Traditions whether by Word or Epistle delivered to us 2. Thes 2 15 Ans It is there shewed 1. That the Apostolick Authority whether in speaking or writing was the same and that to both the Church was to give the same credit 2. That what was taught from the Apostle by word was the very same delivered by Epistle but thence can be no ground for receiving of Traditions of the Church of Rome which are not only different from the Scripture but visibly conâ—rary thereto when neither Scripture Reason nor Antiquity discover their being delivered by the Apostles Qu. Is not Oral Tradition such as cannot possibly deceive whereby the Christian Faith and true sense of the Scripture hath been delivered down from hand to hand and from one age to another Ans To this of late doth a part of this of late doth a part of the Romish Church fly though nothing more visibly repugnant to Scripture and Reason if men but open their eyes to see 1. That no more sure and plain delivery of the Truth can be to us by speaking than by writing nor can it be possibly judged how a certainty of the sense of their traditional Doctrine should be more than that of the Scripture 2. This were to resolve our Faith not on the Testimony of God in his Word but on what the Father Forefathers have told to the Children and in effect to pass from all certainty of the Christian Faith and to deny that Doctrine of Christ and way of being eternally saved which with most convincing evidence is delivered to us in the Scripture 3. We see how far Tradition in a few Ages differeth from it self and hath been the rise of such fabulous Romances the World is full of about matters of fact from former times yea how oft the Church hath been almost swallowed up of ignorance and errour so that if one would trace back the Divinity of Christ by Tradition they should go near to lose the scent when it came to Athanasiâ—s's time whilst the whole Christian world seemed to be Arrian Qu. Is there no necessity of Tradition when the Scripture is not sufficient to refute all Heresies in the Church Ans Can it be possible to understand Heresies but as they are against the Scripture or how to have another conception thereof and yet that not sufficient for their refutation this is I confesse a Doctrine meet for such who can make contradictions meet and agree at their pleasure SECT VIII Qu. HAve we not safe and unanswerable ground from the Antiquity of the Romish Doctrine and its long continued succession to found an infallible assurance of its Truth Ans None can deny these 1. That the Scripture is the truest Antiquity and what is not according to this is a novelty brought in on the Church 2. That the rise and pedegree of the Man of Sin must be trac'd back to the very times of the Apostles in his beginning to work whose gradual breaking-up did then hasten to a more full appearance 3. But it is most clear also that the Primitive Church for some Ages knew no such thing as Popery in so horrid a corrupâ—ing of the Christian Doctrine that after followed nor what an Universal Bishop and his Infallibility meaned Qu. But can any evidence be found from these first times of the Christian Church that will import a contradicting of the Popish Doctrine as it is now professed Ans There are no accidents where the thing it self hath no being nor could these possibly write against Poperie in such heads as the Romish Infallibility the worship of Images and Saints c. before they were once brought to light but by undeniable consequence it is clear they held the Scripture to be the alone Rule and foundation of the Christian Faith therefore not the Romish Church and that the Counsel of God was clearly revealed in the same therefore not to be shut up as the fountain of errour Yea that there are but two places after death without the least touch or mentioning such a thing as Purgatory This also was the known Doctrine of the first times that Faith in Christ was the alone way of Salvation therefore not by oâ—r own merit SECT IX Qu. IS not the Doctrine of Merit for which the Romish Church so much contend agreeable to the Scripture and such as we may securely rest upon That men by their own Righteousness and the merit of works may be saved Ans It is clear we must go to Heaven by Merit though not our own yea upon the exactest terms of Justice it is due to him who hath paid the price to the utmost value that none of his purchase be lost but to us it is only of Grace Nor can such Works be meritorious where 1. We owe all and do nothing which is not a debt upon us being Not our own but bought with a price 1 Cor. 6 17. 2. Where no equality proportion or suitablenesse can be betwixt the Work and the Reward as is clear 2 Cor. 4 17. Rom. 3 28. 3. Which at the best have some spot and stain cleaving thereto and come so short to answer what the Law requires Isa 64 4. But we are all as an unclean thing and all our righteousness as filthy rags 4. It is most directly contrary to the Scripture Rom. 11 6. If by grace it is no more of works otherwise grace is no more grace Rom. 4 4. Nâ—w to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace but of debt but to him who worketh not but believeth in him who justifieth the ungodly his faith is counted for righteousness and chap. 3 28. Wherefore we conclude that we are justified by faith without the deeds of the Law Qu. Yet may not some in an unconverted state deserve a conferring of Grace upon them by putting themselves forth to the utmost for their own conversion which the Romish Church calleth the Merit of congruity Ans From the Scripture it is clear that before renewing Grace all are the Children of wrath who of themselves cannot frame their thoughts to that which is good nor have an active concurrence for such a change 2 Cor. 3 5. And that the alone cause which maketh one to differ from another is that Rom. 9 vers 15. I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy Therefore no plea for Merit by any improvement of mens natural abilities Qu. But do not the works of the Regenerate which follow Justification deserve eternal life not from the Imputation of Christ's righteousness but from their own intrinsick worth and proportionableness to the Reward which is called the Merit of condignity Ans This were to subvert the whole contrivance of the Gospel which is a judicial transferring our sin as a debt on Christ the Surety and of his Righteousnesse and Merit to be imputed to us for our Justification without any respect to works and layeth down the very same way of life which was in the Covenant of Works as
is clear 2 Cor. 5 21. Qu. Is not Heaven held forth is a Reward so as our works do merit by bargain and covenant Mat. 20 12. Ans No reward of debt can be found there as that which is in strick Justice due but to shew it is only of Grace and no proportion betwixt that which is given and their working We see these who came in at the last hour had the same measure with them who had wroâ—ght all the day Math. 20 9. Nor can any Merit be in that claim and reckoning the greatest labourer must still say when he hath done all that he can That he is but an unprofitable servant Luke 17 10. Qu. Is it not promised Rev. 3 4. That some shall walk with Chrest in white because they are worthy Ans There it is clear the Lord doth account them so whom he hath accepted in his Son and for whose sake alone it is 1 Cor. 4 7. For who makes thee to differ from another and what hast thou which thou hast not received then if thoâ— didest receive it why dost thou glory as if thou hadst not received Qu. Is there no necessity of works here even in order to salvation Ans We know 1. This is the way in which God hath commanded us to walk for our attaining Salvation 2. Though they be not causes of our Justification yet they are necessarily required in the subject and person justified as the inseparable fruits of justifying Faith by which it is made evident to others Jam. 2 16. 3. They are of singular use for a Christians comfort and assurance 4. They bring much honour to God Joh. 15 8. But it is sure nothing can be more clear than the Doctrine of the reformed Church is in asserting this SECT X. Qu. IF there be no humane Satisfaction and Merit what safe adventuring can be on the overmeriting of some for others and that Treasure in the Church of Romes hand from the works of Superrogation whereon their Absolutions and Indulgences depend Ans So horrid an Imposture may let us see what it is to be given up unto strong delusion When it is so clear 1. That the wise Virgins could spare no oyl out of their lamps to others Matt. 25 9. 2. That Every one must prove his own work and bear his own burthen Gal. 6 6. 3. If we credit the fulnesse of Christs Satisfaction and its Infinite value as the Scripture holds it forth Heb. 10 14. Who by one offering hath perfected for ever those who are sanctified and Heb. 7 25. That he is able to save to the utmost then no use can be alledged for this supply of humane Satisfaction 4. Let men but exercise Reason and consider how this possibly can be known that such an overplus of Merit is sure or more than they need themselves and where any Rule can be found which the Scripture never shewed how to apply the same or in whose hand this trust is to be put Qu. Is not the Satisfaction of Christ only for the guilt of mortal sins and to free us from eternal punishment but not of temporal therefore we see a filling up of what is behind of the Sufferings of Christ for his body which is the Church Col. 1 24. Ans 1. It is clear that Jesus Christ made a perfect reconciliation for sin Dan. 9 24. John 1 29. And no mite left for us to pay by him who answered the full price 2. What the Apostle there shews none can aver was of Christs expiatory sufferings but to shew that as his sufferings were the price of our Redemption so were they a seal and witness to the truth Joh. 18 37 In which respect the Saints also have their share in all following ages to fill up the sufferings of Christ in his body which is the Church as a testimony to the Truth which the great Witness himself did seal and confirm with his Blood who before Pontius Pilate gave a good Confession Qu. Yet may not this warrant such plenary Indulgences and Absolutions of the Romish Church and a power to apply the Merit of others which is so express Joh. 20 23. Whose soever sins ye remit shall be remitted Ans It is a sad commentary destroying the Text which here hath respect to Church-Censures and is to shew what Authority the Ministers of Christ are cloathed with and impowered by their Masters commission to declare sinners bound or loosed from their sins according to the validity of that declarative sentence thus ensured as they follow that rule for the same in the exercise of Church Discipline but not the least ground is here for such plenary Indulgences they pretend or to absolve and relieve Souls out of Purgatory SECT XI Qu. IS there not clear ground for the Doctrine of Purgatory whereon a great stress of many of the Romish principles visibly lyes that though there be an acquittance from eternal death for the truely penitent yet is there a place after this life where they must for a time be tormented and suffer these pains of Purgatory to expiate venial sins which their Prayers and Pennances here could not do Ans The Scripture hath revealed no such thing but thence it is clear 1. That sin by the Blood of Christ only can be expiated and is his alone work who hath purged our sin himself Heb. 1 3. 2. That forgiveness from the Lord to those who repent is with no reserve of venial sins or a temporal punishment for such to satisfie justice Ezeck 18 22. All his transgressions which hath committed shall not be mentioned Heb. 8 12. I will be merciful to their unrighteousnesse and their sins and iniquities I will remember no more 3. From the Scripture we can know only a two fold state of men after this life Joh. 3 36. And two wayes that accordingly lead thereto Matth. 7 14. Strait is the way that leadeth unto life and the way to destruction broad The Apostle sheweth that no middle place is betwixt the Saints being vncloathed and cloathed upon 2 Cor. 5 1 2. 5. The unconverted Theif found no Purgatory by the way who had no Pennances nor Church Indulgences to lead him by the same if the Infinite Merits of Christ were not sufficient for all In a word this doth manifestly charge God with Injustice as exacting double satisfaction for sin one from Christ the other from the sinner Qu. But doth not the Apostle shew there is a being saved yet so as by fire 1 Cor. 3 15. Ans Nothing can be more plain if any read that Scripture than that there is a figurative expression and the same with verse 13. The fire shall try every mans work Which none can expound to be Purgatory but that not without temporal loss so as to have their work burned these shall escape Qu. Are not some venial sins which a temporal punishment may be sufficient to expiat and therefore such paines do follow sin here as might evince a Purgatory after this
but see what Palpable ignorance in some and deceit and falshood is in others of those they thus implicitely credit and that the concernes of this earth and their private interest doth for the most of such more sway than any thing of Religion 3. It is by clearest consequence manifest that this is a visible betaking of themselves to a Covenant of Works and to stand thereby in the most express opposition to the great intent of the Gospel since according to their Principles it is merite yea their own Proper merite must be the way for their obtaining of heaven and all they ascribe to Jesus Christ herein is this only to give life and Salvation to their merites which yet are in themselves and from their own intrinsick worth without the imputation of Christs merite thereto thus meritorious as they terme it ex â—ondigno And thus only do they admit a restoring again by him of a Covenant of Works on the same termes with the first Do this and live 4. It must be at that rate one can be this day Popish of the grossest Idolatry and a turning the glory of the invisible God into the similitude of a corruptible man Rom. 1 vers 23. with a most express counteracting of that great precept of the Moral Law against bowing down and Worshipping of any graven Image they being no less thus guiltie of an Idolatrous Worship than either the Church of Israel of Old or the Pagan world could be charged with since both had a respect further than the Image it self the one to the true God and the other to their feigned Deity 5. What ever liberty this way gives to sin and to lay the stress of their inward peace on the Priests absolution yet it is clear that at that rate on these tearmes can one be Popish this day to subject themselves to a yoke and bondage from men that without a judicial stroke on their Conscience might seeme intolerable such as Auricular Confession to a Priest of their most secret sins and this under the pain of damnation their Pennanâ—es with that blind and unlimited obedience therein to their Church Guids without access to consult the Scripture as if this way of expiating sin could be a Satisfaction before the holy God such as their whipping of themselves and going in Pilgrimage to some Superstitious place yea thus meritorious because they be grievous to the flesh but why not rather an offering up of the fruit of their body for the sin of their soul as those of old unto Molech which might witness a further degree of doing violence to their own flesh If men might thus think by a sacrifice of their devising to appease the Justice of God 6. This necessarily also must follow an embracement of Popery and subjecting to that way to be put beyond a possibility of any inward peace here or quiet as to their future state in another world since it is undeniable 1. They must have some merite of their own and an humane Satisfaction to confide in and on that foundation of good works lay the weight of obtaining life whilst yeâ— according to their own Principles they see there is no possible being sure if these shall be found equivalent in value to answere this end 2. That no assurance of Salvation is so much as attaineable according to their Doctrine 3. How sad a cure as have no suteableness therewith to ease a disquiet and awakened Conscience does their Principles bring such as Pennances their own Satisfaction the Pop's Pardon or absolution of the Priest invocation of Saints and Images whence it was in the darkness of Popery most found themselves under that inforcement for so many dotations and to stretch their state to the furthest for soul-masses since they could find no ground for their souls quiet here 4. And does not this way and Doctrine most visibly pursue men not unto death only but beyond it through these tormenting thoughts and fear of a Purgatory to come and that uncertainty as to the time or terme of release so as at the best death must have a terrible and affrighting look 7. If men would bring this near their thoughts no less can serve to be a Popish proselyte than a manifest involvement in the blood of all the Saints which hath been shed and serving themselves Heir to both the guilt and judgment of such horrid and unexpressible cruelty exerced by the Romish Church on those for so many ages past who through grace did resist unto the death striving for the truth against Antichristianisme for it is clear how such comes on the same score by their virtual consent and justifying the same with as real accession before the Lord thereunto as though they had actually concurred Oh what a reckoning will this once be found to enter into eternity with before the judgment seat of Christ 8 And is it now possible for any to be Popish but at that rate of resisting the clearest discoveries of the truth and an express doing despite to the Spirit of Grace a refusing to be cured and to come to the light now when Antichristianisme is by such undeniable evidences revealed to the world as men cannot be in the dark who this great Adversary is that does not shut their own eyes from it Oh! what a revenge does hatred and malice at the truth cause that can turn men cruel against themselves nor is that stroke of judicial blindness more strange and amazeing this day on the Jewes when surrounded with so clear discoveries of the truth than this now may be which is upon the Romish Church thaâ— cannot see that desperat state they are in when such undeniable light is held out from the Scriptures there anent nay it must be said who will not see this 9. I must here further add how evident also this is to be Popish and enrolled with such a party that it is no less than to stand under that most dreadful peremptory threatning as is in the whole of the Bible denounced against such as iâ— these times of light shall engage with that way Rev. 14 9. If any man Worship the beast and his Image and receive his mark in his fore head or in his hand the same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God which is powred out without mixture into the cup of his indignation and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy Angels and in presence of the Lamb and the smoak of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever and they have no rest day nor night who worship the beast and his imagâ— and who so receiveth the mark of his name Oh! If men would be so far awakned with the dread of this threatning as once to come and see but with their own eyes to what party this is applicable and expresly pointed at by the Spirit of God there and it is sure they could not then be in the dark how deep it drawes under
THE Truth and Certainty of the PROTESTANT FAITH With a short and plain account of the Doctrine of the ROMISH CHURCH In its visible Opposition to Scripture and the very being of Christianity To which is adjoined some serious Considerations anent Popery the state of that Controversy I. PET. III Ver. 15. And be ready alwayes to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you REVEL XIV Ver. 9. If any man worship the Beast or his Image and reâ—eive his mark in his forehead or in his hand Ver. 10. The same shal drink of the wine of the wrath of God which is powred out without mixture into the cup of his indignation and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy Angels and in the presence of the Lamb. Ver. 11. And the smoak of their torment shall ascend up for ever and ever Printed in the Year 1678. EPISTLE To the CHRISTIAN READER READER THese few sheets adjoyned here against Popery was in part formerly published but being with some further enlargement now reprinted I hope it may not be found unsuteable to set them down here in the close when so convincing necessar a rise from the foregoing subject is clear though such as desire may have it by it self also without the preceeding treatise These grounds did in some measure presse me novv to the present publishing thereof 1. That the import of this controversy betwixt the Romish and Reformed Church concernes the meanest this day no less than the more knowing and learned and that to be a Protestant in earnest must necessarily require a seeing the truth with their ovvn eyes yea such a faith as is the result of a judgment upon diligent search convinced by the Scripture 2. That it is an hour of great trial and of the power of darkness when the Popish Adversary is visibly at work almost every where to sowe tares whilst so fevv even of those who seeme serious in professing the truth can give a clear account of the grosness of Popery and solide grounds of the Protestant Doctrine when thus assaulted but lyâ— naked thereto as without defence though abounding and clearest light hath been held forth for that end and at a sad disavantage to hold fast their Profession by suffering if they should be called thereto as in former times 3. The visible hazard of many young ones in this generation to be made a prey of and easily poisoned vvith Popery vvho but seldome vvork out in their age and riper years vvhat they thus drink in in their youth 4. That such an essay seemed convincingly needful for these whose age vvant of time indisposition to read or loathness too be at expence in buying books is too visible a lett for their improving what hath been more largely written by others 5. That as I hope it shall be found vvhat is of greatest vveight or necessary use to be knovvn in these Controversies is â—ere comprised though in small bounds yet vvith such plainless that the meanest Reader may understand and know the Doctrine and principles of Popery and what Arguments they pretend to be most strong held forth in the Questions here proposed with a clear view of their direct opposition to the Scripture by the Answers thereto so as in a very few houres these for whom this is most designed may by reading it but some times over have it so far impressed on them as to know how to answere and give a soâ—ide account of the Protestant Doctrine and grosness of Popery when assaulted by any Seducers If to any such this small essay might be of use I may then say the Author hath not lost his desire and aime what ever entertainment it should otherwise meet with The time hasteneth when that only vvhich tendeth to a solide peace with Jesus Christ vvill abide and â—y near to the soul vvhen the Testimony of men will be of small value I shall but add that nothing is here charged on the Romish Adversary as their principles Which their own greatest Writers of the Doctrine of the Councel of Trent do not clearly attest The Reader vvould consider that these Sections into vvhich this is divided is vvith respect to the particular Heads of the Romish Doctrine vvhich are there handled There are several Mistakes in words from the press which I hope the judicious Reader will discerne without having the sense darkned thereby and pardon with some visible Mistakes also in the pointing SECT 1. Qu. SEing our greatest interest is to know the truth and certainty of that Religion we profess What is to be understood by the Protestant Reformed Religion as under such a designation it is now held forth Ans The Scripture unto whose trial this offereth it self clearly sheweth that it is no new Doctrine brought in on the World but the truth of Christianity by the good hand of the Lord on the Reformed Church confessed asserted and purged from the corruptions of Popery and hath the very same grounds to prove it which the Christian Religion hath Qu. Is it not of late the Name of Protestant much less as a Church was known and from visible appearances but little to evidence its being and succession in the World when Popery for many Ages had a conspicuous and flourishing State Ans We deny not the Reformation to be late and that name of Protestant which hath its rise from a solemne Protestation of several Princes and Cities against Popery But these also are demonstrably clear 1. How it is the same truth and Religion of the Apostles and Primitive Church wherein they walked though in a great measure after darkned as Antichristianisme grew up which hath been unanswerably proved to the World 2. That in the Scripture no ground can be shewed for a continual visibility of the Church as an unite body and in a flourishing outward state but the contrary is foretold how obscure low her condition should be during Antichrist's reign So as a place of hiding was then prepared for her Rev. 12 6. 3. Yet even in the darkest times there did not want some visibility of the true Church by a continued succession of witnesses to appear for the Truth and against the Romish Apostacie which as a fresh River made its way through that horride Lake without mixing with it Qu. What peculiar grounds are to prove this or enforce a conviction on others That the Protestant Religion this day is the pure and ancient Christian Religion Ans If men shut not their eyes none can deny these grounds as a test of the certainty thereof 1. It s exact conformity to the Scripture and to the genuine and perspicuous sense thereof than which nothing is more clear if we will but compare these together 2. That the Protestant Religion in all the essentials thereof is the very same and exactly agrees with the Faith of the Christian Church in the first three centuries and for
terms that it stood in the Covenant of works certainly we must either quite the Scriptures or acknowledge that nothing can be more destructive to the Christian Faith revealed there than such Doctrine Qu. Is there no infallible Rule and Judge to determine herein on whose decisive sentence we may securely rest in the greatest controversies Ans If we own ourselves Christians this can be no debate that the Scriptures contained in the Old and New-testament are the supreme Judge The Oracles of God committed to the Church Rom. 3 2. to give Answers in every dark case The Type and forme of sound Doctrine Rom. 6 17. Unto whose sentence we are in all matters both of Faith and Practice expresly referred by the Lord Isaiah 8 20. To the Law and to the Testimony if they speak not according to this word it is because there is no light in them SECT II. Qu. SInce the Rule of Faith must be plain and intelligible can the Scripture be such which according to the Popish Doctrine is a Masse of dead and dark Characters untill their Church put a sense thereon Ans It s own witnesse is clear 1. That it Is such as maketh the simple wise Psal 19 7. And a Light shining in a dark place to which we are called to take heed 2 Pet 1 v. 19. A Lamp to our feet Psal 119 105. 2. We see what is written there was for our learning Rom. 15 4. and given us for that end that it might be understood 3. It is clear the promise of the Spirit to lead us into all Truth Joh. 16 13. doth belong to every Believer as well as to the greatest Doctors of the Church who can pretend no extraordinary Revelation for leading of them 4. We know the Fathers and Ancient Church did still prove their Doctrine from the Scripture as not only of more authority but more clear than their Comments 5. Though some Scriptures be not so plain as others and several Prophecies sealed up until their taking place in the event yet nothing can be more plain than the fundamentals of Christianity and those Scripture Truths necessary to Salvation But the World may see it is not obscurity against which their true quarrel is but a too clear evidence before which their interest cannot stand Qu. Yet is this a sufficient ground for the Scriptures being translated into our own Language so as every Man may read and have access thereto which the Romish Church so expresly forbids as the cause of Error and Heresie Ans We know 1. The command is express for all to read and teach their children Deut. 6 11. 2. That under the Law the Jewish Church had no restraint and should the Church now be in a worse case and live in more darknesse 3. Upon this account were the Bereans so highly commended for examining the Apostles Doctrine by the written Word which they could never have done if any such restraint to read the same had been upon them 4. It is a strange cure to keep from the Light for fear of going wrong and when Christ saith You erre not knowing the Scriptures Maâ—t 22 22. That ignorance thereof should be the way to keep us right Qu. Is it not evident 2 Pet. 3 v 16. How there are things hard to be understood in Paul's Epistles which the unlearned and unstable wrest to their own destruction Ans It is there shewed 1. Some things are more dark in the Scripture which none do deny 2. We see those who thus stumble are such as wrest the Word and not of a humble sober and serious Spirit by whom none will judge the Apostle here means the whole of Believers within the Church except the Doctors thereof Nor hath it more weight to forbid Christians use of the Scriptures and to read the same than the necessary use of meat because some unsober abuse the same to their hurt Qu. Whâ—t inducement should the Romish Church have to restrain Christians in this if it be so visibly cross to the Rule Ans They have I confess this plea for necessity since their case so stands they must either ruine their interest and be discovered in the greatest imposture that ever was known in the World or have the Bible shut up though to ruine the Souls of many Millions of the poor People nor is it strange such hate the light whose deeds are evil lest they be reproved SECT III. Qu. IS it not to the Church and to no private person That the supreme Authority and power of interpreting the Scripture and to be judge of the true sense thereof doth belong Ans The Scriptures is the alone infallible Rule for interpreting it self And to none but to the Holy Ghost speaking to us there can such Authority be ascribed 1. Because Scripture is the supreme standard by which we are called to prove all things 1 Thes 5 21. and to know the Spirits whether they be of God or not 1 Joh. 4 1. Yea thus must the Doctrine of the Church be known 2. The sense of the Scripture is the Scripture it self which thence only can be sought and understood by the same Spirit that indited it 3. We see by innumerable instances that where in one place it speaks more darkly it doth explain it self in another and thus refers us to its own interpretation yea how with a greater light and plainnesse Truths are opened up in the New Testament which more darkly and as under a Vail were held forth in the Old Qu. But the Scripture is of no private interpretation therefore to the Church only it must belong Ans This only shews the Scriptures Interpretation can be subjected to no humane Comments nor hath its Authority of men and from their private judgements whatever place they bear in the Church but must be sought from the Scripture it self and according to the Analogie of Faith but no ground in the least to deny accesse to private persons to know and seek after the true sense of the Scripture Qu. What assurance can any have that such is the true sense of the Scripture without some authoritative decision of the Church Ans We know 1. That the promise Joh. 7 17. stands good to every one of the Saints If any man do my will he shall know my Doctrine whether it be of God or not And such who object this dare not I am sure restrict the giving of the Spirit for that end to their Church-Doctors onlie 2. If the sense of any thing written can be understood then it is sure the most weighty and necessarie truths of the Scripture are so obviouslie plain as they can bear no other sense and meaning except men quit the very use of Reason and Judgement 3. Where the Scripturâ— is more dark there want not peculiar helps and means for a Christians attaining the true sense thereof such as serious prayer the knowledg of the original languages and repairing to these fountains themselves advertency to the scope and intent of
the Scripture yea a dexterous comparing of one place with another with a prudent use of the judgement and commentaries of such as have written thereon though not implicitely to rest upon them Qu. Buâ— hath not the Scripture so various senses as necessarily requires a living and visible Judge to decide when to take it in a literal or in a figurative sense Ans It concerns the Romish Church to impose divers senses on the Scripture that it may have none at all though we deny not some figurative expressions the true sense whereof must be understood from what is the obvious intent as the scope of such a Scripture not the very words themselves Such as Mat. 5 29. If thine eye offend thee pluck it out Psal 91 13. Thou shalâ— tread upon the lion and the dragon But it is most clear 1. That one true and genuine sense the Scripture only hath from the words rightly understood which is the literal sense and thence only Arguments can be taken to prove any truth 2. That in truths necessary to Salvation is no thing figuratively expressed but what is with greatest plainnesse to the discerning of all held forth 3. What the Romish Church pleads for of an Allegorick Moral and Typical sense they are no different senses of the Scripture but a different application and accommodation of one and the same Scripture divers ways in the use whereof much caution and sobriety is needful and though a necessarie respect is to be had always to the Type and the thing Typified yet even there is the sense still one and the same SECT IV. Qu. HOw know you the Scripture is of God or can be infallibly sure of its Divinity but by the Church and its Testimony Ans We deny not this to be a peculiar motive and inducement for a high and reverent esteem thereof and a ministerial help to our Faith though with no authoritative Dominion over the same But 1. The Scripture is known by its own light and these expresse Characters and marks of Divinity it bears which convincingly shew whose it is so as the meanest Christian may know this without any humane Testimony 2. There needs also the inward work of the Spirit to beget a firm and through perswasion thereof upon the Soul Qu. But how do you know you perceive such a light in the Scriptures as you speak of Or can make it appear to others that you are not deceived therein Ans None will distrust their own eves though by no Arguments they can perswade those who are blind that they really behold so excellent a light as the Sun But it is strange and absurd to demand a reason of Sense or for a blind man to require him who seeth to prove unto him by Argument that he certainly sees and beholds such things Qu. Is not this torun in a round and circle from the Scripture to the Spirit from the Spirit again to the Scripture when thâ—s you know by the Spirits revealing the Scripture to be the Word of GOD and that revelation to be true by the Scripture Ans No ground is here for any such challenge 1. Because we admit no private or particular Revelation of the Spirit to assure us of the Truth different from what is revealed in the Scripture it self 2. It can be no circle when it is so clear the Scripture and Spirit mutually prove one another by different wayes and not in the same manner for it is by way of Argument that the Scripture proves the certainty of the Spirit holding out such truths whence we know how to discern the Spirit but effectively and as an instrument doth the Spirit prove the Scripture by enabling us to see that marvelous light which is therin 3. As hath been already cleared there are Arguments of another nature and independent on the Testimony of the Spirit by which the Divinity of the Scripture can be solidly known and demonstrated Qu. Can you know the Scripture is Canonical or that these Apocrypha Books which Protestants reject are no part thereof without the Churches decision Ans We know 1. That these were never acknowledged in the Canon of the Scripture by the Jewish Church before Christ to which the Oracles of God were committed nor read and expounded in their Synagogues as their most Ancient Writers and of the greatest credit amongst them witnesse 2. They were not written in Hebrew the language of the Church before the coming of Christ in which all the Books of the Old Testament were generally written 3. Though with that severe caution was the Ancient Church careful to keep the Scripture so as the number of the verses letters thereof was most exactly reâ—koned and lookt to yet none of these Apocryphal Books was ever received or admitted by them 4. By the Primitive Church after the Apostles such were not owned in the Canon of the Scripture though by some allowed to be read for instruction of manners 5. They are convict of notorious falshood in many places both of Doctrine and History which all may see repugnant to Truth and the Analogy of Faith Qu. Bus what certainty can be on the credit of a Translation that all know to be fallible Ans Nothing can be more for moral assurance when it is so clear 1. That the truth of our translations though in divers times and different Languages yet all agree in the maine and substance 2. That solide relief is at hand to go unto the fountains themselves the original Languages and see with their own eyes if the Translations thereof be not faithful and true which by a little pains and diligent use of helps for such an end is in our power to attain 3. It is not on naked words but on the clear and genuine sense thereof in whatever Language held forth that we found our Faith nor can any deny the Scripture truely rendered in English to be the Word of God though not in the very same Characters in which the Prophets wrote the same 4. These evidences of the Scriptures Divinity that it enlighteneth the eyes and converts the Soul with its Authority over the Conscience we know to be no less discernably and convincingly witnessed in mens vulgar Language through all ages than in the Greek and Hebrew SECT V. Qu. IS the Scripture of a sufficient foundation of Faith for a private Christian which according to the Romish Doctrine must have its Aâ—thority from the Church without which it can be no Scripture nor Canonical Ans They are indeed concerned to put down all Divine Record that they may be alone Judges in their own cause But we know 1. That the Apostolick Church had no such claim 2 Cor. 1 24. Not that we have dominion over your Faith 2. That they did bound their Authority within the limits of the Scripture Gal. 1 8. Though we or an Angel from Heaven preach another Doctrine than that we have preached to you let him be accursed 3. Thus should the