is by their owne grant the man of syn of whom the Apostle here speaketh c. Therfore the church of Rome is the Temple of God also that here is spoken of I answer This argument I might wholly grant and not hurt the cause I plead for For though the church of Rome be the Temple of God which Paul speaketh of yet followeth it not that it is Gods true Temple or true Church which is the point that should be concluded seing the scriptures often speak of things as once they were though so they continue not still as also they speak of things according to the outward pretense and shew that is made of them though in deed and trueth they be nothing less The first is manifest by these and other like instances Abigail is called the wife of Nabal 1 Sam. 30. 5. though Nabal was then dead and his wife maried to David Simon is still called the Leper Mat. 26. 6. though he was then clensed of his leprosie The king of Tyrus an heathen man that lived in Ezekiels dayes is sayd to have been in Eden the garden of God to have been upon the holy mountaine of God and to have walked in the middest of the stones of fyre Ezek. 28. 13. 14. meaning that he had been in Gods church on mount Sion among the people of God although not he himself but Huram his predecessor many yeres before in the dayes of David and Solomon was the man that became a proselyte in Israel and helped to build the Temple 2 Chron. 2. 3. 16. even as if a man should speak to the Bishop of Rome at this day and tell him what he was for a Bishop in th'Apostles dayes and how now he is degenerate and become the man of syn The mountaines of Horeb and Tabor where God once gave his Law and Christ was transfigured are after still called the mount of God and the Holy mount 1 King 19. â— 2 Pet. 1. 18. because they had been for the time sanctified by the presence of God And so the Temple in Ierusalem after the Iewes had crucified Christ refused the gospel were broken off because of unbeleef and the sacrificing and worshiping in that place was ended yet is it until the utter ruine of it by the Romans called the holy place Mat. 24. 15. Thus also the Citie become an harlot is called the faithfull Citie Esai 1. 21. the wicked that hath forsaken his righteousnes is named arighteous man Ezek. 18. 26. according to their former and not their present estate And when these titles are given them it is not to justifie them at all but to aggravate their syn So for the second that things are called according to the outward appearance and pretext set upon them though they be in deed false is evident by these and the like examples false Gods which are but idols are called gods usually so one Prophet calleth those the Philistians gods 1 Chron. 14. 12. which an other calleth their images 2 Sam. 5. 21. False prophets are called Prophets 1 King 22. 6. 22 and Balaam a Soothsayer among the heathens Jos. 13. 22. is called a Prophet 2 Pet. 2. 16. The evil spirit whom the witch of End or raised up for Saul is called in the scripture Samuel 1 Sam. 28. 11. 12 15. 16. 20. by reason wherof the Papists contend that it was Samuel in deed and not the Divil urging the letter as mine opposite doth urge against me this phrase of the Temple of God The idolatrous Temple which Ieroboam made in Israel in honour of the God which had brought them out of Egypt is called the house of their God Amâ—s 2. 8. yet that it was his true house or temple I never heard of any that would affirme though it was the true God whom they worshiped therin for Baal with his house was then destroyed out of Israel 2 King 1â— 27. 28. Now mine opposite hath given us a good rule in this his last book when answering the Anabaptists he sayth The word of God is not the bare letter or outward syllables but the intendement and meaning of the holy Ghost by whom it was given Which should carefully be observed by the due consideration of the scriptures with the circumstances therof and by the conference of other places of scripture and the proportion of fayth layd togither Which whiles the Anabaptists neglict they look on the scripture partially and press the letter extreamly without consideration of the true and right meaning therof These words of his are true the more it is to be lamented that he himself would so press the letter against me and not weigh the meaning of the same by it self and other scriptures and the proportion of fayth layd togither In alleaging this text he layeth downe the words thus There shal come an apostasie or falling away wheras the Apostle sayth except there come an apostasie or falling-away first which word first may intimate that the church should fall away from the love of the trueth before the man of syn should be revealed and this is apparant by the 10. verse where the people whom Antichrist seduceth are sayd to be them that perish because they received not the love of the trueth that they might be saved Or if the word first which mine opposite leaveth out be understood before Christs coming then is it meant of the apostasie or the falling away so called by an excellencie as exceeding all other And is not to be referred to Antichrist the head onely but to Antichristians the bodie also who after other synns should fall away with Antichrist and be damned with him as in the 11. verse it is sayd God shall send them strong delusion that they should beleeve a lye shat they all might be damned who beleeve not the trueth but had pleasure in unrighteousnes So that by the whole scope of this scripture it is evident the Apostle divideth not the people of the church of Rome from the Bishop and ministers of the same as if the people should be Gods true Temple Christs true Church under his covenant and so in the state of grace when the Bishops and ministers are the Divils Temple Antichrist the man of syn and so in the state of damnation but maketh both bishops and people deceivers and deceived all of them under wrath and condemnation otherweise then my opposite would perswade For he pleading thus The Apostle speaking of Antichrist describeth him thus There shal come an apostasie c would have men think that the Bishop and ministers of the church of Rome are the apostasie and the people not contrarie to all the scope of this scripture contrarie also to Paul in 1 Tim. 4 1. where he foretelleth of some that should apostate or depart from the faith giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of Divils meaning it of the people deceived by false teachers yea it is contrary also to mine opposites own graunt who
he would 〈…〉 his first covenant and so receive them againe to grace in Christ. Vnto which I now add this sixt that God called himself the God of Jsrael and them his people because of many among them that were in deed his both such as yeilded not to Ieroboams idolatrie but went to Ierusalem to sacrifice 2 Chron. 11. 16. and seven thousand in Jsrael which bowed not the knee to Baal 1 King 19. 18. and such also as erring at first in simplicitie were by the Prophets brought to repentance though the general state of the land never repented but went on in their syn til the Lord cast them out of his sight as is testified in 2 King 17. His next chief ground is the comparison of Iudah who likeweise for sook the Lord and sometime became more corrupt then Israel so that if Israel were not in trueth Gods people and church then Iudah was not Answ. I have shewed how Israel might be called Gods people still and why I judge them not to be Gods true Church For Iudah they changed not the constitution wherin they were set of God made no new face of a Church no new Temples preists c as did Israel Therfore they did wickedly in the true Church as often times greater impietie is committed in the Church then among the heathens yet the state of the church of the heathens may not be compared though the punishmēt of such as transgress in the Church and repent not shal be worse then the heathens Mat. 11. 20. 24. Secondly the defection of Iudah was not generall like Israels though sometime the scriptures speak generally when many are corrupted but even then when for their synns they were caried into Babylon there was a godly company compared to a basket of good figgs Ier. 24. 2. 5. 6. 7. which had cried out for all the abominations were marked and reserved of God Ezek. 9. 4. c Thirdly the state of Iudah was often times reformed by many good Kings as Iosiah Ezekiah Iehosaphat and others the people brought to repentance and the covenant renewed but never so in Israel by any king that there reigned from their first apostasie to the captivitie 2 King 17. Fourthly for the wicked troupes in Iudah that refused admonition persecuted their brethren killed the Prophets mainteyned idolatrie for which the godly left their synfull communion I hold them not Gods true Church or in his covenant of grace Because the covenant was alwayes conditional if men repent and beleeve as I have before proved and mine opposite himself hath granted This may suffice to his often repeated reasons which are deduced and varied from the groundes aforesayd Touching 2 Chron. 15. 3. IShewed from the Prophet Azariahs speech to Asa and all Iudah that Israel was without the true God without teaching Priest and without Law 2 Chron. 15. 1. 2. 3. and therfore could not in that estate be judged to be in the covenant of grace Mine opposite laboureth to bring Iudah it self also within this estate but that hath no colour with it The distinction of names Iudah and Israel the state of Iudah under Solomon Roboam Abijah and Asa though corruptions were come in plainly sheweth it otherweise and I leave it to the readers judgment 2. he granteth it may well be understood of the 10. tribes and sheweth good reasons for it how then doth he take away the weight of the reason that Israel being without the true God without a teaching Priest Gods true ministerie and without Law could not in that estate be Gods true church in his covenant of grace or have the true seales therof unto them He fayrly denyeth the conclusion Jt wil not prove sayth he that circumcision or the other ordinances of God had in Jsrael or in Judah were false and deceytfull signes c. Jf it would then it might be urged against Iudah also and where then was circumcision c. I answer If there were no circumcision but among them that were without the true God without his ministerie and without his Law then was there no true circumcision in the world For if we consider the first institution of circumcision Gen. 17. and the Apostles doctrine of it in Rom. 2. 25. 28. 29. 4. 11. and the doctrine of Christian baptisme now answerable to circumcision of old it is impossible that that people should have the true seale of righteousnes and salvation from God in Christ that are without God and without Christ. No colourable excuses or distinctions wil here availe◠except men can prove an absolute promise of salvation whether men repent beleeve or no whether they be in God and Christ or no Which is contrary to all the scriptures Wherfore this one testimonie is ynough to overthrow all his long plea for Israel as if they in this synfull stare unrepentant continued stil actually in the covenant of grace and state of salvation And what colour maketh he against this plaine scripture He first speaketh of forsaking God what it meaneth and how it is spoken of the Iewes in the Prophets namely of forsaking his Law Temple Worship and service and not simply of so dealing with the Lord himself as the bare words and letter it self might seem to imply For even in the defection of Israel when Ieroboam set up the calves yet stil they intended to worship the Lord that brought them out of the land of Egypt c. 1 King 12. 28. Answ. First observe how here he would not have the bare words and letter of the scripture to be insisted upon yet is it his continuall practise and onely colourable reasons For the Temple of God 2. Thes. 2. and the people of God are his mayn grounds for the church of Rome and of apostate Israel 2. He omitteth the words which I cited that Israel was without the true God c and speaketh of an other phrase of their forsaking the Lord to ease his burden which he found too heavy 3. It is granted him that by forsaking the Lord is meant the forsaking of his Law Temple Worship and service and not that they did professedly renounce God but stil pretended and intended to serve the true God what would he inferr hereupon This maketh the more against his plea for them The scripture sayth they were without the true God without teaching Priest without Law this was true eyther in their own account or in Gods not in their own account for they thought they stil reteyned the true God even as the heathens of old hereticks Antichristians and Iewes at this day perswade themselves that they serve the true God therfore they were such in Gods account Now Gods judgment is alwayes according to trueth when mans judgment erreth and deceiveth himself Thus then though Israel thought themselves the true church and to have the true God as mine opposite also thinketh and pleadeth for them yet in the Lords account which is trueth they were without the true God
Elias prayer against Israel and Gods answer J have reserved to my self 7000. men who have not bowed the knee to the image of Baal Even so then sayth he at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace c. By this we are taught 1. That if a few or any one of a people be reserved of God though the multitude be cast away yet it cannot be sayd absolutely that God hath cast away his people And this may lead us to understand why God called Israel his people in their apostasie because some he kept from falling into it some he brought out of it by repentance 2. That those are in deed Gods people whom he foreknew the rest are cast off Now those which are foreknowen of God are described thus that he also did predestinate them to be conformed to the image of his sont them he also called them he also justified them he also glorified Rom. 8. 2◠〈◊〉 Thus are we led to judge who are Gods people when we see their calling justifying and gloryfying that is their sanctification â— Cor. 3â— â—8 by which iâ— charitie we are to judge of their predestination and estate in grace 3. That as the remnant of the Iewes which imbraced the gospel were the election of grace that is the people whom in charitie we should judge to be elected of God according to his grace and the others are blinded hardned cast off til God give them repentance so in Israel they that kept themselves from the coÌ„mon idolatrie of Baal inwardly and outwardly and reteyned the true service of God were his election of grace and to be judged his true people the others that synned in Baal were dead til God gave them repentance unto life Thus the Apostles exposition and application of those 7000. in Israel may help us to judge of their estate aright And not because circumcision was unto them the seale of grace and of forgivenes of synns to conclude that therfore it was likeweise to them that served Baal for so we should prostitute Gods grace and the seals therof to such as God condemneth and rejecteth Fiftly he instanceth the worship of Baal by Iudah Ier. 7. Judg. 2. c. Wherto I answer as before that Iudah in her constitution remayned a true church though corrupted Israel being a false church as hath been manifested Neyther was the defection universall and open as in Israel As for such in Iudah as so fell from God and would not be brought to repentance the Prophet telleth them they trusted in lying words when they sayd The Temple of the Lord the Temple of the Lord c. Ier. 7. 4. 8. the Lord threatneth to cast them out of his sight and forbad his Prophet to pray for them Jer. 7. 15. 16. So their circumcision became unto them uncircumcision Rom. 2. 25. To this he objecteth Though mans idolatrie c may make Gods sacraments improfitable to himself yet can they not make them lying and deceitfull signes but that in the Lords ordinance they are unto all and therfore also unto them his true signes and faithfull seals on his part of forgivenes of synns and life eternal For shall the infidelitie of man turne the truth of God into a lye God forbid Answ. I have before answered that all Gods ordinances are in them selves and on his part holy faithfull and true They are true seals of forgivenes of synns but to such as are worthy partakers of them in faith otherweise they seale judgment unto men 1 Cor. 11. 27. 28 29. And it is not his ordinance that open and obstinate idolaters and wicked men should administer or receive them Ezek. 44. 9. Numb 15. 30. 31. Levit. 7. 20. Psalm 〈◊〉 1â— 17. That men may turne the truth of God into a lye the Apostle plainly teacheth Rom. 1. 25. so may they the truth of his ordinances into lyes But the truth of God as it is in himself or his faithfulnes is unchangeable if men beleeve not or sanctifie him not they perish by the judgment of God which is according to trueth and his faithfulnes suffreth him not to save such unless he make them first new creatures and beleevers Joh. 3. 36. 1. Joh. 5. 10. 12. Sixtly he expoundeth Israels death in Hos. 13. 1. to be by the exposition of sundry writers not death in syn but slayn for their synns or their estate overthrowen or neer utter destruction c. Answ. Both may be true that first they were dead in syn and after destroyed civilly for their syn Gods judgmeÌ„ts are according to mens deserts he destroyed not the Amorites Egyptians and other nations til their iniquitie was full Gen. 15. 16. Wherfore to condemne the exposition which I gave because an other consequent folowed upon it as the ruine of Achabs house or the like is no fitme argument And to his many expositors whom he citeth I oppose one greater then all even th'Apostle in Rom. 11. before spoken of who sheweth the election of grace to be in the 7000 that worshiped not Baal and not in the multitude of the Baalists And if they were not of the election of grace then were they dead in syn though he and many say the contrary Finally he alleageth the sayings of the Prophet before and after The Lord found Iakob in Bethel and there he spake with us c Therfore turne thou to thy God c. Hos. 12. 4. 5. 6. 9. And yet am J the Lord thy God from the land of Egypt and thou shalt know no God but me I did know thee in the wildernes c. Hose 13. 4. 5. Answ. I have before shewed that the prophets speak to Israel as a corporation or body which after a sort continueth one and the same through many generations when yet as touching their particular persons or generations they are different contrary as godly fathers in the state of grace and life may beget wicked children without grace and in state of death Ezek. 18. 9. 10. 13. 14. 17. 18. c. So the King of Tyre had been in Eden the garden of God a proselyte in the Church Ezek. 28. 13. not that heathen king then living but his predecessor Huram long before 1. King 5. So Paul speaketh of the Iewes cast away of God as the same people till their last calling Rom. 11. And I doubt not but a man preaching to convert them at this day might apply unto them the like sayings I am the Lord thy God from the land of Egypt thou shalt know no God but me J led thee in the wildernes c. But alwayes in such general phrases the promises of grace belong onely to such as beleeve and turne to the Lord the others that remaine hardned shall perish And hitherto of his exceptions against the scriptures which I cited although as I shewed if they had continued Gods true church in the land yet wheÌ„ they were for obstinacie in their synns cast
A REPLY TO A PRETENDED CHRISTIAN PLEA FOR THE ANTICHISTIAN CHVRCH OF ROME published by Mr. Francis Iohnson ao. 1617. Wherin the weakness of the sayd Plea is manifested and arguments alleaged for the Church of Rome and Baptisme therein are refuted By Henry Ainsworth Anno 1618. We would have healed Babylon but she is not healed forsake her and let us goe every one into his owne countrie for her judgment reacheth unto heaven and is lifted up even to the skies Ier. 51. 9. Printed in the yere 1620. The Preface TWo things good Reader have been heretofore controverted between Mr. Iohnson and mee the one concerning the Power of the Christian church which he would have installed in the Ministerie thereof the other concerning the Antichristian church of Rome with the ministerie and baptisme thereof which he hath pleaded to be true though corrupted I have proved to be false and deceytfull These things have passed publikly through mine Opposites occasion in Mr Richard Cliftons Advertisement and my Animadversion therto The former of these two points Mr. Iohnson hath left vnanswered so the prudent may judge of the strife by that which we both have sayd the latter he hath sought to mainteyne by a colourable Plea for the Romane church cheifly underpropped by two reasons 1. because Antichrist should sit in the Temple of God 2. and because Apostate Israel the figure of this Antichristian church was the church of God as he pretendeth These with his other like reasons I have laboured to refell in this treatise folowing His order of handling them I have altered beginning with the Church of Rome then with the Baptisme of that church for so I judge the trueth of the controversie wil soonest appeare His often longsome repetitions I seek to abridge as being fruitlesse wearisome to the Readers his bold and bitter taunts I passe over being not willing to answer any man and least of all the dead to such things As also his marching us among the Anabaptists for our more disgrace his dissembling of his own former judgment and accord with us in the things now controverted imputing them to us and others when himself hath formerly spoken and written for the things which he now would pull down but hath not taken away his owne grounds Onely wheras in his preface he intimateth sundry manifest untruthes published in the Animadversion but nameth none I signifie in a good conscience that to my knowledge â— published not any one untrueth but rather spared him then pressed things in extremitie That which I suppose he aimeth at I set downe from the report of honest faithfull witnesses of whome some are now at rest in the Lord who would not as I am perswaded willingly have related any thing but the trueth Finally as in all other my labours so in these controversies following I indevour to find out manifest the way and wil of God by the light of his word to the glorie of his name and comfort of those that love the trueth in sinceritie A REPLY TO A PRETENDED Christian Plea for the Antichristian Church of Rome WEe are taught of God that they which forsake the Law praise the wicked but such as keep the Law will contend with them Wherfore though my desire hath been to leave off contention with all men to labour to build up Sion in peace yet being provoked by name my writings against the Man of syn that Son of perdition being publickly traduced I held it my dutie to mainteyne the warre which I began to wage against the Beast whom The Lord will consume with the spirit of his mouth and will abolish with the brightnes of his coming The state of this controversie is whether notwithstanding the infinite idolatries and other abominations now of a long time with strong hand practised by the church of Rome it be to be reputed the true church of Christ and the Sacraments especially Baptisme to be esteemed the true signes and seals of the covenant of grace from God to them in their present estate I deny it mine opposite hath colourably pleaded for it inveighed much against me in his last book called A Christian Plea ao. 1617. Wherin though in many things he deserved sharp blame yet having ended his life with his work and not being now to answer for himself or make use of that which is written I will omitt the just reproofs which might through Gods mercie have been a benefit unto him and will address my self to remove the stumbling blocks out of others way and to cleare the trueth which is darkned with the cloud of error The Lord which hath taken this counsel against Babylon that the least of the flock shal draw them out and that he will surely make their habitation desolate with them inable me with his grace to â—ight the good fight of â—aith and to declare in Sion the vengeance of the LORD our God the vengeance of his Temple Of the church of â—ome BEcause the true Church is that people to whom perteyneth the adoption of sonns and the glorie and the covenants the giving of the Law and the service of God and the promises it is requisite that we first haÌ„dle the state of Antichrists church so shall we the better discerne of the ministerie seales of the covenant and other ordinances of God which the man of syn abuseth whether they be true or false unto them in that their synfull abuse In my former answer I layd downe these grounds The Antichristian synagogue is by the Holy Ghost called a Beast Rev. 13. 11. which signifieth a Kingdome Dan. 7. 23. it is named also a great Citie Rev. 11. 8. which noteth the largenes of tha tpolitie kingdome It cometh up out of the earth Rev. 13. 11. as being of this world which Christs kingdome that cometh downe from heaveÌ„ Rev. 21. 2. is not and therefore is called a man of syn 2 Thes. 2. 3. and a great whore Rev. 17. 1. whose head is Abaddon or Apollyon Revel 9. 11. the Destroyer of others and himself the son of perdition 2 Thes. 2. 3. and they that follow him are the children of damnation 2 Thes. 2. 12. This wicked generation warreth against the Lamb Christ and against the Saincts Rev. 17. 14. 6. and 13. 7. blasphemeth Gods name and Tabernacle and them that dwel in heaven Rev. 13. 6. that is the true church whose conversation is heavenly Phil. 3. 20. Yet doe they all this mischief under shew of Christian religion and therefore this Beast hath hornes like the Lamb Christ Rev. 13. 11. this whore is arayed with purple scarlet guilded with gold precious stones and pearles Rev. 17. 4. as if she were the Queen and spouse of Christ Psal. 45. 9. 13. Ezek. 16. â—0 13. Song 7. 5. she hath Peace-offrings and Vowes Prov. 7. 14. as if she were devout in Gods service Psal. 66. 13. bread and waters Prov. 9. 16. 17. as ready
to mankinde c. I answer First for the persons that set downe this profession they are by the testimony of God that false prophet which with the Beast shal be tormēted for ever ever Rev. 20. 10. or at least they are those uncleane spirits which come out of the mouth of the Beast of the False prophet for they are the spirits of Divils working miracles which goe forth unto the Kings of the earth and of the whole world to gather them to the battel of that great day of God almighty Rev. 16. 13. 14. And this is apparant by that corrupt Testament and blasphemous notes and interpretations upon it which they there set forth to the world in sted of the true Christian and catholik faith Moreover they are a part of the popish hierarchie which mine opposite after maketh to be the Man of syn the son of perdition and the Beast which hee will not indure to heare that they should be accounted the church or maried to Christ yet here he maketh them the preachers of the doctrine of salvation Secondly for the Profession which they there make if it were sound and good yet denying it againe in their works it nothing availeth them for of such it is written They professe that they know God but in works they deny him being abominable and disobedient and unto every good work reprobate Tit. 1. 16. But what shal we say if they deny the trueth of the doctrine of Christ not in work onely but even in word and profession First then to omitt their rayling against Calvin about the Godhead of Christ being of himself in their Annot. on John 1. sect 3. concerning Christs manhood and the trueth of his humane nature how ever they acknowledge him to have taken flesh of the virgin yet beleeve they and burne to ashes such as wil not beleeve it that the bread in the sacrament is transsubstantiated into the very body of Christ so they have a Christ made of a wafer cake a Christ whose whole bodie is in an hundred thousand places and moe at once even in all places of the world whersoever Masse is sayd by a Preist so he must have a fanatical bodie which can neyther be seen felt tasted or by any sense of man perceived as an humane bodie this breaden Christ they worship in that their idolatrous sacrament and doe eat him really properly with their mouthes And doe these now beleeve Christs humane nature aright when as by the plain scripture we are taught that the heaven must receive him until the times of restitution of all things Act. 3. 21. As for his office of Mediatorship wheras they profess him to be the singular Advocate and patron of mankinde by singular they mean not the onely Advocate or mediator as the scripture teacheth ◠Tim. 2. 5. 1 Joh. 2. 1. but a speciall or chief mediatour for they have innumerable other advocates and mediators as the heathēs of old had one chief God and many inferiour gods So the same Rhemists gloss on 1 Tim. 2. telleth us that though Christ be the onely singular Advocate and patron c. yet this letteth not but there may be other inferiour mediators though not in that singular sense And how they beleeve in their Queen of heaven let this one song amongst many other to the virgin Marie witness when they sing O regina poli mater gratissima prosi Spernere me noli me commendo tibi soli i. O queen of heaven c. J commend me to thee onely As for the redemption the full and sufficient ransome for all our synns payed by his blood which they would seem to hold it is with fraud and injurie to Christs blood which by their distinction satisfied for the syn but not for the punishment and therefore they have feighned a purgatorie fyre wherein mens soules doe beare the punishment of their owne venial synns Concil Trid-sess 6. can 30. Bellarm. de Parg. c. 1. From which also they can redeem themselves by money given to Antichrists priests that sacrifice for the synns of the living and the dead And whereas God teacheth us that we are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Jesus Christ Rom. 3. 24. and that we are not justified by the works of the Law but by the faith of Jesus Christ Gal. 2. 16. the Antichristians teach us a justification by faith and works togither by Christs merits Saints and Popes merits their owne and these works by which they beleeve to be saved in part are very many of them wicked works of their owne devisings as going on pilgrimage giving of their goods to mainteyne Antichrists clergie and idolatrie and other like works of the Divil And of their owne idols as of an Agnus Dei made of waxe they beleeve and profess Omne malignum peccatum frangit ut Christi sanguis et angit Jt breaketh all wicked syn as the blood of Christ doeth Thus blasphemously they tread Christs blood under their feet Finally the faith which they profess to have in Christ what is it Any trust or confidence such as the faithful have in Christ to be their saviour as the Apostle teacheth in Rom. 8. 33. ◠39. Gal. 2. 20. Hebr. 3 6. Ephe. 3. 12. Nay this confidence they reject as a presumption and their faith which is without confidence being but an assent to the trueth of Gods promises not a confidence of their justification in particular is such a faith as the Divils have who know and assent to the trueth of Gods promises unto mankinde See Bellarm. de Iustific l. 1. c. 5. 6. c. Now if this painted face of the Romish Iezebel be so fowle and uglie being compared with the beawtie of Christs true spouse what may wee think is the faith of that ignorant seduced multitude of Antichristians who professing Christ in name looke for salvation by the wicked workes which the Pope hath learned them and by the works of the Law of God and beleefe in Christ and their owne sufferings confusedly togither and yet neyther know Christ nor what true saving faith in him doth meane Object Who dare say but that God by this faith in Christ saveth some of them who doe thus beleeve in simplicitie c. Answ. And who dare say but that God notwithstanding this faith professed by the Iesuites as before may justly damne them though they thus beleeve in simplicitie ' Seing even in these things which they profess they corrupt themselves with horrible idolatries having many false Gods and false Christs in whom they also trust and dayly pray unto them as did the heathens And seing this their faith considered in the best is no true saving faith but as themselves say The faith which truely justifieth is not that wherby they beleeve that God is merciful unto them but that wherby they beleeve with the whole hart without any doubting that Jesus is the Christ and the son of
sayd a litle before that the church of Rome is fallen into most sinfull and deep defection and apostasie and so is a notorious harlot and idolatrâ—ss Wherefore his distinction here between the apostasie the church of Rome making the one Antichrist the other Gods temple under his covenant of grace neyther accordeth with the scriptures nor with his own assertion Next this where he sayth that by the Temple of God in Israel was figured the church of God among Christians it is graunted But withall let it be noted that himself can not deney but the Temple and tabernacle in Israel was not the church and congregation of Gods people properly but a sacramental signe of Gods dwelling with them which I before confirmed by these scriptures Exod 25. 8. 2. Chron. 6. 2. Ezek. 37. 26. 27. Rev. 21. 3. Secondly he himself affirmeth that the temple at Ierusalem did primarily figure out Christ and secondarily the church both the catholik or universal and particular churches likeweise particular Christians and in several respects both their bodies and their soules and consciences Vpon which graunts of his it foloweth that there is no necessarie consequence of this his proposition Jf the Pope of Rome with his hierarchie be the man of syn spoken of in 2. Thes. 2. then is the church of Rome the Temple of God there spoken of for he understanding by the church the people as in 1. Cor. 3. 16. 17. 2. Cor. 6. 16. Eph. 2 21. and yet granting that the Temple in Israel was not the people all may see the weaknes and insufficiencie of this inference that because the Pope of Rome sitteth as God in the Temple of God therfore the people of the church of Rome are that Temple of God there spoken of consequently Gods true church For why now may we not as well if not much better say that by the Temple of God is understood the doctrine and profession of Christ the true Temple or as in my former †book I shewed thus As the Temple was an outward signe of Gods presence with his people and of his inward dwelling in their harts * by saith and by his spirit unto their salvation so Antichrists temple is an outward shew of his presence with that seduced people in whose harts †he dwelleth by Popish faith and by his spirit of errour carying them to damnation But as Antichrist shal not professedly deny the true God or Christ though in deed he falsly * sheweth himself that he is God so shal hâ— not professedly deny the Temple or church of God but falsly vaunt his adulterous synagogue to be the same Vnto this exposition mine opposite hath given no answer and it being according to the scriptures trueth of the thing in controversie I leave it to the prudent reader whether the outward shew and profession of Christ and Christian religion be not the first thing here intended of th'Apostle by the Temple of God And this is further confirmed by Rev. 11. 1. Where the Temple Altar and Worshipers are three distinct things and the people are the worshipers there spoken of neyther the Temple nor the Altar of which place we shal treat anone Then wheras he granteth that the Temple in Ierusalem did primarily figure out Christ how is it that he wholly neglecteth the primarie thing figured and insisteth upon the secondary the church or people of Rome Seing it is knowen how the Pope pretendeth him self to be Christs vicar and deputie on earth and to be the servant and worshiper of Christ in heaven and may we think that th'Apostle in warning them of the mysterie of iniquitie would not imply the chief point of the mysterie that Antichrist should in pretence sit for Christ and in his sted as his vicar generall on earth Thus to sit in the Temple or for the Temple of God may well be understood that Antichrist should sit for Christ a pretended friend but in deed an adverse foe Now for that which the Temple secondarily figured namely the church catholik and also particular and so mens consciences he wavereth in his application He sayth this terme the church of Rome is taken eyther particularly which he applieth to the Laterane church in Rome the Popes parish church or more generally for all other such Christian churches as are come under the Popes jurisdiction c. This later I hold to be most proper here for what needed there such warning to the Thessalonians other christian churches through the world if a Bishop of the Lateran parish a corner in Rome had exalted himself above God therin onely and had not usurped also a pretended Christian power over all And the complement of the prophesie is an evident exposition of it for who knoweth not that the Pope scorneth to be Bishop of the Lateran parish onely it is a jurisdiction over the catholik church throughout the earth which he chalengeth And now what proof bringeth mine opposite that the church of Rome as God constituted it is taken generally for other Christian churches under the Popes jurisdiction None at all neyther can he bring any jote of Gods word for the same Againe what proof maketh he that the catholik Romane church wherin the Pope sitteth is the true church of God None but this J suppose these men themselves being better advised wil not deny them to be the churches and Temple of God But he should have shewed if it had been possible for him that the Romane church is by divine institution the catholik or universal church which because I assure my self it can never be doen I conclude that this Romane catholik church is a fiction of the Popes braine and a meere idol like himself and is no otherweise the Temple of God then the Pope is Christs universal vicar namely in lying words and vaine ostentation And so the maine ground for the Temple of God wherin Antichrist sitteth to be the true church of Christ is overthrowne As for the Popes Laterane parish I both deny it to be Christs true church and that it onely is the Temple of God wherin Antichrist should sit His proof of the former is this Jf we understand it of a particular church as the Apostle wrote his epistle to the church of the Romans how shall we soundly deny it eyther to be the Temple of God or Antichrist to be set therin Thus have we suppositions and questions in sted of proofes To his demand I answer it is the Temple of God in pretence not in trueth even as the Pope is a bishop of Christ in pretence but in deed is Antichrist the man of syn as mine opposite granteth The church that was in Rome in Pauls time wil no more justifie the Popes synagogue there now then the Christian ministers which were then in that church Rom. 12. wil justifie the Antichristian prelates that there reigne at this day Secondly the Laterane parish at Rome is of the
can be transformed as the ministers of righteousnes 2 Cor. 11. 14. 15. is it such a marvel that he should transforme his temple and church into the Temple of God and church of Christ and yet as he is a Divil stil notwithstanding his transformation so his Temple coÌ„tinueth stil the Temple of the Divil and church of Antichrist how ever they are disguised with other names and habits And to help a litle to the discerning of both these opposite mysteries of pietie and impietie wee are to know that Christs Kingdome beginneth in the kingdome of Satan and is perfected in the Kingdome of God and Antichrists kingdome beginneth in the kingdome of God and is perfected in the kingdome of Satan For the god of this world having blinded the eyes of infidels who are dead in synns and walk according to the prince of the power of the aier Christ by his Ministers sent into the world and by his word of trueth the gospel causeth light to arise unto them openeth their eyes and turneth them from darknes to light and from the power of Satan vnto God that they may receive forgivenes of synns and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in him and thus God delivereth them from the power of darknes and translateth them into the kingdome of his beloved son Then cometh Satan by Antichrists which are his ministers privily crept into the church and by the word of lying which is Antichrists gospel he darkneth the mindes of them that have not received the love of the trueth and turneth them back againe from God and by damnable heresies privily brought in draweth them even to deny the Lord that bought them and so bring upon themselves swift destruction Then doe they goe out from the church blaspheme the way of trueth and togither with the Beast doe warr against Christ whom yet in name and pretense they would seem to honour and serve so accomplishing the mysterie of their iniquitie unto assured damnation if they turne not againe unto God This thing not being observed how Christ beginneth in the world and draweth men out of it into his church and Antichrist beginneth in the church draweth men out of it into the world againe as the Dragons taile draweth the starrs of heaven â—â—fteth them to the earth Rev. 12. 4. mine opposite thought it absurditie and contradiction in me for writing thus When th Apostle therfore telleth us that Antichrist sitteth as God in the Temple of God it is to be vnderstood first of their invading and destroying of Gods church and people as the heathens of old dealt with Jerusalem and dwellers therin secondly of their owne vayne ostentation whiles they will have it called the Christian catholik church and th Pope the head of the same Vpon this he thus inveigheth What have we here Doth himself now by the Temple of God vnderstand Gods church and people yea such as was answerable to Ierusalem and the dwellers therin of old why then hath he so eagerly oppugned us hereabout c. Answ. I oppugne the present church of Rome which Antichrist destroyeth not but buildeth and adorneth as an alluring harlot the Christian church which was in Rome of old that hath he invaded and destroyed long since for they then were Saints such as he hateth these now are worshipers of him and of idols Divils and are an habitation of Divils So there is as much difference between the church of Rome now and the church then as between the Bishop of Rome now the Bishops then they were Christs ministers this now is Antichrist as mine opposite himself confesseth And what cause hath he to insult as if he had got the victorie Let wise men judge But he proceedeth Obj. Where can he shew in the scriptures that sitting is put for invading or destroying c. Otherwhere stil he teatheth that by sitting is meant abiding continuing dwelling c. What if I cannot prove that sitting is put for invading or destroying if I prove my assertion by other words of the text shall it not suffice The words Eiston Naon into the Temple may imply by a figure his invading and the person that invadeth being an enemy a theef a wolf implyeth his destroying for our Saviour sayth The theef cometh not but for to steale and to kill and to destroy 1 Joh. 10. 10. The scripture often wanteth words easy to be understood so here Paul sayth of Antichrist that he having entred into the Temple of God sitteth as God And if they regard not my exposition they shall have his on whom they so much rely Mr. Iunius I mean who so explaineth it saying The testimonie of signe is this that Invading the temple of God he shal sit as God Jun. Animad vers in Bellarm. Controv. 3. l. 3. c. 14. not 18. But what if I confirme it by the word sitting which he thought so unlikely In Esai 14. 13. the Prophet upbraideth the king of Babylon thus Thou hast sayd in thine hart J wil ascend into heaven c. J wil sit also in the mount of the congregation in the sides of the North meaning mount Sion where Gods temple was But this is meant of Nebuchadnezars invading of Ierusalem to spoile the same as the historie sheweth 2 King 25. and in him Antichrists tyrannie against the church was lively figured As for sitting to mean continuing though it doth so often times yet not alwayes Christ sate upon the mount of Olives Mat. 24. 3. the disciples sate in the house Act. 2. 2. yet dwelt they not or continued long there And when the Babylonian invaded mount Sion to sit there he continued not there but having spoiled the citie burned the Temple and captived the people he returned into Babylon 2 King 25. so Antichrist spoiling Christian churches returneth to his whore of Babylon his proper habitation which he wickedly boasteth to be the Sion Temple and church of God Wheras mine opposite expounded the Temple of God to be the church and shewed not whether he meant a church particular or general and catholik I sayd for a particular church it wil not agree with the prophesies of Antichrist whose citie or church is so great as peoples kinreds tongues nations doe dwell in the streets therof Rev. 11. 8. 9. He gainsayeth me thus First Still he calls that Antichrists church which th' Apostle calleth the Temple of God Answ. It is his own interpretation that the Temple meaneth the church and that he that sitteth in it is Antichrist and sitting he wil have to be continuing and why may not I call that church wherin Antichrist sitteth continually as God Antichrists church yea though it were indeed Gods church as he supposeth Seing the citie wherin Christ did but dwell was called his owne citie Mat. 9. 1. And that which God sayth in my house and in my kingdom 1 Chron.
8. is clearly signified so that the Sun wherwith the church had been clothed was become black the Moon bloody the starrs the ministers fallen from heaven to earth and the heaven it self departed as a scroll tolled togither and God for the synns of Christians as of the Iewes of old had delivered this rebellious people into the hands of the spiritual Babylon â—â—e synagogue of Antichrist a Beast or kingdom blasphemous idolatrous filthy in life and hating the Saincts as Sodom Egypt and Rome when it was heathenish then God in wrath remembring mercie to a remnant the election of his grace began againe to reedify his church And to signify this Iohn had in vision a measuring reed given him to measure the Temple Altar and worshipers but not the Court or Citie as yet because he would renew his church by degrees Afterward he saw the Citie gates wall therof measured also when the church should fully be restored This reed which was of gold signifieth the word of God or scriptures wherby all doctrines ordinances churches and peoples are to be measured tried and discerned whether they be the building of God or no. For God by his word directed Moses to make the Tabernacle and all the appurtenances according to the patterne shewed him in the mount Exod. 25. 40. Heb. 8. 5. and so they were made Exod 39. 42. 43. Solomon likeweise had the patterne of the Temple and of the Courts chambers treasures c the weight of gold for the Candlesticks tables bowles cups c as the Lord had made David understand in writing by his hand upon him even all the works of that patterne 1 Chron. 28. 11. 19. So then the commandment to measure with the reed the Temple Altar and worshipers Rev. 11. 1. signified such a renewing of Christianitie and professors of it as should be according to Gods word when they are measured and tried therby of such as have the Apostle Iohns spirit But the Court Citie and Gentiles treading down the same were to be cast out and not measured to signify that the holy doctrines and ordinances of the gospel abused and troden down by the Antichristian gentiles can endure no measure or trial of Gods word but are to be rejected as profane in their synfull abuse of them Because as the Gentiles of old changed the trueth of God into a lye Rev. 1. 〈◊〉 and when they knew God they glorified him not as God but became vaine in their imaginations and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into images Rom. 1. 21. 23. therfore though they reteyned after their profane manner many of Gods divine ordinances taught them from Noe yet no Prophet or man of God ever measured their Temples altars sacrifices Preists or people but cast them out as wicked so the Gentiles the Antichristians now having likeweise changed the trueth of God into a lye and whiles they profess Christ in word doe in deed deny him albeit they tread down and sacrilegiously profane the holy things of God his doctrines and ordinances of faith worship church c yet are they to be cast out and left unmeasured being such as will indure no trial by the word of God How then doeth mine opposite seek in vaine to measure the church of Rome and to prove her Gods true church though corrupted and to be under his covenant of grace when God here expressly biddeth them to be left unmeasured How is it that he pleadeth for a reformation onely and will have no new building or plantation when Sodom and Babylon must be reformed with fyre that is utterly destroyed as in the types of old so in the thing typed at this day as it is written she shal be utterly burnt with syre for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her Rev. 18. 8. We finde in the type how after the Babylonians had burned the Temple when the Iewes returned out of captivitie they layd againe the foundation of the Temple of the Lord and then builded it Ezr. 3. 6. 10. 11. We find also in the Gospel that Antichrist should destroy the Temple even to the foundation which is Christ 1 Ioh. 2. 22. 1 Cor. 3. 11. And in Rev. 11. there is measuring as for a new building yet now we shall have by these pleaders Babylon reformed and no new Temple built or Ierusalem reedified If any like to apply this foresayd measuring of the Temple Revel 11. to the defection of the church rather then to the reedifying of it I wil not strive here about neyther wil it if so it be understood any thing help the present state of the church of Rome about which our controversie here is By this which hath been sayd I leave it to the judgment of men of understanding whether it be more fit to apply these Gentiles to the wicked Iewes which whiles the true Temple courts and citie stood did in hypocrisie abuse Gods holy ordinances Esa. 1. as mine opposite doth apply them or to the Gentiles of whom the Psalmist complaineth that they had come into Gods inheritance defiled the Temple layd Ierusalem on heapes that is ruinous as Mica 3. 12. killed Gods servants and left them unburied as here in Rev. 11. 8. 9. the dead bodies of Gods witnesses are not suffred to be put in graves that had devoured Iakob and layd wast his dwelling place for the former iniquities of Israel Seing that in Esaias dayes there was no measuring for the new building of the Temple as was after the captivitie of Babylon then and in this place nor casting out of the court and giving of the citie to be troden down of the Gentiles for many yeres as Iudah was given into the hand of the King of Babylon when God forsook his house and left his heritage to be destroyed and troden under foot seventie yeres But as of the destruction of the earthly Ierusalem by the heathen Romans Christ sayd Ierusalem shal be troden down of the Gentiles that is ruined not suffred to be built againe until the times of the Gentiles be fulfylled Luke 21. 24. so of the ruine wast of this spirituall Ierusalem by the Antichristian Romans he sayth it is given to the Gentiles and the holy Citie shall they tread down 42. monethes after which time Iohn seeth the heavenly Ierusalem measured that is builded againe Rev. 21. 15. 17. But whether we understand it to have reference to former wicked Iewes called hethens for their hethenish manners or to the Babylonian Gentiles yet hath mine opposite no reason or colour of reason to restreyn it to the governours onely as he doth to the Pope and his hierarchie For they that trode in the Lords courts Esai 1. were the people as well as the Preists and princes the people of Gomorrha as well as the princes of Sodom Esai 1. 10. and they that ruined Ierusalem were the Babylonian soldjers as wel as the
him It is false The Prophet calleth not the citie Jerusalem Sodom or Gomorrhe but the Princes and people figuratively princes of Sodom and people of Gomorrhe The comparison is made of men not of places Likeweise D. Whitakers answering Bellarmine to the same objection sayth Neyther doe wee ever read Jerusalem to be called Sodom or Egypt this agreeth much more truely vnto Rome c. J confess that there in Esa. 1. the people of the Iewes are for their vices compared to Sodom and Gomorrhe as also in Ezek. 16. but yet it was not called Sodom and Gomorrhe spiritually but figuratively wheras this citie is called Sodom and Egypt spiritually that is in a spiritual respect for spiritual lust luxurie blindnes all which are found in the popish church But mine opposite putting no difference between the holy citie Ierusalem ruined and the great citie Babylon Sodom Egypt gloriously edified compareth the phrase of treading the holy citie by the Gentiles Rev. 11. with treading the Lords courts by hypocritical Iewes Esai 1. and sayth it may signify besides a treading down or underfoot a frequent continual conversing in the outward visit le church with their bodies Which if it be granted yet this must be granted also that it is here cast out not to be measured as Gods true church which was not the case of Ierusalem and the Courts in Esaies time And as for the phrase it is such as may mean no frequent continual conversing at all but a violent suppressing of the building thereof For to omitt that he speaketh here of treading down the citie and in Esay of treading down the Courts the Gentiles treading down the earthly Ierusalem Luke 21. 24. meaneth not the frequenting of that place to worship God in Neyther doth the adversaries treading down of the Sanctuarie in Esai 63. 18. or of the Sanctuarie and host that is the temple and people of Ierusalem Dan. 8. 13. or the treading down of the Lords portion Jere. 12. 10. or of his vinyard Esa. 5. 5. signify a frequenting to doe good in appearance as did the Iewes in Esai 1. 11. 12. 13. who came with multitude of sacrifices to honour God and that place of his dwelling Finally as he dutst not deny but the Gentiles in Rev. 11. were also figured out by the heathens of old for he sayth not heathens alone as Antiochus c but synful rebellious Iewes so he should have observed that figures agree not in all things For if I would prove the Antichristians now to be professed heathens and no church because Antiochos and the Babylonians were professed heathens and no church in comparison with the Iewes he would deny the consequence even so his matching them with the true church of God in Iudea because the wicked of that church were figures of them is a very weak conclusion His exposition of making the Temple altar and worshipers to signify the invisible church of Gods elect and the Gentiles with the Court and holy Citie to be the visible church of hypocrites aagreeth neyther with this place nor with Esai 1. For no men can know much lesse measure the invisible church of Gods elect as Iohn here measured the Temple altar and worshipers this belongeth to God alone who knoweth who are his Neyther in Esai 1. were there two distinct churches or places in Ierusalem one wherein the faithful and elect worshiped and another wherin Sodomites and hypocrites trode the Lords courts Besides if so it were as he supposeth what manner of people doth he make the church of Rome which he pleadeth for a cōpany of Sodomites hypocrites cast out unmeasured of God of all good men And how thē are they Gods true church sealed with his covenāt of promise He sayth the daughter of Sion left as a cottage in a vinyard c. Esai 1. 8. was the faithful church of the sealed and elect Who ever heard of such an exposition of those words The daughter of Sion usually signifieth the Common wealth or church of the Iewes as the daughter of Babel Psal. 137. 8. vvas the Common vvealth of Babylon And as Esaie here complaineth of the calamities of the church of Iudea by former warrs for their synns v. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. so where the Babylonians afterward utterly wasted it Ieremie lamenteth how from the daughter of Sion all her bewty was departed the Lord had covered her with a clowd in his anger c. purposed to destroy her wall her elders sate on the ground her breach was like the sea none could heale her her prophets had not discovered her iniquitie to turne away her captivitie c. all which doe concerne the generall state overthrown by the Babylonian not the state of the faithful and elect onely He setteth down from my former writing against Mr Smyth my judgement touching this scripture Rev. 11. when I wrote as he sayth for the trueth He traduceth me now as a quite other man but how justly the reader may see by the very wordes of mine which he hath set downe For there I sayd the cōmandement to measure the Temple altar and worshipers signified the restoring or repayring of Gods church and people after some destruction and desolation as the like visions shewed to Ezekiel Zacharie after the destruction of Solomons temple doe manifest c. There I applied the Gentiles in Rev. 11. to the Babylonians and other heathens Jer. 12. 7. 20. 4. Esa. 63. 18. Further I shewed but this he setteth not downe that M. S. enought have seen a figure of those Gentiles Rev. 11. set forth by the Psalmist O God the gentiles are come into thine inheritance c. where by Gentiles are not meant the Jsraelites but Babylonians or other heathen persecutors c. and that Antichrists church is called Babylon and Christs Jerusalem c. As M. Io. then well approved of my answer to M. S. so even now he sayth still I did soundly convince him And who then wil not see that M. I. even by his own graunt is likewise soundly convinced For as M. S. fetched the type of these Gentiles from the Israelites so doeth M I. fetch it from the Israelites in Esai 1. and contrary to that sound conviction wil not have it like the restoring of the Temple after the Babylonians had burnt it but like the afflictions of the Iewes whiles their Temple Courts and Citie stood undestroyed Esa. 1. So whether of us two be caried about of every wind and as reeds shaken hither and thither as he intwiteth me I leave it unto the prudent reader to judge As then so still I hold the holy Citie Rev. 11. to be meant of Ierusalem not of Babylon how mine opposite now hath expounded it we have seen As I did then so still I hold those Antichristian Gentiles Rev. 11. to be answerable to the Babylonians and other heathens Psal. 79. Jer.
a new Temple altar preisthood and signes differing from Christs as in deed he hath doen. And that idolatrous house erected for the worship of the true God not onely the Israelites but the Prophet Amos calleth the house that is the Temple of their god Am. 2. 8. as Paul calleth the house wherin Antichrist sitteth the temple of God 2 Thes. 2. yet this man blameth me for comparing that Temple with Ieroboams idol temples which Israel builded when he forgat his Maker Hos. 8. 14. how justly let men of judgment consider 2. His 2. exception is about Babylon and the Beast that I make them one with the Church of Rome and distinguish not Babylon from Sion This I have before cleared shewing that the church of Rome is the whore of Babylon Rev. 17. and I distinguish it from Sion which he confoundeth with Babylon being himself in that blame which he would impute unto me And to teach that God calleth us out of any civil state or goverment I have formerly proed to be erroneous and seditious contrary to the Apostles Rom. 13. 1 Pet. 2. 3. That Antichrists Apostasie and the church of Rome with him is much worse then Ieroboams and Israels with him I constantly affirme and let the synns of them both be compared and it wil soon appear Did Ieroboam pray unto creatures as the church of Rome doth to innumerable even all Saincts and Angels and some mere fictions Did Ieroboam hold any of those manifold blasphemous heresies now holden in the church of Rome Nay let the very Babylonians of old be taken and I wil undertake to prove that the church of Rome is not behinde them but in respect of the light of the Gospel revealed by Christ much worse 4. I grant that in Pauls time the church of Rome was set in the way of God and soon after fell into apostasie but where he chargeth me to say that the ordinances of God stil reteyned in that church are stollen he wrongeth me For I acknowledge not this church now to be that which was in Pauls time but a counterfeit arisen since a theif partner with Antichrist in robbing the church as the Babylonians robbed the Temple and abusing the ordinances therof to their perdition But then he objecteth Jf the church of Rome should repent c. they should not reteyn the baptisme and other ordinances of God which she hath but must part with them seing they are stollen goods And here he insulteth asking the Anabaptists how they can ever be thankfull ynough to me for thus pleading their cause c. Answ. If the Babylonians should have repented and joyned to the church of God at Ierusalem they there might have had an holy and lawful use of Gods vessels altars c which before they had stollen and abused so may these spirituall Babylonians have at this day if God give them grace to repent joyne unto Sion Here then the Anabaptists wil conne mine opposite but little thank for his gratulation 5. He calleth it my like errour and iniquitie to match baptisme and the other ordinances of God in the church of Rome with the feasts worship and sacrifices of the heathen who were without Christ and without God c. These assertions he sayth are miserable and Anabaptistical Answ. But why then doth he not refute them by the word of truth I could as easily call his assertions miserable and Papisticall but he would take that for no sound conviction And had he but related mine own words in that 85. page of my book the reader might have seen how little cause he had to exclaime â— I spake not generally of the heathens feasts worship and sacrifices as he would intimate to his reader but distinctly of those which had been ordeyned of God differing from other of their own devisings 2. I sayd the heathens kept Gods ordinance as well as Rome with their sacrifice of the Mass. He telleth his reader I match the baptisme c in Rome with the worship and sacrifices of the heathen Is this good dealing so to change my words But sundry such injuries I must beare And why may we think doth he in sted of the Lords supper now turned into a Romish mass put baptisme But because he thinketh that he hath colour to plead for one sacrament more then for an other In handling that point of their baptisme I instanced this other seale our Lords supper and an other ordinance of God Excommunication both which he passeth over yea every where when it cometh in his way he shunneth it throughout his book as in this place He knew well it was as a red hot yron that would burn his fingers But of it we shal speak more when we come to handle their baptisme 3. To his reason I answer the heathens were in deed without Christ and without God Eph. 2. and so are these Romish Antichristians or els the Apostle hath not given us a true rule to discerne Antichrist by that he denyeth both the Father and the Son 1 Joh. 2. 22. The hethens reteyned the knowledge of the true God in some mesure as their writings manifest and worshiped ignorantly the true God whom th'Apostles preached Act. 17. 23. so the Antichristians ignorantly worship the true God whom we preach and beleeve and as ignorantly by stocks and stones and prayers in an unknowen tongue like Parrats as did the heathens of old The hethens reteyned a knowledge of Christ the Redeemer figured in the sacrifices ordeyned of God so the Antichristians reteyn a knowledge of Christ in name and signified in the sacraments but as impiously doe they abuse them by holding they conferr grace ex opere operato by the work doen and other iniquities mixed with them as did the heathens and by beleeving and worshiping a Christ made of bread they surpass the heathens in ignorance and idolatrie Finally had mine opposite read Mr. Bezaes larger annotations on Eph. 2. as he read him on 2 Thes. 2. he might have seen the Antichristians very litle inferiour to the heathens without God even in Mr. Bezaes judgment which yet I suppose he would not have called miserable and Anabaptisticall as he doeth in me Touching the state of Israel in my discourse as he calleth it he confesseth I have many truthes which he also holdeth yet some sleightes errors c also mixed which he instanceth Seing he yeildeth the rest for truthes I referr the reader to the things there written which being observed he may the better judge of our controversie As first that we both agree The covenant between God man was alwayes conditional by the Law if they did his commandments they should live by them if they continued not in all things written in the Law to doe them they were cursed By the Gospel he that beleeveth in the Son of God hath everlasting life and he that obeyeth not the Son shall not see life And all the figurative covenants that
even in this his last book where he dealeth against the Anabaptists For in his Chr. plea p. 27. 28. he sayth Circumcision once received in the apostasie of Israel was not repeated againe at their returning to the Lord and leaving of their idolatrous wayes c and quoteth among other scriptures 2 Chron. 30 ch and Ezr. 6. 19. 20. 21. Of which the one speaketh of them that returned in Ezekiahs dayes whiles the Israelites were in the land the other of them that had been dispersed among the heathens and returned So I where I treat of Baptisme handle those estates indistinctly which is made a great matter against me by him that doeth the same thing himself against others But now I wil speak of them a part The Israelites that rent themselves from Iudah I take to be a false church and so continued whiles they dwelt in the land After they were dispersed and were no church The first I shew thus The twelve tribes by Gods institution were all one church both in Moses time when they had the Tabernacle among them and encamped all round about it in the order set of God Num. 2. and after in the land of Canaan whiles the Tabernacle stood when the Temple was built by Solomon both which were signes of Gods presence and dwelling with his church And to keep them in this unitie he commanded all the men of Israel to come joyntly togither from all parts of the land three times every yere to worship him and keep their solemne feasts in that one place which he should choose and at all other times to offer their sacrifices there and in no other place and thither onely to bring their first fruits their commanded and their voluntarie oblations Exod. 23. 14. 17. 19. Deut. 12. 5. 6. 7. Who so did otherweise blood was imputed unto that man and he should be cut off from among his people to keep the people from offring their sacrifices unto Divils Levit. 17. 3. 4. 7. Now when the ten tribes revolted and made Ieroboam king then Israel forgat his maker and builded Temples Hos. 8. 14. For Ieroboam took counsel and made two calves of gold and sayd unto them Jt is too much for you to goe up to Jerusalem Behold thy gods ô Jsrael which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt and he set the one in Bethel and the other he put in Dan and this thing became a syn And he made an house of hye places and made priests of the lowest of the people which were not of the sonns of Levi. And he offred on the Altar which he had made in Bethel 1 King 12. 28. 33. And having cast off the Lords Priests Levites Ieroboam ordeyned him priests for the hie places and for the Divils and for the calves which he had made but such of all the tribes of Israel as set their harts to seek the Lord God of Jsrael went to Jerusalem to sacrifice unto the Lord God of their fathers 2 Chron. 11. 14. 15. 16. Thus of one daughter of Sion one â—hurch there became two women or daughters the one to weet Jerusalem the tribe of Iudah the Lord named Aholibah that is My Tabernacle in her the other Samaria the ten tribes he named Aholah that is her own tabernacle So Israel was without the true God and without a teaching Preist and without Law 2 Chron. 15. 3. and the Lord was not with Jsrael 2 Chron. 25. 7. but at their first falling away he threatned by his Prophets that because Ieroboam had made himself other gods and molten images and cast the Lord behind his back Ieroboams house should be cut off and taken away aâ— dung and the Lord would smite Israel and root them up out of that good land which he gave to their fathers and would sâ—arter them beyond the river 1 King 14. 9. 15. Yet for to shew his patience towards his people whom he had chosen for his above all peoples of the earth and for to save his elect among them and to make the rest the more inexcusable he forbare them many yeres and by all the Prophets and all the Seers sayd unto them Turne ye from your evil wayes and keep my commandements my statutes yet they would not heare but hardned their necks and beleeved not in the Lord their God but rejected his statutes and his Covenant that he made with their fathers and folowed vanitie and became vaine and went after the heathen that were round about them and left all the commandements of the Lord their God therfore the Lord was very angrie with Jsrael and removed them out of his sight 2 King 17. 13. 18. From these and other the like testimonies against this people I gather that from the time they departed from the Lord from his Temple altars and holy signes of his presence with his people in Christ from his Priests and the lawfull sacrifices at Ierusalem which were figures of Christ and from the communion of their brethren the Iewes which remayned the church of Christ and made a new Temple altar priesthood and church of humane and synfull institution that this their church Temple preisthood and worship were false For that is trueth which agreeth with the will and word of God all humane devices in religion are lyes and vanities If it be â—ayd the Lord himself rent the kingdom from Solomons son and gave it to Ieroboam 1 King 11. 29. 31. and therfore this second church was also of divine institution I answer though God divided the kingdom yet he divided not the church there might have been twelve kings over the twelve tribes as there were of old twelve princes Numb 1. 5. 16. and yet they should have been one Church The kingdom or Civil state is an ordinance immediately under God Rom. 13. the church or ecclesiastical state is an ordinance immediately under Christ the mediator and he is the head of the bodie the church Colos. 1. 18. The civil state is above the ecclesiastical as God is the head of Christ therfore the Church is to be subject to the Magistrate the higher power the minister of God though he be an heathen Rom. 13. 1. c. 1 Pet. 2. 13. 14. for the civil state is not taken away by difference of religion error heresie or any apostasie from Christ but the ecclesiastical state is by such things dissolved the Candlestick the church may be removed and of a Church of Christ become a Synagogue of Satan 1 Joh. 2. 18. 19. Rev. 2. 5. 9. In their civil state the Israelites were to be subject unto Nebuchadnezar an heathen when he conquered them Ier. 27. 6. 8. 12. but for their ecclesiastical estate they might never submitt to Nebuchadnezars church or priests nor offer to God upon any of his altars So to Ieroboam as king they might be subject without dissolving their communion in the mysteries of Christ set in the Temple altars priests
sitteth as God in the Temple of God carrying them to destruction Whereas to prove the Temple of God 2. Thes. 2. which he expoundeth the Church of Rome to be the true Church he alleaged Zach. 6. 12. 13. Eph. 2. 11. c. 2. Cor. 6. 16. Rev. 11. 19. I shewed how he misapplied the Scriptures he repeateth his former answers which I have formerly resuted And now he addeth But to put him from his shifts let him tel us plainly when Paul sayth The Temple of God hath not agreement with Idols 2. Cor. 6. 16. if yet there be idols set in the Temple of God as was in the time of Manasseh and Antiochus whether now it ceased to be the Temple of God or not The Scripture sheweth it is the Temple of God notwithstanding 2. King 21. 7. Ier. 50. 28. Ezek 8. 5. 10. 16. Dan. 11. 31. 38. Answ. I tell them plainly that that Temple of God which the prophets speak of had no agreement with idols though the wicked set up idols in it by force But the Church of Rome which these call the Temple of God hath agreement with idols if images of silver and gold wood and stone a wheaten god in the Masse and the man of syn which sitteth as God be idols For these idols the Church of Rome worshipeth and serveth most synfully but the Temple of God which the Prophets speake of never worshiped the Idols set up in it nor had accord with them But this is a shift of shifts and a notorious sophisme in mine opposite to reason from the materiall Temple of God then which onely suffered that abuse to the spirituall Temple the Church or people now which are voluntary agents worshipers of Idols By which false argumentation he might even as well conclude that if the Papists should turn flat Pagans of Antiochus religion and serve his idols and be of his faith yet they should continue the true Church and people of God notwithstanding because the Temple then continued Gods true Temple notwithstanding all that Antiochus did thereto The next point touching their baptisme I will anone treat of in particular For his objection of salvation now had in the Church of Rome c. it was his second main argument for that Church which I have before answered he after his manner repeateth againe and againe the same things so lengthening his work I referr the reader to that answer I gave before Other things whereby I convinced his doctrine to beat the path for all licentiousnes contrary to the plaine Scriptures which shew that he that committeth sin is of the Divil and we know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not c. 1. Ioh. 3. 8. 5. 18. whereas if that he plead for be true men may be as prophane as Esau filthy in life as Sodom idolatrous and sinfull as the Aegyptians and Babylonians and yet if they wil call themselves Christians and be outwardly baptized c. they shal be justified as Gods true Church they and their seed in his covenant of grace c. which is to strengthen the hands of the wicked that he should not returne from his wickednes by promising him life Ezek 13. 22. These and other like things he passeth over without word of answer It is ynough for him to cry the Temple of God the Temple of God and to insist upon phrases which may diversly be understood Whereas the sound plea should be from the doctrines of faith and sanctification of life according by which the Apostles teach us to discern true Christians from false And who that seeketh after the truth would not rather insist upon these main grounds taught by our Saviour and his Apostles Verily I judge this pleading for Rome to be an exceeding great sin because it by consequence overthroweth both faith and holines seeing misbeleevers and most synfull idolaters as ever were on earth are justified to be Gods true Church notwithstanding and in his covenant of grace contrary to the whole Testament of Christ. It is to make a wide gate and broad way into heaven and will make men secure in all syn if they that serve the Man of syn himselfe worship his idols beleeve in his heresies and walk in his wicked works which hope to merit salvation by them in heaven may be sayd to be true Christians and in the state of grace Of the state of the Heathen WHereas I sayd J held it presumption for any to limit God by how smal meanes or measure of faith and knowledge he will save a man Who dares den but God had many elect among the heathens after he had separated Jsrael from them Yea God expresly sayd when he made Israel his peculiar people that yet all the earth was his Exod. 19 5. which are the words of the covenant generally Wherefore we leave Gods secret counsels to himself as he willeth us Deut. 29. 29. and doe consider onely the visible state of Churches by the rules of Gods law and promises To this mine opposite sayth What is it that he meaneth hereby Jf by the covenant he mean the covenant of grace for salvation whereof we treat and think that all people of the world in all ages and places of the earth are under it what differeth this from the opinion of the Anabaptists and Armintans touching general redemption Jf he speak not of the covenant of grace which is for salvation all may perceive he speakes not to the point in hand Answ. My meaning is plaine that God had his elect among the heathens as he bath in the Church of Rome and he could not but see what I intended By the covenant generally with all nations I mean the same that himself alleaged whileare from Keâ—kerman of the Church largely taken which he explaineth the company of all those which professe Christian religion or the name of Christ in what manner soever And thus sayth he are all heretikes schismatikes and Arians Papists Anabaptists and such like referred to the Christian Churches So if he understood himselfe he might understand me when I spake of the covenant generally For such large Churches as he describeth I hold all nations to be when God made his speciall covenant with Israel Noe was a Christian and had the covenant of grace in Christ to him and to his seed as absolutely as any Christian Church in the Apostles dayes though the mystery of the Gospel was not then so clearly revealed * as it was afterward by the Apostles But for the substance of the covenant namely Christ and faith in him with obedience it was given to Adam and his seed to Noe and his seed Heb. 13. 8. 11. 1. 2 3. 4. 7. c. And this covenant of grace in Christ confirmed by sacrifices as to us now by the sacraments Which sacrifices all nations kept the first thousand yeers after Noe which was till after Moses death as well as the large Christian
is not true baptisme I constantly affirme so did Mr. Iohnson himselfe whiles he stood in and wrote for the truth That the Papists have turned baptisme into an idoll I have also formerly proved and wil maintain against his answers That therefore it is detestable and cursed unto them through their abuse of it doth necessarily follow for the sacrifice of the wicked is an abominatiō to the Lord Pro. 15. 8. That it should be no better then the dayly washing of our face is wrongfully imputed to us and Mr. Cl. whom hee citeth in his margine professeth to hold no such thing For our dayly washing is no religious action nor sacrament at all but baptisme by hereticks and apostates is a religious action after their manner and a false sacrament therfore neither true neither yet none at all as our opposite with us once professed Apolog. p. 110. Insted of proving it true baptisme hee bringeth reasons to shew that if it were an idol and lying signe it ought to be renounced and an other received This he knoweth the Anabaptists doe practise so it is no conviction of them all But he bendeth his force now against us and leaveth them Let us try what he sayth 1. Because sayth he idols and lying signes and fictions are not of God but of the Divil who is a liar and father thereof Ioh. 8. 44. Rom. 3. 4. Answ. I grant that which he sayth but he concludeth not the question Idols so farr as they are idols and lies are wholly of the Divill and so farr forth to be renounced But some idols and lies are made of Gods true ordinances and of his good creatures as Paul sayth of the Gentiles that they changed the truth of God into a lye and worshiped and served the creature Rom. 1. 25. Here the Gentiles lie is to be doen away and their idolatry renounced but the truth of God is to be reteined and a holy use of the good creature may be had which they abused So wee have renounced the popish idolatry and lies which they have brought upon Gods sacraments but the truth we reteyne 2. An idol or such a baptisme as is no more then a dayly washing of our faces cannot be the signe and seale of Gods true and everlasting covenant c. Answ. I grant it and from his own words conclude against him Baptisme in the Church of Rome is formerly proved to be an idoll because they give to the creature and work of mans hands that honour which is due unto Christ onely Therefore it cannot bee a signe and seale of Gods everlasting covenant by his owne grant As for us we reteyne no idoll but Gods truth onely as before I shewed 3. The signe in a Sacrament is that which is outward and visible which in baptisme is washing with water in the name of the Lord. Jf this be a fiction and lying signe in the churches aforesayd then is it not the Lords and they there baptised have not then the outward visible signe which the Lord ordained to be had of his people and therefore are bound to get it unto them where it may be had Rom. 4. 11. 6. 3. 4. Act. 10. 47. 48. c. Answ. 1. The first part of his reason is unperfectly set down for washing with water is a signe of the washing away of sinns by and in Gods institution onely by which institution it is to bee ministred to none but the faithfull and their seed Act. 8. 36. 37. 2. 38. 39. If it be not ministred according to this ordinance of God it is not the signe of his grace in that abuse though it be the thing which God in the right use hath appoynted for a signe 2. Hee would deceive his reader as if we held washing should be with any other creature then water or in any other name then the Lords These things wee know are in themselves the true ordinances of Christ but by Antichrist turned to a lye whiles hee falsly applyeth them to his adulterous synagogue which Christ hath given to his Church onely and whiles hee idolatrously giveth that grace to the work of his sacrilegious priests which is peculiar to Christ and his bloud It is the true signe of the covenant of Christ which is by Antichrist turned to a lye and if we should devise to our selves any other signe we should be lyars like him who hath devised creame spittle and other like elements synfully joyned with his baptisme 4. That also is to be doen without delay seeing the neglect of baptisme is sin and no unbaptised may eat of the Lords Supper c. Answ. It is true and so we if we had not been baptised with water c. would doe it without delay But hee trifleth insisting upon the outward element which he knoweth we had and leaveth the main thing the relation to the covenant of grace which we had not in that Antichristian synagogue 5. Jf any reteine an idol baptisme c. and presume to come to the Lords table they eat judgement to themselves Answ. We reteyne no idoll baptisme but have put away the idoll and the lye and reteyne the truth onely as before is shewed The same we answer to his sixt reason which is but a repetition and inlargement of his former as is his manner 7. Neither can it be thought that repentance which still they speak of should ever make a lye to be a truth and idol to be Gods ordinance c. For though repentance findeth mercy with God for a lye yet a lye is a lye stil and an idol-vanity Zach. 10. 2. Ier. 10. 8. Ioh. 8. 44. 14. 6. 17. 17. with 2. Cor. 6. 14. 15. 16. Answ. It is true of such idols and lies as the Scriptures which he citeth speaketh of but there are other idols and lies which by men are made of God himselfe and of his word and ordinances which by Gods grace upon mens repentance and faith are restored to the first truth As the Gentiles changed the truth of God into a lye Rom. 1. 25. and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image Rom. 1. 23. and Israel changed God their glory into the similitude of an Oxe Psal. 106. 20. When they repented of their changing the truth into a lye they reteyned the truth still and kept that God whom before they ignorantly worshiped and of whom they had made an idoll to themselves Act. 17. 23. So for Gods ordinances as if the Israelites had made idols of Jachin and Boaz the two sacramentall pillars in the Temple 2. Chron. 3. 17. and had burnt incense to them as they did to the brazen Serpent 2. King 18. 4. they should have repented of and put away their idolatry but have reteyned those pillars still for such signes as God had ordeyned them But such pillars and posts as Israel had invented of their own heads and set them by the Lords posts Ezek. 43. 8. no repentance could make them
with the Holy Ghost nor any other infants there baptised Answ. We and all are by nature the children of vvrath Eph. 2. 3. and being born in Antichrists church we had not the visible covenant of promise vvhich is given onely to Christs Church Albeit God hath his elect in false Churches as among the Gentiles of old and in Israel after they vvere divorced from the Lord. Jer. 3. vvhom he can save vvithout baptisme as he did vvithout circumcision The same is answered to his fifth obiection of the same persons come to yeares And is further cleared in the* answer to his second argument for the Church of Rome vvhere he alleaged the like things And vvhere he sayth Either we have no outward baptisme at all confirming the covenant of God or else we had it before we came under the Lords covenant and in a church divorced from the Lord. I answer Wee had the outward vvashing vvith vvater as the Israelites had the outward cutting of the flesh vvhen they were divorced from the Lord Ier. 3. 8. vvhich could not then confirme Gods covenant to us or them in such synfull estate But as after vvhen they repented and turned to the Lord they had their outward cutting sanctified unto them for a signe of his covenant and were admitted to eat of his Passover Ezr. 6. 21. vvhich no uncircumcised might eat of Exod. 12. 48. so our vvashing hath been by like grace sanctified unto us for a signe of his covenant and vve may lawfully eat of the Lords Supper His 6. reason is of like na ure touching the members of the Antichristian church that they have not the Lords baptisme being not come to the Lord in true faith and repentance c. This also is before spoken of in answering his reasons for that church The Scripture sheweth them to bee departed from the faith of Christ 2. Thes. 2. 1. Tim. 4. to bedead in syn Rev. 20. to bee under the vvrath of God Rev. 14. 9. 10. 11. Our opposite himself sayth of that church She is a notorious harlot and idolatress and of the Hierarchie the ministers of that church vvhich have the same baptisme vvith the people and doe administer baptisme to that people he sayth they are the Man of Syn the son of perdition 2. Thess. 2. the Beast Rev. 13. concerning vvhom he could not endure that vve should aske his proofe that ever they were maried unto Christ. And are such a people and Hierarchy remaining in that estate come to the Lord in true faith and repentance If they have brought themselves by their idolatries heresies and innumerable synns into a woeful estate vvhat are we that we should justifie those vvhom God condemneth Let false prophets preach peace unto them wee must notwithstanding declare the judgements of the Lord vvhose wrath is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who deteyn the truth in unrighteousness Rom. 1. 18. 7. Finally sayth he Wheras they say the outward washing need not to be repeated and yet say also they have renounced the Romish Baptisme as an impure idol in their abuse they use shifts and contradict themselves For if the outward baptisme be an Idol why doe they reteyn it Jf not why have they renounced it Answ. I have formerly shewed the shift and contradiction to be in himself who pleaded against the Anabaptists that there is but one baptisme and now against us would have two 2. I have also shewed that Gods ordinance turned into an idol or lye the lye the idol is to be renounced the truth of the ordinance reteyned so doe we That sayth he which they speak of their abuse is a shift Difference is to be put between a thing abused and th' abuse therof The scriptures are the word of God and not an impure idol to be renounced though they be abused by the Papists and themselves c. Answ. when he hath nought ells to answer he casteth reproches and calleth my reason a shift Would he have me so impious as to call Baptisme the Lords supper or other divine ordinances idols unless for the syn and abuse of men which turne them to idols as the trueth of God was turned into a lye by the Gentiles Rom. 1. 25. And doe not I put that very difference which himself here putteth how then is it a shift in me more then in him The scripture in it self is alwayes pure yet popish heresies falsly gathered from the scriptures are most impure these we reject but hold fast the scripture Water in popish baptisme is Gods good creature Antichrist hath turned it and the action with it into an abominable idol as if it gave grace and washed away syn by the work doon of a sacrilegious priest This abomination we reject the creature of God is of his grace sanctified unto us and we reteyn it Now follow his other reasons to prove it no idol but true baptisme 1. Because an Idol c. is an invention of man in the worship of God wheras Baptisme in those churches is of the holy things of God a true signe of his covenant c. Answ. The first is granted him the latter is denyed and he but beggeth the question For neyther doth the church continew in Rome which th'Apostles planted neyther doth the true baptisme there continew any more then the true Supper of our Lord turned by them into an abominable Mass or any more then the true ministery which is changed by his own grant into a man of syn a Beast and the great Antichrist Or any more then the true Censure of excommunication which they profane against such as forsake their idolatrous church 2. Els those churches should not have a mixture of Gods ordinances with their own inventions c but should be utterly deprived of all and every one of Gods ordinances But they have such a mixed estate c. Answ. He concludeth nothing but should conclude therfore it is no idol to them in their abuse but Christs true baptisme This I deny And first I answer that all the heathens had before Christs coming a mixture of Gods ordinances with their own inventions yet were they not therfore in the covenant of grace neyther had they the true signes and seals therof 2. as mens inventions are idols so Gods ordinances may by men be turned into idols as are the sacraments in Rome For is not the wheaten God in their supper an Idol what mouth wil deny it Mine opposite pressed with it passeth it over alwayes as if he could not see it That thing alone would have convinced this and many other his reasons of like sort if he durst have medled with it 3. Jf their baptisme were an idol then it should be syn in them to reteyn that baptisme still c. Ans. How often shall we have repetitions of the same thing He hath been answered the idol ought to be put away the ordinance of God ought to be reteyned If the Iewes had
hee pleaded against the Pope and his Hierarchy that they they onely are the Man of syn the son of perdition the Beast the Antichrist and why wondred he so at me when I called for proofe that Christ was maried to that Beast seeing he hath the same baptisme the same Lords Supper the same beleef touching the Articles of faith that the people of his church have But their counterfeit profession of Christ is before discovered And they that baptize which are the Hierarchy he confesseth to be the Man of syn the Antichrist they are none of the church as we have heard but ulcers gangrenes c. what now have such to doe with the name of the Lord or administration of the seales of his covenant And compare with this that which himself sayth in the 3. page of his book that the action of baptisme is wholly enjoyned and layd upon the baptiser and not upon the baptised If this be so where hath God layd the action of baptizing upon Antichrist the Man of syn and if God hath not layd it upon him how can hee truely doe it in Gods name How will they prove sayth he that it is a lying signe unto them in their estate seeing baptisme as the other sacraments in Israel and under the Gospel hath this in it to be a signe by the ordinance of God not at the pleasure of man And God is the God of truth and appoynteth no lying signes but true Neither can mans iniquity make Gods signes to be lying signes Synful therfore and erroneous it is so to think if not also blasphemous so to speak Answ. And was it synfull and erroneous thinketh he in Paul when he sayd They changed the truth of God into a lye Rom. 1. 25. For if mans iniquity cannot change Gods signes into lying signes how should it change the truth of God into a lye And how could Ieremie have proved unto the Iewes if mine opposite had then lived to plead for them that those were lying words when they sayd The Temple of the Lord the Temple of the Lord c. Ier. 7. 4. for had they not in deed the Temple of the Lord his true ordinance and signe whereof they spake The word of God is truth Ioh. 17. 17. How then should mans iniquity make Gods truth to be a lye unto themselues though they pervert the word unto all manner false-doctrine errour and heresie Idols are lies Esa. 44. 20. Ier. 16. 19. 20. How can the Pope make an idoll of the bread in the sacrament though he fall downe and worship it and beleeve it is his maker seeing as it is bread it is a true thing and Gods good creature as it is sacramentall bread it is a true signe by the ordinance of God who appoynteth no lying signes Is it not blasphemous now and would he not rend his clothes as did Caiaphas if he should heare one call the Popes sacrament of the altar an idol or a lying signe unto him in that estate But to conclude The sacraments are in deed signes by the ordinance of God not at mans will Gods ordinance maketh them signes of grace to the faithful receivers onely 1. Cor. 11. 20. 29. Rom. 2. 25 Act. 8. 36. 37. If infidels and Antichrists falsly challenge and usurp Gods signes and abuse them to open idolatry and their own perdition they change the truth of Gods ordinance into a lye unto themselves and whiles they vainly think to have forgivenesse of synns by them they add syn unto syn and receive their own damnation Whereas I had set downe two reasons to prove the Popish baptisme false and a lying signe unto them mine opposite passeth them over as too heavy for him and cometh to set downe differences between Gods ordinances and mens corruptions Gods signes and mens errours Mariage meates and drinks and the abuses of these the scriptures and the errors gathered from them the Sun Moon and Starrs as they are creatures and as they are made idols and worshiped of men c. Wherein he laboureth to prove the thing which we hold and doth most injuriously intimate against us as if we thought the contrary Should we be so wicked as to imagine the ordinances of God or his creatures to be evill in themselves Farr be it from us Nay we say that the papists for abusing the sacraments and turning them to lyes and idols shall have the greater judgement not for abusing bread and wine and water as they are creatures onely but for abusing them as they are sacramentall signes ordeyned of Christ which maketh their profanation more horrible their damnation more just But this is a practise of many that plead for errour to leave the arguments which doe convince them and to propone new questions and reasons of their owne that they may seeme to say something by multitude of words So when I shewed the example of the idolatrous Israelites that repenting and forsaking their false Synagogues lying signes in them usurped they needed not a new outward cutting or circumcising as is shewed at large in our former writings Discovery p. 116. 120. Apolog. p. 110. 113. He passeth over the reasons manifested in those books as if he had never seen them when as the one was most of it penned by himself And now he pleadeth Wheras they say that circumcision was also a lying signe and false sacrament to Jsrael in their defection how doe they prove it where doth the Scripture teach it will they have us take it on their bare word and beleeve that their saying are Oracles c. Answ. He might have seen reasons in the books before cited besides those that I have set down But thus in seeking to wound us he hath smitten through his own sides as if himselfe when he wrote those things in our Apologie would have had men beleeve his bare word and that his sayings were Oracles Whereas if ever hee wrote soundly in his life he did it in that Apologie as all men of good judgement may perceive Further now to answer him I say that I spake of their lying signes which implyed their Passover and sacrifices as well as their circumcision And those being so profaned as for them they were by Gods Law to bee cut off as murderers Levit. 17. as sacrificers to Divils not to God Deut. 32. 17. 2. Chron. 11. 15. 15. 3. were they then true signes unto them of Gods grace and fauour and forgivenesse of their synns in Christ The Scripture teacheth they could not be partakers of the Lords table and of the table of Divils 1. Cor. 10 21. In particular for their circumcision I proved it thus True circumcision was the seale of the righteousness of saith Rom. 4. 11. Jsrael in their apostasie were fallen from the faith Hos. 11. 12. they were without the true God without Priest to teach without Law 2. Chron. 15. 3. and how then could they have the true circumcision the seale of
the Papists that worship them as Gods have not made them idols to themselves And under this shelter of falshood he shrowdeth himself when he hath nought else to answer repeting it I know not how often 7. That the Romish baptisme is a lye in the right hand of all that so receive it Where the Prophet speaketh of idols that by nature are no Gods c. Jf the Romish baptisme were in the nature of it no baptisme c then should it without question be renounced as a very idol in deed c. Answ. Belike then he would have us take it for no lye but for a truth that popish baptisme giveth grace and washeth away syn by the work doen. Neyther is it a lye but truth that bread in their Mass is very Christ really properly as he died on the cross To apply Esa. 44. 20. against these things is to hold an errour Wel let my errour continue with me for I trust I shall alwayes hold that they are lyes in the right hand of all that so receive them And as the prophet speaketh of thē that by nature were no Gods so doe I. For neyther is water in Baptisme not wine in the Masse Christs blood naturally neyther can they doe that which onely Christs blood effecteth And how ever there is difference between the idols of false Gods and the idols of the true God yet the scripture calleth them all Divils Deut. 32. 17. 2 Chron. 11. 15. 1 Cor. 10. 20. so I call them all lyes And where he sayth if it were in the nature of it no baptisme he might have knowen that Gods true ordinance of baptisme turned into a lye maketh it a lying baptisme and yet some baptisme it is though not the true Wherof the lye being put away and the truth restored of God unto us there need no other renunciation as before I have proved His other repetitions and questions of the same thing need no further answer Obj. How wil he shew that baptisme is so received as standing in the place of Christ c. seing they are infants usually that receive it there c. Answ. Even as he wil shew against the Anabaptists that baptisme is truly and rightly received in Christian churches where they are infants usually that receive it For as the covenant of Christ is to parents and their seed so the covenant of Antichrist is to parents and their seed even the covenant of destruction that their babes be dashed against the Rock Psal. 137. 9. Esa. 13. 16. The infants of Iewes are Iewes the infants of Turks are Turks the infants of Christians are Christians so the infants of Antichristians are Antichristians Obj. Considering also their profession of Christ and baptising with water in the name of the Father Son and holy Ghost and that this alone is in deed the baptisme of that church the other things being but erroneous opinions and synfull additions c. Answ. We have before considered that the profession of that church is all one with the profession of the Pope who eyther is not Antichrist or else he denyeth both the Father and the Son as the Apostle sayth 1 Joh. 3. 22. how ever in word he confesseth both 2. As they baptise with water in the name of the Father c so they consecrate their Supper or Mass with bread and wine and the words of Christs institution Mat. 26. why doth he not also affirme that their Mass is no idol no lye in the hands and mouthes of them that receive it as their maker and eat their God more profanely then the heathens 3. It is untrue that that alone which he mentioneth is in deed the baptisme of that church in deed it ought to be but so it is not He might as well say their praiers to God are the onely prayers of that church for by divine institution so it should be but it is knowen they pray also to innumerable creatures 4. I grant the other things are but erroneous opinions and synfull additions and he also must grant that all the idolatrie of the heathens condemned in Rom. 1. were but erroneous opinions and synfull additions contrary to the covenant which God had made with them in Noes dayes Gen. 9. 9. 10. 11. c. Were it not for erroneous opinions and synfull additions all men now should be in that perfect estate wherin at first we were created Eccles. 7. 29. 8. That the Romish baptisme is such as the saying of the Apostle is verified in it an idol is nothing in the world 1 Cor. 8. 4. c. Jf so then the baptisme of that church hath no relation to God nor any divine institution representation or signification in it c. Then it ought of necessitie to be rejected c. Answ. If th'Apostles doctrine be true of idols that they are nothing 1 Cor. 8. 4. he ought not to kick against it or me for alleging it To his inference I answer it hath no true relation unto Gods covenant which is not with that Antichristian church but a false pretended relation it hath as their other sacrament of the Mass or supper where also there is a lying relation to Christs sacrifice which they blasphemously renew crucifying dayly the Lord of glorie To his conclusion he hath oft been answered we reject the idol wholly and reteyn onely the truth so farr as God by his word hath sanctified it unto us without eyther grosse Anabaptistry or notorious blasphemie which with open mouth he chargeth us would fray the simple with 9. That water the material thing in popish baptisme is as the gold and silver that is the matter of the idols spoken of Psal. 115. 4. wher as the use of water in baptisme is appointed by the Lord and stil to be reteyned Ioh. 1. 33. c. but the use of gold for idols is forbidden and utterly to be abandoned Exod. 20. 23. Deut. 7. 25. 26. c. Answ. He corrupteth my words I sayd An idol for the matter and workmanship is somthing Psal. 115. 4. but for the relation unto God it is nothing So Popish baptisme as touching the material thing is somwhat the salt water oile are Gods creatures the outward action is the work of the hands of an idolatrous preist and this work remayneth as did the work of the idolaters circumcising in Jsrael c. This he maketh an errour in me which all that have knowledge wil easily see to be trueth But the use of water in baptisme sayth he is appointed by the Lord. True unto the Christian church it is so but the use of water in popish idol baptisme or of bread and wine in the Popish mass was never appointed by the Lord this was the point he should have proved As God sayd to the Iewes bring no more vaine oblations incense is an abomination unto me Esa. 1. 13. so sayth he to the Antichristians make no more vaine baptisings the Masse is an abomination to me Mine opposite
living but their posteritie are meant for they perished in their synns save some few that turned to the Lord but their after generations found mercie Neyther can we deny if we rightly observe th'Apostles doctrine in Rom. 11. but those and the like promises made by the prophets doe belong to the Iewes even at this day though for the present they are without the covenant in their owne persons for when the fulnesse of the Gentiles is come in all Israel shal be saved sayth he as it is written There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer and shall turne away ungodlynes from Iakob And this is my covenant unto them when I shall take away their synns As concerning the Gospel they are enemies for your sakes but as touching the election beloved for the fathers The conditions propounded he observeth not namely Return thou backsliding Israel and J will not cause mine anger to fall upon you Onely acknowledge thine iniquitie c. But pleadeth as if they in that rebellious estate were still in their persons in the covenant of grace visibly though God because they returned not had given them the bill of divorce Contrary to the gospell which sayth If we say that we have fellowship with God and walk in darknes we lye and doe not the trueth If we confesse our synns he is faithfull and just to forgive us c. If we say that we have not synned we make him a lyar and his word is not in us 1. Ioh. 1. 6. 9. 10. Now this was Israels state they walked in darknes and synns and left all the Commandements of the Lord their God they would not turne from their evill wayes nor hear the Lords prophets nor beleeve in the Lord their God but walked in all the synns of Ieroboam they departed not from them until the Lord removed Israel out of his sight And if any of them after their dispersion returned to the Lord they were then received so also were the Gentiles that turned to him and so the Iewes at this day that come unto Christ. He distinguisheth not the times For their mariage with the Lord which he sayth the best writers expound of the covenant of grace if he referr it to the future time of Christ is true but then it will nothing help those unrepentant synners divorced from the Lord for by the bill of divorce the mariage is dissolved as before is proved If he referr it to former times it agreeth not with the scope of the prophesie as I shewed but if that be granted him then his best writers wil hardly prove it to meane the covenant of grace for better then they doe shew it to be the covenant of the Law even Ieremie himself and Paul his expositor For Ieremie in chap. 31. v. 32. useth the same word Baalti J was maried to them when he speaketh of the old covenant made when they came out of Egypt which was the covenant of workes not of grace though they were then also in the covenant of grace as they were in the faith of Christ. And Paul expoundeth that word Baalti according to the Greek version J regarded them not Heb. 8. 9. which is quite contrary to mine opposites purpose But it is usual in the Prophets to speak of things to come as already doen as Esaias prophesying of Christ sayth Unto us a child is borne Esai 9. 6. who was not borne til many yeres after And so here the Greek version so much approved in the new Testament expoundeth this word Baalti J am or was maried futurely thus For J wil rule over you and wil take you one of a citie and two of a familie and bring you into Sion so it is a prophesie of a future mariage with Christ and accordeth to the Apostles writing unto that people saying ye are an holy nation a peculiar people c which in time pass◠were not a people but are now the people of God which had not obteyned mercie but now have obteyned mercie 1 Pet. 2. 9. 10. When was the time that Israel were no people nor obteyned mercie unless when Lo-ammi and Lo-ruhamah were borne Hos. 1. 6. 9. and Ephraim was so broken that it was not a people Esai 7. 8. Thus Peter testifying they were no people by which name Moses calleth the Gentiles when they were estranged from God Deut. 32. 21. and Paul saying that God regarded them not or cared not for them because of their breach of covenant Heb. 8. 9. doe overthrow all my opposites plea for them in their most synfull and unrepentant estate That which he sayth from Jer. 3. 1. that God dealt otherweise herein then a man doth with his wife whom he putteth away c helpeth him not First he should say then a man might doe with his wife for it was syn for such a man to returne to his wife it polluted the land Jer. 3. 1. the reason wherof was the man by unjust divorce had caused his wife to be defiled as the law closely teacheth Deut. 24. 1. 4 which fault cannot be imputed to the Lord. Secondly the Lord dealeth likeweise with the Gentiles when they turne from their adulteries he receiveth them according to his former covenant and spiritual mariage with Noe and his seed Genes 9. 9. 16. Esai 54. 1. 4. 5. 9. 10. So the promise being conditional benefited not them that would not returne unto him The last point of the stablenes of Gods promise though but a few are made partakers of it Rom. 11. 1. 5. is true and concerneth as well the Gentiles as the Iewes for in all ages God brought some of the Gentiles into his grace as the whole historie of the scripture sheweth Wherfore it is marvel how he could so insist upon the promise made to the Iewes to their children in Act. 2. 39. wheras the promise of grace in Christ perteyned also to the Gentiles as is testified by all the Prophets Deut. 32. 43. Psal. 117. Esa. 19. 24. 2◠49. 1. 6. Ezek. 4◠22 And wheras next he digresseth to speak of Iudah and from Esa. 54. 4. compared with Ier. 51. 5. would shew how in one respect they were forsaken and bare the reproch of widowhood to weet by their captivity in Babylon and in an other respect they were not forsaken as a widow of the Lord who yet remembred his covenant to shew them mercie he foloweth his own wisdom in expounding the scriptures regardeth not the wisdom of God who elswhere hath opened that prophesie after a heavenly manner The prophet Esaias in chapt 53. foretold of Christ and of his suffrings and in chap. 54. he prophesieth of the Christian church and beginneth Sing joyfully ô barren woman thou that didst not beare for moe are the children of the desolate then the children of the maried wife sayth the Lord. This argument he goeth on to inlarge shewing the former shame and reproach which this
God testified that Christ was not their mediator to accept their prayers Seing it is certaine that no man cometh to the Father but by him Joh. 14. 6. Thus men may be overseen sometimes to cite authors on their side which eyther say nothing or look quite an other way Touching Hos. 13. 1. THe last placé which here I cited was Hos. 13. 1. where Ephraim offended or synned in Baal and dyed whence I judged their estate to be dead in syn To this mine opposite sayth the same terme and phrase is used by Christ of the church of Sardis Thou hast a name that thou livest and art dead Rev. 3. 1. Should we now inferr hereupon that therfore baptisme and the other ordinances of God in the church of Sardis were but in shew reteyned therin and could not be unto them the signes seals of the forgivenes of synns and of life eternal and therfore were in their use of them false and deceyefull aâ— were the ordinances of God reteyned among the Gentiles Would any man of heart and understanding endure such blasphemie Sayth not the Scripture that the church of Sardis was one of the seven golden candlesticks c. Answ. A man of understanding wil discerne things that differ and be caried by judgment not by affection The syn of Sardis was secret hypocrisie the syn of Ephraim was open idolatrie the death of Sardis was discerned of Christ who searcheth the heart reines the death of Ephraim was discerned of men who can judge but by the works Sardis had a name among the churches to be alive when for the most part they were dead before God though some things remayned which are but ready to dye vers 2. and a few among them were worthy ones and undefiled vers 4. Ephraim was openly knowen to be fallen from God to Baal by the Prophets and by the church of Iudah Hypocrites in all true churches are dead before God though alive before men So Simon Magus was alive in the judgment of the Apostolik church and baptised therin Act. 8. when before God he was dead His baptisme was true baptisme so farr as men could judge though to himself before God he received judgment therby not being a worthy partaker But had he been an open worshiper of Baal and baptised or circumcised among the Baalists it could not by men have been judged a true signe and seale of the forgivenes of his synns he remayning unrepentant They that should so affirme should themselves not be farr from blasphemie before men of understanding that know upon what conditions the covenant of grace is made between God and men They in Sardis that were dead that is without true faith for by saith the just doth live could not by the sacraments or by any ordinance in the church be partakers of Christ of his death or resurrection before God so their baptisme was to them no baptisme And had they been so discerned of men their baptisme should so have been judged by men As the Canaanites in Sichem their circumcision was uncircumcision before men and not the signe and seale of the righteousnes of faith when they had no faith for the unbeleever remayneth in the state of damnation Mar. 16. 16. and the baptisme that saveth is not the putting away of the filth of the flesh but the answer of a good conscience towards God as th'Apostle suyth 1 Pet. 3. 21. That which he further annexeth that I say their reasons from Israel might well serve for the times wherein John lived when the true churches were many of them apostate wherupon he noteth my contradicting of my selfe c. was a mistaking that I distinguished not the state of Iudah which was a true church corrupted from Israel a false church and so the true churches apostate in th'Apostles time Revel 2. 3. from the false churches also in those times 1. Ioh. 2. 19. Into which oversight I fell by their citing undistinctly Jer. 3. and Esai 50. the one speaking of Israel the other of Iudah as is to be seen in their Advertisement pag. 107. wherto I gave answer in Animadvers p. 103. Secondly he pleadeth if Hose 13. 1. be understood of death in syn yet let it be well considered whâ—ther it will therfore follow that Circumcision now in Israel was not the Lords signe and seale of his forgivenes of syn but a false and deceitfull signe in their use therof and no better then the ordinances of the heathen For Christ sayd Let the dead bury their dead c. Luke 9. 60. was circumcision then among the Iewes a false and deceitfull signe in their life therof c. Answ. He runneth into his former errour the Iewish church in Christs time was a true church and Christ communicated in their Temple and sacrifices Israel when they served Baal was a false church and no man might awfully communicate with their Temple and sacrifices Christ speaketh not of the Church generally but of such as he knew to be hypocrites and dead though seeming alive we speak of Ephraim generally open offenders serving Baal and dead in the judgement of the Saincts The same I answer to his next instance of the church of Ephesus which then when Paul wrote was not the house of Baal but of the living God the pillar and ground of the truth 1 Tim. 3. 15. Moreover he citeth not my words sincerely I spake of the seale of forgivenes of synns 〈◊〉 them neyther did I say no better then the ordinances of the heathen which the reader may understand the ordinances devised by the heathens themselves but I sayd in their use of them false and deceitfull 〈◊〉 were also the ordinances of God reteyned in other nations as altars sacrifices c. touching whose estate I have spoken of before Thirdly he excepteth that Baals worship was first instituted by Achab about 60. yeres after Ieroboam and great difference was between Ieroboams calves and Baals idolatrie c. Answ. It is not material to our question who spake of Israels circumcision in their apostasie in generall before and after they were out of the land as before I have manifested 2. I acknowledge Achabs syn was greater then Ieroboams and false churches may grow worse and worse yet Ieroboams calves were also Divils as the holy Ghost calleth them 2. Chron. 11. 15. Fourthly he instanceth the 7000 in Israel that bowed not the knee to Baal 1. King 19. 18. asking what we shall say to these were they not circumcised or had they not the circumcision that was then in Jsrael or was it not to them the Lords seale of forgivenes of synns c. Answ. The instance is good to clear the controversie by the help of other scriptures In Rom. 11. Paul speaking of the rejection of the Iewes sayth Hath God cast away his people Farr be it For I also am an Israelite c. God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew Then speaking of
example more fitly if a Iew had been forced by Antiochus violently to kyss or bow the knee to Iupiters image when he resisted and testified against it none could justly call him an idolater or one of Iupiters people But if an other Iew had revolted to Antiochus religion and beleeved in his Iupiter and honoured him with hart profession and action he now might justly be called the servant of Iupiter or one of his people as the Moabites are called the people of Chemosh Numb 21. 29. So the church of Rome now fallen from true Christianity and beleeving worshiping obeying Antichrist the Popes holynes are and may justly be called his church or else Antichrist hath no temple church or people in the world Object Observe here and throughout his treatise how still he calleth that the Temple church and bodie of Antichrist which Paul expressly and purposely calleth the Temple of God And so therin note stil his shâ—fâ—s and his errours c. Answ. Loe still an urging of the bare letter as doe the Papists This is my body to prove their transubstantiation that there is no bread left but Christs very body really and properly I have I trust without shifting or errour proved the present church of Rome to be Antichrists temple church and bodie if the Pope be Antichrist And seing his mysterie of iniquitie is contrary to Christs mysterie of godlynes and Christ hath a mystical temple which is his church and bodie Eph. 2. 21. 5. 23. I would gladly know what temple church and body Antichrist hath if the church of Rome be not the same Againe he speaketh too largely that J stil so call it throughout my treatise for I have other weise written though it liked him not thus Gods true temple and tabernacle is in mount Sion in heaven Rev. 14. 1. 17. where God sitteth on a throne Rev. 16. 17. 7. 15. and dwelleth among his people where is the Ark of his covenant Rev. 11. 19. and from thence lightnings voices thondrings earthquake and hâ—yle come forth against thâ— Antichristians his enemies and vials of his wrath powred out upon the throne of the beast Rev. 16. 1. 2. 10. and on men that have his mark On the contrary the Beast which is the kingdome of Antichrist ascendeth from beneath out of the bottomless pit Rev. 17. 8. and blasphemeth this heavenly tabernacle Rev. 13. 6. and sitteth in Babylon Rev. 16. 19. upon the Dragons throne Rev. 13. 2. and fighteth against the Lamb and against the saincts Rev. 19. 19. treading under foot the holy citie Rev. 11. 2. and casting downe the place of Christs sanctuarie Dan. 8. 11. When th' Apostle therfore telleth us that Antichrist sitteth as God in the Temple of God it is to be understood of their invading and destroying of Gods church and people as the heathens of old dealâ— with Jerusalem and dwellers therin Psal. 79. Dan. 8 11. 13. 11. 36. Ier. 22. 12. 13. Law 2. 7. 9. Secondly of their own vaine ostentation whiles they wil have it called the Christian catholik church and the Pope the head of the same Ezek. 28. 2. 6. Esa. 14. 13. 14. 2 Thes. 2. 9 10 Rev. 13. 11. 14. 17. 4. 2 Cor. 11. 13. 14. 15. Thus I grant that the Temple which Antichrist invadeth destroyeth is Gods true Temple but that wherin the Beast sitteth as God which he trimmeth upholdeth and boasteth of as he doeth the church of Rome at this day is the synagogue of Satan But he procedeth Object As for the ancient Doctor whom here he citeth let us hear himself speak His words are these That which is the Temple of any idolor Divil the Apostle would not call the Temple of God Wherupon some will have in this place not the Prince himself but after a manner his whole bodie thâ—â— is the multitude of men perteyning unto him togither with himself under the Prince understood to be Antichrist And more rightly also they think it to be sayd in Latine 〈◊〉 in the Greek that he sitteth not in the Temple of God but for the Temple of God which is the church As we say he sitteth for a friend that is as a friend Augustine de Civic Dâ—â— l. 20. c. 19. Where note how farr differing Augustine is from this man that citeth him c. Answ. There is not so great difference as mine opposite would pretend First I cited not Augustine for his own judgment but for others whom he speaketh of touching the translation of the Text in the Temple of God or for the Temple Secondly he setteth down Augustines words maymed both at head and foot For Augustine beginneth thus But in what temple of God he shal sit as God is uncertaine whether in that ruine of the Temple which was built by King Solomon or in the church For that which is the temple of any idol or divil the Apostle would not call the temple of God c. Now the ruine of Solomons temple cannot at this day be called Gods temple otherweise then because it was the Temple of God of old hath now no more holynes in deed trueth theÌ„ any other place in the world And thus I have granted that the church of Rome may be called the church of God in respect that there was a church there in Pauls time wheras now it hath no more true holynes then the synagogue of Satan So we see how for advantage mine opposite baulked Augustines first words In the end he breaketh off in the midst of a period for Augustine sayth sitteth for a friend that is as a friend or if any other thing is wont to be understood by this kind of speech So he defineth not certainly of this place but leaves it doubtfull and presently after confesseth his ignorance For what is this sayth Augustine For the mysterie of iniquitie doth already work onely he who now holdeth let him hold till he be taken out of the way J confess my self to be utterly ignorant what he meaneth Thus we need not strive about Augustines words here and I grant that the Apostle would not have called it the Temple of God unless eyther it were so in deed and trueth or had been so in times past or did pretend to be so still And I think all wil likewise grant that the holy Ghost would not have called the witches spirit at endor Samuel unless eyther it had been Samuel in deed as the Papists doe contend or some thing in pretence and shew like Samuel Neyther would the prophet have sayd to the King of Tyrus Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God a proselyte in the church of Israel unless eyther himself or some of his predecessors had been there in times past Neyther would Amos have called the Israelites idol temple the house of their God unless eyther it were so in deed or in pretense which phrase when the Greek translateth according to the letter the house of
their God and the Chaldee paraphrast as ancient as the Apostles age expoundeth the house of their idols they contradict not one another seing the same thing may be Gods in shew and the divils in deed and trueth for even Satan himself is transformed into an Angel of light 2 Cor. 11. 14. Obj. When the Apostle describeth the mysterie of Antichrists iniquitie would he teach the church that the place of his sitting is the Temple of God if he meant that it were in deed the synagogue of Satan and the temple of Antichrist For that Antichrist should sit in the temple of Antichrist and synagogue of Satan what mysterie is there in it All the world would easily perceive that these agreed very well and most fitly togither But for Antichrist to sit in Gods temple and Christs church this is in deed a mysterie Answ. The mysterie of iniquitie began in the true church but continued not therein alwayes for when it was discerned the church eyther cast it out or soon degenerated into a synagogue of Satan if it accepted Antichrist for God as the Church of Rome doth at this day Which I further manifest thus 1. The Apostle sayth As ye have heard that Antichrist shal come even now are there many Antichrists c. They went out from us but they were not of us for if they had been of us they would no doubt have continued with us but they went out that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us Who is a lyer but he that denyeth that Jesus is the Christ he is Antichrist that denyeth the Father and the Son Whosoever denyeth the Son the same hath not the Father 1. Joh. 2. 18. 19. 22. 23. This scripture teacheth us first that all hereticks departing from the faith of Christ are generally Antichrists though they reteyn the name of Christians still as did the hereticks in th'Apostles time 2. That such are gone out from the church and are in deed none of it though they pretend to be the true church as all hereticks have doen. 3. That both teachers and people departed from the faith and church of Christ are comprehended under the name of Antichrists and not the Bishops onely 4. That whosoever is Antichrist especially the great Antichrist he denyeth the Son Christ and consequently God the Father Now let us apply these things to the Bishop and hierarchie of Rome whome mine opposite granteth to be the great Antichrist If the Pope and his hierarchie be Antichrist then are they none of the Apostolik church but gone out of the same but they are Antichrist by my opposites owne confession Therfore they are none of th'Apostolik church The Pope and his hierarchie are both in and of the church of Rome the heads teachers and principall members of it of the same faith religion and worship but they are not in or of the Apostolik christian church as before is proved therfore the church of Rome is not an apostolik Christian church If the church of Rome denyeth both the Father and the Son then is it Antichrist as the Apostle sayth and so no true Christian church But the church of Rome denyeth both the Father and the Son therfore it is no true Christian church If the Pope his hierarchie deny both the Father and the Son then the church of Rome also denyeth them for they beleeve as the Pope and hierarchie beleeveth have one and the same religion with their preists But the Pope and his hierarchie deny both the Father and the Son otherweise they are not the Antichrist as mine opposite sayth they are therefore the Church of Rome also denyeth both the Father and the Son Now seing it is thus how is it possible that it should cōtinue the true Church of Christ otherweise then by lying pretext and ostentation And this is the mysterie of inquitie if men could comprehend it that the Bishops and people of Rome being at first Christs true church departed by degrees from the faith worship of God til they came joyntly to beleeve lyes and to worship creatures idols and divils Rev. ◠30. and became a Beast or Antichristian kingdome yet with two hornes like the Lamb Christ Rev. 13. blaspheming Gods Tabernacle them that dwel in heaven that is the true church they pretend themselves to be the onely true church of Christ and that all other are hereticks they pretend succession even from th Apostles dayes without change of religion and so they sit in the temple of God or for the Temple as if they none but they were the Temple and church of God the Pope being the head of this sinfull corporation of this Beast or kingdome and exalting himself above God Christ whiles yet he calleth himself Christs vicar and the Servant of the servants of God and by strong delusion keepeth his people in beleef of lyes that togither with him they all might be damned who beleeve not the trueth but have pleasure in unrighteousnes as the Apostle sayth 2. Thes. 2. 12. Now where he objecteth what mysterie is there in it that Antichrist should sit in the temple of Antichrist I answer it is a great mysterie in that it is doen by him and his under the name and shew of Christianitie and as the Apostle sayth after the working of Satan with all power and signes and lying wonders and with all deceivablenes of unrighteousnes 2. Thes. 9. 10. And where he further sayth but for Antichrist to sit in Christs church this is in deed a mysterie I answer it is in deed a contrarietie and impossibilitie not a mysterie for no man can serve two masters Mat. 6. 24. of whom a man is overcome of the same is he brought in bondage 2. Pet. 2. 19. to whom men yeild themselves servants to obey his servants they are to whom they obey Rom. 6. 16. Now the church of Rome yeilding unto and obeying Antichrist cannot be the servants of Christ if th' Apostles doctrine be true And after mine opposites manner of reasoning an other man might say seing Christianitie is the mystirie of godlines 1. Tim. 3. 16. as Antichristianitie is the mysterie of iniquitie 2. Thes. 2. 7. Christ must sit in the Temple of Satan as Antichrist sitteth in the temple of God for for Christ to sit in the Temple church of Christ what mysterie is there in it but for Christ to sit in Satans temple and Antichrists church this is in deed a mysterie Were not this think we good reasoning to put darknes for light and light for darknes Christ into Antichrists place and Antichrist into Christs for to finde out a mysterie But they that have their eyes opened to read the mysterie that is not onely in the Pope but on the forehead of the whore of Babylon his church will soon espie this fraud though others are bewitched with her painted face For as Satan can transforme himself into an Angel of light and his ministers
and without Law So mine opposite hath the Israelites own erroneous judgment to help him I have the Lords judgment his Prophets against both him and them He then referreth us to his former book where he shewed diverse respects how on their part they brake the covenant but the Lord brake it not on his part but called them to repentance c. To which book of his I gave answer and have in this also before shewed how he yieldeth me the mayn ground namely that the covenant of grace is conditional onely if men repent and beleeve Which seing the scripture witnesseth that Israel did not 2 King 17. 13. 14. 15. 16. they remayned still without the true God without teaching Priest and without Law til the Lord cast them out of the land and scattred them among the heathens which were without God and without Law before them And now what could their circumcision Passover sacrifices c availe them but seale up their further judgment who had rejected the true God but falsly reteyned and abused the signes of his favour to their condemnatió Touching Ier. 3. 8. GOD testifieth of adulterous Israel J put her away and gave her â— bill of divorce Ier. 3. 8. Then was she no longer his wife nor he her husband but the covenant of her spirituall mariage was disanulled even on Gods part also Yet the Israelites kept circumcision the signe and seale of his covenant but by usurpation not by right so it was in their abuse of it no true signe or sacrament unto them To this he answereth that the Prophet spâ—kâ— this in Josiahs dayes at which time Jsrael was caried captive into Assyria So this place is not to the point of the question of their state from Ieroboams time all the while they abode in the land Answ. First he takes it for granted that by the bill of divorce is meant their putting out of the land which though I should grant him as I will not deny it but leave it to further consideration yet it is to the question in hand touching their circumcision which they stil reteyned and were upon repentance received to the Passover without any new circumcising in the flesh Ezr. 6. 21. and he himself urgeth this very place of Ezr. 6. against the Anabaptists to prove they need not baptise againe the same by as good right doe I urge against him Yea and suppose that I erred in judging of their estate while they were in the land yet this their estate after is ynough to prove my cause namely that Circumcision and so baptisme usurped by false churches or by them that are no church as Israel now were no people need not be repeated Wheras he pleadeth if Rome be not the true church have not the true baptisme we are to be baptised againe Now that in Ezr. 6. was many yeres after Israels captivitie or divorce for it was after Iudahs captivitie and returne after 70. yeres When Gyrus to whom the Lord God of heaven had given all the kingdomes of the earth proclaimed the peoples returne throughout all his kingdome At what time as those that had been caried to Babylon returned Ezr. 2. to the number of 42. thowsand and moe so after in Darius dayes Ezr. 6. when the children of Israel which were come out of captivitie kept the Passover with joy for that the Lord had turned the hart of the King of Assyria unto them all such as had separated themselves unto them from the filthynes of the heathen of the land to seek the Lord God of Israel did eat with them Ezr. 6. 21. So they of Israel that had been captived in Assyria and returned to the Lord were received without any new circumcising as they were also before in Ezekias dayes 2 Chron. 30. Which example being in the dayes of Ezra and other prophets written in the scriptures for our instruction is a sufficient ground for us now to doe the like whom the Lord hath brought out of the Antichristian Babylon and Assyria that we may eat the Lords supper and injoy other his ordinances without any new baptising with water The bill of divorce he expoundeth to be the putting of them out of the land of Canaan as out of the Lords house or presence from Hos. 9. 3. 15. 17. 2 King 13. 23. A woman divorced is termed hee sayth one that is cast out or thrust forth out of her husbands house Ezek. 44. 22. Thus some think excommunicats to have a bill of divorce c. and then also they are not to be esteemed as put out of the covenant of the Lord but from his house and family til they repent So as upon their repentance they ought to be received againe into the Lords house without any new baptising of them againe which yet should be if they had been put out of the covenant of the Lord. For baptisme is the signe of our entrance thereinto c. Answ. By this it appeareth he takes the bill of divorce for no putting out of the covenant but out of the house out of the land of Canaan onely Which if it be so then the mariage of Israel was no taking into the covenant but into the land of Canaan And this agreeth well with the Anabaptists who hold that Israels covenant was not the covenant of grace but a carnal covenant promise of the land of Canaan It is knowen that the bill of divorce disannulleth the covenant of mariage as appeareth in the Law in Deut. 24. First by the name Câ—rithuth that is Cutting-off secondly by the libâ—â—ty thereupon following that she may marry another man thirdly by the just cause therof which is whordome Math. 19. 9. fourthly by the consequent therof that a man having so put away his wife for whordome he also may without danger of adulterie marie an other woman which cannot be unless the covenant of mariage be disanulled Mat. 19. 5. 9. Fiftly it is confirmed by the copie of the bill of divorse used in the common wealth of Israel as appeareth by their ancient records in these words Jn such a day of the week c J N. the son of N. have voluntarily c dismissed left and put away thee even thee N. the daughter of N. c. which hast been my wife heretofore but now J dismiss thee and leave thee and put thee away that thou mayst be free and have power over thyne own soule to goe away to be maried to any man whom thou wilt c. Sixtly it is testified by the Apostle writing to the Israelites the strangers scattred throughout Pontus Galatia c 1 Pet. 1. 1. and saying to them Which in time past were not a people but are now the people of God which had not obteyned mercie but now have obteyned mercie 1 Pet. 2. 10. Wherby it is evidently proved that their divorce was from the Lord and from being his people or partakers of his mercie in