciation of all adversaries and errors opposite crossing or contradicting the doctrine professed by vs and protected by our King or any article or particle of truth of our religion as my approbation of that truth which in our Church by wholesome Statutes and ordinances is confirmed There is not an heretike or Schismatike to speake of of any speciall marke that from the Apostles time hitherto hath discouered himselfe and his opinions vulgarly in writing or in print against our doctrine but his heresie fancie or phrensie may here be seene against one propositiō or other The Sects and Sect masters adversaries vnto vs either in the matter or maine points of our doctrine or Discipline to one of our Articles or other wholly or in part which here be discouered to be taken heed of and auoided are many hundres 38. This and whatsoeuer els here done either to the confirmation of the truth or detestation of heresies and errors I doe very meekely present vnto your Grace as after God and our King best meriting the patronage thereof My selfe am much the whole Church of England much more bound vnto your Lordship yea not wee onely nowe liuing but our successors also and posteritie shall haue cause in all ages while the world shall continue to magnifie almightie God for the
haue a Quaternitie of persons not a Trinitie to be worshipped so did Anastasius the Emperour command the Apollinarians did hold Some doe graunt and acknowledge the names of three in the God-head but denie their persons such were the Noëtians Praxeneans and Hermogenians This did say how the same God was called by diuers names in the holy Scripture and therefore that the Father became flesh and suffered because one and the same God is called the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost For which cause they were tearmed Patripassians In this number was Sernetus Againe some doe grant the names and persons of three and yet depriue not onely the Sonne and holy Ghost of their diuinitie but the whole Trinitie also of their properties For they say there be three in heauen viz. the Father the Word and holy Ghost howbeit say they the Father onely is very God the word is the breath of the Father and the holy Ghost is the spirit created by God of nothing through the word spoiling so both the Sonne and holy Ghost of their deitie and the whole Trinitie of their properties Such were the Arrian and Macedonian heretikes hence by-named Pneumatomachons because they waged battel with the holy Ghost And some doe bring in other names of deitie besides of the Father Sonne and holy Ghost as did the Priscilianists 2. Article Of the word of God which was made very man The Sonne which is 1 the word of the Father begotten from euer-lasting of the Father the verie and eternall God of one substance with the Father 2 tooke mans nature in the wombe of the blessed virgine of her substance so that 3 two whole and perfect natures that is to say the God-head and man-hood were ioyned in one person neuer to be diuided where-of is one Christ very God and verie man ◠who suffered was crucified dead and buried to reconcile his Father to vs and to be a Sacrifice not onely for originall guilt but also for all actuall sinnes of men The propositions 1. Christ is very God 2. Christ is very man 3. Christ is God and man and that in one person 4. Christ is the Sauiour of mankinde 1. Proposition Christ is very God The proofe from Gods word IN the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and that Word was God This is written of Christ. Therefore Christ is God Christ was begotten of the Father from euerlasting Therefore verie God This is life eternall that they knowe thee to be verie God and whome thou hast sent Iesus Christ They shal call his name Emanuel which is by interpretation God with vs Christ he is the brightnes of the glorie and the engraued image of the Father his person and beareth vp all things by his mightie hand Therefore verie God And this both hath bin of the auncient Christians and is the Faith of the reformed Churches The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Miserably therefore doe they erre which either denie or impugne the deitie of our Sauiour as did certaine old heretikes viz. The Arrians whereof some were called the Douleians because in scorne they tearmed the onely begotten of God the Fathers seruant The Cerinthians The Ebionites among whome some said that Christ Iesus was a meere man others acknowledged him to be God but not from euerlasting The Eunomians The Samosatenians who thought that Christ was not the Sonne of God before his incarnation The Nestorians whose opinion was that Christ became God by merit but was not God by nature The Macedonians which vtterly denied the Sonne to be of one substance with the Father The Agnoites who held that the diuine nature of Christ was ignorant of some things Againe some late heretikes euen to the death neuer would acknowledge Christ Iesus to be the true and verie God as namely Certaine Catabaptists Blandrat Matthew Hamant burnt at Norwitch an 1579. one of whose heresies was that Christ was a meere and sinnefull man Francis Ket burnt also at Norwitch an 1588. who most obstinatelie maintained that Christ was not God til after his resurrection Dauid George sometime of Basil who affirmed himselfe to be greater for power then euer Christ was In oppugning the deitie of our Sauiour with these heretikes ioyne the Iewes and Turkes which say that Christ was a good man such as Moses and Mahomet were but not God Hence Amurath the great Turke in his letters vnto the Emp. Rodolph the second an 1593. tearmed our Sauiour in derision The crucified God vnto whome may be added the Familie of Loue 2. Proposition Christ is very man The proofe from Gods word HOlding the humanitie of Christ wee ioyne with the blessed Prophets and Euangelists who either prophecied of his future incarnation and conception in the wombe of a virgine or plainely auouched and writ both that the virgine Marie was his mother and that as verie man he grewe and increased in strength endured hunger and thirst wept and slept and suffered death Hence the auncient Fathers and Christians I beleeue in God the Father almightie c. and in Iesus Christ c. which was conceiued by the holy Ghost borne of the virgine Mary suffered vnder Pontius Pilate was crucified dead and buried The right faith is that we beleeue and confesse that our Lord Iesus Christ the Sonne of God is God and man God of the substance of the Father begotten before the world and man of the substance of his mother borne in the world Perfect God and perfect man of a reasonable soule and humane flesh subsisting Equal to the Father as touching his Godhead and inferiour to the Father touching his manhood I beleeue in one God the Father almightie c. and in one Lord Iesus Christ c. who for vs men and for our saluation came downe from heauen and was incarnate by the holy Ghost of the virgine Marie and was made man c The verie same testifie Gods people in Heluetia Basil Bohemia the Lowe countries France Ausburgh Wittemberg Suevia with many moe besides The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Therefore most wicked were the opinions of those men which held viz. that 1. Christ really and indeed had neither bodie nor soule but was man in appearance onely as the Manichies the Eutychians the Marcionites and the Saturnians 2. Christ had a bodie without a soule as thought the Eunomians the Arrians the Apollinarians with the Theopaschites 3. Christ tooke not flesh of the virgine Marie so did the Valentinians thinke and so thinke the Anabaptists and the Familie of Loue who make an allegorie of the Incarnation of Christ 4. Christ tooke flesh onely of the virgine but no soule as the Arrians 5. Christ tooke flesh not
of the virgine onely but by the seede of man too so said Ebion and Carpocrates 6. The flesh of Christ was spirituall and his soule carnal so dreamed the Valentinians 7. The carnal bodie of Christ was consubstantial with the Father as published the Apollinarians 8. The humane nature of Christ before his passion was deuoide of humane affections so thought the Seuerites 3. Proposition Christ is God and man and that in one person The proofe from Gods word THat the Diuine and humane natures of Christ are vnited in one person it accordeth with the holy Scripture For The worde was made flesh and dwelt among vs and wee sawe the glorie thereof as the glorie of the onely begotten of the Father full of grace and truth saith the Euangelist Iohn And Matthew Iesus when he was baptized c. loe a voice came from heauen saying This is my beloued Sonne in whome I am well pleased He that descended is euen the same that ascended farre aboue all heauens that he might fill all things saith S. Paul Againe Christ Iesus being in the forme of God thought it no robberie to be equall with God he made himselfe of no reputation and tooke on him the forme of a seruant and was made like vnto men and was found in shape as a man c. wherefore God hath also highly exalted him c. that euery tongue should confesse that Iesus Christ is the Lord vnto the glorie of God the Father And the same Apostle There is one God and one mediator betweene God and man euen the man Christ Iesus who gaue himselfe a ransome for all men Vpon these and the like grounds I beleeue in God the Father almightie c. and in Iesus Christ his onely Sonne our Lord which was conceiued by the holy Ghost borne of the virgine Mary The right faith is that wee beleeue and confesse that our Lord Iesus Christ the Sonne of God is God and man c. who although he be God and man yet he is not two but one Christ. One not by the conuersion of the Godhead into flesh but by taking of the manhood vnto God One altogether not by confusion of substance but by vnitie of person I beleeue in one Lord Iesus Christ the onely begotten sonne of God begotten of the Father before all worldes God of God light of light very God of very God begotten not made beeing of one substance with the Father by whome all things were made Who for vs men c. came downe from heauen and was incarnate c. He suffered and was buried c. and he shall come againe c say the ancient and first Christians The very same is the beleefe and confession of all the reforformed Churches at this present and alwaies hath bin Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Detestable therefore is the error Of the Acephalians who denied the properties of the two natures in Christ Of the Seuerites of Eutiches and Dioscorus who affirmed the diuinitie and humanitie of Christ to be of one and the same nature Of the Monothelites who denied that two wils viz. a diuine and humane were in Christ Of Theodorus Mesechius who said that the word was one thing and Christ another Of Nestorius who denied the two natures of Christ to be otherwise vnited than one freind is ioyned to another which onely is in good will and affection Of Seruetus who said of Christ that he was the patterne of all things and but a figure of the Sonne of God and that the body of Christ was compact of three vncreated elements and so confounded and ouerthrewe both natures 4. Proposition Christ is the Sauiour of mankinde The proofe from Gods word Christ to be the Sauiour of mankinde we finde it perspicuously in the holy Scripture which teacheth vs that Christ was crucified dead and buried and that to reconcile his Father vnto vs and to be a Sacrifice for all sinnes of men Hence I beleeue the forgiuenes of sinne He suffered for our saluation For vs men and for our saluation he came downe from heauen say our forefathers in their confessions as doe also our brethren through-out Christendome Errors and aduersaries vnto this truth Wicked then are all opinions and assertions contrarying crossing this truth as That the Father in his deitie not the Sonne in his humanity did suffer which error the Patripassians did hold That Christ aswell in his diuinitie as in his humanitie suffered for mankind an error of Apollinaris of old and of Islebius and Andreas Musculus of late yeares That the whole and holy Trinitie was crucified as said Petrus Antiochenus That Christ really and indeed hung not on the crosse for his passion was in showe onely said the Cerdonites the Euticheans and the Manicheans and another man said the Theopaschits and Basilides yea the very Deuils and not Christ said the Manichies suffered and hung on the crosse That the whole passion of Christ is to be vnderstood allegorically and not according to the letter as the Familie of Loue doe thinke That Christ on the Crosse hath suffered 1 for the redemption of mankinde and shall suffer againe for the saluation of the Deuills such heretikes there haue bin 2 as Iesus but shal againe suffer as Iesus Christ which was one of Francis Ket his heresies for which he was burned 3 for men but one mother Iane is the Sauiour of women a most execrable assertion of Postellus the Iesuite The fantasies of the Iacobites and Turkes The popish doctrine touching the Masse praiers vnto Saintes Pardons and Purgatorie which make the passion of Christ either of none effect or to put away but originall sinne onely That albeit our Sauiour hath suffered for all men in generall yet both each man must suffer for himselfe in particular and the workes of one man may satisfie the iustice of God for another which are popish errors That Christ died not for the sinns of all men and that some sinnes are so filthie and enormous as Christ his blood vpon true repentance of the delinquents part cannot wash them away which was Kains Fr. Spiras and other desperate persons error That whatsoeuer is written touching Christ his sufferings must in vs and with vs be fulfilled the false doctrine of H.N. 3. Article Of the going downe of Christ into Hell As Christ died for vs and was buried so also it is to be beleeued that he went downe into Hell The Proposition Christ went downe into Hell The proofe from Gods word SVndrie be the texts of Scripture for Christ his descension into Hell Mine heart was glad saith Dauid a figure of Christ my glorie reioyced my flesh also shall rest in hope For why Thou shalt not leaue my soule in hell O Lord my
Iniunctions precepts and Traditions as doe the Papists For of their doctrine say the Rhemists whatsoeuer the lawfull Apostles Pastors or Preists of Gods church preach in the vnitie of the same Church meaning the newe church of Rome is to be taken for Gods owne word To the same purpose but more blasphemously StapletoÌ„ As the Iewes were to beleeue Christ so are wee simply in euery thing to beleeue the church of Rome whether it teacheth truth or errors Whatsoeuer by the authoritie of the Church is commanded ought of all men to be esteemed as the very Gospell saith Abbat Trithemius of Popish precepts and our English Rhemists He that despiseth the Churches or her lawfull Pastors precepts And of their Traditions He that refuseth ecclesiasticall traditions deserueth to be throwne out of the church among the Heathen as well as he which refuseth the Gospell saith Didacus Stella and the counsell of Trent with like affection of godlines and reuerence embrace wee and worship the bookes of the old and new Testament and ecclesiasticall Traditions saith the Counsell The like opinion haue the Moscovites of Traditions To them finally are we adversarie which aboue the Scriptures doe preferre their owne 1 inuentions as did the Philosophers whereof one said of Moses That good man maketh a trimme discourse but prooueth nothing and the Graecians to whome the Gospell is foolishnes 2 and imaginations as did the Manichies David George and doe the Turkes and Familie of Loue 3 or Traditions as doe the Papists who more cruelly doe punish the violators of their owne Traditions and ordinances then they doe the breakers of Gods commandements 4 or Statutes Edicts Iudgements Proclamations c. proceeding from the braine of man as Macâ—hiauell doth and his schollers 2. Proposition All the bookes in the volume of the Bible are not Canonicall but some are That some bookes and namely those aboue mentioned are Canonicall it hath bin graunted by the best learned and most godly of long time And as all reformed churches in the world are of the same iudgement with vs so in their publike Confessions some haue so accounted and iudged of them as we doe Adversaries to this truth Therefore to speake first of the canonicall bookes of the old Testament much haue they offended which either reiected all or allowed but some of the bookes of the old testament of the former sort were the Seuerians Basilides Carpocrates and the Manichies are the Catabaptistes of the latter were sundrie whereof Some receiued no moe but onely the fiue bookes of Moses as the Sadduceis Some of all the bookes in the old testament reiect the workes of Moses and namely his foure last bookes as the Moscovites Some embraced the Law onely and the Prophets as the Samarites Some esteemed neither the Law nor the Prophets as the Appelleans Some had in contempt the booke of the Canticles as Sebastian Castello And some the booke of Iob as the Anabaptists 3. Proposition The third and fourth bookes of Esdras the booke of Tobias c. be Apocrypha That diuers and namely these bookes mentioned are Apocrypha we are neither the first that said nor they alone which affirme the same For so iudge of them did the auncient councel at Laodicea and doe the Churches reformed and name-in France and Belgia c. Aduersaries vnto this truth So that they are to be held and taken heede of as Seducers which vpon the Church would thrust either other mens workes and deuises not comprised in the Bible as would Some the new Prophets Barrobas and Barrolf of Basilides the heretike Some the manifestations of Marcion the heretike Some the mysteries of Manichie the heritike Others Esaias Ascensorium of Hierax the heretike Others the Gospel after the Egyptians after S. Andrew S. Iames the lesser S. Peter S. Bartholomew the 12. Apostles Barnabas Nicodemus Thaddeus The Canons of the Apostles others Others the Acts of S. Abdie S. Andreas S. Paul Peter Philip Thomas Others the Reuelation of S. Paul Peter Steven Thomas Others the bookes of the Anabaptists of H.N. with Popish Legendes and the like Or the bookes Apocrypha within the volume of the Bible as the Papists who therefore anathematize and curse so many as take them not for Canonicall 4. Proposition Of the newe Testament all bookes are Canonicall Although some of the auncient Fathers and Doctors accepted not all the bookes contained within the volume of the newe Testament for Canonicall yet in the end they were wholly taken and receiued by the common consent of the Church of Christ in this world for the very word of God as they are at this day almost in all places where the Gospel is preached and professed Howbeit we iudge them Canonicall not so much because learned and godly men in the Church so haue and doe receiue and allowe of them as for that the holy Spirit in our hearts doth testifie that they are from God They carrie a sacred and diuine authoritie with them and they doe also agree in all pointes with the other bookes of God in the old Testament Errors adversaries vnto this truth Therefore in admitting all and euery of these bookes acknowledging them to be Canonicall we demonstrate our selues to be against Such as reiected all the newe Testament as did the Iewes our Matthew Hamant Such as allowed part but not the whole new Testament and these were of diuers sorts whereof Some allowed of the Euangelists onely Matthew as the Cerdonites and Ebionites others onely Luk as the Marcionites others onely Iohn as the Valentinians Some accepted onely the Acts of the Apostles as the Tatians others of all other bookes reiected the said Actes as the Manichies and the Seuerites Some of S. Pauls epistles tooke the epistles vnto Timothie and Titus onely to be Canonical as Marcion the heretike Some as Apocryphal refused the epistle vnto Philemon others the epistle vnto the Hebrewes the epistle of S. Iames as Althemerus others the first and second epistles of Iohn with the epistle of Iude as Wigandus others the epistle vnto the Hebrewes of Iames the two last of Iohn and of Iude as Cardinall Caietane Some reiected the booke of S. Iohns reuelations or the Apocalypse as Heshusius we are also against them which allowed neither the whole newe Testament nor those bookes wholly which they embraced as the Marcionites who defaced all those places in the Gospell after Luke and in the epistles which concernd either the diuinitie or humanitie of our Sauiour Christ And lastly are wee against them which receiue the whole new Testament but deface and put out such textes as mislike them as the Turkes who scrape out whatsoeuer they finde touching the passion of Christ alleadging how it was added purposely by the Iewes in
Mosaicall decalogue is naturall morall and perpetuall is their doctrine 4. Proposition The Iudiciall lawes of the Iewes are not necessarily to be receiued or established in any Common wealth The profe from Gods word The truth hereof appeareth by the Apostles decree which sheweth wherevnto onely the primitiue church necessarily was tied By the Apostles doctrine which enioyneth Christians to yeeld obedieÌ„ce vnto the ordinaÌ„ces of their lawfull gouerners and commanders whosoeuer By the Apostles example and namely of the blessed S. Paul who tooke benefit and made good vse of the Romane and Emperiall lawes Adversaries vnto this truth This truth neither is nor euer was oppugned by any Church Only among our selues some thinke vs necessarily tied vnto all the Iudicials of Moses as the Brownists For they say The lawes Iudiciall of Moses belong as well vnto Christians as they did vnto the Iewes Others that wee are bound though not vnto all yet vnto some of the Iudicialls as holdeth T.C. and Philip Stubs 5. Proposition No Christian man whosoeuer is freed from the obedience of the law Morall The proofe from Gods word Thinke not that I am come to destroy the Lawe or the Prophets I am not come to destroy them but to fulfill them For truly I say vnto you saith our Sauiour Christ till heauen and earth perish one iot or one title of the law shall not scape till all things be fulfilled whosoeuer therefore shall breake one of these least commandements and teach men so shall be called the least in the kingdome of heauen c If thou wilt enter into life keepe the commandements c. Thou shalt nor kill thou shalt not commit adulterie thou shalt not steale thou shalt not beare false witnesse Honour thy father and thy mother Doe wee make the lawe of none effect through faith God forbid yea we establish the Lawe Circumcision is nothing and vncircumcision is nothing but the keeping of the Commandements of God The publike confessions of the Churches of God in France and Belgia agree with this Doctrine The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Whereby are condemned as most wicked and vnsond the opinions Of the Manichies who found fault with the whole Lawe of God as wicked and prooceeding not from the true God but from the Prince of darkenes Of Brownist Glouer whose opinion was that Loue now is come in the place of the tenne commandements Of Iohannes Islebius and his followers the Antinonies who will not haue Gods lawe to be preached nor the consciences of sinners to be terrified and troubled with the iudgements of God Of Banister among our selues who held how it is vtterly euill for the Elect so much as to thinke much lesse to speake or heare of the feare of God which the Law preacheth 8. Article Of the three Creedes 1 The three Creedes Nicene creede Athanasius creede and that which is commonly called the Apostles creede ought thoroughly to be receiued and beleeued For 2 they may be prooued by most certaine warrants of holy Scripture The propositions 1. The Nicen Athanasian and Apostolicall Creedes ought to be receiued and beleeued 2. The three creedes viz. the Ni. Athan. and of the Apostles may be prooved by the holy Scripture 1. Proposition The Nicen Athanasian and Apostolicall Creedes ought to be receiued and beleeued THis Proposition the Churches of God both aunciently and in these daies doe acknowledge for true The adversaries vnto this truth Therefore much out of the way of Godlinesse are they which tearme the Apostles Creede A forged patcherie as Barrowe doth and Athanasius Sathanasius creede so did Gregorius Paulus in Polouia and in the newe Arrians and Nestorians in Lituania My selfe some â—8 yeares agoe heard a great learned man whose name vpon an other occasion afore is expressed to whose acquaintance I was artificially brought which in private conference betweene him and my selfe tearmed worthy Zanchius a Foole an Asse from his booke de tribus Elohim which refuteth the newe Arrians against whose sounders the Creedes of Athanasius and Nicene were deuised Him attentiuely I heard but could neuer since abide for those wordes in deede I neuer sawe him since 2. Proposition The three Creedes viz. the Ni. Athan. and of the Apostles may be prooued by the holy Scripture The proofe from Gods word Than this assertion nothing is more true For the Creedes I meane these three Creedes speake first Of one and the same God whom wee are to beleeue is for essence but one in persons three viz. the Father the Creator the Sonne the Redeemer the holy Ghost the sanctifier Next of the people of God which we must thinke and beleeue is The holy and Catholike Church The communion of Saints Pardoned of all their sinnes And appointed to arise from death and to enioy eternall life both in body and soule Aduersaries vnto this truth Therefore wee are enemies to all adversaries of this doctrine or any whit of the same in them comprised whether they be Atheists Iewes Sadduces Ebionites Tretheites Antitrinitarains Apollinarians Arrians Manichies Nestorians Origenians Turkes Papists Familists Anabaptists or whosoeuer 9. Article Of Originall or Birth sinne 1 Originall sinne standeth not in the follwing of Adam as the Pelagians doe vainely talke but 2 it is the fault corruption of the nature of euery man that naturally is engendred of the offspring of Adam whereby man is very far gone from originall righteousnesse and is inclined to evill so that the flesh lusteth against the spirit and therefore in euery person borne into the world it deserueth Gods wrath and damnation 3 And this infection of nature doth remaine yea in them that are regenerated whereby the lust of the flesh called in Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 VVhich some doe expound the wisedome some the Sensuallitie some the affection some the desire of the flesh is not subiect to the law of God And although there is no condemnation for them that beleeue and are baptised yet the apostle doth confesse that 4 Concupiscence and Lust hath of it selfe the nature of sinne The propositions 1. There is Originall sinne 2. Originall sinne is the fault and corruption of the nature of euery man c. 3. Originall sinne remaineth in God his deere children 4. Concupiscence euen in the regenerate is sinne 1. Proposition There is Originall sinne The proofe from Gods word In the holy Scripture we finde of Originall sinne the cause the subiect and the effects the cause thereof is Adams fall partly by the subtill suggestions of the deuill partly through his owne freewill and the propagation of Adam his corrupted nature vnto his seede and posteritie Except a man be borne againe he cannot see the kingdom of God saith our Sauiour Christ As by one man sinne entred into the world and death by sinne and so death
left hand is not mine to giue but it shall be giuen to them for whome it is prepared of my Father Many are called but fewe chosen For the elects sake those daies shall be shortned Feare not little flocke for it is your Fathers pleasure to giue you a kingdome I tell you in that night there shall be two in one bedde the one shall be receiued and the other shall be left All that the Father giueth mee shall come vnto me Witnessed also is this by the Euangelist Luke and Paul the one saith how of the Gentiles at Antioch so many as were ordained vnto eternall life beleeued and the other those whome he knewe before he did also predestinate Wee are vnto God the sweete sauour of Christ in them that are saued and in them which perish to the one wee are the fauour of death vnto death and to the other the sauour of life vnto life Blessed be God euen the Father of our Lord Iesus Christ which c. hath chosen vs in him before the foundation of the world c. who hath predestinate vs to be adopted through Iesâ—â— Christ vnto himselfe c The examples also of the elected creatures man and Angels of the two brethren Abel and Kaine Isaac and Ismael Iacob and Esau of the two Eunuches of K. Pharao of the two kingdomes Iuda and Israel the two peoples Iewes and Gentiles the two Apostles Peter and Iudas the two Theeues vpon the Crosse the two men in the fieldes and the two women at the Mill make to the illustration of this truth All Churches consent with this doctrine The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Erre therefore doe they which stand in opinion that Some are appointed to be saued but none to be damned In soule some persons but in soule and body together none shall be saued of this minde were the old heretikes viz. the false Apostles the Carpocratians the Valentinians the Cerdonites the Manichies and the Hieranites and of their opinion be the Familie of Loue 2. Proposition Predestination hath bin from euerlasting The profe from Gods word Predestination beganne before all times It will be said saith our Sauiour Christ Come ye blessed of my Father inherite ye the kingdome prepared for you from the foundations of the world God hath chosen vs in Iesus Christ before the Foundation of the world God hath saued vs c. according to his owne purpose and grace which was giuen to vs through Christ Iesus before the world was The publike confessions of the Churches namely in Heluetia Basil and France beare witnesse herevnto Aduersaries vnto this truth Those wrangling Sophisters then are deceiued who because God is not included within the compasse of any time but hath all things to come as present continually before his eies doe say that God he did not in the time long agoe past onely but still in the time present likewise doth predestinate 3. Proposition They which are predestinate vnto saluation cannot perish The proofe from Gods word All that the Father giueth mee shall come to mee and him that commeth to mee I cast not away saith Christ I giue vnto them eternall life and they shall neuer perish neither shall any pluck them out of my hand c. none is able to take them out of my Fathers hand The gates of hel shall not ouercome the Church Moreouer whome be predestinate them hee also glorified For the giftes and calling of God are without repentance They went oâ—t from vs but they were not of vs for if they had beene of vs they would haue continued with vs So the Churches of God as afore in this article The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Wander then doe they from the truth which thinke That the very elect totally and finally may fall from grace and be damned That the regenerate may fall from the grace of God may destroy the temple of God and be broken off from the vine Christ Iesus which was one of Glouers errors That the number of those which be predestinate may both encrease and be diminished so thought the Pelagians 4. Proposition Not all men but certaine be predestinate to be saued The proofe from Gods word Wee denie that all and affirme that a certaine chosen and companie of men be predestinate and so doth Gods word Reioice that your names are written in heauen I knowe mine and am knowne of mine is the saying of Christ Iesus I suffer all things for the elects sake saith S. Paul The very same with vs doe the Churches affirme Adversaries vnto this truth Wee are therefore against them which teach how not certain but all euen the most vngodly and damnable yea the very Deuils shall be saued of which opinion were the Originists and are the Cptabaptists All men be elected vnto life euerlasting There is no hell nor future and eternall misterie at all but only either in maÌ„s opinioÌ„ as hold the Atheists or in the heart and conscience of man in this life as the Familists maintaine No certaine companie be foredestined vnto eternall condemnation None more then others be predestinate vnto saluation which was an error of Henry Bolsteck In like sort we condemne such as either curiously enquire who and how many shall be saued or damned or giue the sentence of reprobation vpon any men whosoeuer as doe the Papists vpon Caluine Beza and Verone when they call them Reprobates 5. Proposition Of the meere will and purpese of God some men in Christ Iesus are elected and not others vnto saluation The proofe from Gods word In the Scripture wee read of mans predestination the cause efficient to be the euerlasting purpose of God the cause formall God his infinite mercie and goodnes the cause materiall the blood of Christ the cause finall or ende why both God the Father hath loued and Christ for his elect hath suffered is the glorie of God and the saluation of man And this doe all the Churches militant and reformed with a sweete consent testifie and acknowledge Errors adversaries vnto this truth Hereby is discouered the impietie of those men which thinke that 1. Man doth make himselfe eligible for the kingdome of heauen by his owne good workes and merits So teach the Papists The kingdome of heauen say they is prepared for them that are worthie of it and deserue it by their well doing Licet electis gloria ex eterna Dei predestinatione dimanet non tamen provenit nisi ex eorum operibus c. Sine nobis non glorificamur 1. Although from Gods eternall predestination glory floweth to the elect yet for all that it springeth not but from their owne workes c. Without our selues wee are not glorified 2. God
the pure preaching of Gods word and the administration of the Sacraments among Protestants to be the markes of Christ his visible Church and affirme the tokens hereof to be antiquitie Vnitie Vniuersality Succession c. as doth Stapleton Bristow Bozius Hill and Alabaster 2. Of the Brownists who make discipline and that too of their owne deuising such an essentiall argument of the visible Church as they thinke where that is not the magistrates there be Tyrants the ministers false prophets No Church of God is Antichristianitie doth raigne 3. Of the same Brownists and Barrowists who neither allow frequenting of sermons and ministring of the Sacraments nor haue any Sacraments administred among themselus 4. Of the Familie of Loue which haue in vtter contempt and derision both the Preachers and the Sacraments scornefully tearming the Preachers Scripture learned men Ceremoniall and Letre Doctors and the water at Baptisme Elementish water Neither doe wee approoue them who for these visible and externall put downe inuisible and spirituall tokens of the visible Church as Faith in Christ Iesus and Loue towards the Saintes which thing I. K. doth 6. Proposition The visible Church may and from time to time hath erred both in doctrine and conuersation The proofe from Gods word Had not this bin most true it had neuer bin auouched both by our Sauiour Christ and S. Paul Our Sauiour saith vnto his disciples concerning doctrine Take heede c. Beleeue it not Beware of the leauen of the Pharisies and of the leauen of Herod euen of the doctrine of the Pharisies and Sadduces Many shall be deceiued yea the very elect if it were possible Shall he finde faith on earth And concerning conuersation and manners hee prophecied that iniquitie shall be encreased and the loue of many shall be cold S. Paul writeth touching doctrine that Wee knowe in part Antichrist sitteth in the temple of God c. whose comming is by the working of Satan with all power and signes lying wonders and in all deceiueablenes among them that perish beuause they receiued not the loue of the truth that they might be saued and therefore God shall send them strong delusion that they should beleeue lies Beware of dogs beware of euill workes beware of concision And touching conuersation Restore c. least thou also be tempted I doe not the good thing which I would but the euill which I would not that doe I If I doe that I would not it is no more I that doe it but the sinne that dwelleth in mee There is a fight euen in the best men and members of Besides that Churches visible and glorious haue erred it appeareth euidently by the superstitioÌ„ heresies yea and Atheisme nowe raigning at Hierusalem Alexandria and Antioch This with vs the Churches in their confessions do acknowledge Errors adversaries vnto this truth The premises will not be graunted for true neither by the Papists which maintaine that in faith doctrine the church meaning thereby the visible Church whose Rector is the Pope of Rome neuer erreth neuer hath erred and neuer can erre Nor yet by these which say the Church cannot erre for manners such were the Donatists and are the Anabaptists with the Familie of Loue 7. Proposition The church of Rome most shamefully hath erred in life ceremonies and matters of faith The proofe Iustly is the church of Rome condemned of vs and all churches reformed because shee hath erred and still very badly euery way doth offend 1. In life For. At Rome the harlot hath a better life Then shee that is a Romanes wife O Roma à Roma quantum mutata vetusta es Nunc caput es scelerum quae caput orbis eras If yee spell Roma backeward saith I. Bale yee shall finde it to be Amor Loue in this prodigious kind For it is a preposterous Amor Loue out of kinde Hence the Pasquil poets Roma quid est Quod te docuit praeposterus ordo Quid docuit Iungas versa elementa scies Roma Amor est Amor est qualis Praeposterus Vnde hoc Roma mares Noli dicere plura scio Againe Roma vale vidi satis est vidisse Reuertar Cùm Leno aut meretrix Scurra cynadus ero 2. In ceremonies which are for number infinite Gerson writeth how diuers men haue runne into desperation others haue killed themselues finding that they were not able to keepe and performe the ceremonies of the Romish church For vse a so they are vaine and impious as their leading vp and downe of an Asse on Palme Sunday their battering of hel ther buriall of the Crosse c. yea and damnable because Romish ceremonies are held both necessarily to be obserued as well as the lawes of God and also to merit heauen For sinnes veniall say the Rhemists be taken away by sacred ceremonies 3. In doctrine For proofe hereof see the popish errors in euery article almost if not proposition of this booke Againe looke wee vnto the heads of the Antichristian synagogue and wee shall finde that of them Some haue bin Coniurers Sorcerers and Inchanters as were Pope Martin 2. Siluester the 2. and third Benedict 8. Iohn 19.20.21 Sergius 4. Gregorie 6. and 7. and such were all the Popes euen 18. for number from Siluester the second vntill Gregorie the seuenth Some Heretikes For Siricius Calixtus Leo 9 and Paschalis condemned the marriage of Preists Liberius was an Arrian Marcellinus an Idolater Honorius a Monothelite Iohn the 22 held many errors whereof W. Occam wrote a booke one wherof was that the soules of the wicked should not be punished till the day of iudgement Pope Iohn the 23. denied the soules immortalitie And some worldly prophane and deuilish Atheists For Sixtus 4. builded a Male stewes Paul 3. receiued a monethly pension for 45000. whoores at Rome Leo the 10. made a Fable of the Gospell of Christ Hence it proceeded that Rome hath bin called Babylon both by S. Augustine and Hierome and by Pope Pius S. was said Magis gentilizare quam Christianizare rather to gentilize or to be a citie of Heathens rather then of Christians S. Bernard said how the Romanes in his time were hatefull vnto heauen and earth yea and hurtfull vnto both wicked against God rash against holy things and seditious among themselues Genebrard himselfe an Antichristian Romanist writeth that 50. Popes successiuely within the space of 150. yeares departed from the virtue of their Elders and shewed themselues Abâ—urers of Christianitie and Apostataes rather then catholike Bishops The Pope was proclaimed Antichrist at Rhemes by the Councell there vnder Hugh Capet Errors Adversaries to this truth What the Papists are then it appeareth whose doctrine as hath bin shewen is
see at all or Ouersee and what likewise the points of doctrine newly now reuealed their aeternum Euangelium which without great danger may not be preached in England no more then the doctrine and Articles of the Church of England may bee preached at Rome and for defence wherof they ought to afford euen their very liues weare they so many as the haires of euery of their heads is and bee they demonstrate themselues to be most childishly vaine and idle in their imaginations which they take yet to be illuminations of the spirit 13. For all their doings and discourses to say the best of them are but to erect a newe which they tearme a true ministerie and their Discipline among vs. Themselues doe say The controuersie betwixt them and vs is not as the Bishopes and their welwillers they would beare the world in hand for a Cap a Tippet or a Surplesse but for greater matters concerning a true ministerie and regiment of the Church according to the word the one whereof that is a true ministery they shall neuer haue till Archbishops and Bishops be put downe and all Ministers made equall the other also will neuer be brought to passe till Kings Queenes doe subiect themselues vnto the Church and submit their scepters and throwe downe their Crowes before the Church and lick vp the dust of the feete of the Church and willingly abide the censures of the Church that is of the Presbyterie For as the Church is subiect vnto the ciuill magistrate in respect of his ciuill authoritie so must the magistrate the King and Queene subiect themselues and bee obedient to the iust and lawfull authoritie of the Church The ciuill magistrate is none officer at all of the Church For Church officers bee non Magnates aut Tetrarchae not gracious or honorable Lords but Ministers of the Church The Presbyterie is the Church and euerie Congregation or Church should and must in it haue a Presbyterie This is the Light which indeede the Martyrs neuer sawe the Religion which our Brethren striue for the Truth which they may not preach not Childish doctrine like the Bishops Articles but the wise Gospell the maine and materiall points of religion nowe in these last daies last of all yea after the eight Thorowe breaking of H. N. his Euangelium regni reuealed and for furtherance whereof they are to lend and spend euen all their liues if occasion be ministred 14. Strange and strong delusions First to take these and other such assertions for Truths and heauenly mysteries which are but the fancies of troubled braines not grounded nor truly gathered from Gods word Next to teach one another and al their fauorers howe they should be as readie and prepared euen for these matters to giue ouer their liuings and to giue their liues were they as many as the haires of all their heades as Cranmer Ridley Latimer did and Parker Grindall and all other Preachess would and euery Christian man and woman should if they bee called thereunto for the Apostolicall and Catholique doctrine of our Church which all Gods people doe knowe and the Brethren themselues as afore hath bin noted doe confesse is originally from God and his written word These and many moe too many heere to be recapitulate such phantasies of theirs or phrenesies rather this first subscription brought first to light and yet happie had it bin for Gods Church and people they had neuer bin broached 15. Semblablie the next Subscription called for by the last Archb. your L. predecessor an 84. discouered euen the verie thoughts and desires of those Brethren before but nowe stiled faithfull Brethren which haue and doe seeke for the Discipline and reformation of the Church Many Treatises afore but nowe and diuers yeares ensuing they flewe about and abroad like Atomies and by them the same things which afore but in a differing sort and in other words they publish For touching Church officers they name who and howe many sorts they be of them viz. Doctors Pastors Gouernors Deacons and Widdowes no moe no fewer They say Euerie Church must be furnished with a Teacher and a Pastor as with two Eies with Elders as with Feete with Deacons as with Hands Euerie Congregation must haue Eies Hands and Feete and yet neither all nor at all any Congregation is to haue an Head answerable to those Feete Hands and Eies The doctor by their doctrine must be a distinct minister from the pastor and onely teach true doctrine and neither exhort nor apply his doctrine according to the times and his auditorie nor minister the Sacraments For these things the pastor is to performe Which pastor also whensoeuer he administreth the Sacraments must necessarily make a Sermon or els he cōmitteth Sacriledge And concerning discipline by their doctrine euery Congregation must haue absolute authoritie to admonish to censure to excommunicate and to anathematize all offending persons yea euen Kings and Princes if they be of the Congregation And no Prince but must be of some parish and vnder one Presbytery or other alwaies Where this power is not in their iudgements one of the tokens of a true Church is wanting For this Discipline with them is a Marke of the Church and numbred among the Articles of their Faith 16. This say they is the great cause the holy cause which they will neuer leaue suing for though they should be a thousand Parliaments in their daies vntill either ther obtaine it or bring the Lord in vengeance and blood against the Stare and the whole land for repelling the same The Discipline is Gods holy yoke Gods sceptre the kingdome and throne of Christ. Our controuersie say they is whether Iesus Christ shall be King or no. Againe the end of all our trauaile is to build vp the walles of Ierusalem in to set vp the Throne of Iesus Christ our heauenly King the middes thereof the aduauncing whereof is a testimonie vnto vs that wee shall haue part in that glorie which shall be reuealed heereafter So learne we nowe from their said bookes learned and demonstratiue discourses which the Fathers and our fore fathers neuer sawe nor had learned both that their Discipline established and exercised is a visible marke of a true Church and to desire the aduauncement of the same an inuisible token of an elect childe of God so as neither is that a Church at least no true Church where their Discipline is not neither they but titular christians no true christians indeede which either sigh or seeke not to haue it established and Presbyteries in euerie parish to be aduaunced 17. The Articles of our religion concluded vpon by the reuerend Clergie of our Church with these learned and all seeing Brethren are but the Bishops decrees the Articles of the Conuocation house and reueale some little truth but these wise Brethren so faithfull haue they bin betweene God and his Church they haue not failed to shewe vs the whole counsaile of God And
but in Lymbo And lastly from those Germane diuines which thinke that our Sauiour carried with him into heauen the faithfull people in soule and bodie raised at his resurrection 3. Proposition Christ shall come againe at the last day to iudge all men euen the quicke and the dead The proofe from Gods word God annointed Iesus of Nazareth with the holie Ghost and with power c. Hence God raised vp the third day c. And he commanded vs to preach vnto the people to testifie that it is hee that is ordained of God a Iudge of quicke and dead saith S. Peter God shall iudge the world by Iesus Christ Iesus Christ shall iudge the quicke and dead at his appearing and in his kingdome c. Henceforth is laid vp for me the crowne of righteousnesse which the Lotd the righteous iudge shall giue mee at that day and not to mee onely but vnto all them also that loue his appearing saith S. Paul The Iudge standeth before the doore saith S. Iames And this Gods church and people doe firmely beleeue and faithfully confesse Errors and adversaries vnto this truth On the other side both they abroad and we at home abhorre them for their opinions which said that There shall be no generaâ—l iudgement at all as did the Manichies and doe the atheists That the deuills and the most vngodly some of them and namely so manie as in hell do call vpon God for mercie and forgiuenesse say the Turkes yea of al them say the Originists and Catabaptists shall be saued That the wicked shall not be iudged at all but shall die as the bruite beasts and neither rise againe in body nor come vnto iudgement An error of the Familie of Loue That Christ shall not be the future Iudge so thought both Dauid George Coppinger and Arthington For that George rumord himselfe to be the iudge of the whole world and Coppinger and Arthington published how one William Hacket was come to iudge the world and themselues to be his angels for the separating the sheepe from Goates That besides Christ the Pope is iudge of the quick dead An error of the Papists That afore the iudgement there shall be a golden world the godly and none besides enioying the same peaceably and gloriously as the Iewes imagine That the Beleife touching the general Iudgement of Christ ouer the liuing and dead is a doctrine mysticall or a mysterie no historie as H.N. teacheth That the righteous are alreadie in godly glorie and shall from henceforth liue euerlastingly with Christ and raigne vpon the Earth as the Familie of Loue holdeth 5. Article Of the holy Ghost The holy Ghost proceeding from the Father and the Sonne 2 is of one substance maiesty and glorie with the Father and the Sonne 1 very and eternall God The Propositions 1. The holy Ghost is very and eternall God 2. The holy Ghost is of one substance maiestie and glorie with the Father and the Sonne 3. The holy Ghost proceedeth from the Father and the Sonne 1. Proposition The holy Ghost is very and eternall God The proofe from Gods word THe holy Ghost to be verie and eternall God the Scripture teach vs. For he is the Creator of all things In the beginning God created the heauen and the earth c. And the spirit of God mooued vpon the waters O Lord how manifold are thy workes c. If thou hide thy face they are troubled if thou take away their breath they die and returne to their dust if thou send forth thy spirit they are created Ergo the holy Ghost is God Christians are to be baptized in the name of the holy Ghost aswell as of the Father and the Sonne Therefore is he verie God Ananias lied vnto God and Sapphira tempted God when both he lied vnto the holy Ghost and shee tempted the spirit of the Lord. As God he chooseth assigneth and sendeth forth men for the ministerie of the Gospel as God he decreeth orders for his Church and people and as God he is to be invocate and praied vnto as well as the Father and the Sonne Vpon this and the like words I beleeue in the holy Ghost I beleeue in the holy Ghost the Lord and giuer of life the Catholike Faith is this that wee worship one God in Trinitie and Trinitie in Vnitie c. The Father is God the Sonne is God and the holy God And yet they are not three Gods but one God c. say the auncient Fathers which also is the Faith and confession of all Gods people at this day The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth This maketh to the condemnatioÌ„ of the Pneumatomacheis whereof Some impugne the deitie of the holy Ghost as did in old time Samosatenus and Photinus of late yeares Seruetus Ochinus abroad and Francis Ket Hamant and certaine Brownists among vs at home Some affirme the holy Ghost to be but a meere creature as did Arius the Semiarians the Macedonian heretikes the Tropickes Ochinus Some haue assumed the stile and title of the holy Ghost vnto themselues as did Simon Magus Montanus and Manes Some haue giuen the title of the holy Ghost vnto men and women so Hierax said that Melchisedech was the holy Ghost Simon Magus tearmed his Helene the holy Ghost The Helchesaites saide the holy Ghost was a woman and the naturall sister of Christ Many Papists and namely the Franciscanes blush not to say that S. Francis is the holy Ghost 2. Proposition The holy Gost is of one substance maiestie and glory with the Father and the Sonne The proofe from Gods word The holy Ghost effected the incarnation of Christ teacheth all things leadeth into all truth giueth vtterance to his seruants gifts vnto his people placeth rulers in the Church and ouerseers to feede the flocke of God sealeth the Elect vnto the day of redemption aswel as the Father and the sonne and these three viz. the Father the word and the holy Ghost are one Therefore is the holy Ghost of one substance maiestie and glory with the Father and the sonne And this was the beleefe of the auncient Fathers I beleeue say they in the holy Ghost the Lord and giuer of life c. who with the Father and the sonne together is worshipped and glorified who spake by the Prophets The Godhead of the Father of the Sonne and of the holy Ghost is all one the glory equal the maiesty coeternal Such as the Father is such is the Son such is the holy Ghost c And in this Trinitie none is afore or after other none is greater or lesse then another But the whole three persons be coeternall together and coequal The very
went ouer all men forasmuch as all men haue sinned saith S. Paul d. As new borne babes desire the sincere milke of the word that yee may grow thereby saith S. Peter And S. Iames Of his owne will begate he vs with the word of truth that we should be as the first fruits of his creatures And the fore-mentioned Apostle Paul againe You that were dead in trespasses and sinnes c. and were by nature the children of wrath as wel as others But God which is rich in mercy through his great loue wherewith he loued vs euen when we were dead by sinnes hath quickned vs together in Christ c. The subiect thereof is the olde man with all his powers minde will and heart For in the minde there is darkenes and ignorance of God and his will and in the will and heart of man there is concupiscence and rebellious affections against the law of God And the effects of this Birth or Originall sinne are first actuall sinnes and they both inward as vngodly affections and outward as wicked lookes prophane speech and diuelish actions next an euill conscience which bringeth the wrath of God death and eternall damnation All churches of God beleeue this and some in their publike confessions testifie so much The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Thus armed with authoritie and forces from the word of God and assisted with the neighbour churches we offer battell 1. To the Iewes Carpocratians and Familie of Loue who flatly denie there is any originall sinne 2. To the Papists which say that Originall sinne is of all the least sinne and lesse then any veniall sinne Originall sinne is onely the debt of punishment for the sinne of Adam and not his fault Originall sinne is not properly sinne all this hath Ruardus Tapperus Such as are infected onely with Originall sinne are free from all sensible punishment 3. To Florinus and Blastus who make God the author of sinne 4. To the Sabbatarians among vs who teach that The life of God in Adam before his fall could not continue without a Sabbath The Sabboth was ordained before the fall of Adam and that not onely to preserue him from falling but also that being holy and righteous still he might haue bin preserued in the fauour of God which D. B. deliuereth in his Sabboth doctrine 5. We are also adversaries to the like curiously affected who enquire Whether it was Gods will that Adam should fall Whether God enforced our first parents to fall Why God stayed not Adam from falling c. 2. Proposition Originall sinne is the fault and corruption of the nature of euery man c. The proofe from Gods word Originall sinne is not the Imitation of Adam his disobedience For the Scripture speaketh of no such thing neither doth Gods people so thinke and some Churches by their extant Confessions with vs denie the same as the Church in France and the Lowe countries but it is partly the Imputation of Adam his disobedience vnto vs and partly the fault and corruption of mans nature as the Churches also acknowledge The adversaries vnto this truth Aduersaries vnto this truth are The Pelagians and Familie of Loue who say that Originall sinne commeth not by propagation but by Imitation Such as ascribe Originall sinne in no sort vnto man but either vnto God as did the Hermogenians or vnto the deuil as did the Valentinians The Manichies who preached that this sinne is another and a contrary substance within vs and proceeded no◠from our corrupted nature The Appollinarians who held originall sinne to be from nature The Papists who affirme that some persons and namely the virgine Mary is free from this Originall sinne sinne 3. Proposition Originall sinne remaineth in God his deere children The proofe from Gods word I allow not that which I doe for what I wouid that doe I not but what I hate that doe I saith S. Paul The flesh lusteth against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh so that yee cannot doe the same things that yee would Euery man is tempted when he is drawen away by his own concupiscence and is entised Dearely belooued I beseech you as strangers absteine from fleshly lusts which fight against the soule Nothing is more true in the iudgement of Gods people The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth We stand therefore in this point Against the Papists who say that Originall sinne was not at all much lesse remained in the Virgine Mary Against Giselbertus whose doctrine is that Baptisme once receiued there is in the baptized no sinne at al either originall or actuall Against the Familie of Loue who affirme that the elect and regenerate sinne not Against the Carpocratians whereof some boasted themselues to be euery way as innocent as our Sauiour Christ. Against the Adamites both old and newe who said they were in so good a state as Adam was before his fall therefore without originall sinne Against the Begadores in Almaigne affirming they were impeccable and had attained vnto the very top and pitch of perfection in vertue and godlines 4. Proposition Concupiscence euen in the regenerate is sinne Concupiscence in whomsoeuer lusteth against the Spirit fighteth against both the soule and the lawe of the minde and therefore but that there is no condemnation to them which are in Christ Iesus it bringeth death and damnation Mortifie therefore your members which are vpon earth saith S. Paul vnto the Colossians fornication vncleanes the inordinate affection euill concupiscence c. for the which things sake the wrath of God commeth on the children of disobedience And vnto all Christians S. Peter I beseech you as strangers abstaine from fleshly lusts To the same purpose is both the doctrine and Confessions of Gods people Errors adversaries vnto this truth Therefore wee mislike their opinions as vnsound which say that cōcupiscēce either is no sinne at all or but a veniall sin the former was an assertion of the Pelagians and is of the Papists that latter was one of Glouers errors Francis the Monke of Colen counted concupiscence no sin but said it was as naturall and so no more offensiue before God for man to lust then for the Sunne to keepe his course Petrus Lombardus saith that Concupiscence afore Baptisme is both a punishment and a sinne but after Baptisme is no sinne but onely a punishment The Church of Rome both teacheth that the power of lusting is not but the vse of wicked concupiscence is euill and numbred amongst most greiuous sinnes and decreeth how Concupiscence is not sinne but proceedeth from sinne and inclineth vnto sinne Glouer the Brownist said that the intemperate affections of the mind issuing from Concupiscence are but
who held that man is iustified by Gods meere mercie without respect vnto the merits of Christ. Nor of Galeotus Martius which was of opinion that all nations and persons whosoeuer liuing according to the rules of nature should be saued and inherit euerlasting happines Nor of the Turkes who think that so many as either goe on pilgrimage vnto Mecha or doe kisse the sepulchre of Mahomet are iustified before God and thereby doe obtaine remission of their sinnes Nor of the Familie of Loue who teach by the shedding of Christ his blood is meant the spreading of the Spirit in our heartes Nor of the Papists whose doctrine is that 1. Though Christ hath suffered for all men in generall yet not onely each man must suffer for his owne part in particular but also that the workes of one man may satisfie for another 2. They teach next that sinnes veniall are done away and purged by prayer Almes-deedes by the worthy receiuing of the blessed Sacrament of the Altar by taking of holy water knocking vpon the breast with holy meditation the Bishops blessing and such like by holy water and such ceremonies sacred ceremonies as Confiteor tundo conspergor conteror oro Signor edo dono per haec venialia pono that is I am confest vnto the preist I knock mine heart and breast with fist With holy water I am besprent And with contrition all yrent I pray to God and heauenly host I crosse my forehead at euery post I eate my Sauiour in the bread I deale my dâ—ale when I am dead And doing so I know I may My veniall sinnes soone put away And sinnes mortall not by the merits of Christ onely but many waies besides are clensed thinke the said Papists as By the mirits of dead Saints namely of S. Mary the virgine Threnosa compassio dulcissimae Dei Matris Perâ—ucat nos ad gaudiasummi Dei Patris The pittifull compassion of Gods best pleasing mother Bring vs to the ioyes of God the soueraigne father And of Thomas Becket Tu per Thomae sanguinem quem proâ—e impendit Fac nos Christe soandere quo Thomas ascendit By the Blood of Thomas which he for the expended Make vs Christ to climbe vp where Thomas ascended By Agnos Deis whereof they say Peccatum frangit vt Christi sanguis angit It breaketh sinn and doeth good As well as Christ his pretious blood By reading certaine parcels of Scripture according to their vulgars Per Euangelica dicta Deleantur nostra delicta Through the sayings and wordes euangelicall Our sinnes blot out and vices all 2. Proposition Onely by Faith are we accounted righteous before God The proofe from Gods word Onely beleeue all that beleeue in Christ shall receiue remission of sinnes froÌ„ all things from which ye could not be iustified by the law of Moses by Christ euery one that beleeueth is iustified The Gospel is the power of God vnto saluation to euery one that beleeueth To him that worketh not but beleeueth in him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse Christ is the ende of the law for righteousnesse to euery one that beleueth Knowe that a man is not iustified by the workes of the law but by the faith of Iesus Christ c. God would iustifie the Gentiles through faith c. They which be of faith are blessed with faith full Abraham By grace are ye saued through faith and that not of your selues Yea doubtlesse I thinke all things â—ut losse for the excellent knowledge sake of Christ Iesus my Lord for whom I haue counted all things losse and doe iudge them to be doung that I might winne Christ and might be founde in him not hauing mine owne righteousnesse which is of the Lawe but that which is through the faith of Christ euen the righteousnesse which is of God through faith The Cburches of Christ by their publike confessions giue testimonie vnto this truth The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Pertakers of the prophet and sweetens of this doctrine are not they which be altogether ignorant of this mysterie Nor they who knowe the same but applie it not to their owne soules and consciences but altogether despise the same as did Pilate in condemning Christ Herod in killing Iames Agrippa in not defending Paul the Iewes in persecuting the Apostles and doe the Deuills and many vngodly persons Tyrans false Christians and Apostataes Nor they which teach not a sure confidence in Iesus Christ but an historicall knowledge of him as the Papists Nor they which hold that all and euery man is to remaine doubtfull whether he shall be saued or no as doe the same Papists Nor they which teach that man is iustified Either by workes without faith as did the false Apostles in Asia and do the Turkes and Anabaptists Or by faith and workes as both the Pseudapostles at Hierusalem the Ebionites and the Papists with the Russians Or neither by faith nor workes as they which contemne both faith in Christ Iesus and good workes too hoping yet to be saued as they carnally secure worldlings Neither shall they be partakers of the sweetnes of this truth which say that for Christians to trust onely by Christ his passion or by Faith onely to be saued is a breach of the first commandement as Vaux is the doctrine of Deuills as Frier Lawrence a Villanicentia and the doctrine of Simon Magus as do the Rhemists Nor they finally which maintaine how the truly righteous apprehend not Christ by Faith but haue him and his rigteousnesse essentially and inherent within them which is an error of the Catharists Papists Osiandriâ—ns and Familie of Loue 3. Proposition Wee are accounted righteous before God not for our owne workes or deseruings The proofe from Gods word Besides what hath bin said that workes haue no place nor portion in the matter of our iustification it is euident in the holy scripture where wee finde that All men be sinners and destitue of the glorie of God And therefore that no man can be iustified by his owne workes Eternall life commeth vnto vs not by desert but partly of promise partly of gift The iust shall liue by faith and the Law is not of faith Moreouer as the godly in old time were so Christians in these daies are and shall be iustified But the godly were iustified not for any good workes or worthinesse of their owne so iustified was Abraham the Iewes the Samaritans Paul the Eunuch the Iailoâ— and the Ephesians All Churches reformed with a sweete consent applaude confesse this doctrine The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Adversaries herevnto are The Pharisies who thought men were iustified by externall righteousnesse morall and ceremoniall The
false Apostles in Asia and at Ierusalem The Pharisaicall Papists who against the iustification by faith alone doe hould a iustification by merits and that of Congtuitie dignitie condignitie The said Papists teach besides that life eternall is due vnto vs of debt because wee deserue it by our good workes They teach finally that by good workes our sinnes are purged 12. Article Of good workes Albeit that good workes which are the fruits of faith and follow after iustification cannot put away our sinnes endure the seueritie of Gods iudgement 1 yet are they pleasing and acceptable to God in Christ 2 and doe spring out necessarily of a true liuely Faith insomuch that by them a liuely Faith 3 may be as euidently knowne as a tree discerned by the fruite The propositions 1. Good workes doe please God 2. No worke is good except it spring from Faith 3. Good workes are the outward signes of the inward Beleefe 1. Proposition Good workes doe please God The proofe from Gods word THough God accepteth not man for his workes but for his deere sonnes sake yet that good workes after man his iustification doe please God it is a cleere truth euery where to be read in the holy Scripture For God hath commanded them to be done and requireth righteousnesse not onely outward of the body but also inward of the mind and hath appointed for the vertuous and godly rewardes both in this life and in the world to come and to the wicked punishments spirituall corporall and of bodie and soule eternall in the pit of hell And this is beleeued and acknowledged by the Churches The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth This truth is oppugned by adversaries of diuers kindes For Some hold that seeing man is iustified by Faith he may liue as he listeth as the Libertines Some thinke that to attend vpon vertue and to practise good workes is a yoake too heavie and intollerable as the Simonians Some vtterly cast of all grace vertue and godlines as did the Basilidians the Aetians the Circumcellians and doe the Macchiuilians and Atheists Some permit though not all manner yet some sinnes so allowed was both whordome and vncleane pollutions by the Carpocratians and Valentinians and is of the Iesuits and Papists and periurie in the time of persecution by the Basilidians Helchesaites Priscillianists Henricians and Familie of Loue and violaters of promise yea and oaths made vnto heretikes as they call them Some as the Turkish preists called Seiti and Chagi take it to be no sinne but a worke meritorious by lies swearing yea forswearing to damnifie Christians what they can Much like vnto these are the aequiâ—ocating Iesuits in deluding and deceiuing Protestant Princes their officers by their doubtfull speeches euen when they are sworne to answer plainely and truly by their lawfull magistrates Some suppose that God is pleased with lip seruice onely outward righteousnesse as the hypocriticall Pharisies or Pharifaicall hypocrites 2. Proposition No worke is good excepâ— it spring from faith The proofe from Gods word All which man doth is not pleasing vnto God but that onely which proceedeth from a true faith in Iesus Christ so saith God in his word They that are in the flesh cannot please God In Iesus Christ neither Circumcision auaileth any thing neither vncircumcision but faith which worketh by loue Vnto the pure are all things pure but vnto them that are defiled and vnbeleeuing is nothing pure Without faith it iâ— vnpossible to please God And although the workes of the Beleeuing doe please God yet are they not so perfect that they can satisfie the lawe of God Therefore eueÌ„ of the regenerate iustified saith our Sauiour Christ pray forgiue vs our debts say wee are vnprofitable seruants and S. Paul Wee know that the lawe is spirituall but I am carnall c Wee which haue the first fruits of the spirit euen wee doe sigh in our selues c. and haue infirmities Ye cannot doe the same thing that ye would Which is the faith and confession of the Churches Errors adversaries vnto this truth Therefore wee mislike and condemne the opinions of the Valentinians and Papists The Valentinians say that please God doe Spirituall men which are themselues onely not by Faith but onely by their knowledge of diuine mysteries and Naturall men do please him by their bodily labour and vpright dealing The said Valentinians fained three sorts or degrees of men the first spirituall who through bare knowledge the next Natural who by labour and true dealing shall be saued the third they call Materiall meÌ„ vtterly vncapable of diuine knowledge and religious speculations who must perish both in soule and body The Papists teach that They onely are not good workes which God commandeth but they also which be either voluntarily done of our selues or enioyned vs by preists They are good workes and acceptable before God which are done without faith Workes of themselues without respect vnto Christ please God Men perfectly may keepe the Lawes of God in which error also be the Anabaptists and Familie of Loue 3. Proposition Good workes are the outward signes of the inward Beleefe The proofe from Gods word Many are the reasons why good workes are to be done in part cited afore pag. 49. yet not the least cause is that men may be knowne what they are For the Scripture saith and sheweth that thereby are knowne the good trees from the bad the wheate from the chaffe the tâ—ue disciples from the false the sonnes of God from the children of Satan the regenerate from the vnbeleeuers Hereunto the Saints and Churches doe subscribe Errors adversaries vnto this truth The faithfull shewe their workes yet neither to haue them seene of men as did the hypocriticall Pharisies nor therby to merit heauen as doe the Pharisaicall Papists whose doctrine is that Good workes are meritorious Good workes as Contrition Confession and satisfaction done in penance not onely do merit but are besides a Sacrament for to attaine reconciliation with God and forgiuenes of sinnes Life eternall is due vnto good workes by the iustice of God 13. Article Of workes before Iustification VVorkes done before the grace of Christ and the inspiration of his Spirit 1 are not pleasant to God forasmuch as they spring not of Faith in Iesus Christ 2 neither doe they make men meete to receiue grace or as the schoole authors say deserue grace of congruitie yea rather 3 for that they are not done as God hath willed and commanded them to be done we doubt not but they haue the nature of sinne The Propositions 1. Workes done before iustification please not God 2. Workes done before iustification deserue not grace of
from Gods word THat Christ was pure from sinne it is abundantly to be seene in the holy Scriptures For Hee was both conceiued and borne without sinne Hee appeared to loose but not to fulfiâ—l the workes of Satan He liued and was tempted yet without sinne and did no sinne knewe no sinne nor had any sinne in him He died a guiltlesse and iust man euen by the testimonie of Paul Peter Stephen yea of his advsrsarie and iudge Pilate As ours such is the confessions of the purer Churches m. Errors Adversaries to this truth Cursed therefore before God are the Iewes which said that Christ was a violator of the Sabboth That hee taught being not lawfully authorized therevnto That he forbad tribute to be giuen vnto Caesar That hee was the destroyer of the law That he ouerthrew all religion and moued the commons vnto rebellion In this state with the Iewes are The Marcionites which said that he dissolued the Law the Prophets and all the workes of God The Saturnians which blazed that his comming into the world was to ouerthrow the God of the Angels Our newe Heretikes viz. Matthew Hamant in England which divulged that Christ was a sinfull man and an abominable Idol and Leonardus Vairus among the Papists which hath written that Christ was Veneficus or a common poisoner of men and women 2. Proposition All men besides Christ though regenerate be sinners The proofe from Gods word All meÌ„ either be regenerate or vnregenerate the vnregenerate be all sinners vnrighteous sin in whatsoeuer they do The regenerate also be not without their sinnes both originall and actuall Besides there is no man iust in the earth that doth good and sinneth not saith the preacher yee cannot doe the same things that ye would Christ Iesus came into the world to saue sinners of whome I am cheife saith S. Paul In many things we sinne all is S. Iames saying and S. Iohn If we say we haue no sinne we deceiue our selues the truth is not in vs Pray therefore Forgiue vs our debts A truth beleeued and confessed by all Churches expressedly by some The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Many adversaries hath this truth had and hath as the Papists the Manichies the Catharans the Donatists the Pelagians Familie of Loue Marcionites Adamites and Carpocratians For The Papists say that the blessed virgin was pure from all sinne both Originall and actuall For these are their owne wordes Our Lady neuer sinned Our Lady sinned not so much as venially in all her life she exactly fulfilled the whole Law that is was without sinne Also of S. Francis they write that for virtue and Godlines he was like vnto Christ and hath fulfilled euery iot of the Law The Manichies and Catharans thought they could not sinne so much as in thought The Donatists dreamed how they were so perfect as they could iustifie other men Some were of opinion as the Pelagians and Familie of Loue how they were so free from sinne as they needed not to say Forgiue vs our trespasses Which Familie also teacheth how there be men liuing as good and as holy as euer Christ was An error of Christopher Vitels a cheife Elder in the said Familie and that Hee which is a Familist is either as perfect as Christ or els a very Deuill Some deemed themselues as pure as Paul Peter or any men as the Marcionites yea as Adam and Euah before their fal as the Adamites yea as Iesus Christ himselfe as the Carpocratians 16. Article Of sinne after Baptisme 1 Not euery deadly sinne willingly commited after Baptisme is sinne against the holy Ghost and vnpardonable VVherefore the grant of repentance is not to be denied to such as fall into sinne after Baptisme 2 After we haue receiued the holy Ghost we may depart from grace giuen and into sinne and by the grace of God wee may rise againe and amend our liues And therefore they are to be condemned which say they can no more sinne as long as they liue heere 3 or denie place of forgiuenes to such as truly repent The propositions 1. Euery sinne committed after Baptisme is not the sinne aganst the holy Ghost 2. The very regenerate may depart from grace giuen and fall into sinne and yet rise againe vnto newnesse of life 3. No men vtterly are to be cast off as reprobates which vnfainedly repent 1. Proposition Euery sinne committed after Baptisme is not the sinne against the holy Ghost The proofe from Gods word THough euery sinne in it selfe considered deserueth damnation yet is there a sinne which shall be punished with many and a sinne which shall be punished with few stripes a sinne vnto death and a sinn not vnto death a sinne against the Father and the Sonne which shall be forgiuen and a sinne against the holy Ghost which neuer shall be forgiuen So in their extant confessions witnesse the Churches in Bohem Saxonie and Heluetia Errors adversaries vnto this truth Diuerslly hath this doctrine bin oppugned For Some haue thought all sinnes to be like and equall as the Stoikes Pelagians and Iouinians Some haue taught as Manes the heretike how none of the godly fathers and others from the beginning of the world till the 15. yeare of Tiberius the Emperour though earnestly they did repent were saued but were all punished alike with vtter confusion Some giue out that such persons be vtterly out of Gods fauour and condemned which depart out of this world either afore they are baptized as the Papists doe or afore they come vnto yeares of discretion as Hieranites did 2. Proposition The very regenerate may depart from grace giuen and fall into sinne and yet rise againe vnto newnes of life The proofe from the word of God That the Regenerate may fall into sinne and yet rise againe it is a doctrine grounded vpon the Scriptures For in them wee euidently may see that fall they may partly by the admonitions of our Sauiour vnto the man healed of the Palsie and vnto the adultresse of S. Paul vnto the Ephesians Colossians Hebrewes and Timothie and of S. Peter vnto all the godly and partly by the examples of Dauid Salomon Peter who egregiously and very offensiuely did fall and that they doe fall it is most euident by the fift petitioÌ„ of the Lords praier were nothing els to prooue the same but see afore 9. art Prop. 3. art 12. prop. 2. art 15. propo 2. Next that being fallen they may rise againe and be saued it is apparent both by the exhortations of the Angell vnto the Churches of Ephesus Pergamus and Thyatira and by the examples of Peter who denied and
beheld in euery man whether he would vse his grace well and beleeue the Gospell or no and as hee saw a man affected so he did predestinate chuse or refuse him 3. Besides his will there was some other cause in God why hee choose one and cast off another man but this cause is hiddē from vs. 4. Men by nature be elected and saued an error of the Basilideans and Valentinians 5. It is in man his power to be elected the error of Theophylact and of Bolseck 6. God is partiall and vniust for chusing some and refusing others calling many and electing but fewe 6. Proposition They who are elected vnto saluation if they come vnto yeares of discretion are called both outwardly by the word and inwardly by the Spirit of God The proofe from Gods word Though true it be the Lord knoweth all and euery of his elect yet hath he reuealed vnto vs certaine notes and tokens whereby wee may see and certainely knowe whether we bee of that number or not For such as be ordained vnto euerlasting life if they liue long in this world they one time or other be called vnto the knowledge of saluation by the preaching of Gods word they obey that calling through the operation of the holy Ghost working within them they feele in their soules the same spirit bearing witnesse vnto their spirits how they are the children of God and finally they walke religiously in all good workes These things are most euident and cleere in the holy Scripture where is set downe both the calling of the predestinate and their obedience to the word beeing called and their adoption by the spirit to be the children of God and last of all their holinesse of life and virtuous conuersation All Churches reformed consent herevnto Errors adversaries vnto this truth Sundry adversaries hath this truth and First the Papists who teach that none are to thinke or perswade themselues that they are of the number of the Predestinate vnto saluation but to be euer doubtfull thereof The said Papists deliuer that so many persons as are not marked with the signe of the crosse vpon their forehead are damned and reprobate also that they which will be saued must be Franciscans at leastwise become members of the Church of Rome Secondly the Antonomies which thinke the outward calling by the word though they haue not the inward calling by the Spirit and be destitute of good workes a sufficient argument of their election vnto life Thirdly the Puritanes who among other assurances giuen them from the Lord of their saluations make their aduancing of the Presbyteriall kingdome by the putting downe of Bishops Chancellours c. a testimonie that they shall haue part in that glorie which shall be reuealed hereafter Fourthly the Schwenfeldians and all such as depending vpon immediate and diuine reuelations condemne contemne the ordinarie calling of God by the ministerie of his word Lastly the Russians Catabaptists and Familie of Loue who beleeue that themselues onely and none besides shall be saued 7. Proposition The Predestinate are both iustified by faith sanctified by the Spirit and shall be glorified in the life to come The proofe from Gods word Diuers bee the effects of mans Predestination but chiefly it bringeth to the Elect iustification by Faith in this life and in the life to come glorification alwaies a conformitie to the image of the onely begotten Sonne of God both in suffering troubles here and in enioying immortall glory hereafter as testifie all the Churches in their confessions The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth This is flatly against Papias Iustinus and all Millinaries who denie the eternitie of mans happines and dreame of I knowe not what blisse in this life to endure a thousand yeares but no longer Also against the Manichies who said the soule onely shall be saued Also against those heretikes which denie the resurrection of the flesh as did the Carpocratians Manichies and others Likewise against the Hieranites who haue a phantasie that no children departing this life before they come vnto yeares of discretion and knowledge shall be saued So the Papists doe teach that no infants dying vnbaptized doe goe to heauen but vnto another place adioyning vnto Hell called Limbus puerorum 8. Proposition The consideration of Predestination is to the godly wise most comfortable out to curious and carnall persons very dangerous The proofe from Gods word This doctrine of Predestination is to the godly full sweete pleasant and comfortable because it greatly confirmeth their faith in Christ and encreaseth their loue toward God I account the afflictions of this present time are not worthy of the glorie which shall be shewed vnto vs If God be on our side who can be against vs who spared not his owne Sonne but gaue him for vs all to death how shall hee not with him giue vs all things also who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods chosen It is God that iustifieth who shall condemne c Yee were sealed with the holy Spirit of promise which is the earnest of our inheritance vntill the redemption of the possession purchased vnto the praise of his glorie Greiue not the holy spirit of God by whom yee are sealed vnto the day of redemption But to the wicked and reprobate the consideration hereof is very sower vnsauorie and most vncomfortable as that which they thinke though very vntruly and sinfully causeth them either to despaire of his mercie being without faith or not to feare his iustice being extreamely wicked whereas neither from the word of God nor any Confessiō of the Church can man gather that he is a vessell of wrath prepared to damnation but contrariwise by many and great arguments may perswade himselfe that God would not his destruction as in the next proposition immediately ensuing plainely may appeare Errors Adversaries to this truth Therefore they are to be taken as much out of the way which say that this doctrine leadeth either vnto desperation which is without all comfort or vnto loosenes of life and so vnto Atheisme and therefore to be published neither by mouth nor booke and so thought both the Pelagians the Predestinates a sort of heretikes so called in old time and the Familie of Loue in our daies who tearme the doctrine of Predestination a licentious doctrine say it filleth all the prisons almost in England 9. Proposition The generall promises of God set forth in the holy Scripture are to be embraced of vs. The proofe from Gods word That men the better may auoid both desperation and carnall securitie they are to haue alwaies in minde that 1. The promises of grace and fauour to mankinde are vniuersall as Come vnto mee all yee that are wearie and laden and I will case you God sent not his Sonne
into the world that he should condemne the world but that the world through him might be saued God will that all men shall be saued and come vnto the knowledge of the truth 2. The doctrine of the Gospell for the free remission of sinnes is to be preached not vnto a fewe but vniuersally and generally vnto all men Goe therefore and teach all nations baptizing them c Goe into all the world and preach the Gospell to euery creature He that shall beleeue and be baptized shall be saued but hee that will not beleeue shall be damned 3. The seales of the couenant be appointed to be giuen to all men and members of the visible Church or desirous to be ineorporated there into For All are to be baptized and all are to participate of the bread and cuppe at the Lords supper 4. As the disobedience of Adam brought condemnation vpon all men so the blood and obedience of Christ is able all-sufficient to wash away all sinnes and that of all men 5. No man euer truly repented but he was receiued againe into fauour so was Dauid after his adulterie Manasses after his Idolatrie Peter after his Apostacie the Thiefe vpon the Crosse the Niniuites The adversaries vnto this truth They are not to be heard then which say that The number of the Elect is but small and seeing wee are vncertaine whether wee be of that companie or no wee will proceede in our course as wee haue begunne God is an acceptor of persons and so vniust in chusing some and refusing others God hath predestinate all those personns to eternall death which are not in the state of true repentance which was one of Glouers errors It is the part therefore of all and euery man Not to refuse the mercies of God both generally and gratiously offered vnto all men by his word and Sacraments Not to despaire in respect either of the greatnes or multitude of his sinnes Nor yet to prouoke the Lord to execute his vengeance vpon them through prophanes of life or securitie 10. Proposition In our actions the word of God which is his reuealed will must be our direction The proofe from Gods word In our doings but cheiefly in the matter of Predestination wee are to follow not our own iudgement and what seemeth good in our owne opinions but the will of God and that will too not which is concealed from vs viz. of God his omnipotencie wherby he gouerneth at his pleasure the things by himselfe created whereof mention is made both in the Psalmes in the Prophet Isay and other places of his word but of his fauour and good pleasure towards man reuealed in the holy Scriptures by Iesus Christ whome wee are to heare Subscribed hereunto haue and doe Gods church euery where The adversaries vnto this truth This truth is gainesaid by the Phrygians Montanists and Messalians also by the Enthusiastes Anabaptists And Familie of Loue which leaue the written word of God and relie vpon their owne dreames visions and lying reuelations Hence proceedeth the contempt of Gods written word and of the Preachers and all religious exercises thereof For saith the Familie of Loue No difference is there betweene a ceremoniall either Letre Doctor Christian an vncircumcised Heathen 18. Article Of obtaining eternall saluation onely by the name of Christ. 1 They also are to be had accursed that presume to say that euery man shall be saued by the Lawe or sect which he professeth so that he be â—iligent to frame his life according to that Law and the light of nature For holy Scripture doth set out vnto vs 2 onely the name of Iesus Christ whereby men must be saued The propositions 1. The profession of euery religion cannot saue a man liue he neuer so virtuously 2. No man euer was is or shall be saued but onely by the Name or faith of Iesus Christ. 1. Proposition The profession of euery religion cannot saue a man liue hee neuer so virtuously The proofe from the word of God THis we cannot but acknowledge to be a truth if wee beleeue the Scriptures for they testifie that Iewes and Gentiles are all vnder sinn culpable before God and depriued of the glory of God All men that would be saued must be borne againe of the holy Ghost No man is iustified by the workes of the Lawe either ceremoniall or morall God hateth the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes and of Balaam The Reprobate whose names are not written in the booke of the life of the Lambe they doe worship the Beast Punishments eternall and intolerable are threatned both to the Beast and the false prophet and likewise to all such as will not goe out of Babylon and to all Idolaters The confessions of Gods people are to this ende and purpose Errors adversaries vnto this truth Then to be had accursed are they which affirme that This obseruation of the Iudaicall ceremonies is necessarie vnto saluation as did the false apostles the Ebionites and the Corinthians Such throughout the world as lead an vpright life and be morally righteous whatsoeuer their religion is shall be saued as many of the Philosophers were in the opinion of the Valentinian and Basilidian heretikes of Galeatus Martius and Erasmus Roterodam That men externally may professe any religion and notwithstanding be saued if their affections and hart be with the Familie of Loue That all those which liue vprightly and doe good deedes shall be of equall happines in the kingdome of heauen be they Turkes Christians Iewes or Moores A Turkish error That men may embrace and follow the sect and religion which they haue most minde vnto and so doing please God and shall be saued the Lampatians doctrine That no sect euer erred or were out of the way to heauen a fancie of the Rhetorians 1. Proposition No man euer was is or shal be saued but onely by the name or Faith of Iesus Christ. The proofe from Gods word This wee cannot but acknowledge to be true if also wee beleeue the scriptures which say that Among men there is giuen none other name vnder heauen whereby wee must be saued Through Iesus Christ his name all that beleeue in him shall receiue remission of sinnes In thee viz. Christ Iesus shall all the Gentiles be blessed And this is the Faith and confession of the reformed Churches The errors and Adversaries vnto this truth Many waies this truth very heretically is oppugned For Some teach that wee are saued not by Christ but as the Valentinians said by the labour of their hands and by their owne good workes as Simon Magus boasted by his faire Helene as Matthew Hamant held by other meanes and that all persons which worshipped Christ are abominable Idolaters as
Iesus was bound led away and deliuered vnto Pilate A councell iudged our S. Christ to be both a deceiuer and a blaphemer A councell corrupted the Souldiers and willed them to tell a Lie A counsell withstood Peter and Iohn and commanded them that in no wise they should speake or teach in the name of Iesus A councell both caused the Apostles to be beaten and commanded them also that they should not preach in the name of Iesus In auncient writings of credit wee may read how contrarie to Gods word by Councells Arrianisme hath bin confirmed as by the Councell at Ariminum By councells the traditions and bookes of foolish men haue bin made of equall authoririe with the word of God as by the counsell of Trent By councells hath bin established both the adoration of images as by the second councell of Nice and the Inuocation of creatures as by the Tridentine councell By councells the authority of princes hath bin empaired the Pope and Clergie advanced aboue all earthly Princes as by the Councell of Lateran The consideration of the premises and the like mooued S. Hilarie to call the Synode of Mediolane The Synagogue of the malignant and S Augustine to write vnto Maximinus Neither ought I to obiect against thee the Synode of Nice nor thou against mee the Synod of Ariminum and Nazianzene openly to pronounce that Hee neuer sawe any good end of a Councell and The French king his Embassadour to say vnto the chapter of Trent that scarsely any good at all or very little came by Councells vnto the state of Christendome and Cornelius Bishop of Bitonto to breake out into these words in the face of the Councell at Trent I would that with one consent wee had not altogether declined from religion vnto superstition from faith vnto infidelitie from Christ vnto Antichrist from God vnto Epicures Aduersaries vnto this truth This notwithstanding the Papists doe continue in an opinion that councells cannot erre 4. Proposition The things ordained hy generall Councells are so farre to be embraced and beleeued as they are consonant to Gods holy word The proofe from Gods word Generall councells we simply condemne not yet doe wee not ground our faith vpon any councell but onely vpon the written word of God Therefore in generall Councells whatsoeuer is agreeable vnto the written word of God we doe reuerendly embrace but whatsoeuer is contrarie vnto or besides the will of God reuealed in the holy scriptures wee doe carefully auoid And so are wee commaunded to doe euen by God himselfe Whatsoeuer I command you take heed you doe it thou shalt put nothing thereto nor take ought therefrom Walke ye not in the ordinances of your fathers neither obserue their manners c. I am the Lord your God walke in my statutes and keepe my iudgements and doe them Though that wee or an Angell from heauen preach vnto you otherwise then that which wee haue preached vnto you let him be accursed As wee said before so say I now againe If any man preach vnto you otherwise then that yee haue receiued let him be accursed And so thinke the Churches reformed with vs The adversaries vnto this truth Contrarie hereunto are the opinions of the Papists For of them Some doe thinke that the decrees of Councells doe binde all nations as Pope Hormisda decreed they should Some as Pope Gregory the great supposed that some coūsells and namely the councell of Nice of Constanstinople Ephesus and Chalcedon some as Campian thought that all councells were of equall authoritie with the word of God Others as the Guisiā faction in Frāce be resolued in matters of religion to follow the footesteps of their ancestors though Gods word and a thousand councells decree to the contrary 22. Article Of Purgatorie The Romish doctrine concerning 1 Purgatorie 2 Pardons worshipping and adoration as well 3 of images as 4 of Reliques and 5 also Inuocation of Saints is a fond thing vainely inuented and grounded vpon no warrantie of Scripture but rather repugnant to the word of God The Propositions The Romish doctrine concerning 1. Purgatorie 2. Pardons 3. Worshipping and adoration of Images 4. Reliques 5. Inuocation of Saintes is a fond thing and not warranted by the holy Scripture nor consonant but contrarie vnto the same 1. Proposition The Romish doctrine concerning Purgatorie is fond and not warranted by the holy Scripture nor consonant but contrary vnto the same The proofe from Gods word IT is granted as well by the Romish or false as by the true Church that none vncleane thing can enter into the kingdome of God And because all men either haue bin or be still vncleane therefore they must be purged from sinne But in the manner of purging them who are vnpure they doe greatly differ For the true church looking into the word of God doth finde that wee are sanctified or made cleane in diuers respects diuersly as by Baptisme by the word preached by the blood of Christ and by the spirit of God and that in this life and not in the other world For in the sacred scripture there is mention but onely of two waies one leading vnto destruction the other bringing vnto life of two sorts of men whereof some beleeue and they are saued some beleeue not and they are damned and of two States one blessed where Lazarus is the other cursed where Diues doth abide A third way or sort or state cannot be founde in the word of God And therefore the Purgatorie in another world both denied hath alwaies bin by the Greeke Churches and neither is nor will be acknowledged by any of Gods reformed Churches in this world as their Confessions do testifie Adversaries vnto this truth Erroneous therefore and not warrantable by Gods word concerning Purgatorie is the doctrine both of the old Heretikes the Montanists who thought there was a purging of soules after this life and of the newe and renued Heretikes the Papists For They thinke it to be vnsound doctrine and not sufferable in any booke for Christians to diliuer that it is vnpossible for godly and faithfull men or women to be punished after they be dead Therefore deleatur say they Blot out such doctrine They teach by their Catechismes that to doubt whether there is a Purgatorie or no is a breach of the first commandement Thus doe they pray for the soules of the faithfull as they fancie boyling in the torments of purgatorie Auete omnes animae fideles quarum corpora hîc vbique conquiescunt in puluere Dominus Iesus Christus qui vos nos redemit suo pretiosissimo sanguine dignetur vos à poenis liberare c. that is All haile all faithfull soules whose bodies doe here and euery where rest in the dust The Lord Iesus Christ who hath redeemed both you and vs with
his most pretious blood vouchsafe to deliuer you from paines c They haue ratified the doctrine of purging soules after this life in the Councell of Trent It is further to be noted how the same Papists sliding back from the truth of God haue fallen into many noisome and diuers opinions in the matter of Purgatorie agreeing among themselues Neither about the place where purgatorie should be some placing the same in the bottome of the sea some neere vnto the mount Hecla in Ireland some vpon the mount Etna in Sicil others in the Centre of the earth others in Hell whereof they make fower roomes the first of the damned the second of Infants dying vnbaptized the third Purgatorie the fourth Limbus patrum whereinto Christ descended and others in a mind tossed and troubled betwixt hope and feare Neither about the Tormentors there who are thought of some to be holy Angells of others to be very deuills Neither about the torments For some dreame how they are tormented there with fire onely as Sir Thomas More some with water and fire as Roffensis and some neither with fire nor water but with troublesome affections of Hope and Feare as Lorichius Neither about the causes of Purgatorie torments because that some doe thinke that onely veniall sinnes others that veniall and mortall sinnes too for which in this life men haue donn no penance are there purged Nor about the time which they that be tormented shal abide in Purgatorie For some haue giuen out how the poore soules there be continually in torments till the day of Iudgement as Dionis Carthusianus others as Durandus doe thinke they haue rest sometimes as vpon Sundaies and holy daies others are of minde that in time they shall be set free at libertie because their punishment is but temporarie and others that at any time they may be deliuered if either their friends will buy out their paines or the preists will pray or say any Masse for them or the Pope will but say the word Nor finally about the state of soules in purgatorie For Our English Papists at Rhemes doe thinke the soules in purgatorie to be in a more happie and blessed condition then any men that liue in this world and yet say the same Rhemists that purgatorie fire passeth all the paines of this life Thomas Aquinas holdeth how the paines of hel fire and of purgatorie are all one and in nothing differ but that the one is but temporall and the other not so And others put in choise either to tarrie in Purgatorie one day or to endure the miseries of this world an 100. yeares haue chosen to suffer the troubles of this life an hundred yeares together rather then to abide the paines of purgatorie but on short winters day Therefore in this contrarietie of opinions some of them the Papists themselues cannot denie must be wee say all of them are fond and contrary to the word of God Besides they nourish most cursed and damnable errors as That all the soules of the faithfull separated from their bodies are not at rest That all sinnes in their owne nature be not mortall or deadly and that some deserue not euerlasting torments They are purged in purgatory That one sinful man may saue and satisfie the wrath of God for another and that easily by praying saying or doing some thing for them That if friends in this word will doe nothing for the poore soule in purgatorie paines yet may the said soules come at length vnto happines by abyding their deserued torments vntill the last howre or day of iudgement in Purgatorie Finally that the Pope is God in that he can at his pleasure discharge guiltie soules both from the guilt of sinne and from the punishments due for the same 2. Proposition The Romish doctrine concerning pardons is fond and not warranted by the holy Scripture nor consonant but contrary vnto the same The proofe from Gods word Such hath bin the exceeding mercie and loue of God towards mankind that as hee hath purged vs from all guiltines of sinne by the blood so hath hee pardoned vs from the euerlasting punishment due for sinne by the paines of Iesus Christ. For There is saluation in none other For among men there is giuen none other name vnder heauen whereby they must be saued Through his name all that beleeue shall receiue remission of sinnes Hee hath purchased the Church by his owne blood With his stripes wee are healed Hee that beleeueth in him shall neither be condemned nor ashamed Therefore Come vnto mee all yee that are wearie and laden and I will ease you c. and yee shall finde rest for your soules saith our Sauiour Christ If thou shalt confesse with thy mouth the Lord Iesus and shalt beleeue with thine heart that God raised him from the dead thou shalt be saued saith S. Paul Errors Adversaries to this truth This beeing the doctrine euen of God himselfe wee may euidently perceiue how not onely vain but besides not onely besides but against the word of God the Romish doctrine concerning pardons is For that doth teach vs. 1. To seeke saluation not at God alone but at the hands of sinfull men For would wee haue a pardon for the sinnes of 40. daies A Bishop may giue it For the sinnes of 100. daies A Cardinall may grant For all our sinnes committed or to be coÌ„mitted From the pope wee may haue it Hence be his pardons if you respect time for 40.50.100.1000.10000.50000 c. yeares if offenses Homicide Parcide Perâ—urie Sodomitrie Treason and what not c. 2. That wee may be our owne Sauiours So did that of Purgatorie 3. How the pretious blood of Christ was shed in vaine For corruptible gold and siluer with our owne deedes workes may and will saue vs if we will 4. That repentance is not of necessity vnto the saluation of man For without the same a popish pardon may saue But without either a Pardon from the Pope or such like or Absolution of a Priest there is no saluation by the doctrine of the Church of Rome A further manifestation of the vanitie and impieties of the Romish pardons from a booke of the Papists intituled Horae beatissimae virginis Mariae secundum vsum Sarum Quicunque in statu gratiae existens dixerit deuotè septem orationes sequentes cum septem Pater noster totidem Aue Maria ante imaginem pietatis merebitur 56 millia annorum Indulgentiarum Iohannes Papa 12. concessit omnibus dicentibus orationem sequeÌ„tem transeundo per caemiterium tot annos indulgentiarum quet fuerunt ibi corpora iuhumata à constitutione ipsius caemiterij Oratio pro defunctis Auete omnes animae fideles quarum corpora hic vbique requiescunt in puluere Dominus Iesus Christus qui vos nos redemit suo
which of modestie I will not mention but doe ouer passe 5. Proposition Invocation of Saints is a fonde thing not warranted by the holy Scriptures nor consonant but contrarie vnto the same The proofe from Gods word The Christian exercise of Prayer is a dutie which may not be either securely omitted or vainly abused And though many things in prayer be necessarily to be obserued yet a speciall point is it that in our supplications and prayers we doe call onely vpon God For so to doe we are both commanded euen by God himselfe and thereunto also allured by manifold as well promises of large blessings as by the examples of godly men in all ages Patriarkes Abraham Isaac Iaakob Prophets as Daniel Elias Ieremie Centurions Publicans Apostles as Paul Peter c. yea of all the Elect of God in this world On the other side to pray vnto any creature that is out of this world besides Iesus Christ there is in the Scripture neither Law to command nor promise of blessing nor any example of godly men or women to prouoke Finally as all Gods people in the purer and former times haue so in these daies the Protestant Churches vtterly condemne the inuocating of or praying vnto creatures whatsoeuer The Adversaries vnto this truth Therefore the Romish doctrine that Saints are to be praied vnto and their daily praying as occasion serueth vnto S Agatha that haue sore breasts vnto S. Benedict that either be or feare to be poisoned vnto S. Clare for them that haue sore eies S. Damian that be sicke for health S. Erasmus for helpe in the intrals S. Feriol for Geese S. Giles for women that would haue children S Hubberts for dogges S. Iob for them which haue the poxe S. Katherine for knowledge S. Loys for horses S. Margaret for women in trauaile S. Nicholas for little children S. Otilia for the headach S. Petronil for the Ague S. Quintin for the cough S. Ruffin for lunacie or madnes S. Sebastian for the plague S. Thomas Becker for sinners S. Valentine for the falling sicknes S. Winefield for virginitie S. ✚ or Crosse for all things it is vaine not warrantable by Gods word but altogether repugnant to the holy scriptures The vanitie and idolatrie of the Popish Invocation further demonstrated from that booke of theirs entituled Horae beatissimae virginis c. Oremus Maiestatem tuam Domine suppliciter exoramus vt sicut Ecclesiae tuae beatus Andraeas Apostolus tuus extitit praedicator rector ita apudâ—â— sit pro nobis perpotuus intercestor per Dominum nostrum Iesum Christum Oremus Deus pro cuius Ecclesia gloriosus martyr Rontifex Thomas gladiis impiorum occubuit praesta quae sumus 〈◊〉 omnes quiaius implâ—rant auxilium prae petitionis eius salutarèm cause quantur effectum per Dominum nostrum Versus Ora pro nobis beata Katherina Resp. Vt digni efficiamur promissionibus Christi Versus Ora pro nobis beate Martyr Sebastiana Resp. Vt mereamur pestem epidimiae illaesi transire promissionem Christi obtinere Virgo Christi egregia pro nobis Apollonia Funde preces ad Dominum vt tollat omne noxium Ne proreatu criminum morbo vexemur dentium Let vs pray O Lord we humbly beseech thy Maiestie that as thy blessed Apostle Andreas was a preacher and ruler of thy Church so he may be a perpetuall intercessor for vs through Iesus Christ our Lord. Let vs pray O God for whose Churches sake the glorious Martyr and Bishop Thomas was slaine by the sword of the vngodly graunt we beseech thee that such as call vnto him for helpe may obtaine a good effect of his godly praier through our Lord. The vers O blessed Katharine pray for vs. Thans That wee may be made worthy of the promises of Christ. The vers O blessed Martyr Sebastian pray for vs. The Ans. That wee deserue to escape the plague without hurt and obtaine the promises of Christ. Christ his noble virgin Apollonia pray vnto the Lord to remoue whatsoeur is hurtfull least for the guiltines of our sinns wee be vexed with the tooth ach Whosoeuer saith this prayer following in the worship of God and S. Roche the very words in the said booke shall not die of the pestilence by the grace of God c. Oremus Omnipotens sempiterne Deus qui precibus meritis beatissimi Rochi confessoris tui quondam pestem generalem reuocasti presta supplicibus tuis qui pro simili peste reuocanda sub tua confidunt fiducia ipsius gloriesi Confessoris tui prâ—camine ab ipsa peste epidiâ—â—ae ab omni perturbatione liberemur per Christum Dominum nostrum Oratio ad tres Reges Rex Iasper rex Melchior rex Balthasar rogo vos per singula nomina rogo vos per sanctam Trinitatem rogo vos per regem regum quem vagienteâ—â— in cunis viderâ— meruistis compatiamini tribulationum mearum hodiè intercedatis pro me ad dominum cuius desiderio exules factiestis Crux Christi protege me Crux Christi salua me Crux Christi defende me ab omni malo Let vs pray O almightie and euerlasting God who by the prayers and merits of thy most blessed Confessour Roche didest reuoke a certaine generall plague grant vnto thy suppliants who for the reuocatioÌ„ of the like plague doe trust in thy faithfullnes by the prayer of that thy glorious Confessour wee may be deliuered from the plague and from all aduersity through Christ our Lord. A prayer vnto the 3. kings O King Iaspar king Melchior king Balthasar I beseech you by euery of yournames I beseech you by the holy Trinitie I beseech you by the king of kings whom yee deserued to see euen in his swadling cloathes that you would take pittie on my troubles this day and make intercession for mee vnto the Lord for whose desire yee made your selues exiles O Christs crosse protect me ô Christs crosse saue me ô Christs crosse defend mee from all euill 23. Article Of ministring in the Congregation 1 It is not lawfull for any man to take vpon him the office of publike preaching 2 or ministring the Sacraments in the congregation 3 before he be lawfully called and sent to execute the same 4 And those wee ought to iudge lawfully called and sent which be 5 chosen and called to this worke 6 by men who haue publike authoritie giuen vnto them in the congregation to call and send ministers into the Lords vineyard The propositions 1. None publikely may preach but such as thereunto are authorized 2. They must not be silent who by office are bound to preach 3. The Sacraments may not be administred in the Congregation but by a lawfull Minister 4. There is a lawfull Ministery in the Church 5. They are lawfull Ministers which be ordained by men lawfully appointed to the calling and sending forth of Ministers 6. Before
otherside too highly as if the dignitie of their calling were cause good enough that what they doe or say ex opere operato take happy effects These things from the Scriptures are manifest which teach vs that wicked ministers euen the Scribes and Pharisies sitting in Moses chaire and preaching Christ though through enuie strife and contention are to be heard and may administer the Sacraments as did the ordinarie Priests among the Iewes whereof very many both afore and after that our Sauiour came into the world were most wicked men and the best which be are the ministers of God and Gods labourers Also the purer Churches beare witnesse hereunto Neither is hee whosoeuer that planteth any thing neither hee that watereth but God that giueth the encrease saith S Paul And a signe of a good Spirit is it to regard not so much who speaketh or ministreth as what is vttered and offered from God Errors Adversaries to this truth The due consideration of the praemises will both settle vs the more firmely in the truth and make vs the more carefully to abhorre all adversaries thereof as in old time were the donatists and the Petilians who taught that the Sacraments are holy when they be administred by holy men but not els also the Apostolikes or Henricans who had a fancie that he was no Bishop which was a wicked man Among the Fathers also Cyprian and Origen were not â—ound in this point For Cyprian published that no minister could rightly baptize who was not himselfe endued with the holy Ghost hee further deliuered that whosoeuer doe communicate with a wicked minister doe sinne Origen held that in vaine did any minister either binde or lose who was himselfe bound with the chaines of â—inne and wickednes Such adversaries in our time be the Anabaptists the Family of Loue the disciplinarians vsually tearmed Puritants the Sabbatarians the Brownists and the Papists For The Anabaptists will not haue the people to vse the ministerie of euill ministers and thinke the seruice of wicked Ministers vnprofitable and not effectuall affirming that no man who is himselfe faultie can preach the truth to others The Familie of Loue doe say that no man can minister the vpright seruice or ceremonies of Christ but the regenerate also that wicked men cannot teach the truth The disciplinarian Puritans doe bring all ministers which cannot preach and their seruices into detestation For their doctrine is that Where there is no Preacher there ought to be no minister of the Sacraments None must minister the Sacraments which doe not preach The Sacrament is not a Sacrament if it be not ioyned to the word of God preached It is sacriledge to seperate the ministration of the word preached from the Sacraments Of these mens opinions be the Sabbatarians among vs. For their doctrine is to the common people that vnlesse they leaue their vnpreaching ministers euery Sabboth day and goe to some place where the word is preached they doe prophane the Sabboth and subiect themselues vnto the curse of God So the Brownists No man is to communicate say they where there is a blinde or dumme ministerie The Papist doe crosse this truth but after another sort For Pope Hildebrand decreed and commanded that no man should heare Masse from the mouth of a preist which hath a wife The Rhemists doe publish how The Sermons of heretikes and so tearme they all Protestant ministers must not be heard though they preach the truth Their praiers and Sacraments are not acceptable to God but are the howling of wolues 2. Proposition Euill ministers are to be searched out convicted and deposed but orderly and by the discipline of the Church The wicked and euill ministers must not alwaies be endured in the Church of God For they are the euill and vnprofitable seruants the Eies which doe offend the vnsauorie salt which are carefully to be seene vnto and if admonitions will not serue deposed yet orderly and by the discipline of the Churh For that God which appointed a gouernement for the ciuill state hath also giuen authoritie vnto his Church to punish offenders according to the qualitie of their transgressions And so may we read in the word of God Tell the Church saith our Sauiour Let such a one by the power of our Lord Iesus Christ be deliuered vnto Sathan for the destruction of the flesh that the spirit may be saued in the day of the Lord Iesus saith S. Paul So the neighbour Churches Adversaries vnto this truth Then deceiued and out of the way are the Brownists and Barrowists which are of minde that Priuate persons in themselues haue authoritie to depose vnmeete ministers and to punish malefactors Euery particular member of a Church in himselfe hath power to examine the manner of administring the Sacraments c. to call men vnto repentance c to reproue the faults of the church and to forsake that church which will not reforme her faults vpon any priuate admonition For want of the due execution of discipline against persons offending and malefactors both women may leaue their husbands as some haue done and husbands their wiues and goe where it is in force See more in Art 33. Prop. 1. 27. Article Of Baptisme 1 Baptisme is not only a signe of profession and marke of difference whereby christian men are discerned from other that be not Christened but 2 it is also a signe of regeneration or newe-birth whereby as by an instrument they that receiue Baptisme rightly are graffed into the Church the promises of the forgiuenes of sinne and of our adoption to be the Sonnes of God by the holy Ghost are visiblie signed and sealed Faith is confirmed and grace encreased by vertue of prayer vnto God 3 The Baptisme of young children is in any wise to be retained in the Church as most agreeable with the institution of Christ. The Propositions 1. Baptisme is a signe of Profession and marke of differeÌ„ce whereby Christians are discerned from other men that be no Christians 2. Baptisme is a signe or seale of the regeneration or newe birth of Christians 3. Infants and young children by the word of God are to be baptized 1. Proposition Baptisme is a signe of Profession and marke of difference whereby Christians are discerned from other men that be no Christians The proofe from Gods word HOw the Sacraments are tokens and therefore that Baptisme is a signe of the true Church which be Christians it is apparent from Gods word in the 5. proposit of the 19. article afore going and the same doe the Churches of God acknowledge Errors adversaries vnto this truth This declareth vs to be sound Christians and. Not Nazarens who were with the Iewes circumcised and baptized with Christians and so as Hierome writeth of them were neither Iewes nor Christians Mot
visible Church can inflict vpon the wicked and vngodly of this world is Excommunication which is a part of discipline to be exercised and that vpon vrgent occasions and it is commended vnto the Church euen by God himselfe who in his word hath prescribed 1. Who are to excommunicate namely such as haue authoritie in the Church 2. Who are to be excommunicate euen two sorts of men whereof the one peruert the sound doctrine of the truth as did Hymeneus and Alexander the other be defiled with notorious wickednes as that incesâ—uous person as Corinth was 3. The manner of proceeding in Excommunication namely first by gentle admonition and that once or twice giuen with the spirit of meekenesse euen as to a brother if the fault be not notoriously knowne and next by open reprehension afterward by the publique sentence of the Church to put him from the companie of the faithfull to deliuer him vnto Sathan and to denounce him an Heathen and a Publican if none admonitions will serue and the crime and person be very offensiue A man so cut off from the Congregation and Excommunicated is of euery godly professor to be auoyded and not to be eaten with all not to be companied with all nor to be receaued into house This censure is had in great reuerence estimation among the faithfull seruants of God Errors adversaries vnto this truth 1. Aduersaries vnto this doctrine be they Who vtterly condemne all censures ecclesiasticall and so Excommunication saying how the wicked are not excommunicable so did the Paulicians Haeretickes holding other points of religion soundly for their priuate and singular opinions are not to be excommunicate so the Pelagians Christians cleauing vnto the foundation which is Christ are not by excommunication to bee thrust out of the Church for any other errors or misdemeanors whatsoeuer Of which opinion be sundrie Diuines of good regard 2. Which allowe the censure of Excommunication so it be done Not as with vs it is by Commissaries Chancelars or Bishopes but in euerie Parrish and that either By the whole Congregation or by the Eldership and the whole Church or by euerie Minister yea euery member of the Church or finally if not by yet not without the consent of his Pastor who is to be excommunicate 3. Which rightly vse not but abuse the censure of Excommunication drawing the same foorth Against what they list euen against dead bodies dumbe Fishes Flies and Vermie when they haue auoyded them For this the Papistes are famous or infamous rather The dead bodies of Wicliefe Bucer P. Fagius were excomunicated after they were dead and buried The Bishop of Canâ—â—â—â—on anno D. 1593. verie Catholickely accursed the mute Fishes S. Bernard denounced the sentence of Excommunication against Flies And against whom they please so the Apostolikes excommunicated all that were married only for that they were married Diotrephes thrust the Brethren out of the Church The Brownists excoÌ„municate whol citties churches the Papists excoÌ„municate eueÌ„ Kings Emperors Queene Elizabeth of blessed memorie was excommunicate by three Popes Pius quintus Gregorie the 13 and sixtus quintus The Puritanes mislike and find great fault that excommunication is not exercised against Kings and Princes Barrowe saith that a Prince contemning the censures of the Church is to be disfranchised out of the Church and deliuered ouer vnto Satan Also for what thinges they list euen for May-games and Robbin-hoode matters as sometime it was denounced in Scotland by the newe Presbyterie and for all crimes which by Gods lawe deserue death and for all things that to Gods people be scandalous yea not only for all matters criminall but also for the very suspition of auarice Pride c. 4. Lastly which fauour the right and true excommunication but exercise it not being bound thereunto 2. Proposition An excommunicate person truly repenting is to be receaued into the Church againe The proofe from Gods word Sundrie be the reasons and ends why Excommunication is vsed as That a wicked liuer to the reproach of the Gospell be not suffered among the godly and Christian professors of true religion That manie good men bee not euill spoken of for a fewe bad That good and virtuous persons may not bee infected through the continuall or much familiaritie of the wicked For as S. Paule saith a little leauen leaueneth the whole lumpe And that he which hath fallen through shame of the world may at the length Learne to blaspheme no more through repentance be saued Among all other causes therefore of Excommunication one is and not the least that the person Excommunicate may not be condemned vtterly but returne vnto the Lord by repentance and so be receaued againe into the visible Church as S. Paule willed the Incestuous man should be The Adversaries vnto this truth Contrariwise the Montanistes and the Nouatians are of opinion that so many as after Baptisme doe fall into sinne bee vtterly damned of God and therefore bee not to find fauour at the Churches hands 34. Article Of the traditions of the Church 1 It is not necessary that traditions and ceremonies be in all places one or vtterly like for at all times they haue bin diuers and changed according to the diuersitie of countries times and mens manners so that nothing be ordained against Gods word 2 whosoeuer through his priuate iudgment willingly and purposely doth openly breake the traditions and ceremonies of the Church 3 which be not repugnant to the word of God and be ordained and approoued by common authoritie ought to be rebuked openly that other may feare to doe the like as he that offendeth against the common order of the Church and woundeth the consciences of the weake brethren 4 Euery particular or nationall Church hath authoritie to ordaine change and abolish ceremonies or rites of the church ordained onely by mans authoritie so that all things be done to edifying The Propositions 1. Traditions or ceremonies are not necessarie to be like and the same in all places 2. No priuate man of a selfe will and purposely may in publike violate the traditions and ceremonies of the Church which by common authoritie be allowed and are not repugnant to the word of God 3. Ceremonies and traditions ordained by authoritie of man if they be repugnant to Gods word are not to be kept obserued of any man 4. Euery particular or nationall Church may ordaine change and abolish ceremonies or rites ordained onely by mans authoritie so that all things be done to edifying 1. Proposition Tradâ—tions or ceremonies are not necessarily to be like or the same in all places The proofe from Gods word IF a necessitie were laid vpon the Church of God to obserue the same traditions and ceremonies at all times and in all
to goe to warre or to bring any man to a violent death though by law he were adiudged to die In these daies the Anabaptists thinke it to be a thing most exetrable for Christians to take weapons or to goe to warre The Familio of Loue also doe so condemne all warres as the time was when they would not beare or weare a weapō they write first of themselues how all their nature is Loue and peace and that they are a people peaceable concordable amiable louing and liuing peaceably but all other men in the world besides they doe wage warre 〈◊〉 and destroy for which ends they haue diuers sorts of swords Halberds spears bowes and arrowes Gunnes pellets and Gunpowder armour Harnes and Gorgets none of which the Familists doe vse or allowe of 38. Article Of Christian mens goods which are not common The riches and goodnes of Christians 1 are not common as touching the right title and possession of the same as certaine Anabaptists doe falsely boast Notwithstanding 2 euery man ought of such things as he possesseth liberally to giue almes to the poore according to his abilitie The Propositions 1 The riches and goods of Christians as touching the right title and possession of the same are not common 2. Euery man is to giue liberall almes to the poore of that which he possesseth according to his abilitie 1. Proposition The riches and goods of Christians as touching the right title and possession of the same are not common The proofe from Gods word AGainst communitie of goods and riches be all those places which are infinite of holy Scripture that either condemne the vnlawfull getting keeping or desiring of riches which by Couetousnesse Theeuerie Extortion and the like wicked meanes many doe attaine or doe commend Liberalitie Frugalitie free and freindly Lending honest labour and lawfull vocations to liue and thriue by All which doe shewe that Christians are to haue goods of their owne and that riches ought not to be common Of this iudgement be the reformed Churches The adversaries vnto this truth Of another mind were the Esseis the Manichies the Pelagiās the Apostolikes and Fratricellians and are the Anabaptists and Familie of Loue Amōg the Famists saith H.N. none claimeth any thing proper to himselfe for to possesse the same to any owednes or priuatenesse For no man c. can desire to appropriate or challenge any thing to himselfe either yet to make any priuate vse vnto himselfe from the rest ward but what is there is Free and is also left free in his vpright forme 2. Proposition Euery man is to giue liberall Almes to the poore of that which hee possesseth according to his abilitie The proofe from Gods word Vnto liberality towards the poore according to our ability we are in the holy Scriptures prouoked 1. By the commandements from God by his seruants the Prophets by his Sonne our Sauiour and by his Apostles 2. By sweete promises of ample blessings 3. By threatnings of punishments to the couetous and stonie hearted 4. By the examples of the best men viz. the apostles and primitiue Church So the Churches The adversaries vnto this truth Of strange mindes therefore and impious are First the Anabaptists which would haue no man either to giue or receiue For all things in their opinion should be common as afore also hath bin said and none among them be either poore to receiue or wealthie to minister any almes Secondly the hypocriticall Sectaries who are bountiful onely to those which side with them Such were first the publicans in our Sauiour his daies and after them the Manichies who would minister neither bread nor water vnto any hungry and pyning beggar vnlesse he were a Manichean And such are the Familie of Loue who say they are not bound to giue almes but to their owne sect and if they doe they giue the fame to the deuill 39. Article Of a Christian mans oath As wee confesse that 1 vaine and rash swearing is forbidden Christian men by our Lord Iesus Christ and Iames his Apostle So wee iudge that 2 Christian religion doth not prohibite but that a man may sweare when the magistrate requireth in a cause of faith and charitie so it be done according to the Prophets teaching iniustice iudgement and truth The Propositions 1. Wee may not sweare vainely and rashly 2. A lawfull oath may be giuen and taken according to the word of God in iustice iudgement and truth 1. Proposition We may not sweare vainely and rashly The proofe from Gods word THe better to auoid vaine and rash oathes and swearing it is good to haue in remembrance that which is said by our S. Christ and his Apostle Iames. Our Sauiour saith sweare not at all neither by heauen for it is the throne of God nor by the Earth for it is his footestoole nor by Ierusalem for it is the cittie of the great King nor by thine head because thou canst not make one haire white or black but let your communication be yea yea nay nay So the apostle S. Iames Before all things my brethren saith hee sweare not either by the heauen or by the earth or by any other oath but let your yea be yea and your Nay nay least yee fall into condemnation All Churches doe and some in their publike writings condemne vaine rash and idle othes The adversaries vnto this truth This declareth many sorts of men to be very impious as The Wantons which for pleasure and the couetous worldlings who for gaine and profit blush not to take the name of God in vaine by idle rash and vsuall oathes Next the Basilidians Helchisaites Priscillianites and Familie of Loue who for ease and to auoid troubles and persecution dread not to sweare and forsweare themselues Thirdly the papists whose common guise is to sweare either by Saints or Idols or by God and creatures together Fourthly the Puritanes who vse to sweare though not by God c. yet as wickedly vsing horrible imprecations as I renounce God God damne me or as Hackets manner was God confound mee Lastly the Banisterians who deeme it hypocrisie for one Christian to reprooue another for commō and rash swearing which are but Trifles in their opinions 2. Proposition A lawfull Oath may be giuen and taken according to the word of God in iustice iudgement and truth The proofe from Gods word The truth of this doctrine appeareth plentifully in the holy Scriptures For in the same there bee both commaundements that we must and may and formes prescribed howe we shall sweare For the first Thou shalt feare the L. thy God and serue him And shalt sweare by his Name saith Moses Againe thou shalt sweare the Lord liueth and thou shalt cleaue vnto him and shalt sweare by his Name
that the church of Rome neither hath nor can erre Erraverunt aliae ecclesiae saith Di. Stella other churches as of Antioch Alexandria Constantinople c. haue erred sed nunquam ecclesia Romana but the church of Rome neuer yet erred Id constanter negamus saith Costerus the Iesuit we constantly deny that christ his Vicars Peters successors the Bishops of Rome haue either taught heresies or can propound errors God preserueth the truth of christian religion in the Apostolike sea of Rome and It is not possible that the church meaning the church of Rome can erre or hath erred at any time in any point say the Rhemists 20. Article Of the authoritie of the Church 1 The Church hath power to decree rites or ceremonies 2 and authoritie in controuersies of faith And yet it is not lawfull for the Church 3 to ordaine any thing that is contrarie to Gods word 4 neither may it so expound one place of Scripture 5 that it be repugnant to another VVherefore although 6 the Church be a witnesse and a keeper of holy writ yet as it ought not to decree any thing against the same so 7 besides the same ought it not to enforce any thing to be beleeued for necessitie of saluation The propositions 1. The church hath power to decree rites or ceremonies 2. The church may not ordaine what rites or ceremonies shee will 3. The church hath authoritie to iudge and determine in controuersies of faith 4. The church hath power to interpret and expound the word of God 5. The Analogie of faith must be respected in the exposition of the Scripture 6. The church is the witnesse and keeper of Gods written word 7. The church may not enforce any thing to be beleeued as necessarie vnto saluation that is either contrarie or besides the word of God 1. Proposition The church hath power to decree rites or ceremonies The proofe from the word of God THe churches authoritie to decree rites or ceremonies is warranted in the word of God first by the example of the Apostles who did ordaine rites and ceremonies among other things that In the church men should not be couered Women should keepe silence and be couered A knowen tongue vnderstood of the common auditorie should be vsed with other things Next by the generall and binding commandement of God himselfe who at all times will haue euery thing in the church to be done vnto edifying honestie and by order as beeing not the author of confusion but of peace All churches protestant confesse the same Errors adversaries vnto this truth This power being giuen by the Supreame authoritie vnto the Church they doe greatly offend which doe condemne either generally all or particularly some rites and ceremonies orderly and lawfully established of the former sort are 1. The Familie of Loue who say of themselues how they are a free people in bondage vnto no creature nor to any created thing they haue no seuerall distenting or variable religions either ceremonies 2. The Brownists who teach that euery Christian is to ioyn himselfe vnto that people among whome the Lords worship is free and not bound or withholden with any iurisdiction of this world 3. The Puritanes whereof some would haue all matters of ceremonies to be left in christian libertie vnto euery man Others would haue both temples to be left without seruice Sermons and Sacraments and Princes to be scared with the feare of vproares and sedition and all because they would be freed from the obedience vnto ceremonies not impious of themseluees imposed by the Church the Father of these men was Illyricus of whome Melancton writeth Of the latter kinde be 1. The Familie of Loue againe who vtterly dislike our Churches or Temples also our Liturgies formes of seruing our God and finally our designed times of meeting together for the worshippe of God Our Churches there blasphemously tearme Common houses and so we tearme Brothell houses or the stewes Our Lyturgies and manner of seruing of God they call Foolishnes of taken on seruices false and seducing Gods seruices of no man to be ordained nor to be obeied or vsed when they are established with these ioyne the Barrowists who doe write that to haue Leiturgies and formes of common praier is to haue another Gospell and another Testament Our Sabboths they contemne yea they condemne for they say There ought to be no Sabboth day Our Sabbatarians goe not so farre yet come they neere unto these Familists when they divulge that The Church hath no authoritie ordinarily and perpetually to sanctifie any day but the seuenth day which the Lord himselfe had sanctified The church cannot take away this libertie of working sixe daies in the weeke These assertions are against all holy daies lawfully established Barrow yet goeth further then doe these men for he saith how the obseruing of times as it is in our church is an error fundamentall They also be alike culpable who approouing some rites and ceremonies do yet tie the church or people of God to the obseruation of the ceremonies either Mosaicall as many haue donne and doe or of the Romish Church as doe the Papists and the halfe papists the Familie of Loue Finally they are out of the way which thinke that either one man as the Pope or any certaine calling of men as the clergie hath power to decree and appoint rites or ceremonies though of themselues good vnto the whole church of God dipersed ouer the vniuersall world 2. Proposition The Church may not ordaine what rites and ceremonies shee will The proofe from Gods word As it is a cleere truth that the church may ordaine ceremonies so true is it also that the church hath no power to appoint what rites or ceremonies shee will For shee must decree none which be Either for their owe nature impious like the ordinances manners and Idols of our forefathers teachers of vanitie and of lies Or for vse superstitious like the brazen Serpent which king Ezekiah brake in peices Or for their weight ouer heauie and greiuous to be borne like the Iewish constitutions Or for their worthines in the eies of the ordainers either of equall price or of more account then the very ordinances of God so as for the performance of them the lawes of God must be left vndone such were many of the Pharisaicall tires and traditions Or against the libertie of christians and to the entangling of them againe with the yoake of seruile bondage Or last of all any way contrary to the commandements word and will of God But the rites ceremonies and constitutions of the church they must make altogether and tend both to the nourishing and encrease of loue friedship and quietnes among christians and also to the retaining of Gods people in the holy seruice worship