are required to give to God the Father Ioh. 5. 23. 4. Examples every way warrantable because agreeable to these precepts are frequent in the Word Act. 7. 59. 60. 1 Cor. 1. 2. Rev. 22. 20. 5. Baptisme is administred in the name and to the honour of Christ Mat. 28. 17. 18 19 20. 6. At the day of Judgement every knee must bow to him and acknowledge him to be equall to his Father Isa. 45 21 22 23 24. 25. compared with Rom. 14. 10 11 12. Phil. 2. 6 9 10 11. 7. All that are justified do believe in him and they who do believe in him shall not be ashamed Rom. 3. 25 26. 1 Pet. 2 6 7. 8. The Apostolicall benediction so often repeated in the Epistles From whence I argue since God will not give his glory to another because he is true Isa. 48. 11. and cannot because he is just it followes that though Christ be a distinct person yet he is not a distinct God from his Father but one and the same God with him God blessed for ever Much more might be produced upon this argument That which hath been said is abundantly sufficient if God set it home upon our spirits by his own Spirit but if men will not be perswaded by these Scriptures neither would they be perswaded though one should rise from the dead In the next place I am to demonstrate the Divine Nature Person Titles Attributes Works Worship of the Holy Ghost 3. The same eternall Godhead doth subsist in the Holy Ghost who is God blessed for ever The Holy Ghost is a spirituall and infinite substance subsisting with peculiar properties and acting according to the counsel of his divine will The Apostle having distinguished betweene the Spirit and the gifts of the Spirit shews that the Spirit it selfe That one Spiris l That one and self-same Spirit doth work and distribute all those excellent gifts according as he pleases 1 Cor. 12. 4. Now 1. these particularising and indigitating terms That one that same Spirit 2. The wiâ—â— of the Spirit 3. The discriminating energâ— or efficacy of the Spirit do all demonstratâ— the subsistence of the Spirit peculiarity 〈◊〉 his Subsistence When the Spirit of truth 〈◊〉 come He will guide Iohn 16. 13. he saith noâ— It but He and therefore doth not speak 〈◊〉 an Attribute but a Person He c. which is the more to be observed because thâ— word in the originall which signifies Spiritâ— is of the Neuter gender and yet our Savior speaking of the Spirit saith He to point out the peculiar subsistence or person of the Spirit When He the Spirit of Truth c. Iohn 16. 13. and therefore we ought to take speciall notice of that expression and all those notes of particularity 1 Cor. 12. applyed to the Spirit do shew that he is a particular and undivided substance one Spirit the same Spirit the self same Spirit one and the self same Spirit 1 Cor. 12. form the 4. v. to the 12. And that this spirituall particular undivided substance is a divine substance is evident because it is said that the same Spirit who doth work all in all is the same Lord and the same God 1 Cor. 12. 5 6. and Lord in the new Testament doth answer to Iehovah in the old as hath been proved above in this very Chapter when Peter drew up a charge against Ananias he puts this question to him Why hath Sathan filled thy heart to lie to the holy Ghost thou hast not lyed unto men but unto God Act. 5. 3 4. The black and unpardonable sin is after a more speciall manner committed against the Godhead subsisting in the Holy Ghost and the peculiar office and dispensation of the Holy Ghost then against the Father or the Son and that sin is in some respects pronounced the most grievous sin Mat. 12. 32. If the Holy Ghost were only the Power of God as Socinians love to dream that sin would not be so highly aggravated for it is not the highest and foulest aggravation of sin to say it is committed against the Power of God The Father Son and Spirit have but one Power as they have one and the same nature and therefore the Father is said to work in the Son and by the Spirit and hence it is that Christ is called the Power of God 1 Cor. 1. 24. and the Holy Ghost is called the Power of the most High Luk. 1. 35. because the Power of the Father who is called the most High in opposition to the highest of creatures doth reside in is exercised and made manifest by the Holy Ghost and especially manifested in that Omnipotent Work of the Conception of our Lord and Saviour the very shadow of the Holy Ghost makes a Virgin to conceive this miracle speaks him God The Holy Ghost is Jehovah the great God and King above all Gods as is evident by comparing Psal. 95. 3 6 7 8 9. with Heb. 3. 7 9. The Spirit of Iehovah is the God of Israel 2 Sam. 23. 2 3. The People rebelled against Jehovah and tempted him in the Wildernesse Deut. 6. 16. Numb 14. 26 27. Deut. 9. 7 24. now that is meant of tempting and rebelling against the Holy Ghost as well as against God the Father and Jesus Christ as is cleare if you compare Isa. 63. 10. Heb. 3. 7 9. with the places alledged The Holy Ghost is that Jehovah who made the New Covenant with his chosen People Ierem. 31. 31. compared with Heb. 10. 15 16. The Holy Ghost is that Jehovah who spake by Isaiah the Prophet compare Isa. 6. 8 9. with Acts 28. 25 26. we might argue in like manner from Levit. 19. 2. c. compared with Heb. 9. 7 8. and severall other places Num 12. 6. Heb. 1. 1 2 Pet. 1. 21. 1 Cor. 12. 5 6. The Omnipotence of the Spirit is clearly proved because he worketh all in all according to the counsell of his Will and worketh miracles which transcend not only the common course and order but the whole power of nature 1 Cor. 12. 6 9 10 11. such are the raising of the dead Rom. 8. 11. the regeneration and sanctification of our souls Tit. 3. 5. 1 Cor. 6. 11. and therefore he is called the Holy Ghost because the Father and the Son do according to Divine dispensation sanctify us by the operation of the Holy Ghost Moreover the Holy Ghost did teach the Prophets and Apostles and lead them into all truth he overshadowed the Virgin c. Iohn 16. 13. Acts 2. 4. 1 Pet. 1. 11. and 2 Pet 1. 21. The holy Ghost is the great God and Creatour of all things Psal. 93. 3. 5. Heb. 3. The Holy Ghost is Omniscient for he knowes the deep things of God and the secrets of men he inspired the Prophets and Apostles and moved them to reveale the mysteries of faith and godlines 1 Cor. 2. 10. 11. and 1 Pet. 1. 11. 2
what I should disallow Phil. 1 9 10 19. I must choose what the Spirit approves and then prosecute what I have chosen with care hope desire and embrace what I attaine to with love and delight and in a word rest satisfyed with the love of the Father the grace of the Son and the communion of the Spirit as my al-sufficient and satisfactory portion for evermore Psal. 17. 15. Psal. 63. 5. Faith is that Grace which enables and enclines us upon the divine testimony of the Spirit to depend on Christ for righteousnesse and life according to the tenour of the Covenant of Grace The divine Testimony of the Spirit is the true ground of justifying Faith but Historicall Faith which may be in Devils Jam 2. and Temporary Faith which may be in Reprobates Luke 8. are not truly grounded on the Testimony wisdome Authority Revelation or demonstration of the Spirit We read of a Revelation of flesh and blood Mat. 16. 17. And the demonstration and Revelation of the Spirit 1 Cor. 2. 4. 10. 14 15. Ephes. 1. 17. A man who hath nothing but sense and Reason in him may have an Historicall or a Temporary Faith but he who doth upon the divine Testimony of the Spirit beleeve that Iesus is the Christ he is born of God of the Spirit of God and hath the witnesse in himself 1 Joh. 5. 1. 6 10. For the regenerate and they only have a spirituall understanding in them to know him that is true when he is revealed unto them by the Spirit of truth 1 Joh. 5. 20. 1 Cor. 2 14 15. Deut. 29. 4. For the Demonstration of the Spirit is not understood by us untill we are renewed in the spirit of our mind so that we can look upon the Divine truths testifyed by the Spirit with a spirituall eye and discern them after a spirituall manner 1 Cor. 2. 14. And therefore the Testimony of the Spirit is not received but by our renewed Spirits Rom. 8. 16. Before we are Regenerate we receive divine truths only because we judge them reasonable or because we find them in the Scriptures and we beleeve the Scriptures upon an Humane Testimony and therefore only with an Humane not a Divine Faith But the Spirituall man beleeves all upon the testimony of the Spirit and doth constantly beg the direction of the good Spirit O thy Spirit is good saith David teach me lead me quicken me by thy Spirit Ps. 143. 10 11. Finally this good spirit discovers to a man before he beleeves 1. His want of Christ 2. The worth of Christ. His want of Christ by reason of 1. His hainous sins which are inexcusable damnable 2. His Spirituall wants which are innumerable 3. His present misery and slavery which are unspeakable unsupportable The worth of Christ because he is an All-sufficient Saviour and only Saviour the Spirit discovers the treasures of Free grace the mysteries of Divine Faith which even Angels admire the unsearchable riches of Christ the fulnesse of God able to satiate the soule with heavenly glorious everlasting happinesse and even infinite content Then the soule is convinced by the Spirit of God not onely of the truth but goodnesse of the Covenant made by God with man in Christ and that there are better things laid up for beleevers in Christ then any are or can be bestowed by Sathan upon his greatest Agents and dearest favourites the darlings of the flesh and world and upon this account the soule is perswaded by this demonstration of the spirit to close with Christ and deny itself to have no ability wisdome righteousnesse will of its own but to seek wisdom Righteousnesse Sanctification and Redemption in Christ. 1 Cor. 1. 30. In a word to deny its own will and take the will of Christ for its rule and compasse to do or suffer any thing for Christ to lose or sell all for him The good spirit perswades us 1. To prize Christ highly even above all the kingdomes of the world and glory of them 2. To beleeve in Christ stedfastly 3. To love Christ deerly better then our selves or dearest friends better then worldly treasures sensuall joy or any carnall contentments whatsoever 4. To follow Christ fully that we may enjoy him eternally as our Crown our happinesse our heaven And to this end and purpose to set up the word of God in our Consciences as our only rule for to direct us 1. In all points of Faith 2. In all parts of worship 3. In all passages of our life and conversation that we may cast out the world the Devil nay flesh and self and all to make roome for Christ. Now when the Spirit hath by its own evidence testimony authority wisdome and efficacy wrought Faith in the soule to carry it into the armes of Iesus Christ Christ doth bid it welcom embraces kisses it and takes this young beleever by the hand and puts him into his Fathers bosome And when we are thus brought to beleeve in Father Son and Holy Ghost then we are fitted and prepared to worship and obey all three glorious persons as one God blessed forever And therefore I may now proceed to speak of the worship of all three and then of our obedience to all three 2. This grand Mystery of Faith hath an effectuall influence into our Gospel-worship He takes the name of Father Son and Holy Ghost in vain and doth not make that Holy use which he should of the Titles Properties workes and Ordinances of all three who doth not with Knowledge Faith Reverence sincerity and spirituall joy worship all three for this is true Gospel-worship And therefore I would intreat my Reader diligently to consider what I have delivered in the fourth and fifth chapters of this Treatise concerning the divine Nature Titles Properties works of all three in order to worship for the glory of the thrice illustrious and yet single God head and then if he will study the scope of the first Table of the Holy Law of God and the substance of Gospel-worship he will acknowledge that every one who beleeveth in all three persons will find his Faith obliging and inclining him to worship al three glorious persons as one God blessed for ever 1. God the Father is to be worshipped under the Gospel as the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ and our Father in him I have touched this point already and because it is not much controverted by our grand enemies I shall not insist long upon it All the knowledge of God which we gain by the Scriptures of truth is revealed to us on purpose for our direction in the worship of God we must not worship God according to our own devices but according to that discovery which God hath made of himselfe to us in his Holy word not onely in respect of his divine nature as when our
we adde a fit Epithet and say the Father is a divine Person or an uncreated Person and say the same of the Son and Holy Ghost The word Person signifies the most excellent kind of Subsistent an understanding Subsistent as is acknowledged by all the Masters of Language sacred and prophane as hath been proved and that place 2 Cor. 1. 11. is very cleare of all the derivations of Persona that pleases me best Persona quasi per se una because it doth expresse the unity and excellency of a personall subsistence Per se notes the excellency because subsistere per se notes the most excellent kind of subsistence Nay the word Person doth expresse more excellency then the word subsistence alone doth import for it is proper to say that a Beast doth subsist but it is absurd to say that a Beast is a Person because a Person is an understanding subsistent But neither of these words doth expresse the excellency of that subsistence which the Father Son and Holy Ghost have in the Godhead And therefore we do not only say that these three are Persons or Subsistencâ—s but we say they are uncreated Persons Divine Subsistences Persons subsisting in the Divine Nature Persons of the Godhead that so we may take in all the excellency which these words Subsistence and Person do afford and then by other Epithets superadd that excellency which is proper to Father Son and Holy Ghost and leave out all that imperfection which is in created persons and subsistences The word Subsistence is in the Scripture Heb. 1. 3. The word Person is in Scripture applyed to men 2 Cor. 1. 11. who have a more excellent subsistence then beasts An understanding subsistence and therefore both Greek and Latine Fathers did at last agree to use the word Person because it signifies an understanding subsistent And if you adde divine or uncreated Person then there is no danger of any mistake unlesse men will be so vain as to say the word Person doth sometimes signifie a visible shape an outward form or appearance the countenance or gesture of a man or else some office relation or quality and say that we do make three shapes countenances c. in the Godhead as Sabellius Servetus and such bold Atheists as have sucked in their poyson are wont to say We do therefore vindicate the Church of God from these insolent and groundlesse aspersions and freely declare what we mean by Person namely an understanding Subsistent Every of the Three Divine Persons hath an office and hath a relation but no Divine person is an Office or a mere Relation but the Godhead doth contain all relative as well as absolute perfection within it self as hath been said God as represented to us in Scripture doth as it were take upon him the person of a displeased Father and sometimes of a well-pleased Father but we do not say there are three such Persons in the Godhead for one Divine Person may sustain the person of a well-pleased Father at one time and the person of a displeased Father at another And if any man will be so ridiculous us to conclude from thence that then one person may be two persons I hope he will see his own vanity and be sensible of the equivocation by considering what hath been said already in this very Chapter When we say God doth take upon him the Person of a well-pleased Father we speak 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 after the manner of men just as when we speak of the eyes and hands of God but we must be understood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 after such a manner as becomes the infinite dignity and pure majesty of God If men do not wilfully mistake they may then know what we mean by Person when we say there are three uncreated Persons in the Godhead The word Person is in Scripture and if it were not yet as long as the thing signified by it is there we have no reason to account that word or any other such like an Exotick word because we find it very proper and pertinent to the point in hand in the sense which we have so often declared that there might be no mistake but a full agreement in such an high and weighty point It is out of question that we may expound the Scripture by words and phrases which are not in those very letters and syllables to be found in Scripture as long as we do not affect a needlesse curiosity in inventing new and obscure phrases a rigid superstition in defending them for that would not conduce to edification but beget or foment an endlesse contention Our expressions must be sober and plain grave and usefull such as may hold forth the godly and prudent simplicity of the Scripture That is al that needs be said for the use of such words and phrases as are fit and necessary to be used in this and divers other obscure points There are some that mistake the Attributes of God for Persons and they make more then three persons and therefore I shall not go about to reckon up the innumerable absurdities which follow upon that one mistake Vno absurdo dato mille sequuntur I read indeed that Sabellius conceived the Father Son and Holy Ghost to be different Attributes of God But the Orthodoxe Christians desired him to remember that there were more then three Divine â—ttributes and pressed him to acknowledge that A Trinity of persons do subsist in the unity of the nature of God and then they would close with him and give the right hand of fellowship unto him The fraud and subtilty of Arius Sabellius and the rest of the old Heretiques gave the reverend Doctors of the Chuâ—ch cause to use the words Trinity Coessential Consubstantial and the like that they might more clearly and fully manifest this profound and glorious mysterie And they who did wrangle about these Words did indeed deny the Mystery and thing it self and therefore did but manifest their pride fraud obstinacy for the maintenance of their damnable Heresie when they quarrelled with those eminent Writers for making use of unwritten words phrases upon so just and necessary occasion that the written truth might be more clearly explained and fully defended It is not in the judgement of any man any fault at all to make truth plain unlesse in the deluded judgement of such who are enemies to truth Now we have removed the rubbish we begin to build A Divine Person is a Spiritual and Infinit Subsistent related indeed to those other uncreated Persons which subsist in the same Divine Nature with it but distinguished from those Coessâ—ntial persons by its peculiar manner of subsistence order of subsisting singular relation and incommunicable propertie In these few line there is matter enough to fill many sheets and I am to treat of the distinction of persons at large in the next
which are two of the Affections of Ens are distinguished by their severall and peculiar relations Truth hath relation to the understanding and Goodnesse to the will The Father Son and Holy Ghost are known to be distinguished by their severall and peculiar relations and if it be not unreasonable to say that there is in Entity three affections and two relations in ente simplicissimo without any Composition in or Multiplication of the Entity why should it seem unreasonable or at least why should it seem incredible that there are three subsistences and severall relations in the Godhead without any composition in or multiplication of the Godhead 9. One affection nay all the affections in abstracto do but inadaequately represent Ens unlesse you take notice of the Entity it self as well as the three Affections One single Subsistence nay all three Subsistences in abstracto do but inadaequately represent God unlesse you take notice of the Godhead in which they subsist and therefore this praecisive abstraction of the Subsistences from the Divine nature is but an inadaequate conceit of God as hath been demonstrated above in this very Chapter for we must not dream of a Trinity of Modes but assert and believe the glorious and Coessential Trinunity The Father is truly God that God who is the only true God but the Father alone doth not adaequately represent God to us as he is described in the Holy Scriptures It is true that the Divine Essence is by the Subsistence of the Father adaequately the Father but as God is represented by that Divine subsistence only he is not Deus Trinunus he is not Father Son and Holy Ghost the Father alone is not all those three Witnesses who are one God And therefore the acute Socinians with their precise abstractions do but suggest an inadaequate conceit of God that only true God whom we worship doth not subsist only in the Person of the Father We worship God subsisting with all Absolute and Relative Perfection in Father Son and Holy Ghost for these three are that one God who is the only true God blessed for ever This is the adaequate representation of God in the Scriptures of truth And we are resolved to regulate all our Metaphysical notions by the holy Scriptures that we may make the highest of Sciences to acknowledge the supremacie of that Divine science which is nowhere to be learnt but in the Word of God for the purest reason must be elevated by the Word and Spirit of God for the discovery of this mysterie 10. These affections of Ens represent the manner of that Being which Ens hath as it is transcendently confidered and the three Divine Subsistences do represent that manner of Being which God hath as he is most transcendently considered namely as subsisting after the most glorious manner with all Absolute and Relative Perfection It is the manner of a transcendent Entity to be one and true and good and it is the manner of Gods being to be one God in three Subsistences These three are one single God there is no Composition or Multiplication imaginable in this single and infinite being I was bold to adventure upon this enquiry because so many reverend learned Orthodox and pious Doctours of the Church have declared that the Divine Essence differs from the Divine subsistences as the manner of the thing doth from the thing it self and the Persons differ from one another tanquam modi a modis I conceived that there was something more in the expression then was commonly known Moreover I considered that if there might be so great simplicity or singlenesse in a Created and finite Entity notwithstanding there are three affections and two relations which do affect that Entity it seemed to me somewhat easie to beleeve that there are three subsistences in one infinite Godhead without any composition in or multiplication of the single Godhead Finally I perceive that some youthfull towring wits are drawn away from the simplicity of the Gospel by some froathy speculations presented to them as most sublime curiosities and Metaphysicall notions and therefore I humbly submit what hath been said to the judgement of the learned and conclude this discourse with the same prayer wherewith Augustine shuts up his books of the Trinity Domine Deus unus Deus Trinitas quaecunque dixi in hoc libro de tuo agnoscant et tui si quid de meo et tu ignosce tui O Lord who art one God O God who art a whole Trinity of Persons in the Godhead what ever I have said in this discourse of thine let all that are thine acknowledge what ever I have said of mine own Lord let it be pardoned by thee and thine II. Concerning the Attributes of God we may observe that they are al perfect glorious infinite because they do signifie and declare the infinite Perfection Happinesse Majesty and glory of God and to speak higher yet these glorious Attributes though they be very many are nothing else but the single undivided indivisible Essence of God we may be instructed but are even confounded with the glory of this mystery There are three reasons why we do not readily apprehend this truth 1. The defect of words to expresse it especially in English but indeed the most rich and copious languages are onely happy in the confession of their penury when we come to treat of this argument because the mystery of the Godhead doth transcend all our eloquence and teaches us to admire and adore with silence what we cannot expresse without a manifest demonstration of our ignorance 2. The imperfect manner of signifying is easie to be observed in our most significant words and therefore we must confesse that the Excellency of God doth transcend the significancy of the most significant words in the most rich and copious tongues 3 The imperfection of our own understanding and of our manner of apprehending and judging of things whiles we are in the body If any man desire to know a reason why he cannot readily apprehend these divine Mysteries let him consider the perfection of the mystery and the imperfection of his own reason he hath a sufficient reason a reason from whence he may draw a most invincible argument against idolizing of his own reason so far as to make his reason judge of the mysteries of faith Let us then prudently consider that we are not able to apprehend the infinite and impartible Essence of God but as it were by parts by many incomplete and inadaequate conceits and apprehensions The most profound and serious schoolmen have fairely expressed this truth there are not say they many Attribut all Perfections nay there is but one Perfection in God for all the Essentiall Attributes of God are nothing else but that single and undivided Essence which is singularly and altogether the same Essence in all three subsistences Nay to speak properly the Divâ—ne
they do not consider that they themselves are finite 2. The nature of these three glorious subsistences is Independent the nature of all created subsistences is dependent and therefore it is no wonder if a dependent nature do subsist in its proper person and depend upon its proper person for sustentation but the divine Nature doth not depend upon the three subsistences for its sustentation or subsistence but all three persons do subsist in this Independent and infinite Nature Philip. 2. 6. subsisting in the Nature of God so the Scripture expresses it and we must apprehend and beleeve these holy Mysteries according to the holy Scriptures because no man hath seene God and God is the only all-sufficient Witnesse concerning his owne essence and subsistence concerning himselfe and therefore we must not think or speak otherwise of God then according to the Scriptures of truth in which God hath sufficiently and graciously revealed himself Iohn 1. 18. Matth. 16. 17. Matth. 11. 26 27. The Scriptures direct us how to distinguish uncreated persons from created persons Our finite and dependent Nature doth subsist in a created person but uncreated persons do subsist in an Infinite and Independent Nature there is a manifest difference Our nature indeed doth subsist in the divine and uncreated person of the Son of God but that is not according to the common course of nature there is a peculiar reason and another Mystery in that wonderful subsistence And yet even in that wonderfull Mystery our dependent Nature doth subsist in a person which notes its dependance and our Nature is more satisfied and quieted by subsistence in a divine then in an humane person because it hath a more glorious sustentation and is more powerfully upheld by that divine and uncreated person The divine person of Christ doth subsist in his divine Nature and the humane Nature of Christ doth subsist in his divine and onely person III. All created persons have a compounded and divisible nature but uncreated persons have a single undivided and indivisible nature The Socinians Arminians and Vorstians of this age do not love to hear any discourse of the single Nature of God in Father Son and Holy Ghost this Doctrine they say is Philosophical Scholastical Metaphysical and therefore there is nothing which concernes Faith Piety or manners in it But it is most clear and evident that all the glorious Attributes of God are united by an Eternal bond which cannot be dissolved and we have invincibly proved that they do all signifie but one single and infinite perfection If you take away the singlenesse of Gods being you take away his Incommunicable unchangable incomprehensible independent and infinite perfection This point is excellently discussed and opened by Damaseene Composition saith he doth beget strife strife may well cause a separation and separation dissolution which all who know any thing of God will acknowledge to be repugnant to the perfection of the Godhead The learned Doctours of old did consider that God is a most pure and perfect Act the first and Independent Being that he is what he is by his owne Essence and not by participation But Vorstius was bold to publish his dreames coâ—trary to the Analogy of Faith and unanimous judgment of the reverend Doctours of the Ancient Church The Socinians in their Catechisme the Arminians in their Confession and Apology are exceedingly too blame in this point The Socinians do expunge the single and infinite perfection of Gods spiritual nature out of their Catechisme that they may more securely deny the Coessentiall Trinunity of Father Son and Holy Ghost and therefore I do insist upon this difference between created and uncreated persons because if the Doctrine concerning the single and infinite perfection of Gods spirituall nature be overthrowne All the Fundamentals of the Christian Religion will be overturned God is Jehovah he is what he is by his owne Essence he can neither cease to be or to be what he is for he cannot be any other thing or any otherwise then now he is and ever was Exod. 3. 14 15. Revel 1. 8. Iames. 1. 17. Psal. 10. 2. 27. Gos is called Light and Love Life in Scripture to note the singlenesse of his being because whatsoever is in him is himself and he himself is one single infinite perfection he is light it self and in him is no darknesse at all 1 John 1. 5. God hath not such an imperfect singlenesse of being as we say is in the first matter of last difference and the like nor such a singlenesse as is in Angels or the souls of men for theirs is but a Comparative singlenesse there is some kind of composition even in the most glorious Angels God is not compounded of a Nature Atrributes and Relations as hath been shewen nor is any of the Divine Persons compounded nor can the Godhead be said to be compounded of three Persons for though the Persons be distinguished they do not compound nor can they be compounded Distinction connotes perfection because it is opposite to confusion but Composition denotes multiplicity and imperfection we must then consider that 1. The Essence of God is most perfect and therefore nothing can be added to it to make it more perfect because it is infinitely perfect 2. Whatsoever is compounded may be dissolved into the parts whereof it is compounded The Godhead cannot be dissolved because it cannot be changed 3. Whatsoever is compounded must needs be dependent both in being and in working But God is Independent Ergo. 4. The parts compounding are before the whole that is compounded but God is the Former of all things and therefore nothing can be before God The divine Essence cannot be later then it selfe or later then any thing else because it is the first and eternall being Now if neither of the Nature or Attributes of these uncreated persons nor the persons themselves be compounded nor God compounded of the Nature and Persons here is another very great difference between created and uncreated persons who have life and are life it self because they are one single perfection IV. Three created persons have three different Natures but these three uncreated Persons have the selfe same most single and singular nature Three created persons may have the same specifical nature but they have not the same singular nature created persons in respect of their specificall nature which is universall are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of like nature but in respect of their singular nature they are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But now these uncreated persons are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in respect of their singular Essence Look how many created persons there be of the same species so many singular substances there are of that species For a finite nature cannot be communicated to severall proper persons of the same species without a multiplication of
And I have consulted the most judicious and experienced writers upon that place though I cite but few in the margine because I have not time to peruse them againe True it is that we are not to beleeve every spirit and therefore are permitted to try the spirits whether they be of God or no 1 Joh. 4. 1. But in this tryall the Holy Spirit speaking in the Scriptures is the suprem Judge and the Holy Spirit doth condemn all erroneous and fantasticall spirits who forsake old truths and pretend to follow New Light The holy Spirit doth constantly teach the same truth in the holy Scriptures for he doth not change his mind or contradict himself We saith the Apostle having the same spirit of Faith according as it is written I beleeved and therefore have I spoken we also beleeve and therefore speake 2 Cor. 4. 13. The same spirit doth lead all the faithfull into all truth necessary to salvation not Absolutely and at once but by degrees For we see the Apostles themselves were for a time guilty of grosse errours Mark 10. 37 41. Act. 1. 6. But the faithfull cannot obstinately hold and continue in such odious and damnable errours as do directly overthrow the foundation of Faith And for the time in which they do erre they hearken to their own spirits so farre as they are carnall and do not as they ought search and pray and wait for the direction of the Holy Spirit It is not the Spirit of Faith which speaks in them when they dissent from such as receive the publique Testimony of the Holy Ghost speaking in the holy Scriptures And therefore the Spirit teacheth us to try the spirits and doctrines of men by the Scriptures if they speak not according to this Word it is not because they have new light from the spirit but because they have no light no morning light heavenly light conveyed unto them in that point wherein they dissent or they have not as yet received it the spirit hath not as yet sealed that portion of truth to their consciences or writ it in their hearts For the spirit doth not whisper one thing in privat to my conscience and declare the contrary in his publique Testimony delivered in the Word Behold saith the wisdome of God I will pour out my spirit unto you I will make knowen my words unto you Pro. 1. 23 For this is the Covenant of God that his Word and spirit should go together and the spirit should deliver his publique Testimony Authoritatively as it becomes his supremacy and soveraignty in the holy Scriptures This is my Covenant with them saith the Lord my spirit that is upon thee and my Word c. Isa. 59. 21. And by attendance on the ministry of the Gospel in the Church of Christ we receive the Spirit Gal. 3. 2. By hearing the doctrine of Faith preached in the Gospel they received the Spirit and therefore the ministry of the Gospel is called the ministration of the Spirit 2 Cor. 3. 8. And for these reasons we try the doctrines and Spirits of men by the word of God because the Spirit who is the Author of Scripture doth every where agree with himself and there is a friendly relation between the truth of the party witnessing the truth of the thing witnessed We do readily acknowledge that the world doth look upon this publique testimony of the Spirit in the word as a private testimony and are apt to scoffe at them who receive it as at men led by their own private spirit but the true reason is because this testimony of the Spirit is not manifest to them who have not the Spirit But it is so manifest to them that have had this publique testimony sealed up to their consciences that they will hold fast this testimony though it cost them their lives I saw under the Altar the soules of them that were slaine for the word of God and for the testimony which they held Rev. 6. 9. The testimony which they held is no other then that publick testimony which the Spirit delivers in the Word and had privately sealed up to their Spirits They were slaine for the Word of God and for the testimony which they held according to that Word They were Martyred because they gave testimony of that truth which they had learnt in the Word of God I am willing to dwell longer upon this subject because it is Fundamentum Fundamentorum and therefore we will for our better satisfaction descend from handling the point in Generall unto some very weighty points in particular and shew how the Spirit doth perswade the hearts and consciences of men to receive his testimony in particular controversies which have been raised and disputed by men of great wit and Spirit In the great controversies between us and the Papists they do as divers Hereticks have done before them urge visions miracles traditions successions prudentiall motives and sometimes Councels Fathers and for a fairer pretence the holy Scriptures But when they are beaten off from their pretending to Councels and Fathers by our learned Whitaker Iewel Abbot Vsher Rainolds not to name Chamier and other Worthyes what lamentable shifts do they make when they are pressed to stand to the publicke testimony and judgement of the Holy Ghost delivered in the holy Scriptures We do therefore in compassion to their poor soules intreat them to hearken to the Spirit of Christ and not to the Spirit of Antichrist because the right sense of the Scripture expounded by the Scripture is the sword of Gods Spirit where with all heresies whatsoever are overcome by all those good souldiers who add the shield of Faith to the Sword of the Spirit But when men neglect the Scriptures and idolize humane inventions they spend their strength in vaine and are like the blind men of Sodome who wearied themselves to find the doore The great point of the Popes Infallible Supremacy can never be proved by the Originall Universall and Perpetuall Tradition of the Church of Christ in all Ages no nor by the unanimous consent of all learned men now living in communion with the present Church of Rome The Sorbon Doctors cannot beleeve that the Popes of Rome are not subject to the sins and passions of other men and if the succession of Popes which they brag of were to be tryed by Fame Celebrity Antiquity Consent it is most evident to all that are acquainted with pure antiquity and impartiall History that the Supremacy of the Popes and Papacy would be sufficiently condemned but if the Popes infallible Supremacy come to be tryed by the Holy Ghost speaking in the holy Scriptures the Popes and Papacy will be infallibly condemned by the Supream Judge The learned Papists do not agree concerning the Infallible Propounder of Fundamentall points for 1. Some say that the Popes proposall ex Cathedrâ is sufficient but Gal. 1. 8. 2. Others
God be thanked that ye who were the servants of sin have obeyed from the heart that for me of Doctrine which was delivered unto you by the holy spirit Rom. 6. 17. Be much in supplication and thanksgiving and the spirit of Supplication will be a spirit of Adoption an oile of gladnesse Heb. 1. 9. The spirit will teach you to cry Abba Father with comfort Gal 4. Rom 8. The spirit will fill your soules with all joy and peace in beleeving and in obeying the joy of the spirit shall be your strength the comforts of the Almighty even all the comforts of the Kingdom of God which consists in righteousnesse and peace and joy in the holy Ghost shall be all-sufficient to revive and support your dejected spirit All your fears and discomforts shall be dispelled your wants supplyed your wound soares infirmities healed and you at last filled with all the fulnesse of God Mal. 4. 2. Eph. 3. 19. Beleeve in the spirit obey the spirit and ye shall be sealed with the spirit Eph. 1 13. I beseech you by the tender mercies of God by the meekness and gentleness of Christ by the joy and for the love of the Spirit that you consider what hath been said that ye receive this wholesome Word as it is in truth the word of God the word of the Father Son and holy Ghost but testified after a more especiall and immediate manner by the Holy Ghost that it may worke effectually in all you who beleeve it 1 Thes. 2. 13. Even unto spirituall and sincere obedience to Father Son and Holy Ghost and that it may be so we must have a care to obey after the right manner for Amazia was too blame though he did that which was right in it self because he did it not with a perfect heart 2 Chron. 25. 2. Let us imitate our Saviour who did all as he was commanded Ioh. 14. 31. Let us have 1. High thoughts of the Majesty and greatnesse of God 2. Sweet thoughts of the rich grace and infinite goodnesse of God 3. An intire and an universall respect to all the commands and every work of God Ioh. 6. 28 29. Every work which God hath given us to do Ioh. 17. 4. and ordained for us to walk in Eph. 2. 10 For every command of God must have a divine authority over our consciences and hearts Psal. 119. 6. and then Christ will account us his friends Iohn 15 14. 4. A more especiall respect to the weightiest and greatest duties of Religion such as God hath more especially enjoyned for instance 1 The duties of inward worship and obedience Mat 22. 37 38. the most reserved and intimate duties of Religion 2. Duties of judgment mercy and fidelity towards all men Mat. 23. 23. Love to our enemies Mat. 5. 44. 45. 3. Duties of our particular callings and speciall relations publique duties and family duties especially such as are most private Mat. 6. 6. Zach 12. 12. 4. The great work of Faith which is the summe of both Testaments because all judicious and zealous love all sincere and uniforme obedience springs from faith Iohn 6. 29. This is the worke of God and unbeliefe is the work of the Devill faith purifies our heart by applying the bloud of Christ to our soules Heb. 9. 14. The weighty matters of Law and Gospel may be referred to those foure Heads above mentioned observe that excellent Scripture God hath chosen the poore of this world rich in faith and heires of that kingdome which he hath promised to them that love him Iam. 2. 5. Faith and love will make us constant in the performance of all the other weighty matters required of us both in Law and Gospell and we have proved at large that faith and love is due to all three Persons We must performe all our duties 1. As to a Father a divine Father as hath been proved 2. In the name of Christ. 3. In the strength of the spirit 4. At the command and for the glory of all three co-essentiall Persons for all things are of the Father by the Son and through the spirit 5. With a willing mind a perfect heart a good conscience and faith unfeigned 6. With all self-denyall diligence constancy 7. With an humble desire that we and our obedience may be accepted in and for Christ according to the tenour of the Covenant of grace Let us now put all together again and observe what a sweet harmony exact Symmetry and glorious uniformity there is in this whole mystery of Faith this mystery of the Co-essentiall Trinunity as reduced to practice by its effectuall influence into the mystery and power of godlinesse Beloved Christians I look upon my self as the least of Saints and greatest of Sinners unworthy to be accounted a Member but far more unworthy to be a Minister of Jesus Christ because I know more evill by my self then I know by any member of Christ but I thank God our Father Christ Iesus our lord and the co-essentiall Spirit the same God who worketh all in all 1 Cor. 12. 6. that I have obtained mercy and ability of all three for to be faithfull and to be counted faithfull by them all for they have all three in some measure enabled me for that they counted me faithfull putting me into the Ministry for I am a Minister of that Gospell which is revealed from heaven by Father Son and Holy Spirit and I am a Minister accordidg to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectuall working of his power unto me I say who am lesse then the least of all Saints in this grace given that I should preach the love of the Father the grace and unsearchable riches of Christ the sweet Communion peace and joy of the holy Ghost which is unspeakable and full of glory Be pleased then to take a view of the whole mystery of faith and godlinesse and observe how this Co-essentiall Trinunity of Father Son and holy Ghost who are one God blessed for ever is the adequate Object Author End of all Religion 1. Look upon the Grand Mystery of our Election unto Grace Peace and Glory and observe what practicall inferences may be drawn from thence to raise our hearts to admire beleeve love worship obey Father Son and holy Ghost Elect according to the fore-knowledge of God the Father through sanctification of the Spirit unto obedience and sprinkling of the bloud of Iesus Christ grace unto you and peace be multiplied Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Iesus Christ c. 1 Pet. 1 2 3 4. God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the spirit and beliefe of the Truth whereunto he called you by our Gospel to the obtaining of the glory of the Lord Iesus Christ Now our Lord Iesus Christ himself and God even our Father c. 2 Thes. 2.
age do professe Faith in and obedience to the Lord Jesus Christ according to the Rules of Faith and Life delivered in the Word 3. Desire that the above mentioned Officers should be incorporated in one Eldership and joyn in all acts of Government of the Church 4. Hold the same censures of Admonition and Excommunication and do likewise receive such as have been censured into communion again as soon as they give testimony of their repentance to them Godly Independents doe acknowledg that Parochial Churches wherein Ministers and others endeavor to remove all things justly offensive that so all ordinances may be administred in purity are true Churches of Christ. 2. They retaine Communion with these Parochicall Churches by baptizing their Children and receiving the Lords Supper there as occasion serves And if occasionall Communion with us be lawfull constant Communion with us would not be sinfull 3. They receive the members of such parishes as aforesaid unto Communion with themselves in their own Congregations also occasionally 4. They professe that they are ready to give an account to such Parochiall Congregations as to Sister-Churches whensoever they are offended at any irregular administrations in Independent Churches 5. They esteem a sentence of Non-Communion passed by such Parochicall Congregations is Churches against them upon any scandall wherein they are unsatisfied as a means to humble them and as an ordinance of God to reduce them Much more might be added But it is clear from these premises that prudent and godly Independents cannot conceive themselves obliged 1. To set up other Churches with differing rules of Constitution or Worship For Presbyterians and Independents did both agree in the same Confession of Faith and Directory for Worship and resolved to practice most of the same things and those the most substantiall in respect of Government also as doth appeare by those few transactions in the Assembly and Committee for Accommodation which have been Printed 2. Nor can they say that they are enforced to gather new Churches out of true Reformed Churches for a circumstantiall difference cannot be a sufficient ground for leaving of all ordinary Communion with true reforming Churches The prudent and godly Presbyterians have set no bounds to themselves in their Reformation but the Word of God and therefore if the Independents will set forth a compleat Modell of their whole Church-way and Church-order fully freely and clearely and prove it by plaine Texts out of the holy Scriptures we shall thankfully receive whatsoever they shall convincingly impart And I shall be bold to say that there had been a judicious affectionate and practicall Accommodation between us notwithstanding some speculative differences in notionall Ideas if there had been no interposition of Statesmen or Sword-men when the Committee of Accommodation had sadly considered and reviewed all materiall Arguments on this side and on that And if you set aside all reasons of State and saecular considerations I do not see why men who agree in the substance of the Service and Worship of God in the Directory according to the Preface in the Confession of Faith set forth by the Assembly and in the Doctrine contained in the Confessions and Writings of the reformed Churches should not mind the same thing and walk by the same Rule that there might be a Practicall Communion between us in all points wherein there is a Doctrinal Agreement and we might go hand in hand to heaven together with meeknesse of wisdome and sincerity of love Let men of both perswasions beware of such a superstitious tendernesse as doth usually arise from some unconscionable errour and unmortified lust because it is no priviledge but a judgement to be given up to errour or lust and from such ensnaring liberty which is indeed perfect bondage good Lord deliver us No man is obliged to follow the Positive Praescript of an erroneous conscience in any point or case whatsoever Differences of Iudgment did not extinguish the relation of membership amongst the Romans and Corinthians And it is certaine that the Substantials of Church-Government must not be changed in every age acording to the graduall differences of light in severall persons and Congregations We humbly desire that there may be a strict and mutuall obligation condescended to in some expedient by all godly men of both perswasions for mutuall edification and for the preservation of all the Churches in these Dominions in truth godlinesse and peace that we may not passe unchristian censures upon our Christian Brethren Let all private quarrels then fall to the ground and let us mind the common interest of the Lord Iesus and seriously promote it in our respective places in faith and love And let all Statesmen beware 1. That they do not fall into the same spirituall or civill evils which they themselves have condemned in the King and Prelates 2. Beware of ERASTIANISME which doth overthrow all Church-government both Presbyterian and Independent 3. Take heed of CIVILL SCEPTICISME which doth overthrow the Fundamentals of publike Faith and publike rights and plucks up all Civill Government by the roots 4. Beware of Familisticall Polytheisme for the Familists affirme that there are as many Christs as many Gods manifested in the flesh as there are Saints on earth But to us there is but one God and one Lord Iesus Christ it is enough for blind Pagans to talk of many Gods and many Mediatours 5. Beware of Atheisme the great Monster of this Age compounded of Socinianisme Familisme Libertinisme and Antinomianisme The Ephesians complaine of none but robbers of Churches and blasphemers Acts 19. 37. But we have cause to complaine of them and Apostates Idolaters Atheists and what not 6. Beware of a Toleration of intolerable errours Reverend Mr Cotton is afraid that the Antichristian Whore will steale in at the Back-doore of a Toleration The Magistrates of England are engaged by the Oath of God to root out whatsoever is contrary to sound Doctrine and the Power of Godlinesse That man is seduced by a private Spirit as you observe well in your Orthodox Book who lusteth after envy after Sects and Divisions but the holy Spirit is a Catholike Spirit a Spirit of Catholike Faith and Catholike love an unreserved and universall Love to all that beleeve and love the Lord Jesus Christ. Let us then all hold fast the wholesome forme of sound words in faith and love For they who waver against the credit of their own testimony are not as the Civilians say to be heard or regarded because they have lost their credit We are reserved for some service in this declining Age and therefore it doth become us to be Orthodox Saints steady Christians that our Posterity may imitate us and see those glorious daies which some conceive are come already because they have attained a little vainglory in this Age of vanity The Writers of this present time who seeme to contradict one another concerning the light and glory of
when it is used on this occasion upon this subject we may after so many disputes about this Argument easily understand the proper and consecrated importance of the word We may take warning by the mistakes of others and avoid those rocks on which others have suffered shipwrack Some who understand that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 did signifie essence were offended with such as said there were three Hypostases in God because according to that signification of the word to say that there are three Hypostases in God is to say that there are three Essences in God and consequently that there are three Gods It is readily acknowledged that the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth sometimes signifie the nature or essence of a thing not the generical or specifical nature in their latitude and abstract universality but the nature truly existing and subsisting in the world This acception of the word may all things duly considered and soberly expounded be admitted with some grains of allowance for the infinite difference which is between created and uncreated Subsistents For if Hypostasis be described in concreto for which we have with invincible reason contended all along this Chapter then Hypostasis doth connote the Divine Nature and signifies not an Abstract Subsistence but a Complete Subsistent When I say that Jesus Christ is the Character of his Fathers Subsistence I do not as I have formerly shewn understand it thus that Jesus Christ is the Character of his Fathers Abstract Personality but he is the Character of God the Father I take in the Divine Nature But you must then consider that the glory of the Trinunity must be preserved in this acception for there is not a new nature in every one of the Three but the Divine nature which is connoted in these three Hypostasâ—s is the very same there is the glory of the Mysterie which dazles the eye of carnal reason And therefore whatever we say on this argument must be taken cum granosalis and expounded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because of the infinite difference between a finite and infinite nature and between created and uncreated persons as I shall God willing shew at large before I conclude this Chapter Three Persons may and do subsist in one and the same Infinite Nature and therefore though eâ—ery Hypostasis doth connote the Divine nature yet all â— here connote one and the same infinite nature in which all three Persons do subsist To subsist is as Aristotle the great Interpreter expounds it to have the most perfect manner of Being by it self that a Substance the best of Beings can attain to and it is very proper to say that the Father Son and Holy Ghost have the most perfect manner of Subsistence in the Divine nature that is or can be The Divine Nature considered with all Absolute Relative Perfection in Father Son and Holy Ghost doth most truly properly and perfectly subsist for there are three illustrious Subsistences in that one undivided infinite Nature and therefore the Godhead thus considered doth subsist 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Singular substances have the most perfect subsistence A Spirit is the most perfect Substance God is the most single and singular Substance and he is the only Infinite â—pirit the best of Spirits and therefore he must needs have the most perfect Subsistence Every single Person is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and therefore I will be bold to inferre that these three Persons only do perfectly subsist by themselves though in one another for they have one Independent Spiâ—itual Infinite Nature which is of it self and is complete in it self because Infinite in Perfection and therefore contains all absolute and Relative perfection in it self but when we speak of the Relative perfection we speak of three in one because the Relative properties are distinctive and when we treat of the Absolute perfection we speak of One in Three one Essence in three Persons who do all three subsist with their Relative and Incommunicable properties in that most perfect and single Essence This is that Divine Trinunity which contains all Absolute and Relative Perfection And therefore hath the most perfect and excellent Subsistence that is or can be Finally though these three Persons do mutually subsist in one another yet they are said to subsist by themselves 1. Because these Persons do not subsist in one another as Accidents do exist in a Subject for Accidents exist in another because of their imperfection but these subsist in one another because of their perfection because they have the same single infinite nature and are one infinite and omnipresent Spirit 2. They subsist mutually in one another the Father subsists in the Son Ioh. 14. 10 11. as well as the Son in the Father and therefore this subsisting in one another doth not argue any imperfection but doth demonstrate the infinite perfection of all Three Subsistents but there is no mutuall inexistence of an accident in a subject and a subject in that accident or any other 3. These three Subsistents have one and the same spirituall independent infinite nature which is complete of it self and in it self and the whole Creation doth not afford one Example to illustrate much lesse to parallel these three illustrious Subsistences in one undivided Nature And it is impossible it should for this one undivided Nature in which these three glorious Persons do subsist is an infinite nature and there can be but one Infinite and therefore the Socinians seem to have lost what they do so much idolize their Reason when they desire us to illustrate this Mysterie by an Example 4. These three Subsistents are Coequal because Coessential The Fathers upon some of these considerations did agree to use the phrase of three Hypostases and one Essence though the word Hypostasis was not so plain and familiar at first especially to Latine eares and therefore Hierome complains that some were too rigorous in imposing that word without expounding of it to such whose judgment was Orthodox though their skill but small in the Greek To conclude my discourse upon this word Subsistence be pleased to consider that we read of the Nature of God we read of the Subsistence of the Father and we read that these three Father Son and Holy Ghost are one having these two words Nature Subsistence in Scripture we are prompted by the Spirit speaking in the word to explain this Mystery thus The Father Son and Holy Ghost are three in Subsistence but one in Nature No Mystery can be explained with lesse Violence and more Sobriety for we are precise in keeping to the very words of Scripture in explaining this grand Mystery to the plainest of men and therefore they were sentenced of old that did not beleeve this plain truth IX We have no reason to be offended with the Vse of the word Person when we treat of this Argument if
and Substance oâ— all that can be said a parte rei as we use to speak but because we are not able distinctly to apprehend the absolute and Relative Perfefection of God God doth make himself known to us in a way most suitable to our weak apprehensions in representing himself to be an eternal Father and then we are ready to enquire after and willing to heare of an eternal Son Now according to our weak manner of conceiving we must needs apprehend that there is a Divine Relation between the eternal Father and his coeternal Son and conclude that these two are distinguished from and in a well qualified Sense opposed to one another with a mere Relative Opposition for there can be no contrarie Opposition between the Persons but this Relative and friendly Opposition assures us that the Father is not the Son and that the Father did not beget himself but did beget his Son But then we consider again that this Son is an eternal Son and therefore is God and we are sure God did not beget another God for the Power of God is not nay cannot be exercised about any thing repugnant to the Nature of God and nothing is more repugnant to the Godhead then a Pluralitie of Gods and therefore we must conclude that the Father and Son are one and the same God Now we are come to the Mysterie which faith must receive and reason admire 7. We may best resemble all that difference which is between the Essence of God and the Divine Subsistences by considering the transcendent Affections of Ens simpliciter and the Attributes of God who doth infinitely transcend not only a Praedicamental Substance but a Metaphysical Entity as the most Metaphysical men who are sound in the Faith do honestly confesse 1. Concerning the transcendent Affections of Ens which are unum verum bonum we say these three affections and Ens in latitudine do not make foure things really distinct and yet we say they are reall and positive affections for our Metaphysical science hath too much serious Majesty to be pleased with the pretty fictions of Reason when our understanding hath got leave to play and recreate it self with its own artificial inventions The thing is most cleare and evident to all at the very first proposal because the things which God hath made are not beholding to God only for their Entity and to us for their goodnesse for the things do not cease to be good when our understanding ceaseth to work but the things are truly and really good whether we think them to be so or no. Moreover we say that these Positive and reall affections of Ens do not make any composition at all in Ens transcendently considered because then the most simple and uncompounded Being would lose its Being For Simplicity would be repugnant to Entity if that Entity it self did involve any Composition And therefore it is agreed on all sides that this proposition Ens simplex est Ens is a true proposition Finally from what hath been said it is reasonably and commonly inferred That Entity Truth Goodnesse and Unity make but one Real thing though they do all foure differ quoad modum significandi Because the thing adaequately signified by all those foure words is but one Real Thing namely the very Entity of Ens transcendently considered For when I say Ens est unum this Praedicate Vnum doth not superadde any new Entity but doth imply and connote the very Entity of Ens. Nay more if you ask these Metaphysical men what this transcendent Unity is they will not answer that Vnity is Indivision but Unity is the very undivided Entity it self not that Unity alone doth signifie simply and adaequately the same that Ens doth in tota latitudine as Res or Aliquid do for Unity doth not signifie Truth and Goodnesse which are the two other transcendent affections of Ens but Ens in its complete compasse and adaequate signification doth import Entity Truth Unity and Goodnesse also Truth is a single affection of Ens and therefore it doth signifie or rather connote Entity under an inadaequate conceit or notion for it doth represent Ens not in its full latitude but as considered with respect to the understanding If we may now make so bold as to compare the Essence of Essences with these Metaphysical notions we may in some weak measure resemble that difference which is between the Essence of God and Divine Subsistences at least in some few particulars For if when we compare creatures with creatures there appear to be some dissimilitude even in the most apt similitude and no similitude runs as we say upon four feet it is not to be wondered at if this comparison be rather a resemblance then an illustration When Divine revelation hath gone before and we have built upon that as the ground-work and foundation by a serious faith these Metaphysical notions may be subservient helps in a subordinate way 1. The Father Son and Holy Ghost do all Three really positively truly subsist in the Divine Essence and yet these three Subsistences and the Divine Essence do not make four no nor two things really distinct even as Entity Truth Goodnesse and Unity do not make four things really distinct as you heard but now but are one reall thing and no more 2. Ens is not compounded of Entity and its three Affections nor is God compounded of the Godhead and three Subsistences nor is any one Person compounded of the Divine Nature and Subsistence 3. As Truth is not Goodnesse nor Goodnesse Truth nor either of them Unity and yet all three are Entity so the Father is not the Son nor is the Son the Father nor is either of them the Holy Ghost and yet all three are God for they are all three but one God subsisting with all absolute and relative perfection as hath been shewen 4. Every one of the three Affections of Ens doth connote Entity Every one of the three Subsistences doth connote the Godhead the Divine nature as hath been proved at large 5. Not any one of the three Affections of Ens doth nor do all three together super-adde a new Entity not any one of the three subsistences doth nor do all three together super-adde a new Deity a new Divine nature or Godhead For Ens is one Ens est trinum non triplex trinum et unum Ens trinunum Deus est trinus non triplex trinus et unus Deus trinunus This instance doth in some measure resemble the mystery of the Trinunity 6. No affection of Ens can be really separated from Ens Nor can one of the Divine Persons be separated from the Divine Nature or the Divine Nature from any one of the Divine Persons or any one of the Persons from either of the other two 7. All the Affections of Ens are distinguished but none divided all the three Subsistences are distinguished but they cannot be divided 8. Truth and Goodnesse
to be God who cannot cease to be God but hath life in himselfe as well as the Father Iohn 5. 20. and hath the self-same divine life divine nature divine power which the Father hath and therefore the Schools conclude well that the Father and the Son have the same power but with a different relation but these different relations do not superadd a new Essence a new divine Nature and they who have the same Essence must needs have the same power because the Power of God is not distinguished from the Essence of God and the Father doth communicate the same Essence and Power which the Son receives 5. There is the same reason of the Son and Holy Ghost for these three are equall nay one Essentially one one God with the most perfect kind of unity as hath been shewen and some that are Metaphysical acknowledge that nothing is simply one but that which is most 〈…〉 and nothing is most singly 〈◊〉 but God who hath nothing in himself but that which is himself Aristotle discoursing of six kinds of unity saith that things may be said to be one 1. in respect of Continuity because they are one Continued body 2. In respect of their Subject as two accidents in the same subject 3. Because they are under the same Genus 4. Because they are of the same Species 5. Because they have the same definition but then he concludes that all these are but imperfect kinds of unity if compared with the last unity which is 6. When a thing is one in respect of its single and indivisible Essence Now the Father and Son are one Iohn 10. 30. The Father Son and holy Ghost are one 1 Iohn 5. 7. and they are one after the most perfect manner they are one in respect of the most single and indivisible Essence because the divine Essence is most single and perfectly one And therefore since Essence and Power are not distinguished in God it followes undenyably that these three who have one Essence have one and the same power but with different properties and relations This truth will be more evident when we have discoursed of the distinction of these three divine persons of which we are to treat in the next Chapter VI. Created Persons have a different place and presence but Uncreated Persons are omnipresent they cannot be separated or divided from one another in respect of place or presence but do subsist in one another The Father did beget the Son in the unity of the divine nature and the Son doth subsist in the nature of God Phil. 2. 6. and all three persons subsisting in the same single omnipresent nature they must needs subsist in one another The divine nature of the Father is in the Son and therefore the Father is in the Son the divine nature of the Son is in the Father and therefore the Son is in the Father and the like may be said of the Holy Ghost for the divine nature of the Holy Ghost is in the Father and the Son These three glorious persons are distinguished from one another and yet they do subsist in one another They do subsist in one another without any contraction commixtion or confusion as Damascen taught the Schoolmen to speak when Philip desired Christ to show him the Father our Saviour answers He that hath seene me hath seene the Father John 14. 9. because he is the Image of his Fathers Person and the illustrious brightnes of his Fathers glory nay because the nature of his Father is in him and the person of his Father is in him and therefore he calls upon Philip to beleeve that his Father is in him Iohn 14. 10 Beleevest thou not that I am in the Father and the Father in me as if he had said I wonder you should not beleeve this truth it is a special Article of your faith if you be a Christian and it is a very plaine Article for you have some sensible Arguments to confirme your faith in this point both from my words and from my works you may hear the Father speaking in me and see my Father working in me The words that I speak unto you I speak not of my selfe but the Father that dwelleth in me he doth the works Joh. 14. 10. And then he presses the point home upon him by a Peremptory Injunction in the 11. verse Beleeve me that I am in the Father and the Father in me or else beleeve me for the very works sake Philip might hear what was truly divine in the saving words of Christ and see what was divine in the miraculous works of Christ and by the words and works and Spirit of Christ making both effectuall he might be brought to beleeve this necessary point that the Nature of God the Father and the Person of God the Father is in Christ. Give me leave to insist upon this point for there is more in it then we can well observe at first view and therefore our Saviour did presse this point home very frequently and require that men would expressely beleeve it Iohn 10. 38. beleeve the works but to what end Why that yee may know and beleeve that the Father is in me and I in him This is the end of Christs working so many miracles amongst them to bring them to beleeve that he and the Father did mutually subsist in one another Credite operibus beleeve my works saith he they speak me to be God and the Son of God and therefore I am not guilty of blasphemy because I say I am the Son of God and equall to God for I am God I and my Father are one God and if you beleeve that I and my Father are one God you must beleeve that I am in the Father and the Father in me This is the summe and substance of our Saviours discourse from the 25. verse of the tenth chapter of Iohn to the 39. verse of that chapter and our Saviour did enter into this discourse at the request of the Jewes who came round about him and desired him not to hold them in suspence any longer but to tell them plainly whether he were the Christ or no. John 10. 24. all then who beleeve Jesus Christ to be the Christ the true Messiah the onely Saviour and an all sufficient Saviour must beleeve confesse and acknowledge this truth That the Father is in Christ and Christ in the Father From what hath been spoken it is clear and evident that this is a point of life and death as we say a fundamentall point a point necessary to salvation and therfore our Saviour did so often insist upon it In the 8th of Iohn our Saviour tells them more then once that he was not alone and therefore his testimony of himselfe was not a single testimony but his Father who was with him and in him did bear witnes with him and of him John 8. 16. for I
not serve the turn we reject it for its impertinâ—ncy and dissimilitude Christ is the only begotten Son of God he is Absolutely and Simply considered his only begotten Son and not only in some respect as Isaac was the only son of Abraham Christ as Gregory Nazianzen said is truly the Son of God he alone is the Son and the only Son of the Father and his son in an only or singular way and he is the son only he is not the Father also or the holy Ghost Jesus Christ is the proper Naturall true son of God begotten by the Father without a mother in the unity of the Godhead from all eternity equall to the Father one and the same God with the Father as the Scripture sets it forth and therefore we conclude that he is simply and absolutely the only begotten Son of God a more excellent son then all the other sons of God not only more excellent in degree for gradus non mutat speciem but a super-excellent son who doth differ from all his other sons plusquam genere aut specie because he is one God with the Father Iesus Christ is truly the Son of God because he is the true God 1 Iohn 5. 20. begotten of the Father Heb 1 5. begotten without a mother Hebr. 7. 3. begotten from the dayes of eternity Micah 5. 2. a son equal to his Father who begot him Iohn 5. 18. Phil. 2. 6. The Son of God Matth. 16. 16. the first begotten and the only begotten Son of God the naturall and proper Son of God for he is as the Father is God by nature Gal. 4. 8. and therefore naturally necessarily eternally begotten of the Father in the unity of the Godhead and therefore there is more then a graduall nay more then a specificall or genericall difference between this and all other sonnes of God we see by all these various expressions and by those divine and glorious Attributes which are ascribed to Christ in Scripture that God hath wonderfully declared his love to us in sending his only begotten to redeeme us according to that of the Apostle 1 Iohn 4. 9. In this was manifest the love of God towards us because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world that we might live through him When our Saviour called God his Father the Iewes did very well understand that he meant it in a proper and peculiar sense and therefore told him that he did make himself equall with God Iohn 5. 17. 18. and that being but a man he made himself God Iohn 10. 33. And though the Jewes accused him of blasphemy and endeavoured to stone him as they pretended for his blasphemy yet our Saviour doth not excuse his speech or say he meant it in a Metaphoricall sense but doth defend it by many arguments both in the fifth and in the tenth chapters of Saint Iohn though he did thereby endanger his life he saith he is equall to the Father nay one with the Father Iohn 5. 18. Iohn 10. 30. and when the High Priest asked him whether he was the Son of the blessed Mark 14. 61. our Saviour answers I am there 's a punctuall and positive affirmation of it v. 62 63. and you may easily know in what sense the High Priest meant it by his renting of his clothes and condemning our Saviour to death for blasphemy v. 64. And yet our Saviour did not endeavour to allay their heat and rage with any retractation he would not say that he spake Metaphorically for he spake properly he meant that he was the proper and naturall Son of God who had the same nature and power with the Father and therefore was able to do and actually did the same works with his Father And the Iewes did understand him so and therefore urged the Law against him and condemned him to death for blasphemy Iohn 19. 7. The Iews answered him We have a Law and by our Law he ought to die because he made himself the Son of God Mark the reason because he made himself the Son of God If our Saviour had not meant that he was the proper and naturall Son of God a Son equall to the Father one God with the Father the Iews would not have accused him of blasphemy Moreover the Iewes do generally hold that those words of the second Psalme This day have I begotten thee are meant of the Messiah as Rabbi Salomon doth acknowledge in his commentary upon the place Whatsoever saith he is sung in this Psalme our Masters have interpreted of King Messiah but saith he and he whispers it as a secret in regard of the sound of the words and for the refutation of Hereticks for so the Iew calls us Christians we think fit to expound it of David himself Here 's a Iew would faine conceal a confessed truth from Christians and there are some others it seems that would conceal this malitious concealment for these words are expunged out of the great Hebrew Bibles set forth at Basil but they are to be found in the Hebrew Bibles set forth with the Commentaries of the Rabbins at Venice by Bombergius or else I had not insisted upon the words I hope the detecting of this fraud may be very usefull but I must hasten to some other arguments The Socinians tâ—ll us that there are five Causes of Christs sonship assigned in Scripture which arr all temporall causes and therfore they see no reason why we should assert or they beleeve this eternall generation of the Son of God since Christ may be called the Son of God upon another and farre different account We desire to know whether every one of these five causes be totall or perpetuall causes if they be every one a totall cause then there will be as many sonships as there are causes no lesse then five sonships for that rule is certaine where there is a totall and sufficient cause in act there the effect must needs follow If they be partiall causes then the causes which succeed in order do not produce their complete effect untill the last cause be in act this we premise that the vanity of this invention may be more evident in the whole contexture of their discourse I shall now give them leave to speak their mind freely and fully 1. The first Cause of this Divine sonship is as they conceive the Conception of Christ by the Holy Ghost whereby say they Christ is said to be begotten of God in an excellent and peculiar way and they urge that testimony of the Angel which stands upon Record Luke 1. 35 to make good their conceit And the Angel answered and said unto her The holy Ghost shall come upon thee and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee therefore also that holy thing which shall be borne of thee shall be called the Son of God These words of the Angel have reference to the prophesie of Isaiah mentioned in the 31. verse of this first of Luke The words
maintaining of saving communion with God 1. That God is For he who commeth unto God must beleeve that God is Heb. 11. 6. 2. That there is but one God Deut. 6. 4. 3. That the Father Son and Holy Ghost are this one God because they are all three Coessentiall subsistents in this most single Godhead 1 Cor. 8. 5. 6. Phi. 2. 6. 1 Io 5. 7 Ioh. 10. 30. Mat. 3. 16 17. Mat. 28. 19. Act. 5. 4. 1 Cor. 12. 6. 11. 2 Cor. 13. 14. Ioh. 15. â—6 Rev. 1. 4. 5. Reverend Calvin was not so morose and austere in this point as to contend about unnecessary words or curious phrases so there were such words used as did fitly and fully expresse the whole mistery of Faith in this weighty point and sufficiently refute the damnable errours of Arrius and Sabellius If men will but acknowledge 1. That the Father Son and Spirit are one God and the selfe same God 2. That the Son is not the Father nor the Spirit the Son but that these three are distinguished by speciall Relations Incommunicable and unchangeable properties so that there is a Trinity of Coessentiall Subsistents in the selfe-same Divine Essence we are all agreed Arrius would acknowledge that Christ is God buâ— not Consubstantiall or Coessentiall with his Father for he did deny Christ to be the same God with his Father And in like manner the Socinians will say that they acknowledge and maintaine the true Divinity of the Son and Holy Ghost but they do deny that the Son and Spirit are one and the same God with the Father and affirme that the Reformed Churches who beleeve that all three persons have the selfe same God-head do ascribe a false and imaginary God-head to the Son and Spirit which the Holy Scriptures do no where acknowledge or declare And this is the true reason why the Orthodox Doctors of the Church have been so unanimous especially of late yeares in maintaining this Proposition Pater Filius Spiritus Sanctus sunt 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Father Son Holy Spirit are one and the self-same God On the other side Sabellius acknowledged that the Father Son and Holy Ghost are one God but if you say that the Father Son and Holy Ghost are three different subsistents then he cryed out as M. Fry doth that you acknowledge three Gods the best way to avoid these saith judicious Calvin is to say That there is a Trinity of Persons in one and the same essence of God For we must needs acknowledge the unity of the Divine nature because we read that the Father Son and Spirit are one and we must acknowledge the Trinity of these Coessentiall Subsistents or persons because we read that they are three Now the Trinity and unity make a Coessential Trinunity if the unity of the God-head and Trinity of the Subsistents or persons be acknowledged we shall not wrangle about curious phrases or unnecessary words The most judicious and moderate men amongst the Orthodox Doctors of the Church agree in this The learned and Reverend Doctor Davenant in his judicious exhortation to Brotherly Communion betweene the Protestant Churches teaches us how to distinguish between points that are fundamentall and Problems or Propositions that are not Fundamentall and when he comes to reckon up Fundamentals he instances in the Trinity and expresses himself after this manner That God is one in Essence three in Persons distinguished betwixt themselves That the Son is begotten of the Father That the Holy Spirit is the Spirit of the Father and the Son That these three persons are coeternall and coequall All these saith he are deservedly determined and ranked amongst the Fundamentall Articles Now if any should contend that all those things which are disputed of the School-men of the manner of proceeding and begetting are also fundamentall and necessary to be determined on one side verily he by this his rash judgement would gaine no favour with Christ. But it is objected by some who do acknowledge Christ to be God that they have no reason to close with us when we say That Iesus Christ is Coessentiall with God his eternall Father because we do impose a new word upon them and so make a new Fundamentall of our own Inventition to which I answer 1. That if we make an old truth plaine by a new word they ought to forgive us that injury 2. We explaine our new Terme 3. We save them the trouble of an artificiall and tedious deduction for as soon as they do but understand the word they must necessarily imbrace the sense and acknowledge that though the word seem new to them yet the Doctrine is old for if the persons be of a different Divine Essence then there would be more Gods then one 4. We doe hereby secure them against the subtilty of pernicious Hereticks who endeavour to seduce them into damnable Heresies For if the Father Son and Spirit have not the same Divine Essence then either there will be more Gods then one or else the Son and Spirit are no Gods at all but such petty inferiour Gods as the Socinians make them 5. No man that hath a sound braine and a single eye can conceive that there are divers Gods in the same Essence and therefore the expression is necessary and safe The Father Son and Spirit are three Coesential subsistents in the same single God-head they are all three one and the selfe-same God who is God by nature the only true God blessed for ever in this Faith we will live and in this we will dye as it becomes Orthodox Christians who were bâ—ptized in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost CHAP. IX This Grand Mystery of Faith hath an Effectuall influence into the Practical Mystery of Godlinesse and Power of Religion IT is the great designe and faithfull endeavour of sincere Christians to attaine unto all riches of the full assurance of understanding to the acknowledgement of the Mystery of God and of the Father and of Christ Colos. 2. 2. They who have but a Forme of Godlines 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a kind of painted powerlesse shaddow of piety may look upon the Doctrine of the Trinity as a School-point a meer speculative Doctrine which men receive by Tradition from their fore-fathers but they who live in the spirit and walke in the spirit Gal. 5. 25. have a life that is hid with Christ in God Colos 3. 3. hid from formall men as colours are hid from blind men and these spirituall Christians do account the love of the Father the grace of Christ and the communion of the Spirit to be their Heaven upon earth They receive Iesus Christ so as to live by him walke in him and live to him Colos. 2. 6. Phil. 1. 21 1 Ioh. 5. 12 2 Cor. 5. 15. What is a Godly life but a life of faith and love of joy and thankfulnesse of self-denyall and devotion of patience and obedience hope
is the Author of Faith he gives us supernaturall light and spirituall eyes 1 Cor. 2. 8 9 10. Ephes. 1. 17 18. He that beleeveth on the Son of God hath the witnes in himselfe The Spirit is called the witnesse 1 Ioh. 5. 6. 10. And the Apostle assures us that none can say with faith and full perswasion of heart that Iesus is the Lord till he hath been taught to say so by the Holy Ghost 1 Cor 12. 3. They who are sensuall and have not the Spirit Iude ver 19. do slight the testimony of the Spirit because the world cannot receive the Spirit or the things of the Spirit It is a naturall mans pride and folly to account those things below him which are above him for he doth account spirituall wisedome foolishnesse wheras indeed it is too excellent for him to understand because he is a meer naturall sensual man but these spirituall things are spiritually discerned he doth not receive them he cannot know them 1 Cor. 2. 14. This is the true reason why men do not beleeve in the Spirit and adore the Spirit because he is the Spirit of Truth whom the world cannot receive because it seeth him not neither knoweth him Ioh. 14. ver 17. But saith Christ to his Disciples ye know him for he dwelleth with you and shall be in you Ioh. 14. in the selfe-same ver and Act. 5. 32. 5. The Spirit is the Supream Judge of truth even of controverted truths in matters of Religion we need not speake of a Private judgement of Discretion such as spirituall men may passe by the help of the Spirit and word of truth nor of that Publick and ministeriall judgement which may be passed in greater or lesser Synods where Pastors and Elders are assembled by the Ordinance of Christ and therefore may pray in faith for the direction and assistance of the Holy Ghost in all their Ministeriall determinations But I speak of the supremacy and Soveraignty of Iudgement which belongs to the Holy Ghost True it is that Christ is King and head of the Church and therefore he is our master Doctor Lawgiver Mat. 23. 10. Iam. 4. 12. But the Father hath sent the Spirit in the name of Christ to teach us the meaning of the Word of Christ and to lead us into all truth and holinesse by the holy Scriptures of truth The Spirit did indite the whole Scripture and it is agreeable to the light of nature that he who made the Law should expound it This Holy Spirit is a publick Spirit he governes the whole body of Christ the whole Church and speaks in the whole body of the Scriptures every part thereof and if we do compare one place of Scripture with another we shall by comparing of Spirituall things with Spirituall come to understand the saving wisdome which the Holy Ghost teacheth which things we speak saith the Apostle not in the words which mans wisedome teacheth but which the Holy Ghost teacheth comparing spirituall things with Spirituall 1 Cor. 2. 13. The Holy Ghost speaking to us in plain places doth discover to us all that is necessary to be knowne and beleeved for our eternall salvation and doth thereby give us so much light as that we may sufficiently understand hard places if we pray as we should compare and search the Scriptures as we ought in the Spirit of Faith and modesty Iam. 1. 5. Ioh. 5. 39. Mat. 7. 7. 1 Ioh. 5. 14. Rom. 2. 2. 3. and practise what we know before Ioh. 7. 17. Phil. 3. 15 16. for we shall at least learne so much wisedom as not to expound hard places of Scripture in any sense that is contrary to the mind of the Spirit cleerly delivered in plaine places of Scripture If we expound hard places according to the Analogy of Faith cleerly delivered in other places though we should mistake in the application yet the Spirit doth so far interpose as to keep us from falling into heresie And if we meet with no plaine places to expound an hard place by there is then no danger of heresie because all things necessary to salvation are set downe cleerly in the plaine places of Scripture This conference of Scriptures is an excellent means to bring us acquainted with all Book-cases the determinations which the Spirit hath made in Scripture and left there upon Record in those sacred Rolls which are the treasury of the Church for the direction of the Saints And whether we make use of this ordinance in our private reading or in the publique ministry the spirit doth deliver his judgement authoritatively and infallibly in the holy Scriptures and we may come to be acquainted with the mind and judgment of the Spirit by both Ordinances Thine eyes shall see thy teachers And thine eares shall heare a word behind thee saying This is the way this and not that behold a cleere direction walk ye in it continue and go forward in it do not forsake it when we are wavering and even turning out of our way on one hand or the other when ye turn to the right hand and when ye turn to the left then even then doth the Spirit resolve us and put us out of doubt when we are disputing and even yielding up the truth in a controversie we have a cleer certain and infallible direction from the holy Spirit Isa 30 20 21. The Holy Ghost doth exhort the Jewes to compare the dimmer light of the Prophers with the cleerer light of the Apostles that so the Sun of righteousnesse may shine in its strength with its healing beams into their hearts and then tels them that no Prophecy of the Scripture is of private interpretation because Prophets spake as the Apostles also did not as the will of man did move or the fancy of man direct but according to the mind and will of the Holy Ghost And therefore since all the Scriptures were endited all are to be expounded by the Holy Ghost speaking in the Scriptures thus compared for the Holy Ghost did move all the Holy men Apostles as wel as Prophets to write and teach them what they should write And though we have no extraordinary revelations now by a voice from the excellent glory for our direction yet we have that which is better the writings of the Prophets and Apostles to compare together the Prophesies be darke yet they are sure more sure then those voices which may be more easily counterfeited though the Prophesies be dark yet the Spirit who did endite them will if you compare them with the writings of the Apostles give light to both and deliver his judgement as cleerly in all necessary points as if it were written with a Sun-beame this I take to be the scope of the Holy Ghost in that excellent discourse 2 Pet. 1. from the sixteenth verse to the end of the chapter
well call upon him for new miracles Nay the very preservation of the Scriptures in despight of Tyrants Heretiques and Divels is a convincing miracle In a word the Testimony of the Penmen is sealed 1. By the Oath of God 2. By the blood of Christ 3. By the testimony of the Spirit 4. By the Efficacy of the Spirit The Testimony and Efficacy of the Spirit is that sweet Subject which I am now more especially engaged to insist upon the Testimony of the Spirit to the heart and conscience of every true beleever in particular is a convincing Testimony But it will be said that this is such an Argument as none can take notice of and therefore altogether insufficient to perswade other men to beleeve to whom no such Testimony hath been vouchsafed 1. I answer This is an Argument indeed whereby I cannot convince others but this is an Argument which makes all other Arguments effectual to convince me 2. The Efficacy of the Spirit in the word upon the hearts of enemies is very considerable Their minds are inlightned their judgements convinced their consciences awakened terrifyed their hearts smitten because the very thoughts of their hearts are strangely unexpectedly discovered their souls embowelled and their marrow as it were melted in their bones by this almighty spirit speaking testifying working in with the word the very letter kils them the very savour confounds them though bold Athiests scoffe at the word and do in their Jovial fits blaspeme the spirit yet sometimes their hearts quake their joynts tremble even as Belshazzars did at the very sight of the hand-writing when they do but glance their eye upon some startling Text. Their consciences do often joyne with the word and spirit against themselvs against their wils for though they be self-willed yet they are after some soule-searching Admonition self-confounded and selfe-condemned men Tit. 3. 10 11. And though the malice of some men bee too strong for their wit reason and conscience yet it is not too strong for the spirit in the Word all the powers of Hel in them are over-powred by this good Spirit all the strong-holds of Sathan batterd and they themselves so confounded that they seeme to be even damned already they thinke themselves in Hell above-ground when they are stung and bitten they fall into the passion of the heart and are taken with such Hellish convulsion-sits that they do even foam at mouth and gnash with their teeth they are cut to the soule and tormented in their conscience they cry and howle and fight against the Spirit but all in vain for even they are out-witted and over-powred who are not converted by this stinging Efficacy of the Almighty Spirit What shall we say to these things If Idols have been overthrown Oracles silenced Divels convinced by the Majesty of the Spirit in the holy Scriptures and so over awed by the Spirit that they have been forced to confesse nay beleeve these truths at which they tremble then surely those bold theists are worse then devils who do not tremble at the Word because they do not beleeve the Spirit 3. Look upon a soule in its Agony and Pangs in its Throws and conflicts at its first conversion or in its After-throws upon some sadrelapse and observe how the wit is captivated reason conquered conscience confounded heart broken and will turned nay all the powers of corrupt nature overpowred and overturned by the word and spirit of God And then you must needs cry out O the divine Efficacy of Scripture which turns a Lyon into a Lamb a Goat into a sheep a man a Beast a Divel into a Saint and perswades Philosophers and Courtiers Emperours and souldiers Publicans and Harlots Mariners and Politicians to embrace a Religion and run a course clean contrary to the carnall and Divelish wisdome of their proud reason contrary to the stubborn resolutions of their perverse wils in a word contrary to their very nature education custome contrary to dictates of policy and reasons of state contrary to their passions lusts interests friends CoÌ„panions O victorious spirit What aileth what aileth thee O thou man of war and pride thou Secretary of nature Advocate of the Devil to hâ—ng the head and weep to resigne thy estate lay down thy Commission and thy Armes burn thy Conjuring-books and sacrifice thy dearest life in the maintenance of that truth which thou hast formerly contemned I must cry as he did 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is the power of the Word Behold the Efficacy of the Spirit in the word conquering and triumphing over the subtilty and obstinacy the pride and malignity of carnal men The promises of God are better then all the proffers of Sathan the divel shewes us the glory of the world the Scripture shewes us the vanity of the world and the conscience is convinced by the word and Spirit that the reversion of Heaven is infinitly better then the possessions of earth all the kingdomes of the world and glory of them are not worth one dayes Communion with Jesus Christ nay one dayes comfort from the Gospel and Spirit of Jesus Christ. Good reason have we then to beleeve the Spirit Angels admire and Divels tremble at the Majesty of the word Saints beleeve obey adore the Majesty of the Spirit speaking in the word of truth and life of grace and glory The Familists might learn by this sad discourse to beleeve the Spirit of God speaking in the word of God and not beleeve their own natural carnal phantastical spirits which contradict the word and spirit of God The Familists did learn of the Papists to call Orthodox Protestants Scripture men to scoffe at them as Scripture-wise and to say as Stapleton and divers others do that the most diligent conference of Scriptures is the ready way to the most damnable errours That the fountains of Greek and Hebrew are neither pure nor necessary and the like And yet Howlet in his Epistle to Queen Elizabeth did lay the sin of the Family of love to the charge of the Protestants But Dr. Raynolds our learned Champion in his conference with Hart doth vindicate the Protestants and make it evident that such as were godly and learned in the Scripture did detest Harry Nicolas that imp of Sathan and master of the Family of Love therfore they could not lay the Families sinto our charge as if we did foster that venemous vipers brood I keep to the Doctors own expressions that you may see how the zeal of that meek Moses was enflamed in this contest which did march into the field with Papists to strengthen their hands against Protestants The Anabaptists likewise might learn from hence to make the spirit speaking in the word the Judge of their pretended Revelations if they were not too conceited of their own inventions and apt to fall in love with the dreams of their own feaverish brain with their weak arguments but strong delusions The
Socinus the Uncle and the Nephew brought from thence They who are acquainted with Ecclesiastical Writers can readily declare what difficulties they wrestled with and what persecutions they did undergo rather then they would consent to any Syncretisme with the Arians when it was obtruded or yeeld to any agreement when it was offered to them upon plausible and tempting conditions They who have read the Acts of the Nicene Syrmiensian and both the Ariminensian Councels Athanasius Hilary Epiphanius Nicetas Socrates Sozomen Theodoret Augustin know this to be as cleare as if it were written with a Sun-beame Was there not an Anathema denounced against Liberius by great Hilary for yielding to such a Syncretisme with the Arians as Acontius did propound for an Accommodation between Christians and Socinians pardon the harshness of that expression I am not in passion or in haste but follow the example of the Orthodoxe Doctors of the Church who did use the name of Christians in opposition to the Arians to shew that they did not acknowledge the Arians for to be Christians because they denied the true Christ who is God-man the only Mediatour and Saviour of his people from their sins Melancthon and Bucer were men of great prudence modesty and moderation as well as piety and learning but they never offered to conclude a peace with any of these new Arians they would not admit any into Christian Communion with them unlesse they would subscribe the Confessions of faith received in the foure first general Councels They who deny the Godhead of our Saviour and the holy Ghost are Antichristian Antispiritual men their Idolatry in worshipping Christ whom they look upon as a meere Creature their impiety in denying worship to the holy Ghost their horrid blasphemies to the dishonour of Christ and Christianity their poysoning of soules disturbing of Christian Societies should be laid to heart by all Christian Magistrates all Ministers and Members of Jesus Christ and therefore this Acontian Syncretisme is abominable Upon these and divers other considerations I was desired to make a report to the Reverend Assembly concerning the danger of translating and Printing of Acontius in English the heads of the report were briefly these The Report made to the Reverend Assembly March 8. 1647-48 By Mr Cheynell We humbly conceive THat Acontius his Enumeration of Points necessary to be known and beleeved for the attainment of Salvation is very defective 1. Because in the Creed which Acontius framed there is no mention made either of the Godhead of Iesus Christ or of the Godhead of the holy Ghost And 2. Although Acontius doth acknowledge Christ to be truly the Son of God yet he doth not in his Creed declare him to be the natural Son of God That these points are necessary to be known and believed for the attainment of salvation is in our judgement clearly expressed in the holy Scriptures 1 Joh. 5. 7 20. compared with Joh. 17. 3. We do therefore conceive that Acontius was justly condemned because he maintains that the points of Doctrine which he mentions are the only points which are necessary to be known and beleeved and did not hold forth or mention the points aforesaid as necessary to salvation And we esteeme him to be the more worthy of censure because he lived in an age when the Photinian Heresie was revived and yet spared the Photinians though he condemned the Sabellians Finally Acontius doth cautelously decline the Orthodox expressions of the Ancient Church in the foure first generall Synods and doth deliver his Creed in such general expressions that as we conceive the Socinians may subscribe it and yet retaine the worst of their blasphemous errours The promises being humbly presented we leave it to the judgement of this Reverend Assembly Whether Acontius his Stratagems was a Book fit to be translated into English and recommended to the Parliament Army and City to direct them how to distinguish truth from errour in this juncture of time Upon these few heads of the Report I discoursed somewhat affectiontely and freely according to the weight and moment of the Point in Question And thereupon the reverend Assembly did unanimously desire the Prolocutor to perswade me to print something about that Argument as soone as the heat of our employment at Oxford was over for the satisfaction of the Kingdom I am very willing to obey the Commands of that Assembly famous for learning and piety even to the admiration of those great Schollers whose hearts were once espoused to another Interest If the debates of that Reverend Assembly upon severall Articles of Faith were printed and published to the world all ingenuous enemies of piety would blush at the remembrance of those bitter censures which have been passed upon men of whom this Age is unworthy But I must hasten for my Book begins to swell beyond its just proportion and I am called away to another service which cannot be performed at any other time Acontius hath invented very pretty diversions instead of Excuses to abate our zeale against the most dangerous errours he saith that Hereticks do not intend to make Christ a lyar the controversie between them and us is not concerning the truth but concerning the meaning of the words of Christ. To which I answer that he who beleeves the words of Christ in the sense of Antichrist and rejects the sense of Christ and his Spirit is not a Christian but is indeed and truth Antichristian The sense of Scripture is the Scripture and therefore if men be permitted in these great and weighty Articles to impose a new sense upon the Church of Christ they do clearely impose a new Creed a new Gospell upon us and deserve that Anathema Gal. 1. 8 9. though they should pretend to Apostolical authority or Angelical purity Although we or an Angel from heaven preach any other Gospel unto you then that which we have preached unto you let him be accursed As we said before so say I now againe if any man preach any other Gospell unto you then that you have received let him be accursed Grotius in the daies of his modesty refused to sollicite in the behalfe of the Socinians and professed that he did not know a man in the grand Assembly in Holland that would not pronounce the Socinians accursed The distinguishing question which was then put was the old question Do you beleeve that Christ is God by nature If you do not you are an Arian and if you be an Arian you are no Christian. Acontius reckons up some things as necessary to beleeve which are expressed in Scripture some other things which are necessarily inferred from what is expressed but he doth not reckon up the Godhead of Christ or the holy Ghost in his Catalogue of things that are plainely expressed or necessarily inferred as is most evident by his whole discourse in his third Book which is now in English Finally the Socinians take away
the right foundation of faith hope worship justification as hath been proved lay a wrong foundation they bring in a new Christ a meer man and a new Gospel a new Iudge in the highest matters and mysteries of Religion their own reason which they might infallibly know to be not only fallible but corrupt They deny the true causes and means of salvation the right application of them Their impiety in not worshipping of the Spirit Their Idolatry in worshipping one whom they esteeme to be a meere man and refusing to be washed and purged with the bloud of the Covenant will justifie all that reject them and their Confederates from Christian Communion I am not at leasure to handle the Magistrates duty in this point nor are many of them at leasure to consider all that is fit to be considered in that weighty point but for the present satisfaction of such as know not how to study in these busie times I shall point at some unquestionable truths for the ending of that unhappy and fatall Controversie in the Church of Christ. 1. There is no warrant given in the Word to any Minister of the State or Officer of the Church to molest oppresse or persecute any man for Righteousnesse sake he who doth persecute a man for following his conscience when rightly informed by the Word and Spirit of the Lord Jesus doth certainely persecute the Lord Jesus Christ. Saul Saul why persecutest thou me I am Iesus whom thou persecutest it is a fit Text to be preached on this twenty second of February 1649. But I am now learning another Lesson which is to suffer persecution patiently for righteousnesse sake and pray for such Benefactours who do besides their intention and against their will make Christians happy by endeavouring to make them miserable in their outward man by an unexpected persecution Yet I could not but take notice of the seasonablenesse of this truth and put down the day the moneth and the yeare as the Prophet did Ezek. 8. 1. And it came to passe in the sixth yeare in the sixth moneth in the fifth day of the moneth as I sate in mine house and the Elders of Iudah the Princes of the people sate before me c. The great Statesmen were at leasure now in the time of the Captivity to hear the Prophet if they would have heard beleeved obeyed before they had never gone into Captivity for the misusing of the Prophets and despising of their message was the sin against the most Soveraigne remedy and when there was no other remedy then God sent them away Captive c. 2 Chron. 36. 16 17. Let all such consider this who are poasting on in the high-way to Captivity 2. No man ought to be punished for following his mis-informed conscience untill he hath been better informed and spiritually admonished as we have formerly shewn twice or thrice and is so unconscionable as to despise good information reject prudent and faithful admonitions contrary to the doctrine of godliness and all good conscience for of such a man the Apostle saith not only that he is perverted but he is subverted Tit. 3. 10. 3. The Ministers of God the Civill Magistrates and the Ministers of Christ and all Church-Officers whatsoever must joyne together and uphold one another in the discharge of their several duties that they may be in a capacity to revenge all disobedience and execute the judgement that is written Rom. 13. 4. 2 Cor. 10. 6. I Cor. 4. 21. Deut. 13. 10 11. 4. Heretical Seducers Blasphemous Apostates and Idolatours of whom we have discoursed at large are Wolves that subvert whole houses Tit. 1. 11. Churches Gal. 5. 10 12. Act. 15. 24. States and Kingdomes and therefore they must be driven from the sheepfold lest the very vitals of Christianity be corrupted Religion destroyed many soules poysoned God extremely dishonoured the Church and State endangered as is fully declared unto us in the holy Scriptures of truth 5. God doth work by these Legal terrours and executions of vengeance sometimes upon the party punished the false Prophet converted by the spirit of God working in this great Ordinance doth in the day of his visitation confesse the justice and charity of those Officers who did stigmatize him with wounds in his hands Zach 13. 6. as M. Cotton doth observe in the ninth Chapter of his Answer to Mr Williams pag. 20 21. Moreover it is most cleare that God doth make use of the Magistrate as his Minister and Instrument for the overawing of the people by inflicting exemplary punishment on such as do speake lies in the name of the Lord blaspheme the name truth person of Christ and seduce or thrust men away from the only true God Father Son and holy Ghost Deut. 13. 6 8 9 10 11. The Morall equity of this Command is very evident for the punishing of such as do entice men from the true Religion because there is a reason given which is of general and perpetual equity Thou shalt stone him Because he hath sought to thrust thee away from Iehovah thy God It is now certainly as great a fault to seduce men from Father Son and holy Ghost nay a greater fault now because it is a sin committed against clearer light And it is of generall and publique concernment to have such great examples made in a nation to make the generality of men affected with an awfull regard of the truth goodnesse Majesty and Justice of God For this is Gods ordinance to strike the people with such a reverence as shall at least restraine them from this sin And all Israel shall heare and feare and shall do no more any such wickedness Deut. 13. 11. The Lord is acquainted with the frame of our hearts and spirits and he doth propound such remedies as are proper suitable to our distempers and he who doth ordaine such remedies will make them effectual by his own Spirit who doth often sanctifie legal terrours and outward afflictions and makes them subservient to spiritual purposes and therefore these outward weapons are spiritually used and are of a spiritual efficacy according to the Counsell of Gods will When the Magistrate as a Minister of God draws the Sword in the cause of God for the honour of God according to the Ordinance of God expressed in the thirteenth of Deuteronomy compared with the thirteenth of Zachary and the thirteenth to the Romanes the Sword that is thus drawn is not the Sword of Gideon only the Sword of man but the Sword of God And it is certainly most proper to restraine them by the Sword who will not be restrained by any other Ordinance of God men that have seared consciences have strong passions and exemplary punishments will work effectually upon the passion of feare in a self condemned man when no spiritual Physick will work upon him because all wholsome admonitions are rejected by him Carnall men are ready to
of the Lords day Eheu nec fictis lachrymis dolendaest ista profanatio quae sub praetextu Libertatis Christianae in diei Dominici celebrationeÌ„ tanquam torrens irrupit SabbathuÌ„ inter omnes mortales celebre Vide Theophil Antioch lib. ad Attolycum Joseph lib. 2. adversus Appion Phil. Iud. lib. 2 de vitâ Moysis The Iewish Holy days * Vide Aug. Ep. 68. ad Casulanum Chrysost. Homil. 10. in cap. 2. Gen. Phil. Iudae lib. 3. de vitâ Moysis Theod. Trad quaest in Gen. See Master White of the morality of the 4th Commanment Dr. Twisse Mr. Cawdry and Mr. Palmer Mr. Shepheard Dr. Ames Medulla Theol. Dr. Lakes Theses The grounds of sanctifying the Lords day The Iewish Sabbath Isa. 58. 13. The Christian Sabbath The Evangâ—licall Ministry The scope of the second and fourth Commandements Rabbi Agnon dicit hanc benedictionem transire super sanctificantes Sabbatum ante legem in Sina datam Cognitio celebratio Dei Creatoris consideratio seria operum Creationis ac Redemptionis ad CeremoniaÌ„ referri nequeunt D. Waelleus de Sabbatho pag. 583. How the Lords day is to be sanctified unto Father Son and holy Ghost How Christians do enjoy God upon the week-days Eminent holiness and Communion Read Mr. Shepherds excellent Treatise upon this Subject in his fourth part of the sanctification of the Sabbath Restorative Communion Constant Communion Soule-satiating communion Extraordinary duties Penitential meltings * The sad condition of the most ingeneous sort of unregâ—nerate men Motives to Faith and true Repentance The great difference between an ingenuous man and a gracious man How far an unregenerate man may be changed The Conversion of notorious sinners The greaâ—est sinners are welcome to Christ when they turne and submit to him No meritorious Praeparatives Luk. 24. 49 Magnitudo animi ad praedicandum â—vangelium necessaria ex alto promittitur D. Aâ—ting An etiam Abnegatio Christi quae fit corde in Epâ—cureismum prolapso sit peccatum in Spiritum Sanctum Vide Scultetum in Ideis concionum ad cap 6. ad Hebraeos Clamant Dâ—ificaâ—i Spiritus homunciones se nullum habere Deum sed usque adeo se sibi esse mortuos ac Deo unitos ut ipsimet Deus effecti sint vide Joh. Ruys broch in cap. 2. Apologiae Nobilissimum Marnixium in Tract contra Enthysiastas Calvinum de Libertinis in Gallia Merceunum contra Deistas De Atheismo subtili palliato vide D. Vedelium de Deo Synagogae Casp. Barth Adversar lib 10. cap. 6. Cornel. à Lapide Comment ad Act. 17. 18. Sladum nec non Eglisemnium contra Vorstium Atheus est qui fidem cultum Dei directe aut indirecte à se aut ab alâ—â—s removet D. Voetius de Atheismo Vide John Junium in Refutatione Praelect Socini cap. 2. D. Rivet in Psal. 10. D. Voet. de Atheismo Ignorans quis sit Deus ignorantiâ pravae dispositionis contra sensum numinis congenitum verum Deum negans Atheus certè nec immeritò â—â—cendus est Nulli autem sunt Athei qui certò persuasi sunt non esse Deum Vide Mersennum in Gen. 1. à pag. 235. usque ad pa. 279. Voetium in Ther site Sect. 2. cap. 4. de Atheismo parte secundâ parte quarta pag. 189. Wigandum de Arianis in Polonia Facilis est ab Atheismo Sâ—ciniano in directum Atheismum prolapsus Vide Bedae notas in Ephes. 2. 14. D. Vedelium de Deo Synagogae Atheismus interpretativè contradicens directè blasphemans ferendus non est in civili hominum societate quia bonum civile non consistit sine metu cultuque numinis Vide Calvin in Psal. 115. de Atheo blasphemante Vide Arist. de coelo lib. 1. cap. 3. Aug. in Psal. 44. Senec. Epist. 1. 7. Damasâ— de Orth. fid lib. 1. c. 1. Ciceron de naturâ Deorum The Father and his coequal Son are to be honoured with equal honour Christian communion with the Father in his natural Son by their co-essential spirit The largest bounds of Christian Communion We can have no Christian communion with such as deny the Godhead of Christ. Vide Epistolas Martini Seidelii Silesii apud Socinum de Adoratione Christiad versus Christian Francken Franciscum Davidis Catechis Racov. The Socinìans are blasphemous and Idolatrous Hereticks The Family of love H. Nicolaus Familiae Caritatis Pater dixit Ego sum Deus Vide Theodor Cornhert in Specimine injustitiae Deificati Hen Nicolai Praefat. Mr. Fry his Bellows pag. 16. Mr Fry his proud blasphemy The grand question concerning Christian communion with blasphemous Idolaters seducing Hereticks and base Apostates Vide Gomarum Voetium Zanchium Polanum de Trinitate Jod Cocâ— Thesaur Cathol lib. 1. Goldast in Imperial constit Tom. 3. Elmenhorst com ad Gennadium The Reasons why Socinians are rejected from Christian communion The common unity of the Christian Faith The Adequate object of Divine and Evangelical worship They who deny the Trinity are apt to close with Iews and Turks Vide Epistolas Seidelii apud Socinum de Adoratione christi Videl de Deo synagogae lib. 1. cap. 2. socinismus ex Mahumetismo oritur in eundem resolvitur Stegman Photin Socinismus est recta ad Judaismi Turcismi nec non Atheismi via Exempla dabant Neuserus Pafradus viri non indocti quorum ille minister in Palatinatu hic praeceptor Classicus Scholae Marpurgensis Vide D. Voetii Antidota Generalia adversus Socin pag. 437. 438. Abrah Caloviumâ— Mr Fryes blasphemy 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Phil. 2. 2. Error Personae fatalis error est The substance of the Gospel and the Covenant of Grace The Contents of the Covenant of Grace Gal. 5. 5. 2 Cor. 13. 14. Eph. 2. 18. Socinismus est haeresis pestilentissima divinitatem Christi spiritusque abnegans viamque per propriam vitae obedientiam ad coelum affectans Socinianism overthrows the Covenant of Grace Socinismus divinam Christi essentiam personam satisfactionem negans objectum fidei cultusque tollit Christianismum evertit We are quickned and cured by Christ and his spirit according to the tenour of the Covenant of Grace The Spirit is given by Covenant as a bond of union Christ God-man is the only Mediatour of the Covenant Christ is God and man in one subsistence or Person The high importance of this truth Mr Fry in his Bellows printed at Addle-hill pag. 15 16 17. The nature of christian Communion 2 Cor. 13. 14. Eph. 2. 18. The Sacraments of communion Christian Baptisme Mat. 28. 19 Eph. 2. 18. 2 Cor. 13. 14. Act. 2. 38 39. 2 Cor. 6. 18 2 Cor. 7. 1. Rom 8. 15 Gal. 4. 5 6 The Lords Supper The growing saving communion The mystery of the Trinity is made even sensible to us in the hâ—ly Sacrament The special application The highest communion Sacramental knowledge Sacramental mysteries are spiritual and yet real Joh. 6. 55 63.
1. 14. Professionis nostrae Pontifex est naturalis Dei filius Heb. 5. 4 5 6. Heb. 1. 4 5. Mat. 16. 16 18. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ephes. 4. 13. Mat. 28. 19. Ephes. 4. 5. 2 Cor. 13. 14. Ephes. 2. 18 20 22. Heb. 6. 1 2. 1 Joh. 1. 7. 2 Tim. 1. 13. cap. 3 15. 1 Tim. 3. 16. Rom. 1. 4. Joh. 10. 30. compared with Joh. 5. 18. Phil. 2. 6. 1 Joh. 5. 7. 20. Joh. 17. 3. 1 Cor. 3. 11. 1 Joh. 2. 20 22 23 24. 2 Joh. 9. 10 11. Joh. 5. 23. Regula fidei pusillis magnisque communis Aug. Epist. 57. vide Sym. apud Epiph. in haeresi 72. quae de consil Chalced habentur apud Evagrium lib. 2. Hist. c. 4. praesertim de spiritu sancto Consulantur Scholastici de iis quae necessaria sunt Necessitate medii vel finis Bannes in secundam secundae quest 2. art 8. Greg. Val. Tom. 3. com The. quest 2. punct 2. Scot. Suarez Ocham Lorca c. Vide Aug. contra Pelag. Celest. lib 2. c. 24. Ecclesia una dicitur propter unitatem fidei Hieronym in Psal. 23. Baptismus est Sacramentum fidei Aug. epist. 23. Vide Basil. de spiritu sancto lib 1. cap. 2. Tertul. de praescript cap. 14 20. Iren. l. 1. cap. 2. â—arker de desc ad Inferos Fides nostra secunduÌ„ Christi doctrinam est in Patre Filio spiritu sancto Mat. 28 19. Eph. 4. 5. concil Ancyran de spiritu sancto 2. Sym. Antioch apud Socrat. l. 1. cap 8. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Concil Constant. Epist. apud Theod. l. 5. Hist. cap. 9. Sct D. Vshers learned answer to the Iesuits challenge p. 311 312. And his excellent Sermon of the unity of Faith where he gives a satisfactory account of the faith of the Eastern and Western Churches Mr Rous his Catholique charity cap. 10 11. D. Voetius de Symb. Apost D. Potter his Answâ—r to charity mistaken sect 7. lod Coâ— Thesaur Cathol l. 1. art 4. Acta Consilii Niceni Athanas. de Synodis Hilar. de Synodis Epiph. haeres 73. Socrat. Hist. lib. 1. cap. 6. Baronii Annales ad an 357 358. Alcuinum de Trinitate Nicet Thesaur Orthod fid l. 4. haeres 32. Videlium de Deo Synagogae Gomarum de Trinitate Atheus est juxta religionem Christianam qui Christum ut Deum non colit Vide sis orationem D. Jac. Arminii de componendo dissidio Religionis inter Christianos Arii Symbolum explodendum statuimus nam si ab aeterno Deus est Pater Filius quoque Patri coaeternus necessario statuitur D. S. Glassius de Deitate Filii Vide Tilenum de Deo Patre Filio D. Sohnium de Trinitate Zanchium Bezam Calvinum Junium Trelcatium Seniorem D. Altingium Maccovium Synop. Purioris Theol. Polanum Chamierum Libertinismus introducit Socinismum Socinismus destruit Christianismum Socinus Acontius Barleus nec non Semi-Iudaizantes Arminiani pietatem fovent parum Christianam Vide Stegmannum Voetium Videlium de prudentia veteris ecclesiae l. 2. cap. 5 6. de Deo synagogae de Arcanis Arminianismi de finibus Arminianismi lib. 1. cap. 1 2. Comnenus reclamantibus Orthodoxis dixit Turcas colere verum Deum ut videre est apud Nicetam Choniatem in Manuele Comâ—eno lib. 7. Qui quaerere Deum se profitentur extra Christum quem abominantur ut Turcae Iudaei neque verum Deum neque verum cultum habent Nam sine Christo nec verus Deus cognoscitur nec colitur D. Rivet Comment in Hos. 3. p. 116. Acontius his thîrd Book of Stratagems * See D. Reynolds his learned conference with Hart. Grotius in Pietate Ord. p. 13. c. Hic ego optima fide profiteor neminem me nosse in omni Hollandiae Conventu qui non istis opinionibus omnibus singulis dicturus sit Anathema Christus est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 credis vel non si non Arianus es Christianus non es Vide etiam Nicet Thesaur Orthod Fid. lib. 4. haeresi 32. Athanas. ad Serap Orat. 2. Disp. 1. 2. contra Arianos Photium in Epitome Philost Canones Concil Nicen. Epiph. haeres 65. 73. Socrat. Hist. l. 1. c. 6. Baronii Annales ad annum 357 358. Anathema tibi Liberi inquit Hilarius Vide Photii Nomocan Tit. 1. c. 1. Alâ—uinum de Trinitate Whether seducing Hereticks and blasphemous Apostates may be punished No man is to be punished till he is unconscionable Act. 9. 4 5 The High-way to Captivity Non tantùm 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 haereticus post unam alteramque admonitionem repellendus itaque est eversus haereticus ut qui suopte judicio sit condemnatus What kind of persons are to be punished The morall equity of the command for punishing Seducers Deut. 13. compared with Zac. 13. and Rom. 13. 1. The general equity of this Ordinance 2. The general concernment of it 3. The spiritual efficacy of it according to Gods Decree The Magistrate must act as a Minister of God according to the Ordinance of God Vnconscionable men must be restrained by the Sword The Object and end of the Magistrates power See Reverend Master Whites way to the Tree of life concerning Humane Authority Mr. Cotton in his bloudy Tenent washed white cap. 70. Magistrates must study Fundamentall Truths Godly Mgistrates a instructed by God in all necessary Truths The rule of all Christian Magistrates Deut. 13. 10. Arius in Alexandriâ una scintilla fuit sed quia non statim oppressa est totuâ— orbem ejus flamma de populata est Hieronymus Mirabatur se totus mundus factum Arrianum Iulian the Apostates Designe * Julianus desertor Christi inimicus Haereticis libertatem perditionis permisit tum Basilicas haereticis reddidit quando Templa Daemoniis Eo modo putans Christianum nomen posse pertre de terris si unitaâ—i Ecclesiae de quâ lapsus fuerat invideret sacrilegas dissensioâ— nes liberas esse permitteret Epist. 166. Toleration of Heretikes in Doctrine and Idolatours in worship made the world Antichristian See Reverend Mr. Cotton in his answer to Mr. Williams his Bloudy Tenent Chap. 61. pag 131. 132. The toleration of seducing Apostates hath often introduced a bâ—ter persecution of Orthodoxe Saints Vide Athanas Apolog Socrat. Hist. lib. 1. cap. 25. lib. 2. cap. 22. Vict. de per. sec. vandal lib. 3. Euseb in vitâ Const. lib. 3 ca. 4. Sulpit. Sever Sozon â—vâ—gr Pau Diacon Baron Annal Hieronym orat de non crad Basil. Heretikes are not punâ—shed for Simple Errour Esterror amoris est Amor erroris Errores sunt vel praeter vel circa vel contra fundamentum Est error pervertens est error animam subvertens fidem ever tens pacem Ecclesiae nec non Reip. Christianae perturbans Hereticidium auteÌ„ ob simplicem nudam hae resin nemo nostrûm simpliciter asseruit D. Profess Leyd Censur c. 24. p. 318. Calvin Epist. p. 197. Calvin Retuâ— err Michaelis Serveti inter opuscula pag. 694. Scimus tres esse errorum gradus c. Pelargus in Deut. 13. Bullinger Beza c. Mr. Rutherfurd against pretended liberty pag. 184. * Vide Brochman de Magist. Pal. cap. 2. qu. 3. dub 2. Meisner Philosoph sobr sect â— câ—p 4. Haereticum leditiosum blasphenium capitali supplicio dignam nemo ex nostris facile impugnabit Tota quaestio est de Haeretico Simplici a Ergo si potest vel unum nominet qui aut omnes Haereticus censuerit interfiâ—iendes aut ita sibi plaâ—uâ—it ut alios omnes diversum 〈◊〉 pro Haereticis habuerit Vide Bezam contra â—elliâ—m Monfortium Et Tract de Haerâ—â—eis 〈◊〉 b Calv. in opuse de Serveto c Mr. Cotton often in his 〈◊〉 to Master Williams his bloudy Teneâ—t p. 1â—6 181. Irresistible motives to quicken Magistrates to dloe their duty What Lawes are of perpetuall obligation Vide Piscator in Exodum See Master Palmer and Mr. Cawdrey of the Sabbath Chap. 2. An Indulgence to such as deny supernaturall principles permits men to be Anti-Scripturists Mr. Burroughes Heart-divisions pag. 35. The very attempt of killing a Soule deserves Death See Master Cottons Tenent washed white pag. 175.
Saviour saith God is a Spirit and from thence concludes that God is to be worshipped in Spirit and truth but in respect of the Divine Persons also We are to worship God as a Creator as the first of Causes last of Ends best of Beings to whom we owe our Being and our well-being but we must worship God the Father as God and look upon him as the Father of our Lord Iesus Christ and as our Father reconciled to us in Christ this is that worship which becomes the Gospel and therefore we ought to worship God the Father considered after this Evangelicall manner that he may be glorifyed we moved and affected with those endearing expressions O God the Father of our Lord Iesus Christ and our Father in him Such expressions as these do beget in us 1. Holy boldnesse mixed with Reverence 2. Christian confidence our Father wil supply the wants of his children out of his rich treasure for he commands Heaven earth 3. Filial Love and cheerefull obedience which are even con-naturall to our new man upon due consideration of this sweet relation between God and us Ier. 3. 19. 4. A thankefull acknowledgement of Gods fatherly bounty even unto admiration Behold what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us that we should be called the sons of God 1 Joh. 3. 1. Nay heyres of God Rom. 8. 17. What are we vile wretches wormes and no men yea by reason of our filthinesse Dogs and Devils that we should be adopted into the family of God married to the Sonne of God and made co-heyrs with the Lord of glory When the Spirit of a man is raised by such thankfull acknowledgements unto an Holy admiration then it is brought into a Gospel frame and by such high and sweet thoughts of Gods fatherly love and bounty fitted for filiall and Gospel-worship But it will be said that the whole Trinity is our Father and therefore all three persons are to be worshipped under that fatherly consideration and in that deare Relation To which I answer 1. That when the word Father is attributed unto God essentially though all creatures are excluded yet all the three Divine persons are included because they are co-equal they have one nature will and worship they are one and the same God and they are one Father also in opposition to Images Ier. 2. 27. To Saints Is. 63. 16. Doubtlesse thou art our Father though Abraham be ignorant of us and Israel acknowledge us not Thou O Lord art our Father our Redeemer thy name is from everlasting And in opposition to all creatures Mat. 23. 9. and in the Lords Prayer Father Son and Holy Ghost are all called upon as our Father 2. The word Father is sometimes taken personally and attributed to a single person of the God-head More frequently and more peculiarly to God the Father who is the first Principle of subsisting life even in respect of his own naturall and Co-essentiall Son as hath been proved at large in this Treatise and is to be reckoned first in order and finally in regard of our Adoption and the mysterious and divine Oeconomy and dispensation vouchsafed for the salvation of man and yet these peculiar notions do not exclude the other persons from being God as hath been proved above in the fourth chapter nor do they exclude them from being our Father in the common notion of Father in opposition to creatures and Idols nay all three persons have a Fatherly care of us and love to us and therefore Christ is called our Father Isa. 9. 6. Heb. 2. 13 14. And it is the proper office of the Holy Ghost to Regenerate us as it is of the Father to Adopt us but then the Father doth Adopt us in Christ who is a Father to us though a Son to God the Father and the holy Spirit is the Spirit of Regeneration and Adoption and therefore all three Co-essentiall persons are our Father 3. We may direct our Prayers to any one person as Steven directed his to the Lord Jesus Act. 7. 59. Lord Iesus receive my Spirit 4. We may direct our Prayers expressely unto two of the divine persons Now God himself and our Father and our Lord Iesus Christ direct our way unto you 1 Thes. 3. 11. 5. We may direct our Prayers unto all three as we do in the administration of Baptisme and in that Fundamentall Benediction 2 Cor. 13 14. 6. When we direct our prayers to one of the divine persons we exclude none because the Persons are in one another the Father is in the Son and they are all three coessentiall coequall They are one God and therefore are to be worshipped with that selfe same religious and divine Worship which is due to their single and undivided Godhead 7. When we direct our prayer to the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ the terme Father is taken in a peculiar notion not in the common notion and the Apostle directs his prayer after this peculiar manner Eph. 3. 14. For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Iesus Christ of whom the whole Family in Heaven and Earth is named God the Father looks upon us poore wormes as part of his Family nay as his deare children whilest we are here on earth as well as he looks upon his other children the glorious Saints who are made perfect in heaven Oh what a quickning consideration is this to bring us upon our knees at a Throne of grace before Christs Father and our Father that we may have a childs Portion and be prepared for that place which Christ is now preparing for us We are part of the Family numbred amongst those of the best ranke we are children and have the same Father that Christ and the Saints in heaven have Iohn 20. 17. Ephes. 3. 14. and therefore shall come to be Coheires with Christ and them Here is heavenly encouragement unto Gospell-worship and Gospell-conversation It is no wonder then if that Gospell-worship be frequently performed to God under this endearing consideration and in this sweet and comfortable relation The Apostle wishes us grace and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ Rom. 1. 7. and in like manner 1 Cor. 1 3. 2 Cor. 1. 2. Observe that solemn forme of thanksgiving Blessed be God even the Father of our Lord Iesus Christ the Father of mercies and the God of all comfort 2 Cor. 1. 3. Oh how willingly and cheerefully do we run to the God of all mercies and comfort in a time of temptation and affliction 2 Cor. 1. 4. For the Father discovers his bowels of mercy on purpose to invite us to him The Father himselfe loves you Iohn 16. 27. All spirituall glorious eternall blessings our Election Redemption Salvation are ascribed to this Father of all grace mercy comfort glory