with the Titles of impious seditious infamous to Popes ruinous to States c. 96. Yea moreover within these six Moneths a certain Priest of the Hermitage of Caen called Fossart a known Emissary of that society having in his publick acts for a degree in that University advanced this proposition That the Pope has a Soveraign Authority in Temporals as well as Spirituals and that he has power to depose and constitute Kings though to evade a censure he Interpreted his Assertion saying that he understood that power of the Pope to extend only to Tyrants notwithstanding by a Decree of the whole faculty of that University both his proposition and exposition of it was censured to be impious pernicious seditious and in all regards to be detested and as such it was by them condemned And the same Fossart being after this imprisoned was sentenced by the presidial Court of Justice in Caen publickly and bare-headed to acknowledge that the said propositions were false contrary to the holy Decrees of Councels to the fundamental lawes of that Kingdom and to the liberties and rights of the Gallican Church 97. Such is the judgment of the Ecclesiasticks and State of France of this Article of Faith from which was issued rivers of blood during the Ligue there As zealous against the Temporall power of Popes has the State of Venice shewed it self And if other Catholick Kingdomes have not done the like it is because they have not had such dismal occasions and provocations to declare their minds In Spain indeed the Schools are connived at to preserve it from extinguishing because by its assistance a great part of Navarre has been annexed to that crown and some hopes of England too gave it credit there But yet when the Court of Rome would interpose in temporal matters there without the Kings liking he is as boldly resisted as in any other Catholick Kingdome besides 98. And as for the Church and State of England I mean even in former times when Catholick Religion most flourished here and when Church-Men had the greatest power what sign can be shewed that the foresaid Decree and the new article of Faith was admitted either in Parliaments or Synods Yea so far were they from acknowledging the Popes deposing power or Supremacy in Temporals that Statutes were then made and the penalty no less then a Praemunire against any that without the Kings licence should make any Appeals to Rome Or submit to a Legats Jurisdiction Or upon the Popes Summons go out of the Kingdom or receive any Mandats or Briefs from Rome Or sue in a forrain Realm for any thing for which the Kings Courts took Cognisance Or for impeaching a judgment given in the Kings Courts Or for purchasing Bulls from Rome for presentments to Churches anâ—iently sued for in the Kings Courts in the time of all his Progenitors And it is very observable that in the Act where the last Ordinances were made we find this expression To this all the Bishops present and all the procuratours of the absent unanimously assented protesting against the Popes translating some Bishops out of the Realm and from one Bishoprick to another And moreover the ground of their rejecting the Popes usurpations in temporal matters is there thus expressed For that the Crown of England is free and hath been free from earthly subjection at all times being immediately subject to God in all things touching the Regalities of the same and not subject to the Pope 99. All these lawes and many other of the like kind all the Kings Catholick Subjects knew and willingly submitted to without any prejudice to their beliefe that the Pope was the supreme pastour of Gods Church in spiritualibus And all these Lawes are still in force and the penalty of them no less then a premuniâ—e Our De-fide-men are not much concern'd in all this but sure persons of honour and loyalty and such as have Estates in the Kingdom are very deeply interested 100. And now let any English Catholick judge what reception such a decree or Article of Faith would have had in England in those most Catholick times if they had been proposed Those that were so jealous of the least deminution of the Kings temporal power in matters of the smallest consequence and that imposed the greatest penalty but death upon transgressours that is upon all Factours for the gaining to the Court of Rome any illegal temporal Authority with what indignation would they have heard only the mentioning of the reception of such a Decree And yet those Lawes were made not long after that Councel had been assembled whereby it is apparent that they were ignorant of it Those that would not suffer the least flower of this imperial Crown to be ravished from it would they admit a power and forraign Jurisdiction to take the Crown it self from the Kings head and afterward the head it self from his Shoulders 101. It is true the teaching of such an Artiâ—le of faith brings very great temporal commodities to those few that have the cruelty to their Country to become the preachers and Apostles of it great favour and power they gain thereby abroad and therefore they will take it kindly at the hands of English Catholicks if for a mere Secular advantage of theirs they will be content to Sacrifice their own Estates Honours Families and lives as traytors to the lawâ—s and withall bring an unavoydable scandal to Catholick Religion besides But truly this is too dear a rate to be paid for such a commodity 102. A man would think that such Apostles should be content yea and by their own Doctâ—ine of probability should be obliged to grant this Doctrine of the Popes deposing power to be somewhat less then an Article of Faith The opposition of the whole State Ecclesiasticks of France against their single forces surely may be available to make it pass at least for a probable Opinion But this they must not allow because if it be not an Article of Faith unless infidelity to Princes be de fide it signifies juâ—t nothing neither can it have any effect at all For certainly no Law nor justice wil permit that an Authority only probable and therefore questionable can dispossess Kings of their right to a Supremacy in temporals in which they are actually instated So that such an Authority can only have force to dispossess Princes already dispossessed 103. However they would esteem themselves much bound to any other learned Catholicks among us if they would condescend to grant that it is only probable that it is a point of faith and decree of a General Councel But in vain will they expect such a compliance For by granting only so much it will necessarily follow 1. That all the so rigorous censures given of it by the Parliaments and Vniversities of France have been most temerarious and damnable For what can be more horrible then to call a Doctrine impious seditious detestable c. which probably is a
Protestants know that the first invention of this Oath was to explore the consciences of Catholicks and to tempt them to Schisme by renouncing the Spiritual Authority of the head of Gods Church which under perill of damnation they cannot do They would not perhaps find so great difficulty without swearing only to say That the King alone is the supreme Governour in all matters Ecclesiastical within his Dominions c. when they are obliged to say this to persons that acknowledge with them such power to be only Civill But an Oath to Catholicks is a thing so dreadful that they dare not call God to witnesse that they sincerely swear an acknowledgement that the Pope has not nor ought to have any Superiority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual unlesse it might be permitted them at the same time in the same breath to signify that this is intended of Civil Kingly Authority in Ecclesiastical causes They tremble to swear in a phrase at the best ambiguous or rather not ambiguous but formally contradictory to Catholick Doctrine for all the words that they pronounce and of their acknowledgment whereof they make God a witnesse are such as they are perswaded to be manifestly erroneous Now God is called a witnesse to what men say in an oath not to what they think unless they think as they say 80. But moreover there is another consideration that is more than sufficient to make the taking of this oath inconsistent with Catholick Religion and that is the difference that King James Bishop Andrews c. put between the two oathes of Supremacy and Allegiance in regard of their End and intention For sayes King James The Oath of Allegiance was not framed against Roman Catholicks in general but only to make a separation between Catholicks of a peaceable disposition in all other things good Subjects and such Roman Catholicks as maintained the Rebellious Maxims of the Powder-traitours But as for the Oath of Supremacy the intention of the continuation of it was to the end to discover who were Roman Catholichs and who Protestants So that whosoever takes that Oath is presumed by King James c. to declare that he is no Catholick Bishop Andrews has the like expression but withall he discovers the usesessness of that oath For saies he what needs any oath at all to detect who are Roman Catholicks For they refuse to be present at the Protestants Church service they will not come to our Sermons they dare not receive the Eucharist with us c. So that without any oath you may easily know who are Roman Catholicks 81. Lastly the principal proof by which Protestants demonstrate that by the Oathes no other Authority or Supremacy is given to our Princes but civil only which is the 37 Article of the English Church though it be sufficient to clear the Affirmative part of the oath yet not so for the Negative concerning the Popes spiritual Jurisdiction Yea in the same place it is expresly excluded For the words following in the same Article do apparently give and require a very uncatholick sence of that Negative Clause for there is expressely affirmed The Bishop of Rome hath not any Jurisdiction in this Kingdom Now since both King James Bishop Andrews and the thirty seventh Article even in the very same places where they speak of Kingly and papal power do as the former rightly state the Kingly and leave the Papal Spiritual power indifinitely excluded their intention appears to have been to declare against and require an abrenunciation of a Catholick point of faith 82. Upon these grounds Catholicks dare not but refuse to take the Oath of Supremacy Perhaps by the new unlawful art of Casuistry some of them might think they could find evasions but generally such is the tendernesse of their consciences that they dare not think it lawful to make advantage of Casuistry in a Solemn Oath Very likely Protestants will call them nicely scrupulous foolish or improvident for this their tendernesse of conscience But sure they will not suspect them disloyal who attribute as much Authority to the King as themselves do and if it were permitted them to confirm this by a clear Oath in their own language they would not yield to them in the fullnesse of the expression If hereafter they are resolved not to grant them any ease from their pressures if a harmlesse scrupulosity in Catholicks shall bear those penalties which direct rebellion in others escapes If to satisfy the passion of not very good Subjects those that are truly loyal shall be treated as Rebells and their religion only punished indeed however that will not be acknowledged by those that punish it all that remains for Catholicks to say is Dominus judicabit fines terrae SECT IX Vpon what grounds some Catholicks make scruple to take the Oath of Allegiane 83. NExt followes the Oath of Allegiance framed by K. James upon the greatest provocation and an attentat the most execrable the most abhorred by the whole body of Catholicks both at home and abroad and the most scandalous to Christian Religion that ever was This oath affords also matter of wonder to Protestants Why Catholicks who acknowledge the Kings supreme civil authority should make any scruple to take it since it was never meant against such 84. But they may impute only to themselves the cause of such a refusal for by some incommodious phrases unnecessarily thrust into it they have frighted many from taking it and as if they had conspired with that one too well known party which alone gave occasion for the framing it they have given them advantage for those unnecessary phrases sake to fix upon all the Refusers a scandalous however unjust imputation as if they approved these abominable principles from which flowed that more abominable Attentat which deservedly wrung extreme severity from a Prince the most element that ever this Nation formerly had enjoyed 85. In the following Reflexions therefore upon this Oath justice requires that we should divide between the innocent and the guilty between those that not in this Kingdom only have made that Principle of Disloyalty their distinctive Charter and those that are ready to renounce that Principle if they might be allowed to renounce it by any other though more Emphatical expressions 86. As touching the former unhappy party it is observable that at the first publishing of the Oath there were in every line and almost particle of it pointed out by them a several Heresie All which Heresies are now at last vanished excepting only one which is that by which there is enjoyned a renouncing of that so bruited Article of Faith touching the Popes power of deposing Princes not for Heresie only but almost any other fault that shall be esteemed sufficient to deserve it 87. This pretended Article of Faith is by such new De-fide-men grounded either upon the Actions of certain Popes since Pope Gregory the seventh which both for their own sakes and ours it is to be
wished had never been done or might be blotted out of all mens memories or upon the Decrees of some Councels not received or acknowledged by Catholick Churches but principally upon a Decree of the Councel of Lateran under Pope Innocent the third in which an Ordinance is said to have been framed to oblige not supreme Princes but Temporales Potestates and Dominos which bear Offices in States to take at Oath to root out of their Dominions all Hereticks upon penalty if they do not performe what they swear of being denounced by the pope to be deprived of their Estates c. yet reserving the right of the supreme Lord. 88. All these Allegations have been already unanswerably confuted by several learned Writers of our Nation but because this last Decree of a Councel not so questioned for as much as can be proved to have been decided in it and because it is almost alone suggested to the tongues of some Catholicks among us as the principal pillar of that pretended Article of Faith for the maintaining of which they are exhorted to forfeit their Estates and Lives they are desired sadly to consider 89. First that this pretended decree of faith has been disclaimed by a World of unquestion'd Catholicks and Doctor Bishop the last Catholick Bishop but one in England has written a book purposely against it and no proof can be given that it was ever received or executed by any Catholick Kingdome out of Italy The reasons whereof are 1. Because these Decrees were never published by P. Innocent nor so much as a copy of them extant either in the Body of Councells or the Vatican Library or any where else till a certain German three hundred years after said that he found them in a Manuscript compiled he knowes not by whom being indeed a meer Collection made by some unknown person out of the Decretals of his Nephew Gregory the ninth 2. Because by the testimony of all Historians of those times P. Innocent the third suffred much in his reputation for having convoked such a multitude of Prelates to no purpose Above sixty Capitula were by the Popes order recited in the Assembly and many of them pend in a stile as if they had been concluded for that was the Popes expectation but nothing at all could be plainly decreed they seemed indeed to some PLACABILIA passable to others Onerosa but no conciliary Determinations were made except one or two which was about the recovery of the holy Land and the subjection of the Greek Church to the Roman by reason of a war then begun between them of Pisa and Genua which called the Pope from the Councel 90. Again though it were granted that this was a Conciliary Decree it is far from looking like an Article of Faith which saith Bellarmine and Canus may easily be discerned by the stile Here is nothing proposed to be believed no Anathema fulminated against those that are of a contrary sentiment no signification that the contrary is against the words or sence of Scriptures c. At the best therefore it is a mere Ecclesiastical Ordinance touching external discipline And being such what is more ordinary and by custom permitted then for Princes to refuse the admittance of them we see at this day that the State and Church of France do reject the Decrees of Reformation made in the Councel of Trent This is known at Rome and all Christendom over and yet who dare impute Heresy to them What confusion would follow if all the Ordinanâ—es of the Councel of Trent should be practised among catholicks here in England as about Clandestine Mariages c. 91. Thirdly suppose this were granted to be an Ordinanâ—e established and admitted all Christendom over yet supreme and Independent Princes not being expresly named in it but rather excluded by the expressions of it what can be more palpably injust then without and against their consent to captivate them to such an ordinance Moreover to demonstrate that they were purposely excepted the Emperour Frederike not above five or six years after published an edict to the very same intent and in the very same language and titles by which he intended to oblige only the Feudatary princes and officers of the Empire by oath to root out heresy And yet after all no example can be produced either in the Empire or other Christian States that such an oath was in succeeding times imposed This is the Article of Faith for the maintaining of which it is by one party expected that all English Catholicks should ruine both themselves and their Religion It is not so in Catholick countries abroad VVe know that Charles the fifth by a law of the Empire publickly permitted Lutherans in several provinces and all the Kings of France since Henry the third the Calvinists through their Kingdom and yet the pope never so much as threatned nor they feared a Deposition 93. And as for the Doctrinal point of faith most shamelesly pretended to be involved in that or the like decrees to wit the Popes power of deposing Princes what one Catholick State Kingdom Republick or City can the preachers of it name where it is received or permitted to the people to be taught even as a probable opinion 94. It is well known that in France in the year 1614. a book written by Suarez the Jesuite purposely against this Oath in which that Deposing power was asserted was by a Decree of the Parliament of Paris condemned therefore to be burnt by the publick Executioner as containing propositions scandalous seditious tending to the eversion of States and inducing Subjects to practise against the lives and sacred persons of Kings c. And moreover it was ordained according to a former Edict made A. D. 1610. that a decree then made by the Theological faculty for renewing a Doctrinal Censure of the same faculty A. D. 1408. against the like Doctrine and confirm'd by the Councel of Constance should every year upon a certain day be read in the Schools of the Jesuites and of the four Mendicant orders Besides all this the same Parliament enjoyned the four principal Jesuites in Paris Armandus Cotton Fronto and Sirmond to take order that their General at Rome should renew a prohibition to any of the society to teach and publish the like Doctrines and themselves were commanded in their Sermons to preach a contrary Doctrine all this under the penalty of being proceeded against as Traytors 95. The like fate had several other books written by eminent persons of the same Order as Mariana Bellarmine Santarellus c. which maintained the Popes temporal Jurisdiction and power to deprive Princes and to absolve Subjects from their Obedience And particularly upon occasion of Santarellus his book no less then eight Universities in that Kingdom Paris Valentia Tholouse Poictiers Bourdeaux Bourges Rheims and Caen did of their own accord not expecting any command from the Court in the year 1626. brand the Doctrine of the Popes deposing power
the only supream Governour of this Realme and of all other his Highnesse Dominions and Countries as well in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical things or causes as Temporall And that no Forreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Iurisdiction Power Superiority Pre-eminence or Authority Ecclesiastical or Spirituall within this Realme And therefore I do utterly renounce and forsake all forraign Iurisdictions Powers Superiorities and Authorities And doe promise that from henceforth I shall bear faith and true Allegiance to the Kings Highness his heirs and lawful Successours and to my power shall assist and defend all Iurisdictions Priviledges Pre-eminencies and Authorities granted or belonging to the Kings Highness his hâ—irs and Successours or united and annexed to the imperial Crown of this Realme So help me God and by the Contents of this book 11. The tenor of the Oath of Allegiance is this viz. I A. B. do truely and sincerely acknowledge professe testify and declare in my conscience before God and the World that our Soveraign Lord King CHARLES is lawful and rightful King of this Realme and of all other his Majesties Dominions and Countries and that the Pope neither of himself nor by any authority of the Church or Sèe of Rome or by any other means with any other hath any Power or Authority to depose the King or to dispose any of his Majesties Kingdomes or Dominions or to authorise any forreign Prince to invade or annoy him or his Countries or to discharge any of his Subjects of their Allegiance and Obedience to his Majesty or to give licence or leave to any of them to bear Armes to raise tumults or to offer any violence or hurt to his Majesties Royal Person State or Government or to any of his Majesties Subjects within his Majesties Dominions Also I do swear from my heart that notwithstanding any Declaration or sâ—ntence of Excommunication or Deâ—rivation made or granted or to be made or granted by the Pope or his Successours or by any Authority derived or pretended to be derived from him or his Sèe against the said King his Heirs or Successours or any Absolution of the said Subjects from their Obedience I will hear faith and true Allegiance to his Majesty his Hâ—irs and Successours and him and them will defend to the uttermost of my power against all conspiracies and attempts whatsoever which shal be made against his or their Persons their Crown or dignity by reason or Colour of any such sentence or declaration or otherwise and will do my best endeavour to disclose and make known unto his Majesties Heirs and Successours all Treasons and Traiterous conspiracies which I shall know or hear of to be against him or any of them And I do further swear that I from my heart abhorr detest and abjure as impious and hereticall this damnable doctrine and position That Princes which be excommunicated or deprived by the Pope may be deposed or murthered by their Subjects or any other whatsoever And I do believe and in my conscience am resolved that neither the Pope nor any person whatsoever hath Power to absolve me of this oath or any part thereof which I acknowledge by good and full authority to be lawfully ministred unto me And do renounce all Pardons and dispensations to the contrary And all these things I do plainly and sincerely acknowledge and swear according to these expresse words by me spoken and according to the plain and common sense and understanding of the same words without any equivocation or mental evasion or secret reservation whatsoever And I do make this recognition and acknowledgment heartily willingly and truly upon the true faith of a Christian So help me God 12. These are the formes of the two Oathes Both which if they be understood according to the proper and natural sence of the words import that there being only two kinds of Jurisdictions viz. Spirituall and Temporal both which are named here the King within his Dominions is equally the Fountain and Root of them both So that whosoever exercises any office or Magistracy either in the State or the Church does it and must acknowledge so much meerly by communication from the King or a participation of so much of his power as he is pleased to impart Upon which grounds it will follow not only that no forraign Prince Prelate c No Assembly or Councel of Bishops though never so Oecumonical hath right to any superiority or Jurisdiction within these Kingdomes but also that whatsoever any Bishop or Priest in the Kingdom c. acts in matters duties purely Spiritual as conferring Orders Ecclesiastical inflicting censures administring Sacraments c. they do all this with a direct subordination to the King as his Delegates or Substitutes insomuch as if he pleases he may himself exercise all those functions personally and may according to his pleasure suspend the execution of them in all others 13. All this plainly seems to be the true importance of the Oathes neither will any Stranger or dis-interessed person reading them frame to his mind any other meaning of them though certain it is that our four last Princes have not intended that all that took them should accowledge all this that is imported by them Neither is there at this day any Church or Assembly of Christians nor perhaps any person unlesse it be the Authour of Leviathan that taking these Oathes will or can without contradicting his belief mean all that the formes and clauses of them do directly properly and Grammatically signify as shall be Demonstrated SECT IV. Reflections upon these two Oathes in grosse 14. IT well deserves to be considered what was the occasion of framing this Oath of Supremacy by K. Henry the eighth and what power he received or at least executed by vertue of such Acts of Parliament as enjoyned the taking of it c. 15. The Title of Supream head and Governour of the Church of England was first given to King Henry the eight in a Petition addressed unto him by the Bishops obnoxious to a Praemunire for having submitted to Cardinal Wolsey's Legantine power without the Kings assent Now how far this new Ecclesiastical power of the King was intended to extend will appear by following Acts of Parliaments and by the Kings own proceedings in vertue thereof 13. It was enacted by Parliament 1. that no Canons or Constitutions could be made by the Bishops c. and by them promulgated or executed without the Kings command 2. Yea the Clergy were forced to give up also their power of executing any old Canons of the Church without the Kings consent had before 3. All former Constitutions Provincial and Synodal though hitherto inforce by the authority of the whole Church at least Westerne were committed to the abitriment of the King of sixteen Lay persons and sixteen of the Clergy appointed by the King to be approved or rejected by them according as they conceived them consistent with
by that of Allegiance Though how can Equivocation be excluded when according to them one Equivocation may be renounced by another A most horrid example whereof England has lately seen in the R. Padre Antonio Vais 72. Neither do Protestants think that a Declaration formerly made by the Pope and forbidding Catholicks to take those Oaths with any Interpretation whatsoever needs to be a hindrance to the taking of it in the forementioned sence so publickly avouched but onely in any secret meanings invented or mentally reserved by particular persons For surely the Pope intends not to take a power from Law-givers to interpret their own lawes nor to forbid their Subjects to admit their interpretations if they be agreable to truth and that the words be capable of being so interpreted as these are pretended to be Certain it is that the Pope was never informed of this so legal an interpretation For if he had he would never have forbidden that to distressed English Catholicks which to his knowledg all good Subjects in France Germany Venice c. neither will nor dare refuse to acknowledge and profess Besides say they is England now become the only Kingdom in Christendom where all manner of Briefs must be immediately submitted to without a publick Legal acceptation and without examination of the Motives or suggestions by which they wâ—re procured It is far otherwise now in the most Catholick Countries and was formerly even in England when it was most Catholick the Lawes then made against receiving or executing Bulls from Rome without a publick admission under the penalty of incurring a Praemunire are still in force 73. If Catholicks rejoyning say that there is another regard for which they are unwilling even to receive information touching any qualifications of these Oaths viz. because the mere admitting a probability that they may lawfully and without prejudice to Catholick Faith be taken would argue that so many vertuous wise and holy Men as have suffered death c. for refusing them have suffred without any necessary cause Such were Bishop Fisher Sir Thomas More c. in King Henry the eights dayes and many good Priests since 74. Notwithstanding say Protestants such a consequence is not necessary For first it hath been shewed that King Henry the eighth intended to exclude the purely spiritual Jurisdiction of the Pope his power of determining matters of Faith according to former Lawes of the Church c. And therefore no wonder that good Catholicks then would not betray their consciences But it is well known that Sir Thomas More advised the King to limit some excesses of the Popes Jurisdiction And an eminent writer tells us that Bishop Fisher offered to take the Oath if it might have been permitted him to explicate his sence of it which could be no other then this that he should deny the Popes temporal Jurisdiction Secondly as for those that suffred in Q. Elizabeths time it is certain that all good Catholicks would never have esteemed it a Martyrdom to dye for refusing to the King a supreme Kingly Power and attributing that to the pope They had therefore a quite different notion of what the state of England required by this Oath But of late good occasion has been given for a more exact examination of it For to make a sincere and ingenuous confession it was a Committee of the late rebellious parliament that probably first of all discovered what use they made of the foresaid proviso in the Act 5. Eliz. to warrant them to take this Oath without submitting their Religion to the King And the same use they judged that all other Sects might make of the same and justify their so doing by law even Roman Catholicks themselves 75. All these things considered it is no wonder that English protestants not being fully informed of the state of Catholicks should wonder at Roman Catholicks for their so Universal agreement in refusing an Oath so interpreted without the least prejudice to their faith but with so unexpressible a prejudice both to their estates and exercise of their Religion 76. The Authour of these Reflexions does freely acknowledge that he has been inquisitive with more then ordinary diligence into the grounds upon which Protestants do make no scruple at all to take an oath which if it had no Expounders to qualifie the sence properly imported by the words he knows they could not take it with a good conscience Nay moreover he has given all the advantage that he could to the proofes produced by them to justify that no other sence ought to be given therto by any English Subject in so much as he may apprehend that he shall incurr a danger to be esteemed by Catholicks to have a design to encourage them also to take it since that sence is such as is very convenient to the principles of Catholick Religion 77. But he protests the contrary His end in writing all this is besides a satisfaction given to his mind that he cannot now without breach of Charity charge Protestants with such an unsincerity in their taking this Oath as Presbyterians c. are apparently guilty of to afford unto the World an illustrious proof of the most perfect sincerity and the greatest tendernesse of conscience expressed on this occasion by the generality of English Catholicks that I believe ever was given by any Church since Christs time 78. They live here in their own native Country with lesse priviledg then strangers they are excluded from having any influence on any thing that concerns the Common-weale of which they are freeborn Subjects When laws are made against them as guilty persons they are not permitted to separate their cause from a few that only deserved the penalties of those lawes they are by lawes obnoxious to greater sufferings then enemies they see their families impoverished their houses invaded by savage officers their lives forfeited as Traytours for entertaining those without whom they could not live otherwise then as Pagans deprived of performing any service and worship to God c. All these miseries they groan under without proofe of any demerit on their parts the crimes of a few miserable seduced and seducing wretches and their bloody Doctrine by none in the Kingdom more detested then by themselves are made their guilt And these calamities they could avoid by taking an oath the present new acknowleded sence whereof as to his Majesties right is just and lawful And yet they dare not take it Why Because they fear God above all But do not Protestants fear him too They are no Judges of the consciences of others This they assure themselves of that if those that now take the Oath had been to have framed it they would have shewed a greater proof of their fear of God then to have expressed the Kings Supremacy in termes fit for none but K. Hen. the VIII 79. But moreover great difference there is between the case of Protestants and Roman Catholicks in regard of this Oath For
substance and intention of the oath and being present do render the whole ineffectual They are assured that the first framer of this Oath K. James never intended to intangle the consciences of his subjects and if he had foreseen that a few unnecessary words would have rendred them uncapable to serve him he would never have made choice of such unhappy expressions But so long experience having demonstrated what it is that wounds the consciences of Catholicks they confidently hope that this tendernesse will shew how infinitely more tender they will be to keep the Fidelity promised in the oath since they have kept it when they were treated as breakers of it only for I cannot say not daring to professe it for that have alwayes been ready to do but for not dareing to say things unnecessary to be said or that they understand not or are not permitted to Explicate their meaning 119. Never certainly was there a time when it was either more seasonable or more necessary to obstruct all passages of jealousies amongst English Subjects and to prevent all attempts of disturbing the Kingdomes peace As for other Sects the State will it is hoped and prayed for be assisted by a divine wisdom to provide against the particular tempers of each and as for Roman Catholicks no other expedient will be necessary but to afford them means to shew abroad that Fidelity which their Religion indispensably obliges them to This indeed will be a great affliction to other Sects among us who would rather forgive Catholicks for being real traytours then for manifesting themselves in the eyes and to the satisfaction of all to be good Subjects 120. Certainly that old policy of Queen Elizabeths Calvinistical Statesmen is now very unseasonable and was alwaies dangerous of first fomenting divisions among Catholick Subjects especially about principles of loyalty and disloyalâ—y and then exposing both the loyal and disloyal subjects indifferently to the same rigour of lawes Surely it is of greater concernment now for his Majesties security to unite all Catholicks with one heart to assist and defend him by casting out all principles of disloyalty inconsistent both with Catholick and Protestant Religion 121. Now what more efficacious mean or rather what other mean is there for this then that which his Majesty may if he please conferr upon them by allowing such an Ecclesiastical Government among them by which there will be produced a true Christian Unity and Uniformity both in opinions and practises and consequently by which without giving the least jealousy but on the contrary very great security to the State they may all be united to concurr in promoting his service 122. Now to what special parties both within and without the continuation of a defect so projudicial is to be imputed is but too well known It is not to be doubted but that the forementioned party will make use of all their skill and power to oppose all good correspondence among them upon more then one Motive For 1. A strong affection which they have to independence and to a promoting of their particular interests dividedly from all others by which means they have got great power abroad little for the publick good of this Kingdom this will make a common union very unwellcome to them 2. And again they will easily foresee that by this only means those wicked principles of disloyalty which made them heretofore eminent abroad must necessarily then be renounced They will no longer be looked upon as the only Apostles of a forraign temporal power either direct or which is as bad indirect the enormous writings and worse practices of their Forefathers which only procured the continuation of the Oath of Supremacy and the framing of that of Allegiance together with the sharp lawes not against them alone must be condemned to the same fate that they have suffered in other Kingdomes and lastly an advantage of corrupting good English Natures with Maximes of Morality odious to all Christenstom and condemned by supream Authority will be taken from them 123. These cannot chuse but prove unto such dispositions very great mortifications and as great as any of these would be the framing of Oaths which all good Catholicks could securely take For it is well known that they have been publickly told that it is for their advantage only that such Oaths are imposed here as cannot generally be taken and that worse newes cannot come to their brethren abroad then that such Oaths were taken away from Catholicks Because they have a strong apprehension that themselves having been the sole clauses of those rigours against the whole body of English Catholicks shall have but a small portion in any future indulgence without an explicite satisfactory renunciation of their principles and an assurance given to teach the contrary as they were obliged by an Arrest of the Parliament of Paris A. D. 1626. 124. And that this was no suspicion groundlesly taken or invented there was produced a well known verified story hapning toward the latter end of Queen Elizabeths raign For that Queen being at last satisfied of the loyalty of certain Catholick Priests had a purpose to shew some indulgence and qualification of the lawes to them Hereupon certain of their Brethren went to Rome to carry such good newes thither whither being come they were by that party branded with the names of Schismaticks Spies and Rebels to the See Apostolick and moreover there was by one of the party T.F. compiled a Treatise in Italian to advise his holyness That it was not good or profitable to the Catholick cause that any liberty or toleration should be granted by the Sâ—ate of England to Catholicks And why not good for the Catholick cause Because not for their own interest For having been persons never formerly admitted by publick authority into this Kingdom and having given sad proofs of their temper they did not without reason suspect that if only good loyal Catholick Subjects were tolerated their so dangerous and to themselves only advantageous principles must be abandoned 125. It is not therefore to be expected but that a charitable concurrence of several Ecclesiastical pastours here would be to them very unwellcome But the commodities and Benedictions flowing there-from are unexpressible For 1. Though perhaps by a hindrance thereby given to that parties divided way of agitation here the number of Catholicks among us might come to be diminished yet then there would be none but good charitable and obedient Catholicks in England free from all intelligence or designs abroad 2. Matters of discipline and Spiritual Government would not be only and immediatly ordered by a Court too far distant from us and too much suspected by the State here 3. English Catholicks would be freed from a burden and the King from jealousies to which no other in the World are obnoxious For in France c. none dare under utmost penalties execute orders or publish Mandats without express allowance from the State though such briefs touched only
spiritual matters Whereas in England whensoever any such briefs are published at Rome although upon information of one interessed party there being no setled correspondence of pastours to whom they ought in common to be directed by them communicated to their respective flocks not only the consciences of particular Catholicks are disquieted whilst some of their directours press the validity of them others reclaim but the State also not causelesly entertains jealousies suspicious of secret practises not being at all or not sufficiently informed All which inconveniences by such a Government would be easily avoyded 4. Lastly by this means Catholicks would be enabled to receive from his Majesty any orders that may be for his service and effectually put them in execution 126. It is well known what important advantage the Prince of Orange and the States of Holland received from the Catholick Bishop there during the seditions between the Arminians and Calvinists The Prince doubting the success of those contentions to strengthen his party sent two or three persons of condition to the Bishop usually residing at Amsterdam to propose to him these two demands Fiâ—st to whether of the two Factions the Catholicks had an inclination to adhere Next what assistance of forces they were able to bring The Bishop being then absent they were to this effect answered by his Vicarius in spiritualibus As to the first That without studying or consulting with his brethren he could immediately assure his Excellency that he being the prime person trusted by the States with all their forces the Religion and consciences of all Catholicks obliged them to offer their Estates and lives for his service and assistance But that he could not give an answer to the second demand till two sundayes were passed in the one of which he was to publish orders for enquiry into their numbers and in the other to receive information And in effect accordingly after the second Sunday he gave them assurance of the readiness of above ten thousand well appointed Soldiers out of that one City This hapned in Holland where Catholicks though proportionably far exceeding us here in numbers yet never gave any jealousies to the State and the less because of their good correspondence among themselves 127. Such and many other great commodities flâ—wing from such a Government it is no wonder that besides the formentioned party there should be found out of the Church also many that have and no doubt will endeavour to oppose it especially their embitterd Enemies the Presbyterians partly out of the hatred which they bear to the very name of lawfull pastours which they want and will not have but principally least Catholicks thereby should be in a better capacity to serve his sacred Majesty and his faithfull Subjects after a manner that they do not desire and this not only by sacrificing their Estates and persons to the maintaining of his power and safety but also by gaining to himself and the State both civil and Ecclesiastical here a great affection and readiness of an assistance from Catholick Kingdomes when it shall appear that in England the scandal of disloyalty which heretofore was cast upon Catholick religion in general shall be taken away 128. These things considered and moreover that the Presbyterians c. implacable adversaries to Protâ—stant Religion and Government as well as Catholick have great intelligence and correspondence abroad upon that account and for the mere interest of their Religion which Protestants hitherto are utterly destitute of it would be strange if there should still remain any one among them after so long experience of the ready concurrence of Catholicks with them in adhering to his Majesty and suffering with them for him who should not now at last have spent all their aversion from them noâ—e being more interested then they to make use of all lawful means to enable his Majesty now more then ever to oppose all future practices 129. It hath been an objection formerly against this That the promâ—ses made by Catholick Ecclesiasticks of Canonical Obedienâ—e to their supreme pastour in their ordinations are dangerous to the State But alas how groundless is such a fear For this ground being once laid and assented to that no forraign power whatsoever hath any right to dispose of temporals in these Kingdomes what shew of prejudice to any Mans loyalty is the promise of Canonical Obedience in mere spiritual matters Do not all Ministers in England owe and promise Canonical obedience to their Bishops and Presbyterians to their Consistories which yet in merè spiritualibus they will not allow to be subject to the King but only and immediately to our Lord Besides all manner of such submissions and Obligations are every where meant and understood and if need be may be expressed with a Salvâ Obedientiâ Regi debitâ What apprehension have the Kings of France Spain or the State of Venice from such promises And yet were ever any Princes more scrupulous in defending their temporal superiority and authority against the power by some flatterers ascribed to the Pope then the King of France and the State of Venice are Nay they would not be so secure of their pastours loyalty if they should suspect them to be regardless of their duty to the Church which indispensably obliges them to loyalty SECT X. Of his Majesties Declaration for liberty of tender consciences And who they are that have the justest pretentions to the benefit of it 130. BY What hath been hitherto said it is apparent that the words phrases and Formes of these Oathes are at least ambiguous and that by such ambiguity no manner of convenience not the least addition of security accrews unto his sacred Majesty or the State c. but on the otherside infinite prejudice to his afflicted Subjects What then can be more just more for Gods honour more becoming the benignity of his Majesty and more for the reputation of the Kingdom then that such ambiguous expressions suggested no doubt by some particular malignant spirits should be cleared or taken away and that Oathes should be conceived in such a form that they may be taken uniformly sincerely and cordially by all good subjects and must be refused by all ill Subjects and withal that our Princes safety and the peace of the Kingdom may be provided for by them 131. Besides the ambiguity there seems now to be another Motive more pressing though none can be more weighty to perswade a change in the Formes of the Oathes and that is this When the Oathes were made the intention of the State was to have one only Religion openly permitted in the Kingdom and then the Catholick was that which appeared opposite to it as having been formerly the only Religion of the kingdom and for this reason consequently the Oathes were framed either upon a jealousy of a doubtful title or at least against some special point about the Popes Authority which one party among Catholicks falsely pretended to be essential
REFLEXIONS UPON THE OATHES OF SUPREMACY AND ALLEGIANCE BY A Catholick Gentleman an Obedient Son of the Church and Loyal Subject of his Majesty Printed in the Year MDCLXI ERRATA PAge 15. line 7. fet read set l. 15. dele and p. 22. l. 25. excepting r. not excepting p. 25. l. 8. Christian r. Christians p. 26. l. 24. Auihority r. Authority p. 33. l. 6. r. in the marg ib. p. 13 p. 41. l. 18. ther r. their p. 42. l. 31. mogannant r. moyenant l. 32. entire r. entier p. 47. l. 2. Scots r. Sects p. 57. l. 19. invention r. intention p. 58. l. 32. the useselsesse r. uselessnesse p. 61. l. 18. Charter r. Character p. 62. l. 10. at r. an p. 65. l. 7. permitted to the people to be taught r. permitted to be taught to the people p. 73. l. 6. fiers Estate r. Tiers Estat l. 7. they are r. there are l. 21. to Article r. to be an Article REFLEXIONS UPON THE OATHES OF Supremacy and Allegiance SECT I. The Occasion of making these Reflexions And the summe of that which follows THe Divine Providence having been so watchful over His Most Sacred Majesty in his wonderful preservation from dangers and so miraculous in restoring him to his Throne just and necessary it is that both Himself and his Counsel should make use of all lawful means to preserve him in safety and his Subjects in Obedience and Peace And because a greater obligation cannot be imagined among Christians then a Solemn Oath it became them to make use of that Obligation indifferently to all the which in all probability would now at last have a greater effect by vertue of his Majesties Declaration of a Liberty to tender consciences and that no Man shall be disquieted or call'd in question for differences of Opinion in matter of Religion which do not disturbe the Peace of the Kingdom by which is taken away the chief cause which began and fomented the late Troubles and confusion 2. Notwithstanding seeing that the manner of the application of that Preservatory and remedy of an Oath hath lately occasioned great Disputes and unquietness of minds in several persons and seeing the Oath by none more readily taken and earnestly imposed on others then by those who began the War and promoted the Covenant and of whose party not one was ever found that drew a sword for his Majesty and on the other side by none more scrupled at or refused then by those who alwayes assisted the King and of whose party never any one drew a Sword against him and withall of whose Loyalty his Majesty hath oft professed that he hath sufficient assurance The consideration of all this begat in my mind an Opinion that surely there lay hidden in these Oaths some Mystery fit to be discovered and which is attempted in the following Reflexions 3. In which 1. After a brief Declaration of the Nature of a solemn Oath how high a point of Gods worship it is and what Reverence and caution is to be used in it 2. And after the setting down the Formes of the two Oaths at this time imposed 3. There follow Reflexions upon the said Oaths in gross shewing the occasion of the making of them c. 4. After which it is demonstrated that the Oath of Supremacy as it lyes and according to the sence of the first Lawgiver cannot lawfully or sincerely be taken by any Christian. 5. Then is declared in how different a sence the two Oaths are taken by Protestants 6. And by Presbyterians Independents c. 7. And upon what grounds Roman-Catholicks do generally refuse to take the Oath of Supremacy 8. And some of them make scruple to take that of Allegiance 9. Lastly there are short Reflexions on his Majesties Gracious Declaration for tender consciences shewing who have the justest pretentions to the benefit of it c. 4. All this is offered to the consideration of all good Christians among us to the end Advice may be taken whether it be for Gods honour or the Kingdoms peace that such Formes of Oaths so manifestly ambiguous so inefficacious to the producing of Loyalty and Peace in the generality of the Kings Subjects so piercing and wounding to tender Consciences c. should be continued to be imposed or new Formes more effectuall for his Majesties security contrived after the Example of Scotland c. SECT II. Touching Oaths in General 5. AN Oath by which God is invoked as a witness Surety and caution of whatsoever we affirm renounce and promise and a Revenger upon us if we transgress in any of these is certainly an high Act of Religion but such an one as that like Medicines it ought not to be used except in cases of just necessity and then with great advice and sincerity 6. The conditions therefore required by God himself in an Oath are expressed in this saying of the Prophet Thou shalt swear The Lord liveth in truth and in Judgment and in Justice So that if an Oath be ambiguous captious or false it wants the condition of Truth If it be either unnecessary or indiscreet and unprofitable it will be destitute of Judgment and if in the Object and Forme of it and in the mind of the Taker there be not a conformity to the Eternal Law of God it will want Justice Lastly if with all these it be not attended with fidelity in the execution of what is promised supposing it be a Promissory Oath and this according to the intention of the Law-giver it will be dishonourable Irreligious and odious to God and wanting any of these conditions it will respectively be destructive to those that so contrive or take it 7. All these conditions are doubtless with more then ordinary caution to be observed in Solemn publick and National Oaths the breach of which will involve whole Kingdomes in guilt and punishment and this even in the Opinion of Heathens inevitably 8. These things considered if we will call to mind how many Oaths Covenants Abjurations c. Ambiguous Entangling Trayterous Contradicting one another and consequently inducing a necessity of Perjury have been sometimes voluntarily taken or by a pretended Authority imposed on the Subjects it will surely deeply concern us all to take some fitting course to avert Gods most just indignation from our Nation by humbling our selves before his Divine Majesty and making a publick acknowâ—edgment of the guilt universally contracted by us and however for the future to take â—are that men may clearly see and understand what it is that they must be compelled to wear SECT III. The Forme of the two Oathes Of Supremacy and Allegiance and the proper litteral sence of them 9. THe Oathes at this time in force and publickly or generally imposed are two 1. that of Supremacy 2. that of Allegiance conceived in distinct Formes 10. The Oath of Supremacy is in the forme here expressed viz. I A. B. do utterly testifie and declare in my conscience that the Kings Majesty is