in general all Religious Adorations of the Virgin Mary Epiphan Haeref 72. in fine v. 79. Although saith he she is glorious holy and honourable yet she is not appointed to be Adored Again the Lord in the Gospel speaketh to the Virgin his Mother What have I to do with thee woman In which Speech to the end that none should think her over excellent he calleth her woman Prophesying as it were aforehand of the Heresies which should arise And premonishing that none in admiration of her Sanctity should fall into this Heresie of Adoration 5. Of which doting Heresie of Adoration of the Virgin the Papists are guilty in a high degree For in the Countries subject to the See of Rome all men and women wheresoever they are in the City or in the Field thrice a day when the Ave Mary Bell rings send up their united devotious to her and where one professeth himself a devote to our Saviour whole Towns devote themselves to her where one prayeth at a Crucifix ten pray at her Image where one fasteth on Friday which they account our Lords day Many fast on Saturday which they count our Ladaies day To conclude they conclude all their prayers with an Ave Maria As we do with our Lords Prayer and most of their Treatises with Laus Deiparae Virgini Praise be to the Virgin Mother of God And in the Psalter called Bonaventures they have Intituled all the 150. Psalms of David to her and where he saith Lord they put Lady Touching Adoration of Relicks It is Idolatry the Church of Rome is very much guilty thereof What office is to be rendred to the Bodies of those that are deceased by those that are alive It is not to worship them but to bury them 1. THis the Protestants reproves concerning Relicks of Saints 1. Such Adoration of Relicks as S. Hierome himself and S. Augustine condemned 2. The attributing of Supernatural Effects to Monuments and Relicks which they have not by any ordinance of God 3. To place confidence and merit in these things without any divine authority and to cause people to gad and wander to this or that place that they may receive benefit by them 4. We most of all condemn the Impostures and covetousnesse of the Romanists who in stead of true Reliks brought in counterfeits The Lance is found wherewith Christs side was pierced A Brazen Serpent made of the same Brass which Moses his Serpent was at Milan in S. Ambrose his Church Tunica Inconsutilis Domini nostri c. 5. And consequently for filthy lucre bartered and made Portsale of these Relicks abusing herein the Ignorance and Superstition of fond people 2. And on the side the said Protestants declare That the office which is to be rendred to the Bodies of Saints Deceased by those that are alive is not to Worship them but to bury them In that regard Eusebius writeth thus concerning Polycarp After we had gathered his Bones being more precious than Pearls and Gold we buried them where it was fit Of Miracles wrought by Dead Bones and Carcasses of Saints 1. WHen it pleaseth the Lord to shew his Power and to work Miracles in any place or by any means as seemeth Good unto himself we admire his power and praise his goodness 2. And we are not Ignorant how God hath used dead bones as an Instrument of Life 2 King 13. v. 21. 3. And concerning these things Bishop Jewel hath written in this manner Reply Art 1. p. 39. Almighty God for the Testimony of his Doctrine and Truth hath oftentimes wrought great Miracles even by the dead carkasses of his Saints In witness that they had been his Messengers and the Instruments of his Will But as they were godly Inducements at the first to lead people unto the Truth So afterwards they became snares to lead the same People into Errors We Protestants must not frequent Exercises of Popish Worship nor assist to the Mass 1. WE cannot be present there but either we must give great offence or commit a Greater 2. Give great offence if we do not as the Papists do and joyn not with them in Censing Images bowing before them offering unto them and kissing In calling upon Saints and praying for the releasing of Souls out of Purgatory 3. Or commit a greater if we joyn with them in their superstitious Rites and Idolatries In so doing we give greater offence to the Church of God And not onely receive a mark from the Beast but a grievous Wound 4. Constantine the Emperour thought himself defiled if he had but seen an Heathenish Altar Ambros Epist. 31. David if he had but made mention of an Idol Psal 16. v. 4. Their Offerings of Blood I will not offer nor take their names into my mouth 5. The Corinthians might not be partakers of such meats as were offered to Idols May we be partakers of such Prayers as are offered unto them It was unlawful for them to sit at the same Table with Idolaters when they kept their Solemn Feasts Can it be lawful for us to stand at the same Altar with them 6. Let us think again and again upon those fearful menaces Apoc. 14. v. 9. If any man worship the Beast and his Image and receive the mark in his forehead or in his hand the same shall drink of the Wine of the Wrath of God and he shall be tormented in fire and brimstone before the holy Angels and before the Lamb And the smoake of their torments shall ascend for ever And they shall have no rest day nor night which worship the Beast and his Image and whosoever receiveth the Print of his Name 7. We have not received any print of the Beast we are free from the least suspition of Familiarity with the Whore of Babylon we have kept our selves unspotted of Popery Therefore as we tender not onely our Honour and Reputation but chiefly the salvation of our Bodies and Souls let us keep our selves still from Idols Let us be zealous for Gods honour and he will be zealous for our safety Let us abstain from all appearance of that evil which the Spirit of God ranketh with Sorcery and Witchcraft As the Church of Rome became corrupted by Degrees in Regard of the Doctrine of Faith since the Apostles Times So did she in regard of Manners 1. This is True in regard of the Pope her Head 1. THe Common Opinion which Men did conceive of the Time in which Gregory the Great lived was that Gregory the Great was the last good and the first ill Bishop of Rome 2. He was no better then should be 3. And all the other Bishops that succeeded him were stark nought Every one striving to goe beyond his Predecessor in all leudnesse 4. So that now a Sink of all wickednesse hath hath violently burst into the Church 2. This is true in respect of the Popish Clergy and in respect of other Members of the said Roman Church 1. A Sink of all wickednesse doth now
when he goes on 4. Concerning the particular Faults of the said Cardinal they appear in every point of controversie which he handles against the Reformed Churches Which particular Faults are clearly discovered and solidly refuted by the Doctors of the said Churches who did undertake the Answer to the said Controversie §. An Observation very considerable concerning the Society of Jesus and the Name of Jesuite 1. THe Societie of the Jesuites have separated Christ Else why have they separated Jesus from Christ 2. And leaving the Ancient ordinary Name of Christians which they scorn as too common they desiring rather to be called Jesuites a new Name of their own framing then to be called Christians 3. As though there were some society of Jesus priated to one kind of men separated from other Christians 4. If there be then is Christ divided 5. If not then you Jesuites are too Impudent to devise a new Society §. Exception of the Jesuites YOu Reformed set upon our Society and say we have divided Christ because certain men have chosen unto them this Name above all others to be accounted of the Society of Jesus because they have consecrated themselves wholy to advance this Name Must they therefore of necessity divide Christ Have not the English Christ Colledge in Oxford Answer of the Reformed to this Exception 1. WE will not strive much with you Jesuites about your Society of which we reformed make very small account 2. If you have for some special consideration Dedicated your selves unto Christ What is that consideration Why do not you tell us what Jesus requireth of you which all other Christians are not bound to do 3. If the Order of your profession require that you propagate the honour and magnifie the Name Jesus If for this all Christians ought not to labour at least Bishops and specially the Pope of Rome And if they be Jesuites who do this Why are not your Divines Bishops Cardinals and Popes Jesuites 4. It may be this care is far from them 5. Whereas then Names are for distinguishing of things they be needlesse and vain when there is no difference of the thing 6. Either shew us what is the proper and peculiar duties of Jesuites Or confesse that without any cause you have appropriated such a Name unto them 7. In Cambridge as well as in Oxford there are both Christ and Jesus Colledges but they that live in those Colledges are called onely Christians 8. Think you That because there are many Colledges different in Names there are many different Orders and Professions of men 9. In places distinctions of Names are necessary and without danger unlesse some Schism may happen betwixt the wals 10. Have you Jesuites no other thing to say for your Sect and Society Concerning the Conversion of Countries made by Papists What judgment is to be made of such Conversions 1. IT may happen that a corrupt Church which holdeth not the faith intirely throughout but erreth in some parcels thereof may convert Heathens 2. Such a conversion shall be mixed In some things it shall be to the true Faith In others it shall be to erroneous beleeving 3. Like as diseased Parents when they procreate Children do together with their nature and kind propagate hereditarie sicknesse 4. And that the Ecclesiastical story reporteth That the Arrians converted the Goths to Christianity 5. And such is the conversion of Heathens made by Papists Again Of the Conversion of the Americans by the Jesuites 1. The Jesuites which have assayed to make new kingdoms among the Indians did not serve Christ but the Pope 2. Nor did they enlarge the Kingdome of Christ but they did prepare for the Pope a Kingdom far from the Reformed where he may reign after he shall be banished from these countries 3. Which newly could easily have been effected by Lewis the 14 King of France if he had been willing to chastise or rather so far to punish Alexander now Pope as to take from him the Temporal Dominions of which the Popes are become Princes by the liberalitie of the Kings of France his predecessors Of the different Sects that are in the Church of Rome namely Thomists Scotists Dominicans Franciscans Jesuites COncerning these different Sects the Jesuites for Defense of them produce this Reason That all these did ever consent in Faith and differed onely in such things which might be disputed without any hazard of Faith Answer to that by the Reformed 1. BE it granted they did agree in matters of Faith Why then do they not follow all one Rule 3. For S. Paul reproved the Corinthians agreeing in Faith because they attributed to their Ministers more then was meet whilest one had Devoted himself to S. Paul another to S. Peter and another to Apollo What then shall be done to the Scotists to the Thomists and to others Are the Names of Scotus of Thomas of Francis more holy and lawful Names in their Disciples then the names of S. Peter S. Paul and of Apollo 3. Besides the difference is very great not in the name onely but in things also 4. As thus Let the Question be whether the Crosse of Christ and the Image of Christ be to be worshipped with the same kind of worship that Christ is Adored withal Doth not this appertain to Faith But Error in this will be plain Idolatry And yet the Jesuites know some of the Schoolmen stand for it Some against it 5. What of that Question which hath exercised all Churches and all Schools so long Whether the Virgin Mary had Original sin Or was ever pure and without spot 6. And infinite such Differences the Reformed do omit being matter of Faith § From hence I infer That the Vnitie pretended by the Popish Doctors to be in the Church of Rome is not so Intire and General as they would have it thought 1. BUt although it be not so yet if it proceeded of knowledge of the Truth and of faithful submission with the heartie obedience to the same truth it should deserve great Commendation 2. But springing from this Fountain That all men must obey the Pope whatsoever he teach and command without Examination or Resistance upon pain of Eternal Damnation It is altogether unworthie of commendation and praise because it is an easie matter upon this Foundation to raise up and maintain any unitie whatsoever 3. In that regard such unity is Tyrannical and Devilish 4. And in other Regards it is Carnal For in the chiefest Members of the Church of Rome it doth proceed from vain Ambition from worldly Pleasures and from filthy Covetousnesse 5. In another regard besides It is Brutish and also carnal proceeding in the most Members of Brutish Ignorance and of Fear Of the Seduction of People by the Popes and the Roman Church by their False Doctrine in General 1. IT is one of the Sinnes of the Popes and of the Church of Rome to seduce People by their False and Corrupted Doctrine 2. Which is a crying and an abominable Sin
Nor Chrysostom Nor Ammianus Nor the Tripartite Historie Nor Dantasus Nor Bede Nor Orosius So Carerius The Charter or Edict of Constantines Donation is a base and improbable Fiction 1. ALL that which is proved by Reformed Writers of the supposed Leprosie Persecution and Baptism of Constantine by Pope Sylvester are undoubted Demonstrations of the Forgerie of this Edict of Donation 2. For in the Charter are all these Not onely related as certain truths but they are made the very ground and occasion why Constantine made this Charter 3. Seeing then there is neither truth nor reality in the foundation Certainly there is no truth at all in the Charter it self 4. But leaving these we will propose a few other Considerations in this Cause 1. In this Edict is mentioned the See of Constantinople as one of the Patriarchal Sees Whereas neither it had Patriarchal Dignitie before the Second General Council that is more then fiftie years after the Donation is supposed to be made Nor was there at that time so much as the name of Constantinople For this City was then called Byzantium And divers years after when Constantine had much enlarged it and made it as Socrates saith Parem aequalem Romae equal to Rome choosing it for the Imperial Seat It was then first called by his Name Constantinople And this was done as Baronius himself acknowledgeth a little after the Nicene Council was ended But as Sigonius more truely teacheth five years after that Nicene Council when Gallicanus and Symachus were Consuls So very stupid was the forgerer that to gain to the Pope to the See of Rome principality over Constantinople he makes Constantine write of that City which was not no nor the name of it so much as extant in the World at that time 2. Had Constantine given principality to the Roman See above all Churches in the World as the Charter saith he did What folly was it in John Bishop of Constantinople in Cyriacus and in others to strive for that Preheminence What meant Boniface the third that he would never shew this Charter and grant of principalitie made by Constantine Why did he use so much intreaty and means to Phocas a murtherer that the Church of Rome might be called the first of all Churches when the same was long almost 300. years before given by a fair Charter to the Roman See by Constantine so Worthy and Renowned an Emperour 3. In this Edict Constantine is made solemnly to give unto Pope Sylvester the Lateran Palace whereas not only Sigonius witnesseth that this was given long before to Pope Meltiades Augustale Palatium in Later ano impertiit Constantine gave to Meltiades the Lateran Palace but Baronius and Binnius avouch the same for a certainty and say that no wise body will doubt thereof Those Augustissimae Lateranenses Aedes say they That most princely Palace of the Lateran was given by the same Constantine to Pope Miltiades the Predecessor of Sylvester and to his Successors and that in the Seventh year of Constantine which was twelve years before he was either Baptized or made this Charter of Donation Is not this now a piece of great munificence in the Emperour to give that which it is not his own to give or to give that to Sylvester which many years before that gift was Sylvesters own and his Successours for ever 4. To the above said considerations let us add the Testimony of their great Cardinal Baronius to whom accords Gretser who hath written an Apologie for him in this very point He by many Reasons and at large proves the Edict to be Commentitium prorsusque falsum A meer Figment and Forgerie And as Gretser saith Commentis accensendum docuit He hath taught that it is a Counterfeit One Reason is That this Edict was not in the Ancient Acts of Sylvester but was by forgerie inserted into them The time when this was done he defines to have been after the 1000 year of Christ The Parties by whom this forged Edict was made and published he also declares It was fained by some Grecian under the name of Eusebius and set forth by Theodorus Balsamon whereas a nullo Graecorum hactenus in lucem editum until then no Grecian had published it And from the Grecians it came to the Latins and Western Church Leo the 9. being the first Pope who makes mention thereof Thus the Cardinal By whose acknowledgment it may be seen what truth there is in the Popes specially in Pope Leo who in his Decretal Epistle most solemnly commends this Edict for an Ancient and undoubted Evidence Such as he knew by sight and sense to be the true deed of Constantine Which yet their great Cardinal after long sifting of Monuments and Records testifieth to be a Forgerie and that of the Grecians First of all devised as he saith about 700. years and published 800. years after the Death of Constantine Fraud Of the Fraud and Imposture of the Popes and of the Church of Rome in regard of pretended Revelations both by Dreams and by Extraordinary Visions and Apparitions of the Dead 1. THe Pope and the Church of Rome make use of these pretended Revelations to lead the poor People by the Nose and to make him believe some Doctrines which the word of God doth condemn 2. So was it said that some were Appeared who had said That to come out of Purgatory such and such things were to be done so Sing Masses and by some certain kind of persons that by such forged Impostures the Fable of Purgatory should be established 3. Likewise was it said that some were Appeared who said That they had seen some Tormented in Hell Fire who told them That they were there for sundry Sinnes but particularly for having Stolne a Chalice from the Convent of the Benedictine Monks 4. Others who being Tormented did say That it was because they had Taken and Appropriated to themselves some Possessions belonging to the Church 5. Besides others said That some certain Priests godly persons singing Masse did see an Angel which did accompany them 6. In the Times of the deepest ignorance there was nothing more common then the speech of such Visions and Apparitions either Imaginaries and Phantastical or proceeding from the Devil to abuse the poor people and to establish his False Doctrine Fraud It is a Fraud and a meere Cavillation for the Refutation of the Falshood of a Religion and also for the Proofe of the Truth of a Religion to demand only Formal Places of Holy Scripture contained word by word in it Which Fraud and Cavillation is used by many Doctors of the Church of Rome disputing with the Reformed but wrongfully BEcause if all that which is not opposed by Formal Texts cannot be said to be grounded in the Word of God Then there are none so abominable Heresies nor any so monstrous opinion which may not boast although wrongfully to have the word of God for its Ground So for Example 1. The Heretick Arrians could say