Selected quad for the lemma: tradition_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
tradition_n apostle_n church_n succession_n 1,780 5 10.0444 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A41629 Transubstantiation defended and prov'd from Scripture in answer to the first part of a treatise intitled, A discourse against transubstantiation. Gother, John, d. 1704. 1687 (1687) Wing G1350; ESTC R4229 70,639 92

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View original text

necessary_o deduce_v from_o scripture_n and_o therefore_o this_o authority_n make_v nothing_o against_o we_o cardinal_n cajetan_n cajetan_n s_z word_n be_v censure_v and_o expunge_v by_o authority_n and_o therefore_o ought_v not_o to_o be_v bring_v against_o we_o transubstantiationem_fw-la cardinal_n contarenus_n free_o declare_v that_o all_o divine_n agree_v although_o it_o be_v not_o plain_o deliver_v viz._n not_o in_o express_a word_n yet_o follow_v reason_n as_o their_o guide_n and_o what_o be_v this_o but_o necessary_a rational_a deduction_n that_o this_o viz._n which_o be_v do_v in_o the_o sacrament_n can_v be_v effect_v by_o a_o local_a motion_n but_o by_o some_o change_n of_o the_o substance_n of_o bread_n into_o the_o body_n of_o christ_n which_o be_v call_v transubstantiation_n auctores_fw-la melchior_n canus_n do_v acknowledge_v that_o the_o church_n have_v by_o the_o spirit_n of_o truth_n explain_v some_o thing_n which_o be_v account_v obscure_a in_o the_o holy_a write_n and_o that_o she_o do_v just_o judge_v the_o author_n of_o the_o contrary_a opinion_n to_o be_v heretic_n but_o thing_n may_v be_v necessary_o contain_v in_o scripture_n although_o with_o some_o obscurity_n so_o that_o there_o be_v not_o so_o much_o as_o one_o of_o these_o author_n unless_o it_o be_v that_o which_o be_v condemn_v by_o the_o church_n and_o therefore_o in_o that_o point_n be_v none_o of_o we_o who_o have_v tell_v we_o that_o there_o be_v no_o necessity_n to_o understand_v our_o saviour_n word_n in_o the_o sense_n of_o transubstantiation_n last_o as_o if_o that_o true_a martyr_n bishop_n fisher_n have_v not_o suffer_v enough_o already_o the_o author_n exercise_v further_a cruelty_n against_o he_o by_o a_o false_a and_o imperfect_a recital_n of_o his_o word_n and_o corrupt_v their_o sense_n this_o holy_a bishop_n indeed_o speak_v of_o the_o word_n of_o institution_n say_v xcvii_o there_o be_v not_o one_o word_n put_v here_o by_o which_o it_o can_v be_v prove_v that_o in_o our_o mass_n the_o true_a presence_n of_o the_o body_n and_o blood_n of_o christ_n be_v make_v to_o be_v which_o last_o word_n be_v make_v to_o be_v the_o author_n false_o render_v by_o these_o word_n can_v be_v prove_v but_o this_o good_a martyr_n do_v not_o say_v that_o christ_n word_n of_o institution_n be_v not_o to_o be_v understand_v in_o the_o sense_n of_o the_o true_a and_o real_a presence_n of_o his_o body_n as_o make_v to_o be_v in_o that_o sacrament_n which_o our_o lord_n himself_o consecrate_a but_o that_o the_o power_n of_o priest_n now_o to_o consecrate_v in_o our_o mass_n after_o the_o same_o manner_n be_v not_o express_v in_o the_o bare_a word_n of_o institution_n and_o it_o be_v evident_a from_o the_o immediate_o follow_v word_n of_o this_o reverend_a bishop_n that_o this_o be_v his_o true_a sense_n which_o word_n run_v thus_o for_o although_o christ_n make_v of_o the_o bread_n his_o flesh_n and_o of_o the_o wine_n his_o blood_n it_o do_v not_o therefore_o follow_v by_o virtue_n of_o any_o word_n here_o place_v that_o we_o shall_v effect_v the_o same_o as_o often_o as_o we_o endeavour_v it_o as_o be_v also_o plain_a from_o the_o other_o word_n of_o this_o reverend_a author_n in_o the_o same_o chapter_n without_o the_o interpretation_n of_o the_o father_n and_o the_o usage_n of_o the_o church_n by_o they_o deliver_v down_o unto_o we_o consecrare_fw-la no_o body_n will_v prove_v out_o of_o the_o bare_a word_n of_o scripture_n that_o any_o priest_n can_v consecrate_v the_o true_a body_n and_o blood_n of_o christ_n for_o although_o we_o allow_v christ_n to_o have_v say_v what_o scripture_n say_v he_o do_v in_o this_o kind_n to_o the_o apostle_n out_o of_o luke_n and_o paul_n it_o do_v not_o therefore_o follow_v that_o he_o give_v the_o same_o power_n to_o all_o that_o be_v to_o succeed_v they_o for_o a_o power_n of_o cast_v out_o devil_n be_v give_v to_o the_o apostle_n but_o that_o this_o learned_a and_o pious_a bishop_n assert_v the_o change_n of_o the_o substance_n of_o the_o bread_n into_o the_o body_n of_o christ_n to_o be_v the_o necessary_a sense_n of_o the_o word_n of_o christ_n daemon_n this_o be_v my_o body_n be_v clear_a from_o these_o word_n of_o he_o controversia_fw-la if_o the_o substance_n say_v he_o of_o bread_n be_v change_v into_o christ_n body_n christ_n ought_v not_o to_o have_v say_v otherwise_o than_o he_o have_v say_v and_o again_o if_o the_o substance_n of_o bread_n remain_v than_o christ_n ought_v to_o have_v speak_v otherwise_o we_o must_v take_v notice_n that_o this_o pious_a bishop_n be_v defend_v tradition_n as_o necessary_a for_o the_o interpretation_n of_o some_o place_n of_o scripture_n and_o particular_o such_o which_o relate_v to_o the_o power_n that_o those_o who_o succeed_v the_o apostle_n have_v to_o consecrate_v and_o upon_o very_o good_a ground_n since_o without_o tradition_n we_o can_v conclude_v the_o scripture_n itself_o to_o be_v the_o word_n of_o god_n and_o no_o church_n can_v prove_v the_o succession_n of_o her_o pastor_n to_o this_o high_a function_n which_o be_v without_o doubt_v a_o fundamental_a point_n since_o therefore_o the_o protestant_n hold_v that_o there_o be_v a_o lawful_a succession_n of_o pastor_n in_o god_n church_n as_o necessary_a to_o the_o salvation_n of_o mankind_n as_o evident_o deduce_v from_o scripture_n interpret_v by_o tradition_n though_o not_o from_o the_o bare_a word_n of_o the_o institution_n of_o the_o eucharist_n no_o less_o than_o catholic_n and_o that_o they_o have_v as_o full_a a_o right_a to_o consecrate_v as_o the_o apostle_n themselves_o they_o must_v therefore_o allow_v that_o they_o do_v do_v so_o and_o then_o there_o can_v be_v no_o doubt_n raise_v from_o the_o word_n of_o this_o holy_a bishop_n but_o that_o christ_n body_n and_o blood_n be_v true_o in_o the_o sacrament_n by_o way_n of_o transubstantiation_n which_o doctrine_n he_o allow_v to_o have_v a_o certain_a foundation_n in_o scripture_n but_o the_o author_n here_o will_v rather_o pull_v down_o the_o pillar_n on_o which_o the_o church_n of_o christ_n stand_v by_o interrupt_v the_o episcopal_a succession_n and_o undermine_v its_o very_a foundation_n than_o not_o set_v a_o face_n upon_o his_o argument_n that_o he_o may_v thereby_o delude_v unwary_a christian_n upon_o the_o whole_a matter_n it_o be_v plain_a from_o what_o have_v be_v say_v 1._o that_o not_o any_o of_o these_o catholic_a author_n which_o be_v cite_v hold_v that_o there_o be_v no_o necessity_n to_o understand_v our_o saviour_n word_n in_o the_o sense_n of_o transubstantiation_n but_o the_o contrary_n 2._o that_o they_o indeed_o differ_v only_o about_o some_o curious_a speculation_n concern_v the_o dependence_n and_o circumstance_n of_o this_o doctrine_n of_o transubstantiation_n which_o they_o discourse_v of_o in_o a_o problematical_a way_n as_o for_o instance_n whether_o this_o transubstantiation_n be_v a_o mutation_n and_o transubstantiation_n productive_a that_o be_v to_o say_v by_o virtue_n of_o which_o the_o substance_n of_o the_o body_n be_v produce_v from_o the_o substance_n of_o bread_n or_o a_o mutation_n and_o transubstantiation_n adductive_a that_o be_v to_o say_v by_o virtue_n of_o which_o the_o substance_n of_o bread_n cease_v to_o be_v and_o that_o of_o the_o body_n be_v introdue_v in_o its_o place_n and_o whether_o in_o this_o adductive_a transubstantiation_n the_o cessation_n of_o the_o substance_n of_o bread_n and_o wine_n be_v to_o be_v call_v annihilation_n or_o whether_o it_o ought_v to_o be_v exempt_a from_o this_o name_n for_o as_o much_o as_o although_o it_o cease_v to_o be_v nevertheless_o this_o cessation_n of_o its_o essence_n have_v not_o non_fw-fr entity_n for_o its_o final_a term_n but_o the_o substitution_n of_o the_o essence_n of_o the_o body_n of_o christ_n or_o the_o like_a and_o such_o kind_n of_o dispute_n which_o do_v not_o at_o all_o relate_v to_o the_o essence_n of_o the_o article_n of_o transubstantiation_n but_o only_o to_o some_o consequence_n and_o mode_n of_o it_o for_o all_o the_o schoolman_n agree_v that_o the_o bread_n and_o wine_n be_v change_v and_o transubstantiate_v into_o the_o body_n and_o blood_n of_o christ_n by_o virtue_n of_o consecration_n the_o substance_n of_o bread_n and_o wine_n cease_v to_o be_v and_o those_o of_o the_o body_n and_o blood_n be_v substitute_v in_o their_o place_n 3._o they_o evident_o deduce_v the_o essential_a part_n of_o the_o doctrine_n of_o transubstantiation_n from_o scripture_n and_o although_o some_o few_o of_o they_o do_v sometime_o say_v that_o the_o bare_a word_n of_o scripture_n do_v not_o compel_v we_o to_o believe_v the_o less_o material_a consequence_n of_o it_o yet_o they_o do_v not_o deny_v that_o these_o also_o may_v be_v rational_o deduce_v 4._o the_o author_n do_v not_o pretend_v to_o prove_v from_o these_o authority_n that_o these_o writer_n do_v not_o hold_v the_o real_a presence_n of_o christ_n body_n here_o but_o only_o a_o sign_n and_o