Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
truth_n	aaron_n	church_n	establish_v	16	3	8.4884	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A83437	The casting down of the last and strongest hold of Satan. Or, A treatise against toleration and pretended liberty of conscience: wherein by Scripture, sound reason, fathers, schoolmen, casuists, Protestant divines of all nations, confessions of faith of the Reformed Churches, ecclesiastical histories, and constant practice of the most pious and wisest emperours, princes, states, the best writers of politicks, the experience of all ages; yea, by divers principles, testimonies and proceedings of sectaries themselves, as Donatists, Anabaptists, Brownists, Independents, the unlawfulnesse and mischeif [sic] in Christian commonwealths and kingdoms both of a vniversal toleration of all religions and consciences, and of a limited and bounded of some sects only, are clearly proved and demonstrated, with all the materiall grounds and reasons brought for such tolerations fully answered. / By Thomas Edvvards, Minister of the Gospel. The first part.; Casting down of the last and strongest hold of Satan. Part 1	Edwards, Thomas, 1599-1647.	1647 (1647)	Wing E225; Thomason E394_6; ESTC R201621	211,214	231

of that knowne axiome A particulari ad universale non valet consequentia and therefore though that particular reason be ceased although I haue fully shown that never was any reason of those Laws under the old Testament for punishing of false Prophets but a meer device and a fancie t is no good consequence all the other reasons yea and the commands themselves should cease also Seventhly to that Hagiomastix saith that the punishments enjoyned by God then under the Law to be inflicted in his Church upon delinquents were more bodily and afflictive to the outward man then the punishments enjoyned under the Gospel and consequently were not only carnall or bodily but typicall also and prefignificative of those greater and more spirituall under the Gospel cutting off from his people then as of casting out from his people now cutting off under the Gospel being no where found to be used but in a metaphorical and allusive sense also to what Minus Celsus Senensis writes that that corporall punishment in Deut. 13. was a Type of eternall damnation and therefore that Law with all the rest given for the future signification of things by the comming of Christ ceased I answer as followes First I deny the punishments enjoyned by God under the Law to be inflicted in his Church upon delinquents to be bodily or afflictive at all to the outward man as by donfiscation of goods or by death but they were spirituall and inflicted upon the soules by suspension excommunication and such like spirituall censures as well as now under the Gospel T is true there were bodily outward punishments in the Civill Iudicatories inflicted then on the bodies of false Prophets Idolaters c but by the Magistrates the Civil Governors and not by the Priests the Ecclesiastical Governors in the Church of the Iewes For under the Law the Jewish Church and Common-wealth the Civil Government and Ecclesiastical the censures and punishments of Church and State were formally distinct as Master Gillespie hath fully and excellently proved in his Aarons rod blossoming in many places particularly 1. Book cap. 2. 3 4 5 and the Church of the Iewes proceeded then against false Prophets only with the sword of the Spirit and spirituall weapons and the State with the materiall Sword and bodily punishments Which truth is fully acknowledged also by Master Cotton however differing from Presbyterians about a National Church in his Answer to Master Williams Bloudy Tenet saying I should think mine eye not only obscured but the fight of it utterly put out if I should conceave as he doth that the National Church State of the Jewes did necessarily call for such weapons a speaking of a Sword of Iron or Steel to punish Hereticks more then the Congregetional State of particular Churches doth call for the same now in the dayes of the new Testament For was not the National Church of the Iewes as compleatly furnished with spirituall Armor to defend it selfe and to offend men and Divels as the particular Churches of the new Testament be Had they not power to convince false Prophets as Eliah did the Prophets of Baal Had they not power to seperate all evil doers from the fellowship of the Congregation what power have our particular Churches now which their National Church wanted or what efficacie is there found in the exercise of our power which was wanting to them It is therefore a Sophistical imagination of mans Braine to make a mans selfe or the world believe that the National Church State of the Iewes required a Civil Sword whereas the particular State of the Gospel needs no such helpe And was not the National Church of Israel as powerfully able by the same spirit to doe the same surely it was both spoken and meant of the National Church of the Jewes not by might nor by Power but my Spirit saith the Lord of Hosts Zach. 4. 6. So that by what I have already said Hagiomastix must either I suppose recall what he hath written of carnal bodily punishments enjoyned by God then to be inflicted in his Church upon delinquents or else must joyne with the Erastians in holding the Iewish Church and Common-wealth their Governement and Censures all one and the same Secondly The foundation upon which Hagiomastix rears this building of outward punishments under the old Testament being typical of spiritual under the new viz the Land of Canaan with the external happinesse and peace there being typical and therefore reasons a compara●is and from the Analogie is sandie and unsound for the Land of Canaan with the external happinesse and long life in it whatsoever it was typical of was from what God had put into the Land being a Land healthful pleasant flowing with milke and honey abounding in excellent precious fruits the immediate blessings of God upon it and not from what came to it by the Magistrates Laws and their good Government for further satisfaction of which I wish Master Goodwin to resolve me this question whether the Land of Canaan were not typical as well in times of wars and troubles and under bad Princes as in dayes of peace and under good Princes and so to reason a comparatis to use his owne Phrase and adidem if temporall threatnings and bodily punishments inflicted upon delinquents under the old Testament were typicall and Praesignificative of greater under the Gospel they must be threatnings and bodily punishments inflicted from God upon false Prophets c not thoe executed by the Magistrates on them Thirdly Granting both Hagiomastixs foundation and the building reared upon it to be good yet they no whit prove bodily and outward punishments to be wholly taken away under the new Testament for suppose the temporal happinesse and the temporal punishments had typified more spiritual happinesse and lesse of the earth more spiritual judgements and lesse of outward or bodily sufferings under the Gospel yet it followes not they take away all outward happinesse and blessings and all outward bodily punishments there may be greater or lesser degrees of things under the old and new Testament suitable to some difference in the manner of Administration betweene the old and the new and yet not the substance of the things taken away These are knowne axioms Gradus non tollunt substantiam Magis Minus non variant speciem T is apparent by sense and experience that how much soever spirituall blessings and spiritual judgements in the dayes of the Gospel abound above the times under the Law yet they take not away all temporal outward blessings nor all temporal outward judgements but God for all that gives many outward blessings and sends many temporal judgements on the earth So supposing God should inflict more spiritual judgements on the soules of men under the new Testament and the Church greater spiritual censures then under the old it no way followes the Magistrates may inflict none at all especially when all spiritual judgements on the soule are slited and with a high hand

in the name of Christ cannot erre in those things which are of any great moment For we truly willingly confesse many Councels not to have erred yea wee confesse Lawfull Churches as in the sense above is explained by us that are truely gathered in the name of Christ not to erre in necessary things and of Baron in that acute and learned Reply of his to Turnebull the Iesuite wee doe not simply and absolutely condemne that which the Doctors of Paris doe teach of the infallibilitie of Councels For it may be piously and probably beleeved that Councels truely generall and Lawfull that is Lawfully gathered and proceeding to be so governed and directed by the holy Spirit that they may not erre in fundament all points I say this may be beleeved because t is certaine such Councels have never hitherto erred in Doctrines fundamentall Secondly although the Authoritie and Power of Synods and Councels is not of it selfe infallible neither appointed of God that it should be the supreme and principall Rule of our Faith and therefore cannot by it selfe and of its owne Authoritie bind the faithfull to beleeve whatever is determined in a Synod or Councell yet there is in them the supream Ecclesiastical Power of judging and determining Controversies of Faith and that appointed by God to avoid confusion and rents in the Church Hence the Authoritie of Lawfull Councels hath a speciall force and singular efficacie before many other motives of faith to beget a peswasion in the minds of men of the truth of the Doctrine agreed on in the Councell And because in our times the best Synods and Councels are rejected and flighted and every private person takes upon them a boundlesse Libertie of contradicting all Synodicall Decrees I shall therefore lay downe briefly out of divers learned Authors what preeminencie there is in Synods and Co●ncels towards the compounding of Controversies and doubts in Religion above what is in private Christians or single particular Ministers 1 There is an Authorite given them by God they are an Ordinance of Jesus Christ to judge of and determine Controversies of faith which no man of a sound mind affirmes of private Christians or particular Ministers Secondly they have a power of subjecting those to excommunication and other Ecclesiasticall censures who openly contradict their Decrees Thirdly they have a more peculiar assistance of the Spirit so greater then that which particular Ministers judgeing apart have Fourthly They have surer means of finding out the truth viz. The Prayers Fastings Disputations c. of the cheifest Pastors of the whole Church For as Cameron speaks In a Councell if there be present piou● and learned men they open things which before were shut by their mutual disquisition which cannot be so easily done of particular men apart Fifthly A better ground of knowing what is the judgement of the whole Church concerning any Question in Controversie and what the Churches have observed in such cases Sixthly A more easie way of reducing the Decrees and Determinations of the Church to practice Seventhly greater Reverence Respect and Obedience is owing to the Determinations and Decrees of Synods and Councels then of particular Persons or Churches the Authoritie of Synods in their place and degree is so to be looked upon that particular Ministers or private Christians should not lightly or easily for every probable Reason or conjecture reject their determinations Hence Cameron speaking of Councels well observes So oft as any thing is decreed by an Assembly of men who are put into Anthoritie in the Church that should be a ground that such a thing should not rashly nor without a great deale of accurate and serious observation be rejected For first of all we owe Reverence to a Synod even then when we judge it decrees false things A pious sonne of the Church doth not vainely insult over her but with a kind of Reverentiall shamefastnesse departs from her Secondly wee owe outward obedience unlesse wee doe evidently perceive the Synod to prescribe and determine false and wicked things for t is not Lawfull upon light and probable Reasons to oppose the judgement of the Pastors of the Church the certaine manifest Authoritie of God commands us to obey the decrees of the Church and when wee have only uncertaine conjectures and probable Reasons then that common rule is to be followed Hold that which is certaine leave the uncertaine And therefore they who doubt of the truth of the Decrees of a Synod or upon light and probable Reasons think their Opinion false but doe not cert●inly know it to be such are bound by the Synodicall decrees to performe such an obedience as is agreeable to order comelinesse and peace which obedience is nothing else but the observance of Christian humilitie and modestie by which the faithfull in such cases abstaine both from a publike open profession of their Opinion and a condemning and confuting of the Synods Opinion and in the meane time by diligent searching of the Scripture do enquire out the truth and pray to God to manifest his truth to men and to discover the errors of the Synod that so they being knowne contrary Doctrine may be established in another Councel Of which seven particulars and divers others of Synods whoever would see more let them read Baron against Turnebull Tract 5. De Authorit Ecclesiae cap. 17. Camerons Praelect De Eccles Infallibilitate 292. 293. Apollon Jus Magist circ sacra first part cap. 4. 247. 248 249. Fourthly there is a greater degree of infallibilitie and certaintie in matters of faith and religion to be attained by means of the Scriptures then was by the high Priests answers by Vrim or then is to be had by miracles by one arising from the dead and comming to us then by an Apostle or an Angel from heaven yea or from a voice comming from heaven of each of which I will speake something briefly 1. There was more certaintie even under the old Testament in the word written in the Law then in the high Priests Answer which appeares thus because the Law was made by God himselfe the cheife rule and measure of the high Priests Answer and in difficult cases wherein the Iewes were commanded to come to the high Priest for resolution the last reference is made to the Law That very place Deut. 17. 9. 10 11 12. brought by Hagiomastix page 130. to prove the sentence there spoken of only such a sentence which the Priest did upon enquiry by Vrim and Thummim receive immediately or however infallibly from the mouth of God himselfe and by the Iesuits Bellarmine Lorinus Bailius c brought to prove the Pope the supreame infallible Iudge of Controversies and not the Scriptures showes cleerly whatever answers the high Priest gave in matters of judgement they are limited expresly to the word of God and that is made the supreme Iudge The Iewes were not simply to rest in the judgement of the high Priests whatever they