Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
truth_n	age_n	church_n	time_n	2,142	5	3.6322	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A37245	A letter to friend concerning his changing his religion	Davies, Rowland, 1649-1721.	1692 (1692)	Wing D412; ESTC R5643	30,321	32

himself to some particular Society he that is in the Communion of the Church of England must appear to live in the Communion of the Catholick Church more than any Member of the Church of Rome And you were strangely mistaken in your Sentiments of Religion when in this Notion of the Catholick Church you quitted the one Communion and Embrac'd the other § 4. But perhaps you will tell me that the Church of Rome is truly Catholick not so much upon account of its extent or comprehension or even the terms of Communion in her as for her Antiquity and Catholick Doctrin in that she appears the same from the days of the Apostles while the Church of England as it is now establisht seems to take her date from the Reformation of her If these should be your thoughts there are two particulars that deserve to be considered by you 1 st That no Article of Faith is maintained in the Church of England as necessary to Salvation but what is evidently founded on the Holy Scriptures and consequently hath been believed and received as such by every true Christian from the Primitive Ages So that you cannot instance any one particular that we hold as such to which the universal rule of Catholick Doctrin may not be easily and properly applyed viz. Ab omnibus ubique semper fuit creditum It was at all times and in all places and by all Men believed Whereas every particular wherein the Church of Rome doth differ from her is also evidently of a later date and it is easie to instance whenever you require it if not the particular time when it was introduc'd at least a certain Age when it was not so believed And consequently then the Doctrin of the Church of Rome as she is at variance with the Church of England cannot with any Truth be stiled Catholick nor as it is such be the occasion of your Change § 5. The Second particular is that the Reformation of any thing doth not extirpate its former being and new make it nor yet essentially change it from the same thing that it was before but only rectifying what was formerly amiss and removing all things that were repugnant to its Nature it leaves the Being essentially the same but renders it abundantly more pure and illustrious The Church of England therefore cannot be truly said to have lost or changed any of the Fundamentals of the Christian Religion by her Reformation or any wise to cease from being the same Church that it was before since whatsoever was received by the Primitive Christians she still holdeth believeth and openly professeth and whatsoever was not so she never could esteem as part of her Religion And she hath made no change either in her Faith or Practice but by rejecting of such Unchristian Novelties as in the times of Ignorance and oppressing Tyranny were slily introduc'd and forcibly imposed upon her Whereas in the Canons of the Council of Trent which do comprize the Faith and regulate the Communion of the Church of Rome not only many things reputed by the Ancient Fathers as uncertain for instance Purgatory as I shewed before but also some that are evidently false viz. Transubstantiation as will appear hereafter are not only therein determined and as Articles of your Faith made a part of your Religion but also delivered to us with an Anathema to Unbelievers and as the express terms of the Communion If therefore you will say that the Religion or the Being of a Church is to take its beginning from the last system of the Christian Faith or the last change of Discipline that was Establisht in her and will consider farther that the Faith of a Christian is to be measured à credendis not à negatis from the points to be believed not those uncertainties that are deny'd by him You will find it necessary to acknowledge that the Old Religion is maintained in the Church of England and that that of the Church of Rome is of a later date Since the Church of England as I shew'd before stands by the Primitive Rule of Faith and what ever was so determined by the first four General Councils and this without the mixture of any Secular Notions or any thing that is opposite either to Reason or the Scriptures and consequently then she professeth the same Faith and the same Religion which she ever did and is not essentially changed since she was first Establish'd But the Church of Rome hath evidently made many changes and innovations both in Faith and Practice and hath imposed new Articles as necessary to Salvation which were never so reputed before her Injunction And therefore in point of Doctrin as also she cannot be truly called the Catholick Church nor on that account have drawn you to her Communion § 6. As to your second Motive founded upon the Excellence both of Faith and Practice which you supposed in the Church of Rome as that it is more Orthodox than the Church of England Should I Examine at large every particular Disputation into which this Point may lead us to determine it and which is already extant and discust fully upon this Subject it would probably require more time than I can have leisure to expend and withal would seem impertinent to my present design which is your Satisfaction with all brevity and plainess Especially when so much hath been said already by more Learned Persons that it is almost as impossible to add to as to answer their Arguments and I cannot but suppose that you are acquainted with them although you seem not satisfied nor convinced by their Evidence It is certainly sufficient in this case to have recourse but to our foundation that our Faith and Worship both are wholly founded upon the Scriptures have the consent of the Universal Church backt with Reason and an uninterrupted Practice which warrants and maintains whatever we hold as necessary against the force of all manner of Opponents Whereas the Doctrin and Devotion of the Church of Rome is chiefly built upon a loose Tradition or rather indeed the Projects and Inventions of Monastick Votaries such as True Religion cannot countenance nor the Law of God be perswaded to comply with In so much that should a Stranger but inspect our Churches and knowing only that God is a Spirit and that they that worship him must worship him in Spirit and in Truth should he examine the grounds and circumstances of Publick Devotion in them he would discover clearly the Nature of our Religion both consonant to Reason and the God we Worship while the other is hid in Ceremonies buried in external I ormalities and makes but a meer shew or pageant of Devotion § 7. But since however there is one particular case of moment in deciding whereof this Question may be resolved also viz. Whither the Church of Rome or Church of England is more Pure and Orthodox both in Faith and Worship It will not be amiss to enquire into it

to the nature of Man or to the justice of God especially if he should punish us for being so deceived I refer to any Man of reason to determine I will not trouble you with the recital of any of those Arguments which demonstrate this Change to be impossible and that the Doctrin doth imply so many contradictions that it is no proper Object for Almighty Power But this I must desire you to observe that if a substantial change were made of the Elements by the words of Consecration then the act of the Apostles was manifestly different from the command of Christ whereon it was founded For nothing can be clearer from the Text than that our Saviour gave the Bread and commanded them to take and eat that is Bread the words of its Consecration being not yet pronounced If then they did eat another substance and not Bread who can truly say that they fulfilled the Commandment of the Lord or Received the Sacrament according to his order § 10. As to the Design in this most Sacred Institution it appears to be the same in relation unto Christians as that of the Passover was unto the Jews That as they did believe in a Messias that was to come and of whom their Sacrifices were but Types and Shadows and so were partakers of the Sacrifice that he was to offer by eating of those Sacrifices that did Typically represent it So we that now believe in a Messias already come should in a parallel manner become Partakers of the same Oblation and by an external act like unto what they did in every Circumstance we should obtain the benefit of that propitiatory Sacrifice and really and truly be made Partakers of it And therefore our Saviour Christ appointed that Bread and Wine should be received by his Disciples in the place and stead of his Body and Blood which were the real Sacrifice that he offered unto God for Man and very improper things to be actually eaten or drank by Christians and therefore he calls the Bread his Body and the Wine his Blood not as being really the things themselves but as Instituted by him to represent them to us So that by a due participation of these Creatures according unto Christ's appointment it is certain that all Christians are partakers of that Sacrifice which he offer'd to God for them and the Bread and Wine being duly Consecrated and Received in the nature of a Sacrament the Body and Blood of Christ is really and truly received by the Faithful in them not that the Elements are changed in themselves or that there is any real alteration of their substance but the act is Spiritual in respect of the Receivers who take them not for Food but as a Mystery in Religion and therefore they do not receive them in their common notion as they are Bread and Wine that is proper Food to nourish or sustain the Body but as they represent the Body and Blood of Christ and are appropriated by Faith to nourish and support the Soul And since then this Sacrament was ordained to become a Sacrifice to Christians as St. Augustin● tell us and that those Patriarchs of old who believed in a Messias that was to come were as actual Partakers of that Sacrifice which he hath offered as we can be For they all eat the same spiritual Meat and they all drank the same spiritual Drink 1 Cor. x. 3. Neither is there Salvation in any other Acts iv 12. And yet it was impossible that they should eat the Flesh of Christ and drink his Blood according to the Letter because his Body was not framed yet nor actually born It is therefore rational to conclude that we are still Partakers of the Body and Blood of Christ in the same manner that they were not in a Literal but a Spiritual participation Since the reception of them by Faith only was fully sufficient to the Salvation of the one and therefore is all that is necessary to the Salvation of the other § 11. And this gives us a fair light into the reason or occasion of this Figurative Expression in that the Sacrament of the Eucharist being Instituted by our Saviour in the place of the Jewish Passover which was now to be abolished many of the External Rites were still retained to shew that all those Types are now compleated And therefore as it was usual at the introduction of the Paschal Lamb for the Priest or some other of the Company to tell the People that this is the Lamb that was slain in Egypt when the Lord passed over the houses of our Fathers and slew the Egyptians And again after Supper was ended distributing Bread and Wine to every one in order was wont to tell them This is the Bread of Sorrow which our Fathers eat in Egypt Whereas all Men know that it could not possibly be that very Lamb that was slain nor that very Bread that was eaten in Egypt but another Lamb and other Bread Instituted by God's order in the stead or commemoration of it So our Saviour likewise at the Institution of the Sacrament using the same Phrase upon the like occasion ought to be understood in the same manner of expression And since it was in conformity to their constant way of speaking that when he Instituted Bread and Wine to be Received by Christians in the Commemoration of his own death as that Lamb was of the Passover he said of the Bread This is my Body and of the Wine This is my Blood we are to understand by it no more than if he had told us that they are Elements Sacramentally to be Received in the stead and commemoration of his Body and Blood So that although there is nothing Corporeally upon the Table after the Co●●e●ration but the same things that were there before nor eat●● by the Receivers but very Bread with the very same substance that it always had Yet in the notion of a Sacrament and as a Religious Mystery it is not to be received as meer or common Bread by any true or faithful Christian But we verily believe that the Sacrifice of the Body and Blood of Christ is actually and truly partaken of in those Elements and as the Church of England Emphatically expresses it The Body and Blood of Christ are verily and indeed taken and Received by the Faithful in the Lord's-Supper § 12. This you cannot but know to be the Doctrin of the Sacrament as it is received in the Church of England and if you will consult Antiquity you shall find that it hath not only been the general Doctrin of the Universal Church but particularly of the Church of Rome in former Ages For the Antient Fathers generally speak of the Spiritual and Figurative Being of Christ's Body in the Sacrament and do expresly call the same thing at the same time both Bread and the Body of Christ which is impossible to be a truth in the Literal sense and therefore it is necessary to