learnedst Jewish Rabbies very many judicious Divines among us Protestants and divers learned Papists do hold the affirmative Some few in comparison of the other do hold the negative upon the former suppositions suppositions I call them for that they have no ground of Reason from either the Letter or Circumstance of the Text. SECTION II. Of the conceit of an Anticipation or Prolepsis and what it is TOstatus his conceit of an Anticipation in the words was saith Catherinus ineptum commentum and is indeed contrary to the plaine meaning of Moses his whole narration and the letter of text Here its fit in the first place to shew what is an Anticipation It 's the setting down of a thing in order of story before which cometh to be so in order of time afterwards The Reason of every such Anticipation is from the Penman of the Historie who writeth down things not as they were of old at the first but as they then were when he wrote the story Such an Anticipation here some of them only so say or do rest on others who affirme it without allegation of reasons for this their conception and brain birth But there is one of late who hath produced his grounds for it 1. Because saith he the words may be thus translated And God hath blessed the seventh day and hath sanctified it Ans 1 None so translate the words otherwise than the former in verse 2. Perfecit requievit no advantage to be taken more in the word hath blessed and hath sanctified than in saying He blessed and sanctified Hath is but an English particle and not of force in the Hebrew in the Greek or Latine which yet if we adde to the other verbs as He hath ended and hath rested speaking of that same time would be absurd Ans 2 Thus to devise a Translation from all that have Englished the words as a reason to build thereon a new conceit is no sound dealing but a perverting of the true sense 2. For that diverse places are named elsewhere by an Anticipation saith he Ans This will not conclude therefore here is an Anticipation because there For in those other places there evidently appeareth the grant of the Prolepsis why of necessitie it should be so taken there would else manifestly be an untruth uttered which cannot be here understood when the words are taken as they be in the text as then and at that time so Yet these two reasons for no more I finde are onely the weak under propers of their fancie SECTION III. Arguments against this Anticipation or Prolepsis Argument 1. WHere the words may be taken literally without danger of any untruth contradiction or absurditie there is no figure and anticipation For in a plain narration to take the words figuratively is to abuse the Scripture and to make it as a nose of wax But these words He blessed and sanctified applied to that self-same singular day in which he rested have in them no falshood no contradiction no absurdity Therefore here is no Anticipation Let any shew wherein the falshood the contradiction or obsurditie in so applying and understanding of the words is if they cannot they must give over Abulensis commentum figmentum Argument 2. EVery Prolepsis is onely in places or in the description of things and actions done by men but not of Gods divine institution no instance can be given hereof But these words are not spoken of any place nor act nor thing of men but an act of Gods institution who is said to blesse and sanctifie the day and are words of his divine institution And therefore here is no Anticipation till it can be proved that one may so differ from all other in holy Story Argument 3. In every Anticipation the name act or thing forespoken of in order of Storie hath its dependance and rise from some thing following yet before in order of time For this is an Anticipation as is before shewed and it is most true in every such figure See it in instances In Bethel is a prolepsis Gen. 12. 8. from Gen. 28. 19. In Gilead is a prolepsis Gen. 31. 31. from Gen. 31. 47. In Gilgal is a prolepsis Iosh 4. 19. from Iosh 5. 9. In Bochim is a prolepsis Iudg. 2. 1. from Iudg. 2. 5. In Exo 16. 33 34. which act was when the Tabernacle was built and the Testimony made afterwards Exo. 25. and 26. and 27. on which the truth of this act of Aaron dependeth In 1. Sam. 17. 54. is a prolepsis for the act of David here mentioned could not be true till afterward he won the strong hold of Zion and got Ierusalem 2. Sam. 5. 7. In all these and in every other prolepsis there is such a dependance so clear and evident as none can doubt of the truth of the figure except we would faultie the narration with an untruth But now these words in Gen. 2. 3. have not their truth dependant upon any thing after recorded in Scripture which was before this act of God in time For who can say truely and sollidly prove it that the words in Exo. 20. 11. were the institution of the Sabbath in time before this in Genesis For t is manifest that the Sabbath was kept before the promulgation of the Law Exo. 16. 30. And again the words in Exo. 20. 11. shew us not what new thing God did then but what he had done when he rested the seventh day from his six dayes works in the Creation For as God telleth them what he had done in the very first six dayes in the beginning so he told them what he did that very seventh on which he rested from his work he blessed and hallowed it and made it the Sabbath Therefore it s to be concluded from the nature of a true Prolepsis and the dependance of that which is first spoken upon that which maketh it so in time that here is no Anticipation Argument 4. IN every Anticipation the thing so spoken of is generally known to be come to passe before the Penman wrote it as those former instances do shew If here then were a Prolepsis Gods blessing and sanctifying the seventh day should have been known generally and the institution before Moses tyme who wrote this history of Genesis If they will not acknowledge it was so known before Moses wrote Genesis then is there no Anticipation If they grant it to be generally known then must they yeeld that the Sabbath day was before the giving of the Law and generally so known If they say it was known unto all Israel onely after the giving of the Law then I ask them 1. What Sabbath that was which was knowne to Israel at the raining of Manna 2. How they know that Moses wrote Genesis after the time of the giving of the Law If only it was generally knowne from that time and not before from whence hee must take occasion as they say to insert the words into the second of Genesis and third verse by
will doe us no hurt Ier. 25. 6. Hee doth not willingly afflict nor greive us Lam. 3. 33. Therefore when hee doth hurt and afflict these vaine loose and licentious sort of persons on this day what sinne for they doe sinne evidenced by Gods hand against them what sinne I say may wee suppose it to bee but their prophanesse and if the case bee so doubtfull as some would make it yet whether is it not better to make this use of these judgements to sanctify the day with due reverence rather than in doubtfull case to take our pleasurable liberty for the rule is good Quod dubitas ne feceris for so we are sure not to sinne 3 Rule That we find it by observation to have ever been and continually or for the most part so What sinne is there that may agree with this rule that hath ever and continually or for the most part some judgement to set it out by and by which it may be discovered For as an Opposite in this our case saith are there not thousands more is the pitty that prophane the Lords day in greater measure than any of those in whom instances have been made which never felt any exemplary evill So may I say of many other sinnes and sinfull men wallowing in their filthinesse where finde we that ever and continually or for the most part that vengeance suffers not a murtherer to live Have not many lived and do not many live guilty of bloud hath ever and continually and for the most part the drunkard the glutton the adulterer the cruell extortioner and the like wicked ones been made exemplary by judgements upon them that any should expect ever continually or for the most part judgements upon Sabbath breakers But it is a pretty cunning for men to devise rules out of their owne braines and lay them downe as Maximes to try their Adversaries tenents by and to reject them as not sound because they agree not to their crooked rule Yet concerning the matter in hand let me say thus much the so frequent accidents as some call them in so great variety and happening so thick together in many places may worke amazement and do answere better to the rule than what other sinne with following judgements upon the offenders may be produced It is said and but said that such accidents fall out as frequently upon other dayes Let them that so say be pleased to take the paines to observe and gather a Catalogue and present them to the view of the world to give satisfaction 4. Rule When the sinner is taken in the very manner the Lords hand may be observed therein the sinne co-operating with the judgement either naturally or morally When the sinne and the judgement meet together it is very certain that the judgement then points out the sin which is at that time committed to be the cause of that punishment Whilst Vzzah was laying his hand upon the Arke he was struck dead therefore the touching of the Arke was the cause of the judgement Nadab and Abihu offered strange fire and whilest they were offering fire from heaven Num. 10. 1. 2. light upon them therefore the offering strange fire was the cause why this fire from above was sent down upon them Plagues fell upon the Philistimes whilst they deteined 1. Sam. 5. the Ark therefore the withholding the Ark was the sin which made God so to plague them and was not a Chance Jehoshaphat joyned himselfe with Ahaziah to make ships to go to Ophir for gold but were broken at Ezion-Geber which 1. Kin. 22. 48. 49 casuall crosse befell him for that sin as appeareth by the use Jehoshaphat made of it afterwards for he made not a tush of it but refused to joyne any more with Ahaziahs servants the Prophet also applyed that casuall punishment to that sin The Holy Prophet did not lightly reckon of such a hand of God but was taught by the Lord to observe it and to apply 2. Chr. 20. 37. it to the particular sinne Many other instances might be brought to confirme this trueth if need were out of the Scriptures Therefore this being a rule certaine then the hand of God may be observed against our Sabbath-breakers for their prophanations did co-operate to the hurt of many and to the death of some They were punished in their actes and deedes doing It is not the questioning to make the matter doubtfull that can overthrow the rule laid nor sicknesse nor death happening when any are about a good thing for the good thing co-operateth not with the sicknesse nor with the death following preaching and praying procure not hurts nor evils and therefore cannot be produced fitly for this case to take the sober minde off from observing Gods punishments upon such as we speak of in this discourse It is a truth undeniable that the true estimation of things dependes not upon the events or accidents following it for where the acts be apparantly good the ill events and accidents concurring cannot make the good to become evill nor to be so judged in any wise mans understanding nor the party afflicted to be judged ill of in his good act by men charitably-minded But on the contrary if evill events and ill accidents meet with ill deedes there the offenders may without the breach of Charitie be judged to bee justly punished And I suppose that evill events and ill accidents happening very often where acts be done which be ill in great probability may probably witnesse Gods displeasure against such as so doe evill without prophanely making the Lord to beare false witnsse with us in such a case 5. For the rule of retaliation it is not applyable to our purpose and therefore I passe it by as neither furthering nor hindring the cause in hand Though upon the Lords day God may proceed against prophane men by retaliation as for instance known to my selfe to be a truth A lewd fellow tall and strong in a Market Town upon a Lords day drinking in an Ale-house with his fellow they fell out about sprinkâ—ing of the Cup with an Orenge-pill and were so inâ—aged as this bigge fellow wounded the other deadly whereupon he fled into the Low-Countries a yeere after the selfe same day twelve-month on the Lords day in the same Town returned he home as soone as he was come one skilfull in fencing but a little fellow would goe and drink with him and in drinking they two quarrelled about the sprinkling of the Cup with an Orenge-pill who could doe it best but when the little fellow stood upon his skill the other said that if hee durst say he could sprinkle it either better or as well as hee hee he would fight with him the other apt enough thereto they agreed fourthwith into the field they went taking their swords the little fellow after a few bouts ranne the other quit thorough who being tall closed with him and stuck his sword in the little fellowes back and broke
darknesse the Lords people observed a weekely Sabbath day then surely we should be ungratefull and negligent of our own salvation if we yeld not to God a weekly day or a sufficient time for his service as well as the Iews did Thus you see how we agree in the proportion of time one day in the week according to Gods designation of time and the equity of the Law CHAP. VI. Of the first day of the week that it is the Lords day and also the seventh day AS we must have a day within the week so is it needfull to know which day in the week it is which we are to observe for the Lords day else should wee be uncertaine for one would keep one day and others another day In Scripture the first day in the week mentioned in Mat. 28. 1. Mark 16. 2. 9. Luk. 24. 1. Joh. 20. 1. 19. Act. 20. 7. 1 Cor. 16. 2. is that which is called in Rev. 1. 10. the Lords day So saith S. August the first day of the week is that day Epig. 86. qui postea Dies Dominicus appellatus est S. Cyrill affirmeth In Iohn lib. 8. cap. 58. Apost 2. the very same Our Sunday saith Justine Martyr is the first day of the week Our Homily saith the first day after the Jewish Sabbath is our Sunday It is our Lords day said the Divines in Ireland The former Scriptures are interpreted See the many Exposit cited by Master Spr. pag. 61. by all Expositors the Fathers Greek and Latine the later writers Protestants and Papists to bee the Lords day It cannot well be dâ—nyed saith B. White that the first day of every week was the Christian weekly holy day It is manifest saith Doctor Pocklington that the first day of the week is the Lords day and to strengthen more this truth learned Beza saith that he hath read in a Manuscript 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 added to the Text in 1 Cor. 16. 2. so Crispine in his Greek Lexicon This first day of the week hath beene observed for our Lords day ever and no true Christian Church can be named that ever brake off the custome of this day This universall unity of so Catholique a custome is sufficient to settle any Christian in his faith of this truth that the first day of the week is the Lords day For what better Expositor than the Churches continuall practice and observation which must needs bee from a setled judgement of the truth of the time observed Our Church telleth us in the Homily that this custome hath beene kept in all ages without any gaine-saying And although this day after the Jewish account bee the first day of the week yet neverthelesse it keepeth the proportion of time in the Commandement the seventh part of a week so as it may be called the seventh day though not that seventh day I say the seventh day Let none here make a stir about the seventh and a seventh for the seventh day and not a seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord our God for the particle the and not a is to bee prefixed to seventh and not only because of the six dayes in which the world was made the dayes of the Creation as is commonly and onely so supposed to bee taken but for the donation of six dayes to us by God and that in the promulgation of this Law and Commandement as is in the former Treatise shewed Alwayes in counting of numbers we our selves in any ordinary number of seven when six is taken out doe not say there remaineth a seventh but the seventh for a should note an uncetainty but the doth not God of seventh dayes for there are no more in a week nor ever was hath given us for ever irrevocably six of them for to labour in and to doe all that wee have to doe Exod. 20. 9. These dayes we take to our selves as Gods gift from his words in the Law Now if we have six of the seven certainly knowne unto us can we reasonably say a seventh is the Lords or the seventh is his A seventh may be spoken of whole numbers where a certainty is not determined nor pitched upon nor taken out but where the number is no more but seven in a week as none heretofore nor any now count more there six being taken out for us the seventh is left as a certaine day not to bee doubted of for the Lord. So as yet the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord our God both by Gods donation of six to us and our counting our dayes to come to the seventh having taken to us the six For our first day of the week is Munday and so wee account forward to the Lords day as the seventh day and our Sabbath and resting day And most fit it is that wee should still hold the seventh day for our Sabbath * Dies dominica representat mâ—moriam Creation is mundi non minus quam Sabbagim nam die dominica incepit mundus fieri unde Iustinus Apo. 2. Et Leo Epist ad Dioscorum dicunt diem dominicam colitam ob memoriam mundi Creationis quà m ob resurrectionem Christi Bellarm. de â—â—lâ—u sanct lib. 3. cap. 110. that we might whilst we honour the Sonne in finishing the work of our redemption not forget the honour of his Father for his perfecting of the work of the worlds Creation and his resting from the same which cannot bee by observing any other day but the seventh day CHAP. VII Of the time when this first day began to be the Lords day and upon what ground THis first day observed was the very first day immediately Mat. 28. 1. Mar. 16. 2. 9. Luke 24. 1. Iob. 20. 1. 19. Ad Magnes after the Jewish Sabbath so the Scriptures confirme it to us whereto agreeth the exhortation of Ignatius After the Sabbath let every friend of Christ make the Lords day a solemne Festivall And the reason of this was because of the Lords resurrection S. Aug. ad Ian. epi. 119. 130. De verbo Apo. ser 15. Epi. 93. by which the Lords day was declared to Christians and from that time began to be celebrated and in another place it is said that the Lords Resurrection promised us an eternall day and it did consecrate unto us the Lords day And Leo saith the same Dominicum diem nobis Salvatoris resurrectio Lib. 8. c. 33. consecravit In the constitutions of the Apostles it is Ca. 50. ordained to be kept holy in the memoriall of the resurrection so a Councell held at Paris in Anno 829 ordeined the like Bishop White alleadging reasons why the Lords day was Against Brab pag. 269. 270. preferred before other weekly dayes saith that the Primitive Church could have made choyce of no other day of the week more proper and convenient for the solemne and religious worship and service of Christ Great was this work saith Athanasius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for we
for that they prophaned the day At Chidlington in the edge of Hertford-shire not farre from Hitchin upon an holy day a company of fellowes intended a match at foot-ball some of them were come into the Church and to call the rest together one tolled the Bell presently it began to thunder and on a sudden was seene a black ball to come tumbling downe a hill neare by and came directly to the Church and there flew into the Bell-Free and first slew him that tolled the bell then flustred about the Church and hurt divers and at last did buise in sunder leaving behinde it a filthie stinch like to brimstone Now albeit this was not on the Lords day yet were they thus fearefully punished First In plotting an unlawfull sport on that day against the authority of the Magistrate Secondly By making the Church a consecrated place their randevouze Thirdly by prophanely toling a Bell the principall use whereof was to give notice to the people to come and serve God and not to draw youths to vaine and unlawfull sports Fourthly and lastly in purposing to spend the time dedicated to sacred uses in their boisterous rude and harmeful spoâ—ting Thus we see how we may take notice of the judgments for breach of the Sabbath though punishments of the like nature yea sometimes worse happen upon other daies To Conclude this it is not good to take off our awefull thoughts from Gods hand upon breakers of the Sabbath least we grow presumptuous and fall into sinne and so procure to our selves the deserved judgements which have light upon others And let us consider how God threats to destory such Psa 28. 5. as regard not his workes and the operation of his hand Lastly some are so farre from having any regard at all to this argument drawne from the judgements of God as they hold the allegation of them in this cause to be impious rashnesse impious and rash presumption vaine observations next allied to superstition yea a prophane kinde of observation a strangly presumptuous and dareing manner to perke up into Gods throne and a taking upon men to reade the darke and divine Characters of the causes of his inscrutable judgements and an unsufferable arrogancy in such as produce them making God to beare false witnesse foolishly triumphing before the victory with saying Loe the judgements of God Loe the judgements of the Lord out of Heaven making them speake Gods indignation against the prophanation of the Lords day What should move any thus to condemne and censure such as bring Gods judgements against the prophaners of the Lords day They may perhaps better know with in themselves than they yet have expressed unto others If any have failed in trueth of Story or related examples not to purpose or what if but common and ordinary yet true yet may examples be memorable though common and ordinary for God makes them so common because he would not have them forgotten or that have put Causam pro non Causa they are left to answere for themselves For my part I suppose without feare of mens fore-mentioned heavie doome that we may with lowly reverence and with an holy awefullnesse of divine Majesty soberly observe his judgements and for those Reasons First the Scriptures are full of examples of Gods judgements to teach us to observe them now as then they were For whatsoever is written is written for our learning according to the nature of the things left us to read and understand Secondly Our Saviour Christ minded his Hearers of the destruction of the old world of Sodome and of Lots wife to make use thereof for their instruction Thirdly Saint Paul mentioneth fore-past judgements not 1. Cor. 10. to the Jewes among whom they happened but to converted Gentiles the Corinthians He nameth the sinnes and then the punishments and telleth them that they were written for ensamples and for our admonition that we should not doe as they did If judgements past serve for this use are we not to make the same use of judgements present which dayly happen among us I doubt not but we may and ought so to doe Fourthly The holy Psalmist layeth it down as a sin and threatneth destruction as a punishment because they regarded not they did not consider nor understood as the word Psal 2â— 5. signifieth the works of the Lord nor the operation of his hands The like doth the Prophet Esai in his time complain Esay 5. 12. of they were given to fcastings and wine and to the Pipe and other musicall instruments but they regarded not the work of the Lord neither Considered the operation of his hands as many in our times and especially on the solemne We are taught to magnifie his worke which men behold Iob 36. 24. Pro. 21. 11. daies set apart for Gods worship At which times if evills befall any of them are wee slightly to passe them by Should we not learne by other mens harmes to take out a lesson for our selves when the Scorner is punished the Simple is made wise saith Salomon Fifthly It is a duty yea a grace commended in the Godly Esa 26. 9. 10. that they will learne righteousnes when they see the judgements of God in the earth but it is cleane contrary to the wicked they will not behold the Majesty of the Lord when he 〈◊〉 â—hem and when they behold others punished yet they â—ill not learne righteousnesse Marke how the Prophet here â—â—dgeth them for wicked who from judgement on others and from his favour towards themselves will not learne righteousnesse Sixthly I have shewed that 800 yeeres ago how the Reverend Prelates at the Synod in Paris laid to heart the fearefull judgements which befell some for the prophanation of the Lords day Gualter as you have heard durst averre boldly confidently saying that it was not to be doubted that the prophanation of the Lords day was not the least cause of the evils and calamities in those times Bellarmine durst say as much In the exhortation added to our Fast-Booke is it not acknowledged that the plague hapned among other sinnes for the polluting and not keeping holy the Lords day Learned men from time to time have made Catalogues of such judgements as have hapned upon this day The Authour of the Practise of Pietie a book thirty five times reprinted allowed by authority and dedicated to our Now Dread Soveraigne when he was Duke of Yorke and after when he was Prince of Wales rehearseth many judgements upon Sabbath-breakers as he calleth them and is bold in the Conclusion to affirme that those judgements which he mentioneth may be sufficient unto them whose hearts are not seared how wrathfully God is displeased with them who are wilfull prophaners of the Lords day What shall we say of all these Reverend Fathers aforetime of our Reverend Prelates in their exhortation of Learned Divines aswell Papists as Protestants in their observation of judgments and applying them for the breach of the