Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
truth_n	aaron_n	authority_n	moses_n	34	3	6.5232	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A10958	The faith, doctrine, and religion, professed, & protected in the realme of England, and dominions of the same expressed in 39 articles, concordablie agreed vpon by the reuerend bishops, and clergie of this kingdome, at two seuerall meetings, or conuocations of theirs, in the yeares of our Lord, 1562, and 1604: the said articles analised into propositions, and the propositions prooued to be agreeable both to the written word of God, and to the extant confessions of all the neighbour churches, Christianlie reformed: the aduersaries also of note, and name, which from the apostles daies, and primitiue Church hetherto, haue crossed, or contradicted the said articles in generall, or any particle, or proposition arising from anie of them in particular, heereby are discouered, laid open, and so confuted. Perused, and by the lawfull authoritie of the Church of England, allowed to be publique.	Rogers, Thomas, d. 1616.; Rogers, Thomas, d. 1616. English creede.	1607 (1607)	STC 21228; ESTC S116041	208,079	284

were not Gods ordinance for the good but an humane institution for the hurt of men Many haue a fancie that before the generall Resurrection there shall be no magistrates at all because as they dreame all the wicked shall be rooted out Of this minde are the Anabaptists and Familie of Loue 5. Proposition The Bishop of Rome hath no iurisdiction in this realme of England nor other of the kings dominions The proofe from Gods word The Bishope of Rome did hee according to the will of God preach the Gospell labour in the Lords haruest diuide the word of God aright minister the Sacraments instituted by Christ that sincerely shew by his life conuersation the good fruites of a godly Bishop doubtlesse he were worthy of double yea of triple honor Yet will not the word of God were hee neuer so holy and religious warrant him any Iurisdiction out of his Diocesse especially not within this Reamle much lesse when he doth perform no part of a christian but euery part of an antichristian Bishop in corrupting the doctrine of the truth with errors and cursed opinions in polluting the Sacraments of Christ by superstitious ceremonies in persecuting the Church and Saints with fire and sword in making marchandise of the soules of men through couetousnes in playing the Lord ouer Gods haeritage in sitting in the Temple of God as God shewing himselfe that he is God and in exalting himselfe against all that is called God or that is worshipped In respect of which fruites of impieties the said Bishop of Rome in the holy Scripture is described to be very Antichrist that wicked man the man of sinne the sonne of perdition and the aduersarie of God He was openly proclaimed Antichrist by a Counsell in France in the raigne of Hugh He is tearmed by the truly and godly learned The Basiliske of the Church neither the Head nor the Taile of the Church His iurisdiction hath bin and is iustly renounced and bannished out of England by manie Kings and Parliaments as by K. Edward the 1.3 and 6 by K Richard the second by K. Henrie the 4.6 and 8 by Q. Elizabeth and by our most Noble K. Iames. His pride and intolerable supremacie ouer all Christian people is renounced and condemned aswell by the mouthes as wrightings of all the purer Churches and that deseruedlie The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth But with the Papists the Bishop of Rome hee is forsooth for supremacie Abell for gouering the Arke Noah for patriarchship Abraham for order Melchisedecke for dignity Aaron for authoritie Moses for iustice Samuell for zeale Helias for humilitie Dauid for power Peter for his vnction Christ the generall Pastor the common Father of all Christians the high Pastor of Gods vniuersall Church the Prince of Gods people for title God euen the Lord God the Pope for power God For By him Kings raigne hee may iudge all men but must of none be iudged hee can doe what him list aswell as God except sinne His iurisdiction is vniuersall euen ouer the whole worlde Him vppon paine of eternall damnation all Christians are to obey And by his soueraigne authoritie both all Papistes in England were discharged from their obedience and subiection vnto Q. Elizabeth and the same Queene disabled to gouerne her owne people and dominions 6. Proposition By the lawes of this Realme Christian men for hainous and greeuous offences may be put to death The proofe from Gods word As the natures of men be diuers and some sinnes in some countries more abound then in others so are the punnishments to bee imposed vppon malefactors according to the quantitie and qualitie of their offences and any countrie and Kingdome may punnish offendors euen with death if the Lawes thereof and their offence doe require it For All that take the sword shall perish with the sword Gouernors bee sent of the King for the punnishment of euill doers A wise King scattereth the wicked and causeth the wheele to turne ouer them The magistrate beareth not the sword for nought and is the minister of God to take vengeance on them that doe euill Which punishments testifie to the world that God is iust which will haue some sinnes more seuerely punnished then others and the magistrates to cut off dangerous and vngodly members God is mercifull and ●●th care both of his seruan●s and of humane societie God is all wise and holy in that he will haue it knowne who are iust who wicked who holy and who prophane by cherishing and preseruing of the one and by punishing and rooting out of the other Our Godly and Christian brethren in other countries approoue this doctrine The aduersaries vnto this truth The aduersaries of this doctrine be diuers For Some are of opinion that no man for any offence should be put to death Such in old time were the Manichies and the Donatistes and such in our daies be the Anabaptistes And some doe thinke that howsoeuer for other offences against the second Table malefactors may bee put to death yet for haereticall and erroneous opinions in points of religion none are so to suffer Of this minde are the Familistes For They hold that no man should bee put to death for his opinions They blame M. Cramner and Ridley for burning Ioane of Kent for an haereticke It is not christianlike that one man should persecute another for any cause touching conscience Is not that punnishmen● sufficient say they which God hath ordained but that one Christian must vexe torment belie and persecute another 7. Proposition It is lawfull for Christian men at the commandement of the Magistrate to weare weapons and serue in warres The proofe from Gods word There is saith K. Salomon a time of warre and a time of peace and Princes are by warre and weapons to represse the power of enemies whether forraigne or intestine For they are in authoritie placed for the defence of quiet and harmlesse subiects as also to remoue the violence of oppressors and enemies whatsoeuer they bee For these causes haue they Horses prepared for the battell Tributes paide them aswell of Christians as others and Subiects to serue them in their warres of what nature soeuer Cornelius being a Christian was not forbidden to play the Centurion or bidden to forsake his profession nor the Souldiers that came vnto Iohns baptisme willed to leaue the warres but to offer no violence vnto any man This truth is graunted by the Churches The adversaries vnto this truth Many are against this assertion whereof some doubt of the truth thereof as Ludouicus Viues Others denie it altogether as vntrue So did in ancient time the Manichies whose doctrine was that no man might goe to warre Lactantius thought it altogether vnlawfull for a good man or a Christian either

Mosaicall decalogue is naturall morall and perpetuall is their doctrine 4. Proposition The Iudiciall lawes of the Iewes are not necessarily to be receiued or established in any Common wealth The profe from Gods word The truth hereof appeareth by the Apostles decree which sheweth wherevnto onely the primitiue church necessarily was tied By the Apostles doctrine which enioyneth Christians to yeeld obediēce vnto the ordināces of their lawfull gouerners and commanders whosoeuer By the Apostles example and namely of the blessed S. Paul who tooke benefit and made good vse of the Romane and Emperiall lawes Adversaries vnto this truth This truth neither is nor euer was oppugned by any Church Only among our selues some thinke vs necessarily tied vnto all the Iudicials of Moses as the Brownists For they say The lawes Iudiciall of Moses belong as well vnto Christians as they did vnto the Iewes Others that wee are bound though not vnto all yet vnto some of the Iudicialls as holdeth T.C. and Philip Stubs 5. Proposition No Christian man whosoeuer is freed from the obedience of the law Morall The proofe from Gods word Thinke not that I am come to destroy the Lawe or the Prophets I am not come to destroy them but to fulfill them For truly I say vnto you saith our Sauiour Christ till heauen and earth perish one iot or one title of the law shall not scape till all things be fulfilled whosoeuer therefore shall breake one of these least commandements and teach men so shall be called the least in the kingdome of heauen c If thou wilt enter into life keepe the commandements c. Thou shalt nor kill thou shalt not commit adulterie thou shalt not steale thou shalt not beare false witnesse Honour thy father and thy mother Doe wee make the lawe of none effect through faith God forbid yea we establish the Lawe Circumcision is nothing and vncircumcision is nothing but the keeping of the Commandements of God The publike confessions of the Churches of God in France and Belgia agree with this Doctrine The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Whereby are condemned as most wicked and vnsond the opinions Of the Manichies who found fault with the whole Lawe of God as wicked and prooceeding not from the true God but from the Prince of darkenes Of Brownist Glouer whose opinion was that Loue now is come in the place of the tenne commandements Of Iohannes Islebius and his followers the Antinonies who will not haue Gods lawe to be preached nor the consciences of sinners to be terrified and troubled with the iudgements of God Of Banister among our selues who held how it is vtterly euill for the Elect so much as to thinke much lesse to speake or heare of the feare of God which the Law preacheth 8. Article Of the three Creedes 1 The three Creedes Nicene creede Athanasius creede and that which is commonly called the Apostles creede ought thoroughly to be receiued and beleeued For 2 they may be prooued by most certaine warrants of holy Scripture The propositions 1. The Nicen Athanasian and Apostolicall Creedes ought to be receiued and beleeued 2. The three creedes viz. the Ni. Athan. and of the Apostles may be prooved by the holy Scripture 1. Proposition The Nicen Athanasian and Apostolicall Creedes ought to be receiued and beleeued THis Proposition the Churches of God both aunciently and in these daies doe acknowledge for true The adversaries vnto this truth Therefore much out of the way of Godlinesse are they which tearme the Apostles Creede A forged patcherie as Barrowe doth and Athanasius Sathanasius creede so did Gregorius Paulus in Polouia and in the newe Arrians and Nestorians in Lituania My selfe some ●8 yeares agoe heard a great learned man whose name vpon an other occasion afore is expressed to whose acquaintance I was artificially brought which in private conference betweene him and my selfe tearmed worthy Zanchius a Foole an Asse from his booke de tribus Elohim which refuteth the newe Arrians against whose sounders the Creedes of Athanasius and Nicene were deuised Him attentiuely I heard but could neuer since abide for those wordes in deede I neuer sawe him since 2. Proposition The three Creedes viz. the Ni. Athan. and of the Apostles may be prooued by the holy Scripture The proofe from Gods word Than this assertion nothing is more true For the Creedes I meane these three Creedes speake first Of one and the same God whom wee are to beleeue is for essence but one in persons three viz. the Father the Creator the Sonne the Redeemer the holy Ghost the sanctifier Next of the people of God which we must thinke and beleeue is The holy and Catholike Church The communion of Saints Pardoned of all their sinnes And appointed to arise from death and to enioy eternall life both in body and soule Aduersaries vnto this truth Therefore wee are enemies to all adversaries of this doctrine or any whit of the same in them comprised whether they be Atheists Iewes Sadduces Ebionites Tretheites Antitrinitarains Apollinarians Arrians Manichies Nestorians Origenians Turkes Papists Familists Anabaptists or whosoeuer 9. Article Of Originall or Birth sinne 1 Originall sinne standeth not in the follwing of Adam as the Pelagians doe vainely talke but 2 it is the fault corruption of the nature of euery man that naturally is engendred of the offspring of Adam whereby man is very far gone from originall righteousnesse and is inclined to evill so that the flesh lusteth against the spirit and therefore in euery person borne into the world it deserueth Gods wrath and damnation 3 And this infection of nature doth remaine yea in them that are regenerated whereby the lust of the flesh called in Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 VVhich some doe expound the wisedome some the Sensuallitie some the affection some the desire of the flesh is not subiect to the law of God And although there is no condemnation for them that beleeue and are baptised yet the apostle doth confesse that 4 Concupiscence and Lust hath of it selfe the nature of sinne The propositions 1. There is Originall sinne 2. Originall sinne is the fault and corruption of the nature of euery man c. 3. Originall sinne remaineth in God his deere children 4. Concupiscence euen in the regenerate is sinne 1. Proposition There is Originall sinne The proofe from Gods word In the holy Scripture we finde of Originall sinne the cause the subiect and the effects the cause thereof is Adams fall partly by the subtill suggestions of the deuill partly through his owne freewill and the propagation of Adam his corrupted nature vnto his seede and posteritie Except a man be borne againe he cannot see the kingdom of God saith our Sauiour Christ As by one man sinne entred into the world and death by sinne and so death

mysticall and propheticall as Brocardus Morelius and others Some are of minde that the Gospell or Euangelicall word cannot be committed to letters and wrighting saith Lindanus Some doe thinke as afore also hath bin shewen how that is the olde and onely true sense of the Scriptures which is made and giuen by the Church and Pope of Rome Some doe maintaine that as the Church in time doth alter so the interpretation of the Scripture also therwithal doth vary wherby that which in the Apostles time was a truth in these daies shall be a falsehood In which error was Cardinall Cusanus 6. Proposition The Church is the witnesse and keeper of Gods written word The proofe from Gods word Though the Church hath authority to heare and determine in controversies of faith yet hath the Church power neither to iudge the word of God nor to iudge otherwise then Gods word doth iudge For it is saide to the Church and people of God I beseech you brethren marke them diligently which cause diuisions and offenses contrarie to the Doctrine which you haue learned and auoid them Here him To him giue all the Prophets witnesse Search the Scriptures whosoeuer trangresseth and abideth not in the the doctrine of Christ hath not God yee are c. built vpon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets And of the holy Scriptures Thy word is the the truth They haue Moses and the Prophets let them heare them saith our S. Christ. Wee haue also a sure word of the Prophets saith Saint Peter And S. Paul The whole Scripture is profitable to teach c. If any man teach otherwise and consenteth not to the wholsome wordes of our L. Iesus Christ he is puft vp and knoweth nothing c And so with vs doe other Churches conceiue both of the Scriptures and Church yet all of vs do grant that the Church as a faithfull witnesse may yea of necessitie must testifie to the world what hath bin the doctrine of God his people from time to time and as a trustie Recorder is to keepe make knowne what the word of God which it hath receiued is which truly hath bin perfomed afore the word was written by the Patriarchs and after the same was committed to writing before Christ his incarnation by the Iewes in Christ his life time in the primitiue Church From the Apostles time by the godly Christians thoroughout the world Errors adversaries vnto this truth Be it farre therefore from vs to thinke which the Papists do not stick to write and say namely that The Church is to iudge the Scriptures and not the Scriptures the Church The Scripture is not of the essence of the Church Because without it a Church may be though not very well So said Card. Cusan The Scripture because in their opinion it is vnperfect cannot obscure may not ambiguous ought not be the iudge So Lindan Latomus Petrus a Soto Pighius Coster c. He is an heretike that cleaueth to the Scriptures So said Iacobus Hocstratus Againe the carefull keeping of the holy Scriptures by Gods people from age to age and time to time declareth first how the mother Church of Rome is not the onely keeper of the holy writ and next that cursedly they doe offend which either as greatly esteeme the Ethickes of Aristostle as the commandements of god the Odes of Pindar as the Psalmes of Dauid the workes and bookes of men as the writings of God which the Councell of Trent doth or before and aboue the scripture prefer vnwritten Traditions Hence Petrus a Soto Tradition saith hee is both more auncient and more effectuall the● the holy Scripture and Lindan The scriptures would be of no validitie neither had continued till this day but for traditions 7. Proposition The Church may not enforce any thing to be beleeued as necessary vnto saluation that is either contrarie or besides the word of God The proofe from the word of God Yee shall put nothing vnto the word which I command you neither shall yee take ought there from Put nothing vnto his words least hee reprooue thee and thou be found a liar Though it be but a mans couenant when it is confirmed yet no man doth abrogate it or addeth any thing thereto If any man shall adde vnto these things God shall ad vnto him the plauges that are written in this booke And if any man shal diminish of the words of the booke of this prophecy god shall take away his part out of the booke of life and out of the holy cittie and from those things which are written in this booke And so witnesse with vs the Churches reformed Whatsoeuer also is grounded vpon Gods written word though not by our common and vulgar tearmes to be redde therein wee doe reuerendly embrace which maketh vs for doctrine to embrace the Consubstantiality of our Sauiour with the Father and the holy Ghost which the Arrians would not a Trinitie of persons in the Godhead which the Sabellians would neuer doe the iustification by faith Onely which the Papists will not the baptisme of Infants and young children which the Anabaptists dare not and for discipline not to refuse of Church officers the names Archbishops Patriarches Primates Metropolitanes Suffragans Parsons Vicars c. of ecclesiasticall censures the tearmes Suspension Excommunication of Ceremonies none at all which tend either vnto order comelines or edification But from the heart wee abhor in matters both of doctrine and disciple whatsoeuer either agreeth not with the canon of the Scripture or is not grounded thereupon The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Hence detest wee both all the old heretikes and their fancies with the newe prophets of Basilides the Manifestation of Marciō the mysteries of the Manichies the Iobolia of the Sathiās the Symbonia of the Archōtikes the Cabala of the Iewes the Alcaron of the Turkes and also all newe heretikes and Schismatikes with all their cursed opinions as first the Anabaptists and namely the Libertines the Dauigeorgians and Familie of Loue and all the codeified Elders thereof as Henry Nicholas Eliad Fidelitas Christopher Vitell Theophilus the Exile and the rest Next the Papists whereof Some haue commanded that all the Popes decrees should be taken as confirmed by the mouth of God himselfe so did Pope Agatho the first Some write as Busgradus that if the Pope beleeue there is no life to come as some Popes haue done wee must beleeue it as an article of our faith Some say if the Pope carrie innumerable soules with him vnto hell yet he may not be iudged so did Pope Boniface the 8. Some as Bellarmine conclude that it is a point of faith to hold that the Bishop of Rome hath succeeded Peter in the vniuersall regiment of the Church Others as the Iesuites perswade their Catholikes

to goe to warre or to bring any man to a violent death though by law he were adiudged to die In these daies the Anabaptists thinke it to be a thing most exetrable for Christians to take weapons or to goe to warre The Familio of Loue also doe so condemne all warres as the time was when they would not beare or weare a weapō they write first of themselues how all their nature is Loue and peace and that they are a people peaceable concordable amiable louing and liuing peaceably but all other men in the world besides they doe wage warre 〈◊〉 and destroy for which ends they haue diuers sorts of swords Halberds spears bowes and arrowes Gunnes pellets and Gunpowder armour Harnes and Gorgets none of which the Familists doe vse or allowe of 38. Article Of Christian mens goods which are not common The riches and goodnes of Christians 1 are not common as touching the right title and possession of the same as certaine Anabaptists doe falsely boast Notwithstanding 2 euery man ought of such things as he possesseth liberally to giue almes to the poore according to his abilitie The Propositions 1 The riches and goods of Christians as touching the right title and possession of the same are not common 2. Euery man is to giue liberall almes to the poore of that which he possesseth according to his abilitie 1. Proposition The riches and goods of Christians as touching the right title and possession of the same are not common The proofe from Gods word AGainst communitie of goods and riches be all those places which are infinite of holy Scripture that either condemne the vnlawfull getting keeping or desiring of riches which by Couetousnesse Theeuerie Extortion and the like wicked meanes many doe attaine or doe commend Liberalitie Frugalitie free and freindly Lending honest labour and lawfull vocations to liue and thriue by All which doe shewe that Christians are to haue goods of their owne and that riches ought not to be common Of this iudgement be the reformed Churches The adversaries vnto this truth Of another mind were the Esseis the Manichies the Pelagiās the Apostolikes and Fratricellians and are the Anabaptists and Familie of Loue Amōg the Famists saith H.N. none claimeth any thing proper to himselfe for to possesse the same to any owednes or priuatenesse For no man c. can desire to appropriate or challenge any thing to himselfe either yet to make any priuate vse vnto himselfe from the rest ward but what is there is Free and is also left free in his vpright forme 2. Proposition Euery man is to giue liberall Almes to the poore of that which hee possesseth according to his abilitie The proofe from Gods word Vnto liberality towards the poore according to our ability we are in the holy Scriptures prouoked 1. By the commandements from God by his seruants the Prophets by his Sonne our Sauiour and by his Apostles 2. By sweete promises of ample blessings 3. By threatnings of punishments to the couetous and stonie hearted 4. By the examples of the best men viz. the apostles and primitiue Church So the Churches The adversaries vnto this truth Of strange mindes therefore and impious are First the Anabaptists which would haue no man either to giue or receiue For all things in their opinion should be common as afore also hath bin said and none among them be either poore to receiue or wealthie to minister any almes Secondly the hypocriticall Sectaries who are bountiful onely to those which side with them Such were first the publicans in our Sauiour his daies and after them the Manichies who would minister neither bread nor water vnto any hungry and pyning beggar vnlesse he were a Manichean And such are the Familie of Loue who say they are not bound to giue almes but to their owne sect and if they doe they giue the fame to the deuill 39. Article Of a Christian mans oath As wee confesse that 1 vaine and rash swearing is forbidden Christian men by our Lord Iesus Christ and Iames his Apostle So wee iudge that 2 Christian religion doth not prohibite but that a man may sweare when the magistrate requireth in a cause of faith and charitie so it be done according to the Prophets teaching iniustice iudgement and truth The Propositions 1. Wee may not sweare vainely and rashly 2. A lawfull oath may be giuen and taken according to the word of God in iustice iudgement and truth 1. Proposition We may not sweare vainely and rashly The proofe from Gods word THe better to auoid vaine and rash oathes and swearing it is good to haue in remembrance that which is said by our S. Christ and his Apostle Iames. Our Sauiour saith sweare not at all neither by heauen for it is the throne of God nor by the Earth for it is his footestoole nor by Ierusalem for it is the cittie of the great King nor by thine head because thou canst not make one haire white or black but let your communication be yea yea nay nay So the apostle S. Iames Before all things my brethren saith hee sweare not either by the heauen or by the earth or by any other oath but let your yea be yea and your Nay nay least yee fall into condemnation All Churches doe and some in their publike writings condemne vaine rash and idle othes The adversaries vnto this truth This declareth many sorts of men to be very impious as The Wantons which for pleasure and the couetous worldlings who for gaine and profit blush not to take the name of God in vaine by idle rash and vsuall oathes Next the Basilidians Helchisaites Priscillianites and Familie of Loue who for ease and to auoid troubles and persecution dread not to sweare and forsweare themselues Thirdly the papists whose common guise is to sweare either by Saints or Idols or by God and creatures together Fourthly the Puritanes who vse to sweare though not by God c. yet as wickedly vsing horrible imprecations as I renounce God God damne me or as Hackets manner was God confound mee Lastly the Banisterians who deeme it hypocrisie for one Christian to reprooue another for commō and rash swearing which are but Trifles in their opinions 2. Proposition A lawfull Oath may be giuen and taken according to the word of God in iustice iudgement and truth The proofe from Gods word The truth of this doctrine appeareth plentifully in the holy Scriptures For in the same there bee both commaundements that we must and may and formes prescribed howe we shall sweare For the first Thou shalt feare the L. thy God and serue him And shalt sweare by his Name saith Moses Againe thou shalt sweare the Lord liueth and thou shalt cleaue vnto him and shalt sweare by his Name