making or ordaining Bishops c. ancient Authors that from the Apostles time there have been these Orders of Ministers in Christs Church Bishops Priests and Deacons And in that our Church mentioneth the reading of Holy Scripture it is clear that in her account she taketh in the very times of the Apostles and meaneth that from the Scripture it may be proved that Episcopacy was erected while the Apostles were living Which shall give me warrant to take one step more backward from the Age next to the Apostles to the Apostolical Age it self and to affirm that even then there was such a Sacred Order of men as we now call properly strictly and by way of eminence and distinction Bishops Now that we meet with the Name frequently in our Translation and oftner in the Original is altogether out of doubt The grand Question is about the thing whether in those days the Office Power and Order of a Bishop was distinct from and in any respect superiour unto the Office Power and Order of a Presbyter And though the Sence and Practice of the succeeding Age be enough to make us morally certain that it was so because it cannot be reasonably suppos'd that men so harassed by Persecution so zealous for Truth and Honesty and so careful to observe the Apostles orders even in the least things could or would conspire together to make an universal defection from so main a part of Christianity as the Government of the Church is yet setting aside that consideration to me it seemeth obvious and certain that Christ the great Bishop of our Souls erected an Episcopal Power and that the Apostles continued and propagated it I mean still a Power above that belonging to Presbyters This I shall endeavour briefly to shew 1. By making good the Affirmative and then Secondly By clearing up those difficulties which are usually brought from Scripture to prove the Negative 1. For probation of Episcopacy we begin with the Ordination of the Twelve Apostles which evidently differ'd from the Mission of the Seventy two Disciples in whom 't is conceived that the Office and Power of Presbyters was founded Now the Twelve Apostles were indeed Bishops though they were not clenched to any particular Sees and Chairs which the necessities of those times would not give way to For the clearing of this it is observable that the Mission of the Twelve Apostles as to their own Persons was extraordinary and that which none could pretend to in following Ages because they were sent immediately by Christ himself and had a common jurisdiction and care over all the Churches that should be and were endowed with a Power of working Miracles to confirm the Truth of their Doctrin But then their Authority and Charge as to their Function was an ordinary and standing Power that was not to dye with them nor to cease as Miracles did after a little interval but such as was to be transmitted to others from time to time and so to continue to the Worlds end Now if it doth appear First that the Twelve had a Superiour power over Presbyters Secondly that this Power was to be imparted and communicated to their Successors for ever Thirdly that this was no other than the Ordinary Episcopal Power Then this will suffice to shew that the Twelve Apostles were truly and indeed Bishops in their ordinary capacity and consequently that Episcopal Power was erected in their Time First then That the Twelve Apostles had a Superior power over Presbyters appeareth not only from the Extent of their Commission which compared with that given to the Seventy two Disciples was much larger for as the Father sent Joh. 20. 21. Christ so Christ sent them with full power to Teach and Govern the Church according to God's Will and to ordain Successors and in all respects to execute that power which he was invested with and had delegated unto them but moreover it is clear from the Exercise of this their Authority for they ordained Deacons Act. 6. They Ordained Matthias and took Act. 1. him into the number of Apostles who before was one of the Seventy two as Eusebius tells us twice they made Decrees Euseb lib. 2. c. 1. and sent them abroad to be observed in all Churches Act. 16. They had power of Censure and Jurisdiction every single Apostle had over inferiour Presbyters for St. John threatned ambitious Diotrephes that when he came he would remember his deeds meaning that he would correct him with the Rod of 3 Joh. his Apostolical Power And so were Hymenâ—us and Alexander delivered unto Satan by St. Paul after that he was ordained an Apostle This is enough to shew the Superiority of the Apostles 1 Tim. 1. 20. power 2. Again This power of theirs was no Temporary thing that was to vanish with their breath but that which was to be communicated to others to be transmitted unto Posterity and to hold as long as there should be need of it that is as long as the World should hold For so the promise of Christ runs Lo I am with you always even unto the end of Matt. 28. 20. the World Here our Lord did engage not to be with their Persons alone for they were to dye within a short time but to be with their Successors too that is to assist their Function for ever And truly had not Christ assisted it marvellously it would have fallen e're now since it hath been so lustily beav'd at especially in these last Ages 'T is plain that our Saviour intended that the Apostles power should continue to the Worlds end I mean their Ordinary power which was for the Regiment of the Church For their Extraordinary power of speaking all Languages and working Miracles which was for the Planting of the Church was not to last long but to cease after a while So that it was their ordinary and standing power to Administer Sacraments to Preach to Govern to Ordain and to exercise the power of the Keys this was that which was to hold to be delivered and banded down from Generation to Generation Now if there be any truth in that Promise of Christ this Apostolic Power and Office doth last and still continue and is even at this hour in the World 3. Thirdly then this Power we speak of is really that which we now call Episcopacy The Apostles Function is part of it in Deacons more of it in Presbyters and all of it in Bishops there the whole Ordinary power centers and is united The Twelve were called as their immediate Successors were many times also called Apostles in respect of their Mission and Authority from Christ but in respect of their Office and Inspection over Christ's Church they were indeed Bishops They were the first possessors of Episcopacy and the Bishops now are their Successors to the Apostolate 'T is plain that they themselves and the Church following them understood them to be no more than Bishops in their ordinary capacity For as on
made up of converted Gentiles Now over each of these Churches there did preside a Bishop with his Deacons so that frequently you shall find in Church-History two several Bishops in one City 2. Secondly that these and the Neighbouring Bishops were wont to convene and meet together to consult concerning the ordering and management of Ecclesiastical Matters 3. And thirdly that the necessities and condition of places were such in the beginning that all Churches were not so compleatly and perfectly modelled at the first as they were in process of time For as Churches were greater or less in proportion so were Church-Officers more or fewer in number Where the multitude of Christians was not great there a Bishop and his Deacon were enough to discharge the work of the Ministry where the numbers of Christians did increase there Presbyters were appointed to assist the Bishop and to act under him and where an Apostle thought good not to fix any Bishop but to hold the Government of a Church immediately in his own hands there he did commonly appoint a College or Bench of Presbyters to perform Ministerial Offices as his Proxies in his absence and by his Authority derived and delegated unto them For so did St. Paul keep the Superintendency over the Church of Corinth in his own hands as their immediate and sole Bishop because he had converted them to the Faith and what the Presbyters did in excommunicating that incestuous person they did it by St. Paul's Spirit that is by 1 Cor. 5. 4. his Episcopal Authority and Power committed unto him by Christ I verily as absent in Body but present in Spirit or by my Authority have judged already concerning him saith the Apostle This Observation will give us to understand the meaning Epiph. haeres 75. of that which we collect out of Epiphanius that in one Church there were Bishops and Deacons only where the numbers of Converts were small in another there were Presbyters without any Bishops besides an Apostle where there was need of many Ministers and yet one could not be found that was so fit for the Bishoprick in others agen there were Bishops Presbyters and Deacons too where the condition of the place did require it and the worth and abilities of the Men did admit of it Now then to come to the Objection St. Paul gives Timothy an 1 Tim. 3. account of the Qualifications necessary in Bishops and this questionless was in order to their Ordination But how doth it appear that Presbyters are meant by the word Bishops Were Presbyters now to be Ordained Did the word of God Act. 19. 20. grow and prevail so mightily in the Ephesian Churches and yet no Presbyters in them Was St. Paul among them for the space of three years preaching disputing and converting so many Act. 20. 31. Multitudes to the Faith and yet ordained no Presbyters to water what he had so prosperously planted And if Presbyters were ordained were setled in the Churches of Ephesus before the Apostles departure to Macedonia what necessity was there for him to send his Son Timothy Instructions concerning the Ordination of Presbyters especially when he hoped to return unto him shortly Divines conceive that this Epistle was sent by 1 Tim. 3. 14. him soon after he departed from Ephesus and were all the Presbyters dead in that little time 'T is hardly to be believed that Presbyters were wanting but Bishops were For hitherto St. Paul had been with the Ephesians for the most part in his own person he had governed them in his own person and had exercised his Episcopal Authority in his own person But now he was gone leaving Timothy in his room he was the first Bishop that was fixt at Ephesus and the only Bishop indeed now and yet but a young Man that had need of other Bishops to concur with him and help him in his Office and considering that St. Paul was uncertain when he should see him 1 Tim. 3. 15. again there was an urgent necessity for him to write speedily to his Son that other Bishops might be ordained that other Churches might be guarded from the Gnostic Seducers as well as Ephesus it self the great Metropolis There is no necessity then for us to conceive that St. Paul in his Epistle to Timothy did mean Presbyters when he spake of Bishops but rather that he gave directions for the Ordination of those who were to be Bishops indeed to be invested with Episcopal Power and to preside over other Cities as Timothy did over Ephesus in St. Paul's own Chair Again the Apostle saluteth the Saints at Philippi with the Bishops and Deacons Phil. 1. 1. But there is no Demonstrative Reason to constrain nor probable Argument to induce us to believe that he directed his salutation to Presbyters much less that he gave them the Title of Bishops For there are several fair accounts to be given of this matter either as some conceive that there were two Bishops over two Churches in Philippi Jewish and Gentile Christians as 't was usual in other places or as others are of Opinion that the Neighbouring Bishops were now assembled at Philippi as 't was usual at other times or as others are persuaded that the Salutation is sent not to but from the Bishops and Deacons and so the words are to be read thus with a Parenthesis Paul and Timotheus the Servants of Jesus Christ to all the Saints in Christ Jesus which are at Philippi with the Bishops and Deacons Grace be unto you c. But which way soever we interpret the Text we are so far from finding any Presbyters in the Salutation that there is no argument to prove that they were at all in the City whither the Salutation was sent For Epiphanius tells us that many Churches at the first were ordered by Bishops and Deacons only and then why not the Churches of Philippi also Thus their whole Argument fails them who would prove the Office and Order of Bishop and Presbyter to have been the same in the Apostles days because forsooth the Name is given to both in Scripture Though the Consequence would not be good should their grand Principle be granted yet there is no solid reason for us to grant the Principle it self And therefore I shall not stick to conclude peremptorily That the Order of Bishops both as to name and thing is so far from being either an Antichristian or an Ecclesiastical Ordinance that it was instituted by Christ himself and founded in the Apostles of Christ and by them so establish'd and continued in all the Churches of Christ that for 1500 years together no Church in the world being perfectly and rightly form'd was ever under any other sort of Government but that the Episcopal Office and Authority hath through a continual Succession of Ages been communicated transmitted and handed down to the whole Catholick Church even from the most primitive and infant times of Christianity and consequently that this way of Government
seemeth to be as groundless an Assertion as the former For the Devisor of that Custom was either an Heretic or a Catholic First then suppose he was a known deceiver suppose he had fair opportunities of going into all parts and great ability of speaking all Languages and a strong design of corrupting the Simplicity of Religion yet it is impossible that so many wise and watchful Fathers of the Church could sleep all that time and suffer every Province and Countrey to be overrun with Superstition and Innovation in a trice Consider seriously but this one following Instance Montanus was a very early Impostor for Tertullian at last became a Proselyte to his Party This man pretended to have been inspired and profess'd greater Sanctity of Life than other men insomuch that his Adherents called all sober and regular Christians by the name of Psychici that is Animal or Carnal Gospellers He condemned all second Marriages and would have a Euseb Eccles Hist lib. 3. enacted Laws of Fasting and endeavoured to introduce a Custom of observing more Lents than one b Hieron Epist ad Marcel in a year The Christians at that time were very severe in their times and manner of Abstinence and were ready enough to comply with any usual though never so austere kinds of Discipline But yet when Montanus went about to impose upon them his attempting an Innovation gave such an Alarm to the Bishops that the Church rose up against him as one man and condemn'd him for an Heretic though if Tertullian c Non quòd aliquam fidei aut spei regulam evertant scil Montanus Maximilla sed quòd planè doceant saepiùs jejunare quà m nubere Tert. adv Psychicos may be believed he did not Innovate in any matters pertaining unto the Faith Now when we consider this single Instance can we be so unreasonable as to imagin that a Government which was set up every where was a new-fangled device Or that a Discipline which was received every where was a private Invention and of a Seducer too Or that Forms and Rituals which were used every where were Brats begotten by some doating Head and superstitious Brain and then thrown into the Bosom and forc'd into the Embraces of every Church in the World 2. Well to mend the matter a little suppose this Author of these Customs to have been a Person of Note and Eminence in the Church yet we are much mistaken if we think that the Governours of the Church were such tame easie and flexible men as to receive and admit of new Customs upon the Recommendation of a single or private Person though of unquestionable Integrity for they refus'd Offers made them by whole Churches For instance The difference about the keeping of Easter is as famous as it was old The Churches of Asia observed it on the day of the Jews Passover on whatsoever day of the week that happened The Western Churches observed upon the day when our Lord rose from the dead This Variety of Observation was from the beginning if there be any truth in Ecclesiastical History and in a little time it begat a Controversie first between two Bishops Anicetus of Rome and Polycarpus of Smyrna S. John's Disciple The matter was debated between them but neither could Polycarpus persuade Anicetus to recede from his Custom nor could Anicetus persuade Polycarpus to recede from his So they parted good Friends Almost thirty years after this Controversie Euseb Eccles Hist l. 5. c. 23 24. was revived between whole Churches in the time of Polycrates Bishop of Ephesus and Victor of Rome Several Provincial Synods were summoned to consider of the matter and on each hand Tradition was urged The Western Churches insisted upon a Tradition which they had received from some of the Apostles the Churches of Asia pleaded a Tradition which they had received from S. John who 't is likely recommended that Custom to them to gratifie the Jews And perhaps the Plea on both sides was good But so stiff they were on each hand that no Arguments could prevail with either Party to relinquish their old Custom and to take up the other so that Victor in a great heat would have cut off tot tantas Ecclesias Dei so many and such eminent Churches of God from his Communion had not the great Prelate of Lyons Irenaeus stood in the gap and reprehended Victor for his rashness Now he that shall seriously consider this story with all its Circumstances cannot with reason believe that the Ancient Churches were easie to be impos'd upon or to be corrupted with Superstition when they stood out so resolutely against an innocent Tradition Much less is it credible that a few Persons though of Repute and Dignity could possibly leven all Churches in Christendom with their private Inventions And therefore when we consider how all Churches of old did conspire as in the same Faith so in the same Government in the same Ministrations and generally in the same Rites too and those now in use with us here we must needs be startled in our thoughts and be posed to conceive how these things could arise all at once of themselves without any hand like so many Mushromes that start out of the Earth in a Night or how they could be disseminated by any Private hand Rather it seemeth reasonable to impute them to the Special Providence of God and to the Institution of the first Ministers of Religion who probably did recommend these usages as things useful or convenient though they did not Ordain or Impose them as things simply and universally Necessary I do not pretend peremptorily to derive all our Customes from Apostolical Practice although there are such fair evidences of the Antiquity of many of them that we might strongly argue that point if the Ancient Christians may be allowed what is allowed Jews and Heathens to be good Witnesses of matters of Fact But my purpose is to prove that our present Establishments in the Church of England are of a very Venerable date and for that Reason to contend that they ought not to give place to Novelties as if they were of no moment or to be kick'd down as if they are Despicable So that if better Arguments may be setch'd from Antiquity on their behalf than can be brought against them I have obtained my Ends and in order to that I urge the General as well as Ancient usage of them For certainly one Church ought to have regard to the Constitutions of other and especially the Ancient Catholick Churches or else St. Paul's Argument is trifling in 1 Cor. 11. 16. where condemning the covering of Mens Heads and the uncovering of Womens in Religious Assemblies he confronts the Practice by urging the custom observed in all Places besides Corinth We have no such custom neither the Churches of God And in St. Paul's Judgment that was enough to determine the Controversie Two things may be objected against what hath been spoken First That
Age we find Pothinus to have been Bishop of Lyons and Clement of Rome and Denys the Areopagite of Athens and another Denys of Corinth who mentions Philippus Bishop of Gortina and Pinytus Bishop of Gnossus I say though the Names of these and other Primitive Bishops in the very next Century to the Apostles do still stand upon good Record yet 't is not modest ingenuous or reasonable for any Man to require us either to nominate every one of the Apostles Successors in all parts of the World or to lay down our pretensions of a setled Episcopacy in the Ages next to them especially since Ireneus hath told us that he was able though Iren. ubi suprà Idem affirmat Tertullianus de Praesc Adv. Her we are not to reckon up the Bishops who succeeded the Apostles in all the Churches Were there no exact List of the former Prelates of England yet I hope it would not follow that these Churches have not been all along under the Government of Episcopacy It will trouble the best Antiquary to tell us all the old Bishops among the ancient Britains and Scots and yet we know that they had Bishops before the Saxons came in hither which was about Anno 450 and many Ages before the Bishops of Rome claimed any Jurisdiction in this Island 3. But then supposing a Succession of Bishops in the Apostolical Churches nevertheless it is Objected Thirdly that Antiquity is no sufficient witness of a setled Episcopacy in the first Ages because the Ancients speak ambiguously and doubtfully of those Bishops calling them sometimes Presbyters so that we have no certain account whether those Men were superiour to Presbyters in Order Power and Authority or whether they were above them only in a Degree of Honour like the Chair-men in Assemblies or like the Archontes at Athens and the Ephori at Sparta who had an equal power but gave a deference of Honour and Dignity to one above the rest Now I cannot but wonder that Men should invent doubts where there are none for nothing is more clear then that the Bishops thus succeeding the Apostles had a Superiority of Power over the rest of the Clergy not only to ordain but also to judge and censure them without any Authority given them by a Bench of Presbyters though not always without their Aid and Advice For the removing of this third Scruple then these five things are to be noted 1. That in many of the writers of the first and second Age after Apostles we find a plain distinction between Bishops Presbyters and Deacons as three distinct Orders 2. That in not one of these writers can we find that this Superiority of Bishops over Presbyters was thought then what ever was imagined in after-times to be founded on any act vote or consent of the Church as bestowing this Power upon them 3. But on the contrary that the care of all Ecclesiastical Can. Ap. 39. matters was acknowledged then to belong to the Bishops that Presbyters were charged to obey the Bishops in all things and to do nothing without them or contrary to their Sentence is plain and evident out of Ignatius and other writers of that Age and all this was grounded upon the Sacredness and Superiority of their Power which they all owned to have been derived to them not from the Presbytery but from God and Christ by Divine appointment and institution and through the hands of the Apostles who left them for their Successors Suum ipsorum locum Magisterii tradentes as Ireneus said delivering to Iren. l. 3. c. 3. them their own Office Power and Authority 4. Therefore whereas it is alleaged that a Father or two of that Age do sometimes comprehend Bishops under the general Name of Presbyters it is granted that the Prelates were so humble and modest as upon occasion to stile themselves Presbyters thereby giving a deference of Honour to those as were such only But yet they looked upon the Offices to be distinct and saith St. Clemens Ep. ad Cor. pag 57. the Apostles fore-seeing that a contention would arise about the Name of Episcopacy for that reason they appointed the Orders aforesaid and divided their parts and Offices among them meaning to the Bishop his Office and to the Presbyter his that they being dead other fit Men might succeed them in their Ministry Office or Apostolic function Now how all this can consist with that novel pretence that Presbyters had an equall Power with Bishops and that Bishops had only an Honorary Dignity above Presbyters seemeth to me to be altogether unimaginable 5. But fifthly to put all out of doubt we are beholding to a very Learned Prelate of our Church for Two useful and choice Vindic. Epist Ignat. p. 2. c. 13. Observations which we may well take upon his Credit First that no writer of that Age next to the Apostles did so promiscuously use the Names of Bishop and Presbyter as to give the Name of Bishop to one who was only a Presbyter of the second Order Though Bishops were sometimes called Presbyters the greater Office including the less yet that a bare Presbyter was ever then called a Bishop is not to be proved by any one instance out of the Monuments of those times Secondly that no writer of that Age did ever give the Name of Presbyter to a Bishop when he reckoned up the Degrees and Orders of Church-men and where he spake of some single Minister then living So that as you shall never find a Presbyer called Bishop so you shall rarely find Bishops called Presbyters and where they are so the writer mentioneth things in a lump not counting up the Degrees orderly nor speaking of one single person of his time With these two positive Assertions I shall rest 'till I see some body to have either the confidence to contradict or the Learning to confute them By what has been briefly said it may appear to any unprejudiced person that in the earliest and first times when Christianity was but green in the World the Churches were under the Government of Bishops We find innumerable instances of it in those Churches planted by St. Paul St. Peter St. John and other Apostles We find in undoubted Monuments of the best Antiquity the very Names mentioned of several Primitive Bishops who presided over some Apostolical Churches and a certain Succession avowed of other Bishops in other Churches whose particular Names do not occur We find that these Bishops were then looked upon as a distinct Order from the rest of the Clergy sometimes called Bishops in contra-distinction to Presbyters and always own'd as Superiour unto them not by any Ecclesiastical consent or grant for the avoiding of confusion only but by an Antecedent Charter derived to them from the Apostles All which do abundantly satisfie me of the Truth of that declaration of the Church of England that it is evident to all Men diligently reading Holy Scripture and Pref. to the form of
still retained and defended in the Church of England is undoubtedly the old and the good way The truth is Aerius was the first man that ever durst affirm that a Bishop is not above a Presbyter in Power Order and Authority but he was counted a mad man for his pains and was ranked by the Church in the black Catalogue of Hereticks not onely for his Separation from the Catholick Bishops nor onely for his condemning of Catholick Customs nor onely for embracing the Heretical Sentiments of Arius but also for affirming that Presbyters were of equal power and authority with Bishops And yet I much question whether he spake his free opinion or onely said so out of envy and spight to Eustathius For Aerius would fain have been a Bishop himself but Eustathius stood in his way and for that reason he grew sullen dogged and envious and such men commonly vend some new opinion to be revenged for their disappointments and so did he this because he had not Merits enough to advance himself from a Presbyter to a Bishop he had it seems impudence enough to degrade a Bishop into a Presbyter I will not make any untoward Reflections upon those Disciples of Aerius who in these our days have greatly wounded Christianity by the same groundless and singular but confident Assertion Yet I think 't is no uncharitableness to wish for the Peace and Interest of Christendom that their tallons were well pared who are not content to scratch and deface the Walls of the Church unless they undermine the very pillars of it too those ancient and strong Pillars upon which the Church hath rested and by which Religion has been upheld even from the beginning 2. Having said thus much touching the Antiquity of our form of Government I proceed now to that which is another most material part of our Establishments that is the form of our Service-book or Liturgy Concerning which I will be bold to affirm and be bound to maintain against all parties whatsoever that whosoever doth either deprave or dis-esteem it must of necessity be either a very Ignorant or a very naughty person Very Ignorant if he doth not see that our Service is so correspondent to that of the Ancient Churches that no Church in Christendom this day can shew a more lively Monument of Antiquity than our Common-Prayer Book But a very naughty person if seeing and knowing this he doth presume yet to condemn it because he cannot in this respect condemn the Church of England but he must likewise condem all the Old Churches in the World which whether it be not an Argument of an Vnchristian and naughty Spirit I leave to all moderate men to Judge I am apt to hope that those calumnies and reproaches which our Liturgy hath been laden with have been occasioned by mens Ignorance of its excellencies And therefore to prevent those aspersions for the future if it be possible I shall endeavour to shew First the Antiquity of set forms of publick Prayer in general Secondly then the Antiquity of our English Liturgy in particular And when these two things be made to appear I hope the Church of England will be acquitted in this respect as following the Old way of serving God 1. Touching the Ancient use of set Forms of publick Prayer in general three things are proveable for the satisfaction of all Modest and Ingenuous People 1. That set Forms of Divine Service were used among the Ancient Jews 2. That set Forms of Divine Service were used also among the Primitive Christians 3. That after our blessed Lords Ascention in that interval between the Burial of the Synagogue and the setling of the Christian Church set Forms of Divine Service were allowed also even by the Holy Apostles These three Heads I shall insist on the more largely and particularly because they may serve to inform and satisfie many even prejudiced persons who have not searched into the bottom of things but have contented themselves with many superficial not to say groundless and impertinent Notions 1. First then it is manifest that the whole Body of Divine Service among the Jews did consist of several Prescript and set Forms At their Temple though a great part of their Service was Ceremonial and Typical consisting of divers kinds of Sacrifices and offerings which in the fulness of time were to be done away yet this was attended with Moral and Spiritual Services consisting of Praises and Prayers which were to continue for ever For the Levites whose office it was to stand every morning to thank and praise the Lord and likewise at the Evening were wont to perform their parts as with a world of 1 Chron. 23. 30. solemnity so also with Hymns and Songs that were composed and set to their hands Most of these were Psalms endicted by David some were framed by Asaph and other Prophets and all were put together into a Book out of which the Levites were appointed in the Name of the Congregation to worship and praise God in one of the outward Courts of the Temple while the Sacrifices were offering by the Priest within Hence it is that we find many Psalms directed to the chief Musitian for Tunes to be set unto them that the Sons of Jeduthun Korah and other Levites in their courses might sing them in Consort with wind Instruments and stringed Instruments of which there were divers kinds as Flutes Cornets Trumpets Cymbals Harps Psalteries c. according to the commandment of the Lord by his Prophets 2 Chron. 29. 25. And hence it is too that we find some Psalms framed on purpose to be used on some special occasion as particularly the 92 Psalm entituled a Song for the Sabbath day which was intended questionless to be sung solemnly on the Sabbath in memory of Gods rest upon that day and to give him thanks for his wonderful works of Creation and Providence And Lastly hence it is that the fifteen Psalms immediately following the Hundred and Ninetenth are called Psalms of Degrees or steps because the Levites were wont to sing them upon the fifteen Stairs upon each Stair one which were between the womens and the mens Court. Briefly we find it said expresly of King Hezikiah that he commanded the Levites to sing praises unto the Lord with the words of David and of Asaph the Seer 2 Chron. 29. 30. So that it seemeth to be without question that all Acts of Divine Worship done by the Levites were performed in Prescript and set forms And let me add touching the People of Israel that when they presented their first fruits at the Sanctuary the offerer was to make an humble acknowledgement of Gods mercy to him and to the whole Nation in a set Form of words Deut. 26. 5. Thou shalt speak and say these words a Syrian ready to perish was my Father and so on to the Tenth Verse inclusively And at the end of their Tithing every man of them was to say these words before the Lord I have
Sabaoth Heaven and Earth are full of thy glory Blessed be thou unto all Ages world without End Amen In like manner the Prayer of Consecration which comes next is very agreeablee to that Form which was of most ancient usage The Prayer of Consecration only it is shorter than that old affectionate and devout Prayer wherein they commemorated the wonderful love of God and Christ to an undone world and made mention of his Humility Incarnation Birth Life Miracles Passion Death and Burial then thanked God for the Redemption of the World by these methods of Love and Wisdome then proceeded to the History of this Sacraments Institution using the same words as we do who in the same night that he was betray'd took Bread c. and likewise the Cup saying c. and at last prayed unto the Father of Lights that he would look favourably upon the Elements and send his holy Spirit to Const lib. 8. sanctifie them so that whosoever did partake thereof might be confirmed in Religion and receive remission of sins and be filled with the holy Ghost These things done and all having received they proceeded Post Communion even as we do to a Prayer of Thanksgiving which as we find it in the Book of Constitutions did so resemble for the most part of it that second Prayer after the Communion prescribed in our Liturgy as if it were none other than a Copy and Translation of it After that they used that Angelical Hymn Glory to God on High c. concerning which I cannot but observe the Conjecture of the Learned Dr. Hammond that it is that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Hymn View of the Direct in Philopat which Lucian the Heathen Scoffer pointed to when speaking in the person of Triephon who represents the Christian he saith let those words alone beginning your prayer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the Father and adding in the end 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that famous Ode or Hymn full of Synonymous and repeated words The Doctor concieves that by the former is intended the Pater Noster with which both now and anciently the Communion-Service was begun and that by the latter is meant that Hymn of ours Glory be to God on high we praise thee we bless thee with which that Service ends having nothing but the Benediction after it which being so powerful and importunate repetition of O Lord God Heavenly King and O Lord God Lamb of God c. is most properly called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the notion that it was used in among the Heathen Writers Now if this opinion of Dr. Hammonds be right we have a most pregnant account of the Antiquity of this Hymn because Lucian lived about S. John the Evangelists time but however we find it in Clements Constitutions I have insisted the longer and the more particularly upon the Antiquity of our Service-book to satisfie the World that it was not taken out of the Roman mint neither is a late invention without good Authority and Precedent but that it hath the practice of the Old Apostolical Churches and times to warrant and patronize it however it is new slighted and hated by a sort of people among us who either cannot or will not distinguish between an invaluable Jewel and the dry harsh husk of a sorry Barley-corn I shall conclude this whole matter with that known story of Arch-Bishop Cranmer in the reign of Queen Mary how he offered the Queen if he might be permitted to take unto him Peter Martyr and four or five more to prove that the Communion-office set Foxes's Martyrol Anno 1554 in his purgation out by King Edward the sixth was conformable to that which Christ commanded and which the Apostles and Primitive Church used many years And that the whole Order of Divine Service then used by the Church of England was the same meaning in effect and substance that had been used in the Catholick Church for fifteen hundred years past By what has been said hitherto it doth appear that the Zealous Prelate spake not without good Reason But the Challenge would not be accepted because the Learned sorts of Papists knew that the thing could be made out And though some ignorant and some malicious men among our selves have been pleased to say that our Liturgy was taken out of the Mass-Book yet the most judicious and most unprejudiced Protestants have looked upon it to be as in Truth it is a most strong Bullwark and Fence against Popery And indeed the Papists themselves know it to be so and therefore upon the restoring of Popery in Queen Maries time they did with all haste and fury throw our Excellent Liturgy and the wise Compilers of it into the Fire and surely none but Mad men and Fools would have served their friends so The Antiquity of our Rites Customes and Vsages comes to be confidered in the next place And truely there are some Ecclesiastical Observations which we meet with in the most Ancient Writers of the Greek and Latine Churches of whose Birth and Original I believe the Learnedst men in Christendom cannot shew us the particular time by the help of their best readings nor can they who dislike them shew us when they came first into the Church 1. The first is the use of the Cross especially at the time of Baptism Of the Cross Mercerus Vticensis in his additions to the Hieroglyphicks of Orus Apollo tells us that the Cross among the old Aegyptians was an Emblem of the Life to come What their reason was I Eccl. Hist lib. 11. c. 29. am not to enquire But Ruffinus relates the same thing and moreover tells us that the Aegyptians and especially their Priests who understood their Mysteries best the more willingly embraced the Christian Religion for the Cross sake calling to mind its ancient signification The Ancient Christians though they Min. Fel. never worshipped the Cross yet they used the sign of it as an outward badge of their Profession and all that were received into the Church received this sign upon their foreheads in token that they were not ashamed of a Crucified Saviour 'T is recorded of the Gnosticks those first Hereticks who denied the reality of Christs Incarnation and Passion that they branded their Proselytes with an hot Iron in the upper part of their right ear Iren. lib. 1. and some conjecture that S. Paul restected upon that custome of theirs where he saith that they had Consciences seared with an hot Iron meaning as well as their ears But in all probability this custome was taken up in opposition to the true Christians 1 Tim. 4. 2. who were marked with the sign of the Cross upon their foreheads S. Basil I am sure reckons it in the first place among S. Basil de Spiritu Sanctu c. 27. the Ecclesiastical Constitutions which were derived by Tradition from the holy Apostles and indeed the use of the Cross was so ancient and so