Selected quad for the lemma: state_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
state_n	government_n	king_n	monarchy_n	1,384	5	9.4516	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A62025	Reasons of the present judgement of the Vniversity of Oxford concerning The Solemne League and Covenant, The Negative Oath, The Ordinances concerning discipline and vvorship : approved by generall consent in a full convocation, 1, Jun. 1647, and presented to consideration.; Judicium Universitatis Oxoniensis. English	Sanderson, Robert, 1587-1663.; Zouch, Richard, 1590-1661.; Langbaine, Gerard, 1609-1658.; University of Oxford.	1647 (1647)	Wing S624; ESTC R183228	29,783	44

to endeavour the extirpation of the Church-Government by Law established without forfeiture of those Obligations 1. Having in the Oath of Supremacie acknowledged the King to be the onely Supreme Governour in all Ecclesiasticall Causes and over all Ecclesiasticall Persons and having bound our selves both in that Oath and by our Protestation To maintain the Kings Honour Estate Iurisdictions and all manner of Rights it is cleare to our understandings that we cannot without disloyalty and injury to Him and double Perjury to our selves take upon us without his consent to make any alteration in the Ecclesiasticall Lawes or Government much lesse to endeavour the extirpation thereof Unlesse the imposers of this Covenant had a power and meaning which they have openly d disclaimed to absolve us of that Obedience which under God we owe unto His Majesty whom they know to be intrusted with the Ecclesiasticall Law 2. We cannot sincerely and really endeavour the extirpation of this Government without a sincere desire and reall endeavour that His Majesty would grant His Royall Assent to such extirpation Which we are so far from desiring and endeavouring that we hold it our bounden duty by our daily prayers to beg at the hands of Almighty God that he would not for our sins suffer the King to doe an act so prejudiciall to his honour and conscience as to consent to the rooting out of that estate which by so many branches of his e Coronation Oath he hath in such a solemne manner sworn by the assistance of God to his power to maintain and preserve 3. By the Lawes of this Land f the Collation of Bishopricks and g Deanries the h fruits and profits of their Lands and Revenues during their vacancies the i first fruits and yearly tenths out of all Ecclesiasticall Promotions and sundry other Privileges Profits and Emoluments arising out of the State Ecclesiasticall are established in the Crown and are a considerable part of the Revenues thereof which by the extirpation of Prelacy as it is in the Article expounded or by subsequent practice evidenced will be severed and cut off from the Crown to the great prejudice and damage thereof Whereunto as we ought not in common reason and in order to our Allegiance as Subjects yeeld our consent so having sworn expresly to maintain the Kings honour and estate and to our power to assist and defend all Jurisdictions c. belonging to His Highnesse or united and annexed to the Imperiall Crown of the Realm we cannot without manifest Perjury as we conceive consent thereunto 4. The Government of this Realm being confessedly an Empire or k Monarchy and that of a most excellent temper and constitution we understand not how it can become us to desire or endeavour the extirpation of that Government in the Church which we conceive to be incomparably of all other the most agreeable and no way prejudiciall to the state of so well a constituted Monarchy In so much as King JAMES would often say what his long experience had taught him No Bishop no King Which Aphorisme though we find in sundry Pamphlets of late yeares to have been exploded with much confidence and scorn yet we must professe to have met with very little in the proceedings of the late times to weaken our belief of it And we hope we shall be the lesse blamed for our unwillingnesse to have any actuall concurrence in the extirpating of Episcopall Government seeing of such extirpation there is no other use imaginable but either the alienation of their Revenues and Inheritances which how it can be severed from Sacrilege and Injustice we leave others to find out or to make way for the introducing of some other form of Church-Government which whatsoever it shall be will as we think prove either destructive of and inconsistent with Monarchicall Government or at least-wise more prejudiciall to the peaceable orderly and effectuall exercise thereof then a well-regulated Episcopacy can possibly be §. V. Of the other parts of the Covenant HAving insisted the more upon the two first Articles that concern Religion and the Church and wherein our selves have a more proper concernment We shall need to insist the lesse upon those that follow contenting our selves with a few the most obvious of those many great and as we conceive just exceptions that lye there against In the third Article we are not satisfied that our endeavour to preserve and defend the Kings Majesties Person and Authority is so limited as there it is by that addition In the Preservation and defence of the true Religion and Libertyes of the Kingdome Forasmuch as 1. No such limitation of our duty in that behalf is to be found either in the Oathes of Supremacy and Alleagiance which no Papist would refuse to take with such a limitation nor in the Protestation nor in the Word of God 2. Our endeavour to preserve the Rights and Privileges of Parliaments and the Libertyes of the Kingdome is required to be sworn of us in the same Article without the like or any other limitation added thereunto 3. Such limitation leaveth the duty of the Subject at so much loosenesse and the safety of the King at so great uncertainty that whensoever the People shall have a mind to withdraw their obedience they cannot want a pretence from the same for so doing 4. After we should by the very last thing we did viz. swearing with such a limitation have made our selves guilty of an actuall and reall diminution as we conceive of His Majesties just power and greatnesse the obtestation would seem very unseasonable at the least with the same breath to call the world to bear witnesse with our Consciences that we had no thoughts or intentions to diminish the same 5. The swearing with such a limitation is a Testimony of the Subjects Loyaltie to our seeming of a very strange nature which the Principles of their severall Religions salved the Conscience of a most resolure Papist or Sectary may securely swallow and the Conscience of a good Protestant cannot but strein at In the fourth Article 1. We desire it may be considered whether the imposing of the Covenant in this Article do not lay a necessity upon the Son of accusing his own Father and pursuing him to destruction in case he should be an Incendiary Malignant or other evill Instrument such as in the Article is described A course which we conceive to be contrary to Religion Nature and Humanity 2. Whether the swearing according to this Article doth not rather open a ready way to Children that are sick of the Father Husbands that are weary of their Wives c. by appealing such as stand between them and their desires of Malignancy the better to effectuate their unlawfull intentions and designes 3. Our selves having solemnly protested to maintain the Liberty of the Subject and the House of Commons having publiquely declared against the exercise of an Arbitrary Power with Order that their said Declaration

the strictest sense that is to say expressely commanded by God in his Word yet of Apostolicall institution that is to say was established in the Churches by the Apostles according to the mind and after the example of their Master Iesus Christ and that by virtue of their ordinary power and authority derived from him as deputed by him Governors of his Church 2. Or at least that Episcopall Aristocracy hath a fairer pretension and may lay a juster title and claime to a Divine institution then any of the other formes of Church-Government can doe all which yet do pretend thereunto viz. that of the Papall Monarchy that of the Presbyterian Democracy and that of the Independents by Particular Congregations or Gathered Churches 2. But we are assured by the undoubted testimony of Antient Records and later Histories that this forme of Government hath beene continued with such an universall uninterrupted unquestioned succession in all the Churches of God and in all Kingdomes that have beene called Christian throughout the whole world for fifteen hundred yeers together that there never was in all that time any considerable opposition made there against That of Aërius was the greatest wherein yet there was little of consideration beside these two things that it grew at the first but out of discontent and gained him at the last but the reputation of an Heretique From which antiquity and continuance we have just cause to fear that to endeavour the extirpation thereof 1. Would give such advantage to the Papists who usually object against us and our Religion the contempt of antiquity and the love of novelty that we should not be able to wipe off the aspersion 2. Would so diminish the just authority due to the consentient judgement and practice of the universall Church the best interpreter of Scripture in things not clearly exprest for Lex currit cum praxi that without it we should be at a losse in sundry points both of Faith and Manners at this day firmely believed and securely practiced by us when by the Socinians Anabaptists and other Sectaries we should be called upon for our proofes As namely sundry Orthodoxall explications concerning the Trinity and Co-equality of the Persons in the God-head against the Arians and other Heretiques the number use and efficacy of Sacraments the Baptising of Infants Nationall Churches the observation of the Lords-Day and even the Canon of Scripture it self Thirdly in respect of our selves we are not satisfied how it can stand with the principles of Iustice Ingenuity and Humanity to require the extirpation of Episcopall Government unlesse it had been first cleerly demonstrated to be unlawful to be sincerely and really endeavoured by us 1. Who have all of us who have taken any Degree by subscribing the 39. Articles testified our approbation of that Government one of those a Articles affirming the very Book containing the form of their Consecration to contain in it nothing contrary to the Word of God 2. Who have most of us viz. as many as have entred into the Ministery received Orders from their hands whom we should very ill requite for laying their hands upon us if we should now lay to our hands to root them up and cannot tell for what 3. Who have sundry of us since the beginning of this Parliament subscribed our names to Petitions exhibited or intended to be exhibited to that High Court for the continuance of that Government Which as we then did sincerely and really so we should with like sincerity and reality still not having met with any thing since to shew us our errour be ready to doe the same again if we had the same hopes we then had of the reception of such Petitions 4. Who hold some of us our livelyhood either in whole or in part by those titles of Deanes Deanes and Chapters c. mentioned in the Articles being members of some Collegiate or Cathedrall Churches And our memories will not readily serve us with any example in this kind since the world began wherein any state or profession of men though convicted as we are not of a crime that might deserve deprivation were required to bind themselves by oath sincerely and really to endeavour the rooting out of that in it selfe not unlawfull together wherewith they must also root out themselves their estates and livelyhoods 5. Especially it being usuall in most of the said Churches that such persons as are admitted members thereof have a personall Oath administred unto them to maintain the honour Immunities Libertyes and profits of the same and whilst they live to seeke the good and not to doe any thing to the hurt hindrance or prejudice thereof or in other words to the like effect Fourthly in respect of the Church of England we are not satisfied how we can swear to endeavour the extirpation of the established Government no necessity or just Cause for so doing either offering it selfe or being offered to our understandings 1. Since all change of Government unavoidably bringeth with it besides those that are present and evident sundry other inconveniences which no wit of man can possibly fore-see to provide against till late experience discover them We cannot be sure that the evils which may ensue upon the change of this Government which hath been of so long continuance in this Kingdome is so deeply rooted in the Lawes thereof and hath so neere a conjunction with and so strong an influence upon the Civill State and Government as that the change thereof must infer the necessity of a great alteration to be made in the other also may not be greater then the supposed evils whatsoever they are which by this change are sought to be remedied For there are not yet any come to our knowledge of that desperate nature as not to be capable of other remedy then the utter extirpation of the whole Government it selfe 2. Whereas the House of Commons have b remonstrated that it was far from their purpose or desire to abolish the Church-Government but rather that all the members of the Church of England should be regulated by such Rules of Order and Discipline as are established by Parliament and that it was Malignancie to infuse into the people that they had any other meaning We are loth by consenting to the second Article to become guilty of such Infusion as may bring us within the compasse and danger of the fourth Article of this Covenant 3. Since it hath been declared by sundry c Acts of Parliament That the holy Church of England was founded in the state of Prelacy within the Realm of England We dare not by endeavouring the extirpation of Prelacy strike at the very foundation and thereby as much as in us lyeth cooperate towards the ruine of this famous Church which in all conscience and duty we are bound with our utmost lawfull power to uphold Lastly in respect of our Obligations to His Majesty by our Duty and oathes we are not satisfied how we can swear

defenditur Iure mente ROM. 14. 22. Happy is he that condemneth not himselfe in that which he alloweth THE END ERRATA Page 23. marg. read Haeretici pag. 24. l. 12. read Ecclesiasticall p. 24. l. 27. r. declared against Episcopacie p. 26. l. ult. marg. r. Hen. 3. p. 28. 1. 24. r. be inevitably a Such an Oath as for Matter Persons and other Circumstances the like hath not been in any Age or Oath we read of in sacred or humane stories M. Nye Covenant with Narrative pag. 12. a Pactum est duorum pluriúmve in idem placitū consensus L. 1. ff. de Pactis b Whereas many of them have had an oath administred unto them not warrantable by the Lawes and Statutes of this Realme They doe humbly pray that no man hereafter be compelled to take such an oath All which they most humbly pray as their rights and liberties according to the Lawes and Statutes of this Realme Petit. of Right 3. c It is declared 16 Ian. 1642. That the King cannot compell men to be sworne without an act of Parliament Exact Collect. pag. 859 860. d Proclam of 9. Octob. 19. Car. a viz. In accounting Bishops Antichristian and indifferent Ceremonies unlawfull b viz. In making their discipline and government a mark of the true Church and the setting up thereof the erecting of the throne of Christ c Let us not be blamed if we call it Parliament Religion Parliament Gospel Parliament Faith Harding confut of Apology part 6. Chap. 2. d Stat. 13. Eliz. 12. e Such jurisdictions privileges superiorities and preheminences spirituall and ecclesiasticall as by any c. for the Visitation of the Ecclesiasticall State and Persons and for reformation order and correction of the same and of all manner errors heresies schismes abuses offences contempts and enormities shall for ever by authority of this present Parliament be united and annexed to the Imperiall Crown of this Realme An Act restoring to the Crowne the antient Jurisdiction c. 1 Elizab. I. a Art 36. b give advantage to this Malignant party to traduce our Proceedings They infuse into the people that we mean to abolish all Church-Government Remonst 15. Dec. 1641. Exact Collect. pag. 19. The Lords and Commons doe declare That they intend a due and necessary Reformation of the Government and Liturgie of the Church and to take away nothing in the one or in the other but what shall be evill and justly offensive or at least unnecessary and burthensome Declar. 9. Apr. 1642. Exact Coll. p. 135. c Statut. of Carlile 25. E. 1. recited 25. E. 3. d They infuse into the people that we mean to leave every man to his own fancie absolving him of that Obedience which he owes under God unto His Majesty whom we know to be entrusted with the Ecclesiasticall Law as well as with the Temporall Exact Collect. ubi sup p. 19. e That he will grant keep and confirm the Laws Customes and Franchises granted to the Clergie by the glorious King S. Edward And that he will grant and preserve unto the Bishops and to the Churches committed to their charge all Canonicall Privileges and due Law and Iustice and that he will protect and defend them as every good King in his Kingdome ought to be Protector and Defender of the Bishops and the Churches under their Government Vide Exact Coll. p. 290 291. f See Stat. 25. H. 8. 20. 1. E. 6. 2 g See Stat. 39. Eliz. 8. h Stat. 14. E. 3. 4. 5. 17. E. 3. 14 i Stat. 26. H. 8. 3. 1. Eliz. 4. k Supremam potestatem merū imperium apud nos habet Rex Cambd. Whereas by sundry divers old authentique Histories Chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the world governed by one Supream Head and King having the dignity and royall estate of the Imperiall Crown of the same Stat. 24. H. 8. 12. See also 1 Elizab. 3. a The Lords Commons doe declare That they intend a due and necessary Reformation of the Liturgie of the Church and to take away nothing therein but what shall be evill and justly offensive or at least unnecessary and burthensome Declarat 9. Apr. 1642. Exact Coll. pag. 135. c From whence it is most evident that the Rights and Privileges of the Parliaments and Liberties of the Kingdom are in the first place to be preserved Answ. to Scotish Papers 18. Nov. 1646. page 21. d We observe you mention the defence of the King twice from the Covenant yet in both places leave out In the preservation and c. pag. 39. 46. a maine clause without which the other part ought never to be mentioned pag. 56. a Haeretici nec Deo nec hominibus servant fidem Speciatim hec addo Calvinistas in hac re deteriores esse quàm Lutheranos Nam Calvinistae nullam servant fi●em Iura perjura Lutherani moderatiores sunt Becan 5. Manual Controv. 14. 2. 4. c. b Invent Oathes and Covenants for the Kingdome dispence with them when he pleaseth sweare and forsweare as the wind turneth like a godly Presbyter Arraig of Perfec in Epist. Ded. c By the Covenant both Houses of Parliament many thousands of other His Majesties Subjects of England and Ireland stand bound as well as we to hinder the setting up of the church-Church-Government by Bishops in the Kingdome of Scotland And that we as well as they stand bound to endeavour the extirpation thereof in England and Ireland Scots Declar. to the States of the United Provinces 5. Aug. 1645. recited in Answer to the Scots Papers pag. 23. d The old formes of Acts of Parliam were The King willeth provideth ordaineth establisheth granteth c. by the assent of Parliament c. See Statutes till 1 H. 4. After that The King of the assent of the Lords Spirituall and Temporall and at the speciall instance and request of the Commons of this Realm hath ordained c. See Statutes 1 H. 4. till 1 H. 7. A forme of such Petition of the Commons see 1 R. 3. 6. Prayen the Commons in this present Parliament assembled that where c. Please it therefore your Highnesse by the advice and assent of the Lords Spirituall and Temporall in this your present Parliament assembled and by the authori●y of the same to ordaince c. No Bill is an Act of Parliament Ordinance or Edict of Law although both the Houses agree unanimously in it till it hath the Royall Assent Ancient Customes pag. 54. Assemblee de ceux troys Estats est appellee un Act de Parliament car sans touts troys nest ascun Act de Parl. Finch Nomotech fol. 21. We admit that no Acts of Parliament are complete or formally binding without the Kings assent H. P. Answer to David Ienkins pag. 6. e Which if your Majesty shall be pleased to adorne with your Majesties Royall assent without which it can neither be complete and perfect nor Stat. 1. Jac. 1. f Stat. 33. H. 1. 21. g Dominus Rex habet ordinariam jurisdictionem dignitatem potestatem super omnes qui in regno suo sunt Ea quae jurisdictionis sunt pacis ad nullum pertinent nisi and coronam dignitatem Regiam nec à coronâ separari possunt Bracton cited by Stamford lib. 2. cap. 2. h For in our Lawes the Clergie Nobility Communalty are the 3. Estates We your said most loving faithfull and obedient Subjects viz. the Lords Spirituall and Temporall and the Commons representing your Three Estates of your Realme of England 1 Eliz. 3. the State of the Clergie being one of the greatest States of this Realme 8 Eliz. 1. i See Fin●h supra ad lit. d k The Crown of England hath been so free at all times that it hath been in no earthly subjection but immediately to God in all things touching the Regality of the said Crowne 16 R. 2. 5. Omnis sub eo est ipse sub nullo nisi tantùm sub Deo Parem autem non habet Rex in regno suo quia Item nec multò fortiùs superiorem aut potentiorem habere debet quia sic esset inferior suis subjectis Bracton conten 1. Rubr. 36. Cui {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} legibus ipsis legum vim imponendi potestatem Deus dedit Finch Nomotech in Epist. Dedic. to K. Iames l Fons Iustitiae Bracton By War to intend the alteration of the Lawes in any part of them is to levy War against the King and consequently Treason by the Statute of 25 E. 3. because they are the Kings Lawes He is the fountaine from whence in their severall channels they are derived to the Subject Master Saint John's Speech concerning the Earle of Strafford page 12. m Et ibidem vobiscum colloquium habere tractare super dictis negotiis tract vestrumque consilium impensur Writ to the Lords a Every Subject by the duty of his Allegiance is bounden to serve and assist his Prince and Soveraigne Lord at all seasons when need shall require 11 H. 7. 18. Stat. 1. El. 1. 1 Cor. 5. 1. c. 1 Cor. 11. 28. c. * Stat. 23. Eliz. 1. 29. Eliz. 6. 35 El. 1. 2. 3 Iac. 4. 5.