may be compensed by that eminent Worth and Perfection is in You. I do confess I have so many ties by personal Favours received above my desert that I were the ingratest of Christians if I did not acknowledge it yet give me leave to speak truth notwithstanding all these Endowments if I had not seen and were not assured that in none in this Age there can be seen more true discreet Zeal to Christ's Church and Loyalty to Your Master our most gracious King I had never presumed to go this way I see it even there and then where and when Satan had erected his Throne and Antipas God and the King 's faithful Servant did fuffer My Lord God hath sent You to us for a comfort in these worst of Christian times who knoweth but at this time You are set at the Helm to help the Lord right his Anointed and to save a poor Church threatned with ruine Go on in Your Piety and Devotion with these Heroical Endowments God hath enabled You and be assured God will heap Honour on you and your Noble Family for ever and reward you with an uncorrupt undefiled and Eternal Crown of Glory Which shall be the fervent and constant Prayers of Your Lordships most humble and bounden Servant I. A. To the Christian Reader CHristian Reader this is an Extemporary Piece which was extorted by the importunity of Friends who prevailed so far with me that I chose rather to expose my Weakness and it to the Censure of the World than uncourteously refuse them To strengthen Truth I was able to bring more Zeal and good Affection than any other Abilities Believe I write nothing but that I am assured of in Conscience in certitudine mentis and which I believe to be really certain in certitudine entis God knows I am far from temporizing and he is of weak apprehension that in this Distemper can expect any great Reward by appearing in Publick to maintain this Sacred Truth Experience teacheth us that it is more advantageous to run the contrary course if a good Conscience could allow it If the method in handling and proposing these five ensuing Questions be not so orderly I beg pardon and that justly because I follow the Order proposed by the Observator If the Diction be not so terse and pregnant I am not able to help it for by nature I am not enabled to delicate and witty Expressions nor have I endeavoured by Industry to help those natural Defects My care was ever to study Truth and Reality more than flowers of Eloquence holding that for one as I am of small reach the better way is rather to be inter reales than inter nominales If there be any tart Expression construe it charitably as fallen by inadvertence from my Pen whereas there was no Gall in my Heart If any will be at pains to examine it critically and to answer it rationally and fully I humbly intreat him to do it in a Christian and Charitable way without Passion for which I shall heartily thank him And if I be not able with as much reason to answer him I shall not be ashamed to retract my Errours and joyn Heart Hand and Pen for him and all Christian Sacred Truth of which kind I hold those which I would maintain to be If any thing in it give thee content thank God for it and pray for Grace and Strength to the weak Author who hath resolved to be a Lover a Professor and a maintainer of Truth according to his Power at whatsoever peril to advance the true Reformed Catholick Religion and what may conduce to the Honour of our Church to the overthrow of that is truly Popery and to the regaining of all erring Sectaries to the Communion of this Church And let all of us put up our hearty and humble Prayers to Almighty God to touch our Hearts that we may endeavour to keep the Unity of the Spirit in the Bond of Peace to do good in his good pleasure unto Sion to build up the Walls of Ierusalem to re-establish his Anointed our Sovereign in His Throne and Right to set aright what is disjoynted in Church and State that all of us may be happy here and receive that Crown of Glory which the righteous Judge hath laid up for them that love him his Truth and Christian Peace Si quid novisti rectius istis Candidus imperti si non his utere mecunt Elenchus Questionum Quaestio Prima WHether or not the King be onely and immediately dependent from God and independent from the Body of the People diffusive collective representative or virtual Affirmatur Quaestio Secunda Whether or not God is no more Author of Regal than of Aristocratical and Democratical Power Of Supreme then of Subordinate Command and whether or not that Dominion which is usurped while it remains Dominion and till it be legally divested again refers to God as its Author and Donor as much as that which is hereditaryâ— Negatur Quaestio Tertia Whether or not the nature of conveyance of Sovereignty to the King is by Trust immediately from the People and mediately onely from God and as Fiduciary so Conditionate and proportioned to what measure or portion the People please or is it intirely and immediately by a Trust devolved upon him from the King of Kings Neg. prius Aff. posterius Quaestio Quarta Whether or not be there any Jura Majestatis some Divine Prerogatives intrinsecally inherent in the Kings Crown and Sovereignty which are incommunicable to the Subjects Aff. Where is explained what they be Quaestio Quinta Whether or not in any case upon any reason just or pretended it be lawful for the Subject or Subjects in what Notion soever imaginable singly or joyntly collectively or representatively to oppose the Sacred Authority of the King by Force or Arms or to resist him either in a Defensive or Offensive way Neg. Elenchus Capitum QUESTIONIS PRIMAE THE Preface Page 1. containing the Sum Method and Order of the ensuing Treatise Chap. I. Wherein is maintained that the King is onely and immediately dependent from God and independent from the Body of the People diffusive collective representative or virtual The contrary Opinion is explained the Authors and Asserters some of them with their differences are recited Pag. 9. Chap. II. How that God is the immediate Author of Sovereignty in the King and how he is no Creature of the Peoples making is explained and proved by Scriptures 30. Chap. III. The same Truth is proved by more Arguments from Holy Scripture 57. Chap. IV. That Kings are onely dependent from God and not from the Community is further proved by Scripture The poor shifts of Suarez and Bellarmine are removed who abusing the passage Deut. 17. would have the constitution of the Kings of Israel to relate to the People as its real and proper origine and Cause and the priviledged case onely this that God reserved to himself the designation of the Person of the King 62.
Hierarchy is Antichristian against Christ and his Scepter not being able because of their Ignorance to difference betwixt Christian Hierarchy and Romish Hieromonarchy Have not the Authors and Abettors of these Paradoxes in Divinity invented and vented as blasphemous Principles against the Lord 's Anointed in Policy Do they not magisterially determine that Kings are not of God's creation by authoritative commission but onely by permission extorted by importunity and way given that they may be a scourge to a sinful People Nor is this all these late distempers have produced Creatures not of Christ's making Ruling Elders who are adopted to be Ecclesiastical Persons with equal Power with men in holy Orders to decide and determine in matters of Faith Worship and in the exercise of the Power of the Keyes nothing kept from them but liberty to Preach publickly to baptize and to consecrate the blessed Eucharist Answerable to this find we not that they have erected a coordinate a coequal a corrival Power with Sovereignty and have made Regnum in regno two Sovereigns a thing incompatible with Supremacy and Monarchy the persecution of Episcopacy has been so hot and cruel that I dare say look upon all Persecutions recorded in Ecclesiastical Story none can parallel this if ye consider it as it is cloathed with all its circumstances and attended with its consequents Episcopacy after the most exact and sollicit Tryal is onely the Crime except you will add the Solemnity of the Publick Worship intended and attempted to vindicate God's Service from prophaneness and contempt and to restore it to its ancient true beauty to the shame of the Roman Church Men innocent men well deserving of the Church and Kingdom have been cast out their Estates seized their Houses rifled and plundered their Blood thirsted after their poor Wives forced to fly some into mountains and wilderness some by Sea some one way some another their poor Children forced to starve or beg at best O barbarous and inhumane Cruelty more beseeming Cannibals than Christians When the Lord's Prophets were hurt and wronged was the Lord's Anointed not touched Tell it not in Gath publish it not in the streets of Askalon lest the Daughters of the Philistims rejoyce lest the Daughters of the uncircumcised triumph The best of Kings in whom malice it self how quick-sighted soever cannot find any thing blame-worthy except it be a Crime to be too good and transcendently clement hath been forced to flie from his Palaces could not find Safety in that City enlightened and enriched by his royal Presence to the Admiration and Envy of the whole World His royal Consort necessitated for personal Security and in a prudential way to provide for strengthening her Lord the best of Husbands to flie beyond Seas That Royal Family those Olive-branches the Pledges and Hopes of our continuing Peace divided one from another and to this day remaining so His Revenues his Casualties seized by those have sent out Armies and Arms against him His Forts his strong Holds taken from him his Royal Navy employed to destroy him keep all Encouragement of Allies from him and to divorce personally if they could those royal Personages in whom we are most happy if we had Eyes to see it whom in Heart and Affection the Devil and his Malice cannot divide notwithstanding it hath been shrewdly endeavoured More of this kind might be added but of purpose I forbear it If we will consider what private men have gained since God and Religion have been wronged we will find we have made an unhappy Choice a miserable Change No man hath Protection or Direction by Law no known Law hath place we are all oppressed and tyrannically over-ruled by an arbitrary Power placed in a wrong hand all Religions if I may call Sects so are tolerated except the true Catholick Reformed Religion and all Heresies buried long ago in Hell are revived in number like to be more and in their nature more ugly than all recorded by Epiphanius and St. Austin our Sectaries agreeing only in the destructive part to make away Truth and the true Government to spoil Churches rob Christ of his Patrimony abrogate the Solemnity of the Worship destroy ancient Christian Monuments but in the positive not one agreeing with another Ephraim smiting Manasseh and Manasseh Ephraim and both of them against Judah Hath any now the Liberty of his Person are not the best of Subjects the best of God's Servants kept in Prisons like to Jeremie's Dungeon What Property is reserved Since Christ's Patrimony hath been despoiled who can say This I have They command what portion what quota they will and in the end he will be a Malignant at Pleasure that hath any thing to maintain this Rebellion If S. Austin were living now he might well say Quod non capit Christus hoc rapit fiscus What stately Houses have been spoiled What rich and princely Furniture hath been destroyed What Blood of Nobles and generous Gentry hath been shed More in this uncivil Rebellion in this short time than in many years in long continuing Wars in many Countries beyond Seas this Loss cannot be valued it infinitely surpasses all other Losses besides And yet give me leave to say it if we will look upon the Pressures and Sufferings of the Subject the only Effects we feel of this glorious so much talked of Reformation they will transcend highly all Grievances complained of in the successive Reigns of seven Sovereigns And the greatest of all Iudgments have fallen upon us that some sort with the Prophet Hosea We have no King because we feared not the Lord what then should a King do to us They have spoken words swearing falsely in making a Covenant thus Judgment springeth up as Hemlock in the Furrows of the Field Hos. 10. 3. 4. A Redress of these Disorders a Remedy of these Evils we need not to expect till we turn to God by Repentance and Moses and Aaron be again rightly seated in their Power their Place My Lord I have put Pen to Paper to right our gracious Sovereign to undeceive his Subjects making it appear that his Right is independent from man solely dependent from God that Monarchy is the most countenanced the most authorised Spece of Government by Almighty God that the conveyance of this Right is not by Trust from the People and have cleared what are Jura Majestatis the Prerogatives inherent in the Crown incommunicable to the Subject and how Sacred his Person and Charge is that they cannot be opposed are not to be resisted A task it is above my strength In the Imperial Law it is a crime mixt with Sacrilege to argue the Right and Power of the King nor was it allowed to every vulgar and ordinary Pencil to draw the Picture of Alexander the Great and we see what advantage the Seditious and Factious have made of the escapes of some Pens Notwithstanding I am necessitated to meddle with it with no less constraining and unavoidable necessity than that
Pearls and precious Stones you know to whom I have a better Opinion and Esteem of all the Kings Subjects It is a poor and ignorant shift that some Pettifoggers Smatterers in the Law use to wrong the sacred Prerogative of Kings acknowledging no more for the royal Prerogative nor what they say the Law municipal of the Kingdom hath determined I do not speak this to reproach intelligent Jurists and reverend Judges whose places and parts I reverence as much as any accounting the knowledge of that Science next to Divinity and far more excellent and useful than all others besides I acknowledge none have written more divinely almost nor rationally in maintenance of the sacred Right and Person of Kings than some excellent and eminent in the Knowledge of the Law as Bodin Barcklay Blackwood â—nd others to whose Travels in this Subject we owe much but for these other Sâ—ioli they cannot distinguish betwixt a Statute declarative and a Statute consâ—â—tutive What is found in the Statutes of the Kingdom concerning the Prerogative they only declare Prerogative to the Subject and add a Sanction penal in case of Violation they do not determine it God Almighty hath by himself declared it We would laugh at him in the School of Divinity who would but mutter that the Decalogue was not a Law till God wrote it with his own Finger in two Tables in mount Sinai gave it to Moses and Moses intimated it to the people What is morally natural in it is Lex naturae the Dictate of Nature by the finger of Nature written in the minds and Hearts of all and what is positivum morale positively moral was from the Beginning so known and practised by the Church from Adam to Moses when David commanded what share of the Spoil those should have who were the reserve to preserve the Stuff Scripture calleth this Ordinance a Law made by David to last for ever yet we know this was God's Ordinance before the Law The very like is in Statutes and Acts of Parliament declaring the royal Prerogative of a King that the Subject may the better know it be put in malâ fide if he violate it and know what Judgment he is to expect Lastly to shut up all this Discourse let us intreat the impartial Reader to cast his Eyes upon all Story domestick and Foreign and especially domestick and if they find not the worst Bargains ever Subjects made was at any Rate to purchase a possession of the sacred Rights of Kings sometimes it hath been no better than occidisti possedisti it hath been purchased with a great deal of Blood The Market hath been made by Sedition Rebellion Rapine Murder plundering God and man and sometimes regained again to its right Owner but at as dear a Rate and Price It is in Morals as in Naturals Omne corpus quiescit in suo loco an Element without its place hath never Rest nor the World good by it's Operation and Influence till it be replaced and seated in it's right Locality God hath commanded not a date but a reddite not a giving unto Caesar of his Right but a rendring not only as due but if it be with-holden or with-drawn to restore him it The Stories of these Kingdoms have too many real Proofs of this Truth I forbear to cite them or to refer you to them I wish of these days and others like them that they be never known nor read of hereafter Excidat illa dies c. But seeing I treat of this purpose divinely give me leave to speak Gods Truth to you as becometh Gods Servant and a good Subject Till those Kingdoms be purged of Sacriledge so highly committed against God by wronging his Anointed and his Church and both of them restored to their sacred Right we need not expect true and solid Peace nor the true and effectual Blessings of God Let us fancy to our selves this or that Accommodation for Peace if God be wronged in his Anointed and Church we add only Fewel or Oyl to the Fire Almighty and merciful God the God of all Spirits put it in the Hearts of all Christians and Subjects to honour him and in him and for him his Anointed and Church rendering to God what is God's and to the King what is the Kings that there may be a Blessing in these Kingdoms in our Ierusalem there may be Peace within her Walls and Prosperity within her Gates that the Crown which he hath put upon the head of his Anointed our Sovereign may flourish with him and his Seed for ever and we and our Posterity may live in Godliness and Honesty under him and them till the coming of our Lord when he they and we shall receive that immortal Crown of eternal Glory which the King of Kings Lord of Lords and chief Bishops of our Souls hath laid up for all them that fear him Amen CHAP. XV. Wherein is examined the Iesuit's Maxim That every Society of Mankind is a perfect Republick and consequently the Community may supply and rectifie the defects and errours of Sovereignty And the Puritan's too That if there were not such a Power and Super-intendency in People to supply God had left man remediless THE Jesuit and Puritan although they differ in their Expressions agree well in the Sense and intend both of them one Conclusion How this Argument 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may be retorted upon the Jesuit against his Numen terrenum the Pope we told in the preceding Chapter only now let the Jesuit give me leave to ask him how a Republick is conceivable is imaginable without a Governour or Governours and People governed How can a Society be imagined without Order and how Order without Priority and Posteriority When the Jesuit then saith that every Society of men is a perfect Republick and every perfect Republick must have within it self as much Power as may preserve it self from Ruine and right what is amiss he must necessarily by this Society of men and Republick mentioned in the Premisses understand only the Community of the People and Subject in an abstracted Notion from the Sovereign Governour or Governours otherwise concludes nothing at all to purpose And here let me intreat the Jesuit or Puritan to tell me where ever he read the word Civitas or Republick ascribed to a multitude a disorderly rout where there is no Governour It is alike to conceive a politick Body without a Governour as to conceive the natural Body without a Head We pardon the Jesuit and Puritan to give us new Tenets in Policy seeing they are so bold with God and his Church to give us new Tenets in Divinity Again it is worth our observing that when our Adversaries come to shew where this Republick is where this Superintendent Power is seated they differ and vary infinitely It is no wonder to hear the Builders of Babel speak with different Tongues we are hopeful God in his mercy will scatter them upon the Earth and cast down this Babel The
to refute the Errour of the Canonists and others who hold that Directum Dominium the direct and primarie power supream whether Civil or Ecclesiastical is in the Pope as Christs Vicar upon earth immediately from Christ derived unto him and from Him to all Kings whatsoever mediately by Dependence and Subordination The Jesuits are ashamed of this and therefore will have the Pope only to have Indirectum Imporium an Indirect Directive and Coercive power over all Kings and States in ordine ad Spiritualia as civil Power and Businesses are related to Religion and Salvation It is a curious subtle quirk and nicity of Scholastick Invention and a jugling Trick to bring all Kings Christian at Least Kingdoms and States into Subordination and Subjection to the transcendent and extravagant power of the Pope nor doth this Expression differ from the other in re in the matter or extent of the Power but in modo rei in the manner of the thing as they claim it And cometh fully home that the Pope by this indirect Right of his related to Religion by which any civil Act or Business whatsoever with his School Formalities he may qualifie with such an Ordination and Relation to Spirituals that directly by this indirect power he may King and Unking at his Pleasure Our Presbyterians if they run not fully in this way they are very near to it I wish we were so happy this time as that we had not to do with other Impugners of Sacred and Royal Authority but Jesuits and Canonists That which we have proposed to our selves in this short ensuing Treatise is to consider the main grounds by which the Jesuit and Puritan endeavour by no less spurious than specious Pretexts of Liberty of the People and Subject of the reforming of Religion purging it from Error preserving it in Purity to rob Kings of their Sacred and divine Right Prerogative making them Derivatives from the People in whom they will have all Supream Power originally and radically primarily seated So that if Kings fail in Performance of their Duty the People may supply it at least in some cases may do it of themselves Nay that Kings are accountable to them as to their Superiours censurable punishable and dethronable too By which the Copy-hold of a Crown is no better than Durante beneplacito plebis or communitatis during the good Will of the Community for by these mens Principles the People are made Judges and may find exigents which will warrant them to resume and to exercise this power Puritan and Jesuit in this not only consent and concur but like Herod and Pilate are reconciled to crucifie the Lords anointed A thousand pities it is that our Sectaries pretending such a Zeal against Popery and who no less maliciously than confidently rub upon sound Protestants the Aspersions of Popery and Malignancy do joyn with the worst of Papists in the worst at least most pernicious Doctrines of Papists But ten thousand times more pity it is that the true reformed and sound Protestant Religion should suffer by such miscreants that sound Protestants should be charged with these Heresies in after Ages We will be forced to disclaim them and say with St. Iohn They were amongst us but were not of us and they have gone out from us It is not warrantable to be so large in our charitable Defence of any as to prejudice the inviolable and sacred Truth of Almighty God Our work is to examine and discuss some new devised State-principles set on foot in this distempered Age which have robbed Church and State of Peace and Happiness which these Kingdoms of late and long Continuance have plentifully enjoyed under the Government of our blessed King and his Predecessors to the Envy of other neighbour Kingdoms and States These may all of them be reduced to five great ones 1. First that Royal Authority is originally and radically in the People from them by Consent derived to Kings immediately mediately only from God That the Collation or Donation of the Power is from the Community The Approbation only from God 2. The second that God is no more Author of Regal than of Aristocratical and Democratical Power of Supreme than of Subordinate and that Dominion which is usurped and not just while it remains Dominion and till it be legally again divested refers to God as to its Author and Donor as much as that which is hereditary 3. The third that Sovereignty and Power in a King is by Conveyance from the People by a Trust devolved upon him and that it is conditionate fiduciary and proportioned according as it pleaseth the Community to entrust more or less 4. The fourth that Royal Power in a King is not simply supreme but in some cases there is a co-ordinate Power or collateral nay that in some cases the King is subordinate to the Community 5. The fifth and last is that the King in some cases may be resisted and opposed by Violence Force and Arms at least in a defensive way These are the main Foundations upon which all those impious Courses are built and which have had such Influence upon disaffected and less knowing Subjects to raise and cherish these Distempers and Rebellions for which all sound-hearted and good Subjects mourn Yet to add the more Lustre to them there be couched under them or added to them a number of specious general Maxims apt to ensnare the popular Faction which we shall by Gods help clear and demonstrate to be Untruths and popular Sophisms as they offer in their own proper place The contrary of what they aâ—firm we hold to be sound Divinity agreeable to the Truth revealed in Scripture consonant to the Tenets and Practice of the ancient Christian Church and grounded upon sound Reason deducted out of nature and the best Institutions of Policy and Government That we may the more orderly proceed we sum up all into five Questions whereof the first is this Whether or not Sovereignty or the Royal Power of a King be independent from all Creatures solely and only dependent from God immediately from him and neither from the Community the diffusive collective representative or vertual Bodie of the People In which by Gods grace we will make it appear that the King is the derivative of the primative King who is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords The second is Whether or not God is no more Author of Royal Power than of Aristocratical or Democratical Of supreme than subordinate Of usurped and not just than of just Government and Regal In which it will appear that by Gods Institution Regal is graced and authorised above others that Aristocracy Democracy and Monarchy are not Species univocae regiminis sed analogicae not univocal Kinds and Species of Government but equivocal at best analogical are howsoever tolerable and not so perfect some way defective and that they degenerate from the true and most perfect Species of Government Monarchy in which is formalis completa gubernandi
grounded upon a good cause for proof see Bellarmin de translat Imper. and Suarez in his Book which we have often cited in this little Treatise It is easie to bring a great many more Arguments to destroy this erroneous Tenet pernicious to mankind it self onely because we are weary of it give me leave in the Close to shew you that it is morbus complicatus a Disease a Distemper made up of the confluence of many together and that it hath involved within or adherent to and coherent with it a great many Absurdities contrary to Truth in Sacred Scripture revealed to sound Reason and Policy I shall onely point at them and leave the enlarging of them to the judicious Reader 1. First it is absurd to say and maintain in true Philosophy that the Community is primum subjectum the first Seat and Subject in which Sovereignty is immediately fixed How can it be said so seeing in them it was never found never actuated never exercised Vana est potentia quae nunquam reducitur in actum 2. Next this Principle presupposeth the most excellent of Creatures Men to be like Cadmus off-spring de terrâ nati sprung out of the Earth Iuvenes aquilone creati or which is worse in origine like to the most imperfect of living Creatures Animalia de putredine orta Creatures coming from Corruption it self which Paradoxes how well they sute with the Excellency of humane Condition and which is more with the Goodness and Wisdom of God in the Creation of all and lastly how consonant to sacred Truth in Scripture revealed if these be well considered then I am hopeful our new Statists will forsake their Errour 3. Thirdly this Tenet of our Sectaries presupposeth that all men coming into the World are Iure or privilegio naturae by the Right and Priviledge of Nature originally born equal independent one from another without desparity or Difference one from another This is contradictory to the word of God that teacheth God did fix Government in Adam before the Woman was made or Children begotten by him Is not every one that cometh into the World begotten of a Father Is he not thus by the Law of God and Nature to submit and subject himself in Reverence and Obedience to his Father Is he not then so far from having original Power inherent in himself that he hath not his own Original being in the Capacity of Nature but from his Father How then can he be freed from Subjection to his Father And if his Father be subject to another is he not by the same Law subject to his Father's Superiour Who can make this Subordination void except he will ranverse the Ordinance of God and Nature Where then is the Truth of this deceiving Maxim which worketh so much mischief Quisque nascitur liber every man is born a free-man in the Forrest Are they not subordinate subject to their pre-existent Father and to his Superiour too if he have any Is not the Female Sex by the Ordinance of God and Nature inferiour and subordinate to the male Doth not Nature teach that the Wife by the Law of Nature is subject to the Husband If you will believe Aristotle in his Politicks he telleth you that a man of weak Understanding is subject to him who is more intelligent and prudent and if I forget not that he is naturâ servus 4. Fourthly this ground presupposeth Anarchy to be de facto pre-existent really and actually before Order and Government Christians must believe that as God created all things in numero pondere mensurâ in a compleat Perfection of all things every Creature having its own intrinsecal Weight and Worth not only in it's own due Proportion and measure but in a measure orderly disposed for it's Accord and Being with the Universe and must believe accordingly that he hath disposed of all things in that Order which establisheth an unrepealable Government by which 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the whole Universe and every spece and individual in the Universe is preserved and continued in it's happy natural Being Who then can be so stupid to think that God Almighty sends man in the World destitute of this Order and Government which is necessary for the happy Being of the Abridgment of the World for whom it was made in a secondary respect If the whole world without this Order could not but return to a confused Chaos and Mass and from thence to an Annihilation what other can be the Condition of Mankind without order established to preserve it See Chrysostom's Testimony upon Rom. 13. cited above If they will speak philosophically they must confess Habitus est naturâ prior privatione the Habit in nature is presupposed to be existent before the Privation How come we then from our new-state-Philosophers to hear that Anarchy was in Nature was in the world before Government 6. Fifthly by the same Ground by Consequence it will as necessarily follow that Ius paternum jus maritale the lawful Authority of a Father over his Children and a Husband over his Wife are derived from the Children and Wife and that Children and Wife in some cases may resume their Power derived from them and their native Liberty If any aver so he is Flagris dignus to be cudgelled not to be answered 6. Sixthly this Tenet if it be not blasphemous it is certainly sacrilegious for to say that Power is radically originally fundamentally inherent in the Community or as the observator saith that in the people is an underived Majesty robbeth God and Christ of his Glory Scripture declareth them to be the immediate Authors of all Sovereignty Glory and Majesty as we proved above Doth not Scripture express the immense Sovereignty of God and Christ over the World and Church by the Compellation of King If you will have Kings then to be the Derivatives of the People take heed you make not God and Christ the Derivatives of Derivatives which any pious mind will be loth to think 7. Seventhly when the King 's Right is made to be such that the same Sovereign Power is habitually retained in the People and the Power in some cases is resumable How can you make the King's Title complete Law is against it when the Donor is dans retinens as Jurists speak giving a right yet retaining it he maketh not over a full and entire Right nor can the Donee lay just claim to it It is a maxim without Exception among them Nulla obligatio consistere potest quae à voluntate promittentis statum accipit the Donor is not tyed to make his Bond and Gift good if at pleasure he may resume it as we spoke before 8. Lastly leaving many Absurdities more untouched in the last place we place it which in our Judgment moveth us most to abhor it that you which believe this Tenet must either give us new Bibles or find out new Commentaries to the Bible for what you say is right down opposite and contradictory to