Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
truth_n	according_a	scripture_n	spirit_n	3,143	5	5.2045	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A14212	A collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinitie in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laide downe by that author in his catechisme. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newlie translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoofe of our Christian country-man	Ursinus, Zacharias, 1534-1583.; I. H., fl. 1600.; Pareus, David, 1548-1622. aut; Junius, Franciscus, 1545-1602. aut	1600 (1600)	STC 24527; ESTC S100227	171,130	346

these tteasures and are adiudged vnto eternal maledictiō everlasting death For thus saith he in the Gospell He that beleeueth not is cōdemned alreadie the wrath of God abideth on him And Paul testifieth If any man hath not the spirit of Christ the sāe is not his which place of the apostle I suppose to be very pertinēt to this presēt purpose For if the vnfaithfull belōg not vnto Christ neyther are they of Christ it may soūdly be argued well cōcluded by the logiciās rule of Relatiues that Christ with his benefites pertaineth not vnto them and as they are not Christs so neither is Christ theirs For how I pray should Christ pertaine vnto thē whom one day at the last iudgement he shall pronounce before all the world aliants and strangers from him his benefites and his kingdome of whō he shall testifie that he never knew them lastly whom he shall cast as being the cursed workers of iniquitie into hell fire Yea but saie you Christ died for the sinnes of all Therefore he rose againe for the iustification of all The answere herevnto is two-folde either of which is true and sóund First as often as the Gospell extendeth the fruit of Christs merites and benefites vnto all it must be vnderstood as saith Saint Ambrose of the whole number of the faithfull and elect For this is the vsuall and common voice found everie where throughout the whole course of the gospel He which beleeveth shall be saved and commeth not into iudgement He which beleeveth not shall be damned and is iudged already and the wrath of God abideth on him Wherefore the Gospell dispossesseth all vnbeleevers of Christs benefites not onlie by a flat exclusion but also by positiue vertue of that condition of faith and repentaunce by which he promiseth expresly or covertlie his benefits vnto mē which it appeareth is neuer found in the reprobate that is such as do persist and wil stil persist in their impietie Christ therefore is thus said to be dead for all that is for all the faithfull and elect for whom alone he also praied and in whom alone he findeth the end and fruit of his death But to extende the benefites of Christs death vnto infidels reprobates for whom he neuer praied whom he neuer knewe or tooke for his owne and on whom the wrath of God abideth for ever what els is this but against his expresse commaundement to giue holy thinges vnto dogges and cast pearles before swine This answere may be strongly maintained by the authoritie of holy scripture and testimonies of sound fathers and is much available vnto Christian consolatiō Howbeit there is an other answere no lesse true wherwith we may satisfie the most contentious wranglers that Christ died for all men absolutely and without exception to wit if you respect the sufficiencie of the merite and the price which he paied It is out of all doubt and controversie that the death of the Son of God is of such weight worth that it may serue to purge and cleanse the sinnes not of one world only but thousands of worlds if at least all m●● would apprehend by faith this salue of sin But the question concerneth the efficacie and participation it selfe of the fruits which we mainely deny to be common to the beleeving and vnbel●●●ing or to be generally promised or given in the 〈…〉 and we hold it no sound doctrine to 〈…〉 in this respect Christ died alike for all 〈…〉 and reprobate But here some men possessed with an 〈…〉 as if the Church had not other controve●●● 〈◊〉 ●nough spew out on vs their stinking 〈…〉 open mouth taking it grievously that 〈…〉 not those heavenly treasures and iewels equallie to the godly and vngodly to the faithful and vnfaithfull to the elect and reprobate to Christs members and the Divels vassals to the sheepe to the swine They make lowd out cries on vs for denying that Christ died for al. They say this our assertion is tainted with a more odious blasphemy then any of the Saracens Turkes and Pagans and that by it Christian Religion is cleane overthrowne It is not my purpose to encounter with these monsters of men only I must needs touch the slāder they fasten on vs. For what slaunder is there if this be none When we distinguish the worth of the merue from the efficacie and participating of the benefites and restraine according to Scripture and the iudgement of the soundest Fathers this participation to the whole number of the faithful alone gathered from amongst the Iews Gentiles do we then deny that Christ died for all But that the truth of this controversie may the more appeare and these busie heads if it be possible may by some satisfaction on our part be set at rest let vs in briefe set downe the force of our maine reasons whereon wee ground this our distinction And first the holy Scripture it selfe teacheth vs plainely this kinde of distinction and forceth vs therevnto For you shall finde it in scripture somtimes absolutely spoken that Christ tasted of death for all men that he gaue himselfe a ransome for al men that he is the recōciliatiō for the sins of the whole world Againe you shal read that Christ praied not nor sanctified himselfe that is offered vp himselfe for the world but for the elect which were giuen him That hee laid downe his life for his sheepe that hee gaue his life for the ransome of many that by his knowledge he iustifieth many that hee shed his bloud for many that the world cannot receiue the holy spirit because it seeth him not neither knoweth him and because it hath not the spirite therefore it is not CHRISTS These places carry some shew of contrariety were it not that the former are vnderstood by vs of the sufficiency of satisfaction and the latter of the efficacie and working vertue thereof Furthermore other places occure which seeme to impart vnto the wicked the benefit of redemption as when Peter saith that they denie even the Lord which hath bought them that they were purged from their old sins And Paule also saith that they were sanctified with the blood of the Testamēt al which the Scripture els where enforceth vs to interpret either of the vaine glorying of Hypocrites of their redemption and sanctification or els to vnderstand thē no otherwise then of the extent and sufficiencie of Christs satisfaction whereas it simply excludeth the vnfaithfull and vnrepentant from the benefit of Redemption and constantly avereth that they are yet held captiues in the snares of Devill that they are overswayed by him and carried headlong to worke wickednes that the wrath of God abide hon them he saith is abideth not it returneth as if it had at any time relinquished them lastly that Christ never knew them much lesse redeemed them Now if I were purposed to

to baptise the professors of faith whether hypocrites or no. For the church iudgeth not of things so secret but only the hart-searching God The like reason serveth for all other Ministers which ought to iudge of those that are to bee baptised not according to Gods predestinatiō but mans professiō Christs commandement This if they doe themselues are not sacrilegious but the reprobate hypocrits who vnreverently and irreligiously presse to the sacraments But fie on that his blasphemy where hee saith that if sacraments bee ministred vnto reprobate hypocrites yet vnrevealed then God must lie by the mouth of the minister Did God thinkest thou lie by Peters mouth when he baptised Simon Magus He setiously and sincerely by his word sacrament offereth adoption and grace vnto al purposing also to bestow it but cōditionally if they beleeue cōmandeth thē to beleeue and receiue by faith the grace offered But to infidels and hypocrites he is so far frō promising or sealing any grace of adoption and election whē they force themselues vnto the sacrament that he threatneth them with a terrible and feareful iudgement Hee therefore is true in offering howsoeuer the grace offered to the vnbeleeuers be of none effect But saith the Iesuite he doth not onely offer but indeede also bestowe it when men are indeede baptized We graunt it For this Calvin also confesseth in Antidot Artic. Paris speaking on this manner The godly do all confesse that in baptisme is offered yea exhibited or giuen vnto vs both remission of our sins grace of the holy spirite But saith he els where these good fathers by reason of their grossenesso doe not here obserue that what grace so euer is by sacraments bestowed on vs must notwithstanding be imputed vnto faith For he which sondereth faith from the sacramērs doth as ●f he seuered the soule frō the body God therefore doth indeed giue that which he offereth but vnto those that beleeue To the vnbeleeuing he neyther promiseth nor performeth any thinge as longe as they continew in their vnbeleife that through their owne fault because by infidelity they refused the good offered as much as in them lieth make a mocke of God which offereth it This Cauill therefore of the lesuites is no lesse impudent and blasphemous against God then was that of the Iewes who accused God of perfidiousnesse vnlesse he would performe the couenant evē to the vnbeleeuers which the Apostle retorting shall saith hee their vnbeleife make the faith of God vaine God forbidae Let God be 〈◊〉 euery man a lyar Well then Let vs now returne the Iesuites blasphemy vpon his head Both he his mailler Lombard teach that reprobation is nothing else but that some there are on whom God will haue no mercy For so doeth the maister of sentences define it Suppose thē that the Iesuite even by the very worke wrought either of baptisme or of the masse should bestow the grace of sanctificatiō vpon Simon Magus or the like reprobate shall not hee and the sacrament become now sacrilegious in conferring grace on a reprobate of whom God will haue no mercy may shall not he make God himselfe a lier and contrary to himselfe in his name bestowing or testifying vnlesse he altogither exclude God out of the sacraments that God himselfe bestoweth the grace of sanct●fication on a reprobate on whom notwithstanding hee hath for all eternity decreed to bestowe nothing and on whom God will haue no mercy From this blasphemy howe the Iesuite can acquite himselfe maintaining his opinion of the worke wrought let him looke to it But howsoeuer he acquite himselfe he must withall discharge Calvin of the cavill devised against him Let this suffice briefly for answere to the perverse peevishnesse of this stage declaiming Iesuit The rest which hee disputeth towardes the ende pertaineth nothing to vs well they may prevaile vpon those against whom they were vvritten namely Swenckefield his brethren Vbiquitaries common corrupters of the doctrine of Christ his person and the sacraments A PREFACE TO THE FOVRTH PART OF the Catechisme wherin are desciphered the pestilent pamphlets of some Divines of this age and Calvin the most valiant Champion defendant of Christ his glory is briefely cleered of the slaunderous crime of Arrianisme * ⁎ * THe argumēt of this part which is Of mans thankfullnesse towards God enforceth me to enter the Common complaint of all the godly against the bruit blockishnesse and foule in gratitude of the world which after so many inestimable benefits heaped by almightye God most aboundantly on these our latter daies hath onely thus farre profited that vnthankfull men continually become worse and worse as if they had sworne perpetual warre against so good a God gracious a benefactor For howe huge a cloud of witnesses of Gods cōtinuall kindnesse doth enuiron vs round about what hath been denied vnto this age that men could haue wished thereby to haue made this life happy blessed I speake not of blessingee common or generall how many how pretious are those we haue receiued in particular The light of the Gospel sincerity of doctrine renewed the purity of sacraments the trew worshippe of God and reading of holy scripture restored the discouery of Antichrist the chasing of darknesse the flight of supersticion the ruine of of idolatry the liberty of the church after long seruitude restored These so inestinable treasures how few of vs doe worthily regard not rather with bestiall blockishnesse overpasse or shameles impudency disdaine One saide some times of the Athenians that they knew what was good but did it not How much more may we Christians be ashamed of our selues who not only do not that which we know to be good and know it by the light of the Gospell not as they did by the light of nature but also doe euen those thinges which we know are not good The whole worlde is now possessed with security profanenes ambition luxurye envy contempte of doctrine abuse of sacraments surfet of preaching what not How many are there of those which withhold the truth in vnrighteousnesse of those which professe God in their knowledge but deny him in their life of backesliding Apostataes who eyther inforced by the vnsta●ednesse of the● owne conceipt looke backe to the Aegigptian flesh-pottes or beguiled by seducing spirites daily reuolt from Christ to Antichrist like dogges returning to their yo● mit but this ingratitude is perhappes a fault incident to the common sort O then that the greater part of our Prelates would ascend vnto these breaches and draw a counter-mure and sence before the house of Israel not lyke subtile foxes secke to fat●e themselues with the spoiles publique scandales of the church as Ezechiel complained of the prophets of his time It hath bin euer a great plague vnto the church to make sale of the word of G●d or wrest it to the affections of men to the lust fauour

my bodie doe signifie vnto vs not vvhere Christs body is neither what it is IN WITH or VNDER the bread but what the bread it selfe is and ought to be vnto the godly in this vse 2 The second Reason is because the body of Christ is a true instrumentall finite visible body after his ascension no longer present on the earth or every where but cōversant and remaining in heaven even vntil his last comming 3 The third Reason is because the sounder Fathers do teach that the body and bloud of Christ is in the bread wine not as in a caue orden but as in a mystery and by a mystery Chrysostome opers imperfecto Math. Homil 11. saith In holied and sanctified vessels is conteined not the true body of Christ but the mysterie of Christs body The third proposition III. The Signes and Things haue their coherence in the Lords Supper by a Sacramental vnion Now this vnion is of like quality with that vnion which is commō to the whole kinde of Sacraments otherwise it should not be a sacramentall vnion but by a title of distinction should be tearmed The vnion in the Lords Supper But in al the other Sacraments their is an vnion of Relation and respect to wit A mysticall signification of the Thinge signed by the Signe a sealing exhibiting receiving thereof after a lawful vse which is not without the faith and repentance of thē which approach vnto it to vse it The reason● of the third proposition 1 The first is drawne from the nature of the whole kinde in this sort There is such an vnion in all Sacraments Therefore in the Supper also The Antecedent or former proposition of this argumēt is manifest out of the definition principal end of the Sacraments 2 The second is framed on this manner The bread is the body of Christ either in the truth of the thing as Augustine according to Prospers opinion speaketh or in a mysterie signifying it But it is not the body of Christ essentially 〈◊〉 the truth of the thing because there is no Transubstantiation Therefore it is the body of Christ in a mysterie so signifying 3 The third reason is because al the arguments by which the sacramentall speech in the wordes of the Supper is proved are hithervnto belonging For a sacramental vnion requireth sacramentall phrases and termes 4 The fourth is because we haue the testimonies of the Fathers that the bread is a signe figure and sacrament of the body of Christ no longer absent but present and yet present not in the outward and visible elements of bread and wine but in the worde ioyned with them present I say not to the mouth but to the heart not locally and in place but mystically and spiritually The obiection of Papists for their Transubstantiation drawne out of the words of the Supper This which Christ gaue and the Preist consecrateth is the body of Christ Therefore it is not bread The argument holdes from the rule of thinges different as if a man should say This is a man therfore it is not an Oxe Wee deny that this argument is framed as you say from the inducing of one speciall by the remouing of the contrarie of the same kinde because it is rather a faulty processe in argumentation frō the inducing of a sacramētal respect which is but an Accident to the displacing and deniall of the subiect substance such as this is if I should say This man is a Father Therefore he is not a man For so they argue This bread is the body of Christ therefore it is not bread There is therefore in this argument a Fallacie of Accident no lesse absurd the if you should thus conclude This thing is a table therefore it is not wood For although the body of Christ bee not the forme or Accident of bread● yet the Relation and respect which the bread hath by vertue of the promise vnto the body of Christ is the forme of a Sacrament Whence it is a weake kind of reasoning to say A doue is the holy Ghost therefore it is no longer a doue Circumcision is the couenant of God therfore it is no longer Circumcision The cupp is the New Testament therfore it is no longer a cuppe The answere to all the testimonies of the Fathers which the Papists alleadge for the change of the signes is common that they are all to hee vnderstood of the Sacramentall not of an essentiall and reall mutat on which is apparant out of the consent of foundest Fathers in this point of the sacrament II. The second question Howe both the signes the heauenly things signified are exhibited or receiued in the Lords Supper This question is in controuersie betweene vs both with the Papists the Vbiquitaries because both of them are of opinion that the things being present in their signes or vnder the shewes of the signes are covertly and miraculously caried vp and downe in the hands of the ministers hādled by them and put into the mouthes of the Communicants We contrariwise teach that the thinges with their signes are both togither exhibited and receiued with their signes in the lawful vse of the Supper but in a diuers manner For the signes are handled by the Ministers and takē by the mouth of the Communicants But the things themselues are given by Christ our high Priest received by faith This point may in like sort with the former be expressed in three propositiōs two negatiue and one affirmatiue 1. The first proposition The things signified that is the bodie and bloude of Christ are neither handled nor reached out by the hand of the Ministers to be receaved corporallie in the signes The Reasons of this first proposition 1 The first reason is collected negatiuelie from the whole kinde of Sacraments thus In no Sacrament the Ministers handle or bestowe things spirituallie signified Therefore neither in the Lords Supper doe they handle the thing spiritually signified The Antecedent is proved both by an induction or instance in every Sacrament which is evident by the adversaries owne confession and also the proportion betweene the Sacrament and the worde Marc. 1. I am the voice crying c. Ioh. 1. I baptise with water he which cōmeth after me shall baptise with the holie Ghost and with fire 1. Cor. 3. 7. Neither he that watereth nor hee that planteth is anie thing but God which giveth the encrease Therefore it holdeth alike also in the Sacraments which are the visible word 2 The second reason is this The things signified are not corporally IN WITH or VNDER the signes as hath beene shewed Therefore they are not handled or distributed by the hand of the Minister 3 The third reason proceedeth thus The things signified in the Supper are spirituall which coupled with their signes are offered in the promise of grace But the promise of grace is not handled with hands c. 4 The fourth reason is the testimonies of Fathers as Chrysost

signifie that in scripture we are taught that GOD promiseth or performeth vnto menne either before or since the manifestation of Christ in the flesh and what he requireth againe of them and for what cause 9. Which also the scripture intendeth professing to teach Christ 10. For whatsoeuer is therin deliuered eyther it pertayneth to the trew knowledge of Christs person or his office 11. The differences betweene the doctrine delivered in scripture and the religions of other sectes are these First in the doctrine of the trew church is taught the whole Gospell of Christ but other religions either knowe it not at all or to their owne errours ioyne some part thereof whose vse they neyther know nor conceaue 12. Secondly in the doctrine of the Prophets Apostles is delivered the whole lawe of God that rightely vnderstoode other religions cutt of the cheife points therof namely the trew knowledge and worship of God or the first table of the commaundements and the internall and spirituall obedience of the second table retaininge onelie a parte therof namelie the precepts of Disciplines or externall and civill duties towardes men 13. But though even they also doe boast and glorie of the trew God and his worship yet doe they erre from him for 3 causes First because naturall testimonies are not sufficient to the knowledge of the trew God Secondly because vnto thē men ioyne many errors of their owne Thir●ly because for want of the light of Gods worde they vnderstād not even those thinges which in word they truely professe but corrupt them with an evill interpretation 14. Either they commaund onely so much touching aff●ections and inclinations disagreeing with the secōd table as may serue to bridle them which is but a parte of this doctrine or they doe accuse and condemne all or els they doe not so much accuse and condemne them as doth the doctrine of the church 15. Other sectes admit approue some things against the externall obedience of the second table God by his iust iudgment giuing them over into a reprobate sense 16 We pronoūce the doctrine of holy scripture to be true not for the authority of the church but because we know it was delivered vnto vs by God 17 That it is from God we know by testimonie of the holy Ghost in the hearts of the godly by our deliuerance from sinne and death whereof this only religion doth assure vs by the puritie integritie of the lawe which is founde onely in the church by the prophecies and the fulfilling therof by miracles proper only to the church by the antiquitie of this late vpstarte newnesse of others by the consent and agreement of everie parte in this doctrine and the disagreement in others by the hatred of Satan and all the wicked against this doctrine by the miraculouse preseruation defence therof against the Diuell and the worlde by the punnishmentes inflicted vpon the enemies therof by the constancie of martyrs and confessors who had sure comforte euen in death by their holy life by whom it was deliuered and spread abroade 18. No opinion of God or his will and worship must be receaued which is not set downe in scripture we must so fa● giue credit to other doctors of the church as they confirme their doctrine out of the prophets and apostles 19. This is not only proued by testimonie of holie scripture whereby we are commaunded in cases of religion to depende on it alone but also by the nature definition of faith and the worship of God both which must needes be grounded on Gods worde also by the perfectiō of this propheticall apostolicall doctrine and by the diverse callings of Prophets apostles other doctors teachers of the church 3. OF THE CERTAINETIE AND AVTHORITIE OF HOLIE SCRIPTVRE 1. It is certaine that onely this doctrine of religion which is cōteined in the bookes of the prophets apostles is deliuered by God himselfe doth not only nor principally relye vpon the authoritie of the church but most especially vpon the testimonie of God the scripture it selfe 2. The first and principall argument wherby this authoritie of holy scripture is established amōgst vs is the witnesse of Gods holy spirit in the hearts of the faithfull 3. This witnes as it is peculiar to the godly so it only causeth vs in true faith to embrace the doctrine of the prophets apostles all the rest may be vnderstood even of them which are not regenerate and do indeed conuince or forceablie perswade vs of the truth of this doctrine but except we haue also this witnesse of the spirite they can neuer moue our mindes to embrace and giue credit to them 4. The seconde argument is because this doctrine only sheweth men the causes of evill deliuerrance from sinne death agreeing with the perfect iustice and goodnes of God and also satisfying our consciences 5 The third because only the doctrine of the prophets and Apostles retaineth Gods law entire pure but all other Religions frame vnto thēselues Gods and their worship without any authoritie from God and approue many things contrary to the law naturally knowne vnto vs. 6 The fourth because history and experience doth witnesse that the evēt hath answered those predictions which haue beene heere and there set downe in scripture 7 The fift is the miracles added to this doctrine 8 The sixt antiquity because this religion vva● the first and hath continued the same from the beginning of the world vntill this day 9 The seventh the consent and agreement of all parts of this doctrine betweene themselues which is not in other religions 10 The eighth is the hatred of Satan and all the wicked against this doctrine 11 The ninth is Gods preservation and defence of this doctrine against all his enemies 12 The tenth the punishment of such enemies as persecute or corrupt this doctrine 13 The eleventh the constancy of Martyrs and confessors Tertullian The bloud of Martyrs is the seed of the church The Martyrs of the church differ from others● in multitude 2 in alacrity cheerefulnesse in vndergoing dangers death it selfe 3 the defenders of wicked doctrine suffer when they are convicted of errors but the godlie are by tyrannicall force carried awaie to punishment 14 The twelfth their holinesse of life by whom it was delivered and spread abroad farre exceeding the vertues of heathen men and such as followed other religions 15 Seeing therefore this only doctrine of religion is true and Divine no opinion can binde our consciences to beliefe or obedience which is not established by testimonies of holy scripture rightly vnderstood but no opinion disagreeing therewithall is to be so much as receiued OF GOD AND THE TRVE KNOWledge of him 1 MAn being destitute of the true knowledge of God is most vnhappy 2 It is no true knowledge of God which agreeeth not with Gods own opening of himselfe nor is ioined with true loue and feare of God 3

them gouernours seruing him in true religion cherishinge the church and all good learning that hee vpholdeth schooles and giveth vnto them fit teachers and inflameth the mindes of some men with desire of learning the truth and delivering it to posteritie but especiallie that he sendeth amongst vs the light of the gospell clensing refining it from idols freeing vs from Antichristian darkenes ordaining strength out of the mouthes of infantes and sucklings at whose voice alone the very gates of hell though terrible in themselues do tremble fall to everlasting ruine It is out of question that al these benefits doe not happen vnto vs by chance or mās wisedome but are given and continued to vs by the singular providence and bountie of God as may appeare partly by their greatnes and excellencie and partly by this that amongst so greate furies of the worlde and the devill and so great weakenes infirmitie of thēselues they coulde not otherwise be retained First therefore wee giue eternall thankes vnto almightie GOD for vouchsafing to bestow vpon vs so great benefits Secondly we giue them also their due commendations who by their godlinesse and vertue desire to preserue these benefites to mankinde VVherefore with all reverence and duetie wee thanke the most mightye Prince Elector our gracious Lorde for encouraging and gracing this schoole and all good artes with exceeding loue and curtesie Also vvee thanke all other the noble and vertuous gentlemen especiallie our worthy Chancellour Lastlie wee thanke the Right worshipfull and learned Doctors and Maisters our reverende and very good Patrons and all the rest of the learned and honest sorte who gracing this my publique proceeding with their presence haue wit●essed their good will towards vs and our studies and would haue our calling commended to God in their publique praiers And I hartely beseech GOD that he woulde vouchsafe the encrease continuance of these his great benefits which he hath bestowed vpon v● and woulde graunte vs all grace to vse them to his glory and the good of his Church through IESVS CHRIST our Lord Amen XIV OF MANS CONVERSION I. NO man shall ever enioye eternall happinesse in the life to come which doeth not repent in this life and turne awaie from his sinnes vnto God II. True repentaunce or conversion is a change or renuing of man wrought by the holy GHOST whereby man vppon tiue acknowledgement of GOD and his will revealed in the Lawe and the Gospell and his owne corruption doth seriouslye feare GODS anger and iudgemente against sinne and is sorie that by his sinnes he hath heretofore and doth still offend God and yet obeying the commādement of faith in Christ and amendment of life resteth secure vpon the mercy of God and his promise of grace by confidence in our mediator Christ through whom because he is perswaded that God is pleased he submitteth himselfe vnto him as a sonne to a loving father and for this his receiving him into favor studieth to shew himselfe thankefull vnto God for ever Eph. 4. 21. If so bee yee have heard him haue beene taught by him as the truth is in Iesus That is that yee cast of concerning the conversation in times past the olde man which is corrupt through deceiueable lustes And be renued in the spirite of your minde and put on the newe man vvhich after God is created in righteousnesse and true holinesse Tit. 3. 5. Hee saved vs by the vvashing of the nevve birth and the renuing of the holie Ghost Rom. 7. 18. I knowe that in mee that is in my flesh there dwelleth no goodnesse c. to the ende of the chapter Isay 5. 16. vvash and be cleane III. This repentaunce consisteth of tvvo partes which the scripture calleth mortifying of the old man and quickning or raising againe of the new man Romanes 6. 6. Our olde man is crucified with him Galathians the seconde and nineteenth By the lawe I am deade to the lawe that I may liue to GOD I am crucified with Christ c. Coloss 3. 12. Buried with him through baptisme in vvhom yee are also raised vp together through the faith of the operation of God c. Coloss 3. 5. Mortifie therefore your earthly members c. IV. The olde man or vnrenued is he which is ignorant or doubtfull of God and is subiect and yeeldeth to evill desires But the newe or renued man is he which knowing GOD aright serveth him in true righteousnesse and holynesse Ephes 4. 24. V. The mortifying of the olde man is vpō knowledge of our owne corruption Gods anger lying heavy on vs therefore to feare and sorrow for our offences to God and therefore heartilie to hate and avoide all sinne VI. But the quickning of the new man is vpon knowledge of Gods mercie towardes vs in Christ to reioice and quiet our selues in God and to haue a fervent desire to obey God in all his commandements Rom. 7. 22. I am delighted with the lawe of God in my inwarde man VII This renuing in infantes which are sanctified by the spirite of GOD is onelie a beginning that is a receauing of new qualities and inclinations and therefore may more fitlie bee called regeneration or newe birth then repentaunce But in men of riper yeares it concerneth motions and good actions in the minde will and hearte Luke the first and fifteenth Hee shall bee filled with the holy Ghost from his mothers womb Mat. 19. To such belongeth the kingdome of heauen VIII Nether yet is it perfited in those of riper yeares before the end of this life therfore they which are conuerted haue in them part of the new and part as yet of the olde man vntill such time as together with the life they lay aside all the oldnes or corruption of nature Roman 7. 23. I see another law in my members 1. Ioh 1. 10. If we say we haue n● sinne we lie or deceaue our selues IX Therfore the whole life of the godly is and must be a certaine continuall repentance and conuersion wherin they must strongly persist and proceede fighting against the flesh and the diuel vnto the end of their life 1. Cor. 9. 24. So runne that yee may abtaine Phil. 3. 13. Brethren I coūt not my selfe that I haue attained to it Revel 22. 11. He which is holy let him be more holy X The victorie in this combate is not doubtfull For in them in whome trew conversiō is once begon although sometimes they fal greeuously by humaine infirmitie and the reliques of the olde man or sinne which in this life they beare about them it is neuer so extinguished but that they againe struggle vp from their fall are at length saued Math. 7. 24 They that are built on the rocke do not fall Phil. 1. 6. He which hath begon in you a good worke will finish it 1. Ioh. 2. 19. If they had ben of vs they had remained with vs. 1. Ioh. 3.