Scripture if necessary or else are such points of faith or practice as in the conclusion are inquireable For that of infants Baptism Scripture prescribes in Generalls Principles equivalent For that of the blessed Maries perpetuall Virginitie post partum a point that we piously believe according to some probabilities of Scripture No matter of such weight as that the doubting or deniall thereof should shut us up under condemnation To leave these men to their vain faith and conversation taught by their fathers traditions from which Christ with his bloud hath ransomed us 1 Pet. 1.18 Let us in matter of faith learn Abrahams prudence believe according to that we know the Lord hath spoken And this rule let us remember it is partiall infidelity to deny credence to any thing delivered in Scriptures Fancy not Faith to believe as Gods truth what he hath not in Scriptures revealed unto us And here I cannot but take notice of the folly of many amongst us Wise it may be in their generation wiser in their own conceit Their profession is this in the point of believing They had rather believe too much then too little and in that sottish resolution how many gross errours drink they in almost to the bane of their souls It cals to mind that fable should I call it or story rather of a woman in the dayes of Popish darkness accused to her Confessour for denying Christs carnall presence in the Sacrament that being charged by the Priest with that point of heresie made answer for her self That she never made question of any such matter And believest thou indeed saith her Confessour that Christ is there present Flesh Bloud and Bone as he was born of the Virgine Not He onely saith the woman but his blessed Mother also O woman replies this Seraphicall Doctour great is thy faith or rather O man great is thy impious folly to approve as points of faith such sottish dreams a just parallel for our men so superfluous and supererogatory in matter of believing But now proceed we in the Text. VERS 19 20 21. And being not weak in faith he considered not his own body now dead when he was about an hundred years old neither yet the deadness of Sarahs Wombe He staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief but was strong in faith giving glory to God And being fully perswaded that what he had promised he was able also to perform THe next commendable property of Abrahams faith is the strength of it set out in an Antithesis and heap of words Not weak but strong and fully assured 2. By removing certain effects of weak faith from Abraham as 1. Consideration and looking down upon things that opposed the promise and might hinder faith 2. Doubting or debating of the promise 3. By the means supporting and strengthening faith the truth and power of the promiser This is the sum these the particulars of this passage Sense For sense of the words Sundry questions offer themselves to be discussed First was Abrahams faith so perfect that in it was no weakness no doubtfulness at all Answ So Origen so Papists often in question touching perfection of righteousness The truth is great things are here given to Abraham in this point of believing Now whether this strength of faith should be conceived comparatively or limited to the particular Article now in hand may be some question This once is evident in the story of Abraham that however firm his faith was touching this particular at some time yet in other things Cajetan ad loc he bewrayed some incredulity and at other times as Cajetane conjectures was not without some doubtfulness of this promise Now what when it is yielded Abrahams faith was at sometime perfect in respect of this particular promised The Law to justification requires an universall perfection of all virtues as well as of faith and in faith perfection not onely in respect of some particulars but of all truths revealed and that not at sometimes onely but perpetually without interruption Gal. 3.10 A second quaere How saith Paul Abraham considered not his body dead c. When as Moses bringeth him laughing at the promise Gen. 17.17 and enquiring as it should seem of the likelihood of it Shall a child be born to him that is an hundred years old and shall Sarah that is ninty years old bear Answ Cajetane answers That the quaeres of Abraham recorded by Moses were made whiles yet the Revelation was not so clear unto him and issued not so much from doubtfulness of the thing as from desire to be informed whether the words bear the sense that their sound purported Pauls speech is to be referred to the time when the Revelation was complete and the sense thereof distinctly understood conferre Gen. 17.17 18. What if we say Pauls meaning is this He considered not these impediments out of doubtfulness of the promise but as admiring the power and great grace of the Promiser intending him a favour that must be accomplished against the course of nature saith Augustine Riserat pater quando ei promissus est Augustin de Civ dei lib. 16. cap. 31. super Gen. qu. 36. admirans in gaudio riserat mater quando iterum promissus est dubitans in gaudio The same Augustine to like purpose enquires Why the Lord reproves Sarahs and not Abrahams laughter and thus answers Quia illius risus admirationis laetitiae fuit Sarae autem dubitationis So much force is there in the grounds of our actions to determine them either to good or evil The third quaere How saith Paul of Abrahams body it was dead that is destitute of generative vigour when as so many years after he had many children by Keturah Gen. 25.1 August qu. 35. super Gen. de Civ Dei lib. 16. c. 28. contra Iulian. Pelag. l. 3. c. 11 2. his second wife after Sarahs death Answ Augustine in many places propounds this doubt and assoyls it The summe of his solution is this First that it was dead in respect of Sarahs body decayed by age not so in respect of a younger woman alledging to that purpose the judgement of Physicians Emortuum corpus non ita intelligendum est ac si omnino nullam vim generandi habere posset si mulier juvenilis aetatis esset sed secundum hoc emortuum ut etiam de provectioris aetatis muliere non posset His second answer this That Abrahams bodie was dead until such time as the Lord was pleased to put new vigour into it as he did for the begetting of Isaac and that the same gift of generation continued after the death of Sarah for begetting of other children of Keturah we have both in summe Abrahams body was dead through age ut ex illius aetatis foeminâ gignere non valeret qui tamen ipse de adolescentula valeret sicut postea de Cethura valuit quamvìs illic dici possit foecunditatis munus in eodem
Sitacet Christus quid sibi volunt haec Evangelia quid sibi volunt voces Apostolicae quid cantica Psalmorum quid eloquia Prophetarum in his enim omnibus Christus non tacet S. Augustin In Johan tractat 4. The Scripture Fitly doth Paul consult with Scripture as the only Competent Iudg in-questions of his nature without which if we search for resolution in matters of this quality we run into a Labyrinth The advise that Constantine gave to the fathers in the Nicene Councell should have place with us sumamus ex dictis divini spiritûs explicationes quaestionum Mark his reason Evangelici enim Thedoret Hist lib. 1. cap. 7. Apostolici liâ—ri nec non Antiquorum Prophetarum oracula planè instruunt nos sensu Numinis And truth is howsoever in matters of Morality there be to be found some good directious in nature yet in this and like matters touching reconciliation with God and means of justification before him how utterly not only blind but opposite to what truth teacheth is nature yea it may not be denied that the Fathers them selves have some of them too naturall conceits in this business and if my judgment and observation in their writings be any thing as it is not much the attentive Reader shall finde much of the popish plot of justification to be framed out of the errours and misprisions of some Ancients here therefore especially let it have place that the Prophet adviseth to the Law and to the Testimony Isai 8.20 See we now the sentence of this Judg What saith the Scripture This Abraham believed God and it was imputed to him for righteousness In which sentence we have two particulars observable First Abrahams act with the object he believed God Secondly The fruit or benefit thereof It was counted to him for righteousness Touching the first Abrahams act he believed God Let us here a little largely enquire what is the nature of justifying faith so much the rather The nature of justifying faith explained because the controversie is famous betwixt us and our adversaries Concerning it two questions shall be handled First whether it be an assent to the promise Or an Affiance rather and trusting in the promise Or in plainer terms whether this to believe in this question signifie to give Credence to God speaking or else to put confidence in God The opinions both of them have great Authors both Popish and Protestant For our better understanding it shall not be amiss to fetch the consideration somewhat higher even from the generall notion of these two habits as they are conceived by Philosophers and others according to reason Faith therefore or beliefe hath this generall description It is an habit of the understanding inclining us to a firm and undoubtfull assent to something as truth for the authority and credit of the speaker or witness I call it first an habit of the understanding because the proper object thereof is truth and the act thereof an assent to truth or a perswasion and acknowledgment of the truth propounded The difference stands partly in the measure of assenting partly in the cause moving to assent for as touching absolute doubtfulness when the minde hangs in aequilibrio giving no assent either way it s quite opposite to the nature of faith Now the assent of the minde hath three degrees The first is when the minde hath some though weak inclination and hath a propension to assent to a thing propounded perhaps moved by some slight sign or by apprehension of possible truth some call this suspition more fitly perhaps conjecture The Second is when the assent is more stable and resolute yet not without fear that the contrary may be true this called opinion The Third and highest is a perfect and peremptory acknowledgment that the thing propounded is of infallible and certain truth of this last sort is the assent that faith yields Now this certain and perfect assent is of four sorts according to a fourfold means swaying the minde The first is that which is caused by sense as when the minde acknowledgeth a thing for truth because it hath received perfect intelligence from the sight hearing c. or other senses not hindered or deceived The second is that which is caused out of the clear light and evidence of the thing without arguments of any kinde to perswade it as in principles clear of themselves and that need no demonstration or evidence but their own light to convince as that omne totum majus est suâ parte The third is that which is caused by certain discourse and demonstrative arguments which they call science The last is that which is procured by the authority and credit of him that propounds a thing to be received for truth which authority being without exception breeds perswasion as firm as any can be raised by argument sense or if there be any other means more forcible with the minde to perswade And of this last sort is faith Now Fiducia confidence or affiance is that habit or act of the will whereby we hopefully repose our selves upon the power truth and goodness of the promiser for receiving of some good thing promised It differs from belief 1. In the proper seat belief being in the understanding affiance in the will 2. In the object which it s carried unto which is bonum not verum 3. As the effect from the cause this reposing of our selves on arising from a perswasion of the power truth goodness of him we trust in And of the general notion of these two qualities thus far Their difference we shall better yet see if we consider the divers phrases of speech wherein the Scripture expresseth their actions fittingly to that usuall distinction received from Austin putting difference betwixt these two acts of S. Aug. Trict. in Ioh. 29. and Serm. 61 de verb. Domini Credere deo Credere in deum The first being the act of beliefe properly so called the other expressing the act of that other habit which we call fiduciam To apply this Praemissa to the purpose the question is of whether sort that faith which we call justifying is whether a giving credit to God promising us remission of sins in Christ or a relying on his mercy and the merits of Christ for pardon of sins and life everlasting The severall opinions shall be propounded and examined that the truth may the better appear Papists well nigh all that I have seen Resolve of the former and thus determine Bellarm. de Iustif lib. 1. cap 5. 9. See Kemnit Exam. lib. 1. cap. de Fide justific That Faith justifying is no such Affiance or Confidence in Gods mercy as Protestants teach but a general assent to all things contained in the Word of God and a perswasion of their Truth Of our own Divines some not of lowest rank judg that it is meerly an assent to the truth of the Gospell or Evangelicall promise made to us in Christ And they
particular assent and affiance also in him as the Messiah promised as by view of some of the principall obligations will appear For think we the acknowledgment of this proposition in generall That Jesus Christ is the Son of God is that See Joh. 20. and 1 Ioh. 5. that justifieth and saveth Then how fail Divells of justification yea and of eternall life that sensibly acknowledg him to be Jesus the Son of the living God Mark 2. Besides what means our Saviour so often to invite us unto him and propounding the condition of eternall life to utter it in a phrase importing affiance as Ioh. 6.40 yea particular acknowledgment of him to be a Saviour unto us Lastly Thus I reason A Pari other parts and conclusions of Scripture propounded generally are to be believed not only as they concern the generall but particularly as having their truth in us Why not then these that propound remission of sins righteousness and salvation to be obtained by Christ For instance when the Scripture teacheth that every one is accursed that keeps not the Law that the wages of sin is death c. Binds it not me also to believe that I also for my sins am by nature subject to the curse that the proper wages for my sins is death When it propounds promises of temporall blessings as it doth to them that seeks Gods Kingdome and his righteousness ought not I to acknowledg this promise to belong to me and to place confidence in God for the performance Why then when the promise of remission of sins is made to believers binds it no me and every believer to assume that my sins are pardoned when it teacheth Christ to be the Saviour of the world and Author of Righteousness to those that obey him should I not say that Christ requiring generall faith intends also a particular applying of this generall to my self for my comfort and salvation More I add not in this kinde Two paradoxes only of Bellarmine Bellarm. l. 1. de justific cap. 8. I will briefly propound and so leave them The first is that faith is justifying though it have no respect to Gods speciall mercy The Second That it is not justifying if perhaps it have respect thereto The proofes have in them the quintessence of Iesuitical acumen The Leprous mans faith Mark 1. was a justifying faith and yet had no respect to speciall mercy Ergò Faith not respecting speciall mercy is justifying Answ The proposition needs proof inasmuch as many had faith for obtaining Miracles that had none at all touching the person of the Messiah Luk. 17. 2. How proves he that he had no speciall faith concerning remission of sins by Christ What because he doubts of his will for his cure As who say there may not be speciall faith touching pardon of sins even where there is doubt of obtaining some remporall blessing the one having a promise for Gods children to rest on the other not so but with limitation to expediency But will you see how he proves that faith is not justifying if it have respect to speciall mercy The Pharisee having it even because he had it was not justified Ergò Answ And was the Pharisees affiance in Gods speciall mercy the Reason why he was not justified Nay rather the vain boasting of his own righteousness as appears by the drift of the parable expressed Luk. 18.9 Vacuus proindè rediit Bernard de Annuc Ser. 3. ad calcem quia plenitudinem simulavit as S. Bernard and therefore failed he of justification not because he trusted on Gods speciall mercy to obtain it but for that he trusted in himself that he had it Some Ancients let us hear in this point Bernard de Annuc Serm. 1. saith Bernard Si credis pecoata tua non posse deleri nisi ab eo cui soli peccâsti in quem peccatum non cadit benè facis Sed adde adhuc ut hoc credas quia per ipsum Tibi peccata donantur hoc est Testimonium quod perhibit in corde nostro spiritus sanctus dicens dimissa sunt tibi Poccata Tua The Second opinion touching the nature of saith justifying as it is justifying is this that justifying faith is an assent not so much to the truth of the whole word of God as to the promises of the Gospell and that as having their truth in us The difference betwixt this and the Popish opinion stands in two things First in the object which they make the whole word of God these only the Doctrine of the Gospel Secondly In the manner of assenting which they make generall without any particular applying to our selves these particulars They consent in this that it is an act of the understanding rather then of the will perswasion rather then considence assent rather then affiance And for this they have these Reasons First For that the faith that justifieth is so often expressed in a phrase importing assent or giving credit as in this Scripture Abraham believed God that is gave credit to God promising to be his reward c. Similia vide Mark 1.15 Their Second Reason is because the object thereof is usually made the propositions of the Gospel and that which they call Terminum complexum or as Thomas speaks something propounded per modum enuntiabilis or to speak more plainly and agreeably to the phrase of Scripture a testimony which God gives in the word and in the heart See Rom. 8.16 Gal. 2.20 A Third Reason Because it seems strange that faith justifying should have divers seats or subjects The understanding as an assent the will as an affiance From hence and the like reasons it is concluded that faith justifying is an assent rather then affiance Now that it hath not for the proper object the whole word of God but rather only the doctrine of the gospel as it is justifying these Reasons evince First For that our Saviour prescribing the act limits out also the object and makes it the Gospel rather then any other part of the Scripture Mark 1.15 Secondly Kemn it in Exam. part 1. de Fide justisic For that in other parts of the word of God faith findes not what it may lay hold on for reconciliation remission of sins and justification but only in the Gospel that is the word of reconciliation there is Christ the Mediatour propounded there remission of sins promised For the Third branch that its a particular assent particular I mean not only in respect of the Subject but of the Object Examples prove Gal. 2.20 Christ loved me gave himself for me The generalls of the Gospel thus particularized are that which faith justifying as it is justifying respects by this faith Paul lived Secondly In point of believing there can else be no difference betwixt faith of Reprobates and that of the Elect betwixt faith of Divells and of justified men For it s an idle tenant of theirs that they make charity the form of faith a
gift disparate from it not in act and office only but in the very subject and seat where it resides More see to this purpose Suprà The Third opinion is of them that make it only an affiance and resting on God and his Christ as propounded in the gospel for justification and remission of sins And for this opinion these Reasons are brought First For that the phrase wherein usually it is expressed imports rather confidence and affiance then assent or perswasion as Ioh. 12. alibi But finde we it not as often expressed in a phrase that signifies assenting Secondly Because they cannot else finde a difference betwixt faith justifying and that which may be in hypocrites and divells What say they to that particularity of assenting Gal. 2.20 and appropriating the generals to our selves a thing as impossible for hypocrites or divels to perform as that other of affiance and what to that Eph. 3.12 that makes this confidence a fruit of faith justifying The last tenant is of those that make it partly an assent particular partly an affiance and for that opinion are these Reasons First For that the phrases of speech wherein it is expressed seem to import both Secondly They are both required as necessary to justification not only as dispositions but after a sort as ingredients not only as qualifications of the person but our means of justifications Thirdly Because they concur in every person justified as he is justified Now Of these three last which is the truth I dare not peremptorily determine For my part I profess my self to think with them that make faith justifying and assent rather then affiance especially for that place Eph. 3.12 Howbeit I may not deny but that the affiance spoken of in an inseparable companion of that assent perhaps also as conferring something to justification yet this I am well assured of First Faith properly so called hath its seat in the understanding Secondly According to Etymology imports a perswasion Thirdly In use of Scripture most frequently signifieth giving credit rather then putting confidence Fourthly And if there be any truth in that our Divines affirm concerning the office of faith in applying Christ to our selves most likely it should be an assent rather then affiance applying or appropriating of Christ to us being no more but this an acknowledgment that Christ is such to us as the Scripture describes him a Redeemer a Saviour a Mediatour of reconcilement and Author of righteouiness and salvation which acknowledgment is an act of the understanding not of the will Fiftly Besides this the opposites or defects of faith are apparently in the understanding and import defect of assenting as doubting Sixtly The perfection and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as I may term it of this grace is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fulness of assent and perswasion the grace it self for substance therefore is of the same nature Let us view a little how the Apostle in this Chapter expresseth that faith of Abraham which to him was imputed to righteousness In this verse it s thus enunciated Abraham believed God that is gave credit and assent to what the Lord promised touching a seed and vers 22. He was fully assured or perswaded that he which had promised was able to perform and this perswasion was imputed to him for righteousness All which laid together sway my judgment to theirs that teach faith justifying to be such an assent as in the third opinion is expressed rather then affiance and of the nature of faith justifying thus far There remains yet one thing before we proceed to the fruit of Abrahams faith expressed in the next member And that is to enquire how fitly this testimony is alledged to the purpose of justification the promise being in shew only of a temporall blessing namely a numerous seed and no mention made of Christ the Mediator whom faith justifing as it is such respects Answ Answers here are diversly conceived the likeliest I will propound First It s thus answered that Abrahams faith whereby he believed the promises both touching the reward vers 2. and touching the seed cannot be imagined to have been without respect to Christ the Mediator inasmuch as all the the promises of God are yea and Amen in Christ 2 Cor. 1.20 That is have their accomplishment and ratification in and for Christ Secondly That the seed mentioned in the promise is rather to be understood of the spirituall seed then of the carnall posterity of Adam and the head thereof is Christ as the Apostle interprets Gal. 3.16 The fruit of Abrahams faith follows It was counted to him for righteousness The difference in the reading out of the Hebrew originall is little or nothing Hebrew thus he imputed or counted it for righteousness out of the septuagint it s rendred positively it was counted for righteousness For the sense of the words if it be enquired What was it that was counted righteousness It s answered faith as appears both by the text Gen. 15.6 as also vers 5. Was counted unto him for righteousness For better understanding the text let us consider the word first severally and alone according to the native signification and use of Scripture 2. Conjunctly according as thereof sundry phrases are raised The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it signifies usually two things First To repute or esteem and make reckoning of Secondly to impute or ascribe In the first sense Psal 8.4 What is man that thou reputest or esteemest him Christ was reckoned amongst the wicked that is esteemed as they Isai 53.12 In the second sense the use is also frequent Philem. vers 18. If he hath wronged thee or oweth the ought impute that is ascribe it to mee and set it as it were upon my score the speech being borrowed from Merchants The phrases of speech arising from conjunction of this word with others are divers in Scripture In this Chapter faith is said to be imputed to righteousness or reckoned for righteousness wages is said to be reckoned or imputed righteousness to be imputed to a man sins to be imputed or not imputed to the committer The First phrase is of all the rest of most difficult explication Conjectures of others that have any probability I will propound some thus Faith was counted for righteousness that is instead of righteousness as if it supplyed the stead of the righteousness of the Law in this point of justification and this exposition they would approve by likeness of phrase in other things as they conceive it As Rom. 2.26 Uncircumcision is counted for circumcision that is instead of circumcision Rom. 9.8 The Children of the promise are counted for the seed that is instead of the seed But why not thus rather they are counted the seed for so they are apparently not reckoned iustead of the seed but counted or esteemed the leed they being the seed with which the Covenant is made Others thus Faith is imputed to righteousness that is ascribed
life How many incredulous yea opposites to faith hath he by his word brought to the obedience of the faith His hand is not shortned it is ever true of him He can quicken the dead and still by his word give being to things that erst had no subsistence This may serve to direct us in use of these marvellous effects of Gods power for stablishing of faith And of the first member of this Chapter thus far The second followeth from the 18th verse to the 23. VERS 18. Who against hope believed in hope that he might become the father of many nations according to that which was spoken so shall thy seed be IN this verse and the four that follow the Apostle digresseth a little from his principall conclusion to a commendation of Abrahams faith The scope whereof seems this To prescribe us a form of Believing and to direct us a course for the establishing of our faith required of us to justification both which we may learn from the example of Abraham the father and pattern of Believers The specialties commendable in Abrahams faith expressed in this verse are two 1. His courage 2. His prudence in Believing His courage in that against hope he believed in hope Sense Against hope in hope How reconcile we Against hope which naturall course could afford In hope by meditation of Gods power and truth conceived He had promise to be father not of children onely but of whole nations the course of nature contradicted it His body dead and unfit for generation with Sarah besides her wonted barrenness it ceased to be after the manner of women so that in respect of means naturall causes there were many of despairing none of hope yet believed he the promise in the largest extent knowing that Gods power transcends nature Observ From whose example we learn in the midst of despair still to hope where we have Gods promise for our warrant Besides Abrahams example we have like practice in Job a mirrour not of patience onely but of faith Who would rest on him for life whom he feels wounding even to Death Yet Though he kill me saith Job I will trust in him Job 13.15 To their practice let us add the consideration of defects in this kind severely punished in Moses Num. 11.13 20 21 22. The incredulous Prince 2 King 7.1 2 17. Zachary Luke 1.18 20 22. In a word In Believing there are four degrees one more excellent then another 1. That which is exercised in sufficiency of means 2. Where the means are weak and improportionate to the promise 3. In the want of means 4. Where are means strongly opposing the accomplishment of the promise this the highest degree of faith so commendable in Abraham Vse Brethren we all profess our selves the sonnes and daughters of Abraham Gal. 3.29 His children we are if we walk in the steps of his faith Iohn 8.39 and labour therein to resemble Let us be exhorted not onely in believing but in the very measure of faith to hold correspondence above hope yea against hope to believe in hope above sense yea against sense to believe what the Lord hath promised There fall out times with Gods children when if we shall make sense or naturall causes the measure of faith a thousand to one but we are swallowed up of despair The Lord sometimes writes bitter things against us and makes us possess the sinnes of our youth seems to surcharge Conscience with imputation of those sinnes the pardon whereof he commands us to believe What shall a poor soul do in this case to keep it self to the task of faith Surely what thou feelest God to impute believe he will pardon to thy repentance for so runs the promise There are times when we may feel decayes of grace and declinings in obedience yet sith it is his promise to give perseverence without interruption believe thou shalt stand even while thou thinkest thou art falling c. Helps to stablish faith in this kind are these 1. To rest on the naked promise of God 2. Consideration of the transcendency of Gods power able to work without above yea against nature Ephes 3.20 to do as * Paul speaks exceeding abundantly above all that we can ask or think 3. Observation of the Lords dealing with others or our selves accomplishing his promises beyond all expectation The second commendable specialty in Abrahams faith here mentioned is his prudence in believing according to that which was spoken Observ Whence learn we That the rule and measure of a wise mans faith is the word of God so that all the Lord speaks must be believed onely what he speaks must be believed And in this generall we and Papists accord The rule and object of Christian faith is Veritas prima and the adaequatum objectum of faith is the Word of God But that word say they is of two sorts Scriptum Traditum Written and Traditionary Both these together make us a perfect rule of faith Scripture without Tradition is regula but partialis Bellarm. de verb. Dei non scripto lib. 4. cap. 12. That which is taught for Gods truth in our Church is this That the Scripture contains doctrine and direction all-sufficient for faith and practice necessary to salvation so that there is no more to be believed or done upon pain of damnation then what is contained in the written word of God For explanation the contents of Scripture we conceive to be not only what is here immediately and in express terms taught but all whatsoever may thence be diduced by just and necessary consequence out of generalls causes equalls c. Our arguments are these 2 Tim. 3.14.15 The Scriptures saith Paul to Timothy are able to make thee wise to salvation to make the man of God perfect throughly furnished unto every good work Afford they us wisdome sufficient to salvation Bellarm. lib. 4. cap. 11. ubi supra therefore they contain doctrine sufficient for faith and practice And that there may be no place for that idle evasion of our adversaries limitting the sufficiency of written doctrine to what is necessary for Laiques Both Timothy was a Bishop and him they they were able to make wise to salvation and generally saith the Apostle they completely furnish the man of God that is the Minister to every good work of his calling Our Second argument is this The written rule of practice we are sure is perfect both for that the Lord gives so strait charge to add nothing thereto Deut. 4.2 Prov. 30.6 Rev. 22.18 and because there cannot the duty be named which the Law of God prescribeth not nor the sin thought of which it forbids not May we think to evade this testimony with that Nicety of Bellarmine add not by depraving the sense nay as appears by the Lords own often reproof of doctrins of men in matter of his worship Isai 29.13 and his heavy judgments on those that altered but circumstances of his prescripts Levit. 10. additions as well
pauci post te o domine Iesu ire volunt cum tamen ad te pervenire Nemo sit qui nolit Lord Jesu How few are they that are willing to go after thee when as yet there is no man but desires to come unto thee as knowing that at thy right hand there are pleasures for evermore Et propterea volunt omnes te frui at non ita imitari conregnare cupiunt sed non compati Hence is it that all men would enjoy thee but they like not so well to resemble thee fain they would raign with thee loath they are to suffer with thee Et mox mortem spiritualium optant sibi etiam carnales quorum tamen vitam abhorrent Brethren like rewards require like labours like favours like duties They fail not of Abrahams blessing that follow Abrahams faith and let them never expect his comforts that refuse to resemble his virtues That for the Generall View we now the Words wherein are two things First The duty it self required of us to the end we may share with Abraham in the blessing of justification believing in God Secondly The object thereof God set out here by a periphrasis who raised up Iesus from the dead Sense Sense Believing in God The words thought not delivered in that form yet import the condition required of us to justification and are therefore well rendred according to the sense by some translatours If we believe or so that we believe Some here conceive the Apostle to deliver us the nature of justifying faith and to resolve us that it is rather an affiance or putting trust in God then an assent or giving credit to the truth of his promise The question hath been largely discussed ad vers 3. Whether I remit the Reader We may better hence collect the necessity of putting trust in God for righteousness to justification then a description of the faith that justifieth And that is it the Apostle directly teacheth that to justification is necessary a relying upon God through Christ and putting confidence in him for justification and withall the infallible sequel of justification upon our confidence placed in God for that blessing As touching the nature of faith justifying the Apostle intends not here to teach us yet shall it not be amiss on this occasion to propound some arguments brought for that conclusion as I heard them lately in conference with a friend reverend for learning and piety Mr. J.D. His judgment was that faith justifying was rather an affiance and resting on Christ for righteousness then a perswasion of Gods love in Christ or an assent to the promises of the Gospel His arguments these First Faith that justifieth be it what it will be must needs go before justification it self so doth affiance so not particular faith For it must first be true that God justifieth me before I can believe it and in order of nature there is truth in the proposition before the assent is given to the truth of it Answ The propositions of the Gospel we may conceive to offer themselves to our minde either in terms of the future tense or sub verbis de praesenti or praeterito As thus God will pardon my sins and accept me to his favour for Christ or thus God hath pardoned my sins and doth accept me as righteous in Christ accordingly the assent thereto is either as to a thing that shall be or as to a thing already done In the first obtaining of justification the assent of faith is to the proposition De futuro and that we are sure had actual truth from everlasting concerning all those that shall be heirs of salvation The assent to the proposition de praesenti or praeterito is in order of nature after justification In time for all that they are simul the proposition de futuro is in nature before it so soon as I believe that God will pardon he pardons Before I believe that he hath pardoned he hath pardoned And that I think may suffice to assoyl that doubt so expertly and acutely contrived Besides this they should attend that the affiance they speak of issues out of the perswasion we have of Gods love to us in Christ for who can relye on God for righteousness and salvation that hath not some perswasion that God is a father to him in Christ So that what argument concludes the precedence of confidence to justification concluds much more a precedence of particular assent out of which as out of a fountain that affiance issueth And howsoever it be true that such assent as is spoken of receives strength from our affiance yet from it no otherwise then from other gifts of sanctification namely as from evidences and signes and as I may term them qualifications of our persons and dispositions as it were to entitle us to the Promises or rather to evidence the title we have according to the Covenant unto the merits and benefits of Christ The second argument was as I conceived it on this manner To faith justifying all men are bound To particular perswasion of Gods will to pardon sins all are not bound For God binds no man to believe an untruth there are some of whom it never was nor shall be true that God will pardon their sins as Reprobates Ergó Answ Zanch. de natura Dei lib. 5. c. 2. That which is ground of his Argument I confess I find amongst our Divines more resolutely determined then distinctly explained Their conclusion is that all men even Reprobates are bound to believe that they are in Christ Elected to Salvation These reasons seem to make against it First for that there are and ever have been many to whom the name of Christ or the benefits in him conveyed unto us were never known And Paul seems to say of such Rom. 2.12 as sin without the Law they shall perish without the Law By proportion we may say They that sin without the Gospel shall perish without the Gospel The not giving credit thereto shall not be imputed to their condemnation in as much as it was never revealed unto them By consequence therefore there was no bond upon their conscience to believe it Moreover particular assent riseth from that particular Testimony of Gods spirit with ours Rom. 8.16 Which who can say to be vouchsafed to Reprobates But yield ex abundanti that Reprobates at least in the Church are bound to believe it What then It follows thence that God binds them to believe an untruth Answ An untruth in the thing No untruth to them except by their own default because that howsoever God hath revealed that there are some Reprobates Yet reveals he to no man in this life his own Reprobation And as the rule of our actions is not Gods secret but revealed will so the rule and measure of Faith is not truth secretted but truth revealed St. August Enchirid ad Laurent Augustine sticks not to say that a man may will what is contrary to
him Hear the Apostle assuring us that for our sins not for his own he was delivered even for the sins of all that believe in his name Act. 10. For us he was born our sins he bear the chastisement of our peace was laid upon him It is no blasphemy to say he is more ours then his own our benefit we are fure more by him then his own by himself saith Bernard Bern. in Epiphan Ser. 1. Vtamur nostro in nostram utilitatem If we lack what to give for our sins we have Christs body to give it is of ours and it is ours And as Bernard so may every believer say De Te Domine suppleo quod minus habeâ— in me And of the first member the cause meritorious of our justification thus far Proceed we to the Second containing the evidence of the value that was in his humiliation for righteousness to wit his resurrection from death amplified by the end thereof our justification And was vaised for our Iustification How for our justification To work it say some to apply it say others to preserve us in it saith a third To declare and assure us of it say the most Iudicious It is good advise a Learned Interpreter here gives Not auxiously to dispute or enquire how the Apostle distinguisheth the effects of Christs Death and Resurrection ascribing to his death the expiation of sins to his resurrection our justification Touching the thing I will not be inquisitive but of the sense it will not be amise a little to enquire The first exposition is commonly received amongst our adversaries and thus they explain themselves Bellarm de Iustific l. 2. c. 6. Justification they here understand our internall renovation and regeneration by which we walk in newness of life and that they ascribe to Christs resurrection not as to a cause meritorious for Christ by his Resurrection merited nothing being then extra statum merendi How then say some As causa exemplaris Thomas par 3a quest 56. Art 2. Bellarm. quâ suprâ Cajetane ad loc quatenus he hath given us therein a forme of rising in our souls to newness of life as he in his flesh rose to the life of glory Say others His resurrection avails to our justification rather as an occasion and help or motive to faith for had he not risen from the dead who would have believed in him as Author of life These interpretations both of them contain truthes It is true that Christs Resurrection is a pattern for us to follow Rom. 6. True also that it is an enducement to believe in him as able to save us but impertinent to this place For 1. In what Scripture finde they Renovation to be called Justification And 2. The Apostle is not yet come to treate the point of sanctification And 3. How fits the Reason to the Apostles conclusion Faith shall be imputed to us for righteousness for Christ rose to give us a pattern of rising to new life dissolutae scopae To apply it â—rsin Kemnitius and to confer it upon us say others For it behoved the Mediator not only to merit but also to confer what he had merited upon us that also is a truth but these in explaining themselves make his resurrection availeable only as a cause sine quâ non to our justification except he had risen he could not have conferred his benesits upon us To preserve it unto us saith a third some such thing we finde after a sort ascribed to Christs Resurrection Rom. 8.34 But if we attend the place to his Resurrection it is assigned remotely our continuance in grace following rather from his session at his Fathers right hand and his intercession there made for us The last I rathest rest in conceiving Christs resurrection to avail to our justification as an evidence assuring us of it rather then as a cause in any sort procuring it unto us By raising Christ from the dead God the Father shewed that he accepted the obedience Keumit part 1. de Justificat Uâ—sin and satisfaction of his Son Christ for our reconciliation and atonement Christ was thrust into such a prison as out of which he could never have come forth except he had paid the utmost farthing The least sin unsatisfied had for ever detained him under the dominion of death but God raised him Ergo He hath satisfied or thus you may conceive it As when Christ our surety was condemned we in him and together with him were condemned So when he was discharged we in him and together with him received our discharge from the guilt and punishment of sin So that the point we have here is this That Christs Resurrection is to us a pledge of our Justification 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Amen FINIS Texts of Scripture explained in this Commentary GEn. 17.17 p. 155.156 Levit. 18.5 compared with Rom. 10.5 p. 106 107 112 113. Num. 23.10 P. 170. Nehem. 1.8 p. 180. Nehem. 13.22 p. 179.180 Psal 2.7 p. 92. Psal 32.1 p. 48 49 57. Psal 143.2 p. 38 39 40 41. Isa 38.3 p. 104. Isa 64.6 p. 123.124 Dan. 9.18 p. 178 179. Matth. 5.45 p. 92. Matth. 10.3 p. 44. and verse 37. p. 126. and vers 38. p. 125. Matth. 11.30 compared with 1 Joh. 3.5 p. 125 126. Matth. 16.18 p. 142. Matth. 19 1â— p. 128. Mar. 16.16 p. 70 89 97. Luk. 1.6 p. 126. Luk. 10.28 p. 115. Luk. 17.6 p. 157. Joh. 2.19 compared with Joh. 10.18 p. 182. Joh. 3.5 p. 72. Joh. 8.36 39. p. 97 98 99 141. Act. 13.39 p. 62 63. Rom. 5.19 p. 52. Rom. 6.23 p. 122. Rom. 7.14 p. 122. Verse 18. p. 120. Rom. 9.32 p. 51 52. Rom. 10.5 p. 106 107 112 113. 1 Cor. 3.21 22. p. 104 105. 1 Cor. 10. p. 90. Gal. 1.8 p. 150. Gal. 3.10 p. 121 122. vers 18. p. 103. Gal. 4.1 p. 104 105. vers 30. p. 115. Gal. 5 4. p. 116. Eph. 2.12 p. 96. 1 Tim. 4.8 p. 106 107. Heb. 8.6 p. 134. 1 Pet. 1.3 p. 183. vers 18. p. 153. 1 Joh. 2.2 p. 100. 1 Joh. 3.9 p. 127. 1 Joh. 5.3 p. 125 126.
Apostle God cannot lie and it is impossible that God should lie Heb. 6.18 or denie himself 2 Tim. 2.13 These and the like defects being so repugnant to his nature that if they were incident into Him he might cease to be God 2. Besides his nature his will and ordinance further restrains his power in respect of the executions thereof whereby it comes to pass that of many things agreeing well with his nature yet supposing his peremptory ordinance and decree to the contrary we may say They are impossible For example It was possible for God to have saved his children by some other means then the death of his sonne but supposing his ordinance determining this we say without blasphemy it is impossible that any should be saved by any other mean then the death of Christ Acts 4.12 So though we confess it had been possible for the Lord to have given his children Grace fully proportionate to the obedience of the Law yet considering his Will to the contrary we say it is impossible that by measure of grace here given to make good perfection of legal justice That measure Paul thus expresseth we have primitias the first-fruits Rom. 8.23 and arrham spiritus The earnest of the spirit only 2 Cor. 1.22 A measure of renovation that grows 2 Cor. 4.16 Corruption still cleaving to the most sanctified stil there is some of the old man to be put off Ephes 4.22 Corruption stil to be mortified Col. 3.5 In a word Grace such as that when we have attained to the greatest measure appointed to this life and stretched our gracious abilities to the utmost hath need of mercy to cover imperfections and pardon to clear from guilt contracted Let us now out of these grounds assume And first out of Bernards Requisites Can any possibly say His actions are all so regular that in none of them there is want of that rectitude required in the law whose measure of illumination is so great as to comprehend that depth of righteousness contained in the Law Certainly David a man of a Propheticall spirit prays for pardon of secret sins Psal 19.12 and still finds need of further Revelation to know the wonderous things of the Law Psal 119.18 And Pauls profession is That we know in part 1 Cor. 13.12 But yield a man may know all enjoyned and do all he knows can any say His performances are without blemish so that no imperfection cleaves to any of his actions saith Bernard Nostra si qua est humilis justitia Recta forsitan sed non Pura Except happily we are better then our fathers whose humble confession it was that all their righteousnesses were as filthy clouts Isa 64.6 If any say The Prophets so speaks in humility Nay saith Bernard Non minùs verè quam humliter in as much truth as humility say Pelagians He spake as the mouth of the people and as a member of the Body wherein those blemishes were Hear then that great Daniel S. August de peccat merit remiss lib. 2. cap. 10. saith Saint Austine of whom said the Prophet Art thou wiser then Daniel He professeth to confess as well his own as the peoples sins Dan. 9.8 But suppose our performances may be thus universally regular and free from blemish is it or can it be so steddy in any that it at no time admits interruption Hear James In many things we sin all and Solomon There lives not the man so just on earth that doth good and sinneth not and our Saviour taught not onely the common rank of his children but the Apostles also to pray daily forgive us our sins yea say Papists but he would be understood of veniall sins and they though they be praeter Legem yet are not contra Apage are they sins then are they breaches of the Law 1. Joh. 3.4 and so impair that justice which the Law requires to justification say Pelagians these Scriptures testifie De facto onely not De impossibilitate Augustine answers It is a strange possibility that never yet came into act no not in those whose measures of grace were greatest Besides that the Apostle tells us of an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and by a reason irrefragable shews not onely that through negligence we do not but that through impotency we cannot do what we would Gal. 5.17 the Apostles requisite is that our obedience be spirituall Rom. 7.14 The second Commandment forbids not onely manuall but mentall images or similitudes of the Diety We may not so much as think the Godhead like to silver Acts 17.29 Matth. 5.28 or gold or any thing that either sense imagines or reason conceiveth and our Saviour tells us of adultery that may be committed in the thought and desire though the act of uncleanness follow not S. Hierome to this purpose mentioning that of our Saviour Matth. 15.19 out of the heart proceed evil thoughts c. Procedat saith he qui in corde suo haec non esse testetur plenam in corpore isto mortali justitiam confitebor Let me see the man that can say he never feels these in his heart I will then say there may be complete justice in this state of mortality And could ever any claim to himself perfect freedom from those inordinate motions of wrath grief fear c. of him that is such I will say saith Hierome Aut Deus est aut saxum I not so but sure he is either an Angel or a glorified Saint To these let be added that continuall in-dwelling of originall corruption in men most sanctified Rom. 7.23 Gal. 5.17 empty the heart of all reliques thereof then I will say Perfection may be attained yield that sentina cannot be drawn dry thou must needs yield pollution and stench in thy best obedience Add moreover the ingenuous confession of the Saints of God and the recorded examples of frailtie in the strongest Augustine hath all in a short summe Quid excellentius in veteri populo sacerdotibus sanctis tamen bis praecepit Deus sacrificium primitùs pro suis offerre peccatis Quid sanctius in Novo populo Apostolis tamen praecepit bis Dominus in oratione dicere Demitte nobis debita nostra c. The conclusion is this Omnium igitur piorum sub hoc onere corruptibilis carnis in istius vitae infirmitate gementium spes una est quòd Advocatum habeamus apud Patrem c. Thus far we have avowed the truth of this controversie by grounds of Scriptures and Fathers Whereto if any shall object that Fathers deal against Pelagians onely I answer that their grounds conclude as well Papists as Pelagians As to their objections they are the same that of old were made by Pelagians as 1. Christ saith of his yoke it is easie Matth. 11.30 S. John that his Commandments are not grievous 1. John 5.3 Answ Saith Hierome Poyse but a piece of the yoke a little portion of the burthen and then tell me whether it be of so easie
by new prescripts as by false glosses are here forbidden May we think the rule of faith is left more at randome and uncertain How then doth Paul so resolutely denounce Anathema to him that shall teach any other thing then what they taught and the people received Gal. 1.8 Perhaps they will say under their doctrine of faith comes chiefly what they delivered in Preaching by word of mouth Irenaeus advers Haeres lib. 3. cap. 1. Answ Hear Iraenaeus Evangelium quidem tunc praeconiaverunt postea vero per dei voluntatem in in scripturis nobis tradiderunt fundamentum columnam fidei nostrae futurum yea and for their own rule of preaching it is Pauls protestation It was no other then the Scriptures of Moses and the Prophet Act. 26.22 Lastly If there be and have been ever so necessary use of tradition to direct us in matter of faith and practice I wonder much that our Saviour and his Apostles never in any point of faith aledg tradition but Scripture for evidence It is written in the Prophets Psalmes Moses c. I finde often It is come to us by tradition from Elders I finde never for allegation of Christ or his Apostles To these Reasons Let us add the consent of some Ancients Tertullian advers Hermogen Tertullian Adoro scripturae plenitudinem quae mihi factorem manifestat facta In Evangelio vero amplius Ministrum atque arbitrum rectoris invenio sermonem An autem de aliquâ subjacenti materiâ facta sint omnia nusquam adhuc legi Scriptum esse doceat Hermogenis officina si non est scriptum timeat vae illud adjicientibus aut detrahentibus destinatum Augustinus Austust de Doctr. Christia lib. 2. cap. 9. Contra litem Petilian lib. 3. cap. 6. In his quae aperte in scripturis posita sunt inveniuntur illa omnia quae continent fidem moresque vivendi Idem sive de Christo sive de ejus Ecclesia sive de quacunque aliare quae pertinet ad fidem vitamque nostram non dicam si nos nequaquam comparandi ei qui dixit licet si nos sed omnio quod secutus adjecet Si Angelus de caelo vobis annuncianerit paeterquam quod in scripturis legalibus Evangelicis accepistis Anathema sit Heaps of such like testimonies of Fathers are every were occurrent amongst our Divines It were strange that in their own School this doctrine should be taught yet Scotus and those that follow him Scotus Nic. prolegom in sent q. 2. maintain this position That cognitio supernaturalis necessaria viatori tradita est sufficienter in sacra Scriptura Their Reasons Sacra scriptura tradit quid sit finis hominis puta visio fruitio dei determinat quae sunt necessaria ad illum finem consequendum scil Mandata declarat etiam proprietates substantiarum separatarum quantum est utile viatori nosse Igitur Dico illa omnia scripta esse ab Apostolis quae sunt omnibus necessaria Bellarm. de verbo dei non scripto lib. 4. cap. 11. Some chiefe of their arguments shall be propounded If Scriptures be sufficient either the whole Canon of Scriptures joyntly taken or the severall parts but neither the whole because some parts are lost nor the severall books Ergo. Answers are given to the minor that both the whole is sufficient and perfect according to perfection requisite for the whole and the parts also perfect according to perfection of parts That some parts of the Canon are lost they are not able to prove their instances being all either of writings not canonicall as some of Solomons Songs and Proverbs or else parts of Scripture extant though not under the names of those to whom they are assigned as those ascribed to Nathan Ahia Iddo For fuller answer Let us consider that the question is touching Scriptures now extant Whether the Scriptures we have be a sufficient rule of faith and practice How impertinent is it to tell us that part of the ancient Canon is lost which though it were yielded impeacheth nothing of the truth of what we hold concerning full perfection of Scripture now extant for the Church that now is and shall be to the end of the world Our conclusion is this Since the days of Moses there never was wanting to the Church a written Canon completely sufficient for the times of the Church sometimes it was more narrow sometimes more large ever perfect secundum tempus as Lumbard distinguisheth never defective in any necessary point of faith or practice Their Second argument is from induction of particulars necessary to be believed or done which yet are not contained in Scriptures as that there are some books of Divine inspiration that these now bearing that credit are they that they have such Authors as they pretend c. None whereof are taught in Scripture Answ For this last of the certainty of Penmen whose names they carry this that we answer First That many of them give testimony to their Authors Secondly That the ignorance of the Penmen impeacheth nothing of the fulness of necessary knowledg It sufficeth that we know they have God for their Author though his secretary or scribe be to us unknown As for their other particulars That we know not the Scriptures to have proceeded from God Scotus in Prolegom ad Magistum but only by tradition Hear their own Scotus and his followers convincing all that question of the Heavenly Author of them or any part of them by Scriptures themselves His arguments these 1. Propheticall prenunciations all verified by events 2. Perfect concord and consent of scriptures 3. Credit and candor of the penmen 4 The reasonableness of the things therein contained 5. The unreasonableness of errours and heresies in things wherein they oppose the doctrins of scripture 6. The stableness of the Church professing doctrine of Scriptures and punishments of those opposing it 7. Clarity of miracles c. These and the like hath Scotus as arguments in his judgment sufficient to stop the mouthes of any Atheist or Heretique that shall question their inspiration from God And I will boldly say The Scriptures carry as express characters of a divine author as the creatures of the power or wisdome of the Creator The Doctrine so holy so majesticall so divinely powerfull to humble to comfort to convert the soul that it is as absurdly questioned whether God be the inspirer of Scripture as he is the maker of Heaven and Earth There is no creature so high or low but carries this inscription Deus me fecit No Scripture nor sentence of it wherein a man not blind may not read this Title Deus me inspiravit It is vain to object that sundry have questioned this principle For so have many done Gods Creation of the world such quaere's arise out mens blindness to which the clearest things are questionable For other particulars they are either expressely or by implication taught in the