be beleeued besides the Word Gal. 1.8 Reas 6 Lastly the practice of the faithful is answerable to this both of teachers and learners the Teachers they haue referred the people still for certaine proofe of the truth to the Scriptures Esa 8.20 to the law and to the testimony if they speake not according to this Word it is because they haue not light in them Acts 10.43 to him giue all the Prophets witnesse saith Peter to Cornelius referring the truth hee taught to be tryed by the Scripture and so this hath beene the practice of the learners Acts 17.11 12. The men of Berea seached the Scriptures to try whether the things were so as Paul had taught them and yet Paul was a principall member of the Church and in his Doctrine hee was specially guided by the Spirit more then euer any Church was since and the Bereans are commended for this and not accounted curious So that the Teachers and the Learners haue still referred themselues for the tryall of the truth to the Scriptures and not to the Church and therefore the authority of the Scripture is greater then the authority of the Church Yea Obiect but you will say so the Scriptures are vsually referred to the censure of other Scripture and yet that is no proofe that therefore one Scripture is of greater authority then another how then doth this proue that the Scripture is of greater authority then the Church I answer Answ yes It proues the first ponit of the obseruation plainely that is that the Church is not aboue the Scripture which is the maine controuersie Nay if it be well considered it proues the second point of the obseruation that the authority of the Scripture is greater then that of the Church I say it proues it as sufficiently though not at the first sight so plainely for still in euery kinde there must be one highest which all the rest must settle vpon else there will be no stay at all but we shall runne on infinitely and without end now the Scripture or the Church is the highest thing in this kinde whereon we are to rest for they cnanot be equall then the Scriptures must needs be highest and if they be referred to any at all it must be to themselues for there is none greater nor higher as in the matter of an oath Heb. 6.13 to 16. men sweare by him that is greater then them selues But God sweares by himselfe because there is none greater to sweare by So likewise the Church is referred to the Scripture for trial because the Scripture is higher then the Church but Scripture is referred to Scripture because there is none higher to be referred to nor there cannot be two highests in one kinde for that is against nature and reason too and therefore when the sayings of the Church are referred to the approbation of Scripture it is the referring of them to an higher and so the authority of the Scripture is greater then the authority of the Church The vses are these The first is matter of refutation Vse 1 against the Papists that vsually disparage the holy Scriptures and set them downe too low and doat on the Church aduancing it too high their reach therein is not so much the loue they beare to the Church it selfe but that thereby they might exalt themselues and their owne Church and that their faith might be reputed the onely true sauing faith because their Church teacheth it So that God and his Word must goe downe that they might be lifted vp but if it be true that the Church were aboue the Scriptures yet except they can proue their Church to be the only true Church of God which they are neuer able to doe it helps not their cause It is strange to see and heare what monstrous and blasphemous speaches and positions many of them haue deliuered to this purpose as that the Scripture is of no more authority without the approbation of the Church then Esops Fables Oh horrible blasphemie there are some others of a better kinde that are more modest that say that the Scriptures are to be fitted to the times and the sense thereof is to be altred as the times alter others there are that say that the Churches are not bound to take the Scriptures as true without the allegation of the Church and that the Church hath authority to reiect or allow Scripture and that yee may know that by the Church they meane their Romish church and by that the Pope hearken how blasphemously they ascribe vnto him all power in heauen and in earth that hee may dispence against the Apostles and their Canons and against all the commandements of God in the old and new Testament c. Here the world may see that the church of Rome is that whore of Babilon an impudent and shamelesse strumpet that sets such a brasen face and belches out such whorish filthy blasphemies against God and his Word the very naming of these positions is refutation enough for them in any Christians iudgements To come to their best positions in this controuersie Position 1 First the Church say they is supreme Iudge in all controuersies of Religion but yee see by this obseruation that it is not so God is higher and the Scripture is higher the Spirit indeede is the Iudge and the highest Iudge speaking openly and plainely in in the Word and secretly in the minde and heart of euery beleeuer 1. Ioh. 2 20 27. you haue anoyntment from that holy one and know all things And againe the same anoynting teacheth you of all things Obiect yea but say they are not men sent to the Priests to enquire at their mouhes Mal. 2.7 and is not the Priest the highest Iudge then Answ I answer What are wee to goe to the Priests for for the Law not for their owne Iudgement whereto if they speake wee are to receiue it yet not because it is their saying but Gods Law but happly they can deliuer no other but Gods Law that is flatly contradicted verse 8. where the Prophet saith that they are gone out of the way and haue caused many to fall by the Law yea but say they the high Priest was the Iudge as wee may see Deut. 17.8 12. But hee was to iudge according to the Law as we may see in Vers 11. so that except they will arrogate more to themselues then the messengers of the Lord of hoasts did vnder the law they cannot be Iudge nor Iudges of the Scripture The second position of theirs is this Position 2 That whatsoeuer the Church saith we must take it as a Law and obey it It is true that whatsoeuer the Church saith according the Law and Word of God we must obey it not otherwise The Scribes and Pharises were to bee obeyed as they sate in Moses chaire that is as they taught his Doctrine Matth. 23 2 3. but if they transgresse and bring in the precepts of men and their owne traditions
that say wee haue no true Ordination we Answer that we had our ordination from the Church of Rome at the first and that being a true visible Church therefore we haue a lawfull Ministery Vse 3 Thirdly this may serue for satisfaction to that question which the Papists aske vs where was your Church before Luthers time did he erect a new church No he erected no new church but by his Ministry brought many faithfull out of their impure and vnsound Church into a more sound and pure Church not onely for matters of ceremonies for then he had beene a Schismatique to separate from them but for matters of substance so that this point well considered preuents a number of inconueniences which wee should runne into if wee should fall into that heate of zeale as to deny them to bee a true visible Church Vse 4 Fourthly this may comfort vs in respect of our fathers that haue liued in the Popish Church what shall we thinke of them that they liued in no true visible Church and therefore could not be saued far bee it from vs no we are perswaded that they liued in a true Church and that many of them where sound in those times and now saued they attained not to that high straine of Iustification by workes I would faine know whether they did not doe that they did ignorantly or whether they did challenge or disclaime their merits on their death beds many at the point of death disclaime their merits now though that point now is more stiffly defended by the Popish faction then euer it was much more did they doe it then Now to disclaime all their owne merits at their death is not that both repentance of former errors if any in that kinde and faith in Christ alone too If any beleeue in Christ crucified in truth of heart though hee hold but by the hemme of his garment shall he perish Surely no. Vse 5 Lastly this teacheth vs to vse charity towards them of the Popish Church in censuring of their estate we are not rigourously and rashly to call for fire from heauen vpon them as the Disciples would haue Christ haue done on the Samaritanes No yee know not what Spirit ye are of saith our Sauiour wee must not rashly Iudge them to bee vnbeleeuers but rather mis-beleeuers And so much for that point what in charity and yet in truth maybe said for that Church The seuen and Twentieth LECTVRE of the CHVRCH HAuing entred into the last point concerning the matter of the Church namely the application of the Doctrine of the Church to all Churches that we know in the world After we had diuided them according to their scituation and language into the Easterne and Westerne the Greeke and Latin Churches we beganne with the Easterne and Greeke Churches and so proceeded to the Westerne and Latin Churches And of them I tould you that some were vnder the yoke of the Pope and haue him to bee their head Others haue shooke off that yoke and head-shippe and are therefore called the Reformed Churches Concerning the Church of Rome that which is spoken of her may be applyed to her Adherents as is the mother â—o is the daughter as I haue said Now for the Chuâ—ch of Rome I propounded these two obseruations to be spoken to first what might be-spoken in charity for her and yet in truth and sound iudgement too and of that we haue spoken Secondly what in zeale and yet in truth and sound iudgement too may be said against it And that is it which wee are now to speake to what may be said in zeale and yet in truth and sound iugement against her A point very needfull to be well cleared and rightly vnderstood for whereas we haue deliuered in the former obseruation that the Church of Rome in some sense may rightly be reputed a true visible Church ' Euery one will be ready to except against it and say why then haue yeâ— forsaken it why doe ye not still hould communion with her what iust exception can yee alledge for your separation from her For Answere to which exception Doct. 2 I will propound in the second place this obseruation namely that howsoeuer the Church of Rome in some sense may be reputed a true visible Church yet it is maruellous vnsound and corrupt and exceedingly corrupt with many foule abuses errors and abhominations yea so corrupt as it is not lawfull nor safe for vs to communicate with her The Obseruation ye see consists of two branches the former is the ground of the latter auouching that shee is polluted with many foule abhominations the latter is an inference from the former that therefore it is not safe nor lawfull to ioyne with her The whole obseruation is to be vnderstood of that Church specially in respect of the Popish faction the Pope and his Darlings for as when wee spoke in charity for them acknowledging that in some sense they are to be reputed a true visible Church it was intended of some that were of better Spirits amongst them that are sounder in some chiefe points of Religion and that are not so obstinate in their errours as the rest So now that we come to speake in zeale against them that they are so foulely polluted that it is not safe to ioyne with them It is intended in respect of the Pope and his chiefe Darlings and factors called the Popish faction neyther is this any wrong to the Church that we so speake of the whole body in generall tearmes because the Church and faction are there mingled together in that Body as when wee come into a Barne floore and see a great deale of chaffe in the same heape with good wheat we may speake fauourably of the wheate and say there is good corne and we may speake disgracefully of it too and say it is but light stuffe We will begin with the first part of the obseruation that condemnes her corruptions And we will reduce all her corruptions to these two sorts First matter of Doctrine secondly matter of practice And though these be much incident one to the other yet for playnnesse sake we will distinguish them God willing as well as wee can First for Doctrine the point is this The Doctrine of the Church of Rome as it is at this day vnderstood and maintained by the Popish faction is very vnsound and corrupt full of grosse and abhominable errors they haue changed the truth of God into a lye light into darknesse and the Gospell of Christ the comfortable Doctrine of grace and faith into the erors of Antichrist and the damnable Doctrine of workes and merits and of mans traditions We wil not speake of all her corruptions in doctrine that were too much only we will shew it in some chiefe particulars that briefely we wil reduce them to these foure heads The first is error in Doctrine concerning the Scripture the second is concerning the direct
of Elias yet in this very time God had his Church and a flourishing one too in his eyes though men could not discerne it Afterward in that generall Apostasie when Israel and Iudah were both fallen from God yet here is a true Church still here was one out of a Citie and two out of a Tribe to worship God Ier. 3.13 14. So in the Captiuity of Babylon when the Church is quite ouerwhelmed as it were Ierusalem was so distressed Religion defaced all turned into a miserable desolation so as there was neuer the like Is there any sorrow like vnto my sorrow saith the Prophet speaking in the behalfe of the Church Lam. 1.12 yet then God had his Church there were both teachers and embracers as Ieremy Haggai Zechariah and Daniel and many others At our Sauiours comming in the flesh when the Law and the Temple Priests and people the Church and Common-wealth were vtterly corrupted and defiled yet still God had his Church there was Zachary and Elizabeth Ioseph and Marie Simeon and Anna true beleeueres and right worshippers of God Lastly in the height of the pride of Antichrist the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place for many hundred yeeres when all the Nations in the earth were made drunke with the Cup of fornications by the Whore of Babylon the Synagogue of Rome yet God had some from time to time that lothed her golden Cup some that were not defiled with her fornications but kept themselues pure Virgins and a chaste Spouse to the Lord Iesus Christ sweetly embracing his sauing truth And so much for proofe of the first part of the obseruation That God alwayes had a Church and company of chosen people c. The second part is that as God euer hath had so he now hath a Church c. I shall not neede to speake much for proofe of this point for it cannot be denied but that blessed be God there be many flourishing Churches at this day in Germany France England and Scotland many in all these places that worship God in Spirit and Truth yea vnder Popery no doubt but there are many true Christians yea euen amongst the Turkes and Iewes and Infidels I doubt not but that there are yeâ— remaining some that worship God with vs no question but there are some sparkes of fire amongst those burnt ashes some polished stones of these decayed Churches some gold amongst all that drosse some that serue the Lord amongst so many thousand seruants of sinne and slaues of Sathan we haue many instances now at this day of some that liue vnder Popery and amongst the Iewes that professe our Religion So the second part is proued that God now hath his Church and chosen people The last part and shall haue to the worlds end c. Wee cannot prooue this point by examples as we did the former because it is not yet throughly fulfilled yet wee haue as sure proofes for it as examples we haue Gods own Word for it and that which God hath spoken is as sure as if it were already done and therefore the Prophets deliuer many predictions in the Preterperfect Tense as if they were already done because of the certaintie of it I say wee haue Gods Word for proofe of this point Psal 132.13 14. For the Lord hath chosen Sion and loueth to dwell in it saying this is my Rest for euer here will I dwell c. God will dwell and rest and that for euer in his Church as himselfe is for euer so his Church is for euer So Math. 28.20 I am with you euer euen to the worlds end It is more then if hee had said I wil be with you c. It is as much as if he had said thus As sure as I am actually present with you now so I will still continue vnto the very end of the world And whereas in respect of his bodily presence it was nor so because he was to ascend into heauen yet by his Spirit hee is with vs effectually to all sauing purposes Ioh. 14.16 I will pray the Father and he shall giue you another comforter that he may abide with you for euer vers 17. euen the Spirit of Truth c. And whereas there are many opposers of Gods Church men and Deuils and many times they haue a great hand ouer the Church yet they are still bridled and curbed and the Church still so protected and defended that the gates of Hell shall neuer preuaile against it that is vtterly to disanull it Math. 16.18 There are many other proofes for this Point but because we shall speake of them in the Reasons therefore we will passe to them The Reasons of the point that God euer had now hath and shall haue a Church to the worlds end are these Reas 1 First we haue Gods promise for it who is truth and cannot lie If that be too little we haue his Oath for it wherein it is impossible he should lie Psal 132.11 12. The Lord hath sworne in Truth to Dauid and will not shrinke from it saying of the fruit of thy Body will I set vp thy throne for euer He hath sworne it and will not shrinke from it that is hee will not recant which although it be typically spoken of Dauid and his seede yet in truth substance of it it is intended of Christ and his Church The same promise is renewed Ier. 33.17 18. where it is said that Dauid shall neuer want a man to sit vpon the Throne of the house of Israel And in the 20. and 21. verses it is said If yee can breake my Couenant of the day and my Couenant of the night then my Couenant may bee broken with Dauid my Seruant Giuing vs to vnderstand that his promise is irreuocable so long as there is day or so long as there is night on the earth so long the Lord will haue his Church on earth his Word and his Promise cannot be broken no saith our Sauiour Heauen and Earth may faile but my Word shall neuer faile therefore he hauing passed his Word for the continuance of his Church for euer it shall continue for euer in despight of all her aduersaries Secondly the sauing Truth and doctrine of saluation Reas 2 shall neuer perish from the earth therefore the Church that is the pillar of Truth shal neuer be abolished from the earth If the truth of God could faile then the Church might faile but that can neuer faile for still there shall be some witnesses of Gods Truth to feele the sauing power of it in themselues and to testifie it to others and therefore the Church shall neuer faile The third Reason is taken from Gods Fatherly Care ouer Reas 3 his Church euen for their owne sakes because he loues them and they are deare to him as the Apple of his eye and therefore they shall neuer be all destroyed except the Lord could forget his owne people his dearlings which is impossible Fourthly he doth preserue his Church
profession Secondly their profession must be publike or open that is it must be so publike and open that there may be notice taken that such and such men are of such a society and Religion else they are rather of the inuisible Church spoken of before And looke as their profession is more or lesse publike so the Church is to be reputed more or lesse visible Thirdly as they must publikely professe so they must ioyne together in this profession and that intends first their separation from all others whether they be of none or of a contrary and diuers Religion and secondly it intends their associating or sorting of themselues together with professors of the same Religion growing into and liuing in a louing Communion and fellowship with them Thirdly it intendes that they must doe it voluntarily and of their owne accord some ioyne for fashion some for feare some for hope of gaine and some others for the sauing of their goods and the like yet all these doe it voluntarily for the will cannot be forced yea if they doe it against their will it is a sinne to them though they ioyne to the purest Churches in the world And so much for the second part of the definition that they must ioyne together in a publike profession of Religion Thirdly that there may be a true visible Church the Religion which this Company make profession of must be the true Religion for as without the Church there is no saluation so without the true Religion there is no true Church there are diuers Religions in the world and accordingly diuers Churches yet there is but one onely true Religion which is that which is contained in the Scripture the Word of Truth and so there is but one only true Church that is that which embraceth that true Religion So that whatsoeuer Congregation vnder the Sunne doth not professe that one true Religion let them professe whatsoeuer Religion they will besides they cannot iustly bee reputed true visible Churches For the better vnderstanding of this Point I will draw it into an Obseruation and so discourse of it at large and the Obseruation is this Doctr. Whatsoeuer Company or Congregation of men doe openly professe the sauing Truth of God the same Congregation and Company is to bee held and reputed a true visible Church The truth of this Doctrine holds generally in all Congregations whatsoeuer of that quality from the greatest to the least and from the best to the worst for first whereas all and euery Professor of Gods Religion through the world doe concurre and ioyne together in the acknowledgment of the common sauing faith though not in the outward Communion of the same Ecclesiasticall Assembly and therefore all these may bee termed a true vniuersall visible Church so also euery particular Ecclesiasticall Assembly professing the same sauing Truth and ioyning together in the outward Communion of one setled Congregation and obseruing the same lawes and Orders at the same time and place may be called a true particular visible Church and that whether it be in the same Countrey and Prouince or in a Parish or in a priuate house and accordingly they are called a Prouinciall a Parochiall or a domesticall Church and each of these is a true visible Church though one be vniuersall and the other particular For Instances of all these in Scripture First for a Prouinciall or Nationall Church which is a Company of people professing the same Truth in the whole Land or Nation you may see an instance Act. 9.31 Then had the Churches Rest in Iudea and Samaria and Galile c. There were Prouinciall Churches named by the Countrey they were in as Iudea Samaria c. And in the Reuelations the second and third Chapters the seuen Churches there mentioned were Nationall Churches as Ephesus c. And 1. Cor. 1.2 vnto the Church of God which is at Corinthus c. there was a nationall Church Secondly for a Parochiall or Parish Church which is a Company of people professing the same faith in a Towne or in a Parish we shal reade of them in Act. 14.23 Where it is said that the Apostles ordained them Elders in euery Towne Thirdly for a domesticall Church which is a Company professing the same faith in a priuat house as we may reade in the Rom. 16.5 and in the 1. Cor. 16.19 of Aquila and Priscilla with the Church in their House And Colos 4.15 We reade of a Church that was in the House of Nimphas though these are rather to bee reputed inuisible Churches except they may be so openly taken notice of and so notoriously knowne as the Church that was in Priscilla and Aquila's house then they may be called Domesticall visible Churches So much for the first diuision that some Churches are either vniuersall visible Churches or particular Churches and that either in a whole Land or in a Towne or in a priuat House Secondly whereas some Churches are more notoriously knowne some lesse yet both are true visible Churches though one be more visible and the other lesse visible In the time of the Apostles it was so the Church of Rome was notoriously knowne for their faith was knowne throughout the whole world Rom. 1.8 and their obedience was come abroad amongst all Rom. 16.19 so that this Church was more visible Other Churches were lesse knowne as the Church at Cenchrea Creet which are only named in the Scripture and no Epistle written to them Now because they are onely mentioned therfore they were lesse knowne and so lesse visible yet true Churches as wel as the other Thirdly whereas some Churches professe the sauing faith more purely and sincerely others more corruptly yet each of these is a true visible Church though the one bee more pure not more true the other lesse Instances of these we haue in the second and third Chapters of the Reuelation some Churches there were more pure some more corrupt yet all true Churches Churches more pure were Smyrna and Philadelphia all commended in them nothing dispraysed Churches lesse pure were Ephesus Pergamus and Thiatira in which Churches some things are commended some things discommended Churches yet lesse pure were Sardis and Laodicea where there is nothing commended but all things dispraysed So we see that some of these profest the true sauing faith more purely some lesse purely and some more corruptly yet euery one of them was a true visible Church Fourthly and lastly whereas some Churches are growne to some Ripenesse and perfection and to some setled forme of Gouernment others are in their infancy and haue not such a forme established for Gouernment yet each of these is a true visible Church though the one be more the other lesse perfect Instances of these we haue in Scripture First for them that were more perfect as at Hierusalem where Iames was Bishop there the Church was growne to some perfection there the Apostles met and had a Consultation
this as a generall ground that the onely way whereby we are to find out the true Religion is by the true visible Church which may be true in some sense but not in this And their reach herein is to make all the Christian World to suspend thēselues vpon their Church as that being alwayes visible and so to receiue that Religion and none but that which their Church doth teach For say they there is no way to find out the true Religion but by the true visible Church but ours is the true visible Church therefore if euer you will find out the true Religion you must find it out by our Church It is not to be denied but that a true visible Church is a good meanes to find out the true Religion being assisted with the continuall presence of Gods Spirit and being furnished with the Word and Sacraments and gifts for that purpose but whereas they say it is the onely way it is not true for the Scripture hath another way and a better Ioh 5.39 Search the Scriptures saith our Sauiour for they testifie of mee Againe if this be the onely way to find out the true Religion by the Church then a man must first be well assured which is the true Church before hee can safely relie vpon her iudgement for the truth of Religion so that whereas before his care was to find out the true Religion and thereupon resolues to search it out from the true Church now his first and greatest care is to find out which is the true Church for other companies that are not may and doe bragge oft-times that they are the true Church when there is no such matter what are wee to doe in this case This Doctrine tells vs directly what is to be done where is it that the sauing truth is professed There and no where else is a true visible Church so that whereas they say the Church is the onely way for the finding out of the true Religion it is plaine as we haue shewed that the true Religion professed is the onely way or at least the chiefe way to find out a true visible Church The case is this we say the true Religion shewes forth the true Church the Papists say the contrary that the true Church shewes forth the true Religion And this that they say is true in some sense but that which we say is true in a better sense for the true Religion shewes the true Church as the cause shewes the effects but the Church shewes the true Religion as the effects shew the cause As for example the Sunne-shine is the cause of the day and the day proues that the Sunne shines Now one man may reason thus from the cause to the effect and say The Sunne shines therefore it is day another from the effect to the cause It is day therefore the Sunne shines and both say true but the first is the more forcible kind of reasoning when we reason from the cause to the effects So when I reason thus Here is the true Religion therefore the true Church here I reason from the cause to the effects and this is a more forcible and better reason then to say Here is the true Church therefore here is the true Religion which is but to reason from the effect to the cause This wee shall find to be true in the Scripture phrase where the Church is compared to a Candlesticke now what serues that for but onely to hold out the light then the sauing truth is the Light or Candle now the Candlesticke is not seene at all without the Light of the Candle in the dark night though it were of gold so in the darknes of this World the Church which is the Candlesticke if it hold not forth the sauing truth which is the Light or Candle it cannot be seene it selfe So that it is the truth of Religion that makes a true Church and the profession of this truth makes it visible then the Church is not the only way to find out the true Religion nor yet the best way but the best and safest way to find out the true visible Church is to find it out by the true Religion which they professe And so much for the reproofe of the Papists Vse 2 The second Vse is for triall Is it so that euery Congregation openly professing the sauing truth of God is a true visible Church then here is the straitest and precisest Rule to measure the being of a true visible Church by the definition containing all true visible Churches and no more Therefore look wheresoeuer the true sauing faith is profest there is a true visible Church And looke where there is a true visible Church there true sauing faith is profest for these hold in reciprocall termes so that whether wee would proue any assembly to bee a true visible Church or reproue and conuince any for a false we must lay it to this Rule so whether they professe the sauing truth of Christ or not and accordingly esteeme and iudge of them to bee true or false Churches Here certaine exceptions may bee made to this Doctrine The first exception is this What doe you say that a company professing the sauing truth makes a true visible Church Will profession onely make a true visible Church I answer No First it is required Answ that the sauing truth be amongst them indeed else they are no true Church Secondly that being amongst them it is not to bee smothered but profest Thirdly that it bee not onely outwardly profest but inwardly imbraced too at least by some of them Rom. 10.10 The second exception is this But what say you if they professe it with their lips and deny it in their liues and practise is such a Church a true visible Church I answer Answ a fearefull state are all such Churches in for God cannot bee more dishonoured his Spirit more grieued his Gospell more reproched his children more offended Satan and all Gods enemies more gratified and aduantaged then by this yet farre bee it from vs to denie them to bee a true visible Church so long as Gods sauing Truth is profest amongst them it cannot bee though there be neuer so great and generall a falling away from the practise of it but that some doe liue as they professe though they be not seene to vs. And therefore for their sakes though they bee but few and not to bee outwardly discerned it is to be reputed a true visible Church though a very corrupt and impure one The third exception But what say you of such a Church which though they professe the whole sauing faith yet they doe in certaine some crosse opinions which ouerthrow it Answ I answer wee must consider what manner of opinions these be which that Church holdes First whether they be such as ouerthrow the foundation secondly whether they bee publikely profest as the Doctrine of that Church thirdly whether they bee persisted in after they haue been admonisht by
and to raigne ouer them and therefore he refused them to bee his Body therefore what direction soeuer Christ tenders vnto vs we must obey it and whatsoeuer is against the directions of Christ wee must defie them And secondly seeing Christ is our head therefore whatsoeuer life or direction wee haue in spirituall things wee must acknowledge the Fountaine of them that we haue them not of our selues but from him onely for of his fulnesse wee all receiue grace for grace Ioh. 1.16 and without him we are able to doe nothing Ioh. 15.5 and by him we are able to doe all things Phil. 4.13 Marke how sweetely these places agree together wee receiue all from him without him wee can doe nothing by him we are able to doe all things therefore whatsoeuer good things wee haue spirituall life or graces wee must receiue them thankfully embrace them sweetely vse them gratiously to the honor of thy head and the good comfort of thy selfe and thy fellow-members so likewise for vnprofitable members that dishonor our head wee should pray that our head Christ Iesus would either make them profitable or else cut them off and also that he would be pleased to purge from his body the noysome humours as sinne and superstition that so hee may haue a sound and a healthfull body Thirdly and lastly seeing Christ is our head therefore as he hath a gracious care for our safety so we should be as carefull to preserue and maintaine his honour and glory we should reioyce when we see his honor and glory aduanced and we should mourne and bee greeued when we see it opposed And so likewise we should bee affected with the good or harme of our fellow-members 1 Cor. 12.25 we should be carefull to bring one another to heauen and not bee carelesse whether they come thither or no. Vse 4 The last Vse is this hence wee haue a sufficient warrant that the Church of England is a true visible Church because Christ our head spirituall life and the Doctrine of Saluation is found truly in our Church But our aduersaries except against vs First say they you haue not Gods ordinances amongst you and therefore you haue not Christ to be your head We answer that they must shew vs out of Gods word that those are the ordinances of Christ which we want But say they you haue Antichrist to bee your head for you haue many things from him I answer we defy him as much as they do together with his doctrine wee defie his practises and courses if wee haue or vse any thing that he doth or hath vsed before vs first it is either no matter of substance but onely some passage or carriage or circumstance either in worship or gouernment or secondly they are such things as were vsed in purer time and Churches before Antichrist or thirdly it is of the best which that Church being in Apostacy that is hauing beene a Church and still pretending to continue the same hath reserued for still they haue some good things and professe some good truths Lastly at least it is throughly cleansed from their superstition and idolatry So that still we hauing Christ to be the head of our Church and his spirituall life and the Doctrine of saluation being found amongst vs and begetting spirituall life in many of vs we must needes bee a true visible Church And so much for this point The twelfth Lecture of the Church THe third point propounded to bee spoken of concerning the finding out of a true visible Church was touching the members of it for as I shewed you the Church being a body and that euery body consists of certaine members therefore if wee would exactly know the body we must know the members Now the members were taken either in a more generall sense including the head or else in a more strict and particular sense being considered as a diuerse thing from the head now because we would carry the matter fully before vs we tooke it in both those senses and hauing spoken of the members of the Church in the first sense where wee shewed that our Lord Iesus Christ was the head and the onely head of the true visible Church now we come to speake of the members of the Church in a more strict and particular sense being considered as a diuerse thing frō the head And thus considered the members are of three sorts First some are members by right onely and not by possession secondly some are members by possession not by right and thirdly some are members both by right and by possession First some are members of the visible Church by right onely not by possession for some members haue a good right in the body of the visible Church and the priuiledges thereunto belonging but yet are not actually possessed of them And of these there are diuers kindes irst generally all the elect of God liuing vpon the face of the earth that as yet are not called for the Church is theirs and the Word is theirs and the Sacraments are theirs and the Ministry is theirs the Lord specially intending his owne ordinances to the benefit of his chosen though indeed they themselues be notable so much as to know their own right in them much lesse are they able to reach forth their hands to claime it and enioy it yet because the Lord hath appointed them to be heires of saluation and therefore consequently hee hath appointed them a time in which hee will call them to the outward profession of the sauing faith therefore in respect of the purpose of God they are by right true members of the true visible Church though they be not as yet actually possessed of it And thus one and the same man may be at one and the same time a member of the Church malignant and Synagogue of Satan in his owne practice and profession and by right in respect of Gods purpose a true member of Christs true visible body This was the case of Saul who by his practice was of the malignant Church and persecuted the true Church of God and yet by right he was a member of the true Church of God Secondly those that are members of the true visible Church by right and not by possession are such as onely haue heard of Christ and of the Gospell and are endued with some little smatch of religion yet they are but entring into the Church onely their feet are in the Porch they are not yet come within the holy place they haue not yet receiued the Sacrament of Baptisme which is our admission into the visible Church so that after that time the Church doth acknowledge vs from thence forward to bee her children and wee acknowledge her to be our mother and so we are incorporated and become members of that body So then those that haue onely heard of Christ and of the Gospell and haue some little smatch of Religion they cannot iustly bee said to bee members by possession yet
and naturall Mother that Reas 5 brings forth a Childe of her owne body and after she hath brought it forth nourisheth it with her owne milke So likewise the Church that doth beget us by the Word of Truth and nourish us with the Sacraments is not shee a true Church Sixthly every Tree is knowne by the fruites Matth. 7.16 Reas 6 17. The false prophet is knowne by his false doctrine for so the place intends if that bee a sufficient marke to know them by then true doctrine is a sufficient marke to know the true Church by Seuenthly it is Christs presence that makes a true visible Reas 7 Church therefore the Word and Sacraments outwardly representing Christs presence so as nothing else doth and so making him notoriously present make a true visible Church Lastly frō the sufficient enumeration of the parts of a true Reas 8 visible Church it must be so none are members and parts of it but the Ministers and people now the Ministers doing their duties in dispensing Gods mysteries both for preaching the Word and administring the Sacraments they are the Ministers of Christ 1 Cor. 4.1 and the people doing their dutie in obeying that they teach at least outwardly they are the sheepe of Christ Ioh. 10.4 Now which of these markes might be spared or what other are Vse 1 there that neede to bee added Therefore where these are there is a true visible Church The vses of the point are these The first vse is matter of reproofe and that of many aduersaries First it reprooues such as except and say first that other Congregations besides Except 1 the true visible Church have these markes and therefore they are not sufficient nor infallible markes I answere Answ It is true that other Congregations pretend to haue these markes as what Heretikes or Schismatikes are there that will not say they have the Truth and right faith with them this is the generall claime of them all the Scriptures are ours and for us But this is a false pretence for when it comes to the tryall it will appeare that it is but their saying not that it is so in truth for either they will refuse some part of the Scripture or else they will mangle and deprave it or else they will take the Letter for the sense as the Papists doe in the matter of Transubstantiation this is my Body and other Heretikes that because it is said He shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire therefore they baptize with fire taking the Letter of the Scripture instead of the sense of it Or else they adde somthing to the word as traditions and such like and so though they doe approue and take it in at the fore-doore yet they cast it out at the backdoore so that indeede they haue it not at all whatsoeuer they pretend we may say truly therefore that they challenge these markes but wee cannot say they are theirs but they still remaine the proper right of Gods true Church Wee know that the Divels policie and the depth of his subtiltie is to imitate apishly the courses of God that thereby hee may deceiue the more cunningly and therefore hee will counterfeit Gods owne markes and cognisance but wee must trie the Spirits 1 Ioh. 4.1 and the proofe will make all cleare for Sathan can transforme himselfe into an Angell of light and his Apostles can transforme themselues into the Apostles of Christ and his Ministers as though they were the Ministers of righteousnesse 2 Cor. 11.13 14 15. So then though these lay claime to these markes and say they are theirs yet they have no right to them it is but their vaine bragges their master Sathan himselfe alleageth Scripture and pretends it is for him but hee was shamefully discouered by our Sauiour for hee left out part of it and depraued it as wee may see Math. 4.6 7. And so the harlot Pro. 7.14 said I have peace-offerings this day I have paid my vowes therefore came I out to meete thee she pretends to pray but her intent was to play the harlot And so Zidkiah 1 King 22.24 braggs that hee had the Spirit of Prophecie when indeede it was a lying Spirit that was in his mouth So the Congregations of Heretikes and of Schismatikes lay claime to the Word and Sacraments and say they are theirs when as indeede they are not because they doe either refuse some part of them or depraue them or adde vnto them their owne Inuentions Secondly that except and say that many visible Churches haue Except 2 not these markes at least not all of them alwayes I answer yes they haue them all Answ and that alwayes in some measure more or lesse els they are not true visible Churches For the better vnderstanding hereof consider these two things first the different estate of Churches sometimes Gods Church doth thriue and flourish and then it hath all these markes without doubt Gods Word is truly preached the Sacraments rightly administred and obedience to them both is professed and yeelded and that in an high degree But sometimes a Church of God is not in such an excellent estate some are but in their beginings newly planted and so cannot haue all at once but hath euery thing in its order place first the Word is tendred to them then the people if they beleeue and submit themselues and professe obedience to it they are to be made partakers of the Sacraments First Baptisme and then the Lords Supper so far forth as it is a visible Church it hath all these marks these Church's are but in their beginnings and therefore they haue but the beginnings of these notes and markes Againe sometimes a Church is in a dying and decaying estate either by reason of Apostacie or persecution if the Church bee in a decaying state by Apostacie what shall I say to such Churches I say that so farre forth as these be true visible Churches so farre forth they retaine these markes if they be but the remainders of a Church then they haue the remainders of these markes if it bee a dying and a decaying Church then it hath dying and decaying markes So then these markes must be found in all true visible Churches according to the state of those Churches if it be a dying Church then the Word and Sacraments and Obedience are dying and decaying too but when it is quite fallen it ceaseth to be a true visible Church nor hath it these markes And so likewise in the time of persecution when the Church is so persecuted that there are none left to make open profession of the Faith and Religion of Christ yet so long as there are any that publikely suffer for the Gospell so long there is a true Church though troubled and brought low for by their suffering they professe obedience to the Gospell and though they are debarred of the publike vse of the Word and Sacraments yet the fruit and effect of them is still visible
and so they haue these notes and markes in some degree Secondly consider in what state or sense these markes are necessarily required in the Church they should be and sometimes are in the purest and soundest Churches in an high and excellent degree There is the true Word without tradition the true Sacraments none but those that Christ instituted true obedience without resistance to any part of the knowne Will of God and answerably this true Word must bee truely and soundly preecht these Sacraments onely so administred as Christ hath commanded without any addition and this true obedience truly professed without any sinister respect And this all Churches are to pray and labour for and thus it ought to bee in all true visible Churches but yet they are generally otherwise in all visible Churches in as much as all are subiect to errors and corruptions but yet so long as the true markes are found in any visible Church though they bee not so rightly and sincerely carried as they should the same is a true Church though not so pure as some others if they haue the true Word though mixt with some errors so they be not such as ouerthrow the foundation they are a true Church though more corrupt As for example the Church of Galatia embraced the true Word but not truly preached for they taught iustification by workes Gal. 3.1 2 3. and some thinke that they were then in the state of Apostacie and yet they were a true visible Church and are so called Gal. 1.2 So secondly for the Sacraments looke into the Church of Corinth 1 Cor. 11.22 to the end of the Chapter they had the Lords Supper but it was much depraued and not so sincerely administred as it ought to haue beene and yet they were a true Church and so for the Doctrine of the Resurrection a materiall point in Religion there were some that denyed it in the Church of Corinth 1 Cor. 15.12 and yet they were a true Church Lastly for profession of obedience the Church of Sardis Revel 3.3.1 had a name that she liued but was dead they were generally in the estate of Apostacie in that Church yet because they made profession of obedience though not sincerely and because some amongst them did truly professe as in the 4. ver therefore it is called a Church I speake not this to cherish any Church in the corruptions that they are in but onely to keepe vs from an vncharitable conceit of such a Church as not to esteeme it for a true Church because the Word is not so truely preacht nor the Sacraments so rightly administred nor profession of obedience so sincerely yeelded as it ought to be Thirdly they obiect and say that these are not more Except 2 knowne than the Church and so are disabled by your own rule before given from being the principall markes I answer they must be and are better known than the Church for seeing that onely is a true Church which professeth the true Faith as wee haue shewed before therefore wee must first know which is the true Faith before wee know which is the true Church and so as they must bee more knowne so they must bee first knowne I know a visible Church as a company of men not by their faith but as a Church by their faith only and their profession of it As I know a Musitian because of his Musicke not the Musicke by the Musitian And so much for reproofe of these first sort of Aduersaries that except against this Doctrine Secondly it reproueth others that obiect and say that there are other markes required as well as these as first Loue to the Brethren I answer This is a part of their obedience which they professe Secondly say they there Except 1 must bee a lawfull Ministery I answer that is presupposed and intended in the two former markes Answ when we say Except 2 that the Word must be truly preach'd and the Sacraments rightly administred Answ Yea but say they specially Discipline Except 3 that is an essentiall marke I answer That is a good marke Answ but not essentiall the Church hath a being and a wel-being Discipline is a note of the wel-being of the Church not of the true being of it for it is no part of the essence of the Church and so it is excluded from being a necessary marke of a true Church because it is not essentiall I confesse where that Discipline wants that God calls for in his Word that so farre that Church is an imperfect Church but yet not a false Church As a man sicke of the Palsey his sinewes are weak his hands tremble his ioynts are not soundly knit together this is a crazed and diseased man not a false man So that Church that wants Discipline is not well and soundly tied together in the ioynts and so is an imperfect Church not a false Church I speake not this as I said before to cherish any Church in their corruptions for they are to labour against them but yet let vs iudge charitably and not say Such a Church is a false Church when indeed it is but a bad Church Thirdly and lastly there are other aduersaries here reproued that obiect against this Doctrine and they are the Papists They obiect and say that these markes are not the principall but others are more required than these and that as better markes They alleage foure first Antiquity secondly Succession thirdly Multitude lastly Vnity or Consent These are strange markes of a true Church First for Antiquitie can that find me out the true Church then it would follow that euery ancient Church were a true Church and so the Church amongst the Turks should be a true Church because it is ancient therefore it is Antiquity of truth not of place or people Look what Church maintaines the ancient Doctrine of truth that is the true Church so that antiquitie separated from the truth is no note of a true visible Church Caine and Satan were ancient yet no true Church but ioyne this note with the Truth The true Word preach'd which is one of our notes and then it is a true marke Secondly for Succession What succession of Bishops or of men that sit in one Chaire Is this a Note without the Word or with it If they say without the Word that is falsâ—â—f with the word then still they run vpon our notes and markes of the Church for wee say that Succession of true and sound Doctrine is a special Note of the Church Succession of it selfe is no Note it is as if a man should say This is my Horse because this is my Bridle as if his Bridle would not serue any other Horse Thirdly for multitude they make that a Note of the Church but it is quite contrary for generally the true Church is the fewest in number and for the most part the greater number are the worst and by this Rule in Christs time the Scribes and Pharises and Iewes were
when as the Partie knowes the right and yet willingly declines from it and these that thus erre are so far from striuing against their Error that they rather striue against a manifest Truth to maintaine their Error such an Error the Iewes are taxed for by Stephen Acts 7.51 and by Paul himselfe Acts 28.26 where he applies a place out of Esay to them shewing their obstinacie that in seeing they did see and not perceiue c. so that this is an error of obstinacy for a man to know the Truth and yet willingly to decline from it Thirdly some are finite and for a time onely some finall and for euer for a time onely and vpon better Aduice they change their minde such was Peters deniall of Christ Matth. 26.75 for which hee presently repented and went out and wept bitterly Againe some are finall and for euer as when men liue and dye in sinne without any Repentance at all at least without any true and sound Repentance such was the sinne of Iudas in betraying Christ he died desperately in it without any true Repentance Mat. 27.3 5. Lastly some Errors are particular some are generall and each of these in two respects first in respect of the persons that erre secondly in respect of the things they erre in for when as one or two or some few men in a Congregation are tainted with Error here is a particular Error in respect of the persons as it was in the Church of Corinth when as but some of them denied the Resurrection and not all 1 Cor. 15.12 But when as all or the greatest part in a Church erre this is a generall Error in respect of the persons An Instance of this wee haue in the Iewes when as they did all cry out against our Sauiour Christ Crucifie him Crucifie him So secondly in respect of the things erred in as when a man or a Church erres onely in one or in few things this is a particular Error in that respect so did the Church of Pergamus Reuel 2.14 I haue a few things against thee But when a man or a Church erres in all or the most things this is generall also in respect of the things they erre in as the Church of Rome at this day erres in all or the most things and so their Error is generall in that respect as also in respect of their persons Now to apply all this to the subiect of the question whether the Church may erre in all or in any of these respects or no If wee vnderstand the Church in the first sense for the whole Company of Beleeuers liuing on earth in this sense the Church may be said to erre first in matters of smaller moment not in the foundation Secondly of Infirmity not of obstinacy Thirdly at least onely for a time not for euer Fourthly particularly not vniuersally either in respect of the persons or of the things But if wee vnderstand the Church in the latter sense of one particular Congregation in this sense the Church may erre in all these which that I may the more largely and distinctly without Confusion deliuer and you apprehend receiue it plainely in these Obseruations The First is this That the Church militant the whole Company of Beleeuers on earth howsoeuer it hath many excellent Priuildges by the Spirit of truth yet it is not so exempted from Error but that it may and doth oftentimes erre both in Doctrine and manners I shall not neede to handle Errors in manners by themselues and Errors in Doctrine by themselues for each of these are transgressions against the Word Wil of God and they are both damnable and each alike may take hold of the Church 1 Cor. 13.12 The Apostle Paul speaking of himselfe being then a sound yea a principall Member of the Church of Christ acknowledgeth ingenuously much Ignorance that hee knowes little to that hee should know he knowes but in part Now Ignorance being an Error in a generall sense as wee heard before then we see that the Apostle willingly vndergoes the Imputation of Error and if he bee in Error who can looke to escape And therevpon it followes by necessary consequence that he erred in manners too for wee cannot bee obedient in that wee doe not know so that as his knowledge was imperfect so was his loue and obedience too But for errors in manners it is far plainer in Rom. 7.22 23. where the Apostle acknowledgeth that there was a Law in his members rebelling against the Law of his minde and leading him captiue vnto the law of sinne c and this was not his infirmity alone but it is the infirmity of all the Faithfull the Spirit stirres them vp to doe good yea but saith the Apostle Galat. 5.17 the flesh lusteth against the Spirit and the Spirit against the flesh and these are contrary one to another so that you cannot doe the same things you would And our Sauiour giues an Inckling of this to his Disciples in a kinde of Parable Ioh. 13.10 where he faith He that washed is needeth no â—â—ue to wash his feete c. which though it be spoken in a negatiue sense as shewing that nothing needes washing in them but their feete yet it is affirmatiue in force shewing that none is so cleansed and purified but that still hee hath foule feete that is hee hath still sinne and error in him and these must be cleansed and washed away or else he can haue no part in Christ Iesus as in verse 8 So likewise for error in manners the Apostle Iames 3.2 saith In many things wee sinne all there all are included and that not in one kinde onely as nâ— a diuided sense as if one should offend in one thing and another in another thing but in a compounded sense not one or many but all sinne and that not in one or few things but in many And for further confirmation of the Truth hereof it is elsewhere negatiuely deliuered as in the 1 King 8.46 There is not a man that liues and sinnes not now lay these two together and we shall see that none is exempted from error in manners So for Error in Doctrine Rom. 3.4 where it is not onely affirmed in generall of all and of euery one in particular that euery man is a liar that is that he erres in some of his Apprehensions of the Truth but the Apostle doth likewise so derogate the holding of the whole Truth entirely and incorruptly from man that he appropriates it to God alone so that it is as possible for man to bee God as not to bee deceiued So that the Doctrine is cleare that the Church militant that is the Company of Beleeuers liuing on earth may and oftentimes doe erre both in Doctrine and manners So much for proofe of the point out of Scripture Reas 1 The Reasons of the point are these First mans frailtie The members of the militant Church true Beleeuers they are but men and therefore naturally louing darkenesse
proportion in like cases Christ himselfe when hee came to teach saluation spake nothing but from the father Iohn 12.49 50. and whatsoeuer the Spirit doth teach hee receiued it from Christ Iohn 16.13 If Christ doe tye himselfe to teach those things and nothing but those things hee receiued from the Father and the Spirit nothing but those things he receiued from Christ then I hope the Church hath not greater liberty in respect of the Scripture then Christ in respect of his Father and the Spirit in respect of Christ Therefore as Christ spake nothing besides that hee heard of his Father and the Spirit nothing but that hee receiued from Christ so by proportion the Church is to speake nothing in matters of saluation besides Scripture Reas 6 Sixthly the Church is to do nothing heerein but by direction and assistance from the Spirit and as it is horrible presumption to say the contrary so the Papists themselues sometimes ingenuously confesse that the Testimony oâ— the truth consists in the holy Ghost and the Prelates iointly so that it is not in the Church alone without the Spirit And what doth the Spirit teach the Church any new Doctrines or Reuelations No but that which Christ hath reuealed before If ye compare Iohn 14.26 with Iohn 16.13 14 15. you shall finde that the holy Ghost whom Christ promiseth to send shall teach all things that Christ hath taught which beâ—ng the same which is in the Scripture then the Spirit teacheth the Church nothing besides Scripture And so the Church is able to decree nothing besides the Scripture because shee is able to doe nothing without the Spirit Lastly when things are decreed by the Church are Reas 7 we to receiue them hand ouer head or vpon tryall and examination If ye say haâ—d ouâ—r head without examination that were a gracelesse speech and vtterly vnlawfull being against the rules of the Word 1 Thess 5.21 Trye all things 1 Iohn 4.1 Trye the Spirits If then they must be receiued vpon tryall and Examination how must they be tryed and by what rule Eyther by the Iudgement of the present Church or by the Scripture If ye say by the Church that were to make her Iudge in her owne cause then it must bee examined by the Scripture as the men of Berea did Paules Doctrine Act 17.11 they searched the Scriptures daily whether the things were so as he taught So the things the Church decrees must bee tryed by Scripture and if that cannot approue them as being not there found they are to be reiected and the authority of the Church in imposing them to be disclaimed So we see in reason that the Church hath no power nor authority to decree anything or matter of substance in Religion â—yth 〈◊〉 faith oâ— for obedience without or besides Scripâ—â—â— The â—irst vs◠〈…〉 of reproofe of sundry Popish practises and positions not to name all For indeede if this point be well vnderstood it razeth and ouer throweth the very foundation of Popery Here then we see first that the Church cannot coyne any new Articles of faith why is any man so gracelesse to doe so yes the Papists doe so And howsoeuer many of them will not seeme to fauour it in word yet their practise makes them guilty of it Pope Pius the fourth propounds a Creede and tyes his children the Papists to it wherein after hee had set downe the twelue articles contained in the Nicene Creede he addeth twelue more of his owne concerning traditions Purgatory c. And these hee will haue acknowledged and vndoubtedly beleeued as the former and is not this to coyne new articles of faith Ob. But say they why may not we doe so as well as you that haue your articles of Religion and all reformed Churches haue their seuerall confessions wherein there are many things besides those in the Creede and yet professed and beleeued Answ as well as they I Answer It is not a like comparison for we though we doe beleeue many things that are not in the Creede yet wee beleeue nothing besides Scripture and that which is soundly proued by Scripture is to be beleeued as well as that in the Creede But theirs are such for the most part as haue little or no shew of Scripture for them but are matters besides Scriptures which they obtrude on the people meerely or at least principally by the authority of the Church But hath the Church then no authority about Articles of Faith newly to be made I Answer No But onely as thus if any article hath beene neglected obscured and layen hidden in former times the places of Scripture whereon it is grounded being not well vnderstood then the Church hath power to declare and publish it vpon the better vnderstanding of such places as it is proued by And this is not to make new articles of faith but to reuiue and renew those that were before and that not beside the word but with and by the word This may be cleared by an Instance The article of Iustification by Faith had lyen hidden for many yeeres before Christ came but when Christ and his Apostles came they reuiued it and yet made no new article of it but the same that was taught from the beginning of the world to come neerer home After that this doctrine was againe obscured lay hid for many yeeres till it pleased God to raise vp Luther and others which brought it forth to that cleare light that it was in in the Apostles times And is this to make new articles No but to reuiue and to bring to light that which had lyen hid a long time And thus far the Church may goe and no further The second Position is this that the Church cannot make any booke to be Canonicall Scripture which is not so of it selfe For this is to ordaine and decree matters of substance in Religion besides Scripture But do the Papists doe this yes they doe and therefore are here to bee reproued for it as being vtterly vnlawfull for them so to doe For first the number of Canonicall bookes are certaine as themselues confesse and therefore no authority can admit more Secondly if the Church hath power to make bookes that are Apocrypha Canonicall then also shee hath power aswell to reiect some that are Canonicall for hee that hath power to build hath also power to destroy And what were this but for the Church to mayme and mangle the Booke of God as shee list her selfe what an horrible wrong were this to God Thirdly the sheepe of Christ heare his voice they doe not make or frame it Lastly as a Gold smith takes a peece of gold and tries it whether it bee right or counterfeit by the touch stone and before he finds it to be true Gold he doth not make it true Gold for if he finde it to be counterfeit all the Gold smiths that are cannot make it true so must the Church cry which are Canonicall
reasons First where there are many particulars of one and the same kinde there must bee acknowledged by the rules of nature and reason some generall notion or apprehension wherein they all meete together to beare the name and to comprehend the nature of all As for example there are many particular persons of men being of one and the same kinde and therefore there must be one generall humane nature in which they must all meete and bee comprehended And therefore whereas we haue many Parochiall Churches in England of one and the same kinde they all may rightly be tearmed and comprehended vnder one name that is the Church of England Secondly if but two or three congregations liuing in a City or about it may be so called the Church of that City as it is very probable if we compare Reuel 2.1 with Acts 20 17. why may not therefore all Parochiall Churches of any one land bee called the Church of that land or nation Thirdly it is not against the nature and being of a Church to be nationall the Church of the Iewes was directly so vnder the former Testament the Iewes being cast off the Gentiles are come in their steade and therefore where any whole Nation of the Gentiles doe publiquely and generally embrace the sauing ordinances of God as the Iewes did I see not but that they may rightly bee called by the name of a Nationall Church why may not the Church of England be called a Church of England now as well as the Iewes were called a Iewish Church heretofore Lastly whereas I speake of our whole Church in generall that it is in some measure a sound Church it must be vnderstood in respect of the better part the whole taking the denomination from them for if it be proued true but in some parts that is in our most Religious and best ordered congregations that they are so then I hope charity will grant I am sure reason will that the whole Church may lawfully take her denomination from the better part else no part 〈◊〉 congregation can be rightly affirmed to bee a true and sound Church for it is so called properly in respect of the true beleeuing and liuing members that are therein though the greater part oft times are Hypocrites Thus we see the note is set vpright Let vs proceede to the proofes of it Reas 1 Many reasons may be alleadged to proue it three or foure shall serue the turne The reason before mentioned prouing the Greeke Romane and Lutheran Churches to be true Churches being applyed vnto vs proues vs sufficiently to be a true Church because wee affirme the whole foundation and euery part thereof But in this we haue vndertaken more that is that our Church is in some good measure a sound visible Church and therefore that is the point here to bee holden to And the first reason to proue this is from the infallible markes of a true and sound Church Wheresoeuer the Word and the Sacraments are in publique profession in vse so that the Word in some good measure is purely taught and the Sacraments rightly administred and obedience to them both accordingly professed there is a true and in some good measure a sound visible Church But in the Church of England the Word and Sacraments are in publique profession in vse so that Word is purely taught and the Sacraments rightly Administred and obedience to them both in some good measure professed And therefore the Church of England is a true and a sound visible Church For the proposition I haue handled it before in deliuering the markes of a true Church and therefore I will referre you thither for the proofe of it For the Assumption none will deny but wee haue the Word and the Sacraments and profession of obedience to them both but the Question is whether wee haue them purely or no for the measure of the soundnesse of a Church is esteemed according to the measure of the purenesse of these markes where they are more pure there is a more sound Church and where they are lesse pure there is a lesse sound Church But in the Church of England they are pure without traditions or mans inuentions therefore the Church of England in some good measure is a sound visible Church Wee are charged by the Separatists that we preach canons and mans constitutions as Gods Wor◠But wee Answer These are not taught for Doctrines but onely serue for some passage and carriages touching Gods Seruice specially in Church gouernement Secondly they say we suppresse some part of Gods Word as Discipline I Answere All that we know wee teach expresly and impartially if there should be any faylings as we know there are in all Churches yet that hinders not but that they are in some good measure purely taught And so the truth still stands good that the word taught amongst vs so also the Sacraments are rightly administred amongst vs for the substance of them if there be any error in circumstance as wee know none neyther yet that doth not nullifie the action nor ouerthrow the truth of this Assumption Likewise obedience is truely professed thereunto at least by some yea by a great many too through Gods mercy And therefore the note stands firme and true that the Church of England euen as it now stands is a true and a sound visible Church Reas 2 The second reason is taken from the comparison of the visible Church with the inuisible Take it thus that faith and Religion which being truely beleeued and obeyed by the whole company of the Elect makes them the true Church inuisible the same faith and Religion being publiquely taught and learned in a visible congregation and by them professed iointly to bee beleeued and obeyed that in some good measure makes them a true and in that proportionable measure a sound visible Church for the visible Church is so called respectiuely to the Church invisible as they publiquely and ioyntly professing the same sauing faith which the inuisible in the minde and truth of heart beleeue and obey But our Church doth ioyntly and publiquely professe that faith which the inuisible Church doth truely embrace and thereby is made a true Church visible euen that whole truth that is reuealed in the Word as by our articles of faith and Religion it doth appeare which is the ioynt confession of our Church yea our very aduersaries may witnesse for vs in this Aynsworthe saith I doubt not but your Doctrine hath saued many therefore it must needs bee the same Doctrine of faith which makes the true Church inuisible And so Iohnson acknowledgeth that very many amongst vs are true Christians by that knowledge and faith which here they haue attayned vnto only setting them a part from the constitutions of our Church and if any man elsewhere in the world doe truely beleeue and obey that faith which we professe who can deny him to bee a member of the true inuisible Church Our Church
vnto vs the sufficiency Scripâ— Thirdly such as forbid any addition to or detraction from the Scripture Fourthly such as condemne all Doctrine taught either without or besides the Scripture Rhemists 15 Acts â— The Papists say the church may coyne new articles of faith What authority the Church hath about articles of Faith Hyper 6â— Hyper 54. Secondly that the Church make any booke to bee Canonicall Scripture Which the Papists hould this confuted by diuers reasons Thirdly that the Church hath power to deuise adde diminish or alter any part of Gods worship which the Church of Rome hath done prooued by diuerse things Fourthly concerning customes The fathers iudgement concerning customes Fifthly concerning traditions How and in what sense tradition is to bee receiued Answers to the Popish tenent concerning tradititions Answer 1. Ob. Answer wherin is shewed that the Baptisme of Infants the change of the Sabbath and that so many bookes are Canonicall Scripture and are not had by tradition but proued by good consequence out of the Scripture Answ 2. Answ 3. Their proofe out of 2 Thes 2.15 Answe Answ 4. The scripture the so onely rule of saith acknowledged to bee by all Churches generally Secondly the Scripture is the onely tryall of euery truth How euery matter of substance is to be found in the Scripture Concerning Churches power in matters of circumstance and they are of two sortes one of miracles and what is to be helde concerning the same Secondly of discipline and this is of two sorts either matter of dâ—scipline which is spoken of before or secondly matter of ceremonies and what the church hath power to doe therein The bounds the Church is to keepe in ordaining matters of ceremony 1. 2. Vse 2. 1. The ninth generall point concerning the Church viz. the application of all that hath bin spoken to all visible Churches in christendome that I know of The generall diuision of all churches that haue beene or are since our Sauiours time into Easterne and WesteÌ„rne and this according to their scâ—tuation Secondly according to their language and so some be greek and some latin Churches VVhether Schismaticall or hereticall Churches may be accounted true visible Churches What a Schismatike church is Hereticall Churches First what they are and when any particular man is to be reputed an Heretike Heresies of 2. sorts first such as ouerthrow the foundation What this fundation is Resol Those that deny directly this foundation or any part thereof cease to bee Christians and are no more visible Churcher The Greeke Churches be here spoken of and what weare to thinke of them 1. of the Greeke Churches generally disperse in most at the Easterne parts of the world Ortelius 100. Ortelius 97. 98. 108. Secondly the Greeke Churches which are more particularly and properly so called and what we are to hold of them deliuered in an obseruation Doct. The mayne error of the Greeke Churches The Greeke Churches better then the Popish-Church The Papists vnchatarible censuring the Greeke Churches answered The Greeke Churches not guâ—lty of Schisme from Rome The Greeke Churches neuer subiect to the Romane Church One note of the Church as the Papists account it is found in the Greeke Church viz succession of Bishops The goodnes of God in perseruing of his Churches seene in the Greeke Churches vnder the Turke The miseries of the Greeke Church vnder the Turke in many particulars in regard of their persecutions in regard of the Religion of the Turks The Religion of the Turks 1. a pestilent Religion directly opposite to Christ 2. It ouerspreadeth a great part of the knowne world 3. It is a pleasing Religion For what it was that the Lord suffered such famous Churches to come to ruine applied to vs. The Western churches and first of those that acknowledge the Pope their head as the Church of Rome and those that hold with her and what maâ— be said and held of her deliuered in two obseruations The church of Rome as now it standeth may in some sense be reputed a true visible Church A differenâ—e betweene the papacy or the popâ—sh â—action and some better spirits amongst them in regard of whom the whole may be called a true Church The popish church doth not directly deny any part of the fundation but in outward shew of words affirme it The church of Rome hath beene a true Church The Papists by their Doctrine of iustification by workes must ouerthrow the foundation they by this ouer throw Christ not directly but by consequence Quest Answ It is not so great a sin to deny Christ directly as by consequence yet hee that doth this deserueth to be cut off from Gods mercy The Church of Rome compared with the Church of Israel 2. with the Church of the Iewes in our Sauiours times With the Church of Galatia Circumcision doth as neerely by consequence cut off from Christ as iustification by workes with the of Church Sardis Baptisme a true Sacrament in Rome and rightly administred there for the substance of it Those that were Baptised in the Church of Rome were lawfully Baptised Ob 1. Answ Ob. 2. Answ The ordinati of our Ministers from the Church of Rome and yet a lawfull ordination The question where the Church was before Luthers time answered The inconuenience preuented by acknowledging that the Church of Rome may be accounted a true Church What to thinke of our fathers that liued in the Popish Church They of the Popish Chuâ—ch are to â—e â—udâ—ed rather mis-beleeuers then vnbeleeuers The 2. Obseruation wherein is further delired what may be sayd and held further of the church of Rome The Church of Rome so corrupt that it is not lawfull to ioyne with her This that is spoken against thee is in respect of the Pope and Popish factors Corruption of the Church of Rome reduced to 2. sorts 1. matter of Doctrine reduced to 1. part of the Doctrine Foure heads 1 concerning Scriptures And their error therein Three things 1 denying the sufficiency of the Scripture 2 Perâ—erting the truth of the Scripture 3 Disanulling the authorâ—ty and credit of the Scripture many wayes 1 teaching the apochryphaâ—l bookes to be canonicall Scripture Secondly equalling traditions of men with the written word of God Thirdly preferring the authority of the Church aboue the Scripture Two heads wherein they orre in matter of Doctrine viz concerning the direct offices of the Mediator The Papists say there bee many mediators betwixt God and man The distinction of mediators of intercession and redemption answered Two things in a Mediator To be mediator of intercession is peculiar to Christ as well as to be mediator of redemption The popish shâ—ft off praying to the Saints not as helpers but as intercessor Answered The popish reason for praying to the Saints departed drawn from our desiâ—ing the Saints on earth to pray for vs Answered The third head wherein the church of Rome erreth in doctrine and that is concerning Images The church of Rome an abominable whore deseruing
shall be made as white as snow Secondly here is comfort against their wants and defects and infirmities thou canst not pray nor performe any other good duty as thou oughtest yea but thou art a member of that blessed and glorious Church whereof Christ Iesus is the Head and therefore all thy wants and infirmities are couered and supplied by the perfection of Christ Thirdly here is comfort against temptation and against the Diuell and all his power for thou art a member of the true Church which is like to Mount Sion that cannot be remoued but shall stand fast for euer and euer the Gates of Hell nor all the power of the Diuell shall euer preuaile against thee the Lord for his owne glory which he hath set vpon vs will neuer see vs ouerthrowne Lastly here is comfort for vs against all the reproches of men that howsoeuer wee be as the off-scowring of the world in their vniust censures yet in Gods sight who iudgeth according to the truth wee are beautifull and glorious And therefore let this suffice to giue vs content against all the scoffes and nick-names in the world If wee bee so blessed and beautifull in Gods eyes what neede wee care though wee bee contemned in the world The fifth Vse is matter of terrour to the world that persecute Vse 5 and oppose themselues against Gods Church they know not who it is they make their force against it is euen against God and therefore they shall neuer preuaile and against the people of God the most glorious and blessed company that are And therefore first they may bee dismaied for they rush against a Rocke and kicke against the prick Act. 9. they shall neuer haue good successe yea secondly they shall be punished with the fierce and full vengeance and wrath of God because they resist the Lord and oppose his glorious and annointed Ones Vse 6 The sixth and last Vse is to reproue the peruerse opinion of the world that are blind and can see no grace nor beauty in the Church like vnto the wicked Iewes that would not see any forme or beauty in Christ Isai 53. they looke onely on the outward man and indeed there is nothing to bee seene but deformity and misery but if they could looke within there is perfect glory Yea but say they this is but your words wee can see no such glory in the Church but we can see a great deale of sinne and misery among you why doe you then face it out thus I answer we must vnderstand it with these limitations First it cannot bee discerned but with a spirituall eye and therefore the world cannot see it because they want this eye to discerne it withall Secondly it is vnderstood of the Church as they are considered in their Head Christ and not as they are considered by themselues If they consider the Church thus they shall perceiue perfect glory Christ himselfe being perfectly glorious and he couers and supplies our wants and deformities and presents vs as glorious to God his Father Thirdly it is so rather in our desires and Gods account then in actuall possession Fourthly we haue not thâ—s glory and blessednesse here but onely in the beginnings of it we haue some grace and some beauty and some glory here but it is to be perfected in heauen when there shall be a new Ierusalem Reuel 21.2 and then Christ shall present vs a glorious Body vnto God his Father without spot or wrinckle Ephes 5.27 which because some haue attained to already and the rest shall surely obtaine hereafter and haue some beginnings of it here already it may therefore bee iustly said in respect of some of her parts now and of all hereafter Thou art all faire my Loue and there is no spot in thee Thus you see how beautifull the Church is and blessed and glorious though the world be blind and can see no such thing in her And so much concerning the second generall Point propounded to be handled in the Doctrine of the Church The third Lecture of the Church THe third generall Point propounded to bee handled in the Doctrine of the Church is the Nature of the Church for so the order of teaching requires that when once wee doe know the name of a thing what it is called and the titles that it is graced withall then it followes that wee should search out the nature of the thing that is thus called and thus intituled For the names and titles of things may and are oft-times imparted to others But the nature of euery thing is proper to it selfe and cannot bee communicated to any thing else And therefore howsoeuer the name and titles set it forth vnto vs and make vs esteeme of it yet the nature will more fully expresse it and make vs the highlier to esteeme of it The name bearing diuers significations in ordinary method ought to bee diuided first and defined after But because the whole nature of the thing may bee aptly enough comprehended in one generall description and because the diuision hath a more neere dependance with that which followes making a ready steppe and passage thereunto we will first define therefore the nature of the Church and then proceede in the next place according to our order set downe to diuide it into seuerall kinds and branches The nature of the Church is thus described The Church of God in the true generall nature thereof is the whole company of Gods chosen both in heauen and earth where they are described by three things First by the efficient cause of their being of the Church Gods electing or chusing them Secondly by their number the whole Company Thirdly by the places where they are in heauen in earth First by the efficient cause of their being of the Church for the principall reason why any man is a true member of the true Church is because God hath chosen him to it First to saluation and glory as the end secondly and consequently to be of the Church as the means to the end Therfore the Church ofttimes is called Gods chosen Psal 33.12 Euen the people whom he hath chosen for his inheritance And in Psal 132.13 The Lord hath chosen Sion that is his Church And Rom. 8.33 The Apostle speaking of the Church calls them by that expresse name Gods chosen And hence it is that the Faith of Gods Church is called the Faith of Gods chosen Titus 1.1 And therefore they are called The first borne whose names are written in heauen Heb. 12.23 Which what is it else but to bee written in the Booke of life That is to be Gods chosen It is true that it is much more agreeable to the name of the Church to bee defined by their Calling rather then by their Choosing as in the first Lecture because they are a Company called But yet it is more agreeable to the right nature of the Church to be defined by their choosing rather then by their Calling and that
more then light and euill more then goodnesse and howsoeuer the Spirit bee giuen them to enlighten them and to relieue them against each Infirmity yet their weaknesse is such that they are not so farre capable of the Spirit as that thereby they are enabled to vnderstand and know all Truthes and practise all goodnesse The Spirit indeed in it selfe is all sufficient but in them not so sufficient nothing can be receiued but according to the capacity of him that receiues it be the master neuer so good to teach yet if the Scholler be not capable of the Art he teacheth he shall neuer bring him to it so it is in this the Spirit is sufficient to teach them all Truthes but they are not capable of them the Spirit is sufficient in them for Saluation but not for perfect knowledge or obedience and that by reason of their frailty that they are not so farre capable of the Spirit The second reason is Satans malice and subtilty who Reas 2 as he is the father of lyes himselfe and the Auhor of all error and sinne so hee ceaseth not to tempt both to error and wickednesse and his labour is not altogether lost but that he fastens some of his Infections in both kindes on the best men Liuing or at the least as a hinderer he hinders that truth and holinesse is not embraced at least not in that measure that it should yea and he soweth errors and sinnes like Tares vpon that good seede of Truth and holinesse which Gods Spirit hath sowen in our hearts Thirdly whilest wee liue here we haue many occasions Reas 3 of Error many deceiuers false Apostles Heretiques Scismaticks many ill examples perswasions and sundry prouocations and these are too strong for vs to withstand them all and that at all times at least not so that wee may be free from all Infection by them Fourthly Our perfection both for knowledge and Reas 4 obedience is respited to the life to come not attained to in this life by the perfectest Phil. 3.12 the Apostle saith that he had not attained to perfection though he were inferior to no man no it is not for this life it is respited to the life to come then the Church shall be without spot or wrinckle Eph. 5.27 and that not onely by Imputation as we are here but by actuall possession then shall that be verified Cant. 4.7 where the Church is said to be all faire and no spot in her but that is for the Church glorious and triumphant it cannot bee so with the Church militant but they must sit downe vnder that ignorance and error which they cannot preuaile against and pray daily Lord forgiue vs our trespasses So you see the point made plaine by reasons too Vse 1 The vses are these First here is matter of Instruction teaching vs to humble our selues and to bee cast downe in our soules in that wee are such vile and corrupt wretches brutish in our selues both for matter of knowledge and obedience for so the Scripture sets vs foorth that wee are euen beasts in both First for knowledge the Prophet saith Ieremy 10.14 Euery man is a beast by his owne knowledge and for Obedience it is said Iob 15.16 that man drinketh vp Iniquitie as water c. concerning knowledge First wee finde by experience that wee loue error and falshood and that we are ready to accept lyes at the hands of Sathan and other deceiuers wee embrace them with both handes and make much of them and hardly can abide to bee wonne from them wee are sooner and easier perswaded from an hundred Truthes then from one Error Secondly for Truth wee know that naturally wee hate and abhorre it wee cannot learne or finde it our selues nor yet are we willing to receiue it from others when it is brought to vs no not when God himself and his Word his own blessed Spirit tenders it vnto vs or if wee doe receiue it it is but in part to the halues deadly and coldly and fearefully and wee are easily drawen from it the Euill one catching it out of our hearts our mindes wauering carried away with euery wind or blast of vaine Doctrine or if wee doe receiue it and sticke to it it is with much infirmity wee are apt to defile it with our owne Inuentions deuises glosses additions detractions mistakings doubts distrustes idle and euill apprehensions the Lord knowes the thoughts of man that they are all but vaine So concerning obedience we finde that of our selues we are prone to all sin and averse from all righteousnesse and in this wee doe much more resist the spirit of Grace then them former the Reason is this Truth and falshood being of the vnderstanding reason and iudgement the highest faculties of the soule we can more easily submit to the power of the Word and Spirit but good and euill being of the will and heart and affections the more base and more carnall parts in vs and the doing of good and the forbearing of euill being the denying of our selues and the bridling of the course of nature the forsaking of all our pleasures and profits and indeed the breaking of our hearts It is death to vs to bee thus mastred and this is the reason that wee are much more vnwilling to reforme in matters of obedience then in matters of knowledge and that reformation which wee doe attaine to in matters of obedience is much more imperfect then in matters of knowledge Let vs consider rightly of this and seeing the case stands thus with vs let vs be ashamed confounded before the presence of God and hate and abhorre our selues in dust and ashes what are wee ignorant of our selues and yet will not learne naught and sinfull and cannot bee reformed How doth this prouoke Gods Wrath against vs what a deforming is this to his Image in vs what dishonour to his name what griefe is this to his spirit that hee hath to deale with such peruerse and froward Schollers that will not bee taught by him either wee will not receiue his good motions at all or else not as wee should what reioycing is this to Satan that can insult and say I can perswade men to error and sinne when as Gods Spirit and his motions to Truth and righteousnes are reiected this is a great gratifying of Satan and a great reioycing to him besides what hurt doe wee to those amongst whom wee liue But specially what wrong doe we to our owne Soules this is to forsake our owne mercy and herein our selues are the chiefest Enemies to our owne saluation let vs confesse this to God and bewaile it and instantly beg pardon of him for it and striue the best we can against â—â— and let vs bee humbled all our daies that we can striue no better against this brutish nature of ours Vse 1 The second vse is for Refutation of the Puritanes those ancient hereticks that held an absolute perfection in this life and so the Papists
and the Anabaptists are here refuted that hold this error that they offend not in manners surely this is a farre higher straine then euer the Apostles attained to for they erred all in manners they all forsooke Christ and fled Matth. 26.56 but this was before the comming downe of the holy Ghost vpon them but did they so afterward yes euen after they had receiued the holy Ghost they erred in manners Iohn the Disciple whom Iesus loued would haue worshipped the Angell Reu. 19.10 and againe euen after admonition hee would haue done the like in Chap. 22.8 and so very likely hee did it after Repentance too And so wee see that Peter was reproued to his face by Paul for his sinne Galat. 2. If this bee so in the greene tree Alas Alas What shall it bee in the dry when Peter and Iohn and the rest of the Apostles haue had their falls shall any Puritan in the world bee so shamelesse as to boast of perfection This point shall neede no further Refutation all Gods Children from the first to the last will ondemne this Assertion by their owne contrary clamentable experience in the whole race of their liues I mention this the rather because some papists Anabaptists and familists are infected with this presumption at this day Vse 3 Lastly this serues for the Refutation of Papists that challenge to their Church and head the Pope an Immunity yea an impossibility of erring in Doctrine as if it must of necessity be true whatsoeuer they hold whereas this wee are able to shew how that they haue erred from themselues in many things holding one thing this yeare another thing the next and one contrary to the other so that except two contraries may bee true they must needes erre in the one or in the other but of this more shall bee spoken hereafter Thus wee haue seene the first point handled at large that the Church militant howsoeuer it hath many excellent priuiledges yet it is not so exempted from Error but that it may and oftentimes doth erre both in Doctrine and manners Now let vs come to the second Obseruation and Doct. 2 therein see how the Church may not erre The Obseruation is this That the Church militant is so guided by the Spirit of Truth that though it be subiect to error yet it cannot erre fundamentally obstinately finally and generally First not fundamentally Psal 62.2 he is my strength and my saluation and my defence therefore I shall not much bee moued that is fundamentally nor obstinately Psal 19.13 Lord keepe me from presumptuous sinnes nor finally Psal 55.22 the Lord will not suffer the righteous to fall for euer he may fall but not for euer nor generally in all her parts but still some are reserued that haue not bowed their knee to Baal 1 King 19.18 these two finally and generally are neuer found in the true members of the militant Church haply they may erre fundamentally and obstinately but neuer finally and generally Psal 37.24 though he fall yet shall he not bee cast off which if it be vnderstood of our outward preseruation here as the Text seemes to intend it then much more of our preseruation from sinne and error that though wee doe fall yet not finally for euer And Psal 125.1 they which trust in the Lord are like mount Syon which cannot bee remoued but standeth fast for euer And this is cleared by our Sauiours owne mouth Matth. 16.18 vpon this Rocke will I build my Church and the gates of hell shall not ouercome it hee saith not shall not touch it but onely not ouercome it And Psal 102. last verse the Children of thy Seruants shall continue and their seede shall stand fast in thy sight So then the Church militant though haply it doe fall fundamentally and obstinately yet it cannot fall finally and generally The Reasons First it is Christs promise that the Reas 1 Gates of hell shall not ouercome it Matth. 16.18 if there were no other reason this were sufficient Reas 2 But secondly the Church is built vpon a Rocke Mat. 16.8 and therefore cannot fall Matth. 7.25 Reas 3 Thirdly Christ God and man knits and vnites vs and if God knit the knot who shall vnknit it Reas 4 Fourthly Chirst prayes for vs that we may not fall Luk. 22.23 and hee cannot be denied Reas 5 Fiftly the vnchangeablenesse of Gods Loue he admits none to bee of the Church militant but whom hee loues Now whom God loues once he loues to the end Iohn 13. Reas 6 Sixtly the presence of the Spirit is another Reason of it Ioh. 16.13 the Spirit of Truth is continually present with them inlightning quickning directing perswading and reclaiming them from sinne and error whereunto if wee adde the sufficiency of the Scripture for all matters both for life and doctrine what other direction can wee haue or how can wee erre finally and generally Reas 7 The last Reason is drawen from Gods Loue and Care of his owne heauenly Truth which if it be not beleeued at all it is much disparaged and if it be beleeued any where then surely it must be in the Church which is the Pillar and Ground of Truth therefore still the Truth is aliue at least in some of the Church so that the Church cannot fall finally and generally for then the Truth must fall too Vse The vses are these The first vse is for matter of comfort to the faithfull that howsoeuer if we be left to our selues wee are weake and darke and blind prone to sinne and error and vntoward to grace and goodnesse yet wee see Gods Grace is sufficient for vs to keepe vs in his holy Faith vnto the end It is true that in regard of our selues wee are like silly sheepe ready to be a prey to the Beare and the woolfe yet wee haue an heauenly sheepherd our Sauiour Christ and he hath still an Eye on vs and lookes after vs and rather then we shall be quite lost hee will bring vs home on his owne shoulders Luke 15. Satan may and does seeke to deuour vs and to swallow vs vp quicke but God hath set him his stint so that neyther altogether nor for euer hee can preuaile against vs Iohn 10.28.29 Christ knowes his sheepe and hee will giue them eterternall life and they shall neuer perish c. If wee be ignorant of any point God will reueale it if wee be doubtfull God will resolue it if wee be out of the way he will admonish and reclaime vs wee shall heare a voyce behind vs saying This is the way walke in it c. Esay 30.21 The second vse is for reproofe of the Papists and Vse 2 Lutherans which hold that the very chosen may fall away and that finally which cannot be held without blasphemy for by this they wrong God making his election to be a meere casuall thing depending on mans goodnesse and perseuerance therein so likewise it is an exceeding wrong to the faithfull for if they may
Shepheards and of Christ Luke 2.19 51. she did ponder and keepe these sayings in her heart And this wil ripen our thoughts digest our readings and conceits as chewing the cud separating the refuse and turning the best into good nourishment The third duty is conference we must conferre of the things we reade and heare as the two Disciples did Luke 24.4 32. for this will reuiue our vnderstanding and quicken our wits and wheâ— our reason and helpe our memories and stablish our iudgement and throw out the hidden substance as it were from the huske and winnow away the chaffe from the wheat And fourthly to these we must adde patience wait the Lords leasure and tarry till he giue the succsse and till he reueale his will to thee and thus doing God will reueale it Phil. 3.15 all this while that thou hast beene toyling and striuing expect and waite vpon God and thou shalt finde the successe in Gods good time thou hauing vsed the meanes dayly labouring and praying for the effect be sure it shall bee reuealed vnto thee when it is best for thee and thou fittest for it and if it should neuer be reuealed to thee yet thy former paines seconded with patience shall make thy state as good in Gods acceptance through Christ as if thou haddest knowne it Fiftly that which strikes the nayle to the head is practise and experience a most certaine guide in all points fundamentall After we haue done all the former rules we must adde practice therefore practise Religion in the obseruation of Gods wayes in afflictions in temptations in the court of thine owne conscience in thy dayly watch in the continuall course and terme of thy life Iohn 7 17. If any man doe his will hee shall know of the Doctrine whether it be of God or no Act. 5.32 the holy Ghost whom God hath giuen to them that obey him Psal 119.100 I vnderstand more then the ancients because I haue kept thy Precepts God wil not see vs erre in Iudgement and practice too in such necessary points as he sees we desire as well to obey as to learne And so much for the second vse which teacheth vs warinesse and care and conscience in medling with Scripture Vse 3 The third Vse teacheth vs thankfulnesse to God that we liue in those times of light wherein we haue so many good helpes for the knowledge of Scripture learning tongues sciences histories wits all of them being at the highest and ripest now And many godly men both at home and abroad yea many Churches haue published their iudgement touching the sense of most places of Scripture And therefore if men will be blind now let them be blind for euer let vs take the benefit of these helpes thankefully and soberly and let vs adde to these the vse of those seciall helps before mentioned then it is not possible that we should erre fundamentally and finally in any truth But there are diuers exceptions made against this Doctrine Obiect 1 first say some all this while this is but priuate interpretation flatly forbidden 2 Peter 1.20 Answ I Answer that is priuate which is of man as we may see in the 21 Verse of that Chapter so that our interpretation according to the former rules being framed out by the Spirit is falsely called priuate that same Spirit teaching vs which teacheth all the faithfull Secondly It is excepted that this is a detraction from the Church I Answere No for any priuate man that beleeueth is of the Church and as the Church must trye the Spirits so must euery beleeuer 1 Cor. 12.10 and 1 Iohn 4.1 and as the Church hath the promise of the Spirit so hath euery beleeuer And this is a sure rule the Spirit doth infallibly teach euery one of Gods chosen first or last euery thing needfull for his saluation he vsing such meanes as the Lord hath appointed Phillip 3.15 It is so in manners therefore it is so in Doctrine each being a part of the truth which God requireth and which the Spirit leads vs into Psal 25.5 leade me in thy truth and teach me for thou art the God of my Saluation And Psal 143.10 teach mee to doe thy will for thou art my God Euery one of the faithfull hath the Spirit to comfort them in their distresse to helpe them in their temptations to perswade them to holinesse and why not therefore to inlighten and teach them the truth Ob. 3 Thirdly It is excepted how doe you know whether such an interpretation be from Gods Spirit or from your owne fancy for any Heretique can and will say as much as you Answ 1 I Answer If the matter bee necessary to saluation the promise of God puts vs out of all doubt Iohn 16.13 when the Spirit of truth is come he will guide you into all truth Secondly hast thou sought and attained that interpretation by prayer Then out of question the Lord will not giue thee scorpions and poyson when thou askest fish Errors when thou askest the truth Thirdly doth it concurre with the articles of faith not doubted of then it is the truth Obiect 4 Fourthly Is it not more likely that a whole Church specially the Doctors and Pastors of it are so guided then a particular man and so are to bee beleeued before him Answ Answer yes If they follow the former rules and yet then they are to be beleeued not so much because they are the Church but because they are directed by those rules sometimes one particular man or two follow these rules but the present Church doth not in this case the one or two are to be beleeued before the present Church as in the time of Wicklife Husse and Luther one or few then deliuering the truth ought to be beleeued before the present Church because they obserued these rules Sometimes the Church doth obserue these rules and particular men doe so too then eyther they concurre and so the truth is directly deliuered receiued or else they dissente and then rather follow the streame then one or two if there be no other reason to the contrary For sometimes euen in this case too one man may see more then many as Paphnutius in the Councell of Nice Againe sometimes the Church obserues these rules and some particular men doe not so In this case particular men are right Heretiques and the other the true Church of God Fifthly It is Obiected that by this meanes we all rest on our owne Iudgement and so haue no faith in God Answ I Answer Our Iudgement in matters necessary to saluation being wrought in vs by the letter sense of Scripture revealed by the Spirit is not our owne iudgement indeede but Gods our frailties wherewith we are accompanied are ours onely but wee are endued with our iudgement from God so that we rest on Gods iudgement now and not our owne Euery man must haue faith of his owne that is though not of his owne by working
bookes by the Scripture and not make any so of her selfe for this she cannot doe The third Position is this That as the Church cannot make any booke Canonicall which is not so of it selfe for she hath no power to deuise adde diminish or alter any part of Gods worship outward passages of Gods worship are much in her power as we shall see hereafter but that she may ordaine any part of his worship besides Scripture or affixe remission of sins or other supernaturall effects to the obseruations and ceremonies which she deuiseth all this is but will-worship hatefull to God and expresly forbidden Col. 2.23 Intolerable hath beene the presumption of the Church of Rome in both these For first they haue ordained besides Scripture Images satisfactons new Sacraments new intercessours new propitiatory sacrifices and sundry other parts of Gods worship and seruice Secondly euen to ceremonies of their owne deuising as to crossings processions ringing of Bels pennance and such like they haue ascribed forgiuenes of sinnes driuing away of Deuils and such like gracious effects wherein consists no small part of Gods worship The fourth point is concerning the customes of the Church custome we know preuailes much in matter of practice and many times they are very approuable and not to be varyed from but vpon good occasion yet in matters of Religion yeelding to customes hath bred much inconuenience as wee see amongst vs profaning the Sabbath by playing and walking in the streets and in the fields after the exercises is growen to such a custome as that men thinke it no sinne and so in other things And to speake plainely customes are but a carnall motiue apt to ouer sway the naturall man but of themselues besides Scripture they are no spirituall motiues to the true Beleeuer The ancient fathers tye vp customes in Religion thus short that they must be agreable to the truth so that where truth and customes agree there they are to be admitted else to be reiected Now what is truth Our Sauiour saith Gods Word is truth Iohn 17 17. then if there be any customes in matters of Religion besides the Scriptures which are the truth they must be abolished euen by the Iudgement of the Fathers whom the Papists would seeme to alleadge for these things yea but say they the Apostle Paul alleadgeth custome 1 Cor. 11.16 but how doth he alleadgeth them Against contentions because contentions are against the Word of God so that custome besides Scripture is nothing worth The last point is for matter of traditions Traditions are one mine Piller of Popery and if they leaue them once they will quickly leaue their Religion too Now if we vnderstand traditions in a general sense It intends the whole Doctrine of Saluation which from time to time hath beene deliuered from the fore fathers to the children of the Church And so we willingly embrace traditions as being the Doctrine contained in the word and so the speeches of many of the ancients are to bee expounded and doe make for traditions But in the particular sense as the Popish Church intends them that is vnwritten verities and matters besides Scripture then so there is no building on them If they be verities it is more then we know and being vnwritten we haue no warrant to receiue them to his point we say first eyther there were no such traditions at all or secondly if there were yet they were needlesse considering the sufficiency of the Scripture thirdly if they were needfull yet they were vncertaine lastly if they were certaine yet certainely they were but the words of men and not certainely the word of God First eyther there were none at all I meane for matter of substance yes say they for substance ye haue something by tradition as the Baptisme of Infants the change of the Sabbath and that so many bookes are Canonicall Scripture c. We Answer wee haue not these by tradition for they may sufficiently be proued by good consequence out of the Scripture As first for the Baptisme of Infants we haue the example of our Sauiour in Marke 10.14 And secondly for the Canon of Scripture we haue that place 2 Tim. 3.16 the whole Scripture is giuen by Inspiration from God c. yea but what place in the word saith that so many bookes are Canonicall I Answer euery booke beares witnesse of it selfe and this place of them all that they are Canonicall Thirdly for the change of the Sabbath we haue Reu. 1.10 where it is called the Lords day so that we haue Scripture enough for these things to satisfie an humble minded man that is not contentious Secondly if there were any such yet they were needlesse for supposing the sufficiency of Scripture which we haue proued before what neede vnwritten traditions besides Scripture Indeed before the Word of saluation was committed to writing It was needfull that it should be deliuered by word of mouth from man to man but the word being now written and hauing beene now written these 1610. yeeres and as much written as euer shall be what haue we to doe with traditions besides Scripture Thirdly if they were necessary yet they are vncertaine for how shall I know that the Apostles deliuered ought by tradition or that the Churches after them be they either de facto or de iure For that which is alleadged from the Apostle in the 2 Thess 2.15 keepe the Instructions yee haue bin taught eyther by word or by Epistle whereupon they say the Apostle left traditions and Epistle I Answere these words doe not imply any diuersity in the things he taught but onely in the manner of deliuery looke what he preacht he writte And whatsoeuer can be alleaged for the Churches after them is but the testimony of man we must know it by history and what certainety is there in that to repose my Saluation vpon Lastly if they were certaine yet all this while they were but certaine the traditions of men and certainely not the Word of God And therefore here is the damnable presumption of the Papists that they by name call them the Word of God vnwritten equall them both in authority to binde the conscience in necessity to be beleeued and obeyed with the written word common sence and reason which is endued but with the least touch of Religion will easily decide this controuersie If we adde heere to determination of councels consent of fathers decrees of Popes and other patches and faynings of Popish Religion the conclusion must be this that either there were none such or if there were they were not beside Scripture but according to it or else if they were besides Scripture then they were no matter of substances nor Saluation nor to be receiued as such The second Vse is for Instruction to teach vs what Vse 2 it is that our faith must be framed by and what euery truth is to be tryed by And that is
office of the mediator the third is concerning Images the fourth is concerning Iustification for the first which is her corruption in Doctrine concerning the Scripture which is the truth and ground of Religion they teach uery erroniously not onely that which disparageth them which yet is a presumptuous sinne but that which by consequence vtterly ouerthrows them First in that they dare deny the sufficiency of Scripture Secondly in that they peruert the truth of Scripture thirdly in that they disanulle the authority of Scripture First they deny expresly the sufficiency of Scripture whereas God hath deliuered them as a particular rule 2 Tim. 3.16 they say No It is not sufficient of it selfe they must be pieced and perfected by traditions No man dare adde to the will of a dead man and yet these are so shamelesse and presumptuous that they dare presume to adde to the sacred Testament of Iesus Christ thus they deny the sufficiency of Scripture Secondly they peruert the truth of Scripture teaching and deliuering first concerning the translation that none is to be admitted as authenâ—icall but the vulgar Latine translation which themselues confesse is sometimes faulty and doth misse of the meaning of the Holy Ghost secondly for the interpretation of Scripture they will admit of none but such as it pleaseth the fathers to giue who themselues acknowledge may and doe sometimes erre and are deceiued now to teach that an vntrue translation is the Text of Scripture and an vntrue interpretation to be the sense of Scripture what is this but to make the Scripture vntrue Third they disanull the authority and credit of the Scripture and that many wayes first teaching that the Apochryphall bookes which are knowne to containe certaine vntruthes to be Canonicall Scripture secondly equalling the traditions of men with the written Word of God and vrging them to be receiued with as great authority as the Word of God Now if the Word of God be of no more authority in matters of Saluation then the word of man it is very feeble and not worth trusting to Thirdly they goe further preferring the authority of the Church aboue the Scripture the Scripture say they is to beleeued for the authority of the Church that is as much as if they should say God is not to beleeued for his owne sayings but for the witnesse of man thus they disanull the authority and credit of the Scripture Now all these layd together see whether that may not be iustly taken vp against them which our Sauiour speaketh against the Iewes Iohn 8 47. he that is of God heareth Gods Word ye therfore heare them not because yee are not of God and Iohn 10.26.27 ye beleeue not because yee are not my sheepe my sheepe heare my voyce and I know them and they follow me Gods children heare his word and will not impeach the truth and credit of it the Popish faction will not heare it but will impeach the truth and credit of it and therefore they are none of Christs sheepe So much for their error in Doctrine concerning the scripture where wee see that their fountaines are corrupt and therefore we are like to finde but foule waters in their Channels Their second Error in Doctrine is concerning the direct office of the mediator God saith directly that there is but one Mediator betwixt God and man that is Christ 1. Tim. 2.5 they say there are many the blessed Virgin Mary and other Saints not onely praying for vs but to bee inuocated by vs doth not this iustle Christ out of his roome at least to sit so close that others must sit in commission with him in that office they would shift it off with this that they make the Saints mediators of intercession onely and Christ of Redemption and the Apostle say they when he saith there is but one Mediator c. hee meanes of Redemption not of intercession I Answere that the Apostle in that place speakes of a Mediatour of intercession for he speakes of Prayers and intercessions in the first Verse and as in reason he that is to make intercession for any must be able to reconcile them and to take away the enmity and to bring the parties whom he intercedes for into fauour else it would be a friuolous and vayne intercession and he that intercedes for any must be such an one as the person interceded doth appoint or at least approue of for that businesse euen so the Scripture propounds Christ alone to be intercessor in both these respects 1 Iohn 2.1.2 If any man sinne wee haue an Aduocat with the Father Iesus Christ the Iust and he is the propitiation for our sinnes He is our Aduocate or intercessor and our propitiation or reconciliation both and Iohn 16.23 whatsoeuer ye shall aske the Father in my name he shall giue it you hee doth not say whatsoeuer ye shall aske in my mothers name or in the Saints names but in my name And therefore both Redemption and Intercession are oft times in Scripture by name ioyned together as in that 1 Tim. 2.5 6 there is one Mediator betwixt God and man c who gaue himselfe a Ransome for all men Rom 8.34 who shal condemne vs it is Christ that died ye rather that is risen again who is euen at the right hand of God who also maketh intercession for vs so that we see to be mediator of intercession is as peculiar to Chrst as to be mediator of redemption They shift again say we pray to the Saints not as helpers but as intercessors onely but wee pray to Christ as intercessor and helper by his owne power too I answer yet still they make them intercessors then though not in the same degree and so they eyther iustle Christ out of his roome or set his mother and the Saints on the Bench with him but if therebe any other intercessors then either the intercession of Christ is imperfect or else the intercession of the Saints is superfluous But say they we doe no more to the Saints in heauen then yee doe to the Saints on earth and then the Apostle did to the Thessalonians in the 2 Thes 3.1 Brethren pray for vs c. I answer First wee haue a warrant for this Scripture but for the other wee haue none at all Secondly will any man say that the Apostle made them intercessors for him This were a disparagement to him no but hee intreats them to be fellow Suitors and ioint Petitioners to God with him and for him Thirdly the Saints that are aliue we haue accesse vnto and can vtter our mindes to them but so wee cannot to them that are deceased and therefore they that pray to them though it be but as fellow suitors they make God of them in that very fact that is they make them knowers of the desires of the heart for Prayer is the desire of the heart and to know that is proper to God
but say they the Saints in heauen can know the desires of our hearts by our words But how shall they heare our words God reueales them say they to the Saints I answer there is no warrant for that And thus we see that the Papists making other intercessors besides Christ they iustle Christ out of his roome or set others on the Bench with him and so much of their error in Doctrine concerning the direct Office of the mediator The third point is concerning images they teach that images are to be worshipped though God himselfe hath exprssely forbidden it Exod. 20.4 in the second Commandement and if that Commandement forbid Idolatry as what other meaning can it haue then they teaching the contrary doe teach flat Idolatry And if Idolatry be spirituall whoredome and if a Spouse playing the Harlot is to be diuorced from her husband both which are largely set forth in Ezech. chap. 16. Then howsoeuer the church of Rome hath beene the Lords owne Spouse yet vpon this abominable whoredome she deserues iustly to be diuorced and cut off as a filthy Strumpet but let vs heare how this Harlot pleads for her selfe to saue her credit and honesty First say they we worship not the Image but God in and by the Image I answer did not the heathen doe so and yet they were abominable Idolaters yea say they but they made Images of the false gods we of the true God I answer yes they made Images of the true God too Acts 17.23 whom ye ignorantly worship him declare I vnto you saith the Apostle And did not the Israelites worship the true God in an Image Exo. 3â— 9 and yet they were horrible Idolaters nay the very resembling of the inuisible God in any mâ—de image is in the second CoÌ„mandement and else where directly forbidden as flat Idolatry Nay is it possible that any man falling downe before the Image to worship God in it can be freed from worshipping the Image it selfe at least in outward worship which worship God challengeth as intirely to himselfe as the inward the matter is so plaine that themselues confesse that they worship the Image but here they haue another deuice some honour say they we giue indeede to the Image it selfe but that is a lesser honour but the greater we giue to God alone so they distinguish without any ground from the Scripture for both these worships are condemned alike in the Scripture Rom. 1.25 there the great worship is condemned Galat. 4.8 there the lesser worship is condemned when it is not performed to God Besides to examine the matter a little further I would faine know whether that lesser honour which they giue to the Image be any part of that worship which is due to God or not If they say it is not then there is some religious worship which is not due vnto God and so the Saints belike haue that which is not befitting his Maiesty whereas wee know that little great worship is all too little for his greatnesse If they say it is part of that worship which is due to God then it is plaine Idolatry for God will not giue the least part of his glory to any other Esa Lastly if this lesser seruice could or were or might be giuen to Images yet not the greater worship but they giue to the bread in the Sacrament to the wooden Crosse yea to the Image of God and Christ this greater worship this very Latria this they professe to be due and accordingly they giue it them which is as grosse Idolatry as any among the heathen We come now to the last point concerning their Corruption in Doctrine and that is in the matter of Iustification which is the life of Religion and the ground of Saluation as being our reconcilement to God and acceptance into his Fauour wherin consists our whole Comfort and true happinesse therfore to erre in this point is most dangerous of all The Apostle saith directly Gal. 2.16 that a man is not iustified by the workes of the Law they say directly that a man is iustified in part by his owne works And here they mince it lest they should make a manifest Contradiction to the world and say that their works doe not iustifie of themselues but because of the diuine Grace dwelling in vs which makes vs worke and that we are saued by grace the Apostle saith it and ye grant it where then is the difference Surely the difference is very much though in appearance there bee little or none at all For by grace they vnderstand the gifts of Grace inherent in vs as faith and hope and loue c And so they directly conclude that our Iustification is by inherent Righteousnesse But the Apostle saith and so say we that we are iustified by the Grace and free Fauour of God in Christ Ephes 2.8 9. and Titus 3.3 and not by the workes of Righteousnesse which wee haue done Our Iustification is onely by Christs Righteousnesse imputed which wee apprehending onely by Faith that is beleeuing it for our selues and so applying it to our owne State by the comfortable perswasion of Gods Spirit in our hearts are therefore iustified by faith alone Alone I say not but that it is ioyned with good works in our liuing but because Christ our Iustifier is apprehended by our faith and not by our works Gods plaine truth without any quillets is this God is all in all for our saluation hee chose vs to saluation before the world was he calls vs takes vs out of our filth and bestowes his Spirit and the gifts thereof freely vpon vs and hee receiues vs into glory at the end of our life and all this he doth freely for his names sake and for the grace and mercy and merits of Christ Iesus without any merits of our owne or deseruing the least blessing at his hands this is the plaine truth of God the opposite whereof is a most fundamentall error and they that disclaime it not I see not how they can possibly be saued And so much be said for their errors in matter of Doctrine Secondly their errors and corruptions in matters of practice and they are of two sorts The first is their corruption in practice in the carriage of Gods worship And the second is their corruption in their ordinary manners First for the carriage of Gods worship they are exceedingly corrupt in their practice and this we will shew first in the generall Secondly in the particular parts of it In the general carriage of Gods worship they erre and are foulely corrupted for take it as it is caried by the Popish faction and it is fitter for man yea for an Idol then for the true and liuing God to be honored and serued by for first it is a carnall seruice full of Rites and Ceremonies like vnto that of the Iewes Heb. 6.10 Which stood only in meats drinks and diuers washings and carnall ordinances imposed on them
indirect allegations by way of inference from Gods commandements bidding vs to doe well and from his promises if we doe well which rather send vs to God for that which we cannot doe of our selues then imply any ability for the doing of them in our selues The third instance iustification by faith alone against mans merits we teach according to the Scripture Rom. 3.20 28 that by the workes of the law no flesh shall bee iustified But that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the law And Gal. 2.16 A man is not iustified by the workes of the law but by the faith of Iesus Christ And Ephes 2.8 9. by grace ye are saued through faith not of workes c And Titus 3.5 not by the workes of righteousnesse which wee haue done but according to his mercy he saued vs That which the Papists pretend to the contrary Iames 2.24 yee see then how that of workes a man is iustified and not of faith onely doth not crosse the former except they wil blaspheme and say that God doth contradict himselfe but is plainely spoken of another saith that is dead Verse 90. whereas iustifying faith is a liuing faith and of another iustification that is before man as Verse 18. whereas this is before God The fourth instance Christ our onely aduocate against other intercessors wee hold and teach according to the Scripture 1 Iohn 2.1.2 that wee haue an Aduocate with the Father Iesus Christ the iust and hee is the reconciliation for our sinnes And Reuel 8.3 Another Angell came and stood before the Altar hauing a golden censor and much odours were giuen vnto him that he should offer with the Prayers of all Saints This Angell is Christ who as the high Priest in the Law Exod. 28.38 doth appeare before God making the Prayers of the Saints acceptable to God And there is not any shew of warrant in the word neyther for any one no nor for all the Saints together to doe the like The fifth instance the spirituall worship of God against images Our Religion teacheth according to the Word Iohn 4.23.24 that all true worshippers shall worship the Father in Spirit and truth for the Father requireth euen such to worship him God is a Spirit and they that worship him must worship him in Spirit and truth And Exod. 20.4 5. Thou shalt make thee no grauen Image thou shalt not bowe downe to them c This second Commandement is so plaine for this that the Papists leaue it out in some of their Catechismes and make vp the number of ten Commandements by diuiding the last And there is not one titâ—le of Scripture for Images neyther precept dispensation exception or example approoued but on the contrary they are fearefully threatned and strangely punished The sixth instance Our Communion against their Masse Our Communion is warranted by Gods Word 1 Cor. 10.16 the Cuppe of blessing which we blesse is it not the Communion of the blood of Christ c And 1 Cor. 11.23 24 25 c whereas their Masse hath no warrant at all in the Word not so much as the name of it found there nor in the Nature of any propitiatory Sacrifice nor any Intimation of repeating it but directly the contrary as wee may see Hebr. 10.10 14. the offering of the body of Christ once made with one offering c The seuenth Instance our carriage of the meanes of Saluation in open sight against their carriage of all in a cloude Our prayers made in a knowne Tongue are warranted in the word 1 Cor. 14.14 15. If I pray in a strange Tongue my spirit prayeth but my vnderstanding is without fruite what is it then I will pray with the Spirit but I will pray with vnderstanding also c And so for the word to be free and common to all as it is with vs hath his warrant Matth. 5.15 neither doe men light a candle and put it vnder a Bushell but on a candlesticke and it giueth light to all that are in the house And Prou. 9.4 5. who is simple let him come hither c And Esa 55.1.3 Loe euery one that thirsteth come ye to the waters c encline your eares and come vnto me and your soule shall liue So likewise hath an explicite faith his warrant Ioh. 9.35 Doest thou beleeue in the Son of God where our Sauiour requires an explicite and particular faith in the blinde man And in the 1 Pet. 3.15 the Apostle would haue vs bee ready alwaies to giue an Answer to euery man that asketh vs a Reason of the hope that is in vs c That which the Papists pretend to the contrary Matth. 7.6 Giue yee not that which is Holy to Doggs c is a malicious peruerting of Christs Words to his peoples destruction and their owne Ruine Thus wee see that their Religion is too light and oars full weight in this second Ballance of Gods word Let vs try them in the third Ballance The Ballance of true holinesse That is the best and true Religion of God that is most powerfull to worke Holinesse of heart and life for God is holy and our calling and the end of â—â— what cold deuotion will there be in vs and what hourely prayers and little faith and lesse reuerence as dealing with men and not with God himselfe For the fifth instance If wee worship God in Spirit without Images it workes in vs Spiritualnesse and truth for wee presenting our selues in all our worship nakedly without any Image before the Lord as before a pure Spirit wee are stirred vp thereby and growne by vse to frame our selues to his owne Image to be spirituall men and spiritually minded spiritually affected our vnderstanding will thoughts desires meditations and courses will be spirituall and heauenly lifted vp to an higher strayne in affection and eleuation of Spirit the onely meanes whereby to be truely renewed in the Spirit of our minds it will be a notable meanes against all carelesnesse and Hypocrisie and formality in our hearts and liues Sixthly our spirituall and true Communion with Christ against their Masse By this Communion Christ spiritually enters into vs and stirs vs vp to the life of God and incorporates vs into his mysticall body here faith doth her right office in discerning the Lords Body with a spirituall eye and applying Christ and his death and merits soundly to the heart of the receiuer and feeding vpon Christ in heauen at Gods right hand whereas in the Masse there is but the flesh which without the Spirit profiteth nothing and the bodily eye and hand and mouth and belly doe in a manner all faith doth little or nothing Seuenthly if the meanes of Saluation be carried openly and not in a cloude then all is done in knowledge and vnderstanding And then there is an holy will desire deuotion affection and endeuoure to serue the Lord in an holy manner as may best beseeme him and