so farre foorth onely as they agree and consent 4 They alleadge the vngrounded opinions of some priuate fathers we their trueth so farreforth as they agree to Gods word and examples of the Prophets of Christ and his Apostles 5 They insist vpon Fathers further from the Apostles from Apostolicall and Primitiue purity wee most of all insist on those who were most neere to the Apostles as being most pure and free from Antichristian contagion 6 They are only for the former Fathers we bring the consent of all our later worthy Fathers and teachers of the most reformed and purest Churches of the world Obiect This were to giue and to ascribe as much to man as to God to make them the grounds and iudges of our faith or practise yea it is so farre from being a sinne to sway from all iudgements that it is a sinne to iudge that all iudgements should bee the rule of our consciences Answ This obiection is both vnfit and vntrue It is vnfit because the argument concludeth not that they are or that we should make them the grounds and iudges of our faith and practise But that it is an errour and a sinne to condemne the whole Church of Christ for teaching errour and for practising and maintaining sinne Next it is an vntruth to call the whole company of Saints and spirituall persons Man opposed vnto God Which appeareth further by considering the aequiuocation of the word Man For man is taken either for meere man i a carnall man or to the poynt a company of carnall men prophane ignorant and erronious which cannot know nor perceiue the things of God because they are spiritually discerned 1. Cor. 2 14. and so it is true if the case were thus that wee should put the iudgement of this thing to a company of carnall persons for in this case it is sayde that all men are lyers Rom. 3. 4. But there is also the spirituall man which hath vnderstanding to iudge what other men do say 1. Cor. 10. 15. and discerneth all things euen the deepe things of God Psal 25. 14. 9. 1. Cor. 2. 15. 10. 12. Dan. 12. 10. Iohn 7. 17. 1. Iohn 2. 27. The consent in iudgement of which company is not to be termed a company of men opposed against God But such as being built one the foundation of the Prophets Apostles and Christ the corner stone Eph. 2. 20. are also called by holy the Ghost in this respect the pillar and ground of trueth 1. Tim. 3. 15. Obiect A priuate man may see a truth which a great many Godly men may not discerne Answ Though a priuate man may see more into some trueth and explicate or confirme it better than many other yet it were absurd to say that one man might see more then all the faithfull all godly learned Teachers all true Churches that euer were in the world for the rule is good which Lyrinensis giueth Nouè non noua The Papists take the Church for onely persons in office as Pope Cardinall Bishops and Abbots and other Doctors gathered in a Councill and it was well maintained by Gerson that a priuate man by the light of Gods word may see more then they all And the reeson is plaine First because those persons haue many wayes prooued themselues to be carnall and prophane and not able to discerne the things of God which are spiritually to be discerned And againe because they iudge not as it was inioined to the Priest in the law Secundum legem Deut. 17. 11. and so there can be no light in them Esa 8. 20. But the case in question is quite opposite to this in either part and therefore this obiection toucheth not the point Obiect The whole Church of God may erre in some circumstantiall matters All visible Churches may erre in matters not fundamentall The consent of Churches and of the faithfull teachers according to Gods word a rule of fundamental truths that is of al such truths as may quiet a mans conscience it is not so in matters of circumstance Answ 1 Wee hold rightly against the Papists that all particular Churches may erre whereupon wee assume and inferre But the Roman Church is a particular Church Therefore it may erre But that the Catholique Church taken in the sence that our part doe explicate it i for the company of the faithfull in all ages it was neuer holden by any sound diuine But the cleane contrary 2 Though the iudgement of all true Churches in matters fundamentall be infallible because without fundamentalls they could not be Churches and againe albeit all particular Churches may erre in matters circumstantiall and ceremoniall yet it is an hard speach to say that the generall or Catholique Churches or company of the faithfull in all ages haue generally consented in an error neither can there possibly on instance be shewed of such a point no not of a circumstantiall point 3 The depriued Ministers hold it a sinne in nature to practise the ceremonies prescribed in our Church or the like but sinne in nature is a thing substantiall in the practise whereof a mans conscience cannot bee quieted and therefore if the iudgements of all Churches bee brought against them either they must confesse their doctrine in this point to be an error or else that the whole general Church since Christ haue erred fundamentally which is not farre from haeresy and blasphemy and I earnestly do pray them to consider of this poynt Obiect Churches and fathers haue exceedingly differed among themselues in all times heere should wee make their iudgement and consent to bee a rule of our doctrine and practise Answ This is soone answered because I speake not of their differences or of the things wherein they are deuided but only of such things wherein they all consent and agree as namely they all agree that the Christian Sabbath must bee sanctified and that from the ground and in memoriall of Christ his resurrection for they agree that al the bookes of Scripture are the word of God and in the point in question they agree that Churches may vary in their ceremonies and discipline and yet retaine their peace one with another And that ceremonies as inconuenient as our ceremonies are supposed to be in some respect fit to be abolished yet may they be retained and ought to be practised to preuent the diuision of brethren disquiet of the Church hinderance of the Gospel and there are few points wherein they agree more constantly then in this Obiect We are commanded to call no man our teacher vpon earth because one is our Doctor and teacher euen Christ Mat. 23. 8. 10. there is one law giuer Iam. 4. 12. Answ This obiection is much vrged by Brownists as some of the others are But what will they conclude from hence surely if any such thing it must be this Therefore we may not make the iudgement of the Fathers or whatsoeuer men in earth a rule of our conscience And indeed I say
deuided and the course of the Gospel hindred and interrupted to aske and seeke the iudgement of other true Churches and Teachers about the case in question As the Apostles did in Act. 15. 2 3 4 6. and the Primitiue ages following after their example also did imitate as their duty was Ph. 3. 17. and 4. 8 9. in which case if the iudgment of one two or twenty Churches be to be harkned to and not despised or contradicted rashly how much lesse the iudgement of all true Churches of all times and places Now for a few persons of one Prouince as of England and of one season to sway against all Churches to condemne their doctrine and practise of sinne and error is against this ordinance of God and the way to error Because the swaying against the iudgement and practise VIII of all Churches and Teachers is against the equity of many forcible and maine reasons For 1 Who are more likely to know the trueth euen in such a point as this then the whole company of such First who are indued with the most excellent gifts in the Church and greatest degrees of knowledge and vnderstanding of Gods word and with meanes tending thereunto doe not the best sights best iudge of colours Secondly who are and haue been endued with greatest degrees of euident sanctity Thirdly whose labours haue beene most of all blessed of God for the conuersion of soules for the ouerthrow of sinne and Antichrist and Heresies Fourthly who haue liued and died most comfortably in the Lord If a man should not rest in the iudgements of the whole company of such where should he rest or what peace or assurance shall hee haue to haue all these so many as all and so incomparable persons his aduersaries as in condemning such for sinners and false Teachers 2 No one point of error can be shewed which is established by this rule namely by the consent of iudgement and practise of all Churches primitiue and reformed latter For albeit some faithfull persons and some true Churches may differ from some other in sundry points and thereby there must needes bee error in one part or other yet it were hard for a few priuate persons to conuince them all of errour in a matter wherein they all agree if they were in errour is it not strange no age should bee able to discerne it 3 Such as haue wilfully and professedly differed from this rule haue beene found to haue beene New-fangles Heretickes Schismatickes and prophane persons such as Donatists Anabaptists Brownists Arians Famelists and the like and are of infinite varieties one from another and therefore all or the very most must needes bee an errour for there is but one trueth 4 By the reiecting of this rule euery Sect maketh a way open to their owne contempt For if the iudgement of so reuerend and so excellent lights and agreement of them all is to bee despised and reiected by any particular why should not others reiect and contemne them and their iudgement the matter being difficult and of disputable nature and themselues being so many thousand degrees behind the person whom they thus despise in their worth or number 5 It opens a doore to singularitie noueltie and of endlesse differences errors and contentions and leaues no rule of Peace or of ending dissentions in the Church of God For if one may vnder colour of trueth teach and practise what he list in his diuersitie why may not another do the like or what rule will there be to compose the dissention that doe and will arise in the Church which one part hauing the trueth may vrge vnto the other voyd of truth why should hee rather follow this part then that wherefore in this case wee are to note that no priuate person or persons may raise vp any new opinion and pretend Scripture for it and so propose it for a Doctrine and a truth in the Church though hee condemne the whole Church beside for an error and a sinne Because as the Scriptures are not of priuate interpretation so Gods Spirit is not priuate but generall to all the faithfull Thus wee see this doctrine of swaying against all true Churches and Teachers of all ages and places and condemning them of sinne and error is false doctrine Whereupon also it followeth secondly that it is a sinne which also appeareth further I Because Dauid doth iudge himselfe that he trespassed in that he being a priuate man condemned and censured all the generation of Gods children Psal 73. 13. 14. 15. Againe because God laieth a woe vpon the practise of taking away the righteousnesse of the righteous from him Esa 5. 23. or of condemning the iust Pr. 17. 15. But that doctrine practise which laieth a sin vnto the charge of all Gods Church takes away their righteousnes and condemnes them in that point Therefore it is a sinne euen of bearing false witnesse against the whole congregation of neighbours 2 Because the censuring of all true Churches for a sin or of false Doctrine is contrary to the Commandements of God who would haue the Teachers obeyed and hearkened vnto which doe teach and define secundum legem as aboue I noted Heb. 13. 17. Deut. 17. 9 10 11 12. and would haue the rest to iudge of the words of a few which prophesie 1. Cor. 14. 29. 32. and of the commandement of walking in the wayes of good men Pro. 2. 20. Phil. 3. 17. and 4. 9. It is also contrary to the practise of the holy Apostles who determined one Churches differences by another Act. 15. 2. as before I noted 3 Because this Doctrine is the ground and mother of schisme For S. Paul noteth that they cause diuision and offences that teach and practise contrary to the doctrine which the whole Church hath receiued especially from the Apostles Rom. 16. 17. Therefore this doctrine is a sinne Obiect Against this point it is alleadged first that it is a Popish ground to make the Church the ground of our Faith It contradicteth the Doctrine of our Churches against the Papists Answ This point includeth no Popish ground nor doeth it contradict the Doctrine of our Churches against the Papists For the Churches desire nothing so much against the Papists then that they would grant the elect and faithfull to bee the onely Church and then that they would stand to the iudgement determination and practise of such as are faithfull in all ages But that this may the better appeare to bee no Popish ground Wee are to note 1 The Papists vnderstand the Church to consist onely of persons in office and those often hereticall sacrilegious and prophane persons such as their Popes Cardinalls carnall Bishops Wee the only faithfull in all times and places whether in office or not 2 They vrge Apocriphall and basterd Fathers for the patronage of their errors Wee the vndoubted writings of the approued Fathers 3 They vrge the Fathers errors and things wherein they differ we their truth
opposit therto if it be fauourably taken or construed on the better part For I confesse there want not some few matters which if they be not * candidè fairely taken may seeme not altogether to agree vnto the word of God Script Angl. fol. 456. Praefac ad censur Caluin In the English Leturgie or booke of Common prayer which you describe I perceiue sundry * tolerabiles ineptias Looke the discourse of the troubles at Frankford fol. 28. wherin is shewed that Knox Whitingham and others described the English Leturgie to which description this was the answer of Caluin as appeareth there fol. 34 35 tolerable vnfitnesses In which two words I expresse thus much that there was not that purity therein contained which were to be wished which blemishes at the first day of reformation could not be corrected Wherein seeing there is conteined no manifest impiety these things therfore ought to be borne with for a season Ep. 200. fol. 336. and a little after to the English exiles at Frankeford which desired reformation of the English Leturgie hee giueth this aduise Vos vltra modum rigidos esse nolim Epist. 200. fol. 336. Of the which aduice of his he thus speaketh in Epist. 228. fol. 374. in Anglorum controuersia moderationem tenui cuius me non poenitet in Epist 206. fol. 342. hee perswadeth one part to incline themselues to all possible moderation and is displeased with the other part that nothing by them was yeelded or mitigated Martyr loc com inter Epist fol. 1127. amico in Angliam For mine owne part I wish that all things may bee done simplicissimè most free from humane mixtures in the worship of God Yet when I thinke with my selfe that if peace betweene the Saxon Churches and ours might be obtained there would follow no separation for such matters as these Ceremonies Alexander Alesius a worthy Scot of great account and note in Proaem before his Translation of the Common prayer Booke in Script Anglican Buceri fol. 373. commendeth the performance of it by our Countrey-men exceedingly with their great diligence and care therein and calleth it Preclarissimum diuinum factum in constituting and ordering the Church of Christ according to that Booke further declareth that the vertue and pietie of English men in this matter would reioyce many mindes and bee an help to the endeuors of others in the like and that it was euident that the enemies of the trueth were very sorry of the good successe and progresse herein Also hee complaineth with Gregory of some Vt cōmotis studijs contentio semper irritet aliquorum indignationem vtque nimio ardore interdum admodum peccetur dum nemo minus videri altero ac potius solus sapere vult fit vt non necessarijs quaestionibus disputationibus necessariarum rerum cognitio negligatur further he sheweth this contention of brethren about this booke to come of the diuell who failing one way seeketh another to mischiefe the Church hee complaineth of some Aliquam diuisionis occasionem arripientibus non iam nulli vocabula penissyllabas expendendo verbis tantùm litigant reipsa si placidè exquiratur futuri concordes Of the common prayer booke it selfe he saith Hic liber per se vtilis futura lectio ipsius quà m plurimis hoc tempore diuinitus oblatus esse videatur ibid. fol. 375. Cranmer Martyr In his purgation of slanders against him If the Queenes highnesse will graunt thereunto I with Maister Peter Martyr and other foure or fiue which I shall chuse will by Gods grace take vpon vs to defend not onely the common prayers of the Church the ministration of the Sacraments and other rites and Ceremonies but also all the doctrine and religion set out by our said Soueraigne Lord King Edward the sixt to be more pure and according to Gods word then any other that hath beene in England these 1000. yeeres so that Gods word may bee iudge Acts mon. fol. 1465. Bishop Ridley When Bishop Grindall from beyound Sea wrote to him in prison being condemned to bee burned concerning Knox his peremptory and violent exceptions against our booke of Common prayer which was euen misliked by Caluin himselfe Epist fol. answered by writing thus Alas that brother Knox could not beare with our booke of Common prayer in matter against which although I grant a man as hee is of wit and learning may finde apparant reasons yet I suppose hee cannot soundly by the word of God to disproue any thing in it Act. mon. Doctor Taylor Martyr There was after that set forth by the most innocent King Edward for whom God be praised euerlastingly the whole Church seruice with great deliberation and by the aduise of the best learned men of the Realme and authorised by the whole Parliament and receaued and published gladly by the whole Realme which booke was neuer reformed but once and yet by that reformation it was so fully perfected according to the rules of our Christian religion in euery behalfe that no Christian conscience could bee offended with any thing therein contained I meane of that booke reformed Act. mon. fol. 1521. Exiles at Franckeford Among them was great diuision and dissention about the vsing of the Common prayer booke of England one part refusing it as Iohn Knox William Whittingham Christopher Goodman Dauid Whitehead Miles Couerdale Iohn Fox Anthonie Gilby c. The other part standing for it which also were reuerend persons as Thomas Leauer Iohn Iewell Iohn Mullins Iohn Parckhust Lawrence Humphry Iames Pilkington Alexander Nowell Iames Haddon Edwin Sands Edmund Grindall and others Looke the discourse of the troubles at Franckeford fol. 16. 23. 19. Which dissentions caused them to seeke the iudgements of other churches and their teachers as of Caluin Beza Bullinger fol. 25. 199. Also Robert Horne Thomas Leauer Io. Mullins Tho. Bentham W. Cole Io. Parckhust Lawrence Humphry c. were all fully determined to vse none other then the order last taken in the Church of England Discourse fol. 16. 223. The same order of seruice concerning religion which was in England last set forth by King Edward fol. 10. Also Iames Haddon Edwin Sands Edmund Grindall Christopher Goodman c. not doubting or distrusting their good conformitie and ready desires in reducing the English Church now begun there to it former perfection it had in England least by much altering the same wee should seeme to condemne the chiefe authours thereof whereas they now suffer so are they not ready to confirme that fact with the price of their bloud c. fol. 22. 23. They also at Franckford writing to them at Zurick exiled also dissenting from them about our Ceremonies Thought not that any godly men would stand to the death in defence of those Ceremonies which as the booke specified vpon iust occasions may be altered accounting it an argument that they are slenderly taught which for a Ceremony will refuse such a singular benefit
we haue expounded namely of Ceremonies significatiue ordained by the Church not superstitiously but purely vsed This argument also hath Zanch. de redempt cap. 16. fol. 445. a. There is a great question saith hee in these our dayes about Ministeriall garments surely we read not that Christ and his Apostles did appoint any thing of this matter neither that they changed their garments either when they baptised or when they administerd the Lords Supper but neither did they forbid that men might not take other garments Wherefore it is liberum perse a matter free in it selfe to vse or not to vse other garments in the administration of the Sacraments Because if true Christians hauing the pure doctrine of Christ discipline in their Churches should enioine some speciall garment though abused by the Papists for the commendation of the Ministery to the simple people there is no Scripture forbidding a man to leaue such Christians to their iudgement But there are sundry Scriptures clearely teaching a man why he should leaue them to this their practise as Rom. 14. 1. Cor. 8. and 9. and many other places namely wheresoeuer we are taught of the libertie and good vse of the creatures not of meates onely but of all creatures else Hee giueth instance of a white garment vsed on the Baptized or Communicants of the Lords Supper Bucer Script Anglican fol. 708. Hoopero Because they which defend these things may pretend some honest and iust signification not strange from the Scriptures As touching the Surplesse the Ministers of the Church are Angels Mal. 3. 1. and the Angels alwayes for the most part appeared as apparelled in White garments Pet. Martyr loc fol. 1085. Hoopero Bucer will haue them signifie Caelestē puritatem candorē omniumque virtutū ornatū heauenly puritie and sinceritie and the ornament of all vertues Script Angl. fol. 682. so also fol. 707. 709. Againe What should let but that the Churches may vse this white Vesture or more Vestures to monish vs precisely of that diuine benefit of the light and dignitie of the heauenly doctrine which he giueth vs by the holy Ministery and by the which the Ministers themselues may bee the more mindful of their office c. Bucer in his Epistle to Io. Alasco at the end of the examination This reason also hath Zanch. Albeit a garment be a free thing saith he and numbred vp among matters indifferent yet for signification a linnen garment were more decent then a woollen for a Minister to vse in administring the Sacramēts for that it is the Impresse or type of innocencie and holinesse Hence in the Apocalyps white garments are giuen to the Saints Zanch. de redempt cap. 16. fol. 445. a. Because these Ceremonies are ancient and haue some good vse it was an old custome in the Church that such as administred the Sacraments should weare a white linen garment Zanch. ibid. ex Hieron cont Pelag. li. 1. The signe of the Crosse is vetustissima very ancient Beza Epi. 8. fol. 75. There was therfore some vse therof thogh since it hath bin horribly abused and there be small profit thereof Bez. Ep. 12. fol. 99. Kneeling at the Communiō hath a shew indeed of godly Christian reuerence and therefore might heretofore haue been vsed cum fructu with some profit ibid. fol. 100. Because if we proceed to disswade from these indifferent things as from pernicious and euill things we shall thereby condemne very many Churches not disagreeing from the Gospel and shall taxe too bitterly innumerable Churches which haue euer and are of old celebrated as most commendable and approued P. Mart. loc fol. 1086. Hoopero If agreemēt in doctrine might be procured between the Saxon or Lutheran Churches and ours there would be no separation made for Surplesses or Ceremonies of the like nature ib fol. 1127. Bucer hath also this reason If there be no liberty granted to the Churches of ordeining Ceremonies about the Lords Supper whereof they haue not the expresse commandement of Christ By this meanes will all Churches be condemned impiae audaciae of impious boldnesse For all Churches doe obserue in the Supper of the Lord such a time place and habit or site of body and besides doe admit womē to the Cōmunion of all which things they haue not onely no commandement of the Lord but they haue also his contrary example For our Lord did celebrate his Supper at night not in the morning in a priuate house not in a publike leaning with his Apostles and after the receiuing of the Pascall lambe notwithstanding Also hee admitted not the women among whom he had sundry his most holy Disciples Bucer Scrip. Anglic. fol. 807. 809. To this reason Pet. Martyr moueth an obiection The Church authority present or past ought not to be of that force that the truth of Gods Word be thereby wronged which albeit the world do fall about our eares in peeces ought to be kept inviolable It is true sed propter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but for things indifrent I am resolute that by no meanes we may admit that either Churches should be condemned or that wee should lesse reuerently or honestly speake of them Ibid. fol. 1086. Because we must take heed lest these things which be of lesse importance through our contention may be the meanes or occasions that those things which should be esteemed of greater force and valew either cannot at all be brought vnto the Church or if they be once brought in they cannot be established with continuance Peter Martyr ibid. 1086. Because we must take heed of Satans accustomed sleights whereby he leadeth vs away from the care of necessary things to the immoderate carefulnesse of those things which may well be let passe and from searching out of the true doctrine of Christ to induce vs to those things wherein few can consent alike and finally by the which he kindleth in diuers men a zeale to purge those things which are without vs thereby to neglect our inward deformities Bucer Epist. ad Ioan. Alasco After at the ende of that Epistle This coulorable craft of Satan must be taken heed of by which often he effecteth this that wee reckon those things sinnes which are no sins and those that bee sinnes indeede wee seeme not to regard them in our selues or else against those sinnes which our consciences define to bee sinnes indeede we vse no such seuerity as we ought Because we should in this Realme take most godly heedfulnesse that wee further not vnawares the Diuels intents who throweth in among vs sundry questions and controuersies least wee should take in hand to handle the question of setting forward the doctrine of the Gospel and restoring of discipline and thereby to remoue all drones from Ecclesiasticall Ministeries Bucer in Ep. Io. Alascco Because things in themselues otherwise indifferent doe after a sort change or alter their nature when as by any command of lawfull authority they be either commanded or forbidden because they may not
that are sicke of preiudice to gather all I could against them and abstained from the practise of them as from things simply euill But after hauing been indicted at a quarter Sessions for refusing to conforme by some of my Parish for my fidelity in opposing their disordered life I was occasioned to looke more neerely into the state of this question whether I might vse them with my peace in any case or not namely of necessity Depriuation I asked of my selfe two things whether I would rather suffer death then vse them in a Church professing the foundation and vrging them as things indifferent not pressing them as binding Conscience in themselues or as needfull to saluation And whether the execution of my Ministery which was pressed on my Conscience with a woe if I neglected it should not be as deare vnto me as my life Which questions when they put mee to a stand and that I could not well resolue vnto my selfe for the ill conceit I had against the Ceremonies I beganne to search into the iudgement of our best latter writers and the practise of reformed Churches from whence I went vnto antiquitie of primitiue and purer times where with one consent and harmonie of iudgement I found them for the practise of farre more and more offensiue Ceremonies then ours may bee supposed and chiefely in this case This was a ground to stay my iudgement and build my resolution From which when once I found it in con-conscience I could not in modestie I durst not depart in haste For with what shew or conscience should any man turne his backe in dislike or his face in opposition to the iudgement and practise of all Churches of Christ since the Apostles And from all those worthy Lights those Spirituall persons the Teachers of the Churches the champions of the Trueth the Masters of Religion by whom and by whom onely God had in all ages propagated his Gospell conuerted soules confirmed Veritie confuted Heresies and Errors builded Christes Church discouered and ouerthrowne the Church of Antichrist Chiefly seeing it is the iudgement not of one or two nor of some against some other but euen of All not One excepted which is of note or classicall authority And none against this iudgement excepting conuicted and condemned Hereticks and Schismaticks such as Donatists Anabaptists and our latter Brownists From thence I looked into the reasons mouing them vnto this iudgement that practise which in this Tractate are set downe So that here is no nouelty broached or fancy of mine owne proposed to thy view Christian reader but Antiquity and Vniuersality not Papall but Euangelicall according to the Scripture not of Carnall but Spirituall persons which may bee to thy Conscience as an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The causes of publishing are principally three respecting Causes of publishing the trueth the Ministers my brethren and my selfe The publication of this booke concerneth the trueth in two respects First because it is a questioned trueth which may not bee concealed without iniury to God and to his Church and it is a sin of no light nature to withhold the trueth in vnrighteousnesse Rom. 1. 18. next it is a profitable trueth which may occasion some Ministers to enter which dare not for conformitie and others to returne which are depriued for not conforming to the Ceremonies both tending to the benefit and edification of Gods Church For what greater profit may there be then that which is opposed to the greatest mischiefe For as it pleaseth God to saue them that beleeue 1 Cor. 1. 21. prou 29. 18. by preaching so where no vision is the people perish Secondly it respecteth the ministers of two sorts First such as are depriued on whom these reasons doe inforce a sinne for not conforming in the case of depriuation and it is very scandalous for Ministers professing sinceritie of Christ his Gospel to haue begunne and to continue in a wrong course neither can they approoue their conscience before God or man to beginne and to remaine in error and not amend when they see a better way Then it concerneth the Ministers that haue conformed in this case both because it serueth to cleere the innocencie of sundry godly teachers that haue conformed to preuent their depriuation which are hardly thought of and traduced as backsliders and betrayers of Gods cause And if this trueth were knowen they would not haue condemned innocents As also because it is meete that the hearts of such as haue conformed of feare and are wounded with griefe should bee relieued this trueth seruing to quiet their afflicted conscience which must not bee neglected Lastly it respecteth my selfe and that two wayes First because by suppressing of this veritie I should wrap my selfe in the guilte of a two fold sin namely vnthankfulnesse to God vnrighteousnesse to man For why hath God opened my eyes to see this truth but to that end I should reueale it vnto others And it were vnrighteousnesse and hatred to my Leu. 19. 17. brethren to suffer them to sin and not to shew them of it to see them to wander and not to point vnto the right way Lastly it were iniquitie to my selfe to suffer my Ministerie to be euill spoken of for practising the trueth there being scandall taken farre and neere at the alteration of my iudgement and profession of my purpose to conforme rather then to suffer depriuation which I may lawfully and must also of some necessitie preuent To this I adde the respect I haue vnto our Schismatickes the Brownists whose errors are hereby discouered and their false conclusions ouerthrowne Obiections answered But it will bee said I am in error If so it shall the easier be confuted And when any man hath shewed it to be error hee may the more safely call it so And I shall bee the rather induced to confesse it so to be It will be well and more agreeing to the comfort of mens consciences and more fitted to the rekconing they must giue to bee aduised before they so conclude it Howbeit if I erre it is with such company with whom in some case I had rather erre as one speaketh then thinke or know the trueth with some other Neither can I bee perswaded neither will any man proue easily that all true Churches of Christ of all ages agreeing in a pointe haue agreed in an error But thus good men receaue disgrace that stand against the Ceremonies To this I say that no man can no good man will esteeme the trueth to bee his owne disgrace It is a grace by seeing error to acknowledge it It is an honour vnto God to disgrace our selues by gracing and embracing of his trueth Can any man preferre his credit to Gods dishonour and redeeme it with the shipwracke of the trueth O but I lay a sinne vnto the charge of all the Ministers depriued And to this I say they lay a sinne vpon their brethren not inferiour to themselues that haue
conformed to the Ceremonies by their account in nature euill Nay they lay a sinne vpon all Churches and godly Teachers since the time of Christ should any man indure so great indignity or swallow such absurditie by sparing them And admit they be prooued to be found in sinne it is no newes that hath beene taught from the beginning Rom. 3. 4 23. Iam. 3. 2. 1. Cor. 13. 9 10 that all men are liers and that all haue sinned yea in many things wee offend all Wee know but in part and difference will bee among the best and with difference error on one side or another in matters circumstantiall vntill perfection come Our Psal 19 12. comfort is that all sinnes especially vnknowne to such as are in Christ are pardoned as being included in the compasse of their generall repentance Though reason accuse them of a sinne yet grace in 1. Ioh. 1. 7. Christ his blood cleanseth from all sinne neither can any man condemne where God hath iustified Rom. 8. 33 34. And what I thinke of them in charitie that to my comfort I thinke of my selfe and all that holde this iudgement albeit it prooue an error Yet againe good mindes will be offended at this which I haue written But either it is Truth or error If error I confesse they haue iust cause and I will confesse it when I see it But if it bee the Trueth what will the children of the light bee offended at Gal. 4. 16. Luk. 7. 35. the light or am I their enemie because I tell them the Trueth wisedome is iustified of all her children And euery one that is of the Trueth heareth the Iohn 18. 37. voice thereof And wicked men with such as are the enemies of our Church such as Papists Brownists Anabaptists will triumph and reioyce that such as haue stood out against Conformitie doe now defend it But when was it otherwise when will it how can it bee but that weake eyes should be offended at the light It is a griefe to raigning sinnes to see others to amend They triumph in our conforming but will they not much more in our eiection they reioyce in our conforming to the Ceremonies and wee will grieue at their conforming to the world Lastly some haue obserued how certaine of the Modest offer fol. 19. Ministers which stood against Conformitie haue after yeelding euidently lost the grace and power of their gifts some fallen to idlenesse neglect of publicke and priuate duties yea to prophane and scandalous life conuersation And so say I haue sundry done vpon my knowledge that haue holden out against Conformitie euen to suspension depriuation whose zeale in that behalfe hath either been prepostrous more insisting on the lesser then the weightier matters of the Law or ioyned with grosse ignorance themselues not able to haue giuen a reason of their doings before God or man It being iust with God to punish them on either side who without conscience or ground of Faith do either conforme or refuse Conformitie For otherwise none can be ignorant but that on either side sundry haue remained in the constant euidence of Gods best gifts and graces and in the blessing of a sanctified estate To teach vs that it is not the zeale for or against the Ceremonies but an heart established in grace that Heb. 13. 9. can keepe men from the markes and badges of hypocrisie Now for the manner of my handling these my The manner of handling reasons I trust it shall appeare to euery person fearing God that as I haue written these things with a good conscience as in the sight of God so I haue performed it with due respect to my Brethren as it becommeth Truth I know with whom I hold this controuersie not with enemies but brethren and I haue not learned the language of fowle speech If any man be moued to reply I wish him to performe it in the spirit of meekenesse and in the euidence of Iames 3. 17. heauenly wisedome for that our passions are great hinderances of finding out the Truth And no man breaketh out into inordinate affection in any controuersie chiefly of this nature but hee hazardeth the losse of a better thing then that he seeketh Hee seeketh Truth and loseth Charitie and power of godlinesse whereas he should seeke Truth in Charitie For Charitie reioyceth not in iniquitie but in Ephes 4. 15. 1. Coâ— 13. 6. the Truth God needeth not our lies to defend his Truth I leaue such practise for my part to Papists and to Brownists who by vnablenesse to leaue their rayling formes and bitternesse do manifest the foulenesse of their heart and falsehood of their cause that cannot bee defended but by weapons borrowed from corrupted nature and the diuill And in a word declare themselues vnprofitable in the Truth they know vncapable of any Truth they know not and quite vnworthy of respect Wee haue had contentions enough about circumstances and Ceremonies The yeeres should teach vs how smally the Lord doeth blesse the dissentions of Brethren And the times approach wherin it must be knowne Rom. 14. 17. that the kingdome of God stands not in meate and drinke nor godlinesse in Ceremonialls but in the power of a regenerated state And that sauing grace wil stand though men neuer write or preach against a Bishop or suffer depriuation for refusall of a Ceremony And that the grace of God doth teach vs to seeke resolution of euery doubt and to witnesse our dislike of things to bee disliked in wisedome and proportion but neuer to contend about any thing but for the faith once giuen to the Saints If any man Iude v 3. Phil 3. 15. bee otherwise minded God shall reueale the same vnto him If any man bee ignorant let him be 1. Cor. 14 38. ignorant still If any man will be contentious we 1. Cor. 11. 16. haue no such custome nor the Churche of God In the foundation we all agree Time and day will 1. Cor. 3 11. 12. 13. 15 10. try the hay and stubble from the gold and siluer And the fire of Gods triall will surely sindge delinquents Let euery man take heede how hee builds 1. Cor. 4. 5. Let vs iudge nothing before the time vntil the Lord come who will bring to light the things hidden in darkenesse Phil. 3. 16. But whereunto we haue attained let vs walke by the same rule and let vs minde the same thing Iude v. 20. Let vs edifie our selues in our most holy Faith and pray one for nother And the in their hearts Iames 5. 16. Lord doe good to those that are good and to them that are vpright Psal 125. 4. IOHN SPRINT THE NECESSITIE OF CONFORMITIE IN THE CASE OF DEPRIVATION IT is necessary for a Minister to Conclusion conforme to the Ceremonies prescribed in the Church of England rather then to suffer Depriuation Quest. 1 Two questions touching this conclusion
a lesser sinne for to performe a duety that is greater Answere First the doctrine of the proposition remaineth true notwithstanding this obiection For the case is proposed not of a sinne and a duetie but of two dueties being considered a part being both commanded of God and there is no such case wherein a greater duetie is to bee neglected for the performance of a lesser which also is in reason absurd Secondly to the instance of preaching in a naked manner I say that in this case there are two things to bee considered Necessitie and Decency if then he cannot preach naked but with the perill of his life he ought to refuse preaching it being a case of necessity and mercy is better then sacrifice But if his life will consist with his naked preaching hee ought to preach notwithstanding the scandall or indecencie if there bee no other meanes admitted for his preaching 1 Because a mans naked body being considered as it is naked it is the good creature of God and is not indecent to be looked on but to vncleane and vaine mindes it is decent enough to the pure 2 Because the gayning of soules and meanes of mans saluation is a duety of farre greater reason and waight then the auoyding of an inconuenient circumstance of scandall or of seeming indecencie arising only by accident not from the nature of the obiect and the like case is of the practise of our Ceremonies to redeeme the libertie of preaching to the place Rom. 3. 8. which sheweth that we may not doe the least euill to compasse the greatest good I say that to the present purpose wee may consider euill two manner of wayes For first euill is either that which is formally simply and in nature euill which no circumstance can amend As to redeeme preaching vpon condition of blaspheming God Inuocating the Deuill committing of idolatry periury idultery teaching of heresie or the like the which kind of euill is intended by the Apostle and may not bee done at any hand for the gayning of the greatest good 2 Againe euill may bee taken for that which is onely circumstantially ceremonially or accidentally euill which kind of euill may in some cases bee practised without sinne namely in case of superior reason at what time it is improperly called euill That this is so appeareth in the Priests who brake the Sabbath in Dauid who did that which was not lawfull for him to doe and yet were blamelesse and innocent Mat. 12. 4 5. 7. Also in the practise of Iewish inconuenient and many wayes euill Ceremonies which practise was so farre from being euill in that case that it was good and necessary Act. 15. 28. 29. touching this obiection see more at the end of the argument Obiect Mordecay refused to bow and performe the gesture of reuerence to Haman yea though hee were commanded by the King Hest 3. 1 2 3. by which refusall of obedience to a ceremoniall hee violated two greater dueties One was the Kings command and the other was the hazard of his life and destruction of the Church of the Iewes and thereby for performance of a lesser duetie hee did violate a greater Answ Either this gesture was Spirituall or Ciuill if the former hee ought to auoide spirituall adoration to a creature an heathen a wicked person an Amalekite and an enemy of the Church which is a sufficient and the true answere and thus doe all interpreters vnderstand this place thus the Hebrew glosse thus the Apocryphall prayer in the additions to Hester Lyra Vataplus Iunius Drusius Merlyne vpon these places If the latter either his action was euill or good if euill in disobeying the Magistrate in a thing indifferent it is impertinently alledged if well the reason is vnknowne and not expressed wee cannot iudge of the qualitie of the dueties compared if he did refuse this reuerence 1 Because hee was of the Amalekites which were especially cast out by God Exod. 11. 14. Deut. 25. 7. Num. 24. 7. 2 Because an open prophane person a malitious and professed aduersary of Gods Church 3 Because himselfe was a better man then Haman being the Queenes Vncle it may bee considerable whether hee did not well euen in this respect to refuse this reuerence Touching the hazard of his life and ruine of the Church it was vnknowne to Mordecai for Haman practised it because he did refuse it Obiect Daniel neglected a greater duety to performe a lesser for hee continued to pray three times a day kneeling vpon his knees his window being open towards Ierusalem notwithstanding that he knew that he should die for doing it so hee preferred the ceremonie and circumstance of prayer which was a smaller duetie before the safety of his life which was a greater Dan. 6. 10. Also the Iewes chose rather to die then to eate Swines flesh 2. Mac. 7. 1. and 6. 8. preferring obseruance of a ceremoniall duetie before their life Answ To these instances I first demaund whether these bee brought therefore to conclude that therefore Ministers should rather die then to vse the Ceremonies prescribed in our Church And let it bee considered seriously by euery person truely fearing God whether they thinke it fit for another or could resolue himselfe to loose this life by being at a stake for none other cause then for refusing the prescribed Ceremonies especially in a true Church of Christ wherein there are otherwise a true confession of faith and sufficient meanes of their saluation If it should fall out that they would not die in such a case I would know further how then they could loose their Ministery for not vsing them seeing it were better for a Minister to loose his life then to loose the comfort of his Ministerie Act. 20. 24. 1. Cor. 9. 15. If they would rather suffer death then vse the Ceremonies let them shew the ground and comfort they should haue before the Lord in this proceeding If they alleadge these instances I wil shew to how small purpose they serue therein therefore I say that their cases doe farre differ from the case in question First they were controuersies depending betweene the heathen and professed enemies of Gods Church and betweene the people of Gods couenant and members of the Church our controuersies are in the Church and betweene professed louers and beleeuers in Christ Secondly they were cases of confession wherein they were called to confesse the trueth and religion of God amongst Gods enemies as also the necessitie of inuocation of Gods name and of obedience to Gods precepts With vs the doctrine of Ceremonies is true and according to Gods word and the parts of our generall confession in the Booke of Articles is agreeable to the word of God Thirdly the dueties were of exceeding great moment for the performance whereof they should haue hazarded and lost many liues Daniel stood in obedience of a maine substantiall duetie not Ceremoniall or circumstantiall of the first commandement namely prayer to God and praysing of his name
for which a man should rather die then intermit for the pleasure of any mortall man and the ceremonie of his praying toward Ierusalem in farre distant place was such as specially did exercise his faith and to which the promise of audience was tyed 2. Chron. 6. 34. The Iewes refusing the eating of Swines flesh did confesse the whole religion of God and faith of the Church and totall obedience to all Gods Commandements which was that which Antiochus did aime at as appeareth 2. Mac. 6. 2. 7. and 18. 24. and 7. 1. 2. 4. Lastly to both cases the meere commandement of a Magistrate and an idolater was opposed to the especiall commandement of God Dan. 6. 7. 9. 10. 2. Mac. 7. 30. In which respect God must of necessitie bee obeyed before man Act. 5. 29. There being no such materiall circumstance in the case in question whereby it also appeareth that they did not neglect a greater dutie to performe a lesser but passed by an inferior dutie to performe a farre greater And thus much of obiections to the first point which being answered I proceede vnto the second point which is this That to suffer depriuation for refusing to conforme is the neglecting of a greater duetie to performe the lesser For the proofe and clearing this point two trueths must be confirmed The first that two duties both commanded of God doe offer themselues in the questioned case to bee obserued where one of the two cannot be done and therefore must be left vndone The former dutie is to preach the word the which duety is commanded to all the Ministers of Christ Mat. 28. 19. 20. 2. Tim. 4. 2. 1. Pet. 5. 1. 2. 1. Cor. 9. 16. and is included in the second Commandement Now this duety cannot bee done with vs ordinarily as things doe stand if Ministers doe not conforme for by order they are to be depriued of their Ministery as very many wee see haue beene Lincol. Apo. arg 1. against the ceremonies Except 2 fol. 17. arg 4 excep 2. fol. 45. 49. The other duty is to refuse Ceremonies as they pretend incōuenient in their vse though in their nature indifferent which is commanded in the second cōmandement Ez. 14. 7 as also to auoid occasions of superstition And to preuent sundry offences and other inconueniences arising from the vse of things in different commanded 1. Thes 5. 21. Iude verse 23. 1. Cor. 10. 32. and 8. 9. 12. Rom. 14. 3. 4. 10. 15. 16. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. The which deuties in respect of diuerse and sundry persons which will take offence in the vse of them cannot be well performed if Ministers doe conforme vnto the Ceremonies The second point is this that for a Minister to continue in preaching is a greater deutie of superior reason and of higher bond to tye the conscience then the dutie of labouring vnto fit Ceremonies or of refusing inconuenient Ceremonies such as ours are presumed to be And this appeareth by reasons drawne first from their nature and secondly from their effects First from the nature of either worke or dutie it is manifest that the dutie of preaching is a duty of farre greater moment then the dutie of performing fit Ceremonies or of refusing inconuenient Ceremonies such as they pretend ours are or the like First because the dutie of preaching the Gospel is a matter simply good in nature but the refusing of such Ceremonies as ours are supposing them to be inconuenient or the practise of other Ceremonies in their steede supposing them to bee more fit is a labouring about matters in their nature simply indifferent as before is manifest and after appeareth further so that in this case there is a refusall of a thing simply good as preaching of the word and propagation of the Gospel Secondly because the dutie of preaching the Gospel is a substantiall externall worship of God the dutie of vsing fit Ceremonies or of refusing vnfit so they be not impious is a matter ceremoniall and circumstantiall For the Ceremonies are but circumstances tending to the better performance of the substantiall worshippes and doe serue those substantiall worships of God that is they must be so ordered as they may best serue to edifie and further the substantiall worships of God and meanes of edification Wherefore to omit preaching is the violation of a dutie substantiall the conforming to inconuenient Ceremonies is but the violating of a dutie circumstantiall It is better suffering an vntoward handmaide in the house then by thrusting out the handmaide to thrust the mistresse out of dores Thirdly because preaching the word is a dutie particularly commanded in the word but the dutie of the practise of fit Ceremonies or of refusing the practise of vnfit so they bee not simply and in nature euill is included onely vnder generall rules of necessitie of edification expediencie c. Fourthly because the dutie of preaching is pressed on the Church as a dutie perpetuall to the worlds end Matth. 28. 19. 20. till we all meete Ephes 4. 11. 12. till the appearing of Christ 1. Tim. 6. 14. But the performance of Ceremonies are variable as appeareth by the frequent and lawfull variation of them as in the chang of the time of the Lords supper from night to morning abolishing of the kisse of loue and of the feast of charitie sometimes in some Church Ceremonies burdensome and scandalous are needefully imposed and practised as Iewish rites by the Apostles sometimes in other Churches others more needfull and they pernitious Galath 2. 3. 5. and 4. 9. 10. and 5. 2. Colloss 2. 20. 21. Besides all Churches differ in their Ceremonies one from another and that in such like Ceremonies as ours are The Primitiue from the reformed and all among themselues some vsing more others lesse conuenientrites and ceremonies But the preaching of the Gospel which giueth life and being to the Church is perpetuall and vniforme for the substance thereof in all true Churches of all times and places They all agree therein Fifthly Because the preaching of the Word is an essentiall and inseparable marke of the true Church without the which a Church cannot consist fit ceremonies are no marke of the Church neither doe vnfit and inconuenient ouerthrow the being thereof and to this I adde that by continuance of preaching by which the Church is gathered and vpholden the danger of the ceremonies whatsoeuer it would be preuented and auoyded by the purity of doctrine but the purity of ceremonies or the refusing incōuenient ceremonies will not counteruaile the losse of preaching Corrupt ceremonies deface the wals perhaps may in time impaire some part of the out house But the nullity of preaching ouerthroweth the whole Church walls couering ornament foundation and all Sixthly Because the preaching of Gods Word is the ordinary meanes of new birth faith hope and of all grace and finall saluation 1. Cor. 1. 21. 1. Tim. 4. 16. Rom. 10. 15. 17. Eph. 4. 12. Fit Ceremonies are no such meanes neither
that it is wel concluded neither verely would I nor any other that I know of sound iudgement hold otherwise But that it may appeare how little to the purpose it is alleadged I say 1 If they will apply this to our Church in respect of our ceremonies prescribed then may they conclude against the Apostles for prescribing Iewish ceremonies notwithstanding the end and accomplishment of them all by the death and consummatum est of Christ 2 The Primitiue auncient and latter reformed Churches are all of them deficient this way either in disipline or ceremonies they are faulty and doe faile more or lesse yet they will not accuse them for denying Christ to be their teacher and Prophet 3. They onely deny Christ to be their Prophet and teacher who doe preach another Gospell to the Church Gal. 1. 6. 7. which teach any thing besides Gal. 1. 8. 9. Ro. 16. 17. otherwise 1. Tim. 6. 3. Contrary to the word of God Tit. 1. 9. diuers and strange doctrines Heb. 13. 9. Heresies Tit. 3. 10. which will not heare him in all things whatsoeuer hee shall say Act. 3. 22. Mat. 28. 20. Ioh. 3. 36. 10. 5. All which our Church with all other reformed Churches doe vtterly disclaime and are free from and namely in prescribing and vsing of these ceremonies or the like as appeareth by considering First the matter which is taught which is of two sorts some things are fundamentall and of greater moment some things circumstantiall and of lesser againe some things are specially commaunded others included vnder generall rules and are left free to euery Church to bee determined as shall best serue for the edification thereof sometimes after one manner and at other times after some other where we are to obserue that our Church as other reformed Churches doe teach nothing fundamentall which is not expresly taught in the Word neither doth it teach any thing contrary to that which is expresly commanded by Christ in his Word onely it varieth the circumstantialls or ceremonialls according to the liberty left vnto all Churches and practised by all Churches which the gouernours doe suppose best to further or edifie the substantialls Secondly consider we the manner of our Churches proposing of these things The fundamentall points and speciall precepts of Christ shee proposeth as binding the conscience vnder paine of condemnation to euery wilfull and impenitent transgressour The circumstantialls or ceremonialls determined by her out of the generall rules of the Word she proposeth and inioyneth as free not binding the conscience in themselues as variable not perpetuall as accidentall not as necessary In which case our Church cannot bee saide to deny Christ for her onely teacher and Prophet but rather to confesse him seeing shee teacheth nothing but that Christ hath commanded In which respect hee is with our Church by promise ad finem saeculi Matthew 28. 19. 20. and hee that heareth the teachers thereof thus teaching heareth Christ Luke 10. 16. Ioh. 13. 20. And thus the first point is confirmed The second followeth Point 2. to be spoken of which is this That the doctrine and practise of suffering depriuation for refusing to conforme to the prescribed Ceremonies doth tend to condemne all Churches and godly teachers Primitiue and latter of teaching false doctrine of practising a maintained sin Which point is thus made euident Because such Ministers as haue suffered depriuation for refusing to conforme or doe hazard their ministery for the same doe account and conclude it to bee a sin simply to conforme vnto the Ceremonies proposed in the present Church of England or the like and that all that doe conforme in any case vnto them shall therein commit a sinne against God and further that whosoeuer teacheth the contrary they stand out to confute them and conuince them of an errour But all true Churches of Christ and all true Orthodoxall Teachers both auncient and latter of all times and places without exception of any one haue vniformely and constantly taught this conclusion That it is a truth and no errour to teach a dutie and no sinne to practise the prescribed Ceremonies of the present Church of England or the like rather then to violate and breake the peace of the Church or that a Minister should suffer depriuation and so the preaching of the Gospell should bee interrupted or that a Minister or any other Christian should separate themselues or suffer themselues to bee separated from the publike worships of God in a true Church Wherefore it must needes follow that they who iustifie the former must needs condemne the latter Now that it may appeare that all Orthodoxall Churches and Teachers of all ages and places since the time of the Apostles of Christ are of this iudgement and practise and not of the other I will first begin with the Primitiue Churches before the Reuelation and raigne of Antichrist and next in order of the latter reformed Churches since the restauration of the Gospell and declination of Antichrist Concerning the Primitiue Churches and their teachers I will obserue two points First the state of the Churches of those times concerning Ceremonies and secondly the iudgement and practise of the Fathers and the faithfull in that estate Point 1 And touching the former point wee must not bee ignorant that euen in the dayes of the Apostles the mysterie of iniquitie did beginne to worke as themselues obserued 2. Thessalonians 2. 7. For euen then there were many Antichrists 1. Iohn 2. 18. And after the Apostles departure the seruants and workemen of Christ his fielde that is the Ministers of Christ his Church did fall a sleepe that is they were not vigilant and watchfull but grew carelesse and remisse in teaching and propagating the truth of Gods Word to confute errours and to resist and keepe out corruptions attempted to bee brought in by Heretickes and Sectaries and while they thus slept the Diuell sowed his tares Matthew 13. 25. a president whereof wee haue Apocalips 2. and 3. Where the Angels or Teachers of the Churches are reproued in this respect of which kinde of tares that the Diuell sowed the Ceremonies of the Church were not the fewest nor the least hurtfull And they farre exceeded our Ceremonies if wee should esteeme or proue them much worse then they are and namely in three respects First in respect of their multitude varietie and difference Secondly in regard of their nature kinde and qualitie Lastly in respect of their effects and abuse arising from them 1 Their multitude variety and difference did begin very high and neere the times of the Apostles For the difference of the celebration of Easter if the Ecclesiasticall Records bee true began before or about the time of Policarp Bishop of Smyrna and disciple of Saint Iohn and Anicetus Bishop of Rome Euzeb 5. 24. Socrat. 5. 22. and who readeth the antiquitie with any obseruation that shall not perceiue in the vndoubted writings of the most auncient Fathers both of the
is contrary to the law of loue The first point is of it selfe cleere ynough without any further proofe howbeit it appeareth by these reasoÌ„s that namely it is coÌ„tray to Gods word to do any thing coÌ„trary to the law of loue First because if loue be the fulfilling of the law Ro. 13. 8. 12. theÌ„ the violatioÌ„ of this law is the violatioÌ„ of the law of God which is a sin 1. cor 16. 14. al our things must be done in loue Secondly because of the fulfilling of the law of loue according to the scrip by wel doing for the Apost saith If ye fulfil it ye do wel Iam. 2. 10. theÌ„ the violatioÌ„ of the law is euil doing which is sin Thirdly because the violation of the law of loue is a breach of the end of the coÌ„mandemeÌ„t 1. Tim. 1. 5. 6. which is a sin Fourthly because the violatioÌ„ of the law of loue is a breach of the law of loue to God Io. 3. 17. 4. 20. 21. 5. 1. therefore a sin Fiftly Because the violation hereof putteth out the infallible and true badge in vs of being ture christians * Ioh. â—3 35. 1. Ioh. 4. 7. 13. 10. 19. which is a sin Sixtly because the violatioÌ„ of this law putteth out the internall assurance of regeneratioÌ„ of being the childreÌ„ of God * that wee be translated from death to life which is a sinne The second point is also prooued thus namely That to incurre and suffer depriuation for refusing to conforme 2 Poynt is contrary to the royall law of loue The reasons are these Reason 1 First because this doctrine and practise is a greate enemy to mans saluation which is a breach of this law of loue in the highest degree Rom. 14. 15. This appeareth because it doeth by abstaining from a thing in nature indifferent such as our ceremonies are prooued to be needlesly depriue him of the ordinary meanes of his saluation which is the preaching ministry of the word of God and of the Sacraments For as things doe stand all such as doe not conforme vnto the ceremonies are to be depriued without exception Obiect A man may haue the ministry of others though some be depriued Answ Surely very hardly For where almost in any place many thousands of persons fearing God in this land enioy a preaching minister hauing lost their faithfull teachers by this doctrine of suffering depriuation for refusing conformity to our ceremonies which haue no teachers neerethem in a greate compasse and are tyed by necessitie of outward meanes that they cannot remooue their dwelling where they may enioy this ordinary meanes of their saluation Secondly this obiection is nothing to the point in hand for in that some preachers remaine for the comfort of Gods people is Gods extraordinary blessing and grace of whose mercy it is that wee are not consumed because his compassion fayles not Howbeit this is no thanke to this doctrine of suffering depriuation for indifferent ceremonies which if it might preuayle according to their minde would leaue noe preacher in England at this houre but sweepe them all away at once which I thus manifest First our Soueraigne King and the Ecclesiasticall gouernors vnder him with the whole state as appeareth by the Statutes yeat in force doe remaine resolued and vnremooued to maintaine the practise of ceremonies prescribed indifferent and that it is not a conuenient thing neither yet safe neither standing with the credit of the Church or common-wealth to remoue these things which they hold to haue bin at first with mature aduice established and this resolution of theirs experience in the losse of many woorthy preachers hath taught vs. Secondly the doctrine of suffering depriuation for inconuenient ceremonies if it bee truth as they suppose it be who haue beene for that cause depriued doth tie all Ministers alike so that if it tie the conscience of one it tieth also the conscience of another yea of a thousand besides not one excepted Wherefore no man if wee presuppose the state of things to remaine as they doe may by that doctrine without sinne conforme to redeeme his Ministery not onely at this time but not in any posteritie heereafter and so this doctrine doth vniuersally depriue all places of this Land at all times things standing as they doe of the ordinary meanes of their saluation which is the Ministery of the Word and Sacraments Obiect God blesseth the priuat meanes of priuat reading catechising instruction reproofe comfort exhortation and inuocation in the absence of the publike Answ True vnto such persons as are not cause of depriuing themselues needlesly of the publike meanes in which case I know God accepteth a man according to that he hath and not according to that he hath not But what is that to the Ministers that doe not on iust cause but needlesly suffer depriuation for refusing to conforme whereby it seemeth that they incurre the danger of two mischiefes One by needlesly suffering the light of Gods publike ordinance to be quenched they create to themselues iust feare that hee will not blesse their priuat meanes to them being guilty of the needlesse leauing of the publike The other that they may also feare least they haue done though in ignorance purpose of well doing as much as in them lay needlesly to destroy the flocke committed to their charge by denying further instruction to them and publike ordinary meanes of their saluation which they might haue with good conscience continued in to the comfort conuersion of many a soule Obiect Wee must so loue our neighbour as that wee must loue Christ aboue our deerest friends Matth. 10. 37. Luk. 14. 26. Secondly loue reioyceth in the truth not in iniquity 1. Cor. 13. 6. Thirdly wee must so loue our neighbour as that we offend not God by breaking his will Fourthly wee must so loue our neighbour as that we offend not God by violating a good conscience and breaking our peace Heb. 13. 18. Fifthly we must not doe euill that good may come thereof wherefore wee must not vse the ceremonies though wee suffer depriuation and by this practise wee breake not the law of loue but keepe it Answ First wee loue Christ when we keepe his Commaundements Ioh. 14. 21. 24. who hath commanded his Ministers to preach his Word to the worlds end Matt. 28. 19. 20. he breaketh not Christs commandement that doth practise indifferent ceremonies though in some respects accidentally inconuenient to redeeme the fulfilling of his greater duty of teaching the Gospel to the flocke which is a great argument of our loue to him Ioh. 21. 15. 16. 17. Secondly the truth is this wherein true loue reioyceth that for tender loue vnto the sheepe of Christ that Ministers must conforme and practise euen inconuenient ceremonies that the Gospell may haue a free passage which truth is proued Act. 16. 1. 3. 15. 28. 29. 21. 23. 24. 25. 26. Thirdly we breake the will of God if we neglect
the preaching of Gods Word 2. Tim. 4. 2. but vpon iust cause and draw the heauy woe vpon vs 1. Cor. 9. 16. Fourthly what good conscience may a man haue by breaking a greater duty to performe a lesser by committing a greater sinne to auoid that which in this case leaueth to bee a sinne to make conscience of that where none in this case is to be made and to make no conscience of that where great conscience is to bee made namely of continuing to feede the flocke committed to their charge Fifthly this obiection is answered before and holds in matters euill onely by nature not in things indifferent of nature and in vse onely inconuenient Reas 2 Because the doctrine and practise of suffering depriuation for inconuenient ceremonies is a great enemy to the edification of the Church which is a speciall property and effect of loue for loue edifieth Ephes 4. 16. 1. Cor. 8. 1. For by ineuitable consequence it ouerthroweth all the Churches and ministery of Christ in England yea al the reformed churches Zanch. in Phil. 1. fol. 45. b. Read the Question of Christendome at this houre yea all Churches since Christ and his Apostles Wherefore this doctrine and practise is opposite vnto the law of Loue. The ineuitable ouerthrow dissipation and destruction of all Churches by this doctrine and practise appeareth by this that followeth First wee must consider this that no Church since the Apostles time but hath practised inconuenient Ceremonies in some respect neither is there any true reformed Church at this houre in the Christian world German Danish Bohem Heluetian Dutch or French which doth not practise some inconuenient ceremonies some of them doe practise farre more then ours and more liable to exception all which is made euident in Argument the fourth Yea the Apostolicall Churches did practise inconuenient ceremonies that by the Apostles command and that as things good and necessary for the Church Act. 15. 28. 29. Secondly it therefore followeth by this doctrine of suffering depriuation for inconuenient ceremonies that all the Ministers of England yea of al Christendom must necessarily suffer depriuation for refusing their inconuenient ceremonies seing all Churches doe strictly tie their Ministers to the practise of their ceremonies yea the Apostles by this doctrine did very ill and committed sin to perswade others to conforme to inconuenient ceremonies Act. 21. 23. 24. yea to command them to conforme to them as good and necessary in that case Acts 15. 28. 29. Yea to practise this conformity on themselues Act. 21. 26. Yea and on others also Acts 16. 1. 3. Yea they should rather haue suffered their Apostleship to haue bene forfeited and left the preaching of the Gospel to haue bene suppressed the Churches of Christ to haue bene dissolued and desolated then to haue yeelded to this conformity of inconuenient ceremonies But to admit of this is apparantly absurd wherfore the reason followes and remaines in force Reas 3 Because this doctrine and practise doth needlesly on no ground or iust cause breed or produce sundry scandalls and offences against diuers sorts of persons which is against the law of loue as appeareth First it is the occasion of fraternall discord mouing the Ministers to â—udge and account of the reuerend Bishops as of Antichristian and tyrannous Prelates and the Bishops to esteeme of them as of pernitious and vnsufferable Schismatickes This disturbeth the Churches peace maketh the common enemy insult and blaspheme the Gospel at our mutuall discords and deuoureth our owne strength by biting one another and is Ergo against the law of loue 1. Thess 5. 13. Galat. 5. 13. 14. 15. Rom. 12. 8. Whereas if in the case of depriuation the Ministers did peaceably conforme this scandall would be cut off or exceedingly made lesse and mittigated of which sin the authors and accessaries are guilty before God Secondly it two fold more scandalizeth the Papist then conformity for hee doth farre more reioyce and insult to see a godly Minister thrust out and with him all the truth of the Gospel feruently and continually pressed the greatest enemy to Popery that can be then to see him weare a Surplesse in the face of our Church with his mouth opened and stomacke inlarged against Antichrist and his superstitions and will worships Thirdly it two fold more scandalizeth the Atheist and carnall Libertine and Epicure who by the painfull Ministers depriuall will exceedingly triumph to see a doore opened for him without resistance to liue in drunkennesse whoordome swearing oppressing to bring in securely wanton dancings Church-ales profane wakefeasts reuells vnlawfull sports and a thousand euills much more then to see the Minister though conforming to the ceremonies yet present to withstand disgrace and suppresse these sins and therein to glorifie God to further his kingdome to edifie his Church to propagate his Gospel with a Surplesse on his backe Fourthly it two fold more scandalizeth such one as doth truly feare the name of God who could bee more contented to enioy the meanes of his Faith and saluation and of the Communion of Saints and visible prosperity of Christ his kingdome vpon earth with a small inconuenience of some Ceremonies which hee grieueth at and is not guilty of then to lose his Pastor the Gospel and ordinary meanes of his sauing faith yea of his saluation and heereby to see if it so fall out loyterers and Wolues in sheepes clothing take the charge of the flocke of Christ and to behold the sheepe and lambes so deerely bought and heeretofore so well instructed to lie scattered vp and downe which were vnited in one fold together and led into the greene pastures of grace and life Fiftly it offendeth the Magistrate by prouoking him perswaded and resolued as hee is to disgrace these otherwise well deseruing Ministers and to strike them with the sword of authoritie and that in the dayes and light of the Gospel which would cease by conforming in this case And if wee should not offend a priuate person much lesse should we offend the Magistrate which is a publicke person about the vse of a thing indifferent If it be saide that therefore they abstaine from the Ceremonies that they might not giue offence to godly mindes I say againe that good mindes should not bee offended in this case which if they do we must neglect for that by refusall of conformity the Magistrate is prouoked to depriue them and such as are well minded haue farre more occasion of offence at the depriuation of a good teacher which is a mischeefe then at his conformity which is but a simple inconuenience at the most 6 Sixtly it vniustly condemneth the harmonie of all true Churches that euer were Primitiue and reformed for teaching false doctrine and many godly and most reuerend persons who in case of depriuation partly haue taught the doctrine of necessary conformity to inconuenient Ceremonies partly who aduised thereunto partly who practised the same themselues which hath bene an
contrary iudgement to that for which they alledge him and saith that it is recepta illius loci interpretatio vntill they come vnto the place which my Brethren say I put most confidence in which they finde to bee Acts 15. Which place it selfe vnlesse they had gone about directly to confute they could haue said nothing to the purpose For what is it to the point when I speake of inioyning and doe bring a place to proue it for them to insist vpon the number but according to the old saying Ego de allijs tu de caepis which might bee referred to the Dialogue of Erasmuus de absurdis As for the ensuing repetion of the things which before they alleadged in the same words almost that the things enioyned in Act. 15. were not Ceremonies that they were imposed not as ceremoniall but as morall dueties that Timothy his circumcision was not a Sacrament and the rest they are by me sufficiently replyed vnto before The fourth and last member of my assumption is of reasons of suffering depriuation where my Brethren in their answere beginne againe with misreporting of my wordes For my reason saith not that the Apostles and Churches were moued to inioyne and practise Ceremonies for reasons of no greater weight but for reasons partly equiuolent and partly inferiour to the auoiding of depriuation And I am sorry that in so little compasse of two or three sheets of paper my Brethren should so many times ouerslip themselues which if in this part of their answere they had not done it had beene to small purpose to bring in so large a proofe of that in the first Section heereof which no man denieth that the Apostles office is of greater dignitie or excellency then the office of an inferiour Minister For in that I said partly equiuolent I left roome enough for any man to vnderstand that the reasons were not altogether equiuolent and yet this very point being caeteris paribus vnderstood as the office of a Minister is the ordinance of God as well as the office of an Apostle so the one in these dayes is no lesse necessary for the saluation of the faithfull man now then the other then and a Minister in these dayes ought no lesse to bee carefull of the losse of his Ministery or interruption of the Gospell then the Apostles then and therefore I see not but the same reasons and practise they vsed then to that end we should also now vse for the profit of Gods Church Next in the second place there is one thing by the way that I cannot be perswaded of that my Brethren say that the very vsing of the Iewish ceremonies then would edifie whereas they should rather say that the effect of such vse did edifie onely For that the bare vse of them being in it selfe considered might in many respects be scandalous and did minister occasion to the corrupt Iewes of stumbling as I haue prooued But it is much that my Brethren should affirme that conformity to our Ceremonies to preuent Depriuation should not doe any good at all and further that a Minister should doe much more hurt by his conformity then good by his Ministry As if the liberty of preaching the word were so great good by the Apostles practise to the Church and with vs by Gods blessing on his owne ordinance it were no good at all Or as if the practise of the ceremonies would nullifie or confound the blessing of Gods ordinance of preaching and then how can the preaching of Conformitans bee blessed of God Or as if the vse of our Ceremonies would destroy more soules then preaching could conuert or establish in the faith Or last of all as if the vse of the ceremonies were more apt and forcible to peruert a man to his destruction then preaching to conuert him to saluation Which supposals as they are most vntrue and my Brethren I know will not denie so if they graunt them to be false a Minister conforming to redeeme the free passage of his preaching shall haue a better bargaine out of question by his practise then my Brethren heere doe vndertake to driue on his behalfe Now touching the last point if my Brethren will haue me grant that the Apostles were well assured in their consciences they did that which was not onely lawfull but needfull for them to doe Then still I must needs conclude that so long as we doe performe the like practise with them in the like case and on the like reasons as it doeth yet appeare wee may very well haue assurance sufficient for it in our hearts And so in degree according to our modell we may be said to haue an equiualent reason for the auoyding of our Depriuation As for that full assurance which my brethren say they enioy namely that they haue Gods expresse commandement to the contrary and that they should doe euill in the sight of the Lord to conforme vnto our Ceremonies euen to auoid de priuation It seemeth to me a speach neither Theologicall nor safe I say not Theologicall for that Theologie is assurance of matters fundamentall which in their nature are onely euident and vnquestionable among the faithfull which this is not And I say againe not safe because as wee are expressely charged not to call good euill so if our Ceremonies should in their nature proue indifferent wee should feare to call them simply and in nature euill both because it is vntrue and the consequences are pernicious which come from thence And if it bee good and needfull in a case of depriuation to conforme vnto our Ceremonies as all good iudgements and godly learned teachers and Churches haue taught till now our brethren are become assured otherwise Me thinks this plerophoricall confidence of my brethren should not bee so safe for them but rather to set a side all ancient preiudice to hearken carefully to that which is disputed and concluded by the chiefest lights and iudgements that euer the Church of Christ since the time of the Apostles obtained of God to iudge charitably of their differing brethren and modestly of themselues and to iudge nothing before the time till the Lord come who will lighten things that are hid in darkenesse And if they will not yeeld vnto this trueth yet to leaue it as a matter of disputall nature till the day doe try and the fire consume the stubble of the errors of Gods faithfull seruants FINIS AN ADMONITION TOVCHING THE FAVLTS escaped in Printing THOV maist vnderstand good Christian Reader that this treatise was put in presse before I had knowledge thereof and I had not perused the copy that was written Whereupon there is great neede of thy patience in respect of the many slippes escaped in Printing and other alterations thereof yet without the Printers fault or mine The chiefe whereof I haue heere corrected Let no man take offence at my consent for the publication thereof because I rest perswaded of the truth therein contained and I bring
not shew of words but waight of reason and besides it was needfull for me to publish those reasons which the hazard of my depriuation did heeretofore occasion mee to frame and enforced me of late to follow The Lord giue such blessing to the same as I heartely desire for the peace of the Church and for the quieting of the consciences of such as neede it Pag. Err. Correct 7 GAl. 5. 20. 21. 22. Gal. 5. 30. 10. 21. 22. 10 of Faith dayly in the Faith dayly 11 as ours are now as ours are not by our Church 13 mystically mutually 14 then sometimes they sometimes  or rather straw or rather tares  those many things those maine things 16 noted to King noted by King 18 as also all as also did 19 both by otah doctrine both by doctrine  Papists popishly Papists and Popishly 21 these dayes those dayes  Act. 25. 28. 29. Acts 15. 28. 29. 22 and 10. 13. and 10. 31.  of his iudgement of this iudgement 24 in one practise in our practise 25 reproued approued 27 2. King 23. 12. 2. Chron. 32. 12. 28 being both works because both workes 31 we cannot iudge and therefore we cannot iudge 31 by euery person by all persons 35 the performance the formes 38 yea saints the Saints  essentiall practise effectuall practise 39 sound doctrine sound doctrine 43 to conforme or the like to conforme vnto our ceremonies or the like 45 the Apostles in the Apostles case in 46 Contrariae contrarius 47 Exercit part inter thes Vrsin Excercit part 2. inter thes 126. 48 because all such because otherwise al such 49 or rather or other 50 kneeling high or low kneeling outward habite as this or that forme of apparell voice high or low 51 Consider that which also Consider secondly that as also 52 obedience to good obedience to God 54 proued a matter proued that a matter 54 preaching of the worke preaching of the word 55 practising of the word by preaching preaching of the word  no sinne of adultery no time of adultery 57 the praecepts these praecepts 59 The former as a circumstantiall duetie to which all ceremonies as a lesser work to a greater the former as a circumstantiall duty commanding fit ceremonies the other as a substantiall duty to which all ceremonies ceremoniall duties must serue as a lesser work to a greater 62 broken taken 63 of the fulfilling if the fulfilling  by well doing be well doing  violation of the Law violation of that Law 64 many thousands may thousands 72 as the Papist as the Papists wil haue it 74 as in condemning or in condemning  must needs be an error must needs be in error 78 the consent of Churches suppose then the consent of Churches 79 Catholique Church taken Catholike Church may erre being taken  Catholike Church haue Catholike Church hath  here should we make how should we make 80 For they agree so they agree 87 Decret caus 26. qu. 6. 7 8. 10. Decret Caus 26. qu. 6. can 9 ex Nicaeno Conc. item can 6. 7. 8 10. 88 Commended and commended as 90 onely fish and fowles onely fish some fish and foules 91 Valentius Valentinus 92 that in those dayes in cities in villages that a man in those dayes might find in cities and villages 97 afterwards the same afterwards the Sunne 98 wholesome wholesomely 102 Easterne Controu Easter Controu 103 praesumptuous praesumptions  pacificum pacificum filium 106 M. Middelburgi  Putaeus Paraeus  Witenberg Wirtenberg so Correct it pag. 108. 109. 115.  gaue giue 107 Epistle of Luther Postill of Luther the like pag. 109. 109 Harm Confess § fol. 176. Bohem. Harm confess § 16. fol. 179. Bohem.  4. Lex Decal § 11. fol. 43. albeit 4. Lex Decal § 33. so doe the Tigurines Har. conf § 11. fol. 43. albeit 110 First of their iudgement touching ceremonies in generall appeareth First of their iudgement touching ceremonies in generall as also of their practise after and then also of our cere  Iniunction Inuention 113 Iocun Ioan. 115 an aedification and aedification  Scriptu fol. 21. Cap. fol. 211. 118 for the Churches aedification Deleatur 125 penislyllabas Paenè syllabas 128 Benhagius Bugenhagius 130 Myricus Illyricus  reuolue reuoke 133 Came Comes 134 therefore first I answere albeit in our iudgement these ceremonies are not rightly commanded Deleatur 140 primitiue had the Primitiue Church vsed 144 yeelding Confession of the trueth yeelding to his request heerein 4. if he conceale not this confession of the trueth 151 lesser better 152 wherefore it is written whereof it is written 153 we are bound following wee are not bound following faires 157 Paraeum Duraeum  Commandeth commendeth 159 meane to rather 162 then to then so to 165 paritie purity 166 perils points 167 of mending of weeding out 168 admitted permitted 170 haue some notwithstanding haue had some not standing 171 to be kept inuiolable to be kept inuiolable And he answered it thus 175 No partes neither partes 191 hold a right affection should preiudice a right affection 197 admonition of them admonition of the weake that they be not offended praier vnto God to strengthen them 199 so respected so reserued 202 his argument this argument 203 Lumbertus Lubbertus 205 which note the controuerfie which were the controuertists  did stirre doe shew 288 though pure past 209 soote salt 213 so refusing for refusing 214 doctrine and practise of the Apostles doctrine and practise of the Apostles therefore it is a sinne 215 viz. that the Apostles doctrine and practise doeth not so warrant a minister viz. that it is both against the doctrine and practise of the Apostles for a minister  beginne begge  doctrine of the Scribes practise and doctrine of the Scribes 224 Apostles inioyned them Apostles vsed and enioyned them 225 when that himselfe then that himselfe 226 his first proposition his proposition  to be obserued to haue beene obserued 227 for matters of direction in the Church concerning ceremonies for the direction of the Church in matters of ceremonies 230 nature and euill nature vse and euill 235 this commandement his commandement 236 Answeres Answerers