to be exercised in Causes and over Persons Ecclesiastical or Spiritual the one placed in the Princes the other in the Churches of Christ 1. The difference betwixt these two Powers 2. The Necessity if the Civil Power in Ecclesiastial Matters notwithstanding Church-Power § 2. What is common to both and wherein each of these Powers differ from the other shall briefly be shewed 1. They are Powers both a Subordination or Policy in the Church as well as in the Common-weal and an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Jurisdiction exercised in each You read of Authority or Jurisdiction not only in Civil Assemblies as Rom. 13. John 19.11 but also in Churches 2 Cor. 10.8 and 13.10 the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in both places 2. They are both from God and the Ordinance of God and ought to be submitted to for Conscience sake and are for Encouragement to those that are Good and for Wrath upon him that doth Evil and he that resisteth this Power in either resists the Ordinance of God and they that resist receive to themselves Damnation as the Apostle speaks as well in respect to the one as the other And both being from God they are also both Powers under God that is under his Designment and Limits as also his Direction and Guidance for his Glory as the ultimate and the good of Mankind as the penultimate end of both 3. This Power of Princes is termed spiritual Ratione objecti because it hath to do with Spiritual Persons and Causes In such like a sense and manner of Speech if it had the stamp of vulgar Use the Church-Power may be termed Civil or Temporal because all sorts of Persons and Causes without Difference are under the Power of it That as the secular Power is Custos utriusque Tabulae matters of Holiness and what 's opposite to it Blasphemy Heresy Perjury c. as well as Righteousness so Church-Power is Custos utriusque Tabulae Righteousness and second-Table-Duties and what is opposite as Rebellion Sedition Lying Stealing if any Man that is called a Brother be a Fornicator or a Drunkard or an Extortioner c. In all these and such Cases the Church-Power is applied in an Ecclesiastical or Spiritual way as in a Civil and Secular way the Magistrate deals with what are Duties of the first Table The Powers do mutually further each other and so ordained by God from whom they are both originally as they sweetly comply and agree being kept in their just Bounds each with other as Moses and Aaron David and Nathan Zerubbabel the Son Shealtiel and Joshua the Son of Josedech Jungamus Gladios said the Emperor to his Bishop let us joyn our Forces and purge the Land of Wickedness And our Senators in Parliament speak thus of these Stat. 20. Hen 8. c. 12. Both Authorities and Jurisdictions joyn together and the one helps the other § 3. Their Differences are in these Particulars 1. Though both have in their respective way to do with both Tables yet the Civil Magistrates Work lyeth most over Persons with respect to the Duties of the second Table as in matters of Justice and Righteousness in the managing whereof the very being of a Common-wealth principally consists its wel-being only as he hath to do in Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Causes So the Church-Power is chiefly and principally exercised in the ordering of Persons with respect to the first-Table-Duties and which appertains to Piety Wherein is the Being and constant Employment of Churches The other that is matters of Righteousness Justice Sobriety and the like are occasionally only and in ordine ad spiritualia under Church-Power and Censures 2. The Power of Churches is not only spiritual Ratione objecti because it s over spiritual Persons and Causes but ex natura rei a spiritual Power having Spirituality and its Denomination from more intrinsick Considerations as the Matter Form Subject Rule End c. and not from the Object only as that other Power which though it be in spiritual things yet it is not properly spiritual Power the Sword which it bears is not the Sword of the Spirit Rev. 1.16 Ephes 6. which is the Word of God and this Word is eternal not temporal it endureth for ever the Power and Soveraignty of it is from Christ out of his Mouth went a sharp two-edged Sword his Sword and Power being spiritual it pierceth runs deep Heb. 4. even betwixt the Soul and the Spirit there comes no such Sword or Law from Civil Authority that Power in its greatest Efficacy reacheth not the Inner-Man though to be submitted unto for Conscience sake Indeed this Power is over spiritual Persons but not immediately and directly over their spiritual part By these Powers we are given up to a Prison to Banishment to Death but not to Satan It is not for cruciating the Souls and perplexing the Consciences of Men as is Church-Power where there is Cause 3. That of Secular Magistrates even in Spiritual Affairs and having to do primarily with the outward Man is more Authoritative it is Jurisdictio propriè dicta Legislative Coercive and in all respects the same as in Civil Matters what he doth in his own Name And truly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Church-Power is not properly Jurisdiction or Authority as in the Church but as in Christ the Head of the Church as seated in the Church or Caetus fidelium it is only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ministerium not Deminium and acts all in the Name or Authority of Christ 4. They differ in Extension in respect to both Persons and Causes 1. Church-Power is limited to a particular Congregation as Family-Power to those of our own Houshold But this other Ecclesiastical Power seated in the same Person or Persons extends it self throughout a whole Kingdom yea sometimes to more than one But in some one Province or Kingdom you read in Scripture of many Churches This cometh to pass from another Difference between these Powers The Manage of Ecclesiastical Affairs as in Civil Magistrates may be delegated to other hands by way of Commission or Deputation they may ordain under them subordinate Thrones and inferior Powers acting in their Names which is Lordly and full of Honour and State But Churches may not do so by delegation of Power Representatives or any other Method or Way to stretch forth the Wing of their Authority like that of the Civil over all the Churches of a Nation or over more Congregations than one or a greater than ordinarily partake of all other Ordinances together is not at all suitable to a Church-Condition which is Ministerial not Lordly So Mr. Bradshaw as the Opinion of the Nonconformists We confine and bound all Ecclesiastical Power within the Limits only of one particular Congregation holding that the greatest Ecclesiastical Power ought not to stretch beyond the same And that it is an arrogating of Princely Supremacy for any Ecclesiastical Person or Persons whatsoever to take upon themselves Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction
Whit. Tract 3. c. 6. p. 181. in an external and visible way These visible Bodies are either greater and containing as Empires Kingdoms Provinces c. Or those that are less and contained as Cities Colledges Parishes Families and the like whether they be Civil or Ecclesiastical These lesser though they have the Compleatness of a Body or Corporation each in its kind and sufficient Power to govern it self yet not to govern one another A Church hath not Authority to govern a Church nor a Family or the chief in it to govern a Neighbour-Family The Light in the least Star is sufficient for it self but not to rule the Day or the Night as the Sun and Moon These lesser Bodies are therefore so composed in their several Regiments that many of them together may lie in the Bosom of a greater Corporation and it will be for their better and more comfortable subsisting and Government There is no external Coercive or ruling Power that falls in and fills up the space betwixt those great and Catholick Bodies the World and the Church and those lesser and lowest Regiments and Societies but what is or ought to be expected by or from the Civil Magistrate who is to be acknowledged of his Subjects whether Ecclesiastical or Civil under God to be over all Consid 3 3. These lesser Societies therefore ordinarily are found under a twofold Regiment or Discipline The one intrinsecal and peculiar which in Families is received from the Light of Nature and from the Light of Institution in Churches The other more General and Common And these lesser Bodies come under it by reason of their Situation being within the Confines of such a Republick they are under the Jurisdiction of the Princes thereof De Episc lib. 3. c. 5. Each Prince saith Mason hath Power in subditos suos ac proinde in Ecclesiam modo subditi sunt Ecclesiae If situated where there is no formed Common-wealth King or Supream Power over them they are as a Free-State each Family City and Church immediately under God and Christ and no other Power but what it hath in it self which being a Power not derived from the Magistrate but peculiar to a Family or Church remains in them though no Magistrate Such was the Family and church-Church-state in the time of the Patriarchs for two thousand Years Consid 4 As it is a Happiness to a People that live in Empires and Kingdoms that these are parcels of that World which hath the righteous God to govern it who is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords 2 Kings 19.15 So is it likewise to these lesser Bodies a Family or a Church that they are situated under the Wing of a Christian and well-governed Common-wealth Where their Governours may be under some Government and in Wrongs and Disorders they may have the Benefit of a Magistrate's Authority to appeal unto CHAP. V. 1. The first Objection answered 2. The Government of a particular Church hath Affinity with that of lesser Bodies more than with the Government of Empires and Kingdoms Object § 1. IT may be objected that Churches are spiritual Corporations and of a more peculiar Consideration in respect of their Government and therefore not to be reckoned with Civil at least not with Families or such mean and low Societies Answ Policy or Government in it self and all the sorts of it is from the Light of Nature and common Reason And this is generally supposed by all that tho the Subject Matter or Persons governed be of different kinds yet the Law and Forms of Government may be the same where so appointed by Christ And I rather insist on such a way of Discourse and Reasoning as most suitable to the Subject I am upon but especially because Subordination of Churches to Churches is argued from the Light of Nature and in this very Case termed by our Brethren a Divine Topick Now if we may argue and guide our selves in Church-Affairs by the Light that shineth forth from the natural Wisdom and Prudence of Man in the Government and managing of Kingdoms there is as much a Jus Divinum and ground of reasoning from the Light that appears in the prudent Constitution and Government of any other civil Society I have mentioned in the Considerations Cities Families and those lesser and contained as I term them Societies or Corporations with particulars Churches Because I humbly conceive the Policy and Government of each tho in other things different to be more proportionable and of greater Similitude in many things then between particular Churches and those greater and containing Bodies Kingdoms Empires or the like Churches thus humbly constituted and governed are most consistent with Civil Magistracy of what Form soever the Common-wealth shall be In Confirmation of this Agreement or Similitude I shall take for the most part the Concessions of the learned of each Perswasion The Instances or Particulars are these § 2. 1. Families tho contained under the National Government where they are sinuated yet are intrusted with a ruling and governing Power compleat and sufficient each in and for it self so are particular Churches 1. They are intrusted with a Government each for it self It is not sufficient saith Mr. Perkins for a Church to have the preaching of the Word Perk. on Rev. 2.20 but Church-Government This Church speaking of Thyatira is blamed because she did not use the Authority God had given her There is given to the Ministers of each particular Congregation according to Episcopal Ordination established by our Law not only a Power to preach c. Take Authority to preach the Word of God but they are made Rectors Governours in those particular Churches and it 's said to them Whose Sins thou dost remit they are remitted and whose Sins thou dost retain they are retained by which Words the Keys of Discipline are given them see Bilson Perpet Govern p. 213. By Order of the Church of England saith Bishop Vsher all Presbyters are charged to administer the Doctrine and Sacraments Reduct of Episc p. 2. and the Difcipline of Christ as the Lord hath commanded and as this Realm hath received the same And that they might the better understand what the Lord hath commanded therein the Exhortation of St. Paul to the Elders of the Church of Ephesus is appointed to be read unto them at the time of their Ordination Take heed to your selves and to all the Flock among whom the Holy Ghost hath made you Overseers to * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so taken in Mat. 2.6 and Rev. 12.5 and 19.15 Ho. Eccl. Pol. lib. 3. Sect. 1. rule the Congregation of God which he hath purchased with his Blood Mr. Hooker tells us that for Preservation of Christianity there is not any thing more needful than that such as are of the visible Church have mutual Fellowship and Society one with another In which Consideration the Catholick Church is divided into anumber of distinct Societies every of which is termed
a Church within it self not an Assembly but a Society A Church as we are now to understand it is a Society that is a number of Men belonging to some Christian-Fellowship the Place and Limits whereof are certain having communion in the publick Exercise of such Duties as are mentioned Acts 2.47 As those of the Mystical Church by their inward Graces differ from all others which are not of the Body and those that are of the visible Body of the Church have the Notes of external Profession Even so these several Societies or Churches have Properties belonging to them as they are publick Christian Societies And of such Properties it may not be denied that one of the very chiefest is Ecclesiastical Policy We use the name of Policy rather than Government because Church-Policy containeth both Government and also whatsoever besides belongeth to the ordering of the publick Affairs of the Church of God In which words he asserts not each particular Church to have Government in it self but this Government as a Property or Propriety by which it 's distinguished from the Mystical as also the Catholick visible Church So that he doth not as some of late make the Catholick visible Church the first Subject of the Keys but each particular Society or Church supposing that great Body of Christians to be only and immediately under the Spiritual Government of Christ Jesus 2. Compleat and sufficient It is not to be understood of such a perfection as may not with much advantage receive help both from the Power of the Magistrate as I have shewed before as also from the Counsel and Advice of other Churches But I mean an essential Compleatness or Sufficiency not being deficient in any material requisite for Government This that learned Author expresseth in those last Words ' We use the Word Policy saith he rather than Government because Church-Policy containeth both Government and also whatever besides belongeth to the ordering of the Affairs of the Church of God Every particular Church Against Whitgist lib 3 pag. 147. saith Mr. Cartwright having an Eldership is a Catholick Church of Christ under whom Pastors Doctors and Elders are the ministerial and immediate Governors In which Words he intimateth a Compleatness in each particular Church for Government and Privileges as much as if the Catholick visible Church were Organical Rutherf Due Right or Presbyt pag. 307. and a governing Church The Power of Jurisdiction saith one is as perfect and compleat in one single Congregation as in a Provincial as in a National yea as in the Catholick visible Body All Things are yours saith Paul to a particular Church 2 Cor. 3. Parker's Polit. lib 3. cap. 13. To this purpose Mr. Parker Sicut non para c. As a particular Church is not a maimed or half but a whole and perfect Body so it is possessed with the whole and entire Church-Government and not with a part only This Oeconomick and Domestick Power is intrinsick and essential to a Family 2d Instance and is a Power derived immediatly from the Lord by the Light of Nature and hath not its original from any Power on Earth Families being much more ancient than Common-Wealths So Government or Discipline is intrinsick and inseparable from the very Essence of a Church received immediately from Christ and not the Grant or Constitution of any Secular Prince or State Jackson of the Church cap. 8. § 5. Churches are endued saith Dr. Jackson with a Judicature immediately derived from Christ and independent upon any Earthly Power or any Power whatsoever on Earth whether Spiritual or Temporal Bilson of Suprem p. 171. Bishop Bilson expresseth it thus The Things comprised in the Church and by God himself commanded to the Church these Things are specified in pag. 227. to be the Word Sacraments and Vse of the Keys or Ecclesiastical Power and Cure of Souls are subject to no mortal Creature Pope nor Prince And those of another Persuasion are to the same purpose The Church saith Mr. Rutherford hath the Keys from Christ Peaceable Plea p. 300. equally independent upon any mortal Man in Discipline as in Doctrine Due Right of Presbyt cap. 9. § 9. A Power and Right to Discipline saith the same Author is a Property essential to a Church and is not removed from it till God remove the Candlestick and the Church cease to be a visible Church Potestas ipsa de jure c. Power saith Dr. Ames is so much the Right of a Church Cas cen lib 4. cap. 24. p. 4. as it cannot be separated because necessary and immediatly floweth even from the Essence of each true Church There are Authorities enow to be produced from the Writings of the Learned for the confirmation of this particular All grant there is a Government jure divino I speak not of this or that Form and by the appointment of Jesus Christ It is denied by none but Erastus and those that follow him who may as well deny Praying Preaching or Sacraments jure divino It is as expresly ordained that Discipline be exercised in the Name of Christ as to preach pray or baptize in his Name There are certainly Things of God that are not the Things of Caesar And if those Things upon which Christ hath put his Name be not peculiarly his I know not where we shall find the Joint As we say there were Families so particular Churches before any Commonwealths were and Christian Churches and Discipline exercised many Years before any Emperors or Kings were Christian And therefore as Families have many Privileges so peculiar and by the Law of Nature so much theirs as are never touched or infringed by the Supreme Power of any Nation So likewise it is with Churches they have very many Privileges so evidently theirs from the Law of Christ and their spiritual Constitution as Christian Magistrates will do their utmost to preserve and cherish and not in the least infringe It is a part of Magna Charta Concessimus Deo hac presenti Charta confirmavimus 3 Hen. 3. cap. 1. pro nobis Heredibus nostris in perpetuum quòd Ecclesia Anglicana libera sit habeat omnia jura sua integra Libertates suas illaesas And it is mentioned in the Oath our Kings take at their Coronation that He shall keep and maintain the lawful Rights and Liberties of the Holy Church A third Particular 3d Instance or Instance of what we have supposed in the former Considerations is this The lesser Corporations Cities Families and the like have not Authority or Jurisdiction one over another It is the same with Churches each having the Fountain and Original of their own Power as before is shewed immediatly proceeding from Christ in themselves and not elsewhere or one from another cannot by any Art or Device of Man be made to rise up above it self as it doth if one Church exerciseth a Power or Jurisdiction over another There is
consisting of their Parish-Bishop and his Elders they do ascribe that sufficient immediate and independent Authority for Ecclesiastical Government for every proper visible Church That Independency of Churches was asserted by those learned men of a former Age in relation only to a superior Church-power properly spiritual and such as is claimed jure divino and not in relation to that Ecclesiastical Power which is in or exercised from the Civil Magistrate Some of them have thus described a particular Church It 's a Body Politick spiritually independent or independent in relation to a spiritual Superiority which is expressed fully by him that wrote Church-Government with the Peoples consent pag. 115. Though we affirm the Church-Government is independent and immediately derived from Christ yet we affirm also that the Civil Magistrate is even therein that is in Ecclesiastical Matters Supreme Governor civilly And though nothing may be imposed on the Christian Churches against their Will by any spiritual Authority for so only we intend yet we affirm withall that the Civil Magistrate may impose on them spiritual Matters by Civil Power yea whether they like or dislike if it be good in his Eyes that is if he judge it within his Commission from God And such an Independency hath been pleaded for also and argued by them to be much more consistent with His Majesties Supremacy than a DEPENDENCY or Subordination of Churches to any spiritual Power And it was their professed Judgments That no External Power ought to be exercised in spiritual Matters any where within that space betwixt a particular Congregation instituted by Christ and the Catholick Visible Church by any person but the Civil Magistrate or by his Appointment Take their own Words They that make claim Jure Divino of Power and Jurisdiction to meddle with other Churches than that one Congregation of which they are Members do usurp upon the Supremacy of the Civil Magistrate who alone hath and ought to have a power of Jurisdiction over the several Congregations in his Dominions c. A Protestation of the King's Supremacy made and published in Anno 1605. § 27. and in § 28. The King himself is to be General Overseer of all the Churches within his Dominions and ought o employ under him fit persons to oversee the Churches in their several Divisions visiting them and punishing whatsoever is amiss in any of them Mr. Bradshew in the Vnreasonableness of Separation against Johnson writes thus It 's their principal Honour speaking of Archbishops and Bishops to be Commissioners and Visitors in Causes Ecclesiastical under the King over the Pastors and Churches of Provinces and Diocesses In his Answer to Johnson's first Reason And in his Answer to his second He questions him thus 1. Whether the Supreme Magistrate hath not Power to oversee and govern all the several Churches within his Dominion yea whether he be not bound so to do 2. Whether for his further help and assistance herein he may not make choice of grave learned and reverent men to assist him in the same Government 3 Whether by vertue of his Power these persons thus called to assist the Supreme Magistrate may not lawfully try the Gifts of Ministers within his Dominions convent them before them examine how they have behaved themselves in their places and punish the blame-worthy In a Petition also to King James for Tolleration That your Highness would afford us and assign to us some persons qualified with Wisdom Learning and Vertue to be under your Highness our Overseers for our more peaceable orderly and dutiful carriage of our selves both in our worshiping God and in all other our Affairs at your pleasure To whom with all Readiness and Subjection we are willing to be accomptable and answerable always The opinions of learned men about Church Matters Government especially were collected together in a Treatise which was put into Latin by Dr. Ames and in an Epistle of his prefixed avouched by him who was a man much studied in those Controversies to be the Judgment of Cartwright Fenner Fulk Whitaker Rainolds Perkins Brightman and those that were more Ancient As Wichliff Tyndal Rogers Bradford Gilby Fox Moore Dearing Noel Greenham Dogmata ista c. These Tenents saith he were either their Principles or so conjunct with them as not to be denied theirs Christ Jesus saith the Author hath not subjected any Church or Congregation of his to any other Superior Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction than unto that which is within it self the Civil Magistrate alone upon Earth hath power to punish a whole Church or Congregation Cap. 2. § 3. and more fully in § 12. They hold and believe saith he that the Equality in Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Authority of Churches and Church Ministers is no more derogatory and repugnant to the State and Glory of a Monarch than the parity or equality of School-masters of several Schools or Masters of several Families Yea they hold the clean contrary that Inequality of Churches and Church Officers in Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Authority was that principally that advanced Antichrist unto his Throne and brought the Kings and Princes of the Earth unto such vassalage under him And that the Civil Authority and Glory of Secular Princes and States hath ever decayed and withered the more that Ecclesiastical Officers of the Church have been advanced and set up in Authority beyond the limits and confines that Christ in his Word hath prescribed unto them And in Cap. 6. § 6. They are said to deny a principal part of the Kings Supremacy that hold any Jurisdiction or Offices over Churches jure divino 〈…〉 will and pleasure of the King and Civil States of the 〈◊〉 And from what is said cap. 5. § 12. It is 〈◊〉 that this way is as little prejudicial to the Subjects 〈…〉 expresly there said If any Member of a Congregation 〈…〉 crime shall of himself forsake Communion with the Church that then the Ecclesiastical Officers have no authority or jurisdiction over him but only the Civil Magistrate Parents or Masters c. So that as persons are free otherwise than from conscience of duty to joyn with these Assemblies so also to leave them remaining always under the Magistrates Ecclesiasticul power and care I have made this Digression not only for the matters sake which is very sutable to our present Subject but also to vindicate the Congregational way 1. That it is not such a Novelty as is pretended This of the equality of Churches and thence an Independency from which we are reproachfully surnamed seems to be the worst of our Tenents Yet it appears to be no other but what the reverend and learned of a former age have asserted Nor do I know any other of their opinions or practices but may as easily be remonstrated to be the assertions of those holy men Nor secondly inconsistent with civil Magistracy or with their Power in Ecclesiastical Affairs And as a further Testimony hereof they take the Oaths both of Allegeance and Supremacy
or Censures may lawfully by a Church or any Ecclesiastical Assembly be threatned or drawn forth against a whole Nation and the chief Governors thereof to urge or compel especially in State concernment as the Pope and some others have done though it be truly in ordine ad spiritualia The fifth Instance or particular is this The 5. Instance A Family of all Corporations or Societies is the lowest species or kind it 's Consociatio simplex prima and hath the least of pomp or state in the Government of it Cottages are built low Palaces with many stories one above another Those great and extensive Bodies Empires and Kingdoms represent in their Government more adequatly the mystical Church in respect to Jesus Christ who is their King and Lawgiver whose Kingdom is with Power and Glory a Power that is truly Imperial and Princely having Officers under him his Kingdom reaching to the utmost ends of the Earth who in his name command reward and punish But Particular Churches as Governed by his Ministers have their porportion rather with the meanest and lowest Societies of men The Scripture seems to point at more than a similitude and likeness betwixt a Family and Church in the managing of affairs I mean in the general and what is it not determined by express Institution Paul speaking to Timothy about Church affairs mentioneth their expertness in Governing a Family as a good preparative or qualification for Church administrations And this is not only Negatively 1 Tim. 3.5 if a man know not how to rule his own house how shall he take care over the Church of God But affirmatively These things I writ that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thy self in the house of God which is the Church of the living God The sence is full in those words vers 15. the Church of the living God yet it is added the house of God purposed as it were to carry the Eye back to what was written ver 5. which sheweth that there is a great affinity betwixt our Houses and the Houshold of God In a Fathers Governing his Children saith one there is a lively resemblance of such Duties of Government which he is to dispence towards the Church There is nothing enjoyned the Minister as a Father of Children which belongeth not to him as he is a spiritual Father of the Children of God On the other hand it may be observed this question being amongst the Apostles Matth. 18.1 who or which of us shall be the greatest in the Kingdom of Heaven upon supposition the Church being termed a Kingdom there would be places of State and higher dignity in it as are in the Kingdoms of the World Christ Answers There shall be no such thing no primacy in one Apostle over another no the greatest of you shall be the least and the first shall be the last Though a Jurisdiction and power truly Imperial absolute and equal to any of the Kings of the Gentiles belongs to me and I exercise it in those spiritual administrations yet no such dignity may be assumed by you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luke 22.25 1. When the Scripture speaks of a particular Church under the notion of a Family or Houshold Government or Ruling is mentioned as that wherein the similitude or proportion is most perspicuous and clear as hath been shewed But speaking here of a Church under this expression a Kingdom how purposely are we cautioned against an imitation in Rule and Authority 2. We may further observe that Ambition after greatness in those that manage these great things Hos 8.12 1 Pet. 1.4 is an infirmity almost unavoidable For if 1. Such persons the holiest men on the earth they who had forsaken all to follow Christ 2. And these so often relapse into this folly after they had been reduced from it by Christ 3. And at such times immediatly after Christ had minded them of his Death Matth. 20.19 20. Luke 22.21 24. 19. with 24. and that one of them should betray him when also they had newly been at the Communion with him What great cause is there that every man be very jealous of his own heart 3. It is not unevident also from the Disciples often Disputes about their greatness that most of our controversies and contentions about Church-Government if traced home will be found to arise from hence namely The having our Eye fixed so much upon the lofty state of a Kingdom as our pattern in such managements rather than that familiar and humble way of a Family For indeed this was the only breach and contest that we read of amongst those holy Men the Disciples of Christ 4. And where such differences are a Reconcilement will be found more difficult because where the mind is bent on worldly greatness we are very dull and slow in understanding whatsoever shall be spoken though from Christ himself that seems to cross those thoughts as appears also in that story Mark 9.32 A Parent or Master would not easily have been tempted into such an Error or make this question who or which of us shall be the greatest that is have a paternal power over other Parents and their Families c. And had the Disciples looked upon Ministerial power under so low and humble a notion as what is Economical James and John would never have thought it congruous that they should have an Apostolical power over the other Apostles Hoc Papatum fefellit c. saith Cartw. This deceived the Papacy which governs throughout after the form of worldly * Plurimorum consensu Ecclesia à repub formam illam magna parte mutuata est Eilesac Empires The Pope he is as the Emperor himself the Cardinals as his Deligates or Representative the Arch-Bishops as the Governors of Provinces c. Hence John calls the Church of Rome the Image of the Beast the Vizard of the Roman Empire For further confirmation of this fifth particular or Instance let it be considered how seldom and sparingly a particular Church in the N. T. is termed a Kingdom Although 1. It s Government be derived as a Branch of Christs Kingly Office 2. Church Ordinances are the most effectual means by which he exerciseth his spiritual Soveraignty in each mans soul 3. His Mystical Kingdom on earth thus by parcels comes to be wholly under an external spiritual regiment and 4. His Church when National was managed in the Glory and State of a Kingdom Yet notwithstanding all these leading occasions how sparingly and not without special Caution is a particular Church thus termed Whereas not only the Society but the Government Officers Ordinances Censures and other Church matters are universally and frequently delivered unto us by Christ and his Apostles in terms apt to mind us of this low and humble policy To give some Instances thereof 1. A particular Church or the Society it self is represented unto us as the House of the living God 1 Tim. 3. His
no Invention of Man that by contriving Pipes or any other Artifice can make Water freely and naturally run higher than the Spring-Head Tho that Jurisdiction which hath its rise in a particular Church be pumped up into a Classis or Synod it is but the same it was before Synods saith Parker out of Chamier Polit lib. 3. cap. 13 § 9. Disp de Polit. Eccles p. 5. nullam habeant Authoritatem c. They have no Authority but what is derived from particular Churches So Voetius There seems to be a great Emphasis in those Particles of Propriety Children obey your Parents 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so to Servants 1 phes 6.1 And speaking of the Relation of Husbands and Wives by which is set forth our Obedience to Christ and his Officers it is more appropriate Ephes 5.24 As the Church is subject to Christ so let the Wives be to their own Husbands it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 propriis viris not only theirs but their own Husbands It is said 1 Tim. 3.4 One that ruleth well his own House 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So of Ministers Know them that labour among you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and are ever you in the Lord 1 Thess 5.12 and in Heb. 13.17 it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Duces vestri your Captains Officers in Churches being as exactly limited as in an Army There is no Power in a Superior to command where no Obligation upon the Inferior to obey And therefore the Lord seems by these Expressions to limit both Church and Family-Power within their own Walls This is the Judgment of the Learned of each Persuasion Bishop Davenant Nota est Jurisconsultorum regula c. It is a known Rule of Lawyers A Sentence given by him that is not his Judg is void in Law But particular Churches are not the Judges of private Persons that are of other Churches how much less then over the Churches themselves such Sentences were to be slighted and contemned as of a Judg that presumeth to make Laws out of the bounds of his own Jurisdiction Nec potest De judice cont cap. 16. p. 90. nec debet saith the same Author elsewhere particularis una Ecclesia judiciaria authoritate aliam sibi non subjectam a Catholica abscindere quaelibet enim Ecclesia filios suos ad consensionem in Doctrina publicè stabilita censuris adigit Sed fratres Ecclesiarum externarum monet pro officio charitatis non punit pro imperio potestatis Dr. Field Of the Church lib 5. as a common Resolution of Divines tells us That if a Bishop ventures to do any Act of Jurisdiction out of his own Diocess that is his particular Church so cap. 30. as to excommunicate or absolve or the like all such Acts are utterly void and of no force The same thing saith Dr. Crakanthorp cont Spal cap. 28. pag. 177. Jue divinum Regim p. 230. Every Congregation say our Brethren hath equal Power one as much as another according to the trite and known Axiom Par in parem non habet imperium An Equal hath no Power over an Equal Ecclesiae institutae parochiales integrae sunt Disp de Polit. Eccles p. 3. inter se collaterales potestate Ecclesiastica aequales saith Voetius Which you may English out of the English Puritanism thus Particular Churches are in all Matters equal and are entrusted by Christ with the same Ecclesiastical Power and Authority Cap. 2. § 3. Jewel Reynolds Whitaker and most of our Divines against the Papists are large in their Disputes for a parity of Churches and Mr. Parker hath written a whole Chapter de paritate Ecclesiarum De Polit lib 3. cap. 21. Some make a particular Church to be of larger Extension as a Diocess a Province c. but that altereth not the State of the Question A DIGRESSION 1. Of Independentism Name and Thing 2. It s consistency with the Kings Supremacy THis State of a particular Church namely their equality in respect of Jurisdiction or coercive Power one over another was wont to be expressed by INDEPENDENCY which though now it be a term of Raproach yet formerly made use of by good Authors as very fit and significant to set forth this Priviledge of each particular Church compleat and intire namely their not Dependency or Subjection to the Jurisdiction of another Church as their Head and Superior Dr. Jackson in his learned Treatise of the Church Cap. 15. Cap. 119. useth this term frequently Unity saith he in one place of Discipline or of INDEPENDENT Judicature is essential and necessary to the Church as visible Hence there be as many distinct visible Churches as there be INDEPENDENT Judicatures Ecclesiastick Dr. Sibbs thus Gospel-anointings pag. 94. Particular visible Churches are now God's Tabernacle The Church of the Jews was a National Church but now God hath erected particular Tabernacles Every particular Church under one Pastor is the Church of God a several Church INDEPENDENT The Church of England saith the same Author is called a particular Church from other Nations because it is under a Government Civil which is not dependent on any other Foreign Prince Each Church saith Voctius Desp Cau. Pap. lib. 3. § 3. c. 4. as it hath its proper Form of an Ecclesiastical Body or Society so it s endued with its proper Government and Jurisdiction which it exerciseth DEPENDENTLY upon Christ his Word and Spirit but INDEPENDENTLY in respect of all other Churches Mr. Bates One Company of Men assembled Treatise printed Anno 1613. hath no Authority to impose things upon many Churches 1. None now have Apostolick Authority 2. Each Congregation is a Body INDEPENDENT of any Ecclesiastical Power There is no Ordinance of God for this saith Mr. Banes that Churches within a circuit should be tyed to a certain Head-Church for Government pag. 8. and pag. 13. We affirm that no such Head-Church was ordained either vertually or actually but that all Churches were single Congregations equal INDEPENDENT each of other in regard of Subjection Every true Church saith one now is an INDEPENDENT Congregation A Collection of sundry matters Anno 1601. and in another place The Congregational Body Politick spiritually INDEPENDENT is Christ's Divine Ordinance in the Gospel One ordinary Congregation of Christians is a spiritual Body Politick INDEPENDENT That is it hath the Right and Power of spiritual Administration and Government in it self Confession of Faith p. Anno 1601. and over it self by the common and free consent of the People INDEPENDENTLY and immediately under Christ This was the Opinion generally of N. Conformists as is observed by one of themselves in the Name of the rest as also by B. Downam Sermon at Lambeth p. 5. They that is the N. C. say that every Parish by Right hath sufficient Authority within it self immediately derived from Christ for the Government of it self in all Causes Ecclesiastical To the Parishional Presbytery
Professedly assent also to All the Articles of Religion which concern only the Confession of the true Christian Faith and the Doctrin of the Sacraments comprised in a Book entituled Articles whereupon it was agreed by the Arch-bishops and Bishops of both Provinces and the whole Clergy in the Convocation Anno 1562. for the avoiding of diversity of Opinions and for the establishing of consent touching true Religion as is required by Stat. 13 Eliz. cap. 12. And do humbly hope living peaceably under his Majesties Government they shall obtain their share in that Indulgence his Majesty graciously purposed to shew to such persons as through want of full satisfaction differ in smaller matters from the present Establishment A fourth Particular which ariseth from the former 4 Instance is this Families being not subordinate one to another they cannot associate or unite into any large or great Body and therefore do and may more conveniently retain their Government though it be peculiar and distinct in any Common-wealth of what form soever without prejudice to the Peace and Welfare of it So is it with Churches their State and Government as it is appointed by Christ is such as is consistent with and no prejudice unto any civil Powers under whom they are situated And that upon this account principally Having no Dependency in Respect of Power or Jurisdiction one on another they cannot in their own Sphere enlarge themselves by Subordinations to a political Body of any such Extension and Greatness as may render their Obedience or Compliance more doubtful or uncertain It is matter of Jealousie with Princes and States when there is in their Dominions a Body large and extensive firmly joyned and compact in it self of an interest peculiar and not holding of them Particular Churches are of a small compass sometimes comprehended in One ordinarily but of a few Families So that in this respect though their Interest and Government be peculiar they may retain it and for substance the same as Families do throughout the World Which will further appear in the following Considerations 1. It is granted on all hands That the Lord hath limited his Church to a Government which is perpetual and for substance to be the same in all places As also that the Nations from their Civil Government variously and as they judge most prudent 2. Since the Wall of partition by Christs Death was broken down The Gospel and Christian Churches were by Christs commission to be planted in all parts of the World It stands therefore with common reason that the Church Government Christ hath left us is of that Nature as without any substantial Alteration may comply with and not be prejudicial to any Civil Government 3. If particular Churches by Union become one body for extention as large as the Civil State There will hardly be a due and peaceable accord and each enjoy its priviledge and Liberties without prejudice to the other unless these two great bodies be moulded and formed one with respect unto the other The policy therefore of the Nation and the National Church of the Jewes were both respectively formed by the Lord himself 4. Hence this opinion of States-men that there is no form of Church Government left by Christ or his Apostles but to be moulded by the wisdom and discretion of Christian Magistrates as may best sute and joynt in with the Civil Government And of others the contrary The Commonwealth saith one must be made to agree with the Church and the Government thereof with her Government for as the House is before the Hangings therefore the Hangings which came after must be framed to the House which was before so the Church being before there was any Commonwealth and the Commonwealth coming after must be fashioned and made suitable to the Church We need none of these extteams The middle way is this Let not the Churches claim to be National or Provincial Jure divino but leave such disposements to the civil Magistrate and be numbred with those lesser Societies Families Cities Colledges c. For these do retain in themselves much the same form of Government and Freedom therein throughout the World 5. It is not so much a different Form of Government For in each Republick there are contained lesser Societies of all Forms but their Extention and Potency in numerousness of Persons by which they are made up Nor from this Principallity but the nature of their Vnion and Incorporation begets the Jealousies If particular Churches become Diocesan Provincial or National by Union from the Law or Direction of the Civil Magistrate for the better exercise of that Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction the Lord hath intrusted him with and conveniency of such persons as he shall appoint to inspect the Churches in such a case the Greatness of Churches cannot be disturbent to the Civil Government being so directly under its cognizance Holy Common-wealth R. B. p. 2. 220. The Common-wealth saith one containeth all the people in a whole Nation or more united in one Soveraign but particular Churches distinct from the universal united in Christ have no general Ecclesiastical Officers in whom a Nation must Unite as one Church How then become they to be termed a National Church Ans As several Corporations in one Kingdom or as so many Schools that have a peculiar form of Government but such only as is under and united in the Magistrates Government in its kind If this should be claimed as the Law or Priviledge of each Family that the Governors be it the Father or Husband or Master are thereby invested by Nature with the same Power in respect to all Families in a Nation and by several Correspondencies and Subordinations raise and Vnite themselves at last into a general Assembly or Representative And by Vertue of that Enconomical Authority give Laws to the whole Nation though not as their Subjects yet to the same persons under another notion that is as Wives Children Servants There is no well Governed State could entertain such a spreading interest as this without great doubtfulness lest their Authority and Supremacy should hereby be much Ecclipsed 6. But a particular Church consisting only of a few persons in it self and independent on others is necessitated to depend under God upon the Magistrate for protection Which if they should not obtain but be opposed and persecuted yet have no ability to resist being as a Family single and alone not able to defend it self or molest others Nor if they were able is it lawful for a Church to compel by the Sword more than the Magistrate may by the Keyes 2 Chron. 26. Matth. 16.19 with 24 25. or what is peculiar to the sacred Function Vzza erred in the latter and Peter in the former The primitive rule and practice was this being persecuted in one City to fly into another and pray that their flight may not be in the Winter Matth. 10.23.24.20 No nor do we judg that these spiritual weapons the Keyes
relation between them and you being such as Fast and Pray and Mourn and Rejoyce yea Eat and Drink with you daily at the same Table of the Lord and are intrusted with the Care of your Souls from the hand of Christ This cannot be where the Pastoral or Ministerial Work is divided and the Keys of the Church hung apart Those that instruct us not nay are Strangers to us Rule over us Rebukes and Chastisements in this spiritual way are from those whose Faces we never saw or know so much as by name It 's true we may argue thus They are strangers expect no favour therefore or mercy from them if you offend this procures Obedience indeed but it is in a servile way The mind of Christ is that as our Submission to himself so to his Ministers who even in Censures act in his Name be affectionate filial and drawn by the cords of love Thus have I gone through with the Instances promised with what brevity the nature of the matter would permit By which it is not intended to parallel these Societies in respect to the intrinsick Form of Government peculiar to each for that in a Church is from the Institution of Christ rather than the light of Nature but the more general state and habitude of Ecclesiastical Government as Churches stand disposed to the Civil Magistrate or one to another and what the light of Nature and common Reason contribute hereunto being so much insisted upon What hath been said I hope tends to Union and Accommodation Those that hold any spiritual Government Jure Divino and by the appointment of Jesus Christ do not deny it to a particular Church And those that hold none yet are at a lesser distance from such who claim so-little CAP. VI. A second Objection Of the Jurisdiction over Particular Churches in Synods Ecclesiastical Courts c. § 1. as exercised with us § 2. and in other places Object 2. THere are Synods Consistories Colloquies and other Ecclesiastical Courts which exercise an Authority in spiritual matters over Churches Therefore that of the Magistrate before mentioned is not so necessary Answ It is humbly denied and asserted That these greater Assemblies a Synod Classis Coloquie and the like either have no such coactive Jurisdiction as we mentioned or are dependent upon the Civil Magistrate for it This we shall shew by declaring more fully what Ecclesiastical Power is exercised by Synods or such Courts 1. In this Kingdom 2. In other Reformed Churches The Ecclesiastical Courts in this Kingdom are of two sorts 1. There are we know Spiritual Courts so termed such as the Prerogative the Arches Court of Faculties the Archdeacons and Commissaries Courts These claim only from the Civil Powers as was shewed before Pag. 45 46. In the Statute of 37 Hen. 8. c. 17. it is declared That the Archbishops Bishops Archdeacons and other Ecclesiastical Persons have no manner of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction but by from and under the King 's Royal Majesty By the Statute also of 1 Edw. 6. c. 2. All Courts Ecclesiastical within the Realms of England and Ireland ought to be kept by no other Power or Authority either Foreign or within the Realm but by the Authority of His most Excellent Majesty And it was further Enacted That all their Process shall issue out under the King's Seal and His Name and Style c. but since repealed Dr. Cosens in his learned Defence of them and their Proceedings asserts thus They are saith he warranted by the Statute and Canon Law of this Nation professing also that there were Reason enough against those Ecclesiastical Proceedings Apol. Part 1. Cap. 1. if they were not claimed from the Crown but from some other Authority immediately as the Popish Clergy did theirs from by the means and direction of the Pope 2. Our Convocation or General Synod which makes Laws and Canons about matters that are more spiritual This is an ancient Court and hath formerly been in it self of great Authority in Ecclesiastical Regulations it 's not so now but dependent upon the Civil Magistrate for whatsoever Jurisdiction or Coercive Power there exercised which will appear in these Particulars 1. There are no Laws or Canons made by the Bishops and others of the Clergy in the Convocation Nihil habet vim legis priusquam Regius assensus fuerit adhibitus iis quae Synodus decernanda censuerit Cosins Polit. Ta. 1. a. that oblige under any Penalty without the Stipulation and Assent of the Civil Magistrate be it either in matters of Faith or Discipline The 39 Articles and Canons about them concluded upon by the Synod in Anno 1562. engaged no man under any Penalty in our Law to believe profess or subscribe until they had an Assent or Establishment by the Civil Powers Nor can they proceed against any Crime as Heresie Apostasie or gross Enormity in Doctrine but what our Laws declare to be such And for matters of Discipline and Worship it appears by the Letters Patent Copies whereof are annexed to the Canous published in Anno 1603 and 1640. That 1. All power to meet confer treat debate and agree upon any matter for common good is from such Licence Power and Authority as is granted to the Archbishops Bishops Chancellors and other Members of the Convocation from His Majesty of His special Grace and by virtue of His Prerogative Royal and Supreme Authority in Ecclesiastical Causes And 2. the Synod having treated of concluded and agreed upon Canons Orders c. To the end and purpose by His Majesty limited and prescribed unto them they are to offer and present the same to His Majesty in writing He upon mature consideration taken thereupon may allow approve The Licence to the Convoc in Anno 1640. confirm and ratifie or otherwise disallow anihilate and make void such and so many of the said Canons Orders c. as he shall think fit requisite or convenient And none of those Canons c. shall be of any force effect or validity in Law but only such and so many of them and after such time as His Majesty by His Letters Patents shall approve and confirm the same The Civil Magistrate may suspend for what time he shall please yea wholly deprive any Bishop or Bishops from their Office and Place in this Synod who are the chiefest Members thereof He may Commissionate also by Writ * Cook Instit pag. 4. cap. 74. what other Persons He shall please to sit in Convocation with them And if occasion be He may likewise wholly constitute another Syond and nominate each particular Person of what Quality and of what Number of His Natives as He shall please Field Of the Church Lib. 5. cap. 53. Princeps potest assignare nominare authoritatem dare quandocunque quamdiu ipsi placuerit hujusmodi indigenis subditis quos idoneos censuerit c. Dr. Cosin de Pol. Tab. 1. a. and give them like Authority in Ecclesiastical matters So was that
otherwise that are spiritual yield Appeals but it 's upon this Supposition that the Cause at last will be brought to a Tribunal that is Infallible Licitumest saith P. de Aragon in re grave cuique causam suam defferre ad sedem Apostolicam Aragon in 2.2 q. 69. a. 3. D. Th. quando vel ex imperitia vel ex Passione inferiorum judicum qui homines sunt ac decipi possunt injuriam patitur The Pope cannot be deceived he is more than a Man 2. Matters of Fact by reason of Appeals come to be sentenced at a great distance from the place where the Crime and Offence lieth which in Worldly Concernments may with more Righteousness be done than in what is Spiritual and of Church Cognizance 1. Transgressions come under a Civil Judgment as materially considered and according to the gross Act but brought to the Church not as Sins simple but as Scandals and Offences which is a Consideration not so obvious but requires good judgment in the Witnesses as well as in the Judges The Obstinacy also or Penitency of the Person offending accordingly as Testimony shall be given of either is a more difficult matter to make out than either the Sin it self or the Scandal Repentance Godly Sorrow or the contrary is the principal thing to be regarded in Church-process Repentance I say in truth and sincerity so far as we can judge in a seeing and not blind charity It is not only the Passion Sorrow or Shame but Godly Sorrow which is more spiritual and deeper in the heart and requireth much and particular knowledge of the Person and his temper and such as cannot be attained at a distance but by frequent and familiar Converse To sit in the Stool of Repentance stand in a White Sheet or do Penance as it 's termed these are as the fruits of the flesh manifest and judged of at the greatest distance it 's not so deep Prov. 20.5 as we need much understanding to draw it out 2. The Censure whether binding or loosing is to be executed always by the particular Church where the Offender is a Member those persons above all others are to have a particular knowledge of his Crime and true Repentance they are to forgive and confirm their love 2 Cor. 2.7 Mat. 18.15 17 or otherwise to withdraw from him If THY Brother offend thee let him be unto THEE an Heathen c. The Execution of the Censure being by each Brother of that Church it is necessary the Examination of the matter be before them Spiritual Duties are not to be performed upon an implicit Faith What knowledge but by remote heresay can a Church in the Orchades have of a mans repentance or obstinacy the ultimate tryal and cognizance whereof is taken by a Synod at Edenhurgh Civil censures are for Satisfaction of the whole Nation and not the Parish or Borough only where the crime was committed but in a Church-censure the particular Assembly being only and no other Congregation or person morally leavened and charged with the offence are principally and in the first place concerned to have satisfaction of the repentance and submission of the person offending For by this means only their Lump or Church becomes again unleavened Disparity 4 4. The other End before mentioned and Vse of Appeals is that our Judges and their Sentence be censured and judged by superior Tribunals To which proceeding Vnaequaque res per quascunque res nascitur per easdem dissolvitur the Judges in Civil Judicatures are liable but there is not the like Subordination in Churches for these Reasons 1. All the Power and Authority placed in their Inferior Courts is no other but the influx of the supream Civil Powers to whom we always make our last Appeal and therefore proper to them to suspend Actings nay utterly to destroy in part or in whole what Jurisdiction is derived from them as appears in the Constitution of all Kingdoms But it is not so here a particular Church The Court we are to Appeal from hath not its Being or Jurisdiction from a Classis or Synod * Ecclesia Parochialis est Ecclesia vera essentialiter integraliter absque ulla correspondentia vel Synodo Voet. de Syn. pag. 13. Parker de Polit Eccles lib. 3. cap. 13. It is an authoritative unchurching of an obstinate Church we plead for Ruth peaceable Plea cap. 15. p. 223 and p. 222. Excommunication is an authoritative unchurching these rather derive their Power from it being Representatives only as our Brethren have formerly written Particular Churches they term Ecclesiae primae and Synods Ecclesiae ortae Again if Synods as they grant exercise over Churches a Power only cumulative not destructive How can they Excommunicate a Church seeing Excommunication renders a Society as Heathens and Publicans which is to unchurch them as Mr. Rutherford rightly affirms 2. Although whole Churches may be punished for male Administration by the Civil Magistrate yet may not an Ecclesiastical Power meerly such do the like for to destroy or save whole Societies for the Evil of a major part or a few persons is the prerogative of the Lord himself which he communicates also in some cases to Civil Magistrates his Deputies but in no case to Churches it being an Authority high and Princely and not at all sutable to such as have only a Ministry and not a Dominion Bishop Davenant tells us That a Censure is not to be drawn on the whole Body of the Church Brotherly Communion c. 9. p. 102. for as the Laws forbid to Excommunicate a Society or Corporation because it may happen that those that are innocent may be intangled in the censure So Right and Religion forbids to exclude whole Churches from the Communion of the Faithful because this cannot be done without an injury and contempt to many that be innocent What ever formerly of this same unchurching power in Synods hath been asserted yet since upon further debate we are told this same Excommunieating of whole Churches is a thing not known in the Presbyterian Government and not the Churches but particular persons in the Churches are censured Assemb disputes pag. 180. But how can we say single persons only are to be censured and not the whole Church Whenas we know the contending parties of what condition soever are both equally liable to the Censure of the Judge Now when matters are brought by Appeal to a superior Court the Court Appealed from is a Party and in this respect upon no higher terms than the pars appellans though a single person But grant it be so and that the object of a Censure from a Synod be only particular members Excommunicatio ejusque denunciatio post appellationem legitimam latam est nulla Nardus p. 53. col 2. Then 1. Churches cannot have such a remedy as in Civil States for Appeals of this Nature are not to be made to any but persons invested with such a power as may