called came who to say the truth of the matters within contained being chosen tried and sworn say upon their Oath That the said Humphry Morley did buy of the said John Slade the within written Wheat and Rye in eares upon the within written Close as is said before growing being for 16. pound of good and lawful mony of England To be paid to the said Iohn Slade in the Feast of St. Iohn the Baptist then next following as in the Declaration within written is within specified And further The said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That betwixt the said Iohn Slade and the said Humphry Morley There was no promise or taking upon him besides the bargain aforesaid But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid by the said Jurors in form aforesaid found The said Humphry Morley did take upon him in manner and form as in the Declaration within written within specified or no the said Jurors are altogether ignorant and thereof they ask the Advice and Consideration of the Court here c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the said Jurors in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices of the Court here That the said Humphry Morley did take upon him in manner and form in the Declaration within specified Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Humphry Morley did take upon him in manner and form as the aforesaid Iohn Slade within against him complaineth And then they do assesse the damages of the said Iohn Slade by occasion of not performance of his promise and taking upon him within written besides his charges and his costs by him in the sute aforesaid by him expended to Sixteen pounds And for those charges and costs by Twenty Shillings And if upon the whole matter by the said Jurors in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the said Justices and Court here That the said Humphry Morley did not take upon him in manner and form in the Declaration within specified Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath That the said Humphry did not take upon him in manner and form as the said Humphry hath within alleged And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of their judgement of and upon the premises to be given is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid in State as now it is before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Monday next after 15. dayes of the Holy Trinity to hear their judgement of and upon the premises Because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. And so from Term to Term untill Saturday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their judgement of and upon the premises Because the Court of the Lady the Queen here not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid came the parties aforesaid in their proper persons Upon which seen and by the Court of the Lady the Queen all and singular the premises fully understood and mature deliberation being thereupon had For that it seemeth to the Court of the said Lady the Queen now here That the said Humphry did take upon him in manner and form in the Declaration aforesaid above specified It is granted That the aforesaid John Slade shall recover against the said Humphry Morley his damages and costs aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed As also Nine pounds for his charges and costs aforesaid to the said John Slade by the Court of the said Lady the Queen here by his assènt of encease adjudged which damages in the whole do amount to Twenty and six pounds And the said Humphry Morley in mercy c. Hillary Term. 8. Jacobi Rott 1112. William Banes Case C. 9. part fol. 91. a. Mâ—morandum That at another time that is to say In the Term of St. Michael last past before the King at Westminster cometh William Banes by Thomas Ferrer his Attorny and brought here in the Court before the said Lord the King that now is his Bill against Edward Paine and Mary his Wife in the Custody of the Marshal of a Plea of Trespass upon the Case And are Pledges of Sute that is to say John Doo and Richard Roo Which Bill followeth in these words ss Willam Banes complaineth of Edward Paine and Mary his Wife in the Custody of the Marshall of the Marshalsey of the Lord the King before the King himself being for that is to say That whereas one William Havert in his life time the late Husband of the aforesaid Mary That is to say the first day of March in the year of the Reign of the Lord James that now is King of England the 6th at London that is to say in the Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap London was indebted to the said William Banes in 77. pounds of lawful Money of England for divers summs of Mony to him the said William Havert by the aforesaid William Banes give to loan and lent And so being endebted the said William Havert afterwards that is to say the 6th day of April in the year of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is of England the 7th at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid lying sick earnestly required the said Mary then his Wife to pay to the said William Banes after the death of the said William Havert the said 77. pounds And then and there the said William Havert made his Testament and last Will and made and constituted the said Mary Executrix of his said last Will then there dyed After whose death the said Mary took opon her the burthen of Execution of the Testament aforesaid And whereas the aforesaid Mary after the death of the said William Havert by colour of the last Will aforesaid was possessed of the interest of a Term for divers years then and yet to come Of and in certain Gardens and a Bowling-Ally scituate and being in Morefield that is to say in the Parish of St. Leonard in Shordich in the County of Midd. And the said Mary when she was single perceiving that the aforesaid William Banes intented to trouble and sue the said Mary for the aforesaid 77. pounds because that the said Mary the said 77. pounds to the said William Banes after the death of the aâ—oresaid William Havert her Husband deceased had not paid the said Mary whilest she was single afterwards that is to say 25th day of June in the year of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of Engl. the 7th aforesaid At London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid In consideration that the said William Banes at the instance and especial request of the said Mary should not trouble or sue the said Mary for the said 77. pounds but would forbear the payment thereof until the next Quarter that is to say until the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel then next following Promised unto the said
the Queen that the re-entry of the aforesaid William Ambry into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances in and upon the possession of the said Richard Hynde be or in Law ought to be adjudged a good and Lawfull re-entry then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath that the said William Ambry is not guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment of the farm aforesaid as he before for himself hath alleged And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement further of and upon the premises is not yet avised day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid in the state that now it is before the Lady the Queen at Westminster untill thursday next after 8 dayes of Saint Hillary to heare their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet have avised c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid and because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid in the state it now is before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until wednesday next after 15 dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement thereof c. because c. And so from Term to Term until the plaint aforesaid was farther adjroned by another writ of the said Lady the Queen of Common adjournment before the Queen until the morrow of All Souls at the Castle of Hartford in the County of Hartford at which day before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hartford came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Court of the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is farther given to the parties aforesaid in state as it is now before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hartford until Tuesday next after 3 dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement c. because c. Before which day the plaint aforesaid was adjorned by a writ of the Lady the Queen of common adjornement before the said Lady the Queen untill 8 dayes of Saint Hillary at Westminster at which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgment of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster untill VVednesday next after 15 dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement thereof c. because c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid Upon which seen by the Court of the Lady the Queen here and the premises diligently looked into and thereof mature deliberation being thereof had Because it seemeth to the Court of the said Lady the Queen here that the entrie of the aforesaid VVilliliam Ambry above specified into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances in and upon the possession of the aforesaid Richard Hynde was a good and lawfull re-entry therefore It is granted that the aforesaid Richard Hynde take nothing by his Bill aforesaid but that he for his false clamour be taken c. and the aforesaid VVilliam Ambry be thereof without damage c. Ejectione Firme Hillary Terme 36. Eliz. Rott 440. in the Kings Bench. Sir George Browns Case C. 3. part fo 45. WIlliam Spencer late of Swindon in the County aforesaid Yeoman and Thomas Spencer late of Swindon in the County aforesaid Yeoman were attached to answer to James Linche of a plea wherefore with force and armes one Messuage one Barn 80 Acres of Land 80 Acres of Meadow and 80 Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in Swindon which George Brown Knight to the aforesaid James demised for a Term which is not yet ended they entred and him from his Farm aforesaid did eject and other harms did unto him to the grievous damage of the said James and against the peace of the Lady the Queen that now is c. and whereupon the said James by Thomas Cooper his Attourny Complaineth That whereas the aforesaid George Brown the 22 th day of October in the year of the Reign of the Queen that now is the 35 th at Swindon aforesaid had demised to the said James the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to have and to hold the same Tenements with the appurtenances to the said James and his assigns from the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel then last past until the end and Term of 4 years from thence next ensuing and fully to be compleated By virtue of which demise the said James into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and so thereof being possessed the aforesaid William and Thomas afterwards that is to say the 22 th day of October aforesaid in the 35 th year aforesaid with force and armes c. the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances which the said George Brown to the said James in form aforesaid demised for the term aforesaid which is not yet ended entred and him the said James from his Farm aforesaid held out and other harms c. To the grievous damage c. and against the peace c. whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20 pound and thereof bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid William and Thomas by John Paxton their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And say that they in nothing are guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid as the aforesaid James above against them complaineth and of this put themselves upon the Country and the aforesaid James likewise c. Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he have here in 8 dayes of the Purification of the blessed Lady 12 good and Lawfull men c. by whom the truth c. and who neither c. Because aswell c. afterward the process between the parties aforesaid was continued of the plea aforesaid by Jurors put between them put in respite here until this day that is to say in 8 dayes of Saint Michael in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 37 th Unless the Justices of the Lady the Queen for Assises in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the statute upon Thursday the 17 day of July last past at New Sarad in the County aforesaid first came And now here at this day come as well the aforesaid James Linche as the aforesaid William Spencer and Thomas Spencer by their Attorneys aforesaid and the aforesaid Justices of Assise before whom c. sent here their Record in these words Afterwards the day and place within contained before Thomas Walmesley one
aforesaid are utterly Ignorant And thereof pray the Advise of the Justices aforesaid and of the Court here c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the same Justices and Court here c. That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father dyed seised of the Manors Tenements in the Monstrans de droit within written specified in his demesn as of Fee or of any part thereof with the Appurtenances Then the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father dyed seised of the Manors and Tenements with the Appurtenances in the Monstrans de droit specified or of so much thereof as to the same Justices shall â—eem the same Christopher so dyed seised in his demesn as of Fee as the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son the aforesaid Edward Digges within pleading have alleged And if upon the whole mâ—ttâ—r aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid sound It shall seem to the same Justices and Court here c. That the aforesaid Chrâ—stopher Digges the Father dyed not seised of the Manors and Tenements with tâ—e appurtenances in the Monstrans de droit within written specified or of any parcel thereof in his demesn as of Fee Then the said Juror say upon ther Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father dyed not seised of the Manors and Tenements with the Appurtenances in the Monstrans de droit within written specified or of so much thereof as to the said Justices aforesaid shall seem the same Christopher so not to dye seised of â—n his demesn as of Fee in his demesn as of Fee as the said Thomas Palmer and Margaret within pleading have alleged And because the Court of the Lady the Queen hereof giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avisâ—d day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid in state is now before the Lady the Queen untill the morrow of the Holy Trinity wheresoever c. to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof are not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges by their Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret in their proper persons And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Jugement of and upon the premises are not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in sute as now before the Lady the Queen untill in 8. dayes of Saint Michael wheresoever c. to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court or the Lady the Queen here thereof are not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come aâ—well the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and the said Edward Digges by their Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret in their proper persons and because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here oâ— giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised day thereof is given to the parties aforesaâ—d before the Lady the Queen untill in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary wheresoever e. for to hear their Judgâ—ment thereof c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here are not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges by their Attorney aforesaid as the said Thomas and Margaret in their proper persons and because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen untill from Easter day in 15. dayes wheresoever to hear their Judgement thereof c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof are not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges by their Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret in their proper persons And because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster untill the morrow of the Holy Trinity wheresoever c. to hear their Judgement hereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here are not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges by their Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret in their proper persons Upon which seen and by the Court of the Lady the Queen here all singular the premises here fully understood and mature deliberation thereof being had Because it seems to the Court of the Lady the Queen that now is here That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father dyed not seised of the Manors and Tenements with the Appurtenances in the Monstrans de droit aforesaid above specified or of any parcel thereof in his demesn as of Fee It is granted that the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges take nothing by their Writ aforesaid but for their false clamor thereof be in mercy c. And the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret go thereof without day c. Prohibition and Attachment upon Prohibition Easter Term Anno 38. Eliz. Rott 628. in the Kings Bench Co. 2. part The Bishop of Winchesters Case MEmorandum that at another time that is to say Michael Term last past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come Robert Wright by Thomas VVebb the younger and brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then and there his Bill against John VVright Executor of the Testament and last Will of Nicholas VVright late whilest he lived Farmer as he affirmed of the Rectory of the Parish Church of Eastmeon otherwise called Eastmeam in the Diocesse of VVinchester in the Province of Canterbury in the Custody of the Marshalsea c. in a Plea of Trespass and Contempt against those who prosecuted in the Spiritual Court against the Queens Prohibition to the contrary thereof directed and delivered And are Pledges of sute John Doo Richard Roo which Bill followeth in these words ss South That is to say Robert Wright who as well for the Lady the Queen as for himself prosecuteth complaineth of John Wright Executor of the Testament and last Will of Nicholas â—â—ight deceased late whil'st he lived as he affirmed of the Rectory of the Parish Church of Eastmeon otherwise called Eastmeam in the Diocess of Winchester in the Province of Canterbury in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being why he sueth
sworn therein and many years served the place Thus much being on my own knowledge to be true at his humble and earnest sute I thought good to advertise your Lordships and so do bid your Lordships farewell from the Court the 21th day of May 1579. your Lordships loving Friend R. Leicester And the Jurors further say That the aforesaid Augustine Steward brother of him the said Mark the 6th day of January in the 11th year abovesaid at Hampton Court in the County of Middlesex by the said Lady the Queen was admitted ordained and constituted to attend in the place and room of him the said Mark his brother upon Nicholas Bacon Knight then being Lord Keeper of the Great Seal of England and to the said Office for in the place and room of him the said Mark well and faithfully to exercise and execute then and there in the presence of the said Lady the Queen was sworn as by the Deposition of the said Augustine Steward which followeth in these words we finde to be true After Christmass and before Hillary Term in the 11th year of her Highness Reign on a Sunday or Holiday her Majesty coming from the Closet at Hampton Court was moved by the Right Honourable deceased Earl of Pembroke for the instituting of Augustine Steward Sergeant at Arms to attend upon the Lord Keeper To whom her Majesty answered My Lord he is not to have his brothers Office but is to be appointed only to attend in his place for him at such time as his brother shall be absent her Majesty making then relation of her favourable License already granted to Mark Steward to abide in the Country and to absent himself from her service at his pleasure until he should by her Majesty be called again to his attendance upon the said Lord Keeper And then the said Augustine was sworn to attend as is above specified By colour of which the said Augustine Steward in the absence of him the said Mark Steward his brother the aforesaid Office of Sergeant at Arms attendant upon the Chancellor of England from thence until the 20th day of June in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 18th used and executed But whether the said Lady the Queen by word only without Writing sealed can give sufficient License in Law to the said Mark Steward to absent himself from the exercising of his Office aforesaid the Jurors aforesaid are utterly ignorant and thereof pray the ayd and advise of the Court here in the premises And if upon the whole matter aforesaid it shall seem to the Court of the Lady and Queen here That the said Lady the Queen that now is can by word only without her writing sealed give sufficient License in Law to the said Mark to absent himself from the exercising of his Office aforesaid Then the said Jurors say That the said Lady the Queen that now is gave Licence to the said Mark Steward to absent himself from the exercise of his Office aforesaid during the pleasure of him the said Mark until he should be commanded by the said Lady the Queen to serve in his Office aforesaid in manner and form as the said Mark above in pleading alledged And if upon the whole matter aforesaid It shall seem to the Court of the Lady the Queen here That the said Lady the Quâ—en cannot by word only without her Writing sealed give sufficient license in Law to the said Mark to absent himself from the exercising of his Office aforesaid Then the Jurors aforesaid say That the said Lady the Queen did not give license to the said Mark to absent himself from the exercising of his Office aforesaid during the pleasure of him the said Mark until he should be commanded by the said Lady the Queen to serve in his Office aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement thereof is not yet avised c. Therefore day thereof is given as well to the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as to the aforesaid Mark Steward until in 8. dayes of Saint Michael before the Lady the Queen wheresoever c. in state as now c. to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which 15. dayes from Saint Michael before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come as well the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as the aforesaid Mark by his Attorny aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement thereof are not yet avised c. Therefore further day thereof is given as well to the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as to the aforesaid Mark Steward until from the day of Saint Martin 15. dayes before the Lady the Queen wheresoever c. in state as now c. to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which 15. dayes from Saint Martin before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as the said Mark Steward by his Attorny aforesaid Upon which all and singular the premises being seen and fully understood by the Court here and mature deliberation being had thereof the Queens Serjeant at Law and the Attorny General of the said Queen being called to it and present It was awarded That the said Office of Serjeant at Arms holden in the Hands of the said Lady the Queen be restored to the said Mark And that the said Mark Steward to the exercising and holding of his Office aforesaid from which he was amoved together with the Wages and Fees thereof to the said Office due and belonging from the time of his amoving from the exercising of his Office aforesaid hitherto received and with-holden be restored c. Saving the Right of the Queen if any c. TRESPAS Hillary Term Anno 41. Elizabeth Rott 1049. in the COMMON-PLEAS C. â— part Corbets Case fol. 77. b. ROwland Corbet late of Stokefaston in the County aforesaid Esquire was Leicest attached to answer to Arthur Corbet Gentleman of a Plea wherefore with force and Arms the Close of the said Arthur at Stokefaston aforesaid he broke and his Grasse there to the value of 10. pound growing with certain Cattel Fedd Trod and Consumed and other harms to him did to the great damage of the said Arthur and against the Peace of the Lady the Queen that now is c. And whereupon the said Arthur by Lawrence Lyter his Attorny complaineth That the said Rowland the 20th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 40th with Force and Arms c. the Close of him the said Arthur at Strokefaston broke and his Grasse there to the value c. there then growing with certain Cattel that is to say with Horses Cows Hoggs and Sheep fed trod and consumed and other harms c. to the great damage c. and against the Peace c. Whereupon he saith that he
That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid John â—rayne into the Close within written with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the aforesaid VVilliam Dillon thereof be a good and lawful Entry in Law Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid John Frayne is not guilty of the Trespasse within written as the aforesaid John Frayne within hath alleged And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet a vised Day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Monday next after one Moneth of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid here in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of their Judgement thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Monday next after three Weeks of Saint Michael to hear their judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Saturday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Saturday next afer 15. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Saturday next after 8. dayes of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen hereof giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Thursday in the Feast of St. Martin to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Tuesday next after the Morrow of the Purification of the blessed Mary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Wednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Q. at West come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Que. at Westminster until Monday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. Before which day the Plea aforesaid was adjorned by the Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment before the Lady the Queen until from the day of Saint Michael in one Moneth then next following wheresoever c. At which day the Plea aforesaid was further adjorned by another Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment before the said
Lady the Queen until the Morrow of All Souls then next following At the Castle of Hertford At which day before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hertford come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hertford until Tuesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. Before which day the Plea aforesaid was adjorned by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment before the Lady the Queen in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary at Westminster At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Wednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at VVestminstrr until Tuesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. Before which day The Plea aforesaid was adjorned by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Cōmon Adjornment before the Lady the Queen until the day from Saint Michael in one Moneth then next following At the Town of Saint Alban in the County of Hertford At which day the Plea aforesaid by another Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment was adjorned before the said Lady the Queen until the Morrow of All Souls then next following at the aforesaid Town of St. Alban At wch day before the Lady the Q. at the aforesaid Town of St. Alban come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of upon the premises is not avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at the aforesaid Town of Saint Alban until Wednesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here therof not yet c. Before which day the Plea aforesaid was adjorned by another Writ of Common Adjornment before the Lady the Queen from the aforesaid Town of Saint Alban until the said 8. dayes of Saint Hillary at Westminster aforesaid At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestmin come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until VVednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day further is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster until Fryday next after the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westmin come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Que. here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the said Lady the Queen at VVestminster until Tuesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster until Thursday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid Upon which all singular the premises being seen by the Court of the Lady the Queen here well understood and diligently looked into mature deliberation being thereof had because it seemeth to the Court of the Lady the Queen that now is here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid John Frayne into the Close within written with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the aforesaid William Dillon thereof is a good and lawfull Entry It is granted That the aforesaid William Dillon take nothing by his Bill aforesaid but for his false clamour be in mercy c. And the aforesaid John Frayne thereof go without day c. TRESPAS Trinity Term Anno 24. ELIZABETH Rot. 928. in the COMMON-PLEAS Co. 2. part Thoroughgoods Case Fol. 5. b. WIlliam Cole late of Great Paringdon in the County aforesaid Gent. Essex was attached to answer to William Thoroughgood of a Plea wherefore with force and arms the Close and House of him the said William Thoroughgood at great Paringdon he brake and his grass there
at Westminster in the County of Midd. was holden at Westminster aforesaid unto the Castle of the Lady the Queen c. is adjorned c. and their holden c. Afterwards the said Lady the Queen By other Letters Patents Constituted John Clench and Francis Rodes one of her Serjants at Law Justices to Assizes in the a-aforesaid County of York c. And the said Justices by virtue of the said Lett. Patents Afterward that is to say Monday in the 4th week of Lent in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 25th At the Castle of York came before whom then and there come the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth by their Attorney aforesaid and pray a Writ of Reattachment to the aforesaid Edward George Richard Coats c. that they be before the Justices of the Lady the Queen at the next Assizes in her County of York to be taken assigned to be holdē at the afores Castle of York to hear the Record and their Judgement of the Assize aforesaid w hc was in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is at the Castle aforesaid so that that Assize then be here in the State as it was in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is before the aforesaid John Clench and Francis Gawdy Justices to Assizes c. At the aforesaid Castle of York the aforesaid Monday the 6th day of August in the year of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 24th in which day the Assize aforesaid was adjorned before the said John Clench and Francis Gawdy then Justices c. from the aforesaid Castle of York unto the aforesaid Inn of the Justices in Chancery Lane London untill the aforesaid Saturday next after the aforesaid morrow of All Souls then next following c. At which next Assizes holden at the Castle of York aforesaid Monday the 29th day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 25th before the aforesaid John Clench and Francis Gawdy then Justices to Assizes c. came as well the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth by their Attorny aforesaid as the aforesaid Edward George Richard Coats Iohn William Robert and Robert by the aforesaid Thomas Hill their Attorny And the Sheriff that is to say Thomas Wentworth Esq now sent That the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn William Robert and Robert c. And upon this day is given to them before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Bench in the Bench at Westminster in the morrow of All Souls next comming to hear and receive what to the said Justices should seem in this behalf because the said Iohn Clench and Francis Rodes Justices to Assizes c. thereof not yet c. And the Assize aforesaid with all touching the same to the said Justices of the Bench is sent c. The Warrant of Attorny followes and the Writ of Resummons in the Roll and the Tenor of the Writ of Reattachment and Retorn of the said Writ Elizabeth c. To the Sherriffs of York greeting Reattach Edward Vavasor Esq George Richard Coats Iohn William Robert and Robert or their Bailiffs if they shall not be found before our Justices to Assizes in your County to be taken assigned at the Castle of York in your County upon Monday the 22d. day of Iuly then next to come to hear the Record and Judgement of the Assize of Novel disseisin which was in our Court at the Castle aforesaid which Assize Thomas Dowman Esq and Elizabeth his Wife there arraigned against them of 6. Messuages 300. Acres of Land 100. Acres of Meadow and 200. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in Spaldington VVillytoft and Southcone So as they that Assize then be there in the same state as it was in our Court before Iohn Clench third Baron of our Exchequer and Francis Gawdy one of our Serjants at Law our Justices to Assizes in your County to be taken assigned At the aforesaid Castle of York Monday the 6th day of August last past which day the assize aforesaid for certain causes was from thence adjorned before the same our Justices unto the Inn of the Justices in Chancery Lane London Untill Saturday next after the morrow of All Souls then next following And have here the names of the Pledges and this Writ Iohn Clench at the Castle of York the 11th day of March in the yeer of our Reign the 25th Frankland Cresly The within named Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert hath not any thing nor any of them have any thing in my Baliwick by which they can be attached or any of them can be attached nor have they nor any of them hath a Bailiff or Bailiffs nor are they or any of them to be found in the same Thomas VVentworth Esq Sheriff And now here that is to say at VVestminster aforesaid at this day that is to say at the aforesaid morrow of All Souls came as well the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth by the aforesaid Henry Cressy their Attorny as the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert by Tho. Algar their Attony And because the Justices of the Bench here will avise themselves of and upon the premses before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties here until 8. dayes of St. Hillary and so it is continued in 8. dayes of St. Hillary the yeer following At which day here come as well the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth as the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this The premises being seen and by the Justices here fully understood It seemeth to the said Justices here That the aforesaid Indenture by the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esq after the aforesaid Recovery in form aforesaid made and had was good and sufficient in the Law to lead the uses of the Recovery aforesaid of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenunces so that the same Recovery of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the view of the Recognitors of the Assize aforesaid put and in the Plaint aforesaid specified by the aforesaid Andrew VVindsor VVilliam Vavasor Peter Vavasor the younger and John Laundere against the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esq in form aforesaid had was to those uses in the aforesaid barr of the aforesaid Edward above specified in manner and form as the said Edward in his bar aforesaid above alleged Therefore it is considered That the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth take nothing by their Writ aforesaid but in mercy for their false clamour c. And the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert go thereof without day c. Audita Querela Easter Term Anno 80. of King JAMES Doctor Druries Case C. 8. part Fol. 139. a. AT another time as appeareth in