the Fundamental Charter c. the far more considerale part yea the very substance of both which Books I examine and exartuat I discuss moreover the Plea they bring from Ignatius's Epistles as also detect most of the foremention'd Artifices together with many such ungenerous Methods not hitherto so fully discovered Hence I hope I cannot be justly accounted an Aggressor or Provocker nor yet my Papers superfluous I don't notwithstanding impeach as guilty of these Deallings all Episcopall men for of these there have been and doubtless now are both good men and stout Protestants and such I know will never be offended if I lay open open the Weakness and unworthy Deallings of such as anathematize whosoever preferr the Model of the prime ptimitive Church-Government the Apostolick Humility and Simplicity to their Diocesan Hierarchy the secular Grandeur of subsequent and more degenerat Times if I among many other Demonstrations hereof bring a Cloud of most competent and unsuspected Witnesses who depone that during the Apostolick Age and the prime Primitive Church there was a Bishop for each Congregation an Identity of Bishop and preaching Presbyter and finally a compleat Parity of ordinary Pastors if I make appear that the greatest Enemies to this Truth and Adorers of the Hierarchy are maugre all their Cunning compell'd to subscribe and seall it If yet some hesitat and admire how then so many of the Learn'd can give their Hierarchy a divine Sanction or set it so high as the times of the Apostles such wowld remember that to fewer at least and these of no less Learning no less confidently pretend a Divine Origen for many things the Foundation whereof notwithstanding is undenyably in the dust of humane Corruption How many Torrents of Wormwood hide their little heads in sources in that Christian 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the space of about an hundred years after the Canon of the Scriptures was sealled whereof so few genuine Monuments now remain and wherein Christians as they were also for a good many yeares after that time being astonish'd at these more prodigious Heresies and wholly imployed in quelling these Hydra's were kept from watching against more fly and subtile Assaults of the Enemy the Danger of whose Tares was scarce discernable till they were hardly to be eradicated Again 't is to be remembred that there are vast Ods between the Cases of the Contending Parties many things tempt and invite men to patronize the Hierarchy whereto the other side is not obnoxious for whosoever confides in his own Parts and Abilities may probably promise to himself a graduall Ascent even to the satiety of worldly Ease Riches and Honour Did not these and such Motives byass too many men together with the Liberty Prelacy gives to Heterodox Principles and to licentious Practices how few should there be found to agent its Cause On the other hand Preâ—hâ—â—â—erian Discipline they think too rigid against both these Enormites and as to worldly Encouragements there 's nothing in Presbytry but a mediocrity of Stipend with a hard and perpetuall Labour without any Hope of Ease Grandor or more opulent Fortune I should now have doon only I can not but express how desirable 't were that haying aside our own unscripturall Fancies the Grounds of these most lamentable Contentions all of us followed after the things which make for Peace aâ—d things wherewith one may edifie another Who would have thought not many years heâ—ce when all true Protestants were at the very briâ—k of Destruction but that the admirable Deliveraâ—ce God give us should have had this most desirable Consequent How amazing is it that a number call'd Protestants should vent their Spite Malice and Treason against the most happy Instrument of this our Delivery in Peace His Majesty King WILLIAM who is under God the main Stay of Protestants whom yet God protects and I pray may protect maugre all the malicious Machinations of wicked Men. God yet continues to call us to the same Duty of Christian Concord to name no others by terrible Monitors for at one Quarter we are besieg'd by nominal Theists but real Atheists who ridicule God's Sacred Word as the product of Rogues or Sots and explode the Doctrine of the Existence of Angels and Spirits and consequently of the Beeing of God the Father of Spirits as the Dream of some Brainsick Weaklings and below a man of sence and at another Quarter by a direfull Combination of Infernal Fiends and wretch'd Mortals It 's pleasant notwithstanding to observe how the latter of these Satanical Machines split and undoe the former for the well known and confess'd Compacts and Commerce between these wicked Spirits and Miscreants of human Race and Operations of Demons and such Effects undenyably proceeding from preternatural and incorporeal Causes are sure Proofs of such immaterial Beeings and so demonstrat the Falshood of what is broach'd by these abominable Saducees aliquisque malo fuit usus in illo O how clossly ought all of us to joyn in Weeping Sighing and Crying not only for our oun Guilt but also for these such horrible Abominations that be doon in the midst of the Land In the mean while these and a thousand such Mischiefs mostly owe themselves to this Controversy our Divisions Ignorance want of Church-Discipline and other such its odious Effects How many thro' God's Blessing should that Zeal Learning and Industry spent for the support of mens unscripturall Conceits have brought to the Obedience of Christ from both Romanists and open Infidels Heu quantum potuit Terrae pelagique parari Hoc quem Civiles hauserunt sanguine dextrae Bless'd then in this Case should be the Peace-Maker wherefore let all of us Pray for our Jerusalem that Peace may be within her Walls and Prosperity within her Palaces Let us also with Tertullian adore the fullness of the Scriptures which as Augustine teaches contain all things needfull either for Faith or Life The Books saith Constantine the Great of the Evangelists Apostles and ancient Prophets clearly teach us the Mind of God wherefore laying aside hostile Discords let us seek from these the Determination of our Controversies Surely this is a Catholick Principle Good had it been if the Fathers had as cloâ—ly stuck to 't in Practice as they firmly believ'd it You assert saith Optatus to the Donatists We deny between your Assertion and our Denyal the Peoples minds Waver let none believe either you or us we are all contentious Men Judges must be sought if these be sought for among Christians they can be found among neither of the Parties because the Truth is impeded thro' Partiality we must seek for Judges from without if the Judge be a Pagan he cannot know the Mysteries of Christians if a Jew he is an Enemy to Christian Baptism on Earth therefore there cann't be rouâ—d a Determination of this Controversie a Judge must be sought from Heaven but why should we knock at Heavens Gates when hearing the Gospel we
62 Knox alloweth no Prelacy to England 66 He exhorts the English to embrace a Church-government and Discipline altogether Antiprelatical 67 The Assemblies letter 1566. vindicated from this Author 's pretended allowance of Prelacy 69 Knox acknowledged by the fiercest Prelatists to be truly Presbyterian 70 Superintendents in Scotland a temporary expedient The nullity of this Author's reasons to the contrary detected 72 The falsness of his Gloss of our first Book of discipline largely demonstrated 76 Superintendency not really inconsistent with parity This Authors unchristian rallery his overthrowing of the great principle of Hierarchicks are discovered and his bottomless cavills enervated 77 The stock of Prerogatives he pretends to have belonged to Superintendents evinced to be unserviceable to his design of giving Superintendents a superiority over their Pastors 81 He at once yields the whole cause and clasheth with himself Our first Reformers their opposition to and hatred of Prelacy's being damnable demonstrated The Helvetian and other 〈◊〉 Churches opposite to Prelacy as beeing destitute of Scripture-foundation 86 SECT IX The forraign Reformed Churches truly Presbyterian The Judgement of Luther and Lutherans 89 The mind of Calvin and those called Calvinists both in their private capacities and confessions of the most famous Churches 90 Specimens of the chiefest objections adduced and removed where the uncandide dealing of our Adversaries is unfolded 91 Who yet are forced to acknowledge the truth of our assertion 95 The eminent Opposers of Popery before Luther truly Presbyterian 96 The first Reformers and body of the Church of England at that time for no divine right of Prelacy where some of Saravia's qualities are noted Ibid. SECT X. Some of the manifold Inconveniences attending Prelacy briefly mentioned A Spirit of Persecution still attended it 98 The Principles of Prelacy and practise of Prelatists most Schismatical Ibid. It 's native tendency to introduce Popery 99 And to a Papal Domination and enslaving of the Kingdom 100 The spite and hatred the Hierarchicks shew against our Reformation from Popery their impiety and affection to Popery Ibid. Dr. Burnets exceptions from the Regulars theâ—r trampling on the Bishops and the dealing of the Papalines at the Council of Trent enervated 102 Another exception or retortion of this Author cashier'd 105 Lousness and Prophanity the constant attendent of Prelacy 106 PART II. SECT I. Of Ignatius and his Epistles Papists and other Hierarchicks make a fairer appearance from humane than from Divine Writings 109 A short account of Ignatius and of the Epistles bearing his name 110 Various Editions thereof Ibid. Our Adversaries now acknowledge to be spurious that they once gave out for genuine where of the Florentine Copy 111 Debates among the Learned concerning it Ibid. The unhandsome arts of our Adversaries to free themselves of further dispute 112 The great Confidence they place in Ignatius 113 Three Hypothese laid down according to each whereof Ignatius becomes unserviceable to the Prelatists Ibid. SECT II. The first Hypothesis viz. that Ignatius is at best interpolated Writings pretending to greatest proximity to either Old or New Testament carry most manifest signs of spuriousness in which Divine Providence is observed 114 Their Epistolick Ignatius's want of Apostolick Gravity and Humility his enslaving of the People and flattering yea deifying of all Church-men 115 Dr. Pearsons Exceptions removed 119 Du Pin's self-repugnancy 121 Dr. Wake 's Error discovered 122 A brief sum of the Arguments evincing our assertion 124 Other things very early falsly father'd on Ignatius Ibid His Journey to Rome uncredible 125 SECT III The second Hypothesis viz. That the Antiquity of the true Ignatius could not secure him from all Lapses or Escapes nor serve to prove that there were no declension in his time Whole Churches suerving during the life of the Apostles themselves They grew worse after their death 126 Papias's mistakes and multitude of Followers 127 The failings of Justine Martyr and Irenaus Ibid. The influence they had on the Church The common mistakes of these times in Practicks no less than in Dogmaticks which is instanc'd in their debate about Easter 128 Both parties went contrare to the Apostolick practice which is proved by clear Testimonies of Iranus and Socrates 129 Their strange conduct in managing this debate who Metamorphosed some Apostles into Jewish High-Priests 130 The Credulity and Oseitancy of Hegesippus 131 We are to hearken to God before the chiefest of Men. Divine providence observable in the mistakes of the Ancients 132 SECT IV. The third Hypothesis that there is no real disagreement but a true concord betwixt the Doctrine of Ignatius and that of the present Presbyterians They are reconcil'd by sustaining the Hypothesis of ruling Elders which Office is vouched to be of greatest Antiquity and where Ambrose or Hilary is vindicated against Dr. Field 134 Ignatius most express for the reciprocation of a Bishop and a Pastor of one Congregation 136 Our Adversaries yield the whole Controversy where Dr. Maurice's Mist is dispelled 138 Vindiciae Ignatianae destroy their Authors ultimate design 140 SECT V. The Objections they pretend to bring from Scripture against the Doctrine now deduced from Ignatius removed D. M's reasonings for the Diocesan Episcopacy of Timothy and Titus annihilated 140 No power properly Apostolick ordinary and permanent in the Church 143 Willet's answer to the Iebusites vindicated against their Advocat D. M. 147 The Office and nature of an Evangelist declared out of the Ancients 148 D. Mâ—s mutilation and perversion of Eusebius 149 That Timothy Titus were Evangelists and not Diocesan Bishops made out from Scripture Ibid. Apostles and Evangelists degraded by the Hierarchicks 150 Their Arguments for Timothy and Titus their Diocesan-ship houghed by the very Authors in whom they most confide both ancient and modern Ibid. Their Argument from the Asian Angels several ways overthrown and D. M's shifts and perversions expunged 151 Malach. 2. 7. vindicated against Dr. Hammond 153 His Correction of the receiv'd Greek Coppy of Rev. 2. 24. corrected D. M's strange and wild Gloss. Ibid. Salmasius vindicated against him and the mind of Presbyterians concerning Apocalyptick Angels fully sustain'd by Scripture and Fathers 154 The best of our Adversaries really acknowledge Episcopacy destitute of Scripture warrant Dr. Hammond wholly destroys Episcopacy while he attempts to establish it 155 SECT VI. Our meaning of Ignatius confirmed from the writings of the Apostles his immediate Ancestors Acts 20. v. 17 28 vindicated against Dr. Maurice and others who are by the ears among themselves 157 Philippians 1. 1. vindicated where the Diocesanists their Digladiations are exposed 158 Philippi no Metropolis where Dr. Maurice his weakness is detected the fiction of the existence of Metropoles in the Apostolick age exploded by the Hierarchy's truest friends Dr. Maurice's slippery dealing 159 The first to Timothy 3. vindicated against Bellarmine and his Friend D. M. 162 As is also Titus 1. 164 SECT VII The grand objection taken from the Commentaries of the Ancients The primitive Doctors
Presbyters elected and ordain'd their Bishop There is nothing saith D. M. said by Boethius but that the Bishops were elected from among both the Priests and Monks And true it is there is no more said in the words D. M. cites but 't is as true that elsewhere Boethius expresly says that the Pastors Priests or Culdees themselves by common suffrage elected this Pontificem or Prefect Add hereto that if Boethius have said ought inadvertantly or obscurely he is to be correct'd or explain'd by the harmonious and most express Testimonies of Fordun Major Buchanan Craig and other such most learn'd of our Antiquaries all of whom are beyond scruple most positive for what we affirm § 11. Next he assaults Prosper's Testimony alledging that according to Baron Palladius was not sent to the Scots in Britain Baronius saith D. M. never thought that Palladius was sent by Pope Coelestine to the Scoto-Britanni but rather to the Irish. And whatever the Testimony of Prosper be Spondanus and Baronius leave the Vindicator for they understood Prosper ' s words of Palladius his mission to Ireland and not to that part of Britain which is now call'd Scotland To prove this his Assertion he adduces but which was his wisdom untranslated these words of Baron that he viz. Palladius was brought also into the Isle of Ireland but was soon taken away by Death is related by Probus who wrote the Deeds of St. Patrick Egregiously reason'd Probus saith that Palladius went once into Ireland therefore Baron thought the words of Prosper not at all to be understood of his coming into Scotland Surely this Author may be allow'd a chief place in their next Book of Sports for the Sabbath Yea these words that he was brought also c. seem clearly to hold forth that he was sent to another place beside out of which he came into Ireland and what place this was the immediatly preceeding words evince the same year and in the time of the same Consuls St. Prosper saith that Palladius was sent to the Scots being ordain'd the first Bishop That he continues Cardinal Baron was brought also into the Isle of Ireland c. Where 't is most evident that Baron distinguishes the Scots to whom Prosper saith Palladius was sent from the Inhabitants of Ireland But to cut off all further debate of this matter the Cardinal clearly demonstrats what we plead for while he expresly says that they highly honour Palladius his Relicts which are buri'd in the Mernes a Province of Scotland And the Cardinal continuing his Discourse of the same Scots whose first Bishop in his Judgement Prosper makes Palladius to have been saith that their late Queen viz. Mary was the Glory of the Catholick Faith and a Martyr but I insist not on a matter so evident the Advocat hath learn'dly made it out and prevented all such attempts of D. M. and the like Enemies of our Countrey § 12. He having thus abus'd Baron prepares next for the depravation of Prosper himself telling us that all that can be inferr'd is that Palladius was the first Bishop of the Roman mission But Prosper's words are clear and without any such limitation Palladius saith he is ordain'd by Pope Coelestine for the Scots that had already believed in Christ and is sent to them to be their first Bishop Behold our very Assertion and why we should yeeld it and in lieu thereof imbrace its contrary I am yet to learn He adds that as soon as the Pope aspired to his unlimited and universal Supremacy there were several Bishops sent to other Churches already constituted not to introduce Episcopacy which was the Government of the universal Church but rather a subjection to and uniformity with the Roman See But tho' all this were as true as some of it is false it 's nothing to the purpose except he find good Authors wherein a Bishop sent to a People who not only were Christians but also govern'd by Bishops before he came is called without restriction their first Bishop And Boethius continues D. M. understood the History of Palladius in this sense Which tho' 't were yeelded stands him in little stead seeing all the Historians Antiquaries of our Countrey and as we have heard from Card. Baron with whom joins our learn'd Advocat all men every-where else understand Prosper in the sense we plead for believing that there was no Bishop in Scotland before Palladius But 't will not satisfie D. M. to wrest Prosper's words except he also at once overthrow his whole Chronicle telling us that it is not thought by the learned to be the genuine Work of Prosper All he brings for this is a conjecture of Petrus Pithoeus fancying that the Chronicle ascrib'd to Prosper appended to that of Eusebius Hierome is of a different stile from that of a confus'd fragment which he took for a part of the true Prosper's Chronicle wherein there is nothing concerning Palladius But why the meer conjecture of one man should be enough to discredit that Chronicle so universally ascrib'd to Prosper I leave to the Judgment of the learned Vossius indeed mentions this fragment but if it be preferable to the vulgar Copy determines not neither for ought I know did ever any save D. M. embrace this faint Conjecture of Pithoeus and indeed there must be brought incomparably better Arguments before that confus'd fragment either be preferr'd to or vye with the universally receiv'd Copy immemorially under Prosper's name affixed to Hierome's Chronicle Moreover seeing this Schred is most disordered and the words now under debate most universally believ'd to have been written by Prosper 't is highly probable on supposition that this fragment is a part of the true consular Chronicle that it once contain'd that passage tho' throw mutilation and either negligent or malicious transcribing it hath now lost it however the matter be we are at no loss for never was there a sentence more unanimouâ—ly ascrib'd to any Author than this concerning Palladius is to Prosper and is by all both ancient and modern acknowledg'd so that all their endeavours to prove this passage supposititious and that it belongs not to Prosper or some else of equall Antiquity and Authority are the last efforts of meer desperation And indeed had they not in defiance of the whole Christian World and Truth it self resolv'd per fas aut nefas to maintain that there was never a Church without Diocesan Bishops before the time of Calvine and Beza they had never adventur'd their skulls on what is so hard firmly bottom'd and so universally believed Have we not already heard fully how the most knowing and zealous for Prelacy while they sustain'd the truth of our Countrey Histories and yet labour'd to disprove what we now plead for gave only in favours of their latter Assertion triffles so empty and prevarications so apparent that 't is most presumable they believ'd nothing of what they said how the
went thro' the World for the Commodity of that Church and was never absolutely ordain'd a Bishop by the Apostles for James himself was an Apostle Of the same Mind is Salmasius that James resided not at Jerusalem as one of their Hierarchick Bishops but as an Apostle And yet D. M. is not asham'd to tell his Reader as the Concession of Salmasius that we have a Diocesan Bishop establish'd in the person of St. James the Just in the City of Jerusalem Now that Hierome understood James's Episcopacy in the sense giv'n by Junius and Salmasius against the Jesuites is most apparent especially if we consider how the Ancients us'd to speak of the Apostles and Apostolick extraordinary Church-Officers in the Stile of their own times and how positive Hierome was for the Identity of Bishop and Presbyter during the Apostolick age and first primitive Church Add hereto that Hierome as he shews in his Preamble to Dexter was altogether uncertain of much of what he wrote in his Catalogue of Writers which is yet more clear from his account of Paul for the writes that he was a Native of Gischalis and during the Wars between the Jews and Romans sted with his Parents to Tarsus when Gischalis was taken Which I 'm sure Hierome a Man so well acquaint with the Affairs of the Jews who had no Wars with the Romans for many years after the time wherein the Fabler whom Hierome transcribes suppos'd these Wars to have been commens'd and Gischalis taken could never believe but only because he could light on no better transcrib'd things as he found ' em Which removes tho' no more could be said D. M's Objection from Hierome's mentioning of Ignatius his Epistles whereon D. M. with no small Ostentation insists He follows also Bellarmine objecting that Hierome makes Bishops the Apostles Successors But Junius Replies that Hierome denies not this to be also the priviledge of Presbyters It 's also objected by Dr. Pearson that Hierome in his Epistle to Heliodorus speaks of the Deacons as the third Order And seeing this of all the passages of Hierome produc'd by the Papists to involve him in self-repugnancy is most plausible take it at full length If a Man saith Hierome desires the Office of a Bishop he desires a good Work These things we know but add what follows A Bishop then must be blameless c. and having express'd the rest of the things which there follow concerning a Bishop the Apostle uses no less diligence in setting forth the Duties of the third Degree saying Likewise let the Deacons be grave c. But passing that he was scarce more than a Child when he wrote that Epistle and wrote clearly for the Identity of Bishop and Presbyter in his riper years it 's certain he pretends no Divine Warrant for this Tripartition Yea from the very words they would now detort it 's most evident that tho' Hierome following the Custome of his Age mentions a third Degree he notwithstanding takes both Paul's Bishop and Presbyter for one and the same thing Moreover in this same Epistle Hierome makes all who had the Power of Dispensing the Sacraments Successor to the Apostles which the Jesuites and their Supporters appropriat to Bishops hence they are baffl'd with the very places of Hierome they endeavour to abuse § 7. But I return to Hierome Philippi continues he is a single Town of Macedonia and truly in one City there could not be called are they as moe Bishops But because at that time they called the same Men both Bishops and Presbyters therefore he spoke indifferently concerning both Bishops and Presbyters From these words saith Petavius It can be evidently demonstrated that Hierome believed that Bishops and Presbyters were not one and the same Order yea even in the Age of the Apostles For had he so believ'd he had never said that there could not be a plurality of Bishops in one City when surely there was a plurality of Presbyters As if Jerome's whole discourse scope and conclusion were not directly opposite to what the Jesuite impudently fathers on him who in the words Petavius abuses only meets with some Wranglers as he elsewere terms them who to elude the proof Jerome brought for the Identity of Bishop and Presbyter from Philippians 1. 1. absurdly contended that in the City of Philippi alone there were a multitude of Bishops distinguish d from and superior to other Pastors But yet this may seem doubtfull continous Jerome to some except it be confirmed by another Testimony It is written in the Acts of the Apostles that when the Apostle was come to Miletum he sent to Ephesus and called for the Elders of that Church to whom amongst other things he said take heed to your selves and to the Flock over which the Holy Ghost hath made you Bishops to feed the Church of Christ. And observe this diligently how the Apostle calling the Elders of Ephesus which was but one City afterwards names them Bishops if any receive the Epistle which under Paul's Name is written to the Hebrews there also the care of the Church is equally divided amongst a plurality For he writes to the People Obey your Governours and be subject to them for they watch And Peter who received his Name from the strength of his Faith saith in his Epistle The Elders which are among you I exhort who am also an Elder We have enlarged on these things that we might shew that among the Ancients Bishops were all one with Presbyters Hierome then never as Petavius and his Followers impudently pretend thought that there had hapned no alteration or that Bishops bore greater bulk in his time than they had done in the Age of the Apostles but by little and little to the end the seeds of Schism might be remov'd the whole care was devolv'd upon one wherefore as the Presbyters know that by the Custome of the Church they are subject to their prefect so let Bishops know that rather by Custome than by the Truth of Christ's Institution they are greater than Presbyters and ought to Rule the Church in common with them imitating Moses who when he alone had Power to Rule the Israelites chused other Seventy with whom he might judge the People Here say they is a proof of Superiority of Bishops by Divine Right but they should remember that Hierome here undertook to prove the quite contrary And it 's most injust to fish and search for self-contradictions in any Author when with ease he may be understood otherways as the Matter is here Hierome is arguing a majori ad minus from Moses his Practice who tho' he had sole Authority by Divine Right yet shar'd it with others to that which ought to have been done by the Bishops of his time whom only Church Custome not Christ's Appointment had raised over other Pastors And indeed they might on equal grounds inferr from John 13. 14. If I then your Lord and Master have washed your
have Christ's Testament And having elegantly compar'd the Scripture to Man's Testament which is able to determine every Controversie that may arise among his Children adds He who leâ—t us this Testament is in Heaven let his Will therefore be sought for in the Gospel as in a Testament for the things which you now do Christ forsaw before they came to pass The same Justice and no more do we require in the present Case we require with Cyprian that Custom or Tradition which is without Scripture tho' otherways never so Old be thrown away as mouldy Errors Let not the Hope of Emoluments secular Grandeur or Power make Men rack their Wits to Dâ—prave and Detire the Truth and despise the Apostolick Humility and Parity Then saith Chrysostome speaking of these Apostolick Times and that by way of Opposition to his own Age Church-Government was not Honour or Grandeur but Watching and Care of the Flock Seeing it's evident saith Isidorus Pelusiota how vast a difference there is between the Ancient humble Ministry and the present Tyranny Why don't ye Crown with Garlands and Celebrate the Lovers of Parity or Equality Let not the gay Pageantry of foppish Ceremonies steal away our Hearts from the simplicity of the Gospel Is such trash worth the patronizing Nay rather Let the Sword of God Theâ—'re Jerome's words cut off every thing that men without the Authority and Testimony of the Scriptures have devised and pretend as if they had it by Apostolick Tradition Let all such things be broken in Pieces called Nehustan and finally sacrific'd to Truth and Peace Whatsoever thing God commands us let 's observe to do 't and neither add thereto nor diminish from 't This I'm sure is the old Path and the good Way wherein if we Walk we shall find rest to our Souls our Peace shall be as a River and our Righteousness as the Waves of the Sea we shall Dwell together in that Brotherly Vnity which is a true Antecedent of Life for evermore And thus I can freely say is the ultimat Design of Composing and Emitting the ensuing Treatise and is and still shall be the fervent Prayer of Will. Jameson Nazianzeni THE CONTENTS PART I. SECT I. The Scope of the ensuing Treatise The ancient Church for no Divine Right of Diocesan Episcopacy pag. 1. The ablest of its late Patrons of no other mind where Dr. Sandersone is noted 2 An examen of the Conveniencies and Inconveniencies of Prelacy undertaken 5 SECT II. The Aphorism No Bishop no King discuss'd Prelacy contributes not a little to introduce Tyranny ibid. Prelats severall ways most hurtfull to Princes 6 Presbytry well agrees with Monarchy where their Charge of Sedition and Disloyalty is largely vouch'd to be most unjust from the most applauded Writers of our Adversaries themselves 8 SECT III. Their Argument taken from Order weigh'd Their strange Improvement thereof 17 It equally serves Prelatists and Papists Ibid. SECT IV. The Plea for Prelacy drawn from Unity discuss'd Dissentions most frequent where Bishops bore sway 18 Unity and Parity harmoniously lodged in one and the same Assembly 19 SECT V. The Argument Prelatists bring from antiquity canvass'd Ibid. SECT VI. The Instance of Aërius condemn'd by Epiphanius prov'd to be unserviceable to our Antagonists They joyn with the most disingenous of Papists in using this Argument 21 The choicest of the Fathers for the Scriptural and Apostolick Identity of Bishop and preaching Presbyter 22 Epiphanius giveth little Patrociny to our Adversaries 23 His Injustice to Aerius in this matter ibid. If Aerius was Arrian largely disputed the affirmative whereof is rendred improbable by the profound Silence of those who were concern'd to have mention'd it 24 The Tractate ascribed to â—â—siliu◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is judgâ—d supposititious wherein there 's nothing to be found concerning Aerius This report of Aërius his Arrianism leans on Epiphanius's testimony alone whose great Levity and Credulity is universally noted 25 It is instanc'd in his dealing with the Donatists whom on no good ground he accuses of the same crime of Arrianism 26 They 're absolv'd by Augustine and Optatus Ibid. It 's objected that Aerius his commerce with Eustathius of Schastia may give countenance to the report of Epiphanius Ibid. Eustathius tho' a Heretick yet was not Arrian but a Macedonian who seems rather to have been dangerously shaken then intirely wedded to Macedonianism Ibid. But on supposition of the worst several reasons are brought making probable that nothing can be inferrâ—d from his commerce to prove Aërius Heretick 27. The loss of the Writings of the Ancient and traduced witnesses of truâ—h is lamentable Ibid. The Judgement of Philastrius concerning Aërius related against whom the Aërians are vindicated from the Crime of Encratitism 28 They were fiercely persecuted and why 29 Between Philastrius and Epiphanius no good agreement The negative testimony of both Philastrius and Rabanus Maurus against what is delivered by Epiphanius 30 SECT VII No Diocesan Bishops in several ancient Churches This Instanc'd in the Churches of Ireland of Africk and of Scotland 30 The ablest of our Adversaries brought to a sore pinch hereby 34 Sir George M ckenzie 's Epistolary Defence of Prelacy canvassed where Bede is vindicated against the Bishop of St. Asaph and Buchanan and Hector Boethius vindicated against Spotswood to whom the Advocat referred Ibid. That we had a constitute Church before the coming of Palladius evinced against both Bishop and Advocat 38 Our Primitive Doctors why called Monks The cavills of Spotswood and the Bishop of St. Asaph removed 39 Smal power of Prelats for a long time after Palladius 40 The most memorable result of the Combat between the Advocat and the Bishop of St. Asaph Ibid. D. M.'s exceptions removed His negative argument no argument 42 â—â—â—ndel vindicated 44 D. M's perversion of Baron's clear testimony detected Ibid. He in vain attempts to deprave and then to exauctorate Prosper himself 46 Other specimens of D. M's unhandsome dealing 47 SECT VIII Prelacy opposite to the Principles of our Reformers The Hierarchy is condemn'd by our Confession 49 Knox and his fellows are proved to have been most opposite to the Hierarchick Domination 50 The Author of the Fundamental Charter of Presbytry adventures not on our special Arguments Ibid. Against whom Knox's great aversness from Prelacy is evinced by vindicating of his Letter to the Assembly 51 And by vindicating of Knox's words and actions at the Installment of John Douglas 52 And from clear and unsuspected records where 't is also evinc'd that the bulk of both Ministers and People were then opposite to Prelacy 54 This Authors cavills from the meeting at Leith 7½ and from some expressions of the Assemblies canvass'd and annihilated 56 Knox's antiprelatical judgement demonstrated from Beza's Letter which is vindicated from this Authors exceptions 60 Who pretending to make Knox a Prelatist only labours to prove him and our other Reformers self-repugnant Bablers 61 His ridiculous Sophisms examin'd and expos'd
And The Apostles retain'd the Phraseology of the Jews who spoke of Priests and Levites as two distinct Orders without mentioning the High Priest And When the Ancients Dichotomiz'd the Clergy they in other places plainly reckon up three distinct Orders of Bishop Presbyter and Deacon But is there never in all the Scriptures any Title Distinction or Marks of Eminence giv'n to one Priest which were not communicable to all of ' em Got ever all of 'em promiscuously the Title of High Priest or such distinctive Appellations Did the Apostles so retian the Phraseology of the Jews as that they sometimes make a Bipartite and sometimes a Tripartite Division of ordinary Church-Officers and give to any one ordinary Pastor sometimes at least a distinguishing Title and Marks of Eminence which are at no time communicable to all ordinary Pastors promiscuously As to the Ancients their sometimes Dichotomizing sometimes Trichotomizing the Clergy it 's most certain that in their Dichotomies they ey'd the prime primitive Church and in their Trichotomies their own times But Christ saith D. M. is call'd an Apostle a Bishop the Apostles Presbyters and Deacons But was Christ so call'd an Apostle that he had no other peculiar titles or marks of Eminence or that on the other hand the name Christ was giv'n promiscuously to all Apostles or ever giv'n to any of ' em Lastly was the Apellation of Apostle equally communicable to all Presbyters or ordinary Pastors as to the twelve and some few else extraordinary Officers All which he must swallow else he gives no relief to his Friend Bellarmine We Argue that seeing to no ordinary Pastor is giv'n any peculiar Appellation Character or Description but what is equally common to all there must be an Equality and Parity amongst all of 'em and this they can never get over Moreover among the Evangelists yea and among the Apostles Officers superior to ordinary Pastors the reformed Churches being Judges there was a compleat Parity as was also among the Deacons their Inferiours notwithstanding of all which the Hierarchicks must plead for certain Stories of Preheminence among the ordinary Pastors in favours whereof ne gry quidem they can bring from the Word of God the only Rule of Faith and Doctrine § 6. Add hereto Tit. chap. 1. where we not only find the Apostle using indifferently and promiscuously the two words Bishop and Elder but also he alledgeth the necessity of fit Qualifications in the one to prove that the same are required in the other the Presbyters that were to be Ordain'd must be blameless c. because a Bishop must be so wherein either we have an ocular Demonstration of the Identity of these two Officers or else which I abhorr to think the Apostles reasoning is more pitifull than the most equivocant Paralogism their being not so much as a nominal Connexion betwixt the Antecedent and Consequent and no less ridiculous than if one should reason that every Captain of a single Company must be able to guide and manage a whole Army because such Qualifications are required in a General Now seeing these Scriptures already vindicated to name no others evidently declare that there was no such thing as a Diocesan Bishop that there 's a compleat Identity of Bishop and preaching Presbyter and consequently a Parity of all ordinary Pastors they of necessity condemn the Hierarchick and Diocesan Imparity for I 'm perswaded these who alledge that they find in Scripture a Distinction between these Offices will judge that they may with reason enough conclude the Divine Right of Episcopacy Hence judge of D. M's fifth Query where and in what places of Scripture the superiority and jurisdiction of one Priest above another is forbidden And if it be not plainly forbidden then the Fancy of a Jus Divinum in favours of Presbytry such as is exclusive of all other Forms of Ecclesiastical Government is groundless and Chimerical From all which I conclude that if the Ignatian Bishop and Presbyter most be understood in the Notion of our Adversaries he then quite crosses the Apostles so his Doctrine is stark nought or which is a far more charitable Sentiment his Epistles have suffer'd no small interpolation Section VII The grand Objection taken from the Commentaries of the Ancients remov'd BUT the Fathers as our Adversaries pretend glossing on these Texts went quite cross to our Doctrine To the Bishops and Deacons saith Chrysostome What means that What was there a Plurality of Bishops in one City Not at all for at that time the Name was yet common so that a Bishop was also nam'd a Deacon that is a Servant And adds that both Timothy and Titus were Bishops Of the same mind say they were Hilary Epiphanius Theodoret OEcumenius and others which harmonius Consent of Ancients cann't but be the true meaning of the places in Controversie But as these and such Fathers confess and their Works proclaim they were like others subject to humane Weakness and Corruption fell into compliance with the growing Errors into immoderat heat prevarication and self-repugnancy and negligence to search for the Scriptures their meaning How loudly sounded the debate concerning rebaptizing between Stephen and Cyprian which â—ore almost the whole body of Christians into a pair of Factions With what heat was it prosecuted And which is most lamentable how pitifully was the truth on both hands deserted For altho' it be commonly believ'd that Stephen only held the truth and Cyprian and his fail'd yet Stephen and the Romans did no less betray it On the other extream while they asserted the sufficiency of Baptism altho' administred by the grossest Hereticks and capital Enemies of the Fundamentals of Christianity How great both before and after that time were the Contests about Easter How scandalous were the Contests between Chrysostome Epiphanius and Theophilus and between Hierome and Ruffine Not to name others in all which it is apparent how little they believed one another and how much many of 'em prevaricated in favours of their particular Fancies § 2. But their Contradictions to one another are less to be admired when we clearly perceive that one and the self same Author either out of negligence or some other weakness hath given us quite contrary Doctrines Justine Martyr which Sculteâ— observes in one place ascribes the whole Work of Regeneration to free Grace and in another destroyes what he had builded and places free Will in the room thereof And Clemens Alexandrinus as the same Scultet observes following Justine Martyr delivers the like inconsistencies about the same Theme he sometimes ascribes our Salvation wholly to Faith and again tells us that we may purchase it with the Treasure of our Works § 3. Of the same kind are their polemick Discourses wherein their study was much more directed to bespatte their Antagonists and alure the vulgar Auditor than solidly to support the Truth I shall never believe that Optatus believed himself when he maintain'd that all
lower Order of Church-Officers as Rom. 13. the Magistrate is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Minister of God But there is no such explicative word or particle in Clement to alter the common Signification thereof on which account we 're not lightly to resile therefrom But that which utterly overthrows the Jesuite's Cause is Clement's closs Conformity to the Apostle in his account of Church-Orders who 1 Tim. 1. 3. beyond all Scruple of any Party takes these words in the sense we plead for to Clement and makes not at all the word Deacon exegetick and explicative of the word Bishop but by it designs a distinct Order of Church-Officers from what is signifi'd by the other For doubtless Clement Paul's Fellow-Labourer took the words in the same signification and meaning wherein the Apostle had understood them And accordingly Clement for Confirmation hereof adduces the words of Isaiah 60. 17. which place as he then certainly found it in the Septuagint contains the words Bishops Deacons exactly as Paul expresseth distinguisheth Church-Officers and on this Ground Clement goes when he intimats that the Apostles in their Institution of Church-Officers had an eye to these words of the Prophet In vain therefore labours Petavius to disprove the Copy of Isaiah used by Clement and brings the Hebrew Hierome and others taking the word in a different signification for thus he hath not Salmasius or any other modern Defender of Presbytry but Clement himself whom he pretends to vindicate for his Adversary seeing we Dispute not concerning the Greek Copy Clement used but of the thing he inferr'd from these words of Isaiah according to the Copy he then cited Neither is it more to the Jesuite's advantage that the word Presbyter is several times found in Clement For seeing as is plain yea and the Jesuite himself not only grants but proves that it frequently there denotes not a degree of Age but a Church-Officer it must of necessity be a Term altogether Synonymous with the word Bishop For they themselves plead not for the Equipolency thereof with the word Deacon wherein Petavius himself shall afford us no small assistance who having but to no purpose seeing never Man denied it shewed that with Clement the word Presbyter is sometimes taken appellatively to denote old Age but no Church-Officer subjoins these remarkable words At other times Clement so uses the word Presbyter as thereby to signifie a certain Function and publick Office in the Ministry and a certain Dignity in the Church which he calls an Episcopacy or the Office of a Bishop From this plain Testimony of a Man in learning and love to Prelacy second to none that ever undertook its Defence it 's clear as the Light it self that with Clement the word Bishop and the word Presbyter when he takes it for a Church-Function are Terms altogether Synonymous For if 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Episcopacy or the Office of a Bishop be competent to Clement's Presbyter and things as they ought receive Denominations from Forms wherewith they 're cloathed then this Presbyter in the Judgement of Clement is really a Bishop and indeed this is superlatively clear to any who but with an open and unprepossess'd Mind reads the places of Clement we have already produced Howbeit the Testimony of such an Adversary gives no small additional Confirmation to the Truth thereof Yea the same Adversary in the same place acknowledges that even then the Title of Bishop was also common and in after times only appropriated to one And again It 's clear saith Petavius from this place that there was a Council or Ecclesiastick Senate ordain'd by the Apostles at Corinth whose Dignity and Office Clemens calls Episcopacy and the chiefest of the Clergy he names Presbyters as also from this which Clement afterward writes It 's base Beloved yea most base c. And he names the same Presbyters Pastors and Church-Governours of the Christian Sheepsold And now judge how the Jesuite after these Concessions could yet say that it follows not from hence that in Corinth or at other Cities there was no peculiar Bishop § 3. And here again we find D. M. at his old filching Trade transcribing Petavius his Perversions of Clement or bringing what is no more serviceable to either Cause or Credit as that Clement comprehends all the Jewish Clergy under the name of Priests and Levites Therefore Inferrs D. M. It follows not from Clement his naming only Bishops and Deacons that Bishops and Presbyters are not in Clement distinct Offices But D. M. should remember that Clement not only Dichotomizes but Trichotomizes the Jewish Clergy into three Parts But does he any where so divide the Christian Clergy He not only names the two Kinds of Offices but so names them as to identifie and take for one and the same Bishop and Presbyter which Petavius and D. M. and their Brethren by all means labour to make him distinguish But St. Clement saith D. M. exhorting the Corinthians to order sets before them the subordination under the Temple-Service how the High-Priest Priests and Levites were distinguish'd by their proper Service and immediatly recommends to them that every one of them should continue in his proper Order Now continues D. M. when we consider the primitive Method of reasoning from Jewish precedents St. Clement had never talked at this rate if the Jurisdiction of one over many Priests had been abolished under the New Testament But why does he mutter for it if he can bring ought for his purpose he must also Inferr from this passage of Clement that as there was a High-Priest over all the Jewish Church so there must be another High-Priest over all Christians And that all Christians must bring Oblations and Sacrifices to the Temple at Hierusalem for from these Topick does Clement exhort the Corinthians to Harmony Whether then D. M. be a Romanist or a Jew may be a Question for unquestionably his way of reasoning symbolizes with both of them The Truth is nothing can be inferr'd from this place of Clement but that as under the Old Testament every one whether Church-man or Laick was to abide in his own Order without raising Schism or Confusion so it ought to be under the New Testament St. Clement himself continues D. M. distinguishes the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 An express untruth and I challenge D. M. and his Complices to prove it Nor can it be adds D. M. an Objection of any weight that the first who were their Spiritual Governours are mention'd in the plural number since this was an Encyclical Epistle addressed to Corinth as the principal City and from thence transmitted to its dependencies c. By which words if he speaks sense he intimats that there were in the Apostolick age Metropolitan Cities in an Ecclesiastick sense whose Bishops according to the Civil Dignity of these Cities were Metropolitan and had their numbers of inferiour and dependent Bishops A most nauseous and