Holiness by the resurrection from the dead Rom. 1. 4. And then was glorified with that glory which he had with the Father before the world was John 17. 3. And as this dispensation was needful unto the accomplishment of the whole work which as our Mâ—diator he had undertaken so in particular he who was in himself the Lord of Hosts a Sanctuary to them that feared him became hereby a stone of stumbling and a rock of offence to both the Houses of Israel for a gin and for a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem Isa. 8. 13 14. See Luke 2. 34. Rom. 9. 33. 1 Pet. 2. 8. Isa. 28. 26. But yet notwithstanding as occasions required suitably unto his own holy ends and designs he forbare not to give plain and open testimony to his own Divine Nature and eternal pre-existence unto his Incarnation And this was it which of all other things most provoked the carnal Jews with whom he had to do For having as was said lost the Doctrine of the Trinity and Person of the Messiah in a great measure when ever he asserted his Deity they were immediately enraged and endeavoured to destroy him So was it plainly John 8. 56 57 58 59. Saith he Your Father Abraham rejoyced to see my day and he saw it and was glad then said the Jews unto him thou art nâ—t yet fifty years old and hast thou seen Abraham Jesus said unto them verily I say unto you before Abraham was I am then took they up stones to cast at him So also John 10. 30 31 32 33. I and my Father are one then the Jews took up stones again to stone him Jesus answered them many good works have I shewed you from my Father for which of those works do you stone me The Jews answered him saying for a good work we stone thee not but for blasphemy and because that thou being a Man makest thy self God They understood well enough the meaning of those words I and my Father are one namely that they were a plain Assertion of his being God This caused their rage And this the Jews all abide by to this day namely that he declared himself to be God and therefore they slew him Whereas therefore the first discovery of a plurality of Persons in the Divine Essence consists in the Revelation of the Divine Nature and personality of the Son this being opposed persecuted and blasphemed by these Jews they may be justly looked upon and esteemed as the first Assertors of that misbelief which now some seek again so earnestly to promote The Jews persecuted the Lord Christ because he being a Man declared himself also to be God and others are ready to revile and reproach them who believe and teach what he declared After the Resurrection and Ascension of the Lord Jesus all things being filled with tokens evidences and effects of his Divine Nature and Power Rom. 1. 4. The Church that began to be gathered in his name and according to his Doctrine being by his especial institution to be initiated into the express profession of the Doctrine of the Holy Trinity as being to be baptized in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost which confession comprizeth the whole of the truth contended for and by the indispensible placing of it at the first entrance into all obedience unto him is made the doctrinal foundation of the Church it continued for a season in the quiet and undisturbed possession of this Sacred Treasure The first who gave disquietment unto the Disciples of Christ by perverting the Doctrine of the Trinity was Simon Magus with his followers an account of whose monstrous figments and unintelligible imaginations with their coincidence with what some men dream in these latter daies shall elsewhere be given Nor shall I need here to mention the Colluvies of Gnosticks Valentinians Marcionites and Manichees the foundation of all whose abominations lay in their mis-apprehensions of the being of God their unbelief of the Trinity and Person of Christ as do those of some others also In especial there was one Cerinthus who was more active than others in his opposition to the Doctrine of the person of Christ and therein of the Holy Trinity To put a stop unto his Abominations all Authors agree that John writing his Gospel prefixed unto it that plain declaration of the eternal Deity of Christ which it is prefaced withall And the story is well attested by Irenaeus Eusebius and others from Polycarpus who was his Disciple that this Cerinthus coming into the place where the Apostle was he left it adding as a reason of his departure lest the building through the just judgement of God should fall upon them And it was of the Holy Wise Providence of God to suffer some impious Persons to oppose this Doctrine before the death of that Apostle that he might by infallible Inspiration farther reveal manifest and declare it to the establishment of the Church in future Ages For what can farther be desired to satisfie the minds of men who in any sense own the Lord Jesus Christ and the Scriptures than that this Controversie about the Trinity and Person of Christ for they stand and fall together should be so eminently and expresly determined as it were immediately from Heaven But he with whom we have to deal in this matter neither ever did nor ever will nor can acquiesce or rest in the divine determination of any thing which he hath stirred up strife and controversie about For as Cerinthus and the Ebionites persisted in the Heresie of the Jews who would have slain our Saviour for bearing witness to his own Deity notwithstanding the evidence of that testimony and the right apprehension which the Jews had of his mind therein so he excited others to engage and persist in their Opposition to the truth notwithstanding this second particular determination of it from Heaven for their confutation or confusion For after the more weak and confused oppositions made unto it by Theodotus Coriarius Artemon and some others at length a stout Champion appears visibly and expresly engaged against these fundamentals of our faith This was Paulus Sa nosatenus Bishop of the Church of Antioch about the year 272. A man of most intolerable pride passion and folly the greatest that hath left a name upon Ecclesiastical Records This man openly and avowedly denyed the Doctrine of the Trinity and the Deity of Christ in an especial manner For although he endeavoured for a while to cloud his impious sentiments in ambiguous expressions as others also have done Euseb. lib. 7. cap. 27. yet being pressed by the Professors of the truth and supposing his party was somewhat confirmed he plainly defended his Heresie and was cast out of the Church wherein he presided Some sixty years after Photinus Bishop of Syrmium with a pretence of more sobriety in life and conversation undertook the management of the same design with the same success What ensued afterwards among the Churches
is Father Son and holy Ghost So that the Father is God so also is the Son and the holy Ghost likewise and as such are to be believed in obeyed worshipped acknowledged as the first cause and last end of all our Lord and Reward If this be not admitted if somewhat of it be not particularly denyed we need not we have no warrant or ground to proceed any farther or at all to discourse about the Unity of the Divine Essence or the distinction of Persons We have not therefore any original contest in this matter with any but such as deny either God to be one or the Father to be God or the Son to be God or the Holy Ghost so to be If any deny either of these in particular we are ready to confirm it by sufficient Testimonies of Scripture or clear and undeniable Divine Revelation When this is evinced and vindicated we shall willingly proceed to manifest that the explications used of this Doctrine unto the Edification of the Church are according to truth and such as necessarily are required by the nature of the things themselves And this gives us the method of the small ensuing Discourse with the Reasons of it The first thing which we affirm to be delivered unto us by divine Revelation as the Object oâ— ouâ— Faith is that God is one I know that this may be uncontroulably evidenced by the â—ight of Reason it self unto as good and quiet an Assurance as the mind of man is capable of in any of its apprehensions whatever But I speak of it now as it is confirmed unto us by Divine Revelation How this Assertion of one God respects the Nature Essence or Divine Being of God shall be declared afterwards At present it is enough to represent the Testimonies that he is one only one And because we have no difference with our Adversaries distinctly about this matter I shall only name some few of them Deut. 6. 4. Hear O Israel the Lord our God is one Lord. A most pregnant Testimony and yet notwithstanding as I shall elsewhere manifest the Trinity it self in that one divine Essence is here asserted Isa. 44. 6 8. Thus saith the Lord the King of Israel and his Redeemer the Lord of Hosts I am the first and I am the last and besides me there is no God Is there a God besides me Yea there is no God I know not any In which also we may manifest that a plurality of Persons is included and expressed And although there be no more absolute and sacred truth than this that God is one yet it may be evinced that it is no where mentioned in the Scripture but that either in the words themselves or the context of the place a plurality of persons in that one sence is intimated Secondly It is proposed as the object of our Faith that the Father is God And herein as is pretended there is also an agreement between us and those who oppose the Doctrine of the Trinity But there is a mistake in this matter Their hypothesis as they call it or indeed presumptuous errour casts all the conceptions that are given us concerning God in the Scripture into disorder and confusion For the Father as he whom we worship is often called so only with reference unto his Son as the Son is so with reference to the Father He is the only begotten of the Father John 1. 14. But now is this Son had no praeexistence in his Divine nature before he was born of the Virgin there was no God the Father seventeen hundred years ago because there was no Son And on this ground did the Marcionites of old plainly deny the Father whom under the New Testament we Worship to be the God of the Old Testament who made the World and was Woâ—shipped from the foundation of it For it seems to follow that he whom we worship being the Father and on this supposition that the Son had no praexistence unto his incarnation he was not the Father under the Old Testament he is some other from him that was so revealed I know the folly of that inference yet how on this opinion of the sole existence of the Son in time Men can prove the Father to be God let others determine He who abideth in the doctrine of Christ he hath both the Father and the Son but whosoever transgresseth and abideth not in the Doctrine of Christ he hath not God 2 John 9. Whoever denyes Christ the Son as the Son that is the eternal Son of God he loses the Father also and the true God he hath not God For that God which is not the Father and which ever was and was not the Father is not the true God Hence many of the Fathers even of the first Writers of the Church were forced unto great pains in the confirmation of this truth that the Father of Jesus Christ was he who made the World gave the Law spake by the Prophets and was the Author of the Old Testament and that against Men who professed themselves to be Christians And this bruitish apprehension of theirs arose from no other principle but this that the Son had only a temporal Existence and was not the Eternal Son of God But that I may not in this brief discourse digress unto other Controversies than what lyes directly before us and seeing the Adversaries of the truth we contend for do in words at least grant that the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ is the true God or the only true God I shall not further shew the inconsistency of their hypothesis with this confession But take it for granted that to us there is one God the Father 1 Cor. 8. 6. See John 17. 3. So that he who is not the Father who was not so from Eternity whose paternity is not equally coexistent unto his Deity is no God unto us Thirdly It is asserted and believed by the Church that Jesus Christ is God the Eternal Son of God that is He is proposed declared and revealed unto us in the Scripture to be God that is to be served worshipped believed in obeyed as God upon the account of his own Divine excellencies And whereas we believe and know that he was Man that he was born lived and dyed as a Man it is declared that he is God also and that as God he did preexist in the form of God before his Incarnation which was effected by voluntary actings of his own which could not be without a preexistence in another nature This is proposed unto us to be believed upon Divine Testimony and by Divine Revelation And the sole enquiry in this matter is whether this be proposed in the Scripture as an Object of Faith and that which is indispensibly necessary for us to believe Let us then nakedly attend unto what the Scripture asserts in this matter and that in the order of the Books of it in some particular instances which at present occurr to mind as these that follow Psalm
from the first foundation of the Church sundry Persons by the instigation of Satan attempted the disturbance and ruine of it by the very same errours and Heresies about the Trinity the Person of Christ and his Offices the person of the Holy Ghost and his Grace wherewith its first trouble and ruine was endeavoured And hereof we have of late an instance given among our selves and that so notoriously known through a mixture of imprudence and impudence in the managers of it that a very brief reflection upon it will suffice unto our present design It was alwaies supposed and known to some that there are sundry Persons in this Nation who having been themselves seduced into Socinianism did make it their business under various pretences to draw others into a compliance with them in the same way and perswasion Neither hath this for sundry years been so secretly carryed but that the design of it hath variously discovered it self by overt acts of Conferences disputations and publishing of Books which last way of late hath been sedulously pursued Unto these three is now a visible Accession made by that sort of People whom Men will call Quakers from their deportment at the first erection of their way long since deserted by them until by some new Revolutions of Opinions they cast themselves under a more proper denomination That there is a conjunction issued between both these sorts of Men in an Opposition to the holy Trinity with the Person and Grace of Christ the Pamphlets of late published by the one and the other do sufficiently evince For however they may seem in sundry things as yet to look divers waies yet like Sampson's Foxes they are knit together by the tayle of consent in these fire-brand Opinions and joyntly endeavour to consume the standing Corn of the Church of God And their joynt management of their business of late hath been as though it were their design to give as great a vogue and report to their Opinions as by any waies they are able Hence besides their attempts to be proclaiming their Opinions under various pretences in all Assemblies whereunto they may intrude themselves as they know without trouble they are exceedingly sedulous in scattering and giving away yea imposing gratis and as to some ingratiis their small books which they publish upon all sorts of persons promiscuously as they have advantage so to do By this means their Opinions being of late become the talk and discourse of the common sort of Christians and the Exercise of many amongst whom are not a few that on sundry accounts which I shall not mention may possibly be exposed unto disadvantage and prejudice thereby it hath been thought meet by some that the Sacred Truths which these men oppose should be plainly and briefly asserted and confirmed from the Scripture that those of the meanest sort of Professors who aâ—e Sincere and upright exercising themselves to keep a good conscience in matters of faith and obedience to God may have somewhat in a readiness both to guide them in their further enquiry into the Truth as also to confirm their Faith in what they have already received when at any time it is shaken or opposed by the cunning sleights of men that lye in wait to deceive And this comprizeth the design of the ensuing discourse It may possibly be judged needless by some as it was in its first proposal by him by whom it is wriâ—â—â—â— and that because this matter at present is by an especial providence cast on other hands who both have and doubtless as occasion shall require will well acquit themselves in the defence of the Truths opposed Not to give any other account of the Reasons of this small undertaking it may suffice that in publico discrimine omnis homo miles est Every mans concernment lying in a common danger it is free for every one to manage it as he thinks best and is able so it be without prejudice to the whole or the particular concerns of others If a City be on fire whose bucket that brings water to quench it ought to be refused The attempt to cast fire into the City of God by the Opinions mentioned is open and plain and a timely stop being to be put unto it the more hands are orderly employed in its quenching the more speedy and secure is the effect like to be Now because the Assertors of the Opinions mentioned do seem to set out themselves to be some great Ones above the ordinary rate of men as having found out and being able publickly to maintain such things as never would have entred into the minds of others to have thought on or conceived and also that they seem with many to be thought worthy of their consideration because they now are new and such as they have not been acquainted withall I shall in this Prefatory entrance briefly manifest that those who have amongst us undertaken the management of these Opinions have brought nothing new unto them but either a little contemptible Sophistry and caption of words on the one hand or futulous affected unintelligible expressions on the other the Opinions themselves being no other but such as the Church of God having been opposed by and troubled with from the beginning hath prevailed against and triumphed over in all generations And were it not that Confidence is the only relief which engaged impotency adheres unto and expects supplies from I should greatly admire that those amongst us who have undertaken an inforcement of these old exploded errours whose weakness doth so openly discover and proclaim it self in all their endeavours should judge themselves competent to give a new spirit of life to the dead carkass of these rotten Heresies which the faith of the Saints in all Ages hath triumphed over and which Truth and Learning have under the care and watchfulness of Christ so often baffled out of the world The Jews in the time of our Saviours converse on the earth being fallen greatly from the Faith and Worship of their forefathers and ready to sink into their last and utmost Apostacy from God seem amongst many other truths to have much lost that of the Doctrine of the Holy Trinity and of the Person of the Messiah It was indeed suited in the dispensation of God unto the work that the Lord Jesus had to fulfill in the world that before his Passion and Resurrection the knowledge of his Divine Nature as unto his individual person should be concealed from the most of men For this cause although he was in the form of God and thought it no robbery to be equal with God yet he made himself of no reputation by taking on him the form of a servant and made in the likeness of men that being found in the fashion of a man he might be obedient unto death Phil. 2. 7 8 9. whereby his Divine Glory was veiled for a season until he was declared to be the Son of God with power according unto the Spirit of
of God in this matter is of too large and diffused a nature to be here reported These instances I have fixed on only to intimate unto persons whose condition or occasions afford them not ability or leisure of themselves to enquire into the memorials of times past amongst the Professors of the Gospel of Christ that these oppositions which are made at present amongst us unto these fundamental Truths and derived immediately from the late renewed inforcement of them made by Faustus Socinus and his followers are nothing but old baffled attempts of Satan against the Rock of the Church and the building thereon in the confession of the Son of the living God Now as all men who have ought of a due Reverence of God or his truth remaining with them cannot but be wary how they give the least admittance to such Opinions as have from the beginning been witnessed against and condemned by Christ himself his Apostles and all that followed them in their faith and waies in all Generations so others whose hearts may tremble for the danger they apprehend which these sacred Truths may be in of being corrupted or defamed by the present opposition against them may know that it is no other but what the Church and faith of Professors hath already been exercised with and through the power of him that enables them have constantly triumphed over And for my part I look upon it as a blessed effect of the holy wise providence of God that those who have long harboured these Abominations of denying the holy Trinity the person and satisfaction of Christ in their minds but yet have sheltered themselves from common observation under the shades of dark obscure and uncouth expressions with many other specious pretences should be given up to joyn themselves with such Persons and to profess a community of perswasion with them in those opinions as have rendred themselves infamous from the first foundation of Christianity and wherein they will assuredly meet with the same success as those have done who have gone before them For the other head of Opposition made by these Persons unto the truth in Reference unto the satisfaction of Christ and the imputation of his Righteousness thereon unto our Justification I have not much to say as to the time past In general the doctrine wherein they boast being first brought forth in a rude mishapen manner by the Pelagian Hereticks was afterwards improved by one Abailardus a Sophistical Scholar in France but owes its principal form and poison unto the endeavours of Faustus Socinus those who have followed him in his subtle attempt to corrupt the whole doctrine of the Gospel Of these Mâ—n are those amongst us who at this day so busily dispute and write about the Trinity the Deity of Christ and his satisfaction the Followers and Disciples And it is much more from their Masters who were some of them Men learned diligent and subtle than from themselves that they are judged to be of any great consideration For I can truly say that upon the sedate examination of all that I could ever yet hear or get a sight of either spoken or written by them that is any amongst us I never yet observed an undertaking of so great importance managed with a greater evidence of incompetency and inability to give any tolerable countenance unto it If any of them shall for the future attempt to give any new countenance or props to their tottering errours it will doubtless be attended unto by some of those many who cannot but know that it is incumbent on them to contend earnestly for the Faith once delivered unto the Saints This present brief endeavour is only to assist and direct those who are less exercised in the waies of managing controversies in Religion that they may have a brief comprehension of the truths opposed with the firm foundations whereon they are built and have in a readiness to shield their Faith both against the fiery darts of Satan and secure their minds against the cunning sleights of Men who lye in wait to deceive And wherein this discourse seems in any thing to be too brief or concise the Author is not to be blamed who was confined unto these strait bounds by those whose requests injoyned him this service The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity Explained and Vindicated THe Doctrine of the blessed Trinity may be considered two wayes First In respect unto the Revelation and proposal of it in the Scripture to direct us unto the Author Object and End of our Faith in our worship and obedience Secondly As it is farther declared and explained in terms expressions and propositions educed from the Original Revelation of it suited thereunto and meet to direct and keep the mind from undue apprehensions of the things it believes and to declare them unto farther edification In the first way it consists meerly in the propositions wherein the Revelation of God is expressed in the Scripture And in this regard two things are required of us First To understand the terms of the propositions as they are Enunciations of Truth And Secondly To believe the things taught revealed and declared in them In the first Instance no more I say is required of us but that we assent unto the Assertions and Testimonies of God concerning himself according to their natural and genuine sence as he will be known believed in feared and worshipped by us as he is our Creator Lord and Rewarder and that because he himself hath by his Revelation not only warranted us so to do but also made it our duty necessary and indispensible Now the sum of this Revelation in this matter is that God is one that this one God is Father Son and Holy Ghost that the Father is the Father of the Son and the Son the Son of the Father and the Holy Ghost the Spirit of the Father and the Son and that in respect of this their mutual Relation they are distinct from each other This is the substance of the Doctrine of the Trinity as to the first direct concernment of faith therein The first intention of the Scripture in the Revelation of God towards us is as was said that we might fear him believe worship obey him and live unto him as God That we may do this in a due manner and worship the only true God and not adore the false imaginations of our own minds it declares as was said that this God is one the Father Son and Holy Ghost that the Father is this one God and therefore is to be believed in worshipped obeyed lived unto and in all things considered by us as the first cause soveraign Lord and last end of all that the Son is the one true God and therefore is to be believed in worshipped obeyed lived unto and in all things considered by us as the first cause Soveraign Lord and last end of all And so also of the Holy Ghost This is the whole of Faiths concernment in this matter as
things consist 1 Tim. 3. 16. Without Controversie great is the Mysterie of godliness God was manifested in the flesh Tit. 2. 13. Looking for that blessed hope and the glorious appearance of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ who gave himself for us Hebrewes the first throughout Chap. 3. 4. For every house is builded by some man but he that built all things is God 1 Pet. 1. 11. Searching what or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signifie Chap. 3. 18 19. But Christ also hath once suffered for sinners being put to death in the flesh but quickned by the Spirit by which also he went and preached unto the Spirits in Prison which sometimes were disobedient when once the long suffering of God waited in the dayes of Noah 1 John 3. 16. Hereby we perceive the Love of God because he laid down his life for us Chap. 5. 20. And we are in him that is true even in his Son Jesus Christ this is the true God and Eternal life Rev. 1. 8. I am Alpha and Omega the beginning and the ending saith the Lord which is and which was and which is to come the Almighty Ver. 11. I am Alpha and Omega the first and the last and what thou seest write in a Book and I turned to see the voice that spake with me and being turned I saw seven Golden Candlesticks and in the midst of the seven Candlesticks one like unto the Son of Man Ver. 17. And when I saw him I fell at his feet as dead and he laid his right hand upon me saying unto me fear not I am the First and the Last Chap. 2. 23. I am he which searcheth the reins and hearts and will give unto every one of you according to your works These are some of the places wherein the truth under consideration is revealed and declared some of the Divine Testimonies whereby it is confirmed and established which I have not at present enquired after but suddenly repeated as they came to mind Many more of the like nuture and importance may be added unto them and shall be so as occasion doth require Let now any one who owns the Scripture to be the Word of God to contain an infallible Revelation of the things proposed in it to be believed and who hath any conscience exercised towards God for the receiving and submitting unto what he declares and reveals take a view of these Testimonies and consider whether they do not sufficiently propose this Object of our faith Shall a few poor trifling Sophisms whose terms are scarcely understood by the most that amongst us make use of them according as they have found them framed by others be thought meet to be set up in opposition unto these multiplyed Testimonies of the Holy Ghost and to cast the Truth confirmed by them down from its credit and reputation in the consciences of men For my part I do not see in any thing but that the Testimonies given to the Godhead of Christ the Eternal Son of God are every way as clear and unquestionable as those are which testifie to the Being of God or that there is any God at all Were men acquainted with the Scriptures as they ought to be and as the most considering the means and advantages they have had might have been did they ponder and believe on what they 〈◊〉 or had any tenderness in their consciences as to that Reverence Obedience and Subjection of soul which God requires unto his Word it were utterly impossible that their faith in this matter should ever in the least be shaken by a few lewd Sophisms or loud clamours of men destitute of the truth and of the Spirit of it That we may now improve these Testimonies unto the end under design as the nature of this brief discourse will bear I shall first remove the general Answers which the Socinians give unto them and then manifest farther how incontrolable they are by giving an instance in the frivolous exceptions of the same Persons to One of them in particular And we are ready God assisting to maintain that there is not any one of them which doth not give a sufficient ground for faith to rest on in this matter concerning the Deity of Christ and that against all the Socinians in the world They say therefore commonly that we prove not by these testimonies what is by them denyed For they acknowledge Christ to be God and that because he is exalted unto that Glory and Authority that all creatures are put into subjection unto him and all both men and Angels are commanded to worship and adore him So that he is God by Office though he be not God by nature He is God but he is not the most high God And this last expression they have almost continually in their mouths He is not the most high God And commonly with great contempt and scorn they are ready to reproach them who have solidly confirmed the Doctrine of the Deity of Christ as ignorant of the state of controversie in that they have not proved him to be the most high God in subordination unto whom they acknowledge Christ to be God and that he ought to be worshipped with Divine and Religious worship But there cannot be any thing more empty and vain than these pretences And besides they accumulate in them their former Errors with the addition of new ones For First The name of the most high God is first ascribed unto God in Gen. 49. 18 19 22. denoting his Soveraignty and Dominion Now as other Attributes of God it is not distinctive of the subject but only desscriptive of it So are all other Excellencies of the nature of God It doth not intimate that there are other Gods only he is the most high or one over them all but only that the true God is most high that is indued with Soveraign Power Dominion and Authority over all To say then that Christ indeed is God but not the most high God is all one as to say he is God but not the most holy God or not the true God And so they have brought their Christ into the number of false Gods whilst they deny the true Christ who in his divine nature is over all God blessed for ever Rom. 9. 5. A phrase of speech perfectly expressing this Attribute of the most high God Secondly This Answer is suited only unto those testimonies which express the name of God with a correâ—ponding Power and Authority unto that name For in reference unto these alone can it be pleaded with any pretence of reason that he is a God by Office though that also be done very Futilously and impertinently But most of the Testimonies producâ—d speak directly unto his divine Excelâ—encies and properties which belong unto his nature necessarily and absolutely That he is Eternal Omnipotent Immense Omniscient Infinitely wise and that he is and worketh and produceth Effects suitable unto all these properties and such
the Personal Union The Divine and humane nature in Christ have but one personal subsistence and so are but one Christ one distinct personal principle of all Operations of all that he did or doth as Mediator And this undeniably follows from what is declared in the Testimonies mentioned For the Word could not be made flesh nor could he take on him the seed of Abraham nor could the mighty God be a Child born and given unto us nor could God shed his blood for his Church but that the two natures so directly expressed must be united in one Person for otherwise as they are two natures still they would be two Persons also 2. Each nature thus united in Christ is entire and preserves unto it self its own natural properties For he is no less perfect God for being made Man nor no less a true perfect Man consisting of soul and body with all their essential parts by that natures being taken into subsistence with the Son of God His Divine nature still continues Immense Omniscient Omnipotent infinite in Holiness c. his bumane nature finite limited and before its Glorification subject to all infirmities of life and death that the same nature in others absolutely considered is obnoxious unto 3. In each of these natures he acts suitably unto the essential properties and principles of that nature As God he made all things upholds all things by the word of his Power fills Heaven and Earth c. As man he lived hungred suffered dyed rose ascended into Heaven Yet by reason of the Union of both these natures in the same Person not only his own Person is said to do all these things but the Person expressed by the name which he hath on the account of one nature is said to do that which he did only in the other So God is said to redeem his Church with his own blood and to lay down his life for us and the Son of Man to be in Heaven when he was in the Earth All because of the unity of his Person as was declared And these things do all of them directly and undeniably flow from what is revealed concerning his Person as before is declared Of the Satisfaction of CHRIST THE last thing to be enquired into upon occasion of the late opposition to the great fundamental Truths of the Gospel is the satisfaction of Christ. And the Doctrine hereof is such as I eonceive needs rather to be explained than vindicated For it being the Center wherein most if not all the Lines of Gospel Promises and Precepts do meet and the great medium of all our Communion with God in Faith and Obedience the great distinction between the Religion of Christians and that of all others in the world it will easily on a due proposal be assented unto by all who would be esteemed Disciples of Jesus Christ. And whether a parcel of insipid Cavils may be thought sufficient to obliterate the Revelation of it men of sober minds will judge and discern For the term of Satisfaction we contend not about it It doth indeed properly express and connote that great Effâ—ct of the Death of Christ which in the cause before us we plead for But yet because it belongs rather to the Explanation of the Truth contended for then is used expresly in the Revelation of it and because the right understanding of the Word it self depends on some notions of Law that as yet we need not take into consideration I shall not in this entrance of our discourse insist precisely upon it but leave it as the natural conclusion of what we shall find expresly declared in the Scripture Neither do I say this as though I did decline the Word or the right use of it or what is properly signified by it but do only cast it into its proper place answerable unto our method and design in the whole of this brieâ— discourse I know some have taken a new way of expressing and declaring the Doctrine concerning the Mediation of Christ with the causes and ends of his death which they think more rational than that usually insisted on But as what I have yet heard of or seen in that kind hath been not only unscriptural but also very irrational and most remote from that accuracy whereunto they pretend who make use of it so if they shall publish their conceptions it is not improbable but that they may meet with a Scholastical Examination by some hand or other Our present work as hath been often declared is for the establishment of the Faith of them who may be attempted if not brought into danger to be seduced by the slights of some who lye in wait to deceive and the clamours of others who openly drive the same design What therefore the Scripture plainly and clearly reveals in this matter is the subject of our present enquiry And either in so doing as occasion shall be offered we shall obviate or in the close of it remove those Sophisms that the Sacred Truth now proposed to consideration hath been attempted withal The summ of what the Scripture reveals about this great truth commonly called the satisfaction of Christ may be reduced unto these ensuing heads 1. That Adam being made upright sinned against God and all mankind all his posterity in him Gen. 1. 27. So God created man in hit own Image in the Image of God created he him Male and Female created he them Gen. 3. 11. And he said who told thee that thou wast naked Hast thou eaten of the Tree whreof I commandeded thee that then shouldst not eat Eccles. 7. 29. Lo this only have I found that God made man upright but he hath sought out many inventions Rom. 5. 12. Wherefore as by one man sin entred into the world and death by sin and so death passed upon all men for that all have sinned Ver. 18. Therefore by the offence of one judgement came upon all men to condemnation Ver. 19. By one mans disobedience many were made sinners 2. That by this Sin of our first Parents all men are brought into an Estate of Sin and Apostacy from God and of an enmity unto him Gen. 6. 5. God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the Earth and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually Psal. 51. 5. Behold I was sâ—â—â—pen in iniquity and in sin did my Mother conceive me Rom. 3. 23. For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God Rom. 8. 7. The carnal mind is enmity against God fâ—r it is not subject to the Law of God neither indeed can be Ephes. 4. 18. Having the understanding darkned being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them because of the blindness of their heart Chap. 2. 1. Col. 2. 13. Thirdly That in this state all men continue in sin against God nor of themselves can do otherwise Rom. 3. 10 11 12. There is none righteous no not one there is none
we intend by that expression of satisfaction But now all those things are openly and fully witnessed unto in the Testimonies before produced as may be observed by suiting some of them unto the several particulars here asserted As 1. What was done in this matter was from the will purpose and love of God the Father Psalm 40. 6 7 8. Heb. 10. 5 6 7. Act. 4. 28. John 3. 16. Rom. 8. 3. 2. It was also done by his own voluntary consent Phil. 2. 6 7 8. 3. He was Substituted and did Substitute himself as the Mediator of the Covenant in the room and stead of sinners that they may be saved Heb. 10. 5 6 7. Chap. 7. 22. Rom. 3. 25 26. Rom. 5. 7 8. 4. And he did therein bear their sins or the punishment due to their sins Isa. 53. 6 11. 1 Pet. 2. 23. And this 5. By undergoing the Curse and penalty of the Law Gal. 3. 13. Or the punishment of sin required by the Law 2 Cor. 5. 21. Rom. 8. 3. 6. Herein also according to the will of God He offered up himself â— propitiatory and expiatory Sacrifice to make Attonement for sin and Reconciliation for sinners Ephes. 5. 2. Rom. 2. 17. Heb. 9. 11 12 13 14. Which he did that the Justice of God being satisfied and the Law fulfilled sinners might be freed from the wrath to come Rom. 3. 25. 1 Thes. 1. last 7. And hereby also He paid a real price of Redemption for sin and sinners 1 Pet. 1. 17 18. 1 Cor. 6. last These are the things which we are to believe concerning the satisfaction of Christ And our Explication of this Doctrine We are ready to defend when called thereunto The consideration of the Objections which are raised against this great fundamental Truth shall close this Discourse And they are of two sorts First In general to the whole Doctrine as declared or some of the more signal heads or parts of it Secondly Particular Instances in this or that supposal as consequences of the Doctrine asserted And in general 1. They say This is contrary to and inconsistent with the Love Grace Mercy and Goodness of God which are so celebrated in the Scripture as the principal properties of his nature and Acts of his Will wherein he will be glorified Especially contrary to the freedom of Forgiveness which we are encouraged to expect and commanded to believe And this exception they endeavour to firm by Testimonies that the Lord is Good and Gracious and that He doth freely forgive us our sins and trespasses Answer First I readily grant that whatever is really contrary to the Grace Goodness and Mercy of God whatever is Inconsistent with the free Forgiveness of sin is not to be admitted For these things are fully revealed in the Scripture and must have a consistency with whatever else is therein revealed of God or his Will Secondly As God is Good and Gracious and Merciful so also He is Holy Righteous True and Faithful And these things are no less revealed concerning him than the other and are no less Essential Properties of his Nature than his Goodness and Grace And as they are all Essentially the same in him and considered only under a different habitude or respect as they are exerted by Acts of his will so it belongs to his Infinite Wisdom that the effects of them though divers and produced by divers waies and means may no way be contrary one to the other but that Mercy may be exercised without the prejudice of Justice or Holiness and Justice be preserved entire without any obstruction to the Exercise of Mercy Thirdly The Grace and Love of God that in this matter the Scripture reveals to be exercised in order unto the forgiveness of sinners consists principally in two things 1. In his Holy Eternal Purpose of providing a relief for lost sinners He hath done it to the praise of the Glory of his Grace Eph. 1. 6. 2. In the sending his Son in the pursuit and for the accomplishment of the holy purpose of his Will and Grace Herein most eminently doth the Scripture celebrate the Love Goodness and kindness of God as that whereby in Infinite and for ever to be adored Wisdom and Grace he made way for the forgiveness of our sins Joh. 3. 16. God so loved the world as he gave his only begotten Son Rom. 3. 24 25. Whom he hath set forth to be a propitiation through saith in his blood Rom. 5. 7 8. God commendeth his Love towards us in that while we were yet sinners Christ dyed for us Titus 3. 4. 1 John 4. 8 9. Herein consists that ever to be adored Love Goodness Grace Mercy and Condescension of God Add hereunto that in that act of causing our iniquities to meet on Christ wherein he immediately intended the Declaration of his Justice Rom. 3. 25. Not sparing him in delivering him up to death for us all Rom. 8. 32. There was a blessed harmony in the highest Justice and most excellent Grace and Mâ—rcy This Grace this Goodness this Love of God toward mankind towards sinners our Adversaries in this matter neither know nor understand and so indeed what lyes in them remove the foundation of the whole Gospel and of all that faith and obedience which God requires at our hands Fourthly Forgiveness or the actual condonation of sinners the pardon and forgiveness of sins is free but yet so as it is every where restrained unto a respect unto Christ unto his death and blood-shedding Eph. 1. 7. We have Redemption in his blood even the forgiveness of sins Chap. 4. 32. God for Christs sake hath forgiven you Rom. 3. 25 26. God hath set him forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood to declare his righteousness for the forgiveness of sins It is absolutely free in respect of all immediate transactions between God and sinners Free on the part of God First In the Eternal purpose of it when he might justly have suffered all men to have perished under the guilt of their sins 2. Free in the means that he used to effect it unto his Glory 1. In the sending of his Son and 2. In laying the punishment of our sin upon him 3. In his Covenant with him that it should be accepted on our behalf 4. In his tender and proposal of it by the Gospel unto sinnâ—rs to be received without money or without price 5. In the actual condonation and pardon of them that do believe Secondly It is free on the part of the persons that are forgiven In that 1. It is given and granted to them without any satisfaction made by them for their former transgressions 2. Without any merit to purchâ—se or procure it 3. Without any poenal satisfactory suffering here or in a purgatory hereafter 4. Without any Expectation of a future recompence or that being pardoned they should then make or give any satisfaction for what they had done before And as any of these things would so nothing else can
are really so from whence they receive their denomination that it is meet it should be wholly in the power of these persons to declare But 2. What should hinder the death of Christ to be a Sacrifice a proper Sacrifice and according to the nature end and use of Sacrifices to have made Attonement and Satisfaction for sin 1. It is expresly called so in the Scripture wherein he is said to offer himself to make his soul an offering to offer himself a Sacrifice Eph. 5. 2. Heb. 1. 3. Heb. 9. 14 25. 26. Chap. 7. 27. And he is himself directly said to be a Priest or a Sacrificer Heb. 2. 18. And it is no where intimated much less expressed that these things are not spoken properly but Metaphorically only 2. The Legal Sacrifices of the Old Law were instituted on purpose to represent and prepare the way for the bringing in of the Sacrifice of the Lâ—mb of God so to take away the sin of the World And is it not strange that true and real Sacrifices should be Types and R presentations of that which was not so On this supposition all those Sacrifices are but so many seductions from the right understanding of things between God and sinners 3. Nothing is wanting to render it a proper propitiatory Sacrifice for 1. There was the person offering and that was Christ himself Heb. 9. 14. He offered himself unto God He that is the Sacrificer denotes the person of Christ God and Man and Himself as the Sacrifice denotes his Humane Nature whence God is said to purchase his Church with his own blood Act. 20. 28. For he offered himself through the Eternal Spirit so that 2. There was the Matter of the Sacrifice which was the Humane Nature of Christ soul and body His soul was made an offering for Sin Isa. 53. 10 And his body the offering of the body of Jesus Christ Hob. 10 11. His blood especially which is often Synecdochically mentioned for the whole 4. His death had the nature of a Sacrifice For 1. Therein were the sins of men laid upon him and not in his entrance into Heaven for he bare our sins in his own body on the tree 1 Pet. 2. 23. God made our sins then to meet upon him Isa. 53. 6. Which gives the formality unto any Sacrifices Quod in ejus Caput sit is the formal reason of all Propitiatory Sacrifices and ever was so as is expresly declared Lev. 16. 21 22. And the phrase of bearing sin of bearing iniquity is constantly used for the undergoing of the punishment due to sin 2. It had the End of a proper Sacrifice it made expiation of sin propitiation and attonement for sin with reconciliation with God and so took away that enmity that was between God and sinners Heb. 1. 3. Rom. 3. 25 26. Heb. 2. 17 18. Heb. 5. 10. Rom. 8. 3. 2 Cor. 5. 18 19. And although God himself pesigned appointed and contrived in Wisdom this way of Reconciliation as he did the means for the attoning of his own Anger towards the friends of Job commanding them to go unto him and with him offer Sacrifices for themselves which he would accept Chap. 4. 28. Yet as He was the Supream Governour the Lord of all attended with Infinite Justice and Holiness Attonement was made with him and satisfaction to him thereby What hath been spoken may suffice to discover the emptiness and weakness of those exceptions which in general these men make against the Truth before laid down from the Scripture A brief examination of some particular instances wherein they seek not so much to oppose as to reproach the Revelation of this Mysterie of the Gospel shall put a close to this discourse It is said then 1. That if this be so then it will follow that God is gracious to Forgive and yet impossible for him unless the debt be fully satisfied Answ. I suppose the confused and abrupt expression of things here in words scarcely affording a tolerable sense is rather from weakness than captiousness and so I shall let the manner of the proposal pass 2. What is this should follow that God is gracious to forgive sinners and yet will not cannot on the account of his own Holiness and Righteousness actually forgive any without Satisfaction and Attonement made for sin the worst that can be hence concluded is that the Scripture is true which affirms both these in many places 3. This sets out the exceeding greatness of the Grace of God in forgiveness that when sin could not be forgiven without satisfaction and the sinner himself could no way make any such satisfaction that he provided himself a Sacrifice of Attonement that the sinner might be discharged and pardoned 4. Sin is not properly a debt for then it might be paid in kind by sin it self but is called so only because it binds over the sinner to punishment which is the satisfaction to be made for that which is properly a Transgression and improperly only a debt It is added 2. Hence it follows that the finite and impotent creature is more capable of extending Mercy and Forgiveness than the Infinite and Omnipotent Creator Answ. God being Essentially Holy and Righteous having ingaged his faithfulness in the sanction of the Law and being naturally and necessarily the Governour and Ruler of the World the Forgiving of sin without satisfaction would be no perfection in him but an effect of impotency and imperfection a thing which God cannot do as he cannot lye nor deny himself 2. The direct contrary of what is insinuated is asserted by this Doctrine for on the supposition of the Satisfaction and Attonement insisted on not only doth God freely forgive but that in such a way of Righteousness and Goodness as no Creature is able to conceive or express the glory and excellency of it And to speak of the poor halving pardons of private Men upon particular offences against themselves who are commanded so to do and have no right nor authority to require or exact punishment nor is any due upon the meer account of their own concernment in comparison with the forgiveness of God ariseth out of a deep ignorance of the whole matter under consideration 3. It is added by them that hence it follows that God so loved the World he gave his only Son to save it and yet that God stood off in high displeasure and Christ gave himself as a compleat satisfaction to offended Justice Answ. 1. Something these Men would say if they knew what or how for 1. That God so loved the World as to give his only Son to save it is the expression of the Scripture and the foundation of the Doctrine whose truth we contend for That Christ offered himself to make Attonement for sinners and therein made satisfaction to the Justice of God is the Doctrine it self which these Men oppose and not any consequent of it 3. That God stood off in high displeasure is an expression which neither the Scripture useth
words in the Scripture the nature of the thing it self concerning which they are used the uncontrolled use of that Expression in all sorts of Writers in expressing the same thing which the instances and examples of its meaning and intention among the Nations of the World is to deny that he dyed for us at all Neither will his dying for our Good or advantage only in what way or sense soever answer or make good or true the Assertion of his dying for us and our sins And this is evident in the Death of the Apostles and Martyrs they all dyed for our Good our advantage and benefit was one end of their sufferings in the will and appointment of God And yet it cannot be said that they dyed for us or our sins And if Christ dyed only for our Good though in a more effectual manner than they did yet this altereth not the kind of his dying for us nor can he thence be said properly according to the only due sense of that expression so to do I shall in this brief and hasty discourse add only one consideration more about the death of Christ to confirm the Truth pleaded for And that is that he is said in dying for sinners to bear their sins Isa. 53. 11. He shall bear their iniquities v. 12. He bare the sins of many explained v. 5. He was wounded for our Transgressions he was bruised for our iniquities the Chastisement of our peace was upon him 1 Pet. 2. 24. Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the Tree c. This expression is purely Sacred It occurreth not directly in other Authors though the sense of it in other words do frequently They call it luere peccata that is delictorum supplicium ferre to bear the punishment of sins The meaning therefore of this phrase of speech is to be taken from the Scripture alone and principally from the Old Testament where it is originally used and from whence it is tranferred into the New Testament in the same sense and no other Let us consider some of the places Isa. 53. 11. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The same word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used vers 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And our griefs he hath born them The word signifies properly to bear a Weight or a Burden as a man bears it on his shoulders bajulo porto And it is never used with respect unto sin but openly and plainly it signifies the undergoing of the punishment due unto it so it occurrs directly to our purpose Lam. 5. 7. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Our Fathers have sinned and are not and we have born their iniquities The punishment due to their sins And why a new sense should be forged for these words when they are spoken concerning Christ who can give a just reason Again 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used to the same purpose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vers 12. And he bear the sin of many 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is often used with respect unto sin sometimes with reference unto Gods actings about it and sometimes with reference unto mens concerns in it In the first way or when it denotes an act of God it signifies to lift up to take away or pardon sin and leaves the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where with it is joyned under its first signification of iniquity or the gâ—ilt of sin with respect unto punishment ensuing as its consequent For God pardoning the guilt of sin the removal of the punishment doth necessarily ensue Guilt containing an Obligation unto punishment In the latter way as it respects men or sinners it constantly denotes the bearing of the punishment of sin and gives that sense unto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with respect unto the guilt of sin as its cause And hence ariseth the ambiguity of those words of Cain Gen. 14. 13. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 if 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 denotes an act of God if the words be spoken with reference in the first place to any acting of his towards Cain 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 retains the sense of iniquity and the words are rightly rendered My sin is greater than to be fogiven If it respect Cain himself firstly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 assumes the signification of Punishment and the words are to be rendred My punishment is greater than I can bear or is to be born by me This I say is the constant sense of this expression nor can any Instance to the contrary be produced Some may be mentioned in the confirmation of it Numb 14. 33. Your children shall wander in the Wilderness forty years 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and shall bear your Whoredoms v. 34. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ye shâ—ll bear your in quities forty years that is the punishment due to your whoredoms and iniquities according to Gods Provideneial dâ—aling with them at that time Lev. 19. 8. He that eateth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 shall bear his iniquities How 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that sâ—ul shall be cut off To bâ— cut off for sin by the punishment of it and for its guilt is to bear in quity So Chap. â—0 16 17 18. for a man to bear his iniquity and to be killed slain or put to death for it are the same Ezek. 18. 20. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the soul that sinneth it shall dye the Son shall not bear the sin of the Father To bear sin and to dye for sin are the same More Instances might be added all uniformity speaking the same sense of the words And as this sense is sufficiently indeed invincibly established by the invariable use of that Expression in the Scripture so the manner whereby it is affirmed that the Lord Christ bare our iniquities sets it absolutely free from all danger by Opposition For he bare our iniquities when 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lord made to meet on him or laid on him the iniquity of us all Isa. 53. 6. which words the LXX render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Lord gave him up or delivered him unto our sins That is to be punished for them for other sense the words can have none He made him sin for us 2 Cor. 5. 21. so he bore our sins Isa. 53. 11. How in his own Body on the tree 1 Pet. 2. 24. that when he was and in his being stricken smitten afflicted wounded bruised slain so was the chastisement of our Peace upon him Wherefore to deny that the Lord Christ in his death and suffering for us underwent the punishment due to our sins what we had deserved that we might be delivered as it everts the great foundation of the Gospel so by an open perverting of the plain words of the Scripture because not suited in their sense and importance to the vain imaginations of men it gives no small countenance to Infidelity and Atheism FINIS