or Crowne of any Countrey when wee intimate and signifie thereby the Kingdome of that Countrey Wherefore Paul saith 1 Tim. 3.15 1 Cor. 4.1 The Church is the house of the living God The Ministers of the Church are Gods Stewards For look what a faithfull Steward is in his Masters house ordering all things at his Masters beck the same a faithfull Minister is in Gods Church Wherefore the denouncing of Gods will in his Church is executed by the Ministers as the Stewards in his name God himself is authour of this Ministry who gave this power and priviledge to his Church and intituled it by the name of the Keys saying unto Peter I will give unto thee the Keys of the Kingdom of heaven that is the office or power of shutting and opening the Kingdome of God and unto all his Disciples Whatsoever yee binde on earth shall be bound in heaven Mat. 18.18 and whatsoever yee loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven So then the Keyes are that power of opening and shutting binding and loosing and are called Keyes from the efficacy of this power For the Church verily by the Word of God in Christs name whose place the Ministers supply doth open and shut heaven binde and loose men and the holy Ghost workes powerfully by the Word John 20.23 as Christ promised Whosesoever sins ye remit they are remitted unto them and whosesoever sins ye retain they are retained Now the chiefe and principall parts of this power of the Keyes are two The preaching of the Gospel Two parts of the power of the Keyes or Ministery of the Word and Church judgement which is called also spirituall Discipline or Jurisdiction whereunto Excommunication belongeth With either of these two parts the Church shutteth and openeth bindeth and looseth By the preaching of the Word it shutteth and bindeth when it denounceth to Hypocrites and Infidels Gods wrath and eternal damnation untill they repent and it openeth and looseth when it preacheth to the faithfull and penitent remission of sinnes and Gods favour through Christ By Ecclesiasticall judgement it shutteth and bindeth when it excommunicateth outragious and refractary or stubborne persons that is excludeth them from the communion of the Sacraments the Church and Kingdom of God Againe it openeth and looseth thereby when it receiveth the same persons upon their repentance as members of Christ and his Church Here we are to observe a difference in the order of these two parts For in the preaching of the Gospel the Keyes doe first loose and afterwards binde but in Ecclesiasticall discipline they first binde and afterwards loose Againe in the former they bind and loose the same or divers parties in the latter they binde and loose the same persons only Now What Excommunication is Excommunication is the banishing of a grievous transgressour or an open ungodly obstinate person from the fellowship of the faithfull by the judgement of the Elders or Chief men and by the consent of the whole Church exercised and executed in the name and authority of Christ and of the holy Ghost to the end that the offender being put to shame may repent and scandals in the Church may be prevented This exclusion or exile is not only from the Sacraments but even from the whole communion of the faithfull whereunto the obstinate pertain not at all Two sorts of Excommunication It is two-fold Internall which concerneth God only and Externall which belongeth to the Church The internall excommunication is manifested to men on earth by the externall and the externall is ratified in heaven by the internall according to Christs promise Whatsoever ye bind on earth Mat. 18.18 shall be bound in heaven 2. Whether Ecclesiasticall Discipline and Excommunication be necessary in the Church COncerning the Ministery of the Word there is no doubt but all the Prophets Christ and the Apostles have preached and whereas Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction hath a necessary co-herence with the Ministery of Gods Word it is not to be doubted thereof inasmuch as God himself and Christ and the Apostle Paul have both by precepts and practice confirmed and established it Mat. 18 15. 2 Thes 3.14 1 Cor. 5.1 1 Tim. 1.20 And verily if no Territory no City can stand without discipline lawes and punishment the Church also which is the House of the living God hath need of some spirituall policy and discipline though it much differ from civill Jurisdiction Church-discipline therefore is necessary 1. In respect of Gods generall commandement of preventing the profanation of his Sacraments both in the Old and New Testament In the Old Testament God would not that the rebellious should be reputed so much as members of his people but would have them cut off much lesse would he indure that they should be admitted to his Sacraments Num. 15.30 31. The person that dothought presumptuously whether born in the land or a stranger the same blasphemeth the Lord Therefore that person shall be cut off from among his people Because hee hath despised the Word of the Lord and hath broken his commandement that person shall be utterly cut off God would that all should come unto the Passeover that is all the members of his people but the rebellious and obstinate breakers of his Covenant he utterly disclaimed and renounced from being members of his people therefore hee permitted them not to come thereunto That man that will doe presumptuously Deut. 17.11 not harkening unto the Priest that standeth before the Lord thy God to minister there or unto the Judge that man shall dye and thou shalt take away evill from Israel By these two places God will have those cut off which are rebellious against his law and that even from the civill state and Common-wealth neither doth he permit them to be any members of his people much lesse then will he have them to be accounted members of his visible Church and admitted to the Sacraments The civill or judiciall law indeed is taken away as also are the ceremonies but that especiall difference between the Citizens of the Church and others is not taken away In the first of Esay is a whole Sermon against the wicked which offered sacrifices unto God and there God will not that they should sacrifice unto him therefore now also he will not that such men be admitted to the Sacraments Bring no more oblations saith God in vaine Object God will that all should celebrate the Passeover Therefore here-hence hee excluded not the wicked Ans God will that all celebrate his Passeover that is all such as he will have accounted for members of his Church and people not the obstinate whom hee commanded to be sequestred from his congregation Againe Esay 66. he detesteth such as persist in their wickednesse and yet offer sacrifices unto him Hee that killeth a bullocks is as if he slew a man hee that sacrificeth a sheep Esay 66.3 as if he cut off a dogges necke hee that offereth
the Father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you And we are to hold and keep these notes and marks 1. In respect of Gods glory that enemies may be discerned from sons 2. In respect of our own salvation that we may joyn our selves to the true Church Object 1. There were in all ages great errours both publike and private in the Church Against the first marke Ans 1. But still the foundation was held on which some built gold some stubble 2. Errours are not defended by the Church and this mark standeth sure if the foundation be held though on it stubble be built so that such errours and such stubble be not maintained Against the third marke Object 2. In many Churches which professe true doctrine this third mark is not seene Therefore they are no Churches Ans 1. There are many in them who indeed yeeld and indeavour to yeeld obedience 2. All obey acknowledging by their profession that sins ought not to be maintained But it is necessary that this third mark should be added because they should mock God Against all the foresaid markes Not all that challenge these marks are the Church because all have them not though they challenge them The ordinary succession of Bishops no necessary mark of the Church who would say that they received this Doctrine of Christ and would not frame their lives according unto it Object 3. But those which all Schismaticks and Hereticks doe challenge unto them are not the marks of the true Church But all of them doe challenge these unto them Therefore they are not marks of the true Church Ans I deny the Major For we are not to see whether they challenge them but whether they have them So also would it follow that the heavenly blessings which are proper to the true Church are theirs also because they challenge them Object 4. Without which the Church cannot be that is a mark thereof But without the ordinary succession of Bishops the Church cannot be Therefore it is a mark thereof Ans By ordinary succession in the ministery is meant the succession of Ministers in the same doctrine and administration of Sacraments And if the proposition be so understood it is true for such a succession is nothing else then those notes which we have put But in the conclusion of this objection is understood that there should be an ordinary succession into the same place whether they teach the same doctrine or a diverse from it And so also it should be a tying of the Church to a certaine City Region and so forth But in this sense the Minor and Conclusion are false 4. Why the Church is called one holy and Catholike One for consent in faith and doctrine THe Church is called one not in regard of the cohabitation or the neere dwelling of the members thereof or for their agreement in rites and ceremonies of their Religion but in respect of their consent in faith and doctrine It is also called Holy because it is sanctified of God by the bloud and spirit of Christ that it may be like unto him not in perfection but Holy 1. for imputed righteousness By imputation of righteousnesse because Christs holinesse and obedience is imputed unto it For inchoative righteousnesse By inchoation of righteousnesse because the holy Ghost doth renue it by little and little and cleanse it from the filth of sin that all the members may begin all the parts of obedience For the use to which it is consecrated Catholike in respect of place time and the members thereof Because it is consecrated to an holy and divine use and therefore sequestred from the rout of wicked ones who are without the Church It is called Catholike 1. In respect of place because it is spread through the whole world For there is one universall Church of all places and degrees of life neither is it tied to a certaine place and kingdome or to a certaine succession 2. In respect of time because there is but one true Church of all times which also is at all times so Catholike as that it is dispersed through the whole world neither is it at any time tied to any certaine place 3. In respect of the men who are members of the same For the Church is gathered out of all sorts of men all states kindreds and nations It is not Catholike because it possesseth many kingdomes For Catholike is a title given unto the Church in the Apostles time for before time the Church was limited within narrow bounds Now that there is but one Church of all times and ages One Church of all times and ages from the beginning of the world unto the end it is out of doubt For 1. It is manifest that the Church hath ever beene Neither can Abrahams daies be objected as if before he was called there had been no worship of the true God in his family and himselfe had beene after his calling alone without any others For before his calling he held the foundation and grounds of doctrine of the true God though it were darkned with superstitions mingled therewith Againe Melchisedech lived at the same time who was the Priest of the most high God and therefore neither was Abraham after his calling alone but there were others besides him worshippers of the true God whose Priest was Melchisedech 2. That the Church as it hath beene ever so shall it also continue ever appeareth by these testimonies My words shall not depart out of thy mouth nor out of the mouth of thy seed If the night and day may be changed Esay 59.21 then shall my Covenant also be changed I am with you alwayes unto the end of the world Jer. 33.20 Mat. 28.20 Moreover Christ was ever and ever shall be King Head and Priest of the Church Wherefore the Church was ever and ever shall be And hence also it is manifest That the Church of both Testaments is one and the same that which is confirmed also by the article following For Christ is the sanctifier of his Church who is common to men of both Testaments Hitherto appertaineth the question of the authority of the Church The Papists maintaine that the authority of the Church is greater then the authority of the Scripture But this is false For the Church made not the Scripture but the Scripture made the Church They urge S. Augustine his testimony S. Augustine against Manichaeus his Epistle cap. 5. sheweth how he was brought to the faith of the Catholike Church For he saith That he obeyed the Catholikes when they said Beleeve the Gospel and there he bringeth forth that common saying I would not beleeve the Gospel except the authority of the Catholike Church moved me thereunto By the testimony therefore of the Church he was moved to read the Gospel and to beleeve that heavenly doctrine was contained therein But doth he after he
Lastly God created the world not from everlasting but at a certain and definite time and even in the beginning of times In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth c. namely after the common account this present yeer of Christ Genes 1.1 1601. 5564 yeers since For from the creation of the world to the nativity of Christ According to Melancthons supputation are 3963 yeers Luthers supputation are 3960 yeers Their supputation of Geneva are 3943 yeers The supputation of Beroaldus are 3929 yeers Therefore the world hath continued According to Melancthon 5564 yeers Luther 5561 yeers Them of Geneva 5544 yeers Beroaldus 5520 yeers The supputations accord very well one with another as concerning the grand number though in the lesser number some yeers are either wanting or abounding By these four supputations then of the most Learned of our time compared together shall be apparent that at the utmost God created not the world before these 5564 yeers past and therefore it was not from everlasting but had his beginning 3. For what cause God created the world THe ends of the creation of all things are some generall The ends of the creation of the world some speciall and subordinate The glory of God The first and chiefe end is the glory and praise of God for which cause men and Angels were principally created for he would have his goodnesse wisdome omnipotency justice which his properties hee sheweth in the creation of all things be known and magnified of us The Lord made all things for himself Prov. 16.4 Psal 103.22 Rom. 11.36 Praise the Lord all yee his works Of him and through him and for him are all things The knowledge of God The manifesting knowledge and contemplation of his divine wisdome and goodnesse shining in the very creation of things For that he might be celebrated and magnified for his works hee was to create those things which should know him and should praise and magnifie him being known and manifested unto them in his works And to this purpose created he natures both indued with reason and without reason that there might be both those which should praise him and the matter of his praise The heavens declare the glory of God Psal 19.1 and the firmament sheweth the works of his hands His providence The administration and governing of the world For therefore he created the world that he might by his providence ever govern rule preserve it and so might perpetually shew forth his marvellous works which hee hath done from the beginning of the world and now doth and will do but chiefly that hee might administer the Church and congregation of elect Angels and men Isa 40.26 Lift up your eyes on high and behold who hath created these things This third end is subordinate and serveth for the second end That he might gather a Church To gather an everlasting Church of Angels and men who should agnize and magnifie the Creatour That all things might serve for man That all other things might serve for the safety both of soule and body of man as also for the life necessity and delight of men but especially that they might profit the elect each thing in their due place and might be to them as ministers and instruments whereby God blessing and increasing them might be lauded and praised of them Subdue the earth Genes 1.28 and rule over the fish of the sea and over the foule of the heaven and over every beast that moveth upon the earth Thou hast made him to have dominion over the works of thine hands Psalm 8.6 thou hast put all things under his feet Whether the world or life or death or things present 1 Cor. 3.22 or to come All are yours Only man he created for himself the rest for man that they might serve man and by man might serve God Wherefore when we place creatures in the room of God we cast our selves out of that degree in which we were placed by God Why God would have this doctrine of the Creation to be delivered and held in the Church This doctrine of the creation of the world God would for these causes especially have remain extant in the Church 1. That the glory of the creation might be given wholly to God and his wisdome power and goodnesse therein acknowledged 2. That neither the Son nor the holy Ghost should be excluded but each should have their owne parts yeelded them therein according as it is said That all might honour the Son as they honour the Father 3. That as the world was created by the Son and the holy Ghost so also wee might know that by them mankind is restored For by him were all things made Col. 1.16 18 19. And he is the head of the body of the Church for it pleased the Father that in him should all fulnesse dwell 4. That seeing God created all things of nothing wee may think that hee is able to restore them being corrupted and ruinated 1 Cor. 4.6 into their first state againe For God that commanded the light to shine out of darknesse is he which hath shined in our hearts to give the light of knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. 5. That wee may not referre the originall of corruption to God but know that it was purchased by the fault of divels and men John 8.44 The divell is a lyar and a murtherer from the beginning and when hee speaketh a lye Rom. 5.12 he speaketh of his own By one man sin entred into the world and death by sin 6. That knowing God as in the creating so also in the maintaining and governing of all things not to be tied to second causes and to the order by him setled in nature but that he may either keep or alter it wee should with confidence and full perswasion look for and crave those things which he hath promised yea those things which Rom. 4.17 in respect of second causes seem impossible Hee calleth those things which are not as if they were 7. That we should celebrate for ever the known goodnesse of God whereby he hath created all things not for his own profit or happinesse for he wanted nothing but for ours and seeing all other things were created for mans use wee above other creatures especially being restored from sin and death to righteousnesse and life should acknowledge that we owe thankfulnesse unto God therefore Psal 8.4 What is man that thou art mindfull of him and the son of man that thou visitest him Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thine hands 8. That we knowing God inasmuch as of nothing and through his meer goodnesse hee created all things to owe nothing to any but all his creatures to owe themselves and all that they have to him their Creatour should confesse that to be most just whatsoever hee shall do concerning us
God which was in him and also teacheth him how they may be done By giving attendance to his reading 2 Tim. 1. 6. 1 Tim. 4.14 to exhortation and doctrine 3. He is lost by carnall security and by giving our selves to commit wickednesse against our conscience 4. By neglect of prayer 5. By abusing the gifts of the holy Ghost as when they are not imployed to his glory and to the safety of our neighbour Vnto him that hath shall be given from him that hath not Luke 8.18 even that he hath shall be taken away 10. Wherefore the holy Ghost is necessary HOw necessary and needfull the holy Ghost is and for what causes doth cleerly appeare by these places of Scripture Except that a man be borne of water and of the Spirit John 3.5 he cannot enter into the Kingdome of heaven Flesh and bloud cannot inhabite the Kingdome of God We are not sufficient of our selves to think any think as of our selves but our sufficiency is of God 1 Cor. 15.50 2 Cor. 3.5 Rom. 8.9 If any man hath not the Spirit of Christ he is none of his Hence we may thus conclude Without whom we cannot think much lesse doe ought that is good and without whom he can neither be regenerated nor know God neither attaine unto the inheritance of the celestiall Kingdome without him we cannot be saved But without the holy Ghost these things cannot be done by reason of the corruption and blindnesse of our nature Therefore without the holy Ghost it cannot be that we should be saved and so it followeth that he is altogether necessary for us unto salvation 11. How we may know that the holy Ghost dwelleth in us WE know that we have him by the effect or by his benefits and blessings in us as by the true knowledge of God by regeneration faith peace of conscience and the inchoation or beginning of a new obedience or by a readinesse and willingnesse to obey God Rom. 5.1 4. Being justified by faith we have peace towards God The love of God is shed in our hearts Againe we know it by the testimony and witnesse which he beareth unto our spirit that we are the sonnes of God Moreover most certaine testimonies and tokens of the holy Ghost dwelling in us are comfort in the midst of death joy in afflictions a purpose to persevere in faith sighes and ardent prayers a sincere professing of Christianity * 1 Cor. 12.3 ON THE 21 SABBATH No man can say that Jesus is the Lord but by the holy Ghost In a word by faith and repentance we know that the holy Ghost dwelleth in us Quest 54. What beleevest thou concerning the holy and Catholike Church of Christ Ans I beleeve that the Son of God a Ephes 5.26 John 10.11 Act. 10.28 Ephes 4.11 12 13. doth from the beginning of the world to the end b Psa 71.17 18 Esay 59.21 1 Cor. 11.26 gather defend preserve unto himself c Mat. 16.18 by his Spirit d John 10.28 29 30. and Word out of whole mankind e Psal 129.1 2 3 4 5. a company chosen to everlasting life f Esay 59.21 and agreeing in true faith g Rom. 1.16 10.14 15 16 17 and that I am a lively member of that company h Ephes 5.26 and so shall remaine for ever i Genes 26.4 Revel 5.9 The Explication The Questions to be observed 1. What the Church is 2. How many wayes it is taken 3. What are the marks thereof 4. Wherefore it is called one holy and Catholike 5. What is the difference betweene the Church and Common-weale or civill State 6. Whence it is that the Church differeth from the rest of mankind 7. Whether any man be saved out of the Church 1. What the Church is WHen the Question is What the Church is it is presupposed that there is a Church so that it is not necessary to make question Whether there be a Church For there was alwayes and shall be some Church sometimes greater sometimes lesser because Christ alwayes was and shall remaine for ever the King and Head and Priest of the Church as hereafter in the fourth Question of this Common-place shall more plentifully be proved Now as concerning the name Ecclesia which we call the Church it is natively a Greek word The originall of the name and cometh from a word which signifieth to call forth For the custome was in Athens that a company of the Citizens were called forth by the voyce of a Crier from the rest of the multitude as it were namely and by their hundreds to an Assembly wherein some publike speech was had or to heare relation made of some sentence or judgement of the Senate And thus differeth the word Ecclesia from Synagoga or Synagogue How it differeth from Synagogue For Synagoga signifieth any manner of Congregation be it never so common and inordinate But Ecclesia betokeneth an ordained Congregation and such as is called together for some cause From hence the Apostles translated the name Ecclesia to their purpose terming the Church by it for resemblance and likenesse sake For the Church is Gods Congregation neither coming together by chance without cause nor being inordinate but called forth by the voyce of the Lord and the cry of the Word that is by the Ministers of the Gospel from the Kingdome of Sathan to heare or imbrace Gods word This Congregation or company of those which are called of God to the knowledge of the Gospel the Latines keeping still the Greek word call Ecclesia The Dutch word Kyrc which by adding letters of aspiration we call in English Church seemeth to come from the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth The Lords house The meaning of the word Church or Gods house But it shall be requisite that we a little more fully define what the Church is The Church of God is a Congregation or company of men chosen from everlasting of God to eternall life which from the beginning of the world to the end thereof The definition of the Church is gathered of the sonnes of God out of all mankind by the holy Ghost and the Word consenting in true faith and which the Sonne of God defendeth preserveth and at length glorifieth with glory and life everlasting Thus is the true Church of God defined whereof the Creed doth properly speak 2. How many wayes the Church is taken The false Church The true Church is THE Church is taken either for the true Church or for the false The false Church is unproperly called the Church and is a company arrogating unto themselves the title of Christs Church but which doe not follow the same but rather persecute it The true Church is either Triumphant 1. Triumphant which even now triumpheth with the blessed Angels in heaven and shall have their full accomplished triumph after the Resurrection 2. Militant The Militant
beleeved the Gospel promise that he would beleeve the Church more then the Gospel if the Church determine or propound any thing which is either contrary to the Gospel or can be proved by no testimony of Scripture This doubtlesse Augustine never meant Nay elswhere he denounceth Anathema and biddeth a curse to come to them who declare any thing besides that that we have received in the writings of the Law and Gospel And in the selfe-same place he witnesseth That he because he beleeveth the Gospel cannot beleeve Manichaeus for that he readeth nothing in the Gospel of Manichaeus Apostleship Therefore traditions or ordinances of the Church bring us unto the Scripture and tie us to that voice which soundeth in the Scripture The Papists wrangling about Traditions But here it must be observed how honestly and fairly the Papists deale For wheresoever they meet with the word Tradition that by and by they wrest to their traditions which cannot be proved out of the Word of God as when Paul saith I delivered unto you that which I received Straight-wayes they cry out Heare you traditions I hear but read on there in the words following Paul himself by writing declaring what those traditions are I delivered unto you how that Christ died for our sinnes according to the Scripture And that he was buried and that he arose the third day according to the Scripture Here you heare Pauls traditions to be double things written For first they were taken out of the Scripture of the Old Testament Secondly they were committed to writing by Saint Paul himselfe So Paul saith of the Lords Supper I have received of the Lord that which I have delivered unto you 1 Cor. 11.23 But this traditions after the Evangelists himself also hath set downe in writing 2 Thes 3.16 The Jesuites cite the saying of Paul Withdraw your selves from every brother that walketh inordinately and not after the traditions which yee received of us But a little after in the same Chapter he describeth what tradition he meaneth as it is manifest to him that looketh on the place And yet will they thence prove that many things are to be beleeved which cannot be proved by any testimony of Scripture The like impudency they shew in another testimony taken our of Luke Acts 16.4 They delivered them the decrees to keep ordained of the Apostles and Elders which were at Jerusalem Ibid. 15.23 When a little before he witnesseth that those decrees were set downe in letters written by the Apostles How the Church may be said not to erre That opinion or saying of the Papists The Church doth not erre is true after this sort 1. The whole doth not erre though some members thereof doe erre 2. It doth not erre universally although in some points of doctrine it may 3. It erreth not in the foundation 5. In what the Church differeth from the Common-weale Seven differences betweene the Church and Common-weale THe Church differeth from the Common-weale 1. Because Common-weales are distinct and Kingdomes of the world are in divers places and times The Church is alwayes one and the same at all times and with all men 2. The Kingdoms and States of the world have many heads or one chiefe Head and many other inferiour heads besides and that on earth The Church hath but one and that in heaven 3. The Common-wealth is governed by certaine Lawes made for the maintenance of outward peace and tranquillity The Church is ruled by the holy Ghost and the Word of God 4. The Common-wealth or civill State requireth outward obedience onely The Church requireth both as well inward obedience as outward 5. In civill States and Common-wealths there is power and liberty to make new Lawes positive by the authority of the Magistrate the violating of which Lawes bindeth mens consciences and deserveth corporal punishments The Church is tied to the Word of God to which it is not lawfull to adde ought or to detract ought from it 6. The civill State hath corporall power wherewith it is armed against the obstinate and disobedient for he may and ought by force to curb these and to punish them by the sword The Church punisheth by denouncing Gods wrath out of the Word of God 7. In the Church are alwayes some elect and holy but not alwayes in the Common-wealth 6. Whence ariseth the difference of the Church from the rest of mankinde Three sorts of men in the world THere are three sorts of men very much different one from another For 1. Some men are even in profession estranged and alients from the Church as who deny faith and repentance and therefore are open enemies of God and the Church 2. Others are called but not effectually which are Hypocrites who professe indeed the faith but without any true conversion unto God 3. Others are called effectually which are the elect who are but a little portion according to that of Christ Many are called Mat. 20.16 Election putteth the difference between the Church and others but few are chosen Now the difference being known let us in a word see what is the cause of this difference 1. The efficient cause of this difference is the Election of God willing to gather unto himselfe a Church in earth 2. The Sonne of God is the mediate executor of this his will and purpose the holy Ghost the immediate Acts 14.16 Rom. 9.18 John 6.37 Rom. 8.19 30. 3. The word of God is the instrumentall cause In times past God suffered all the Gentiles to walk in their owne wayes God hath mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardneth All that the Father giveth me shall come to me Those which he knew before he also predestinate to be made like to the Image of his Sonne and whom he predestinate them also he called c. By these words we are taught that the promise of grace is generall in respect of the Elect or Beleevers God verily would have all to be saved and that 1. In respect that he loveth the salvation of all But the Elect onely have attained to that salvation 2. In respect that he inviteth all to salvation But the rest have beene hardened Rom. 11.7 7. Whether any one may be saved out of the Church NO man can be saved out of the Church None saved out of the Church John 13.5 Because without the Church there is no Saviour therefore no salvation also Without me you can doe nothing 2. Because whomsoever God hath chosen and elected to the end which is eternall life them he hath chosen to the meanes which is the inward and outward calling The elect therefore though they be not at all times members of the visible Church yet they are all made such before they die Object Therefore election is not free Answ It is free because God chose freely both to the end and to the meanes But after he hath once destined and ordained men to meanes he never
tell it unto the Church Mat. 18.17 Luke 22.25 26. The Kings of the Gentiles reign over them but ye shall not be so Wherefore the consent and decree of the Church is to be expected 1. Because of Gods expresse commandement to this purpose 2. That no man be injured 3. That the processe may be better authorised 4. That the Ministery of the Church grow not unto an Oligarchy or a Papisticall soveraignity of some few persons 5. That the condemnation of the rebellious may be the more just The last abuse to be prevented by Excommunication is 5. That we kindle no schismes not give occasion of scandall and offence in the Church whilst good men see many at variance between themselves that grievous evils follow one another on the head and that the Church is divided These evils if the Ministers see or feare they may not proceed but warne and exhort both privately and publikely If they profit nothing hereby they are held excused Blessed are they which hunger and thirst after righteousnesse Mat. 5.6 for they shall be filled Others shall give an account of their obstinacy 5. How the power of the Keyes committed to the Church differeth from the Civill power THe differences are many and manifest 1. Ecclesiasticall discipline is executed by the Church the civill power by the Judge or Magistrate 2. In the civill state judgement is exercised according to civill and positive lawes in the Church judgement proceedeth according to Gods Lawes and Word 3. The power of the Keyes committed unto the Church dependeth on Gods Word and the Church exerciseth her authority by the Word when it denounceth the anger and wrath of God against Infidels and unrepentant persons and punisheth the obstinate with the Word only yet so as that this punishment pierceth even unto their consciences the civill power is armed with the Sword and punisheth the obstinate with corporall punishments only 4. The judgement of the Church hath degrees of admonition and if repentance interpose it selfe it proceedeth not to punishment the civill judgement and the Magistrate proceeds to punishment though the offender repent 5. The end and purpose of the Church is that hee which hath offended should repent and be saved for ever the end and purpose of the Magistrate is that the offender be punished and so peace and externall order and discipline be maintained in the Common-wealth 6. As the Church proceedeth against refractary and obstinate persons only so it is bound to reverse and retract her judgement and punishment if there come repentance but the Magistrate when he hath once punished is not bound to recall his judgment and punishment neither is hee able sometimes to revoke and repeale it The Thiefe repenteth on the Crosse and is received of Christ into Paradise neverthelesse the Magistrate goeth on to execute this penalty adjudged unto him and putteth him out of the Common-wealth So oftentimes the discipline of the Church hath place where there is no place for civill judgement as when the Church casteth out of her congregation the impenitent and accounteth them no more for her members whom notwithstanding the civill Magistrate tolerateth And contrariwise the civill government oft-times exileth those whom the Church receiveth as when the Magistrate punisheth Adulterers Robbers Theeves and doth no more reckon them for members of the Common-wealth whether they repent or continue obstinate whom yet the Church if they repent abandoneth not but receiveth Wherefore the difference of the Ecclesiasticall and civill power is apparent and manifest There remaine objections of the Adversaries of Ecclesiasticall Discipline whereunto wee will in few words make answer Object 1. The charge and office of the Keyes is no where commanded Therefore it is not to be ordained in the Church and by consequent no man ought to be excluded from the Sacrament Ans The Antecedenc is false because frequently in Scripture manifest testimonies of this charge and commission are extant Matth. 16.19 I will give unto thee the keyes of the kingdome of heaven and whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth shall be bound in heaven Here in plain words is expressed the power of the keyes committed to all ministers of the word Moreover what this office or charge of the keyes committed to the Church is and how the Church must discharge this charge and function Christ likewise plainly advertiseth and declareth If he will not vouchsafe to hear them tell it to the Church Mat. 18.17 1â— and if he refuse to hear the Church also let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican Verily I say unto you Whatsoever ye bind on earth shall be bound in heaven and whatsoever ye loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven These things given thus in precept by Christ Paul also doth in the thing it selfe confirm 1 Cor. 5.1 5. 11.20 Let such a one be delivered unto Sathan for the destruction of the flesh that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus When yee come together into one place this is not to eat the Lords Supper 2 Thes 3.14 If any man obey not your savings note him by a letter and have no company with him that he may be ashamed Of whom is Hymeneus and Alexander whom I have delivered unto Sathan 1 Tim. 1.20 that they may learn not to blaspheme In the Prophets also are manifest testimonies in which this is apparent to have been commanded by God Isa 1.11 What have I to do with the multitude of your sacrifices saith the Lord I am full of the burnt offerings of rams and of the fat of fed beasts and I desire not the bloud of bullocks nor of lambs nor of goats Isa 66.3 Hee that killeth a bullocke is as if he slew a man he that sacrificeth a sheep as if he cut off a dogs neck he that offereth an oblation as if he offered swines blond he that remembreth incense as if he blessed an idol I spake not unto your fathers nor commanded them Jerem. 7.22 when I brought them out of the land of Egypt concerning burnt-offerings and sacrifices Psal 30.16 Unto the wicked said God What hast thou to doe to declare mine ordinances that thou shouldst take my covenant in thy mouth Wherefore Christ also saith Matth. 5.24 Leave there thine offering before the Altar and goe thy way first be reconciled to thy brother and then come and offer thy gift There are other places also of Scripture besides these where it is commanded that all professed wicked persons be excluded from the Church and the use of the sacraments as wheresoever is reprehended the unlawfull use of the sacraments Likewise wheresoever the Ministers are commanded to receive only such for members of the Church as professe faith and repentance Rep. God indeed forbiddeth the ungodly to come unto the Sacraments but he willeth not that the Church should forbid them Ans What God forbiddeth to have done in the Church
and re-established by the Messias Ans The Major of this Syllogisme is not simply and universally true because there the Prophet indeed prophesieth of the kingdome of the Messias but not only thereof For withall he describeth the restitution of the ceremoniall worship in Judea which should be after the returne of the people out of the captivity of Babylon and should stand in force untill the coming of the Messias Wee deny also the Minor For in the alledged Prophecie not onely the restoring of the Jewish types is promised but under the description of the types the spirituall state and stateliness of the Church which should be under the kingdom of the Messias is shadowed and insinuated which state and statelinesse was to be begun in this life and to be perfected in the life to come Whereof good proofe may be made by these evident arguments Arguments to prove that under the typicall description before alledged the spirituall condition and estate of the Church is figured 1. The story of Esdras testifieth unto us that this restoring was not accomplished untill the coming of Christ and withall other Oracles also of the Prophets concerning the base and contemptible coming and kingdom of the Messias in this world suffer us not to beleeve that there shall be any such magnificent and pompous estate of the Church on earth as the Jewes dreame of no not after the coming of the Messias Wherefore that fore-mentioned restoring of Jerusalem that is the Church is either to be understood spiritually or of force we must grant this absurdity namely that this Prophecy never was nor shall be performed 2. That promise delivered by the Prophet The house of Israel shall no more defile mine holy Name neither they nor their Kings doth necessarily enforce a spirituall sense and meaning touching the perfection of the life to come Ezek. 43.7 For usuall and customable it is with the Prophets to unite the entry of Christs kingdom with the full and perfect establishment thereof Ezek. 47.1 3. Furthermore those waters issuing out of the Temple spoken of in the same Prophecy may not be interpreted to be elementary waters but shadow and represent unto us the plentifull effusion from heaven of the gifts of the holy Ghost in Christs kingdom 4. Lastly we Christians have for our Interpreter the Apostle S. John in his Revelation Chap. 21 22. where the spirituall and heavenly Jerusalem that is the glorified Church of the New Testament is desciphered in words and termes literally borrowed from this description of Ezekiel Wherefore this Prophecie maketh nought to prove the continuall observation of ceremonies in the kingdome of the Messias Object 3. The best and most just forme of government is alwaies to be followed But there can be none better or juster than that which God himselfe settled among his people the Jewes therefore that is to be followed and retained Answ Either the Major of this reason may be distinguished or the Minor denied with an exposition For that which in positive lawes that is such as define the circumstances of the duty of Magistrates and subjects and Citizens one towards another is in every place and at all times most just the same are Law makers to follow But in that forme of the Mosaicall government many things are applied to the state and condition of that Nation Region Time and Ceremoniall worship the observation whereof would now be neither just nor profitable because the causes for which those lawes should be given to the Jewes are taken away or changed as of giving a bill of divorce of marrying the widowes of their kinsmen Wherefore God will not that all Nations and ages be tyed unto those lawes An argument whereof is that even at that very time when he commanded these lawes to be observed hee bound not all Nations but only Abrahams posterity unto them and yet some that lived according to such civill laws of other Nations as were not wicked and ungodly did please him as Naaman the Syrian and whosoever of the Gentiles were converted who yet notwithstanding did not observe the ceremonies and civill lawes of the Jewes And Paul saith wee must obey not only those which governe according to Moses laws but also other Magistrates as the ordinance of God as long as they command nothing contrary to the commandements of God And himself also submitted himselfe to the Romane lawes when hee appealed unto Caesar Rom. 13.2 and when he said it was unlawfull to binde one uncondemned which was a Romane Furthermore if any man will hence conclude That seeing it is lawfull to use the Lawes of other Common-weales as the Athenian Romane and such like it is therefore much more lawfull and beseeming to imitate and follow the forme of that Common-wealth which was immediately ordered and constituted by God himselfe We easily grant that wise and discreet Magistrates and Law-givers may take as well thence as out of other governments if there be any thing convenient and agreeing with their subjects with whom and the time wherein they live so that all opinion of necessity be taken away that is so that it be not therefore commanded or retained because it was prescribed by Moses to the Jews but because there are good reasons wherefore now also it should be done so and if the causes be changed then that the liberty also of changing these lawes by publike authority be retained Neither yet is Moses law any whit impeached by this liberty of cleaving to it or leaving it and appointing other ordinances in place thereof sith in so doing we doe no more than cease to observe that which was never imposed on us How far forth the morall Law is abrogated Hitherto have we intreated of the abrogation of the Ceremoniall and Civill lawes Touching the morall law it is in some part abrogated by Christ and in some part not abrogated It is abrogated in respect of the faithfull two waies 1. As touching the curse of it 1. As touching the course of it Psal 143.2 so that it cannot condemne such as are justified by faith in Christ by reason of the merit of Christ imputed unto them or as touching justification because judgement is not given of us according to the Law but according to the Gospel John 3.36 For the judgement of the Law would condemne and cast us away whose dreadfull voice is Rom. 8.1 In thy sight shall no man living be justified But the judgement of the Gospel is He that beleeveth in the Son of God hath everlasting life This abrogation of the Law is the first and principall part of Christian liberty whereof it is said There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus Rom. 6.14 Ye are not under the law but under grace 2. As touching constraint 2. As touching constraint For now the Law doth not any more expresse and wrest obedience from us as a Tyrant or as a Master enforcing and constraining a
apostasie fascinated by idolatrie it had never submitted it selfe to the slavery and yoke of Antichristian tyrannie 159. It is tyranny to oppresse undo a Common-wealth got by right or wrong against all right and equitie 160. The Pope hath invaded and oppressed the Church State of Christendom with a double tyrannie to wit spirituall and corporall 161. He invaded the Church in a spirituall tyrannie when by his pride he overthrow the Apostolicall discipline of the Church 162. The Apostolicall discipline was Oeconomicall that under one head or master of the family our Saviour having gone to heaven as it were into a far countrie divers houshold servants as Apostles and after them Bishops equall in power should every one of them disperse their owne talents according to every mans place for the benefit of the house of the living God 163. For Let a man so esteeme of us saith the Apostle as of the ministers of Christ 1 Cor. 4.1 and stewards of the mysteries of God 164. And we reade that Christ ascending into heaven gave to the Church besides Apostles Prophets and Evangelists Doctors also and Pastors or Bishops 165. But wee reade not that hee gave to the Church a Prince of Priests or high Pontifie 166. For there is but one Bishoprick saith Cyprian which is communicated by parcells to every one 167. Neither any of us saith the same Father hath made himselfe a Bishop of bishops or by tyrannicall tyrannie doth compell his colleagues to a necessitie of obedience 168. But when the Church began to increase and withall the ambition of Bishops for orders sake because Rome was the head of the Empire to the Bishop of old Rome the first seat was given 169. Yet observing the Canon under written by Austines hand the Bishop of the first seat is not called the Prince of Priests or high Priest or any such like thing but only the Bishop of the first seat 170. This order and this Oeconomicall discipline continued in the Christian Church for six hundred years after Christ 171. Boniface the Third was the first that was stirred up by Satan out of desire of government and pride to break downe the bars of Apostolicall discipline and with much contention played the Tyrant in the Church being pronounced universall Bishop by Phocas the Tyrant But by the sentence of Gregory his predecessor Antichrist was declared to the world 172. From him began these words of tyrannie to be used in the Roman See lest their tyrannie might not be knowne So we will So we command 173. In the Chaire of universall pestilence scarce did he sit one full yeare according to the Proverb Too rigid Lords never raigne long 174. From thence the fume of Catholick pride by Satan was blowne upon the Romane Chaire which hath propagated the Ecclesiasticall tyrannie and encreased it unmeasurably 175. Hence the Pope hath an heavenly power 176. The Pope hath the same Consistorie with God the same Tribunall with Christ 177. The Pope is a certaine Deitie representing some visible God 178. The Pope hath all lawes within the cabinet of his breast 179. The Pope is Bishop of the whole world to whom all Bishops and Patriarchs ought to be subject necessarily upon salvation 180. The Pope is an universall Prince King of kings and head of all within the militant Church 181. The Pope hath all men for his subjects 182. To the Pope every humane creature is subject 183. To the Pope all power is given in heaven and earth 184. The Pope is made Judge over the angels 185. From the Pope there is no appeale no not to God 186. The Pope is above all Councels he alone hath power to call direct confirme disanull them 187. The Pope conferres jurisdiction upon all Bishops 188. The Pope cannot submit himselfe to Councels 189. The Pope makes lawes to compell the conscience 190. The Pope alone judgeth all men but is judged of none 191. If the Pope should send head-long to Hell many thousands of soules no man must say Why doest thou so 192. The Pope can doe all that God doth 193. The Pope is neither God nor angell nor man according to that Verse O Pope the amazement of the world who alone art the greatest of things thou art neither God nor man but a neuter between both 194. Yea the Pope is God 195. The Pope is the cause of causes and Lord of lords 196. The Pope is Gods supreme Vicar and whosoever speaks the contrarie is a lyar 197. We must stand to the Popes judgement though the whole world should think to the contrarie 198. None is equall to the Pope but God 199. The Pope is the head and bridegroom of the Catholick Church 200. Hence we must beare and with pious devotion endure the yoke which is imposed by the holy See though it may seem intolerable 201. But hee that makes himselfe a God the Churches husband is not hee the enemy of God and of Christ even the Antichrist 202. Now except the Serpent devoure the Serpent it cannot become a Dragon as it is in the Proverb 203. So if the Pope had not devoured the Roman Empire he had not been Antichrist 204. With the spirituall tyrannie hee snatched also the secular 205. By vertue of that feigned patrimony of Peter or of the Church let the Pope be one of the Princes of Italy by humane prescription 206. The Pope being clothed with the Emperiall robe and crowned with the Emperors crowne holding the sword in his hand and saying I am Cesar is not he the Tyrant of the Empire and Cesars enemy 207. Neither did any one Pope this by chance the Papall ambition for these eight hundred years hath devoured the Roman Empire and trod upon the Emperors 208. The Emperor should take the oath of allegiance and obedience to the Pope 209. The Emperor should depend on the Popes judgement and not the Pope on the Emperors as is said 210. The Emperor should bow himselfe to the Pope whilst hee takes horse hee must stand by as a Lackie and must hold his bridle and stirrop 211. At a feast the Emperor should hold water to the Pope whilst he washeth his hands 212. The Emperor ought to carry the first dish to the Popes table 213. The Pope can excommunicate depose and kill the Emperor 214. The Pope hath power over all Kings and Princes over all the Kingdomes of the world directly or indirectly and can give them to whom hee will 215. Hence the Pope hath two bodies and two chiefe Pontificalities like another Numa Pompilius One way hee is like the Gentile Archflamine another way like the Roman Emperor after the Emperor left off the profane title of Pontifex maximus which Gratian did first abandon as some think 216. Hence he is armed with two swords the spirituall and secular because Boniface the Eighth said Behold Luke 22.38 here are two swords 217. Neither did he obtaine this great tyrannie by force onely at which you may wonder but
above three meanings Either that Christ by his death obtained reconciliation for all by a certaine Metalepsis by meriting or pro-meriting matter sufficient enough of reconciliation to all men as for example The Physician of whom before preparing a most sufficient cure for all sick people or obtaining it else-where may be said to have prepared or obtained health for all Or that he hath properly obtained reconciliation for all conferring the same upon all that is hath really reconciled all and that either absolutely without condition as for example Joab 2 Sam. 14.21 33. Esther 7.2 13. by the intercession of the woman of Tekoa did absolutely obtaine reconciliation from David for the paricide Absalom that without any condition he should be brought into the Kings sight and that the father should kisse his son As also Esther is said to have obtained for the Jews security absolutely without condition Or under condition of faith to be required in all that if all beleeve in the Son they may indeed be reconciled if they beleeve not they may be debarred from reconciliation as for example Impunity was obtained from Salomon to seditious Adomiah upon condition of his innocency 1 King 1.52 If he be a worthy man a haire shall not fall from his head but if evill be found in him he shall die I will speake more briefly Christ hath procured reconciliation for all men either in respect of the amplitude of his merit being most sufficient for the reconciliation of all or over and above in respect of the efficacy of reconciling all men and that either absolutely whether they beleeve or not or conditionally if all beleeve Neither can there be a fourth sense given of this phrase which when the Remonstrants alledge in their Conference That Christ hath procured reconciliation for all that is hath caused that God should open againe the gate of his grace to sinfull man although no man shall enter into that communion of his grace but by faith either this is a new buskin or an equivocall Scheme or Livery-cloak by a limitation taking that away which before it had set downe for how hath he really obtained reconciliation who hath caused the Prince to open the gate of his Castle to seditious people through which notwithstanding no man must passe but by paying of a thousand Crownes then which the condition of faith is farre better or if it is to be called the obtaining of reconciliation it belongs to the third conditionall way of impetration There remaines then onely three wayes of obtained reconciliation with one of which they must say that Christ obtained reconciliation for all If the first way they agree with the orthodox Church what then doe they trouble the Church and State If the second way they contradict themselves affirming that Christ did obtaine for all absolute reconciliation that is that he did restore all men really into the state of grace as Joab did absolutely reconcile Absalom to his Father that is restored him to his Fathers favour But contrarily they plainly deny in limiting of the Article in their Conference That all are really repaired in Christ and restored to the state of grace which contradiction is no lesse apparent then if they should say That Joab made Absalom absolutely obtaine his Fathers favour and not absolutely or he restored him really into his Fathers favour and did not absolutely restore him If the third way they are againe dashed upon the rock of contradiction for if Christ by his intention obtained reconciliation for all men upon condition of faith to be required in all men then he obtained it to none without the condition of faith or to none that want faith or Infidels in whom it ought not to be nor is it put casually either by God who doth not give faith to all men but to whom he pleaseth nor by free-will which is dead in sin till God quicken it Now there have beene alwayes faithlesse men and yet are many is not here then a manifest conflict He hath procured for all and he hath not procured for all Which way soever then they use this buskin either they meane the same thing with their equivocations which orthodoxall men do and so by their verbosity they disturbe the Church and State or else they are entangled with manifest contradictions or lastly how strange soever they seeme to make the matter they are forced to betake themselves unto the tents of the Massilian Semi-pelagians maintaining an universall reconciliation even of those that live and die without the faith and knowledge of Christ which Heresie was lately renewed in Germany by Huberus And hither truly do almost all their Arguments borrowed from the Huberians Coll. pag. 141 142 143.213 aime Hence they call Christ the reconciler not onely of the faithfull but also of the whole world that is of Infidels too From this Hypothesis are their Classicall absurdities which they cast upon the orthodox Protestants That otherwise the unbeleevers if Christ did not obtaine for them reconciliation should have nothing to beleeve or if they did beleeve they should beleeve a lye which are most false for though Christ died not for all in respect of the efficacy of his death yet he died for all in respect of the sufficiency of his merit This all Infidels have which they may beleeve in the Gospell that Christ suffered sufficiently for the sins of all the world and paid a full ransome and reconciled all to God that beleeve in him and therefore shall be partakers of this merit and reconciliation if of faithlesse they will become beleevers Now in affirming and beleeving this they do no wayes beleeve a lye But Infidels should beleeve a lye if they should conclude or were taught that while they remaine in infidelity reconciliation is obtained for them in Christ For this is a lye and not truth that Christ hath obtained reconciliation for all even for Infidels as they are and remaine such They suppose also that many for whom Christ died are damned but the Apostle cries out against this as false Who shall condemne it is Christ that is dead for Rom. 8.34 this Apostolicall consolation were in vaine if this universall were not supposed to wit That no man is condemned for whom Christ died For to this godly minds may firmely subsume Christ died for me and conclude I shall not then be condemned This is the Christians comfort from Christs death But they destroy this putting a particular instead of an universall Some for whom Christ died shall not be condemned for what consequence can arise of pure praticulars or what comfort And in vaine do they alledge the words of the Catechisme to cover their buskin and Massilianisme saying If one will have obtaining to be altogether the same that restoring to the state of grace Coll. p. 172. what will be done to the Catechisme which Answ 37. useth the same word But 1. this is false that the Catechisme useth the same words
for it doth not say That he might obtaine the grace of God justice and life eternall but that he might acquire it Then if it should use the same word obtained this would helpe nothing the cothurne for it doth not say for all but that to us to wit beleevers of whom the question is What beleevest thou when thou sayest he suffered Grace c. he might acquire But the Catechisme evidently tieth them with a contradiction For it speakes of the reall acquisition of grace or restitution into the state of grace Acts 20.28 with which Christ is said to have purchased the Church of God with his owne bloud that is to have restored her into the state of grace If then he purchased be all one with he obtained it follows that to obtaine is all one with to restore into the state of grace which they deny and to obtaine reconciliation for all is the same that to restore into the state of grace by denying of which in the Conference they tye themselves againe with the knot of contradiction Coll. p. 497. Nor can they free themselves of this knot by objecting that in the same Answer Christ is said to have sustained the wrath of God against the sins of all mankinde for these words will not suffer themselves to be thus glossed upon and wrested That Christ by his death hath reconciled all mankinde or hath impetrated reconciliation and remission of sins to all mankinde for to whom he purchased this or as they speake hath impetrated the subsequent words teach that by his passion c. But they declare and amplifie the cause and matter of his passion to have beene this to wit The sense and induring of Gods wrath kindled against the sins not of some men but of all mankinde from whence is made an universality of sin and of Gods wrath suffered by Christ against sin but no wayes an universality of reconciliation obtained or restored to all for the impetration or restitution of reconciliation declares the end and fruit of the passion but these words speake not of the end and fruit but of the efficiency and matter of the passion The knot then remaines and in vaine do they seeke a pretext for their buskin in the Catechisme Lastly Coll. p. 171. I finde in the Conference one cunning trick devised to elude the contradiction where they write That the passion and death of Christ doth in order precede both faith and infidelity and therefore the Remonstrants thinke it an absurdity that Christ died for the faithfull and Infidels as Infidels and that they assented he did die for all men of whom afterward some became Infidels some beleevers for they discerned betweene the state of a sinner before his infidelity and in it and so they thinke they have sufficiently salved this contradiction Christ died for all and singular and Christ died not for Infidels whereof there be many but indeed they loose not the knot with these subtleties and new tragicall phrases but they lay open the hidden ulcer of their mindes and the mystery of the new prophesies Therefore let us examine the particulars 1. Though we grant that Christs death and passion do in order precede faith yet 't is false that it goeth before infidelity in order for infidelity in order goeth before mans sin and his enmity against God as in order the cause precedes the effect but sin and mans enmity against God in order precede the passion and death of Christ as the Apostle witnesseth For Christ when as yet we were without strength in his owne time he died for the wicked Rom. 5.6 8 9. also When as yet we were sinners and enemies we were reconciled by the death of his Son therefore infidelity in order precedes the passion and death of Christ Againe there is no consequence Christs death in order precedes faith and infidelity therefore it is absurd to say that Christ died for the faithfull and unfaithfull as they were such for they delude us under the fallacy of non causa for whatsoever becomes of the order of faith and infidelity to Christs death it is most true that Christ died for beleevers and unbeleevers as they were such removing the hidden equivocations Of unbeleevers we have shewed out of the Apostle testimonie for if it be most true that Christ died for sinners and enemies as they were such to wit antecedently that is who in order were sinners and enemies before Christs death then it is most true that Christ died for Infidels as they were such to wit antecedently that is who in order before Christs death were Infidels after ceased to be wicked unbeleevers enemies by reason of their faith The same is also most true of beleevers and that whether Christs death be absolutely considered in it selfe or in relation to Christs intention and the Fathers counsell If we absolutely consider Christs death as in order it goeth before faith we conclude that it is absurd to say that Christ died for the faithfull as such antecedently that is whose faith in order went before Christs death for so beliefe must goe before the thing beleeved which is absurd whereas in such relatives beliefe is posterior to the thing beleeved as knowledge to the thing knowne the sensitive act to the sensible object according to Aristotle But it is no absurdity if we say In Categ c. 8. that Christ died for the faithfull as such consequently that is whose faith looking on Christs death and applying it to themselves might attaine the fruit and efficacy thereof for in this sense our Saviour Christ plainly saith Joh. 17.19 20. John 15.13 John 10.51 that he prayeth and sanctifieth himselfe for those that should beleeve in him that he layeth downe his life for his friends and sheepe to wit consequently who in order after the beliefe of Christs death should be beleevers friends and sheepe But relatively to our Saviours intention and his Fathers counsell if we speake of Christs death as in this Question we ought to speake and understand the phrase to die for another is the most proper signification as was said above it is most true that Christ died and that he would and should die onely for the faithfull as they are such that is for such as should make his death by faith their owne not for Infidels as they are such that is for such as by infidelity should neglect and contemne his death On the contrary it is absurd to say that Christ in that most proper sense did not die nor would nor should die onely for the faithfull but also that he died and that he should and would have died for Infidels as they are such For that this is not onely repugnant to holy Writ and to the event by which we ought to judge what our Saviours will and his Fathers counsell was but that it implies also a manifest contradiction the Remonstrants owne conscience will tell them 3. In that they assent that Christ died for
all men it is well if they meane of the greatnesse of the price of Christs death which was most sufficient for all men but if they meane the fruit and efficacy impetrated or purchased for all men although both in life and death they be strangers to Christ they do not assent to Scripture and to the event but to the Massilian Semi-pelagianisme 4. It is true that of all men some in order after Christs death become faithfull but 't is false that in order after Christs death some become unfaithfull for Christ being to die in order found all men in impiety sin and enmity Rom. 5. v. 6.8 9. therefore he found all in infidelity 5. In that they know how to discriminate betweene the state of a sinner in his infidelity and before it they doubtlesse had not this knowledge in Scripture which knoweth not the state of sin or of sinners before infidelity or without it Rom. 11.31 Ephes 2.2 5.6 Col. 3.6 but testifieth that all men are borne the sons of wrath of infidelity and of disobedience This then is that corrupt lurking sort of mystery of the new Prophesie and the first lye upon which the five Articles and divers other both manifest and occult are built to wit that man is borne without infidelity and that there is no infidelity till man be growne up and rejects the Gospell and from hence that originall sin if any such be is a punishment not a fault and hence is it that the naturall man hath free-will to good and evill otherwise wrongfully is faith demanded of him who hath not the faculty of beleeving hence are predestination and election of fore-seene faith hence an universall impetration of reconciliation by Christs death hence is resistible grace or indifferent hence is the apostacy of the Saints uncertain perseverance doubtful faith other hid matters which time wil reveale Out of all this two things we have to observe One is that by this cunning shift of the order of faith to Christs death the contradiction is not unfolded or avoided by which they are forced to entangle themselves in this Article That Christ died absolutely for all and singular and obtained reconciliation for all and yet that he died not for Infidels whereof there be many nor obtained reconciliation for them which is an evident argument of an evill cause For when the Adversary is driven to admit of contradictions he is gone The other because this Article troubles the Church with contradictions and equivocations and overthrowes it selfe that it is not to be suffered in the Church ARTICLE III. Man hath not saving faith from himselfe nor by force of his free-will seeing that in the state of defection and sin he cannot of himself either thinke or do any good which is good indeed such as saving faith is but it is necessary that he be borne over againe by God in Christ through his holy Spirit and that he be renewed in his minde will affections and all his faculties that he might think understand will and performe that which is good according to that of Christ John 15.5 Without me yee can do nothing ARTICLE IV. This grace of God is the beginning progresse and perfection of all goodnesse and that so far that the regenerate man himselfe without this first or adventitious exciting consequent and co-operating grace can neither will thinke or do any good nor resist any evill tentation so that all the good workes which we can imagine are to be ascribed to the grace of God in Christ As for the true manner how that grace worketh that is not irresistible for it is said of many They resisted the holy Ghost Act. 7. and else-where in many other places The Examination ALthough these two Articles in some sort differ for the third is concerning the operating cause of faith and conversion in an unregenerate man the fourth in the former part is concerning the operating cause of the progresse increment and perfection of all good in the regenerate man the other part is concerning the manner by which that cause produceth both faith and conversion in the unregenerate and the progresse increment and perfection in the regenerate notwithstanding they do altogether cohere and therefore in the Conference were conjoyned by the parties that conferred yea and the fifth which is concerning the perseverance of the Saints Coll. p. 206. 225. 237. 268. is knit to the fourth because the way of operating grace hath relation as well to that perfection which is obtained by perseverance as to its beginning and progresse The third needs not much examination if we follow the naturall sense of the words in both parts it is consentaneous to holy Writ 1. That the procreating cause of saving faith in man is not man himselfe or his free-will because in the state of sin man is not fit to think or doe any good thing of himselfe according to Scripture Ephes 2.9 2 Cor. 3.5 c. 2. That man necessarily must be by God in Christ through the grace of the holy Ghost regenerated or illuminated in his minde renewed in his will affections c. to understand think will and perfect that which is good according to the place alledged John 15.6 The fourth also in the former part if you looke upon the words is true and gives glory to God because it ascribes the beginning progresse and perfection of all goodnesse in the regenerate man to God or to grace according to these sayings Jam. 1.7 Ephes 2.9 Phil. 1.6 c. Neither would the orthodox men in the Conference reprehend any of these if they be understood according to the meaning of holy Scripture But there is poyson in the taile The closure concerning the way of the operation of that grace takes away what before was granted They deny this way of operation to be irresistible in the Conference they call it resistible These words in their very sound are horrid and barbarous and not without a Solecisme they are barbarous because not knowne to Latine Writers for ought I know nor to the holy Scriptures unheard also in the Schooles of orthodox Protestants and perhaps of the Jesuites too I have not read all the Jesuites but Bellarmine the chiefest of them an exact Disputer of generall and speciall assistance or indifferent and not indifferent motion and grace in his Books of Grace Free-will hath it no where as I remember It seems that Arminius his party hath devised this high buskin of irresistible grace to the great benefit of their cause to make the truth the more envied As if forsooth the orthodoxall party did teach that grace were irresistible that is coactive or coaction Even in sense and signification the termes are barbarous for that is irresistible which cannot be resisted resistible which may be resisted By what Authour will they prove this to be spoken passively Why may not rather actively irresistible signifie that which cannot resist resistible which can resist Many verbals indeed in
of our Catechisme which saith That by nature we are propense to hate God and our neighbour that we are so corrupt that to doe well we are altogether unapt This sure is it which resistible grace goeâ—h about to abolish Out of all this it is manifest that the Remonstrants in both Articles Art 1. coth 7. especially in the closure of the fourth either abuse the equivocation of the word grace explained above affirming that the operation of calling perswading exciting grace which they call adventitious and precedaneous is resistible which orthodoxall men deny not and so with vain debates they trouble the Church and State or by understanding the operation of grace producing faith and conversion they dangerously corrupt the doctrine of grace with Pelagius or lastly they do entangle themselves again with the knot of contradiction in ascribing to operating grace alone faith and conversion and making the same resistible that is indifferently depending from the will of man Again while they professe that faith is the meer gift of God and yet make the same to depend resistibly from the assent of mans will they fall into such contradictions that no Sophistry can reconcile But Col. p. 502. when the Adversary as we said before is forced to contradict himselfe it is knowne that he is subdued They deny that grace whether resistible Col. p. 226. or not proceeds from Gods absolute decree for this they hate worse then dog or snake But it is sufficient that the Apostle witnesseth this where he conjoynes vocation not externall onely Rom. 8.30 but most properly internall justification the producer of faith immediately with predestination as the effect with the first cause But what-ever this is it will no wise help their turn Suppose there were no predestination in heaven no election yet this most firm principle of Scripture remains asserted by Austin in the fore-alledged places That Almighty God hath a most omnipotent power over the wills of men and that he can according to his pleasure either leave the wills themselves in their sins or encline them to good i.e. make them irresistible to his grace With which principle if resistibilitie of grace could stand which they feign i.e. the imbecillitie and indifferencie for effecting of faith and that power of mens wils in rebelling against grace and God himself working in man I say if these could stand God could not be Almighty nor would there ever be any conversion of man to God nor regeneration which is so evident that no Sophistry can elude it And this is sufficient concerning the 3d. 4th Article And how tolerable these are every man may see ARTICLE V. Who are by true faith ingraffed into Jesus Christ and therefore partakers of his quickning Spirit they have power sufficient to fight against Satan sin the world and their owne flesh and to obtain the victory but by the help of the grace of the holy Spirit So Jesus Christ is present by his spirit to them in all tentations stretching out his hand and confirming them if they be ready for the combate if they require his help nor be wanting to themselves and this so much Hebr. 3.6 14. 2 Pet. 1.10 Jude 3. 1 Tim. 1.14 Heb. 11.15 that by no cunning of Satan or strength can they be seduced or taken out of Christs hands according to that of John 10. No man can take them out of mine hand But whether these same may not by their negligence desert their beginning in Christ and embrace again this present world and whether they may not fall off from the holy doctrine once delivered to them make shipwrack of their consciences and fall away from grace ought to be weighed fully out of holy Scriptures before they can be taught with full tranquillitie of mind and plenitude of confidence The Examination WHereas the Remonstrants in this Article professe that they deliver in their Conference the doctrine of the Saints perseverance in faith wee may justly wonder why they are so wary in expressing the word perseverance or persevering and much more why they are afraid once to name God except it be because they betray in the adversative clause that they would have both the name and the thing quite extermined out of the Church But their consciences did so dictate to them that God would never blesse so wicked a designe that they cannot endure perseverance should be called the gift of God Col. p. 407. and are not ashamed to write that it is ill done to call it so But if we must speak the truth by this means they do too much bewray their perversnesse and ignorance For is it not perversnesse to say that is not rightly called the gift of God which God hath so often in Scripture promised to bestow upon the faithfull and which the Saints so earnestly desire God to bestow on them Is it not ignorance to deny perseverance to be a gift and that infused and not to think that perseverance is nothing else but faith it selfe persevering to the end But is not faith the gift of God infused Col. p. 502. Do not they themselves confesse that it is the meer gift of God But they cannot be ignorant that Austin in a book by it selfe asserted the gift of perseverance against the remainders of the Pelagians to which book he gave the title Of the good of perseverance the argument thereof is nothing else but the same to wit That perseverance in faith to the end is the gift of God is to be sought of God and is given truly to all that are called and predestinate according to the purpose of God This is Austins opinion These men throughout all their Conference as appeares can well enough endure the perseverance of the Saints but no waies that it should proceed from predestination as the effect from the cause or that it should be held certaine seeing all the engines of these five Articles are devised and directed to overthrow the counsell of Gods discretive predestination And on the contrary to erect the idoll of self-power in us But let us weigh the words of this fifth Article The fifth answereth the fourth For whereas the fourth with the third is very bountifull in extolling of grace but what it gave in the last clause it took away so this very carefully provides for the means and security of salvation in the faithfull in the three former parts for it is quadripartite as it seems 1. That they have meanes sufficient to resist Satan and sin by the help of grace 2. That Jesus Christ in all tentations is present with them and reacheth out his hands to them 3. That he so confirmes them that they cannot be seduced or taken out of Christs hands by any deceit or violence of Satan With such large priviledges they have sufficiently provided for perseverance But as before so here there is poyson in the taile for what they granted in the adversative appendix they call it in
evill cause and a bad conscience neither doe they elude the conflict but tye the knot while they say That they question not the doctrinall point of perseverance Coll. p. 401. but desire onely to be further instructed But they dispute so through all their Conference of the perseverance of the Saints and they desire to be instructed that among their divers tergiversations they may prove the very same to be plainly false and impious which in the former members of the Article they did assever to be true and certaine Furthermore in the same Conference every-where whether it be to avoid this conflict or to draw envy upon orthodox men sophistically changing the subject of the Article they write that our orthodox Divines teach That they who once beleeved can never againe fall Coll. p. 403 404.353.354 355.372 nor shall fall but are perswaded that let them sin as often as they will they can never lose their faith nor fall from grace but inevitably shall persevere and shall be saved And it is but only this opinion of perseverance as they say or manner of it which they cal in question Coll. p. 353. or dislike For the refuting then and overthrowing of which the engines of seven Arguments are properly directed to overthrow the orthodox doctrine pag. 356. 1. Because of it self it is repugnant to true piety and good works pag. 359. or because the preaching of it is scandalous pag. 360. and the beliefe of it licentious 2. Because it takes away the meanes of exhortations pag. 361. promises pag. 362. and threatnings c. 3. Because it makes the warnings and caveats which the holy Ghost gives us against Satans trecheries ineffectuall pag. 363. 4. Because examples testifie that many who have beleeved have totally and finally fallen from the faith 5. Because many faithfull men are recorded to have fallen grievously and that they have committed the workes of the flesh and hainous wickednesse with which filthy deeds faith could not consist 6. Because this being granted all baptised Infants that are borne of faithfull Parents should be saved 7. Because many faithfull men do so defile themselves with wickednesse that they are to be excommunicated and are excommunicated by the Ministers of the Church But truly if this be all and onely this which they question and oppose they shew themselves to be vaine wranglers I will not say rash disturbers of the Church and State who make such stirre about an opinion which the orthodox no lesse then themselves would have not onely to be examined according to Scripture but also as a scandalous doctrine and manifestly false they oppose it reprove it and judge it fitting to be thrust out of the Church or surely they fasten a notable calumny upon orthodox men fathering an opinion upon them which they do no wayes acknowledge to be theirs And therefore these seven engines of Arguments beate upon that false opinion onely and no wayes hurt the orthodoxall Tenet as is shewed in the Conference Now the Calumnies appeare thus Coll. p. 368. to 398. The first is in the Subject who once beleeve For the Orthodox do not affirme that all such persevere whereas hypocrites also and temporary beleevers not perseverers are said equivocally to beleeve but of these onely they speake who by true faith are inserted into Christ Coll. p. 341. and are partakers of his quickning spirit The other Calumny is in the first Attribute That they can never nor ever shall fall for both Scripture and experience testifie and the Orthodox think and teach that the Saints or such as are ingraffed into Christ being they are men and subject to humane infirmities may not onely fall but have oftentimes fallen through the infirmities of their flesh into small and great sins The third is in the other Attribute Let faithfull men sin never so much yet they may and ought to be perswaded of their perseverance and this is that absurd doctrine of the Saints perseverance But this is as foolish and plaine a piece of Sophistry or fallacy of the accident as if they had said Because sound men may and ought to run and labour so sick men who are in a Fever or in a fit of the Gout may and should run and labour but as sickly dispositions accidentally hinder the vitall actions of the body so the infirmities of the flesh accidentally hinder the spirituall operations of faith and of the Spirit The fourth Calumnie is in the third Attribute The faithfull can never lose their faith nor fall from grace This sounds to them as an absolute impossibility but the Orthodox use a limitation thus The faithfull cannot fall if you looke upon Gods gracious promises for the holy Ghost is a faithfull keeper and the counsell of God concerning the salvation of such as are predestinated is unchangeable and that out of the mouth of our Saviour Mat. 24.24 John 10.28 But if we looke upon the treacheries and strength of Satan and the infirmities of the faithfull when they are left to themselves then they are too part and that every moment to be supplanted by Satan and their owne flesh Coll. p. 36. and they openly professe that in that respect they may fall away and perish The fifth is in the same Attribute To lose faith to fall from grace which these men understand absolutely but the Orthodox understand a limitation That they cannot lose faith nor fall from grace altogether or totally to wit so as to become of faithfull men Infidels and enemies to God as they that sin before regeneration which is false both by testimonie of Scripture and experience The sixth is in the fourth Attribute But shall persevere inevitably They think that we meane any sort of men even such as are carnally secure as if they should persevere nill they will they which is farre from the minde and candor of orthodox Divines And so having unfolded their buskins and removed the calumnies that the orthodoxall doctrine concerning the perseverance of the Saints in faith is true and sound is shewed by ten Arguments taken out of the Scripture in the Conference 1. Because God in his word hath promised to the faithfull in Christ Coll. p. 147. a totall and finall perseverance Jer. 32.40 Psal 125.1 John 10.28 c. Therefore he performes it because he cannot lye This is Austines first Argument for the good of perseverance De bono persev c. 2. Coll. p. 343. 2. Because the Apostles witnesse that God doth and will faithfully performe his promises concerning their preservation in the faith 1 Cor. 1.8 10.13 Phil. 1.6 1 Thes 5.23 c. 3. Because out of the Apostles doctrine Coll. p. 344. Lib. 3. De justif c. 12. Rom. 8.30 the perseverance of those that are called according to Gods Decree is the proper effect of predestination so that Bellarmine himself a great Patron of indifferent or resistible grace doth plainly confesse That perseverance
bulwarke Now the cavill about the condition annexed to the promises doth nothing hinder our Arguments as was shewed Neither is the perseverance of the Saints prejudiced by that calumny of scandalous preaching and licentious beliefe of perseverance For otherwise the Apostles preaching of this doctrine had beene scandalous and the Churches beleeving thereof at that time had beene licentious De bono persev c. 18. I saith Austine will not exaggerate this matter with my words but will rather leave it to them to consider that they may see what this is which they have perswaded themselves to wit that the preaching of perseverance doth rather wrong the hearers by desperation then helpe them by exhortation for this were as much as if you would say that then man despaires of his owne salvation when he hath learned to put his trust not in himselfe but in God Neither doth the Paralogisme non causae concerning the neglect or nullifying of the meanes and fore-warnings c. hinder us for by these same meanes the holy Ghost doth worke and support the certainty of perseverance in the hearts of the Saints nor are we moved with the examples of hypocrites and Apostates in their fourth Engine of whom also the five marginals of the Article speake For these men had nothing common with the true faithfull but the bare name onely of faith of all which it is therefore said 1 Joh. 2.1 They went out from us because they were not of us for if they had beene of us they had remained with us but that is might be knowne they were not of us therefore they went out See Austine De bono perseverantiae c. 8. The great and grievous falls of Moses Aaron David Salomon Peter Judas and of others trouble not us for if they did any thing prejudice perseverance it was in the totality not in the finality thereof for it may be easily proved that all those whom the enemies of perseverance do object either were not true beleevers but hypocrites or repented in the end But neither can their totall perseverance be overthrowne from hence except withall Gods promises be overthrowne too which is impossible should be overthrowne by the exception of a pretended condition But the failings of the Saints that I may speake this by the way must not too peevishly be canvased by those who will be accounted among the number of Saints but prudently according to the rule of Charity are to be deplored 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rather then censured considering God is a Father who is to judge his owne sons when they offend and the Saints are his children who are to give an account of their actions to their Father Oftentimes in a family the son and the servant commit the same offence and the son offends more hainously then the servant yet an earthly father thrusts the servant out of doores whereas he will not dis-inherit the son but chastise him onely for his good therefore the offence of a Son committed in the folly of his youth as it doth not induce him to hate his father so it doth not extinguish the fathers affection to his son David trecherously killed Vriah Joab Amasa Peter three times perfidiously denied his Master Judas once betrayed him put aside the event and Peters sin will seeme greater then that of Judas yet Christ looked with pity upon him not upon this Now let our Censors come and prove that Peter utterly lost that faith for which Christ prayed that it might not faile Now for their faults As in sharpe diseases mans life is endangered till the Physicians helpe come yet it is not presently extinguished even so in great sinnes the Saints faith is shaken and weakened but it is not therefore presently lost or dead because the heavenly Physician by his unspeakeable grace sustaines in their hearts that immortall seed of God from which their faith proceeds and supports them with his hand that when they fall they may not be bruised 1 John 3.9 Psal 37.24 This doctrine humane equity not to speake of Christian charity cannot upon any pretence subvert Lastly the two last foolish Paralogismes do not hurt the Saints perseverance if they be even scholastically examined for though both of them should directly conclude as they ought to do the contradictory to perseverance to wit That some truly and actually beleeving and regenerate do lose their faith and spirit of regeneration they must necessarily conclude lest either of the Premisses be false out of pure particulars and the first of them thus Some baptised children of faithfull parents do utterly lose faith and the Spirit of regeneration the reason is because otherwise all without exception should be saved which to them seemes an absurdity but by us is to be wished in charity But some baptised children of faithfull parents do truly and actually beleeve and are regenerated Therefore some truly and actually beleeving and regenerate do utterly lose faith and the Spirit of regeneration but the latter concludes thus Some excommunicate for their wickednesse doe utterly lose their faith Some excommunicate for their wickednesse are truly faithfull and regenerate Ergo Some truly faithfull and regenerate do utterly lose their faith or else of necessity seeing these are childish foolish that the consequences may be mended the former Paralogisme most assume the Minor universally false and the latter must suppose the Major universally false also so that the former must be thus made in Disamis otherwise they cannot conclude except they had rather have a Major universally false Some baptised children of faithfull parents utterly lose their faith and regeneration All the baptised children of faithfull parents truly and actually beleeve and are regenerate Therefore same truly and actually beleeving and regenerate utterly lose their faith and regeneration Here the Remonstrants themselves cannot deny but that the universall Assumption is false except they understand it sacramentally and so againe the consequence should be faulty For Austines doctrine which the orthodox Churches follow is this As in Isaac who was circumcised the eighth day the signe of the righteousnesse of faith went before and because he imitated his fathers faith there followed in him as he grew in yeares the righteousnesse it selfe the seale whereof went before in the Infant even so in baptised Infants the Sacrament of regeneration goeth before and if they have Christian piety conversion followes after the mystery whereof goeth before in the body Neither doe the words of the Catechisme page 74. any thing availe to the proofe of the Assumption universally false The latter from an universall Major in Datisi or a Minor converted in Darii otherwise they cannot conclude will be thus All excommunicated for wickednesse do utterly lose true faith and the holy Ghost Some excommunicate for their wickednesse are truly faithfull and regenerate Ergo Some truly faithfull and regenerate do utterly lose faith and the holy Ghost That here the Major is universally false was rightly answered by the Orthodox in the Conference and not refuted by the others For they may be excluded out of the Church and kingdome of Christ who never were truly in the state of grace but were alwayes hypocrites being destitute of true faith and Gods Spirit And so we have demonstrated that the orthodox truth concerning the perseverance of the Saints in faith doth subsist altogether unhurt by their Engines and let these suffice concerning the fifth Article FINIS