Selected quad for the lemma: state_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
state_n	conclude_v	king_n	treaty_n	1,026	5	9.0823	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A52837	The letter sent by the States-General of the United Provinces of the Low Countreys to His Majesty, by their Trumpeter together with His Majesties answer to the said letter / translated out of French into English.; Lettre des Estats Generaux des Provinces Unies des Pays Bas envoyee a sa majeste le Roy de La Grande Bretagne par un trompette. English	United Provinces of the Netherlands. Staten Generaal.; Charles II, King of England, 1630-1685.; Fagel, Gaspar, 1634-1688.; England and Wales. Sovereign (1660-1685 : Charles II). His Majesties answer to the letter sent from the States General of the United Provinces of the Low Countreys by their trumpeter.	1673 (1673)	Wing N486; ESTC R43477	9,318	14

time of Our Surrendring that place into your hands till the beginning of this present War and is there not yet the greater part of them remaining there Are they there detained your Slaves at Our desire Did We send Our Ships thither onely for a colour with intention to subject them to your Tyranny more entirely and with the greater decency and not to deliver them from it Was not the Officer We sent thither Major Banister confined presently upon his arrival and not suffered to speak with his Countrey men or acquaint them with the care We had of them Did he not protest against the Governour for having broken the Capitulation in Eighteen several points And will you say all this was done according to what We desired Had you been so tender of the bloud of both Nations as in your Paper you pretend you would not so long and with so much obstinacy have persisted in oppressing those Our Subjects whom you detain in that Colony And it is manifest that if you could cast all the blame hereof upon Us you have a mind to do it All We can say therefore to this your assertion is That you have indeed granted Us in words all We asked but that We have never obtained any thing of you in deeds What followed was the pretended Satisfaction you say you offered at all times to make Us in relation to the Trade of Our Subjects in the East-Indies It was solemnly promised by the Treaty of Breda that things should be adjusted by Commissioners to be sent hither by you when there should be more leisure for it But you well know that Our Ambassador whom We sent after the said Treaty to reside with you could obtain nothing in that matter by all his instances that could in any wise satisfie Our East India Company Nor did the Sieur Van Beuningen who seemed to have come hither expresly upon that account offer any more in all his Conferences with Our Commissioners upon that subject It is true the Ambassador Boreel produced here a full Power from you to treat and conclude an Offensive and Defensive League with Us but We could not accept the Proposition because the conditions of it were not sufficiently equitable and that instead of giving Us satisfaction in Our complaints he would never so much as admit of their being mentioned On the contrary his whole discourse tended to nothing else but to perswade Us that the States-General offered Us this League as a mark of their Friendship and for Our security alone seeming indifferent whether it were accepted or not and magnifying continually the greatness of your Forces by Land and Sea as sufficient to defend you against the formidable power of France and often threatning Us that you could make such a League whensoever you pleased with France and even against Us if We accepted not what his Masters offered Us. The sum of these two points is That the Sieur Van Beuningen was pleased to discourse concerning the Satisfaction demanded by Us in point of Trade in the East-Indies but departed without offering any thing and the Sieur Boreel offered Us a League Offensive and Defensive without giving Us Satisfaction for the past Injuries or security against future And all this to the end the Injuries We had complained of that till then were peculiarly your Acts might by a solemn Treaty be declar'd Our own The next matter of offence given Us was as you well observe in your Letter the affront committed against Our Flagg in the moneth of August 1671. Complaint was made thereof to your Ambassador residing here and he assured Us he would procure Us a fair satisfaction thereupon but three or four moneths time passing without the least notice being taken thereof by you We held Our Self obliged to send our Extraordinary Ambassador to demand Satisfaction of you in more earnest terms then We had done before To which not receiving any satisfactory Answer he had order to return Soon after he was followed by an Extraordinary Ambassador from you who affirmed that he had no Powers to make reparation for this affront or any other of those things We had so often complained of but to agree upon terms of Regulation in the business of the Flagg for the future yet saying withall that of himself and without consulting you again he could not put any thing in writing concerning it The arrival of the said Ambassador Extraordinary was about the time We were ready to make open Declaration of War against your State which We could no longer delay because the Spring was coming on and the said Ambassador persisted that his Instructions permitted him not to do any thing upon Our Demands neither was he able to produce any thing to justifie his delay but the offering Us to write to his Masters for larger Powers and Instructions The War following upon this In the heat of it Three Deputies arrived here from you without any Passports from Us or giving Us notice of their coming according to the Customs and Usages of War Whereupon We might well have confined them as you say We did but We contented Our Self with warning them to abstain from coming to lodge in this Our City appointing them instead thereof Lodgings in Our Palace of Hampton Court with all other conveniences suitable to their Character and dissembling what We knew passed between them and persons they practised upon to cause tumults and disorders in Our City or to disturb the progress of the War Notwithstanding which We forbore not to send to them some of the Principal persons of Our Council to conferre with them and hear their Proposals To whom they made this only Answer and persisted therein to the time of their departure that they had no Authority or Instructions to make any Propositions but were content to hearken to those that should be made to them and to transmit them to their Masters hoping that while they amused Us with this appearance the Deputies you had sent at the same time to the Most Christian King might have concluded a separate Treaty with him And can you flatter your selves with the opinion that the World should look upon this proceeding as a convincing proof of your ardent desires for Peace Did ever Prince or state send an Ambassador with design to obtain that which the Ambassador was not empowered either to conclude or sign especially to a Prince with whom they had War It is much more rational to believe what you did was to gain time whilst you endeavoured to put in execution those threats in relation to France that the Sieur Boreel had before given us The Minister of Brandenburgh never declared that he came hither to make Us any overtures of Peace or that he had any other Commission then to incline Us at the recommendation of His Master to hearken to those that should be made Us. He came hither at the time that the Ambassador Extraordinary of His most Serene Majesty the King of Sweden arrived in