having themselves seen them or taken them out of good Records we may be consident that for the main of the History they tell us nothing that is not exactly true These Qualifications alone are sufficient to oblige us to give Credit to them An Historian that is honest and well inform'd of that which he relates is worthy of Credit And if you add thereto that he has also suffer'd Death in maintaining the Truth of his History as the Apostles did who were put to death for maintaining that they had seen and heard that which the Gospel tells us of Jesus Christ then not only that History will be worthy of Credit but they who shall refuse to believe it can pass for no other than Fools or obstinate Persons In this manner we may be fully assur'd of the Truth of the History of the New Testament that is to say That there was a Jesus who did divers Miracles who was rais'd from the Dead ascended up into Heaven and who taught the Doctrine which we find in the Gospels And this Jesus having born witness to the History of the Jews we cannot doubt its truth at least as to the principal Matters This can not be call'd in question without absolutely renouncing Christianity But People believe commonly two things which seem to me groundless unless they ground them upon Jewish Tradition a Principle as is well known extreamly uncertain They believe first that the sacred Historians were inspir'd with the Things themselves And next that they were inspir'd also with the Terms in which they have express'd them In a word that the holy History was dictated word for word by the holy Spirit and that the Authors whose Names it bears were no other than Secretaries of that Spirit who writ exactly as it dictated As to what concerns the Inspiration of Historical Matters of Fact I observe First That they suppose it without bringing any positive Proof and that consequently a Man may with good reason reject their Supposition They say only that if it were not so we could not be perfectly certain of the truth of the History But beside that a Consequence cannot undeniably prove a Fact and that it may happen that one cannot disprove a Consequence although that which is pretended to be prov'd thereby be not true I affirm that it is false that we cannot be perfectly certain of the main substance of a History unless we suppose it inspir'd We are for Example perfectly certain that Iulius Caesar was kill'd in the Senate by a Conspiracy whereof Brutus and Cassius were the Chiefs without believing that they who have inform'd us hereof were inspir'd There are such like matters in the Histories of all Nations which we cannot doubt of without being guilty of Folly and Opiniatrety and yet without supposing that these Histories were writ by Divine Inspiration In the second place this Opinion supposes without necessity a Miracle of which the Scripture it self says nothing To relate faithfully a matter of Fact which a Man has seen and well observed requires no Inspiration The Apostles had no need of Inspiration to tell what they had seen and what they had heard Christ say There needs nothing for that but Memory and Honesty Neither had those Authors who writ only the things that came to pass before their time as the Author of the Books of Chronicles any more need of Inspiration for copying of good Records And as for those who made the Records there was no more requisite than that they should be well inform'd of what they set down either by their Eyes or by their Ears or by faithful Witnesses It will be said perhaps that according to this Opinion the Faith which we build upon the Scripture will be no other than a Faith purely human because it will be grounded only upon Human Testimonies To this I answer That neither do we know any more than by a Human Faith that the Book which we call the Gospel of St. Matthew is truly his It is nothing but the uniform Consent of Christians since the beginning of Christianity to this day that makes us believe it which in truth is no more than a Testimony purely Human. We do not believe it because we are assur'd of it by an Oracle from Heaven which has told us that this Book is truly that Apostle's but on the same account that we believe that the Eneid is truly Virgil's and the Iliad Homer's But that which they here call Human Faith is of as great certainty as the Demonstrations of Geometry And even Divine Faith it self as they call it is built upon this Certainty For in truth we do not believe in Jesus Christ but because we are perswaded that the History we have of him is true And how do we know that this History is true Because Eye-witnesses have written it and have suffer'd Death to maintain the truth of their Testimonies And how are we certain that these were Eye-witnesses and that they suffer'd Death rather than deny what they said By History that is to say by the Testimony of Men who affirm it to us constantly from the time of the Establishment of the Christian Religion to the Age we live in So that Human Faith is found to be the ground of Divine Faith But we need not fear that this Foundation is not solid enough For without ceasing to be a Man and reasoning no more than a Brute it cannot be disputed as has been made appear by many Learned Men who have written of the Truth of Christian Religion In the third place The common Opinion is contrary to the Testimony even of the Sacred Writers St. Luke begins his Gospel after this manner For asmuch as many have taken in hand to set forth in Order a Declaration of those things which are most surely believed among us even as they delivered them unto us who from the beginning were Eye-witnesses and Ministers of the Word It seemed good to me also having had perfect Vnderstanding of all things from the very first to write unto thee in order most excellent Theophilus that thou mightest know the certainty of those things wherein thou hast been instructed You may observe in these words a Confirmation of what I have been saying and a full Proof that St. Luke learn'd not that which he told us by Inspiration but by Information from those who knew it exactly Now if you allow St. Luke to have so faithfully related to us the Life and Discourses of Jesus without having been particularly inspir'd that we ought to receive what he tells us with an entire belief in his Fidelity you ought not to make any difficulty to grant the same concerning the other Historians of the Scripture If any of them ought to be inspir'd certainly they were the Evangelists And if you will have another Example of a Histoory written without Inspiration you have but to read the Books of Kings and of the Chronicles being Extracts out of publick Registers and out
been pure Inspirations and which ought to make the Speakers attended unto as if they were the simple Interpreters of the Holy Spirit The Spirit says St. Paul 1 Cor. VII 8. gives to one the word of Wisdom to another the word of Knowledg It seems as if he meant thereby the Gift of prophesying that is to say of instructing others in Piety of which he says many things in the XIVth Chapter of the same Epistle This seems contrary to what I have been saying concerning the Inspiration of the Apostles and I confess I cannot see how according to my Notion this difficulty can be clearly solv'd I might say that this Gift of Prophecy was perhaps no other than a Disposition of Mind which God infus'd sometimes into those on whom he bestow'd it by which they became fit to instruct although he inspir'd them not extraordinarily with that which they were to say which is so much the more likely by how much this Gift was preserv'd and increas'd by Study and Reading as appears by those words of St. Paul to Timothy First Epist. Chap. IV. 13 c. Vntil I come give thy self to Reading to Exhortation to Instruction Neglect not the Grace which is in thee which was given thee by Prophecy through the Imposition of the Presbytery Meditate on these things be always imployed to the end they Improvement may be known of all Men. Now it is plain that the Gifts which are owing to an actual and immediate Inspiration of the holy Spirit such as curing Diseases c. could not be increas'd by Application of Mind as not depending upon Man in any sort The most assiduous Study cannot contribute any thing to prophetick or immediate Revelations This Conjecture seems probable enough And indeed I see no other way of explaining what St. Paul says to Timothy But without determining any thing concerning the Gift of Prophecy it appears plainly by what St. Paul says 1 Cor. XIV that it consisted not in an immediate Revelation of the holy Spirit that forced the Prophets to speak He there gives them this Advice Let the Prophets speak two or three and let another judg but if any thing be revealed to one of those that sits by let the first hold his Peace for ye may all prophesy one by one to the end that all may learn and all may be comforted And the Spirits of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets The Prophets whom the holy Spirit had inspir'd immediately with what they ought to say had no need of this Advice Nay it had even been ridiculous Because the holy Spirit inspiring them with what they had to say would have inspired them likewise as to the occasion and the place and would not have put many Persons on speaking at one time in the same place nor so as to interrupt others who spake by his Inspiration Moreover St. Paul would have the Prophets judg one another and that the Spirits of the Prophets be subject to the Prophets which cannot be understood of Prophets immediately inspir'd who are subject to none but God and who are to give account to none but him The Prophets of the Old Testament spoke as long as God inspir'd them after which they held their Peace without needing any Advertisement because they easily perceiv'd when the Inspiration ceas'd It seems to me that we may now conclude that there never was any body but our Saviour who had a constant and perpetual Inspiration and all whose words we ought to receive as Oracles As he alone amongst Men was incapable of sinning so it was he alone whom God indow'd with an absolute Infallibility The same Light which perpetually inlighten'd his Mind regulated also the Motions of his Affections otherwise it would be difficult to conceive how he could chuse but be subject to Error if he had been subject to Sin There is so great a Correspondence between the Mind and the Affections that it is not almost possible there should be any Irregularity in the one without a disorder in the other But that you may not believe I am the first Author of this Opinion and that it is a desire to appear singular or an Affectation of Novelty that has ingag'd me in this Notion I must also let you see that some great Men have been of the same Mind before me St. Ierom makes this Observation upon the fifth Chapter of the Prophet Micah in speaking of this Passage And thou Bethlehem Ephratah though thou be little among the thousands of Judah c. which St. Matthew cites otherwise than it is either in the Hebrew or Septuagint There are says he that affirm there is the like Error in almost all the Testimonies that are taken out of the Old Testament that either the Order is chang'd or the Words and that sometimes the Sense it self differs the Apostles or Evangelists not transcribing the Testimonies out of the Book but trusting to their Memory which sometimes fail'd them It is true St. Ierom says not that he approves this Opinion but he makes it appear elsewhere that he is not very far from it In his Letter to Pammachius de optimo genere interpretandi of the best way of interpreting He gathers together many Examples of the New Testament by which he shews that the Apostles tie themselves more to the Sense than to the Words and maintains with good reason that we should not play the Criticks on them for it nor even for the places where they have mistaken Names After having compar'd the Quotation Matth. XXVII 9. with the Original he adds One may accuse the Apostle of falsity in that he agrees neither with the Hebrew nor with the Septuagint and which is more that he is mistaken in the Name putting Jeremy for Zachary He seems indeed elsewhere to disapprove that Opinion but it is usual with him to accommodate himself to the common Opinion and yet not omit to give his own without being concern'd whether he contradicted himself or no. When he speaks as others do you must not conclude presently that he is of the same Opinion with them because it may be he speaks so by way of Condescension whereas when he says the contrary it seems rather that he speaks his own Thoughts You need but read what he says of the Dissimulation which he attributes to St. Peter and St. Paul in his Commentary upon the second Chapter of the Epistle to the Galatians and in his Answer to St. Austin to see that he believ'd that St. Paul by a Prudence purely human which he calls a Dispensation made shew of believing that St. Peter was in the wrong insomuch that when St. Paul says that St. Peter was to be reprov'd because he walked not uprightly according to the Truth of the Gospel It was not that he believ'd so but only to hinder the converted Gentiles from imitating that Apostle I say not that St. Ierom was herein in the right but at least it hereby appears that
we allow the Holy Scripture and what use is to be made of it according to these Principles To answer hereto I begin with the New Testament which is the principal Foundation of our Faith In the first place then Jesus Christ in whom were hidden all the Treasures of Wisdom and Knowledg and whom God had expresly commanded us To hear was absolutely infallible We must believe without questioning it whatever he says because he says it and because God hath testified that he speaks nothing but Truth In the second place since we have nothing writ by Christ himself we ought to believe what his Apostles have said concerning his Life and Doctrine because God has given Testimony to them by the Miracles he inabl'd them to do and because they seal'd the Truth of their Deposition with their Blood They tell us what they had seen and heard so that it was impossible they should be deceiv'd in the substance of the History and Doctrine It may be that in some Circumstance of small importance they do not relate things exactly as they happen'd and that therein they do not agree together But they all agree in the Historical Facts whereon the Faith we have in Jesus Christ is grounded his Birth of a Virgin his Miracles his Death his Resurrection and his Ascension into Heaven though there may be some difference among them in some Circumstance which is nothing to the substance of the History It is not necessary for the Foundation of our Faith as I have already observ'd that they should agree exactly in all things to the least tittle and the trouble the Learned have given themselves to reconcile these sort of Contradictions is of no use It were better to own ingenuously that there are some than to strain the sense of their Writings to make them agree one with another which instead of converting Libertins does but excite their Railery and confirms them in their Impiety As to what concerns the Doctrine of Jesus Christ there is not the least Contradiction among the Evangelists although it be express'd in different Terms and they relate it on divers occasions We must observe therefore that they relate only the Sense and keep not exactly the same order that Christ kept in preaching it so neither ought we to insist rigorously upon their Expressions as if they made use of some words rather than others to insinuate certain Niceties which are ordinarily attributed to them without any probable ground nor ought we to lay such stress upon the order they make use of in their Writings as to colour thereby certain Inferences which are not otherwise obvious in the Sense of our Saviour's words If a Man observe never so little he will find that they use every where popular Expressions that they have not aim'd at any Elegancy in their Stile and that they have been very far from speaking with such Exactness as Philosophers or Geometricians use in their Writings We ought not then to insist too much as commonly Men do upon the manner of their expressing the Doctrine of Christ. We should only indeavour to understand the Genius of the Language they use and to stick to the substance of things essential which are express'd in so many places and after so many ways that it is not difficult to frame to our selves an Idea thereof clear enough to instruct us perfectly in our Duty In the third place as for the Epistles of the New Testament they do not only afford us the same Considerations with those we have last mention'd in respect of their Stile but there are also two things further to be observ'd and distinguish'd in them We find there the same Doctrines we have in the Evangelists and those the Apostles assure us often they learn'd from Christ. But there are others things which the Apostles speak of their own heads or which they draw by divers Consequences from the Old Testament The first of these are to be believ'd on the same account as the Gospels that is to say because of the Authority of Jesus Christ who preach'd them to the Jews The second are to be receiv'd because they contain nothing but what is very conformable to the Doctrine of Christ or what is founded upon right Reason The Apostles will not have us believe them upon their own word They distinguish in that their Authority from the Authority of Christ. See 1 Cor. VII 10 12 25. But as they apply'd themselves cerefully to mind Doctrines tending to Edification which are few in number and never ingag'd in too nice inquiries they have told us nothing that is not conformable to the Spirit of the Gospel with which they were fill'd and which right Reason will not easily admit It is to be observ'd that having no extraordinary Inspiration for writing their Epistles they insert in them divers things that concern their Designs or their particular Affairs where we ought by no means to seek for or expect any thing mysterious Such are the Salutations found at the end of their Epistles the Order St. Paul gives Timothy to take Mark along with him in his return to bring the Cloak he had left at Troas with Carpus the Books and above all the Parchments the Counsel he gives him to drink a little Wine for his Stomachs sake and because of his Weaknesses and other such like things See St. Ierom's Preface to his Commentary upon the Epistle to Philemon In the fourth place there are divers Prophecies scatter'd in these Epistles and the Apocalipse is wholly Prophetic Now we ought to give Credit to these Revelations because it is God that imparted them immediately to the Apostles And it is easy to distinguish them from other things which the Apostles give out only as their own Conjectures of which you have some Examples in the words of Grotius which I cited concerning the Inspiration of the Pen-Men of the New Testament Thus then according to my Hypothesis the Authority of the Scripture continues in full force For you see I maintain that we are oblig'd to believe the substance of the History of the New Testament and generally all the Doctrines of Jesus Christ all that was inspir'd to the Apostles and also whatsoever they have said of themselves so far as it is conformable to our Saviour's Doctrine and to right Reason It is plain that nothing farther is necessarily to be believ'd in order to our Salvation And it seems also evident to me that those new Opinions brought into the Christian Religion since the Death of the Apostles which I have here refuted being altogether imaginary and ungrounded instead of bringing any advantage to the Christian Religion are really very prejudicial to it An Inspiration is attributed to the Apostles to which they never pretended and whereof there is not the least mark left in their Writings Hereupon it happens that very many Persons who have strength enough of Understanding to deny Assent to a thing for which there is no good proof brought
Advertisement BY THE TRANSLATOR TO THE READER FOR the better understanding of these five Letters it seems necessary in a few words to explain the Occasion and Subject of them They are not in French one distinct Volume as they are here made in English but a part of two larger Volumes written in an Epistolary Form The First entituled The Thoughts or Reflections of some Divines in Holland upon Father Simon 's Critical History of the Old Testament The Second A Defence of those Thoughts in Answer to the Prior of Bolleville who is supposed to be also the same Mr. Simon disguised under a borrowed Name The general Design that Mr. Simon drives at in the Critical History of the Old Testament as well as in that of the New which are now both of them published in English is to represent the many Difficulties that are amongst the Learned concerning the Text of the Scriptures and thereby to infer the necessity of receiving the Roman Doctrine of Oral Tradition This Design raised him many Antagonists amongst the Protestants beyond the Seas who have opposed him in their Writings each according to his different Genius or Principles The Book first above mentioned was one of the earliest of that kind and it 's Anonymous Author appears second to none either in Critical Learning or Solid Iudgment But it is not necessary to my purpose in this place to insist upon his particular differences with Mr. Simon in Points of Criticism This only in general is needful to be observed That though on the one side he sufficiently overthrows the pretended necessity of Oral Tradition and on the other side ingenuously acknowledges all the Difficulties that are amongst the Learned about the Text of the Scriptures yet he does not thereupon leave the Iudgment of his Reader in suspence about so weighty a matter but propounds a middle way which he conceives proper to settle in Mens Minds a just esteem of the Scriptures upon a solid Foundation The Scheme or System of this middle way he says he received from his Friend Mr. N. and therefore he gives it not in his own but in his Friend's words It is comprized in the Eleventh and Twelfth Letters of his foresaid Book And because That is a distinct Subject of it self and of more consequence to the generality of Christians than those nice Disputes of Criticism with which he is obliged in following Mr. Simon to fill up the rest of that Volume I have therefore thought fit to translate those two Letters into English They are the two First of these Five and are the Ground and Occasion of the rest The publishing of that Volume of Letters produced an Answer from Mr. Simon or the Prior of Bolleville as he calls himself and further gave opportunity to the Author to learn from several hands whatsoever was objected most materially by others against the fore-mentioned Scheme which he had published in his Friend's words This afforded him occasion in replying to the Prior of Bolleville to insert a further explanation and defence of that Scheme from the hand of the Author as also to justifie himself for having published it and in the last place to remove the great Popular Objection arising from a Iealousy lest that System of Mr. N's should prejudice the Foundation of the Christian Religion I say it prompted him to answer that Objection by giving a solid Demonstration of the Truth of our Religion without interessing it in this Controversy This is done in the Ninth Tenth and Eleventh Letters of his Second Book Entituled A Defence c. And they are the three last of these following Five I have translated them all that the Reader may at once have a full view both of Mr. N's Opinions concerning the Holy Scriptures in the fore-mentioned System of the Objections that have been made against it of the Answers he gives to those Objections and of the Vse that may be made of all in setling the Christian Religion upon a Basis not to be shaken by the Difficulties about the Scripture which the Learned are forced to acknowledg to be insuperable This is all that I think needful to premonish the Reader upon this Subject Only if in the perusal of the two first of these Letters any one should be apt to condemn me for publishing things of this nice concernment in our Language I intreat him to suspend his Censare till he have read the rest and as he goes along to apply unto me the Author's Apology Our Case is the same and I think he has said all that is needful upon it In a word We live in an Age of so much Light that it is not only now as at all times unbecoming the Dignity of such Sacred Truths as the Christian Religion teaches us to build them upon unsound Principles or defend them by Sophistical Arguments but it is also vain to attempt it because impossible to execute The Doctrine of Implicit Faith has lost its Vogue Every Man will judg for himself in matters that concern himself so nearly as these do And nothing is now admitted for Truth that is not built upon the Foundation of Solid Reason Let not therefore any simple-hearted pious Persons be scandalized at these Disquisitions They are not calculated for their Vse But they are absolutely needful for many others who are more Curious and less Religious And that they may be in some measure useful to the Propagation and Advancement of True Religion amongst such is the strong Hope and hearty Desire of the Translator THE FIRST LETTER YOU are desirous Sir that I should inform you more particularly about the thoughts of Mr. N. concerning the Inspiration of the Sacred Writers and you ask me if our Friends do not suspect him to be tainted with Deism He that gave me the Essay which I send you told me nothing of his other Opinions nor of his Manner of Life And for his Thoughts concerning that Divine Inspiration which the Sacred Pen-men received from God it is conceived that from thence he cannot be concluded to be a Deist It is presumed on the contrary without entring into the Examination of what he says that he believes by this Method he better answers the Objections which the Deists and Atheists have used to make against the Stile of Holy Scriptures And it appears by this Essay that he is far from being of their Opinions We ought not always to measure or judg of the extent of any Man's Thoughts in reference to Religion by the manner of his explaining or defending them as if all those who do not defend well their Religion were Men of ill Design that only seemingly defend in order to destroy it 'T is said that the impious Vannini designed to shew there is no God in making as if he would prove there is one But it does not follow from thence that all others do the same who defend or oppose weakly any Opinion Otherwise we must believe many Writers both Catholicks
Apostles where they do not say that God has taught them by extraordinary Revelation that which they publish And where the matter it self shows that there was no need of his doing it It does not therefore follow that those who acknowledge the Inspiration of the Prophets are obliged to acknowledg the like of all other sacred Writers because there are convincing Reasons which oblige us to believe that the Prophets speak Truth when they say Thus saith the Lord c. and no reason to believe that the Apostles were extraordinarily inspir'd when they say it not and when their Discourses have in them no mark of such like Inspiration If we reflect upon this difference between Prophecies and Discourses which have nothing of Prophetic in them we shall take heed of applying to this Subject a loose Maxim and which is good for nothing viz. That is happens most frequently that those who distinguish and divide Matters with design to make use of part and reject the other do give great advantage to their Adversaries On the contrary it scarce ever happens that in handling a compounded Subject there can be made such general Rules as may be equally apply'd to all the parts of it Parts of different nature must of necessity be differently handled Objection 11. It has been said that by the holy Spirit or the Spirit of God may be understood the Spirit of Holiness and of Constancy which the Gospel inspires or such a Disposition of Mind as is an Effect of our Faith But the general Reasons there made use of which are grounded only upon equivocal words can prove nothing but Generals They must be apply'd and particular Enquiry made whether the holy Spirit has any other Signification in Scripture or no. Mr. Simon Resp. Pag. 131. Answer When a Passage is to be answer'd wherein there is an equivocal word upon which an Objection is founded it is sufficient to show that such a word may be understood in another Sense than that in which it has been taken There is no need of examining all the other Significations that it may have It suffices to show that the Signification then given it is agreeable to the ordinary use of the Language and suitable to the Subject there treated of It was Mr. Simon 's part therefore to show that where it is said of St. Stephen on occasion of whom the Observation was made That they could not resist the Wisdom and Spirit by which he spoke I say it was his part to show that by the word Sprit any thing ought to be understood but the Spirit of the Gospel that is to say a Disposition of Mind conformable to the Precepts of Jesus Christ. He ought to have shown that this word in this place ought necessarily to be understood in another Sense But Mr. Simon seldom gives himself the trouble to read the places of Scripture that are cited as appears in the same Page where he says that St. Paul told the High Priest with a just Indignation God shall smite thee thou whited Wall and where he compares the words of St. Paul to those of Jesus Christ when he calls Herod Fox and to the Reproaches that the Prophets make to the Kings of Israel But he should have shown us in what place Jesus Christ and the Prophets confess'd they were to blame in doing so as St. Paul confesses he was God has Power to censure Princes But it belongs not to Subjects to do it when they think sit So St. Paul had no right to abuse the High Priest on his own Head though those who had receiv'd express Order from God to make such like Reproaches to Princes cannot be blam'd for it But Mr. Simon who probably never thought of all this is not aware of this difference and argues always on without understanding what he finds fault with Obiection 12. The Promise which Jesus Christ made his Apostles that the holy Spirit should teach them what they should say when they came before the Iudges seems to have been explain'd as a general Promise for all that they should say whereas it only relates to what they should say for the defence of the Gospel Luc. Chap. 12. ver 11. Answer The promise is express'd in general terms and must relate to that which the Apostles should be oblig'd to say as well for the defence of their own Persons as for that of the Gospel For it was of the greatest importance that these first Ministers of Jesus Christ should then say nothing unworthy of the Doctrine of which they were the Heraulds But if this Promise must not be taken in so large a Sense in relation to the Discourses which the Apostles should make before Judges neither ought it to be so taken in relation to their preaching of the Gospel My Design was only to shew that since the words could not be taken in the whole extent of their Signification it could not from thence be necessarily inferr'd that the Apostles had then a Prophetic Inspiration Objection 13. The Promise Iohn 16. that when the Spirit of Truth shall come it shall lead you into all Truth ought not to be understood so as if it were intirely accomplish'd the day of Pentecost but as a thing that should be accomplish'd according to the occasions and necessities that the Apostles should be in of knowing some further Truths But it seems as if Mr. N. suppos'd that this promise is ordinarily understood as if it ought to have been accomplish'd all at once Answer The reason of my insisting upon that was to make appear that this Promise though conceiv'd in so general terms ought necessarily to receive some Qualification and consequently that it ought not to be understood like an Axiom of Geometry in the utmost Signification of its Terms Now that being once granted it cannot be made appear that this Promise relates to a Prophetic Inspiration There is a Passage very like this in the first Epistle of St. Iohn Chap. 2. ver 27. But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you and ye need not that any Man teach you but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things and is Truth and is no Lie and even as it hath taught you ye shall abide in him It is apparent that this cannot be understood strictly since St. Iohn speaks to all the Christians to whom he writ Objection 14. Whereas it has been affirmed that the Apostles did not agree Acts 15. till after they had disputed a great while it is not said in that Chapter That the Apostles disputed but only that When there had been much disputing Peter rose up c. Answer Two things were considered in this History The first is The Opinion that Men had of the Apostles viz. That they were not look'd upon as Persons infallible whensoever they began to speak of the Gospel since they were not believ'd just at their first speaking The second is The Conduct of the Apostles on
made me believe that I could not get out the Truth better than by putting to the Rack two Women Servants whom they call Diaconesses but I discover'd nothing but a strange and excessive Superstition They that understand the Latin Tongue will not wonder that Tacitus and Pliny make use of the word Superstition The Romans gave that Name to all sorts of Religious Worship that were not establish'd by public Authority Two such Witnesses as these cannot be excepted against Seeing it is evident they had no favour for Christians and were perhaps the most able Men of their time but especially if we consider that they treat of matters of Fact which they themselves had either seen or which were known by all Men as was the Death of Jesus Christ under Pontius Pilate The Writings that we have of Christians living between the times of Pilate and those of Tacitus or Trajan attest the same Truths They date the beginning of Christianity from the same Christ that Pilate put to Death and they preach to us precisely the same Morals We must then necessarily allow that there was in Iudaea during the Reign of Tiberius a Person that laid the Foundation of the Christian Religion and had many Disciples Let us now examine some of his first Disciples and see what sort of People they were Let us read the Epistle which Clement Bishop of Rome writ to the Christians of Corinth forty Years after the Death of Iesus Christ and in the beginning of the Raign of Vespasian There appears in this Epistle a Spirit of Peace of Charity of Humility and many lively and pathetical Exhortations to the Observation of the Gospel-Morals He reproves severely those that had not observ'd them but commends those that had In the beginning of that Epistle he says among other things That the Christians of Corinth had labour'd day and night for their Brethren to the end that the number of the Elect might be sav'd in applying themselves to Works of Mercy and of a good Conscience That they had been sincere without Malice and without remembring the Ill that any of them might formerly have done to one another That all Division and Schism was abhorr'd by them That they were afflicted for their Neighbour's Failings That they look'd upon his Necessities as their own That they never repented them of well-doing but were always ready to do all sorts of good Works That in their Conversation full of Vertue and worthy of Veneration they did all things in the fear of God whose Commandments were writ in their Hearts He adds afterwards That he had known may Christians who to redeem others out of Slavery had put themselves in Chains That many having sold themselves for Slaves had maintain'd others out of the price of their own Liberty The Masters of this Clement were the first Disciples of Iesus of Nazareth who was the first Teacher of Christianity and he gives Testimony of their great Piety Indeed if we read their Writings we find nothing in them but what speaks a profound Veneration of the Deity an extream Tenderness towards all Men and an extraordinary Strictness in all that concerns the Government of a Man's Self Let us chuse which we will of them we shall find nothing in their Works but what tends to Piety If some of their Writings have been question'd let us take those concerning which there never was any Question Or without looking further the Gospel according to St. Luke and the first Epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians which are cited by Clement and we shall perceive every where the same Morals which they endeavour to implant in the Hearts of their Disciples I suppose all along that the Reader has some knowledg of the Precepts of the Gospel and has given some attention to what I said at the beginning And then I dare boldly say that unless he have lost all Sense he will acknowledg that there is nothing more reasonable that the Morals of the Gospel and that it were to be wish'd that all the World observ'd them The Apostles then in exhorting their Hearers to live after a manner so reasonable and so profitable to human Society requir'd nothing of them contrary to Reason or to the true Interests of all Mankind And this puts me in mind of the Saying of a Person that once had no great Opinion of the Truth of our Religion When the Morals which the Disciples of Jesus Christ preach'd throughout the World were thus livelily describ'd to him he could not but fall into these words which the Evidence of the thing drew from him I wish all the World had believ'd them This Doctrine of the Apostles ought undoubtedly to make all those who love human Society and their own Advantages to listen to it But it may here be objected that perhaps the Apostles preach'd not this Doctrine but in design to insinuate themselves into the Minds of the People and afterwards upon pretext of Piety to get from them whatsoever they had a mind to But to answer that Objection in the first place I observe and suppose it will be granted me that this Suspicion has no Foundation in the Doctrine which they preach'd For that condemns the love of Honours of Riches and of Pleasures There cannot so much as one single Passage of their Works be alledg'd that favours Ambition Covetousness or Concupiscence This being so this Suspicion can be grounded but upon one of these two things Either that the Apostles could hope to make some advantage of this their Doctrine when it should be receiv'd or that they actually made it when they preach'd it I understand here by Advantage A Good out-ballancing all the Inconveniences that the Apostles underwent in preaching the Gospel or at least such a one as they esteem'd in that degree It is not probable if they were Deceivers but that they propos'd an Advantage to themselves greater than the Pains they took Otherwise they might justly be look'd upon as Fools which they cannot without great Impertinence be suppos'd to have been by any that read their Writings Now the Apostles could not hope to make any Advantage of their Doctrine unless it were receiv'd by the generality of those amongst whom they preach'd it For without that they would have been expos'd to perpetual Persecution None but Fools could expect to live quietly amongst People vehemently prepossest with Opinions directly contrary to those they resolv'd to profess and teach People that believed themselves oblig'd for the Interest of the State and of Religion to take away both the Estates and Lives of those that oppos'd their Superstition Such were the Romans the Greeks and the Iews in the times of the Apostles They must then have hoped that their preaching would take such effect as would draw after them the greatest part of the World But that was impossible to be hop'd for by any that had never so little knowledg of the Disposition of the Heart of Man And the Apostles who
all those Scriptural Truths without which a Man cannot perfom his Duty as that there is a God absolutely perfect who has sent Jesus Christ into the World to draw Men from their Sins and guide them to eternal Salvation that this Jesus has been rais'd from the Dead and that he now reigns in Heaven c. All Christians agree in all this Let us suspend still our Jugdment concerning Doctrines and speak yet only of the practical Part of our Religion It cannot be deny'd but that if all Men liv'd according to the Precepts of the Gospel and that out of the hope of another Life they betook themselves with Care to adore the Creator of the Universe to live always in Temperance and Sobriety and to do constantly to their Neighbour as they desire their Neighbour should do to them It cannot be deny'd I say but this manner of living would be very agreeable and very advantagious to Human Society We should not then hear any words spoken that could cause us Trouble or that would kindle Divisions in Religion There would be no Sickness through Intemperance no Vexation nor any Quarrel occasion'd by Debauchery The doing Wrong to ones Neighbour and the suffering any Inconvenience through the Inhumanity or Malice of Men would be things unknown Men would help one another in all their Needs with all the Fervency and Earnestness that could be desir'd If by mistake any of them had been the occasion of Inconvenience to one another they would mutually pardon one another and repair that Damage by all sorts of Services The love of Honours or of Riches would trouble no Man's Mind nor cause any Envy or Discord In a word the Mind being in a perfect Tranquillity the Body as healthful as feeble Nature will admit and both Mind and Body enjoying the innocent Pleasures which the Gospel allows this amiable Life would not be quitted but for the enjoyment of another freed from all the inevitable Inconveniences entail'd by Nature upon the Inhabitants of this Earth All that have any Idea of the Rules of Morality taught by Jesus Christ must necessarily agree in this Truth that by generally observing them Men would be exceedingly happy But it may perhaps be ask'd Where is there in the World a Society in which Men live conformably to these Rules of Morality That is not the Question It is sufficient for our present purpose that there are at this time many Nations that make Profession of it though they live not up to the Practice Let us enquire whether these Nations invented those Rules or receiv'd them from their Predecessors They all tell us they are not the Inventers and it may well be judg'd by their way of living that they say true For it is not probable they should have invented the Precepts of the Gospel and yet live so contrary to them Inventions always savour something of the temper of the Spirit of the Inventors But we have no need of Arguments to convince us of this We may examine from Age to Age the Authors that are left us beginning at our own and going backwards to that wherein Christian Religion was first spoken of to see who they were that brought it into the World We shall readily find by reading those Authors that it is more than thirteen hundred Years since the Roman Emperors being become Christians Christianity has flourish'd in a great part of Europe Asia and Africa Since that time we may be convinced by a very great number of Christian Authors that Profession has been constantly made of believing that the Morality taught us in the Gospel came from Heaven If we go yet further backwards we shall find that even under the Pagan Emperors there was a great multitude of Christians that profess'd the same Doctrine We have many Christian Authors of those times who assure us of it But without staying to reckon up needlesly Authors sufficiently known let us examine in what Age Christianity began first to be spoken of All Christians agree that it was under the Reign of Tiberius and if we consult Heathen Authors we shall see that before that time it was altogether unknown Tacitus who was born towards the end of the Reign of Claudius or about the beginning of that of Nero says that Nero after having set Rome on fire in divers places and thereby destroy'd the City accus'd the Christians of it and made them suffer horrible Punishments Upon that occasion he speaks of the beginning of Christianity in these terms The Author of this Sect says he was Christ who in the Reign of Tiberius was put to death by Pontius Pilate Governour of Judaea This dangerous Superstition continues he in speaking of the Christian Religion though nipp'd in the Bud broke out a fresh and spread not only through Judaea where the Mischief first began but came even into Rome it self where all things shameful and abominable are brought and find Persons ready to join with and uphold them Presently as many as confess'd they were Christians were seiz'd on and soon after a great many more were discover'd but were not found guilty of the Fire though they were the Objects of the public Hatred c. You see here the Testimony of a Heathen Author who being born in the beginning of Christianity and very well vers'd in the Passages of his Time assures us of two things then publickly notorious The one that the Authors of the Christian Religion had liv'd in Iudaea in the Reign of Tiberius and had been punish'd during the Government of Pontius Pilate The other that after his Death in few Years the Embracers of his Doctrine were extreamly multiply'd Suetonius also tells us that in the time of the Emperor Claudius the Christians were banish'd out of Rome which shows that there were then a great number of them in that Capital City We find also by the Testimony of another Author contemporary to Tacitus that the Christians at that time made Profession of the same Morals they teach now a-days Pliny being Proconsul of Bithynia about threescore and ten Years after Pontius Pilate had been Governour of Iudaea by Trajan's Order sought out the Christians within his Province and inform'd himself with all the care imaginable concerning their Opinions Hereupon he writes a Letter to Trajan which Letter is still preserv'd I was inform'd says he that all their Crime or Error consisted only in that they us'd to assemble themselves upon a certain Night and to sing together a Hymn to Christ as to a God That they all oblig'd themselves by Oath not to any Crime but on the contrary that they would not commit Felony Robbery or Adultery and that they would deceive no Man nor break a Trust This done they dispers'd and return'd again after sometime to eat together which they did in common and without any harm But that they had given over doing it upon my Proclamation wherein according to your Orders I had forbidden all sorts of Conventicles This