the Apostle liable to be abused Answers of the Apostle unto this Objection He never once attempts to answer it by declaring the necessity of Personal Righteousness or good Works unto Justification before God He confines the cogency of Evangelical Motives unto Obedience only unto Believers Grounds of Evangelical Holiness asserted by him in compliance with his Doctrine of Justification 1. Divine Ordination Exceptions unto this Ground removed 2. Answer of the Apostle vindicated The Obligation of the Law unto Obedience Nature of it and consistency with Grace This Answer of the Apostle vindicated Heads of other Principles that might be pleaded to the same purpose Pag. 539. CHAP. XX. Seeming Difference no real contradiction between the Apostles Paul and James concerning Justification This granted by all Reasons of the seeming Difference The best Rule of the Interpretation of places of Scripture wherein there is an appearing repugnancy The Doctrine of Justification according unto that Rule principally to be learned from the Writings of Paul The Reasons of his fulness and accuracy in the teaching of that Doctrine The Importance of the Truth the opposition made unto it and abuse of it The design of the Apostle James Exceptions of some against the Writings of S. Paul scandalous and unreasonable Not in this matter to be interpreted by the passage in James insisted on Chap. 2. That there is no repugnancy between the Doctrine of the two Apostles demonstrated Heads and Grounds of the Demonstration Their scope design and end not the same That of Paul the only case stated and determined by him The designs of the Apostle James the case proposed by him quite of another nature The occasion of the case proposed and stated him No appearance of difference between the Apostles because of the several cases they speak unto Not the same Faith intended by them Description of the Faith spoken of by the one and the other Bellarmines Arguments to prove true justifying Faith to be intended by James answered Justification not treated of by the Apostles in the same manner nor used in the same sense nor to the same end The one treats of Justification as unto its nature and causes the other as unto its signs and evidence proved by the instances insisted on Pag. 557. How the Scripture was fulfilled that Abraham believed in God and it was counted unto him for Righteousness when he offered his Son on the Altar Works the same and of the same kind in both the Apostles Observations on the Discourse of James No Conjunction made by him between Faith and Works in our Justification but an opposition No distinction of a First and Second Justification in him Justification ascribed by him wholly unto Works in what sense Does not determine how a sinner may be justified before God but how a Professor may evidence himself so to be The Context opened from Ver. 14. to the end of the Chapter Pag. 569. Some of the Mistakes that have escaped in the Press may be thus corrected PAg. 10. Line 2. a fine read other p. 11. l. 24. none r. nothing p. 41. l. 30. r 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 33. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 42. l. 22. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 53. l. 6. r. this Author l. 25. man r. men l. 26. them p. 64. l. 4. a fine that it is p. 71. l. 21. and r. add p. 72. l. 12. r. For an p. 172. l. 17. for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l 28. Hithpaol p. 174. l. 8. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 175. l. 10. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 20. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 24. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 28. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 176. l. 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 8. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 9. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 4. a fine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 3. a fine affects p. 180. l. 22. vocation that is intended p. 199. l. 1. which was r. whereas p. 208.23 such r. Faith p. 234. l. 2. dele 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 266. l. 8. Curcellaeus p. 283. l. 23. suffered r. offered p. 311. l. 30. of him p. 362. l. 11. r. as if we p. 392. l. 20. r. more colour p. 412. l. 7. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 436. l. 2. a fine r. other men p. 444. l. 10. proofs r. process p. 465. l. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sundry other literal Mistakes and Mispointings are referred unto the candor of the Reader which I chuse rather than to trouble many with the rehearsal of what it may be few will take notice of General Considerations previously necessary unto the Explanation of the Doctrine of Justification THat we may treat of the Doctrine of Justification usefully unto its proper Ends which are the Glory of God in Christ with the peace and furtherance of the Obedience of Believers some things are previously to be considered which we must have respect unto in the whole process of our Discourse And among others that might be insisted on to the same purpose these that ensue are not to be omitted 1. The first Enquiry in this matter in a way of Duty is after the proper Relief of the Conscience of a sinner pressed and perplexed with a sense of the Guilt of sin For Justification is the way and means whereby such a person doth obtain acceptance before God with a Right and Title unto an heavenly Inheritance And nothing is pleadable in this cause but what a man would speak unto his own Conscience in that state or unto the Conscience of another when he is anxious under that Enquiry Wherefore The Person under consideration that is who is to be Justified is one who in himself is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 4.5 Vngodly and thereon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chap. 3.19 guilty before God that is obnoxious subject liable 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chap. 1.32 to the righteous sentential Judgment of God that he who committeth sin who is in any way guilty of it is worthy of Death Hereupon such a person finds himself 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gal. 3.10 under the curse and the wrath of God therein abiding on him Joh. 3.18 36. In this condition he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without plea without excuse by any thing in and from himself for his own relief His mouth is stopped Rom. 3.19 For he is in the Judgment of God declared in the Scripture 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gal. 3.22 every way shut up under sin and all the consequents of it Many Evils in this condition are men subject unto which may be reduced unto those two of our first Parents wherein they were represented For first they thought foolishly to hide themselves from God and then more foolishly would have charged him as the cause of their sin And such naturally are the thoughts of men under their convictions But whoever is the subject of the Justification enquired after is by various means brought into his
way of handling sacred things But the Spiritual Amplitude of Divine Truths is restrained hereby whilst low mean Philosophical senses are imposed on them And not only so but endless Divisions and Contentions are occasioned and perpetuated Hence when any Difference in Religion is in the pursuit of Controversies about it brought into the field of Metaphysical Respects and Philosophical terms whereof there is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sufficient provision for the supply of the Combatants on both sides the truth for the most part as unto any concernment of the souls of men therein is utterly lost and buried in the rubbish of senseless and unprofitable words And thus in particular those who seem to be well enough agreed in the whole Doctrine of Justification so far as the Scripture goeth before them and the Experience of Believers keeps them company when once they ingage into their Philosophical Definitions and Distinctions are at such an irreconcilable variance among themselves as if they were agreed on no one thing that doth concern it For as men have various apprehensions in coining such Definitions as may be defensible against Objections which most men aim at therein So no Proposition can be so plain at least in materia probabili but that a man ordinarily versed in Paedagogical Terms and Metaphysical Notions may multiply Distinctions on every word of it 8. Hence there hath been a pretence and appearance of twenty several Opinions among Protestants about Justification as Bellarmine and Vasquez and others of the Papists charge it against them out of Osiander when the Faith of them all was one and the same Bellar. lib. 5. cap. 1. Vasq. in 1.2 Quaest. 113. disp 202. whereof we shall speak elsewhere When men are once advanced into that field of Disputation which is all overgrown with thorns of subtilties perplexed notions and futilous terms of Art they consider principally how they may entangle others in it scarce at all how they may get out of it themselves And in this posture they oftentimes utterly forget the business which they are about especially in this matter of Justification namely how a guilty Sinner may come to obtain Favour and Acceptance with God And not only so but I doubt they oftentimes dispute themselves beyond what they can well abide by when they return home unto a sedate meditation of the state of things between God and their own souls And I cannot much value their notions and sentiments of this matter who object and answer themselves out of a sense of their own Appearance before God much less of theirs who evidence an open inconformity unto the Grace and truth of this Doctrine in their hearts and lives 9. Wherefore we do but trouble the faith of Christians and the peace of the true Church of God whilst we dispute about Expressions Terms and Notions when the substance of the Doctrine intended may be declared and believed without the knowledge understanding or use of any of them Such are all those in whose subtile management the captious Art of wrangling doth principally consist A diligent Attendance unto the Revelation made hereof in the Scripture and an examination of our own experience thereby is the Sum of what is required of us for the right understanding of the truth herein And every true Believer who is taught of God knows how to put his whole trust in Christ alone and the Grace of God by him for Mercy Righteousness and Glory and not at all concern himself with those loads of thorns and briars which under the names of Definitions Distinctions accurate Notions in a number of Exotick Paedagogical and Philosophical terms some pretend to accommodate them withall 10. The Holy Ghost in expressing the most eminent Acts in our Justification especially as unto our Believing or the acting of that faith whereby we are justified is pleased to make use of many Metaphorical Expressions For any to use them now in the same way and to the same purpose is esteemed rude undisciplinary and even ridiculous but on what Grounds He that shall deny that there is more spiritual sense and experience conveyed by them into the hearts and minds of Believers which is the life and soul of teaching things practical than in the most accurate Philosophical expressions is himself really ignorant of the whole Truth in this matter The Propriety of such Expressions belongs and is confined unto natural science but spiritual Truths are to be taught not in the words which mans wisdom teacheth but which the Holy Ghost teacheth comparing spiritual things with spiritual God is wiser then man and the Holy Ghost knows better what are the most expedient ways for the Illumination of our minds with that knowledge of Evangelical Truths which it is our Duty to have and attain then the wisest of us all And other knowledge of or skill in these things then what is required of us in a way of Duty is not to be valued It is therefore to no purpose to handle the mysteries of the Gospel as if Holcot and Bricot Thomas and Gabriel with all the Sententiarists Summists and Quodlibetarians of the old Roman Peripatetical School were to be raked out of their Graves to be our guides Especially will they be of no use unto us in this Doctrine of Justification For whereas they pertinaciously adhered unto the Philosophy of Aristotle who knew nothing of any Righteousness but what is an habit inherent in our selves and the Acts of it they wrested the whole Doctrine of Justification unto a compliance therewithall So Pighius himself complained of them Controv. 2. Dissimulare non possumus hanc vel primam doctrinae Christianae partem de Justificatione obscuratam magis quam illustratam a scholasticis spinosis plerisque quaestionibus definitionibus secundum quas nonnulli magno supercilio primam in omnibus autoritatem arrogantes c. Secondly A due consideration of him with whom in this matter we have to do and that immediately is necessary unto a right stating of our thoughts about it The Scripture expresseth it emphatically that it is God that justifieth Rom. 8. 33. And he assumes it unto himself as his Prerogative to do what belongs thereunto I even I am he that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine own sake and will not remember thy sins Isa. 43.25 And it is hard in my Apprehension to suggest unto him any other reason or consideration of the pardon of our sins seeing he hath taken it on him to do it for his own sake that is for the Lords sake Dan. 9.17 in whom all the seed of Israel are justified Isa. 45.25 In his sight before his Tribunal it is that men are justified or condemned Psal. 143.2 Enter not into Judgement with thy servant for in THY SIGHT shall no man living be justified And the whole work of Justification with all that belongeth thereunto is represented after the manner of a Juridical proceeding before Gods Tribunal as we shall see afterwards Therefore saith the Apostle
indeed a pretended contempt of the Arguments of his Adversaries is the Principle Artifice he makes use of in all his Replies and Evasions wherein I am sorry to see that he is followed by most of them who together with him do oppose the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. And so of late the use of this Testimony which reduced Bellarmine to so great a strait is admired at on the only ground and reason wherewith it is opposed by Socinus Yet are his exceptions unto it such as that I cannot also but a little on the other hand wonder that any learned Man should be troubled with them or seduced by them For he only pleads That if Christ be said to be made Righteousness unto us because his Righteousness is imputed unto us then is he said to be made Wisdom unto us because his Wisdom is so imputed and so of his Sanctification which none will allow yea he must be redeemed for us and his Redemption be imputed unto us But there is nothing of force nor truth in this pretence For it is built only on this Supposition That Christ must be made unto us of God all these things in the same way and manner whereas they are of such different natures that it is utterly impossible he should so be For instance he is made Sanctification unto us in that by his Spirit and Grace we are freely sanctified But he cannot be said to be made Redemption unto us in that by his Spirit and Grace we are freely redeemed And if he is said to be made Righteousness unto us because by his Spirit and Grace he works inherent Righteousness in us then is it plainly the same with his being made Sanctification unto us Neither doth he himself believe that Christ is made all these things unto us in the same way and manner And therefore doth he not assign any special way whereby he is so made them all but clouds it in an ambiguous expression that he becomes all these things unto us in the Providence of God But ask him in particular how Christ is made Sanctification unto us and he will tell you that it was by his Doctrine and Example alone with some such general assistance of the Spirit of God as he will allow But now this is no way at all whereby Christ was made Redemption unto us which being a thing external and not wrought in us Christ can be no otherwise made Redemption unto us then by the Imputation unto us of what he did that we might be redeemed or reckoning it on our account Not that he was redeemed for us as he childishly cavils but that he did that whereby we are redeemed Wherefore Christ is made of God Righteousness unto us in such a way and manner as the nature of the thing doth require Say some it is because by him we are justified Howbeit the Text says not That by him we are justified but he is of God made Righteousness unto us which is not our Justification but the ground cause and reason whereon we are justified Righteousness is one thing and Justification is another Wherefore we must inquire how we come to have that Righteousness whereby we are justified And this the same Apostle tells us plainly is by Imputation Blessed is the Man unto whom the Lord imputeth Righteousness Rom. 4.6 It follows then that Christ being made unto us of God Righteousness can have no other sense but that his Righteousness is imputed unto us which is what this Text doth undeniably confirm 2 Cor. 5.21 The Truth pleaded for is yet more emphatically expressed For he hath made him to be sin for us who knew no sin that we might be made the Righteousness of God in him The Paraphrase of Austine on these words gives the sense of them Ipse peccatum ut nos justitia non nostra sed Dei non in nobis sed in ipso sicut ipse peccatum non suum sed nostrum non in se sed in nobis constitutum Enchirid. ad Laurent cap. 4. And the words of Chrysostome upon this place unto the same purpose have been cited before at large To set out the greatness of the Grace of God in our Reconciliation by Christ he describes him by that Paraphrasis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who knew no sin or who knew not sin He knew sin in the notion or understanding of its nature and he knew it experimentally in the effects which he underwent and suffered but he knew it not that is was most remote from it as to its commission or guilt So that he knew no sin is absolutely no more but he did no sin neither was guile found in his mouth as it is expressed 1 Pet. 2.22 Or that he was holy harmless undefiled separate from sinners Heb. 7.26 Howbeit there is an Emphasis in the expression which is not to be neglected For as it is observed by Chrysostome as containing an auxesis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and by sundry learned persons after him So those who desire to learn the excellency of the Grace of God herein will have an impression of a sense of it on their minds from this emphatical expression which the Holy Ghost chose to make use of unto that end and the observation of it is not to be despised He hath made him to be sin that is say many Expositors A Sacrifice for sin Quemadmodum oblatus est pro peccatis non immerito peccatum factus dicitur quia bestia in lege quae pro peccatis offerebatur peccatum nuncupatur Ambros. in locum So the Sin and Trespass offering are often expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the sin and trespass or guilt And I shall not contend about this Exposition because that signified in it is according unto the truth But there is another more proper signification of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being put for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sin for a sinner that is Passively not Actively not by Inhesion but Imputation For this this the phrase of speech and force of the Antithesis seem to require Speaking of another sense Estius himself on the place adds as that which he approves Hic intellectus explicandus est per Commentarium Graecorum Chrysostomi caeterorum quia peccatum emphaticῶs interpretantur magnum peccatorem ac si dicat Apostolus nostri causa tractavit eum tanquam ipsum peccatum ipsum scelus id est tanquam hominem insigniter sceleratum ut in quo posuerit iniquitates omnium nostrum And if this be the interpretation of the Greek Scholiasts as indeed it is Luther was not the first who affirmed That Christ was made the greatest sinner namely by Imputation But we shall allow the former Exposition provided that the true notion of a sin offering or expiatory sacrifice be admitted For although this neither was nor could consist in the transfusion of the inherent sin of the person unto the Sacrifice yet did it
which is far more sublime and excellent For he speaks not of an inclination or affection but expresseth the quality it self For he says not he made him a sinner but sin that we might be made not meerly Righteous but Righteousness and that the Righteousness of God when we are justified not by works for if we should there must be no spot found in them but by Grace whereby all sin is blotted out So Bernard also Epist. 190. ad Innocent Homo qui debuit homo qui solvit Nam si unus inquit pro omnibus mortuus est ergo omnes mortui sunt ut videlicet satisfactio unius omnibus imputetur sicut omnium peccata unus ille portavit Nec alter jam inveniatur qui for as fecit alter qui satisfecit quia Caput Corpus unus est Christus And many more speak unto the same purpose Hence Luther before he engaged in the Work of Reformation in an Epistle to one George Spenlein a Monk was not afraid to write after this manner Mi dulcis frater disce Christum hunc crucifixum disce ei cantare de teipso desperans dicere ei Tu Domine Jesu es justitia mea ego autem sum peccatum tuum tu assumpsisti meum dedisti mihi tuum assumpsisti quod non eras dedisti mihi quod non eram Ipse suscepit te peccata tua fecit sua suam justitiam fecit tuam maledictus qui haec non credit Epist. An. 1516. Tom. 1. If those who shew themselves now so quarrelsome almost about every word that is spoken concerning Christ and his Righteousness had ever been harrassed in their Consciences about the Guilt of sin as this man was they would think it no strange matter to speak and write as he did Yea some there are who have lived and died in the Communion of the Church of Rome it self that have given their Testimony unto this Truth So speaks Taulerus Meditat. vitae Christ. cap. 7. Christus omnia mundi peccata in se recepit tantumque pro illis ultro sibi assumpsit dolorem cordis ac si ipse ea perpetrasset Christ took upon him all the sins of the World and willingly underwent that grief of heart for them as if he himself had committed them And again speaking in the person of Christ. Quandoquidem peccatum Adae multum abire non potest obsecro te Pater Coelestis ut ipsum in me vindices Ego enim omnia illius peccata in me recipo Si haec irae tempestas propter me orta est mitte me in mare amarissimae passionis Whereas the great Sin of Adam cannot go away I beseech thee Heavenly Father punish it in me For I take all his sins upon my self If then this Tempest of Anger be risen for me cast me into the Sea of my most bitter passion See in the Justification of these Expressions Heb. 10.5 6 7 8 9 10. The Discourse of Albertus Pighius to this purpose though often cited and urged shall be once again repeated both for its Worth and Truth as also to let some men see how fondly they have pleased themselves in reflecting on some Expressions of mine as though I had been singular in them His words are after others to the same purpose Quoniam quidem inquit Apostolus Deus erat in Christo mundum reconcilians sibi non imputans hominibus sua delicta Et deposuit apud nos verbum reconciliationis In illa ergo justificamur coram Deo non in nobis non nostra sed illius justitia quae nobis cum illo jam communicantibus imputatur Propriae justitiae inopes extra nos in illo docemur justitiam quaerere Cum inquit qui peccatum non noverat pro nobis peccatum fecit hoc est hostiam peccati expiatricem ut nos efficeremur Justitia Dei in ipso non nostra sed Dei justitia justi efficimur in Christo quo jure Amicitiae quae communionem omnium inter amicos facit juxta vetus celebratissimum proverbium Christo insertis conglutinatis unitis sua nostra facit suas divitias nobis communicat suam justitiam inter Patris judicium nostram injustitiam interponit sub ea veluti sub umbone ac clypeo a divina quam commeruimus ira nos abscondit tuetur ac protegit imo eandem nobis impertit nostram facit qua tecti ornatique audacter secure jam divino nos sistamus Tribunali Judicio justique non solum appareamus sed etiam simus Quemadmodum enim unius delicto peccatores nos etiam factos affirmat Apostolus ita unius Christi justitiam in justificandis nobis omnibus efficacem esse Et sicut per inobedientiam unius hominis peccatores constituti sunt multi sic per Obedientiam unius justi inquit constituentur multi Haec est Christi justitia ejus Obedientia qua voluntatem Patris sui perfecit in omnibus sicut contra nostra injustitia est nostra inobedientia mandatorum Dei praevaricatio In Christi autem obedientia quod nostra collocatur justitia inde est quod nobis illi incorporatis ac si nostra esset accepta ea fertur ut ea ipsa etiam nos justi habeamur Et velut ille quondam Jacob quum nativitate primogenitus non esset sub habitu fratris occultatus atque ejus veste indutus quae odorem optimum spirabat seipsum insinuavit Patri ut sub aliena persona benedictionem primogeniturae acciperet Ita nos sub Christi primogeniti fratris nostri preciosa puritate delitescere bono ejus odore fragrare ejus perfectione vitia nostra sepeliri obtegi atque ita nos piissimo Patri ingerere ut justitiae benedictionem ab eodem assequamur necesse est And afterwards Justificat ergo nos Deus Pater bonitate sua gratuita quo nos in Christo complectitur dum eidem insertos innocentia justitia Christi nos induit quae una ut vera perfecta est quae Dei sustinere conspectum potest ita unum pro nobis sisti oportet Tribunali divini judicii veluti causae nostrae intercessorem eidem repraesentari qua subnixi etiam hic obtineremus remissionem peccatorum nostrorum assiduam cujus puritate velatae non imputantur nobis sordes nostrae imperfectionum immunditiae sed veluti sepultae conteguntur ne in judicium Dei veniant donec confecto in nobis plane extincto veteri homine divina bonitas nos in beatam pacem cum novo Adam recipiat God was in Christ saith the Apostle reconciling the world unto himself not imputing-unto men their sins In him therefore we are justified before God not in our selves not by our own but by his Righteousness which is imputed unto us now communicating with him Wanting Righteousness of our own we are taught to seek for Righteousness without our selves in
and unsuited unto the Genius of the present Age. For they all of them arise from or lead unto the want of a due sence of the Nature and Guilt of sin as also of the Holiness and Righteousness of God with respect thereunto And when such principles as these do once grow prevalent in the minds of men they quickly grow careless negligent secure in sinning and End for the most part in Atheism or a great Indifferency as unto all Religion and all the Duties thereof CHAP. I. Justifying Faith the Causes Object and Nature of it declared THe means of Justification on our part is Faith That we are justified by Faith is so frequently and so expresly affirmed in the Scripture as that it cannot directly and in terms by any be denied For whereas some begin by an excess of partiality which controversial Engagements and Provocations do encline them unto to affirm that our Justification is more frequently ascribed unto other things Graces or Duties than unto Faith it is to be passed by in silence and not contended about But yet also the Explanation which some others make of this general concession That we are justified by Faith doth as fully overthrow what is affirmed therein as if it were in terms rejected And it would more advantage the understandings of men if it were plainly refused upon its first proposal than to be lead about in a maze of Words and Distinctions unto its real Exclusion as is done both by the Romanists and Socinians At present we may take the Proposition as granted and only enquire into the true genuine sense and meaning of it That which first occurs unto our Consideration is Faith and that which doth concern it may be reduced unto two Heads 1 Its Nature 2 Its Vse in our Justification Of the Nature of Faith in general of the especial Nature of justifying Faith of its Characteristical Distinctions from that which is called Faith but is not justifying so many Discourses divers of them the effects of sound Judgment and good Experience are already extant as it is altogether needless to engage at large into a farther discussion of them However something must be spoken to declare in what sense we understand these things what is that Faith which we ascribe our Justification unto and what is its Vse therein The Distinctions that are usually made concerning Faith as it is a word of various significations I shall wholly pretermit not only as obvious and known but as not belonging unto our present Argument That which we are concerned in is That in the Scripture there is mention made plainly of a twofold Faith whereby men believe the Gospel For there is a Faith whereby we are justified which he who hath shall be assuredly saved which purifieth the heart and worketh by Love And there is a Faith or Believing which doth nothing of all this which who hath and hath no more is not justified nor can be saved Wherefore every Faith whereby men are said to believe is not justifying Thus it is said of Simon the Magician that he believed Act. 8.13 When he was in the Gall of Bitterness and bond of Iniquity and therefore did not believe with that Faith which purifieth the Heart Act. 15.9 And that many believed on the name of Jesus when they saw the Miracles that he did but Jesus did not commit himself unto them because he knew what was in man Joh. 2.23 24. They did not believe on his Name as those do or with that kind of Faith who thereon receive power to become the Sons of God Joh. 1.12 And some when they hear the Word receive it with joy believing for a while but have no Root Luke 8.13 And Faith without a Root in the Heart will not justifie any For with the Heart Men believe unto Righteousness Rom. 10.10 So is it with them who shall cry Lord Lord at the last day we have prophesied in thy name whilst yet they were always workers of Iniquity Math. 7.22 23. This Faith is usually called Historical Faith But this Denomination is not taken from the Object of it as though it were only the History of the Scripture or the Historical things contained in it For it respects the whole Truth of the Word yea of the Promises of the Gospel as well as other things But it is so called from the nature of the Assent wherein it doth consist For it is such as we give unto Historical things that are credibly testified unto us And this Faith hath divers differences or degrees both in respect unto the Grounds or Reasons of it and also its Effects For as unto the first all Faith is an Assent upon Testimony and divine Faith is an Assent upon a divine Testimony According as this Testimony is received so are the Differences or Degrees of this Faith Some apprehend it on humane motives only and their credibility unto the Judgment of Reason and their Assent is a meer natural Act of their Understanding which is the lowest degree of this Historical Faith Some have their minds enabled unto it by spiritual Illumination making a discovery of the Evidences of Divine Truth whereon it is to be believed the Assent they give hereon is more firm and operative than that of the former sort Again It hath its Differences or Degrees with respect unto its Effects With some it doth no way or very little influence the Will or the Affections or work any Change in the lives of men So is it with them that profess they believe the Gospel and yet live in all manner of sins In this Degree it is called by the Apostle James a dead Faith and compared unto a dead Carkass without life or motion and is an Assent of the very same nature and kind with that which Devils are compelled to give And this Faith abounds in the World With others it hath an effectual work upon the Affections and that in many degrees also represented in the several sorts of Ground whereinto the Seed of the Word is cast and produceth many effects in their lives In the utmost improvement of it both as to the Evidence it proceeds from and the Effects it produceth it is usually called temporary Faith for it is neither permanent against all oppositions nor will bring any unto Eternal Rest. The name is taken from that Expression of our Saviour concerning him who believeth with this Faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Math. 13.21 This Faith I grant to be true in its kind and not meerly to be equivocally so called it is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is so as unto the general nature of Faith but of the same special nature with justifying Faith it is not Justifying Faith is not an higher or the highest degree of this Faith but is of another kind or nature Wherefore sundry things may be observed concerning this Faith in the utmost improvement of it unto our present purpose As 1. This Faith with all the effects of it men
forth to be a Propitiation through Faith in his Blood As he is a Propitiation as he shed his Blood for us as we have Redemption thereby he is the peculiar Object of our Faith with respect unto our Justification See to the same purpose Rom. 5.9 10. Ephes. 1.7 Col. 1.14 Ephes. 2.13 14 15 16. Rom. 8.3 4. He was made sin for us who knew no sin that we might be made the Righteousness of God in him 2 Cor. 5.21 That which we seek after in Justification is a Participation of the Righteousness of God to be made the Righteousness of God and that not in our selves but in another that is in Christ Jesus And that alone which is proposed unto our Faith as the means and cause of it is his being made sin for us or a Sacrifice for sin wherein all the Guilt of our sins was laid on him and he bare all our Iniquities This therefore is its peculiar Object herein And wherever in the Scripture we are directed to seek for the forgiveness of sins by the Blood of Christ receive the Atonement to be justified through the Faith of him as crucified the Object of Faith in Justification is limited and determined But it may be pleaded in Exception unto the Testimonies that no one of them doth affirm that we are justified by Faith in the Blood of Christ alone so as to exclude the consideration of the other Offices of Christ and their actings from being the Object of Faith in the same manner and unto the same ends with his Sacerdotal Office and what belongs thereunto or is derived from it Answ. This exception derives from that common Objection against the Doctrine of Justification by Faith alone namely that That exclusive term alone is not found in the Scripture or in any of the Testimonies that are produced for Justification by Faith But it is replyed with sufficient evidence of Truth that although the word be not found Syllabically used unto this purpose yet there are exceptive Expressions equivalent unto it as we shall see afterwards It is so in this particular instance also For 1 whereas our Justification is expresly ascribed unto our Faith in the Blood of Christ as the Propitiation for our Sins unto our believing in him as Crucified for us and it is no where ascribed unto our receiving of him as King Lord or Prophet it is plain that the former Expressions are virtually exclusive of the later consideration 2 I do not say That the consideration of the Kingly and Prophetical Offices of Christ is excluded from our Justification as works are excluded in Opposition unto Faith and Grace For they are so excluded as that we are to exercise an act of our minds in their positive Rejection as saying Get you hence you have no Lot nor Portion in this matter But as to these Offices of Christ as to the Object of Faith as Justifying we say only that they are not included therein For so to believe to be justified by his Blood as to exercise a positive act of the mind excluding a compliance with his other Offices is an impious Imagination 3. Neither the Consideration of these Offices themselves nor of any of the peculiar Acts of them are suited to give the Souls and Consciences of convinced Sinners that Relief which they seek after in Justification We are not in this whole cause to lose out of our Eye the state of the Person who is to be justified and what it is he doth seek after and ought to seek after therein Now this is Pardon of Sin and Righteousness before God alone That therefore which is no way suited to give or tender this Relief unto him is not nor can be the Object of his Faith whereby he is justified in that exercise of it whereon his justification doth depend This Relief it will be said is to be had in Christ alone it is true but under what Consideration For the sole design of the Sinner is how he may be accepted with God be at peace with him have all his wrath turned away by a Propitiation or Attonement Now this can no otherwise be done but by the acting of some one towards God and with God on his behalf for it is about the turning away of Gods Anger and Acceptance with him that the enquiry is made It is by the Blood of Christ that we are made nigh who were far off Eph. 2.13 By the Blood of Christ are we Reconciled who were Enemies v. 16. By the Blood of Christ we have Redemption Rom. 3.24 25. Eph. 1.7 c. This therefore is the Object of Faith All the actings of the Kingly and Prophetical Offices of Christ are all of them from God that is in the Name and Authority of God towards us Not any one of them is towards God on our behalf so as that by vertue of them we should expect Acceptance with God They are all Good Blessed Holy in themselves and of an eminent tendency unto the Glory of God in our Salvation Yea they are no less necessary unto our Salvation to the praise of Gods Grace then are the Attonement for Sin and Satisfaction which he made for from them is the way of life Revealed unto us Grace communicated our Persons sanctified and the Reward bestowed Yea in the exercise of his Kingly power doth the Lord Christ doth pardon and justifie Sinners Not that he did as a King constitute the Law of Justification for it was given and established in the first Promise and he came to put it in Execution Joh. 3.16 But in the vertue of his Attonement and Righteousness imputed unto them he doth both pardon and justifie Sinners But they are the acts of his Sacerdotal Office alone that respect God on our behalf Whatever he did on Earth with God for the Church in Obedience Suffering and Offering up of himself whatever he doth in Heaven in Intercession and Appearance in the presence of God for us it all entirely belongs unto his Priestly Office And in these things alone doth the Soul of a convinced Sinner find Relief when he seeks after Deliverance from the state of Sin and Acceptance with God In these therefore alone the peculiar Object of his Faith that which will give him Rest and Peace must be comprized And this last consideration is of it self sufficient to determine this difference Sundry things are Objected against this Assertion which I shall not here at large discuss because what is material in any of them will occur on other occasions where its consideration will be more proper In general it may be pleaded that Justifying Faith is the same with saving Faith nor is it said that we are justified by this or that part of Faith but by Faith in General that is as taken essentially for the entire Grace of Faith And as unto Faith in this sense not only a respect unto Christ in all his Offices but Obedience it self also is included in it as is evident in many
intended we have no way to determine the signification of them but by the consideration of the nature of the things which they were invented to declare and signifie And whereas in this Language these words are derived from Jus and Justum they must respect an Act of Jurisdiction rather then a Physical Operation or infusion Justificari is Justus censeri pro justo haberi to be esteemed accounted or adjudged Righteous So a Man was made Justus Filius in Adoption unto him by whom he was Adopted Which what it is is well declared by Budaeus Cajus lib. 2. F. de Adopt De Arrogatione loquens Is qui adoptat rogatur id est interrogatur an velit eum quem adopturus sit Justum sibi Filium esse Justum saith he intelligo non verum ut aliqui censent sed omnibus partibus ut ita dicam Filiationis veri Filij vicem obtinentem naturalis legitimi Filij loco sedentem Wherefore as by Adoption there is no internal inherent change made in the Person Adopted but by vertue thereof he is esteemed and adjudged as a true Son and hath all the rights of a legitimate Son so by Justification as to the importance of the word a man is only esteemed declared and pronounced Righteous as if he were compleatly so And in the present case Justification and gratuitous Adoption are the same Grace for the substance of them Joh. 1.12 only respect is had in their different denomination of the same Grace unto different effects or priviledges that ensue thereon But the true and genuine signification of these words is to be determined from those in the Original languages of the Scripture which are expounded by them In the Hebrew it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This the Lxx. render by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Job 27.5 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chap. 13.18 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Prov. 17.15 To shew or declare one Righteous to appear Righteous to judge any one Righteous And the sense may be taken from any one of them as Chap. 13.18 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Behold now I have ordered my cause I know that I shall be justified The ordering of his cause his Judgment his cause to be judged on is his preparation for a sentence either of Absolution or Condemnation and hereon his confidence was that he should be Justified that is absolved acquitted pronounced Righteous And the sense is no less pregnant in the other places commonly they render it by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereof I shall speak afterwards Properly it denotes an Action towards another as Justification and to justifie do in Hiphil only and a reciprocal Action of a man on himself in Hithpael 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hereby alone is the true sense of these words determined And I say that in no place or on any occasion is it used in that Conjugation wherein it denotes an Action towards another in any other sense but to absolve acquit esteem declare pronounce Righteous or to impute Righteousness which is the Forensick sense of the word we plead for that is its constant use and signification nor doth it ever once signifie to make inherently Righteous much less to pardon or forgive so vain is the pretence of some that Justification consists only in the pardon of Sin which is not signified by the Word in any one place of Scripture Almost in all places this sense is absolutely unquestionable nor is there any more then one which will admit of any debate and that on so faint a pretence as cannot prejudice its constant use and signification in all other places Whatever therefore an infusion of inherent Grace may be or however it may be called Justification it is not it cannot be the Word no where signifying any such thing Wherefore those of the Church of Rome do not so much oppose Justification by Faith through the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ as indeed deny that there is any such thing as Justification For that which they call the first Justification consisting in the infusion of a principle of inherent Grace is no such thing as Justification And their second Justification which they place in the merit of Works wherein Absolution or pardon of Sin hath neither place nor consideration is inconsistent with Evangelical Justification as we shall shew afterwards This Word therefore whether the act of God towards men or of men towards God or of men among themselves or of one towards another be expressed thereby is always used in a Forensick sense and doth not denote a Physical operation Transfusion or Transmutation 2 Sam. 15.4 If any man hath a Suit or Cause let him come to me 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and I will do him Justice I will Justifie him judge in his Cause and pronounce for him Deut. 25.1 If there be a Controversie among men and they come to Judgment that the Judges may judge them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they shall justifie the Righteous pronounce sentence on his side whereunto is opposed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and they shall condemn the wicked make him wicked as the Word signifies that is judge declare and pronounce him wicked whereby he becomes so judicially and in the eye of the Law as the other is made Righteous by declaration and acquitment He doth not say this shall pardon the Righteous which to suppose would overthrow both the Antithesis and design of the place And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much to infuse wickedness into a man as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to infuse a principle of Grace or Righteousness into him The same Antithesis occurs Prov. 17.15 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He that justifieth the wicked and condemneth the Righteous Not he that maketh the wicked inherently Righteous not he that changeth him inherently from Unrighteous unto Righteousness But he that without any Ground Reason or Foundation acquits him in Judgment or declares him to be Righteous is an Abomination unto the Lord. And although this be spoken of the Judgment of men yet the Judgment of God also is according unto this Truth For although he Justifieth the Vngodly those who are so in themselves yet he doth it on the ground and consideration of a perfect Righteousness made theirs by Imputation and by another act of his Grace that they may be meet Subjects of this Righteous Favour really and inherently changeth them from Unrighteousness unto Holiness by the Renovation of their Natures And these things are singular in the actings of God which nothing amongst men hath any Resemblance unto or can represent For the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ unto a Person in himself ungodly unto his Justification or that he may be acquitted absolved and declared Righteous is built on such Foundations and procedeth on such Principles of Righteousness Wisdom and Soveraignty as have no place among the actions of men nor can have so as shall afterwards be declared And moreover when God doth Justifie the ungodly on the
which is here pleaded for But the Apostle makes an express distinction between them and as this Author observes proceeds from one to another by an ascent from the lesser to the greater And the infusion of an habit or principle of Grace or Righteousness Evangelical whereby we are inherently Righteous by which he explains plains our being justified in this place is our Sanctification and nothing else Yea and Sanctification is here distinguished from washing but ye are washed but ye are Sanctified So as that it peculiarly in this place denotes positive habits of Grace and Holiness Neither can he declare the nature of it any way different from what he would have expressed by being Justified 2. Justification is ascribed unto the Spirit of God as the principal efficient cause of the Application of the Grace of God and Blood of Christ whereby we are Justified unto our Souls and Consciences And he is so also of the operation of that Faith whereby we are Justified whence although we are said to be justified by him yet it doth not follow that our Justification consists in the Renovation of our natures 3. The change and mutation that was made in these Corinthians so far as it was Physical in effects inherent as such there was the Apostle expresly ascribes unto their washing and Sanctification So that there is no need to suppose this change to be expressed by their being Justified And in the real change asserted that is in the Renovation of our Natures consists the true entire work and nature of our Sanctification But whereas by reason of the vitious habits and practices mentioned they were in a state of Condemnation and such as had no right unto the Kingdom of Heaven they were by their Justification changed and transferred out of that state into another wherein they had peace with God and right unto life Eternal 4. The third reason proceeds upon a mistake namely That to be justified is only to be freed from the punishment due unto sin For it comprizeth both the Non-imputation of sin and the Imputation of Righteousness with the priviledge of Adoption and right unto the Heavenly Inheritance which are inseparable from it And although it doth not appear that the Apostle in the enumeration of these Priviledges did intend a process from the lesser unto the greater nor is it safe for us to compare the unutterable effects of the Grace of God by Christ Jesus such as Sanctification and Justification are and to determine which is greatest and which is least yet following the conduct of the Scripture and the due consideration of the things themselves we may say that in this life we can be made partakers of no greater Mercy or Priviledge than what consists in our Justification And the Reader may see from hence how impossible it is to produce any one place wherein the words Justification and to justifie do signifie a real internal Work and Physical operation in that this learned man a person of more then ordinary perspicuity candor and judgment designing to prove it insisted on such instances as give so little countenance unto what he pretended He adds Tit. 3.5 6 7. Not by works of Righteousness which we have done but according unto his Mercy he saved us by the washing of Regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour that being justified by his Grace we should be made Heirs according unto the hope of Eternal life The argument which he alone insists upon to prove that by Justification here an infusion of internal Grace is intended is this That the Apostle affirming first that God saved us according unto his Mercy by the washing of Regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost and afterwards affirming that we are Justified by his Grace he supposes it necessary that we should be Regenerate and renewed that we may be justified and if so then our Justification contains and compriseth our Sanctification also Answ. The plain truth is the Apostle speaks not one word of the Necessity of our Sanctification or Regeneration or Renovation by the Holy Ghost antecedently unto our Justification a supposition whereof contains the whole force of this Argument Indeed he assigns our Regeneration Renovation and Justification all the means of our Salvation all equally unto Grace and Mercy in opposition unto any works of our own which we shall afterwards make use of Nor is there intimated by him any order of precedency or connexion between the things that he mentions but only between Justification and Adoption Justification having the priority in order of nature that being justified by his Grace we should be Heirs according to the hope of Eternal life All the things he mentions are inseparable No man is Regenerate or renewed by the Holy Ghost but withal he is justified No man is justified but withal he is renewed by the Holy Ghost And they are all of them equally of Soveraign Grace in God in opposition unto any works of Righteousness that we have wrought And we plead for the freedom of Gods Grace in Sanctification no less then in Justification But that it is necessary that we should be Sanctified that we may be justified before God who justifieth the ungodly the Apostle says not in this place nor any thing to that purpose neither yet if he did so would it at all prove that the signification of that expression to be justified is to be sanctified or to have inherent Holiness and Righteousness wrought in us And these Testimonies would not have been produced to prove it wherein these things are so expresly distinguished but that there are none to be found of more force or evidence The last place wherein he grants this signification of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is Revel 22.11 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 qui Justus est Justificetur adhuc which place is pleaded by all the Romanists And our Author says they are but few among the Protestants who do not acknowledge that the word cannot be here used in a Forensick sense but that to be justified is to go on and encrease in Piety and Righteousness Answ. But 1 There is a great objection lies in the way of any Argument from these words namely from the various Reading of the place For many antient Copies read not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the vulgar renders Justificetur adhuc but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let him that is Righteous work Righteousness still as doth the Printed Copy which now lyeth before me So it was in the Copy of the Complutensian Edition which Stephens commends above all others and in one more antient Copy that he used So it is in the Syriack and Arabick published by Huterus and in our own Polyglot So Cyprian reads the words de bono patientiae Justus autem adhuc justiora faciat similiter qui sanctus sanctiora And I doubt not but that is the true reading of the place 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
abounding in good works 1 Pet. 2.12 chap. 3.16 And so is it with respect unto the Church that we be not judged dead barren Professors but such as have been made partakers of the like precious Faith with others Shew me thy Faith by thy Works Jam. 2. Wherefore 3 This Righteousness is pleadable unto our Justification against all the charges of Satan who is the great Accuser of the Brethren of all that believe Whether he manage his charge privately in our Consciences which is as it were before God as he charged Job or by his instruments in all manner of reproaches and calumnies whereof some in this Age have had experience in an eminent manner this Righteousness is pleadable unto our Justification On a supposition of these things wherein our personal Righteousness is allowed its proper place and use as shall afterwards be more fully declared I do not understand that there is an Evangelical Justification whereby Believers are by and on the account of this personal inherent Righteousness justified in the sight of God nor doth the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ unto our absolute Justification before him depend thereon For 1. None have this personal Righteousness but they are antecedently justified in the sight of God It is wholly the Obedience of Faith proceeding from true and saving Faith in God by Jesus Christ. For as it was said before Works before Faith are as by general consent excluded from any Interest in our Justification and we have proved that they are neither Conditions of it Dispositions unto it nor Preparations for it properly so called But every true Believer is immediately justified on his Believing Nor is there any moment of time wherein a man is a true Believer according as Faith is required in the Gospel and yet not be justified For as he is thereby united unto Christ which is the foundation of our Justification by him so the whole Scripture testifieth that he that believes is justified or that there is an infallible connexion in the Ordination of God between true Faith and Justification Wherefore this personal Righteousness cannot be the condition of our Justificaion before God seeing it is consequential thereunto What may be pleaded in exception hereunto from the supposition of a second Justification or differing causes of the beginning and continuation of Justification hath been already disproved 2. Justification before God is a freedom and absolution from a Charge before God at least it is contained therein And the Instrument of this charge must either be the Law or the Gospel But neither the Law nor the Gospel do before God or in the sight of God charge true Believers with Unbelief Hypocrisie or the like For who shall lay any thing unto the charge of Gods Elect who are once justified before him Such a charge may be laid against them by Sathan by the Church sometimes on mistake by the World as it was in the case of Job against which this Righteousness is pleadable But what is charged immediately before God is charged by God himself either by the Law or the Gospel and the Judgment of God is according unto Truth If this charge be by the Law by the Law we must be justified But the plea of sincere Obedience will not justifie us by the Law That admits of none in satisfaction unto its demands but that which is compleat and perfect And where the Gospel lays any thing unto the charge of any Persons before God there can be no Justification before God unless we shall allow the Gospel to be the Instrument of a false Charge For what should justifie him whom the Gospel condemns And if it be a Justification by the Gospel from the charge of the Law it renders the death of Christ of no effect And a Justification without a Charge is not to be supposed 3. Such a Justification as that pretended is altogether needless and useless This may easily be evinced from what the Scripture asserts unto our Justification in the sight of God by Faith in the Blood of Christ. But this hath been spoken to before on another occasion Let that be considered and it will quickly appear that there is no place nor use for this new Justification upon our personal Righteousness whether it be supposed antecedent and subordinate thereunto or consequential and perfective thereof 4. This pretended Evangelical Justification hath not the Nature of any Justification that is mentioned in the Scripture that is neither that by the Law nor that provided in the Gospel Justification by the Law is this The man that doth the Works of it shall live in them This it doth not pretend unto And as unto Evangelical Justification it is every way contrary unto it For therein the Charge against the person to be justified is true namely that he hath sinned and is come short of the Glory of God In this it is false namely that a Believer is an Unbeliever A sincere Person an Hypocrite one fruitful in good Works altogether barren And this false charge is supposed to be exhibited in the name of God and before him Our Acquitment in true Evangelical Justification is by Absolution or pardon of sin here by a Vindication of our own Righteousness There the plea of the person to be justified is Guilty all the World is become guilty before God but here the plea of the person on his Trial is not Guilty whereon the proofs and evidences of Innocency and Righteousness do ensue But this is a Plea which the Law will not admit and which the Gospel disclaims 5. If we are justified before God on our own personal Righteousness and pronounced Righteous by him on the account thereof then God enters into Judgment with us on something in our selves and acquits us thereon For Justification is a juridical Act in and of that Judgment of God which is according unto Truth But that God should enter into Judgment with us and justifie us with respect unto what he judgeth on or our personal Righteousness the Psalmist doth not believe Psal. 130.2 3. Psal. 143.2 nor did the Publican Luke 18. 6. This personal Righteousness of ours cannot be said to be a subordinate Righteousness and subservient unto our Justification by Faith in the Blood of Christ. For therein God justifieth the ungodly and imputeth Righteousness unto him that worketh not And besides it is expresly excluded from any consideration in our Justification Ephes. 2.7 8. 7. This Personal inherent Righteousness wherewith we are said to be justified with this Evangelical Justification is our own Righteousness Personal Righteousness and our own Righteousness are expressions equivalent But our own Righteousness is not the material cause of any Justification before God For 1 It is unmeet so to be Isa. 54.6 2 It is directly opposed unto that Righteousness whereby we are justified as inconsistent with it unto that end Phil. 3.9 Rom. 10.3 4. It will be said that our own Righteousness is the Righteousness of the
shadow of a dream a fancy a mummery an imagination say some among us An opinion foeda execranda pernitiosa detestanda saith Socinus And opposition ariseth unto it every day from great variety of principles For those by whom it is opposed and rejected can by no means agree what to set up in the place of it However the weight and importance of this Doctrine is on all hands acknowledged whether it be true or false It is not a dispute about Notions Terms and Speculations wherein Christian Practice is little or not at all concerned of which nature many are needlesly contended about but such as hath an immediate influence into our whole present Duty with our eternal Welfare or Ruine Those by whom this Imputation of Righteousness is rejected do affirm that the Faith and Doctrine of it do overthrow the necessity of Gospel Obedience of personal Righteousness and good Works bringing in Antinomianism and Libertinism in life Hereon it must of necessity be destructive of Salvation in those who believe it and conform their Practice thereunto And those on the other hand by whom it is believed seeing they judge it impossible that any man should be justified before God any other way but by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ do accordingly judge that without it none can be saved Hence a Learned man of late concludes his Discourse concerning it Hactenus de Imputatione Justitiae Christi sine qua nemo unquam aut salvatus est aut salvari queat Justificat Paulin. cap. 8. Thus far of the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ without which no man was ever saved nor can any so be They do not think nor judge that all those are excluded from salvation who cannot apprehend or to deny the Doctrine of the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ as by them declared But they judge that they are so unto whom that Righteousness is not really imputed nor can they do otherwise whil'st they make it the foundation of all their own Acceptation with God and eternal salvation These things greatly differ To believe the Doctrine of it or not to believe it as thus or thus explained is one thing and to enjoy the thing or not enjoy it is another I no way doubt but that many men do receive more Grace from God than they understand or will own and have a greater efficacy of it in them than they will believe Men may be really saved by that Grace which Doctrinally they do deny and they may be justified by the Imputation of that Righteousness which in opinion they deny to be imputed For the Faith of it is included in that general Assent which they give unto the truth of the Gospel and such an Adherence unto Christ may ensue thereon as that their mistake of the way whereby they are saved by him shall not defraud them of a real Interest therein And for my part I must say that notwithstanding all the disputes that I see and read about Justification some whereof are full of offence and scandal I do not believe but that the Authors of them if they be not Socinians throughout denying the whole merit and satisfaction of Christ do really trust unto the mediation of Christ for the pardon of their Sins and Acceptance with God and not unto their own Works or Obedience Nor will I believe the contrary until they expresly declare it Of the Objection on the other hand concerning the danger of the Doctrine of the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ in reference unto the necessity of Holiness and works of Righteousness we must treat afterwards The Judgment of the Reformed Churches herein is known unto all and must be confessed unless we intend by vain cavils to encrease and perpetuate contentions Especially the Church of England is in her Doctrine express as unto the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ both active and passive as it is usually distinguished This hath been of late so fully manifested out of her Authentick Writings that is the Articles of Religion and Books of Homilies and other Writings publickly authorized that it is altogether needless to give any farther Demonstration of it Those who pretend themselves to be otherwise minded are such as I will not contend withall For to what purpose is it to dispute with men who will deny the Sun to shine when they cannot bear the heat of its beams Wherefore in what I have to offer on this subject I shall not in the least depart from the ancient Doctrine of the Church of England yea I have no design but to declare and vindicate it as God shall enable There are indeed sundry differences among Persons Learned Sober and Orthodox if that term displease not in the way and manner of the Explication of the Doctrine of Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ who yet all of them agree in the substance of it in all those things wherein the Grace of God the Honour of Christ and the Peace of the Souls of men are principally concerned As far as it is possible for me I shall avoid the concerning of my self at present in these Differences For unto what purpose is it to contend about them whilst the substance of the Doctrine it self is openly opposed and rejected why should we debate about the order and beautifying of the Rooms in an House whilst Fire is set unto the whole when that is well quenched we may return to the consideration of the best means for the disposal and use of the several parts of it There are two grand Parties by whom the Doctrine of Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ is opposed namely the Papists and the Socinians But they proceed on different principles and unto different Ends. The design of the one is to exalt their own Merits of the other to destroy the merit of Christ. But besides these who trade in company we have many Interlopers who coming in on their hand do make bold to borrow from both as they see occasion We shall have to do with them all in our progress not with the Persons of any nor the way and manner of their expressing themselves but the Opinions of all of them so far as they are opposite unto the Truth For it is that which wise men despise and good men bewail to see persons pretending unto Religion and Piety to cavil at Expressions to contend about Words to endeavour the fastening of Opinions on men which they own not and thereon mutually to revile one another publishing all to the World as some great atchievement or victory This is not the way to teach them truths of the Gospel nor to promote the Edification of Church But in general the Importance of the cause to be pleaded the Greatness of the opposition that is made unto the Truth and the high concernment of the Souls of Believers to be rightly instructed in it do call for a renewed Declaration and Vindication of
it And what I shall attempt unto this purpose I do it under this perswasion that the life and continuance of any Church on the one hand and its Apostasie or Ruine on the other do depend in an eminent manner on the Preservation or Rejection of the Truth in this Article of Religion and I shall add as it hath been professed received and believed in the Church of England in former days The first thing we are to consider is the meaning of these words to Impute and Imputation For from a meer plain Declaration hereof it will appear that sundry things charged on a supposition of the Imputation we plead for are vain and groundless or the Charge it self is so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The word first used to this purpose signifies to think to esteem to judge or to refer a thing or matter unto any to impute or to be imputed for Good or Evil. See Levit. 7.18 chap. 17.4 And Psal. 106.31 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and it was counted reckoned imputed unto him for Righteousness To judge or esteem this or that Good or Evil to belong unto him to be his The Lxx. express it by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as do the Writers of the New Testament also And these are rendred by reputare imputare acceptum ferre tribuere assignare ascribere But there is a different signification among these words In particular to be reputed Righteous and to have Righteousness imputed differ as cause and effect For that any may be reputed Righteous that is be judged or esteemed so to be there must be a real foundation of that Reputation or it is a mistake and not a right Judgment as a man may be reputed to be wise who is a fool or reputed to be rich who is a beggar Wherefore he that is reputed Righteous must either have a Righteousness of his own or another antecedently imputed unto him as the foundation of that Reputation Wherefore to impute Righteousness unto one that hath none of his own is not to repute him to be Righteous who is indeed Unrighteous but it is to communicate a Righteousness unto him that he may rightly and justly be esteemed judged or reputed Righteous Imputare is a word that the Latine Tongue owns in the sense wherein it is used by Divines Optime de pessimis meruisti ad quos pervenerit incorrupta rerum fides magno Authori suo imputata Senec. ad Mart. And Plin. lib. 18. cap. 1. In his Apology for the Earth our common Parent nostris eam criminibus urgemus culpamque nostram illi imputamus In their sense to impute any thing unto another is if it be evil to charge it on him to burden him with it so saith Pliny we impute our own faults to the Earth or charge them upon it If it be Good it is to ascribe it unto him as his own whether originally it were so or no magno Authori imputata Vasquez in Thom. 22. Tom. 2. Disp. 132. attempts the sense of the word but confounds it with reputare Imputare aut reputare quidquam alicui est idem atque inter ea quae sunt ipsius ad eum pertinent connumerare recensere This is reputare properly imputare includes an Act antecedent unto this accounting or esteeming a thing to belong unto any Person But whereas that may be imputed unto us which is really our own antecedently unto that Imputation the word must needs have a double sense as it hath in the Instances given out of Latine Authors now mentioned And 1. To Impute unto us that which was really ours antecedently unto that Imputation includes two things in it 1 An Acknowledgment or Judgment that the thing so imputed is really and truly ours or in us He that Imputes Wisdom or Learning unto any man doth in the first place acknowledge him to be Wise or Learned 2 A dealing with them according unto it whether it be Good or Evil. So when upon a Trial a man is acquitted because he is found Righteous first he is judged and esteemed Righteous and then dealt with as a Righteous Person his Righteousness is imputed unto him See this exemplified Gen. 30.33 2. To Impute unto us that which is not our own antecedently unto that Imputation includes also in it two things 1 A Grant or Donation of the thing it self unto us to be ours on some just Ground and Foundation For a thing must be made ours before we can justly be dealt withall according unto what is required on the Account of it 2 A Will of dealing with us or an actual dealing with us according unto that which is so made ours For in this matter whereof we treat the most Holy and Righteous God doth not justifie any that is absolve them from sin pronounce them Righteous and thereon grant unto them Right and Title unto Eternal Life but upon the interveniency of a true and compleat Righteousness truly and compleatly made the Righteousness of them that are to be justified in order of nature antecedently unto their Justification But these things will be yet made more clear by Instances and it is necessary they should be so 1. There is an Imputation unto us of that which is really our own inherent in us performed by us antecedently unto that Imputation and this whether it be Evil or Good The Rule and Nature hereof is given and expressed Ezek. 18.20 The Righteousness of the Righteous shall be upon him the Wickedness of the Wicked shall be upon him Instances we have of both sorts 1 In the Imputation of sin when the Person guilty of it is so judged and reckoned a sinner as to be dealt withall accordingly This Imputation Shimei deprecated 2 Sam. 19.19 He said unto the King Let not my Lord impute Iniquity unto me 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word used in the expression of the Imputation of Righteousness Gen. 15.6 neither do thou remember what thy Servant did perversely For thy Servant doth know that I have sinned He was Guilty and acknowledged his Guilt but deprecates the Imputation of it in such a sentence concerning him as his sin deserved So Stephen deprecated the Imputation of sin unto them that stoned him whereof they were really guilty Act. 7.60 Lay not this sin to their charge impute it not unto them As on the other side Zechariah the Son of Jehojada who died in the same cause and the same kind of death with Stephen prayed that the sin of those which slew him might be charged on them 2 Chron. 24.22 Wherefore to impute sin is to lay it unto the charge of any and to deal with them according unto its desert To impute that which is Good unto any is to judge and acknowledge it so to be theirs and thereon to deal with them in whom it is according unto its respect unto the Law of God The Righteousness of the Righteous shall be upon him So Jacob provided that his Righteousness
should answer for him Gen. 30.33 And we have an Instance of it in Gods dealing with men Psal. 106.31 Then stood up Phineas and executed Judgment and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness Notwithstanding it seemed that he had not sufficient warrant for what he did yet God that knew his heart and what Guidance of his own spirit he was under approved his fact as Righteous and gave him a Reward testifying that Approbation Concerning this Imputation it must be observed that whatever is our own antecedently thereunto which is an Act of God thereon can never be imputed unto us for any thing more or less than what it is really in it self For this Imputation consists of two parts or two things concur thereunto 1 A Judgment of the thing to be ours to be in us or to belong unto us 2 A Will of dealing with us or an actual dealing with us according unto it Wherefore in the Imputation of any thing unto us which is ours God esteemeth it not to be other than it is He doth not esteem that to be a perfect Righteousness which is imperfect so to do might argue either a mistake of the thing judged on or perverseness in the Judgment it self upon it Wherefore if as some say our own Faith and Obedience are imputed unto us for Righteousness seeing they are imperfect they must be imputed unto us for an imperfect Righteousness and not for that which is perfect For that Judgment of God which is according unto Truth is in this Imputation And the Imputation of an imperfect Righteousness unto us esteeming it only as such will stand us in little stead in this matter And the Acceptilation which some plead traducing a fiction in humane Laws to interpret the mystery of the Gospel doth not only overthrow all Imputation but the satisfaction and merit of Christ also And it must be observed that this Imputation is a meer Act of Justice without any mixture of Grace as the Apostle declares Rom. 11.6 For it consists of these two parts 1 An acknowledging and judging that to be in us which is truly so 2 A Will of dealing with us according unto it both which are Acts of Justice The Imputation unto us of that which is not our own antecedently unto that Imputation at least not in the same manner as it is afterwards is various also as unto the Grounds and Causes that it proceeds upon Only it must be observed that no Imputation of this kind is to account them unto whom any thing is imputed to have done the things themselves which are imputed unto them That were not to impute but to err in Judgment and indeed utterly to overthrow the whole nature of Gracious Imputation But it is to make that to be ours by Imputation which was not ours before unto all ends and purposes whereunto it would have served if it had been our own without any such Imputation It is therefore a manifest mistake of their own which some make the Ground of a Charge on the Doctrine of Imputation For the say if our sins were imputed unto Christ then must he be esteemed to have done what we have done amiss and so be the greatest sinner that ever was and on the other side if his Righteousness be imputed unto us then are we esteemed to have done what he did and so to stand in no need of the pardon of sin But this is contrary unto the nature of Imputation which proceeds on no such Judgment but on the contrary that we our selves have done nothing of what is imputed unto us nor Christ any thing of what was imputed unto him To declare more distinctly the nature of this Imputation I shall consider the several kinds of it or rather the several grounds whence it proceeds For this Imputation unto us of what is not our own antecedent unto that Imputation may be either 1 Ex justitia or 2 Ex voluntaria sponsione or 3 Ex injuria or 4 Ex gratia all which shall be exemplified I do not place them thus distinctly as if they might not some of them concur in the same Imputation which I shall manifest that they do But I shall refer the several kinds of Imputation unto that which is the next cause of every one 1. Things that are not our own originally personally inherently may yet be imputed unto us ex justitia by the Rule of Righteousness And this may be done upon a double Relation unto those whose they are 1 Foederal 2 Natural 1 Things done by one may be imputed unto others propter relationem foederalem because of a Covenant Relation between them So the sin of Adam was and is imputed unto all his Posterity as we shall afterwards more fully declare And the Ground hereof is that we stood all in the same Covenant with him who was our Head and Representative therein The corruption and Depravation of nature which we derive from Adam is imputed unto us with the first kind of Imputation namely of that which is ours antecedently unto that Imputation But his actual sin is imputed unto us as that which becomes ours by that Imputation which before it was not Hence saith Bellarmine himself Peccatum Adami ita posteris omnibus imputatur ac si omnes idem peccatum patravissent De Amiss Grat. lib. 4. cap. 10. The sin of Adam is so imputed unto all his Posterity as if they had all committed the same sin And he gives us herein the true nature of Imputation which he fiercely disputes against in his Books of Justification For the Imputation of that sin unto us as if we had committed it which he acknowledgeth includes both a Transcription of that sin unto us and a dealing with us as if we had committed it which is the Doctrine of the Apostle Rom. 5. 2. There is an Imputation of sin unto others ex justitia propter Relationem naturalem on the account of a natural Relation between them and those who had actually contracted the Guilt of it But this is so only with respect unto some outward Temporary effects of it So God speaks concerning the Children of the Rebellious Israelites in the Wilderness Your Children shall wander in the Wilderness Forty years and bear your Whoredoms Numb 14.33 Your sin shall be so far imputed unto your Children because of their Relation unto you and your Interest in them as that they shall suffer for them in an afflictive condition in the Wilderness And this was just because of the Relation between them as the same procedure of Divine Justice is frequently declared in other places of the Scripture So where there is a due foundation of it Imputation is an Act of Justice 2. Imputation may justly ensue ex voluntaria sponsione when one freely and willingly undertakes to answer for another An illustrious instance hereof we have in that passage of the Apostle unto Philemon in the behalf of Onesimus ver 18. If he have wronged the or oweth thee
in the behalf of another whose Ability or Reputation is dubious are ad me recipio facâ—et aut faciam And when 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is taken adjectively as sometimes it signifies satisdationibus obnoxius liable to payments for others that are non-solvent 2. God can therefore have no surety properly because there can be no Imagination of any defect on his part There may be indeed a Question whether any Word or Promise be a Word or Promise of God To assure us hereof it is not the Work of a surety but only any one or any means that may give evidence that so it is that is of a Witness But upon a supposition that what is proposed in his Word or Promise there can be no Imagination or fear of any defect on his part so as that there should be any need of a surety for the performance of it He doth therefore make use of Witnesses to confirm his Word that is to testifie that such Promises he hath made and so he will do So the Lord Christ was his Witness Isa. 43.10 Ye are my Witnesses saith the Lord and my Servant whom I have chosen But they were not all his sureties So he affirms that he came into the World to bear witness unto the Truth Joh. 18.37 that is the Truth of the Promises of God for he was the Minister of the Circumcision for the Truth of the Promises of God unto the Fathers Rom. 15.8 But a surety for God properly so called he was not nor could be The distance and difference is wide enough between a witness and a surety For a surety must be of more Ability or more Credit and Reputation than he or those for whom he is a surety or there is no need of his suretiship or at least he must add unto their credit and make it better than without him This none can be for God no not the Lord Christ himself who in his whole work was the Servant of the Father And the Apostle doth not use this word in general improper sense for any one that by any means gives Assurance of any other thing for so he had ascribed nothing peculiar unto Christ. For in such a sense all the Prophets and Apostles were sureties for God and many of them confirmed the Truth of his Word and Promises with the laying down of their lives But such a surety he intends as undertaketh to do that for others which they cannot do for themselves or at least are not reputed to be able to do what is required of them 3. The Apostle had before at large declared who and what was Gods surety in this mattter of the Covenant and how impossible it was that he should have any other And this was himself alone interposing himself by his Oath For in this cause because he had none greater to swear by he sware by himself chap. 6.13 14. Wherefore if God would give any other surety besides himself it must be one greater than He. This being every way impossible he swears by himself only Many ways he may and doth use for the declaring and testifying of his Truth unto us that we may know and believe it to be his Word and so the Lord Christ in his Ministry was the principal witness of the Truth of God But other surety than himself he can have none And therefore 4. When he would have us in this matter not only come unto the full Assurance of Faith concerning his Promises but also to have strong consolation therein he resolves it wholly into the Immutability of his counsel as declared by his Promise and Oath chap. 6.18 19. So that neither is God capable of having any surety properly so called neither do we stand in need of any on his part for the confirmation of our Faith in the highest degree 5. We on all accounts stand in need of a surety for us or on our behalf Neither without the Interposition of such a surety could any Covenant between God and us be firm and stable or an everlasting Covenant ordered in all things and sure In the first Covenant made with Adam there was no surety but God and men were the immediate Covenanters And although we were then in a state and condition able to perform and answer all the Terms of the Covenant yet was it broken and disannulled If this came to pass by the failure of the Promise of God it was necessary that on the making of a new Covenant he should have a surety to undertake for him that the Covenant might be stable and everlasting But this is false and blasphemous to imagine It was man alone who failed and broke that Covenant Wherefore it was necessary that upon the making of the New Covenant and that with a design and purpose that it should never be disannulled as the former was that we should have a surety and undertaker for us For if that first Covenant was not firm and stable because there was no surety to undertake for us notwithstanding all that Ability which we had to answer the terms of it how much less can any other be so now our Natures are become depraved and sinful Wherefore we alone were capable of a surety properly so called for us we alone stood in need of him and without him the Covenant could not be firm and inviolate on our parts The surety therefore of this Covenant is so with God for us 6. It is the Priesthood of Christ that the Apostle treats of in this place and that alone Wherefore he is a surety as he is a Priest and in the discharge of that Office and therefore is so with God on our behalf This Schlictingius observes and is aware what will ensue against his pretensions which he endeavours to obviate Mirum saith he porro alicui videri posset cur Divinus Author de Christi sacerdotio in superioribus in sequentibus agens derepente eum sponsorem foederis non vero sacerdotem vocet Cur non dixerit tanto praestantioris foederis factus est sacerdos Jesus hoc enim plane requirere videtur totus orationis contextus Credibile est in voce sponsionis sacerdotium quoque Christi intelligi Sponsoris enim non est alieno nomine quippiam promittere fidem suam pro alio interponere sed etiam si ita res ferat alterius nomine id quod spopondit praestare In rebus quidem humanis si id non praestet is pro quo sponsor fidejussit hic vero propter contrariam causam nam prior hic locum habere non potest nempe quatenus ille pro quo spopondit Christus per ipsum Christum promissa sua nobis exhibet qua in re praecipue Christi sacerdotium continetur Ans. 1 It may indeed seem strange unto any one who imagineth Christ to be such a surety as he doth why the Apostle should so call him and so introduce him in the Description of his Priestly Office as that which belongeth thereunto But
However I know not of any that say we are accounted of God in Judgment personally to have done what Christ did and it may have a sense that is false namely that God should judge us in our own persons to have done those Acts which we never did But what Christ did for us and in our stead is imputed and communicated unto us as we coalesce into one mystical person with him by Faith and thereon are we justified And this absolutely overthrows all Justification by the Law or the Works of it though the Law be established fulfilled and accomplished that we may be justified Neither can any on the supposition of the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ truly stated be said to merit their own Salvation Satisfaction and Merit are Adjuncts of the Righteousness of Christ as formally inherent in his own person and as such it cannot be transfused into another Wherefore as it is imputed unto individual Believers it hath not those properties accompanying of it which belong only unto its existence in the person of the Son of God But this was spoken unto before as much also of what was necessary to be here repeated These Objections I have in this place taken notice of because the answers given unto them do tend to the farther explanation of that Truth whose confirmation by Arguments and Testimonies of Scripture I shall now proceed unto CHAP. X. Arguments for Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. The first Argument from the Nature and Vse of our own Personal Righteousness THere is a Justification of convinced sinners on their Believing Hereon are their sins pardoned their persons accepted with God and a Right is given unto them unto the Heavenly Inheritance This state they are immediately taken into upon their Faith or Believing in Jesus Christ. And a state it is of actual peace with God These things at present I take for granted and they are the Foundation of all that I shall plead in the present Argument And I do take notice of them because some seem to the best of my understanding to deny any real actual Justification of sinners on their Believing in this life For they make Justification to be only a general conditional sentence declared in the Gospel which as unto its Execution is delayed unto the day of Judgment For whilst men are in this world the whole Condition of it being not fulfilled they cannot be partakers of it or be actually and absolutely justified Hereon it follows that indeed there is no real state of assured Rest and Peace with God by Jesus Christ for any persons in this life This at present I shall not dispute about because it seems to me to overthrow the whole Gospel the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ and all the comfort of Believers about which I hope we are not as yet called to contend Our Enquiry is how convinced sinners do on their Believing obtain the Remission of sins Acceptance with God and a Right unto Eternal Life And if this can no other way be done but by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ unto them then thereby alone are they justified in the sight of God And this Assertion proceedeth on a supposition that there is a Righteousness required unto the Justification of any person whatever For whereas God in the Justification of any person doth declare him to be acquitted from all crimes laid unto his charge and to stand as Righteous in his sight it must be on the consideration of a Righteousness whereon any man is so acquitted and declared for the Judgment of God is according unto Truth This we have sufficiently evidenced before in that juridical procedure wherein the Scripture represents unto us the Justification of a Believing sinner And if there be no other Righteousness whereby we may be thus justified but only that of Christ imputed unto us then thereby must we be justified or not at all And if there be any such other Righteousness it must be our own inherent in us and wrought out by us For these two kinds inherent and imputed Righteousness our own and Christs divide the whole nature of Righteousness as to the End enquired after And that there is no such inherent Righteousness no such Righteousness of our own whereby we may be justified before God I shall prove in the first place And I shall do it first from express Testimonies of Scripture and then from the consideration of the thing it self And two things I shall premise hereunto 1. That I shall not consider this Righteousness of our own absolutely in it self but as it may be conceived to be improved and advanced by its Relation unto the satisfaction and merit of Christ For many will grant that our inherent Righteousness is not of it self sufficient to justifie us in the sight of God But take it as it hath value and worth communicated unto it from the merit of Christ and so it is accepted unto that End and judged worthy of Eternal Life We could not merit Life and Salvation had not Christ merited that Grace for us whereby we may do so and merited also that our Works should be of such a Dignity with respect unto Reward We shall therefore allow what worth can be reasonably thought to be communicated unto this Righteousness from its respect unto the Merit of Christ. 2. Whereas persons of all sorts and parties do take various ways in the assignation of an interest in our Justification unto our own Righteousness so as that no parties are agreed about it nor many of the same mind among themselves as might easily be manifested in the Papists Socinians and others I shall so far as it is possible in the ensuing Arguments have respect unto them all For my design is to prove that it hath no such Interest in our Justification before God as that the Righteousness of Christ should not be esteemed the only Righteousness whereon we are justified And first we shall produce some of those many Testimonies which may be pleaded unto this purpose Psal. 130.3 4. If thou Lord shouldst mark Iniquities O Lord who should stand But there is Forgiveness with thee that thou maist be feared There is an Enquiry included in these words how a man how any man may be justified before God how he may stand that is in the presence of God and be accepted with him How he shall stand in Judgment as it is explained Psal. 1.5 The wicked shall not stand in the Judgment shall not be acquitted on their Trial. That which first offereth it self unto this End is his own Obedience For this the Law requires of him in the first place and this his own Conscience calls upon him for But the Psalmist plainly declares that no man can thence manage a plea for his Justification with any success And the Reason is because notwithstanding the best of the Obedience of the best of men there are Iniquities found with them against the Lord
mortification of sin nor of growth in Grace And indeed this is the only rational pretence of ascribing our Justification before God thereunto For were it so with any what should hinder him from being justified thereon before God but only that he hath been a sinner which spoils the whole market But this vain Imagination is so contrary unto the Scripture and the Experience of all that know the Terrour of the Lord and what it is to walk humbly before him as that I shall not insist on the Refutation of it 2. It is pleaded that although this Righteousness be not an exact fulfilling of the moral Law yet is it the Accomplishment of the Condition of the New Covenant or entirely answereth the Law of Grace and all that is required of us therein Ans. 1. This wholly takes away sin and the pardon of it no less then doth the conceit of sinless perfections which we now rejected For if our Obedience do answer the only Law and Rule of it whereby it is to be tried measured and judged then is there no sin in us nor need of pardon No more is required of any man to keep him absolutely free from sin but that he fully answer and exactly comply with the Rule and Law of his Obedience whereby he must be judged On this supposition therefore there is neither sin nor any need of the pardon of it To say that there is still both sin and need of pardon with respect unto the moral Law of God is to confess that Law to be the Rule of our Obedience which this Righteousness doth no way answer and therefore none by it can be justified in the sight of God 2. Although this Righteousness be accepted in justified persons by the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ yet consider the principle of it with all the Acts and Duties wherein it doth consist as they are required and prescribed in the Gospel unto us and they do neither joyntly nor severally fulfil and and answer the commands of the Gospel no more then they do the commands of the Law Wherefore they cannot all of them constitute a Righteousness consisting in an exact conformity unto the Rules of the Gospel or the Law of it For it is impious to imagine that the Gospel requiring any Duty of us suppose the Love of God doth make any Abatement as unto the matter manner or degrees of perfection in it from what was required by the Law Doth the Gospel require a lower degree of Love to God a less perfect Love than the Law did God forbid The same may be said concerning the inward frame of our natures and all other Duties whatever wherefore although this Righteousness is accepted in justified Persons as God had respect unto Abel and then unto his Offering in the way and unto the ends that shall be afterwards declared yet as it relates unto the commands of the Gospel both it and all the Duties of it are no less imperfect then it would be if it should be left unto its Trial by the Law of Creation only 3. I know not what some men intend On the one hand they affirm that our Lord Jesus Christ hath enlarged and heightened the spiritual sense of the moral Law and not only so but added unto it new precepts of more exact Obedience than it did require But on the other they would have him to have brought down or taken off the Obligation of the Law so as that a man according as he hath adapted it unto the use of the Gospel shall be judged of God to have fulfilled the whole Obedience which it requires who never answered any one precept of it according unto its original sense and obligation For so it must be if this imperfect Righteousness be on any account esteemed a fulfilling of the Rule of our Obedience as that thereon we should be justified in the sight of God 4. This opinion puts an irreconcileable Difference between the Law and the Gospel not to be composed by any distinctions For according unto it God declares by the Gospel a man to be perfectly Righteous justified and blessed upon the consideration of a Righteousness that is imperfect and in the Law he pronounceth every one accursed who continueth not in all things required by it and as they are therein required But it is said that this Righteousness is no otherwise to be considered but as the condition of the new Covenant whereon we obtain Remission of sins on the sole account of the satisfaction of Christ wherein our Justification doth consist Ans. 1. Some indeed do say so but not all not the most not the most learned with whom in this controversie we have to do And in our Pleas for what we believe to be the Truth we cannot always have respect unto every private opinion whereby it is opposed 2 That Justification consists only in the pardon of sin is so contrary to the signification of the Word the constant use of it in the Scripture the common notion of it amongst mankind the sense of men in their own Consciences who find themselves under an Obligation unto Duty and express Testimonies of the Scripture as that I somewhat wonder how it can be pretended But it shall be spoken unto elsewhere 3 If this Righteousness be the fulfilling of the condition of the new Covenant whereon we are justified it must be in it self such as exactly answereth some Rule or Law of Righteousness and so be perfect which it doth not and therefore cannot bear the place of a Righteousness in our Justification 4 That this Righteousness is the condition of our Justification before God or of that interest in the Righteousness of Christ whereby we are justified is not proved nor ever will be I shall briefly add two or three considerations excluding this personal Righteousness from its pretended interest in our Justification and close this Argument 1. That Righteousness which neither answereth the Law of God nor the end of God in our Justification by the Gospel is not that whereon we are Justified But such is this inherent Righteousness of Believers even of the best of them 1 That it answereth not the Law of God hath been proved from its Imperfection Nor will any sober person pretend that it exactly and perfectly fulfills the Law of our Creation And this Law cannot be disanulled whilst the Relation of Creator and Rewarder on the one hand and of Creatures capable of Obedience and Rewards on the other between God and us doth continue Wherefore that which answereth not this Law will not justifie us For God will not abrogate that Law that the Transgressors of it may be justified Do we saith the Apostle by the Doctrine of Justification by Faith without Works make void the Law God forbid yea we establish it Rom. 3.31 2 That we should be justified with respect unto it answereth not the end of God in our Justification by the Gospel For this is to take away all glorying in
ever Wherefore it is only thus far broke as a Covenant that all Mankind having sinned against the Commands of it and so by Guilt with the Impotency unto Obedience which ensued thereon defeated themselves of any Interest in its Promise and possibility of attaining any such interest they cannot have any Benefit by it But as unto its power to oblige all mankind unto Obedience and the unchangeable Truth of its Promises and Threatnings it abideth the same as it was from the Beginning 2 ly Take away this Law and there is left no standard of Righteousness unto mankind no certain boundaries of Good and Evil but those pillars whereon God hath fixed the Earth are left to move and flote up and down like the Isle of Delos in the Sea Some say the Rule of Good and Evil unto men is not this Law in its original constitution but the Light of Nature and the Dictates of Reason If they mean that Light which was primogenial and concreated with our natures and those Dictates of Right and Wrong which Reason originally suggested and approved they only say in other words that this Law is still the unalterable Rule of Obedience unto all mankind But if they intend the remaining Light of Nature that continues in every individual in this depraved state thereof and that under such additional Depravations as Traditions Customs Prejudices and Lusts of all sorts have affixed unto the most there is nothing more irrational and it is that which is charged with no less inconvenience than that it leaves no certain Boundaries of Good and Evil. That which is Good unto one will on this Ground be in its own nature evil unto another and so on the contrary and all the Idolaters that ever were in the World might on this pretence be excused 3 ly Conscience bears witness hereunto There is no Good nor Evil required or forbidden by this Law that upon the Discovery of it any man in the World can perswade or bribe his Conscience not to comply with it in Judgment as unto his concernment therein It will accuse and excuse condemn and free him according to the sentence of this Law let him do what he can to the contrary In brief it is acknowledged that God by virtue of his supream Dominion over all may in some Instances change the nature and order of things so as the Precepts of the Divine Law shall not in them operate in their ordinary efficacy So was it in the case of his command unto Abraham to slay his Son and unto the Israelites to rob the Aegyptians But on a supposition of the continuance of that order of things which this Law is the preservative of such is the intrinsick nature of the Good and Evil commanded and forbidden therein that it is not the subject of divine Dispensation as even the School-men generally grant 10. From what we have discoursed two things do unavoidably ensue 1. That whereas all mankind have by sin fallen under the Penalty threatned unto the Transgression of this Law and suffering of this Penalty which is Eternal Death being inconsistent with Acceptance before God or the enjoyment of Blessedness it is utterly impossible that any one individual person of the posterity of Adam should be justified in the sight of God accepted with him or blessed by him unless this Penalty be answered undergone and suffered by them or for them the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 herein is not to be abolished but established 2. That unto the same End of Acceptation with God Justification before him and Blessedness from him the Righteousness of this Eternal Law must be fulfilled in us in such a way as that in the Judgment of God which is according unto Truth we may be esteemed to have fulfilled it and be dealt with accordingly For upon a supposition of a failure herein the sanction of the Law is not Arbitrary so as that the Penalty may or may not be inflicted but necessary from the Righteousness of God as the supream Governour of all 11. About the first of these our Controversie is with the Socinians only who deny the satisfaction of Christ and any necessity thereof Concerning this I have treated elsewhere at large and expect not to see an Answer unto what I have disputed on that Subject As unto the latter of them we must enquire how we may be supposed to comply with the Rule and answer the Righteousness of this unalterable Law whose Authority we can no way be exempted from And that which we plead is that the Obedience and Righteousness of Christ imputed unto us His Obedience as the surety of the New Covenant granted unto us made ours by the gracious Constitution Soveraign Appointment and Donation of God is that whereon we are judged and esteemed to have answered the Righteousness of the Law By the Obedience of One many are made Righteous Rom. 5.19 That the Righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us Rom. 8.4 And hence we argue If there be no other way whereby the Righteousness of the Law may be fulfilled in us without which we cannot be justified but must fall inevitably under the Penalty threatned unto the Transgression of it but only the Righteousness of Christ imputed unto us then is that the sole Righteousness whereby we are justified in the sight of God But the former is true and so therefore is the latter 12. On the supposition of this Law and its original obligation unto Obedience with its Sanction and Threatnings there can be but one of three ways whereby we may come to be justified before God who have sinned and are no way able in our selves to perform the Obedience for the future which it doth require And each of them have a respect unto a Soveraign Act of God with reference unto this Law The first is the Abrogation of it that it should no more oblige us either unto Obedience or Punishment This we have proved impossible and they will wofully deceive their own Souls who shall trust unto it The second is by transferring of its Obligation unto the End of Justification on a surety or common undertaker This is that which we plead for as the substance of the mystery of the Gospel considering the Person and Grace of this Undertakers or Surety And herein all things do tend unto the Exaltation of the Glory of God in all the holy properties of his nature with the fulfilling and establishing of the Law it self Math. 5.17 Rom. 3.31 chap. 8.4 chap. 10.3 4. The third way is by an Act of God towards the Law and another towards us whereby the nature of the Righteousness which the Law requireth is changed which we shall examine as the only reserve against our present Argument 3. It is said therefore that by our own personal Obedience we do answer the Righteousness of the Law so far as it is required of us But whereas no sober person can imagine that we can or that any one in our lapsed
of God Wherefore by an Act of Derogation from its Original power it is provided that it shall oblige us still unto Obedience but not that which is absolutely sinless and perfect but although it be performed with less intension of Love unto God or in a lower Degree then it did at first require so it be sincere and universal as unto all the parts of it it is all that the Law now requireth of us This is all that it now requires as it is adapted unto the service of the new Covenant and made the Rule of Obedience according to the Law of Christ. Hereby is its preceptive part so far as we are concerned in it answered and complied withall Whether these things are so or no we shall see immediately in a few words 18. Hence it follows that the act of God with respect unto our Obedience is not an act of Judgment according unto any Rule or Law of his own but an Acceptilation or an esteeming accounting accepting that as perfect or in the Room of that which is perfect which really and in truth is not so 19. It is added that both these depend on and are the procurements of the Obedience suffering and merits of Christ. For on their account it is that our weak and imperfect Obedience is accepted as if it were perfect and the power of the Law to require Obedience absolutely perfect is taken away And these being the effects of the Righteousness of Christ that Righteousness may on their account and so far be said to be imputed unto us 20. But notwithstanding the great endeavours that have been used to give a colour of Truth unto these things they are both of them but fictions and imaginations of men that have no ground in the Scripture nor do comply with the experience of them that believe For to touch a little on the latter in the first place There is no true Believer but hath these two things fixed in his mind and conscience 1. That there is nothing in principles habits qualities oractions wherein he comes short of a perfect compliance with the Holy Law of God even as it required perfect Obedience but that it hath in it the nature of sin and that in it self deserving the Curse annexed Originally unto the breach of that Law They do no therefore apprehend that its Obligation is taken off weakned or derogated from in any thing 2 That there is no Relief for him with respect unto what the Law requires or unto what it threatens but by the Mediation of Jesus Christ alone who of God is made Righteousness unto him Wherefore they do not rest in or on the acceptation of their own Obedience such as it is to answer the Law but trust unto Christ alone for their acceptation with God 21. They are both of them doctrinally untrue For as unto the former 1 It is unwritten There is no Intimation in the Scripture of any such Dispensation of God with reference unto the Original Law of Obedience Much is spoken of our Deliverance from the Curse of the Law by Christ but of the Abatement of its preceptive power nothing at all 2 It is contrary to the Scripture For it is plainly affirmed that the Law is not to be abolished but fulfilled not to be made void but to be established that the Righteousness of it must be fulfilled in us 3 It is a supposition both unreasonable and impossible For 1 the Law was a Representation unto us of the Holiness of God and his Righteousness in the Government of his Creatures There can be no Alteration made herein seeing with God himself there is no variableness nor shadow of changing 2 It would leave no standard of Righteousness but only a Lesbian Rule which turns and apply's it self unto the light and abilities of men and leaves at least as many various measures of Righteousness as there are Believers in the World 3 It includes a variation in the center of all Religion which is the natural and moral Relation of men unto God For so there must be if all that was once necessary thereunto do not still continue so to be 4 It is dishonourable unto the mediation of Christ. For it makes the principal end of it to be that God should accept of a Righteousness unto our Justification inexpressibly beneath that which he required in the Law of our Creation And this in a sense makes him the Minister of sin or that he hath procured an Indulgence unto it not by the way of satisfaction and pardon whereby he takes away the guilt of it from the Church but by taking from it its nature and demerit so as that what was so originally should not continue so to be or at least not to deserve the punishment it was first threatned withal 5 It reflects on the goodness of God himself For on this supposition that he hath reduced his Law into that state and order as to be satisfied by an observation of it so weak so imperfect accompanied with so many failures and sins as it is with the Obedience of the best men in this World whatever thoughts unto the contrary the Phrensie of Pride may suggest unto the minds of any what reason can be given consistent with his goodness why he should give a Law at first of perfect Obedience which one sin laid all mankind under the penalty of unto their Ruine 22. All these things and sundry others of the same kind do follow also on the second supposition of an Acceptilation or an Imaginary estimation of that as perfect which is imperfect as sinless which is attended with sins innumerable But the Judgment of God is according unto Truth neither will he reckon that unto us for a perfect Righteousness in his sight which is so imperfect as to be like tattered Rags especially having promised unto us Robes of Righteousness and Garments of Salvation That which necessarily followeth on these Discourses is That there is no other way whereby the original immutable Law of God may be established and fulfilled with respect unto us but by the Imputation of the perfect Obedience and Righteousness of Christ who is the end of the Law for Righteousness unto all that do believe CHAP. XII The Imputation of the Obedience of Christ unto the Law Declared and Vindicated FRom the foregoing General Argument another doth issue in Particular with respect unto the Imputation of the Active Obedience or Righteousness of Christ unto us as an Essential part of that Righteousness whereon we are justified before God And it is as followeth If it were necessary that the Lord Christ as our Surety should undergo the penalty of the Law for us or in our stead because we have all sinned then it was necessary also that as our Surety he should yield obedience unto the preceptive part of the Law for us also And if the Imputation of the former be needful for us unto our Justification before God then is the Imputation of the latter
Heb. 6.18 Who have fled for Refuge to lay hold on the hope set before us Prov. 18.10 Hence some have defined Faith to be perfugium animae the flight of the Soul unto Christ for Deliverance from Sin and Misery And much light is given unto the Understanding of the thing intended thereby For herein it is supposed that he who believeth is antecedently thereunto convinced of his lost condition and that if he abide therein he must perish eternally that he hath nothing of himself whereby he may be delivered from it that he must betake himself unto somewhat else for Relief that unto this end he considereth Christ as set before him and proposed unto him in the Promise of the Gospel that he judgeth this to be an holy a safe way for his Deliverance and Acceptance with God as that which hath the Characters of all Divine Excellencies upon it hereon he flyeth unto it for Refuge that is with diligence and speed that he perish not in his present Condition he betakes himself unto it by placing his whole Trust and Affiance thereon And the whole Nature of our Justification by Christ is better declared hereby unto the supernatural Sense and Experience of Believers than by an hundred Philosophical Disputations about it 5. The Terms and Notions by which it is expressed under the Old Testament are leaning on God Micah 3.11 or Christ Cant. 8.5 rolling or casting our selves and our burthen on the Lord Psal. 22.8 Psal. 37.5 The Wisdom of the Holy Ghost in which Expressions hath by some been prophanely derided Resting on God or in him 2 Chron. 14.11 Psal. 37.7 Cleaving unto the Lord Deut. 4.4 Acts 11.15 as also by Trusting Hoping and Waiting in Places innumerable And it may be observed that those who acted Faith as it is thus expressed do every where declare themselves to be lost hopeless helpless desolate poor Orphans whereon they place all their hope and expectation on God alone All that I would infer from these things is that the Faith whereby we believe unto the Justification of life or which is required of us in a way of Duty that we may be justified is such an Act of the whole Soul whereby convinced Sinners do wholly go out of themselves to rest upon God in Christ for Mercy Pardon Life Righteousness and Salvation with an acquiescency of Heart therein which is the whole of the Truth pleaded for CHAP. XVI The Truth pleaded farther confirmed by Testimonies of Scripture Jer. 23.6 THat which we now proceed unto is the consideration of those Express Testimonies of Scripture which are given unto the Truth pleaded for and especially of those places where the Doctrine of the Justification of Sinners is expresly and designedly handled From them it is that we must learn the Truth and into them must our Faith be resolved unto whose Authority all the arguings and Objections of men must give place By them is more light conveyed into the understandings of Believers than by the most subtle Disputations And it is a thing not without scandal to see among Protestants whole Books written about Justification wherein scarce one Testimony of Scripture is produced unless it be to find out Evasions from the force of them And in particular whereas the Apostle Paul hath most fully and expresly as he had the greatest occasion so to do declared and vindicated the Doctrine of Evangelical Justification not a few in what they write about it are so far from declaring their Thoughts and Faith concerning it out of his Writings as that they begin to reflect upon them as obscure and such as give occasion unto dangerous mistakes and unless as was said to answer and except against them upon their own corrupt Principles seldom or never make mention of them As though we were grown wiser than he or that Spirit whereby he was inspired guided acted in all that he wrote But there can be nothing more Alien from the genius of Christian Religion than for us not to endeavour humbly to learn the Mystery of the Grace of God herein in the Declaration of it made by him But the foundation of God standeth sure what course soever men shall be pleased to take into their Profession of Religion For the Testimonies which I shall produce and insist upon I desire the Reader to observe 1. That they are but some of the many that might be pleaded unto the same purpose 2. That those which have been or yet shall be alledged on particular occasions I shall wholly omit and such are most of them that are given unto this Truth in the Old Testament 3. That in the Exposition of them I shall with what diligence I can attend 1. Unto the Analogy of Faith that is the manifest scope and design of the Revelation of the Mind and will of God in the Scripture And that this is to exalt the Freedom and riches of his own Grace the Glory and Excellency of Christ and his Mediation to discover the woful lost forlorn condition of man by Sin to debase and depress every thing that is in and of our selves as to the attaining Life Righteousness and Salvation cannot be denied by any who have their senses exercised in the Scriptures 2. Unto the Experience of them that do believe with the condition of them who seek after Justification by Jesus Christ. In other things I hope the best helps and Rules of the interpretation of the Scripture shall not be neglected There is weight in this case deservedly laid on the name of the Lord Jesus Christ the Son of God as promised and given unto us namely the Lord our Righteousness Jer. 23.6 As the name Jehovah being given and ascribed unto him is a full indication of his Divine person so the addition of his being our Righteousness sufficiently declares that in and by him alone we have Righteousness or are made righteous So was he typed by Melchisedec as first the King of Righteousness then the King of Peace Heb. 7.2 For by his Righteousness alone have we Peace with God Some of the Socinians would evade this Testimony by observing that Righteousness in the Old Testament is used sometimes for Benignity Kindness and Mercy and so they suppose it may be here But the most of them avoiding the palpable absurdity of this imagination refer it to the Righteousness of God in deliverance and vindication of his people So Brennius briefly Ita vocatur quia Dominus per manum ejus judicium justitiam faciet Israeli But these are evasions of bold men who care not so they may say somewhat whether what they say be agreeable to the Analogy of Faith or the plain words of the Scripture Bellarmine who was more wary to give some appearance of Truth unto his answers first gives other reasons why he is called the Lord our Righteousness and then whether unawares or over-powered by the evidence of Truth grants that sense of the words which contains the whole of the cause we plead
much more as it includeth Obedience in it is a Work and in the later sense it is all Works And in the ensuing Context he proves that Abraham was not justified by Works But not to be justified by Works and to be justified by some Works as Faith it self is a Work and if as such it be imputed unto us for Righteousness we are justified by it as such are contradictory Wherefore I shall oppose some few Arguments unto this feigned sense of the Apostles words 1. To believe absolutely as Faith is an Act and Duty of of ours and Works are not opposed for Faith is a Work an especial kind of Working But Faith as we are justified by it and Works or to Work are opposed To him that worketh not but believeth So Gal. 2.16 Eph. 2.8 2. It is the Righteousness of God that is imputed unto us For we are made the Righteousness of God in Christ 2 Cor. 5.21 The Righteousness of God upon them that believe Rom. 3.21 22. But Faith absolutely considered is not the Righteousness of God God imputeth unto us Righteousness without Works Rom. 4.16 But there is no intimation of a double Imputation of two sorts of Righteousnesses of the Righteousness of God and that which is not so Now Faith absolutely considered is not The Righteousness of God For 1. That whereunto the Righteousness of God is revealed whereby we believe and receive it is not its self the Righteousness of God For nothing can be the cause or means of of it self But the Righteousness of God is revealed unto Faith Rom. 1.16 And by it is it received Rom. 3.22 Chap. 5.11 2. Faith is not the Righteousness of God which is by Faith But the Righteousness of God which is imputed unto us is the Righteousness of God which is by Faith Rom. 3.22 Phil. 3.9 3. That whereby the Righteousness of God is to be sought obtained and submitted unto is not that Righteousness it self But such is Faith Rom. 9.30 31. Chap. 10.30 4. The Righteousness which is imputed unto us is not our own antecedently unto that Imputation That I may be found in him not having my own Righteousness Phil. 3.9 But Faith is a mans own Shew me thy Faith I will shew thee my Faith Jam. 2.18 5. God imputeth Righteousness unto us Rom. 4.6 And that Righteousness which God imputeth unto us is the Righteousness whereby we are justified for it is imputed unto us that we may be justified But we are justified by the Obedience and Blood of Christ. By the Obedience of one we are made Righteous Rom. 5.19 Much more now being justified by his Blood v. 9. He hath put away Sin by the Sacrifice of himself Heb. 9.26 Isai. 53.11 By his knowledg shall my righteous Servant justifie many for he shall bear their Iniquities But Faith is neither the Obedience nor the Blood of Christ. 6. Faith as we said before is our own And that which is our own may be imputed unto us But the discourse of the Apostle is about that which is not our own antecedently unto Imputation but is made ours thereby as we have proved for it is of Grace And the Imputation of what is really our own unto us antecedently unto that Imputation is not of Grace in the sense of the Apostle For what is so imputed is imputed for what it is and nothing else For that Imputation is but the Judgment of God concerning the thing imputed with respect unto them whose it is So the Fact of Phineas was imputed unto him for Righteousness God judged it and declared it to be a Righteous rewardable act Wherefore if our Faith and Obedience be imputed unto us that Imputation is only the Judgment of God that we are Believers and Obedient The Righteousness of the Righteous saith the Prophet shall be upon him and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him Ezek. 18.20 As the wickedness of the wicked is upon him or is imputed unto him so the Righteousness of the Righteous is upon him or is imputed unto him And the wickedness of the wicked is on him when God judgeth him wicked as his Works are So is the Righteousness of a man upon him or imputed unto him when God judgeth of his Righteousness as it is Wherefore if Faith absolutely considered be imputed unto us as it contains in it self or as it is accompanied with Works of Obedience then it is imputed unto us either for a perfect Righteousness which it is not or for an imperfect Righteousness which it is or the Imputation of it is the accounting of that to be a perfect Righteousness which is but imperfect but none of these can be affirmed 1. It is not imputed unto us for a perfect Righteousness the Righteousness required by the Law for so it is not Episcopius confesseth in his disputation Disput. 43. § 7 8. that the Righteousness which is imputed unto us must be absolutissima perfectissima most absolute and most perfect And thence he thus defineth the Imputation of Righteousness unto us name y that it is gratiosa Divinae mentis aestimatio qua credentem in filium suum eo loco reputat ac si perfecte justus esset ac legi voluntati ejus per omnia semper paruisset And no man will pretend that Faith is such a most absolute and most perfect righteousness as that by it the Righteousness of the Law should be fulfilled in us as it is by that Righteousness which is imputed unto us 2. It is not imputed unto us for what it is an imperfect Righteousness For 1. This would be of no advantage unto us For we cannot be justified before God by an imperfect Righteousness as is evident in the Prayer of the Psalmist Psal. 143.2 Enter not into judgment with thy servant for in thy sight no man living no Servant of thine who hath the most perfect or highest measure of imperfect Righteousness shall be justified 2. The Imputation of any thing unto us that was ours antecedently unto that Imputation for what it is and no more is contrary unto the Imputation described by the Apostle as hath been proved 3. This Imputation pleaded for cannot be a judging of that to be a perfect Righteousness which is imperfect For the Judgment of God is according to Truth But without judging it to be such it cannot be accepted as such To accept of any thing but only for what we judg it to be is to be deceived Lastly if Faith as a Work be imputed unto us then it must be as a Work wrought in Faith For no other Work is accepted with God Then must that Faith also wherein it is wrought be imputed unto us for that also is Faith and a good Work That therefore must have another Faith from whence it must proceed And so in infinitum Many other things there are in the ensuing Explication of the Justification of Abraham the nature of his Faith and his Righteousness before God with the
The next place I shall consider in the Epistle of this Apostle is 1 Cor. 1.30 But of him are ye in Christ Jesus who of God is made unto us Wisdom and Righteousness and Sanctification and Redemption The design of the Apostle in these words is to manifest that whatever is wanting unto us on any account that we may please God live unto him and come to the injoyment of him that we have in and by Jesus Christ And this on the part of God from meer free and sovereign Grace as Ver. 26 27 28 29. do declare And we have all these things by vertue of our insition or implantation in him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from of or by him He by his Grace is the principal efficient cause hereof And the effect is that we in Christ Jesus that is ingrafted in him or united unto him as Members of his Mystical Body which is the constant sense of that expression in the Scripture And the benefits which we receive hereby are enumerated in the following words But first the way whereby we are made partakers of them or they are communicated unto us is declared who of God is made unto us It is so ordained of God that he himself shall be made or become all this unto us 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 denotes the efficient cause as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 did before But how is Christ thus made unto us of God or what act of God is it that is intended thereby Socinus says it is a General act of the providence of God whence it is come to pass or is so faln out that one way or other the Lord Christ should be said to be all this unto us But it is an especial Ordinance and Institution of Gods sovereign Grace and Wisdom designing Christ to be all this unto us and for us with actual Imputation thereon and nothing else that is intended Whatever interest therefore we have in Christ and what ever benefit we have by him it all depends on the sovereign Grace and constitution of God and not on any thing in our selves Whereas then we have no Righteousness of our own he is appointed of God to be our Righteousness and is made so unto us which can be no otherwise but that his Righteousness is made ours For he is made it unto us as he is likewise the other things mentioned so as that all boasting that is in our selves should be utterly excluded and that he that glorieth should glory in the Lord Ver. 29 31. Now there is such a Righteousness or such a way of being righteous whereon we may have somewhat to Glory Rom 4.2 And which doth not exclude boasting Chap. 3.27 And this cannot possibly be but when our Righteousness is inherent in us For that however it may be procured or purchased or wrought in us is yet our own so far as any thing can be our own whilest we are Creatures This kind of Righteousness therefore is here excluded And the Lord Christ being so made Righteousness unto us of God as that all boasting and glorying on our part or in our selves may be excluded yea being made so for this very end that so it should be it can be no otherwise but by the Imputation of his Righteousness unto us For thereby is the Grace of God the honor of his Person and Mediation exalted and all occasion of glorying in our selves utterly prescinded We desire no more from this testimony but that whereas we are in our selves destitute of all Righteousness in the sight of God Christ is by a gracious act of Divine Imputation made of God Righteousness unto us in such a way as that all our glorying ought to be in the Grace of God and the Righteousness of Christ himself Bellarmine attempts three Answers unto this Testimony the two first whereof are coincident and in the third being on the rack of Light and Truth he confesseth and grants all that we plead for 1. He says That Christ is said to be our Righteousness because he is the efficient cause of it as God is said to be our strength and so there is in the words a Metonymy of the effect for the cause And I say it is true That the Lord Christ by his Spirit is the efficient cause of our Personal Inherent Righteousness By his Grace it is effected and wrought in us he renews our natures into the Image of God and without him we can do nothing So that our habitual and actual Rightousness is from him But this Personal Righteousness is our Sanctification and nothing else And although the same internal habit of Inherent Grace with operations suitable thereunto be sometimes called our Sanctification and sometimes our Righteousness with respect unto those operations yet is it never distinguished into our Sanctification and our Righteousness But his being made Righteousness unto us in this place is absolutely distinct from his being made Sanctification unto us which is that Inherent Righteousness which is wrought in us by the Spirit and Grace of Christ. And his working Personal Righteousness in us which is our Sanctification and the Imputation of his Righteousness unto us whereby we are made righteous before God are not only consistent but the one of them cannot be without the other 2. He pleads That Christ is said to be made Righteousness unto us as he is made Redemption Now he is our Redemption because he hath redeemed us So is he said to be made Righteousness unto us because by him we become righteous or as another speaks Because by him alone we are justified This is the same plea with the former namely that there is a metonymy of the effect for the cause in all these expressions yet what cause they intend it to be who expound the words By him alone we are justified I do not understand But Bellarmine is approaching yet nearer the Truth for as Christ is said to be made of God Redemption unto us because by his Blood we are redeemed or freed from Sin Death and Hell by the ransome he paid for us or have redemption through his Blood even the forgiveness of sins So he is said to be made Righteousness unto us because through his Righteousness granted unto us of God as Gods making him to be Righteousness unto us and our becoming the Righteousness of God in him and the Imputation of his Righteousness unto us that we may be righteous before God are the same we are justified His third answer as was before observed grants the whole of what we plead For it is the same which he gives unto Jere. 23.6 which place he conjoyns with this as of the same sense and importance giving up his whole cause in satisfaction unto them in the words before transcribed Lib. 2. cap. 10. Socinus Prefaceth his Answer unto this Testimony with an Admiration That any should make use of it or plead it in this cause it is so impertinent unto the purpose And
Righteous and the Sons of God then may Christ by the imputation of our unrighteousness be said to be a sinner and a child of the Devil Ans. 1 That which the Scripture affirms concerning the imputation of our sins unto Christ is that he was made sin for us This the Greek Expositors Chrysostome Theophylact and Oecumenius with many others take for a sinner But all affirm that denomination to be taken from imputation only he had sin imputed unto him and underwent the punishment due unto it as we have Righteousness imputed unto us and enjoy the benefit of it 2 The imputation of sin unto Christ did not carry along with it any thing of the pollution or filth of sin to be communicated unto him by transfusion a thing impossible so that no denomination can thence arise which should include in it any respect unto them A thought hereof is impious and dishonourable unto the Son of God But his being made sin through the imputation of the guilt of sin is his honour and glory 3 The imputation of the sin of Fornicators Idolaters Adulterers c. such as the Corinthians were before their Conversion unto Christ doth not on any ground bring him under a denomination from those sins For they were so in themselves actively inherently subjectively and thence were so called But that he who knew no sin voluntarily taking on him to answer for the guilt of those sins which in him was an act of Righteousness and the highest Obedience unto God should be said to be an Idolater c. is a fond imagination The denomination of a sinner from sin inherent actually committed defiling the Soul is a reproach and significative of the utmost unworthiness But even the denomination of a sinner by the imputation of sin without the least personal guilt or defilement being undergone by him unto whom it is imputed in an act of the highest Obedience and tending unto the greatest glory of God is highly honourable and glorious But 4 The imputation of sin unto Christ was antecedent unto any real union between him and sinners whereon he took their sin on him as he would and for what ends he would But the imputation of his Righteousness unto Believers is consequential in order of nature unto their union with him whereby it becomes theirs in a peculiar manner so as that there is not a parity of reason that he should be esteemed a sinner as that they should be accounted Righteous And 5 we acquiesce in this that on the imputation of sin unto Christ it is said that God made him to be sin for us which he could not be but thereby and he was so by an act transient in its effects for a time only that time wherein he underwent the punishment due unto it But on the imputation of his Righteousness unto us we are made the Righteousness of God with an everlasting Righteousness that abides ours always 6 To be a child of the Devil by sin is to do the works of the Devil Joh. 8.44 But the Lord Christ in taking our sins upon him when imputed unto him did the work of God in the highest act of holy Obedience evidencing himself to be the Son of God thereby and destroying the work of the Devil So foolish and impious is it to conceive that any absolute change of state or relation in him did ensue thereon That by the Righteousness of God in this place our own Faith and Obedience according to the Gospel as some would have it are intended is so alien from the scope of the place and sense of the words as that I shall not particularly examine it The Righteousness of God is revealed to Faith and received by Faith and is not therefore Faith it self And the force of the Antithesis is quite perverted by this conceit For where is it in this that he was made sin by the imputation of our sin unto him and we are made Righteousness by the imputation of our own Faith and Obedience unto our selves But as Christ had no concern in sin but as God made him sin it was never in him inherently so have we no interest in this Righteousness it is not in us inherently but only is imputed unto us Besides the act of God in making us righteous is his justifying of us But this is not by the infusion of the habit of Faith and Obedience as we have proved And what act of God is intended by them who affirm That the Righteousness of God which we are made is our own Righteousness I know not The constitution of the Gospel Law it cannot be for that makes no Man righteous And the Persons of Believers are the object of this act of God and that as they are considered in Christ. Gal. 2.16 The Epistle of the same Apostle unto the Galatians is wholly designed unto the vindication of the Doctrine of Justification by Christ without the Works of the Law with the use and means of its improvement The sum of his whole design is laid down in the repetition of his words unto the Apostle Peter on the occasion of his failure there related Chap. 2.86 Knowing that a Man is not justified by the Works of the Law but by the Faith of Jesus Christ even we have believed on Jesus Christ that we might be justified by the Faith of Christ and not by the Works of the Law for by the Works of the Law shall no flesh be justified That which he doth here assert was such a known such a fundamental principle of Truth among all Believers that their conviction and knowledge of it was the ground and occasion of their transition and passing over from Judaism unto the Gospel and Faith in Jesus Christ thereby And in the words the Apostle determines that great inquiry how or by what means a Man is or may be justified before God The subject spoken of is expressed indefinitely A Man that is any Man a Jew or a Gentile a Believer or an Vnbeliever The Apostle that spake and they to whom he spake the Galatians to whom he wrote who also for some time had believed and made Profession of the Gospel The answer given unto the question is both Negative and Positive both asserted with the highest assurance and as the common faith of all Christians but only those who had been carried aside from it by Seducers He asserts that this is not this cannot be by the Works of the Law What is intended by the Law in these disputations of the Apostle hath been before declared and evinced The Law of Moses is sometimes signally intended not absolutely but as it was the present instance of Mens cleaving unto the Law of Righteousness and not submitting themselves thereon unto the Righteousness of God But that the consideration of the Moral Law and the duties of it is in this Argument any where excepted by him is a weak imagination yea it would except the Ceremonial Law it self for the observation of it whilest