be taken away 3 Instance The Scripture a long time not knowen From this verie place may we easily refute that which they obiect That wee our selues in that that we say the Scripture hath not bin vnderstood for these many ages in the Popish Church do confesse the obscuritie of it For the ignorance which hath bin from the beginning of the world and shall bee to the end in the aduersaries of the truth is not to bee imputed to the obscuritie of the Scriptures but to their owne peruersnesse who haue not a desire to know and embrace the truth As the Apostle saith 2 Thes 2. Because they receiued not the loue of the truth that they might bee saued therefore God shall send them strong delusions that they should beleeue lies Whereas therefore it appeareth that the ground and summe of doctrine is not obscure 4 Instance Manie places obscure yet wee confesse that there are some places of Scripture which haue losse light more difficulty then others But first they are such that although they were not vnderstood yet the ground may both stand and be vnderstood Furthermore the interpretation of these places dependeth not of the autority of mē but the exposition of thē is to be sought by the conference of other places of Scripture which are more cleare or if we can not finde it yet least wee should affirme any vncertaine thing concerning diuine matters our conscience not satisfying vs in it wee must suspend our iudgement vntill God shal open vnto vs some certaine meaning and in the mean season wee are to hold those with thankfull mindes in which God hath left no place of doubting for vs. 5 Instance Of the necessity of interpretation Act. 20. But when wee answere thus vnto our aduersaries they rise againe vpon vs out of those thinges which wee grant them For because we confesse that some places of Scripture are harder to be vnderstood then others and that by occasion of the dulnes and slownes of mans minde in learning diuine matters neither those things which are most cleare are vnderstood of the people as the Eunuch of Queene Candaces doth complain How can I saith he except I had a guide And that the ministerie it selfe was therefore ordained of God in the Church for that it seemed good vnto the holy ghost to ad for our instruction an exposition of the Scripture which is done by the voice of the Church To be short because our selues in writing and teaching doe expound the Scriptures and do exhort al men to the reading and hearing the exposition thereof Out of these they conclude that besides the reading of the Scripture the interpretation of the Church is necessarie and that therefore what the Church doth pronounce of the meaning of the Scripture that is without controuersie to be receaued But we first confesse that the interpretation of the scripture is necessarie in the Church not for that without this to come vnto the knowledge of heauenly doctrine is simplie impossible whereas both God is able when it pleaseth him to instruct his euen without the Scripture it selfe much more then without the exposition of his ministers and the godly learne many thinges out of the Scriptures without interpreters and of the contrary side except the eies of our mindes be opened by the grace of the holie spirit heauenly doctrine seemeth alwaies alike obscure vnto vs whether it be expoūded by the word of the Scripture or of the church but for that it pleased God to appoint this ordinarie way of instructing vs and himselfe hath commanded the maintenance and vse of his ministery in the Church that it should be an instrument which the holy Ghost might most freelie vse for our saluation Againe Interpreting must not be a deprauing of the Scriptures although interpretation of scripture be necessarie yet this is so far from graunting anie licence vnto the ministers to bring new ordinances into the Church that nothing doth more tie them to this doctrine alone which is comprehended in the Scriptures then this verie function of expounding the Scriptures For to interpret another mans woordes is not to faine at our pleasure a meaning either diuers from them or repugnant vnto them but to render the same meaning and Sentence either in more words or in more plaine words or at least in such as may be more fit for their capacitie whom wee teach and withal when there is need to shew that this is the mind of the autor which we affirme to be Three points to be obserued in interpreting Now such an interpretation of Scripture is made by these meanes that first the phrase be considered and the proper sense of the woordes found out then that the order and coherence of the members or parts of the doctrine which is conteined in the text of Scripture be declared Thirdly that the doctrine be applied to the vse of the Church which it hath in confirming true opinions or refuting errors in knowing of God and our selues in exhorting in comforting and in directing of our life as Paul commaundeth 2. Tim. 2. Studie to diuide the word of truth aright And to Titus cap. 1. A Bishop must holde fast the faithful word according to doctrine that he also may be able to exhort with wholesome doctrine Lib. 2. conhaereses and improue them that saie against it And wiselie did Epiphanius aduise Not al woords of Scripture haue neede to bee allegorised or construed according to a strange sense but they must be vnderstood as they are and further they require meditation and sense for the vnderstanding of the drift and purpose of euerie argument That is Al places of scripture are not to be transformed into allegories but we must seeke out the proper sense of the words by meditation and sense that is vsing the rules of art and hauing a regard of the propriety of tongues and our own experience by which we know the nature of those things which are signified by words commonly vsed in the Church 6. Inst Concerning the diciding of a controuersie about the text and meaning thereof But here is cast in another difficultie for that in controuersies concerning the text and the meaning thereof such a iudge is required whose authoritie and testimonie may suffice for determining of the meaning of the text For when both parties saie they who striue about the meaning plead ech of them that his interpretation is true except iudgement bee giuen of such a iudge from whom it may not be lawful to make anie appeale the contention wil neuer bee decided and we shal stil remaine doubtful of the sense of the Scripture Furthermore this iudgement must needs belong vnto the Church for in the Church alone we are to seeke for an examining and determining of controuersies concerning Religion What the Church therefore doth pronounce in these matters wee must of necessitie rest vpon that as the assured meaning of the Scriptures And hereof they saie
not knowing the scriptures neither were they the true Church though they seased vpon the name and place of it 2 Answere Vniuersallie Secondly the true Church indeede erreth not vniuersallie For alwaies the light of the truth especially concerning the foundation of doctrine is preserued in some mens minds wherupon the Church is called the pillar and ground of truth But yet neuertheles some also of the godly oftentimes fall into errors through ignorance and infirmitie yet so that they hold the foundation neither doe they defend their erronious opinions contrarie to their conscience and at length they forsake them euen as it is said If anie man builde vpon this foundation gold 1 Cor. 3. Ephes 4. 1 Cor. 12 siluer c. And Philip. 3. If ye bee otherwise minded God shal reueile euen the same vnto you Last of al there is giuen vnto euery man grace according vnto the measure of the gift of Christ And the spirit distributeth to euerie man seuerallie as he wil. The Apostles before they had receiued the holie Ghost at Whitsontide were the liuely members of the Church yet erred they concerning the kingdom office of the Messias There were of the Chiliasts opinion great men in the Church as Pasias Irenaeus Apollinarius Tertullian Victorinus Lactantius Methodius Martyr And therefore although the Church er not vniuersallie yet oftentimes some of her members erre when as they swarue from the woord which God suffereth not seldome to happen vnto them for to keepe vs beeing warned of our weakenes and blindnes in modestie and his true feare and in daily inuocating of him and withal to teach vs that the truth of doctrine is not to be measured by the title of the church but by the woord deliuered of him by the handes of the Prophets and Apostles as it is said Thy woord O Lord is a lanterne vnto my feet Psalm 119. and a light vnto my pathes Likewise 1 Tim. 6. Keepe that which is committed vnto thee and auoid profane and vaine bablinges This ground beeing once laied 7 Obiection The Church ought to obey Bishops by the commandement of God that so far foorth the Church erreth not as it doth not swarue from the written woord of God it is easy to answere to that which they make shew of to the contrarie that the Church is ruled by Bishops and therefore must obey them as it is saied Act. cap. 20. Take heede vnto all the flocke whereof the holy Ghost hath made you ouerseers to gouerne the Church of God And Mat. 18. If hee refuse to heare the Church let him bee vnto thee as an heathen man and a Publicane Luc. 10. Hee that heareth you heareth mee and hee that despiseth you despiseth mee And to the Hebrewes 13. Obey those who beare rule ouer you For both they must rule and the Church must obey them according vnto the prescript of Gods woord as it is said If any man preach any other doctrine let him bee accursed Aunswere Necessarilie in those 〈◊〉 things which belong to the ministery frely in traditions Gal. 1. Whatsoeuer therfore the ministers propound out of the woord of God vnto the Church wee must of necessity obey it that which the Lord teacheth Matt. 23.2 when hee saieth The Scribes the Pharisees sit in Moyses chaire All therefore whatsoeuer they bid you obserue that obserue and doe For they sit in Moses chaire who teach Moses doctrine in the Church If also they ordaine any thinges indifferen◠and of a middle sort which are profitable these also are to be obserued for maintaining of order and auoiding of offence But if they require vs to beleeue or obserue thinges repugnant to the woord of God or thinges that are in their owne nature indifferent with putting an opinion of necessitie in them and of woorshipping of God they sit no longer in Moses chaire but in the chaire of scorners and of them it is said Iohn 10. The sheepe heard them not Likewise 1. Tim. 4. In the latter times some shall depart from the faith and shal giue heed vnto the spirites of error And that the decrees of the Bishops also are not to bee receaued among the precepts and decrees of the Church is confirmed by the example of the ciuill magistrate whose iust good Lawes binde the cōsciences of the subiects 1 Inst For the dissimilitude of the examples consisteth in that that God himselfe by expresse woorde hath decreed a necessitie of obedience to the Lawes and commandements of the ciuil magistrate 1 Instance The magstrate doth bind the consciences therfore Bishops which are not repugnant vnto his Law but hath giuen a liberty of conscience in traditions of the Church so that he pronounceth himselfe to be angrie with him who obeieth not ciuil magistrats as long as they command nothing repugnant to his Lawes but not with them which without offence do contrarie to the constitutions of Bishops For of the magistrate it is said Rom. 13. We must obey him for conscience sake But of thinges indifferent in the Church Coloss 2. Let no man condemne you in meat or drink or in respect of a holy daie 2 Instance The higher power doth more bind 1 Answere Likewise Gal. 5. Stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made vs free Now if againe they reply that the office of Bishops is aboue the ciuil power and therefore hath greater force then that to bind men to obey first we graunt that more obedience is due vnto the superior power then to the inferiour as long as it commaundeth nothing contrarie to Gods woorde As long therefore as the ministers propound the word of God vnto the Church and for auoiding of offence commaund such thinges to be obserued as appertaine to decencie and order they do not now offend against them but against God whosoeuer obey them not But if they require their lawes concerning thinges indifferent to be obserued with putting an opinion of necessitie in them and of the worship of God and do make them necessarie when there is no danger of offence to ensue Because this charge is contrarie to the word of God no obedience is due vnto it Further we confesse that greater obedience is due vnto the superiour power in those things in which it is superiour that is in which God would haue other powers to obey it But the ministerial power is superiour vnto the ciuil in those things which belong properly vnto the ministerie that is which are of God deliuered commaunded and committed vnto the ministers that by them they may bee declared vnto the Church But of matters indifferent concerning which nothing is either commanded or forbidden of God the ciuil power is superiour by reason of the authoritie which God in these matters hath giuen vnto the ciuil magistrate and not to the ministers of the Church Obiection 8 But against this they returne againe That wee also doe alleadge the Testimonies of councels fathers in
meaning is to bee receiued which these rules of examining and iudging which haue bin now declared doe not suffer Then must wee consider what times and whose writinges are purest what pointes of doctrine haue bin and in what ages either rightlie expounded or depraued with errors lastly whose interpretation either is of the autor or may bee of vs confirmed by the testimonie of the Scripture And to this deciding of all controuersies about the meaning of the Scripture drawen out of the Scripture it selfe do all the godlie and louers of the truth agree euen as it is said Iohn 8.47 Hee that is of God heareth the wordes of God now the testimonie of the auncient and catholicke Church so farre as they see it to accord with the Scripture they doe with glad and thankful minds embrace and are so much the more assured of the known truth But if any quarrelling men doe not yeelde vnto the Testimonies of the Scripture we must not seek because of them a iudge higher then the word of God but must leaue them vnto the iudgement of God as the Apostle counsaileth vs to Titus 3. Reiect him that is an heretik after once or twise admonition knowing that hee that is such is peruerted and sinneth being damned of his own selfe And 1. Cor. 14. If anie man be ignorant let him be ignorant And in the last of the Apocalyps Hee that is filthie let him bee more filthie Neither verilie doth hee whom the woord of God doth not satisfy rest on the autoritie of men as the truth it selfe doth shew But as these thinges are sufficient to shutte the mouthes of them who gainsay the truth 6. Prayers or at least-wise to manifest their impudencie so is there further required for the fencing of the consciences of all the godlie in debate of religion besides a care of learning the doctrine of the woord of God an ardent and daily inuocating of God by which wee may desire that wee may be taught and guided by his holy spirite This if we shal doe hee will not suffer vs to make stay in error Mat. 11.28 Esaie 57.15 which may pul vs from him but will open vnto vs the true and certaine meaning of his woord concerning all thinges necessarie to our saluation that our faith may depend not on humane but diuine autoritie euen as it is promised in the seuenth Chapter of Matthewe Aske and it shall bee giuen you seeke and ye shall finde knocke and it shall bee opened vnto you For whosoeuer asketh receiueth and hee that seeketh findeth and to him that knocketh it shall bee opened And in the eleuenth of Luke How much more shall your heauenlie Father giue the holie Ghost to them that desire him Also in the first of Iames If anie of you doe lacke wisedome let him aske of God which giueth to all men liberallie and reprocheth no man and it shall bee giuen him but let him aske in faith and wauer not To their former arguments our aduersaries adde that it Obiection 11 is a shame that the holie Ghost speaking in the Church should bee subiect to the examinatioÌ„ and iudgement of another It is vnmeet that the holy Ghost should be subiect vnto another and therefore we must not examine him by the rule of the Scripture But seeing that the same spirite speaketh in the Church and in the Scripture when wee doe examine the voice of the Church by the Scripture we doe not subiect the holy Ghost to another but we compare him with himselfe And by this means first we giue vnto him the praise of trueth and constancie while we doe acknowledge and testifie that hee is alwaies like himselfe and doth neuer square from himselfe then also we confesse that the supreme authoritie of pronouncing the wil of God belongeth vnto him while we doe not seeke whether those things be true and certaine which hee hath spoken but whether those be his words which men ascribe vnto him and this we doe euen after the selfesame manner which he hath prescribed vs and after that we finde out by the rule of the written word that any thing hath proceeded from him to that without making any controuersie we submit our minds wils Contrariwise it is easie to see that our aduersaries themselues are guiltie of that contumelie against the holie Ghost of which they accuse vs. For while they wil haue the authoritie of giuing iudgement concerning the meaning of the Scripture and of deciding controuersies not to belong vnto the Scriptures but vnto themselues by this verie thing both they imagine that the holy Ghost may dissent from himselfe and do make themselues iudges higher then the holy ghost and the word of God Obiection 12 The letter killeth the spirit quickneth Lastly whereas Paul saith 2. Cor. 3. That he is the minister of the newe Testament not of the letter but of the spirit for the letter doth kil the spirit doth quicken some men do thence gather that wee are to heare not what the written word of God soundeth but what the spirite speaketh by the Church or in our hearts Yea there hath growen an opinion heretofore that the graÌ„matical and literal meaning of the Scripture is pernâ—â—â—cus except all be transformed into allegories But a manifold paralogisme in this argument doth easily appeare if it bee considered what the letter and the spirit signifieth in Paul For that all the doctrine and knowledge touching God as also the outwarde obseruation of the Lawe in those that are not regenerate is called the letter by the Apostle and the spirit first the holy Ghost himselfe Secondly the true doctrine concerning God when the holie Ghost is of force and efficacy by it Thirdly faith and conuersion and motions pleasing God being kindled of the holy Ghost through the word it appeareth by the words going before For for that which here he saith that he was made of God a minister not of the letter but of the spirit he said before that the Epistle of Christ was ministred by him and written not with incke but with the spirit of the liuing God in tables of the hart that is that his preaching was not in vaine but of force and efficacy in the harts of men the holy Ghost woorking by it And in like manner Rom. cap. 2. hee calleth the ceremonie without conuersion circumcision in the letter but conuersion it selfe circumcision of the hart in the spirit And Rom 7. He willeth vs to walke in newnesse of spirit and not in the oldnes of the letter that is in true holines such as is begun by the spirit in the regenerate not in the sinne and hypocrisie of them who know verilie the wil of God and make practise also of outward discipline and behauiour but remaine without faith and conuersion Wherefore first as the doctrine by the fault of men 1 The letter killeth not of it selfe but by an accident and not of it remaineth only the letter so also
diuers manner in god As when we speake of god the father that being is of it selfe not from another The sonne is the father The Sonne is the same being or Essence but from the Father The holie ghost likewise is the selfe same diuine being which the father is and the sonne but from the father and the sonne So the wisedome power iustice goodnes bountifulnes mercie c. of these three are the verie diuine being or essence which is in number one and the same in these three But to be of himselfe or from another likewise to be from one or from two that is to haue that one Essence of himselfe or to haue it communicated from an other either from one or from two is the manners of being which are three to wit The eternal father and the sonne and the spirite of them both And this is it that Iustine Martyr saith There is one existence or essence of the three which is from none but of it selfe because it is but one but the manners of the existence are three Wherefore as concerning existence Being or essence it selfe the three persons are of themselues as concerning the maner of existing or beeing the father is none but of himselfe The sonne of the father the holie Ghost from both The sonne begotten the holy Ghost proceeding The summe of the difference between the Essence and person is the essence is absolute and communicable the person respectiue and incommunicable This may bee made more manifest by exemplifiyng in a man It is one thing to bee a man an other thing to bee a Father or a Sonne and yet one and the same is both a man and a Father but hee is a man absolutely or in himselfe or according to his owne nature he is a father to another or in respect of another namely of his sonne Semblablie it is one thing to be God another thing to be the father or son or holy ghost and yet one and the same is both God and father god in respect of himselfe or his own nature father in respect of the sonne Again the essence of a man who begetteth another is communicated to him who is begot but the person or indiuidual is not communicated For the begetter bringeth forth not himselfe but another distinct from himselfe the same essence notwithstanding being communicated vnto him And no relatiue is his correlatiue or any part thereof Therefore the sonne is not the father nor the father the sonne although both bee true man So in like sort the eternall Father hath by eternall generating communicated to the Sonne his Essence but not his Person that is hee begot not the Father but the Sonne neither is the Father the Sonne or the Sonne the Father albeit each is true God God and man communicate both their Essence to another but their maner of communicating is most different and is much to be obserued Now although this be like in God and man that both doe communicate to an other not his Person but his Essence yet is there an exceeding dissimilitude in the maner whereby the diuine Essence being infinite and the humane being created and finite is communicated to another Which dissimilitude is diligently to be obserued For first in men in the father the Sonne the Essence is as distinct as the Persons themselues The father and the Sonne are not onely two persons but also two men distinct in essences So that the father is not that man which is the sonne But in God the persons are so distinct that yet the essence remaineth common one and the same and therefore there are not three Gods but the Sonne is the same God in number which is the Father and the Sonne Secondlie In persons created hee that begetteth and generateth doth not communicate his whole essence to him that is begotten For then hee should cease to be a man but only a part which being alotted and seuered out of the essence of him that begetteth is conueied or deriued into him that is begotten and is made the essence of another indiuiduall or person distinct from the essence of the indiuiduall who begetteth But in vncreated persons he that begetteth or inspireth communicateth his whole essence to him that is begotten or proceedeth or is inspired yet so that he who communicateth doth reteine the same and that whole The reason of both differences is that the essence of man as also of other creatures is finite and diuisible the essence of God infinite and indiuisible and therefore the Deity may beeing the same and whole or entire bee together both communicated and reteined Wherefore the eternall Father and Sonne and holy Ghost are that one true GOD and yet the Father is not the Sonne or the holy Ghost neither is the holy Ghost the Sonne that is they are one God not three Gods but three persons subsisting in one God By the name of Trinity are vnderstoode the three maners of beeing in God that is three not essences but persons of the same diuine Essence Now Trinity and triplicitie as also Trinal and triple differ That is said to be Triple which is compounded of three essences or is distinct by three essences Trinall is that which in essence is but one and most simple but hath three manners of beeing God therefore is not Triple because there are not mo essences but Trinall because he beeing one according to his essence is three according to his persons This difference of essence and person is to be obserued and held 1 Least the vnitie of the true God be distracted 2 Least the distinction of the persons be taken awaie 3. Least another thing be vnderstoode by the name of person than the truth of gods woorde declareth For person in this place doth not signifie only a relation or office as the Latines are wont to speak Principis personam tueri to defend the person of the Prince as of olde Sabellius falsely taught muchlesse doth it signifie the countenance or visible shape as in these daies Seruetus sported and trifled with the word person representing the forme or gesture of another such as is the person of a stage plaier but it signifieth a thing subsistent truely distinct frō others vnto whom it hath a relation respect by an incommunicable property that is it signifieth that which begetteth or which is begotten or which proceedeth not the office or dignity or degree of him that begetteth or is begotten or proceedeth Furthermore the persons are not anie thing separated from the essence but each of them are the verie selfesame whole essence of the Diuinitie But the difference is in this that the persons are each distinct from the other but the essence is common to them three And that the person is no other thing subsisting or other substaunce than the essence may be vnderstoode in some sort by the example of a man One and the same man or one and the same substaunce is a father and a man or
wee beleeue that the scriptures were deliuered from heauen be the witnes of the church who seeth not that heerby the autoritie of mans voice is made greater then of the voice of God For he that yeeldeth his testimonie vnto an other so that he is the onely or the chiefe cause why credence is giuen vnto the other out of all doubt greater credite is giuen vnto him then vnto the other who receiueth his testimonie Wherefore it is a speech most vnwoorthy the maiestie of God that the voice of God speaking in his holie booke is not acknowledged except it bee confirmed by the witnesse of men Secondarily 2. Reason Our comfort Faith is groūded on approoued witnes therfore not on mans wheras the doctrine of the Prophets Apostles doth preach of so great matters as the certaine knowledge of thē is so greatly desired of all who are well disposed and the conflictes of doubtfulnes in all mens mindes are so great what full assurance of our faith can there bee what sure consolation against the assaultes of temptations if that that voice on which our confidence relieth bee no otherwise knowen vnto vs to bee indeed the voice of God but because men say so in whom wee see so much ignorance error and vanitie to bee that no man scarcely especially in matters of some weight doth attribute much vnto their woorde except other reasons concurre with it 3 Reason The confutation of our enemies Thirdly the truth of God and christian religion is plainly exposed vnto the mockes and scoffes of the wicked if we going about to stop their mouthes do therefore onely desire that we should be credited that our Religion is from God because our selues say so For if they bee by no other confutation repressed they will with no lesse shew of truth deny it than wee affirme it 4 Reason Witnesses Last of all the scripture it selfe in many places is against this opinion doth chalenge a far higher authoritie vnto it selfe thē which hangeth vpon mens woords For so sayth Christ himselfe Iohn 5. I receiue not the record of man signifieng thereby that his doctrine stood not no not on Iohn Baptists testimonie although yet he did alleadge it but as of lesse account that he might omit nothing by which men might be moued to beleeue Therefore he addeth But I saie these thinges that you may beleeue I haue a greater witnes then the witnes of Iohn And if Christ nowe beeing humbled said these thinges of himselfe then surely shall they be no lesse true of him being in glory and sitting in his throne And 1. Corinth 2. Paul saith My word and my preaching stood not in the entising speech of mans wisedome but in plaine euidence of the spirit and of power that your faith should not be in the wisedome of men but in the power of God If so bee then our faith must not rest no not vpon reasons wisely framed by men much lesse shal it depend on the bare word of men Eph. 2. the Church herselfe is said to bee builded vpon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles If then the confidence and confession of the Church staieth on the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles as on the foundation the certainty of the Scripture cannot hang on the Churches witnes For so should not the Church be vpheld by the testimonie of the Prophets and Apostles but by her owne And 1. Iohn 5. it is said If we receiue the witnes of men the witnes of God is greater If it be greater then the authoritie of it hangeth not on the record of man But wee are to giue more credence vnto God witnessing the Prophets and Apostles writings to bee indeede his voice then vnto the Church affirming the same Now that it is said of the contrary That they are true the Church alone doth witnesse Answere The minor is false That by the Churches Obiection 1 record alone it doth appeare vnto vs that the sacred bookes which wee haue were written by the Prophets and Apostles whose names they beare in their forhead and that euen vnto vs they are come vncorrupt this we grant not For God farre more certainly testifyeth both in the Scripture and in the hartes of his Saints that no fained or forged thing is in these books thē it can be by the Church and all the creatures of the world confirmed They therefore who stand vpon the Churches testimonie alone in this point shew that themselues haue not as yet felt or vnderstood the chiefest testimonies Furthermore they say that the bookes authentike The discerning of bookes Answere The Minor is false 1 The working of the holy Ghost or as they Obiection 2 terme them Canonical of both Testamentes are discerned from the Apocryphall by the Churches iudgement and therefore that the autority of holy canon doth depend on the churches wisedome But that this difference of the bookes is not determined by the churches iudgement but being imprinted into the books themselues by the Spirite of God is onely acknowledged and approoued by the Church this is easily to be vnderstood if the causes of this difference be considered For either in these which are called Apocryphall the force and maiesty of the heauenly spirit doth lesse euidently appeare in the weight and vehemency of woordes and matter then in others of which it is clear that they are the heauenly oracles therefore set downe in writing by diuine instinct that they might be the rule of our faith or it cannot be determined neither out of these books themselues 2 The certainty of authours nor out of others which are canonicall that they were written either by the Prophets or Apostles because either they were not penned by those whom God by certaine testimonies hath warranted vnto vs to be endued with a prophetical spirit or themselues do not shew any certaine authors of them or by their forme of speech or other reasons it may be gathered that they were not left of them whose names they beare Now as touching either this euidence of the spirit or certainty of the authors we builde not our iudgement on the testimonie of the Church but of the bookes themselues And therefore not for the Churches iudgement onely do we iudge some bookes to be canonicall and the foundation and rule of our faith and do therefore accept of the doctrine of other some because they agree with the canonicall but rather for the verie causes of this difference which wee finde in the bookes them-selues Obiection 3 The Church is more ancient than the Scripture 1. Answere The minor is false As for that which some men say that the Church is ancienter then the Scriptures and therefore of greater autoritie it is too trifling For the woord of God is the euerlasting wisedome in God him-selfe Neither was the knowledge of it then first manifested vnto the Church when it was committed to writing but the manifesting of it began together with the
creation of mankind and the first beginnings of the Church in paradice yea the woord is that immortall seede of which the Church was borne The Scripture is first in nature as the cause The Church therefore could not bee except the woord were first deliuered Now when wee name the holy Scripture wee meane not so much the characters of the letters and the volumes but rather the sentences which are conteined in them which they shal neuer be able to prooue to be of lesse antiquitie then the Church For albeit they were repeated and declared often after the beginning of the gathering of the Church 2. Answere The Maior is false A yonger workmā may be more skilful than an elder yet the summe of the Law Gospell was the same for euer To conclude neither is that which they assume alwaies true That the autority of the ancienter witnes is greater thā of th◠yōger For such may be the conditiō quality of the yonger witnes that he may deserue greater credit then the ancienter Christ being man bare witnes of himselfe Moses also and the Prophets had long time before borne witnes of him neither yet is the autoritie therefore greater no not of all the other witnesses then of Christ alone In like sort the Church witnesseth that the holy Scripture which wee haue is the woord of God The Scripture it selfe also doth witnes of it selfe the same but with that kinde of witnes that is more certaine and sure than all the othes of Angels and men There is alleadged also to this purpose a place 1. The pillar of truth to Timot Obiection 4 3. Where the Church is called the pillar and ground of the truth But since the Scripture doth teach otherwhere and that not once that the foundation of the Church is Christ and his word it is manifest inough that the Church is the pillar of the truth not a foundamentall or vpholding piller but a ministeriall that is a keeper and spreader of it abroad and as it were a mansion place or sure seat which might carrie the truth left with her and committed vnto her in the open face of all mankinde Acts. 9. Gal. 2. 1 Thes 2. 2 Thes 1. Tit. 1. euen as the holy Apostle Paul was called an elect vessell to beare the name of God before the gentiles and kinges neither yet did Paul get credit vnto the Gospell but the Gospell vnto Paul So likewise are the Apostles termed pillars Galat. 2. not that the Church rested on their persons but that they were the chiefe teachers of the gospell and as it were the chieftaines and maisters of doctrine For a man is not bound to beleeue those that teach on their bare woord but for the proofes which they bring of their doctrine Furthermore they alleage a sentence of Austin out of Obiection 5 his booke entituled against the Epistle of the foundation A place of Augustine 1 Answere An example maketh no rule chap. 5. I saith Augustine would not beleeue the Gospell except the authoritie of the catholicke Church did mooue mee thereunto But first if it were true that either Austin or some others did giue credence vnto the Gospell onely for the Churches autoritie yet might there not bee fashioned a rule hence of that which all men either did or ought to doe But that this is not the meaning of Austine 2 Aunswere He speaketh of himselfe as yet not cōuerted or not sufficientlie confirmed which these mē wold haue they do easily perceaue who weigh both the whole course of this place the phrase of speech which is vsual vnto Austen For Austen going about to shew that the Manichees were destitute of al proof of their doctrine first he opposeth one who as yet beleeueth not the gospel and denieth that such a one is able any way to be conuicted by the Manichaeans for he were to be conuicted either by argumentes drawen out of the doctrine it selfe of which the Manichaeans haue none or by the consent of the catholike Church from which themselues were departed for example sake he proposeth himselfe who should not haue had beleeued the Gospel except the authoritie of the catholik Church had moued him thereunto Austen therefore speaketh this not of himselfe as hee was then when hee writ these things against the Manichaeans but of himselfe before hee was yet conuerted or not sufficiently confirmed And that hee speaketh not of the present but of the time past the words that follow do manifestly declare whom then I beleeued when they said Beleeue the Gospel why should I not beleeue them when they say Beleeue not a Manichean For hence it appeareth that when he saith he was mooued especially by the authority of the Church he meaneth it of that time at which he obeied the Churches voice that is departed from the Manichaeans vnto the true Church But after that once he was conuerted and had perceaued the truth of doctrine that his faith was not now any more builded on the authoritie of the Church but on a far other foundation himselfe is a most sufficient witnes for vs whereas in the selfesame book Therefore he did beleeue the Church especially before he was able to perceiue it cap. 14. he saith on this wise Thou hast purposed nothing els but to commend that thy selfe beleeuest and to laugh at that which I beleeue And when as I of the other side shal commend that which myselfe beleeue laugh at that which thou beleeuest what dost thou thinke we must determine or do but euen to shake handes with them who bid vs to know certaine things and afterward will vs to beleeue things that are vncertain and let vs follow them who bid vs first to beleeue that which as yet we are not able to perceaue that being more enhabled by faith it self we may discerne to vnderstand that which we do beleeue not men now but God himselfe inwardly strengthning and illightning our mind Wherefore they do manifest iniury vnto Austen who draw that which himselfe confesseth of himselfe when hee was not yet conuerted or was but weake vnto that time when he affirmeth far otherwise not of himselfe onely but of al the godly For so reuerent a regard ought we to haue of the worde of God and such also is the force and efficacy of the holie spirit in confirming the harts of beleeuers that we beleeue God yea without any creatures Testimony euen as Elias forsooke not god 1. Reg. 19. The application of the answere no not when he thought that himselfe only was left aliue of the true worshippers of God If therefore either Austen or whosoeuer els being not as yet conuerted vnto religiō nor as yet hauing experiēce of the certainty of it in his hart That followeth not which they would 1 Because there is more in the Consequent than in the Antecedent 2 Because thereis a fallacy of the Accident A declaration of the like example 1 The
it is manifest that the decrees of the Church are of no lesse authoritie then the expresse sentence of the Scripture But we as we willingly grant that the controuersies of the Church must bee at length determined Aun Not the Church but the holie ghost is iudge in the word and that according to the Sentence of that iudge of whom wee may bee certainlie assured that we can not be deceaued So wee acknowledge this iudge to be not the Church but the holy Ghost himself speaking vnto vs in the Scripture and declaring his owne woords For he is the supreme iudge whose iudgement the Church onely demandeth declareth and signifieth he can not bee deceaued whereas all men are subiect vnto the daunger of error in a word he being the author of the Scripture is the best and surest interpreter of his owne words And therefore the Scripture it selfe in al doubtes recalleth vs and bindeth vs vnto it selfe as 2. Pet. 1. We haue a most sure word of the Prophets to the which yee doe wel that yee take heede as vnto a light that shineth in a dark place Iohn 5. Search the Scriptures Esay 8 To the Lawe and to the Testimonie if they speake not according to this word The Church doth not alwaies speake the words of the holie Ghost it is because there is no light in them For although the holie Ghost speaketh also by the Church yet because shee doth not alwaies speak the words of the holy Ghost she can not be the supreme chiefe iudge of controuersies in Religion For this iudge must be such a one whose sentence may by no means bee called in question But wee haue none such besides the word of God registred in the Scriptures Deciding of controuersies is not taken away Neither doe we at all take away the deciding of controuersies when wee make Scripture iudge of the meaning of the scripture For although contentious persons alwaies seeke sophismes by which they may delude and shift off the testimonies of Scripture yet doe they this against their conscience and the louers of the truth require no other interpreter of the Scripture but the Scripture and doe acknowledge and confesse themselues to be plentifully satisfied by it For whereas vnto men also it is graunted to bee themselues the best interpreters of their own wordes how much more ought this honor to bee yeelded vnto the holy Scripture The way how to decide doubtful places 1 The Analogy of faith Wherefore if controuersie be mooued concerning the meaning of some place in the Scripture we ought much more to doe that here which we would doe in other writinges First of all to consider and respect the anologie of faith that is to receiue no exposition which is against the ground of doctrine that is against any article of faith or commaundement of the Decalog or against any plaine testimonie of Scripture 1 Cor. 3. 2 Examining of Antecedents Consequents euen as Paul admonisheth forbidding to build wood hey stubble vpon the foundation Secondly to weigh the thinges that goe before and follow after that place which is in question that so not onely nothing contrary to these may be faigned on it but also that that may bee set for the meaning of it which these require For these either not beeing obserued or beeing dissembled the meaning of the Scripture is not seldome depraued Psalm 91. So those words of the Psalme Hee shall giue his Angels charge ouer thee that they shall beare thee in their handes that thou hurte not thy foote against a stone The Diuell tempting Christ interpreteth them as if they serued to maintaine ouer-rash and curious attempts when yet that which is added In all thy waies doth shew that they are to bee vnderstood of men doing those thinges that are proper vnto their calling Thirdly 3 Resorting to places which teach the same more clearly wee ought to search euery where in the Scripture whether there bee extant any place where it stands for confessed or is manifest or may bee shewed that the same doctrine in other woordes is deliuered touching the same matter which is conteined in that place which is in controuersie For if the meaning of the clearer and vndoubted place be manifest vnto vs wee shall also be assured of the place which is doubted of because in both places the same is taught as when Rom. 3. it is said We conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the Lawe That in this place to be iustified by faith is not to please God for the worthines of faith but for the merit of Christ apprehended by faith and that the woorkes of the Law signifie not the ceremonies onely but the whole obedience of the Law chiefly the morall other places doe teach vs which in moe and clearer woordes deliuer the same doctrine concerning the iustification of man before God as in the same chapter By the woorkes of the Law shall no flesh bee iustified in his sight for by the Law commeth the knowledge of sinne But now is the righteousnes of God made manifest without the Law hauing witnes of the Law and of the Prophets The righteousnes of God by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vpon al that beleeue for there is no difference For all haue sinned and are depriued of the glorie of God and are iustified freelie by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Iesus 4 Conferring like places togither Fourthly wee must conferre places of Scripture where though the same woords bee not spoken of the same thing yet the like woordes and formes of speaking are vsed of the like thinges For if the interpretation of the like place bee certaine and there bee the same causes for the like interpretation to bee giuen in the place that is in controuersie which are in the other then of like places wee must giue one and the same iudgement The Lord willeth Mat. 5. to put out our eie to cut off our hand if it be a cause of offence vnto vs. Now whereas the Law forbiddeth vs to maime our bodie Thou shalt not kill that therefore by this figure of speech the Lord would haue vs that wee should rather forsake thinges most deere vnto vs then that by the lust and motion of thē wee should suffer our selues to be withdrawen from God the like forme of speech otherwhere vsed to signifie things most deer and precious doth shew as Ierem. 22. If Iechoniah were the signet of my right hand yet would I plucke thee thence And Deut. 32. Hee kept him as the apple of his eie 5 The catholike Church When once according to these rules the controuersie concerning the text meaning thereof is iudged we may lawfully also descend to the consent of the Church yet putting great space betwixt not without great aduisement For least by the name of the Church we be beguiled first of all no sentence or
to oppresse it The elect can neuer fal into this sin against the holy Ghost Thirdly hereof also it followeth that the elect and those who are truly conuerted can neuer fal into this sinne against the holy ghost that they who commit it were neuer possessed of true faith and repentance For al those who are chosen of God to euerlasting life are conuerted in this life and al they who are truly conuerted ought certainely to think that they are in the number of the elect and therefore shall neuer so sin as withal to perish according to those sayings Iohn 10. My sheepe shal neuer perish neither shall any plucke them out of my hande Luke 22. I haue praied for thee that thy faith faile not 2. Timoth. 2. The foundation of God standeth sure hath this Seale The Lord knoweth who are his How many of the reprobate are said in scripture to be lightned sanctified That many of the reprobate are saide to bee lightened and to bee made partakers of the holy Ghost to haue tasted of the heauenly gift the good word of God and of the powers of the world to come and last of al to haue bin sanctified with the blood of the Testament likewise in Peter to haue escaped from the filthines of the woorld the Apostles themselues shew that this is to be vnderstood of the knowledge of the truth and the foregoing and detestation of errors and vices for a season and lastly of the sufficiency of Christ merits euen for the wiping away of their sins also and the offer thereof made vnto them by his word and Sacraments which they shew when they interpret that lightning tast to be the knowlege of the truth righteousnes cal thē dogs swine 2. Pet 2. Heb. 6 7. not made so againe but returning to their vomit and wallowing in the mire and further compare them to the earth drinking in the raine but bringing forth insteed of good herbs thornes and briars For these things agree not to true faith and conuersion Fourthly by these things which haue bin said We are not rashlie to pronounce anie man a sinner against the holie Ghost vntil wee see him giue vp the Ghost in Apostacie and blasphemy it appeareth that we are not rashly to pronounce who they bee that sin against the holy ghost and that we may not iudge of this sin vntill the end that is vntil we know them who once had the truth confessed themselues to be conuicted and perswaded of it with hatred thereof to persecute reproch it or to end their life in hatred despite against it The reason hereof is manifest because we are not the beholders of mens harts If it be obiected that 1. Iohn 5. it is said There is a sin vnto death I saie not that thou shouldest praie for it If hee wil not that we shal praie for those who sinne to death it must needes bee that wee maie discerne them from others Wee aunswere that Iohn doth not vniuersally forbidde that wee praie for anie so sinning but at such time as that is manifest vnto vs either by some diuine testimony or by manifest argumēts and the sinners owne profession But before this is certain manifest vnto vs we ought to desire of god the conuersion of al men as much as in vs lieth to endeuor it as it is said 1. Tim. 2. I exhort that first of al supplications praiers intercessions and giuing of thanks be made for al men And 2. Tim. 2 The seruant of the Lord must not striue but must be gentle toward al men apt to teach suffering the euil men patiently instructing them with meeknes that are contrarie minded prouing if God at any time wil giue them repentance that they may know the truth and that beeing deliuered out of the snare of the diuell of whome they are taken they maie come to amendment and perfourme his will And Matth. 5. Praie for them which hurt you and persecute you And Actes 7. Lorde laie not this sinne to their charge Our praier for the aduersaries of the trueth must be conditionall with submission to Gods will If it be replied that so it will come to passe that our praier shall be contrarie to the will of God if not knowing of it we praie for them who sin against the holie Ghost the aunswere is ready That praier is made for them with a condition by which we submit our wil desires to the counsail of God that he will conuert and saue the aduersaries of the truth if they maie be recouered but that he will represse them and punish them if he haue not appointed to recouer them Our praier for them being but conditional it argueth not but that their sinne maie be notwithstanding vnpardonable By the same answere is this argument dissolued Their sinne is not vnpardonable for whom wee must praie But wee must praie for all men Therefore no mans sinne is vnpardonable First wee denie the Minor because if it appeareth by anie diuine testimonie or by manifest argumentes and their owne profession that they are castawaies whether they sinne against the holy Ghost or otherwise do not repent we must not pray for them Secondly neither is the Maior true For if we know not whether they sin against the holy Ghost or are reiected of God or no we must pray for them but with that condition if they may bee recouered Out of these thinges also which haue been spoken answere is made to this obiection He that must fear lest he hath anie vnpardonable sinne The fear of vnpardonable sin belongeth to the wicked not to the faithful can neuer bee assured of remission of his sins and of life euerlasting But if there be anie sin vnpardonable which is committed before the ende of a mans life no man can be assured that he hath not or shall not haue such sinne Therefore either there is no such sinne or no man can bee assured of the grace of God and his owne saluation For the Minor of this reason is false cōcerning those who beleeue For they must certainely think that they neither had nor haue the sinne against the holy Ghost because there is no condemnation to them who are in Christ neither that they shall haue this sinne because no man can plucke the sheepe of Christ out of his hand Adam and Peter sinned not against the holie Ghost 1 Obiection Adam and Peter obtained remission of sins Adam and Peter sinned against the holy Ghost because they denied the manifest and known truth of God Therefore some men sinning against the holy Ghost obtaine remission of sins Aunswere The proofe of the minor is a false definition For not euery deniall or reiection of the truth is sinne against the holy Ghost but that onely which hath accompanying it an inwarde hatred of the trueth and which of a purposed intent and with horrible furie endeuoureth to oppresse it
of Christ applied vnto vs by faith and yet according to workes as according to the tokens or testimonies of faith from which they proceede and which they as effectes thereof doe shewe to bee in men 4 Obiection The Scripture in manie places ascribeth perfection of good woorkes to Saintes euen in this life and saith that they are perfect and did walke with their whole and perfect heart before God Psalme 119. I haue sought thee with my whole heart and in the same Psalme Blessed are they that keepe his testimonies and seeke him with their whole heart Genes 6. Noah was a iust and vpright man in his time 2. Chron. 15.17 The heart of Asa was perfect in all his daies Matth. 5. In what sense the Scriptures sometimes ascribe perfection of workes to the regenerate in this life Bee yee perfect as your father in heauen is perfect Answere First these and the like speeches speake of that perfection which is not of degrees but of partes or of the integritie and syncerity of the obedience begun in them Perfection of degrees or obedience perfect in degrees is that which hath not onely all the parts of obedience but that degree also which the law requireth in vs. Such a perfection haue not the regenerate in this life They haue indeede all the partes of obedience begun in them but yet weakely so that they are here daily more and more perfected but attaine not to the chiefe and due degree thereof vntill they inioy the life to come The perfection of partes is the integrity of obedience or whole obedience begun according to the whole law or it is a desire and endeuor to obay God and withstand corrupt lustes according not to some only but to al the commandements of his lawe The perfection of securitie is a desire or studie of obedience and godlinesse not fained but true and earnest albeit somewhat bee wanting to the partes as touching the degree This perfection to wit both the integritie and syncerity of obedience is in al the regenerate For vnto them is it proper to submit themselues to the commaundementes of God euen to all without exception and to beginne in this life all the partes of true godlinesse or obedience This is called also the iustice of a good conscience because it is a necessarie effect of faith and pleaseth God through Christ And albeit in all men euen in the most holy much hypocrisie remaineth as it is saide Euerie man is a lyer yet there is a great difference betweene them who are wholy hypocrites and please themselues in their hypocrisie hauing no beginning or feeling of true godlinesse in their hearts and those who acknowledging and bewailing the remnantes of hypocrisie which are in them haue withal the beginnings of true faith and conuersion vnto God Those hypocrites are condemned of GOD these are receiued into fauour not for this beginning of obedience in them but for the perfect obedience of Christ which is imputed vnto them And therefore to this declaration or exposition another is also to be added That they who are conuerted are perfect in the sight of God not onely in respect of the partes of true Godlinesse which all are begunne in them but also in respect of the degrees of the true and perfect righteousnesse of Christ imputed vnto them As it is said Coloss 2.10 Yee are compleate in him Heb. 10.14 With one offering hath he consecrated for euer them that are sanctified But they reply that the perfection also of degrees is attributed vnto the Saintes in the Scripture 1. Corint 2. vers 6. Wee speak wisedome among them that are perfect 1. Cor. 14. Be perfect in vnderstanding Eph. 4. vers 13. Till we all meete together in the vnity of faith and knowledge of the Sonne of God vnto a perfect man and vnto the measure of the age of the fulnesse of Christ. But these places also doe not call them perfect in respect of the Law of God that is in respect of that degree of knowledge and obedience which the Law requireth in vs but in respect of the weaker who haue lesse light and certainty and readines confirmed by vse and exercise to obey God to resist carnall lustes and to bear the crosse For so is this perfection expounded Heb. 5. and Ephes 4.14 That we be no more children wandering and carried about with euerie wind of doctrine Philip. 3.12 Not as though I had alreadie attained to it or were already perfect They oppose against these aunsweres a place out of 1. Iohn 4. vers 17. Herein is the loue perfect in vs that we should haue boldnesse in the daie of iudgement for as he is euen so are we in this woorld There is no feare in Loue but perfect Loue casteth out feare for feare hath painfulnesse and hee that feareth is not perfect in Loue. But Saint Iohn meaneth not that our Loue towardes GOD but Gods Loue towards vs is perfect that is declared and fully knowen vnto vs by the effects or benefites of GOD bestowed vpon vs in Christ Our regeneration newnes of life doth assure vs of our iustification as being an effect thereof or as Saint Paul speaketh Roman 5. Where hee saith that the Loue of GOD shed abroad in our heartes by the holy Ghost is the cause why wee doe without feare and with bouldnesse expect the day of iudgement And of this mercy and free Loue of GOD towards vs hee signifieth that by this token or testimonie wee are assured because in this life wee are refourmed by the holy spirite to his image For by our regeneration wee are assured of our iustification not as by the cause of the effect but as by the effect of the cause Nowe though regeneration be not perfect in this life yet if it bee indeede begun it sufficeth for the confirmation and proouing of the truth of our faith vnto our consciences And these very words which S. Iohn addeth Loue casteth out fear shew that Loue is not yet perfect in vs because wee are not perfectly deliuered in this life from fear of the wrath and iudgement of God and eternal punishment For these two contrary motions are now together in the godly euen the fear and loue of God in remisse and low degrees their feare decreasing and their loue and comfort or ioy in God encreasing vntill ioy get the conquest and perfectly cast out all trembling in the life to come when GOD shall wipe away euery teare Diuers places of Scripture to be vnderstood of the vprightnesse of a good conscience not of anie perfect fulfilling of the Law in the godly Obiection Iohn 3.21 He that doth truth commeth to the light that his deedes might bee made manifest that they are wrought according to God 1. Iohn 3.20 If our heart condemne vs not then haue wee boldenes toward God Psalm 119. I haue not declined from thy Lawe Therefore the good woorckes of the regenerate maie bee alleadged and stand in Gods
none Answere It is free vnto God to saue either al or none or some for he was not bound to vs that he should saue vs. Rom. 11.35 Who hath giuen vnto him first and he shal be recompensed Yet is it necessarie that he should saue some not by any absolute necessitie but by such as is called necessitie by supposition First because God hath most freely and vnchangeably decreed The necessitie not absolute but depending on the vnchangeable will and decree of God promised this deliuerie published A syllogisme thereof may be framed on this wise It is impossible that God should either lie or deceiue But God hath auouched and promised by an â—th that hee will not the death of a sinner but will that hee bee conuerted and liue The conuersion therefore and deliuerie of man not onelie may bee wrought but necessarily also is wrought Secondly In the beginning God created maÌ„ that he might for euer be magnified of him Epes 1.6 He hath made vs to the praise of the glorie of his grace And Psalm 89.48 Hast thou made al men for naught Wherefore seeing God is not frustrated of the end of his counsels it is necessarie that some be deliuered Thirdly God did not in vaine send his sonne into the world and deliuer him ouer vnto death Iohn 6.39 I came downe from heauen to doe his will which hath sent me And this is the fathers will which hath sent mee that of al which hee hath giuen mee I should loose nothing Mat. 9.13 I am come to call sinners to repentance 18.11 The Sonne of man is come to saue that which was lost Rom. 4.25 He died for our sinnes and is risen againe for our iustification Fourthly God more enclineth to the exercising and setting forth of his mercy than of his anger But he sheweth his anger in punishing the wicked Therefore he must shew his mercy in sauing the Godly 4 What manner of Deliuery this is THe deliuerie and setting of man at libertie is necessarilie compleat that is in al ponites perfect Our deliuerie most perfect euen from both euils both of crime and of paine First because God is not a deliuerer in part onely but saueth and loueth perfectly those whom hee saueth 1. Iohn 1.7 The bloode of Iesus Christ cleanseth vs from all sinne to witte as touching both the formall partes thereof the guilt and the corruption of sinne Secondly because he doth perfectly punish the wicked that his iustice may bee exactly satisfied by their punishment Therefore doth hee perfectly deliuer the godly from punishment because he is more inclining propense to mercy than to anger Thirdly because we were fully perfectly lost in Adam But Christs benefit is not imperfecter or of lesse force than the sin of Adam which it would be if he did not perfectly deliuer because al haue lost al their righteousnesse saluation and blessednes in Adam Therefore righteousnes and felicity is restored by Christ Each of these deliueries both from the euill of crime and from the euil of paine or punishment is necessarily perfect Because the image of God glory and blessednes which is restored vnto vs by Christ our redeemer is more glorious greater than that Our deliuerie from eternall death perfect in this life from other calamities in the life to come which we lost in Adam Our deliuery from euerlasting death or damnation is most perfect euen in this life both as touching the parts thereof and also in degree Because Christs satisfaction for our sinnes which is imputed vnto vs is a most perfect conformity and correspondence with the law of God Now from other calamities we shal be fully deliuered in the life to come when as the remnants of sin in vs shal be vtterly abolished In the meane season they are mitigated vnto the godly euen in this life turned into fatherly chastisements Our deliuerie from sinne in part here by regeneration but perfect in the life to come Our deliuery from crime or sinne by regeneration is perfect not at once in a moment but successiuely by degrees For in this life it is perfect as concerning the partes thereof but as by a beginning onelie that is all the partes of obedience are begunne in the redeemed or beleeuers so that as long as we liue here it is daily augmented by new accessions and encreasings But after the departure of the soule out of the body this deliuerie is perfecter because then man doeth wholy cease from sinne After the resurrection and glorification it shall bee most perfect both as touching the partes thereof and in degree For then shall God bee all in all that is hee shal immediatly blesse vs with exceeding happinesse so that nothing shall remaine in vs repugnaunt to God but whatsoeuer shal be in vs that shal be of god But now there is somewhat in vs which is not of GOD euen sinne it selfe 5 By what meanes mans deliuerie may be wrought THe meanes whereby we may be deliuered from the curse and beeing reconciled to God may be accounted iust before him is only one euen a full and condigne or worthy satisfaction that is punishment for sinnes committed or obedience omitted For the Lawe The law being transgressed no satisfaction but by suffering due punishment when as wee haue not perfourmed obedience dooth iustly exact punishment of vs this being sufficiently paied wee are receiued of God into grace and beeing indued with the holy spirit are renued to the image of God that wee may hence-forward obey his Law and enioy euerlasting blissefulnes Beeing therefore reconciled vnto God by satisfaction most fully perfourmed vnto the Law we are deliuered then from sinne also that is from corruption it selfe by regeneration that is by the forcible working of the holy Ghost abolishing it in vs and restoring true holines and righteousnes heere by beginning it and in the life to come also by perfecting and absoluing it This deliuery is necessarily knit with the former as a necessary effect with his proper nearest cause For God wil of that condition accept of this satisfaction and for it pardon our sinne so that wee leaue off to offend him hereafter thorough our sinnes and be thankfull vnto him for our sinnes pardoned and other his benefites For to bee willing to bee receiued into Gods fauour and yet not to be willing to cease from sinning is to mock God Wherfore they who are receiued of God into fauour are withall regenerated and satisfaction is the cause as of acceptation so also of regeneration Now that if satisfaction or sufficient punishment come not betweene there is no deliuery from the guilt or from sinne it selfe the cause hereof is gods great iustice and truth which his mercy dooth no way ouerthrowe Deut. 27.26 Cursed bee hee that confirmeth not all the woordes of this Law to doe them Matth. 5.18 It is not possible that one iot of the Law should fall that is be frustrate till al thinges
in the old Testament were special certaine and definite as the promises of the Land of Canaan of the Church of the gouernement and Mosaical ceremonies to be obserued in that region and nation vntil the comming of the Messias and lastly of the Messias to be borne out of that people In the new Testament there are no speciall promises of certaine corporall benefites but onely generall as that god will alwaies in this life giue his Church some abiding and resting places although it be dispersed and scattered throughout all Nations 2. They differ in a circumstaunce of the promise of grace For in the olde Couenaunt they were reconciled vnto god and saued for the Messias sake who shoulde come or be exhibited we in the newe Couenaunt are saued for him beeing come and exhibited 3. In the signes or symboles of the promises In the old were many and diuers signes and Sacramentes as the Circumcision the Passeouer the Sacrifices in the new few and plaine euen Baptisme and the supper of the Lord. 4. In the olde Couenaunt were types and figures of good thinges to come and so all thinges were the more obscure and darke in the newe is an accomplishment and exhibiting of those things and so all thinges more cleare The doctrine and knowledge of the Gospell especially nowe Christ beeing come and manifested is more bright and plentifull for that a declaration of thinges done vseth to bee more perspicuous than the fore-telling of thinges which shall bee done 5. In the olde the pouring out and effusion of the gifts of the holie Ghost is more narrow and sparing in the new more large plentifull Hierem. 31. vers 31. I will make a newe Couenaunt 2. Cor. 3.6 The olde was but for a time during vntil the comming of the Messias The newe is for euer According to that I will make an euerlasting Couenaunt with them How they differ in respect of men They differ in respect of men First For that in the olde testament the Church stood bound to the obedience of the whole Mosaicall lawe Morall Ceremoniall and Ciuill In the newe testament wee are bounde onelie to the spirituall or morall worship and the vse of the Sacramentes The Ceremoniall and Ciuil lawes of Moses binde not vs. Secondly The olde was made to one certaine Nation The Prophets therefore were sent vnto the people of Israell and to them they applyed their speeches The newe belongeth to all Nations For God will that all bee saued of what Nation language or condition so euer they bee The Apostles therefore were sent to the whole world to gather the Church of Christ out of all Nations or which is the same in the old testament the Church was tied vnto a certaine Nation In the newe it is Catholicke and vniuersall that is spread through all Nations Why the old couenant was taken for the law and the New for the Gospel Here is to be obserued that the old Couenāt is takē by a figure of speach called Synecdoche which we vse when wee take the whole for a part or a part for the whole for the law in respect of that part which was especially handled there For in the old testament the law was more vrged there were many partes thereof Contrariwise the gospel was then more obscure The newe also is taken for the Gospell because in the newe testament a great part of Moses law is abrogated and the manifestation and knowledge of the gospell is to vs more cleare and ample OF THE GOSPEL THis 19. question of the Catechisme which is cōcerning the gospel is like to the third For as that so this also sheweth that our deliuerance by the Mediator is knowen learned out of the gospel Seeing then it hath beene alreadie spoken of the Mediator we are necessarily also to speake of the doctrine in which the Mediator is declared described and offered vnto vs. That doctrine is the gospell Afterwardes wee are also to speake of the meane whereby we are made partakers of the Mediatour that meane is Faith First therefore the common place concerning the Gospel commeth to be handled which is fitly annexed to the former doctrine concerning the Mediator Couenant between god men 1. Because Christ the Mediatour is the subiect or matter of the Gospel which teacheth who what maner of Mediator this is 2. Because he is the Autor and publisher of the same For it is part of the Mediators office to publish the gospel as it is said Ioh. 1.18 No mā hath seen god at any time the only begottē son which is in the bosome of the father he hath shewed him 3. Because the gospel is part of the couenant the new couenant is often taken for the gospel The principall questions are 1 What the gospel is 2 Whether it hath bin alwaies knowen 3 How it differeth from the Law 4 What are the proper effects of the gospel 5 Whence the truth and certainty of the gospel maie appeare 1 WHAT THE GOSPEL IS THe greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for which we vse Gospel signifieth 1. A ioiful message or news 2. The sacrifice which is offered to god for this ioiful news 3. The reward which is giuen to him who bringeth these glad tidings Here it is takē for the doctrin which intreateth of Christ because it declareth ioiful things euē our deliuery frō sin death or remissiō life euerlasting There is a difference also to bee obserued betweene the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth the doctrine concerning Christ now manifested and is a cleare declaration of things done or of the promises nowe fulfilled by the Messias being manifested But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is the promise and as it were a certaine shadowing out or a darke expressing of things to be fufilled by the Messias who was after to bee manifested and so is it more obscure The Gospell for so we interprete 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is of the new Testament the fulfilling of the promises of the old Testament Neuertheles this difference of these words is not perpetuall neither consisting in the thing it selfe For both of them declare the same benefites of the Messias but the difference is onely in the circumstance of time in the maner of his manifestation exhibiting Ioh. 8. Abraham saw my daie and was glad Ioh. 14.5 No man commeth to the father but by me Now the Gospell is the doctrine made manifest of God by his Sonne the mediatour presently after the fall of mankind into sinne and death The definition of the Gospel promising all beleeuing and repentant sinners remission of sinnes and their receiuing into fauour and life euerlasting freely to be graunted through and for his sonne the Mediatour By which doctrine the holie ghost doth forcibly kindle and worke in the hartes of the chosen faith repentaunce and the beginning of euerlasting life Out of
all euill For these are the effectes to come of that present and perpetuall wil of God towards vs which wee apprehend by faith Rom. 8.24 Wee are saued by hope but hope that is seen is not hope But if we hope for that we see not we doo with patience abide for it 1 Obiection Life euerlasting is a thing to come We beleeue life euerlasting Wee beleeue therefore that which is to come that is faith is also of things to come and so faith is hope it selfe Ans The Maior must bee distinguished Life euerlasting is to come tru as concerning the consummation or accomplishment therof But it is present vnto vs as cōcerning the wil and vnchaungeable purpose of God who hath decreed from euerlasting that which he hath begun in vs and will also in due time accomplish it Againe it is present vnto vs as concerning the beginning therof For euerlasting life is begun here in the elect by the holy ghost Wherefore faith apprehendeth it as it is present both in respect of the purpose of God in respect of the beginning thereof in vs. For he that beleeueth feeleth and knoweth that he is quickened and resolueth this to bee the will of God that that quickening and reuiuing which is here begunne shall bee absolued in another life Iohn 5.24 He that beleeueth in the sonne hath passed from death to life Iohn 17.3 This is life eternall that they know thee to be the only verie God and whome thou hast sent Iesus Christ Gal. 4.6 God hath sent forth the spirit of his sonne into your harts which crieth Abba father Rom. 8.24 We are saued by hope 1. Ioh. 3.2 Now are we the sonnes of God but it doth not yet appear what we shal be By faith thē we are certein that those blessings also which as yet we haue not are notwithstanding ours for Gods promise for the vnchangeable will in God to giue them vs but in certain hope wee looke for them as concerning their accomplishment Faith apprehendeth the promises of thinges to come hope relieth on the thinges promised The summe is There is one and the same act and operation of faith and of hope but they differ in consideration It is called faith as it doth apprehend things to come as if they were present in regard of the vnchangeablenes of Gods will It is called hope as it doth certainlie look for the bestowing of those things Therfore Heb. 11 1. it is shewed that faith is the ground substance of things which are hoped for that is it is that which maketh things which are hoped for to be extant and present in that manner as hath bin shewed Shorter thus Faith apprehendeth the promises concerning things to come as they are to come Hope the things themselues which are promised 2 Obiection Faith is the euidence of thinges which are not seene therefore not of thinges present Aunswere It is the euidence of thinges which are not seene to wit by the outward senses but they are seene by the eies of the mind euen as if they did lie open to the eies of the bodie Againe they are not seene in respect of their accomplishment or consummation 5 What are the causes of Faith THE first and principall efficient cause of faith is the holie ghost illightening the minde that it may vnderstand the word and moouing the will that it may assent vnto the woord once vnderstoode Yee are freelie saued by faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of God Ephes 2.8 Obiection The Diuel hath faith It is wrought therefore in him by the holie ghost Aunswere What faith is in the Diuel is wrought by the spirit of God but that by a generall woorking onely whereby hee worketh in all euen in Diuels and hypocrites what-soeuer knowledge or vnderstanding is in them 1. Cor. 12. c. not by a speciall and proper action or working wherby to regenerat or sanctifie them that they might truely acknowledge him to bee the author of this gift and magnifie him therefore after which maner hee woorketh faith in the elect alone The Diuels therefore and hypocrits haue faith from the spirit of God but the elect from the spirit of God sanctifieng them The instrumentall cause of faith in generall is the whole worde of God the Lawe and the Gospell written spoken readde heard The chiefe instrumental causes of ingendering iustifieng faith are the preaching of the word and the vse of the sacramentes meditated likewise many works miracles of God in the world But the chiefe and proper instrument of iustifieng faith is the preaching of the Gospell the vse of the sacraments For these doth the holy ghost vse as instruments yet not necessarie but arbitrarie at his own good pleasure both to stir vp faith in vs and to nourish strengthen increase the same Rom. 10.17 Faith commeth by hearing Rom. 1.16 The gospell is the power of God vnto saluation to euerie one that beleeueth 1. Cor. 4.15 I haue begottē you through the gospel Mar. 16.16 He that shall beleeue and be Baptized shall be saued Act. 22.16 Wash away thy sins 1. Cor. 10.16 The bread which we break is the communion of the bodie of Christ Wherefore ordinarilie iustifieng faith is neuer engendred in those who are of yeares to receiue it without the preaching of the gospell The cause of that faith which worketh miracles is not simply the woorde of God but there must necessarily come thereto an especiall and immediate reuelation from God The formal causes of faith a sure and ful confidence in Christ The obiect of faith Christ and his benefites promised The final causes of faith Gods glorie our saluation The formall cause of iustifieng faith is a certaine knowledge confidence in Christ The obiect of it is Whole Christ and his benefits promised in the word Likewise God fauorable to vs through Christ The subiect wherein it remaineth is the vnderstanding will of man The end or finall cause 1 The glorie of God to wit the celebration of his trueth iustice bountie mercie which hee hath shewed in the sending of his Sonne and in the giuing of faith in him 2 Our Saluation that we may receiue the blessings which are promised in the worde 6 What are the effects of faith The effectes of faith iustification and regeneration THe effects of iustifieng faith are 1 The iustifieng of vs before God 2 Peace of conscience or ioy resting on God Rom. 5.1 Beeing iustified by faith we haue peace with god 3 Our whole conuersion which followeth faith and beginneth at the same time with faith For by faith are our hats purified 4 The fruits of conuersion repentance euen good woorkes For whatsouer is not of faith is sinne Hither may be referred also the consequences of faith that is encrease of spirituall corporal giftes The first then and immediate effect of iustifieng-faith is Iustification from this afterwardes flow al other benefites
God is WHen it is demanded who is the tru god Wee must acknowledge God to bee such as himselfe hath manifested himselfe to bee we are to hold most firmly and surely that he alone is the tru god who euen from the beginning of mankinde did not onely manifest himselfe in the nature of thinges by the steppes and prints of his diuinity shining therein but especially in the Church by his woord deliuered and other famous testimonies of miracles deliueries and consolations wherby he plainly teacheth whom what he will be acknowleged and published by vs to be and that he is not acknowleged or woorshiped of any but of them who thinke according to this word both of him and his will neither is the true knowledge of him founde else-where than in this worde The certaintie of this position is hereof most manifest for that all those who imagine GOD to bee other in essence or nature or will than hee hath testified himselfe to bee in his owne manifestations and reueilings doe not embrace and woorship at all the true GOD but an other thing of their owne framing in steede of the true GOD according to these sayings Iohn 4.22 Ye woorship that which ye knowe not we woorship that which wee knowe for saluation is of the Iewes And cap. 5. vers 23. He that honoreth not the sonne the same honoreth not the father which hath sent him Gal. 4.8 But then when ye knewe not GOD yee did seruice vnto them which by nature are not Gods Eph. 2.12 Ye were at that time without Christ were aliants from the common-wealth of Israell and were straungers from the Couenaunt of promise and had no hope and were without GOD in the world Act. 17.23 Whom yee then ignorantly worship him shew I vnto you 1. Iohn 2.23 Whosoeuer denieth the sonne the same hath not the father But against these thinges seemeth that to bee which Paul saith to the Rom. 1.19 That that which may bee knowen of GOD is manifest also in men estranged from christian Religion for that GOD hath shewed it vnto them For the inuisible thinges of him The glimse of nature not sufficient to shew who is the true God that is his eternall power and Godhead are seene by the creation of the world beeing considered in his woorkes to the intent that they shoulde be without excuse And Act. 17. That GOD in former ages did not leaue himselfe without witnesse and that out of the whole nature of thinges but chieflie by the minde of man and the difference of thinges honest and dishonest and by the punishments the of wicked it may in some measure bee gathered not onely that there is a GOD but also what hee is and therefore manie thinges are found to haue beene spoken truely by the heathen and others concerning the vnitie and nature of GOD. But to these obiections wee aunswere that there are indeede some true thinges concerning GOD manifested otherwise also than by the worde deliuered to the Church but by them notwithstanding who is the true GOD cannot bee shewed and that for two causes For first those thinges by themselues are not sufficient For to the knowing of the true God it is requisite that wee knowe and professe not some thinges onely but all thinges which hee openeth of himselfe and woulde haue knowen Moreouer these selfe same true testimonies of God also which remaine in mens minds and in nature all they by reason of a naturall blindnesse in them and prauitie doe manie waies corrupt who in weighing of them followe not the light and interpretation thereof drawen from the worde of God deliuered to the Church when as euen of these thinges which might bee knowen by the helpe of nature manie thinges they doe not knowe manie they faine of their owne which haue nothing agreeing with the nature and wil of God and those thinges which they do retaine in shewe of wordes professe they farre otherwise vnderstand than they are proposed of God and declared in his word and in the Church vnderstoode and so beholding and sounding in their mouth true sentences and sayinges concerning God conceiue neuerthelesse and foster false opinions of him in their mind This answere S. Paul himselfe expresseth Rom. 1. when he addeth That they are inexcusable because that when they knewe god they glorified him not as god Now albeit Philosophicall wisedome cannot therefore shew who is the true god for that concerning the essence nature wil and workes of god The voice of nature concerning god neither to bee reiected nor contemned either in respect of insufficiencie or of mens misconstring it so much as is necessary to bee knowen it doth not teach is diuersly depraued by men so that out of the Church remaineth no true knowledge of god yet neuertheles that voice of the nature of things concerning god ought not for these causes to bee reiected as false or contemned as fruitles For neither is that straight waies false in it selfe which is peruerslie constred of men neither fruitles for al things nor to al men which auaileth the reprobate nothing at all to euerlasting saluation For god will also out of the Church bridle the lewd dissolute by the testimonies which their conscience punishments giue of his will anger and iudgement and according to them will hee haue the life and manners of men ruled Hee will haue mans corruption and his iustice made more conspicuous and cleare in punishing them who stubburnely withstand the knowen truth He wil by natural testimonies mens conscience shewing the imperfection thereof haue men stirred vp to seeke the true God in the Church as it is said Act. 17. That men were therefore placed in the theater of the worlde that they should seeke the Lord if so be they might haue groaped after him and found him Hee will also haue them who are conuerted to him to be more confirmed by the consent of nature and the worde as the often alleadging of naturall testimonies in the Scriptures declareth Lastly he will the imperfection of naturall knowledge being considered haue mens ignorance concerning God acknowledged his mercy magnified who discouereth and openeth himselfe in his woorde God cannot bee defined 1. Because he is immense 2. Because his essence is vnknown vnto vs Yet some way hee may be described which description comprehendeth his attributes or properties the persons principal woorks and by these three is the true God discerned from all false Gods The description of God according to the rules of Diuinitie After this sort then is God Theologically described God is a spiritual essence intelligent eternall infinite other from all the creatures incomprehensible most perfect in it selfe vnmutable and of an immense power wisedome goodnesse true iust chast mercifull bountifull most free angry and wrath with sinne which essence is the eternal father who frō euerlasting begot the Sonne according to his Image and the Sonne who is the coeternall Image of the father
appointeth nor will nor speaketh thinges repugnaunt and contradictorie 2. Corinth 1.19 The Sonne of GOD Iesus CHRIST who was preached among you by vs was not Yea and Naie but in him it was Yea. Thirdly that hee faineth nothing nor deceiueth anie man but this is in trueth and indeede his will which hee openeth vnto vs. Roman 3.4 Let GOD be true and euerie man a liar Fourthly that hee neuer changeth his minde Psalm 89.34 My couenant will I not break nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips Fiftly that it certainly commeth to passe whatsoeuer god auoucheth shal come to passe which experience also witnesseth many sayings of holy Scripture as Matth. 24. Heauen and earth shall passe but my word shall not passe Sixtly that he is the louer autor and preseruer of the truth in the reasonable creatures and an enimie to all lies dissembling and hypocrisie Therefore Iohn 14.15 and 16. The holy Ghost is called the spirite of trueth who shoulde teach vs all trueth Prouerb 12.12 The lying lippes are an abomination vnto the Lord but they that deale truelie are his delight Mat. 24.51 He wil giue him his portion with hypocrits Seeing then the trueth of God is to bee considered out of his woorde and woorkes albeit men by nature confesse that GOD is true yet are they ignoraunt wherein his trueth consisteth For it is saide Iohn 17. Thy woorde is trueth and Psalm 89.5 Thy trueth in the congregation of the SAINTES Neither doth the conscience or the priuie knowledge of anie mans sinnes suffer him who knoweth not CHRIST the Mediatour to put any confidence in Gods promises For as 2. Corinth 1. it is said Al the promises of God in him are Yea and in him Amen vnto the glorie of God God dissēbleth not when hee saieth hee will doe that which yet he doth not But if sometimes god foretold that hee would doe those things which he neuer decreed to doe he did not therein dissemble For what hee threatned that hee meant with this condition should so come to passe except the conuersion of men and praiers came betweene and what he promised hee meant with this condition if they repented either persisted in godlinesse or needed not affliction and chastisement Wherefore he would indeede haue punished the Niniuits if they had persisted in their sinnes And Christ Luke 24. was indeed departing except his disciples had desired him to stay in the Inne at Emaus How God is saide to deceiue a deceiued Prophet As for that which God saith Ezech 14 9. And if a Prophet be deceiued and hath spoken a thing that he hath deceiued him he signifieth not thereby that hee deceiueth by instilling lies into false Prophets but that they are by him in iust iudgement deliuered and giuen to bee seduced by the Diuell as 1. Kings 22. GOD is saide to haue giuen a lieng spirite in the mouthes of all the prophetes of Achab. Replie But yet GOD would that the false Prophetes should tel a false tale Aunswere Hee would but in diuerse respects and to a diuerse end God foretolde victorie to Achab by an ironie and that a sharpe and bitter one thereby to recall him from making his expedition to warre and to punishe him for not obeying by deliuering him to bee seduced by the Diuell The false Prophets foretolde victorie to flatter him the Diuel to destroy him and to die Why chastitie is one of Gods properties There is made also mention of Chastitie in the former description of God because amongst his especiall and most notable differences whereby he may be discerned from Diuels he wil haue truth to be and chastitie For as God will bee acknowledged to bee true and will haue trueth loued of vs that it maie certainelie appeare that he is and what hee is that men may think and speake the truth of him and through his knowledge be partakers of euerlasting life so the Diuell attēpteth to fil the worlde with lies that he may both darken the glorie of God and by forging lies of God destroy mankinde Whereupon the holy Ghost is called the spirite of trueth But the Diuell a liar and murtherer from the beginning the father of lies Ioh. 8. And as God both by reason of the exceeding puritie of his nature as also because hee will haue the spousal loue and coniunction of mariage to be the image of the vnspeakeable loue and spirituall coniunction betweene him and the Church as wee may see Ephes 5. Ezech. 16. Osee 2. and therefore will haue it accounted sacred and holy amongest men As God then in these respectes is the louer and author of chastity and dooth most seuerely detest and punish al vncleannes both internal externall which is repugnaunt to this order as the examples of the Sodomites of the tribe of Beniamin and others of all other ages and nations testifie So the Diuell both for his impurity as also because whatsoeuer God woulde haue helde most holie and venerable that for the hatred hee beareth to God hee studieth most to depraue and most foulie to defourme endeuoureth with obscenitie and filthinesse horriblie to pollute al mankinde and to withdrawe them from GOD. Therefore it is said 1. Thess 4.3 This is the wil of god euen your sanctification and that yee should abstein from fornication that euery one of you should know how to possesse his vessell in holinesse and honour The mercie or fauourable and inclinable will of GOD to preserue his creatures and especiallie mankinde The mercie of God in preseruing his creatures the Scripture proposeth vnto vs opened by these degrees First that hee taketh delight in the saluation of all but in the destruction of none Ezech. 33.11 As I liue saith the Lord god I desire not the death of the wicked but that the wicked turne from his way and liue Secondlie that he differreth mitigateth and taketh away punishmentes inuiting all men by his long suffering to repentaunce if not one waie yet by the testimonie of their conscience Heereof Exod. 34. and often elsewhere hee is saide to bee slowe to anger Thirdly that hee debaseth himselfe to relieue our infirmitie both by inwarde and outwarde supplies as by his spirit worde oathes Sacramentes and miracles Fourthly that he embraceth with singular loue his chosen so that he saueth and deliuereth them for euer from sinne and all euils and comforteth them also in afflictions Reuelat. 7. and 21. God shall wipe awaie all teares from their eies Isaie 49.15 Though a woman shoulde forgette her Childe yet will I not forgette thee Fiftlie that hee chose rather to bring to passe this our deliuery euen by the incarnation and death of his onelie begotten Sonne than that all mankinde shoulde perish Iohn 3. So god loued the woorlde that he gaue his onelie begotten Sonne Sixtlie that hee promiseth and perfourmeth all these thinges of his owne free goodnesse Exod. 34.19 I will shewe mercie to whome I will shewe mercie
distinct Answere The Maior is true of finit persons but not of infinite Obiect 7. The diuine Essence is incarnate The three persons are the diuine Essence Therefore the three persons are incarnate Aunswere Here also are meere particulars whereof nothing can be concluded For the Maior speaketh not of the Diuine Essence generally but particularly as it is the Sonne Obiection 8. The Sonne is Mediatour vnto Iehoua But the Sonne is Iehoua Therefore hee is Mediatour to himselfe Aunswere Here also are meere particulars and therefore nothing concluded For not all that is Iehoua is Mediator Obiect 9. Christ hath a head aboue him Therefore hee is inferiour to GOD and by a consequent hee is not of one and the same essence with GOD. Aunswere Hee hath indeede a Head but that first in respect of his Mediatourshippe secondly in respect of his manhoode Obiection 10. This is saith Christ life euerlasting that they do know thee to bee the onelie verie God Therefore the Sonne and the holie Ghost are not true God Aunswere In this place is opposed not the father to the son and the holy ghost but God to Idoles and creatures Moreouer the particle onelie dooth not belong to the subiect thee but to the predicate God which the greeke Article sheweth Obiection 11. Iehoua is the Trinity The father is Iehoua Therefore he is the trinity Aunswere Iehoua is not taken for the same but varieth in this Syllogisme For Iehoua in the Maior is meant of all three persons in the Minor of one only Reply The father is Iehoua one in number Therefore the father is the Trinitie Heere those diuerse manners of beeing are of no force Aunswere He is one in number of essence not of persons Obiection 12. Where are three one there are four But in god are three one namelie three persons and one essence Therfore there are four in God Aunswere Where there are three and one reallie distinct there are foure But in God the persons are not really distinct from the essence for the three persons of the Diuinity are one and the same essence Obiection 13. The same works are atributed to the Father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost in the Scripture Aunswere This hindereth not the distinction of persons For mo persons may concurre to one action the distinct order of woorking beeing obserued Obiection 14. Christ saith Iohn 14. He that seeth me seeth the father Aunswere Christ meaneth not hereby that he is the father but that he sheweth and resembleth the person wisedome omnipotency goodnes and wil of the father in his doctrine and woorkes as it is saide The Sonne which is in the bosome of the father hee hath shewed Againe Who is the inuisible image of GOD. And as himselfe addeth here The father in mee and I in the father Obiection 15. The wisedome and power of the father are not distinct persons from the father but are the father himselfe as also mercie goodnesse chastitie trueth and other properties of God But the Sonne and the holie Ghost are the wisedome and power of GOD Therefore they are not persons distinct from the father but the father himselfe wise and powerful Aunswere There is an ambiguity in the woordes wisedome and power which in the Maior signifie the wisedome and power whereby not only the father but the Sonne also and holy Ghost is wise and forcible or effectuall that is the common nature or essence of the father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost But in the Minor they signifie the persons of the Sonne and the holy Ghost the Son beeing called the wisedome and the holy Ghost the power of GOD because by them the Deitie sheweth foorth and declareth the wisedome and power thereof OF CREATION NEXT vnto the Doctrine concerning God the Doctrine of the woorkes of GOD is most fitly placed as we see to be done also in the Creede The woorks of God are of two sortes Generall and Speciall The general are diuided into the works 1. Of creation the works whereof are read in Genesis to haue bin accomplished in 6. daies are by daily increase furthered and multiplied in the world 2. Of preseruation whereby God still susteineth the heauens and earth and the things that in them are that they fal not to ruine and decay 3. Of administration whereby through his immense and great wisdome he administreth and gouerneth all things These two latter are comprehended vnder the name of his prouidence And therefore next vnto creation is annexed the place concerning Gods prouidence The Special woorkes of GOD are those which are wrought in the Church and company of his elect and chosen to iustifie sanctifie and glorifie them and are either works of Reparation or restoring whereby hee repaireth al things which for the sinne of man are subiect to corruption or of perfection and accomplishment whereby hee bringeth all things to their certaine appointed end The principall questions of creation are these 1 Whether the world were created of God 2 How it was created 3 For what cause it was created 1 WHETHER THE WORLD WERE CREATED OF GOD. THE name of the world is diuerslie vsed in the Scripture 1. It signifieth the vniuersal frame of all thinges namelie Heauen and Earth and al thinges which are them visible and inuisible besides God himselfe 2. Woorldlie concupiscences 3. All mankind 4. The wicked or those that are not regenerate in the world 5. The elect Here we consider it in the first sense To create signifieth 1 to ordaine or constitute as the latines vsed it creare Consulem to create a Consul 2 To make something of nothing without any motion with a becke or woorde only So is it taken in this place 3 The continuating of creation or creation continued Which is the prouidence of God That the worlde hath not beene from euerlasting but had when it seemed best to the creatour according to his eternal counsel and wil a beginning once and was created of that only true God who hath manifested himselfe in the Church that he is the eternal Father and Sonne and Holy Ghost we know First by testimonies of holy scripture as by the whole historie of the creation set downe by Moses Likewise out of other testimonies of Scripture verie many Psalm 33 6.9 By the woorde of the Lorde were the heauens made and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth Ps 104.113.124.136.146 Isay 44. Act. 4. 17. He spake and it was doone he commaunded and it stood or was created There are other places also in the Psalmes where more largely and amply the wonderfull woorkes of God and the principall partes of the woorlde created by God are proposed to be considered of vs that through the consideration thereof wee may learne to put our trust and confidence in God For to this purpose did the Lord himselfe propose vnto Iob his marueilous and incomprehensible woorkes conspicuous in heauen Iob. 38. 39. and earth other thinges also
was purchased by their owne fault as who freely and willingly departed from God and remaineth in them ioyned and accompanied with great desire delight Wherefore to this that they should merite punishment their own will sufficeth whereas especially the punishment was before denounced This solution or aunswere Aristotle himselfe in the same fifth Chapter giueth vs when as he sheweth that men are diseruedly reprehended and punished for vices either of minde or bodie though they can not auoid them or leaue them because themselues are the cause of their owne vices and haue purchased them vnto themselues of their owne accorde and voluntarilie Lastly of all they wrest also certaine places of Scripture by false interpretations Certaine places of scripture wrested against Gods prouidence against gods vniuersal prouidence As Iohn 8.44 When the Diuel speaketh a lie then hee speaketh of his owne and Iam. 1. God tempteth no man Eccles 15.20 He hath commaunded no man to doe vngodly as also other the like places which denie God to bee the author of sinne But those places attribute vnto the wicked and remooue from GOD the sinnes as lies and temptations to sinne but the actions themselues of the wicked as they are not sinnes but operations and motions seruing for the exercising and manifesting of Gods goodnesse or iustice the whole Scripture sheweth to bee doone by the will of God and also as they are sinnes by his iust permission As of satan deceiuing the Prophetes of Achab of the false Prophets by whom god trieth and openeth the hypocrisie or constancy of men in true religion Acts 5. Satan filled the hart of Ananias 2. Cor. 4. The god of this world hath blinded the harts of vnbeleeuers In these the like saiengs also is discerned the work of the diuel vniustly blinding men to destroy them and of God iustly blinding them by the diuel to punish them Act. 5.38 If this counsel be of men it wil come to nought And Isa 30. Woe to the rebellious children that take counsel but not of mee The counsels of men are said to be not of God but of themselues in respect of the endes which men letting passe the wil of God reuealed vnto them respect and attaine not vnto but not in respect of the ends which god doth respect attaineth vnto as wel by the wicked not knowing or contemning his wil as by the godly or which is in effect the same the coūsels of men are said to bee of them not of God as they are sins that is as they swarue from the known wil of god but not as they are the execution of Gods either secret or knowen wil. 1. Cor. 9. God doth not take care for Oxen Not principally or not in such sort as for men For he giueth also to beastes their meat Those words thē Thou shalt not mussel the mouth of the Oxe that treadeth out the Corne was therefore spoken especially that God might thereby shewe what hee would haue by men vnto men to be performed So the wicked are often said to be cast out of the sight of God not that the prouidence of God is not extended to them but that he doth not tender them with his mercy bountie as he doth the godly For the godly also complaine that they are neglected of god when they are afflicted not that god is not present with them in affliction but that humane sense iudgement suggesteth this vnto vs. And God is saide to set his face against the wicked to cut them off Leu. 20.5 3 Why the knowlege of this doctrine concerning Gods prouidence is necessary The causes why this doctrine is to bee knowen 1 The Glorie of God THis doctrin is necessarily to be known 1 For the glory of god For he wil haue vs to ascribe vnto him most great liberty goodnes wisedome power iustice this he wil haue vs to acknowlege profes against the dreams dotings of Epicures Manichees and Stoicks But if the prouidence of god in mouing guiding al things euen the least both good bad be denied these also his properties are denied And if these bee denied god is not worshipped and magnified of vs but denied 2 Our comfort and saluation 2 For our own comfort saluation that by this means there maie bee stirred vp in vs First patience in aduersitie because all thinges come to passe by the most wise iust and most auaileable counsell and will of our heauenlie father And whatsoeuer either good or bad god sendeth vs in thē we consider the fatherly will of god towardes vs. Whatsoeuer commeth vnto vs by the counsel and will of god and is profitable for vs that we ought to beare patiently but all euils come vnto vs by the counsell and will of god and are profitable for vs Therefore wee ought to beare all euils patiently Secondly That wee may bee thankefull for benefites receiued of god Wee ought to bee thankeful because of whom wee receiue all good thinges both corporal and spirituall great and small to him wee ought to bee thankefull and to serue and worship him But from god the author of all good thinges we haue all thinges Therefore wee ought to bee thankefull vnto god and to worship him Nowe thankefulnesse hath two partes 1. Truth to acknowledge his benefite and to be thankefull both in worde and minde vnto him 2. Iustice to remunerate and make recompence Or Thankefulnesse consisteth 1. In acknowledging of the benefit 2. Jn celebrating it 3 In remunerating it Thirdly That we may conceiue a good hope and confidēce of things to come when as god by his prouidēce deliuereth vs out of euils He that hath decreed vnchangeablie to saue is able will saue beleeuers doth neuer suffer thē to perish Hope here signifieth such a hope as resolueth al things so to be gouerned of god as that also they shall hence forward be profitable for our safetie that he will neuer suffer vs to be pulled away or withdrawen from his loue nor will euer so forsake vs that we perish Because his will and power in preseruing sauing vs is vnchangeable far aboue the forces of al his enimies Fourthly the desire study of godlines praier and labour because although god indeed alone giueth all good things yet he giueth them with this rule and order that they bee desired and expected from him and sought by our labour and study which must bee guided by his word By this it appeareth Al the groundes of religion shaken in peeces if the prouidence of God bee denied that all the grounds and foundations of godlines or religion are pulled asunder if the prouidence of god be once denied such as before it hath been described out of the scripture For 1. We shall neuer be patient in aduersitie except we know it to come from God our Father vnto vs. 2 Wee shall neuer bee thankefull for his benefites except wee acknowledge them to bee giuen vnto
is most absurd or hee was this from the beginning of the worlde Heb. 3. Hee is made the builder of the house whereof Moses also was a part Hebr. 13. Iesus Christ yesterdaie and to daie and the same for euer Our Second aunswere is by denying their interpretation For Saint Iohn there speaketh of the first creation Which we shewe First Because he speaketh of the second afterwardes As manie as receiued him to them hee gaue power to be the Sennes of God Likewise Of his fulnesse haue all wee receiued and againe Grace and trueth came by Iesus Christ Now he therefore setteth down the first creation before because both creations are the worke of the same That therefore he might shew that the second creation was wrought by the woorde it was necessarie for him to teach that the first also was wrought by it For the same is the Creatour and repairer of the worlde Secondly Because he saith the world was made by him Reply The woorlde heere is taken for the Church Aunswere No for hee addeth And the woorlde knewe him not The same woorlde which was made by him knewe him not Therefore hee meaneth the wicked whether elect or reprobate Thirdly other places demonstrate the same Iohn 5.17 My Father woorketh hitherto and I woorke Wherefore both of them from the beginning of the woorlde woorke the workes of both creations In the same place verse 19. Whatsoeuer thinges the Father dooth the same thinges dooth the Sonne also And vers 20. The Father sheweth him all thinges whatsoeuer hee himselfe dooth Therefore not onlie the workes of the second creation but also of the first creation preseruation and administration of the world In the same place it is said As the Father quickeneth so the Sonne quickeneth whom he wil. But the Father was from the very beginning the giuer of corporal spirituall life Col. 1.16.17 By him were all things created which are in heauen and which are on earth thinges visible and inuisible whether they be thrones or dominions or principalities or powers all thinges were created by him and for him And hee is before al thinges and in him al things consist Thus farre of the first creation that which followeth speaketh of the second creation Reply 1. All these speake of the instauration of the Church Answer No. Because that comprehendeth also the Angels Reply 2. The Angels also were restored by Christ and ioined to their head Auns But the new creation is called a restoring from sinne death to righteousnesse and life this agreeth not to the Angels Reply Heb. 1.2 By whom also he made the worldes The worlds that is the new Church Aunswere 1 God made the old also by him because it is one Church hauing one head and foundation 2 The Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is vsed in that place signifieth in Scripture the world not the Church And faâ—der when it is there added Bearing vp al thinges by his mighty worde those words speak of the preseruation not only of the Church but of al things And moreouer he rendereth a cause why he is the heire not only of the Church but of all Creatures namely because he is the creatour preseruer of all thinges Heb. 1.10 Thou Lord in the beginning hast established the earth the heauens are the works of thine hands Reply In these wordes he conuerteth his speach to the Father to prooue that he was able by his power to lift vp the Sonne to diuine maiestie Aunswere This is â—â—â—mpudent shift and elusion 1 Because it is saide before But vnto the Sonne which appertaineth to both places of the Psalme cited by the Apostle 2 Because the Psalme dooth entreat of Christes kingdome and therefore those words which there are spoken of the Lord are to be vnderstood next immediatly of his person secondarily and mediately of the father Reply 1. If he made all thinges then then father made them not by him Aunswere Both he made them and they were made by him Ioh. 5. Whatsoeuer things the Father dooth the same dooth the Sonne also And yet the father dooth them by him Reply 2. The creatour cannot be compared with the creatures But Christ is there compared with the Angels Therefore creation of thingeâ—â—s not attributed vnto Christ Aunswere He is not comparâ—d with the creatures in any proportion but without proportion This the place it selfe of the Psalme prooueth â—he heauens shall perish but thou doost remaine Reply 3 Iâ— hee were creatour and equall with the Father hee could not sittâ— at his right hand Aunswere Wee may inuert this and saâ— of the contrarie rather if he were not equal he could not sitte at his right hand Because none but the omnipotent and true God is able to administer the kingdome of heauen earth Phil. 2.6 who beeing in the forme of god thought it no robberie to be equal with God Isay 45.23 Thus saith the Lorde that created heauen Euerie knee shall bowe vnto me This is saide of Christ Rom. 14.11 Phil. 2 10. Againe Isay 48.12 I am I am the first and I am the last My hand hath laide the foundation of the earth and my right hand hath spanned the heauens when I call them they stand vppe together These wordes Christ applieth vnto himselfe Reuelat. 1.18 and 22.23 In it was life In the word was life and the life was the light of men Wee interpret That the sonne of God is by himselfe the life as is the Father and the fountaine giuer and maintainer of al life as wel corporall and temporall as spirituall and eternall in all from the verie beginning of the world Iohn 5. He hath giuen to the Sonne to haue life in himselfe as the father hath life in himselfe They conster it That the man Iesus is the quickener or giuer of life because in him is the life of all that no man without him and all by him are saued These are their words Vnto which we reply If hee giue eternall life to all so that no man hath is without him Therefore either no man was quickened before hee was borne of Mary which were absurd or hee was the quickner giuer of life from the beginning Euen as Ioh. affirmeth this of him as beeing verified in him also before hee was made fleshe Neither can this be vnderstood onely of his merit whereby hee deserued this life for men For that life is in him signifieth that hee is by his efficacie and effectuall woorking the quickner and reuiuer as himselfe expoundeth it Iohn 5. and 10. and the aduersaries themselues confesse So are wee also to vnderstand his illightening of men that is the knowledge of God the author whereof hee was in all euen from the beginning as himselfe saith No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne and hee to whome the Sonne will reueile him And Iohn Baptist saith No man hath seene God at ANY TIME the Sonne hath declared him And the light shineth in the darckenes
of any qualities but of the very humane nature when as he sheweth that therefore Christ was necessarily to haue beene true man because men were to bee deliuered by him through his sacrifice The word full of grace and truth And the word dwelt among vs full of grace and truth Christ fulfilled all the promises and types and figures of the law and did truely performe the office of a redeemer and Mediator not only by his merit but also by his power and efficacie as afterwardes is added out of Iohn Baptists sermon That this truth and grace befell vnto vs through Christ and of his fulnes all who euer are saued haue receiued Which S. Paul saith euen that we are consummated and made perfect in him which would not be except the fulnes of the Godhead did dwell in him personally And wee sawe the glorie thereof as the glorie of the onelie begotten sonne of the father This glorie is the diuine power which he shewed in his miracles in his transfiguration vpon the mount in his resurrection from death his ascension into heauen his sending of the holie Ghost his power and efficacie by his ministerie Now thus far they also agree confesse the same But when we say further The glorie of the onely begotten This glorie testifieth him to be the onelie begotten sonne of God that is the sonne of God by nature begotten of the substance of the father who is also himselfe the true eternal God maker of all thinges here they shake handes with vs and dissent For they say that he is called the onelie begotten not because hee is the sonne of God by nature but because hee was borne after a singular manner namely of a Virgin conceiued by the holie Ghost But this reason is not sufficient First because if he bee not a sonne of the substaunce of the father but either by creation or by adoption or by conformation with God either from the wombe as in Christ conceiued by the holie Ghost or afterwards as in other men he shall not be the onelie begotten For so are others also the sonnes of God both Angels men though not in that degree of gifts yet in the manner of generation Wherefore it remaineth that he bee the onely begotten sonne by nature after which manner no other is the sonne of God Secondly because for that which he is here said the onelie begotten he is otherwhere said to be the proper sonne of God Iohn 5.18 Rom 8.32 And he is the proper sonne who is of the substance of his father he that is of an other substance is no proper son Thirdly he is said to be such a sonne of the Lord who is also himselfe the Lord which as it is manifest by other places of both Testaments so namely by Mat. 4. and Luke 1. where of Iohn Baptist it is saide that he shall goe before Christ who is called of the Angel Gabriel the sonne of the most high and the Lord God of the children of Israell whose hearts Iohn Baptist should turne vnto him and shoulde goe before his face And of Zacharie hee is called the most high whose Prophet and forerunner Iohn Baptist should bee whose waies hee should prepare and vnto whose people he should giue knowledge of saluation NOw let vs returne vnto those orders classes of arguments reasons whereby we proue the eternall subsistēce of christ The wisedome of God is a subsistent or persō And Christ is that wisedome Vnto the fift classe whereof are referred those testimonies which testifie Christ to be the wisedome of God The argument is this The wisedome of god Prou. 8.22 is eternall and subsisting before Iesus was borne But the sonne is that wisedome of god Therefore the sonne is eternal and subsisting before Iesus borne of the Virgin The Maior of this reason Salomon confirmeth in the place afore signified where he ascribeth those thinges to wisedome which fall not into any but which is subsisting liuing and working as that it subsisted in God before things were created that it was begotten and so foorth The Minor wee prooue 1. because Salomon saith that that wisedome was begotten of God And to be begotten when it is spoken of such a nature as is intelligent and vnderstanding is nothing else than to bee a sonne For although it bee true that there is made an exhortation there to the studie of heauenly Doctrine yet notwithstanding the name of wisedome to bee doublie there vsed and a transition to be made from the doctrine which is the wisedome or light created in the mindes of men that thereby authoritie might bee gotten to this wisedome with them to the vncreated wisedome that is to God himselfe the author and fountaine of the other those things which are there attributed vnto it doe manifestly conuince 2. Christ the son of god is called Wisedome and the person which teacheth vs wisedome Luke 11.49 Therefore saide the wisedome of god J will send them Prophets Apostles 1. Cor. 1.24 But vnto them which are called wee preach Christ the power of god and the wisedome of god 3. The same proper functions are attributed by Salomon to wisedome which elsewhere are attributed to the Word and are more at large declared in the booke of Wisedome cap. 7.8.9.10 To the sixt classe beelong those places of Scripture which speake of the of the of the Mediatour The Argument is this The Mediatour without whose merite and present efficacie there coulde bee no friendship or amitie ioined betweene God and sinfullmen The Mediatour hath alwaies beene must needes haue beene alwaies in the Church from the verie beginning of the woorlde This proposition those thinges confirme which haue beene before spoken of the Mediatour and his office But the sonne of God onelie not the Father nor the holie ghost is that Mediatour by and for whom the faithful also of the old Church were reconciled vnto god Therefore the sonne of god was subsisting from the verie beginning of the world The olde Church might haue beene receiued into fauour for Christ to come but by him it could not except hee was then beeing for there can bee no efficacie or force of him that is not Whence it is necessarily prooued that Christ was before his incarnation for there cannot be friendship betweene God and men without a Mediator now existing or being But in the old Testament there was friendship betweene God men that is beleeuers Therefore either he or some other was Mediator of that Church there was no other but he only because there is but one Mediator between God and man the man Christ Jesus 1. Tim. 2.5 But that there cannot bee any amitie betweene God and men without a Mediator now alreadie being shall also appeare by that which foloweth For it is the office and function of the Mediator not onely by deprecation or intreaty sacrifice to appease pacifie the father but also to conferre bestow al the benefits which
death of the onely begotten Sonne of God 2 That it might be an exasperating of the punishment and so wee so much the more confirmed in a true faith when wee consider Christ by this kinde of punishment to haue taken vpon him our gilt euen our punishment also and curse according to that Cursed is euerie one that hangeth on tree Deut. 21.23 Gal. 3.13 3 That the trueth might answere according to the types and figures so we might know the types to be fulfilled in Christ For 1 The sacrifices which shadowed the sacrifice of Christ were hung vpon trees thereby to signifie that Christ should be fastned on a tree and accomplishing his sacrifice offer a holy sacrifice vnto his Father 2 The sacrifices being lifted vp on high before they were burned did signifie the exalting and listing vp of Christ on the Altar of the Crosse 3 The same was shadowed in Isaack who being laid on wood was to haue beene sacrificed of his Father 4 The brasen Serpent which Moses set vp vpon a pole in the wildernesse depainteth this kind of punishment Christ himselfe interpreted of himselfe this type of the brasen Serpent Joh. 3.14 DEAD I Beleeue in Christ dead that is I beleeue Christ not onely to haue suffered extreame torments for my sake but also death it selfe hath by his death obtained for me remission of sinnes and reconciliation with God consequently also the holy Ghost who beginneth in me a new life that I may againe bee made the Temple of God and at length attaine vnto euerlasting life wherein I shall woorship and magnifie God for euer OF CHRISTS DEATH THE chiefe Questions hereof are 1 How Christ is said to haue bin dead 2 Whether it was requisite and necessarie that Christ should die 3 What are the fruits of Christs death 1 HOW CHRIST IS SAID TO HAVE BEENE DEAD IT is needful to moue this question because of the heretikes who haue depraued the sense of this article Marcion denied that hee died indeed as also hee affirmed the whole ordinarie dispensation and ministerie of the humane nature in Christ and all those thinges which hee did vndergoe for vs to haue bin but imaginarie and that hee onely seemed to bee as a man Nestorius separated the two natures in Christ neither would haue the sonne of God but man onely to haue died Doe not boast thou Jewe saieth Nestorius thou hast not crucified God The Vbiquitaries beleeue that the humanitie of Christ from the moment of his incarnation was so indowed with all the properties of the Godhead as that only in this the humanitie differeth from the Godhead that the humanitie hath by an accident whatsoeuer the Godhead hath by and of it selfe Hereof it commeth that they imagin that Christ was in the time of his death yea when hee was inclosed in the Virgins wombe in heauen and eueriewhere not onely as touching his Godhead but with his bodie too This is it which they call the forme of God Wherefore against all these wee affirme that Christ died truely and corporallie euen by a true diuulsion separation of his soule from his bodie so that not onely his soule and body were not together euerie where but were not together in one place Mat. 27.50 Thē Iesus cried again with a loud voice yeelded vp the Ghost Mar. 15.37 Iesus cried with a loude voice and gaue vp the Ghost Luk 23.46 Father into thy hands I commend my spirit And when hee had saide these words hee gaue vp the Ghost Iohn 19.30 Hee bowed his head and gaue vp the Ghost But yet this is further to be added that although his soule was separated from his bodie yet the Word notwithstanding did not forsake neither bodie nor soule but remained neuerthelesse ioyned both to bodie and soule and therefore the two natures in Christ were not diuelled or sundered by that diuulsion of the soule and bodie Obiection Why then cried hee Mat. 27.46 My God my God why hast thou forsaken mee Aunswere Because of his delay and differring of help and succour For the two natures in Christ ought not to haue beene diuelled or sundered because it is written God hath purchased the Church with his owne bloude And hee was to be the sonne of God who shoulde die for our sinnes that hee might bee a sufficient price for them Hereby also it doth clearely appeare that The vnion of both natures in Christ is no Vbiquitie For the soul being separated from the bodie was not in the graue with the bodie and by a consequent not eueriewhere because that which is euerie where can neuer bee separated Obiection But as vertue that is his diuinitie is saide to haue gone out of him so also hee gaue vp the Ghost Aunswere There is a dissimilitude in these Because the diuinity remaining vnited with the humane nature yet did worke abroade without it The soule did depart from the bodie The reason of this dissimilitude is because the act of his diuinitie is increate and infinite but the act and power of his soul finite and created 2 Whether it was requisite and necessary that Christ should die IT was requisite and necessarie that Christ should die 1. In respect of the iustice of God that so his iustice might be satisfied which required the death of men by whom it was violated For the hurting offending of the greatest good is to bee expiated with the greatest punishment or with the vtmost destruction of nature that is with the death of the giltie condemned for sinne according to that Rom. 6.23 The wages of sinne is death Now it was requisite that the sonne of God should die that hee might bee a sufficient ransome for our sinnes For no creature coulde haue sustained such a punishment as should haue beene equiualent to eternall punishment and yet withall should haue beene temporal Obiection They haue deserued eternall punishment whosoeuer are not reconciled to God by Christ. Therefore the soules ought not to be separated from their bodies that they might suffer eternal damnation Aunswere It dooth not followe but this rather That therefore both bodie and soule must bee together that they maie suffer it which at length shall so come to passe 2 Jn respect of gods truth that the truth of GOD maie bee satisfied For GOD threatned and denounced death when euer wee sinned which denouncing was to bee fulfilled after sin was once committed And this is that commination or threatning pronounced by God himselfe Gen. 2.17 In the daie that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death Obiection But Adam did not presently die Aunswere Truely he died spirituallie eternal death and now was dead I hard saith he Gen. 3.10 thy voice There was a terrour in him and a feeling of Gods wrath a strife with death the losse of al the giftes both of body and mind But there followed the equity moderation and lenitie of the Gospell For God had not expressely saide that hee shoulde certainelie die wholy and that
is set downe at the right hande of the father there is no cause why wee should doubt at all of our saluation he shall keepe it safe for vs and at length most assuredly and certainly bestow it vpon vs. Ioh 10.28 No man shal pluck my sheep out of my hand And cap. 17.24 I will that they which thou hast giuen me be with me euen where I am FROM THENCE SHAL HE COME TO IVDGE THE QVICKE AND THE DEAD IN this Article three common places fal in one and meet together which are diuerse in themselues namely of Christes second comming of the ende of the woorlde and of the last iudgement Of these places we wil speake iointly as which are linked betweene themselues yet so that the chiefe of them is that of the lâ—st iudgement For to little purpose were it for vs to think of christs second comming except we did furder coÌ„sider to what end he should come I beleue in christ who shall come to iudge the quick and the dead that is I beleeue 1. That at the second comming of Christ shall follow the renuing of heauen and earth 2. That the selfesame Christ shall come who for vs was borne suffered and rose againe 3. That he shall come gloriouslie to deliuer his church whereof J am a member 4. That hee shal come to abiect and cast awaie the wicked By these wee receiue great and sound comfort also and consolation For seeing there shal be a renouation or renuing of heauen and earth we haue a confidence and trust that our state also shal be at length other and better than it now is seeing christ shall come wee shall haue a fauourable iudge for he shal come to iudge who hath merited righteousnesse for vs who is our Brother Redeemer Patron and Defender seeing hee shal come gloriousâ—â—e he shal also giue a iust sentence and iudgement and shal bee mighty enough to deliuer vs seeing hee shall come to deliuer his church great cause why we should cheerefully expect him seeing he shall abiect and cast awaie the wicked into euerlasting tormentes let vs suffer patientlie their tyrannie To conclude seeing he shall deliuer the godlie and cast awaie the wicked hee wil also either deliuer or cast away vs and therefore it is necessarie that wee repent and bee thankefull in this life and flie fleshely securitie that we maie bee in the number of them whome hee shall deliuer The chiefe Questions of the last iudgement 1 Whether there shall be any iudgement 2 What that iudgement is 3 Who shal be iudge 4 Whence and whither he shal come to iudge 5 How he shal come 6 Whom he shal iudge 7 What shal be the sentence and execution of this iudgement 8 For what causes this iudgement shal bee 9 When it shal be 10 Why god wil haue vs certaine of the last iudgement 11 Why he would not haue vs certaine of the time 12 Wherefore God differreth that iudgement 13 Whether it is to be wished for 1 WHETHER THERE SHALL BEE ANIE IVDGEMENT THIS Question is necessarie For the Scripture also hath foretold that there shal come in the later times â—ockers who shal account this Article for a fable The last iudgement cannot indeede be demonstrated out of Philosophy but neither is there any thing in Philosophie against it But the whole certainty thereof is grounded on diuine Prophecies or of the doctrine of the church For although the Philosopher perhaps woulde say somewhat as seeing a litle through a mist as That it is not likely that man was born to this miserie yet by reason that man hath lost the knoweledge of the righteousnesse goodnesse truth of God we caÌ„not know out of philosophy that any iudgement shal be muchlesse with what circumstances it shall be The arguments which Philosophy yeeldeth are forcible indeed in themselues but are not made knowen but in diuinity and therefore the argumentes themselues are onely made forcible of strength in diuinity Wherefore we wil draw reasons proofs out of diuinity or the doctrine of the gospel by which it may appear that there is a last iudgement The first proof is drawn from expresse plaine testimonies of sacred Scripture As out of the prophecy of Dan. Likewise out of the prophecy of Enoch alleadged by the Apostle Iude vers 14. 15. Behold the Lord coÌ„meth with thousands of his saints To giue iudgement against all men Moreouer out of the sermons of Christ especiallie in Mat. 24. vers 25. Likewise out of the sermons of the Apostles Acts. 17.31 He hath appointed a daie in the which he wil iudge the world in righteousnes by that man whom he hath appointed 1. Thes 4.16 The lord himselfe shal descend froÌ„ heauen with a shout with the voice of the Archangel with the trumpet of god Neither is the certainty of the last iudgemeÌ„t apparaÌ„t only by these the like plain testimonies of Scripture but is deduced also out of other places by good consequence hence are made those forcible argumeÌ„ts which the Philosophers saw but by a glims The second proofe is drawen from the ende whereunto mankind was created God necessarily obtaineth his end but to this end did he create mankind that man shoulde bee the image of God and the euerlasting temple of God wherein he should be worshipped to whom he would communicate himselfe perfect wisedome righteousnesse and goodnesse and would impart his blessednesse This blessednesse is a part of Gods Image but this the Diuell hath destroied Therefore God shall restore it who is mightier than the Diuell And although the end for which man was created is hindered diuerse waies in this life yet god will at some time obtaine it Wherefore it is not onlie as the Philosophers reason likelie and probable that man was not made for thâ—se miseries but it is also most certaine that the most excellent of all creatures was made to a better ende Wherefore there must needs be at length a change By this argument is confirmed also the happinesse of our bodies According to that of Saint Paul 1. Cor. 6.19 Know you not that your bodie is the temple of the holy ghost which is in you The third proofe is taken from the iustice goodnesse and trueth of God which requireth that it maie go ful well with the good with the euil ful il Philosophy knoweth not that god is so iust good and true that he will haue the righteous to enioy full and perfect blessednesse But this commeth not to passe in this life nay rather it goeth well with the euill and wicked in this life Therefore there must remaine an other life wherein this shall bee The holie Scripture vseth this argument as in Saint Paul 2. Thess 1.6 Jt is a righteous thing with God to recompence tribulation to them that trouble you And Luk. 16.25 Remember that thou in thy life-time receiuedst thy pleasures and likewise Lazarus pains nowe therefore is he comforted and thou art tormented
cup is the new testament Or the couenant as both the * Berith greeke and * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hebrue word admitteth Now it is called the new couenant that is renewed or to speake it in a woord fulfilled And this new couenant is our reconciliation with God the communion and participation of Christ and all his benefites by faith in the sacrifice of Christ now fulfilled finished without any obseruation of the ceremonies of the old Passeouer The supper is called the new couenaÌ„t because it is a signe and a seale of this couenant signing and sealing vnto vs our reconciliation with God and our coniunction with Christ which is wrought by faith Now in calling the supper the new couenant first he comprehendeth both the promise and the condition which is expressed in the promise namelie faith and repentance Whereof also it foloweth that the supper was for this cause also instituted that it might bee a bond to bind vs to lead a christian life Secondly hee maketh an opposition betweene the new couenant and that couenant which was the Passeouer together with the rites thereof For the supper signified Christ offered The Passeouer signified Christ who should bee offered There is notwithstanding no small similitude and agreeing of both For both signifie our reconciliation with God and coniunction with Christ Jâ— my bloud which is shed for you for remission of sinnes The shedding of Christs bloud is the merite for which beeing apprehended of vs by faith we receiue remission of sinnes For as often as yee shall eate The supper therefore is often to be iterated and celebrated 1. Because of the woordes of the institution 2. In respect of the ende and purpose of the institution because it must bee done in remembranuce of Christ Shewe the Lordes death That is beleeue that Christ died and that for you and then professe it also publiquely before all Till hee come Therefore it must bee obserued vnto the worlds end neither is any other externall forme to be looked for vntill the day of iudgement The words of the institution which haue beene hitherto expounded may be made more plaine and cleare by these wordes of the Apostle The cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the communion of the bloude of Christ The bread which wee breake is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ The cup of blessing that is the cup of thankesgiuing which is receiued namely to this end that wee may yeeld thankes to Christ for his death and passion The communion of the bodie likewise the communion of the bloud is to be made through faith partaker of Christ and all his benefites the same spirit being in vs which is in Christ and woorking the same in vs which he worketh in Christ Bread and wine is the communion that is it is the signe of our communion with Christ Now our communion as the Apostle briefly declareth consisteth in this that wee who are manie are one bodie Whence it is most easie to collect that this communion is not a corporall eating For it is wrought onely by faith and the holy Ghost Christ is the heade and wee the members and all wee who are members haue also a communion of all Christs benefites Therefore the heade is common the benefites common and so the members also common among themselues wherefore their loue and dilection is common and mutual We vnderstand nowe what is the true meaning of the words of the institution especiallie of those about which is greatest coÌ„trouersy which are these This is my body that is to repeat in few wordes the true sense of them This bread broken of me and giuen to you is a signe of my bodie for your sakes rent and deliuered vnto death and a certaine seale of your coniunction with me so that he who beleeueth and eateth this bread doth truelie and reallie after a sort eat my bodie This our iudgement and interpretation or Christs rather is most true and vnto the truth of the Gospell most agreeable Here especially resistâ—unce is made and the greatest controuersie is about the word or vnderstanding of the word For our aduersaries vnderstand those wordes so as tâ—ey maintaine thereof to folow that Christes bodie is present and eaten corporallie But in the meane season they consider not that those wordes are sacramentallie to bee taken or that the speech is sacramental and therefore is not to be taken as proper and simple as it shoulde bee if thence were gathered that the bread is changed into Christs bodie Now to the signe here is attributed the name of the thing signified both for the coniunction which the thing signified hath in the right vse of the supper with the signe and also for the proportion which the signe hath with the thing signified Come wee now to those arguments whereby wee may confirme our interpretation and opinion to bee true The arguments which wee will vse are of three sorts such as are wont to bee also in like controuersies 1. Some are taken from the nature of the thing or subiect that is by vnderstanding the speech as the thing it selfe doth beare and suffer 2. Some are drawen from an analogie of the articles of our faith or from a conference of places or parts of christian doctrine for the holy spirite is the spirite of truth 3. Some are taken from other like places of scripture where the same thing is deliuered in such words as are manifest and whereof there is no controuersie The first sort of Arguments which are taken from the nature of the sacraments THE verie manner and forme of speaking yeeldeth vs a firme and strong argument Breade is the bodie of Christ but bread is not in it owne proper substance his bodie for by reason hereof haue they inuented consubstantiation therefore it is a figuratiue speeche euen such a one as is vsual vnto sacraments and is declared in the institution 2 Sacraments confirme exhibit promise seale no other thing than the woorde doth In the woorde is promised no corporal eating Therefore neither is anie such thing confirmed by the sacrament 3 In all sacraments when the names or properties of the things are attributed vnto the signes there is not signified the corporal presence of the thing but first a similitude of the things with their signes then a coniunction and vnion of the things with their signes in the right vse but in this sacrament Christ attributeth the name of the thing which is his bodie to the signe therefore there is not thereby signified a corporal presence of his bodie 4 The communion of Christ which is promised in his woorde and sacraments is not corporal but the communion of Christ which is giuen in the supper is the same with that which is giuen in the word and in all sacraments therefore the communion of Christ in the supper is spiritual 5 There is one and the same signification of all the Sacraments of the old and new testament
by necessity excluded from it But such a communion of saints with Christ is spirituall as the Apostle doth shew 1. Cor. 6.17 Hee that is ioined vnto the Lorde is one spirit 1. Ioh. 4.13 Hereby know we that we dwel in him and he in vs because he hath giuen vs of his spirit Iohn 15.5 He is the vine we are the branches Ephes 1.22 4.15 5.30.31 He is the Bridegroome and we with the whole Church are his spouse 2 Such is our eating of Christ as is his abiding in vs but this is spirituall For that Christs abiding in vs is spirituall is sufficientlie perceiued by this in that such is his abiding in vs as is his Fathers Jf anie man loue me he will keepe my woord and my Father will loue him and we will come vnto him and will dwell with him But how doth the Father dwell in vs or abide with vs Truely by his spirite Therefore Christ also so abideth with vs or dwelleth in vs. 3 Christ abideth in vs perpetually Therefore that abiding or presence is not corporall because as touching his humane nature he saith Me yee shall not haue alwaies Therefore hee is not eaten of vs corporallie nay hee cannot be eaten of vs corporallie except he be in vs corporally and that also perpetuallie 3 Vnto the former mâ—y be adioined also argumentes taken from the sacrifice and adoration Wheresoeuer Christ is present corporallie whether it be after a visible or inuisible manner there he is to be adored to wit by our mindes and the motions of our bodies coÌ„uerted turned thither But he is not to be adored in the supper Therefore he is not present in the supper corporally That he is not to be adored in the supper is easilie proued For it is neuer granted in the new testament to tie bind inuocation to anie certain place Ioh. 4.21 The houre commeth when yee shal neither in this mountain nor at Ierusalem worship the father Againe Jf christ be so be adored worshipped in the supper by our mindes and motions of bodie conuerted vnto the bread that whole oblation sacrifice should consist in the hands of sacrificing masse-Priests because they offer the Son vnto the Father to obtain remission of sins and so were his crucifieng to be reiterated The third sort of argumentes which are drawen from like places of scripture where namelie the same thing is deliuered in words whereof there is no controuersie 1 COrporall eating is in expresse termes condemned by the holie Ghost Jt is the spirite saith Christ that quickeneth the flesh profiteth nothing By these woordes Christ expressely condemneth the corporal eating of his flesh whether visible or inuisible 2 The bread which we break saith the Apostle is the coÌ„munion of the body of christ But this coÌ„munioÌ„ is spiritual because when the same Apostle opposeth it to the communion of diuels ye caÌ„not saith he drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of diuels yee cannot be partakers of the lords table and of the table of Diuels by these words the Apostle denieth that the wicked can be partakers of the bodie and blood of christ in the supper And therefore there is no corporall eating of the body and bloude of christ in his supper 3 Christ saith that the bread is his bodie Therefore they tie not themselues to the verie woorde who say that christs body is in the bread vnder the bread with the bread 4 The cup is the new testament that is the cup is a signe of the new testament for it cannot bee otherwise meant or taken For the new testament is the seale of the promise or the promise it self but not the thing promised Likewise The cup is the communion of the bloud of christ The bread is the communion of the body of christ But this communion is a spirituall eating and drinking of the body and bloud of christ as is apparaunt by the wordes of the Apostle and the signes of that spiritual eating and drinking are bread and wine 5 In the Euangelist To eat christ which is the liuing bread which descended from heauen Likewise To eat Christs flesh and to drinke his bloud signifieth to beleeue in Christ Therefore in the words of the institutioÌ„ it signifieth the same also because christ doth not here otherwise expound them 6 There are also the like places of scripture vttered sacramentally of other sacramentes which confirme also the truth and meaning of this as Circumcision is the couenant The lamb is the Passeouer The leuitical sacrifices are said to be an expiation or doing away of sinne The bloud of sacrifices is called the bloud of the couenant Baptisme is the washing of the new birth Therefore these woords also This is my bodie are in like sort sacramentally spoken 7 Christ commaundeth his supper to bee celebrated and the bread wine to be eaten drunken in remembrance of him but this remeÌ„brance is chiefly performed by faith not corporally Moreouer that in memorial wherof we doe any thing is not it selfe present because we are not said to remember things that are present 8 By one spirite are we al baptized into one bodie whether we be Iewes or Grecians whether we be bond or free and haue been al made to drinke into one spirite Wherefore after the same maner doe we al eate the same bread Which Paul also manifestly sheweth affirming That al the Fathers did eate the same spirituall foode That eating therefore is not corporall whereby we are made partakers of the body and bloud of christ otherwise before the comming of christ the fathers should not haue beene at al made partakers of christ as hauing not as yet taken flesh Vnto these argumentes drawen out of the sacred Scripture and the ground of our faith may be added testimonies of the fathers and the purer church of al which we will at this present bring only that one notable saying of Macharius the Monke Bread and wine are a correspondent type of his flesh and they who receiue the bread which is shewed eate the flesh of Christ spirituallie AGAINST THE TRANSVBSTANTIATION OF THE PAPISTES NOW it is easy to see what we are to thinke of Transubstantiation euen that it is an impious inuention deuise of the Papists which also we wil shew and proue briefly by diuers reasons 1 Paul calleth expressely that which is taken bread both before after the eating Therefore that which is taken in the supper is not really the body 2 Christ brake bread but hee did not then breake his body Therefore the bread is not really his body 3 The Bread was not giuen for vs But the body of christ was giuen for vs Therefore the bread is not really Christs body 4 Christ willeth vs to take this sacrament and to take bread and wine in remembraunce of him Therefore the bread is called the body of Christ not reallie but in that it is a memorial of his body that is the bread is a remembrauncer
anie means and for the creatures although it be lawful to expesse them yet god forbiddeth notwithstanding their images to be made or had as thereby to woorship or d Exo. 23.24 34.13.14 17. Num. 33.52 Deut. 7.5 12.3 16.22 2. Reg. 18.4 honour either them or god by them c 1. Sam. 15.23 Deu. 12.30 c. Mat. 15.9 98 But maie not images be tolerated in Churches which may serue for bookes vnto the common people No. For it is not seemly that we should be wiser than god who will haue his church to bee e 2 Tim. 3.16.17 2. Pet. 1.19 taught with the liuely preaching of his worde and not with dumb f Iere. 10 8. c. Hab. 2.18 19. images 99 What doth God decree in the third Commaundement That not only by cursing or g Leuic 24.11 c. Leuit. 19.12 forswearing but also by h Mat 5 37. Iac. 5.12 rash swearing wee shoulde not vse his name despitefully or vnreuerently neither shuld by silence or conniuence bee partakers of these horrible sinnes in others But that wee i Jes 45.23 vse the sacred and holie name of God euer with great deuotion and reuerence that he may be k 1. Tim. 2.8 worshipped and honoured by vs with a true and stedfast l Rom. 2.24 1. Tim. 6.1 Col. 3.16.17 confession and m Mat. 10.32 inuocation of his name lastly in al our woords and actions whatsoeuer 100 Is it then so grieuous a sinne by swearing or banning to take the name of God in vaine as that God is also angrie with them who as much as in them lieth doe not forbid or hinder it Surely most a Leuit. 5.1 grieuous For neither is there any sinne greater or more offending God than the dispiting of his sacred name Wherefore also hee b Leuit. 24.15.16 would haue this sinne to bee punished with death 101 May a man sweare also religiously and lawfully by the name of God He may when as either the magistrate exacteth it or otherwise necessitie requireth by this meanes the faith and truth of any man or thing to be ratified and established whereby both the glorie of God may bee aduanced and the safetie of others procured For this kinde of swearing is c Deut. 6.13 10.20 Is 48.1 Heb. 6.16 ordained by Gods word and therefore was wel d Gen. 21.24 31.53 Jos 9.15.19 1. Sam. 24.22 2. Sam. 3.35 1. Reg. 1.29 Rom. 1.9 vsed of the Fathers both in the olde and newe Testament 102 Is it lawfull to sweare by Saints or other creatures No For a lawefull oth is an inuocation of God whereby we desire that he as the onely searcher of hearts beare witnesse vnto the trueth and punish the swearer if hee wittingly e 2. Cor. 1.23 sweare falsely But this honour f Mat. 5.34.35.36 Iac. 5.12 agreeth to no creature 103 What doth God commaunde in the fourth commandement First that the ministery of the gospel and the schooles of learning should be g Tit. 1.5 1. Tim. 3.14.15 1. Cor. 9.11 13.14 2. Tim. 1.2 3.15 1. Tim. 4.13.14.15.16 5.17 maintained and that I both at other times and especially on holy daies should h Psal 68.26 40.9.10 Act. 2.42.46 frequent studiouslie diuine assemblies i 1. Cor. 14 19.29.31 heare the word of God diligently vse the k 1. Cor. 11.33 Sacraments l 1. Tim. 2.1.2.3.8.9 1. Cor. 14.16 ioine my praiers with the common praiers of the assemblie and bestowe some thing according to my abilitie m 1. Cor 16.2 on the poore And further that all my life-time I bee free from misdeeds or euil actions yeelding vnto the lord that he may by his holy spirit woorke in mee his worke and so I may n Js 66.23 begin in this life that euerlasting Sabboth 104 What doth God inioyne vs in the fift commandement That we yeelde due honor loue faithfulnes to our Parentes and so to all who bear rule ouer vs a Eph. 6.1.2.5 c. Col. 3.18.20.22.23.24 Eph. 5.22 Prou. 1.8.4.1 15.20 20.20 Exo. 21.17 Rom. 13.1 submit our selues with such obedience as is meete to their faithful commaundements and chastisementes And further also that by our patience wee b Prou. 23. â—â— Gen. 9.25 1. Pet. 2.18 beare and suffer their vices and maners â—uer thinking with our selues that god will c Eph. 6.4.9 Col. 3.19 21. Rom. 13. Mat. 22.21 gouerne and guide vs by their hand 105 What dooth God exact in the sixt commaundement That neither in thought nor in gesture muchlesse in deede I reproch or hate or harme or d Mat. 5.12.22 Gen. 9.6 Mat. 26.52 kil my neighbour either by my selfe or by another but e Eph. 4 26. Rom. 12.19 Mat. 5.25 18.35 cast away al desire of reuenge Furthermore that I hurt not my selfe or cast my selfe wittinglie into anie daunger Wherefore also that murthers might not be committed f Rom. 13.14 Col. 2.23 Syraâ— 3.27 Mat. 4.7 hee hath g Gen. 9.6 Exod. 21.14 Mat. 26.52 Rom. 13.4 armed the Magistrate with the sword 106 But this commaundement seemeth to forbid murther only But in forbidding murther god dooth further teach that he hateth the roote and cause of murther to wit h Iac. 1.20 Gal. 5.20 anger i Rom. 1.29 enuy k 1. Joh. 2.9.11 hatred and desire of reuenge and doth l 1. Ioh. 3.15 account them al for murther 107 Is it enough then that we kil no man in such sort as hath beene said It is not enough For when god condemneth anger enuy hatred he requireth that wee m Mat. 22.39 7.12 loue our neighbour as our selues and that he vse n Rom. 12.10 humanity lenitie curtesie o Eph. 4.2 Gal. 6.1.2 Mat. 5.5 Rom. 12.18 Mat. 57. Luc. 6.3.6 patience and p Exod. 23.5 mercie towards him q Mat. 5.45 turne awaie from him as much as we may whatsoeuer maie be hurtful vnto him In a word that we be so affected in mind as that we r Rom. 12 20.2â— stick not to do good also vnto our enemies 108 What is the meaning of the seuenth commandement That god hath in Å¿ Leu. 18.27.28 execrational turpitude and filthines therefore we also must Iud. 22.23 vtterly hate and detest it and contrariwise liue temperately modestly and a 1. Thes 4.3.4.5 chastly whether we b Heb. 13.4 1. Cor. 7.4 liue in holy wedlock or in single life 109 Forbiddeth God nothing else in this commandement but adulterie and such kinds of vnclearnes Seeing both our bodie and soule are the temples of the holy ghost god wil haue vs to possesse both in puritie holines And therefore deeds gestures c Eph. 5 3. 1. Cor. 6.18.9 20. woordes thoughtes d Mat. 5.27.28 filthie lustes and whatsoeuer entiseth a man vnto these al that hee wholy e Eph. 5.18.19
and which is belonging vnto the office and function of teaching in the church and whereof mention also is made in the fourth commaundement but this propagation of true doctrine is that instituting and instructing which appertaineth to euery one because euery one priuatly in his place is bound to bring others to the knowledge worship of God Deu. 4.9 Teach them thy Sonnes and thy Sonnes Sonnes Deut. 6 20. When thy Sonne shal aske thee in time to come saying what meane these testimonies and ordinaunces and Lawes which the Lorde our God hath commaunded you Then shalt thou saie vnto thy Sonne wee were Pharaohs bondmen in Aegypt but the Lord brought vs out of Aegypt with a mighty hand Deut. 11.19 Yee shal teach them your children speaking of them when thou sittest in thine house when thou walkest by the waie and when thou liest downe and when thou risest vp Luke 22.32 When thou art conuerted strengthen thy brethen Coloss 3.16 Let the woord of Christ dwel in you plenteouslie in al wisedome teaching and admonishing your owne selues in Psalmes Hymnes and spiritual Songs 1. Thess 5.11 Exhort one another and edifie one another 2 The celebration lauding or magnifieng of God which is a commemoration and recounting of Gods woorkes and properties ioyned with a liking and admiration of them before God and his creatures to this end that we may signifie and declare our liking or approbation and reuerence towardes God that God may excell aboue all thinges and that so our subiection vnto him may appeare and be manifested They therefore which ban and curse sinne against this commaundement because they sin against the praising and magnifieng of God when they speak impious things of God as if he forsooth were their executioner to reuenge their quarell and they sinne against praier and inuocation when they craue of god those thinges which are flat against his word Some man wil here reply Vnto whō God doth imprecate wish euil to thē we maie also wish euil Vnto this we answer 1. All imprecations or euil-wishinges which are made absolutelie without some prophecy or special reuelatiō are sins 2. They must be done without priuate hatred and desire of reuenge 3. They must be done in respect of gods glorie onlie and the preseruation of the true church 4. Wee must not imprecate or wish euill as it is an euill that is as it is the destruction of them against whom wee wish it 3 The confession of the truth which wee knowe concerning GOD which is the shewing of our iudgement and opinion concerning god and his will certainely knowen out of gods word because according as our duty bindeth vs we signifie and declare our minde and knowledge for the setting forth of gods glory for the furthering of the saluation of others Rom. 10.10 With the heart man beleeueth vnto righteousnesse and with the mouth man confesseth to saluation 1. Pet. 3.15 Bee readie alwaies to giue an aunswere to euerie man that asketh you a reasō of the hope that is in you with meeknes and reuerence And hence it appeareth that they who lead a vitious and bad life sinne against this commaundement because they sinne against the confession of the truth when as they boast themselues to bee Christians and shewe the contrarie in their life and maners These three partes or vertues of the right and lawful vsage of the name of god which haue bin now proposed agree in this that they are a commemoration of the truth concerning god again they differ in this that the doctrine or propagation of true doctrine tendeth to the instruction of others The celebration of God respecteth our liking and subiection The confession of the knowen trueth betokeneth the certainty of our opinion and iudgement 4 The zeale of god which is an ardent loue of god and a griefe for any reproch or contempt which is done to god and an endeuour to put awaie that reproch from the name of god and to auoide sinnes our selues and to banish them from others This zeale is required of euery one that euery one according to his place and calling and as hee is in duetie bound doe vindicate and maintaine the glorie of God 5 Jnuocation which is praier whereby we craue of the true God none other blessinges than God hath commanded vs to aske of him onely which praier and petition proceedeth from a desire in vs of gods bountifulnesse and liberality and is made in true conuersion and in a full persuasion of gods promises for the Mediatours sake Psal 105.1 Praise the Lord and cal vpon his name Matth. 7.7 Aske and it shal be giuen you seeke and yee shal find knocke and it shal be opened vnto you 1. Iohn 5.14 This is the assuraunce that wee haue in him that if we aske any thing according to his wil he heareth vs. 6 Thankes-giuing which is to acknowledge and confesse what and how great benefites blessings we haue receiued of god vnto what obedience towards god we are in respect of them bound and ready or prepared and that therefore we wil yeelde vnfaigned obedience vnto him to the vtmost of our power Colos 3.17 Whatsoeuer ye shall do in word or deed doe all in the name of the Lord Jesus giuing thanks to god euen the father by him 1. Thess 5.18 In all thinges giue thanks for this is the wil of God in Christ Jesus toward you Psal 107.1 Praise the Lord because he is good for his mercie endureth for euer 7 Right and lawful swearing which is comprehended vnder Inuocation as a special vnder the general The chiefe questions concerning an oath or swearing 1 What an oath is 2 By whom we are to sweare 3 Of what things we must sweare 4 Whether al oathes are to be kept 5 Whether a christian maie take a right lawful oath 1 WHAT AN OATH IS AN oath is an inuocating on god whereby is desired that god who is the viewer of the harts would bee a witnesse vnto him that sweareth that he wil not lie or deceiue in that matter whereof he sweareth and that God would punish him that sweareth if he doe lie or deceiue In this definition are the other foure questions also comprehended Furthermore an oath was ordained by God that it might be the bond of truth betweene men and a testimonie or recorde that god is the authour and defender of the truth An oath is oftentimes vnderstoode and taken for the whole worship of God because by whom a man sweareth the same himselfe professeth to account for god 2 By whom we must swear WE must sweare by god onlie 1. Because god hath commanded vs to sweare by him onlie as he alone is to bee feared and worshipped 2. God wil haue inuocation to be vsed vnto himselfe onelie Therefore hee will haue vs to sweare also by himselfe only because an oath is an inuocating on god 3. An oath doth giue and ascribe vnto him by whom wee sweare the inspection and
God vnto the enimies of Dauid for surelie J wil not leaue of all that he hath by the dawning of the daie anie that pisseth against the wall But after hee had heard Abigail speake he giueth thankes to god that the executing and fulfilling of his oath was hindered by her and confirmeth by a new oath that this is gods blessing and benefite saying Blessed be the Lord God of Jsraell which sent thee this daie to meete mee and blessed be thy counsels and blessed be thou which hast kept me this daie from comming to shed bloud and that mine hand hath not saued mee For indeede as the Lord God of Israel liueth who hath kept me backe from hurting thee c. Obiection 1. He that sweareth to doe a thing which is in his power to doe and yet dooth it not maketh God witnes of a lie Answere He that sweareth indeede ought that is lawfull and is in his power and doth it not maketh god witnes of a lie but if it be an euil thing which he sweareth the recalling thereof is better than the keeping Obiection 2. The oath of peace which was made to the Gibeonites Iohn 9. was against the commaundement of God Jt is lawful therefore to keepe an oath made of thinges vnlawfull Aunswere 1. They were not excluded from peace if anie of those Nations which God hath commaunded to be destroyed did aske peace of the Israelites and did embrace their religion Now the Gibeonites desire peace and are adiudged to serue the tabernacle for woodcleauers and drawers of water perpetually Therefore the peace which was promised them albeit it was obteined by fraude and guile yet was it not repugnant to Gods commaundment 2. The Israelites doe not therefore keepe this oath as that they were bound thereby because they sware it being deceiued and thinking the Gibeonites to haue beene of another countrie but first for auoiding of offence whereby the name of God might bee disgraced among the Heathen if the Iewes had not kept their oath and then because it was lawful and iust to saue them which desired peace and embraced their religion although no oath had beene made at all Out of those thinges which haue beene spoken concerning the keeping of lawful oathes aunswere is made vnto this question Whether oathes extorted from men against their wils are to be kept Extorted oathes are to bee kept if they containe nothing in them that is vnlawfull or if they haue the forealleaged conditions although they be vnprofitable and hurtful to vs. But vnto wicked oathes no man ought to be forced neither verilie should wicked oathes be extorted by anie tortures from vs but we must choose to die rather But if anie wicked and impious oathes be made through feare or infirmitie against our conscience those doe not bind and are to bee recalled because what is impious to be done that is impious to be sworne neither is one sinne to be heaped on another Now extorted oathes that are not impious which are made of things lawful and possible though hurtfull and harde are doubtlesse to be kept because thou art bound by Gods Law to chuse the lesser euil If it bee iust to doe which thou through constraint hast promised it is iust also for thee to promise by oath to doe it For what we may lawfully doe the same also we may lawfully promise by an oath to do As if a man falling into the hāds of a theef shuld be required by the thief to giue a peece of mony for the redeeming of his life verily he not only may but also ought if he be able to perfourme that which the theef requireth And if this be lawfully performed vnto a theef it is lawfully also performed vnto him by an oath Likewise it is lawful also to promise by oath silence vnto the theefe and such an oath made for the keeping of silence promised vnto the theefe both may and ought to be kept Obiection That which is hurtful vnto the common wealth is not to be promised or if it haue been promised it is not to be kept Such silence promised vnto the theefe is hurtfull to the common wealth therefore it is not to be promised or if it haue beene promised it is not to be kept Aunswere 1. That which is hurtfull to the common wealth is not to bee promised that is if wee may doe it without the hazard and danger of our life And further if at that instant when a man is in such daunger of his life hee bee not rather to prouide for his owne safety than to reueile such a thing 2. It is rather profitable than hurtful vnto the common wealth to promise silence vnto the theefe and to keepe promise For hee which hath promised silence by oath vnto the theefe is by this meanes saued Moreouer if he should not promise by oath silence vnto the theefe threatning him death he shoulde thereby neither profit the cōmon welth nor himself Wherefore to promise silence by oath vnto the theef to keepe it seeing it is the lesser euil is of the two rather to be chosen 3 Whether a Christian maie take a right and lawful oath THat a Christian maie take an oath besides that it is necessariely gathered out of that which hath beene already spoken of an oath Exod. 22.12 Heb. 6.16 it is also confirmed by diuerse reasons The first reason is drawen from the end of an oath For an oath is a confirmation of faith and truth a deciding of debates a bond of ciuill order and giueth and ascribeth the praise and mainteinaunce of the truth to God Wherefore an oath is lawfull and necessary for christians because the confirming of faith and truth and the deciding of debates is profitable lawful and necessary for al and glorious vnto God The second reason is drawen from the definition or nature of an oath because an oath is a testification of the truth and an inuocation of God whereby we desire of God such thinges as are agreeable vnto his nature and wil manifested in his word to wit that he wil bear record vnto the truth But this inuocation of God is lawfull therefore an oath is lawful Inuocation is the worshippe of God Therefore an oath also must necessarily bee iudged to bee the worshippe of God The third reason is drawne from gods commaundement Deut. 6.13 and 10.20 Thou shalt feare the Lorde thy GOD and serue him and shalt sweare by his name Isai 65.16 He that sweareth in the earth shal sweare by the true God Ier. 12.16 And if they wil learne the waies of my people to sweare by my name The Lord liueth Hither are referred especially * Isai 45.23 48.1 Psal 63.10 Iere. 42. Gen. 21.23 c. those places of Scripture where an oath is taken for the true worshippe of God The fourth is drawen from the examples and practise of the Saintes whose oathes are in Scripture approued Neither onely the example of the godly Patriarkes and Apostles
Matth. 12.31 Euery sinne and blasphemy shal be forgiuen vnto men but the blasphemie against the holie Ghost shal not be forgiuen vnto men Whence it appeareth seeing Paul saith hee was a blasphemer and yet obtained pardon and seing likewise christ affirmeth that some blasphemy is forgiuen and some is not forgiuen that the name of blasphemy is taken in diuers senses Vnto the confession of the truth is repugnaunt first The denial of the truth for feare of hatred or persequution or ignominie This deniall is of two sortes The first is an vniuersal and general defection from true religion which is to cast awaie the profession of the truth either certainelie or doubtfullie knowen and receiued with a certaine and purposed aduise and with the whole hearts desire of resisting God and without anie griefe or remorse of flying and shunning this casting awaie of the truth and without any purpose of obeying God in applying vnto himselfe the promise of grace and in shewing repentaunce This denial is proper to reprobats and hypocrites Whereof is spoken Matt. 13. and Luk. 8. and 1. Joh. 2. And this defection if it be don against the truth certainly knowen is sinne against the holy Ghost whereof none repent The other denial is special and particular which is the denial of weaklings is committed either through error not voluntary neither purposed or through feare of affliction when as notwithstanding there remaineth still in the hart an inclination and griefe detesting that weaknesse and denial and some purpose also to struggle out of it and to obey God by applying vnto himselfe the promise of grace and by giuing himselfe vnto repentaunce Into this denial may the elect and regenerate fall but they get out of it againe and returne vnto the confession of the truth in this life as it is shewed and exemplied in Peter Matth. 26. Secondlie Vnto confession is also opposed dissimulation or dissembling and hiding of the truth when as Gods glorie and our neighbours safetie requireth a confession of the truth which then requireth it when false opinions concerning God and his wil or woorde or concerning the church seeme to be confirmed and strengthned by our silence in the mindes of men or when those thinges remaine secret and hidden which God wil haue known and manifest for the maintenance of his glorie against the reproches of the wicked for the conuincing of the obstinate and for the instructing of those which are desirous to learne or lastly when our silence maketh vs suspected to be approuers and abetters of the wicked Thirdly vnto the right and lawfull confession of truth is opposed an vnseasonable and vntimelie confession that is whereby without any aduancing of Gods glory and without the furtherance of any ones safety and without any necessity of discharging his calling or duety there is stirred vp either a derision and euill entertainment of the truth or the fiercenesse and cruelty of the enemies against the godly Such a confession whereas it dooth rather darken than set forth the glory of God rather hindereth than furthereth the safety of the Church swarueth plainly from the scope and end of true and lawful confession and therefore is not a right vsing but an abusing of Gods name Therefore Christ forbiddeth it Mat. 7. Giue not that which is holie to dogs And Paul Tit. 3.10 Reiect him that is an heretique after once or twise admonition knowing that he that is such is peruerted and sinneth beeing damned of his own self Neither doth that crosse this which is said 1. Pet. 3.15 Be readie alwaies to giue an answere to euerie man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekenesse and reuerence For Peter willeth vs to be alwaies in a readinesse or furnished to make aunswere concerning the summe and groundes of Christian doctrine yet so as that it is not necessary to vtter and expound all vnto euery one but vnto all those which require a reason and an account of our faith therby either to learne it or to know it But whom we see once to scoffe at the true doctrine which hath beene expounded confirmed vnto them if they again require a reason and account of our faith we are not to make further answere For so Christ himselfe after hee had sufficiently confessed and confirmed his doctrine by testimonies answereth nothing vnto the High-Priest and Pilate touching the false witnesses and Luk 22. himselfe rendereth this reason of his silence If J shal tel you you wil not beleeue me Another reason is giuen by Isaiah cap. 53. He was oppressed and was afflicted did not open his mouth that is because Christ knewe he was now to suffer according to his fathers will after his cause was sufficiently defended he is not careful of deliuering his person from iniuries contumelies and punishments For he knewe that this obedience did tend to his fathers glorie But contrariwise when the High-Priest adiureth him he confesseth himselfe to bee Christ because then his silence woulde haue giuen suspicion of contempt of the name of god whereby he was adiured Obiection We do not perceiue who are swine and dogs wherefore we are to render a reason of our faith to al without putting anie difference Aunswere Christ doth not cal al wicked men swine or dogs but those only who contemne and make a mock of the doctrin confirmed which they haue heard and which hath beene expounded vnto them 2. Christ willeth not vs to iudge of dogs and swine by the secretes of their hearts but by their present words and deedes If againe it be replied In matters of difficultie and such as are hard to be iudged except there be deliuered some certaine and exact rule how to iudge and deale mens consciences are left wauering and in doubt 1. But if also we are to iudge of the outward shew of swine and dogs it is hard to pronounce who are to bee accounted for swine and dogs Therefore mens consciences are left in doubt vnto whom and when confession must bee made The Minor is false For Christ wil haue none to be counted for dogs and swine but such as shew manifest stubburnes and obstinacy in their woords and deedes of whom it is no hard thing to iudge out of the word of God And further the holy Ghost is promised vnto all that aske him by whom their iudgementes and actions may be directed that they er not And lastly seeing in this life we attaine not vnto the perfection of Gods Law neither in other things neither in this point they who ioine the desire of Gods direction with an earnest care of Gods glory and loue of their neighbour may and ought to be certain assured either that their counsels are so ruled by the holy Ghost that they erre not or if they er that yet their error is pardoned forgiuen them And this certainty sufficeth for the reteining of a good conscience If lastly it be obiected That tyrants and manie Magistrates
persons places times and other circumstances require vnto the glory of God the safety of our neighbor This end maketh that the Diuel cānot be said to be true although he somtimes speak that which is true For his is true who speaketh and loueth the truth doth affection it for the glory of God and the safety of his neighbour Truth may also be defined on this wise Truth is a firme election in the wil whereby we constantly embrace true sentences opinions speak that which is true keepe couenants promises auoide al deceitful dissemblings both in speech and outward gesture True confession is commaunded both in this and in the third commaundement as often times the same vertu is required to the obedience of diuers commandements But in the third commandemēt true confession is required as it is the honour and worship of God immediately respecting God and here it is commanded as there is a will in vs not to deceiue our neighbour but to wishe his safety welfare Vnder the name of truth we comprise liberty of speech which is a vertu wherby as much as the time place necessity requireth we professe the truth freely boldly are not withdrawne through the fear of dangers Vnto truth in the defect are repugnant 1. Al lies vnto which appertain al guiles dissemblings negligence in vnderstanding the truth of thinges lies of courtesy likewise slanders backbitings euil speakinges which kindes of lying are repugnaunt also vnto Fairnesse of maners conditions Lying is to speak otherwise or to signify otherwise by outward gestures than thou thinkest than the thing it selfe is So then in this commaundement principally is lying forbidden Vnto lying is referred also wilful ignoraunce which is a lying in the mind Officious lyes or lyes of courtesie are to be auoided because euil is not to be doone that good may come of it And al lying that doth expressely dissemble the truth is condemned But a truth which is vttered by a figure is no ly whether he vnderstand it or no with whom we deale This is to be obserued that we bee not too rigorous in examining the actiōs of the Saints also that we excuse not those things which haue no neede to be excused 1. Obiect That which profiteth another and hurteth no man is not sinne A dutiful lie is of such qualitie Therefore it is no sinne Answere The Minor is false Reply But yet the truth is often not to bee spoken Answere We must not put a difference between the hiding of the truth and lying Obiect God blesseth the midwiues because thy told a lie Therefore God alloweth and liketh of lies Aunswere God therefore blesseth the mid-wiues because they feared God slue not the infantes of the Israelites 2. Vnto truth in the defect is repugnaunt vanitie or leuitie which is a readines to lieng He is vain who lieth much often easilie and that without anie shame A lier is he who hath a desire to lie Vnto truth in the excesse is repugnant 1. Vntimely professing of the truth which is to cast pearles to swine and to giue that which is holy vnto dogges as Christ saith who by these words doth wholy forbid vnnecessarie and vntimely professing of the truth For as the verse hath it in the Poet He that warneth out of time doth harme 2. Curiositie which is to search after thinges vnnecessary or vnpossible These things may suffice for this chiefe and principall vertue of this ninth commandement The vertues which folow wait vpon trueth and they all are as it were of truthes retinue 2 Fairenesse of minde is a vertu which taketh wel things well or doubtfully spoken or done and interpreteth them in the better part to wit as farre as there are any reasonable causes to induce thereto doth not easily conceiue suspicions neither sticketh vpon suspicions though they be such as are iust haue reasonable causes hee doth not ground thereon neither directeth his actions accordingly neither decreeth or determineth ought by them It is defined after this manner Faiernesse of minde is a neighbour-vertue vnto truth allowing of others wils vpō probable reason hating all euil-mindednesse drawing also some things that are doubtfull to the better part hopeing in deede that which is good but yet as touching mutable thinges thinking that the wils of men may change and that a man may erre concerning anothers will seeing the infoldings and secret places of mans mind are not beheld The Extremes of this vertue in the defect are Slaundering and Suspiciousnesse Slaundering is not onelie falsly to criminate attach the innocent but also to interprete things indifferently spoken in the worser part or also to interlace coine some falshoode Suspiciousnes is to take things well or ambiguously spoken in the worser part to suspect euill thinges of those that are good or to suspect without cause or also to make to much of tru suspicions It is lawful for vs somtimes to suspect except we wil be fools Mat. 10.16.17 Beware of men be ye wise as serpentes innocent as doues In the excesse foolish Credulitie foolish flatterie Credulitie is hastily or vnaduisedly to interprete any thing or to assent to one without iust probable cause Or to beleeue a thing of another when there are manifest or probable reasons to the contrary Flatterie or assentation is to praise or like things not to be praised thereby to get either the goods or fauour of another man Fairenesse of mind is an assistant or special kind of truth Therfore it is also here together with trueth commanded 3 Simplicitie which is open trueth without wrinkles or fetches and compassings or it is a vertue which doth properly and plainly speake and doe such thinges as are true right and declared in artes common life Trueth is tempered with simplicity fairenesse of mind or conditions The extremes of simplicitie are Fained simplicitie and Doublenesse in manners and conuersation 4 Constancie which is a vertue not departing from the knowen trueth neither altering his purpose without good and necessary causes but constantly speaking dooing such thinges as are true iust necessarie Or it is a vertue persisting in the trueth once found knowen approued in the like maner professing defending the same Constancy is necessarie for the preseruation maintenance of the trueth Therefore it is here also commanded The extremes hereof in the defect are Vnconstancie or Lightnesse which is to alter true purposes opinions without reason In the excesse the extremes are Pertinacie or stoicall stifnesse and rigour which is a vice arising from a confidence in his owne wit or from pride ostentation refusing to yeeld or depart from his opinion albeit it bee such as hee seeth by strong reasons to be false but persisting in false opinions or vniust vnprofitable actions 5 Docilitie or a readinesse to learne which is a vertue searching after the reasons of true opinions easily
beleeuing yeelding to those that teach or shew better things that vpon certaine reason framing his will ready to assent vnto true or probable reasons to leaue those thinges which before he held embraced The same are the extremes of Docilitie which are of constaÌ„cie wherunto also this Docilitie is necessarie For Constancie without Docilitie degenerateth into Pertinacie and Docilitie without Constancie degenerateth into Leuitie Now al these vertues which haue beene numbered agree and are linked verie well one with another For Trueth must bee tempered with Fairenesse of minde and Simplicitie perceiued and knowen by Docilitie preserued and maintained by Constancie And so these former vertues are required to the being of truth Now the three vertues following are required to the profitable beeing of the trueth in the world 6 Taciturnitie or silentnesse which is a vertue withholding in silence thinges secret vnnecessarie to bee spoken where when as far as is needful auoiding ouer-much babling talkatiuenes Or it is such a maner of professing the truth whereby secret thinges whether true or false are kept close speeches vnnecessarie vnprofitable are auoided especially vntimely pernicious speeches such as giue offence The extremes hereof in the defect are Pratling foolish prating and treacherie Pratling is not to be able to keepe close any thing Foolish Prating or futilitie follie of speech is to speake vnseasonably immoderatelie foolishly In the excesse Haughtinesse Peeuishnesse dissembling of the trueth where are necessarie or probable causes Peeuishnesse or morositie is an ouer-much silentnesse burying of the truth where gods glorie the safety of our neighbour or our owne or others cause or the loue of our friendes requireth vs to speake Silentnesse without affability becommeth Morositie or peeuishnesse and Affabilitie without Silentnesse becommeth pratling and foolish prating babling out thinges hurtfull vnnecessarie vaine or secret 7 Affability or readines of speaking which is a vertu gladly with signification of good wil hearing answering speaking where need is vpon a necessarie probable cause or it is a vertue easilie entertaining the mutual talkes of others giuing signification of the good wil in conferences speech gestures Or Gentlenes facility affabilitie consist in giuing care making answere vnto others with some signification of good wil. The same are the extremes of Affabilitie which are of Taciturnitie or Silentnesse likewise leuitie Assentation or affectated labored affabilitie 8 Vrbanitie or pleasantnesse which is a vertue of speaking the trueth with a certain grace elegancie to teach comfort exhilarate nip or touch or it is a certain sauce of trueth speech to wit the trueth figuratiuely vttered either to mooue or delight others without bitternesses keeping the circumstances of place time persons The Extremes are 1 Scurrilitie and Dicacitie Scurrilitie is obscene homly iesting especially in serious matters Scurra that is a scurrulous person is so called from the Greeke worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth dung because he speaketh filthinesse dung Dicacitie or scoffing is a vice of iâ—sting bitterly of deriding bourding and exagitating others but especially such as are miserable 2 Stoliditie or Foolishnesse Sottishnesse or vnsauorinesse Foolishinesse is an vntimely affectation of vrbanitie Sottishnesse is an absurd vnsauorie affectation of vrbanitie Now Vrbanitie is an especial gift of the wit but may notwithstanding bee gotten by experience in matters 3 Backbyting which spreadeth false slaunders of others constereth doubtfull speeches in the worse part with a desire of reuenge an endeuor to hurt or to raise enuie THE TENTH COMMANDEMENT THOV shalt not couet thy neighbours house nor his wife nor his seruant nor his maid nor his Oxe nor his Asse not any thing that is his The scope and ende of this commandement is a rightnesse and inward obedience of all our Affections towardes God and our neighbour which must also be obserued in the other coÌ„mandements Neither yet is this commandement superfluous because it is added to the former commandments to be a declaration of them that vniuersall because this is spoken of the whole in generall and furder it is also added to be as a rule leuill according to which wee must take and measure the inwarde obedience of all the other commaundements For in this commaundement is commanded originall iustice or righteousnesse towardes God our neighbour which is the true knowledge of God in our mind a power inclination desire in our will heart in all our parts to obay God his knowen will and to performe vnto our neighbour for gods sake al duties required to regard maintaine his safety welfare Vnto orinall iustice originall sinne or concupiscence is repugnaunt which is an inordinate appetite or a corrupt inclination pronenesse in the minde will heart contrarie to God and desiring those thinges that God forbiddeth in his Law which ensued vpon the fall of our first parents and was from theÌ„ deriued to all their posteritie so deprauing and corrupting their whole nature that all by reason of this corruption are become obnoxious to the euerlasting wrath of God neither are able to doe ought that is pleasing to God except pardon be graunted for the sonne of God the Mediator and our nature be renued by the holy Ghost Of originall iustice towardes our neighbour there are two extremes 1. In the defect Original sinne towardes our neighbour which is a desire and wishing of those thinges which hurt our neighbour 2. In the excesse Jnordinate loue of our neighbour when for his sake we neglect God We are heere to obserue that not onelie corrupt inclinations are sinnes but also the thinking of euil is sinne to wit as the thinking of euill ioined with a desire of doing it Now that concupiscence is euil and sinne albeit it be borne with vs there is no doubt For we are not to iudge according to nature but according to the lawe whether a thing bee sinne or no be it or be it not borne with vs. The Pelagians denied concupiscence to be sin But Paul saith the contrarie Roman 7.7 J had not knowen concupiscence or lust except the law had said Thou shalt not lust Their obiections are these 1 Obiect Natural things are not sins Concupiscence is a natural thing Therefore it is no sin Ans There is a fallacy of the accident in the Minor For concupiscence was not before the fal but ensued after the fal Againe this word Naturall hath a diuers construction For in the Maior it signifieth a good thing created of God in nature to wit mans appetite before the fall which was not contrarie to the Lawe In the Minor it signifieth a thing which wee haue not of nature but which we purchased vnto vs after the fall Replie An affection or appetite euen in nature now corrupted to desire good things and eschue hurtfull things is not sin But such is
but of Christ who hath fully satisfied him for vs. Reply Then is not yet this freely because wee haue merited it in Christ Aunswere That merit is not our merite because the father gaue vs his sonne freely who meriteth without any merit of ours comming between and that merit of Christ is imputed vnto vs through grace therefore freely for that merit are our sinnes remitted vs whereupon also it is truely and wel added that for Christs satisfaction our sins are not imputed to vs. For we desire not that god would do contrary vnto his iustice would not account vs in mind for sinners but that he would impute vnto vs anothers righteousnes that is the righteousnes of Christ wherewith we being clothed our sins also may be couered 3 Why we are to desire remission of sinnes WE are to desire remission of sinnes 1. That we maie be saued because without remission of sinnes we cannot be saued And this benefite God giueth not but onely to those that desire it 2. That we may be put in minde of the remnauntes of sinnes which are euen in the holiest men and that to this ende that repentaunce maie euermore encrease Wherefore wee are daily also to beg and desire remission of sinnes 3. That wee maie desire and receiue the former blessings because without remission of sins those blessings either are at al not giuen or are giuen to our destruction So the wicked doe indeed often receiue them but not for their saluation as turning rather to their condemnation Obiection What wee haue that we neede not desire But the godly haue remission of sinnes Therefore the godly haue no need to desire it Ans The godly indeed haue remission but not wholy neither also as concerning continuaunce but only as touching the beginning thereof This remission must verily be continued and God also doth continue it to them vnto whom hee remitteth their sinnes in his sonne yet with this condition that they daily pray for and desire that continuaunce Although then god hath remitted vnto vs our sinnes yet hee will notwithstanding that we aske and desire pardon for them and therefore we desire that what sins wee commit or shal commit the same god would remit vnto vs. 4 How our sinnes are remitted vnto vs. OVR sinnes are so remitted vnto vs as wee forgiue and remit our debters And this Christ added 1. That we may rightlie desire remission of sinnes and so that we may come to pray with true faith repentance a signe and token whereof is the loue of our neighbour 2. That when wee finde in our selues true faith and repentance we may so haue a certain argument and comfort in vs that we are of the number of them vnto whom remission is promised and that therefore wee shal doubtlesse obtaine remission of sins when as we may be certainly assured by this that we our selues remit vnto others from our heart their trespasses against vs that we please God albeit many remnaunts of sinne are dwelling as yet within vs. Obiection 1. He that remitteth not is not remitted We remit not Therefore we are not remitted Aunswere He that remitteth not fully and perfectly is notwithstanding remitted so that hee remitte truely and sincerely Obiection 2. Christ willed vs to desire that God will so remitte vs our sinnes as wee remitte our debters But wee doe not perfectlie remit our debters Therefore he willed vs to desire that god wil not perfectly remitte vs our sinnes Ans This is a fallacy of speech deceiuing by miscōstring a word For the particle as in this petition dooth not signifie the degree of remission or a comparison of our remission with that remission wherewith God remitteth vs our sinnes but it signifieth the kinde of remission namely the trueth and sincerity of our remission whereby wee forgiue others from our hart and with a readie wil of forgiuing them or to speak shorter heere is not made a comparison according to degrees but according to the truth of the thing or according to the trueth of remission so that the meaning is so perfectly God remitteth vs our sinnes as we truly and certainely remitte and forgiue our neighbour or Forgiue vs our debts because we forgiue our debters Reply Then is our remission of others the cause why God remitteth vs. Answere This a fallacy putting that for a cause which is no cause For our remission wherwith we forgiue others though not perfectly yet sincerely is only an argument and testimony vnto vs that god wil remit vs our sinnes For our remission and forgiuing of others cannot merit 1. Because it is vnperfect 2. Albeit it were perfect yet should it not merit because what we now perfourme that we owe vnto god For were it so that we did now perfourme perfect obedience to god yet were wee bound of duty to perfourme it Reply But neuertheles yet here is betokened an equalitie of remission in vs and god Aunswere Not an equality but a likenesse and similitude of the kinde of remission Obiection 3. He that remembreth iniuries and is desirous of reuenge doth not truly remit and forgiue But we all remember iniuries and are desirous of reuenge Therefore we doe not truly remit and forgiue Aunswere They that remember iniuries that is without a resistance and dislike of this remembraunce or with a yeelding thereto doe not truely remit If then wee withstand and resist the remnauntes of sinnes which as yet cleaue fast vnto vs and doe not yeelde vnto them nothing hindereth why wee maie not bee saide to remitte others truelie and from our heart and so also to attaine vnto that in regarde where-of this particle as was added of Christ to wit which before also we mentioned to desire and pray rightly Now we rightly pray and desire in faith and repentance both which this petition confirmeth Faith is confirmed and strengthned by this petition because when we truely remit our neighbour we may and ought certainly to resolue that our sins are also remitted vs and so haue we a good conscience are assured that we are heard according to this promise of Christ Math. 6.14 Jf ye doe forgiue men their trespasses your heauenlie father will also forgiue you True repentance also is confirmed and increased in vs by this petition For by this petition we are prouoked and incited to true repentaunce the chiefe part whereof is the loue of our neighbour For if we will be forgiuen we must forgiue others Both causes are conteined in the word of Christ before alleaged out of Matthewe as also in the rest which are presently added in the same place in Matthewe by way of opposition If yee doe forgiue men their trespasses your heauenlie father will also forgiue you that is assure your selues also that your heauenly father heareth you In which worde is comprehended the confirmation of our faith But if yee doe not forgiue men their trespasses no more will your father forgiue you your trespasses In these words is added a spurre to
1. Cor. 15.33 forbiddeth 110 What doth God forbid in the eight commaundement Not onely those f 1. Cor. 6 10. thefts g 1. Cor. 5.10 robberies which the magistrate punisheth but by the name of theft he comprehendeth whatsoeuer euil craftes fetches and deuises whereby we seek after other mens goods endeuour by force or with some shewe of right to h Luc. 3.14 1. Thes 4 6. conueie them ouer vnto our selues of which sort are false i Prou. 11.1 16.11 weightes false els vneuen k Ezech. 45.9 c. Deu. 25.13 c. measures deceitfull merchandise couÌ„terfet coine l Psal 15.5 Luc. 6.35 vsurie or any other way or meanes of furthering our estate which God hath forbidden To these we may adde all m 1. Cor. 6.10 couetousnesse and the manifolde waste and n Prou. 5.16 abusing of Gods gifts 111 What are those thinges which God here commaundeth That to my power I help and further the commodities and profit of my neighbour and that I so deale with him as I would o Mat. 7.12 desire to be dealt with my selfe and that I doe my owne woorke painefully faithfully that I p Eph. 4.28 may thereby help others also who are distressed with any neede or calamitie 112 What doth the ninth commandement exact That I beare no false q Prou. 19.5 â— 21.28 witnesse against any man neither r Psal 15.3 falsifie any mans wordes neither backbite or Å¿ Rom. 1.29.30 reproch any man nor t Mat. 7.1 c. Luc. 6.37 condemne any man rashly or vnheard but auoid and u Joh. 8.44 shun with all carefulnesse all kind of lies and deceipts as the a Prou. 12.22 13.5 proper works of the Diuel except I mean to stir vp against mee the most grieuous wrath of god And that in iudgements and other affaires I follow the truth and freely and constantly b 1. Cor. 13.6 Eph. 4.25 professe the matter as it indeede is And moreouer defend and c 1. Pet. 4.8 encrease as much as in me lieth the good name and estimation of others 113 What doth the tenth commandement forbid That our hearts be not at any time moued by the least desire or cogitation against any commaundement of God but that continually and from our heart we detest all sinne and contrarily d Rom. 7.7 c. delight in all righteousnesse 114 But can they who are conuerted vnto God perfectly obserue and keepe these commaundementes No But euen the holiest men as long as they liue haue onely smale beginnings of this e 1.10.1.8 c. Rom. 7.14.15 Eccle. 7.22 obedience yet so that they f Rom. 7.22 Jac. 2.10 begin with an earnest and vnfained desire and endeuour to liue not according to some onely but according to all the commaundements of God 115 Why will God then haue his law to bee so exactly seuerely preached seeing there is no man in this life who is able to keepe it First that al our life-time wee more and more g Joh. 1.9 Psal 22.5 acknowledge the great pronenes of our nature to sin and so much the more greedily h Rom. 7.24 desire remission of sinnes and righteousnesse in Christ Secondly i 1. Cor. 9.24 c. Phi. 3.12.13.14 that wee be doing of this alwaies and alwaies thinking of that and implore and craue of the father the grace of his holy spirit whereby wee may daily more and more bee renewed to the image and likenesse of God vntill at length after wee are departed out of this life wee may ioyfully attaine vnto the perfection which is proposed vnto vs. OF PRAIER 116 Wherefore is praier necessarie for Christians Because it is the cheife part of that a Psal 50.14.15 thankfulnesse which God requireth of vs. And also because God giueth them onely his grace and holy spirit who with vnfained groninges begge them continually of him and b Mat. 7.7.8 Luc. 11.9.13 Mat. 13.12 Psal 50.15 yeelde him thankes for them 117 What is required vnto that praier which shal please God be hearde of him That we aske of the onely true God who hath c Joh. 4.22 c. manifested himselfe in his woorde all thinges which he hath commaunded to be d Rom. 8.26 1. Ioh. 5.14 asked of him with a true affection and desire of our heart and through an inwarde e Ioh. 4.23.24 Psal 145.18 feeling of our neede and miserie f 2. Par. 20.12 cast our selues downe prostrate in the presence of his diuine maiestie and g Psal 2.11 34.19 Is 66.2 builde our selues on this sure foundation that wee though vnworthily yet for Christes sake are certainely h Rom. 10.14 8.15.16 Iac. 1.6 c. heard of god euen as hee hath i Io. 14.13 15.16 16.23 Dan. 9.17.18 Mat. 7.8 Psal 143.1 promised vs in his worde 118 What are those thinges which hee commaundeth vs to aske of him All things k Iac. 1.17 Mat. 6.33 necessary both for soule and body which our Lorde Iesus Christ hath comprised in that prayer which himselfe hath taught vs. 119 What praier is that OVr l Mat. 6.9.10 c. Luc. 11.2 c. Mat. 7.9.10.11 Luc. 11.12.13 Father which art in heauen hallowed be thy name thy kingdome come thy will bee done in earth as it is in heauen Giue vs this day our daily bread And forgiue vs our trespasses as wee forgiue them that trespasse against vs And leade vs not into temptation but deliuer vs from euil For thine is the kingdome the power and glorie for euer and euer AMEN 120 Why doth Christ teach vs to cal God our father That presently in the verie entraunce and beginning of the praier he might stir vp in vs such a reuerence and confidence in god as is meete for the sonnes of god which must bee the ground foundatioÌ„ of our praier to wit that god through Christ is made our father and will much lesse denie vnto vs those thinges which wee aske of him with a true faith than our earthly Parents a Mat. 7.9.10.11 Luc. 11.11 denie vnto vs earthly things 121 Why is that adâ—ed which art in heauen That we b Ier. 23.24 Act. 17.24.25.27 conceiue not basely or teâ—â—enely of gods heauenly maiestie And also that we c Rom. 10.12 looke for and expect from his omnipotencie whatsoeuer things are necessarie for our soule and bodie 122 What is the first petition Hallowed bee thy name that is graunt vs first to d Ioa. 17.3 Jer. 9.23.24 31.33.34 Mat. 16.17 Iac. 1.5 Psal 119.105 know thee aright to worship praise e Psal 119.137.138 Luc. 1.46 c. 68. c. Psal 145.8.9.17 Exod. 34.6.7 Psal 143.1.2.5.10.11.12 Ier. 31.3 32.18.19.40.41 33.11 20. Mat. 19.17 Rom. 3.3.4 11.22.23 2. Tim. 2.19 magnifie thy almightines goodnesse iustice mercie and truth shining in al thy works
And further also to direct our whole life thoughts words and workes to this end that thy most holy name bee not reproched for vs but rather bee f Psal 115.1 71.8 renowmed with honour and praises 123 What is the second petition Let thy kingdome come that is rule vs so by thy word and spirit that wee may g Mat. 6 33. Psal 119.5 143.10 humble and submit our selues more more vnto thee preserue and encrease thy h Psal 51.20 122.6.7 church destroy the workes of the Diuill and all power that lifteth vp it selfe against thy Maiesty make al those counsailes frustrate and voide which are i 1. Ioh. 3.8 Rom. 16.20 taken against thy word vntil at length thou k Apoc. 22.17.20 Rom. 8.22.23 raigne fully and perfectly when thou shalt be al in l 1. Cor. 15.28 al. 124 What is the third petition Thy wil be done in earth as it is heauen that is Grant that we and al men renouncing m Mat. 16.24 Tit. 2.12 forsaking our owne wil maie readily without any grudging n Luc. 22.42 obey thy wil which is only holy and that so euerie of vs may faithfully and cheerfully a 1. Cor. 7.24 performe that duty and charge which thou hast committed vnto vs euen as the blessed Angels doe in b Psal 103.20.21 heauen 125 What is the fourth petition Giue vs this daie our daily bread that is giue vnto vs al thinges which are c Psal 145.15.16 104 27.28 Mat. 6.25 c. needeful for this life that by them wee maie acknowledge confesse thee to be the onely fountaine from whence all good things d Act. 17 27.28 14.17 flow and al our care and industry and euen thine owne gifts to be vnfortunate and e 1. Cor. 15.58 Deut. 8 3. Psal 27.16.17 noisome vnto vs except thou blesse them Wherefore graunt that turning our trust awaie from all creatures we f Psal 62 11. 55.23 place repose it in thee alone 126 What is the fift petition Forgiue vs our trespasses as we forgiue them that trespasse against vs that is Euen for the bloude of Christ doe not g Psal 51 1. c. 143.2 1. Iohn 2.1.2 impute vnto vs most miserable wretched sinners al our offences neither that corruption which still cleaueth vnto vs euen as wee also feele this testimonie of thy grace in our hearts that wee steadfastly purpose vnfeignedly from our hart to h Mat. 6.14.15 pardon and forgiue al those who haue offended vs. 127 What is the sixt petition Lead vs not into temptation but deliuer vs from euil that is because wee our selues are so feeble weak by nature that wee i Ioa. 15.5 Psal 103.14 cannot stand so much as one moment or instant and our most deadlie enemies k 1. Pet. 5.8 Eph 6.12 satan the l Jâ—h 15 19. world and our own m Rom 7.23 Gal 5.17 flesh doe incessantlie oppugne and assault vs vpholde thou vs and establish and strengthen vs by the might of they spirit that we maie not in this spiritual combate n Mat. 26.41 Marc. 13. â—3 yeeld as vanquished but may so long stoutly withstand them vntil at length wee o 1. Thes 3.13 5.23 get the ful and perfect victorie 128 How concludest thou this praier For thine is the kingdome the power and the glorie for euer that is we aske and craue al these things of thee because seeing both thou art our King and art almightie thou art both willing and able to p Rom. 10.11.12 â— Pet. 2.9 giue them al vnto vs. And these thinges wee therefore aske that out of them not vnto vs but vnto thy holy name al glory may q 10.14.13 Psal 115.1 Ier. 33.8.9 redound 129 What meaneth this particle Amen That the thing is sure and out of doubt For my praier is much more certainly heard of God than I feele in my hart that I vnfaignedly r 2. Cor. 1.20 â— Tim. 2.13 desire the same OVT of the diuerse and manifolde doctrine of the two former partes we haue learned that wee are not thorough anie merit of ours but of Gods meere grace by and for Christ redeemed from sinne and death and euen from all the euill both of crime and paine whereof it followeth that we should be thankful for this exceeding benefite bestowed by Christ vpon vs. But we cannot shew approue our selues thankful to God except we be truly conuerted First therefore those things which are spoken Of conuersion are in few words to be expounded Then ensueth the common place Of good works for by them we declare our thankfulnes towardes God and true conuersion cannot stand without good works Afterwardes is adioined the doctrine which entreateth Of the Law whereby wee learne to know good works For those are truely saide to be good works by which we worship God aright shew ourselues to be thaÌ„kful which are done by faith according to the rule and prescript only of Gods Law But because God wil chiefly bee worshipped of vs and magnified by inuocation and for this cause wee shew our thankfulnes most of al by our praiers and thankes-giuing at length the common place Of praier shal bee lastly annexed These things wee purposâ— to declare briefly and in order here following OF CONVERSION THE chiefe Questions 1 What Conuersion is 2 Iâ— what the conuersion of the godly differeth from the repentance of the wicked 3 What are the parts of conuersion 4 Whâ—â— the causes thereof 5 What are the effects of â—onversion 1. WHAT CONVERSION IS FIRST we are to speak some-what of the 〈◊〉 of Conuersion Conuersion is either a generall 〈◊〉 like as is â—â—â—â—ation or it is â—â—ken more specially It signifieâ—â— the same in Latine that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dooth in Greeke and Tâ—sâ—hum in Hebrue Moreouer the Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is very well also interpreted in Latine by * We haue no one english word to answerâ— vnto RESIPISCENTIA For our english REPâ—NTANCE expresseth rather the Latin PaeNITENTIA which agreeth as well to the wicked as to the godly Resipiscentia there beeing the same reason of both names For as the Latine Resipiscentia is deriued from resipisco which signifieth to wax wise after wee haue done a thing So the Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 commeth from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is also to wax wise after an errour or fault committed to recall or retract our iudgement and opinion and to alter an euill purpose Some render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the Latine Paenitentia that is repentaunce or penitencie And this Paenitentia is said to be deriued either from Paenites which signifieth to bee grieued and to repent or from Paena which signifieth paine and punishment because the griefe which is in repentaunce is as it were a punishment But the name of paenitentia or repentaunce is more obscure than the name